►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
A
A
D
E
E
It's
spoken
that
I
think
the
council
should
see
the
final
contract
and
have
a
say
in
the
RFP
as
well
right
now
the
weights-
and
it
all
goes
to
a
five
person
committee,
what
they
have
to
say
in
the
RFP
and
the
contract.
I
think
this
is
something
that
the
full
council
should
have
a
say
in
there's
something
I
want
to
see
in
the
RFP,
specifically
a
an
expanding
of
what's
already
in
the
RFP,
which
guarantees
the
best
prices
for
hip.
It's
not
him
that
uses
I'd
like
to
see
that
expanded
to
all
residents.
E
It
would
guarantee
that
no
resident
would
pay
more
than
with
National
Grid.
It
would
also
shift
the
burden
of
rest
from
the
consumer
to
the
supplier.
So
there's
something
I
want
to
see
in
the
RFP
and
there's
something
I
want
to
see
in
the
contract,
and
my
only
fear
is
that
if
we
vote
on
it
currently
the
way
it
is,
you
know
we
don't
have
another
say
and
I
I
take
full
blame
for
not
being
here
Wednesday
and
I.
Take
for
missing.
E
One
of
the
planning
meetings
with
this
was
discussed
so
I'm
not
chipped
in
the
blame.
I
know.
A
lot
of
people
have
worked
on
this
for
a
long
time
and
worked
really
hard.
The
title
addressed
everyone's
concern.
I
have
been
talking
about
these
two
things
that
I
like
to
see
in
the
contract
from
the
very
beginning
when
we
first
are
talking
about
this
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
so
I
don't
want
a
fact
that
I
missed
two
meetings.
E
The
reason
why
we
don't
have
something
that
I
think
you
know
will
be
critical,
because
we
don't
want
to
be
in
the
situation
where
something
changes
and
we
don't
have
a
say
in
it
anymore,
and
then
we
don't
agree
with
something.
And
you
know
this
is
going
to
affect
every
single
resident
and
we
spent
and
I'll
give
credit
to
the
committee,
because
the
committee
spent
more
a
lot
of
time
on
working
on
adjusting
the
out
letter.
I
think
we
should
have
just
as
much
time
as
looking
at
the
RFP
and
the
final
contact.
F
D
F
H
H
G
E
You
said
that
the
product
of
changing
when
we
spoke,
you
said
the
product
to
change
and
they're
going
into
the
direction
of
guarantees
if
we
put
it
in
our
RP-
and
this
is
why
things
one
of
the
council
has
a
say
in
the
IFP
and
in
the
contract,
if
we
put
it
in
the
RFP
that
we
were
looking
for,
that
guarantee.
Doesn't
that
void
didn't
need
to
choose
to
watch
it
turn
around,
because
they're
gonna
get
in
see
in
the
matter?
G
I
G
E
I'm,
a
strong
believer,
the
customer
yield
the
model
and,
if
Albany
city
of
Albany,
that
has
a
25%
of
poverty
rate
and
have
50%
wait,
were
people
living
above
pay
more
than
a
percent
before
that
housing.
If
us,
the
capital
say,
can
we
get
this
change
you're
already
on
your
way
there
we
can
be
the
tipping
point
if
we
push.
E
F
E
If
we
employed
an
opt-out
letter
that
the
contract
that
the
city
of
Albany
signed
up
for,
has
a
guarantee
that
you
would
never
pay
more
than
what
you
would
be
paying
with
National
Grid,
it
would
benefit
to
supply
it
because
they
would
have
less
people
opting
out
right
before
they
even
get
started.
So
you
know
I
think
there
is
some
opportunities
with
getting
the
supplies
to
ship
their
product.
E
A
F
F
B
J
I
E
J
C
F
A
E
A
F
A
J
I
C
I
A
A
Resolution
15
31
20
is
it's:
miss
Farrow
will
be
going
to
finance.