►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
Everyone
I'd
like
to
call
this
meeting
of
the
standing
committee
on
resource
stewardship
to
order
and
welcome
everyone
in
attendance.
My
name
is
David
Hansen
Emily
for
bonnieville
Cold,
Lake,
St,
Paul
and
chair
of
the
committee
I'd
ask
that
members
and
those
joining
the
committee
at
the
table
introduce
themselves
for
the
record.
We'll
begin
to
my
right.
B
Thank
you
a
few
housekeeping
items
to
address
before
we
turn
to
the
business
at
hand.
Please
note
that
the
microphones
are
operated
by
Hansard
staff
committee.
Proceedings
are
live
streamed
on
the
internet
and
broadcast
on
the
Albert
assembly.
Tv,
the
audio
and
video
stream
and
transcripts
of
meetings
can
be
accessed
via
the
Legislative
Assembly
website.
Those
participating
by
video
conference
are
encouraged
to
please
turn
on
your
camera.
While
speaking
and
mute
your
microphones,
when
not
speaking,
members
participating
virtually
who
wish
to
be
placed
on
the
speaker's
list
are
asked
to
email
or
message.
B
The
committee
Clerk
and
the
members
in
the
room
are
asked
to
please
signal
to
the
chair.
Please
set
your
cell
phones
and
other
devices
to
silent
for
the
duration
of
the
meeting
before
we
get
going
with
this
meeting,
and
since
we
have
members
joining
us
remotely,
we
need
to
address
the
issue
of
teleconferencing
and
video
conferencing.
Before
continuing
section,
6
of
the
legislative
assembly
act
authorizes
members
of
Committees
of
the
legislative
assembly
to
participate
by
teleconference
or
other
methods
of
communication.
B
If
unanimous
consent
is
granted
now,
the
committee
had
passed
a
motion
on
June
25th
2019
to
approve
teleconferencing
for
the
duration
of
the
30th
legislature
and
on
July
7
2020.
The
committee
passed
a
motion
to
allow
video
conferencing,
but
not
for
the
duration
of
the
30th
legislature.
So
in
order
to
continue
permitting
members
to
participate
using
a
video
conference,
the
committee
will
need
to
pass
a
motion
to
that
effect.
I
would
note
that
this
decision
would
not
preclude
the
committee
from
determining
in
advance
that
in-person
attendance
at
a
specific
meeting
is
required.
B
B
Having
heard
the
motion,
all
those
in
the
room
in
favor,
please
say:
hi
hi
any
opposed
where
that
motion
is
carried.
Now
that
we've
passed,
that
motion
I'd
like
to
you
need
to
to
go
to
those
joining
us
via
video
conference
to
introduce
themselves
for
the
record.
Please
introduce
yourself
as
I
call
your
names.
B
And
member
Orr.
B
All
right
approval
of
agenda
are
there
any
changes
or
additions
to
the
draft
agenda,
and,
if
not,
would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda?
B
Mr
getson
moved
by
Mr
gatterson,
the
standing
committee
on
resource
stewardship
approved
the
draft
of
Jennifer
today's
meeting
as
distributed
all
those
in
favor.
Please
say:
aye
aye.
Can
you
post
the
motion
is
carried
next.
We
have
the
draft
minutes
of
our
June
11
2021
meeting.
Are
there
any
errors
or
missions
to
note?
B
B
That
motion
is
carried
so
we'll
move
on
to
item
five,
the
Mandate
and
draft
schedule
government
motion,
seven
honorable
members
on
November
30th
2022,
the
assembly
passed
government
motion
7,
which
referred
to
the
standing
committee
on
resource
stewardship,
the
review
of
the
conflicts
of
interest
act
in
accordance
with
Section
48
of
that
act.
Pursuant
to
Clause
C
of
government
motion
7
and
section
48
of
the
act.
The
committee
has
12
months
to
complete
this
review.
B
This
means
that
the
committee
must
conclude
its
work
by
December
21st
2023.,
as
we
are
now
into
the
fourth
session
of
the
30th
legislature.
Many
of
you
have
participated
in
a
statute
review
by
a
legislative
policy
committee
and
we'll
have
the
general
idea
of
the
process
involved
in
a
statute
review
like
the
kind
we
have
before
us.
B
When
the
committee
feels
it
has
collected
sufficient
information
to
begin
deliberations,
the
committee
will
determine
whether
any
recommendations
will
be
made
in
relation
to
the
conflicts
of
interest
act.
The
review
is
then
concluded
by
Drafting
and
presenting
a
report
to
the
legislative
assembly
on
the
committee's
review.
Are
there
any
general
questions
about
the
process
of
conducting
this
review.
B
Seeing
hearing
none
honorable
members
in
the
course
of
conducting
similar
reviews,
other
committees
have
found
it
useful
to
develop
a
timeline
to
guide
their
process
their
progress.
The
committee
did
establish
a
subcommittee
on
committee
business
back
in
2019,
consisting
of
the
chair,
Deputy
chair
and
a
member
of
the
government
caucus
that
could
be
tasked
with
developing
and
proposing
such
a
timeline.
However,
the
subcommittee
has
never
met
additionally,
it
would
take
time
for
the
subcommittee
to
meet
prepare
a
review
timeline
and
then
for
the
committee
to
review
it.
B
Alternatively,
it
may
it
might
make
a
little
more
sense
for
the
committee
to
direct
the
committee
clerk
to
prepare
a
draft
timeline
for
the
committee's
consideration.
I
would
like
to
open
the
floor
to
any
comments,
questions
or
motions
in
relation
to
developing
a
timeline
of
our
review
for
the
conflicts
of
interest
Act.
F
H
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
Mr,
doc,
a
timeline
as
as
the
chair
indicated
earlier
is
a
year
and
typically
that
nearly
an
entire
year
has
been
taken
to
go
through
that
process.
Typically,
the
committee
will
ask
for
research
like
crust,
restrictional
comparisons
and
things
like
that.
H
It
will
seek
stakeholders,
stakeholder,
written
submissions,
usually
stakeholder
oral
presentations,
often
public
written
submissions
and
typically
those
are
those
written
submission
periods
are
about
a
month
long,
each
in
order
to
allow
people
the
time
to
to
prepare
submissions,
and
then
the
the
research
group
will
put
together
on
issues
and
recommendations
document
and
then
the
committee
will
gather
to
to
go
over
the
recommendations
and
or
go
over
issues
and
make
some
recommendations,
so
it
typically
takes
certainly
several
of
the
several
of
the
12
12
months,
but
it
can
be
done
sooner
if
the
committee
is
determined
to
meet
very
very
frequently,
but
in
the
past
it
has
typically
taken
nearly
the
entire
year.
F
Great
follow
for
me
just
because
it
seems
to
me
that
we
may
be
coming
up
against
budget
estimates.
Does
this?
Do
these
meetings
typically
overlap
with
budget
estimates,
because
the
Committees
don't
meet
during
estimates?
Correct.
H
Yeah,
thank
you.
Mr,
chair,
correct.
The
committee's
are
not
permit.
This
committee
is
not
permitted
to
meet
while,
while
the
main
estimates
are
on
because,
of
course
it's
tasked
with
the
main
estimates,
and
so
your
your
you'll
be
quite
busy
with
that.
So
that's
certainly
that's
usually
about
a
two-week
period
in
March.
F
Just
final
inquiry,
basically
to
the
chair,
I
think
the
chairs
hope
to
have
this
wrapped
up
by
the
spring,
so
given
that
it
has
taken
up
to
a
year
and
we're
overlapping
with
estimates,
what's
the
chair's
vision
for
timeline
well,.
B
Thank
you
for
that.
Mr,
Doc
and
I
know
that
when
we
first
were
assigned
with
this
last
week,
I
got
a
little
excited
about
it
and
thought.
Well,
you
know.
B
Maybe
we
can
push
this
thing
get
this
thing
pushed
through,
but
looking
at
looking
into
the
act
and
looking
at
the
other,
the
previous
reviews
of
of
the
ACT
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
far
more
too
important
of
a
document
to
try
and
push
it
through
and
then,
when
I
look
at
the
timelines,
I
didn't
wasn't
thinking
about
the
budget
estimates
we
have
I
think
in
pretty
much
the
entire
month
of
March
is
going
to
be
gone
with
that.
B
So
in
order
to
do
a
proper
process,
I
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
be
able
to
make
that
ambitious
deadline
that
I
had
of
of
May
1st.
But
so,
but
there
is
some
more
discussion.
I've
got
two
other
people
on
the
list
here
so
Mr
or
go
ahead.
L
Yeah,
thank
you.
Yeah
I
agree
with
the
direction
Mr
doc
started
this
off
going
and
your
initial
question
about.
How
do
we
get
a
timeline
I
think
we
should
actually
just
ask
the
clerk
to
do
it
in
light
of
the
fact
that
the
committee
hasn't
met
and
not
only
have
we
got
estimates
coming,
but
let's
be
realistic
here
we
have
an
election
coming
up
in
the
spring,
no
matter
what
happens
on
that
election,
this
committee
is
going
to
probably
be
substantially
reconstituted
with
members.
L
Therefore,
there
there's
also
that
to
take
into
account
in
order
to
get
this
done
so
I
think
we
should
just
ask
the
clerk
to
take
those
two
major
obstacles
if
I
can
call
them
that
to
our
progress
into
account
and
propose
a
timeline
for
us.
So
that's
my
suggestion,
thank
you
and
if
you
want
I
can
think
more,
but
anyway,
I'll
leave
it
at
that
point.
Thank.
B
You
Mr
member
Ganley.
J
Yes,
thank
you
I.
My
comments
were
much
the
same
in
terms
of
timeline,
I
think
as
well.
Mr
chair,
you
had
mentioned
the
subcommittee
and
the
fact
that
they
tend
to
slow
progress
somewhat.
I
think
the
only
other
thing
I
wanted
to
say
was
that
I
think
I'm
on
the
record
very
fairly
vehemently
about
my
opinion
on
subcommittees.
They
meet
off
the
Record,
taking
the
the
substance
that
is,
in
my
view,
public
business
away
from
the
public.
C
Well,
in
some
sense
that
my
concerns
have
just
been
addressed,
I'm
wondering
then,
if
we
could
set
a
a
timeline
merely
for
informing
the
community
about
the
the
review
and
seeking
written
submissions
and
not
worry
about
all
the
rest
of
it
until
the
after
the
election.
So
the
consideration
of
this
committee
would
be
done
not
after
the
election.
I
would
think
so.
H
Thank
you,
Mr
chair.
Thank
you
for
that
Mr
fian,
I,
guess.
The
only
my
only
caution
about
that
about
seeking
input
is
that
if
we
dissolve
in
in
May,
which
I'm
hearing
that
that
we
will
this
committee
will
no
longer
exist,
the
motion
that
referred,
the
the
review
to
this
committee
will
will
be
dead.
It'll
have
to
be
referred
again,
and
certainly
some
research,
if
you,
if
you
say,
were
to
direct
Research
Services
to
prepare
across
jurisdictional.
H
That
information
could
be
brought
and
offered
to
the
new
committee,
but
I
would
think
that
any
submissions
that
were
made
this
spring
or
this
winter
in
the
spring,
you
know
the
the
organization
would
have
to
re-contact
all
of
those
people
to
say.
Do
you
still
want
your?
Does
your
submission
still
stand?
Do
you
want
to
change
it?
H
Do
you
want
to
submit
something
new,
so
it
that
would
be
my
only
caution
that
you,
you
might
want
to
perhaps
delay
that
that
part
until
the
committee's
reconstituted
after
the
election
and
then
seek
seek
that
kind
of
input.
But
it's
totally
up
it's
totally
up
to
the
committee.
We
can
and
have
done
in
the
past
what
what
you're
suggesting
received
that
feedback
and
then
contacted
every
person
that
responded
to
say
like
six
months
later.
H
B
I
think
that
there's
a
certain
amount
of
research
that
we
could
assign
that
isn't
going
to
really
have
an
effect,
whether
it's
done
this
spring
or
in
the
fall
the
Crosshair
station
study
could
be
could
be
accomplished.
Is
there
anything
else
that
you
can
think
of?
That
would
be
make
sense.
H
Thank
you
Mr
chair.
Yes,
certainly,
the
committee
could
task
Research
Services
with
preparing
a
stakeholder
list
that
the
committee
could
have
a
look
at
that.
That's
not
something
that's
likely
to
change
measurably
in
terms
of
content
between
now
and
and
the
summer.
If,
if
there
were
to
be
a
session
in
the
summer,
you
could
also
ask
for
a
technical
briefing
from
the
ethics
commissioner
and
from
the
Department
if
you
wanted
to-
or
you
could
also
wait,
wait
on
that.
H
E
Ahead,
Mr
Getz
yeah,
just
listening
here
attentively
to
the
to
the
realistic
timelines.
It
sounds
like
all
the
technical
briefings
could
be
done
pre-writ,
so
at
least
we
could
have
that
work
done,
regardless
of
which
committee
members
come
back
later.
We'll
have
that
taken
care
of
sounds
like
typically,
it
takes
over
a
year
anyway
to
do
the
justices
required
for
it,
maybe
Mr
chair.
B
Okay,
so
if
I
can
summarize
I
think
what
we're
hearing
is
that
that
we
would,
the
committee
would
continue
with
some
of
the
work
that
can
be
done.
That's
going
to
benefit
the
next
committee,
whoever
set
up
across
jurisdictional
research,
technical
briefings
from
the
two
typical
ministers
that
would
brief
this
committee
and
then
the
stakeholders
list
that
would
probably
wouldn't
change
a
whole
lot.
So
if
we
could
get
those
three
things
accomplished
prior
to
as
everybody
kind
of
been
go,.
H
Ahead
just
add
one
more
thing,
the
other.
The
other
point
is
that
when
the
assembly
passes
the
the
new
motion
to
refer
the
for
the
statute
again,
it
could
also
indicate
in
the
motion
that
that
this,
the
information
that
was
received
by
this
committee
could
be
used
by
the
next
committee.
That's
that's
also
something
that
that
could
be
done
all.
B
M
Mr
Nielsen,
just
with
the
stakeholder
list,
I
mean
obviously
getting
a
you
know.
An
initial
list
will
be
very
very
helpful.
If
there's
any
other
names
that
pop
up
to
committee
members
would
we
still
have
the
ability
to
add
to
that
list
as
well?
Absolutely
sir
awesome
all.
B
B
So
if
we
can
have
a
motion
to
the
that
effect,
that
we
would
ask
for
the
clerks
to
draft
a
timeline,
if
somebody
could
do
that.
G
The
record
sir
I
moved
at
the
standing
committee
on
resource
stewardship
direct
the
committee
clerk
to
develop
a
draft
timeline
for
the
committee's
review
of
the
conflicts
of
interest
act
at
the
future
meeting
of
the
committee.
J
Yeah,
so
it
wasn't
totally
on
this
specific
motion
I'm
just
so
just
so
I
understand
what
we're
suggesting
we're
gonna
get
a
timeline
drafted.
The
timeline
will
involve
asking
for
the
preparation
of
briefing
materials
by
Research
Services,
but
that's
not
going
to
be
presented
right,
the
technical
briefing,
because
there's
if
we
anticipate
that
this
committee
may
have
different
membership
once
it's
making
decisions
I,
don't
know
that
we'd
necessarily
need
the
current
committee
members
briefed
I'm,
just
I
just
want
to
get
an
idea
of
what
like
whether
we're
asking
Research
Services
to
start
preparing.
B
If
I
can
thank
you
member
again,
I
think
my
understanding
is
that
if
we
had
the
technical
briefings
up
front
say
in
early
February,
that
will
all
be
a
matter
of
record
of
the
committee.
So
it
could
be
presented
to
the
the
future
commit
committee
for
their
use
and
they
would
have
the
option
of
if
they
wanted
to
of
having
another
technical
briefing
if
they
wanted.
B
But
I
think
it
just
gives
our
kind
of
puts
the
wheels
in
motion
for
for
this
part
of
the
committee
and
and
does
a
little
bit
of
The
Upfront
work
for
the
future
committee,
so
that
they
would
be
able
to
because
again,
they're
they're
going
to
be
tossed
into
this,
like
quite
likely
in
the
fall
of
of
next
year.
So
just
trying
to
get
as
much
of
the
work
done
up
front
that
and
hopefully
it
isn't
redundant
any
other
ideas.
A
C
Ahead
so
I
wonder
if
I
could
just
ask
that
anything
we
decide
when
the
new
committee
is
constructed
after
an
election,
they
can
just
redecide
anything
right.
They
can
go
back.
Okay,
so
we're
not
binding
them
in
any
way
whatsoever.
I
didn't
think
so,
but
no.
C
Just
like.
B
Like
I
said,
I
think
just
trying
to
get
some
of
the
some
of
the
upfront
work
done.
I
think
that
will
it
will
be
a
benefit
if,
if
it
was
my
position
to
take
over
that
committee
and
there's
a
bunch
of
that
upfront,
work
had
been
done.
B
You
know
having
a
meeting
with
with
the
new
group
and
having
a
discussion
on
what
stuff
is
going
to
be
accepted
and
where
they
want
to
go.
I
think
that
that
would
be
totally
up
to
them.
L
I
think
clarification
further,
so
the
current
version
of
the
committee
gets
dissolved.
The
new
committee
gets
appointed
and
has
to
be
re-tasked
with
the
job
of
reviewing
the
act,
so
I
guess
I'm
interpreting,
then
that
the
new
committee
would
have
a
year
from
the
start
date
that
they
are
tasked
to
do
this,
not
the
start
date
that
we
have
been
passed
to
do
it
with
correct.
That's.
B
L
B
B
Okay,
any
discussion
on
the
motion
did
you
want
to
speak
to
it?
Mr
turton.
D
Yeah
I
think
this
in
your
words,
Mr
chair,
this
kind
of
gets
the
ball
rolling
allows
maybe
at
least
notice
that
we
are
going
to
be
requesting
these.
This
information
and
I
believe
these
technical
briefings
can
be
used
by
the
future
committee
as
well.
So
I
think
this
will
help
at
least
move
the
ball
down
the
field
a
little
bit,
and
you
know,
obviously
with
the
future
meeting
from
the
committee
aspect
of
the
motion.
It
just
gives
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
for
us
to
be
able
to
do
it
as
well.
B
You,
sir
Ms
Ganley.
J
Yeah
I
guess
my
point
would
just
be
that
it
doesn't
move
the
ball
down
the
field
at
all.
If
I
was
a
future
member
of
this
committee,
I
mean
assuming
I
hadn't
been
in
this
instance,
so
you
know
projecting
some
hypothetical
new
person.
That's
on
this
committee
I
would
expect
to
be
briefed
by
officials.
I
would
expect
to
get
to
ask
my
own
set
of
questions
for
my
own
understanding
and
I.
Don't
think
I
would
find
the
fact
that
a
previous
committee
had
had
a
briefing
particularly
helpful
in
that
respect.
J
M
E
I
think
we're
half
pregnant
either
way.
We
do
it
here,
so
we're
trying
to
get
as
much
work
as
we
can
on
the
front
end.
The
clerks
are
going
to
be
doing
this
work,
regardless
of
whether
this
is
the
same
people
sitting
around
the
table
post-election
or
or
after
at
least
they
can
get
the
timelines
together.
They
can
get
the
technical
briefs
that
are
internal
they're,
not
having
to
redouble
their
efforts
and
and
or
wait
again
for
another
six
months
before
they
get
started.
E
If
the
new
committee
decides
to
throw
that
in
the
trash
can
or
to
use
it
for
the
good
work
that
it
would
be,
I
think
at
least
our
committee
at
this
point
is,
quite
frankly
putting
the
people's
money
to
work
and
using
the
time
that
we
have
appropriately
so
I
I
would
support
the
motion.
I
think
that
we
should
at
least
do
something
not
sit
around
wait
to
do
nothing
because
there's
going
to
be
an
election
in
six
months.
Just
thank.
B
You
and
I'd
just
like
to
add
to
the
committee
members
that
we
have
been
given
an
assignment
by
the
legislature
through
motion
seven,
so
we
we
have
the
unfortunate
knowledge
of
upcoming
events,
but
we
have
to
act
as
a
committee
like
we
don't
have
that
foreknowledge
of
of
budget
estimates
and
an
election
coming
in
May.
So
we
we
technically
have
work
to
do
and
so
I
I
think
it's
important
that
we
do
follow
with
with
it.
B
C
I
I
think
the
point
here
is
that
there's
two
separate
things:
one
of
them
is
getting
the
work
done
behind
the
scenes
by
our
excellent
staff
who
bring
together
the
information
but
actually
presenting
it
to
the
committee.
It
seems
to
be
the
waste
of
time
because
the
committee
won't
be
the
committee,
so
can
we
just
ask
them
to?
C
N
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair
I,
would
like
to
support
this
motion
here
and
I
think
that
it
has
been
a
common
practice
to
invite
technical
briefings
from
the
ministry
of
justice
and
Office
of
the
ethics
commissioner,
as
they
are
more
familiar
with
the
legislation.
That
is
the
subject
of
review
of
the
committee,
and
this
will
ensure
us
to
have
a
full
enough
understanding
of
the
conflict
of
interest
act
and
should
we
have
some
questions
later,
I
think
they
are
in
the
best
position
to
answer
them
and,
having
said
the
Mr
chair,
I
support
this
motion.
E
E
The
new
committee
can
take
that
on
the
record
whether
we
approve
on
a
list
whether
we
approve
on
the
timelines,
that's
inconsequential,
but
at
least
this
committee
either
says
thumbs
up
or
thumbs
down
to
leave
it
just
to
be
in
the
wind,
I
I
honestly
think.
If
I
was
coming
in
and
I
didn't,
have
the
prayer
previous
committee
give
it
a
sniff
test?
I
would
be
hesitant
to
accept
any,
but
not
probably
start
over.
So
at
least,
if
we're
moving
the
ball
downfield,
we
spent
the
time
the
capital
and
the
effort
for
it.
E
N
B
B
We
need
further
motions,
one
for
cross
jurisdictional
and
one
for
stakeholders.
Chris
and
you've
got
them
written
yeah.
We
have
some
okay.
E
And
I
question
back
to
their
our
wonderful
clerk
staff
who
span
electoral
Cycles,
which
is
awesome
to
have
that
tribal
knowledge.
How
long
does
that?
How
long
does
that
typically
take
and
do
you
anticipate
any
changes?
I
guess,
since
the
last
time
you've
performed
these
duties
in,
as
in
regards
to
across
jurisdictional
review,
go
ahead.
H
Thank
you,
Mr
chair
yeah,
across
jurisdictions,
they're
they're,
they're,
emote,
they're,
a
mouthful
they're,
a
big
they're,
a
big
project,
but
you're
right.
We
build
on
the
one
from
that.
We
would
have
done
the
last
time
five
years
ago,
but
of
course,
legislation
changes
and
sometimes
new
legislation
gets
enacted
and
you
need
to
kind
of
add
that
into
the
project.
But
it's
something
that
I
would
say
is
takes
a
month
or
two
to
prepare.
H
Would
you
say
that's
yeah
a
month
or
two
to
prepare,
and
so
certainly
you
know
it's
something
that
that
could
be
prepared
and
provided
to
this
committee
during
like
this,
you
know
this
winter,
maybe
April
kind
of
thing
would
be
possibly
even
be.
Whenever
the
committee
thinks
they
might
need
it,
we
we
will
endeavor
to
to
make
sure
that
we
have
it
ready
for
you.
Thank.
B
You
I
look
at
the
the
timeline
that,
if
it's
going
to
be
a
month
or
two
that
that's
January
February,
then
we're
right
into
budget
and
estimates,
so
I
would
say
probably
presentation
sometime
in
the
in
April.
What
to
the
committee
would
be
reasonable.
Would
that
be
okay?
Thank
you
right,
any
other
discussion,
or
would
somebody
like
to
make
the
motion.
I
We'll
read
it
into
the
record:
yes,
thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
it's
not
working
on
the
projectors
on
the
screen
right
now,
but
I'll
just
read
it
into
the
record:
move
by
the
member
that
the
standing
committee
on
resource
stewardship,
invite
technical
briefing,
invite
a
technical
briefing.
I
Yeah,
sorry
about
that,
sorry,
that
the
standing
committee
on
resource
stewardship,
direct
resource
stewardship,
sorry
direct
Research
Services
to
prepare
across
jurisdictional
review
of
legislation
in
relation
to
the
committee's
review
of
the
conflicts
of
interest
act.
For.
An
upcoming
meeting
of
the
committee.
B
B
That
motion
is
carried
so
we'll
move
on
to
the
stakeholders
list.
Honorable
members,
but
also
now
open
discussion
on
developing
a
stakeholders
list,
as
members
know,
in
this
common
practice
to
develop
a
list
of
organizations
and
persons
as
stakeholders
who
the
committee
specifically
identifies
for
their
expertise
and
knowledge
of
the
perfect
for
the
purposes
of
seeking
information
from
them.
There
are
a
couple
of
ways
the
committee
can
go
about
doing
this.
We
can
ask
Research
Services
with
compiling
a
draft
stakeholder
list
to
be
brought
before
the
committee
for
our
next
meeting
for
review
and
approval.
B
B
If
the
committee
elects
to
have
Research
Services
prepare
a
draft
stakeholders
list,
a
Committee
Member
will
of
course,
have
an
opportunity
to
review
the
list
and
provide
input
prior
to
it
being
finalized.
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
open
the
floor
to
the
discussion
and
any
motions
relating
to
the
matter
of
developing
a
list
of
stakeholders.
The
committee
might
wish
to
call
upon
I
see
member
Isaac
has
her
hand
up
go
ahead.
K
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair
I,
just
want
to
clarify
that
this
stakeholder
list
has
its
developed.
You've
noted
several
different
ways
in
which
it
might
be
developed.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
members
of
the
committee
that
follow
after
the
next
election
will
also
have
the
opportunity
to
have
input
into
that
list
of
stakeholders.
K
A
K
B
No
it
would
it
would
not
once
the
the
new
committee
is
formed
and
the
motion
is
put
forward
from
the
floor,
assigning
them
to
review
the
ACT
that
just
it
starts
the
the
clock
brand
new,
whether
they
use
the
materials
that
we
provide
them
or
not,
is
up
to
them.
So
they
can
accept
our
our
submissions
stakeholder
list
completely
partially
or
started
completely
Anew
again,
it's
it's
totally
up
to
them.
N
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair
I,
just
want
to
know
how
the
previous
stakeholder
Lister
has
been
developed.
We
develop
it
and
how
long
does
it
take.
H
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
thank
you,
Mr
Singh.
In
the
past,
Research
Services
has
been
tasked
with
drafting
a
a
draft
list
for
for
approval
of
the
committee
and
then
sometimes
the
committee
will
then
add
a
few
add
a
few
names
and
then
it's
finalized.
H
F
Ahead,
Mr
doc.
Thank
you,
Clarity.
Yet
leave
the
research
just
about
answered.
My
question
wanted
to
know:
should
we
instruct
Research
Services
to
develop
and
draft
stakeholders
list
when
they
come
back
with
that
list,
potentially
in
January
or
so
at
that
point,
do
we
still
have
options
as
a
committee
to
add
to
it,
that's
I
believe
what
she
said.
Yeah.
B
F
F
B
And
you
know
just
just
just
a
reminder:
I
believe
this.
This
act
has
been
reviewed
three
three
times
previously,
so
there's
probably
a
pretty
comprehensive
list
of
stakeholders
that
you
know
some
may
still
be
around
some,
maybe
not,
but
but
we
can
definitely
add
to
them
if,
as
we
see
fit
as
a
committee,
okay,
so.
B
Yeah
absolutely
I
would
I
would
encourage
committee
members
to
think
about
it.
You
know
over
the
next
couple
weeks
over
Christmas,
while
you're
having
your
eggnog
and-
and
you
know,
if
there's
somebody
that
comes
to
mind
jot
it
down,
so
that
when
we
get
the
stakeholders
listed,
those
those
organizations
don't
get
left
out.
If,
if
you
feel
they're
important
but
absolutely
we'll
have
input
from
everyone
to
make,
that
list
is
as
useful
as
we
can.
I
guess
for
the
next
committee
group
all
right
any
further
discussion
on
this
motion.
L
B
Mr
turton's
already
spoken
up.
Sorry
Mr.
D
B
B
We
have
next
on
our
list.
B
Yeah,
so
we
do
have
two
other
items
on
the
or
on
the
list.
The
I'd
like
to
open
up
the
Florida
for
discussion
on
public
written
submissions
and
Communications,
planned
I,
I.
Think
what
I'm
hearing
from
the
discussions
we've
had
so
far
that
those
would
be
kind
of
redundant
exercises.
So
we
may.
But
again
it's
up
to
the
committee
go
ahead:
Mr
Jackson,
yeah.
E
Mr
chair
I'm
kind
of
the
same
context
or
the
same
mindset.
Maybe
we
should
ride
the
clutch
on
these
ones
and
leave
that
for
the
new
committee
or
or
whatever
we
can
in
those
regards
again.
If
we
do
a
bunch
of
work
in
the
front
end,
the
other
group
may
or
may
not
see
it.
We
might
have
new
stakeholders,
we
might
have
new
submissions
Etc
in
that,
in
all
likelihood,
I
would
think
that
would
go
for
the
communications
plan
as
well.
E
B
Yeah
and
again
did
you
have
something
no
yeah
I
agree:
Mr
Gatson,
like
like
I,
said
before
we
we
still
have
to
you,
know
charge
down
like
we're
heading
for
the
goal
line,
so
to
speak,
because
we
have
been
given
the
assignment,
so
we
have
to
carry
on
and
I
just
I'd
like
us
to
focus
more
on
stuff.
That's
going
to
be
meaningful
to
the
next
committee.
B
If,
but
at
the
same
time
we
have
to
go
down
the
path
like
we
don't
know
what's
coming
in
the
future,
so
it's
it's
kind
of
a
tough
situation
to
be
in,
but
I
do
agree,
Mr,
getson
that
we
should
probably
just
idle
on
those.
If
there's
any
other
discussion
on
that,
do
we
need
a
motion
to
that
effect,
or
we
just
kind
of
carry
on
all
right.
B
We'll
move
on
to
item
number
six,
which
is
one
final
item
we
should
discuss,
is
the
request
from
the
South
Grove
Regional
Economic
Development
Group,
to
present
to
the
committee.
They
sent
a
request
to
the
to
present
to
the
committee
back
on
November
26
of
2021..
The
committee
should
decide
if
it
would
like
to
hear
the
presentation
at
a
future
meeting
and
I'll
open
the
floor
to
discussion
on
that
item
as
well.
A
B
Okay,
my
question
to
the
clerk,
then,
would
be
that
I
know
that
we've
we've
passed
standing
orders
to
allow
other
things
to
take
place.
Do
we
is
there
a
time
timeline
where
we
would
have
some
space
to
maybe
set
up
and
meet
with
these
folks
before.
H
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
certainly
as
long
as
it's
not
during
main
estimates,
the
committee
is
certainly
welcome.
Like
you're
you're
right,
the
standing
order
was
standards
were
amended
to
permit
a
committee
that
is
tasked
with
a
statute
review
or
something
else
from
the
assembly
to
also
consider
and
do
other
work.
If,
if
the
committee
determines
that
time
permits
for
that.
A
E
We
have
an
energy
caucus
that
I'm
a
co-chair
of
so
I
can
take
that
on
as
well
and
then
under
economic
corridors.
This
one
kind
of
sits
within
that
wheelhouse,
so
outside
of
this
committee,
I'm
just
throwing
that
on
the
table
for
folks
that
I
could
probably
meet
with
these
this
group
a
heck
of
a
lot
quicker
than
we
could
with
the
Committees
and
then
not
have
those
delays.
E
During
estimates,
Etc
I
missed
with
Mr
Feehan
on
this
I,
really
like
what
they're
up
to
and
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
share
that
information
to
the
members
around
the
table
afterwards.
If,
if
that
would
be
the
will
of
committee,
I
can
meet
with
them
quick
and
give
you
an
update
of
what's
taking
place
and
again
not
to
preclude
this
group
or
any
other
writing
and
letters
and
wanting
to
meet
with
us
specifically.
But
just
since
they've
been
since
November
of
last
year,
I
feel
quite
frankly,
kind
of
compelled
to
meet
with
them.
B
And
it
has
been
kind
of
tough
to
organize
those
things
over
the
last
couple
years
meeting
in
person,
especially,
but
do
we
have
any
idea
of
what
timeline
that
they're
looking
for
how
much
time
that
they
would
want?
Has
there
been
any
indication
at
all.
I
Go
ahead,
Mr
yeah,
thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
no
I
haven't
had
any
discussions
about
how
long
it
would
be,
but
I
think
generally.
This
type
of
thing
is
a
one
meeting
one
meeting
and
it's
maybe
20
minutes
for
their
presentation
and
then
40
minutes
of
q
a
afterwards
and
then
and
then
the
and
then
that's
kind
of
I
think
that's
I
think
that's
the
whole
process.
There
I
stand
to
be
corrected
if
there's
more,
but
thank.
H
J
J
Yeah
I,
just
I
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
think
it's
possible
for
multiple
groups
to
meet
with
the
same
stakeholder
and
I'm
I'm
happy
to
have
them
come
and
make
a
presentations
to
the
committee.
I
think
they
requested
to
present
to
the
committee
and
I
think
that
that's
a
good
idea.
It's
really
interesting
work
that
they're
doing
so
yeah
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
make
a
motion
to
do
that.
If
Mr
getson
wants
to
meet
with
them
separately
sooner
and
that's
amenable
to
them.
That
seems
fine.
B
Okay,
I
have
a
question
for
the
clerks,
then.
So,
if,
if
we
have
we've
already
passed
motions
for
technical
briefing,
would
it
be
possible?
Can
we
combine
two
meetings,
so
we
could
do
it
the
same
day
rather
than
have
the
committee
reconvene
just
specifically
for
that
with
the
committee?
Okay,
so
that
is
allowable.
Is
that
something
the
committee
would
agree
to
then
that
we
set
up
the
technical
briefing
and
bring
these
folks
in
at
the
same
time,
if
they're,
if
it
fits
in
with
their
calendar
as
well,
yeah
and.
E
Again,
I
guess
I
would
just
offer
again
through
those
other
avenues
to
miss
gamley's
Point
I
I
will
be
reaching
out
to
him
again.
I
feel
kind
of
compelled
with
the
work
they're
doing
to
put
a
nice
bow
on
a
ribbon
on
it,
and
if
that
works,
that
we
want
to
meet
with
them
again.
As
a
Folsom
group,
yeah
no
issues.
F
D
You
very
much
thank
you
very
much
I
I
support.
The
motion
is
put
forth
by
member
Ganley
I.
Think
this
committee,
or
this
group
did
ask
to
come
before
this
legislative
committee,
which
is
public
and
transparent
and
open
to
the
public
and
I
support
them,
presenting
in
that
fashion,
the
same
manner
that
other
groups
have
come
for
other
legislative
committees
as
well,
so
I
don't
see
any
harm
with
them
coming
here.
I
actually
think
it
will
be
a
positive
aspect
to
have
their
voice
put
in
the
public
discussion.
So
thank
you.
D
B
You
Mr
turton,
Ms
Ganley
is
that
fit
in
if
we
can,
as
a
committee
like
I'm,
more
than
happy
to
meet
with
these
folks,
they've
been
very
patient
and
if
we
can
actually
set
it
up
so
that
we
we
do
it
the
same
day
as
our
as
our
technical
briefing
I'd
be
happy
to
entertain
that,
if
that's
the
will
of
the
committee.
L
J
B
K
C
H
C
J
A
B
Day
to
the
next
meeting
will
be
at
the
call
of
the
chair.
I
will
be
in
touch
with
Research
Services
and
we'll
try
and
line
something
up
for
the
technical
briefing
at
the
soonest
possible,
probably
the
first
week
of
February
somewhere
in
that
area.
If
we
can
and
at
the
same
time
we'll
invite
the
group
Sales
Grove
Regional
Economic
Development,
to
come
and
present
at
the
same
time,
if
there's
nothing
else
for
the
committee's
consideration,
I'll
call
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
Mr
Nielsen
is
on
the
record.