►
From YouTube: April 8, 2020 AF Planning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
D
All
right,
let's
welcome
everybody
out
to
planning
commission
mean
for
April
the
8th,
2020,
we're
gonna
bypass
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
and
the
benefit
of
hoping
to
make
it
go
a
little
smoother
faster.
We're
gonna
have
to
do
a
roll
call
vote
after
each
item,
so
I
think
it's
a
little
longer
to
get.
The
information
needs
to
Lisa
to
record.
D
E
Okay,
so
this
first
item
on
the
agenda
tonight,
as
the
chairman
stated,
is
the
American
Eagle
ready-mix
site
plan.
Again
it's
proposed
to
operate
at
approximately
1,700
South
and
500
East.
It's
within
the
proposed
lakeland
industrial
park
subdivision,
which
is
the
following
item
on
the
agenda,
but
these
can
run
separate
from
each
other.
This
property
was
recently
annexed
and
then
some
improvements
for
this
site
were
initially
constructed
without
a
formal
site
plan
approval
and
then
the
the
facility
was
required
to
basically
halt
any
operations
until
an
approval
was
given
if
an
approval
would
be
given.
E
So
a
site
plan
was
submitted,
which
is
now
before
you
tonight,
as
the
Planning
Commission
I
just
wanted
to
touch
briefly
on
the
use
and
site
plan
requirements
for
the
I
1
zone.
Those
are
covered
under
Section
17
for
503
and
17-6
101
of
the
city's
development
code,
so
within
the
industrial
zone
itself.
E
So
in
17
for
503,
the
code
states
that
structures
and
areas
used
for
the
manufacturing
compounding
processing,
fabrication
and
warehousing
of
goods
and
materials
are
allowed
within
the
zone,
provided
that
none
of
the
activities
carried
out
on
the
premises
shall
produce
any
noxious
odor
or
any
fumes
smoke.
Noise,
vapor
vibration,
glare
or
similar
condition,
which
is
harmful
to
persons
or
which
is
readily
discernible
beyond
the
boundary
of
the
zone.
And
then
it
goes
on
a
little
further
with
that
from
the
application
materials
that
we
have.
E
E
The
site
plan
before
you
also
illustrates
a
structure
towards
the
north
end
of
the
property.
Also
south
of
1700
South.
The
I-1
zone
does
require
a
30-foot
front
setback
for
structures
which
would
apply
to
this
one
adjacent
to
1,700.
South
I
would
just
ask
that
verification
of
this
setback
is
met,
and
then
there
are
a
few
small
items
under
the
landscaping
provisions
of
the
code.
That
I
would
like
clarified
that
the
applicant
could
either
clarify
tonight
or
you
know,
provide
some
additional
information
and
I've
outlined
those
in
the
report.
E
In
17-6
that
addresses
application
materials
for
site
plan,
I've
outlined
what
basically,
what
the
site
plan
shows
and
any
deficiencies
that
may
be
there
with
that.
So
I
do
have
those
questions
that
I
would
like
to
have
addressed
for
further
information
and
I
can
try
to
answer
any
planning
related
questions
that
you
may
have,
and
then
I
would
like
to
just
note
for
the
record
John.
E
We
don't
have
to
do
this
right
now,
but
as
we
discuss
this
I
do
have
some
letters
of
opposition
and
some
additional
information
that
I've
sent
on
to
you
as
the
Planning
Commission
from
a
neighboring
property
owner
and
his
legal
counsel.
So
if
you'd
like
me
to
touch
on
those
later,
I
can,
but
my
staff
report
I
can
answer
any
questions
on
that.
Any.
F
C
F
F
E
D
And
I
have
to
agree
I
think
this
site
plan
is
very
ambiguous.
There's
no
well
they're
asking
for
forgiveness
over
permissions,
but
it
comes
down
to
I
was
down
at
this
afternoon
and
they're
still
working
on
that
plan.
As
of
1:50
p.m.
this
afternoon,
I'm
just
wondering
the
red
tag
isn't
being
effective
with
aren't
paying
attention
to
it,
but
I
even
wonder
how
they're
gonna
keep
the
dust
on
site,
especially
the
the
report.
D
I
got
said:
they're
gonna
be
at
30
cubic
yards
per
hour
or
300
cubic
yards
per
hour,
I'm,
not
sure
which
ones
which
and
if
they're
doing
300
cubic
yards
an
hour.
That's
a
lot
of
trucks
begin
cement
powder
in
fly.
Ash
in
aggregate
in
their
site,
Glenn
doesn't
show
any
stock
piles
where
their
aggregate
piles
are
gonna,
be
this
site.
Time
is
very,
very
sketchy
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
F
And
with
those
in
with
those
types
of
materials,
those
also
have
to
have
to
be
contained,
I
mean
they're
they're.
This
type
of
operation
that
you
know
has
as
me
concerned,
because
it's
only
it's
not
only
the
hauling
in
and
out
and
the
processing.
That's
also
the
protection
of
any
materials
used
to
make
the
concrete
those
house
had
to
be
protected,
that
if
I
remember
right
and.
D
E
If
you'd
like,
we
can
move
on,
engineering
can
address
any
comments
they
may
have,
and
we
can
also
allow
the
applicant
to
address
us
and
then
we
could
just
you
could
discuss
it
further
as
a
commission
and
decide
which
way
you'd
like
to
go
we're
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
other
questions.
If
you
have
them
as
well,
all.
I
A
lot
of
the
things
pertaining
to
infrastructure,
public
improvements,
right-of-way
one
of
the
things
that
you'll
notice,
that's
conditional
in
our
engineering
report-
is
that
the
improvements
basically
500
East
and
1700
South
the
improvements
that
are
required
street
curb
gutter,
some
utilities
they're
shown
as
part
of
the
lake
and
subdivision
plat.
That's
the
next
item,
and
so
one
of
the
conditions
that
we
put
on
here
is
that,
depending
whichever
one
comes
in
first,
those
improvements
will
need
to
be
constructed
and
installed
as
part
of
that.
I
So
as
far
as
some
of
the
off-site
infrastructure,
we
do
have
plans
that
have
been
reviewed
and
and
whatnot
and
they
meet
code
and
meet
our
standards
as
far
as
that
goes
on
the
off
sites
off
site
improvements.
That
way,
and
then
anything
else.
As
far
as
pertaining
on-site
operations
and
and
stuff,
the
applicant
would
probably
be
be
able
to
better
address
some
of
those
items
or.
J
I
So
as
part
of
the
subdivision
plat,
there
will
be
some
underground
utilities,
bringing
culinary
water
down
here,
pressurized
irrigation
water
down
here
and
so
forth.
I'll,
let
Scott
talk
a
little
bit
more
as
far
as
as
water
supply
water
demand
some
of
those
conditions,
because
that
is
also
one
of
the
other
conditions
we
have
in
our
report.
So.
K
Just
generally,
my
comments
are
maybe
more
a
little
bit.
System-Wide
then
specifically
towards
this,
because,
as
Ben
said
once
those
the
infrastructure
is
put
in
down
there
near
this.
Whether
it's
the
the
lakeland
item
or
this
item
again,
has
been
said-
whoever's
first
will
need
to
put
in
the
the
pipes
right
next
to
it.
But
system-wide
is,
is
you
all
know?
We've
had
discussions
over
the
last
couple
of
meetings
about
where
we
are,
and
this
area
is
just
like
the
areas
of
the
Tod
where
we
have.
K
We
know
some
major
items
are
pipes
that
need
to
get
built
to
be
able
to
feed
this
area.
It
looks
like
the
city,
we
are
proceeding,
our
recommendation,
but
the
way
we've
worded
it
and
we're
gonna
probably
continually
work.
This
in
our
engineering
reports
is,
is
that
if
the
city
and
meaning
that
the
City
Council
and
is
able
to
commit
to
build
these
water
lines
that
get
more
water
to
the
whole
southern
part
of
the
city,
then
we
recommend
approval.
K
If
the
city
is
not
able
to
commit,
then
we
recommend
denial
and
any
new
growth
really
in
the
south
part
of
the
city.
It's
not
unique
to
this
development,
that's
a
system-wide!
So
that's
the
way.
We've
we've
worded
our
recommendation
on
that
particular
issue
and
if
you've
got
any
questions,
I'll
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
that.
So.
J
K
It
is
tied
in
today
it
would
not
fail,
but
with
everything
that
is,
has
been
approved.
There's
a
lot
that's
been
approved
so
far
that
has
not
yet
been
built
or
it
hasn't
gone.
It's
full
occupancy
if
everything
that
is
either
under
construction,
approved
or
pending
approval,
getting
close
to
being
approved,
including
some
things
that
are
later
on
the
agenda
today.
If
all
of
those
things
are
approved
and
built
and
occupied,
but
the
water
lines
aren't
built
by
the
time.
They're
all
occupied
we'll
have
a
problem.
G
K
Those
lines
are
not
built.
That's
why
we've
said
conditionally.
If
those
lines
are
built,
there
won't
be
a
problem.
There's
a
time
delay
between
approval,
obviously
and
occupy
occupancy.
Excuse
me
and
there's
a
time
delay
between
hey
we're,
designing
the
waterlines
which
we're
doing
right
now
and
the
water
line
being
operational.
If
those
two
things
proceeded
parallel,
we'll
be
fine.
Well,.
J
I
mean:
is
that
a
is
that
a
safe
way
to
look
at
it
in
the
sense
of
that
the
plots
have
been
approved,
and
so
with
that
the
demand
is
coming
and
we'll
be
on
on
the
system
and
there's
been
a
commitment
by
the
by
the
city.
Already
you,
through
the
plat
approval
to
service
those
those
watts,
and
so
should
we
not
be
looking
at
it
as
those
those
those
pre
of
those
watts
are.
K
J
K
J
K
K
In
fact,
literally
just
a
few
minutes
ago,
I
was
finishing
up
my
part
of
an
application
to
the
state
that
I
forget
which
agency
I
apologize
but
to
be
able
to
getting
a
low-interest
loan
to
fund
all
those
water
lines.
So
that's
in
the
works,
but
obviously
that's
got
to
be
approved
and
the
City
Council
has
to
bless
the
borrowing
of
that
money
and
that's
a
that's
a
process,
that's
underway,
but
I,
obviously,
don't
speak
for
the
City,
Council
I
know
every
budget
retreat
I've
gone
to.
K
They
understand
this
and
seem
to
be
on
board
with
that.
We
need
to
build
these
water
lines,
but
they
have
not
yet
taken
the
formal
action
to
accept
this
loan
and
and
get
this
that's
that's
coming.
That
will
take
it
to
them,
but
again,
I
until
that
action
has
not
formally
taken
place
by
them.
Yet,
okay,.
L
L
You
hear
me
that's
a
little
bit
better
well,
I
just
feel
like
so
much
of
what
we're
doing
tonight
has
that
same
requirement
that
we
need
to
have
that
commitment
from
City
Council
before
we
can
move
ahead
and
I
I
I
guess
I
feel
like
rod.
A
little
bit
like
I
feel
uncomfortable
making
these
moves
without
that
firm
commitment.
K
E
Christine
and
the
rest
of
the
Planning
Commission
I
think
the
way
engineering
has
kind
of
prefaced
that
or
given
it
a
caveat
is
really
wise
in
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
bind
your
hands
as
far
as
making
a
recommendation
or
a
decision,
because
what
it's
it's
it
is
putting
it
kind
of
on
the
council
that
you're
still
free
to
make
any
recommendation
or
decision.
With
the
caveat
that
if
these
lines
are
to
be
done,
then
yes,
we
recommend
approval
and
then
again
that
places
it
on
the
council.
E
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
you
need
to
feel
kind
of
frozen
in
place
at
this
point.
I
think,
because
the
many
of
the
items
still
move
on
to
them
for
final
decision-making,
and
then
they
can
see
that
in
the
minutes
that
it
was
discussed
here
at
the
Planning
Commission,
so
I
think
that
you're
still
able
to
move
well.
H
So
this
is
just
what
Scott
mentioned
month
or
so
ago.
That
would
be
happening.
Any
of
these
future
projects
have
come
down.
This
line
would
be
have
this
recommendation
on
there
and
I
agree
I'm,
saying
that
I
Christine
that
we
can
make
that
known
when
we
make
our
recommendations
to
to
reference.
What
Scott
saying
there.
C
J
Can
appreciate
that
position?
I
truly,
do
that
you
know
it's
conditioned
upon.
You
know
the
infrastructure
of
the
water
lines
going
in
I
feel
like
there's
also
a
little
bit
of
a
disservice
if
they
receive
the
approval
and
then
they
get
stopped
because
because,
if
there's
not
an
ability
to
service
it,
and
so
there's
there's
some
one
of
us
alts
approval-
maybe
that's
the
wrong
term,
but
the
sense
that
they
received
an
approval
and
then
they
were
unable
to
receive
that
that
commitment
by
the
city
and.
K
J
D
E
Know
in
the
case
of
what's
sorry
in
the
case
of
what's
before
you
now
in
this
site
plan,
you
are
the
body
that
makes
a
decision
on
this
one.
So
this
is
one
of
those
instances
where
the
Planning
Commission
makes
that
decision,
for
you
know
yes
approval
or
no
or
table
that
this
one
is
in
your
hands.
So.
K
In
this
one,
there
is
adequate
water,
I
mean
again.
If
this
is
built,
the
system
will
handle
this.
It's
it's
with
all
the
others
that
you'll
see
coming
forward.
That
there's
there's
an
issue.
Hence
our
conditional
recommendation
on
pretty
much
everything
you
see
tonight
with
with
this
question
sure.
J
C
M
N
J
I
I
Basically,
whenever
an
applicant
fills
out
the
technical
review
committee
form
and
applies
for
us
to
review
their
design
and
work
it
through
the
process.
There
is
a
box
in
there
that
identifies
when
a
traffic
study
is
required
for
industrial
uses,
it's
generally
when
it's
over
a
hundred
thousand
square
feet.
Obviously,
in
this
particular
case,
it
was
something
that
hadn't
didn't
meet
that
threshold
and
haven't
been
required,
but
because
of
that
threshold,
but
it's
similar
to
John's
question
earlier.
As
far
as
you
know
how
many
truckloads
you're
coming
in,
is
it
on
the
low
end?
I
Is
it
on
the
high
end?
You
know,
perhaps
that
may
be
something
that
the
applicant
could
give
a
little
further
information
to
be
able
to
give
an
idea
with
that.
You
know,
if
that's
a
concern
of
the
Planning
Commission,
then
then
that
could
also
be
something
that
could
be
included
with
any
sort
of
recommendations.
It.
J
I
Very
good
questions:
you
know
that
yeah
would
could
potentially
pose.
You
know
the
in
this
particular
instance.
It
probably
good
to
have
that
information
and
and
to
be
able
to
find
that
out
and
and
how
the
applicant
provide
that
you
know
that
additional
information,
if
that's
the
direction
that
the
Planning
Commission,
feels
that
you
would
like
to
look
at
that,
since
it
didn't
meet
the
threshold
that
we
generally
require
a
traffic
study.
Okay,.
D
That's
why
I
drank
about
thirty
cubic
yards
an
hour
to
300
cubic
yards
of
our
that's
a
perfect
going
out
of
the
facility
and
if
they
got
300
yards
going
out,
they've
got
a
lot
of
bulk
materials
coming
in
also.
So
it's
it's
a
matter
of
how
much
they're
actually
going
to
produce
with
30
yards
or
300
yards
an
hour.
B
B
C
D
B
E
E
In
the
eye,
one
zone
uses
that
are
prohibited
are
called
out,
but
there's
not
necessarily
a
list
of
what's
allowed.
That's
why
it
kind
of
falls
under
that
umbrella
of
those
terms.
So
there
are
I
believe
there's
four
ish
or
four
uses
under
be
beat
like
right
there,
where
the
arrows
are.
Those
are
ones
that
are
not
allowed
in
the
zone.
E
Anything
else
that
kind
of
falls
within
the
parameters
of
the
I
guess
you
could
say
issues
listed
above
like
processing
fabrication,
it's
kind
of
up
to
the
Planning
Commission
to
make
those
determinations
based
on
a
few
mitigation
factors.
If
you
will
how
they're
going
to
address
some
of
those
items.
So
again,
we
do
call
out
some
that
are
not
allowed,
but
a
lot
of
the
others
are
kind
of
an
interpretation
we
do
have.
Some
that
are
called
out
under
item
B,
but
mostly
the
ones
that
are
not
allowed
are
called
out
is.
L
E
D
K
K
G
N
L
N
B
K
N
No
I
appreciate
I,
appreciate
you
working
through
this,
this
technical
problem
and
our
situation
right
now
at
the
virus,
but
just
I
was
just
like,
took
some
notes.
Listening
to
the
meeting
and
one
of
the
members
commented
about
crushing
or
processing,
you
know
concrete
and
Dustin
we're
not
processing
any.
You
know
concrete.
N
Making
ready
mix
with
washed
aggregates,
which
have
you
know,
it's
got
water
they've
been
washed,
and
so
they
come
in
with
water.
The
dusties,
the
dust
with
the
raw
products
is
minimal.
I
do
have
I,
do
have
an
air
quality
permit
already
secured
through
DEQ
in
the
state
of
Utah,
and
we
and
we
have
all
the
equipment
needed
to
you
know
to
maintain
our
dust
and
dust
control.
N
So
that's
one
thing
on
that
site
plan:
the
site
plan
that
you
have
seems
to
be
a
little
bit,
not
I,
don't
think
it's
the
latest
I
plan.
If
you
look
at
that
site
plan
in
the
lower
it
be
the
southeast
corner,
there's
a
series
of
ponds
back
in
that
that
we
site
for
both
storm
drain
and
for
mixer
washout.
If
you
will
so,
we.
N
Retain
a
hundred
percent
of
our
water
and
we
recycle
our
water.
The
other
comment
with
regards
to
water
is:
we
believe
we
believe
that
the
current
use
meet
meets
the
city's
volume
and
but
we
also
have
an
alternative
option
for
two
wells
that
we
have,
that
will
service
that
property.
So
the
intention
is
to
use
well
water.
In
the
event,
the
well
water
is
not
available,
supplement
with
city,
culinary
water,
trying
to
just
trying
to
think
and
address
all
your
questions
we
we
did.
We
did
the
traffic
study
that's
required
to
achieve
the
building
permit.
N
We
gave
the
engineer
all
the
information
that
was
required
and
he
calculated
that
the
traffic
and
stamped
it
and
is
ready
for
a
building
permit,
that's
when
they
asked
for
that.
The
other
trying
to
answer
some
other.
Your
other
questions,
the
zoning.
The
zoning
that
there
is
is
there's
already
a
batch
plant
I
mean
there's
a
batch
plant
that
you
know
300
feet
to
the
east
of
us.
N
That
does
does
the
exact
same
thing
and
that
batch
plan
is
actually
bigger
and
can
produce
more
concrete
than
the
batch
plant
that
I'm
putting
up
one
of
the
one
of
the
committee
members
you
know
wanted
to
know
about.
Is
it
three
or
or
three
hundred
yards
an
hour?
You
know
the
typical
typical
load.
You
know
early
morning
load
you'll,
you
know,
will
probably
exceed
about
100
yards
an
hour,
but
on
an
ongoing
basis,
it's
you
know,
will
average
about.
You
know
60
to
70
cubic
yards
an
hour.
H
N
G
N
K
Jon
they
don't
have
the
building
permit
yet
they're,
not
a
really
can't
apply
for
the
building
permit
until
they
receive
your
approval.
Doug's
been
working
closely
with
us
he's
ready
to
go.
We
had
a
pre-submitted
meeting
with
him
that
if
this
is
approved,
he's
ready
to
submit
for
a
building
permit
there.
N
N
Obviously,
all
the
engineering
you
know
what
we're
building
is
not
to
be
taken
lightly
and
and
we've
complied
with
all
the
engineering
and
in
inspection.
To
this
point,
I
did
I
heard
a
comment
earlier
that
we
were.
You
know
there
was
some
activity
going
on
there
today.
So
we,
you
know,
there's
a
few
safety
items
that
we
felt
necessary
to
use
me
to
secure,
and
you.
N
The
exception
of
you
know
some
safety
rails
and
some
ladders
and
things
in
the
event
somebody
wants
to
go
climbing
around
that
plant.
We
just
we
secure
those
things.
We
have
a
full
building
permit
package
ready
for
some
it'll
and
which
is
has
been
gone
through
Scott
and
his
team
of
helped
me
out
to
get
that
ready
and
make
sure
that
it's
up
to
speed
through
with
all
the
questions
that
that
you
all
have.
I
In
mr.
chair,
one
of
the
other
things
just
maybe
shed
a
little
bit
of
light,
so
there's
two
different
types
of
traffic
impact
studies.
Basically,
there's
one
that
kind
of
goes
into
more
depth.
You
know
of
what
else
coming
to
the
site
where
the
left
turns
the
right
turns.
You
know
that
type
of
thing
and
then
for
building
permit
fee
calculations.
There's
just
a
simple.
I
You
know,
usually
it's
a
couple
page
memo
that
identifies
a
trip
generation
of
how
much
traffic
this
particular
type
of
facility
will
generate
so
that
you
can
calculate
the
building
permit
fee,
so
I'm
just
going
back
to
rods
earlier
question.
As
far
as
you
know
what
sort
of
traffic
study
it
was
just
basically
the
only
thing
that
was
provided
to
the
building
department,
which
is
required
to
calculate
the
building
permit
fees
was.
I
This
is
about
how
many
trips
that
this
particular
facility
is
anticipated
to
generate
to
calculate
those
fees,
as
far
as
addressing
condition
of
you
know
any
sales
on
the
road
or
pavement
sections
or
anything
that
way
that
wasn't
included
with
that.
So
if
that
was
still
something
that
you
know,
if
you
have
any
questions
or
concerns
that
way,
that's
what
has
been
provided,
which
is
separate
from
the
typical
full-blown
traffic
impact
study
that
we
would
review
on
the
engineering
side.
Well,.
D
My
biggest
concern
is
here
is
is
already
almost
ready
for
operation
and
it's
red
line
by
the
city
because
they
didn't
go
through
the
proper
procedure
to
start
with.
I
just
think
it's
you
know
if
we're
gonna
have
ordinances
or
we're
not
going
to
enforce
them.
Why
bother
this
plants
already
up
and
going
up?
And
you
know
above
ground
and
so
I'll
put
together
and
ready
to
roll
I'll
sudden
the
city
finds
out?
D
They
haven't
even
came
to
the
city
to
forget
to
get
permission
to
build
the
thing
I
think
they
had
to
take
it
down
and
disassemble
that
start
over.
He
didn't
other
things
in
place.
It
was
Mike
if
I
accept
I.
Think
if
he's
taking
the
city
for
a
ride,
if
we've
got
Ernest
is
in
place,
we
ought
to
enforce
them.
D
If
we're
not
gonna
force
him,
let's
get
him
off
the
books,
that's
just
my
feeling,
I'm
just
one
of
those
new
of
the
Commission,
but
this
seems
like
he's
asking
for
forgiveness
over
permission
right
from
the
very
start
ignored
the
city
completely.
We
built
the
plan.
No
one
wants
to
get
it
going.
An
operational.
N
The
only
construction
that
we've
done
that
would
require
a
permit
and
I
understand
permits,
is
footing
the
batch
plant.
The
backs
line
itself
is
is
a
machine
there.
It
it
comes
from
the
factory
the
way
it
is
it's
built
for
our
seismic
zone.
We
have
all
the
engineering
on
the
plant.
It's
it's
nothing,
that's
inspectable!
The
only
inspectable
item
is
the
connection
to
the
footing.
We
do
have
100%
engineering
inspection,
both
from
soils
to
compaction,
to
rebar,
to
concrete
and
in
reality
again
I
understand
and
your
construction.
N
It's
no
excuse,
but
in
reality
the
only
thing
we've
done
is
is
poured
some
footing.
We
do
intend
to
build
a
an
office
and
a
shop
there.
You
can
see
the
future
that
that
that
will
come
with
a
you
know,
with
a
full
building
permit
the
batch
plant.
Has
you
know
literally
no
occupancy
and
again
understand
here,
understand
your
concerns,
and
that
was
not
the
intention.
N
N
At
least
that
was
you
know,
she's
the
meeting
guys
back
through
that
was
I.
Think
the
intention
and
the
annexation
ended
up
taking
a
lot
longer
than
I
think
anybody
intended
and
we
we
are
asking
for
for
forgiveness,
for
what
we're
doing
we're
just
trying
to
again
we're
just
trying
to
get
our
business
up
and
running.
We
I
don't
believe
we
would
have
done
what
we
do.
G
N
In
this
zone,
in
where
we're
at
today
within
you
know
two
square
blocks,
we
have
a
batch
plant,
we
have
a
fuel
mixing
station,
we
have
a
sewer
plant,
we
have
a
landscape
center.
We
have
oil
refining
some
oil
there.
You
know
there
is
you
know
the
screen
topsoil
down
in
this
area
for
25
years
and
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
we're
asking
to
put
up.
You
know
our
type
of
business
in
a
in
an
area
where
it's
not
warranted.
N
One
thing
I
wanted
to
make
comment
on
the
traffic
study
in
their
comments
there
we
are
one
mile
west
of
the
interstate
we
bring
in.
We
bring
in
you,
know,
fully
loaded,
you
know,
aggregate
trucks
with
rock
and
sand
and
cement
and
fly
ash
that
come
in
intrude
into
the
to
the
to
where
our
plan
is
is
one
mile
and
and
I.
You
know
ninety
percent.
Ninety
percent
of
everything
that
I
produced
will
exit
out
that
same
Road
up
to
I
15
and
disperse.
So
in
reality
this
is
in
ready
mix
world
reality.
N
You
know
the
impact
with
heavy
trucks
to
anything
in
American
Fork
city
is
very,
very
minimal
and
it's
not
around
any
residential
homes.
Its
there's,
no
schools,
there's
no!
You
know,
churches,
there's.
No!
Those
type
of
you
know
structures
it
where
we're
at
it's.
Surely
an
industrial
you
know
Park
down
here
and
and
I
I.
N
N
D
You
mean
an
industrial,
well,
that's
why,
when
you
belong-
and
let
you
say
there
is
another
batch
plant
just
to
the
east
of
you,
I'm
just
got
a
funny
feeling
that
you
know
you
bypassed
the
city
completely
at
this
point
and
I've
been
on
the
Planning
Commission
for
the
most
twenty
years,
and
this
is
the
first
time
I've
heard
this
batch
plant
being
here,
it's
already
built
and
ready
to
run.
How
can
we
trust
you
in
the
future
to
follow
the
rules
of
the
city?
If
we
let
you
know
now,
I.
D
F
D
L
E
L
N
You
know
in
meeting
with
the
with
Scott
and
his
team,
we
went
through
planning
and
and
and
we
talked
about
landscape
quite
extensively
for
that
zone,
and
you
know
we
intend
to
fully
landscape
our
frontage.
We
intend
to
precast
architectural
wall
around
our
plant
with
the
concern
of
dust.
Our
our
yard
will
be,
you
know,
fully
covered
in
concrete
similar
to
our
neighbors,
which
will
help
and
dust
control
and-
and
we
have
the
ability
to
also
use
water
truck
on
our
property
with
our
water,
the
recycled
water
I've
mentioned
earlier.
N
N
L
I,
you
know
I
acknowledge
that
things
haven't
been
done
in
the
order
that
they
should
have
been
and,
and
that's
kind
of
in
the
past.
I
feel
like
the
intentions
now
are
good
and
I
feel,
like
I,
feel
comfortable,
recommending
approval
or
approving
this
with
certain
requirements
of
things
that
haven't
been
verified.
Yet.
N
N
I'm
not
I
mean
you
know
any
vibration
that
that
will
generate
that.
That
I
mean
the
plant.
The
plant
sits
on
a
three-foot
thick.
You
know
concrete
foundation.
Currently,
that's
full
of
steel
and
I
mean
if
you're
talking
about
the
truck
traffic.
You
know
that
the
the
trucks
that
you
know
currently
deliver
the
concrete
or
the
rocks
rock
and
sand
and
raw
materials
I'm
not
aware
of
any
other
of
any
concern
or
never
have
never
heard.
I've
never
had
that
question.
J
O
J
N
G
N
D
H
C
H
E
Yes,
if
I
could
just
I
did
just
want
to
I
sent
you
guys
attachments
with
emails
earlier
this
week.
I
just
wanted
to
make
note
of
opposition
from
neighboring
property
owners.
I
know
this
is
not
a
public
hearing
item,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
note
that
those
were
sent
earlier
and
that
you
had
an
opportunity
to
look
over
those
and
if
you
had
any
questions
on
what
he
received.
But
I
just
wanted
to
make
note
of
that
opposition
right.
E
E
H
The
difference
is
it's
not
surrounded
by
the
business
part.
The
planned
industrial
there
on
the
edge
of
the
the
I
one
zone,
so
I
get
that
it's
already
existing,
but
I
think
there's
some
reason
to
consider
that
it's
right
up
against.
However,
the
applicant
has
put
where
the
materials
will
be
in
the
very
south
end
of
the
of
the
lot
there
and
so
he's
put
it
the
farthest
away
from
the
adjoining
property
there.
So
he
is
considering
them,
but
I
just
think.
There's
too
many
loose
ends
from
planning
to
to
go
forward.
Today.
D
H
Just
there's
it's
all
listed
in
in
Adams
report
there,
okay,
so
those
are
the
loose
ends,
they're,
just
the
fact
that
just
the
overall
circumstances
here
I'd
live
rather
see
these
things
done
upfront,
the
sort
of
what
we
were
just
talking
about
with
City
Council
and
the
the
water
availability
is.
We
want
to
see
these
things
upfront,
and
so
just
in
that
regard,
I
think
it's
it's
best
that
we
see
those
things
before
we
approve,
so
I
would
recommend
we
table.
H
L
Of
feel
like
we
could
err,
I
mean
like
right
now
in
the
city
and
in
the
country.
Everything
is
on
hold
and
I
would
just
love
to
be
able
to
move
something
on
and
not
have
one
more
thing
on
hold
and
just
let
somebody
like
start
their
business.
That's
that's
what
I'm
thinking
like
yeah,
it's
not
perfect,
but
if
we
approve
it
with,
you
know
with
stipulations
that
certain
things
have
to
be
in
order
before
they
go
ahead,
then
they
don't
have
to
come
back
to
us
again,
just
get
it
in
line
and
go
so.
D
L
With
the
condition
that
they
I'm
just
gonna
list
off
all
the
landscaping,
things
that
are
not
verified
yet
landscape,
Islands
adequately
sized
at
the
end
of
all
parking
Rose,
shade
trees
provided
at
the
ratio
of
one
tree
per
six
parking
stalls
in
one
shrub,
425
square
feet
of
landscaping,
Ireland
six
feet
wide
parking
perimeter,
landscape
area.
Fourteen
foot,
wide
landscape
area
adjacent
to
a
street
frontage
with
one
tree
provided
for
every
40
feet
of
street
frontage
and
with
I.
L
D
D
D
E
F
Looking
for
what
I'm
looking
for
Adam
is
to
have
make
sure
that
some
of
the
the
setback
concerns
and
the
landscaping
concerns
that
you
mentioned
in
your
report
have
those
taken
care
of
so
that
my
hope
is
that
the
next
Commission
meeting
we
can,
we
can
move
forward
with
it.
I
want
I
want
your
concerns
that
you've
identified
in
your
report
resolved
before
we
move
it
forward.
L
H
D
H
D
D
A
A
D
G
D
D
D
E
What
this
this
application
is
actually
for
the
subdivision
of
property,
again,
it's
independent
of
the
site
plan,
and
so
really
what
they're
looking
to
do
is.
This
is
basically
the
first
phase
of
a
subdivision
they're
looking
to
do
three
Lots
access
would
be
off
of
1,700
South,
as
you
can
see
on
the
screen,
and
there
will
be
future
development
into
it
to
the
west.
I
apologize
for
that
that'll
be
a
future
phase
of
the
subdivision,
but
this
is
just
basically
the
first
phase
of
that
and
I
can
answer
any
planning
related
questions.
P
P
D
E
D
E
B
E
D
B
B
So,
like
I
can
read
it.
Roderick
Enterprises
hereby
submits
its
public
comment,
which
is
contained
in
the
two
written
submissions
previously
submitted.
The
Planning
Commission
should
deny
this
application.
The
other
concrete
batch
plant
does
not
submit
a
legal
precedent
requiring
approval
of
this.
This
use
is
illegal
in
the
industrial
zone.
It
will
result
in
litigation
to
the
city
signed
by
Dan
McDonald
attorney
at
law.
D
E
A
I
Basically,
and
again,
just
to
reiterate
they
were
you
know,
the
previous
application
was
for
the
specific
land
use
on
a
lot
to
of
this
subdivision.
So
it's
not
related
specifically
to
the
subdivision.
You
know
as
far
as
that.
One
goes,
but
in
essence
what
this
subdivision
plant
does
is.
It
creates
the
lot
that
that
previous
application
was
wanting
to
construct
other
facilities
upon
with
the
the
infrastructure.
I
As
far
as
the
roadway
and
infrastructure
and
utilities
are
concerned,
the
master
plan
utilities
have
been
included
in
subdivision
improvements
that
would
be
required
as
part
of
these
three
Lots,
which
is
basically
extending
500
east
further
south,
with
asphalt,
curb
and
gutter,
as
well
as
pertinent
utilities,
and
then
1,700
south
would
also
be
extended
currently
at
dead
ends
over
the
east
side
of
the
of
loc
3
is
where
the
edge
of
the
pavement
the
existing
improvements
are.
So
it
would
extend
the
improvements
across
all
the
way
to
the
west
on
watt
1.
I
D
E
Q
Elizabeth
Phelan
and
MESP
excavation
general
manager,
Steve,
is
also
here
as
well
as
Kevin.
All
management
and
I
want
to
bring
to
the
Commission's
attention
that
mr.
Rutter,
who
has
sent
the
opposition
in
his
piece,
was
zone
I,
one
industrial
when
he
bought
the
piece
of
property
he
resumed
after
buying
the
piece
of
property.
So
this
entire
area
was
zone,
I
won,
so
he
moved
into
this
area.
Knowing
that
that
zoning
was
here-
and
that's
where
our
concern
is-
is
that
closing
and
zoning
that
was
already
existing
even
on
the
land
that
he
bought
himself?
Q
Q
Therefore,
sell
obviously
you've
seen
the
site
plan
for
American
Eagle,
and
they
are
one
of
our
potential
buyers
at
this
point,
as
well
as
the
other
lot
other
other
key
Lots
that
they're
all
they're
all
show
interest
for
people
like
landscapers
and
other
people
that
would
be
affiliated
in
an
industrial
zone.
We've
been
contacted
by
approximately
15
different
buyers
for
these
pieces
of
property.
You.
D
Q
Is
nothing
built
on
the
property?
What
you
see
on
the
property
is
a
piece
of
machinery.
It
is
not
a
building,
it
is
a
piece
of
machinery,
so
it's
similar
to
what
we
have
on
our
property
and
we
are
zoned.
We
are
permitted.
Our
business
license
says
we
are
an
excavation
company
and
a
stream
topsoil
screening
company
right
on
our
license
from
the
city.
We
screen
material,
which
is
also
a
machine
very
similar
to
what
the
machine
is
sitting
on
the
property
that
American
Eagle
has
been
on
the
property.
Q
Q
Is
a
piece
of
equipment?
It
is
not
a
building
as
a
piece
of
equipment.
There's
a
piece
of
equipment
the
same
as
what
our
screen
plant
is.
Our
screen
plant
is
mobile.
This
the
batch
plant
is
mobile.
Any
batch
plant
is
mobile.
If
you
go
to
the
interchange
or
the
exchange,
what
they
call
the
exchange
in
Lehigh,
you
will
see
several
batch
plants
that
are
pieces
of
equipment
or
machinery.
They
are
things
that
are
mobile.
Q
A
building
is
not
mobile
unless
it
is
completely
picked
up
with
high
beams
and
put
onto
a
truck
to
move
and
machinery.
Machinery
is
mobile.
Just
like
our
screen
plant
is
mobile.
It
is
something
that
moved
from
our
property
to
another
piece
of
property
and
a
batch
plant
is
the
same
thing.
It's
a
piece
of
machinery
that
can
be
moved
from
plot
to
plot,
where
it
is
necessary,
the
exact
thing
that
they
are
doing
for
the
freeway.
Q
They
move
it
from
one
in
one
error,
change,
one
exit
that
is
convenient
for
those
trucks
to
get
on
and
off
the
freeway
to
avoid
lots
of
traffic
going
through
the
cities.
That's
why
they
put
the
batch
plants
close
to
the
freeway.
That's
why
we
have
a
batch
plan
already
close
to
the
freeway
it
minimizes
traffic.
So
it
is
not
a
building,
it
is
a
piece
of
machinery
and
yes,
we
didn't
allow
them
to
use
machinery
on
the
property
all.
D
D
H
D
M
D
D
E
Thank
you,
so
these
Platts
they're
already
they're,
basically
a
redesign
of
existing
Platts,
really
what's
what's
been
done,
II
won
through
f2.
Basically,
the
units
have
been
clustered
around
900
West
in
order
to
kind
of
provide
a
more
open
corridor.
If
you
will,
for
kind
of
the
trail
and
sidewalk
to
go
down
9th
west
towards
Utah
Lake
they're,
not
asking
for
in
any
extra
units,
they're
utilizing
what
they
have
in
the
zone.
E
Just
kind
of
redistributing
those
units,
especially
along
the
900,
West
Corridor
and
then
east
and
west
of
ninth
West,
will
be
single-family
homes,
but
right
along
that
corridor,
they're
asking
to
utilize
the
townhome
option
within
the
pr3
zone.
The
density
is
is
basically,
as
it
was
again
they're,
not
asking
for
any
extra
density,
they're
just
redesigning
what
they
have.
They
feel
that
this
is
a
better
product
and
would
be
more
visually
pleasing,
as
one
goes
north
to
south
from
the
Tod
down
towards
Utah
Lake.
E
P
E
F
D
B
P
M
P
I
Yeah
so
and
I
could
partially
address
some
of
the
public
comments
and
questions
in
regards
to
some
of
those
particular
items
that
were
brought
up
so
in
essence
the
as
far
as
some
of
the
public
infrastructure,
the
roadway,
the
utilities
and
so
forth.
Some
of
the
roadways
adjacent
to
this
project
vector
are.
I
I
I
Some
of
them
all
of
them
have
been
peer,
reviewed
by
third
party,
just
to
make
sure
they
can
form
sensitive
lands
ordinances
and
that
aren't
any
other
issues
that
way,
and
so
the
some
of
the
description
that
was
given
with
the
liquefaction
concerns
Mike.
The
original
geotechnical
report
had
identified
various
clay
layers
above
the
silty
layers.
So
that's
why
they
didn't
feel
that
it
was
a
liquefaction
concern.
I
As
far
as
where
we're
at
with
the
plans
we
did
receive
all
131
sheets
and
the
plan
said
I
believe
for
200
South
with
the
60
percent
drawings
that
we
reviewed
internally
provide
did
some
comments
and
feedback
back
to
the
consultant.
That's
doing
the
design
work
on
it
and
they're
continuing
to
press
forward
with
finalizing
those
plans
so
that,
beginning
of
summer,
so
we
should
be
able
to
have
those
plans
finalized.
That
would
do
create
a
bunch
of
improvements,
or
at
least
have
the
improvements
available
and
designed
for
200
South.
I
L
I
So
I
can
answer
some
of
those
questions
and
some
of
them
it
depends
basically
I,
don't
know
what
are
Daryl
or
the
developer
of
all
Dixie
farms
Platts
a
through
F
that
have
either
previously
been
approved
or
that
are
up
for
reproval
tonight.
I,
don't
know
the
timeline
of
which
plants
they'll
build.
First
generally,
the
requirement
is,
is
that
whichever
wrote,
whichever
developments
come
in
first
you're,
going
to
have
to
build
900
West
with
you
know
as
part
of
those
that
would
obviously
take
several
months
of
construction
and
whatnot
as
well.
I
So
as
far
as
how
soon
homes
would
be
built,
I
can't
really
answer
that
one.
Just
because
I
don't
know
the
developers
timeline,
but
they
also
not
just
with
Dixie
farms.
They
also
have
several
other
developments
along
900
West,
some
that
are
up
for
approval
or
for
consideration
tonight
for
recommendations
as
well
as
others
that
are
working
through
in
the
Tod
that
our
administrative
staff
level
approvals
that
the
work
so
I
don't
know
what
their
end-all
plan
is.
I
As
far
as
we'll
build
this
one
first
versus
that
one,
but
either
way
any
of
them,
you're
gonna
be
still
looking.
You
know,
months
down
the
road
before
you
have
roads
and
infrastructure
and
then
building
permits
can't
be
issued
until
some
of
that
infrastructure
is
in
place
and
then
you'd
have,
on
top
of
that,
the
additional
time
to
actually
construct
the
buildings.
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
time,
even
if
they
had
everything
ready
to
go.
You
know,
with
with
everything
on
the
engineering
development
checklist
and
bonding
for
improvements
and
so
forth
there.
I
I
Some
of
that,
it
would
just
depend
on
on
funding
on
City
Council
and
on
some
of
those
decisions,
but
as
far
as
being
able
to
have
plans
that
are
ready
to
be
bid
upon,
summertime
is
when
we'd
know
that,
and
so
we'd
be
able
to
get
bids
back
from
there
and
then
at
that
point
it
kind
of
be
in
the
hands
of
City
Council.
As
far
as
construction
timeline
I'm
off
Scott.
If
there's
anything
else,
you
want
to
add
to
that.
As
far
as
that
goes
so.
P
I
May
have
some
stuff
before
it
may
not
be
before
one
of
the
other
things
that,
as
we've
discussed
and
I
know
that
some
of
the
concern
has
been
with
with
back
up
in
traffic
and
and
so
forth,
on
200
South,
the
way
that
we
identify
if
a
road
fails
or
not
there's
different
levels
of
service
and,
as
we've
continued
to
work
with
our
traffic
engineer
that
we've
hired
to
do
the
traffic
study
for
the
overall.
The
trip
generation
study
for
the
overall
Tod
area
I
posed
that
question
to
them.
I
Oh
within
the
last
couple
of
months
or
so,
and
as
far
as
existing
conditions
go
level
of
service.
You
know
whether
it's
a
through
ABCDF.
It
hasn't
gotten
to
that
point
that
it
is
failing.
Yet
it
is.
Are
there
delays?
Yes,
are
there
some
concerns?
You
know
as
far
as
how
long
it
takes
to
pull
out
of
an
intersection.
Yes,
but
it
doesn't
meet
the
threshold
requirements
such
that
it
is
considered
a
failing.
N
I
K
Ahead,
Scott
Christine:
are
you
talking
about
the
road,
the
road?
Okay,
because
the
water
is
the
same?
Pretty
much
discussion
I
had
earlier
it's
it's.
Definitely
here
I
mean
the
road.
The
last
time
we
did
an
official
study.
It
was
level
of
service
see
for
most
of
the
day.
We
think
it
might
have
gone
to
D.
By
now,
F
is
obviously
failing,
but
you
know
sometimes
roads
can
fail
at
certain
times
of
the
day.
K
J
I
J
Can
appreciate
what
you're
saying
with
with
that
failure?
There's
one
other
component,
which
is,
it
may
still
be
operating
in
a
level
of
service
known
to
past
the
demand
as
far
as
traffic.
My
concern
is
safety
without
having
the
sidewalks
or
the
shoulder,
or
you
know,
the
the
clear
zones
to
you
know
really
protect
the
motorists,
as
well
as
the
pedestrians,
without
those
improvements
and
and
I
hear
that
and
they're
coming
and
I
understand
that,
but
they
are
is
that
safety
component.
That
is
also
a
factor
into
her
South.
I
In
2008,
based
or
2018,
based
on
the
traffic
engineers
information,
it
was
functioning
at
a
level
of
service
C
and
had
approximately
5,000
ADT
on
a
two-lane
road.
With
a
capacity
near
9,000
to
10,000,
many
of
the
intersections
were
functioning
at
a
higher
level
of
service.
You
know,
obviously,
without
going
out
and
doing
actual
traffic
counts.
We
do
recognize
that
traffic
is
increased
as
well
to
define
a
quantity
you
know
and
unless
you
actually
go
out
and
do
a
traffic
study
and
traffic
counts
out
there
to
confirm
it.
I
I
don't
know,
but
the
traffic
engineer
estimated
that
he
would
say.
Yes,
it's
probably
increased,
but
maybe
to
the
range
of
6500
7000
ADT,
which
is
still
an
acceptable
range.
So,
yes
to
answer
the
level
of
service
question.
Yes,
it's
still
within
range,
but
acknowledging
Rods
concerned
as
far
as
safety
measures
and
sidewalks
and
so
forth.
You
know
that
is
also
a
component
and
their
concern.
That's
a
legitimate
concern.
I
F
I
also
have
a
concern:
Banas
got
with
it
with
the
current
pavement
conditions
out
on
those
roads
out
there
we
had.
We
continue
to
add
added
additional
construction
traffic
I.
Don't
think,
though,
these
existing
roads
are
going
to
be
able
to
withstand
that
that
constant
pounding
as
these
additional
developments
to
the
South
come
in
I
I
get
that
you
know
that
the
requirement
is
to
get
Norwest
built.
K
K
Physically,
it's
crumbling
help
is
on
the
way
the
design
is
being
done.
Tell
you
the
best.
We
know
about
the
schedule.
I
tell
you,
you
know:
we've
been
through
the
water
explained
kind
of
where
we
are
on
the
water.
I,
don't
mean
to
say
this,
but
I
kind
of
have
to
hand
it
back
to
you
and
say
it
depends
on
your
level
of
comfort
with
how
soon
these
things
are
coming
through
the
water
or
the
sewer,
the
roads,
the
rest
of
the
infrastructure
and
what
message
you
want
to
give
to
the
council.
K
K
J
Well,
once
again,
I,
you
know
if,
if
there's
no
improvement
stones
so
say,
there's
a
budget,
a
budget
constraint
on
200
cells
and
that's
not
able
to
move
forward
and
there's
also
a
master
plan.
The
master
plan
water
infrastructure
is
is
no
longer
available.
Every
everything
that
has
been
approved
at
this
point
would
push
things
into
failure.
It.
K
J
K
K
D
When
Christine,
as
far
as
her
to
talking
about
the
liquefaction
and
all
that
I
still
really
agree
with
what
they've
talked
about,
but
they've
had
a
third-party
review
of
the
digital
report
and
they
claim
it's
deep
enough
that
it
won't
affect
anything
I,
don't
agree,
but
I'm,
just
one
of
many,
so
glad
opinions
so
we'll
have
to
let
it
go.
And
hopefully
this
we
don't
have
a
great
big
earthquake
that
looks
like
small,
eternal
I,
still
believe
that
we
should
it's
a
highly
refraction
zone
and
building
down.
D
A
Know
I
have
one
comment,
and
since
these
are
some
of
these
re
plots,
I
probably
missed
it
on
the
other
one
and
it's
kind
of
outside
my
planning
commission
role,
but
it's
my
professional
role
and
I
just
like
to
get
it
on
the
record,
particularly
lots
or
reflects
f1
and
f2,
particularly
f2.
If
the
developer
Kinberg,
the
engineer
would
be
willing
to
put
on
their
no
building
within
the
power
line.
A
D
D
D
C
A
Only
reason
and
I'll
double
check-
and
this
is
probably
outside
the
scope
and
I'll
call
you
as
well
I'll
double
check,
but
just
as
we've
had
an
issue,
the
Rocky
Mountain
Power
has
had
a
recent
recent
issue
on.
That
is
what
is
on
my
mind
and
that
corridor
is
because
the
nature
of
the
345
kV
it
is
a
no
building
corridor.
There's
a
lot
of
easements
the
Rocky
Mountain
Power.
A
D
A
Do
a
motion,
mr.
Chairman
I,
move
that
we
approved
the
preliminary
plans
and
recommended
approval
of
the
final
plans
of
Dixie
farms.
Plat
e
1
e
2,
F
1
F
2,
with
defining
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report
and
subject
to
any
findings
and
conditions
and
modifications
listed
in
the
engineering
report,
along
with
the
condition
before
plant
goes
to
the
City
Council
that
no
buildings
be
added
to
the
Utah
power
and
light
or
Rocky
Mount
power
corridor
power
line
or
the
park
designated
Park
area
as
well.
All.
H
H
D
D
And
I
and
Sherman
votes
I
also,
so
it's
unanimous
eight
to
eight
to
nothing
motion
passed
moving
on
number
five
Harry
review
in
action
on
Platts,
a
B
and
C
of
the
af10
project
located
in
the
area
of
780,
west
620
south
in
the
PR
3.0
residential
zone.
Now
the
comments
we
had
for
the
one
previous
is
the
same
comments.
Basically
on
this
one.
We
need
to
read
them
in
on
this
one
also,
if.
D
E
Thank
you
this
one.
You
actually
saw
at
your
March
fourth
meeting
that
it
was
the
preliminary
plan,
and
so
this
is
the
final
plat
or
final
Platts
for
those
a
B
and
C
again.
This
is
a
reworking
of
a
previous
final
plan.
The
number
of
units
has
actually
gone
down
slightly,
so
the
density
is
a
little
less
and
basically
the
one
of
the
reasons
for
the
change
was
a.
E
I
C
J
J
D
L
I
I,
don't
have
something
to
say
with
with
these
developments
coming
I'm
voting
aye
because
they
meet
all
of
the
standards
and
specifications
that
are
required.
But
I
feel
like
the
message
that
that
I
guess
City
Council
hopefully
hears
is
that
we
have
a
responsibility
to
make
sure
that
infrastructure
is
a
high
priority.
F
D
K
Chair
yes,
mr.
chair,
this
is
Scott
with
what
Christine
said
and
you
all
agreed
I
would
Justin
encouraged
we'll
do
what
we
can
to
communicate.
That
message
to
the
council,
but
I
would
encourage
if
there's
any
way,
you
could
also
feel
free
to
communicate
in
whatever
way
you
see
appropriate
to
make
sure
that
the
council
hears
loud
and
clear
what
what
you're
saying
I
think
that
would
be
appropriate.
I
agree.
D
E
E
There
was
a
preliminary
plan
for
this
AF
PD
South,
which
was
approved
in
December
of
last
year.
At
that
time,
there
was
a
total
of
24
units
proposed
with
an
overall
density
of
nearly
four
units
per
acre.
For
that
phase,
this
again
has
been
redesigned
clustering,
a
number
of
the
units,
some
of
them
there's
been
a
reduction
in
the
number
of
units
by
two,
and
so
therefore,
the
density
is
dropped.
A
little
bit
a
lot
of
the
open
space,
there's
a
portion
of
that
on
the
east
side
of
900
West
and
then
on.
E
The
west
side
will
be
the
townhomes,
with
instead
of
kind
of
homes
with
the
fence
along
the
corridor
on
either
side.
So
the
intent
is
to
create
more
of
that
open
feel
as
you're
going
from
north
to
south,
more
pedestrian-friendly
landscaped
Pleasant
area
corridor,
through
that
they
are
meeting
the
requirements
of
the
underlying
pr3
zone
for
the
type
of
subdivision
they're.
Looking
to
do
again,
the
density
is
decreased
slightly
and
the
number
of
units
have
dropped
by
two
for
this
revised
preliminary
and
final
plat.
F
E
F
I
So
a
lot
of
the
same
stuff
from
before
those
are
all
good
ideas,
and-
and
you
know,
as
far
as
making
sure
that
the
pedestrians
can
cross
over
to
the
open
spaces,
we
will
have
the
roundabout
like
you've,
seen
in
the
plans
and
whatnot
at
620,
south
and
900
west.
You
know
that
will
provide
some
pedestrian
crossing
and
and
so
forth
that
way
as
well,
so
that
you
know
other
than
that.
Everything
else
is
in
place
as
far
as
master
plan
requirements
and
so
forth
with
some
future
developments.
I
Just
so
you're
aware,
as
you
can
see
on
the
west
end,
where
you
have
some
road
stubs
that
are
kind
of
connecting
further
to
the
to
the
west,
those
will
be
some
additional
future.
You
know
connections
that
may
possibly
be
made
for
future
development
when
those
come
into
the
city
and
so
forth,
but
we've
just
tried
to
make
sure
we
can
accommodate
that
and
still
have
some
connectivity
throughout
this
area,
even
though
it's
just
outside
of
the
Tod
so
other
than
that
we
didn't
have
any
major
concerns.
All.
F
I
know
where
we
designate
people
to
go
and
knowing
people
they
don't
always
know
where
we
wanted
to
where
we
want
them
to
go.
Can
we
really
try
to
turn
we
try
to
find
a
medium.
You
know
maybe,
and
maybe
it's
like
a
an
RSS
feed-
that
rapid
rapid
flashing
beacon,
I
type
in
a
mid
block
and
if
it
is,
if
at
all
possible,
yeah.
I
No
I
agree
and
I
think
that
that's
a
good
idea,
I
mean
one
of
the
things
that
and
just
because
of
the
nature
of
this
particular
piece
of
property
and
being
able
to
actually
develop
it
with
a
big
Road
in
the
middle
of
it
and
usability
and
so
forth.
We
already
had
kind
of
some
concerns
as
far
as
access
spacing
between
the
roundabout
and
then
the
alley
connections.
I
You
know
to
be
able
to
get
to
these
units
and
stuff
with
the
vehicle,
but
by
adding
a
mid-block
crossing
and
whatnot
as
well
I
mean
that
can
also
create
an
additional
traffic
calming
feature
that
could
just
help
with
so
much
stuff
going
on
between
cars
and
pedestrians
and
roads
and
roundabouts
and
so
forth.
Here
that
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
We.
D
C
Think
that
I
think
that
I
don't
have
any
other
concerns.
I
think
we've
tried
to
get
the
best
layout
for
the
city
for
this
parcel.
Have
it
present
towards
ninth
West,
which
ninth
West
his
plan
to
be
really
pedestrian
friendly
with
big
trails
on
each
side
of
the
road?
So
you
know
we
just
have
to
hope
that
they
follow
the
trails
to
get
around
to
the
open
spaces
as
they
go
from
point
A
to
point
B
and.
B
B
R
That
we
approved
the
preliminary
plan
and
recommend
approval
of
the
final
plan
of
the
FPD
south
subdivision,
with
the
findings
and
condition
listed
in
the
staff
report
and
subject
to
any
findings,
conditions
and
modifications
listed
in
the
engineering
report
and
subject
to
a
commitment
by
the
City
Council
for
improvements
to
the
infrastructure
in
that
area.
Alright,.
F
L
L
R
E
R
My
intent
of
my
motion
is
that
the
development
in
that
area
needs
to
come
upon
the
commitment,
we're
only
making
a
recommendation
as
I
understand
it,
and
so
this
recommendation
is
for
an
approval
and
it
hinges
on
the
City
Council
committing
to
that.
It
does
not
suggest
that
it
has
to
be
completed
prior
to,
but
it
has
I
would
suggest.
My
motion
is
that
the
City
Council
commit
to
those
improvements
before
they
reckon
before
they
approve
this
development.
They
have
to
approve
it
still.
R
L
D
Well,
we're
trying
to
make
a
point
to
the
City
Council
they
got
to
stay
up
on
the
infrastructure.
We
can't
tie
to
one
in
particular
development,
because
it's
concerning
everything
south
of
the
freeway,
it
seems
like
to
me
so
be
kind
of
unfair
too
tightly
just
one
particular
development.
Just
let
the
City
Council
know
we're
serious,
but
we're
gonna
handle
those
infrastructure.
Improvements
completed
they've
gotta
commit
to
put
the
money
in
the
political
savvy
behind
it
to
make
it
happen.
So.
F
J
D
J
M
P
J
D
D
E
D
E
It
looks
like
Edgewater
north
I'd
like
to
discuss
that
one
first,
only
because
the
yard
takes
off
of
Edgewater
north,
and
so,
if
we
can
discuss
both
of
these,
you
have
motions
for
both
but
I'd
like
to
start
with
that
one.
So
with
Edgewater
north.
This
subdivision
is
largely
intended
to
provide
the
rights
of
way
for
1,100,
West,
300,
South,
350,
south
and
1,200
west.
E
This
particular
subdivision
proposes
for
lots,
lots,
1,
&
3
will
be
further,
are
to
be
further
divided,
which
is
the
yard
subdivision,
and
then
the
other
two
lots
lots,
2
&
4
will
be
few
will
be
further
subdivided
at
a
later
date
in
more
of
a
medium
density
fashion.
So
this
entire
area
did
receive
approval
of
district
framework
plan
last
year,
and
then
it
was
followed
by
a
block
plan
which
is
a
staff
level
approval
and,
as
part
of
the
lot
plans
submittal.
E
But
again,
what
we're
looking
at
tonight
is
just
the
formal
subdivision
of
property
with
the
yard
subdivision.
They
have
included
cross
access
and
parking
easements,
because
this
area
will
function
as
one
overall
site,
even
though
the
Lots
are
there
that
break
it
up
according
to
the
requirements
of
the
Tod
zone.
So
with
that
I
can
answer
any
questions.
But
thank
you
for
letting
me
talk
about
those
together
because
again
one
builds
off
the
other
and
I
thought
it
was
just
easier
to
do
it.
That
way,
alright.
D
I
In
essence,
the
ion
atom
summarized
it
you
know
quite
well
as
far
as
the
intent
behind
these
particular
plots.
One
of
the
things
specific
with
this
particular
project
is
actually
on
200
South.
Some
of
the
improvements
are
included
and
it's
part
of
as
part
of
the
review
process
next
to
200
South,
where
we've
still
been
working
on
the
design
drawings.
The
engineer
that's
done.
The
the
plans
for
these
two
subdivisions
has
core.
You
know
basically
provided
the
plans
to
us
that
we've
reviewed
and
we've
also
had
PPG
who's.
Our
consultant.
I
You
know,
as
far
as
down
to
350
South
they've
been
working
with
a
with
ensign
engineering.
That's
actually
been
doing
engineering
for
several
developments
on
the
east
side
of
1,100
West,
and
so
there's
been
a
lot
of
coordination.
That's
been
going
back
and
forth
between
engineers,
between
City,
between
city
consultants
and
so
forth,
to
make
sure
that
all
the
line,
all
the
roads
are
lining
up
correctly
and
so
forth.
So
it
is
as
part
of
that
they,
the
additional
infrastructure,
that's
required.
I
J
I
Yes,
that's
part
of
it
and
the
other
part.
So
there
is
right
where
it's
identifying
line
7
l7
there
is.
It
makes
that
jog
to
the
south
at
that
particular
location
just
directly
to
the
west,
or
a
kind
of
a
southwest
of
that
particular
line,
or
maybe
actually
I
think
it's
within
the
right-of-way.
But
basically
you've
got
the
central
Utah
Water
Conservancy
District.
That's
got
a
vault
there
and
Timpanogos
special
service
district.
I
I
If
you
want
to
scroll
down
to
the
next
page
that
basically
at
the
top
there,
you
can
see
the
curb
and
gutter
improvements
that'll
be
on
the
south
side
and
then
as
it
continues
through
on
the
intersection
on
the
east
side
of
the
intersection
of
1,100
West.
That
curb
and
gutter
will
actually
continue.
It's
part
of
the
1,100
West
plans
that
we've
been
reviewing.
That's
been
provided
from
the
other
engineer
for
the
project
to
the
east,
but
that
curb
and
gutter
will
basically
extend
around
that
curb
return.
I
D
F
M
G
D
D
D
D
F
D
L
D
I
internment
votes
I,
also,
eight
to
nothing
on
that
and
the
motion
passed
all
right.
Moving
right
along
we're
on
the
second
page,
guys
we're
all
getting
a
couple
more
hours
were
through
hearing
and
reviewing
action
on
the
plenary
plan
and
final
platform.
Creek
plat
D
conservation
PUD,
consisting
of
25
lots
located
in
the
area
of
700,
north
330
west
and
the
PR
three
point
old
plan
residential
zone.
Adamle
doesn't
miss
one
place.
E
This
is
the
next
phase
of
Stone
Creek.
You
have
been
seeing
this
for
the
last,
maybe
year
year
and
a
half.
This
is
just
the
next
phase
in
an
overall
development,
so
the
phase
we're
looking
at
you
can
see
what
vendor
lanes
kind
of
highlighting
it
right
there.
This
is
the
fourth
phase
in
a
multi-phase
development.
It's
about
a
hundred
and
forty
three
acres.
Overall,
there
are
various
areas
of
open
space
that
they
will
be
dedicating
some
of
it
is
wetland.
E
One
of
the
things
that
the
Planning
Commission
and
council
has
allowed
them
to
do
is
basically,
if
you
will
I,
guess
average
the
lot
sizes,
so
they
kind
of
have
a
consistency
for
their
product.
That's
been
allowed
in
the
previous
three
phases,
they're
asking
for
the
same
thing,
and
this
one
as
staff
I
would
I'm
fine
with
that.
I,
don't
see
any
issue
with
that.
As
it's
been
done
in
the
past
and
I
think
as
we
get
further
into
each
phase
of
these
developments,
we'll
see
more
of
it.
E
I
A
lot
of
these
ones,
most
of
it,
is
all
just
minimum
improvements
other
than
700
South,
which
has
both
a
bike
lane
a
buffered
bike
lane
and
is
a
minor,
collector
they're
meeting
all
of
those
requirements,
and
we've
also
tried
to
accommodate
for
future
development
on
the
east
side,
as
well,
with
the
Stone
Creek
Drive
continuing
on
to
the
adjacent
property.
So
we
didn't
have
any
other
major
concerns.
They
meet
other
standards
and
specifications
all.
S
Ravi
Johnson,
as
staff
has
said,
it's
just
a
continuation
of
the
other
plots
that
we've
already
done.
We
just
completed
just
well
just
getting
ready
to
complete
plot
C,
which
is
just
the
staff
and
a
little
east
of
this
plot,
pretty
standard
nothing.
You
know
nothing
out
of
the
ordinary.
These
lots
are
a
little
bit
bigger
than
some
of
the
other
ones.
Then
plot
C
know
because
of
the
water
table.
There's
no
basements
on
anything
out
there
and
it's
been
a
great
project
and
we
look
forward
to
doing
but
e
F
and
yeah.
D
H
D
D
I
am
chairman:
votes
on
I
also
passed
eight
to
zero.
All
right,
then,
the
next
two
ten
eleven
one
is
the
zone
map
amendment.
Next
one
is
a
plummeted
plan
in
the
final
platform
of
Ridge
subdivision.
First
off
we
have
a
hearing,
review
and
action
on
the
leverage
zone
map
amendment
from
the
ra5
residential
agricultural
zone
to
the
r-1
9,000
residents
and
zone
located
in
the
area
of
508,
South
stores,
Avenue
we'll
discuss
them
together
and
take
a
separate
hearing
and
separate
vote
on
each
one.
Thank
you.
D
E
I.
Thank
you.
Mr.
chairman.
The
first
item,
as
you
stated,
is
the
zone
map
amendment.
This
is
basically
in
preparation
for
the
following
subdivision:
plat,
the
property
owner
applicant
is
looking
to
amend
the
zoning
to
the
r19,
which
is
in
line
with
the
underlying
land
use
map,
which
is
just
a
low-density
residential,
the
resulting
subdivision
plat.
Both
it's
basically
a
two
lot
plaque.
Each
of
those
Lots
is
well
in
excess
of
the
r19
and
that's
fine.
We
don't
have
any
issue
with
that.
E
His
staff
and
those
Lots
would
access
off
of
480
south,
which
is
a
new
road
that
was
instructed
with
one
of
the
Stone
Creek
plants.
It
provided
access
to
this
portion
of
mr.
leverages
property
and
he
would
like
to
do
a
two
lot
subdivision
there
again.
The
zone
change
comes
before
the
proposed
subdivision
and
I
can
answer
questions.
If
you
have
any
any.
D
B
D
E
D
D
D
D
F
D
L
D
Okay,
Ryan
I
had
trouble
votes
I.
Also
it
passed
eight
to
nothing.
Okay,
the
next
one
is
we'll
discuss
them
together.
It's
a
review
and
it's
a
land
use
map
amendment
and
a
zone
map
amendment.
The
first
one
is
a
Harry
reviewing
action
and
a
land
use
map
amendment
located
at
700,
North,
900
west,
from
the
residential
low
density
to
the
professional
office,
designation
Adam.
We
dismiss
one
please
thank.
E
You
these
next
two
items
also
go
hand-in-hand.
The
first
one
is
a
land
use
map
amendment
and
then
the
second
one
is
a
zone
map
amendment
and
what
the
applicant
is
requesting
is
that
the
underlying
land
use
map
amendment
be
changed
from
a
low
density
residential
to
a
professional
office
designation
and
then
the
zone
map
amendment
would
be
from
the
our
a5
and
our
112
to
the
PIO
one,
which
is
professional
office.
If
this
is
approved
through
the
council,
then
he
would.
E
The
applicant
would
come
back
before
us
with
a
site
plan
for
an
orthodontist
office.
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
little
bit
of
background.
You
can
see
on
the
map.
This
is
the
northeast
corner
of
ninth
west
and
7th
North
in
the
past.
When
land
use
map
and
zone
map,
amendment
requests
have
come
before
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
council.
The
feeling
it
was
all
through.
You
know
until
now.
E
900
there,
along
9th
west
would
be
able
to
go
commercial
or
professional
office,
but
7th
north
would
kind
of
be
the
cutoff
and
anything
north
of
there
would
remain
residential,
and
so,
if
that
is
still
the
feeling
of
the
Planning
Commission,
that
7th
North
kind
of
is
that
cutoff.
Then
staff
would
recommend
that
this
application
have
a
recommendation
of
denial
to
the
council,
who
would
then
make
that
final
determination?
D
Like
Adam
said,
Genesis
said
that
7th
no
North
has
been
the
cutoff
point
between
residential
and
commercial
city
council.
As
far
as
I
know,
it
still
wants
it
kept
that
way.
This
blood
is
just
across
the
street.
It's
in
the
corner
of
what
used
to
be
Mitchell's
orchard
where
he
had
he's
at
the
processing
building.
Let
me
come
in.
P
D
E
M
M
O
L
D
O
Okay,
yeah,
you
know,
I
have
an
opportunity
to
purchase
that
that
piece
of
property
I
would
like
to
build
a
professional
office.
There
I
think
it
would
be
an
asset
to
the
city.
I
think
it
would
be.
You
know
that
corner
lot,
I,
don't
know
that
that's
an
ideal
residential
area
and
that
with
that
traffic
there,
if
you
I,
don't
know
if
you've
seen
the
design
concept
or
what
we're
proposing
there,
but
I
think
it
would
only
add
to
that
area.
It
would
be
a
very
good.
O
Neighbor
would
be
very
quiet,
we're
not
there
in
the
evenings
8
to
5.
It's
it's,
not
something
that
I
think.
If
people
understood
what
it
was
would
be
opposed
to
it,
but
I
respect
the
decision
of
the
council
and
that's
the
reason
I
and
I
did
propose
it.
I
wanted
to
find
out
what
possibility
there
was
a
change.
D
O
D
As
I
recall
this,
it
wasn't
so
much
to
do
with
Costco.
It
has
to
do
with
the
blood
place
and
the
IFA
and
the
things
on
the
east
side
of
ninth
West
going
north
and
the
decisions
were
quite
upset
about
not
going
further
north
and
700
north
of
that
time
we
had
to
do
more
less
with
that.
The
blood
place,
and
there
is
a
more
than
I
did
cost
was
I
recall
no
kidding.
I
would.
E
At
one
time
there
was
a
proposal
to
turn
that
what
we're
looking
at
now,
where
that
barn
is
and
I
believe
the
house
to
the
east
at
one
time,
Costco
was
interested
in
purchasing
those
and
creating
an
overflow
parking
lot
for
their
employees,
but
then
they
backed
out
of
that
and
so
that
zone
changed
never
finished.
But
I
know
that
that
was
a
consideration
I
believe
two
or
three
years
ago.
F
It's
also
adjacent
to
commercial.
You
know
with
those
with
the
BioLife
right
there
on
the
south
side
of
the
property,
so
we
just
in
seed.
We
didn't
see
the
benefit
of
having
any.
Having
that
parking
lot,
that
overflow
parking
lot
for
Costco
being
being
right
there
in
the
city.
We
don't,
we
really
were
we're
seeing
a
benefit,
but
as
far
as
you
know,
being
that
being
a
potential
for
commercial
use,
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
we
I,
don't
think
we'd
have
much
of
a
much
of
an
issue
with
that.
E
And
and
just
for
your
information
commissioned
north
of
7th
north,
where
that
mitchell
barn
is
right.
Now
you
there
is
an
approved
preliminary
plan
for
residential
uses
on
that
area.
So
there's
an
existing
plan.
We
just
haven't
received
the
final
platform
property
owner
did
let
the
applicant
know
hey.
If
this
you
know,
if
you
can
get
this
approved,
we
will
sell
this
to
you.
So
there
already
is
an
approved
plan
for
a
subdivision
there,
and
then
this
arose.
D
E
D
O
E
A
I
would
like
vanderlin
were
you
pulling
in
the
the
approved
luminarie
yeah
I'd
like
to
just
see
that
cuz
I
was
wondering
how
that
was
gonna
work
and
just
make
sure
okay?
Well,
this
is
kinda.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
was
back,
cuz
I
agree.
We
want
to
put
a
hard
line
there,
but
I
was
without
seeing
in
front
of
me
I'm
like
how
am
I
gonna,
do
residential
development
there
and
make
them
work.
A
O
E
O
D
Alright,
any
more
discussion
on
that
when
this
and
also
pulse
well
they'd,
like
say
with
this,
had
the
roughly
15
comments.
I'll
turn
me
in
about
not
changing
the
zone,
so
we
got
that
covered
any
further
comments
or
concerns.
We
need
to
discuss
before
I
ask
for
a
motion
on
the
land
use
map.
Amendment
I
just.
L
D
H
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
G
D
I
and
Ryan,
I
sherman
also
votes
I,
so
it
is
denied
eight
to
nothing.
Alright.
Moving
on
we're
done
almost
at
the
end,
guys
hanging
there
for
a
minute.
More
hearing
reveal
inaction
on
the
amendments
to
the
general
plan
by
providing
a
recommendation
on
the
2019
storm-drain
master
plan
and
impact
fee
facility
plan
better
latest
on
this
one.
Please.
I
So
you've
probably
recall
recently
when
we
brought
the
other
master
plans
before
you
again
we're
just
trying
to
do
some
updates
to
the
master
plans
as
when
I
was
doing
updates
to
the
IFF
Peas,
so
that
we
can
just
evaluate
where
our
impact
fees
are
and
completed
impact
fee
analysis.
So
this
was
the
other
one
that
was,
you
know
that
we'd
been
working
on
recently
and
and
come
in
completing
two
with
the
updates
with
the
growth
we've
been
seeing
and
everything
else.
I
D
B
D
M
D
D
K
D
D
D
D
L
L
D
D
B
B
B
B
K
R
E
B
D
D
M
D
G
D
R
D
A
B
D
L
D
D
L
So
I
have
a
weird
suggestion,
and
maybe
this
isn't
it
picky,
but
I
think
it
might
make
it
more
comfortable
for
the
people
who
come
and
like
the
the
applicants
you
come
and
and
speak
for
a
minute
if
we
just
kind
of
give
them
like
a
verbal
dismissal
like
thank
you,
and
so
they
know
like
when
they're
done,
I
just
I
feel
like
it's
awkward
for
them
like
okay
and
there's
no
kind
of
like.
Thank
you.
Goodbye
I.
Don't
know
that.
Maybe
that's
just
me
well,.