►
Description
The Committees discussed the budget and possible vote on legislation (Resolution 96.102.20R to 100.102.20R, Ordinance 16.82.20, Ordinance 22.101.20, Ordinance 25.101.20, Ordinance 26. 102.20, Ordinance 27.102.20 As Amended and Ordinance 28.102.20 to 41.102.20 As Amended)
A
Good
evening,
everyone
welcome
to
our
finance
committee
meeting.
I
am
going
to
initially
apologize.
This
is
the
fun
of
doing
things
from
at
home.
My
dog
is
excited
about
my
son
coming
home.
A
So,
apologies
about
that
this
evening
we
are
joined.
We
have
committee
members
mike
o'brien,
judy
de
shea,
alfredo
ballarand
jamel
robinson.
We
are
also
enjoyed
by
enjoyed
we're
also
joined
by
council
member
joyce
love.
There's
always
two
of
our
council
members.
We
and
our
incredible
staff.
John
rafael,
piccardo,
michelle
andre.
We
also
have
budget.
He
in
the
house.
A
We've
got
mike
wheeler,
nick
riley
and
nick
blaise,
and
how
could
we
forget
our
incredible
corp
council,
brett
williams,
david
gallon,
is
also
on
the
line,
and
how
could
we
forget
gary
shawn
for
our
treasure,
so
I
am
going
to
I
sent
out
kind
of
a
note.
I
think
tonight
we're
going
to
focus
on
first
to
get
those,
I
would
say
the
non-budget
ordinances
out
of
the
way.
So
they
can.
We
still
have
to
operate,
even
though
we're
in
budget.
A
B
I
don't
personally
in
my
office,
it's
usually
sarah
vales
who's
sort
of
the
point
person
on
those
rob
mcgee
is
involved
as
well.
I
have
some
knowledge
of
them,
but
and
I
can
relay
any
questions
the
counselor
or
the
committee
may
have
okay.
A
The
jamel,
I'm
not
sure
if
you
want
to
talk
about
this
at
all
this
is
your
ordinance.
It's
sale
of
william
sale
to
william
chapman
of
a
city-owned
vacant
lot
at
109
3rd
street.
C
Yes,
so
I
do
support
this
ordinance
of
the
sale
of
this
property.
William
chapman
currently
owns
the
property
at
105
third
street
and
sees
this
as
an
opportunity
to
expand
his
property,
and
this
would
bring
our
pride
this
piece
of
property
on
on
the
tax
rolls,
and
I
stand
the
full
support
of
it.
So.
A
Seeing
then
could
I
get
a
motion
to
move
it
through
the
committee
mike
o'brien
moves
judy.
Was
that
a
second
excellent
all
in
favor
of
that's
unanimous,
so.
A
16
8
to
20
passes
through
with
a
positive
recommendation.
Our
next
ordinance
is
22.101.20
about
47
first
street,
which
is
council
member
loves.
This
authorizes
the
sale
to
thomas
lacy
of
city
owned
land
at
47
first
street
joyce.
Do
you
want
to
say
anything
about
this.
D
Yes,
I've
been
knowing
mr
lacey
a
long
time,
so
he
lives
someplace
else,
but
he
has
quite
a
few
pieces
of
property
down
on
first
street
and
timbre
street,
and
this
is
a
piece
of
property
that
fell
down
and
the
city
had
recommended
him
that
he
recommended
to
him
that
you
know
that
he
could
get
this
piece
of
property.
They
will
support
him.
Also,
I
support
him
too,
because
he
does
a
lot
in
our
community.
A
Next
ordinance
25.101.20-
this
is
about
to
genesee
street,
authorizing
a
sale
to
daniel
I'm
going
to
butcher
your
last
name
daniel
and
I
am
sorry
cadalso
of
city
online
at
two
genesee
street
kelly.
Do
you
wanna
talk
about
this,
and
I
will
note
that
kelly
kimbrough
is
here
as
well.
E
Thank
you,
yeah.
It's
a
strip
of
land
off
of
paper
street
well
genesee
street
is
the
paper
street
down
that
runs
off
of
broadway.
It
butts
his
property.
This
real.
This
dates
back
actually
to
for
those
of
you
that
remember
when
david
gonzalez
was
with
us,
this
all
started
back
then,
and
somehow
it
just
kept
getting
dropped
or
missed
and,
and
it
didn't
getting
take,
get
taken
care
of,
and
so
I
support
this.
I
really
see
no
other
use,
except
for
him
he's
down.
E
There
actually
had
a
big
fire
down
there.
We
had
a
person
on
mohawk
street
side
of
that
purchased,
three
lots
and
she,
you
know,
upgraded
her
house
or
what
have
you,
but
since
the
house
and
three
or
four
other
houses
have
burned
down.
So
there's
this
huge,
the
the
mohawk
street
side
and
the
genesis
tree
cider
or
vacant.
So
I
I
support
this
and
it's
been
a
long
time
in
the
making.
A
Seeing
then
can
I
get
a
motion
to
pass
this
through
committee
alfredo
moves?
Can
I
get
a
second
judy
seconds
all
in
favor
hi,
that's
unanimous!
Next
up
we
have.
A
E
Yes,
it's
it's
the
lower
livingston
avenue
between
pearl
and
in
broadway.
E
F
So
do
we
have
an
anticipated
purchase
price
for
this?
I
don't
see
it
in
the
ordinance
or
the
supporting
memo.
B
No,
I
don't
think
there
is
one
at
this
point.
I
know
my
I
know
I
said
my
colleague
sarah
was
one
who
handles
these,
but
in
this
case
it's
my
colleague
laura
gulfos
handling
this
one.
I
asked
her
for
an
update
today.
She
has
not
heard
anything
yet
about
what
a
potential
purchase
price
might
be.
It
is
just
an
easement.
Obviously
I
don't
want
to
try
to
prognosticate
a
price,
but
I
would
assume
it
would
be
fairly
nominal,
but
don't
have
a
solid
price
on
it.
Right
now,.
F
But
it's
going
to
be
an
easement
with
a
permanent
fixture
and
this
you
know
I
note
that
we
do
have
restaurants
paying
to
operate.
Sidewalk
cafes,
you
know
at
an
annual
price,
so
I
do
think
it's
appropriate
for
us
to
get
some
information
about
that,
to
make
sure
that
it's
equitable.
B
Okay,
I
I'm
happy
to
follow
up
and
let
the
committee
know
I'll.
Certainly
you
know
push
to
get
that
information
and
then
report
back.
F
B
Potentially,
if
I'm
able
to
get
that
information
by
then
as
far
as
how
time-sensitive
it
is,
I
know
the
building
owners
or
the
tenants.
I
guess
in
this
case,
albany
distilling
and
defazio's
pizza
have
some
permits
taken
out
on
the
property,
but
with
that
said,
I
don't
think
the
easement
itself
has
been
finalized
between
or
you
know.
Obviously
it
hasn't
been
finalized.
B
It
can't
be
yet,
but
I
I
think,
they're
still
working
on
some
of
the
language
of
the
easement
itself,
so
it
doesn't
sound
like
it's
in
immediate
need
of
approval.
But
if
we
can
get
the
correct
information
by
monday,
then
I'm
sure
that
would
be
appreciated.
A
We
can
still
pass
it
through
the
committee
and
even
if
it's
not
dealt
with
that
monday,
it
could
be
dealt
with
at
the
next
at
the
following
council
meeting.
I
think
you
have
a
good
point
judy.
We
don't
want
to
hold
up
any
ada
compliance,
but
you
know
it
is
important
to
get
that
information.
F
A
That
is
unanimous
excellent.
I
don't
expect
us
to
move
this
quickly
through
everything
this
evening,
but
I
appreciate.
A
That
speediness,
so
what
I
thought
we
would
do,
I'm
not
sure
if
everyone
saw
the
email
that
I
sent
out,
but
since
there
is
still
kind
of
some
remaining
questions
when
it
comes
to
exactly
what
to
do
with
the
capital
reserve
fund,
which
has
more
to
do
with
the
budget.
Specifically,
I
think
there's
also
some
lingering
questions
about
the
budget.
A
I
thought
it
would
make
the
most
sense
for
us
to
deal
with
the
bonding
ordinances
and
and
then
we
can
have
any
you
know
basic
budget
discussion
but
planning
to
on
our
thursday
meeting
deal
with
the
last
remnants
of
and
of
passing
the
budget
ordinance
through,
along
with
any
necessary
capital
reserve
funds.
If
that
is
indeed
the
direction
that
we
go
in
so
the
first
one
up
and
I
I
sent
out
a
chart
along
with
the
numbers
of
the
pages,
which
is,
I
find
helpful,
go
ahead.
Judy.
F
So
before
we
start,
I
had
asked
a
question:
I
don't
know
a
week
or
two
ago
and
since
we
have
all
the
right
people
here
now
I'll
ask
the
question
again:
I'm
a
little
bit
curious,
I'm
or
con
I've
lost
track,
so
we
had
drafts
of
the
bonding
ordinances
and
then
brett
was
working
on
making
amendments
to
those.
F
B
No,
I
don't
think
so.
I
think
there
were
two
or
three
that
ended
up
being
taken
care
of
after
introduction,
which
means
that
they're
now,
as
amended,
bear
with
me
one
second
and
I
can
try
to
figure
out
which
ones
those
were.
I.
G
Have
it
it's
ordinance
37
through
41,
as
amended
as
noted
in
that
document,
that
I
sent
you
guys
with
the
bottomness
bonds
fc
recommendations.
I
noted,
as
amended.
F
F
G
And
I
also
what
I
did
added
all
the
documents
to
one
document
for
tonight.
Everything
we
were
reviewing,
but
I
can
send
you
the
abbreviated.
F
I
see
I
see
it,
I
see
today's
message.
Thank
you
very
much
and
I'll
bring
that
up
and
that'll
be
helpful,
rather
than
the
entire
document
less
to
scroll
through.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that.
F
F
A
Okay,
so
why
don't
we
start
at
the
beginning
and
end
at
the
end
28.102.20?
This
is
for
dgs
vehicles
if
you'd
like
to
follow
along
in
your
handy-dandy
budget
book,
that
is
on
page
90..
A
The
amount
for
the
bond
is
this
is
the
annoying.
It's
four
point:
six,
seven,
four:
four
million
four
hundred
sixty
six
hundred
seventy
four
thousand
and
one
hundred
fifty
six
dollars.
H
I
don't
I
don't
have
that.
I
don't
think
that's
on
michelle's
list
jenny.
I
think
it's
four
four
million
two
hundred
and
eighty
one
thousand
nine
hundred
fifty
six.
I
think
that's
the
total
for
dgs
altogether,
but
on
michelle's
document
it
says
four
million
281
956.
I
H
A
F
H
F
Okay
and
his
and
his
subparagraph
29
what
we
used
last
year
for.
B
A
So
are
there
any
other
questions
about
this
ordinance.
B
F
This
whole
thing
and
and
people
have
verified,
double,
checked
the
bonding
authorization
numbers
and
the
project
numbers.
B
F
Yeah,
so
I'm
okay
moving
forward
with
these,
without
you
doing
that
tonight
for
each
one
of
these-
and
I
want
to
say
in
me
torturing
everybody
with
such
details-
I
would
like
for
before
monday's
meeting
for
on
you
know
on
what
we
have
for
the
abri,
these
abbreviated
documents
that
we're
working
off
of
for
someone
to
verify
double
check
these
numbers,
and
it's
very
easy
to
you-
know,
get
number
transposed,
etc.
I
Okay,
just
just
just
a
question
on
them:
judy
had
to
ask
brett
if
there
are
any
that
have
been
amended
since
they've
been
introduced,
and
if
so
does
that
mean
we
cannot
vote
on?
They
have
not
properly
aged
before
monday.
B
Right
and
in
any
event,
I
think
these
were
sent
out
well
in
advance.
The
seven
day
deadline
that
would
exist
even
if
they
didn't
need
to
be
aged.
I
F
C
A
Next,
we
have
29.102.20
that
is
also
in
dgs,
and
that
is
for
equipment.
The
amount
of
that
bond
is
392
200
and
that
will
also
have
a
the
cash
side
of
it
of
295
thousand
five
hundred
twenty
dollars,
which
we
might
be
discussing
in
the
capital
reserve
fund.
Later
we
might
not.
C
I
moved
to
a
move
bond
orders,
29
102.20
out
of
committee,
with
a
favorable
recommendation.
C
F
I'm
looking
at
I'm
looking
at
the
wrong
ear
for
the
for
the
in
the
budget
book.
I'm
sorry,
so
I
just
wanted
to
double
check
the
the
numbers
in
the
budget
book
to
make
sure
that
we
are
consistent.
And
yes,
I'm
in
favor
of
this
as
well.
A
Okay,
so
that
is
well
and
now
I'm
glad
I
didn't
miss
your
hand.
A
Next
up
we
have
ordinance,
I
just
have
to
make
sure
I'm
looking
for
30.102.20.
This
is
in
the
recreation
department,
and
this
is
for
playgrounds.
A
We
have
a
cash
capital
of
130
000
with
that.
Are
there
any
questions.
A
Favor
jamal,
I'm
not
sure
if
you
that
was
a
I'm,
I
missed
a
yes
okay,
yes,
that
passes
through
unanimously.
Next
up,
we
have
31.102.2,
that
is
with
the
fire
department.
That
is
apparatus
are
there
any,
and
the
amount
of
that
is
one
million
three
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars.
A
Are
there
any
questions?
I
believe.
H
Yeah
yeah
but
judy
go.
A
Oh
judy,
your
volume
is
off.
F
Sorry
about
that,
so
we
there's
agreement
to
reduce
this
by
the
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
they
have
available
in
existing
accounts
for
a
ladder
truck.
So
it
would
be.
It
should
be
amended
to
be
one
million.
Five
hundred
thousand
excuse
me,
one
million
fifty
thousand
so,
and
that
gets
amended
that
amount
gets
amended
in
four
locations
in
the
title
it
appears
twice
and
then
in
the
body
for
the
maximum
estimated
cost
and
the
maximum
amount
of
the
bonds.
F
So
we
can,
we
can
pass
it
out
of
committee
with
that
amendment
and
then
the
ordinance
would
show
that
it
was
amended
as
amended
today,
when
you
make
those
changes,
I
actually
am
realizing.
I
said
the
amount
needs
to
be
amended
in
four
locations.
It's
actually
five
section.
Two
also
has
young
amendment
correct.
There.
F
Darius
is
on
gary's
is,
is
in
with
us
in
our
meeting,
and
I
I'm
just
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
noticing
darius
is
that
sometimes
account
numbers
seem
to
be
like
something
like
nine
or
ten
numbers.
Long
after
the
gh
and
other
times,
it
seems
to
be
like
seven
numbers.
F
Is
that
I'm
just
that's
part
of
my?
You
know
something
that
I
just
pick
up
on
and.
H
That's
that's
because,
like
if
you
look
at
police
and
traffic
engineering,
that's
a
good
example
of
the
the
three
one.
Two
zero
is
account
code
for
the
police
department.
So
whenever
you
see
three
one,
two,
zero
that
means
police
department
and
then
for
traffic
engineering,
which
is
a
subdivision
in
the
erp
through
police,
there
will
be
a
three
three
one:
zero,
which
will
be
like
all
right
now.
That's
traffic
engineering
and
then
comes
the
last
four,
which
is
specifying
the
type
of
account.
So
the
the
the
times
when
you'll
see
the
it'll
be
12.
H
Digits
will
be
when
it's
like
a
special
division
like
where,
with
the
fire
department,
they
don't
have
any
division,
so
it'll
be
three
four
one
zero
and
then
the
account
numbers
after
that.
F
H
Correct,
but
for
the
for
the
gh
accounts,
that's
it's
entirely
dgs.
I'm
I'm
not
sure
exactly
why.
I
think
it's
like
the
1491,
which
is
public,
works
that
1490,
which
is
dgs,
I'm
not
sure
as
to
how
that
was
set
up.
That
was
before
me.
F
So
I
I'm
just
asking
you
guys
to
take
another
look
at
these
account
numbers
again,
because
there's
been
some
confusion
in
the
past
about
that
and
we'd
like
to
be
consistent.
F
F
And
with
that
amendment,
I
move
that
we
move
this
forward,
emotion,
that
we
move
this
forward
with
a
positive
recommendation,
as
amended.
J
A
That's
unanimous:
next
up
we
have
ordinance
number
32.102.20,
it's
in
traffic
engineering,
and
this
is
for
the
lincoln
park
intersections.
The
amount
of
that
bond
is
350
000.
Are
there
any
questions
on
this.
F
So
I
just
want
to
note,
I
think
it
was
late.
Today
we
got
what
we
requested.
You
know.
The
question
I
had
asked
is:
is
there
funding
in
amongst
the
existing
outstanding
accounts
for
that
might
be
used
for
this?
The
answer
came
back
no,
but
in
the
meantime
we
were
promised
that
we
would
be
provided
with
an
accounting
in
the
proposed
uses
for
all
the
existing
accounts,
and
I
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
study.
F
And
come
up
with
any
kind
of
questions
regarding
you
know
where
that
might
be.
So
I'm
taking
a
quick
look
through
that
particular
document,
and
I
am
not.
F
Seeing
any
balances
of
maybe
nick
when
it
says
contract
still
sing,
do
you
know
what
that
means.
H
That's
that's
the
vendor
who
the
who
the
contract's
through
a
lot
of-
and
that
was
what
what
I
wanted
to
review
with
bill,
and
you
know
part
of
the
reason
that
you're
getting
it
so
late
is
that
he's
been
away
from
his
office
for
a
while,
and
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
really
run
over
these
numbers
with
him.
But
from
the
I
mean,
this
is
something
where
we're
on
the
same
page
too.
H
If
we
don't
have
to
borrow
for
something
we
we
don't
want
to,
but
these
are
contracts
and-
and
that's
the
contract
number
with
the
city
and
still
seeing,
is
the
the
vendor
that
they
went
through
and
it
looks
like.
After
all,
these
projects
are
over.
They
still
do
have
forty
six
thousand
dollars
remaining
or
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
it's
it's
in
the
forty
thousand
dollars
remaining
in
one
account
from
from
what
I've
heard.
H
That
is
that
this
estimate
from
the
lincoln
park
projects
is
pretty
aggressive
and
there
might
be.
Potentially
I
mean
it's
going
to
be
coming
close
to
that
350
000
price
tag.
So
I
I
would
caution
against
using
that.
I
mean
that
that's
money
that
bill
hasn't
told
me
that
46
thousand
dollars
after
this
contract
has
gone
through
and
it's
been
awarded
that
he
hasn't
told
me
necessarily
what
his
intended
uses
are
for
that.
H
So
it's
something
that
I
would
either
encourage
rolling
over
or
using
towards
potentially
additional
funds
somewhere
that
where
they
might
be
over.
But
I
I
wouldn't
advise
reducing
the
size
of
this
authorization.
J
F
Funding
in
something
for
roadway
safety,
there's
182
000
that
is
left
over
in
that.
So
I'd
like
you
to
focus
on
that
as
well,
I
mean
I'm,
not
okay,
moving
this
forward.
You
know
with
that
understanding
that
you
guys
are
going
to
be
monitoring
this.
F
And-
and
you
know,
with
regard
to
traffic
engineering,
they
got
way
out
ahead
on
borrowing
for
what
they
could
accomplish,
and
I
appreciate
them
being
ambitious
with
some
of
this
stuff.
F
But
I
also
think
that
we
ought
to
be
keeping
a
little
bit
tighter
oversight
on
our
borrowing
with
regard
to
things
that
make
sure
that
we
don't
borrow
when
it's
really
not
necessary,
and
I
know
that
I
appreciate
all
the
dialogue
that
we've
had
over
the
last
few
years
in
which
people
are
working
on
that
particular
issue.
You,
especially
nick
so.
F
So
with
I'll
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
move
this
out
of
committee
with
a
positive
recommendation.
A
Excellent,
thank
you
judy.
Can
I
get
a
second
thank
you
alfredo
all
in
favor
aye,
that's
unanimous!
A
Next,
we
have
ordinance
number
33.102.20,
that's
with
apd,
and
that
is
for
the
intravid
surveillance
system.
The
amount
on
that
is
564
thousand
dollars.
Are
there
any.
A
A
Thanks
mike
in
a
second.
A
F
A
Oh,
I
should
also
note
that
there,
the
city
is
putting
forty
five
thousand
dollars
of
cash
in
that,
as.
A
A
F
Actually,
it
says
that
the
project
has
secured
340
000
grand
and
the
total
project
cost
is
400
000.
A
F
So
our
cost,
our
total
cost-
is
60
000,
since
the
total
project
cost
is
for
400
000,
the
project
has
secured
340
000
grant.
So
I
imagine
that
we
did
part
of
the
funding
last
year
and
part
of
the
funding.
That's
basically
eighty-five
percent.
I
think
that's
what
was
all
right.
Thank
you
thanks
for
indulging
me
and
looking
looking
for
just
looking
for
consistency
in
what
we're
doing
so,
I'm
glad
to
move
this
forward
with
a
positive
recommendation.
A
Alfredo
all
in
paper,
hi
unanimous,
thank
you.
Next,
we
have
ordinance
number
36.102.20,
that
is
for
the
I'm.
Looking
at
the
brownfield
opportunity
area
program
and
the
local
waterfront
revitalization
program,
also
known
as
boa
la
rap.
A
That's
what
their
friends
call
them.
The
amount
of
this
bond
is
133
500..
That
part
of
it
is
fully
grant
funded
our
cash
capital,
for
it
is
sixteen
thousand
five
hundred.
A
Are
there
any
questions
on
this,
and
I
believe
this
is
also
phased
in.
So
if
you
look
at
the
preamble,
this
is
for
the
part
of
that
phase.
A
All
right
next,
we
have
ordinance
37.102.20
as
amended,
and
that
is
through
engineering,
and
that
is
for
street
reconstruction.
The
amount
on
that
is
3.75
million.
The
majority
of
that
will
be
bonded,
but
there
is
250
000
that
will
be
grant
funded
within
that.
A
Yes,
because
the
the
grant
funded,
I
believe,
is
reimbursable,
so
it's
it's
the
same
as
the
other
pieces
where
we
have
to
pay
the
money
out
and
then
we
get
reimbursed
for
it.
A
I'm
happy
to
hold
it.
I
think
that
that
is
a
reasonable
thing
and
go
ahead
mike.
I
A
All
right
so
budget
guys
we
are
not
passing
that
through
darius.
You
can
hear
this
as
well,
so
we
need
to
get
that
list
of
streets,
because
this
is
a
big
bonding
thing
and
I
know
darius
you're
anxious
to
go
out.
K
I
would
just
say
from
my
perspective
and
going
out
to
borrow
the
sooner
these
past,
the
better.
A
A
F
A
I
just
saw
that
in
the
in
the
book
reading
through
so
I
agree
that
that
can
wait
as
well
and
not
as
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
wasn't
for
any
specific
project
or
if
it
was
just
for
the
streets
which
we
can
pass
the
ada
compliance
without
the
streets,
but
you're
right.
It
won't
make
much
sense
if
we,
if
we
do
the
sidewalks
without
the
ada
compliance
piece.
A
So
let's
move
to
can
I
can.
I.
B
Yeah,
the
only
amendments
on
these,
I
think,
were
to
add
the
the
treasurer's
bond
authorization
numbers
and
the
treasuries
project
numbers
budget
had
given
me
before
the
initial
deadline
for
the
bonding
ordinances
they
had
given
me
the
amounts
and-
and
you
know,
descriptions
of
the
projects
I
just
didn't.
I
think
budget
hadn't
received
them
back
signed
from
engineering
yet
so
I
just
hadn't
received
the
bond
authorization
numbers
and
the.
J
B
J
H
I
mean
from
from
what
I
can
remember
from
this
the
funding
that
was
like
the
additional
grant
funding
kind
of
came
late
into
it.
I
think
I
had
the
authorization
form
requested
and
sent
to
to
randy
for
streets
and
sidewalks
without
the
funding
available
and
about
the
reimbursed
portion
from
the
legislative
funder,
and
then
so.
I
think
that
that's
why
those
were
amended
to
include
those
amounts,
and
I
think
the
engineering
ada
compliance
one.
H
He
was
a
transcriptioner
on
my
end,
where
I
think
I
had
the
sidewalk
amount
in
there,
but
when
randy
signed
it
and
sent
it
back,
he
made
that
change
and
pointed
out
to
me.
So
I
think
we
we
sent
them
to
you
guys
as
placeholders
and
when
randy
sent
it
back
signed.
It
had
the
corrected
amount
in
there.
B
A
So
if
there's
no
further
questions
on
that,
why
don't
we
move
on
to.
A
G
It
was
ford
39,
it
was
originally
6.50.
It
was
reduced
to
300
000..
I
noted
that
that
was
the
request
of
randy.
F
J
A
That's
unanimous-
and
we
have
the
last
ordinance
of
this
evening-
is
41.102.20
as
amended.
That's
in
engineering,
that
is
for
the
lincoln
park
project
and
the
amount
that
we
would
be
borrowing
is.
A
A
I
would
like
does
anybody.
I
asked
people
to
make
sure
that
they
looked
through
any
of
the
budget
amendments.
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
there
was
any
questions
on
those
that
we
could
kind
of
bring
up
this
evening
and,
of
course,
any
other
budget
questions
that
you
have
tonight
would
be
a
really
good
time
to
bring
it
up.
Go
ahead.
I
A
So
we
I
hope
to
have,
I
hope
to
have
it-
send
out
a
draft
to
everybody
either
tonight
or
tomorrow
early,
I
discovered,
as
I
was
going
back,
that
I
lost
half
of
my
day's
work
yesterday:
poorly
saving
it,
which
is
my
own
fault,
but
you
know
using
the
city's
system.
So
after
I
cried
for
a
little
bit
in
my
heart.
A
I
have
to
go
back
to
that.
So
there'll
be
a
draft
to
look
at
very
soon.
I
No,
no,
I
I
made
some
comments.
I
agreed
with
the
other
comments
that
were
made
at
our
last
finance
committee
meeting.
F
Thank
you.
So
today
we
got
a
version
three
of
the
budget,
amendment
a-
and
there
are
a
couple
things
in
there
that
I
would
like
to
just
touch
on.
F
One
of
them
is
when
it
comes
to
technical
and
formatting
amendments.
They
are
willing
to
make
a
change.
F
Add
one
million
dollar
tax
levy
increase,
but
normally,
when
you
it's
not
clear
where
that
goes
so
normally,
when
you
make
that
kind
of
change,
you
are
putting
in
the
existing
language
and
then
adding
you
know
underlining
you
know,
so
you
know
so
you
know
in
referencing
where
it
is
that
the
particular
change
is
being
made.
So
it's
in
context
just
saying
on
page
two
you're,
adding
that
it
doesn't
say
where,
so
it
doesn't
necessarily
make
sense.
F
L
Hello
on,
on
version
two
of
that,
we
did
say
that
on
page
two
in
the
mayor's
message
under
notable
changes,
add,
and
then
we
put
the
line
for
the
1
million
tax
levy
increase
so
that
it
was
in
version
2,
and
it
remains
in
version
3
as
well.
F
F
So,
essentially,
you're
saying
add
a
bullet
under
negative
changes.
I
think
that
I
think
that
that's
the
clarification
that
should
be
there
for
that,
and
that
would-
and
that
would
be
sufficient
to
make
it
that
change
under
notable
changes,
add
a
bullet
to
read
and
then
have
the
bullet
to
have
that
in
quotes.
That's
good.
F
The
professional
audit
in
version
3,
is
still
being
moved
from
the
treasurer's
office
to
audit,
and
I
think
that
there
was
from
what
I
read
from
jenny's
email
that
there's
agreement
that
that
change
is
no
longer
going
to
be
made.
So
in
the
increase
to
expenditures
and
the
decrease
to
expenditures
that
should
come
out.
F
On
the
second
page
of
the
amendments,
so
I
folks
does
anybody
else,
remember
being
told
we're
adding
an
hr
generalist
position
in
the
police
department.
Does
anybody
remember
that
discussion?
Why
that's
being
done
so?
I
think
so.
I
think
that
we
need
an
explanation.
L
That
is
a
formatting
issue,
only
the
salary,
social
security
and
health
insurance
information
for
that
one
was
factored
into
the
police
budget
worksheets
slash
spreadsheet,
but
that
position,
because
it
was
added
mid-year-
was
not
included
in
the
position
list.
So
the
numbers
for
that
one
are
good
and
they
were
not
left
out,
but
we
do
need
to
include
the
position.
F
So
can
somebody
send
me
the
resolution
or
send
us
all
the
resolution
showing
that
position
being
added,
because
that
was
not
clear
from
them
from
what
or
I
don't
recall
that
being
said
previously,
so
the
fact
that
it
was
added
mid-year,
then,
of
course
we
would
want
to
keep
it.
We
already
approved
it
unless
you
know
the
apd
and
the
administration
says
no.
We
no
longer
need
that
in
that,
but
I
don't.
F
I
don't
recall
that
edition
and
let's
not
make
jokes
about
how
old
I
am
these
days.
F
So
I
would
like
to
see
the
resolution
wherever
it
was
that
we
approved
that
edition,
and
then
that
would
answer
my
question
and
I
think
probably
the
rest
of
the
council
might
benefit
from
that
as
well.
With
regard
to
item
e
on
page
two,
I
agree
with
your
edition
of
the
assistant
commissioner.
F
L
Correct
yeah,
we
wanted
to
remove
the
chief
of
staff
because,
as
you
pointed
out,
that
may
not
have
been
officially
authorized
to
go
into
the
adopted-
and
I
didn't
have
a
chance
to
confirm
that
today.
But
I
take
your
word
for
it.
So
we
updated
the
amendment
to
reflect
eliminating
the
chief
of
staff
so
that
we
don't
show
an
inaccurate
position
but
showing
an
assistant
commissioner,
which
is
the
previous
title
in
2020,
and
I
believe
that
that
still
should
be
changing
to
deputy.
F
F
F
K
A
F
With
regard
to
page
138,
I
think
jr
probably
should
come
up
with
some
language.
With
regard
to
we're
saying,
legislation
has
been
proposed
to
remove
the
fifty
dollar
late
fee
associated
with
the
waste
collection
fee.
I
think
that
we
should
be
saying
something
about.
What's
replacing
it
with
regard
to
the
the
the
penalty
will
be
the
same
as
for
late
taxes,
correct.
B
That
is
the
way
that
was
being
replaced.
Yes,
it
was
bringing
it
in
line
with
the
late
fee
schedule.
I
guess
that
we
currently
use
for
property
tax
bills.
F
F
F
K
I
would
say
judy,
I
wouldn't
say
on
that
on
that
piece:
that's
we're
that's!
I
would
call
that
still
a
work
in
progress
until
we
speak
to
to
ken
and
finalize
what
the
accounting
is
going
to
look
on
at
with
all
that
we
are.
K
We
are
kind
of
we
agree
with
you
as
far
as
not
putting
everything
into
into
the
the
the
capital
reserve
accounts
that
make
that,
but
that
the
special
project
accounts
are
more
appropriate,
so
we're
building
a
hybrid
we're
looking
to
keep
it
and
planning
in
the
reserves,
because
we
do
expect
those
to
be
longer
term
and
ongoing.
K
The
remaining
remaining
ones
we're
going
to
move
over
to
the
project.
The
project
funds,
capital
project
funds,
which
works
in
line
with
what
the
charter
spells
out,
we're
just
working
with
ken
now
to
get
all
the
accounting
to
get
the
right
code
that
would
be
put
into
the
budget
and
then
and
then
have
come
up
roll
that
up
into
a
more
appropriate
category.
F
K
Which
we
hope
to
have
you
guys
definitely
before
thursday's
meeting.
Obviously.
F
Oh,
the
other
thing
I
is
oh
nick
last
year
you
know
on
all
these
salary
position
changes
nick.
I
think
it
was
blaze
who
did
this
last
year
you
did
a
nice
job
of
having
a
supplemental
document
to
the
so
we
have.
F
We
have
the
the
first
page
in
that
spreadsheet,
which
is
really
all
that
we
need
to
be
adopting
for
the
resolution.
We
do
need
to
introduce
a
resolution
for
the
salary
and
position
changes,
and
we
should
you
know.
I
mean
I
guess
that
that's
going
to
be
an
emcee,
but
for
our
meeting.
F
L
And
I
we
have
that
this
year
and
I
believe
that
we
sent
that
out
at
some
point.
But
I
will
double
check
and
if
not
send
that
out
again.
F
L
That
I
know
that
the
one
that
we
sent
largely
touched
upon,
the
city's
rise
positions
and
the
hood
led
grant
positions
for
faye,
but
it
did
not
get
into
the
weeds
with
the
things
like
the
chief
of
staff
at
dgs.
I
think
we
did
discuss.
Maybe
the
hr
generalists,
but
we
can.
We
can
go
back,
dig
that
up
and
and
update
it
to
reflect
the
dgs
position
and
any
other
ones
that
were
discussed
tonight
or
added
since
it
had
since
it
was
last
circulated.
F
F
F
You
know
that
we
did
in
hr
and
other
places
the
position,
changes
and
the
salary
changes,
and
I
think
we
took
care
of
explaining
the
changes
in
our
supporting
by
amending
our
supporting
memo
for
our
ordinance
adoption.
With
regard
to
the
other
changes
that
went
into
amendment,
I
could
have
that
wrong,
but
that
was
kind
of.
L
We
don't
mind
doing
that,
and-
and
I
can
update
that
and
send
out
again
and
just
to
be
clear,
so
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
You
are
okay,
with
keeping
the
amendments
that
are
directly
related
to
the
salary
changes
on
that
same
spreadsheet,
correct.
L
So,
for
instance,
if
we
just
to
make
the
two
budget
documents
balance
if
we
have
an
increase
in
social
security
and
an
increase
in
salary
that
has
to
be
offset
by
a
reduction
in
a
non-personnel
line,
we
do
want
to
show
both
of
those
on
the
same
document.
Correct.
A
A
A
So
I
did
remember
the
special
projects
thing
though,
but
are
there
any
other
questions.
G
F
Let
me
just
ask
the
question:
is:
does
everybody
understand
what
I'm
talking
about
with
regard
to
the
cover
resolution
for
this
spreadsheet
for
positions,
because
I
haven't
seen
we
haven't
seen
that
particular
resolution?
It's
not
you
know.
L
I
had
a
chance
to
meet
with
jr
today
and
we
went
over
kind
of
some
of
the
some
of
the
remaining
budget
items,
and
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
we
discussed.
So
he
was
going
to
look
for
last
year's
one
and
just
to
update
that
for
2021.
A
So,
just
to
kind
of
I'd
like
to
reiterate,
because
I
do
like
to
be
clear
when
we
need
more
information,
so
we'll
need
that
before
thursday's
caucus
and
finance
meeting,
we
also
need
the
list
of
streets
and
sidewalks
in
order
to
pass
those
bonds
through,
and
I
would
really
like
to
get
that
beforehand,
because
this
finance
committee
has
met
a
ridiculous
amount
and
I'd
like
to
give
everybody.
A
And
so
we
can
pass
those
bonding
ordinances
through.
We
also
will
have
the
final
answer
to
whether
we
capital
reserve
or
not
capital
reserve,
and-
and
I
think
those
are
the
remaining
pieces
of
information
that
we
need
from
other
people
internally
I'll-
be
sending
out
a
draft
for
the
budget
intent
memo.
I
I
know
it's
a
quick
turnaround,
but
I
do
ask
members
to
look
that
over
and
make
sure
that
you
send
feedback.
So
we
can
finalize
that
as
well.
A
So,
if
is
if
there
is
nothing
else,
then
we
can
bid
everyone
farewell
for
this.
A
Can
I
get
a
motion
to?
I
know
that
we
don't
officially
need
motions,
but
I
feel
like
if
we're.
If
we
vote,
we
should
have
emotion.
So
we
voted
emotion,
judy
in
a
second
to
close
him
alfredo
all
in
favor.
A
I'm
gonna
say
that's
enough
unanimous
and
thank
you
so
much
everyone
and
we'll
definitely
see
you
thursday.