►
Description
The February 18, 2021 agenda was discussed.
A
Okay,
all
right,
I
think
that's
good,
so
recording
welcome
to
our
wednesday
february
10th
caucus
work
session
for
the
common
council.
Jr.
Can
you
just
actually
it's
only
one
screen?
I
can
do
it
so
present.
We
have
council
members,
o'brien
fahey,
conti,
igo,
anani,
hoey,
pharaoh,
robinson
ballerin,
along
with
our
staff,
senior
legislative
aide,
michelle
andre
research,
council,
j.r,
piccardo
city
clerk,
clerk
of
the
council,
daniel
gillespie,
as
well
as
brett
williams,
corp,
council
and
darius
sean
farr.
B
C
Okay,
I
can
speak
now.
Yes,
all
right.
I
want
to
thank
the
council
for
for
getting
this
on
the
on
the
agenda
so
quickly,
and
I
you
know
anything
you
can
do
to
pass
it
as
quickly
as
possible
would
be
very
helpful.
What
happened
was
you
know?
Obviously
we
get
questions
all
the
time
about
late
fees
and
waiving
late
fees
on
property
taxes.
C
There
really
isn't
much
in
state
law.
However,
the
governor
last
weekend
signed
a
bill
that
permitted
localities
to
to
put
off
late
fees
on
property
taxes
for
up
to
four
months,
and
so
it
was
passed
and
it
was
passed
by
the
legislature
assigned
to
law
last
saturday,
the
30th,
and
when
I
found
out
about
it,
which
was
about
three
days
before
it
was
signed,
I
wanted
to
see
what
it
was.
We
could
do
to
get
on
the
agenda
and
see
if
we
can
actually
pass
this.
C
It
requires
passage
by
both
the
city
which
is
on
your
agenda
and
the
county
as
well,
because
the
county
is
the
taxing
authority
in
in
in
albany
county
for
all
the
municipalities,
the
county
put
it
on
their
agenda
this
past
monday
night
and
so
they're
working
on
getting
that
passed
as
well.
I
don't
think
there's
any
opposition.
C
I
certainly
hope.
There's
no
opposition
on
the
council.
All
it
really
does
is
move
essentially
the
the
due
date
now
for
property
taxes
is
going
to
be
june
1st.
If
this
is
if
this
is
passed
and
a
lot
of
people
is
I've,
you
know.
Obviously
the
first
question
is
well.
If
we
do
that,
how's
that
going
to
affect
our
our
cash
flow,
are
we
going
to
get
taxes
in
or
not?
And
the
answer
is
you
know,
because
the
due
date
has
already
passed
for
taxes.
C
We've
received
the
bulk
of
our
taxes
already
and
in
fact,
we're
actually
from
a
cash
flow
perspective,
we're
actually
ahead
of
last
year
because
we
built
the
waste
collection
fees
on
the
property
tax
bills
this
year.
So
we
have
an
extra
about
three
million
dollars
in
cash
on
hand
that
we
waited
to
collect
over
the
course
of
of
last
year
because
the
bills
went
out
later
so
that
that
has
made
up
for
what
is
right
now
about.
C
I
I'm
estimating
about
a
500
000
to
800
000
reduction
in
actual
taxes
collected
compared
to
last
year.
It's
a
little
bit
difficult
because
not
everything's
been
been
input
in
the
system
yet,
and
information
from
last
year
is
actually
is
all
caught
up
with
this
information
we
have
for
this
year,
it's
not
all
caught
up,
but
that
being
said,
I'm
not
concerned
about
cash
flow.
I
think
we've
had
actually.
C
You
know
it's
pretty
simple
for
all
the
for
all.
The
phone
calls
that
we
field
on
a
regular
basis,
certainly
this
year
on
the
waste
collection,
fees,
adding
them
onto
the
bills
and
also
every
year
around
this
time
of
year,
when
when
people
are
unable
to
pay
their
property
taxes
or
ask
they,
can
you
know,
pay
late
and
waive
the
interest?
It's
really
making
life
for
us
a
little
bit
easier
to
say?
Yes,
we
can.
C
I
want
to
not
send
them
back
to
people
and
just
basically,
you
know
catch
them.
You
know
as
as
timely
again
I
I
think,
there's
not
a
huge.
It's,
not
a
huge
revenue
hit
to
the
city
from
the
cash
flow
perspective.
We're
we're
doing
very
well
right
now
on
the
tax
collections,
because
the
waste
collection
fees
and
the
only
thing
that
might
impact
is
interest
that
we
otherwise
would
collect
on
on
late
late
payments
for
tax
bills.
C
But
we've
spoken
with
with
mike
and
you
know,
budget
and
it
might
be
a
100
to
200
thousand
dollar
hit
interest
collected,
but
because
and
partially
because
of
the
installment
program
that
we
implemented
last
year.
We
actually
had
a
banner
year
last
year
in
in
late
fees
collected
from
individuals,
so
we
almost
cracked
500
000,
which
was
about
100.
C
C
It
wouldn't
be
too
late.
You
know
we'll
we'll
manage
it.
Just
administratively
makes
it
makes
it
easier
for
us.
If
we,
if
we
can
get
it
done
by
end
of
the
month,
then
we
can
input
the
bills
quicker
sooner
rather
than
later,
but
if
march
1
is
the
date
that
that
works
for
you
guys
we'll
we'll
make
it
work.
D
C
D
C
Whatever
you
know,
whatever
we
need
to
do,
we'll
we'll
be
happy
to
do.
I
know
that
we're
running
the
same
thing
with
the
county
and
they're.
You
know
they
have
the
same
issues
that
you're
bringing
up
richard
and
we're
trying
to
figure
out
whatever
ways
we
can
do
to
to
get
around
it.
You
know:
do
do
a
public
hearing
as
soon
as
possible,
notice
it
as
soon
as
possible
and
get
get
it
passed
as
soon
as
possible.
C
F
G
F
Our
families,
you
know
whether
it's
renters
or
property
owners,
they're
all
struggling
and
government,
is
here
to
help
you
know
to
help
individuals
help
themselves.
This
is
not
a
handout.
This
is
just
delaying
it
for
until
june,
and
I
strongly
want
to
recommend
that
we
move
as
fast
as
quickly
as
we
can
and
definitely
support
what
it
might
be.
A
co-sponsor
on
this
legislation.
A
H
C
Correct
yeah,
but
they
they
they
rule,
leavened
it
for
monday
night
to
get
it
on
so
that
takes.
You
know
that
that
shows
a
great
deal
of
of,
I
think
unanimous
consent,
I'm
not
mistaken,
but
regardless
there
doesn't
seem
to
be
any
opposition
at
the
county
level.
Either
we
kind
of
work
through
whatever
issues
there
might
be
on
cash
flow,
and
things
like
that.
C
H
C
C
I
think
the
real
we
we've
been
more
diligent
in
our
office
of
trying
to
you
know,
get
out
unpaid
tax
bills
to
people
correcting
addresses
finding
out
where
something
has
changed
and
getting
the
bills
in
people's
hands.
I
think
between
the
two
of
those
things.
That's
really,
I
think
you
saw
the
effect
last
year.
We
had
really,
I
think,
when
I
first
got
here
about
250
thousand
dollars.
C
Well,
what
if
the
effect
of
it
was
essentially
to
delay
the
delinquency
period
to
start
instead
of
you
know,
february
1st
to
june
first,
and
so
the
four
percent
that
is
charged
in
february
right
now
for
delinquent
tax
bill
would
not
be
charged
in
june.
Then
one
one
one
thereafter,
so
the
maximum
impact
would
be
a
loss
of
basically
four
percent
interest
of
for
the
for
the
four
months
that
is
delayed
and
that
come
up
essentially
come
off
the
back
end.
C
H
A
I
I
A
A
A
A
A
F
I
just
want
to
thank
my
my
colleagues
and
also
members
of
the
committee
of
the
planet
committee
for
moving
this
out
of
committee
and
just
bringing
it
up
to
the
floor.
There's
been
discussions
over
the
past
year
about
providing
access
to
the
internet
and
also
the
digital
divide
that
exists
here,
and
I'm
glad
that
my
colleagues
and
are
willing
to
act
on
this
important
issue.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
my
colleague
for
the
support
on
this
local
law.
A
D
A
A
D
Yeah,
so
this
actually
is
a
resolution
that
the
prior
council
passed
back
in
2008
and
it
would
it
asks
for
an
amendment
to
the
public
authorities
law
related
to
the
albany
water
board
and
water
finance
agency
to
provide
that
the
mayor's
appointments
to
those
boards
be
subject
to
council
confirmation,
because
it's
a
state-created
board.
It
would
require
action
by
the
state
legislature
I'll
note
that,
in
terms
of
other
state
boards,
such
as
the
parking
authority
and
also
the
convention
center
authority,
we
do
have
confirmation
authority
for
those
appointments.
D
So
it's
trying
to
catch
of
one
real
remaining
state
authority
that
we
don't
have
confirmation
authority
and,
of
course,
we
directly
appoint
to
the
ida.
So
again,
this
did
pass
back
in
2008
was
sent
to
our
legislative
reps.
At
the
time
it
was
assembly.
Members
were
jack,
mcninny
and
ron
canistrari
mayor
jennings
was
the
mayor.
It
was.
D
There
was
no
action.
We
also
sent
them
a
draft
bill
as
well.
So
I
think
I'd
like
to
try
to
you
know,
take
a
stab
at
it
again.
We
have
different
assembly
members
and
see
what
happens
so.
It
did
pass
unanimously.
Last
time
it's
pretty
straightforward,
so
if
everyone's
okay
I'd
like
to
try
to
pass
it
on
thursday,
next,
not
this
thursday
on
the
18th.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
conte.
Okay,
next
is
a
resolution
for
reappointment
of
jeff
sperry.
As
a
member
of
the
parking
authority
has
he
been
before
he
hasn't
right?
Okay,
he's
got
it
so
I
referred
to
planning
to
have
a
conversation
with
him
before
the
the
reappointment
that'll
be
by
miss
fahey,
going
to
planning
do.
L
E
Yeah
there's
along
the
books
of
albany
and
from
what
I'm
hearing
from
some
old
timers
it
was
put
in
by
corning
back
with
when
the
times
union
had
a
big
strike
because
they
used
to
be
located
downtown
albany
and
they
passed
this
law
and
I
guess
the
strike
ended,
but
it
ended
up
the
times
union
moved
out
of
albany,
they
moved
to
colony
and
that's
where
they're
headquartered.
Now,
anyhow,
this
this
law
has
been
on
the
books.
We
all
know
that
it's
been
over
almost
two
and
a
half
years.
E
I
believe
the
contract
for
the
nurses.
They
have
not
gotten
any
raises,
there's
no
movement
there
and
you
know
I
can
argue
the
point
you
know.
Albany
med
is
not
starving
for
money.
It's
albany,
med
and
saint
peter's
brought
up
every
hospital
in
our
area
when
I
had
my
surgery
done
up
in
saratoga
that
hospital
is
owned
by
albany
med.
E
So,
what's
funny
is
a
lot
of
these
hospitals
that
they
brought
up,
do
have
unions
and
they
they
work
out
quite
well,
and
I've
talked
to
some
of
the
nurses
from
them
and
you
know
they're
happy
to
have
contracts
and
they
could
depend
on
a
raise.
As
we
know,
inflation
is
two
percent
a
year,
at
least
on
some
things,
and
some
things
it's
more.
If
you
go
to
lumber.
E
E
E
D
D
And
again
I
mean
we're
all
on
record
in
supporting
the
nurses
etc.
I
I
just
don't
see
this
as
applying,
and
I
mean
there
is
some
language
in
here.
Also
they
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
with
like
releasing
the
names
of
all
of
them,
the
replacement,
nurses,
the
addresses
and
some
other
things
in
there.
So
I'm
not,
I
don't
feel
comfortable
with
it.
I
don't
think
that
particular
section
of
the
code
relates
to
this
situation.
N
A
O
O
My
father
was
always
very
lenient
to
me,
but
boy
he
raised
holy
hell
with
me
back
then,
and
so
I'm
still
a
union
man
and
I
went
to
you
with
the
nurses
and
everything
here,
but
I
agree
that
this
isn't
it's
got
some
problems
with
it
and
sometimes
it
could
be
written
for
something
else.
A
separate
thing
I
mean
if
there's
a
pandemic,
okay
and
you
don't
have
enough
nurses
and
some
go
on
strike.
What
is
the
head
of
the
hospital
supposed
to
do
confined
and
thrown
into
jail
just
the
way?
G
G
G
If
councilman
hoey
is
okay
with
removing
the
language
about
people's
addresses,
you
know,
I
don't
think
we
we
need
that,
but
I'm
ok.
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
take
a
stand
with
one
of
our
biggest
employers
and
say
we're
not
afraid
of
one
of
our
biggest
employers
that
if
you
you
know,
step
beyond
the
guidelines
that
are
set
forth,
then
you
know
there
are
consequences.
G
I
think
we
should
be
ready
for
that.
I
don't
think
I
it's
not
just
the
one
day
strikes
that
they
brought
people
in
it's
the
fact
that
they
pushed
people
out
for
three
days.
They
didn't
let
people
go
back
to
work
for
three
days.
So
it's
not
just
that.
One
day
that
they
they
wanted
to,
you
know,
keep
the
hospital
going.
It's
that
they
wanted
to
humiliate
and
show
their
strength
by
not
allowing
the
nurses
to
return
back
for
three
days.
So
that
to
me
is
the
bigger
issue.
G
You
know,
because
if
you
say
you,
you
wanna,
you
wanna,
keep
your
staffing
levels
and
you
need
to
bring
people
in,
but
then
you
don't
let
people
come
back
to
work.
Then
what
you're
really
trying
to
do
is
tell
people,
oh,
if
you're,
going
to
take
a
strike
again
we're
going
to
come
back
even
harder
at
you.
So
that's
why
I
think
I
support
this.
G
E
Now
let
me
just
speak
on
that.
If
you
don't
mind,
I
was
asking
the
ordinance
itself
is
embedded
in
the
whereases,
the
resolve
to
ask
for
the
names
and
the
addresses
the
labor
council
asked
me
to
put
that
in.
I
didn't
feel
comfortable
putting
the
names
in,
but
the
reasoning
is
they
want
to
find
out
where
these
strike
breakers
came
from.
Did
they
come
from
pennsylvania?
E
Did
they
come
from
massachusetts?
We
don't
know,
we
know
they
were
bused
in
the
building.
Trades
were
at
the
hospital
and
these
buses
came
in
every
day
and
these
people
got
out,
you
know
between
shifts
and
the
other
ship
got
in
and
they
bust
them
off.
So
I
mean
this
was
an
organized
strike,
breaking
attempt
and
for
anybody
at
this
meeting-
and
you
know
this
is
a
public
meeting.
You
know
to
say
that
you
know
this:
isn't
union
busting
you're,
definitely
not
reading
the
paper
or
staying
abreast
of
things.
E
I
am
a
union
officer,
I
know
a
lot
more
than
the
average
person,
but
this
is
strike
breaking
there's
no
doubt
about
it.
They
haven't
made
a
contract
with
these
people
in
over
two
and
a
half
years
and
they
didn't
want
them
to
come
in
as
a
union.
So
you
know,
are
we
going
to
be
albany
the
union
town?
Are
we
going
to
be
hey
well
once
in
a
while
we're
a
union
town?
Thank
you.
E
E
But
the
bottom
line
is
mike:
there's
supervisors
there
that
could
jump
in
there's
other
ways
and
not
everybody
went
on
strike.
Some
of
the
nurses
came
in
because
to
keep
the
staffing
level
at
a
a
good
place.
So
you
know
there
was
no
talk
with
the
union
before
this.
There
was
plenty
of
notice
given
so
to
use
covid
or
any
of
this.
You
know
they
made.
These
nurses
use
a
mask
for
a
week
when
it's
supposed
to
be
used
once
and
thrown
away.
So
there's
a
lot
of
problems
there
and
I'm
sorry
I'll
shut
up.
A
K
Williams,
thank
you,
president.
Pro
tim,
the
short
answer
to
councilmember
o'brien's
question
is
that
no,
the
this,
this
portion
of
the
code
is
not
enforceable.
Federal
law
has
said
pretty
conclusively
that
employers
have
the
right
to
hire
strike
breakers.
Employers
have
the
right
to
an
almost
absolute
right
to
run
their
businesses,
which
you
know
in
this
case,
involves
bringing
in
strike
breakers.
Similar
laws
and
other
municipalities
in
the
state
have
been
struck
down
so
effectively.
This
law
is
unlawful
and
unenforceable.
K
F
F
F
So
again,
I
was,
I
support
council,
remember
tom
hobbies
resolution,
as
is,
I
think
we
need
to
send
a
message
to
albany
met
that
we're
not
that
albany
is
a
union
town.
Albany
is
a
union
town
and
as
one
of
the
biggest
employers
in
the
city
of
albany.
If
they're
treating
our
nurses
like
this,
others
are
watching
what
albany
med
is
doing
and
I
believe
I
firmly
believe
we
will
win
this
fight
and
when
we
do,
other
employers
are
going
to
follow
suit
and
pay
individuals.
F
The
wages
that
they
deserve
and
more
unions
are
going
more.
Hospitals
are
going
to
take
unionship.
So
I
just
want
to
say
I
I
strongly
support
tom
holmes,
tom
holy's
resolution,
and
I
think
we
need
to
act
on
this
to
send
a
clan
message
that
this
type
of
union
union
buster
is
disgusting
and
this
type
of
behavior
will
not
be
tolerated
in
the
city
of
albany.
Thank
you.
P
J
And
and
brett,
if
you
could
actually
email
that
to
michelle,
so
we
can
all
look
through
it.
That
would-
and
thank
you
so
much
for
that.
That
is
absolutely
very
helpful.
I
agree.
I
agree
with
tom's
intent
completely
and
I
think
mike
brings
up
a
really
good
point.
If
it's
something
that
as
often
as
sometimes
you
would
love
to
go
against
federal
law,
we
unfortunately
do
not
have
that
ability,
and
I
think
it
is.
I
am
I
I
don't
love
what's
happening
at
albany
med.
J
J
So
I
went
to
saint
peter's
because
I've
heard
concerns
about
the
care
at
albany
med
because
these
things
weren't
in
place
because
they
were
pushing
back
so
much
is
that
true?
I
don't
know.
I've
always
had
great
care
there,
but
it's
a
it's
a
much
bigger
concern.
So
I
appreciate
you
tom
and
I'm
happy
to
work
with
you.
H
H
H
H
So
there's
a
you
know,
I'm
having
some
difficulty
with
that,
and
I
I
think
essentially
where
I'm
at
at
this
point,
is
without
having
a
chance
to
take
a
look
at
the
federal
law
and
have
a
discussion
about
that
and
the
cases
that
I'm
not
feeling
ready
to
act
on
this
on
next
thursday.
As
currently
written.
N
I
just
want
to
go
on
record
saying
that
I
support
tom's
resolution,
but
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
send
a
strong
message
to
albany
mad,
because
in
my
three
years
I
just
remember
them
not
wanting
to
honor
the
handshake
agreement
and
we're
not
you
know
growing
up
in
albany.
When
you
look
at
albany
med,
it
seems
to
be
expanding
all
over
the
place.
N
Q
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
say
I'm
supportive
of
this
legislation.
I
do
agree
in
terms
of
removing
the
last,
be
it
finally
finally
resolved
with
the
names
and
the
addresses.
I
think
that
could
pose
some
risk
to
people
and
their
privacy
and
their
safety
potentially
so
would
recommend
that
gets
removed.
E
Yeah
so
I'll
definitely
take
out
the
the
names
of
the
addresses
I'll.
Do
that?
What
I'd
like
to
do
is
put
a
resolve,
and
maybe
I
mean
the
first
resolve
being
that
the
strong
language
and
then
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
change
it
that
you
know
the
council
urges
the
city
to
enforce
this
law.
So
it's
not
saying
you
must,
but
we
urge
that
this
law
be
enforced.
A
Thank
you
I'd
just
like
to
add
that
I
to
support
it.
I
think
we
should
remove
the
names,
though,
but
again,
whether
federal
law
preempts
it
or
not.
We're
expressing
our
feelings
about
this,
so
I
think
that
it
that's
the
point
right.
So
I
support
this
and
thank
you
for
putting
this
together.
Mr
hoey.
A
So
we
can
clean
this
up
a
little
bit.
I'd
like
to
add
that
I
would
I
wanna
number
four
on
the
resolutions
hell,
which
is
resolution.
Four
twelve
of
twenty
I'm
gonna
withdraw
that
I'll
be
withdrawing
it
at
our
next
meeting.
It's
the
one
calling
on
the
governor,
the
state
legislature
not
to
cut
to
cut
medicaid.
A
H
H
H
I
I'm
realizing
that
the
resolution
really
only
needs
to
mention
march
31st
as
the
hearing
date,
not
the
other
two
dates.
The
other
two
dates
are
are
just
meetings
and
potentially
a
follow-up.
The
april
7th
is
just
there
as
a
placeholder,
but
the
hearing
is
actually
mark
just
march
31st,
so
I'd
like
to
introduce
this
simply
so
that
we
can
put
it
in
the
meeting
notice
for
my
committee.
B
A
L
R
So
I
received
all
the
videos
what
yesterday
every
single
one,
it's
right
now,
I'm
editing
everything
and
working
with
special
events.
We're
gonna
have
a
pre-recorded
video
and
it's
gonna
come
live
at
5
30
on
the
17th,
the
time
of
the
event.
It
would
be
similar
to
the
state
of
the
city,
video
that
the
mayor
did
kind
of,
like
you
know,
doing
a
presentational
and
having
the
videos
the
pieces
that
you
gave
will
be
inserted
into
that.
We
also
have
performances
music.
That's
in
it.
L
R
R
It's
going
to
be
usually
how
we
send
the
press
release
it's
going
to
be
usually
probably
at
12
when
I
was
sent
it
just
to
get
notifications
so
that
people
understand
when
it's
going
to
be.
We
created
an
event,
so
it's
on
there
too.
The
public
knows
when
to
look
out
for
it,
but
at
12
I'll
most
likely
send
out
the
press
release.
A
Thank
you
right.
So
it's
virtual,
but
we'll
have
all
the
elements
that
we
would
if
we
were
in
person,
but
we're
mailing
the
certificates
but
everything's
everyone
sent
the
video
in
they're
all
put
together
and
again
like
like
the
mayor's
state
of
the
city.
It
you
saw
how
it
ran
on
facebook
as
an
event
and
folks
can
watch
it
from
home
safely.
So
that's
the
idea.
A
R
R
A
No,
no,
we
can
talk
about
this
this
stuff
offline.
But
again,
thank
you
for
your
service.
Michelle
you've
taken
us
to
higher
heights
you're
you're,
I
mean
really.
You
you've
made
a
lot
of
changes
for
us.
I
mean
we're
gonna
hate
to
lose.
You
I
mean
you,
you
anticipate
our
needs
your
weight,
like
two
steps
ahead
of
us
with
requests.
I
mean
it's,
it's
it's.
You
know
we're
happy
for
you
you're
moving
on
to
something
better
and
but
don't
forget
about
us.
Okay,.
J
L
M
M
Walk
up
to
the
council-
and
you
know
reach
out
to
us,
but
we're
definitely
gonna
be
missed
and
we
appreciate
everything
that
you
have
done
for
the
counselors,
specifically
with
the
social
media
and
whatnot
definitely
has
brought
us
to
the
21st
century
with
the
common
council.
I
definitely
want
to
commend
you
for
that.
H
N
A
G
G
E
M
Quick
question
kelly
just
really
quick,
so
the
legislation
that's
on
the
agenda
and
whatnot,
can
we
like
before?
Can
we
just
bring
it
up
for
like
a
floor
vote
or
something
like
that
on
some
of
those,
instead
of
putting
it
back
in
committee
for
further
discussion
like
if
there's
specific
ones
that
we
could
just
make
recommendation
and
bring
it
in
front
of
the
like?
Maybe
we
all
set
up
a
special
meeting
to
go
over
some
of
these
legislations
that
are
stuck
in
committee
and
just
try
to
see?
A
Well,
I
I
would
suggest
that
I
mean
some
of
this
stuff
has
lied
dormant
for
a
while,
I
would
say
re
as
the
sponsor
talk
to
the
chair
of
the
committee
that
it's
in
and
work
that
process.
And
then,
if
you
you,
you
agree,
you
know
the
sponsor,
and
the
chair
agrees
then
bring
it
forth
and
we'll
look
at
it.
But
things
that
have
gone
to
committee,
but
not
been
taken
up
in
committee
will
not
be
allowed
to
move
forward
into
no.
M
No,
I
understand
that
I
understand
I'm
just
thinking
just
forward
moving
forward.
I
know
I'm
not
the
only
one
I
know
like
probably
half
of
the
council
stuff
is
on.
You
know
been
dormant
on
that
agenda,
so
I
just
want
to
you
know
just
a
suggestion
out
there
that
maybe
just
in
the
future,
you
know
maybe
towards
the
end.
Maybe
we
revisit
all
the
legislation,
that's
on
agenda
at
a
caucus
meeting
and
just
discuss
it
instead
of
just
one
committee,
but
whatever
I'll
talk
to
you
offline
yeah.