►
From YouTube: SBAC 6-19-2017 School Board Appointment Commission
Description
Description
A
All
right,
the
next
item
on
the
agenda,
but
before
I
do
this
I
just
forgot
to
turn
on
my
microphone
so
I'd
like
to
remind
everyone.
Please
turn
on
your
microphones.
When
you
talk
and
I
was
reminded
that
we
have
to
talk
into
our
microphones
lean
into
them
there
we
go
I'm
getting
thumbs
up
so
I'm
doing
it
right.
So
you
turn
on
your
microphone
with
this
little
button.
That
says,
push
and
turn
it
off
when
you're
done
all
right,
establish
agenda
order
is
our
next
item.
A
E
D
A
G
A
H
Evening,
I'm,
Teresa,
Sutherland
and
I
wanted
to
comment
on
two
matters
for
the
Commission
first
I
wanted
you
to
give
some
consideration
because
I
didn't
hear
it
at
the
last
meeting
on
how
you're
going
to
vote
in
August
and
I
bring
this
up
because,
as
I
served
as
the
county
auditor
for
more
than
two
decades
and
watched,
the
County
Council
replace
one
county
executive
and
four
county
council
members,
they
did
that
in
public
session.
Prior
to
that
it
had
been
a
secret
ballot
which
I
think
in
this
day
and
age
doesn't
go
over
very
well.
H
But
even
if
you
do
it
in
public
session,
you
need
to
consider
what
you're
going
to
do.
If
one
candidate
doesn't
get
eight
votes
on
the
first
round,
because
the
last
time
they
filled
a
council
position,
it
took
a
hundred
and
four
votes
to
fill
the
position,
so
you
can
have
to
have
a
process
for
what
happens
to
get
to
round
two
or
three
or
four
or
104.
H
Let's
hope
it
doesn't
go
that
far
so
I
wanted
to
offer
that
up
for
your
consideration
and
I
also
wanted
to
encourage
you
to
deliberate
publicly
and
not
in
closed
session.
I
know
you
saw
it
an
opinion
from
the
Attorney
General
I'm
glad
you've
done
that
I,
don't
know
what
the
Attorney
General
will
say.
But
to
me
this
appointment
is
not
a
personnel
matter
because
whomever
you
appoint
is
not
your
employee,
you
don't
have
any
personnel,
so
I
don't
see
this
as
a
personnel
matter.
H
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Our
next
item
is
why
we're
here,
which
is
to
vote
to
approve
the
new
bylaws
which
has
been
brought
into
compliance
with
the
new
bill
that
is
recently
passed.
Does
anyone
have
any
objections
to
the
bylaws?
Mr.
Moser
said,
there's
been
no
public
comments
on
the
bylaws,
so
there's
there's
no
Corrections
or
comments
from
the
public.
Does
anyone
on
the
Commission
have
a
any
Corrections
or
thoughts
or
comments.
D
D
I
A
C
A
A
C
A
All
a
favor
on
both
all
right
moving
along
does
anyone
have
thoughts
about
the
prospective
member
application
package
here,
I'll
share
with
you
that
was
emailed
out
a
couple
of
times
very
similar
to
to
what
we
had
before.
But,
of
course
it
incorporates
in
the
changes
that
are
required
by
the
new
law.
G
L
J
J
K
A
E
A
G
A
L
A
A
G
K
Think
that
was
done
because
they
wanted
to
limit
the
amount
of
things
they
could
write
to.
So
it's
shorter
quicker
for
us
and
maybe
out
of
like
the
millions,
what
are
the
three
top
once
you
were
tackle.
While
you
liked
their
first
kind
of
like
saying
there
are
many,
but
maybe
the
three
most
important
ones
that
you
think
need
to
be
addressed
first
before
the
rest
of
it
and
they
can
specify
but
I
think
they
did
it
just
for
that
to
limit
the
amount
of
the
answer.
K
J
J
K
J
K
J
M
Would
just
like
to
add
in
that
I
agree
with
maybe
taking
away
the
specific
three
we
don't
want
to
push
them
into.
They
feel
very
passionate
only
want
to
explain
one
or
two
subjects
that
they're
very
passionate
about
in
regards
to
the
school
system,
to
force
them
to
pick
a
third
that
they
may
not
feel
as
passionate
about
and
it
may
it
may
make
their
packets
seem
less
comprehensive
if
all
of
a
sudden,
the
third
issue
does
not
have
as
much
subject
matter
when
they're
writing
it
down
a
good.
J
G
K
N
G
A
Only
thing
is:
if
you
remove
three,
then
people
may
may
feel
they
may
not
know,
or
other
people
saying
five
as
my
packet
going
to
see
in
poultry,
if
I
only
do
two,
perhaps
up
to
three
so
that
it
would
allow
people
to
do
one
issue
or
two
issues
if
those
are
but
it,
but
it
sets
some
limit
so
that
they're
not
right
exactly
because
you're
right
that
there
are
so
many
issues
that
people
may
feel
really
pressured.
If
there's
not
some,
but
even
up
to
five.
If
that
would
be
more
and
I.
K
A
J
O
J
I
think
in
the
verbage
of
this,
if
we
said
what
do
you
consider
the
main
issues,
therefore
they
could
just
choose
to,
they
could
choose
five
and
it
allows
them
some
leeway
in
that.
So
you
know
people
think
three
five
in
there
generally,
but
if
you
send
main
issues
you
know
ones
that
they
would
focus
on
I,
think
it
get
to
the
same.
You
get
to
the
same
one
I.
A
L
L
A
F
I
I
That
way
now
well,
my
thing
is:
is
that
you're
asking
about
critical
issues
which
is
great
but
I'd,
also
like
to
put
something
positive
in
there,
because
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
positive
so
share
your
perspective
on
the
best
practices
or
programs
currently
underway
in
Anne,
Arundel,
County,
Public
Schools,
and
how
you
feel
these
initiatives
benefit.
The
students
and/or,
the
community
I.
I
Think
it
would
show
that
they've
investigated
some
of
the
things
that
are
going
on
some
of
the
initiatives.
Some
of
the
changes
that
have
been
made,
some
of
the
new
processes
and
procedures
and
curriculum
and
things
that
are
going
on
in
the
past
four
or
five
years,
and
let's
see
what
everybody
knows
and
what
they're
willing
to
put
out.
As
far
as
you
know,
something
really
good
so.
M
A
D
I
A
All
right,
all
in
favor
I,
can
close
all
right
under
number
one.
The
last
question
mark
I
think
should
not
be
a
question
mark
I
think
that
should
be
a
period.
Please
include
an
explanation
of
the
primary
strength
you
bring
to
this
position
of
what
you
believe
is
the
proper
role
of
a
board
member
period,
not
question
mark
okay,.
L
K
We
putting
a
limit
on
the
first
page
203.
It
says
where
it
says:
award
and
honors
what
award
honors
have
you
been
most
proud
of
to
receive?
Is
there
a
limit
of
how
many
they
want
to
put
like
I
know
the
first
one
says
and
does
that
include
everyone,
the
past
15
years
or
that
specific
one
I
think
you
know
the
first
to
say
the
past
15
years?
Does
it's
the
second
one,
because
that
one
doesn't
say
that
as
the
first
one
says,
community
involvement
please
limit
to
15
years
with
you.
K
F
K
N
F
A
We
don't
commissioner
picard
reminded
me
that
we
need
to
decide
what
our
deadline
is
going
to
be
application
on
the
very
front
page
application
must
be
received
by
4:00
p.m.
on
XXX.
We
need
to
fill
in
that
date
if
I
think
that
we
said,
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we're
legally
bound
to
do
this,
but
I
think
we
talked
at
the
last
meeting
about
having
a
30
day
period
for
the
applique
application
is.
L
A
We
we
arranged
it
for
that
date
with
this
state
in
mind
that
we
can
have
that
period
for
people.
So
what
do
we
want?
The
cutoff
date
to
be?
We
do
we
want
to
have
loop,
I
think
we
would
probably
like
to
have
some
time
to
close
the
application
period
so
that
we
can
read
them.
Does
anybody
have
a
thought
about
that,
but
what
the
date
should
be
well.
F
G
A
K
K
L
A
D
How
many
interviews
are
done?
All
the
interviews
are
done
until
the
votes
taken
and
I?
Don't
have
the
schedule
in
front
of
me
so
I'm
speaking
from
memory,
you
would
just
mention
the
July
26th
State,
the
first
two
interviewing
people,
and
we
won't
be
voting
totally
somewhat
over
these
ten
days
after
that,
correct.
A
K
K
O
A
A
D
A
A
E
Ten
words,
you
know
five
more
days
at
haunting
issues
in
the
first
slide.
The
building
through
those
I
think
the
worst
thing
you
can
do
in
an
interview
is
duplicate.
A
lot
of
work
that
we
can
do
is
already
in
and
that
extra
five
days
I've
waited
the
ants.
The
following
are
a
couple
of
questions
for
each
a
lot
of
times.
E
K
A
A
O
K
A
K
Can
change
that
to
just
email,
but
then,
if
it
smells,
we
would
have
to
be
scanned
that
same
day.
It
has
to
have
a
stamp
date.
So
if
it
stamps
that
date
has
to
be
before
like
on
the
14th
or
before,
and
then
you
guys
will
scan
them
and
put
them
in
the
packet
of
emails
that
are
sent
to
us
with
all
the
already
reviewed.
So
it's
not
like
we're
getting
going
to
get
sent.
L
K
So
the
ones
that
come
in
paper
also
so
yeah
just
get
them,
scan
them
yeah
and
just
keep
the
hard
copy
and
bring
it
the
hard
copy
to
to
our
meeting.
So
it's
open
to
people
to
see,
and
it's
not
a
it-
keeps
that
openness.
So
people
can
see
that
it's
Sicily
there's
a
physical
copy.
Okay,
I
think
the
application
yeah.
A
K
That's
why
I
meant
of
bringing
the
physical
card
copy
one
if
there's
a
paper
once
there's
anybody
says
well,
when
you
scanned
it,
you
manipulated
it
or
something.
I
know
it's
ridiculous,
but
the
house
like
will
have
the
physical
with
the
post
that
stamp
and
everything.
So
it
looks
like
we
received
it
on
this
date
and
that's
why
maybe
it
was
I
submit
it
because
it
can
be
seen
to
date.
One
I.
G
The
people
are
coming
in
to
be
interviewed,
I
think
unless
we're
going
to
have
iPads
with
everything
at
it,
that
we're
very
facile
with
I
think
be
a
lot
easier
to
have
a
noted
page,
a
document
that
you
can
refer
to
as
you're
talking
to
the
person
just
to
facilitate
the
discussion.
So
no
I'm
not
I'm,
satisfied
that
I'll
be
able
to
get
what
I
get.
A
C
L
K
L
L
A
O
A
E
O
That
way,
the
person
feels
comfortable.
Oh,
it's
been
received,
it's
on
the
desk
and
it'll
get
to
where
it
needs
to
go
important.
I,
don't
expect
big
piles
of
paper
getting
all
lost
and
and
I
will
have
to
miss
to
class.
My
I'll
have
a
file
hard
file
copy
in
a
notebook
that
doesn't
leave
my
office,
and
if
anyone
wants
to
personally
especially
request
paper
copies
I
mean
we
can.
You
know,
certainly
accommodate.
O
L
E
E
O
L
O
A
K
L
L
K
K
O
F
L
L
M
Motion
I
just
wanted
to
add
in
the
wordage
says:
applications
may
either
be
mailed
to
in
bold
and
then
at
the
very
end
after
the
address
it
says
or
email
to
should
the
or
email
be
separated
and
made
bold
as
well,
so
that
they
know
that
those
are
the
two
options
that
way
that
or
emailed
option
doesn't
get
lost.
I.
A
A
M
A
A
A
L
A
A
All
right,
moving
on
number
seven
on
our
agenda
is
again
exactly
what
miss
Sutherland
brought
up,
which
is
voting
procedures,
so
she's
right
that
in
the
past
this.
But
this
Commission
has
been
charged
with
only
with
sending
nominations
to
the
governor,
and
so
we
could
send
as
many
nominations
as
we
wanted
and
we
didn't
have
to
narrow
it
down
to
one
one
person,
and
so
our
voting
has
to
change
in
order
to
to
get
us
to
one
candidate.
A
So
our
start
by
saying
that
we
did
first
I
want
to
say
that
we
did
ask
the
Attorney
General
for
opinions
on
a
number
of
things
and
unfortunately
the
attorney
general's
office
got
in
touch
with
mr.
Moser
today
and
told
him
that
they
are
not
that's,
not
the
appropriate
office
to
give
us
the
opinion.
So
we
do
not
have
a
legal
opinion
on
any
of
the
questions
that
we
asked,
and
so
we
do
have
to
wait
for
that.
A
And
that
is
why
there
are
several
things
on
this
agenda
that
we
are
waiting
to
discuss
because
we
don't
have
a
legal
opinion
and
so
they're
working
on
getting
a
legal
opinion
from
from
a
different
source.
But
for
now
we
do
not
have
that
Attorney
General's
opinion,
so
for
voting
procedures.
There's
a
number
of
ways,
there's
a
number
of
ways
that
we
could
go.
The
County
Council
obviously
has
one
method
of
voting
getting
narrowing
down
a
large
pool
of
candidates
to
one
we
can
use
my
method
we
can.
A
L
A
Them
is
that
they
drop
off
the
lowest
vote
getters
in
each
realm.
So
what
we
would
do
is
we
would
go
down
the
line
when
it
comes
time
to
voting
and
Commissioner
Jones
would
vote
and
and
Commissioner
Bennett
would
vote
and
so
on
down
the
line-
and
you
just
say
your
picks
for
person
and
then
whoever
didn't
get
any
votes
or
whoever
got
the
lowest
number
of
votes
would
drop
out
of
the
pool
and
we
keep
going
through
rounds.
There's
another
option
we
could
take
in
that
initial
vote.
A
A
So
I
I
just
want
to
I.
Don't
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
need
to
vote
on
this
today.
I'm
not
sure
that
we
need
to
settle
on
what
we're
doing
today,
because
it's
a
lot
to
think
about,
but
I
definitely
want
it
to
be
something
that
we
discuss
openly
before
we
get
to
the
voting
in
August.
So
anybody
has
thoughts
about
this.
A
D
D
I
don't
know
if
that
system
would
be
usable
when
the
supermajority
is
just
a
bowl.
Five
out
of
eight
out
of
thirteen
votes,
some
of
the
lower
vote
getters
in
the
early
rounds
might
have
been
some
of
them.
That
might
be
more
likely
to
get
the
eight
votes
had
they
made
it
farther
along
in
the
in
the
process,
and
it
might
make
our
job
to
come
to
a
supermajority
even
farther.
If
we
use
that
method
again,
I
don't
have
another
option
for
you.
I
was.
D
A
D
Having
been
involved
in
interest-based
problem-solving
and
interest
based
negotiation
strategies,
we
had
an
exercise
where
we
use
dots
feel
funny
bringing
that
up
in
a
formal
area.
If
we
have
nine
candidates,
everybody
gets
nine
dots
and
we
put
them
on
our
favorite
situate
a
boat.
It's
just
a
way
to
graphically
show
who
you're
voting
for
it
and
then.
D
A
D
A
So
if
we
really
liked
one
candidate,
we
put
all
our
dots
on
that
and
sort
of
tip
well,
there's
no
legal
charge
for
how
we
how
we
vote
so
it's
up
to
us
to
set
to
set
the
voting.
So
that's
now
would
that
bring
us
which
firm
have
to
have
one
round
of
voting
once
we
got
that
would
pick
our
top
candidates
right
and
then
we
still
have
to
have
a
round
of
voting
because
we
do
have
to
get
to
eight.
We
wouldn't
know
okay,
but
that
would
be
a
way
to
narrow
the
field.
K
We
talk
about
like
a
checklist
in
some
way
like
things
we
narrow
down
and
then
kind
of
do
the
voting
like
that,
like
everybody
like
a
score
sheet
kind
of
thing,
that
we
can
give
each
points
like
out
of
ten
or
something,
and
then
we
add
them
up
and
then
so
there's
a
clear.
Why
I
didn't
vote
for
this
or
that.
But
then
it's
also
having
to
create
one,
and
that
takes
too
long
like
well.
N
Saying
so,
I
think
combining
Commissioner
Jones's
idea
with
the
County
Council
voting
as
you're
scoring
your
let's
say:
there's
ten
applicants
and
I'm
reading
through
and
I'm
going
to
put
my
favorites
at
the
top
I'm
going
to
as
I'm
reading,
and
then
once
we
interview
candidates
I'm
going
to
possibly
reorder
them
as
I've.
You
know.
Are
they
as
great
on
paper
as
they
are
in
person
kind
of
thing?
So
then
I
would
have
my
top
three
and
I
could
use
my
nine
dots
or
ten
dots
or
whatever.
N
I
When
we
did,
when
we
did
Teacher
of
the
Year,
you
would
get
a
scoring
sheet
that
you
know
it
might
be.
You
know
ten
points
per
question
or
whatever,
and
then
what
happens
is
the
the
ones
that
you
know
like
if
you
can
rank
them
one
to
ten
and
there's
ten
questions
on
it,
you
know:
how
did
they
present
themselves?
What
new
ideas
did
they
share?
You
know
whatever
you
want
to
call
it,
but
then
those
that
were
in
the
top
half.
I
So
if
everybody's
vote
on
every
candidate
gets
counted
and
if
you
can
do
one
to
ten
like
let's
say,
there's
ten
questions,
a
hundred
points
all
together
and
your
candidate
did
90
and
you
know
each
of
the
commissioners,
ninety
nine
ninety,
but
then
somebody
else
was
85,
you
add
them
all
up
and
then
the
bottom
ones
drop
off.
But
everybody's
vote
counts
because
you
get
a
scoring
system
and.
K
N
But
my
my
candidate
that
gets
a
95
that
same
candidate
might
get
a
55
from
someone
else
who
has
a
different
perspective.
So
when
we
did
Teacher
of
the
Year
this
year,
we
did
score
the
applications,
but
we
didn't
actually.
So
when
we
went
into
the
room
we
were,
we
were
doing
the
last
ten
you're
taught
you.
We
all
presented
our
top
three
and
then
we
figured
out
with
dots.
N
N
B
I
guess
my
question,
and
we
have
commissioners
who've
served
before
are
you
know?
I
would
imagine
that
the
top
candidates
are
the
top
candidates.
Was
it
a
big
difference
and
who
folks
actually
liked
I
mean
from
the
Commission
and
thought
would
represent
well
where
they,
whether
it
wasn't
really
all
over
the
mat,
Wow.
N
N
Go
from
there
I
don't
want
to
recreate
the
wheel.
That
makes
me
nervous
because
I
mean
we
have
to
a
point.
This
is
important.
You
know,
and
this
procedure
will
probably
follow
for
any
other
appointments
between
now
and
2020.
So
it'd
behoove
us
to
get
the
process
right,
I
would
I
would
feel
more
comfortable
coming
using
a
process
that
has
being
used
in
another
public
body
and
that.
A
J
You'd
have
to
have
a
consistent
criteria,
because
if
you
don't
have
that,
then
you
you
could
get
into
some
major
issues.
Okay,
I
think.
The
other
thing
is
that
you
need
to
be
aware
of
granted
personnel
they're,
not
hired,
but
there
are
certain
liability
issues
if
you
discuss
personalities,
etc
in
a
public
situation.
J
My
backgrounds,
director
of
personnel
and
staff
development
for
the
school
system-
and
you
know
we
had
executive
session
to
talk
about
personnel
so
and
I-
think
that
last
our
last
commission,
we
voted
all
right
again.
It
was
a
recommendation
to
the
governor,
but
when
public
comment
came
out,
no
one
commented
because
there
is
a
liability
issue.
Just
want
you
to
be
were.
A
A
F
J
We
voted
alright
in
public
session.
However,
we
did
have
an
executive
session
to
discuss
some
of
the
candidates
which
we
did
not
obviously
in
the
open
session,
because
there's
some
certain
liability
issues
all
right.
What
we
did
vote
you
remember
that,
don't
you
know?
Okay,
and
so
you
know,
that's
that's
just
the
reality
of
personnel
and
but
these
are
not
paid
while
they
are
paid,
but.
F
J
I
think
I
think
we
have
to
have
consistent
criteria
to
to
to
vote.
I
mean
another
way
might
be
initially
through.
The
applications
is
score.
Each
question
say
it's
five,
all
right
for
each
question
or
10
and
therefore
you'd
have
a
total
score
and
you
can
see
which
candidates
were
strong,
but
then,
after
the
interviews
again
consistency
in
questions.
A
J
A
D
The
denominating
Commission
before
this
past
year
and
a
half
or
so
when
things
kind
of
changed,
we
did
our
voting
an
executive
session
and
our
job
was
to
give
at
least
two
people.
Two
nominees
for
each
vacancy
off
to
the
governor
and
we'd
sit
him
up
in
the
caucus
room
and
we
go
around
the
table
and
do
preliminary
vote
now
required.
8
votes
out
of
11,
so
people
started
falling
off
pretty
quickly.
D
If
one
candidate
only
got
2
votes
well,
there's
still
6
away,
so
we
would
do
another
round
of
boat
and
they
weren't
actually
knocked
out.
They
weren't
actually
voted
off
the
island,
but
the
commissioners
at
the
table
realized
that
it's
very
very
unlikely
to
get
six
more
votes
to
somebody
who
only
got
one
or
two
in
the
first
round.
So
it
was
a
natural
tendency
for
commissioners
devote
for
the
people
who
were
most
likely
to
actually
hit
the
8
vote
mark
and
that's
when
our
conversations
were
going
on.
D
Well,
you
know
five
people,
six
people
voted
for
this
candidate.
Ask
some
of
the
naysayers.
What
made
you
not
vote
for
them?
What
makes
why
not
them?
In
a
conversation,
look
back
important,
we
finally
came
to
an
agreement
I'm
the
two
people
for
each
vacancy.
It
wasn't
wasn't
by
formula
they
came
about
by
discussions
and
going
around
the
table
as
many
times
as
we
needed
to
to
get
the
number
of
candidates
we
needed.
D
D
D
It
was
done
in
the
caucus
room.
What
was
done
in
public?
We
came
from
the
caucus
remotely
here
and
we
announced
the
votes,
only
the
votes
and
not
the
discussion,
not
the
discussions
of
the
house
and
wise,
but
at
each
candidate
got
told
what
their
vote
count
was
and
then
at
the
end
of
we
came
down
to
with
what
the
winners
votes
were
with
the
nominees
votes
were
well.
A
M
Have
a
question
in
regards
to
using
a
pointing
or
scoring
system
as
they
were
discussing?
Is
there
a
way
to
kind
of
and
I
know
this
would
be
maybe
a
bit
of
a
hassle,
but
the
questions
that
we
ask
on
the
application
is
there
a
way
to
kind
of
separate
them
into
categories
was
obviously
maybe
some
categories
allowing
for
more
points
than
others
and
doing
the
point
or
scoring
system
that
way.
F
Well,
actually,
what
crest
does
is
we?
Everybody
asks
their
own
question,
because
every
we
have
a.
We
have
a
group
of
people
that
read
the
applications,
everything
and
they
have
their
own,
concise
questions
that
they're
asking
and
everybody
scores
them
on,
how
articulate
or
how
well
they
articulate
their
answer
on
how
concise
is
and
their
knowledge
and
experience
and
stuff
with
that
with
that
category.
So
that's
how
we
vaguely
just
grade
them.
G
One
number
two
number
three
number
four
I,
don't
know
how
she'd
do
it,
given
one
of
the
things
you're
going
to
have
to
deal
with.
Also
is
the
fact
that
you
have
so
many
commissioners
and
you
just
hope
and
pray
to
the
good
Lord
did
everybody
shows
up
on
both
lights
or
if
we
need
both
lights,
because
if
you
have
a
situation
where
some
people
are
absent
and
therefore
the
applicants
aren't
being
consistently
evaluated
in
terms
of
the
full
body
that
can
be
problematic
too.
L
L
A
The
scoring
idea
creates
a
lot
of
work
for
someone
to
make
sure
that
the
valuation
sheets
are
consistent.
Even
that's.
Maybe
the
questions
are
consistent.
I
think
it's
a
huge
additional
amount
of
work
and
not
necessarily
may
be
worth
the
payoff
in
terms
of
just
in
terms
of
how
we're
getting
to
where
we're
going
so
you're
saying
on
these
evaluation
sheets,
we
would
take
that
everybody
would
take
their
top
scorers
and,
however,
you.
G
Have,
for
example,
seven
criteria,
the
applicants,
understanding
of
the
problems
of
the
school
board,
the
whatever
we
come
up
with.
They
would
be
discrete
criteria
that
would
be
applied
by
each
of
us
as
we
go
through
the
interviews,
and
then
you
have
numerical
factors
associated
with
each
of
the
evaluation
factors
and
then,
at
the
end
of
it.
You'd
have
some
basis
for
saying
all
of
this
when
we
aggregated
our
score
is
ranked
Joe,
Jones
or
Mary
Smith
number
one
number
two.
L
N
N
N
N
G
N
I
would
than
I
would,
if
that's
if
people
are,
if
the
Commission
is
leaning
towards
doing
something
like
that,
then
I
would
create.
A
separate
I
would
advocate
to
create
a
separate
rubric
that
looks
at
their
application,
their
resume
and
their
interview,
and
we
make
that's
three
sections
of
the
process
and
we
attach
a
score
that
equals
up
to
a
hundred
and
then
the.
K
Fun
is
that
if
we
do
that
it's
kind
of
like
a
science
fair,
you
know
how
they
do
it.
They
have
that
little
thing
for
the
kids
like
if
you
cover
page
tempo
instead
of
the
20
points,
so
because
it's
so
transparent
and
perfect,
like
that,
do
we
have
to
attach
it
to
the
application
itself,
so
they
know
that
oh
I
submitted,
like
kind
of
like
their
own
checklist.
We.
J
H
K
N
Application
first
not
similar
to
what
they
did
but
we're.
But
if
we
created
a
separate
document
very
quick
here,
we're
not
opening
it
up.
We
just
approved
an
application
so,
and
that
has
a
lot
of
parts
to
it.
So
if
we
just
set
the
app
with
questions
on
the
application
their
resume
and
then
you
know
the
resume
as
it
relates
to
school
board
service
but
again.
A
K
K
K
F
J
A
Yeah,
so,
okay,
so
you're
saying
so
bright,
so
I'm
texturing
we
go
down
the
line
and
Commissioner
John
says
I
vote
for
a
candidate
7
and
then
commissioner
Bennett
says
I
vote
for
candidate
6
or
whatever
we
just
put
on
the
line,
and
everybody
says
the
top
vote,
because
we
are
only
trying
to
vote
one
person
but
you're
saying
we
need
to
go
through
every
candidate
and
bow
to
every
person
and
say
yea
or
nay,
at
least
once.
Ok,
ok,
ok,.
A
J
E
A
N
If
we,
if
we're
going
to
use
the
county
council
method
with
the
idea
that
we
have
every
single
applicant,
will
have
a
public
vote,
then
the
rubric
idea
or
the
evaluation
idea-
is
for
our
own
personal
issues
for
us
to
sort
out
our
own
application.
It's
not
really
so.
I
personally
can
sort
out
the
applications
without
a
rubric
yeah.
N
K
A
Value
of
the
rubric
was
when
we
were
discussing
and
I
don't
know.
Commissioner
for
may
be
correct
that
we
that
we
do
have
to
do
it.
The
way
that
she
said,
in
which
case
yeah.
This
is
a
whole
different
discussion.
If
the
voting
goes,
everybody
just
says
the
name
of
their
top
candidate
and
you
keep
doing
that
till
you
get
there.
That's
one
thing
and
we
use
the
rubric
and
that
gets
us
to
our
top
three.
A
If
the
voting
goes
that
we
have
to
name
each
candidate
and
everyone
has
to
vote
on
each
candidate,
that's
a
different
thing.
I
know
in
the
past.
That
is
how
we've
done
it,
but
the
goal
of
that
voting
was
different
because
we
could
send
essentially
as
many
names
as
we
wanted
to
the
governor,
and
in
this
case
we
just
have
to
pick
one.
So
we
need
to
decide.
Do
we
need?
N
If
we
vote
on
every
candidate,
then
the
first
round
of
voting
wherever
we
go
through
candidates,
one
through
ten
commissioner
Picard-
is
only
going
to
vote
in
that
first
round
for
her
first
pick
right.
So
if
my
first
pick
doesn't
make
it
if
I'm
the
only
one
in
the
first
round
that
likes
my
candidate
and
they
get
eliminated,
then
I
have
the
option
in
the
next
round
of
voting
to
vote
for
my
second
choice
or,
however,
but
because
I
didn't
vote
for
that
person
originally.
N
K
The
way
I
vote,
our
bylaws
only
say
for
voting
rights.
Each
Commissioner
shall
have
one
vote
upon
each
matter
submitted
to
a
vote
by
his
comments
by
this
commission.
The
vote
shall
be
exercised
in
person
and
not
by
proxy.
All
matters
to
be
voted
upon
shall
require
eight
votes
for
passes.
That's
it.
That's
all
seven
voting
rights
so
so.
A
We
tore
it
open
and
for
everyone
to
let
all
these
ideals,
ideas,
kind
of,
settle
and
think
about
what
would
work.
But
yes,
if
the
legal
opinion
is
that
we
are
not
bound
by
any
restrictions
and
we
can
choose
our
method
of
voting
to
be.
However,
we
want
it,
then
we're
right
back
where
we
are
right
now.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
table
this.
N
J
A
J
L
D
Want
to
make
one
very
short
suggestion:
I
looked
at
the
minutes
and
saw
that
there's
a
10-day
waiting
period
between
the
Macan
des
dates,
interviews
and
the
voting
hour
prior
Commission,
going
back
all
the
way
to
2007
made
decisions
like
this,
and
they
were
never
recorded
effectively.
If
we're
going
to
put
together
voting
procedures-
and
we
want
to
record
that
10-day
waiting
period,
maybe
we'll
have
to
find
a
place
to
put
it,
if
not
in
our
bylaws,
then
an
evolving
pursuit
procedures.
So
it's
memorialized
for
future
commissioners.