►
From YouTube: 05-24-22 ASD School Board Finance Committee Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
Well,
we
might
as
well
we'll
start
I'd
like
to
call
the
it's
12
o'clock
on
my
computer.
If
you
call
the
may
24th
finance
committee
meeting
to
order
online,
we
have
member
wilson
member
jacobs,
and
did
you
say
that
remember
higginson's
here
not.
C
B
In
the
room
here
in
the
room
with
a
tremendous
amount
of
support
staff,
dr
bishop,
dr
bryant,
and
I
appreciate
all
of
your
presence,
so
we
had
a
little
bit
of
clarification
in
today's
agenda.
B
I
think
we'll
get
to
the
bond
within
youth
business,
but
first
we
can
move
to
the
first
item,
which
is
the
auto
claim
topic.
So
this
is
just
a
quick
review
of
what
we
discussed
at
the
last
finance
committee
meeting
and
remember,
jacobs,
and
I
drafted
no
jim
anderson
drafted
all
of
us
directly,
but
I
think
yeah.
We.
B
We
have
a
better
product
collectively
than
it
was
individually,
and
this
will
be
coming
from
the
superintendent's
office
to
the
board.
I
guess
pending
the
committee's
approval,
and
so
this
is
a
review
of
what
we'll
be
doing
over
the
coming
school
year
and
why?
I
guess,
are
there
any
questions
from
board
members
online.
E
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
express
appreciation
for
finance
staff
and
chair
for
hearing
out
the
idea
of
having
a
formal
audit
plan
that
goes
to
the
committee
and
then
goes
to
the
full
board
for
adoption
approval.
I
think
it
generates
buy-in
and
formalizes.
The
process
creates
a
record
for
next
year
and
so
all
just
a
bunch
of
really
good
housekeeping
items,
and
so
I'm
excited
to
have
this,
and
I
hope
the
committee
supports
sending
it
to
the
full
board.
Thank
you
great.
D
B
It
will
be
an
audit
of
travel
and
in
the
winter
of
sort
of
the
2022-2023
fixed
asset
inventory,
and
there
are
no
further
questions.
I
guess
remember
I'll,
ask
the
finance
committee
to
vote
on
this
if
we're
going
to
informally
take
a
formally
take
a
finance
committee,
but
we
haven't
done
this
before.
B
B
F
So,
a
week
ago,
last
friday
the
assembly
did
override
the
mayor's
veto.
F
So
I
think
in
in
terms
of
the
sros
just
just
to
be
really
clear
when
we
put
2.3
million
in
our
budget.
It
covered
july
through
december
plus
january,
through
june
next
year
january,
through
june
next
year,
is
a
different
fiscal
year
for
the
city,
because
their
fiscal
year
goes
from
january
to
december.
G
F
That
at
some
future
date
we
can
either
make
a
decision
and
put
it
in
the
general
fund
in
preparation
for
fiscal
year
24
or
some
other
some
other
need,
and
just
to
be
clear.
F
F
F
Now
if
it
was
the
opposite
effect
and-
and
it
was
double,
then
we
make
you
know-
we'd
have
to
budget
transfer
potentially
funding,
and
then
we
would
come
to
the
board.
So
it
doesn't
require
a
memo
at
this
point.
F
So
if,
if
there
was
a
desire
to
move
the
funds,
that
would
be
an
opportune
time
to
go
ahead
and
clean
up
the
budget
as
part
of
a
revision.
Anyway,
although
I
mean
you
certainly,
second,
okay,
second
bias,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we
stand.
I
think
most
people
are
in
agreement
that
the
assemblies
override,
because
they
use
the
mayor's
team
and
the
assembly
used
the
same
revenue
which,
which
was
not
the
case
last
november
december,
where
the
mayor's
revenue
was
different
than
what
the
assembly
used.
F
B
And
remember
higgins
has
come
into
the
room
as
well
for
the
record.
Are
there
any
board
member
questions
for
mr
anderson
about
the
state
of
our
sro
funding
and
the
idea
of
looking
for
budget
revisions
in
august?
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
question
first
for
mr
anderson.
If,
if
the
as
it
stands
right
now,
if
the
district
were
to
receive
a
a
bill
or
some
formal
request
from
the
municipality
for
any
portion
of
the
school
resource
officer
funding,
would
the
district
comply
and
facilitate
payments
and
would
the
board
be
notified?
If
that
happened.
F
To
the
chair
to
remember
jacobs
that
the
first
thing
I
would
do
would
would
be
to
one
call,
omb
and
and
the
cfo
and
see
where
the
confusion
was.
The
second
step
would
be
if
they
decided
to
use
a
different
budget.
I
would
probably
consult
legal
and
and
get
a
formal
legal
opinion,
and
then
naturally
I
would
I
would
brief
the
superintendent
and
then
the
board,
but
we
would
not
pay
it.
F
I
mean
there's
no,
there's
no
legitimate
mechanism
for
the
for
the
immunity
to
send
us
an
invoice
for
sros
at
this
time
so
andy,
and
I
would.
F
And
we
we
would
go
through
whatever,
whatever
the
next
steps
would
be,
and
I.
E
F
Since
they
used
the
exact
same
revenue
forecast,
which
was
not
the
case
last
winter,
I
can't
imagine
that
there's
a
legal
mechanism
for
them
to
to
ignore
components
of
what
was
what
was
an
override
on
a
lot
of
different
issues.
E
Yeah
no.
Thank
you.
Madam
chair,
mr
anderson.
I
appreciate
the
clarification
sounds
like
the
board
would
be
notified
if
anything
changes
which
is
helpful.
E
The
other
thing
that
I
I
know,
president
bellamy
and
I
both
both
are
articulated
pretty
clearly
to
the
anchorage
assembly,
is
that
we
pledged
if,
if
we
were
given
these
funds
back
where
we
didn't
have
to
appropriate
them
for
the
purpose
of
paying
for
the
anchorage
police
department
that
we
would
have
a
you
know,
a
conversation
as
to
how
those
would
be
used
to
support
classroom
work
and
student
outcomes,
and
so
to
me
not
taking
action,
doesn't
hold
up
our
end
of
the
bargain,
and
so
madam
chair,
I
know
I'd
been
in
contact
with
you
about
a
memo
to
formerly,
you
know
claw
back
that
funding.
E
Remove
that
line.
Item
from
the
budget,
which
I
think
we
tentatively
agreed,
would
be
best
saved
in
general
fund
balance
for
the
administration
to
consider
how
to
best
use
that
in
supporting
classroom
work.
E
I
haven't
heard
anything
which
I
think
either
one
deters
that
course
of
action
or
two
makes
that
any
less
viable
of
a
of
a
path
forward,
especially
given
what
we've
clearly
articulated
to
our
partners
on
the
assembly.
So
that's
where
my
preference
is,
but
I'm
speaking
as
a
member
who
is
on
the
committee.
Thank
you.
F
F
We'll
have
a
little
bit
more
comfortable
feel
because
we
may
have
to
do
a
budget
revision
anyway,
if
we
could
roll
all
of
them
into
one,
but
we'll
have
a
better
feel
as
to
how
many
kids
are
going
to
show
up
when
bill
pop
briefed
the
state
of
the
city
a
couple
months
ago,
he
said
that
anchorage
had
lost
another
1800
jobs
more
than
or
1800
residents
more
than
what
moved
into
anchorage.
F
So
anytime,
you
hear
those
numbers
and
you
can't
get
the
information
on
whether
they
had
independent
students
or
not.
You
never
really
know.
Did
they
leave
part
of
the
family
here
where
the
kids
would
move
during
the
summer
and
and
remake
the
family.
F
You
know
we
really
couldn't
get
that
kind
of
information.
We
haven't
seen
transfers
out
of
the
district,
yet
those
generally
happen
in
the
month
of
june.
In
july,
where
mario
chandler
starts
seeing
all
of
the
records
requests
to
move
records
plus
we'll
have
the
summer
online
enrollment
in
july.
So
you
know
we
knew
two
years
three
years
ago
in
in
the
beginning
of
august,
it
was
we
were
not
going
to
meet
our
numbers
and
we
used
it
based
off
the
number
of
records
transferred
out
plus
the
enrollment
for
title
1.
F
Schools
enrollments,
specifically
elementary
school,
continues
to
grow
throughout
the
first
four
weeks
of
school,
but
we
have
enough
historical
data
that
we
can.
We
can
get
reasonably
close.
You
know
in
that
august
time
frame,
so
I
think
we
have
time
to
for
a
vote
in
that
decision.
E
Ma'am
sure
hey,
thank
you
for
your
grace.
One
last
follow-up,
mr
anderson.
I
I
agree
in
that
how
we
use
the
the
funding
waiting
until
august.
That
seems
to
be
a
reasonable
course
of
action
there.
I
think
the
one
thing
that
we
know
for
certain
at
this
point
is
that
2.3
million
can
go
somewhere
else,
and
so
I
for
me
it's
two
separate
questions.
Number
one:
is
there
a
benefit
for
it
sitting
in
the
budget
until
august?
I
don't
see
that
benefit.
E
The
other
half
of
the
question
is
is
very
relevant
and
I
agree
with
you
wholeheartedly
that
waiting
until
early
fall
as
to
get
those
data
points
as
to
how
to
move
forward
seems
very
reasonable,
and
so
that's
still
where
my
preference
is.
But
I
appreciate
the
information
and
your
clarification
as
always.
Thank
you.
C
I
Hi
yeah,
thank
you.
Madam
chair,
remember,
jacobs,
and
I
and
dr
bishop
had
a
conversation
earlier
and
and
to
be
honest
that
was
before
I
really
re
focused
on
the
august.
You
know
waiting
to
see
what
the
numbers
look
like,
but
I
I
agree
with
remember
higgins
that
the
that
money
is
reserved
whether
we
officially
point
it
out
or
not,
and
I
think
the
system
supports
that.
I
So
we
can
have
further
discussions.
You
know
between
now
and
august,
but
right
now
I'm
I'm
pretty
comfortable
with
the
august
second
date,
I'm
not
on
the
committee.
Well,
I
guess
I
am
ad
hoc,
but
I
don't
get
to
vote.
Okay.
B
At
this
time,
thank
you,
okay.
I
personally
feel
comfortable.
I
mean
I
remember
jacobs,
we
do
have
we.
We
have
a
tentative
draft,
but
I
feel
comfortable
waiting
until
august
to
address
the
bigger
picture
and
the
question
of
student
enrollment,
but
I
absolutely
agree
that
I'd
like
to
see
these
funds
go
towards
student
learning
in
an
effective
and
highly
effective
way
whatever
that
entails,
and
I
think
that
that
would
hold
up
far
end
of
the
bargain.
B
In
your
words,
so
maybe
we
can
hold
on
to
this
conversation
and
revisit
it.
I
mean
in
all
this
conversation.
I
Madam
chair,
can
I
ask
member
jacobs
a
clarifying
question
yeah
relative
to
the
the
memo
or
the
resolution
that
we
talked
about
earlier?
Is
that
something
that
you
think
is,
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
understand?
Why
why
you
think
that
would
be
the
most
that
that
is
important
to
do
right
now.
Other
than
to
I
mean,
we've
already
said
that
we're
go
where
those
funds
are
going
to
go
back
to
the
classroom.
I
Is
there
another
piece
of
this
that
I'm
missing
that
that
that
that
supports
your
your
recommendation
on
a
a
memo
or
a
resolution
of
some
kind.
E
Yeah
through
the
chair,
thank
you,
president
bellamy.
I
drafted
the
memo
after
asking
staff,
specifically
if
the
absence
any
action
from
the
board,
if
staff
would
make
payments
using
that
line
item,
if
if
a
bill
or
statement
was
received
from
the
municipality
and
and
not
notify
the
board,
and
the
answer
I
was
given
was
yes,
and
so
in
an
effort
not
to
an
attempt
to
micromanage
staff
and
not
also
not
put
them
in
a
position
to
have
to
take
action
that
isn't
consistent
with
what
the
assembly
did.
E
Write
a
memo
and
then
have
the
board
support,
removing
that
line
item
from
our
budget
and
then
deciding
what
to
do
with
those
funds.
Later.
Mr
anderson
earlier
clarified
that
it's
his
intent
if
any
requests
from
the
municipality
come
forward
to
utilize
any
portion
of
the
2.3
million
prior
to
august,
to
let
the
board
know
and
to
loop
in
the
superintendent
and
then
take
other
action
with
municipal
finance
partners,
which
is
great
reasonable
and
different
than
what
I
was
told,
and
so
that's
good
news.
I
don't
see.
E
I
continue
not
to
see
a
downside
onto
taking
care
of
the
first
half
of
the
process
now
and
then
looking
forward
to
allocating
it
later.
But
if
the
board's
preference
is
to
take
care
of
both
halves
of
this
equation
in
august,
I
don't
find
that
unreasonable
the
same
as
I
don't
find
taking
taking
care
of
that
first
half
of
the
process
and
removing
that
line
item
now.
It's
also
not
unreasonable.
I
think
it's
ultimately
a
preference,
and
so
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
coming
from.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
member
jacobs.
I
guess
I'd
like
to
ask.
Maybe
just
for
one
last
clarification.
Remember
higgins,
remember
wilson.
Would
you
like
to
see
the
finance
committee
at
our
next
meeting
approve
approve
a
memo
rolling
2.3
million
into
the
general
fund,
or
would
you
like
to
wait
until
august.
C
C
For
political
purposes,
how
we're
using
that
money
to
help
educational
outcomes
without
taking
action
without
giving
new
superintendent
opportunity?
Look
at
the
big
financial
pictures
it's
played
so
far
drinking
from
a
fire
hose,
I
would
think,
is
the
best
way
to
describe
it,
and
so
this
would
just
be
a
more
appearance,
type
of
sake
of
actions,
and
I
I
really
want
to
get
the
recommendation
coming
in
where
we
can
best
you
live
so
just
putting
in
the
general
fund.
It's
a
statement
saying
we're
putting
it.
C
You
know
where
to
be
used.
I'd
like
to
in
august
when
we
identify
where
the
funds
are
going,
and
we
can
take
that
money.
Put
it
directly
into
that.
If
there's
any
questions
in
regards
to
the
the
municipality,
we
can
talk
about
how
we
put
it
towards
educational
outcomes
as
opposed
to
just
in.
C
B
B
Okay,
great
well,
I
appreciate
all
the
board
members
input.
That
sounds
like
something
to
look
forward
to
at
the
end
of
the
summer
start
of
the
fall,
and
with
that
I
think
we
could
briefly
number
three
the
legislative
update
and
it's
my
understanding
that
we're
going
to
have
a
much
more
robust
legislative
discussion
at
the
june
sixth.
F
Work
session,
so
I
went
through
all
three
bills:
the
budget
bill,
the
the
committee
substitute
and
the
capital
bill,
and
this
is
just
to
provide
you
with
in
case
you
get
questions
from
the
community
between
now
and
with
heather
briefs
at
work
session.
F
Give
me
an
idea
of
what
was
in
the
budget
bill.
I
did
go
through
it
several
times.
I
do
have
a
few
questions
that
I
have
to
run
down,
but
you
can
see
in
the
capital
budget
the
state
approved,
100
million
dollars
took
deeds,
one
to
end
list
that
was
approved
in
the
middle
of
the
winter
time
frame
went
through,
and
these
are
all
the
projects
that
have
already
been
completed
in
anchorage
school
district.
F
In
fact,
you
you
kind
of
in
order
to
be
able
to
create
the
list,
because
it's
matching
you
have
to
know
exactly
how
much
you
spent
to
be
able
to
fill
out.
These
request,
lists
and
you'll
see
that
we
have
a
total
of
almost
35
million
dollars
that,
assuming
it
doesn't
get
vetoed,
would
come
back
to
us.
There
was
some
risk
in
the
last
five
or
six
days
in
juneau.
F
A
very
senior
senator
on
the
finance
committee
wanted
to
take
that
and
take
all
of
asd's
bond
debt
reimbursement
and
put
that
towards
the
fort.
It
ended
up
not
making
making
it
through.
So
I
felt
pretty
comfortable
that
that
we
we
would
stay
in
touch
and
and
talk
to
people
the
whole
time
to.
F
Fund
of
500
000
for
russian
check,
I
do
have
to
run
that
down.
It
sounds
like
it's
money
that
goes
to
the
city
and
not
us,
but
I
I
just
have
to
confirm
in
the
same
for
the
airport
heights
ice
rink,
I'm
not
sure
where
that
came
from
you
can
see
the
bomb
get
reimbursement
for
f
fiscal
years,
17
20,
21
and
22.
F
That
money
was
not
funded
with
bond
debt
that
was
terminal
fund
money
that
the
board
approved
to
cover
the
shortfall
when
governor
walker
vetoed
part
of
our
bondage,
so
that
one
kind
of
fits
in
the
same
category
as
the
35
million.
Above
that
that's
pretty
flexible.
I
have
already
reached
out
to
howard
tricky
and
his
team
and
they're
going
through
the
wording
to
find
out
what
our
flexibilities
are
for
fiscal
years,
20,
21
and
22.
F
I
should
get
that
in
the
next
day
or
two
and
I'll
get
with
deed,
confirm
that
and
the
next
time
we
talk
this,
so
I
will
have
a
little
bit
more
information.
F
E
F
Discussions
when
they
were
talking
about
it
with
the
folks
from
fairbanks,
juno
and
matsu,
they
all
said
this
money
goes
back
to
the
cities
because
they
increased
taxes
after
the
fact
to
pay
for
the
bond
debt,
as
it
turns
out.
Some
of
the
cities
didn't
really
do
that
and
had
the
school
district
eat
it
and
because
they
didn't
want
to
increase
taxes
and
and
that's
our
sister
district
right
down
the
road.
F
Doesn't
mean
that
there's
750
million
dollars
more,
it's
just
they're,
going
to
prepay
education
for
portions
of
education
for
fiscal
year,
24.,
so
frankly,
whether
it's
75
to
90
or
whether
it's
101
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
we
get
more
money
in
fiscal
year
24.
So
I
did
want
to
clarify
that,
because
it's
bubble
gap,
it's
right.
It's
just
what
a
set
aside.
So
they
know
they
have
three-fourths
of
the
money
they
need
to
cover
education
for
fiscal
year
24..
It
does,
though,
because
there
were
a
lot
of
discussions.
F
You
know
andy
and
I
briefed
the
fiscal
cliff.
I
don't
know
two
dozen
times
plus
in
juneau
this
year.
There
are
a
lot
of
legislators
who
do
understand
what's
coming
and
I
hope
they
can
set
money
aside,
that
that.
F
F
Tough
on
the
first
year
of
a
two-year
legislative
session,
it
probably
would
be
one-time
money,
but
but
we'll
we'll
see,
but
that's
how
I
see
that
particular
piece
in
the
bill.
The
alaska
reads
act
I
think
almost
everyone
was
following
that
the
0.5
adm
for
pre-k
students
also
counts
toward
transportation.
So
you
know,
I
think,
from.
F
Not
everything
else
in
the
act.
It
certainly
was
a
good
thing
for
us.
Of
course,
you
can't
count
the
students
that
are
funded.
You
know,
spend
pre-k
or
stuff
like
that.
You
can't
count
them
for
any,
but
we're
tired,
but
still
I
you
know
dr
bishop's
been
working.
The
alaska
retax
since,
like
the
second
week
on
the
job,
because
the
brand
new
superintendent,
with
senator
baggage
and
it's
it's,
it's
taken
six
years
to
push
it
through.
So
I
I
think.
F
So
that's
what
I
saw
and
I
did
skip
at
the
top.
There
is
the
57
million
dollars
outside
the
formula
one-time
money,
that's
statewide
for
us!
It's
in
the
16-ish
million
dollars
with
another
2
million
for
a
30
bsa
increase
and
we'll
bring.
E
F
That's
what
may
cause
us
to
do
a
budget
revision
and
once
and
I
do
the
math
will-
that
would
be
another
one-
that
we
would
bring
up
on
that
very
first
board
meeting
in
august
and
we
probably
would
start
reaching
out.
I
would
guess
in
connect
prior
to
that
meeting,
just
to
let
people
see
where
we
stand
so
there's
no
surprise.
C
F
D
F
It
goes
deed
goes
through
and
they
have
a
committee
that
goes
through
and
they
prioritize
based
off
that.
How
well
tom
writes
and
justifies
the
urgency
of
those
projects
and-
and
then
they
take
all
of
those
and
the
committee
approves
it-
sends
it
to
the
governor
the
governor
signs
it
then
it
goes
back
to
deed,
indeed
submits
that
to
the
legislature
as
a
one
to
endless.
So
if
it's
50
million
you
keep
going
down
the
list
until
you
get
to
50
million
100.
F
Largest,
we've
had
in
quite
a
while
and
and
really
I
think
we
did,
we
got.
C
F
You
can,
I
can
get
a
list
of
all
of
the
anchorage
caucus
that
voted
yes
for
this
yeah
and
we
could
go
back.
F
C
A
F
Year,
17,
because
that
was
general
fund
and
that
wasn't
bond
money
or
tax
money
technically,
which
was
dedicated
to
fund
balance.
C
Okay,
like
that
service
fund
right-
and
there
was
there's
like
a
5.8
million
or
something
general
fund
that
we
use
yeah,
it
just
gets
to
be
an
interesting
one,
because
we
get
90
000.
Of
course
we
lost
a
hundred
thousand.
You
know
thing,
but
if,
if
we
do
that
to
say
okay,
the
public
didn't
support
it.
So
we'll
find
another
way
to
do
it.
You
got
that
type
of
questions
associated
with
it.
F
F
The
language
doesn't
say
that
that
it
would
have
reimbursed
the
taxpayers
so
hypothetically.
In
that
scenario,
we
would
take
81
million
and
over
the
course
of
a
couple
years,
apply
that
towards
bond
debt.
Where
anchorage
didn't
have
to
tax
property
owners,
then
there
are
those
who,
when
you
look
at
the
language
who
look
at
it
as
more
flexible
for
other
options
and
that's
why
I'm
sure
there's
a
platoon
of
lawyers.
F
We
need
to
wait
for
the
governor
first
before
we
do.
C
F
A
C
Watching
you,
I
think
I
never
know
how
to
think
that.
I
think
this
year,
the
pre-k
fund
that
doesn't
dictate
how
it's
spent
for
pre-k
or
what
approach
we
take
it's
kind
of
wide
open.
It
would
roll
into
district
funds
just
like
yeah
normal.
B
Thank
you.
I
saw
that
president
bellamy
has
heard
me
raised.
I
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
was
just
gonna.
Let
the
committee
know
that
member
jacobs
and
I
already
also
sent
a
thank
you
to
the
anchorage
caucus
for
several
things
actually,
including
the
capital
budget,
and
my
other
comment
was
this
had
to
do
with
thanking
everybody
for
those
last-minute
requests
for
sending
for
support,
sending
letters
to
our
legislators.
I
really
thank
you
this
year.
You
guys
outdid
yourself,
so
I
really
really
thank
you
for
that.
B
Okay,
well,
thank
you,
mr
anderson,
for
that
really
thorough
update.
I
imagine
there'll
be
more
come
june
6..
So
with
that,
let's
go
to
my
last
connection.
B
The
last
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
new
business,
which
doesn't
doesn't
spell
out
but
does
include
a
discussion
about
the
bond,
and
this
was
something
that
I
wanted
to
have
at
some
point
and
please
that
there
are
people
in
the
room
that
can
help
help
us
talk
about
what
we
understand
didn't
go
well
with
the
bond
and
maybe
plant
the
seeds
for
how
we
move
forward.
B
G
We
have
passed
the
design
monitor
in
the
view,
just
that
that
is
a
needed
project,
and
so
we
have
been
crystal
clear
that
investment
in
that
area
needs
to
be
made.
That's
one
of
our
facilities
when
we
create
a
bond
and
take
that
sixth
year
we
do
research
and
haste
and
we
reach
out,
and
then
we
get
an
early
summer
early
fall
outreach
because
we're
putting
that
bond
together
over
the
summer
ready
to
present
it
to
you,
because
again
we
want
it
out.
G
We
want
to
get
ours
to
be
the
first
approve
of
the
assembly.
So
it's
the
first
on
the
list
and
it
became
crystal
clear
at
that
time
that
the
feeling
was
you
got
to
keep
it
within
debt,
because
people
weren't,
you
know
feeling.
E
G
That
the
unstableness
of
our
enrollment
really
affected
that,
so
we
would
need
to
reduce
so
the
first
bond,
as
you
know
that
we
shared
with
some
board
members
had
in
the
view
on
it
and
then
once
those
results
came
in,
it
quickly
changed
and
we
had
the
second
meeting
with
support
members
to
say:
hey
we
have
to,
and
this
is
tom
and
his
team
coming.
You
know,
meeting
with
me
to
to
share.
We
have
to
then
adjust
this
because
we
have.
G
We
are
loud
and
clear
and
hayes
has
helped
us
out
over
time
of
how
to
do
things
with
one
bonds
quite
a
bit.
So
that
was
where
the
decision
was
made
to
remove
it
for
just
this
year
because
of
the
impact
of
the
community
financially
as
well
as
kind
of
the
feeling
of
right-sizing.
The
district
we
did
not
want
to.
It
was
a
deliberate
action
and
very
I
just
felt
strongly
that
keeping
schools
open
through
delta
and
what
we
were
seeing
was
is
traumatic.
G
It
was
like
hard,
it
was
hard
work
and
if
we
would
have
put
on
top
of
that,
oh
and
by
the
way
we're
to
invest
in
new
schools,
we're
going
to
reduce
these
two
like
we
just
couldn't
do
that
to
people
there's
so
much
capacity
that
we
have
in
our
district
and
that
would
have
from
community
members
to
just
kids
and
our
staff
members,
especially
so
we.
E
G
Let's
put
inland
view
on
hold
for
one
year:
keep
the
bond
under
the
debt
retirement
for
major
maintenance,
because
that
was
the
board's
focus
and
their
writing
at
that
last
time
a
bond
had
failed,
I
think
in
like
15
or
something
or
spring
of
16.,
and
so
that
was
the
plan.
We
went
back
and,
of
course
we
know
from
there.
G
That's
what
we
did
I
mean
just
you
know.
Since
then,
we
shared
with
the
board.
We
did
another
pay
survey
to
say:
okay,
what's
it
after
action,
it
failed
what
to
do
the
exact
same
information
that
came
up
on
that
was
the
same
information
that
came
up
that
it
just
was
too
big
and
we
need
to
you
know
as
a
community
and
I'll.
F
G
Others
add
that,
like
that,
the
detail
of
their
everything
else
run
by
our
capital
plan
for
some
of
the
discussions
that
we
have
had
and
some
of
the
evidence
that
had
come
out
and
it
just
altered
and
the
board
that's
ward's
job
to
create
that
bond
and
below
that
bond.
But
our
best
thinking
had
been
into
it
from
our
experience,
our
research
and
the
realities
of
where
our
district
was
and
really
the
pandemic.
Having
that
influence
on
it
and
I'll
turn.
D
When
you're
looking
at
a
hundred
million
dollar
bond,
that's
pretty
hard
stuff
when
you're
looking
at
a
hundred
million
dollar
bond
without
any
surety
that
you're
going
to
get
debt
reimbursement,
in
fact
no
debt
reimbursement.
For
that,
then
I
got
to
tell
you
that's
even
harder
and
then,
when
you
put
on
top
of
that,
the
economic
strain
that
everybody's
going
through
because
of
the
pandemic,
we're
still
trying
to
recover
from
the
earthquake.
D
All
of
those
things
make
a
difference,
and
so
it
was
just
way
too
much
way
too
much.
The
other
factor
that
keeps
coming
up-
and
I
know
you've
seen
it-
is
that
we
have
excess
capacity
as
the
superintendent
just
said,
and
that
excess
capacity
at
some
point
in
time
is
going
to
fight
us
in
the
rear
end.
If
we
don't
deal
with
it,
because
it's
going
to
be
harder
and
harder
in
the
future
to
get
bonds
approved,
especially
if
you
want
to
build
a
new
facility,
replace
one
expand
one.
C
Higgins,
thank
you
yeah.
I
appreciate
that
because
I
know
that
issue
comes
up
before
success,
but
we
also
I'll
refer
back
to
the
pike
consulting
study
when
we
looked
at
it
from
classroom
size
and
what
we
would
have
to
do
to
be
adequately
funded
based
upon
lawsuits
in
the
lower
48,
we
don't
have
that.
We
don't
know
we
do
not
have
excess
capacity.
When
you
look
at
the
classroom,
size
is
getting
smaller
having
to
have
more
staff
to
where
we're
at.
I
don't
think.
That's
really
the
case.
C
It
is
based
upon
current
funding
and
based
upon
classroom
sizes.
The
way
they
are
right
now
and
with
reductions
in
staff
and
no
increase
in
bsa.
I
agree,
but
if
we
had
adequate
funding
based
on
pipeline
soda
we'd
be
having
hundreds
of
teachers,
it
would
change
the
capacity.
So
if
we
lower
our
capacity
with
classrooms,
then
it's
going
to
impact
our
ability
in
the
future
to
try
to
address
that.
C
If
we
wanted
to
go
over
the
issue
of-
and
that
was
even
promoted
in
the
past
by
former
mayor
baggage
and
others,
they
say
simply
follow
lawsuit
to
establish
what
is
adequate
funding,
because
that's
a
constitutional
issue
and
the
courts
have
ruled
on
that.
So
I
my
concern
about
reducing
class
as
schools
has
to
do
with
that
issue
and
how
we
would
be
able
to
deal
with
it.
I
remember
raising
the
issue
about
classroom
sizes
and
bringing
it
down
when
I
first
ran
and
their
response
was
when
we
have
adequate
funding.
C
We
wouldn't
have
adequate
space
anyway
to
ink
to
reduce
the
classroom
sizes
to
where
it
could
be
meet
that
requirement.
So
I
just
I
just
want
to
connect
those
two
a
little
bit
in
regards
to
saying,
rather
than
concede
that
we're
going
to
have
larger
classroom
sizes
and
other
places
in
the
country
because
of
an
adequate
funding.
G
Yeah
I'd
just
like
to
respond,
and
I
think
the
microsoft
was
done
over
10
years
ago.
C
G
We
actually,
when
you
got
off
the
board,
the
board
actually
focused
on
to
smart
reduction,
because
it
wasn't
actually
saving
money
to
reduce,
because
you,
a
school,
was
a
unit.
And
so
we
worked
with
the
legislature
and
at
that
time
and
they
actually
helped
jim
and
I
testified
to
create
a
hold
harmless
to
close
school.
So
that,
because.
D
G
Was
no
economic
incentive
outside
of
capital
to
close
school
operationally,
so
we
had
done
that,
but
I
would
say
that,
even
over
the
last
10
years,
the
research
has
changed
in
regard
to
what
is
effective
and
good
use
in
some
of
the
edunomics
things
that
member
lessons
attended.
G
Remember,
bellamy
and
certainly
our
team,
and
so
there
there's
renewed
research
in
that
area
that
I
think,
if
the
board
wanted
to
invest
in
that,
you
could
probably
find
some
things
out
that
fluid
use
of
space,
especially
since
the
pandemic
has
affected
that,
and
so
the
use
of
space
and
the
ideas
of
the
space
at
school
have
changed
since
the
pipe
is
open
and
so
there's
a
newer
way
of
doing
business
and.
D
D
So
you
know
we
made
a
major
effort
of
reducing
capacity
and
first
thing.
The
district
did
was
basically
turn
over
all
the
swimming
pools
to
the
municipality
that
cut
down
the
amount
of
square
footage
that
we
had
to
account
for,
and
so
the
deep
formula
was
more
favorable
to
us
in
that
particular
aspect.
So
if
we
ever
get
back
to
debt
reimbursement,
unless
d
changes
the
formula
we're
still
going
to
have
the
same
problem,
okay,
we're
not
going
to
get
the
full
network.
George.
A
It's
still
going
to
affect
us
what
we're
seeing
right
now
and
I've
seen
from
my
counterparts
up,
indeed,
is
debt
reimbursement,
probably
not
come
back.
The
new
mechanism
for
that
is
through
these
legislative,
because
deed
already
has
a
process
for
providing
for
schools,
and
it
works
a
lot
better
for
them,
because
these
are
completed
projects.
A
B
So
this
is
the
question.
That's
in
my
mind
is
how
could
somebody
tell
me
how
capacity
is
determined?
It's
not
based
on
it.
So
it's
based
on
square
footage.
It's
not
based
on
and
we
have
our
ptrs.
You
know
we
can
have
25
kids
in
the
classroom
and
we're
going
to
have
30
kids
in
the
classroom.
You
know
there
are
seven
things
classrooms
of
schoolx,
but
you're
telling
me
that
it
says
square
footage.
It
has
nothing
to
do
your.
G
You
want
when
you
want
to
go
100
as
long
as
you're
to
the
specs
of
safety,
but
when
you
want
the
state
to
give
you
money
back
for
reimbursement,
you
follow
the
rules
and
their
building
codes,
which
is
very
specific
about
how
much
space
a
school
should
be,
and
really
it
came
about.
They
have
things
like
roads
because
think
about
it.
When
you,
what
was
happening
in
a
lot
of
alaska
was
schools
were
being
built
in
communities
to
like
10
miles
outside
of
town,
so
a
road
could
go
to
that
thing.
Like.
F
G
About
you
know
just
the
state
of
alaska
in
general,
so
they
were
putting
all
kinds
of
things
in
schools
like
to
have
school
that
really
personally
paid
for
so
just
over
time.
If
you
can
imagine
how
the
formula
has
now
now
been
very
specific,
that
bond
money
to
build
schools
is
for
children
in
schools,
and
so
they
do
have
square
footage
allowable
now.
The
square
footage
adjusts.
There
are
some
special
education
things.
G
They
do
have
some
specs
for
different
use,
but
it
is
really
like
the
whole
picture
of
a
school
to
begin
with,
and
so
you
want
to
put
an
extra
gym
in
your
pet.
That
is
part
of
your
money
for
classrooms
too.
It's
a
bigger
picture
of
it,
but
it
there's
reason
behind
in
research
why
it
became
so
detailed
in
the
state
of
alaska,
like
literally
the
road
to
the
school,
cannot
be
paid
for
by
a
small
one.
That
is
a
city.
G
God,
that's
a
road,
so
they
put
a
big
divide
in
mind
because
our
state
funding
formula
again
is
bifurcated
in
that
operations
and
capital
are
very
separate
and
that's
why
we
bond
for
major
papers.
So
people
go:
why
don't
you
pick
yourself
just
like
it's
like?
Actually
it
was
designed
in
that
banner.
C
Of
the
capital
has
to
do
with
the
operating
budget
because
the
launch
of
the
school,
unless
you
get
to
a
student
and
that's
where
you
got
to
the
issue-
you
combine
them-
you
have
a
safe
and
safe
provision,
but
that
same
division
is
temporary
right.
It's
over
a
certain
period
of
time
to
allow
you
to
do
that.
But
if
you
have
smaller
schools,
you
you
as
opposed
to
combining
schools.
C
You
look
at
eagle
river
chugach
coming
together
at
one
point
because
of
other
issues
where
we
can
move
kids
around
and
then
we
look
at
the
economics
and
you
end
up,
you
know
getting
less
per
student,
and
so
you
impact
your
operational
funds
that
way,
if
you
expand
it,
so
the
smaller
schools
pay
you
collect
more
for
operational
expense
and
it's
something
that
needs
to
be
weighed
into
it
too.
G
C
G
F
When
you
talk
to
people
in
the
community,
we're
we're
when
I
talk
to
them
and
we
talk
about
you
know
under
capacity
schools-
and
you
know
we
do
have
the
funding
formula
which,
which
kind
of
penalizes
you
for
larger
schools,
but
where
you
really
do
save.
If
it's,
if
it's
a
school,
that
really
needs
a
significant
amount
of
money,
is
that
long-term
capital
that
you
no
longer
have
to
spend
on
that
school?
And
now
you
can
narrow
your
focus
on
a
few
less
schools
on
on
your
capital
and
other
major
maintenance
needs.
A
F
He
went
through
a
a
large
calculation
and
looked
at
the
efficiencies
you
gain
and
when
you
look
at
everything
from
plenty
time,
teachers
and
music
teachers
that
don't
have
to
go
to
four
different
schools
that
now
you,
you
really
do
start
absorbing
some
staff
and
you
can
reallocate
them
in
a
classroom
instead
of
other
places.
So
you
can
look
at
it
50
different
ways,
but
but
certainly
for
long-term
capital
requirements
for
a
school
that
needs
significant.
D
G
And
I
learned
when
we
testified,
because
jim
did
the
analysis
and
the
reason
that
we
wanted
that
legislation
is
because
it
actually
cost
money
to
go
to
school
as
well
and
jim
had
some
data
that
he
shared
with
the
legislature.
That
that's
why
we
got
that
full-time
list,
because
they
would
still
pay
for
your
students
as
that
school
being
open
and
then
ratchet
it
down.
And
that
was
to
assist
in
taking
that
the
difference
before
that
future
could
kick
in.
And
I
forget
and
that's
how
we
got
the
five-year-old
harmless.
F
Was
showing
them
how
to
make
the
math
work
to
where,
over
the
course
of
five
years
you
can
you
can
capitalize
on
efficiencies
of
staff,
you
obviously
reduced
initial
staff
depending
on
the
school.
You
know
really
you're
talking
five
to
ten
people
tops.
I
mean
it's
that
core
office
administration
custodial
nurse
those
folks
but
you're,
still
paying
full
utilities
that
first
couple
years,
as
you
figure
out
what
you're
gonna
do.
F
F
C
Legislature
passing
an
act
that
basically
said
charter
schools
could
use
excess
space
as
well,
and
how
well
we
reach
out
for
that
aspect
is
something
I
think
that
has
to
also
be
considered
in
regards
to
this,
because
there
are
a
number
of
different
charter
schools
with
less
than
ideal
space.
Now,
of
course,
some
of
the
shorter
schools
said
well,
we
just
want
to
take
over
the
whole
school
type
of
thing.
C
In
some
cases
that
might
be
okay,
that's
kind
of
like
the
montessori
kind
of
thing
it
kind
of
expanded
to
the
whole
school,
but
that's
in
consideration.
I
would
hope
that
gets
weighed
in
on
this
whole
discussion
of
how
that
space
can
be
used
for
students
that
aren't
part
of
it
that
are
important
to
our
schools
out
there
and
how
well
we
integrate
them
or
bring
them
into
the
system,
because
some
of
them
want
to
be
separate.
Some
of
them
don't
want
to
be
involved.
C
Others
want
to
take
it
over
the
whole
school,
but
a
good
discussion
on
that
issue.
I
would
hope
to
be
a
factor.
B
You
said
that
you
don't
think
that
that
reimbursement
is
coming
back
and
that's
sort
of
a
scary
proposition.
It's
a
hundred
million
major
maintenance
for
things
that
we've
already
paid
for
statewide
I
mean
asd.
B
Our
needs
are
100
million.
In
and
of
itself
I
mean
that's.
B
E
F
We
have
a
november
election.
Where
you
know
I
mean
our
synod
and
house
only
have
majorities
of
one.
It
doesn't
take
a
lot
to
shift
the
shift,
those
discussions
from
with
the
current
legislature.
Now,
because
you
need
it,
you
need
it
just
a
bit
more,
but
you
know,
depending
on
how
november
turns
out
and
that
changes
the
dynamics
of
what
and
everyone
else
thinks
may
happen
in
the
future.
I
think
I
mean
representative
drummond.
It
was
close,
it's
just
when
it
got
towards
the
end
of
the
session.
F
I
Yeah,
I
just
had
a
couple
of
comments.
Madam
chair
relative
to
the
bond.
You
know
what
kept
coming
back
to
me
is
was
its
size.
So
I
agree
it
was
too
big
and
I
think
we
knew
that
as
a
board.
We
knew
that
we
were
at
least
not
accepting
the
administration's
recommendation,
but
for
some
reason
we
thought
we
thought
otherwise.
I
So,
but
it
was
too
big
and
that's
the
oh
that
that
I
get
coming
back
over
and
over
again
and
and
the
whole
idea
of
there
being
space
or
or
the
perception
that
there
is
extra
space
in
our
buildings
or
we
are
somehow
not
not
closing
and
or
repurposing
our
buildings
using
the
space
in
a
wise
way.
I
So
we
we're
talking
around
the
fact
that
at
some
point
in
the
future,
we
are
going
to
have
to
look
at
how
to
how
to
I'm
not
saying
close,
but
maybe
repurpose
our
space,
so
that
you
know
so
that
we
really
appear
to
be
trying
to
deal
with
the
new
norm,
which
is
we're
losing
kids.
I
And
if
we
are
going
to
continue
to.
You
know
I,
for
its
day
the
pikas
odin
own
report
was
groundbreaking
actually
for
me
anyway,
as
an
educator,
but
right
now
I
just
think.
If
we're
going
to
that
was
based
on,
I
think
50
000,
kids
and
that
came
out
in
2015.
I
think
that
study
was
done
in
the
district.
I
I
think
we're
at
a
point
in
our
leadership
that
we
probably
need
to
look
to
do
a
different
kind
of
report
or
or
an
updated
report.
I
If
we
are
going
to
continue
to
to
compare
you
know
what
what
that
report
said
and
did
from
last
from
years
ago,
until
now,
things
are
very
different
now,
and
I
am
encouraged
by
the
economics
that
presentation
that
we
had-
and
I
am
glad
that
I'm
glad
to
see
that
some
of
that
was
incorporated
in
our
last
reading
monitoring
report
so
with
that
I'll,
just
I'll
I'll
I'll
be
quiet.
Thank
you.
I
E
Yeah,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
actually
wanted
to
say
just
a
couple
quick
things.
I
agree
with
mr
anderson's
assessment.
We've
got
59
out
of
60
seats
in
the
legislature,
up
using
new
legislative
districts
and
a
new
statewide
election
system
for
for
ballots.
E
There's
a
I
mean
we
don't
know
what
what's
going
to
happen
and
who's
going
to
be
taking
their
seats
in
january,
so
I
think
there's
every
reason
for
optimism
or
at
least
kind
of
an
approach
of
waiting
and
seeing.
I
do
want
to
thank
representative
drummond
for
her
work
and
pushing
to
reinstate
bondet
reimbursement.
I
think
if
that
work
had
begun
earlier
in
session,
I
think
that's
one
of
the
many
things
that
could
have
flipped
the
49-51
vote.
The
other
way.
E
I
do
hear
that
we,
we
have
a
number
of
different
conversations
that
need
to
happen,
and
so
I
think
my
question
as
we
wrap
up
today
is
what
our
next
steps
in
terms
of
continuing
to
discuss
the
bond
as
well
as
the
lingering
space
issue
and
conversation
that
needs
to
be
had
as
well.
I
guess
so
that's
what
next
steps
are.
My
question
to
the
group.
H
If
we
were
to
move
reallocate
the
population
of
a
school,
let's
say
at
52
capacity.
Let's
say
it's
an
elementary
school
and
we
were
going
to
say
a
and
ccs
into
that
program.
The
benefit
to
the
district
is
that
the
utilities
and
ongoing
maintenance
are
paid
by
that
charter
school,
so
we're
not
paying
to
maintain
a
school
and,
as
we
say,
warm
storage,
but
the
charter
school
that
occupies
that
building
doesn't
have
to
pay
rent.
H
A
B
H
B
I
had
one
follow-up
question:
it's
my
understanding
that
the
board
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
maybe
a
little
bit
longer
before
four
of
us,
joined
the
board,
approved
a
plan
to
redraw
school
boundary
lines.
B
This
is
is
correct
and
I
believe
it
was
for
fall
of
2022
and
I
haven't
seen
or
heard
that
come
up
in
discussion,
but
it
was
in
a
memorandum
and
it
was
approved,
and
I
just
wonder
how
that
school
boundary
line.
It
was
like
a
once
a
decade
process
how
that
is
going
to
inform
the
narrative,
an
enterprise
solution,
to
borrow
your
language,
because
I.
D
B
President
bellamy,
to
your
to
your
point,
you
know:
how
are
we
doing
the
perception
of
space
and
buildings
it
to
me?
Procedurally,
it
seems
like
we
need
to
do
our
due
diligence
and
follow
up
on
that
prior
board
intent
as
part
of
that
sort
of
this
grand
reimagining.
B
D
Yeah,
it's
ridiculous,
so
you're
absolutely
right
the
thing
that
is,
though,
one
of
the
reasons
that
just
are
kind
of
held
back
is:
we
still
have,
even
if
you
did
rebound
you're
still
going
to
have
an
issue
with
capacity
because
we're
still
5
000.
Yes,
yes,
so
so
what
really
needs
to
happen?
You
need
to
look
both
of
them
at
the
same
time,
because
I
know
mr.
D
Is
so
emotional,
you
don't
want
to
do
it
too
many
times,
and
so
it
would
seem
that
maybe
a
better
holistic
look
at
it.
Yes,
all
right!
If
we're
going
to
repurpose
schools,
which
schools
are
more
likely
to
be
repurposed,
what
would
we
do?
D
Other
schools
that
we
actually
have
to
close?
There
may
be
one
or
two,
because
when
you
look
at
how
much
capital
will
take
to
bring
those
schools
up
to
speed,
which
may
be
economically
more
feasible
to
close,
who
knows,
but
what
I'm
saying
is
all
of
that
needs
to
be
looked
at
once
you've
looked
at
that,
then
you
go
through
the
boundary.
The
rebounding
process.
D
You
don't
want
to
do
a
rebounding,
then
decide
that
you
can
repurpose
goals.
Close
goals
go
through
a
rebounder
again,
it's
too
painful
for
the
public,
and
for
you
all,
so
you
suggest
a
sequential.
I.
A
Think
so,
you're
gonna
be
seeing
a.
We
have
some
it's
housekeeping
on
boundaries
because
you
know
the
last
time
we
did.
This
was
quite
a
while
ago.
We've
had
new
developments
and
those
developments
end
up
splitting
the
boundary.
So
transportation
has
already
gone
through
made
these
adjustments.
A
So
there's
no
big
controversy
around
them,
but
there's
the
official
practice
of
saying
yeah.
If
you
enter
your
name
into
the
system
that
you're
going
to
score
so
you'll
be
seeing
that
in
the
fall
that
doesn't
include
any
major
movements,
mainly
just
updating
our
boundaries
in
accordance
with
our
practice.
Right
now-
and
I
think
another
thing
just
to
put
it
in
perspective
and
how
deed
looks
at
us
normally.
B
A
A
D
To
address
and
those
transportation
boundaries
that
tom
just
talked
about,
the
kids
are
already
going
to
their
schools.
They
have
that
this
is
just
cleaning
up
the
pockets
so
that
when
they
post
every
year,
you
know
if
you
live
in
this
particular
area.
This
is
the
school
you're
going
to
so
parents
know
so
the
kids
have
already
been
transporting
they've,
already
been
transporting
kids
to
the
appropriate
schools.
Yeah,
not
the.
B
E
H
C
Type
of
approach,
it's
extremely.
C
And
I
can
tell
you
it's
hot:
that's
without
closing
the
school
with
closing
the
school.
They
probably
would
have
come
back
here.
I
think,
but
it
would
be
tough
for
driving
home.
You
want
to
go
a
different
way
every
day.
It's
it's
very
emotional,
and
so
the
question
also
raised
is:
is
there
some
way
to
repurpose
part
of
the
schools
for
administration
purposes
versus
some
of
the
other
places?
We've
got
to
do
something
like
that.
Anything
else
that
goes
into
local
schools
has
a
lot
of
compound
a
lot
of
connection
with
the
community.
C
It's
going
to
be
very
disruptive
to
do
that.
If
there
are
I
want
to,
I
just
want
to
look
at
every
option
before
we
get
to
that
big
of
controversial
type
of
upsetting
from
the
educational
standpoint
the
parents
are
going
to
look
at
that
as
it's
very
disruptive.
We've
got.
D
C
In
every
school
people
opting
to
go
to
different
schools
versus
staying
in
school
they're
at
okay,
so
the
boundaries
it's
transportation
only
because
they're
all
over
the
place
and
it
limits
them
because
some
people
definitely
change
just
can't
afford
the
transportation
to
go
out.
They
can't-
and
so
I
don't
know
how
many
would
be
in
the
district
for
denali
montessori,
because
almost
all
of
them
coming
in
from
different
locations,
it
wouldn't
even
reflect
the
population
of
that
area
at
all.
So
I
just
look
at
the
numbers.
D
There's
there's
going
to
be
a
tendency
to
say.
Well
really
we
need
to
close
these
title
1,
schools
and
the
reason
for
that,
of
course,
is
that
in
some
of
the
title
one
schools,
the
capacity,
far
exceeds
the
population
going
to.
But
then
you
have
the
perception
issue
of
a
title,
one
school
and
the
folks
that
can
afford
it
to
land.
They
know
that
the
least
having
to
transport
their
kids
to
some
other
thought
so.
D
D
So
those
are
all
things
that's
being
considered,
but
it's
not
easy
and
and
so
higgins
we
did
have
several
boundary
changes
before
you
came
on
the
board
and
those
are
the
ones
I'm
referring
to
because
they
were
significant
and
they
were
painful.
F
So
I
just
had
one
last
closing,
I
think
about
25
minutes
ago
carl
asked
a
question
about
what
what's
the
way
ahead,
yeah.
So
the
the
chiefs
and
I
have
talked
about
the
way,
a
lot
and
it
and.
E
F
To
look
at
closing
schools
reboundering,
we
know
that
we're
going
to
have
to
have
public
public
awareness
of
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
very
early
in
the
in
the
august
september
time
frame.
F
F
There
will
be
surveys
naturally
and
then
start
slowly
rolling
out
the
very
clear
path
that
we're
leading
down.
So
there
are
no
surprises
in
february
when
the
budget
is
posted
online
and
everyone
will
see
this
developing
in
public.
We
think
that
you
know-
obviously
you
know
dr
brian
has
been
here
for
nine
days,
but
he's
not
aware
of
everything
yet
so
we're
gonna
at
least
another
nine
days
we
have,
but
we're
going
to
be
working
on
this
all
summer
in
in
august.
F
We're
we're
going
to
be
ready
to
sit
down
and
have
those
discussions,
and
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
like
what
well
what
you
and
I
talked
about
last
fall
that
this
time
we're
looking
at
multiple
things
and
when
you're
looking
at
school,
repurposing
or
school
closures
and
and
wipe
them
clean.
F
If,
if
that
were
to
be
the
one
of
the
options,
all
of
those
kind
of
things,
we
can't
surprise
the
public
in
february,
it's
got
to
be
and
at
the
same
time,
what
what
I
also
know
is
part
of
the
likely
outcomes
as
we
build
this.
The
board
members
need
to
know,
and
we
need
to
be
talking
to
legislators
all
winter
long
because
in
february,
when
we
build
our
budget,
it's
based
off
statute.
F
It's
the
30
increase
to
the
bsa,
it's
the
one-time
money
from
the
57
million
they
put
towards
education,
and-
and
I
don't
know
that
anyone
thinks
the
war
in
ukraine
is
going
to
end
real
quickly
or
that
the
price
of
oil
is
going
to
plummet
overnight
and
the
the
worst
thing
is
for
us
not
to
do
it
publicly.
But
we're
going
to
have
to
really
be
careful
in
our
assumptions,
because
we
could
come
up
with
a
budget
in
february
based
off
statute.
F
F
So
we
have
to
prepare
ourselves
for
that
reality
that
it's
the
month
of
february
we're
making
decisions,
knowing
that
the
legislature's
got
four
months
to
make
a
decision
as
to
how
to
make
it
look
like
we,
we
didn't
have
a
crystal
ball,
so
I
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
board
member
discussions,
there's
going
to
be
community
discussions
and
the
last
thing
we
can
afford
to
do
is
surprise
anyone
and
that's
what
the
chiefs
have
been
talking
about.
F
But
we
we
just
wanted
to
wait
till
he'd
been
here
for
a
full
two
weeks
to
ask
for
his
thoughts.
But
that's
carl,
that's
the
best
answer.
I
can
give
you
to
the
question
you
asked.
B
All
right,
I
think
that
I'm
gonna
call
time
here
we're
a
little
bit
over.
We
do
have
a
finance
committee
meeting
scheduled
for
june
14th,
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
conversations
we
can
have
over
the
coming
year
and
I
sincerely
appreciate
everyone's
participation
and
insights
this
afternoon.
Thank
you,
okay.
Oh,
I
need
a
motion
to
adjourn.