►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Commissioner
Daley
and
myself
are
here,
commissioner:
Davidson
is
absent
at
the
time.
I'd
ask
you
to
introduce
yourself
for
the
record,
so
we
can.
We
have
that
go
ahead.
A
A
You
all,
second,
that
motion
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye,
aye
motion
carries.
We
now
have
before
us
ordinance
number
945.
The
public
hearing
has
already
been
opened
on
this,
so
we
won't
need
to
reopen
it,
but
we
will
need
to
close
it
at
the
end
of
the
of
the
discussion.
A
Okay,
do
we
have
Spencer
lay
he's
on
there
he's
on
the
bridge?
Does
he
want
to
speak
to
this
or
do
the
unit
the
Humane
Society
wish
to
speak
to
it?
There
has
been
significant
changes
to
this.
It's
been,
it's
been
altered
and
tabled
a
time
or
two,
and,
and
so
we
we
now
have
it
in
final
draft
form.
K
This
is
Spencer
Ada,
County,
Sheriff's,
Office
I'm,
the
legal
advisor
I've
been
one
of
the
drafters
of
this
bill
or
ordinance.
Excuse
me,
I.
Think
the
number
of
changes
since
we've
seen
last
time
fit
within
Ada
standards,
make
it
more
likely
to
fit
within
Ada
standards.
K
K
It's
not
written
in
stone,
it's
something
that
we
can
work
on,
something
that
can
be
developed
and
into
a
more
finalized
product,
but
I
think
this
is
a
very
good
build
to
update
a
very
a
much
needed
ordinance
and
brings
it
much
more
in
line
with
other
cities
in
the
area,
so
that
we
have
a
more
uniformed
ordinance
which
will
make
it
this
easier
for
stock
for
citizens
to
work
with
when
they're
bouncing
so
easily
between
Incorporated
and
unincorporated
data
County.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
the
issue
I'm
strong,
though.
F
Jeff
Rosenthal
Idaho,
Humane,
Society
I,
appreciated
all
the
public
comments
that
we've
received.
They're
quite
helpful,
really
I
only
wanted
to
go
back
to
one
issue.
Commissioner
Davidson
you
had
to
raise
some
questions
about
the
prohibited
animals,
section
and
I.
Think
one
of
your
points,
which
I
think
is
quite
valid,
is
seems
to
be
a
duplication
of
Regulation
that
occurs
at
state
and
federal
level.
In
terms
of
these
specific
animals,
I
only
wanted
to
point
out
that
I
think
that's
a
valid
point.
F
I
think
the
issue
is
less
that
the
county
has
an
interest
whether
someone
has
a
flamingo
or
a
sea
turtle
or
a
whatever
it
might
be,
but
more
to
the
point
under
Section
D
of
that
the
actual
conditions
for
care
and
keeping
those
are
the
quality
of
life
issues,
things
like
sanitation
issues,
noise
issues,
things
like
that
that
are
important
to
neighborhoods,
but
I
have
had
many
a
couple
decades
of
working
with
these
state
and
federal
agencies
on
nuisance
problems.
F
This
is
not
their
concern,
they
have
a
very
narrow
scope
of
interest
and
when
you
go
to
them
say
you
know
yes,
the
person's
permitted
to
own
monkeys,
but
now
the
entire
neighborhood
smells
like
monkey
poop
or
what
have
you?
That
is
not
their
concern.
So
that's
the
main
focus
of
animal
control's
interest
here
is
to
be
able
to
make
quality
of
life
and
public
safety
issues.
Well
to
your
point:
yes,
we're
not
really
in
the
business
of
figuring
out
which
endangered
species
one
should
own
or
should
not
own
I
hope.
L
F
I,
don't
have
a
a
comprehensive
knowledge
of
exactly
what's
in
state
code.
There
may
be
some
issues.
We
work
frankly
with
Zoo
Boise
here
in
Boise
to
originally
develop
that
list
of
animals
that
they
thought
were
inappropriate
to
have
in
residential
settings
or
I.
F
Think
in
most
cases,
even
in
the
rural
areas
of
Idaho
I
think
they
they
tie
in
pretty
well,
but
in
terms
of
the
specific
list,
I
think
we'd
have
to
go
back
to
all
these
various
agencies
and
see
where
the
overlaps
might
be,
but
but
to
the
point,
it's
it's.
It's
actually
the
enforcing
standards
of
care,
so
that
that
we
aren't
blocked,
because
otherwise
we're
putting
a
lot
of
faith
in
federal
and
state
agencies
that
are
probably
not
going
to
assist
us
in
these
areas.
A
L
So
this
is
under
habitual
barking
or
noise,
making
nuisance
5
7
14..
What
page
is
that
on?
It
starts
on
15.
The
text
I'm
looking
at
is
on
page
60
and
it's
under
exceptions.
So
this
this
would
be
exceptions
to
barking
dogs
becoming
a
public
nuisance
which
the
definition
we
have
is
making
excessive
animal
noise
audible
beyond
the
boundaries
of
the
property
in
which
the
animal
is
situated
for
an
extended
period
of
time,
thereby
unreasonably
disturbing
another
person.
L
So
one
of
the
well
three
of
the
exemptions
are
that
they're
maintained
on
land
zone
for
agricultural
purposes
are
kept
in
a
properly
permitted.
Animal
Shelter.
L
Or
kept
on
a
properly
zoned
commercial
boarding
kennel,
so
my
concern
with
that
is
I.
Don't
think
those
should
be
exemptions
to
the
nuisance
noise,
ordinance,
I!
Think
if
you
have
a
properly
zoned
kennel
or
a
boarding
facility,
you
shouldn't
still
be
allowed
to
have
unreasonable
noises,
go
past
the
boundaries
of
that
property.
Now
it
may
not
be
a
residential
area,
but
it
may
be
a
business
area
where
other
commercial
businesses
are
there
and
so
and
also
for
the
agricultural
purposes
I'm.
L
A
K
Can
you
address
that
I
am
yes
Mr,
commissioner
Mr
chairman
commissioner,
the
exceptions
that
we
built
in
are
a
little
bit
trying
to
be
understanding
that
we
have
when
we
have
a
commercial
kennel,
that
they
can
have
a
lot
of
barking
and
it'd
be
a
little
bit
unfair,
We
Believe
to
have.
We
allow
you
to
have
this,
but
you
need
to
make
sure
that
it's
noise,
proofed
or
something
along
those
lines.
It's
pretty
extensive
and
be
very
hard
to
police.
K
The
primary
one
for
agriculture
is
herding,
animals,
typically
bark,
and
so
we
we
want
to
give
that
allowance
there,
especially
if
they're
working
them
away
from
the
fences
or
something
along
those
lines.
The
two
Commerce,
the
two
kennel
ones.
Frankly,
commissioner,
if
you
would
want
to
take
those
out
I,
don't
have
a
great
argument
against
it.
I'd
be
interested
to
hear
if
the
Humane
Society
has
has
experience
with
that
and
would
have
some
insight
on
that,
but
I'm
open
to
the
idea
that
that
would
get
removed.
K
If
that's
what
the
bocc
would
like.
L
Mr
chair,
yes,
well,
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
against
these
businesses,
making
noise
or
Farm
stuff
animals
they
make
noise,
but
the
definition
we're
going
with
is
unreasonably
disturbing
another
person,
so
I
would
think,
even
if
a
kennel
or
an
animal
shelter
was
unreasonably
making
noise.
I
think
that
you
know
reasonableness
is
something
you
could
take
into
consideration
if
there
was
a
noise
complaint-
and
we
have
a
whole
section
here
on
how
to
report
a
noise
complaint,
an
individual
can't
simply
just
report
a
noise
complaint.
L
Under
this
due
ordinance,
it
has
to
be
either
two
individuals
or
an
individual
of
the
code
enforcement
officer
witnessing
it
at
the
same
time
or
person
taking
a
video
or
audio
recording,
so
I
think
maybe
that
was
probably
designed
to
cut
down
on
frivolous
noise
complaints,
but
yeah
I
still
think
those
exemptions
shouldn't
exist
for
unreasonable
noise,
so
I
would
probably
move
to
only
only
reasonable
noise
only
reasonable
noise
under
the
situation.
L
J
L
So
the
okay,
the
very
exception
or
next
section
to
be,
is
C
proof
of
excessive
noise
and
that
that's
the
section
that
says
what
excessive
noise
is,
I,
think
or
no
that's
the
section
of
who
can
report
I.
Think
unreasonable
noise
was
defined
in
the
previous
page.
L
Section
A
barking
incessantly
for
30
minutes
with
no
individual
period
of
silence
for
more
than
one
minute
during
the
30
minute
period
or
barking
for
a
total
of
60
minutes
or
more
within
a
24-hour
period.
L
L
If
there's
a
complaining
party
and
I
think
it's
probably
up
to
either
the
enforcement
officer
at
the
end
of
the
day,
either
this
board
or
a
judge
to
decide
what's
reasonable
under
the
circumstances.
If
it's
not
worked
out
at
the
lower
levels.
L
Fee
exceptions
at
the
top
of
the
page
and
I
would
probably
strike
everything
after
the
first
comma.
L
L
I,
don't
think
you'd
want
there
to
be
no
way
to
deal
with
that
or
the
person
would
just
say:
hey
we're
a
farm.
Our
dog
can
bark
all
night.
Long
still
again
has
to
be
the
reasonable
standard
and
the
standard
that's
articulated
in
here,
but
again
they
can
make
noise.
It's
just
not
unreasonable
noise
as
defined
by
the
code.
A
All
right
is
there
any
objection
to
those
those
that
language
changed.
F
Jeff
Rosenthal
again:
yes,
it's
essentially
to
Spencer's
question
we're
not
particularly
concerned
about
that
per
se,
but
I
can
give
you
some
background
and
some
context
we're
obviously
a
rapidly
urbanizing
County,
but
we
still
have
our
cultural
activity
and
so
I
think
I
think
the
the
intent
here
is,
for
example,
maybe
a
Farms
existed
for
decades,
maybe
100
years
in
the
county,
they
have
livestock
guard
dogs
and
now
they
see
a
neighborhood
coming
up
around
them,
and
this
is
part
of
this
issue
between
urbanizing,
but
these
previous
stakeholders
having
a
way
of
life
that
requires
perhaps
a
dog
to
bark,
frequently
as
part
of
their
operation
to
prevent
depredation
and
so
forth.
F
So
this
is
one
of
the
concerns
here.
The
prayer
code
had
a
very
vague
definitions
of
barking.
What's
what's
Regional
and
what's
not,
and
so
in
the
definition
here,
it's
quite
specific
because
we
felt
that
it
really
assisted
the
court
and
in
trying
to
vet
whether
something's,
unreasonable
or
not.
That's
why
we
put
this
specificity,
which
is
based
on
a
lot
of
other
ordinances
I'm,
not
at
all
concerned
about
the
issue
of
animal
shelters.
F
But
this
is
the.
The
point
is
that
we
have
boarding
facilities
that
have
been
located
in
rural
areas
and
and
now
they're,
urbanizing
and
so
you're
now
coming
in
and
telling
them
they
can't
do
their
their
historical
operations.
Potentially,
that's
the
the
issue
that
the
commission
needs
to
think
about
I.
Think
in
this
case
the
Humane
Society
itself
will
not
have
an
issue.
If,
if
the
commissioner's
section
is
struck.
A
I
have
a
question:
are
you?
Are
you
familiar
with
some
some
organizations
or
some
areas
where,
where
this
would
have
an
impact.
F
I,
don't
have
any
specific
issue:
knowledge
of
a
particular
problem
area
or
kennel
or
Farm,
but
I
know
that
historically,
this
has
been
where
this
becomes
problematic
going
in
and
telling
a
Rancher
or
a
farmer
I
guess
in
Ada
County
I
know
your
dog
is
guarding
your
sheep
or
cattle
or
whatever
it
might
be.
But
now
the
neighbors
are
complaining
and
so
we're
changing
the
rules
and
and
and
maybe
it's
something
that's
dealt
with
in
zoning
I
suppose.
But
this
is
where
we've
had
issues
from
our
enforcement
end.
A
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Well,
I
have
a
question
our
commissioner
Davidson
are
you
thinking
of
us
of
a
specific
area
where
this
has
been
an
issue,
or
is
this
just
esoteric.
L
Well,
I,
don't
know
of
a
particular
one
in
unincorporated
County,
where
our
ordinance
would
be
applicable
to
we're
not
applicable
to
City
Limits,
but
I
have
familiar
in
city
limits
where
there
are
kennels
next
to
residential
areas
that
don't
do
a
good
job
of
controlling
their
noise.
This
wouldn't
impact
that.
L
But
it's
my
anecdotal
evidence
that
there
is
there
there
can
be
obviously
barking
dogs
are
an
issue
everywhere
in
every
city,
in
the
county
people
allowing
their
dogs
to
bark
unreasonably
that's
one
of
the
biggest
problems
that
I
think
Animal
Control
has
to
deal
with
I.
L
I,
don't
think
anyone
can
hear
dogs
barking
at
the
Humane
Society,
which
has
you
know,
sometimes
hundreds
of
dogs,
maybe
dozens
I,
don't
know
what
your
current
rate
is,
but
you
can't
hear
them
from
outside
as
far
as
I
know
and
I
think,
kettles
should
try
to
structure
themselves
to
minimize
the
amount
that
their
noise
would
carry.
Just
like
any
business
that
makes
noise.
There
has
to
be
a
reasonable
standard.
I
Morning,
my
name
is
Cheryl
Bloom,
Cheryl,
Bloom,
sorry,
I'm
late
I
got
caught
in
traffic,
so
okay
and
I
live
in
Ada
County
and
the
impact
area
for
the
city
vehicle.
And
yes,
this
changing.
This
will
affect
those
of
us
who
do
live
in
the
county
and
under
the
Right
to
Farm
Act.
So
we
do
have
livestock
Guardian
dogs
changing.
This
will
affect
our
ability
to
have
livestock
Guardian
docs
that
do
bark
and
our
sheep
guard.
I
A
A
The
so
so.
I
I
I
J
I
A
A
A
I
Now,
yes,
we're
bringing
it
up
to
Ada
standards,
Ada
our
city,
I'm,
sorry,
state
code
and
doing
we're
doing
a
lot
of
changes.
L
Ahead,
so
the
definition
of
excessive
noise
that
we
have
in
here
is
30
minutes
continuous,
with
less
than
one,
with
less
than
a
one
minute
break
right
or
a
total
of
60
minutes
or
more
within
a
24-hour
period.
Correct.
Do
you
is
that
something
you
feel
you
need
to
have
on
your
farm?
Dude
I
mean
I'm,
not
a
farmer,
but
do
dogs
need
to
bark
that
much
for
control
of
livestock.
I
I
Sorry
I
work
in
the
legal
field.
So
that's.
Why
that's
my
answer
so
it
it
I
mean
it
depends
so
under
the
Right
to
Farm
Act.
You
know
you
have
a
different
standard
than
you
do
with
a
in
the
city,
so
we
worked
with
IHS
Dr
Rosenthal
and
his
staff
on
the
the
noise,
and
so
we
worked
with
them
on
how
to
allow
their
animal
control
people
to
decide
what
is
reasonable,
and
that
is
another
Loosely
defined
term.
I
So
you
know,
and
what's
reasonable
for
one
person
may
not
be
reasonable
for
someone
else
and
it
you
know
you
have
to
it's
whether
the
animals
provoked
or
not.
So
you
know
it's
and,
and
you
know,
neighbors
are-
are
going
to
be
neighbors,
you
know
and
if
somebody
doesn't
like
a
dog,
they're
gonna
complain
all
the
time.
So
you
just
have
to
decide.
What's
good
and
what's
Nevada
I
mean
I
have
I
have
dog,
I
have
Labs
I,
have
a
service
dog
and
I
have
a
hunting
dog?
I
I
It
is,
you
know,
dogs,
no,
you
can't,
you
can't
provoke
them.
You
can't
taunt
them,
you
know,
so
you
have
to
decide
what
how
to
handle
a
situation
you
know,
and
so
and
when
you
live
in
the
city,
we
we
have
City
Limits
all
the
way
around
us
or
County.
So
we
have
a
different
standard
than
the
people
that
live
in
the
city
of
limits.
So
you
have
to
take
that
into
consideration.
Oh.
L
I
I
I
You
know,
but
if
you've
got
a
livestock
Guardian
dog,
that's
out
there
guarding
the
Sheep.
Why
is
the
dog
barking?
You
know
the
person
the
owner
is
going
to
go
out
and
say:
oh
we've
got
a
coyote
out
here.
So
that's
what
you
got
to
decide.
You
know
what's.
Why
is
why
is
the
dog
barking?
What
what's
the
standard,
and
you
know
you
have
to
figure
it
out?
So
that's
it.
But
you
know
you've
got
you're
not
going
to
have
a
one-size-fits-all
rule,
but
you've
got
to
decide.
Why
is
the
rule
there?
L
I
I
A
No
all
right
all
right.
Okay,
any
other
discussion,
Mr.
L
Chair,
yes,
could
I
ask
Richard,
do
do
you
know
if
our
zoning
statutes,
which
cover
agricultural
areas,
do
they
have
their
own
ordinances
for
noise?
Does
that
come
up
or
is
it
always
in
the
conditions
of
approval?
Do
you
have
any
background
on
you
know
Agricultural
and
animals
yeah.
H
Mr
chairman,
commissioner
Daly,
the
zoning
code
is
pretty
pretty
General,
even
in
the
kennel
section.
It
just
talks
about
the
owner
having
an
obligation
to
focus
on
on
noise,
but
it
doesn't
get
very
specific.
So
there's
nothing
that
I'm,
aware
of
for
the
agricultural
scenarios,
typically
falls
back
to
General
County
noise
ordinances.
K
J
Well,
Mr
Mr,
chairman
I,
guess
this
not
having
been
here
for
the
full
consideration
of
this
I
I
have
a
little
bit
of
limitation,
but
especially
the
Agricultural
and
I
think
this
is
a
work
in
progress.
This
whole
ordinance
and
as
we've
discussed
it
and
as
you
know,
she
just
commented-
we
we
will
be
able
to
come
back
and
visit
this
after
after
it
is
in
fact
implemented.
If
it
goes
forward,
I
I
would
have.
After
all
the
work
that's
been
done.
J
All
the
comments
that
have
been
and
Etc
at
this
point
in
time.
I
would
be
reluctant
to
support
changes
of
this
nature
because
we
do
have
the
reasonableness.
It's
still
up
for
grabs.
In
terms
of
definition,
we
still
have
these
exemptions
that
I
think
especially
the
agricultural
one.
I
would
definitely
not
want
to
pull
that
one,
because,
because
somebody
moves
into
an
agricultural
area
and
then
expects
to
have
a
city,
a
city
around
them
is
unreasonable
requirement
on
the
agricultural
sector.
J
A
Right
well
before
we
proceed,
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
on
on
ordinance
number
nine,
four
five,
and
so
then
it's
up
to
us
to
to
make
some
sort
of
a
decision,
and
so
we
have
a
discussion
going
on
and
the
public
hearing
has
been
closed
and
is
there
any
any
more
discussion
from
the
commission?
J
L
Well,
Miss
Cheryl
for
deliberations.
I
mean
I'm
willing
to
pass
this
today
with
the
understanding
I.
That
was
not
the
only
issue.
I
had
I
mean
with
a
25-page
ordinance,
as
commissioner
Daley
said,
there's
obviously
going
to
be
room
for
improvement
as
we
get
through
this,
and
so
I
am
supportive
over
all
of
the
ordinance.
Whether
or
not
we
make
some
changes
today
or
another
day,
but
I
don't
want
my
support
of
this
to
be
construed.
L
That
I
support
every
last
sentence
in
this
ordinance
because
I
still
do
think
they're
we're
going
to
have
issues
come
before
us.
That
call
a
lot
of
us
into
question
and
you
know
it's
animals,
so
it's
a
passionate
issue
and
I'm
sure
we're
still
going
to
hear
from
the
community
if
there's
any
any
problems
but
I'm
willing
to
support
this
now.
At
this
point,
just
to.
A
All
right
well
thanks
and
as
commissioner
Daley
suggested,
then
as
you're
also
suggesting
this
is
a
work
in
progress
and
that
there's
some
issues
that
that's
brought
up
later.
We
can't
amend
the
ordinance
if,
if
there's,
if
there's
further
issues
so
I
agree
with
that
and
yeah
you're
right,
it's
a
20.
It's
a
20
20
four
page
ordinance
with
one
page
for
signatures:
25
Pages,
total!
A
J
Go
ahead
and
Mr
chairman
I
I
agree
with
commissioner
Davidson
as
well
sure.
B
J
There
there
are
some
things
in
here
that
I,
don't
necessarily
like,
but
in
a
25-page
document.
I
think
we,
as
we
all
know,
even
with
your
spouse.
You
don't
agree
on
everything
so,
with
this
I
think
is,
has
developed
over
a
period
of
time.
I've
read
the
record
and
hear
some
comments
today
as
well.
J
I
I
think
we're
we're
at
a
point
in
time
where
we
can
in
fact
go
to
this
point
and
then,
as
both
Commissioners
have
said,
if
they're
coming,
if
there
are
anything
that
comes
up,
we
can
bring
it
back
and
address
it,
and
that's
I
think
is
basically
where
we
are
we
need
to.
We
need
to
put
a
point
in
time
and
then
move
on
and
address
it
as
we
need
to
so
Mr
chairman.
That's
just
my
comment.
All.
A
Right
well,
I
think
that
that
is
a
totally
acceptable.
That's
the
way
ordinances
are
they're
easier
to
pass
than
and
to
to
amend
and
statutory
changes.
So
we
can
do
that
if
we
have
issues
that
come
up
and-
and
so
with
that,
I
will
call
for
the
question
on
the
passage
of
ordinance,
number
945.,
there's
been
emotion
and
it's
been
moved
and
seconded
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye,
hi
hi
motion
carries
thank
you.
A
Okay,
we
will
now
move
on
to
some
new
business.
We
have
a
resolution
number
2833.
A
A
D
D
The
one
change
that
is
applicable
to
this
resolution
is
that,
instead
of
using
HUD
standards
for
rental
agreement
for
the
one
month
of
assistance
that
we
would
provide
as
a
county
we're
using
actual
rental
agreements
because
of
the
discrepancy
between
HUD
and
the
actual
rents
that
we
have
here
in
the
county
which
have
risen
significantly
over
the
last
couple
of
years.
This
will
have
a
minimal
impact
on
our
budget
and
it'll
go
through
the
same
process
that
we've
always
done
in
terms
of
qualifying
as
well
as
payback.
D
A
Right
is
there
anyone
else
wish
to
speak
to
this
resolution,
if
not
I'll
close
public
hearing
on
resolution
2833.
Now
it's
up
to
the
board
Is
there
further
discussion
from
the
board
or
motion.
A
E
Before
you
this
morning,
we
have
a
review
of
bids
received
and
award
recommendation
for
Public
Works
projects,
50
000
to
200
000
and
the
first
of
which
is
Bid
23019
Ada
County,
public
safety
building
window
replacement
fiscal
year
23
and
the
evaluation
team
has
reviewed
the
soul,
bid
submitted
for
this
project
and
would
like
to
give
a
recommendation
today.
So
if
you'd
like
I,
can
read
the
writer.
A
H
E
Okay
letter
dated
January
24th
2023
to
the
board
of
80
County
Commissioners
from
Ada
County
procurement
regarding
bid
23019
dear
members
of
the
board.
After
reviewing
the
soul
bid
submitted
forbid
23019,
the
bidder
was
found
to
be
non-responsive
due
to
conditioning
their
bid
terms
they
attached
with
their
bid.
Therefore,
it
is
a
recommendation
of
the
evaluation
group
to
reject
the
so
bid
submitted
for
bid
23019
and
procure
the
and
procure
the
project
on
the
open
market.
A
J
A
E
Right
and
so
yeah,
so
we
reject
a
bit
and
to
procure
on
the
open
market
that
that
would
be.
A
A
Why
I
was
confused?
Well,
that's
fine!
All
right
is
there
a
second
of
that
motion
I'll,
second,
that
okay,
a
verb
demotion?
Is
there
any
discussion
hearing,
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
right!
Okay!
Is
that
clear
that
that.
A
I
was
confused.
That's
fine!
All
right!
All
right
go
ahead
on
on
bid
number
two,
three
zero,
two
one.
Yes.
E
E
If
you
could
read
the
letter,
yeah
I'd
be
happy
to
it's
a
letter
dated
January
24th
2023
to
the
board
of
Ada
County
Commissioners
from
Ada
County
procurement
regarding
bid
23021
dear
members
of
the
board,
Ada
County
procurement
received
three
responses
for
bid
23021
the
following
are
the
names
of
the
bidders
and
the
bid
amount
submitted,
number
one
is
designer
floors
and
they
had
a
bid
amount
of
fifty
three
thousand
five
hundred
forty
five
dollars.
E
Bidder
number
two:
wall-to-wall
commercial
flooring
with
a
bid
amount
of
thirty
nine
thousand
one
hundred
forty
four
dollars
and
number
three
is
dylabaz
Flooring
America,
with
a
bid
amount
of
thirty
four
thousand
four
hundred.
Seventy
one
dollars
after
reviewing
the
bid
submitted,
is
the
recommendation
of
the
evaluation
group
toward
the
contract
for
bid
23021
to
dyllabus
Florida
America
as
the
lowest
responsive
bidder
in
the
amount
of
34
471
dollars.
A
Okay,
is
there
any
questions
from
the
from
the
board
hearing,
none
I'll
accept
a
motion.
L
Mr
chair
I,
move
to
accept
the
recommendation
of
the
evaluation
committee
and
award
bid
23021
for
400
Benjamin
drivers
license
carpet
replacement
2023
to
dyllabus.
E
A
A
It,
yes,
thank
you
all
right.
Next
up
we
have
catering
permits
and,
and
one
new
license
is
there
any?
Is
there
a
motion
on
that.
A
Okay,
you've
heard
the
motion
all
in
favor
say
all
right
all
right.
All
right.
All
right
motion
carries
all
right.
We
have
with
us
today
our
distinguished
clerk
Mr
Trent
triple.
Do
you
have
a.
D
Report
for
us
Mr,
chair,
Commissioners,
really
the
news
on
the
horizon
for
us
is
the
14
March
election
it'll
be
a
small
election.
Cuna
school
district
is
running
a
bond,
so
it'll
be
a
handful
of
precincts,
won't
be
very
large
but
we'll
be
conducting
that
in
14
March,
and
we
also
have
some
big
court
cases
coming
up
soon
after
that.
So
we'll
be
gearing
up
for
that.
D
But
those
are
the
big
things
on
the
horizon
for
us
right
now,
as
well
as
the
budget,
which
will
be
the
normal
process
over
the
next
couple
months.
So.
A
D
A
All
right,
okay!
Well,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
We
have
the
the
claims.
Journal
I'll
accept
the
motion
on
the
claims.
Journal.
J
A
You've
heard
the
motion
all
in
favor,
say:
I
I.
L
J
A
B
Chairman
Commissioners
good
morning,
yeah
Rebecca's
unable
to
attend
this
morning,
but
I.
Imagine
you
guys
are
shocked.
There's
no
tax
cancellations
on
the
agenda.
B
Yeah
he's
pretty
excited.
I
know
it
creates
a
lot
of
work
for
her
staff
so
but
other
than
that
you
know
our
appraisers
are
working
on
appraising
over
200
000
Parcels.
You
know
by
the
time
we
send
out
assessment
notices,
so
they're
pretty
busy,
and
then
our
admin
staff
is
processing
thousands
of
exemptions,
so
everyone's
pretty
busy
in
our
office.
A
Well,
yeah,
so
every
circuit
breaker
has
to
be
reapplied
for
every
year:
correct,
correct,
yeah,
okay,
all
right!
Any
other
questions.
Do
the
Assessor's
Office!
Thank
you.
Okay!
Now
we
have
our
distinguished
treasure
with
us.
Miss
Beth,
Mom,
good.
C
Morning,
Mr,
chairman
Commissioners.
Yes,
we
were
pleasantly
shocked
that
there
were
no
tax
cancellations
on
today's
agenda.
It
is
a
priority
for
us
to
process,
cancellations
or
adjustments
that
were
approved
in
recently.
At
this
point,
they
are
a
bit
more
time
consuming
only
because
we've
often
received
payments,
so
it
takes
a
little
bit
more
manual
intervention
to
make
sure
we've
corrected
the
record
on
those.
So
that
is
a
top
priority.
Also
just
note
that
next
week
I
will
be
attending
the
IAC
midwinter
conference.
C
So
I
will
be
here
a
bit
less
we're
excited
about
that
conference,
because
we
will
be
moderating
a
panel
on
public
administration
for
the
treasure.
So
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
us
to
learn
how
other
counties
might
be
handling
public
administration
and
then
just
share
some
of
our
practices
too.
So
that's
what
we'll
be
at
next
week.
C
A
Thank
you
appreciate
that.
Okay,
next
we
have
development
services
with
application,
201
601-258-s-f
Dry,
Creek,
Ranch
Village.
H
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board.
This
up
for
consideration
is
the
final
plot
of
Dry
Creek
Ranch
staff
development
services
staff
has
reviewed
the
submission,
finds
that
the
developers
complied
with
the
applicable
conditions
for
this
phase
and
that
the
plaque
complies
with
County
and
state
law
and
recommends
that
the
board
authorize
the
chair
to
sign
and
stamp
the
plot.
A
A
L
A
Okay,
you've
earned
the
motion.
Oh,
if
they
ever
say,
I
I
motion
carries.
We
have
two
interim
agreements
from
the
Expo
I'll
accept
emotion,
Mr,.
J
A
Carries
we
have
two
events
at
the
parks
and
water
AIDS
Barber
Park
and
education?
Event
Center
I'll
accept
the
motion
on
those
two
events.
A
You've
heard
the
the
motion
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
aye
aye
motion
carries
thank
you.
We
now
have
Four
Agreements
I
reviewed
those
agreements.
Is
there
any
question
or
discussion
on
of
any
of
the
agreements?
A
A
Well,
good
morning,
today
is
the
24th
day
of
January.
The
time
is
9
50..
The
board
is
in
of
Commissioners
sitting
as
a
board
of
Emergency
Medical
Services
district
is
in
session
to
conduct
its
weekly
open
business
meeting.
All
three
Commissioners
are
present.
Also
with
us
are
Sean.
A
A
All
right,
we
have
it
guy
back
in
the
back
there,
you
go
okay,
all
right,
Madam
clerk.
Are
there
any
changes
to
the
agenda?
No
they're,
not
okay!
Next
up
is
the
claims
Journal.
G
Mr
chair
Commissioners
good
morning
good
morning,
you
know
thank
you
Mr
chair
and
commissioner
Daley
for
coming
down
to
EMS
day
yesterday.
That
was
a
very
good
event.
We
talked
to
a
lot
of
legislators
yesterday
got
some
good
feedback.
You
know
didn't
really
hear
anything
negative
about
the
discussions
that
we
were
having
down
there,
but
overall
I
think
it
was
a
success
and
I
would
like
to
recognize
our
EMS
integration
officer.
Mark
Babson.
G
He
and
I
both
sat
on
the
planning
committee
with
the
EMS
bureau.
To
put
that
event
together
and
I
know.
Mark
and
Melissa
ball,
especially
with
the
EMS
bureau,
did
a
knockout
job
with
that.
It's
kind
of
interesting
at
the
end
of
the
day,
packing
down
tables
in
a
class
a
uniform,
but
you
do
what
you
got
to
do,
but
overall
it
was.
It
was
a
great
event
and
and
I
think
I.
Think
it's
going
to
do
us
well
in
the
long
term
to
to
have
spoke
with
those
folks
and
again
this
year.
G
What
we're
really
focused
on
is
getting
a
memorial
joint
resolution
passed
that
memorializes
the
idea
of
EMS
being
an
essential
service
in
the
state
of
Idaho
it
currently
isn't,
and
then
in
the
where
fours
and
their
asses,
you
know
would
direct
us
as
the
sustainability
task
force
to
come
back
in
24,
with
some
real
solutions
for
the
problems
that
we
see
in
EMS
in
the
state.
G
Beyond
that
we
there
was
one
other
thing:
I
was
gonna:
oh
I
I.
We
had
our
meeting
with
Medicaid
on
Friday
and
it
went
very
well
the
the
plan
right
now.
They
have
the
draft
state
plan,
Amendment
they're,
going
to
submit
that
informally
to
CMS
immediately,
at
the
same
time,
I
believe
on
Friday
this
week
or
Monday
next
week,
they're
going
to
start
the
clock
on
the
the
60-day
public
comment
period,
which
is
a
requirement
in
the
state
of
Idaho
at
the
federal
level.
G
It's
30
days,
but
here
we
have
60
days
which
puts
us
in
line
for
a
formal
submission
before
March
31st,
and
so
everything
is
on
track.
Right
now
we
met
with
their
process
team
on
Friday
just
so
they
could
kind
of
wrap
their
minds
around.
What
gemt
is
the
reason
for
the
informal
submission
they
found
success
when
CMS
can
get
that
document
and
kind
of
wrap
their
minds
around.
What
Idaho
is
trying
to
do.
G
G
Mr
chair,
ours
will
be
a
little
bit
different,
mainly
because,
as
more
of
these
state
plan,
Amendments
have
been
submitted.
The
Consultant
Group
that
is
helping
the
fire
chiefs
Association
in
the
state,
has
learned
some
things
learned
what
to
do
and
what
not
to
do
more.
Probably
what
not
to
do
in
the
state
plan
amendments
to
make
them
complicated,
but
ours
is
pretty
straightforward.
G
Idaho
is
a
fee
for
service
state,
so
we
will
be
filing
what
is
known
as
a
certified
public
expenditure
that
it's
basically
just
a
cost
report
that
CMS
gets
to
understand
what
our
cost
per
call
is,
so
that
they
can
reimburse
us
correctly
state
of
Washington
because
they
have
managed
care
with
Medicaid.
They
actually
have
to
front
half
of
the
money
up
front
and
then
they
get
it
all
back.
But
you
know
it's
kind
of
spooky
having
to
do
that.
G
B
B
G
Mr
chair
commissioner
Daly:
it's
this
has
been
done
in
other
fee
for
service
States,
so
I
don't
think
there
are
going
to
be
any
issues
at
all.
This
is
very
much
allowable
under
CMS
and-
and
we
have
to
remember
too,
that
these
are
only
Medicaid
patients
that
we
can
get
this
reimbursement
on.
G
So
I
don't
believe
that
we're
going
to
have
any
issues,
but
that
is
part
of
the
the
reason
for
submitting
the
estate
plan
informally
first,
so
they
can
kind
of
work
out
any
bugs
before
they
submit
the
formal
state
plan.
A
G
Mr
chair,
commissioner
Daley,
you
know,
I
I
wasn't
able
to
count
how
many
people
came
through.
Just
roughly
I
would
say
about
a
third
of
all
of
the
legislators
that
were
down.
There
came
through
the
second
floor.
Rotunda
I
could
be
way
off
on
that
I
could
be
closer
to
50
percent,
but
the
the
feedback
and
the
reception
that
we
got
was
was
pretty
favorable.
G
You
know,
I
spoke
to
some
legislators
that
probably
aren't
very
fond
of
of
of
the
idea
of
you
know,
taxes
and
that
kind
of
thing.
But
you
know
they
seemed
receptive
to
the
idea
that
that
we
need
help
and
a
lot
of
the
issues
that
we
have
not
only
with
our
agency
and
Aid
account
and
I.
G
Think
sometimes
people
look
at
Ada,
County
and
say:
well,
you
have
to
be
super
resource
rich
and
don't
have
any
issues
which
certainly
isn't
the
case
that
this
board
knows
well
that
our
Levy
is
below
one
mill
now
I
think
our
Levy
is
actually
less
than
Whedon
passed
abatement
right
now
or
Mosquito
Abatement,
which
is
what
it
is
at
this
point
in
time.
But
when
you
look
at
volunteer
agencies
from
around
the
state,
that's
where
they're
really
suffering.
G
You
know
where
the
question
of
is
an
ambulance
coming
today
or
not,
is
really
the
question
for
us.
The
question
is
growth
continues
and
we're
not
really
able
to
address
it
in
a
meaningful
way.
It
is
not
necessarily
is
an
ambulance
coming
it's
when
is
it
coming?
You
know,
and
we
certainly
want
to
be
able
to
maintain
those
response
times,
that
our
goal
of
eight
minutes
59
seconds
90
of
the
time
and
I'll
be
honest
with
you
right
now.
G
We're
not
meeting
that
goal
because
of
the
growth
that
we've
seen
and
we
need
to
expand
our
resources,
but
that
also
takes
Revenue
to
do
that.
So
you
know
we'll
be
working
hard
when
we
get
into
budget
to
see
if
we
can
put
a
good
package
together
for
you
guys
what.
A
G
Yeah
Mr
chair,
if
you
know,
if
that
happens,
the
The
Next
Step
really
has
to
come
with
funding
behind
it,
and
there
are
several
different
ideas
out
there:
ideas
that
have
come
from
the
state
of
Maine
the
state
of
North
Dakota,
where
they've
they've
implemented
these
things.
Where
State
the
state
pays
for
some
of
the
the
share.
I
know
I've
had
commission
our
conversations
with
commissioner
Daley
about
you
know
these
Federal
lands.
Clark
County
is
a
great
example.
G
Most
of
the
calls
they
run
in
Clark
County
are
not
on
their
own
residence
they're
on
people
that
are
recreating
on
federal
lands
up
there,
and
so
you
know
that's
kind
of
a
longer
term
solution,
but
getting
the
federal
government
to
do
something
like
the
pilt
funds
that
would
would
address
these
needs
on
federal
lands
so
that
that
we
can
do
that.
G
G
G
Oh
my
daily
count.
You
know
what
commissioner
back
I
did
not
look
at
it
this
morning,
but
I
can
tell
I
looked
at
it
on
Friday
and
it's
been
trending
downward.
It
was
down
at
about
4.13
on
Friday,
so
it's
been
trending
downward.
Really,
since
about
the
mid
mid-December
kind
of
thought,
we
would
see
a
tick
up
after
Christmas,
but
I
don't
know
if
we
just
had
enough
people
got
RSV
and
covet,
and
the
flu
after
Thanksgiving
that
now
we're
seeing
a
downward
Trend.
So
hopefully
we'll
see
that
continue.