►
From YouTube: Public Works Committee Meeting - March 28, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Mr
chairman
Mr,
brewski
and
O'brien
are
excused
Mr
Berger
here.
Clearing
here,
Dr
Fine
is
on
his
way
Mr
Tunney
here
Peter
here,
Reinhardt
here
and
Smith
here.
Seven
president
Mr
chairman,
thank
you
for
the
previous
mins
I,
make
a
motion.
Mr
chairman.
C
Yes,
this
is
a
request
for
design
and
construction
inspection
for
our
County
Route
111
covert
replacement,
it's
Alco
Road,
located
in
Queen
the
cost
of
design
and
construct
152
375.
This
is
part
of
our
Cavern.
D
Used
to
be
a
suite
that
was
occupied
by
councilman
Electric.
D
A
G
So
this
was
a
so
a
single
bid.
Yes,
yes,
how
wide
did
you
try
to
advertise
the
video
we'd.
F
G
Is
this
the
kind
of
work
that
I
think
it's
New
York
Industries,
not
that
I'm
aware
of
now
this
is
this
would
be
a
you
know:
disabled
Cruise.
F
G
G
H
Well,
just
a
quick
questions
with
the
sole
better
I,
always
wonder:
what's
the
difference
between
our
last
year's
procurement
costs
and
what
80
people
are
providing
issues.
G
H
I
Yes,
so
this
is
another
active
request
for
approval:
a
submitted
application
to
install
along
a
what
we
believe
is
a
historic
pathway.
So
this
would
kind
of
be
trying
to
restore
an
element
of
historic
preservation
for
historic
accuracy,
but
also
accessibility,.
G
B
I
But
the
it
would
require
Excavating
a
little
deeper,
probably
about
10
inches
down.
So
the
archaeological
impact
is
the
main
thing
I'd
be
concerned
about
from
a
general
kind
of
aesthetic
appearance.
You
wouldn't
be
able
to
see
the
concrete.
The.
I
E
J
An
A
D
that,
or
there
was
a
feasibility
study
in
a
in
a
code
code
study
at
the
top
part
of
losses
Lake.
So
right
now
we
want
to
move,
for
you
know:
infrastructure
on
the
top
part
of
losses
Lake
to
provide
Power,
New
Roads
for
for
all
repair
of
the
site
up
there
get
water
up
there.
So
it's
a
big
infrastructure
package,
but
Sarah
was
the
lowest
responsive
bidder
at
their
price
of
328
249.
J
J
Is
this
within
budget?
Yes,
it's
well!
This
is
part
of
a
larger,
a
larger
budget
type
of
thing.
You
know,
overall,
our
our
facilities,
bonds,
that
were
that
were
getting
money
from.
J
What
they
there
was
a
the
there's
they,
the
feasibility
study,
came
in
with
some
costs
that
they
thought
it
would
be.
So
that's
where
we're
trying
to
get
them.
This
is
more
for
the
documentation.
All
the
documents.
Construction
documents,
construction,
Administration.
What's
the
project
is
on
its.
J
But
that's
that's,
you
know,
that's
bringing
your
power
back
up
in
there.
That's
getting
its
own
water
source,
that's
putting
sewer
in
there
not
really
sewer,
but
you
know
for
Waste
Water
this
the
it
would
be
we're.
B
J
G
J
J
J
You
know:
what's
once
we
get
a
lot
of
the
infrastructure.
I
mean
that'll,
be
part
of
you
know,
construction
documents
and
whether
we
could
do
it
for
Four
Seasons.
If
not,
then
it
would
be
a
three
season
where
we'd
have
to
winterize
it,
but
that's
that'll
be
part
of
the
construction
portion
of
it
in
the
documents,
and
we
are
going
to
look
at
green
a
lot
of
the
green
centers
on
doing
this.
J
If
we
have
to
do
something,
that's
you
know,
maybe
do
we
look
into
try
to
think
of
the
correct
word
thermal
you
know
to
see
you
know
those
types
of
different
things
that
we
could
do
to
make
it
a
Four
Season,
if
not
like
I,
said,
if
anything
would
have
to
be
a
three
season.
Oh
I'll.
J
J
J
J
H
H
Yeah
a
couple
of
things:
correct,
Dave:
you
had
indicated
that
it
was
a
lowest
responsible
and
better,
but
this
is
a
professional
service.
Correct,
so
are
what
you
see
is
what
you
mean:
that
of
the
people
that
submitted
proposals.
Not
only
did
they
come
up
with
the
highest
ranking,
but
they
also
had
the
lowest.
J
Price,
that's
correct.
We
looked
over
the
really
the
closest
to
were
CT
mail
and
basaro
yep
that
were
very,
very
close.
I
mean
it
fell
without
like
sixty
thousand
dollars,
but
there
were
some
other
things,
but
as
you
look
through
the
packages,
they
were
using
pretty
much
a
lot
of
the
same
Consultants,
special
Consultants
that
that
are
in
this
field.
As
far
as
camping
and
Recreation
facilities,
they
were
both
using
the
same
ones.
So
you
know
they're
they're
everything
was
pretty
much
down
the
line,
except
for
the
pricing
and.
E
If
I
could
jump
in,
pacero
is
also
the
one
that
did.
The
master
plan
has
already
been
looking
at
Walton
Lake,
so
in
terms
of
continuity,
they
sort
of
had
that
additionally,
that
they've
already
been
analyzing
a
lot
of
it.
So
when
it
was
between,
you
know,
apples
and
apples.
They
sort
of
had
the
upper
hand
in
terms
of
already
having
looked
at
everything
that
we
kind
of
hoped
to
do.
Okay
and.
H
I
have
one
last
question
and
maybe
it's
a
you
know
a
question
for
Rebecca
when
you
have
something
like
this
major
development
in
Lawson
Lake,
do
we
have
to
have
a
secret
finding
before
we
can
authorize
the
spending
of
any
money,
not.
B
For
this
preliminary
stuff,
Friday
construction,
yes,
absolutely
if,
if
we
were
to
award
construction
contracts
down
the
line,
yes,
but
for
preliminary
things
like
this.
J
A
master
plan
in
the
portion
of
this
I
mean
in
job
they're,
going
to
have
to
go
through
they're
gonna
have
to
go
through
conservation.
You
have
to
go
through
EPA
they're,
going
to
have
to
get
all
all
their
ducks
in
a
row
in
their
package
for
it
and
then
and
that
that's
you
know
they
probably
have
to
go
for
the
Seeker
too
yeah.
B
You're
not
having
environmental
impact,
but
once
we
get
to
construction,
it
all
depends
on
what
they
recommend
and
what
the
kind
of
Defense
move
forward.