►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Day
of
March,
the
time
is
10
30.,
the
Board
of
Commissioners
is
in
session
and
all
three
Commissioners
are
present
and
we
have
a
number
of
guests,
and
so
we're
not
going
to
ask
you
to
introduce
yourself,
but
we
have
you
most
most
people
signed
up
out
in
the
front.
Didn't
you,
okay,
good
enough?
The
purpose
of
this
meeting
is
to
discuss
the
the
petition
for
it
for
a
disillusion
of
the
meridian
Library
District.
A
The
clerk
verified
this
the
signatures
and
determined
that
there
was
sufficient
signatures
to
follow
the
law
and
because
the
law
requires
a
minimum
of
50
signatures,
I
recall
and
there
was
something
80
or
90
signatures.
So
there
were
sufficient
signatures,
and
so
then
clerk
then
delivered
the
signatures
to
this
board
on
or
about
the
15th
or
16th
of
February.
Wasn't
it
16.?
Okay,
and
so
what
that
did?
A
Is
that
set
up
a
a
timeline,
because
everything
that
we
have
done
today
are
in
strict
adherence
with
Idaho
code,
because
a
we've
never
done
this
before
B?
It's
never
been
done
before
in
state
of
Idaho.
A
That
I'm
aware
of
there
may
be
somewhere,
but
I'm,
not
aware
of
of
this
kind
of
a
kind
of
petition
presenting
to
a
County
Commissioners,
and
that's
one
of
the
areas
in
County
government,
where
every
day
is
a
little
different
and
it's
eclectic
I
mean
I,
don't
think
anybody
runs
for
the
County
commission
for
the
possibility
of
considering
a
disillusion
of
a
Library
District.
A
Nevertheless,
it's
here
it's
on
our
it's
on
our
plate
and
the
law
requires
certain
time
frames
be
held
number
one
after
the
petition
is
presented
to
this
board.
We
have
from
we
have
at.
A
Weeks,
the
latest
six
weeks
to
hold
a
public
hearing,
which
we
did,
we
scheduled
a
public
hearing
and
that
it
has
to
be
published
in
the
paper
and
we
publish
it
in
the
paper
twice
as
we
published
twice,
and
so
we
we
did
hold
the
public
hearing,
we
had
it
last,
we
could
go
Monday
and,
and
then
we
concluded.
A
Because
we
want
a
full
transparency,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
every
comment
that
was
available
that
people
wanted
wanted
to
make
would
be
available
to
everybody
everyone
else.
This
is
our
first
set
of
of
comments
that
came
in
these
are
primarily
emails,
but
they're
also
evidences,
that
was
presented
by
the
petitioners
and
by
other
patrons
of
the
district.
There's
lots
of
material
comes
in
there
subsequent
to
the
the
first
public
hearing.
A
We
we
held
another
public
hearing
to
make
sure
that
everybody
and
Miami
and
I
mean
every
everyone,
because
when
we
concluded
our
public
hearing
on
Wednesday
I
posed
the
question
to
the
audience.
Is
there
anyone
here?
That
has
not
had
a
chance
to
speak
and
there
was
a
couple
and
they
came
up
and
and
spoke
so
every
person
that
had
a
desire
to
speak
on
this
issue.
We
gave
them
an
opportunity
to
speak
and
they
spoke
on
on
this
issue.
A
Now
then,
the
in
the
petition,
the
petitioners
made
made
several
allegations
and
it
the
some
of
the
allegations
were
not
really
the
topic
of
the
of
the
public
hearing
the
public
hearing
was
was
to
determine
rather
the
the
Library
District
should
be
subject
to
a
vote
to
determine
whether
I
should
be
dissolved.
A
C
A
Item
that
the
that
the
petitioners
ask
us
to
do
that,
we
could
not
do
upon
disillusion
of
the
Marine
Library
District.
We
asked
that
the
Ada
County
Commissioners
appoint
an
interim
Board
of
Trustees
to
reorganize
the
library
entity
in
order
to
reinstate
public
discourse
and
comments
change.
The
bylaws
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
A
The
County
Commission
has
no
power
to
do
that,
and
so
the
process
will
be
if
this
board
chooses
to
place
this
on
the
ballot
or
not
that's
what
the
vote
today
will
be
to
either
to
put
it
on
the
ballot
or
not
to
put
it
on
the
ballot
the
ballot
will
be
in.
If,
if
it's
put
on
the
ballot,
it
will
be
in
November
of
this
issue.
That's
assume
this
is
a
good
it
could
be
on
the
ballot.
We
also
are
required,
Again
by
law,
to.
A
A
By
so
declaring,
the
state
acknowledges
that
the
ability
of
its
citizens
to
access
information
as
a
critical
impact
on
the
state's
educational
success,
Economic
Development
provision
for
an
informed
electorate
and
overall
quality
of
life.
It
is
the
purpose
of
this
chapter
to
integrate,
extend
and
to
add
existing
Library
services
and
resources,
so
that
Public
Library
Services
may
be
available
to
all
residents
of
the
state
of
Idaho,
from
from
infancy
through
adulthood,
beginning
in
the
formative
years
and
continuing
for
the
lifelong
learning
history.
That's
the
policy
of
the
state
of
Idaho.
A
C
A
Not
know
that
they've
have
a
taxing
Authority,
they
sold
a
bond
a
couple
years
ago,
a
14
million
dollar
bond
to
build
a
new
building,
and
they
have
several
buildings.
Where
patrons
can
access
the
the
library
and
I
did
not
know?
All
of
that,
because
I've
not
been
involved
in
the
library
district
business,
but
it
nevertheless
is
is
a
a
thriving
library
and
part
of
what
brought
this
controversy
up
is?
Is
as
I
read
this
the
record
and
as
I've
gone
through
the
record
part
of
the.
A
What
brought
this
controversy
up
was
some
some
material
that
was
available
to
children.
That
probably
was
not
appropriate
for
children,
and
so
then
you
have
to
ask
the
question:
well:
is
there
a
way
that
that
the
library
district
could
not
make
that
material
available
to
children,
and
we
got
varying
views
on
that
and
that's
part
of
what
all
this
all
this
information
here,
but
that's
part
of
what
we'll
be
we'll
be
discussing
an
incidental
to
that
the
Idaho
legislatures,
we're
not
the
only
ones
dealing
with
this
issue.
A
314
has
has
passed
this
house,
and
it's
and
it's
sitting
on
the
second
floor
right
now
and
it
was
amended
to
do
a
little
tweak
if
that
bill
passes.
A
It
would
give
the
petitioners
another
Avenue
I
believe
to
to
address
their
grievances,
but
anyway,
with
that
I'm
I'm,
going
to
open
this
up
for
discussion
from
my
fellow
Commissioners,
but
I
wanted
to
make
it
clear
that
this
board
did
not
initiate
this
action,
because
that's
been
part
of
the
misunderstanding
as
well,
that
this
board
initiated
the
action
and
that
this
board
could
dissolve
the
district
and
what
this
board
could
do.
All
these
things
that
this
board
can't
do
and
and
wouldn't
do
it's,
not
the
purview
of
this
board.
A
Done
that
I
think
we've
done
it
pursuant
to
the
law
and
and
I
wanted
to
I
did
I
did
the
night
of
the
hearings
and
I'll
do
it
again
again
tonight
we
we
had
a
very
respectful
two
two
hearings.
We
had
everybody
that
wanted
to
speak,
allowed
them
to
speak.
A
We've
had
Commissioners
across
the
state.
Ask
us
how
we
did
that,
because
they've
had
difficult,
difficult
hearings
come
up
as
well,
so
I
want
to
congratulate
both
both
sides,
both
the
the
petitioners
and
the
the
library
people
and
all
the
the
citizens
that
came
up
because
it
was
a.
It
was
a
very
respectful
hearing.
People
expressed
their
heartfelt
concern
and
it
was
I
think
it
was
great
for
us
as
Citizens
to
hear
the
stories
of
literally
hundreds
of
people
and
and
that's
that's
what
we
did
and
that's
going
to
inform.
A
Our
decision,
of
course,
is
the
hearings
and
the
information
that
we
that
we
received
so
anyway
with
that
I'm
going
to
open
this
up
to
to
comment
and
discussion
and
I'll,
ask
ask
Mr
Davidson
if
he
has
anything
to
say:
Mr
chair,
yes,.
C
If
you,
if
you
boil
it
down
the
concerned,
citizens
of
Meridian
the
alleged
that
miners
are
able
to
access
inappropriate
materials
in
the
Library
without
their
parents,
permissions
I
think
that
without
the
parents
permission
is
the
key.
You
know
Factor
here
they've
also
claimed
that
the
Meridian
library
trustees
have
largely
ignored
their
concerns
and
prevented
them
from
speaking
at
meetings.
C
C
I
think
we
also
saw
that
you
know
there
are
books
that
are
geared
towards
teens
and
a
younger
audience
that
the
petitioners
thought
were
inappropriate
as
well
and
again
generally.
The
concern
is
that
and
for
me
it
comes
down
to
not
so
much
teenagers,
because
I
think
in
today's
age,
where
teenagers
can
get
a
smartphone
and
get
access
to
the
internet
might
be
fighting
a
losing
battle.
C
My
biggest
concern
was
with
younger
kids,
maybe
seven,
eight
and
and
younger
having
access
to
materials,
which
I
mean
everybody
agrees
that
certain
adult
materials
are
deleterious
to.
You
know
young
child's
development.
We
try
as
a
society
to
keep
certain
things
away
from
from
kids
because
of
their
Mental
Health.
C
Some
of
the
testimony
we
heard
indicated
that
books
that
maybe
should
have
been
put
in
a
different
section
or
in
a
different
location,
or
at
least
Out
Of
Reach
of
kids,
sometimes
we're
not
and
honestly,
the
the
as
I
said
in
the
hearing.
Some
of
the
pictures
I
saw
in
the
books
that
were
geared
towards
the
other
audience
was
was
pretty
shocking.
C
Considering
you
know,
and
all
I
can
do
is
look
back
at
you
know
what
I
was
you
know
when
I
was
in
elementary
school
or
High
School
junior
high
trying
to
compare
that
experience
to
what
I
see
today
and
obviously
times
are
changing,
but
you
see,
what's
in
some
of
those
books
and
I,
think
everyone
would
agree
that
they
wouldn't
want
young
children
to
see.
What's
in
some
of
those
books,
so
I
I
do
think
concerns
about
materials
in
libraries
are
valid.
C
C
So
I
I
do
agree
with
the
with
the
petitioners
that
there
is
a
concern
about
children
having
access
to
books
that
they
shouldn't.
B
B
Under
the
law
we
have
to
have
a
hearing,
and
that
hearing
we
called
all
the
parties
in
which
was
a
requirement
of
the
law
and
I
would
like
to
again
create
what
the
chairman
said.
The
way
it
was
conducted
by
all
the
parties
that
came
was
both
instructive
as
well
as
refreshing
it.
It
is
an
expression
of
what
our
community
is.
Our
community
has
issues,
but
they
sit
down
in
dialogue
and
I.
Think
that
is
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
can't
address
that
I
think
was
brought
forward.
B
Even
the
petitioners
brought
forward,
everybody
agreed,
the
library
is
something
we
need.
We
want
and
need.
Even
the
people
who
brought
the
petition
forward
said
we
don't
want
to
dissolve
the
library,
we
would
need
a
library.
So
that's
the
first
thing,
that's
a
place
of
agreement,
so
you
build
on
that
agreement,
one
of
the
things
that
the
chairman
of
the
library
when
she
when
she
presented
she
indicated
when
I,
asked
her
about
how
you
review
books
that
are
put
into
the
library
she
outlined
the
process.
B
So
I
think
that's
important
that
again,
that's
not
our
purview
here,
our
purview
is
decide
whether
we
put
it
on
the
ballot
or
whether
we
don't
but
I
think
some
things
as
I
used
to
tell
my
children
when
they
were
growing
up.
What
did
we
learn
from
this
and
when
everything
anything
happened,
whether
it
was
positive
or
negative
in
in
their
lives?
I'd
say:
okay.
Would
we
learn
from
this?
If
we
learn
something
positive
from
it
and
didn't
repeat
it,
then
it
was
a
value
to
us.
B
If
we
learn
from
something
but
then
repeated
it,
then
it
was
of
no
value
and
I.
Think
everybody
involved
here,
I
think,
should
have
and
could
have
learned
something.
The
pro
tem,
because
the
the
chairman
indicated
one
thing:
the
legislature
is
even
discussing
this
issue
because
it's
not
just
a
Navy
County
issue.
It's
a
it's
an
Idaho
issue.
B
One
of
the
bills
that
he
proposed
that's
currently
being
considered,
is
a
process
for
reviewing
the
books
in
the
library.
I
think
that's
instructive
to
us
as
well.
So
this
is
not
just
the
Canadian
Library
District
problem
that
was
raised
here
in
the
discussion
that
I
heard.
So
even
though
we
can't
we
meaning
the
Board
of
Commissioners
can't
solve
that.
I
hope
that
the
players
here
take
forward
from
the
because
what
we
had
is
I
I
choked
with
the
clerk.
B
In
the
last
election
of
the
library
district
for
for
trustees,
there
was
a
little
over
a
thousand
votes
cast
in
the
first
meeting
we
had
in
this
building.
They
tell
me
it's
the
largest
meeting.
That's
ever
been
held
in
the
in
this
building
attendees
we
had
almost
800
people
attend.
So
that
tells
me
that
the
people
in
the
district
want
to
participate.
They
want
a
dialogue,
they
want
to
do
something.
B
B
There
needs
to
be
a
methodology
for
dealing
with
that,
because
it
is
even
Even
in
our
dialogue
when
we
have
as
people
just
together.
If
there's,
if
there's
a
word
that
we
know
someone
doesn't
want
us
to
use,
we
try
not
to
use
it,
even
though
we
may
use
it
in
a
different
forum
and
in
a
different
context
with
other
people.
We
still
respect
that
difference
of
opinion.
So
I
think
that's
that's
where
I
think
we
need
to
go.
I
won't
review
what
the
chairman
said
in
terms
of
that's
right.
B
B
C
And
then
I
also
wanted
to
address
the
issue
that
was
brought
up
of
the
Meridian
library
trustees,
ignoring
the
concerns
of
the
the
people
who
are
bringing
this
these
issues
up
and
as
I
discussed
at
the
hearing,
we
heard
that
the
Board
of
Trustees
shut
down
in
Person
Public
comment
at
their
meetings
and
I
understand
that
there
were.
C
You
know,
outbursts
from
the
from
the
public
and
name
calling,
and
things
like
that
and
I
certainly
hope
going
forward
that
the
groups
can,
you
know,
consider
being
a
little
bit
more
civil
at
these
meetings.
Name
calling
is
is
almost
never
a
good
way
to
to
get
what
you
want.
As
far
as
the
political
strategy
goes.
C
That
being
said,
I
was
kind
of
surprised
that
for
a
board
that
was
talking
so
much
about
the
First
Amendment
with
relation
to
books
that
they
would
restrict
public
testimony
at
the
meetings
that
that
was
certainly
a
concern
of
mine.
Now
we
did
also
hear
testimony
that
the
Board
of
Trustees
never
actually
took
a
vote
on
any
of
these
proposals.
We
also
heard
that
the
the
citizens
never
actually
presented
any
specific
proposals
for
dealing
with
these.
These
issues,
so
I
do
think.
C
There's
some
work
to
be
done
where
the
trustees
and
the
community
need
to
have
a
little
bit
better
dialogue
about
at
least
giving
airing
these
concerns
in
in
open
public
meetings
actually
taking
a
vote.
The
vote
may
not
go
the
way.
People
like
it,
but
I
think
it's
probably
necessary
to
at
least
have
the
Board
of
Trustees
engage
in
actual
substantive
discussions
at
board
meetings
on
some
of
these
issues.
C
So
again,
I
I
found
that
the
concerns
on
the
petition
were
valid.
They
are,
they
are.
They
were
worthy
of
a
public
hearing,
I
think
so.
For
me,
the
question
going
forward
is,
you
know,
based
on
that
is
dissolution
of
the
library
district.
The
appropriate
remedy
to
address
these
particular
concerns-
and
you
know
my
analysis
of
that
is
obviously
dissolving.
The
library
district
is
a
very
broad,
broad
solution.
It's
you
know
it
it's
sort
of
a
be-all
end-all.
It
doesn't
fix
a
particular
issue.
C
It
completely
dissolves
a
district
and,
from
my
perspective,
I
think
that
this
is
probably
a
tactic
that
should
only
be
used
once
every
other
remedy
has
been
tried,
because
it
is
a
pretty
pretty
substantial
thing
to
try
to
accomplish
and
I
do
know
that
the
trustee
or
the
petitioners
their
their
overall
plan
was
to
have
this
dissolved
in
November
and
then
immediately
file
a
new
petition
to
reinstitute
a
new
Library
District,
where
an
entire
new
board
could
be
seated
and
that
might
sound
easy.
C
But
as
we
reviewed
Idaho
code
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
as
easy
as
has
been
presented
again.
This
is
not
an
area
of
law.
The
native
counties
ever
had
to
deal
with,
but
we
have
to
look
at.
You
know
what
the
process
in
Idaho
code
would
be,
and
even
if
a
new
petition
was
delivered
immediately
after
the
November
election,
I
think
the
first
available
election
date
to
hear
this
again
would
be
May.
C
C
It
says
that
the
assets
have
to
be
sold
off
to
pay
any
debt
and
considering
that
the
Meridian
library
district
took
out
a
bond
in
the
last
couple
years
for
14
million
dollars,
there
is
substantial
debt
that
would
have
to
be
paid
by
selling
off
the
library
assets,
but
even
assuming
that
Ada
County
could
could
hang
on
to
it
or
if
they
did
have
no
debt.
Ada
County
could
probably
not
run
a
library
for
six
months
to
a
year,
waiting
for
another
election,
seating,
a
new
board
and
then
hoping
that
everything
goes
smoothly.
C
Transitioning
those
assets
back
to
an
entirely
new
Library
District,
the
cost
of
two
elections
first
to
dissolve
and
then
to
reinstitute
a
Library
District,
the
cost
of
those,
as
well
as
the
cost
of
all
the
lawyers
time
to
do
the
amount
of
paperwork
that
it
would
cost
to,
and
a
district
restart
a
district
put
Ada
County
right
in
the
middle
of
it
I
mean
that's
millions
of
dollars.
C
C
Again,
I
mentioned
trying
to
get
the
library
board
the
trustees
to
get
a
proposal
submitted
and
voted
on
at
a
public
hearing.
C
Again,
we've
heard
that
the
legislature
is
working
on
bills
that
proposals
that
are
narrowly
tailored
to
this
particular
issue
of
inappropriate
materials
and
libraries,
and
it
appears
they're
on
the
the
verge
of
passing
a
bill
and
even
if
they
don't
there's
going
to
be
another
election,
where
you
can
elect
new
legislators
to
bring
this
issue
back
again,
I
think
it's
past
the
house
and
it
has
passed
the
senate
committee-
it's
being
debated
there,
so
it
is
likely
that
that
bill
will
pass
again.
C
C
Citizens
of
Meridian
and,
of
course
we
have
recall
elections
in
Idaho
code,
the
all
the
members
of
the
Board
of
Trustees
are
subject
to
recall,
just
like
every
other
elected
official
I
requested,
the
numbers
from
the
county
clerk's
office
and
the
signature
requirement
on
that
is
50
percent
of
the
people
who
cast
ballots
in
the
last
trustee
election
and
the
number
I
have
on
that
is
562.
C
C
If
anyone
were
to
go
down
that
path
so
again,
in
summary,
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
Avenues
in
our
Democratic
process
to
resolve
this
issue
that
are
more
narrowly
tailored
to
the
specific
issue
of
books.
C
I
think,
if
you
know
the
dissolution
went
forward,
the
library
might
have
to
be
closed
for
six
months
to
a
year.
There's
a
lot
of
questions
there,
because
again,
we've
never
really
had
to
deal
with
this
specific
issue
in
the
history
of
Ada
County.
As
far
as
I
can
tell,
and
so
the
the
cost
to
the
public
I
think
would
be.
Would
be
substantial
using
this
particular
tactic.
B
The
the
bottom
line
here
back
to
what
commissioner
Davidson
was
saying
is
that
one.
C
B
The
chairman
read,
the
the
law
in
the
state
of
Idaho
says
that
the
policy
of
the
state
of
Idaho
or
the
public
library
service
should
be
available
to
all
the
people
of
Idaho,
and
that's
that's
a
policy,
whether
it's
short
term
or
long
term.
B
I
did
I
didn't
thank
the
staff
for
their
help,
because
I
think
the
staff
helped
us
through
this
process
as
well.
This
as
well
as
all
the
other
information
we
had
to
do
in
the
short
time
frame.
We
had
to
do
it
so
I
I
think
the
orderly
process
that
was
considered
here
was
not
only
the
people
that
came
forward.
B
Did
it
in
an
orderly
way,
which
is
a
testament
like
I,
said
before,
to
the
people
of
this
County
and
the
library
district
itself,
and
then
the
people
that
helped
us
do
all
that
we
had
to
do
to
to
analyze
all
the
data,
because
we
had
to
look
at
all
this.
Give
us
it
in
a
format.
We
could
do
that,
so
thanks
thanks
to
them
as
well.
So
that's.
My
final
comment
is
I.
I
think
the
outline
is
pretty
clear
in
terms
of
what
the
options
we
have
available
all.
C
I'll
I'll
just
close
out
and
say
that
you
know
overlooking
all
the
other
issues
and
again
I've
said
that
the
allegations
are
credible,
I
think
it's
still
reasonable
and
appropriate
for
the
board
to
take
into
consideration
the
level
of
public
support
that
exists
to
place
a
question
like
this
on
the
ballot
and
I
guess
neither
side
really
submitted
any
polling
results.
C
I
never
saw
a
poll
about
what
the
what
the
temperature
of
the
community
was,
but
I
think
you
can
probably
ascertain
it
from
the
number
of
individuals
who
testified
at
the
public
hearing
or
who
submitted
emails
to
the
board
and
the
binders
there.
So
we
have
I
think
a
pretty
a
pretty
good
sample
of
the
interest
and
the
results
were
pretty
overwhelmingly
against
putting
the
question
on
the
ballot
by
well
again
a
pretty
substantial
margin.
C
So
that's
not
to
say
that
everyone
who
is
against
putting
this
on
the
ballot
agrees
with
the
library
policy
on
books
and
minors.
I
think
it's
entirely
possible
that
a
lot
of
people
are
concerned
with
miners
access
in
the
library
who,
at
the
same
time,
would
not
necessarily
support
this
particular
tactic.
To
address
those
specific
issues,
I
think
that's
that's
completely
possible,
and
we
heard
testimony
about
that
as
well.
C
So
again,
I
think
it's
reasonable
to
in
a
forum
like
this
take
into
consideration
what
the
levels
of
public
support
were,
and
if
you
also
take
that
into
account,
the
record
is
pretty
clear
that
the
public
was
not
supporting
dissolution
in
any
any
large
number
and
so
I
don't
know
if
I
would
feel
comfortable
putting
that
to
the
ballot
without
a
little
bit
higher
threshold
of
public
support
to
say
that
it's
warranted.
B
I
move
that,
since
dissolution
of
the
district
would
not
be
in
keeping
with
the
declared
public
policy
of
the
state
of
Idaho
in
regard
to
the
library
districts
as
as
set
forth
in
section
33
2701
Idaho
code,
the
board
denied
the
petition
to
dissolve
the
millennial,
Library
District
and
not
place
the
matter
on
the
ballot
and
authorize
the
staff
to
draw
draft
an
order.
Consistent
with
this
motion
and
authorize
the
chair
to
sign
them
on
the
boards.
We
have.
C
Well,
Mr,
chair,
I'm,
going
to
say
no
matter
which
way
the
vote
goes.
I,
think
that
this
has
been
a
good
process
and
I
think
that
you
know
we
had
one
group
of
citizens
who
were
able
to
bring
their
concerns
to
the
attention
of
the
public
and
talking
about
issues
publicly
can
lead
to
changes
whether
one
side
is
successful
or
not.
A
B
I
think
that
my
comments,
I've
already
made
I,
think
that
it's
clear
that
the
decision
that
the
board
has
to
make
in
that
is
whether
it's
in
that
public
interest
to
have
it
on
the
ballot
and
I
think
the
boards,
the
Motions
towards
that
position
of
one
more
thing:
we've
had
both
participation
online
as
well
as
the
the
after
the
48
hours.
It's
it's
actually
increased.
The
numbers
in
terms
of
what
we
were
talking
about
here
so
I
think,
commissioner
Davidson's
position
is
correct.
C
Okay,
yeah-
and
this
is
again-
is
just
one
Avenue
that
is
available
to
citizens
in
Idaho
code
and
it
as
I
said
I
think
it's
it's
an
overly
overly
broad
solution
to
a
specific
problem,
and
there
are
other
avenues
that
can
be
pursued.
That
I
think
would
gather
more
Community
Support
than
this
particular
proposal.
So
this
is
not
in
any
means
the
end
of
the
the
discussion
the
community
has,
you
know
a
lot
of
other
options
available
to
them.
A
Okay,
I
think
in
buttressing
what
some
of
my
fellow
Commissioners
have
actually
suggested
and
for
those
of
you
in
the
Press.
If
you
want
to
look
at
these
they're
available
online,
you
don't
have
to
file
a
public
information
request.
You
can
go
online,
just
click
on
it.
You
can
look
at
every
email
here,
every
document
that's
that's
been
submitted
to
us.
Since
we
closed
out
the
the
hearing
on
Wednesday
There's
been
an
additional
800
documents
been
submitted
to
us.
A
That's
not
all
emails
about,
there's
been
about
a
little
over
100
emails
in
addition
to
what
we
have
here
since
the
the
closeout
of
our
hearing
on
on
Wednesday.
So
and
that's
all
available
too,
and
we
do
this
for
full
transparency.
We
want
the
public
to
know
and
we
want
the
president
to
know
without
having
to
go
through
a
lot
of
rigmarole.
You
got
access
right
here.
You
can
just
log
on
to
our
website
there.
A
It
is
you
can
look
at
every
one
of
them
read
all
we
can
read
all
of
them
and
we've
done
a
little
compilation
and
of
the
emails
in
this.
We
haven't
been
able
to
compile
the
emails,
the
100
or
so
email
cents,
but
the
emails
from
the
first
one,
there's
1072
people
emailed
us
opposed
to
this
illusion.
There
was
55
in
favor
of
a
disillusion.
A
There
was
eight
that
didn't
say
either
way,
but
the
overwhelming
testimony
on
that
our
public
hearing
was
including
from
the
petitioners,
in
fact,
I
think
what
they
spoken
for
the
petitioner
when
he
started
out
his
his
comments.
So
he
loved
the
library
and
wanted
to
keep
it.
A
So
we
had
this
policy
question
that
I
think
could
be
addressed
when
when
a
people
can
can
disagree
without
being
disagreeable
and
I,
would
ask
both
the
library,
district
and
the
petitioners
to
reach
out
and
and
try
to
come
to
an
amicable
solution,
because
I
know,
there's
there's
there
there's
one
out
there,
but
to
dissolve
the
district
would
be
overwhelmingly
disruptive,
because
the
the
commissioned,
if
it
were
to
be
dissolved,
has
no
choice
when
any
Library
District
is
dissolved.
A
All
property
and
assets
of
the
library
district
shall
be
disposed
of
by
the
board
of
County
commissioners
of
the
home
County.
That
is
what's
in
the
law.
It
doesn't
say:
oh,
go
ahead
and
farm
a
new
District,
real,
quick
and
turn
the
assets
over.
It
doesn't
say
that,
and
so
it
just
really
overly
disruptive
and
I.
Think
if
there's
anything
that
we
we
did
learn
from
from
this
from
this
hearing
and
this
process,
it
is
that
the
libraries
are
very
popular
in
this
community.
A
And
that
was
one
of
I.
Think
one
of
the
heartfelt
discussions
is
how
much
they
mean
to
people
for
various
reasons,
and
that
was
one
of
the
I
think
very
positive.
Things
come
out
of
this
people
open
their
hearts
and
and
the
library
was
it
was
a
place
of
Refuge
for
them
in
a
lot
of
people
and
and
as
a
place
of
comfort
and
and
in
today's
society
that
that
is
necessary.
Now.
A
I
would
would
hope
that
the
library
board
and
petitioners
could
get
together
and
resolve
some
of
these
some
of
these
differences,
because
we
don't
want
this
kind
of
division
in
our
community
and
we
can
get
about
that
without
without
that,
but
anyway,
so
I
would
now
ask
our
clerk
to
call
roll.
A
Eyes
have
it
there
will
be
an
official
order,
written
and
and
distributed
probably
later
this
afternoon.
Is
there
anything
else
to
be
brought
before
the
board
we're
in
recess?
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
tennis.