►
From YouTube: Monday May 6, 2019 Albany Common Council Caucus Part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
D
D
F
D
B
D
D
So
all
of
the
amended
versions
were
on
what
comes
up
will
email
to
you.
The
item
number
seven,
which
is
mine.
This
relates
to
snow
emergencies.
That
is
also
a
pass
with
amendment
and
item
number
nine,
which
was
ordinance.
Nine
4119
relates
to
the
living
wage
ordinance.
That
is
also
that's
mine.
That's
also
a
past
with
amendment
and
again
in
that
one,
the
amendment
adds
the
treasurer
auditor
and
the
chair
of
Human
Rights
Commission
to
the
individuals
or
who
will
receive
quarterly
reports
and
all
of
those
came
out
of
committee.
D
The
remaining
ordinances
are
held
on
the
introduction
of
resolutions,
1951
19
or
is
a
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
to
enter
in
I,
guess
a
grant
agreement.
This
is
for
funds
that
we
already
received
for
the
Lincoln
Park
pool.
So
this
is
just
an
administrative
formality.
This
will
be
a
pass.
Mr.
Johnson
ordinance,
20
50
119
is
the
adjustment
budget.
Adjustments
related
to
the
union
contract
with
the
dispatchers
and
counsel
82.
That
is
a
pass.
I
had
mrs.
O'shea
on
that,
and
you
tell
me
you
can
move
that
if
she's
not
here
and.
D
D
D
C
D
The
bill
number
that
was
in
the
original
resolution
was
actually
from
last
session,
so
jared
made
a
correction
to
updated
for
the
current
bill
number,
which
would
be
the
senate
Dilys
15:27.
The
actual
bill
is
69
pages
long.
You
know
it's
a
lengthy
document
to
go
through
and
there
are
a
lot
of
issues
there.
D
My
recommendation
would
be
to
do
more
of
a
general
resolution
on
the
topic,
as
opposed
to
something
specific
to
a
specific
piece
of
legislation
that
is,
is
moving
in
different.
You
don't
know,
what's
gonna
happen
with
it,
but
to
get
your
points
out,
but
of
each
injury
we
can
introduce
the
resolution
tonight
but,
as
I
say,
I'm
not
sure
which
committee
to
go
to
or
if
we
just
have
further
discussion
that
caucus
and
our
next
Wednesday
caucus.
But
you
also
don't
want
to
preclude
the
opportunity
of
discussion
from
the
public.
G
H
H
D
Working
out,
it
may
or
may
not
happen
this
year.
I
don't
know,
but
the
dilemma
is
it's
a
specific
piece
of
legislation
and
it's
as
you
can
either
do
a
resolution
on
a
specific
piece
of
legislation
that
69
pages
that,
in
effect,
it's
endorsing
the
whole
bill
without
us
really
going
through
it
or
you
do
a
general
resolution
urging
the
legislature
to
come
to
terms
with.
E
E
D
E
C
Yep
so
I
guess
like
what
it
all
comes
down
to
is.
The
fluidity
of
the
bill
is
still
very
lives.
So
what
she's
saying
is
that,
like
they
in
general
they're
talking
about
they
want
to
expunge
records,
or
they
may
want
to
seal
records,
and
as
we
discussed,
we
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
just
misdemeanors
if
it's
gonna
be
felonies
included,
like
all
of
that
is
still
very
much
up
for
discussion.
G
H
D
J
H
A
A
D
H
D
Know
I
will
say
that
there
are
a
number
of
organisms
there.
You
know
there
are
a
number
of
organizations
and
entities
and
people
within
the
you
know,
addiction
and
treatment
field
within
law
enforcement,
with
a
number
of
other
areas
that
have
taken
very
definite
positions
on
this
and
for
us,
then,
to
take
a
from
my
perspective,
to
take
a
position
on
a
specific
bill
without
affording
those
entities.
The
ability
to
basically
you
know,
come
to
us
and
express
their
concerns.
Is
you
know
difficult.
G
J
J
E
D
H
D
Know
what
folks
mean
I
really
need
to
so
we
could
I
mean
I,
so
we
can
introduce
a
resolution
as
it
is
I
if
we
want
to
put
it
in
committee,
we
can
try
and
put
it
in
public
safety
I
think
even
after
this
meeting.
If
we
need
to,
if
I
need
to
make
it
change
because
they're,
you
know,
of
course
you
might
not
want,
or
whatever
I
can
administrate.
If
we
do
that,
but
for
now
tonight
we'll
put
in
public
safety.
F
D
I
D
Let
me
go
quickly,
folks,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Joe
in
a
second
of
the
other
resolution
on
resolutions
held
the
only
one
we
have
was
item
four
they'll,
be
by
councilmember
do--she
that
relates
to
changes
in
the
assessor's
office,
a
budget
change
and
that
will
be
a
pass.
That's
item
number
four,
okay
and
then,
when
we
come
to
miscellaneous
and
unfinished
business,
I
think
there
are
a
Commissioner
of
Deeds
will
do
that
and
also
then
I
will
offer
at
that
point,
make
a
motion
on
appointment
of
the
city
clerk,
okay,.
D
D
There
were
several
pieces.
There
I
forwarded
that
to
members
when
I
received
it
I
did
not
have
any
information
or
leadership
did
not
have
any
indication
of
that
prior
to
receiving
that
and
Marissa
indicates
she
wasn't
aware
of
until
she
sent
it
to
us
either.
So
it
was
not
something
that
we
were
anticipating
and
I
forwarded
on
as
soon
as
you
got
it,
and
if
I
can
quickly
recap
what
this
does.
There
are
two
resolutions
similar
to
what
we
did.
Last
year
we
passed
a
resolution.
D
This
is
regarding
the
Beaver
Creek
project,
which
I
believe
everybody
is
familiar
with.
Last
year.
As
part
of
this
process,
we
passed
a
resolution
requesting
the
introduction
of
Home
Rule
legislation
to
allow
us
to
alienate
portions
of
Lincoln
Park
for
the
project
once
that
bill
was
actually
introduced.
You
did
pass
a
second
resolution,
which
was
the
formal
Home
Rule
request
that
legislation
did
pass
before
session
ended
last
year
in
June.
D
So
again
we're
being
asked
to
pass
a
resolution
tonight
that
requests
the
introduction
of
state
legislation
and
then
at
a
later
point,
if
that
is
introduced,
we
could
do
the
homeworld
L,
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Joe,
and
one
of
the
questions
on
in
hey
Joe
is
since
daily
nation
law
was
enacted
last
year.
It
seems
this
is
a
totally
new
free-standing
bill
that
doesn't
amend
last
year's,
so
we
we,
you
know
just
try
to
understand
the
dynamic.
Oh,
we
we're
not
amending.
Last
year's
we're
not
repealing
the
law
that
was
enacted.
D
L
Recent
ones
were
in
February
and
late
April
with
the
third
enemy
blood
and
South
Indian
Association,
specifically
to
talk
about
the
change
to
the
park.
Identity
presented,
bascomb
acro
net
November
fee.
We
had
had
a
lot
of
discussion
from
the
community
about
trucking
the
solids
from
a
facility
Beaver
Creek,
then
down
to
the
opening
County,
those
which
welcomed
antenna,
a
court
of
law.
We
thought
that
was
pretty
legitimate
concern.
We
did
a
lot
of
research
and
we
found
during
that
was
an
existing
sewer,
third
out
of
which
is
not
cheat
number
three.
L
I
L
L
Adding
a
little
bit
of
a
corridor,
probably
forty
feet
wide.
If
every
would
happen,
we
could
work
underground
top
of
all
this
material
death
gravity,
so
windows
12.
He
needs
to
be
gone
through
this
entire
process.
We
met
with
you
after
we
were
back.
Five
percent
design
now
were
about
65%
design,
and
we.
L
Advance
this,
additionally
only
nation
into
a
fight
at
a
courtesy
of
a
meeting
to
the
port
in
the
South
that
neighbor
Association.
We
did
not
want
to
assume
that
we
had.
You
know
a
car
wash
at
school.
So
when
we
met
with
them
in
February
to
answer
questions
about
the
capacity
we
did
an
internal
inspection,
we
televised
that
lines
in
excellent
condition.
We
verified
that
all
the.
L
Sanitary
sewers,
so
that
was
one
of
the
concerns
they
had
and
the
other
concern
I
believe
that
definitely
was
running
a
large
floor
to
that
finally
committed
only
about
6
million
gallons
a
day,
so
we're
convinced
that
the
solution
we
have
here
technically
is
technically
achievable.
It's
still
within
the
context
of
the
budget
of
the
project,
and
we
also
learned
that
we
had
an
appraisal
of
the
value
of
the
land
is
being
alienated.
It's
about
$220,000
and
what
that
said.
L
With
the
crater
story
of
homes
places
that
we
would
do
some
free
infrastructure
and
local
storm
water
management,
rain
guard
cetera
the
next
steps,
I
think
to
Marisa
conservative
rather
the
process
of
how
to
assess
the
fall.
We
would
probably
put
the
percent
where
we
have
to
get
this
project
started
construction
in
2020
and
we
need
to
be
completed
by
the
end
of
2020
too.
So
this
allows
us
to
be
dead
schedule.
We.
M
M
L
L
In
February-
and
we
got
all
the
questions
they
had
raised,
my
head
and
what
flex
of
additional
data
we
televise
a
sewer,
we
did
a
lot
of
flow
monitoring.
We
actually
had
a
Smart
Cover
Flow
and
measures
the
12:1
sewer,
and
we
shared
that
data.
We
did
with
the
south
and
neighbor
Association
I
think
it
was
like
two
weeks
ago.
L
M
I
L
The
South
End
your
association
meeting
specifically
about
the
order,
and
we
discussed
with
them.
Can
we
manage
that
with
traps
in
the
catch
basins
that
connect
to
the
combined
sewers
and
I?
Think
that
was
a
sin.
People
satisfied
with
the
mechanism
that
used
to
control
over
and
again
both
these
are
separate,
so
the
catch
cases
for
the
most
part
really
going
into
the
storm
sewer
a
lot.
M
L
L
L
F
L
L
On
our
Nicolas
of
the
hoppers,
wouldn't
have
to
pay
for
that.
We're
still
working
some
details
on
that,
how
that
can
actually
work
simply
because
the
ones
that
were
services
technically,
the
homeowners
do,
but
we
war
with
them
to
get
a
release
in
the
treatment
to
replace
it.
That
was
something
I
think
these
will
work.
I
was
disgusted.