►
Description
The agenda was discussed.
A
Can
you
tell
them
I'm
not
getting
emails
anymore?
I
don't
know.
What's
going
on
the
last
two
times
that
I
got
and
corey's
had
to
send
me,
the
information.
B
Can
you
hear
me
dj
find
out
which
find
out
what
email
michelle
is
sending
the
links
to
for
you
right,
we'll
take
care
of
that
all
right,
let's
so
we're
back
out
of
executive
session.
Just
for
the
record
from
the
point
where
we
went
into
executive
session,
we
were
joined
in
executive
sessions
by
councilmember,
conte
and
robinson
correct.
B
Those
were
the
two
just
for
the
record
jumping
into
to
the
agenda
and
again
welcome
it's
our
wednesday
october
14th
common
council
caucus
going
back
to
the
the
agenda
consideration
of
local
laws
or
none
being
considered.
C
There
were
just
a
few
things
I
wanted
to
mention
with
regard
to
the
the
agenda
and
the
bond
ordinances.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
me
to
do
that
now
or
when
we
get
to
those.
C
But
go
ahead.
Okay,
I
mean
I
sent
a
memo
mostly
to
this
effect.
I'm
not
sure
that
everybody
saw
it.
I
know,
especially
from
leadership.
There
was
a
desire
to
get
all
the
bond
ordinances
on
this
agenda,
which
certainly
makes
sense.
C
Unfortunately,
with
the
way
the
timing
worked
out,
there
were
a
few
things
I
had
to
leave
open-ended
or
a
few
edits
that
we'll
have
to
make
going
forward
with
regard
to
the
local
finance
law
and
the
periods
of
probable
usefulness,
which,
of
course,
dictate
the
maximum
terms
of
the
obligations
for
the
bonds.
There
were
a
few
of
those
I
had
to
employ
a
little
guess:
work
on,
and
I've
reached
out
to
department,
heads
or
the
people
requesting
those
particular
bonds.
C
So
you
know
hopefully
I'll
be
able
to
get
a
clearer
sense
from
them
which
subsection
of
local
finance
law
section
11
applies,
that's
a
little
technical,
sometimes
so
I
made
educated
guesses
but
may
have
to
adjust
some
of
those
and
then,
with
regard
to
ordinances,
34
through
41,
I
didn't
receive
signed,
completed
bond
authorization
requests
forms
in
time
on
those
to
get
them
out
on
the
agenda.
So
I
drafted
the
ordinances
put
the
ordinances
in
the
support
legislation,
in
the
expectation
that
I
will
be
receiving
the
completed
bond.
C
Treasurer
bond
authorization
numbers
and
the
treasurer's
project
numbers
on
a
few
of
those
ordinances,
but
I
should
be
receiving
those
from
the
budget
office
soon
and
then
there
were
two
corrections
I
noticed
so
far.
Unfortunately,
in
73
pages
of
legislation
there
were
bound
to
be
one
or
two
things,
despite
my
best
proofreading
efforts
in
ordinance,
27
102
20,
which
is
the
ordinance
that
will
eventually
officially
adopt
the
budget
section.
One
refers
to
fiscal
year,
2020
that
should
say
fiscal
year
2021
and
then
on
the
support
legislation.
C
Just
the
first
section
where
it's
laying
out
you
know
the
table
of
contents.
I
guess,
if
you
will,
it
does
say:
ordinance,
35,
102.20,
r,
of
course,
that
r
shouldn't
be
there.
That
should
just
be
35
10220.
C
B
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
williams,
and
that
can
be
done
in
the
finance
committee
when
they're
being
discussed
so
okay.
Well,
thank
you
for
for
the
update.
B
Okay.
So.
D
Although
kelly,
if
I
can
just
know
you
know
to
some
extent,
if,
if
there's
anything
that
he
can
update
and
and
solidify
you
know
before
monday's
meeting,
he
can
certainly
give
us
revised
versions
for
us
to
do
so
that
the
finance
committee
doesn't
have
to
do
all
those
amendments
right.
C
And
I
hope
to
be
able
to
do
that,
councilwoman
on
at
least
a
few
of
the
ordinances
I
should
be
able
to
to
cut
down
on
the
number
of
amendments
needed.
Hopefully,.
B
Okay,
so
we
have
two
public
hearings:
yeah,
just
two
public
hearings:
we
have
the
budget,
the
2021
proposed
budget
hearing
and
also
a
budget
hearing
on
ordinance,
1791
9120.
B
That's
mr
hoey's
ordinance
on
at
our
meeting
on
monday,
we'll
be
taking
up
mr
hoey's
ordinance
first,
obviously,
because
the
budget
ordinance
will
take
a
a
greater
amount
of
time
to
discuss
so
we'll
take
that
that
first,
we'll
have
those
public
hearings
about
the
law
as
hell
on
under
local
laws,
they're
held
under
ordinances
introduced
and
now
I'll
kind
of
bunch
a
couple
together,
ordinance,
26,
102
20
by
myself.
B
That's
for
right
away
at
around
75
livingston
avenue
that
we
we
have
to
approve
it's
going
to
go
to
finance
it's
it's
already,
distillering
a
general
distillery
down
there
that
that'll
be
entertained
or
taken
up
in
finance.
So
we
can
discuss
that
further,
okay
and
then
next
for
the
bonding
ordinances
that
relate
to
the
budget
and
I
can
go
through
each
one
or
I
can
just
kind
of
go
because
it's
bonding
ordinance
or
excuse
me
ordinance,
27
102
20
to
or
would
you
prefer?
B
A
E
B
Yes,
so
orders
27
102
220
is
the
first
bonding
ordinance
and
the
the
one
that's
adopting
the
budget
through
ordinance,
41,
102
20
or
the
bonding
ordinances
for
this
year
and
they'll
be
taken
up
in
the
finance
committee.
G
C
B
C
D
We,
if
I
can
just
get
clarification
jenny,
for
example,
when
we
meet
mara
with
apd
and
afd,
will
we
be
going
over
the
bond
ordinances
at
that
time?
That
was.
E
E
If
council
members
feel
like
we,
I
mean
it's
going
to
be
tight
to
be
able
to
go
through
the
bonding
ordinances
as
well,
so
it's
going
to,
unfortunately
they
might
need
to
come
back
in,
but
ideally
yes,
I
don't
think
any
of
us
want
to
add
on
extra
meetings.
But
if
we
need
to
do
that
to
get
through
all
the
bonding
ordinances,
then
we
need
to.
D
We
also
have
the
the
issue
with
them
for
some
of
the
resolutions
for
the
reserve
funds,
for
example,
the
the
police
department,
which
is
really
a
cash
payment
for
the
police,
cars
which.
E
I'm
thrilled
about
yeah
yeah,
I
mean
I
I
agree
with
your
email.
I
don't
my
and
of
course,
my
familiarity
with
the
capital
reserve
fund
is
more
from
a
school
budget
perspective
which
is
different,
but
it's
not
it's
still
the
same
concept
in
a
municipality.
I
don't
it
kind
of
defies
the
whole
purpose
of
having
a
capital
reserve
fund.
If
it's
not
a
reserve,
it's
just
you're
just
paying
for
it,
then.
So
I
I
don't
know
why
we
jump
through
those
hoops
right
right.
D
So
brett
just
to
make
you
aware
of
you
know
the
thing
that
we're
questioning
is.
We
have
these
resolutions
that
create
reserve
funds,
and
I
know
that
the
budget
specified
that
money
was
coming
out
of
a
reserve
fund,
but
it's
really
money
that
is
being
spent
out
of
you
know
essentially
cash
out
of
this
out
of
this
budget
in
the
same
way
as
we're
paying
salaries
or
buying
office
equipment,
etc.
D
So
we're
a
little
puzzled
as
to
why
we're
jumping
through
the
hoop
of
making
that
a
come
out
of
a
reserve
fund,
especially
since
our
city
charter
says
that
any
capital,
any
allocation
of
funding
for
a
capital
improvement
it
continues
for
it
does
is,
is
not.
Would
it
forget
the
name
of
the
word,
but
it
doesn't
end
at
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year.
C
The
request
for
the
reserve
funds
to
be
created
and
put
on
on
the
support
legislation
came
from
the
budget
office,
so
I
suppose
that's
a
conversation
with
them.
E
I'll
be
reaching
out
to
mike
as
well,
but
yeah.
I
think
judy
has
a
good
point.
If
you
don't
mind
noting
that,
but
I
I'll
also
be
reaching
out
to
mike
on
it
to
get
a
clarification.
C
B
Okay,
that
was
ordinances
on
our
active
calendar
under
ordnance,
is
hell
item
number
13,
which
is
mr
hoey's
ordinance?
It's.
It
is
on
our
active
calendar,
but
we
do
we
are
waiting
and,
mr
pachardo,
can
you
just
speak
to
the
the
fact
that
we're
waiting
waiting
for
the
county
planning
and
the
planning
board
correct.
I
To
do
yes,
so
I
just
I
actually
just
went
to
the
agenda
of
the
county
planning
board
so
tomorrow
we
both
have
a
public
hearing
from
the
planning
board
for
the
city
county
board
and
then
tomorrow,
as
well,
is
the
county
planning
board
as
well
who's
having
a
hearing
on
it.
I
So
I
then
I
should
get
the
decision
within
a
couple
like
within
48
hours
after
that,
and
then
we
would,
I
would
forward
them
all
to
the
council
members
and
then
we
can
most
likely
have
a
vote
after
our
public
hearing
on
monday.
B
Okay,
yeah
and
and
since
it
was
sent
to
committee,
it
hasn't
been
taken
up.
Yet
this
is
a
redo
of
mr
hoey's
last
ordinances.
You
know
involving
the
veto
override
and
all
of
that,
so
we
redid
it.
So
what
may
occur
is
I
might
end
up
discharging
it
from
mr
conte.
I
see
you.
G
Sometimes
my
hand
goes
out
of
frame,
I'm
still
confused
as
to
why
under
state
law,
this
is
a
required
referral
to
the
planning
board.
I
I
wholeheartedly
agree
with
you,
mr
conte.
I
was
advised
by
corporation
council
that
it
had
to
go
to
the
county
planning
board.
I
wholly
disagreed,
but
to
get
it
moving.
I
got
it
on
the
agenda.
Okay,.
G
B
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
mr
o'brien.
F
Yeah-
and
this
has
kind
of
an
unusual
history
because
there
was
actually
a
committee-
I
know
brett
attended
a
lot
of
the
meetings
dave
gallon
and
I
forget
who
else
where
the
where,
in
effect,
this
committee
re-what
re-authored
tom's
ordinance
in
a
way
that
they
felt
was
satisfactory
to
to
the
planning
board,
even
though
the
planning
board
didn't
actually
convene
as
part
of
that
review
group.
F
So
I
assume
there's
some
way
of
getting
that
message
out
to
the
planning
board,
brett,
that
this
is
no
different
than
this
whole
series
of
negotiations
that
were
done
with
tom
maui,
so
that
we
wouldn't
override
the
mayor's
veto,
and
this
this
product
really
has
been
going
over
by
corp
council
and
a
whole
bunch
of
people,
and
it
shouldn't
really
require
if
any
de
novo
review
by
the
by
the
planning
board
correct.
Do
you
have
an
opinion
on
that.
C
Yeah
first
I'll
address
richard's
points
with.
A
C
But
if
I'm
remembering
section
239m
correctly
off
the
top
of
my
head,
it
does
say
that
any
I'm
unfortunately
paraphrasing
here,
I
don't
have
it
pulled
up
in
front
of
me,
but
any
zoning
ordinance
that
would
affect
a
variety
of
types
of
property
within
the
city,
including
property,
that's
next
to
a
state
highway
or
next
to
a
border
with
another
municipality.
C
G
That
would
mean
that
every
single
amendment
that
we
make
has
to
go
to
the
planning
board.
I
think
the
intent
of
that
section,
as
I
recall,
relates
to
when
you're
rezoning
a
property
or
containing
maybe
changing
rules
within
a
district,
but
that's
a
real
broad
interpretation
which
we've
never
used
before
in
all
my
time
on
the
council.
Until
now,
okay,.
C
And
you
know
there
is
another
section
of
section
another
subsection
of
239
m-
that
states
that
we
can
come
to
an
agreement
with
the
county
planning
board
about
things
that
do
or
do
not
have
to
go
to
them
for
the
review.
So
you
know,
potentially
we
can
get
clarification
from
the
county
on
whether
situations
like
this
in
the
future
need
to.
I
A
I
It
needed
to
go
to
39
under
239
and
to
go
over
there,
but
in
the
end,
it's
I
will
say
this
out
of
due
course:
it's
fine
because
it
worked
with
the
timing,
but
I
agree.
C
And
council
member
brian,
could
you
state
your
question
again
for
me?
I'm
sorry.
F
Yeah
this
had
an
unusual
history.
There
was
a
working
group
which
you
were
part
of
and
amy
levine
and
brad
glass
and
dave
gallon.
Oh
right.
C
F
That
working
group
basically
went
through
a
word
for
word
of
this
ordinance
and
the
whole
thing
was
done
as
an
effort
to
prevent
tom's
original
ordinance
from
going
to
an
override
vote.
So
I
mean
it's
kind
of
a
hybrid
process,
but
I
certainly
hope,
even
though
the
planning
board
didn't
actually
sit
down
as
planning
board
during
that
those
sessions,
I
would
assume
that
there's
some
way
of
eliminating
an
awful
lot
of
work
and
by
letting
them
know
that
this
is
an
agreement
that
has
been
struck
with
corp
counsel,
with
planning
department.
F
C
Yeah,
I
I
have
not
personally
spoken
to
the
planning
board,
but
I
believe
amy
from
my
office
has
and
has
communicated
our
office's
approval
of
of
the
new
ordinance
to
the
planning
board
and
I
believe,
as
far
as
I
know,
the
mayor's
office
has
done
so
as
well.
E
And
I
I
can
just
follow
up
on
that
mike
I
I
spoke
with,
and
I
believe
kelly
did
as
well-
spoke
in
depth
with
dave
with
dave
gallon
on
this,
and
they
this
was
the
mayor's
office's
thought
process
and
they're
fully
supportive
of
it
moving
forward.
E
They
understood
the
desire
to
vote
on
this.
Since
I
mean
this
isn't.
This
is
based
on
legislation
that
we've
been
working
on
for
a
very
long
time.
Tom
had
this
legislation
for
what
18
months
tom
and
before
we
went
through
that
whole
process,
where
everyone
was
in
the
room
and
we
went
line
by
line
nearly
letter
by
letter,
so
it
was
so
it's
not
a
brand
new
thing
and
the
mayor's
office
recognized
that
and
also
recognized
the
desire
to
move
forward
with
it
quickly.
E
So
this
was
something
that
they
came
up
with
to
make
sure
that
corp
council's
office
felt
comfortable,
that
we
were
following
the
letters
of
the
law
and
and
but
we
could
still
move
forward
in
a
timely
manner.
G
Yeah
I
mean
this.
This
drives
me
crazy,
because
this
is
based
the
plan.
The
planning
board
again
already
considered
this
issue.
They
made
a
recommendation.
The
council
is
basically
acting
is
taking
their
recommendation
into
consideration.
Acting
on
that,
so
I
don't
know
why
it
goes
back
to
the
planning
board
for
the
planning
board
to
make
their
same
recommendation
again.
You
know
once
they
make
a
recommendation,
we
don't
have
to
go
back
to
them
and
confirm
that.
Are
we
consistent
with
your
recommendation?
B
Right
yeah,
yeah
agreed
and
my
understanding,
and
just
from
talking
with
mr
gallon,
with
both
myself
and
miss
farrell,
it
was
this
was
going
to
be
an
expedited
process.
I.
G
J
J
Richard
conte
said
it
very
too
often
we
we
take
action
and
send
stuff
to
various
departments
and
count
county
agencies
out
of
courtesy,
and
we
don't
have
to
so.
I
don't
want
us
to
start
a
practice
where
some
of
these
departments
are
starting
to
ask.
Why
did
we
send
it
to
them?
So
again,
just
consistency,
let's
be
consistent.
If
we
don't
have
to
send
a
specific
document
to
an
agency,
we
shouldn't
we
just
shouldn't,
because
it's
delaying
the
stolen
time.
J
Individuals
have
legislation
that
they've
been
working
on
for
years
and
they
would
like
to
see
it
move
forward.
So
I
just
want
us
to
be
consistent,
so
we
don't
confuse
some
other
agencies,
that's
released
to
why
they
didn't
receive
a
specific
document
where
we
didn't
really
have
to
send
it
to
them
anyway.
B
Next,
we're
on
to
resolutions
introduced
the
first
by
ms
farrell
for
finance
is
90
102
20.
I
R,
I'm
sorry
kelly,
I
didn't
mean
I
don't
mean
interrupt
right,
because
we're
still
we're
just
entering
resolutions.
Mr
inani
expressed
his
ordinance
14
7
220.
That
was
that
I
sent
out
earlier
today
to
be
voted
on
monday.
Just
wanted
to
put
that
on
there
that
will
be
amended
onto
the
active
calendar.
G
I
F
F
B
Okay,
we'll
move
that
that
forth
for
a
vote
on
monday
can.
G
I
ask
a
question
on
that
one
this.
This
includes
the
notification
through
c
click
fix
was
that
I
don't
remember
was
that
discussed
in
committee.
I
J
We
pass
this
legislation,
I
think
they're
going
to
be
a
little
bit
more
compliant,
but
yeah.
I
G
D
Richard,
if
I
can
just
comment
that
one
of
the
things
that
we
found
out
in
the
discussions
is
that
dgs
isn't
even
finding
people
up
to
the
500
dollar,
fine
that
exists,
so
it's
kind
of
something
that
they
do
a
little
bit
of
a
graduated.
D
You
know
when
somebody,
you
know
second
or
third
time
when
they're
violating
the
statute
so
yeah.
I.
J
B
Right,
okay
and
so
just
to
to
make
the
adjustment
from
the
active
calendar
I
jumped.
Mr
holies
was
number
13.
Mr
inani's
is
actually
number
10,
so
that
can
circle
number
10,
also
in
your
agenda
that
will
be
taking
up
on
monday
all
right.
Those.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So,
on
to
resolutions
introduced
again,
90
102
20
by
miss
farrell
for
finance
will
be
going
to
finance
resolution,
eliminating
a
full-time
position
in
the
treasurer's
office.
B
That'll
keep
going
to
finance
okay
next
resolution,
91
102
20
yards
resolution,
common
council
declaring
october
20th
through
the
25th,
is
free
speech
week.
We've
done
this
before
all
members,
I
believe
in
the
past
have
been
co-sponsors
on
that.
Will
that
everyone?
Okay
with
that
okay
and
there'll,
be
a
pass
again.
Next
is
resolution
92-102
20
declaring
october
19th
the
community
media
day.
We've
done
this
before
also
mr
nani
you'll
get
to
speak
that
night,
of
course,
but
members
all
members
co-sponsors
on
this
one.
B
Okay,
so
we'll
okay
that'll
be
a
pass
next
93
102
20
by
me
for
public
safety.
It's
nairobi,
vivez
reappointing
her
as
a
member
of
community
police
review
board.
She
was
it
and
now
the
committee
recently
got
approved.
So
there
was
only
a
couple
of
months
span
of
time
in
there
between
her
approval
and
the
expiration
and
and
it
expired
and
so
she's
being
reappointed.
We
don't
need
to
bring
her
back
in
so
that'll
be
a
pass
94
102
20r
resolution,
mr
nani,
again
myself,
declaring
october
20th
digital
media.
B
G
Can
I
just
ask
if,
if
a
member
has
multiple
resolutions
that
they're
passing
in
one
night,
can
we
place
some
limitations
on
the
amount
of
time
that
member
speaks
on
the
resolution?.
G
A
B
All
three
resolutions
themselves:
okay,
next
resolution,
95
102,
20
r,
mr
inani
resolution-
to
support
the
city.
While
we
make
an
election
day,
a
paid
holiday
that
will
go
to
finance,
but
members,
thoughts
on
that
go
ahead.
Richard.
G
I
mean
it's
sort
of,
like
almost
voting
on
election
day
is
becoming
obsolete,
with
we're
really
moving
to
no
excuse
absentee
balloting.
We
have
it
right
now
this
year,
at
least
and
with
the
expansion
of
early
voting.
I
I
don't.
I
don't
understand,
why
would
make
election
day
a
paid
holiday
where
there
is
so
many
more
options
now
for
people
to
vote
and
as.
B
So,
that's
why
the
referral
to
finance
for
for
further
discussion.
J
What
I'm
saying
is
that
it
is
currently
a
floating
holiday
for
for
city
workers
to
make
a
decision
if
they
want
to
use
that
day.
So
again,
this
is
already
existing,
but
it's
just
to
kind
of
encourage
and
support
those
type
of
actions
that
the
state
has
taken
and
also
the
federal
government
seemed
like
that's
the
direction
that
they're
going.
J
But
if
jr,
if
you
want
to
speak
on
the
fiscal
impact.
J
Because
I
I
I
was
under
pressure
that
it
won't
be
any
fiscal
fiscal
impact,
but
richard
brought
it
up.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
had
any.
G
If
you're,
it
would
not
apply
to
collective
bargaining
agreements,
but
when
we
do
this
thing
all.
B
Bargaining
agreements
right
and
I'm
sure
I
don't
imagine
that
with
everything
that
go
on
that's
going
on
it'll-
be
ready
for
this
year,
yeah
everything
going
on
in
finance,
but
that's
that's
where
it's
gonna
go.
So,
okay!
Next,
we'll
just
group
these
together.
It's
those
resolutions
for
the
capital
reserve
funds,
it's
96,
102
20
through
100
102
20,
creating
the
reserve
funds.
A
Kelly,
can
I
say
something
about
that:
are
we
gonna
have
somebody
that's
gonna
follow
on
those
reserve
funds.
You
know
once
they're
established,
you
know
how
how
that
just
follow
up
on
the
purpose
and
making
sure
that
these
funds
start
hitting
where
they
need
to
go.
I
think
there's
a
need
for
that.
A
K
E
These
are
you're
absolutely
right
that
a
normal
capital
reserve
fund-
that
is
the
function
that
it's
something
that
is
created
that
then
you
use
in
future
years
for
capital
projects
but
for
some
reason,
they're
creating
them
to
use
this
year,
which
doesn't
exactly
make
sense.
E
So
we're
we're
going
to
find
some
more
we're
going
to
find
out
more
about
it
to
see
exactly
why
they're
creating
capital
reserve
fund
for
funds
that
they're
using
immediately
because
you're
right
like
that's,
that
would
be
the
normal
what
people
would
do
and
what
there
should
be
some
sort
of
oversight
and
watchdog
view
on
exactly
how
the
money
is
being
spent,
but
it's
being
immediately
spent.
So
so
we'll
get
more
to
the
bottom
of
it.
Definitely
before
finance
committee
meetings,
but
it's
a
slightly
different
situation.
A
C
And
I
would
just
point
out,
in
response
to
council
member
johnson's
question
that
the
language
of
the
resolution
establishing
the
funds
it
does
state
that
the
treasurer's
office
would
render
to
the
council
a
detailed
report
of
the
operation
and
condition
of
the
reserve
fund
at
the
end
of
each
fiscal
year.
C
Yeah
possibly-
and
I
think
I'm
looking
at
the
resolution
again
and
I
think
they
have
to
there's
some
level
of
council
approval
for
any
expenditure
yeah
here
we
go.
No
expenditure
shall
be
made
from
this
reserve
fund
without
the
approval
of
the
council
and
such
additional
actions
or
proceedings,
as
may
be
required
by
section
c
of
the
general
municipal
law.
So
the
council
has
some
oversight
as
well.
When
monies
get
transferred
out
of
the
fund.
G
G
Would
this,
but
would
the
with
tran
and
I
haven't
really
looked
into
the
language?
Would
transfers
out
of
this
reserve
fund
have
to
go
through
ena
and
then
count
as
a
transfer
against
that
four
percent
limit
question
and
I
haven't
again,
I
haven't
looked
closely
at
the
language
and
that's
just
an
issue
out
there
and
jr
kind
of
like
sparked
me
on
that.
One.
C
The
resolution
itself,
I
don't
think
addresses
that
particular
issue:
councilmember
conte,
so
I
I
don't
have
a
good.
D
B
B
B
You're,
muted
you're
saying
wrap
it
up.
I
can't
okay,
all
right,
so
just
that's
the
that's
the
end
of
the
agenda
danielle
sent
out
our
public
comment
line.
Did
you
all
see
the
email
with
a
new
contact
number
for
for
folks
leaving
public
comment?
B
I
see
some
heads,
but
I
don't
see
all
it's
a
record
kind
of
a
an
answering
machine
where
they
can
record
up
to
five
minutes
of
public
comment
which
we
could
play
at
a
meeting.
I
would
appreciate
if
you,
if
members
would
push
that
out,
it
would
really
be
helpful
in
trying
to
capture
more
more
public
comment
and
more
public
input.
B
Also,
I
know
we're
out
of
our
executive
session,
but
the
whole
that
lawsuit
thing,
no
no
comments
or
the
the
press
we're
we're,
steering
clear
the
press,
any
anything
related
to
that
has
to
go
through
jr
or
the
piersky
law.
Firm,
we're
clear
on
that
right.
Everyone.
H
No,
can
I
say
something
kelly.
I
read
that
editorial
and
my
blood
pressure
went
up
and
I
almost
fired
off
a
letter.
So
I'm
glad
I
didn't,
and
actually
I
met
judy
on
monday
and
you
know
we
talked
about
it,
but
I
when
something
like
that
happens.
If
we
should
not
say
anything,
I'd
appreciate
just
a
little
more
of
a
heads
up,
because
I
almost
did
fire
something
off.
I
was
so
upset
reading
it.
So
that's
all!
H
B
Yeah,
so
unless
anyone
has
anything
else,.
F
A
J
Yeah,
no,
I
did
see
the
press
release
that
was
sent
out
today
and
I
just
want
to
say
for
the
record:
there
are
some
members
of
our
you
know
community
that
prefer
to
send
letters
for
the
clerk
to
read
it.
So
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear.
You
know
those
who
are
not
watching
that
the
clerk
will
no
longer
read
your
public
comments.
That's
sent
in
is
that
correct,
danielle.
K
B
And
so
we've
had
this
discussion
before
we
are
at
this
point
in
our
regular
meetings
we
didn't,
but
after
discussion
with
members
over
the
last
couple
of
months.
Regarding
this,
the
agreement
was
that
during
we'd
split
the
public
comment,
if
folks
were
in
in
the
room,
they
get
to
go
in
the
first
section
of
public
comment
and
then
anything
that
needed
to
be
read
would
be
read
in
the
second
public
comment
session.
Second,
half.
J
A
Yeah
I
would
like
I
wanted
to
say
I
want
to
talk
about
what
took
place
in
my
neighborhood.
Today
we
were
giving
two-day
notice,
three-day
notice
about
the
city
retting
out
our
community
to
a
production
company,
the
the
communication,
the
he
say
she
say
stuff.
It
is
terrible.
A
We
should
expect
more
from
the
mayor's
office
for
a
a
part
of
town
that
that
has
been
feeling
neglected
for
a
long
time
and
and
for
us
to
be
told
that
you
know
they
paid
to
be
able
to
do
this,
and
you
know
for
the
the
solutions
to
be
to
have
people
walk
five
blocks
to
park
their
you
know,
to
park
their
car
and
have
to
walk
five
blocks
home
where
in
every
direction
it
includes
a
hill.
We
have
elderly,
we
have
a
school
over
there.
A
We
have
immigrants
that
don't
you
know
that
that
are
struggling
with
the
english
language,
so
so
for
people
to
wake
up
and
they
couldn't
find
their
cars
and
just
for
how
sloppy
sloppy
and
poorly
it
was
executed.
I
don't
think
I
think
that
we
should
have
a
conversation,
because
our
residents
deserve
better
than
to
just
be
told
that
the
the
production
company
jumped
the
gun.
A
So
if
the
production
company
didn't
put
out
the
paperwork,
we
wouldn't
have
never
known
that
they
were
coming
to
our
neighborhood,
and
so
you
know
just
the
way.
This
whole
thing
was
handled.
It
just
put
an
already
bad
taste
to
a
bad
taste.
That's
been
in
our
mouth
for
a
long
time
and
I
and
I
think
that
the
residents
deserve
better.
A
I
don't
think
that
the
production
company
handled
other
neighborhoods
in
albany
the
same
way
and-
and
I
just
don't
think
that
it
was
responsible
by
the
city.
A
So
moving
forward,
something
should
be
put
in
place,
so
people
don't
have
to
wake
up
and
and
go
through
the
experiences
that
they
did
today.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
if
no
one
has
anything
else
motion
to
adjourn.
E
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
note
the
the
during
our
leadership
meeting
the
mayor
said
that
they're
going
to
be
having
a
command
center
during
election
day
and
that
they're
just
starting
to
plan
ahead
for
possible
issues.
There
might
not
be
any
issues
that
might
be
fine
and,
of
course,
the
board
of
elections
is
a
county
wide
thing,
but
she
just
within
the
city
to
make
sure
things
go
smoothly
within
the
city
that
they're
definitely
looking
at
that
and
starting
to
plan
for
that.
E
E
Also,
although
we
don't
have
any
firm
information,
yet
on
halloween
there,
they
are
talking
about
doing
events
in
some
parks
across
the
city
powell's
going
to
be
doing
something
in
washington
park.
The
boys
and
girls
club
will
be
doing
something
on
site.
The
mayor
said
that
she
anything
that
is
done.
E
She
wanted
to
happen
in
daylight
and
involved
the
community,
so
they
are
looking
at
different
parks
to
actually
kind
of
set
up
a
trick-or-treating
situation,
so
different
neighbors
would
be
able
to
go
to
the
parks
and
they'd
be
looking
from,
like
you
know,
three
to
five
or
three
to
four
something
like
that
during
the
day
where
the
kids
in
that
neighborhood
could
actually
do
like
kind
of
a
socially
distance
trick-or-treating.
But
it's
not
going
the
house
to
house.
She
also
said
that
it's
there's
not
going
to
be
a
ban
on
trick-or-treating.
E
If
there
are
neighborhoods
that
want
to
continue
to,
they
can
figure
out
a
way
that
they
can
do
it
socially
distance.
But
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
are
not
comfortable
doing
trick-or-treating
at
their
house,
but
still
want
to.
You
know,
still
want
to
participate.
So
this
they're
looking
at
options
to
kind
of
enable
that
so
we
should
be
hearing
if
there's
going
to
be
something
in
your
ward
or
close
to
your
ward,
you'll
likely
be
hearing
from
the
parks
department
to
talk
about
logistics
with
that
again.