►
From YouTube: 2023/06/06: ASD School Board Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
All
right
good
afternoon
today
is
Tuesday
June
6th
I'd
like
to
call
our
board
work
session
together
or
to
order
present
in
the
boardroom.
We
have
members
Donnelly,
Holloman,
Wilson
and
Bellamy
online.
We
have
member
Jacobs
and
member
lessons
is
excused
today,
but
she
did
all
of
her
homework
all
right
and
as
other
board
member
as
member
as
other
board
members
enter,
join
the
meeting.
We
will
announce
all
right
and
there's
member
Higgins
welcome
member
Higgins.
A
That
brings
us
to
Item
B
request
for
information.
I
know
we
received
two
today
I
think
one
was
filled
for
remember
Jacobs
and
member
Holloman.
Did
you
want
to
restate
your
request.
B
Yes,
I
do
and
I
I.
Don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
I
did
you.
A
Know
I
think
I
have
it
in
a.
Why
don't
you
speak
to
it
and
then
I'll
just
pull
it
up
and
read
it
for
everybody
all
right?
If
you
want
to
do
it
that
way,
what.
B
I'm,
asking
for
is
a
comparison
of
the
cost
for
medical
coverage
for
all
of
our
different
bargaining
units
and
groups
of
employees
with
a
little
bit
of
I.
Don't
expect
anyone
to
go
into
depth
on
the
details
of
the
coverage,
but
at
least
the
highlights
I
know.
In
some
cases
families
are
covered.
In
some
cases,
just
the
individual
employee
is
covered,
but
a
real
side-by-side
comparison
to
see
what
the
costs
are.
The
different
plans
that
we're
covering
for
all
employees.
A
C
C
To
it
to
clarify
member
Holloman
would
a
document
that
describes
the
costs
and
benefits
comparison
of
ASD
and
PHT
fulfill
your
request.
Or
would
you
want
something
a
little
more
extensive.
B
C
Okay,
so
that's
readily
accessible.
We
can
provide
it
in
BC.
I
can
give
you
this
copy
now,
if
you'd
like
it
and
then,
if
you'd,
like
additional
information,
just
let
us
know
we
can
provide
it.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
B
A
Right,
thank
you.
Dr
Bryant,
yeah,
just
one
minute,
so
I
think
what
was
the
outcome
of
that
you're
going
to
give
him
a
copy
and
then
it'll
be
in
board
connect?
Okay,
yes,
remember
Higgins.
D
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
I
think
the
the
big
issue
to
me
is
that
the
overall
liability
with
that
we
have
with
the
insurance
policies
the
the
maximums
amount,
the
the
the
the
potential
exposure,
because
it
varies
by
insurance
plan
too.
So,
if
you
look
at
costs,
if
you're
self-insuring
for
the
most
part,
you've
been
you're,
not
paying
an
insurance
component,
but
if
you've
got
a
maximum
per
person,
cost
and
an
unlimited
maximum
I
mean
I.
Don't
know
how
you
calculate
that
issue,
but
you're
comparing
plans.
A
D
E
We
have
already
documents
that
readily
have
those
comparisons.
I
have
not
seen
anything
that
I've
uncovered
in
the
last
five
months.
That
shows
a
risk
analysis
around
each
of
those
plans.
So
that
is
something
that
we
would
have
to
go
back
and
spend
some
time
investigating
and
see.
If
we
can
produce
that
number
for
all
of
the
different
plans
that
we
provide
to
our
employees,
we
only
manage
one.
E
A
Okay,
well,
that
is
that
good,
we'll
we
don't
have
a
timeline,
yet
remember
Higgins,
but
we
have
your
request:
okay,
okay,
thank
you!
I
I
misspoke
earlier
apparently,
member
Jacob's
requests
were
not
filled
so
Amanda.
Could
you
pull
them
up
there?
They
are
okay,
so
the
first
one
is:
could
the
administration
prepare
a
cost
estimate
to
pay
two
thousand
dollar
payment
to
each
ASD
full-time
certificated
teacher
during
the
23-24
school
year?
A
C
So
for
this
one,
assuming
that
we
have
3
200
applicable
AAA
employees,
it
would
cost
about
7.4
million
dollars
if
we
include
tours.
So
that's
a
ballpark
estimate
that
we
can
include
in
writing
in
boardconnect
as
well.
A
Okay,
remember:
Jacobs:
did
you
have
a
I
see
your
hand.
F
Well,
the
supplemental
presidents:
there
is
a
second
part
to
that
related
to
minor
maintenance
projects,
I'm,
not
sure,
if
that's
already
being
handled,
because
that's
a
similar
question
but
I'm
looking
for
that
to
get
priority
or
categorized
as
well.
Today,.
A
Yes,
well,
I
only
read
the
first
request.
The
second
one
I
can
read
now
for
you.
Could
the
administration
provide
the
current
number
of
minor
maintenance
projects
which
exist
in
our
School
dude
software
and
how
and
how
much
Capital
funding
would
be
required
to
effectively
reduce
the
backlog
by
25
and
50
respective
respectively.
A
Frank,
oh
there,
he
is
you
okay,
but
Friday
board
connect!
Okay,
thank
you
alrighty!
So
I
remember
Donnie.
Did
you
have
your
hand
up?
Okay,
let's
go
back
to
member
Holloman.
B
I
was
just
going
to
say
on
this
comparison.
It
seems
to
be
just
ASD
and
peht,
but
I
would
like
to
see
it
for
all
the
the
plans
that
we
support
across
all
the
bargaining
units.
E
So
we
have
two
other
plans:
we
have
the
the
bus
drivers
plan
and
Local
71.
Those
are
both
managed
by
those
entities
or
by
trust
that
they're
associated
with.
So
we
would
have
to
solicit
that
information,
but
I
think
are
you
most
interested
in?
We
can
we
know
what
our
contribution
is
to
each
of
those
plans,
you're
interested
also
in
the
breakdown
for
what
plans
are
offered
and
what
they
pay
per
plan.
B
Not
in
a
lot
of
detail,
but
the
cost
to
the
district
per
employee
and
highlights
you
know,
some
plans
have
a
really
high
deductible
or
they
have
really
high
family
deductibles
I'm,
not
too
concerned
about
getting
into
slight
details.
But
if
there's
something
dramatic
it'd
be
worth
noting,
yeah
mainly
cost
to
the
district.
A
So
then
am
I
understanding
that
something
will
be
in
board
connect
on
Friday
and
then
we'll
we'll
get
an
update
at
that
time.
Yes,
on
all
the
pieces,
okay,
great,
okay,
any
other
rfis.
Thank
you
guys
for
sending
those
in
I
I
missed
the
last
two,
but
you
guys
were
great
getting
them
in
early
I
appreciate
it
come
true
to
staff.
Do
too
all
right!
Moving
on
we're
now
at
item
C
our
discussion,
our
legislative
update,
Dr
Bryant,
and
we
have
the
amazing.
C
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
president,
so
this
afternoon
we'll
receive
an
update
on
the
legislative
session,
so
we'll
be
joined
by
Miss
Heather
breaks.
Who
will
provide
the
presentation.
G
Thank
you
very
much
for
having
me
here
today.
It's
good
to
see
everybody
outside
of
Juno
this
year.
G
G
Think
everybody's
very
familiar
with
with
that
after
this
year,
in
Juno
being
so
busy,
so
I
will
start
first
with
just
sort
of
a
big
picture
on
on
the
budget
in
the
fiscal
situation
that
the
state
is
is
facing
and
sort
of
the
Dynamics
that
led
up
to
where,
where
we
ended
in
adjournment
on
on
the
session.
G
This
is
a
fiscal
picture
prepared
by
the
division
of
legislative
Finance.
You'll
see
on
line
one
it
will.
It
includes
the
spring
revenue
forecast,
the
state
does
a
a
revenue
forecast,
the
official
one
is
in
November
used
to
be
late,
November,
it's
it's
sort
of
been
pushed
now
to
beginning
or
mid-December
when
the
governor
releases
his
budget
for
the
following
fiscal
year.
G
It's
updated,
then,
during
session
to
give
a
a
more
updated
forecast
of
both
oil
price
and
production
for
the
coming
fiscal
year
and
the
remainder
of
the
existing
fiscal
year
through
June
30..
So
this
year
the
Department
of
Revenue
has
forecasted
for
FY
24.
G
The
available
revenue
from
from
oil
will
be
about
six
point,
almost
6.3
billion
dollars
in
in
in
Revenue
they
that
is
forecasted
at
73
dollars
per
barrel.
G
So
you
can
see
there
on
on
line
four.
After
some
some
different
transfers
and
Ada
dividend
the
state,
you
can
see
the
balance
there
on
on
line
four
of
the
forecasted
Revenue.
I
will
note
that,
while
this
budget
has
been
built
on
that
forecast,
oil
prices
are
fluctuating
between
low
and
mid
70s
per
barrel.
G
G
Then,
if
you
go
down
I'll,
just
direct
your
attention
to
line
nine.
That
shows
the
the
total
in
Appropriations
for
this
coming
fiscal
year
and
you
will
see
on
the
line
above
that
line.
G
Eight
is
the
the
amount
of
the
pomv,
the
percent
of
market
value
that
is
drawn
off
of
the
Permanent
Fund
every
year
and
this
year
the
split
of
that
pomv
worked
out
to
be
a
75-25
meaning
75
of
that
pomv
draw
went
to
fund
government
services,
obligations
and
responsibilities,
and
the
the
remaining
25
will
be
paid
out
in
dividends
for
881
million
dollars,
and
that
will
equate,
as
you
can
see,
to
about
a
thirteen
hundred
dollar
per
person
dividend
sent
out
in
October
the
remaining
Surplus.
G
This
I
will
just
note
that
this
chart
was
prepared
and
released
about
a
week
before
session
was
adjourned,
and
so
this
there
is
a
little
bit
of
a
an
a
difference
here
that
I'll
point
out,
but
at
that
time
there
was
a
remaining
surplus
of
a
108
109
million,
then
because
the
legislation
that
passed
a
lot
of
it
had
not
passed
at
that
time,
you'll
see
a
line
for
fiscal
notes,
line
12.
That
was
a
projection
of
the
the
legislation
that
was
sort
of
slated
or
in
the
queue
to
pass.
G
That
number
is
a
little
bit
different
now
after
the
the
adjournment
and
then
you
can
see
on
line
15
the
what
the
total
there
are.
63
million
dollars
was
the
Surplus
again.
This
is
based
on
a
73
dollar
per
barrel
price
of
oil,
and
we
went
into
a
special
session,
as
everyone
is
aware,
for
a
day
to
complete
the
budget
and
that
Surplus
that
you
see
on
line
15
has
been
reduced.
G
As
a
result
of
that
special
session,
there
were
some
capital
projects
that
were
added
in
that
last
day
to
get
concurrence
on
the
Senate's
budget,
which,
aside
from
the
dividend
and
education
funding,
was
significantly
similar
to
what
the
house
passed
back
in
March
to
the
Senate
so
or
I
guess
it
was
April
this
year,
and
so
that
has
been
reduced
by
about
30
million
dollars,
and
so
that's
really
the
cushion
that
the
the
state
has
to
work
with
going
into
this
fiscal
year
and
and
so
there's
not
a
lot
of
room
in
the
past.
G
You'll
remember
Senator
Donnelly.
There
was
language
always
added
to
the
budgets
to
allow
for
the
state
to
draw
on
the
Constitutional
budget,
Reserve
Fund
in
times
of
emergency
or
short
cash
flow,
and
that
meant
that
language
has
a
few
years
ago
is
no
longer
being
included
in
in
the
budget
for
that
purpose.
So
the
legislature
is,
is
sort
of
banking
on
they're
not
being
any
drastic
drop
in
oil
prices.
G
At
this
point,
and
so
as
as
everyone
is
quite
aware,
that
is
not
always
a
given
and
so
we'll
you
know,
keep
it.
Everyone
will
be
keeping
a
close
eye
on
that
number
and,
of
course,
cash.
You
know
payments
go
out
at
different
times
of
the
year,
so
it's
not
there's
not
concern
that
the
state
won't
have
cash
on
hand
to
to
fulfill
its
obligations
and
responsibilities.
G
I
think
that
is
most
on
the
slide.
Unless
anybody
has
any
particular
questions
about
funding.
A
A
G
G
None
thank
you
as
I
sort
of
spoke
to
on
that
previous
Slide.
The
Permanent
Fund
dividend
continues
to
really
dominate
the
budget
process
in
Juneau
and
we
saw
different
products
come
from
each
body.
As
you
might
remember,
the
house
starts
with
the
operating
budget
and
builds
it
off
of
the
governor's
proposed
budget
that
he
releases
in
December,
and
they
did
include
the
one-time
funding
of
six
hundred
and
eighty
dollars
per
per
student
BSA
increase
in
their
operating
budget.
G
It
relied
on
a
draw
from
the
Constitutional
budget
Reserve
fund,
which
requires
three-quarter
vote
to
access
and
that
vote
failed
in
the
house.
So
as
a
result
of
that,
when
the
budget
moved
from
the
sen
from
the
house
to
the
Senate,
it
no
longer
contained
that
BSA
increase
because
of
that
failed
funding
vote,
and
so
the
Senate
did
include
it
in
in
their
budget
and
then
the
budget
that
ultimately
passed
includes
that
one
time
outside
the
the
BSA
funding
the
the
The
house's
budget.
When
passed,
it
really
had
a
significant
deficit.
G
However,
as
we
all
know,
that's
not
the
end
of
the
the
process,
and
so
it
goes
for
that.
That
second
part
of
that
process
in
the
Senate
and
and
so
had
that
that
piece
that
the
The
house's
budget
as
it
went
over
included
about
between
600
and
900
million
dollar
deficit,
part
of
a
big
portion
of
that
was
a
higher
dividend.
G
They
also
included
a
2700
per
person
dividend
and
that
would
have
been
funded
out
of
not
out
of
the
CBR
but
out
of
the
general
fund,
and
so
that
also
contributed
to
the
deficit
in
that
in
that
budget.
So.
G
So
the
Senate
passed
the
the
budget,
it's
it
is
about
6.2
billion
dollars
in
state
spending
and
again
it's
based
on
that
that
73
dollar
per
barrel
forecast
includes
the
dividend
of
Thirteen
hundred
dollars.
As
I
mentioned,
it
includes
a
680
dollar
BSA
increase
as
I
mentioned,
and
leaves
a
little
bit
of
a
surplus
there.
G
It
does
not
draw
on
the
CBR
the
Constitutional
budget
Reserve
fund
and
it
does
not
include
any
new
Revenue
and
it
does
not
include
an
overdraw
of
the
earnings,
Reserve
account
which
is
accessible
to
the
legislature
by
a
simple
majority
vote,
and
there
were
you
know
some
folks
on
both
sides
in
both
majorities
and
minorities,
who
would
have
preferred
to
fund
that
larger
dividend,
but
at
the
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
budget
that
passed
was
did
not
include
that
so
and
as
I
mentioned
as
the
dividend
continues
to
be
really
the
the
biggest
challenge
for
the
budget
writers
in
Juno
on
a
yearly
basis.
G
Their
has
been
some
attempts
over
the
years
and
again
this
year
to
resolve
that
issue.
The
problem
is,
you
can't
get
12
or
excuse
me,
11
and
21
votes
to
on
any
particular
solution.
At
this
point,
the
Senate
did
pass
Senate
Bill
110,
which
is
something
that
they
had
on
the
table
at
the
end
of
last
session.
They
did
not
pass
it.
They
took
it
to
the
floor
and
sent
it
back.
G
In
the
last
days
of
session
previous
session
this
session
they
did
pass
Senate
Bill
110,
which
would
it's
a
proposal
to
sort
of
get
through
the
next
10
years
of
until
the
Permanent
Fund
itself
is
grown
to
a
point
where
we
can
pay
a
higher
dividend
without
having
to
also
forego
any
of
State
responsibilities
or
programs,
so
that
bill
contained
a
couple
of
Provisions
one
that
currently
this
was
a
statutory
bill.
So
it
would
go
into
law
if
signed
by
the
governor
and
it
what
it
would.
G
What
it
proposed
to
do
is
is
pay
out
a
dividend:
75
25
split
of
the
pomv,
which
is
what
we
see
happening
this
year
in
the
budget
process
and
would
move
up
to
a
50
50
dividend,
which
is
what
the
house
had
proposed
in
their
budget
this
year.
G
But
two
conditions
have
to
be
met
for
that
to
occur,
and
the
first
would
be.
A
new
Revenue
has
to
be
enacted
for
1.3
billion
dollars
of
of
new
Revenue
to
the
state,
and
that
cannot
include
higher
just
a
simple
higher
oil
prices
which
we
see
over
the
years
has
happened,
but
it
would
be
new
Revenue,
and
so
there
are
a
number
of
bills
that
have
been
introduced,
not
as
a
result
of
House
Bill.
110.
G
Excuse
me:
Senate
Bill
the
Senate
bill,
but
because
people
want
to
have
a
bigger
dividend,
they
recognize
that
to
do
so,
we're
going
to
need
to
have
new
Revenue
enacted
for
that
to
happen.
So
the
first
condition
is
the
new
Revenue.
The
second
condition
is
the
the
Constitutional
budget.
Reserve
fund
would
have
to
be
at
a
balance
of
3.5
billion
dollars.
Today,
it's
well
last
month.
G
It's
it
was
the
balance
was
2.4
billion
dollars,
so
that
would
have
to
increase
to
make
sure
that
the
state
has
enough
cushion
for
cash
flow
purposes
and
other
emergencies,
so
that
bill
passed
the
the
Senate
and
is
currently
in
the
house.
It
was
amended
in
house
Ways
and
Means
to
go
back
to
a
50,
50
dividend,
and,
and
so
it's
it
has
not
moved.
G
It
was
passed
by
the
Senate
latent
session,
so
the
house
really
hasn't
had
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
vet
it
and
and
hold
the
the
necessary
hearings
and
Analysis
that
they
might
want
to
on
that.
So
so
that's
sort
of
the
the
big
picture,
I
guess
just
one
more
thing.
I-
would
add
to
that.
G
The
governor
and
Leadership
on
both
sides-
House
and
Senate-
held
a
press
conference
in
early
May
to
talk
about
the
fiscal
plan,
a
fiscal
plan,
a
some
kind
of
solution
to
to
take
this
annual
fight
off
of
the
table.
G
The
result
of
that
is
talk
of
a
special
session
in
October
to
take
up
revenue
bills,
a
spending
cap
bill
and
something
to
deal
with
the
formula
of
the
PM
or
excuse
me,
the
of
the
Permanent
Fund
dividend
payout
every
year,
and
so
there
are
most
members
of
the
legislature
want
to
see
that
formula
resolved.
G
But
again
it's
the
what
is
the
the
solution
that
can
get
to
11
and
21
members
to
to
do
that
and
agreement
from
the
governor.
So
the
there's
conversations
ongoing
about
a
a
October
special
session
and
I
will
have
a
report
to
you
that
lays
out
at
at
least
what
we
know
of
for
the
the
the
revenue
bills
and
the
in
the
different
spending
cap
bills
and
Permanent
Fund
dividend
bills.
G
So
I'll
keep
you
posted
on
on
that
I'm
sure
you'll
you'll
see
some
press
about
it.
Yeah
great.
F
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
thank
you
Miss
Briggs
for
the
presentation
and
helping
us
navigate
the
legislative
session.
Your
expertise
is
always
greatly
appreciated.
I
wanted
to
Circle
back
to
your
slide
about
the
49
million
and
one-time
funds.
We're
getting
I've
heard
a
couple
legislators,
although
not
the
chair
of
Senate
education,
couch,
the
680
million
dollars,
is
a
BSA
increase.
I
am
disappointed
by
hearing
it
phrased
that
way,
because
I
think
it
only
muddies
the
Waters
of
public
discourse.
F
My
understanding,
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
that
the
the
funding
appropriate
in
the
budget
Bill
the
spending
bill
is
not
a
statutory
increase
to
the
BSA.
It
is
one-time
funds
that
takes
them
back
of
the
envelope
mass
and
tries
to
effectuate
what
a
BSA
increase
of
680
would
look
like,
but
it
is
one-time
funds.
F
It
is
not
reoccurring
and
my
concern
I
guess
is
the
this
board
has
worked
tirelessly
to
engage
the
public,
an
accurate
conversation
as
to
why
the
BSA
increase
is
important
and
why
it's
different
than
one-time
funds,
and
so
seeing
the
two
conflated
I
think,
is
a
well-intentioned
way
by
at
least
some
legislators
to
explain
what
they
did
during
legislative
session
might
be
misconstrued
by
the
public.
So
is
any
of
that
wrong.
G
No
I
will
apologize
now
through
my
presentation
as
a
BSA
increase.
So
that's
correct.
It
is
not
a
statutory
change,
it
is
one
time
and-
and
that
is
currently
in
the
budget.
The
the
budget
has
not
been
transmitted
to
the
governor
and
once
it
is,
he
will
have
20
days
to
to
take
action
on
it
and
he
has
the
ability
to
line
item
veto
completely
or
make
reductions
to
any
line
item
in
that
budget.
So
you're
you're
absolutely
correct.
It
is
a
one-time
funding,
not
a
statutory
increase.
F
And
and
the
other,
thank
you
for
that.
I
appreciate
the
clarity.
I've
gone
around
different
Community
councils,
correcting
the
record
of
the
best
that
I
can
I,
have
one
voice
and,
and
many
folks
enjoyed
drumming.
It
are
toning
it
out.
So
thank
you
for
adding
your
voice
to
that
course.
The
second
question
I
had
I
guess
was
checking
your
interpretation
and
your
your
thoughts
to
how
session
unfolded.
What
I
gathered
from
at
least
Senate
Finance
was.
F
There
was
a
sincere
desire
to
see
how
districts
were
utilizing
savings
when
they
come
back
in
January
and,
in
addition
to
kind
of
do
a
look
back
with
any
one-time
funds
that
were
appropriated
and
then
don't
get
online
on
them
vetoed
through
the
governor's
office
and
kind
of
doing
a
look
back
to
see
how
districts
are
spending
their
money.
F
It
seemed
that
the
certain
certain
legislators,
or
at
least
certain
committees,
were
having
trouble
grasping
how
districts
could
have
savings
and
also
have
a
fiscal
crisis,
and
so
I
see
that
being
a
big
point
of
emphasis
for
them
when
they
come
back
and
something
we
should
begin
preparing
for,
and
at
least
as
a
board
and
being
attuned
to
is
what
we're
doing
with
our
savings.
What
we're
doing
with
the
one-time
funds
and
how
we
can
wisely
appropriate
those
in
between
now
and
January
is.
Is
that
any
of
that
on
base.
G
Yeah,
that's
that
is
absolutely
correct.
Trying
to
remember
my
days
all
run
together,
but
the
department
of
of
Education
released
a
a
document
that
showed
fund
balances
for
districts.
G
Sent
to
every
sent
the
whole
building
into
a
little
bit
of
a
meltdown,
and
so
there
were
multiple
hearings
as
you'll.
Remember
that
that
were
held
to
clarify
what
those
numbers
were
and
and
exactly
sort
of
when
they
were
reported,
I
guess,
and
so
we
participated
in
several
of
those
hearings
in
person.
Andy
was
able
to
come
down
and
and
then
we
had
a
follow-up
hearing
in-house
Finance
as
well,
so
that
he
participated
in
over
the
phone.
G
But
yes
you're
right.
There
is
intent
language
and
it's
a
two
more
slides
down,
but
the
the
legislature
did
include
intent
language
in
one
of
our
meetings
when
Andy
came
down
our
very
first
meeting
meeting
with
some
legislators,
key
legislators.
G
Prior
to
those
hearings,
we
met
with
Senator
Stedman,
and
he
he
mentioned
this
to
us-
is
that
he
wanted
to
have,
or
the
legislature
at
least
in
the
in
some
Corners,
wanted
to
have
a
reporting
back
from
districts
in
the
fall
and
and
then
again
in
February,
and
so
there
is
intent
language
that
has
been
included
in
the
budget.
It's
non-binding
of
course,
but
it
it
sets
out.
Some
dates
and
you'll
see
here
on
slide.
G
Four
I
think
that
we,
that
reporting
will
be
due
in
early
February
I
believe
the
first
possibly
and
then
the
Department
of
Education
will
forward
that
information
to
the
finance
committees.
So
they
have
a
clear
picture
of
what
exactly
you
know.
Those
funds
represent
whether
they're
Expendable,
whether
there
are
you
know,
required
percentages
for
districts
to
to
hold
and
whether
they're
committed
those
kinds
of
things,
and
so
that
there
will
be
a
I
think
a
better
process
than
we
found
ourselves
in
this
year.
G
As
a
result
of
of
that
information
being
released
without
sort
of
that
context
of
this,
you
know,
may
only
represent
through
the
end
of
reimbursement,
requests
from
districts
through
the
end
of
calendar
year
22
and
does
not
reflect
third
or
fourth
quarter
and
and
some
of
those
really
important
nuances
for
legislators
to
to
be
able
to
see
that
information
correctly.
F
Thank
you
yep,
and
so
what
I?
What
I
took
out
of
that
and
thank
you,
Miss
Briggs,
for
the
the
Insight
is
that
we
need
to
be
Forward,
Thinking
and
start
start
examining
now,
at
least
as
a
board,
how
we
intend
to
utilize
savings
if
we
intend
to
to
utilize
them
in
the
next
fiscal
year.
F
F
So
I
appreciate
that
the
last
question
I
had
related
to
something
you
mentioned,
which
was
that
the
budget
bill
hasn't
been
transmitted
to
the
governor.
Yet,
do
you
have
any
thoughts
or
perspective
as
to
why
that
is.
G
Yes,
that
is
not
abnormal,
typically
well,
not
typically
the.
When
the
legislature
passes
a
bill.
It
has
a
pretty
thorough
process
that
goes
through
in
the
legal
department
of
the
legislature.
That
takes
some
time.
This
year
is
I,
think
the
second
year
with
the
fewest
Bills
ever
passed
by
legislature,
but
a
lot
of
them
did
not
pass
until
the
very
end
so,
and
the
legislative
legal
division
has
been
challenged,
as
has
every
other
employer
with
Staffing,
and
so
they
are
working
through
that
as
fast
as
they
can.
G
That
does
not
preclude
the
the
governor
and
his
OMB
and
departments
from
going
through
and
doing
their
analysis,
while
that
is
ongoing,
so
that's
sort
of
a
can
be
a
concurrent
process,
and
so
once
he
gets
the
budget,
it's
not
always
typical
that
he
takes
the
full
or
he
or
she
takes
that
full
time
allotted
to
take
action
and
and
transmit
it
back
before.
June
30.
A
G
Okay,
this
thank
you.
Here's
the
the
fund
balance
intent
language
that
you
were
asking
about,
and
I
referred
to
that
is
included
in
in
the
budget,
so
that
is
something
that
they,
the
legislature,
will
be
looking
for.
G
One
of
the
the
reasons
they
want,
the
the
the
information,
at
least
through
some
of
my
conversations
as
the
legislature
would
like
to
see
that
information
in
the
fall
and
it
in
in
hopes
that
the
governor
could
include
something
in
his
December
budget,
but
short
of
that
they
really
want
to
be
to
really
have
a
good
grasp
of
what
the
district's
Financial
picture
looks
like
both
in
the
fall
and
then
again
in
February,
recognizing
that
funds
will
still
be
expended
through
that
time
and
and
then
budgets
being
put
together
for
the
following
fiscal
year.
G
Okay,
next
slide
yeah
and
here
I
forgot
to
include
a
number
I
I
called
the
department
of
depart
Department
of
Education,
the
Deputy
Commissioner,
to
find
out
if
they
had
updated
yet
their
release
of
the
school
bond
debt
reimbursement
funds,
they
have
not,
she
was
able
to
provide
the
what
they
based
their
their
budget
request
on
and
and
so
I
believe.
That
number
is
Jim
you're
here
to
correct
me,
but
25.5
million,
okay
and
and
again
that
those
were
numbers
that
the
department
had
from
February.
G
So
that
may
have
that
may
change
somewhat
and
again.
That
is
a
line
item
in
the
budget
that
the
governor
has
the
ability
to
to
change
downward,
only
not
upwards.
So
next
slide,
I
just
included
the
legislative
priorities
that
we
met
on
in
December
and
January
and
I
will
go
through
the
the
different
components
here,
as
we
work
through
bills,
the
BSA,
the
statutory
increase
for
the
BSA.
G
G
and-
and
it's
still
in
that
committee
there
and
so
I
will
go
to
yeah
legislation.
Thank
you,
I
think
we'll
just
kind
of
work
through
this
shows
the
house
bills
that
have
been
introduced
that
have
some
relationship
to
education,
whether
it's
funding
or
substance,
substantive
legislation
highlighted
some
of
the
ones
that
I
think
well,
some
of
them
that
are
moving
and
fit
within
our
legislative
priorities.
G
Is
sponsored
by
representative
Vance,
and
that
is
the
bill
as
you're
aware
that
allows
school
districts
to
opt
into
the
state's
health
care
plan.
It
is
in
the
currently
in
the
house
finance
committee,
where
it
is
still
being
heard
and
debated
it
moved
up
there.
Well,
it
wasn't
heard
up
there
until
late
later
in
session,
so
it
does
have
a
companion
bill
introduced
by
Senator
Shelley
Hughes
in
the
Senate
received
three
Committees
of
referral.
G
That
bill
was
introduced
later
in
session
as
well
and
has
not
had
a
hearing
on
the
on
the
Senate
side:
House
Bill
31.
So
there
are
three
bills
dealing
with
the
Alaska
performance,
scholarship
and
its
eligibility.
As
you
might
remember,
that
bill
was
was
passed.
It
was
a
top
priority
of
Governor
Parnell.
The
legislation
passed
2012
I.
Think
don't
quote
me
on
that
I
think
we
had
two
different
parts
to
that
bill,
but
or
to
that
program
it
has
not
been
updated.
G
There
are
a
number
of
structural
pieces
that
are
being
addressed
in
that
bill,
and
one
of
them
is
to
to
notify
students
much
earlier
in
the
process
than
they
have
been
notified
on
their
eligibility
for
the
and
the
the
scholarship.
G
So
it's
also
removing
some
of
the
high
stakes
or
referred
to
as
high
stakes,
Provisions
for
testing
and
gpas,
and
so
the
it
also
increases
the
awards
so
currently
for
the
first
for
the
very
top
award
for
the
GPA
and
and
high
performance
on
your
college
tests
that
the
current
award
is
4755.
G
The
second
award
is
currently
at
3566..
This
legislation
would
increase
it
to
5250
and
then
the
the
third
level
is
being
increased
to
3
500
from
2378
dollars,
and
this
bill,
like
I
I,
mentioned
this.
This
first
one
I've
highlighted
House
Bill
31
was
introduced
by
representative
story.
G
It's
in
the
House
Education
committee.
The
house
education
committee
introduced
its
own
version,
which
is
similar
to
hospital
31
hospital
that
is
Hospital
148
and
that's
moved
into
the
house
finance
committee,
and
then
we
have
a
companion
in
the
senate
senate
Bill
56
introduced
by
Senator
Dunbar,
and
that
is
in
the
house,
finance
committee.
So
those
bills
are
are
moving
through
the
process
on
both
sides
of
the
legislature.
G
G
It
allows
the
teachers
to
teach
as
a
long-term
substitute
for
not
more
than
165
days
of
a
school
term,
and
it
defines
the
long-term
substitute
teaching
as
for
more
than
20
consecutive
days,
so
that
bill
was
introduced
fairly
late
in
session
and
so
I
expect
that
one
to
be
also
worked
on
over
the
the
next
session
household
148
I
mentioned
House
Bill
165
was
also
introduced
to
increase
the
charter
school
and
correspondence
program.
Funding.
G
Okay,
I
skipped
over
one
I'm,
sorry,
and
that
bill
is
still
in
the
house
house.
Education
committee
I
believe
so
and
we
can
go
unless
anybody
has
any
questions
on
this
slide.
G
All
they're
all
still
alive
for
now
they're
still
alive
for
next
session.
Yeah
I,
just
I
picked
these
ones
out
as
ones
that
sort
of
we've
been
kind
of
watching
and
engaged
on,
and
and
so
if
there
are
others
that
we
have
questions
about.
I
know.
Hospital,
105
and
Hospital
106
drew
a
lot
of
attention
this
session.
They
both
have
companion
bills
in
the
in
the
Senate.
They
were
introduced
by
the
governor.
So
that's
typical.
Do
you
introduce
the
bills
on
both
sides?
G
G
It
was
it
it
did
move
out
of
the
house
education
committee.
It
was
amended
to
also
include
parent
approval
of
classes
for
for
their
students,
so
that
bill
moved
out
after
extensive
debate
and
public
testimony,
and
so
it
is,
it
has
moved.
G
The
Senate
has
not
held
hearings
on
either
of
the
two
companion
bills
that
the
governor
introduced
on
that
side.
So
those
bills-
you
know
it's
hard
to
because
they
didn't
move
past
the
education
committee
and
to
a
a
new
committee
with
other
members
on
it.
G
It
you
know,
I,
don't
know
how
much
it
will
get,
how
much
attention
it
will
get.
In
the
next
session.
On
the
house
side,
the
Senate
education
chair
has
had
stated
very
early
on
that
they
would
not
receive
hearings
on
on
the
Senate
side,
but
we
have
a
whole
another
year
to
to
go
through
so
so
have
those
two
bills:
Senate
Bill
99,
sorry
that
was
the
one
that
I
highlighted
after
I
sent,
sent
the
PowerPoint.
F
It
seems
appropriate
since
we're
just
wrapping
up
the
house
bill
side.
I
think
that
this
was
a
a
budget
appropriation,
but
I
was
wondering
if
it
ties
into
any
legislation,
that's
being
worked
on
in
the
house.
My
understanding
is
that
the
Senate
proposal,
the
budgets
up
until
the
last
sort
of
quasi-conference
process,
that
the
house
had
15
million
in
child
care
Grants,
which
I
feel
like
we
as
a
board,
are
starting
to
tune
more
into
now
because
of
our
school
start
times.
F
Conversation
and
that
got
negotiated
downward
based
on
requests
from
the
house
is
my
understanding
to
7.5
million
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
have
any
insight
as
to
which
legislators
think
we
need
to
invest
a
less
amount
of
money
in
child
care
and
why
that
would
be.
Thank
you.
G
That
was
a
request
that
came
from
the
house
in
the
very
end
negotiations
of
the
budget
process
very
last
I
guess
week,
maybe
a
few
days
and
I
think
there
was
another
one
and
I'm
escaping
it's
escaping
me
right
now
for
15
million
as
well.
That
was
reduced
and
I.
Think
from
as
as
much
as
I
can
tell
most
of
that
reduction
came
to
make
room
for
additional
projects
that
were
added
in
to
to
get
the
the
necessary
vote
on
concurrence
for
the
budget.
G
G
We
had
on
the
education
side,
Senate
Bill
24,
introduced
by
Senator
gray
Jackson,
a
spill
moved
out
of
its
first
Committee
of
referral
into
the
it's
in
currently
in
the
Senate
finance
committee,
and
this
bill
requires
that
the
state
board
established
guidelines
for
health
and
personal
safety,
education
programs,
including
for
developmentally
appropriate
instruction
and
mental
health,
and
so
there's
a
list
of
entities
that
the
the
legislation
prescribes
consultation
with,
including
the
Department
of
Family
and
Community
Services,
the
Department
of
Health,
Regional,
tribal
health
organizations
and
representatives
of
both
National
and
state
mental
health
organizations,
and
so
that
bill
I
know,
is
important
to
the
senator
and
I'm
I
think
she
will
be
making
a
heavy
push
next
year
to
get
that
through
I'm
gonna
skip
over
the
BS,
the
the
actual
BSA
increase,
Senate
Bill
52
for
a
minute
Senate
Bill,
56,
I
I,
mentioned
earlier
as
one
of
three
bills
dealing
with
the
Alaska
performance
scholarship
and
eligibility.
G
G
That
bill
has
got
a
little
bit
of
a
late
start
in
in
terms
of
the
committee
process,
was
vetted
and
and
debated
and
worked
on
in
the
Senate
labor
and
Commerce
Committee
for
some
time
moved
up
to
the
Senate
finance
committee,
where
they
were
able
to
hold
some
hearings
very
late
in
session
last
few
weeks
of
session
and
before
a
bill
can
move
from
that
committee.
It
requires
an
Actuarial
to
be
to
be
done
and
the
last
hearing
that
it
had
I
believe
on
May
13th
about
six
or
seven
days
before
final
adjournment.
G
They
heard
from
two
different
actuarials
who
had
started
with
different
different
numbers,
so
they're
they're,
one
as
Senator
giesel,
spoke
to
one
was
sort
of
best
case
scenario
and
one
was
worst
case
scenario.
They
they
started
with
different
years
and
so
that
changed
a
lot
of
the
Actuarial
information
or
I.
Guess
it
was
different
between
the
two
versions
and
that
bill
will
be.
It
is
one
of
the
priorities
of
the
Senate
majority.
G
It
has
had
cool
reception
on
the
house
side.
Not
the
bill
itself
has
not
moved
over,
but
you'll
remember
the
last
few
years
or
a
few
sessions.
I
guess:
we've
had
legislation
that
would
reenact
or
re-establish
a
defined
benefit
program
for
Public,
Safety
and
and
firefighters,
and
that
bill
is
introduced
Again
by
representative
Andy
Josephson.
It
made
it
out
of
its
first
committee
on
the
house
side
fairly
quickly
and
then
in
its
second
committee
house
state
affairs
committee.
G
It
was
put
into
a
subcommittee
of
three
members
and
it
would
include
at
the
time
that
that
motion
was
made
and
passed.
It
included
Senate
Bill
88,
which
is
not
in
the
possession
of
the
house
yet,
but
when
it
gets
there,
they
have
signaled
that
it's
going
to
go
into
a
a
subcommittee
which
will
require
work
by
those
members.
Before
it
can
come
out
of
that
committee.
They
will
have
to
agree
to
to
remove
it
and
and
move
it
on,
and
so
that
bill
has
had
significant
debate.
G
It
has
had
significant
research
done.
There
are,
you
know,
differing
opinions,
obviously
within
the
legislature,
but
also
for
employers.
Municipal
employers.
Some
are
are
very
supportive
of
re-establishing
a
defined
benefit
program
and
While.
Others
are
not
I.
Think
Fairbanks
has
passed
a
resolution
in
opposition
and
would
rather
look
at
other
ways
of
helping
employees
in
retirement
scenarios,
whether
that
includes
a
higher
Deferred,
Comp
or
or
other
ideas.
I
know
there.
G
There
is
some
concern
I've
heard
from
from
Members
about
why
school
districts
don't
have
social
security
and,
and
so
I
think
that
will
that
came
up
very
late
in
the
session
and
I
think
there
will
be
a
lot
of
attention
to
that
as
we
go
through
the
interim
and
into
next
year
on
on
that
issue
in
particular,
but
this
this
bill
and
as
well
as
household
21
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
G
There's
some
concern
from
municipalities
on
on
that
bill,
as
well
in
terms
of
school
districts,
opting
to
to
not
pool
with
their
municipality
any
longer
and
and
going
to
the
state's
plan
and
what
that
might
look
like
for
a
municipal
budget
in
terms
of
losing
that
that
number
of
employees,
so
just
a
couple
of
points.
A
On
those
channels
I
see,
member
hallerman
has
a
question.
We're
gonna
go
about
five
minutes
over.
Is
that,
okay
with
everybody?
Thank
you,
member
Holloman,
I.
B
Was
just
curious
in
the
past,
I
mean
obviously
there's
fiscal
concern
about
a
return
to
defined
benefit,
but
there
also
is
a
certain
amount
of
opposition.
Just
certain
legislators
didn't
want
it
to
happen.
I
was
just
wondering
if,
if
you
keep
count
of
Who
falls
into
that
group
like.
E
G
Yes,
like
I,
mentioned
that
the
the
Senate
majority
has
made
this
a
one
of
their
three
top
priorities
to
pass
this
and
and
get
it
enacted.
However,
that
doesn't
mean
that
all
members
are
in
agreement.
Senator
Steadman
was,
and
the
one
of
the
authors
of
the
defined
contribution
plan
back
when
it
was
created
and-
and
so
he
has,
and
and
In
fairness
to
him.
G
He
put
in
a
significant
amount
of
work
on
during
I
was
working
in
the
legislature
at
the
time
and
I.
Remember
he
pretty
much
sort
of
shut
down
everything
else
and
and
just
focused
on
that
that
bill
for
about
two
years
and
so
he's
got
a
lot
of
questions.
I,
don't
I,
wouldn't
categorize
him
as
an
opponent
of
it.
I
think
he
just
wants
to
make
sure
that
sideboards
are
are
on
that
bill
and
and
that
we
don't
increase
our
unfunded
liability
to
where
it
was
I.
G
Think
10
billion
was
about
our
highest.
That
I
can
remember.
It
could
be
more
than
that
and
in
the
last
hearing
that
the
Senate
finance
committee
held,
he
did
raise
the
point
that,
because
of
Investments,
the
unfunded
liability
had
from
one
year
last
year
to
this
year
had
grown
by
a
billion
dollars,
and
so
he
is
laser
focused
on
making
sure
the
state
doesn't
get
into.
G
G
So,
but
to
your
broader
question
about
individual
members
on
the
Senate
side,
I
could
probably
tell
you,
but
on
the
house
side
it's
difficult
at
this
point.
I
know
there
are
a
lot
of
majority
members
who
who
would
support
it,
but
again
they
just
haven't
had
the
information
on
that
side
yet
to
to
to
be
able
to
get
to
that
point.
There
are
also
many
members
that
that
do
not
support
it
and
would
like
to
look
at
different
ways
of
increasing
employee.
G
G
Yeah
I'll
just
skip
to
the
to
the
substantive
legislation
that
that
deals
with
the
BSA
increase
and
and
as
I
mentioned,
Senate
Bill
52
started
out
with
a
thousand
dollar
VSA
increase
before
the
Senate
passed
it
to
the
house.
G
They
they
amended
that
bill
to
to
bring
that
down
to
the
680
per
student
BSA
increase
to
mirror
what
was
agreed
to
overwhelmingly
by
the
house
when
they
passed
that
initial
Amendment
on
the
house
floor,
and
so
they
they
went
with
that
number
and
that's
also
reflected
in
in
the
budget
bill,
as
we've
discussed.
G
That
bill
also
had
an
additional
when
it
was
first
introduced
and
moved
it
had
an
additional
year
following
year
of
increase
that
was
removed,
the
CPI
indexing
was
removed
from
that
bill
before
it
was
passed
over
to
the
house.
It
is
in
the
house
finance
committee,
as
I
mentioned,
where
it
met
up
with
House
Bill,
65
and
and
Along
Came
Senate.
G
Bill
140.,
which
is
a
priority
of
some
members
in
the
Senate,
was
passed
late
in
session,
and
it
deals
with
internet
for
schools
increasing
their
speed
over
I
105
115
schools
I
think
qualify
for
that.
It
has
a
significant
fiscal
note
attached
to
that
bill
in
the
house
finance
committee.
G
It
was
amended
to
include
all
of
the
provisions
that
the
senate
had
passed
of
Senate
Bill
52,
and
so
you
have
now
a
bill
that
includes
the
internet
for
schools
as
well
as
a
BSA
increase,
Pupil
Transportation
increase
funding
for
and
directive
to,
the
Department
of
Education
and
labor
to
track
students
post
graduation,
so
the
state
can
understand
sort
of
where
those
students
are
are
going
and
ending
up,
and
so
that
bill
was
amended
very
late
in
session
I
last
few
days
and
it
moved
to
the
house
rules
committee
where
it
is
sitting
now
I
would
I
don't
expect
that
bill
to
be
taken
up
in
past
early
in
session
next
year.
G
I
think
you
know
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
and
I'm,
not
gonna,
guess
what
happens.
But
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
with
bills
like
this
is
that
it
would
be
sent
back
to
the
house
finance
committee
to
be
worked
on
there,
possibly
and
and
making
sure.
G
Given
new
information
on
as
member
Jacobs
was
asking
about
fund
balances
and
expenditures
and
budgets
for
the
following
year,
all
of
that
will
be
taken
up
at
that
time
in
to
to
work
on
that
bill,
and
it
may
be
that
they
strip
that
out
and
and
let
the
the
internet
go
on
its
own
in
the
original
Bill
and
work
on
Senate
Bill
52.
That's
really
the
the
companion
or
I'm
sorry
the
vehicle.
At
this
point,
yeah.
A
All
righty
so
Heather,
thank
you.
So
much
can
we
get
a
copy
of
your
slides?
Yes,
okay,
great!
That
would
be
great
because
I'm
sure
remember
lessons
is
not
here
and
we'll
have
to
catch
her
up,
and
that
will
be
helpful.
So
thank
you,
okay,
not
seeing
any
other
pants.
G
Forgot
one
thing
can
I
ask
sorry
I
meant
to
mention
this
one
of
during
the
debate
this
year
on
on
the
increased
the
BSA
funding.
G
We
there
was
a
lot
of
conversation
about
outcomes
and
measures
and
accountability
for
districts,
as
well
as
looking
at
the
the
edu
the
foundation
formula
itself
and
and
really
doing
a
deep
dive
into
that
Foundation
formula
which
hasn't
been
done,
I
believe
since
it's
an
enactment
and
so
there
were
conversations
about
creating
a
task
force
to
do
that
with
legislators,
bringing
on
Consultants
to
work
with
them
and
probably
the
legislative
finance
division
sort
of
managing
that
project.
G
In
the
end,
nothing
transpired
there
there
were,
but
there
were
bills
being
worked
on,
that
would
have
created
a
task
force
to
to
do
this
work.
In
the
end,
it
really
came
down
to
funding
a
big
portion
of
it.
That
is
a
long-term
project,
and
the
state
would
need
funding
to
conduct
to
bring
on
a
consultant
if
they
don't
solely
work
with
icer.
G
To
do
that
work
and,
as
you
can
see
from
my
first
slide,
they,
the
the
senate
in
particular,
was
really
on
lockdown
in
terms
of
adding
any
more
funds
or
expenditures
to
the
budget.
So
it
came
down
to
not
having
the
funding
to
to
do
that
and
Department
of
Education
doesn't
have
it,
and
so
that's
something
that
would
have
to
pass
the
legislature
in
the
future.