►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
See
miss
Farrow
mr.
O'brien
mr.
Howe
II
miss
Fahey,
miss
love
mr.
Igoe
mr.
Conti
miss
Frederick
mr.
bowring.
Mr.
Robinson
mentioned
that
he'd
be
running
a
little
bit
late
legislative,
any
change,
legislative
aide,
Michelle,
Andre,
Research,
Council,
Junior,
Pichardo
and
Danielle
Gillespie
I
see
the
cook
as
well
as
brett
williams
from
corporation
council.
I.
Think
I
got
everyone
right.
Okay,
so
someone's.
C
B
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
all
right!
So
just
jumping
right
into
the
agenda.
We
don't
have
public
hearings,
no
minutes
from
the
last
meeting.
I
didn't
get
to
it
consideration
of
vetoes
now
the
week
jr.
we
go
through
the
process
from
the
last
meeting
or
wait
until
we
get
to
the
the
ordinance
in
question.
We.
B
B
B
Ordinances
held
number
nine
and
ten,
which
service
miss
loves
again,
they
are
in
the
Finance.
Committee
will
be
moved
pending
the
outcome
of
that
meeting
tomorrow
evening,
that
was
nine
and
ten
on
the
agenda
and
next
on
to
resolutions
introduced
by
mr.
inany
44:52
20,
someone
saying
something:
the
coffin
or
long,
no
okay.
So
mr.
nanny
is
he
in
yet.
A
E
A
E
E
This
designation
is
reserved
for
workers
who
are
injured
or
died
doing
a
job.
These
are
typically
designated
for,
like
police
officers
in
a
in
a
crime
scene
where
they
are
shot
or
a
firefighter
who
was
like
lost
in
a
burning
building.
The
value
of
this
benefit
is
to
various
city.
Agencies
is
awarded
by
individuals,
pension
board
when
the
state
of
the
emergency
was
announced.
Not
every
municipal
employee
had
the
luxury
of
working
from
home
line
of
duty
benefit
will
grant
a
survivor
spouse
the
lifetime
pension
of
deceased
partner.
E
If,
on
the
other
hand,
Cobra
19
is
deemed
a
natural
course,
a
one-time
insurance
payout,
where
the
fraction
of
that
amount
would
be
given.
During
this
pandemic,
many
city
employees
were
designated
as
essential
and
they
didn't
have
the
luxury
of
staying
home
and
I
believe
that
we
have
an
obligation
to
make
sure
that
these
workers
who
are
putting
their
lives
on
the
line
who
who
putting
their
health
on
the
line,
are
fully
supported.
E
Dealing
with
the
coronavirus
isn't
stressful
in
itself,
and
people
should
have
be
worried
about
their
family
being
taken
care
of
in
case
of
a
tragic
incident
taking
place.
I
think
about
myself
personally,
sometimes
when
I
go
out,
I
think
about
the
race
that
I'm
putting
myself
so
and
I
don't
go
out
as
much
I'm.
Can
you
imagine
some
of
these
essential
workers
in
our
city,
like
police,
firefighters,
who
are
going
out
on
a
consistent
basis?
The
amount
of
stress
and
pressure
they
under
are
currently
in
our
state.
E
We
have
over
300,000
confirmed
Kovan
19
cases,
20
confirmed
20,000,
confirmed
dearth
deaths
as
of
2020,
which
is
roughly
one-third
of
all
coronavirus
cases
in
the
United
States
I
think
this
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction
to
show
appreciation
for
our
four
in
the
five
essential
workers
in
a
city
and
to
designate
everyone
as
a
line
of
duty
worker
within
our
city.
Thank
you.
E
E
And
this
is
a
measure
that's
being
taken
by
several
municipalities,
all
across
our
state,
urging
the
governor
and
also
the
legislature
to
act
on
this
issue.
A
couple
of
weeks
ago,
someone
asked
me:
what
could
we
do
if
the
state
legislature,
the
governor,
doesn't
take
action
immediately
and
I?
Did
some
research
and
I
found
out
that
the
mayor
actually
could
make
an
executive
order
which
will
grant
widows
to
continued
health
benefit
until
the
state
legislature,
Act.
E
F
You
contracted
at
home
when
you
say
every
employer
every
employee.
That
means
everybody
works
for
the
city
of
Albany,
whether
they
contracted
at
work
or
at
home
you're
saying
they
should
be
paid.
Those
benefits
when
normally
when
something
like
this
happens,
it's
normally
because
they
contracted
it
while
doing
their
job
gotcha.
E
So
I
I
understand
what
you're
saying
right
now:
I
am
in
favor
of
just
making
it
for
everyone
in
the
city.
The
reason
why
is
that
we're
not
sure
if
an
individual
contracted
the
Kovac
during
before
the
state
of
emergency
was
offered
and
then
later
on,
find
out
that
they're
ill
or
have
a
fatal
health
problem?
B
I
think
it's
just
it's
really
broad
in
the
case
of
a
police
or
a
fireman
or
other
essential
workers
or
frontline
workers.
So
this
is
essentially
saying
if
you're
a
bisque
worker
you
and
you
have
it-
you
get
covered
it's
line
of
duty.
We
can't
omit
really
really
brought
using
times.
Example,
that's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
folks
to
to
cover
so
that
all
for
me,
the
problem
is,
is
all
municipal
employees
the
circumstances
matter
on
how
they
contracted
it?
One.
A
H
I
Gonna
say:
I
spoke
to
junior
about
the
letter
that
I
spoke
about
at
the
last
meeting.
Why
haven't
we
finally
get
something
like
this
for
all
essential
workers,
not
just
municipal,
but
it
would
be
a
federal
it'd,
be
a
much
bigger
task,
but
I
think
this
is
a
great
first
step,
and
this
is
something
that
we
can
do
here.
You
know
at
out
level,
you
know
if
we
can.
D
I
G
I
E
H
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
another
thing
with
this
resolution
is
it
calls
on
the
governor
in
the
state
legislature
to
have
a
bill
to
do
this.
So
I
think
a
lot
of
these
details
that
we're
talking
about
they
would
actually
look
at
on
the
state
level.
I
mean
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
that
council,
member
and
on
a
or
Flynn
are
are
suggesting
that
we
craft
the
language
that
would
work
on
a
state
level.
It's
highly
likely
that
the
legislature
themselves
would
look
at
that.
So.
H
More
about
the
intent
of
saying
this
is
an
important
thing
and
we
want
like
this
is
something
we
as
a
city
support,
and
we
would
like
to
see
this
happen
at
the
state
level,
but
the
actual
language,
what
it
would
look
like
and
Richard's
absolutely
right.
A
lot
of
these
bills
do
get
vetoed
because
of
cost,
but
you
know:
there's
I,
I,
think
that
the
intent
is
the
important
thing
and
it
allows
the
legislature
to
kind
of
worry
about
the
details
of
it.
Yeah.
E
D
D
I
mean
there
was
one
bill
that
was
very
controversial,
was
to
make
death
by
HIV
kind
of
an
occupational
exposure
kind
of
a
you
know,
a
occupational
hazard,
and
it
was
very
it
didn't.
It
wasn't
based
on
the
signs-
and
it
just
said,
if
a
you
know,
a
correctional
officer,
Public
Safety
Officer
as
a
result
of
HIV
or
AIDS.
That
was
automatically
occupational
and.
D
J
J
Generally,
you
would
put
some
sort
of
time
limit
when
you're
construing
benefits
on
it.
I
understand
that
you're
talking
you're,
basically
saying
leave
it
to
the
legislature
to
make
that
kind
of
determination,
but
I
share
the
concerns
about
I
want
to
say
the
concerns
about
it
being
overly
broad
and
I.
E
Thing
is
that
we
don't
know-
and
we
have
seen
studies
come
out
every
single
day
as
no
new
reports
and
new
revelations.
There
are
individuals
who
might
contract
it
in
January
and
they
might
be
fine
for
the
first
month
or
so,
but
then
it
might
come
back
again.
So
this
is
just
a
protection
for
our
municipal
workers.
K
J
B
I
agreed
mr.
nahdi,
would
you
about
a
intro
and
then
you
kind
of
work
on
it?
Rework
it
and
we
can
take
it
up
at
next
caucus
or
we
can
do
the
community
thing
probably
be
easier
to
see
you
there,
because,
as
it
is
I,
don't
I
don't
support
it.
This
morning
that
seems
like
there
are
a
few
other
members
that
don't.
E
E
I
That
have
gotten
this
disease
I
think
we
can't
know
that
if
the
worst
were
to
happen,
we've
actually
to
be
out
of
your
home.
Do
you
think
it
should
be
for
those
essential
workers
that
are
outside
their
homes,
because
if
it
gets
to
stay
at
home,
be
safe
and
work
from
the
desk
the
same
list,
the
other
staff
that
were
action
to
be
out
there?
It
filled
a
path
for
us
and
pick
up
the
trash,
the
police
else
to
take
care
of
our
fires
to
make
sure
the
water
still
runs
and
our
faucets.
I
I
Fix
the
language
and
make
it
so
that
feel
more
comfortable,
but
not
watered
it
down
because
I
understand
there
will
be
a
fiscal
with
ot
with
this,
but
acts
these
men
and
women
to
go,
lifts
their
lives
and
with
still
families,
lives
and
their
families
held.
We
owe
it
to
them
to
make
sure
we
have
their
families
back.
If
the
worst
comes
again,
we
are
fortunate
we
are.
It
has
not
been
that
fortunate
they've
lost
a
police
officer,
other
municipal
workers.
We
have
been
fortunate
and
we
continue
to
be
fortunate
and
I
hope.
C
I
just
wanted
to
add
I
think
that
it's
important
to
show
a
commitment
to
the
people
that
are
on
the
front
line,
but
also
I,
don't
want
to
just
rush
into
doing
stuff.
You
know
a
lot
of
times
we
rush
in
and
doing
stuff,
because
somebody
else
in
some
part
of
the
state
is
doing
something,
and
you
know
the
history
of
Albany.
We've
been
in
front
of
a
lot
of
things
and
I
think
that
at
this
time
we're
learning
you
know
each
two
weeks
we
learn
something
different
about.
C
E
Something
I
know
everyone
wants
to
talk
about
the
essential
workers
and
which
is
it
is
important,
but
let's
put
a
scenario,
god
forbid,
where
Michelle
Michelle
actually
has
to
go
to
City,
Hall
and
contracts
it.
If
what
happens
to
her
family
in
this
instance,
is
that
we're
going
to
make
sure
that
it
will
be
categorized
instead
of
the
family
having
to
prove
that
the
disease
was
contracted
while
on
work.
It
would
automatically
the
maker
designate
for
under
this
resolution,
as
a
line
of
duty
death.
So
just
sometimes
I
know.
E
We
want
to
focus
on
essential
workers,
but
there
are
still
some
individuals
who
worked
for
the
city
of
Albany.
They
still
have
to
go
to
City
Hall
or
the
consistent
basis.
I
mean
we
all
went
to
City
Hall
to
pick
up
some
some
letters
to
give
to
our
constituents.
I
mean
there
are
still
people
that
I
have
to,
but
I
was
still
working
currently
that
it's
not
designated
as
an
essential
worker.
D
Just
just
to
know
your
language
is
contradictory
because
it
seems
to
reference.
The
issue
is
really
front
line:
workers
that
have
occupation
responsibilities,
that
preclude
them
from
working
from
home
and
then
later
then
you
say,
but
let's
apply
to
everybody.
So
there's
there's
contradictory
language
in
here.
E
Sounds
good
I'm
open
to
making
amendments
and
Kelly
yeah.
B
A
E
E
D
B
B
B
A
A
M
L
M
And
that's
done
by
a
simple
motion:
correct
seconded
motion.
Yes,
in
other
words,
let's
say,
council
leadership
wanted
to
make
that
motion
instead
of
me,
and
that
would
be
perfectly
appropriate.
Correct.
M
N
M
Yeah
Jenna
put
out
a
memo
which
I
think
is
right
in
point.
I
was
just
going
to
raise
a
few
other
issues
about
the
parts
of
the
us.
Do
that
the
mayor
cited.
She
cited
some
parts
of
the
u.s..
Do
that
don't
apply
to
the
changing
of
the
ordinance,
it
simply
apply
to
filing
a
development
application.
So
those
procedural
defects
which
the
mayor
sites
there
are
not
applicable
because
most
of
those
sections
don't
even
Chris
I,
don't
even
pertain
to
making
a
change
in
the
ordinance
itself.
M
E24,
b
and
c,
and
there's
nothing
in
there,
there's
in
fact
C
is
C,
is
very
twenty-four
East
24
see
is
very
explicit
that
the
make
chain
writing
or
amending
the
us
do
is
committed
to
the
legislative
discretion
of
the
Common
Council,
that's
very
specific,
so
that
totally
contradicts
our
citation
of
it
and
then
the
other
one,
a
24
B.
It
takes
a
rather
stretched
reading
to
say
that
the
council
has
to
be
has
to
submit
I
mean
as
a
courtesy
we
normally
do.
M
C
M
It
contradicts
all,
except
for
one
little
fractured
interpretation
of
where
the
comma
was.
It
contradicts
all
of
the
rest
of
the
us.
Do
and
again.
I
said
I,
don't
even
know,
I,
don't
know
who's
advising
the
mayor,
because
I
don't
think
she
really
realizes
that
she's,
citing
parts
of
the
us
do
that
pertain
only
to
development
applications,
not
to
making
changes
to
the
US.
Do
itself
like.
D
M
D
G
D
With
you,
if
those
provisions
do
not
apply
to
us,
we
allowed
it.
But
there
are
you
know
when
you
cannot
affect
the
powers
of
an
elected
official,
except
by
a
certain
process.
The
USDA
was
adopted
by
ordinance,
which
cannot,
you
know,
effect
or
place
limitations
on
our
powers
as
elected
officials,
to
be
making
the
policymaking
body
of
government
and
to
enact
and
amend
city
code.
D
If
you
wanted
to
do
that,
I
believe
you
would,
it
would
have
to
go
via
local
law
pursuant
to
the
municipal
home
rule
law,
and
then
that
would
be
required
a
permissive
referendum,
because
you
are
now
placing
a
limitation
on
our
legislative
authority,
which
you
cannot
so
I.
Don't
think
the
u.s.
do
does
not
and
Kidwai
was
adopted,
cannot
preempt
our
authority
or
put
an
appointed
official
of
the
mayor,
give
that
person
authority
over
our
role
and
that's
in
fact
what
they're
saying
so
I
think?
Yes,.
M
M
D
M
Don't
think
they
apply
to
us
to
accept
that
it's
a
courtesy
to
send
it
to
the
Planning
Board,
but
that
doesn't
give
them
veto
power
or
in
any
way
diminish
what
the
Charter
state
law
and
the
u.s.
do
itself
gives
us,
and
maybe
that
I
mean
the
mayor
says.
Oh
and
the
article
78
would
be
very
expensive,
I'm,
not
sure
why?
Because
she
has
a
team
of
lawyers,
but
I
think
an
article
78
would
thoroughly
look
at
that
issue
and
basically
say
no.
It's
not
fatally
defective.
M
The
City
Council
did
their
courtesy
referral,
but
they
never
succeeded
any
of
their
authority
pursuant
to
the
Charter
and
pursuant
to
name
pursuant
to
the
u.s.
do
itself.
That
interpretation
is
based
on
a
where
comma
is
in
a
in
a
sentence,
and
it's
contradicted
by
the
very
next
paragraph.
So
maybe
we
need
a
judicial
interpretation
to
restore
our
rights
too,
and
then
the
u.s.
do
and
don't
like.
Oh.
B
E
B
E
M
Passed
I
believe
this
part
of
the
us
do,
but
it
was
something
that
she
actually
had
to
sign
off
on
and
she
did,
which
is
something
which
also
puzzles
me
cuz,
then,
what's
the
constitutional
violation
and
she
says
that
this
setting
a
space-
you
know
a
boundary
limitation-
is
unconstitutional
and
is
a
dangerous
precedent
that
will
negatively
affect
future
investment
and
development,
to
which
I
asked
question
boundaries
already
exists
in
the
US.
Do
I
eat
a
marijuana,
dispensaries
and
I
have
heard
no
attribution
of
negative
effect
from
those
or
unconstitutional
effect.
M
So
I
am
just
mystified
who
she's
getting
your
advice
from,
and
you
know
the
points
that
and
and
junior
are
lays
out.
The
other
ones
beautifully.
I
mean
the
case
law.
That
cited
is
not
in
point
and
on
the
conflict
of
interest.
You
know
I'm
I
can
assure
you
that
neither
me
nor
any
of
the
five
other
petitioners
had
any
sort
of
financial
interest
whatsoever
in
either
mr.
M
Nigro
Hannaford
Plaza
CSL
their
competitors
whatever,
and
our
only
interest
was
the
fact
that
we
live
in
Albany
and
under
the
under
the
whole
2030
plan
that
we
had
a
certain
interest
in
maintaining
certain
qualities
of
life
in
Albany
and
and
and
the
other
point
to
which
I
think
has
gotten
fuzzy
in
the
argument
is
I
know
when
Marissa
submitted
her
memo
to
us
at
4:30.
On
the
day
we
were
voting
on
the
resolution.
M
E
C
E
M
Unusual,
the
first
accusations
of
me
acting
in
any
way
that
was
a
conflict
or
improper
came
from
a
letter
from
the
attorney
for
the
for
the
applicants,
and
then
it
was
quickly
adopted
into
statements
that
were
made
by
Corporation
Counsel
unusual,
as
well
as
the
fact
that
I
can
ensure
you
and
if
it
does
go
to
as
jr.
says,
that
can
only
be
interpreted
in
a
court
of
law,
because
each
case
differs
case
by
case
I
have
no
fear
of
going
in
front
of
an
article.
M
78
court
and
I
feel
quite
confident
that
they
would
say
neither
me
nor
the
five
other
petitioners
were
acting
out
of
any
conflict.
Yeah
and
I
might
also
and
I
think
their
provisions
under
the
public
officers
law
that,
if
somebody
feels
a
public
officer
is
in
conflict,
there
are
avenues
to
be
addressed
through
through
that.
But
I
haven't
seen
that
undertaken.
B
M
We
can
take
the
one
paragraph
that
they're
most
relying
on
and
make
it
clear
as
a
that's
375,
5
e,
24
B.
That's
where
the
placement
of
a
comma
is
argued
to
mean
that
oh
no,
the
Common
Council
was
meant
to
be
the
same
as
the
city
agencies
that
have
to
apply
the
planning
director,
which
is
contradicted
by
the
very
next
paragraph
but
yeah
I
think
we
can
put
some
other
language
in
there
too,
affirmative
ly
disabuse
any
reader
did.
That
was
the
the
intent.
Okay.
H
M
B
A
I
M
B
Hands,
okay,
so,
on
to
awesome,
you
know
we're
offer
the
agenda
and
on
to
our
leadership
discussions.
We
we
had
a
meeting
with
the
mayor
and
went
through
some
of
the
budget
issues.
Discussion
of
the
you
know
the
shortfall
remember
that
the
shortage
was
seventeen
to
twenty
million
dollars,
and
you
know
she
she
identified
some
steps.
They
were
taken,
including
cuts
freezes
on
spending
and
services
being
eliminated.
B
H
Yes
and
absolutely
and
I
would
say,
expertise
is
lose
leave
here,
but
I
take
good
notes,
so,
unfortunately,
we
do
have
plenty
of
people
with
expertise
that
can
help
out
too
so,
as
everyone
remembers,
I'm
sure
that
right
now,
so
this
is
what
the
city
is
looking
at.
Basing
all
of
its
numbers
on
is
a
seventeen
million
dollar
revenue
loss,
so
that
is
something
that
could
potentially
hit
the
next
day.
H
Payment
is
June
first,
so
that
is
a
date
that
they're
looking
as
a
potential
hit
the
they're
expecting
a
revenue
loss
in
both
the
capital
city
funding
and
in
the
apron
municipality
also
called
aim
funding
we're
not
expecting
it
in
19
a
which
is
the
Empire
State
Plaza
payment
has
that
statutory
but
they're
expecting
a
20%
drop
in
state
aid.
In
the
other
two
places
they've
been
going
through
every
single
department.
Every
line
to
review
budgets.
H
H
The
they've
identified
potential
layoffs
and
cuts
to
make
and
they've
identified
some
buckets
of
savings,
and
this
is
something
that
councilmember
Robinson
and
councilmember
Conte
brought
up
in
terms
of
looking
at
those
kind
of
buckets
of
savings,
so
difference
in
expenditures.
So,
for
example,
gas
prices
are
down
so
they're,
expecting
less
to
paying
gas
snow
removal
they're
expecting
that
to
be
down
and
they're
kind
of
looking
within
each
department,
tiered
savings
and
pools
the
potential
layoffs
is
55
to
75,
depending
on
the
salaries,
and
it
is
with
different
within
each
department.
There's
not.
H
They
didn't
give
us
a
full
layout
of
what's
happening
in
each
department,
and
we
did
say
that
we
would
since
we're
having
Mike,
wheeler
and
Darius
B
the
Finance
Committee
meeting
tomorrow.
We
did
expect
to
speak
a
lot
more
on
those
things
there
and
they
said
that
they
would
be
able
to
articulate
things
better
there.
But
there
are
a
lot
of
unknown
stone.
H
It's
I,
don't
think
the
governor's
office
has
given
a
definite
number,
but
there's
been
an
indication
to
expect
about
that
much.
They
I
think
every
every
office
that
we
get
revenue
from,
whether
it's
state
aid
or
even
the
county,
is
giving
a
range
and
and
I
I
mean
realistically
New,
York
State
doesn't
know
either
I
think
they're
still
holding
out
hope
for
federal
money,
which
I
don't
know
how
realistic
that
is,
but
that
that's
where
we
are
right
now,
I
think.
F
H
So
the
they
also
have
said
so,
as
they're
going
through
department
to
Department
the
different
monetary
numbers
can't
be
unfilled.
Positions.
That's
already
been
factored
into
the
savings,
so
they're
leaving
every
position
vacant
with
the
exception
of
police
and
fire,
so
there's
a
class
of
eight
firefighters
that
they
are
moving
forward
with
if
they
did
not
move
forward
with
that
class
of
eight
firefighters,
and
we
actually
would
take
a
budget
hit
because
of
overtime.
H
There's
also
they're
still
anticipating
a
class
of
four
police
of
30
at
the
end
of
June,
and
there
are
plenty
I'm
moving
forward
with
that,
mainly
because
we're
down
so
deeply
in
police
right
now,
anyway,
with
the
different
retirements
that
are
up,
we
could
potentially
be
down
at
73
officers
if
they
don't
move
forward
with
this
class
of
30.
So
I
think
that
that's
I
I
know
on
the
council.
H
D
H
Know
the
nuance
of
where
we
live
with
those
numbers.
I
think
that's
something
that
we
should
discuss
tomorrow
night
with
the
with
the
exact
we're
still
gonna,
be
in
a
tough
spot.
Absolutely
I
mean
it's
you're,
absolutely
right.
If
exactly
what
those
numbers
will
be
I,
don't
think
that
they
know
cuz
I,
don't
think
that
they
know
exactly
who's
going
to
be
retiring
they're,
just
looking
at
who's
eligible
for
retirement,
yeah,.
K
B
I
I
I
I
You
have
seen
that
at
least
five
to
seven
won't
finished
a
growing
process,
so
you
go
from
dirty,
let's
see
if
we're
lucky
25,
but
you
were
originally
down
fifty,
so
you're
still
down
25
unless
another
ten
people
who
beat
I
in
that
timeframe
tonight
it
down
to
85
officers.
Well,
if
you
have
a
class
of
forty
or
class
of
fifty,
we
were
taught
it
will
be
a
class
of
fifty.
You
know
now
fifty
are
gonna
finish.
I
H
H
The
voice
of
the
council
has
always
been
consistent
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
police,
full
police,
cohort
and
fire
cohort
safety
is
hugely
important
across
the
city.
I
know
my
constituents
when
it
comes
to
making
sure
that
we
have
police
and
fire
and
well-trained
police
and
fire
it's
they.
It
matters
to
them
and
they
understand
how
important
that
is.
So
I
think
that
it's
definitely
important
to
reiterate
that
tomorrow,
when
we
talk
with
people
from
the
mayor's
office,
I
wanted.
G
To
jump
in
on
the
governor
several
times
in
his
PowerPoint
slides
has
said:
he's
going
to
do
a
20%
cut
to
education,
the
local
governments
and
to
medical,
or
you
know
the
hospital
system,
so
I
mean
he's
been
kind
of
laying
that
out
something
the
house
did
pass
a
bill
out
today
or
yesterday
three
trillion
dollars.
One
trillion
is
supposed
to
be
for
a
lot
of
states
and
cities.
So
you
know,
hopefully
we
can
get
that
money.
G
H
Know
if
that's
included
or
not
that's
a
good
question
and
that's
it
may
be
included,
but
I'm
not
sure
it
actually
would
be,
because
the
number
of
crossing
guards
is
actually
a
pretty
any
number
so.
But
we
should
ask
that
tomorrow.
I'll
make
a
note
of
that
too.
H
So
they
are
looking
at
these
as
temporary
layoffs.
The
goal
is
to
for
state
and
federal
aid
and
in
fact
the
mayor
asked
for
us
to
reach
out
to
the
President
and
Mitch
McConnell
as
much
as
possible,
and
there
is
a
letter
that's
going
around
that
people
can
consider
signing
on
to
if
you've
not
already.
So
those
are
important
things.
I
personally,
don't
know
how
much
Mitch
McConnell
cares.
H
So
the
longer
we
wait
for
the
layoffs,
the
mayor's
office
said
the
the
more
that
it's
likely
to
have
to
cut.
So
they
are.
The
layoffs
could
potentially
hurt
hit
as
soon
as
June
first,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
did
ask
for
a
stronger
discussion
tomorrow
at
the
Finance
Committee
meeting
on
exactly
what
we're
looking
at.
So
we
can
really
articulate
it
for
our
constituents
and
people
that
are
reaching
out
to
us.
B
O
H
Wasn't
any
specific
plan
of
a
lay
of
saying
that
we're
doing
this,
but
they
did
and
I
think
that's
also
a
worthwhile
question
to
ask
it's
a
valued
like?
Is
there
going
to
be
something
in
writing
to
say
that
we
will
be
hiring
them
back
if
we
get
the
funding
in
place,
but
I
the
intent
is
to
look
at
them
as
temporary
layoffs,
and
the
mayor
was
very
clear
on
that
that
the
intent
is
to
hire
them
back,
but
it's
Jamil.
A
H
H
H
E
Was
pretty
fast
have
demonstration,
or
even
a
Budget
Office
thought
about
any
type
of
shared
service
with
the
county,
I.
H
Think
that
absent
like
they're
looking
at
everything,
but
that's
an
excellent
question
to
ask
tomorrow,
to
ask
for
any
specifics
on
it.
I
know
that
over
the
past,
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
of
services
over
with
the
county.
The
but
and
I
know
that
we
do
do
some
of
them,
but
exactly
what
we
do
and
if
it
makes
sense
to
do
more
of
them
now.
Those
are
great
questions
to
just
see
exactly
what
is
happening.
D
Do
you
know
if
maybe
this
or
tomorrow,
one
one
thing
would
be
I
mean?
Are
we
looking
at
these
as
one-time,
obviously
opening
up
and
getting
the
economy
back
on?
It's
not
going
to
happen
overnight.
It's
going
to
be
a
slow
process,
so
we're
going
to
maybe
for
a
couple
of
years
see
these
challenges
as
far
as
revenues
and
how
long
it's
going
to
take
to
really
get
things
back
up
to
where
they
were,
especially
in
the
sales
tax
area.
Yep.
H
H
So
I
I
think
that's
definitely
the
case
but
again.
Another
excellent
question
to
actually
ask
the
people
that
are
in
those
positions
to
see
exactly
what
they
would
say
to
that.
But
I
I,
really
from
the
different
things
that
they've
indicated
I
think
that
they're
expecting
it
to
not
be
a
quick
fix
but
likely
200
next
year
to.
B
D
I
was
just
thinking
about
the
landfill,
a
couple
of
perspectives.
In
a
sense,
you
might
assume
that
commercial
dumping
is
going
down
because
there's
less
activity
like
but
I'm
also
wondering
you
know.
A
lot
of
the
you
know
take
out
now
and
more
people
have
more
disposables
at
home
and
now
that
going
into
our
home
trash,
you
might
say
in
a
lot
of
ways
and
wondering
if
there
is
these
impacts
that
we
met
their
worth
or
if
we
can
even
measure
I.
H
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
remember,
but
not
in
this
past
leadership
meeting,
but
I
mentioned
it.
It
was
just
mentioned
briefly
in
our
leadership
meeting
two
times
ago,
but
one
of
the
things
that
they
were
tossing
out
there
I
mean
it
was
a
lot
of
different
things.
You
know
but
was
potentially
no
recycling
so.
D
Absolutely
we
are,
we
are
paying
still
to
take
away
those
recyclables.
Yes,
does
it
make
I
think
some
youth
families
that
looked
at
that
does
it
make
sense
just
to
you
know,
dump
them
in
the
landfill
and
avoid
the
expense
of
disposal
of
we're
not
making
any
money
off
of
it
or
maybe
a
streamline
what
we
recycle
so
that
we
only
focus
on
those
recyclables
that
might
have
a
commercial
value
if
there
are
any,
rather
than
doing
the
whole
massive
single
stream
thing
that
we
do
right
now,
I.
M
H
M
N
D
N
N
M
How
much
do
you
know
how
much
we
are
paying
for
recyclables
we
haven't
had
the
mayor
has
a
task
force,
it
used
to
meet
monthly
or
bimonthly,
and
it
hasn't
met
in
about
five
or
six
months
now
and
that's
when
we
get
to
reports
and
all
the
things
from
Joe
label
house
how
much
it
cost
us-
and
there
was
I
forget
how
much
they
said
at
the
last
meeting.
I,
don't
know,
I
think
something
like
about
fifty
bucks
of
time
to
get
rid
of
recycle
most
we
used
to
have
paid
for
them.
It.
J
Actually,
he
actually
had
said.
Essentially
it
was
costing
us
essentially
about
what
we
are
charging
others
for
for
that
when
they
dumped
so
I.
Think
it's
something
like
ninety
five
dollars
per
ton
is
what
you're
paying
for
our
recyclables
Jenny
I.
Are
you
anticipating
that
Darius
or
Mike
will
have
any
PowerPoint
presentation
or
other
materials
I'd
like
to
get
those
in
advance
of
the.
J
Want
to
encourage
council
members
to
have
the
2020
budget
handy.
You
know,
as
we're
talking
about
these
things
to
you
know,
talk
about
those
cuts
and
look
at
especially
look
at
the
revenue
page
where
we're
gonna
be
seeing
hits
in
particular,
and
then
you
know
where,
where
do
we?
You
know
I
mean
I'm
glad
that
she's
asking
the
department
heads
to
you
know
figure
out
things
to
some
extent.
J
Some
people
have
not
been
identified
as
essential
employees
and
her
notice.
Every
week
to
all
city
employees
mentions
that
there
are
these
people.
You
know
that,
are
you
know
we
appreciate
everybody
in
and
then
she
reminds
people
that
if
you
are
not
an
essential
employee
and
not
working
out
of
their
home,
you
are
still
on
call
at
this
point.
So
that
appears
that
there
are
some
people
who
are
not
providing
a
function
for
the
city
at
this
particular
point
in
time.
I
don't
know
how
many
people
there
might
be
like
that.
H
H
H
L
H
K
Thanks
Kelly
I
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update
about
the
CCA
advisory
committee.
Alfredo
and
I
met
with
the
committee
on
Friday
and
also
mega
energy.
Was
there
because
of
cold
in
19?
There's
been
quite
a
bit
of
volatility
in
the
commodity
market
and
prices
for
electricity
right
now
by
the
utility.
Are
you
know
it's
a
15-year
historic
low,
so
what
we're
faced
with
is
going
out
for
a
bid
for
a
one
or
two
year
contract
and
it's
very
unlikely
that
we'll
get
a
price.
K
That's
going
to
beat
this
this
a
typical
price
that
we're
currently
getting
from
the
utility.
So
the
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this
and
I
think
they're
going
to
look
at
prices,
try
to
get
an
idea
of
what
some
of
the
prices
might
be
within
the
next
few
weeks
before
there's
any
decision
for
going
out
and
and
just
to
be
really
clear
on
this.
K
You
know
the
concern
is
that
we
want
to
offer
residents
of
Albany
a
price
that's
lower
than
what
they
get
from
the
utility.
So
that's,
and
we
also
want
that
green
energy.
So
I
just
wanted
to
assure
everybody
that
that's
something
that
every
minute
every
member
of
that
Advisory
Committee,
is
pretty
much
on
board
that
that's
what
we're
looking
for.
So
there
have
been
delays
as
a
result.
K
K
People
have
to
respond,
and
then
you
know
the
CCA
wouldn't
go
into
effect
for
fights
for
four
months.
They
wouldn't
go
into
effect
for
four
months.
So,
for
example,
if
we
let's
say
if
we
got
if
we
went
out
to
bid
in
May,
we
would
vote
on
it
in
June
and
we
wouldn't
it
wouldn't
start
to
lock
over.
But
if
we,
if
we
shifted
it
back
a
little
bit
until
the
the
volatility
and
in
the
market
lessened
that
process
might
get
moved
back
a
little
bit
or
forward
a
little
bit.
K
So
it's
a
little
confusing,
but
you
know
Alfredo,
you
might
want
to
weigh
in
a
little
bit
on
this
I
think
he's
gone.
Yes,.
I
I
The
fact
the
fact
that
we
were
projected
based
on
what
future
prices
are-
you
know
it's
hard
to
protect,
but
right
now
we
would
not,
but
now
would
not
be
a
good
time,
because
any
suggestion
that
we
would
get
would
be
looking
at
numbers
now
in
two
years
into
the
future,
which
is
higher
than
what
people
are
paying
now.
So
it
would
make
no
sense
to
do
that
now,
because
we
would
be
lacking
people
into
high
weights,
which
is
more
I'm
gonna.
I
I
E
It's
not
a
question
I'm,
just
more
so
just
observation.
Earlier
today,
I
found
out
that
the
City
School
District
is
going
to
layoff,
potentially
over
200
staffers
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
to
people's
attention
that
they're
meeting
on
May
14th
for
board
meeting.
So
if
you
have
any
suggestions
or
any
recommendation,
you
might
want
to
attend
that
board.
Meeting
me
personally.
H
Now
any
input
it
has
to
be
emailed
into
the
board
members
by
I
think
two
or
four
o'clock
tomorrow,
so
because
they're
they're
voting
tomorrow,
so
they
had
a
meeting
last
night
on
it
and
that
kind
of
outlined
the
budget
that
they're
going
to
be
voting
on
tomorrow.
So
I
tomorrow
is
definitely
important
to
watch
if
you're
interested
in
it.
But
if
you're
interested
in
weighing
into
it,
then
I
recommend
looking
at
the
past
information
and
sending
any
anything
along.