►
From YouTube: Antrea Community Meeting 07/05/2021
Description
Antrea Community Meeting, July 5th 2021
A
Perfect
so
good
morning
or
good
afternoon,
this
is
the
andrea
community
meeting
and
today
is
tuesday
july,
the
6th
or,
if
you're,
joining
the
u.s
it's
july
5th.
But
since
it's
a
public
college
in
the
us,
there
is
no
one
joining
us
from
there.
So
today
is
only
july.
A
The
6th-
and
this
is
going
to
be-
let's
say,
a
shorter
meeting,
likely
as
we
don't
have
any
attendees
from
the
us
being
a
public
holiday
there,
and
also
we
don't
have
any
topic
which
has
been
booked
in
advance
for
the
agenda.
Therefore,
for
today
it's
a
pretty
much
open
discussion
and
if
you
have
anything
to
propose
anything
to
discuss
anything,
that's
bothering
you
please
go.
A
Ahead,
there
is
a
silence,
I'm
just
curious
if
there's
been
any
follow-up
discussion
to
the
multicast
conversation
we
had
a
few
weeks
ago,
but
I
don't
think
that
the
people
that
presented
the
multicast
area.
A
B
A
Okay,
thanks
chan,
I
was
just
looking
at
this
as
an
issue
that
jay
shared
over
the
select
channel
over
the
over
over
this
lakshmi's
luck
channel
on
on
sunday,
and
it
seems
that
we
have
never
validated
kind
of
antria
with
the
multiple
nix,
which
seems
a
little
bit
strange.
A
C
C
I
had
a
brief
discussion
with
wayne
this
morning
a
few
hours
ago,
and
we
are
considering
that
maybe
it's
possible
to
decouple
this
logic,
that
and
light
like
that
user
to
specify
a
interface
that
could
be
used
for
data
paths.
So
oh
external
traffic
and
all
encapsulation
traffic
can
go
that
data
link
and
that
detailing
data
link
can
be
different
from
the
device
that
has
the
node
ip
yeah.
You
guys
think
this
is.
C
As
well-
yes,
that's
a
good
question.
We
also
discussed
this
and
think
this
applies
to
linux
as
well,
because
even
for
now,
when
I
wanted
to
test
linux
performance,
I
had
to
make
the
the
the
device
that
has
higher
bandwidth
to
hold
the
node
ip,
so
it's
very
inconvenient
to
performance
to
switching
the
node
ip.
C
C
It
has
higher
bandwidth,
but
since
it's
not,
it
cannot
be
reachable
by
default.
It's
it
makes
me
how
to
make
some
configuration
to
to
use
that
that
that
ip
for
kubernetes,
controlling
yeah.
A
Understood:
okay,
so
thanks
for
for
the
clarification
here.
A
There
is,
there
was
another
thing
that
it's
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up
today
and
it's
kobe's
work
on
the
no
different,
integrated
node
diaphragm
controller
copy.
What's
the
current
status
of
your
pr.
B
I
think
I've
addressed
all
the
comments
which
we
had
on
that
pr
and
I
was
I
was
doing
some
testing
on
it
like
a
week
ago,
which,
as
far
as
I
recall,
because
since
then
I
had
an
openstack
break,
seems
to
look
okay.
A
Okay,
but
you
are
you
testing
it
with
the
like
a
standard,
kubernetes
environment,
or
are
you
able
to
test
it
with
an
open
shift
environment.
A
Okay,
that's
that's
good.
B
A
A
Yeah,
I
mean
in
theory
nothing
should
change,
because
you
know
the
controller.
The
controller
should
behave
in
the
same
way
is
just
that.
The
reason
why
that
pr
has
become
important
is
that
we
have
been
painted
on
the
community
channel
by
some
community
members
that
are
trying
to
install.
A
I
don't
know
if
open
shifter,
okay
with
andrea
and
you
know,
since
openshift
version
4.6
the
they
have
disabled
the
node
ibm
controller
and
in
cube
controller
manager,
which
means
that
the
only
way
for
making
andrea
work
is
to
go
to
openshift
before
it
deploys
the
cluster
and
tweak
the
bootstrap
node
to
re-enable
the
node
iphone
controller,
and
then
andrea
deployment
can
proceed.
Obviously
this
is
less
than
ideal,
because
openshift
deployment
is
supposed
to
be
fully
automated
and
instead
you
need
a
you
need
to
go
and
do
this
arc.
A
So
that's
why
that
pr
is
a
kind
of
important
at
the
moment.
Okay,
so
it's
good
that
all
the
all
the
comments
have
been
have
been
addressed
and
and
yeah,
and
then
eventually
we
need
to
have
a,
I
think,
eventually
kind
of
quite
soon
we
will
probably
need
to
have
a
conversation.
Also
about
adding
openshift
to
our
ci
upstream
ci
pipeline
switch.
A
To
be
honest
with
you,
I
don't
know
how
that
I
mean,
I
know
how
that
work.
Technically,
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
deploy
okd
or
if
we
need
to
get
some.
You
know
some
some
account
from
reddit
for
for
deploying
openshift,
because
clearly
it's
it's
not
free
and
open.
B
B
A
No,
no,
we
just
need
to
run
openshift
within
three
yeah.
No.
A
But
maybe
ncp,
you
know,
ncp
is
a
completely
different
model
because
it's
like
a
it's
a
corporate
product.
We
are
just
talking
about
purely
open
source
stuff.
If
we
put
something
upstream,
we
need
to
have
a
license
and
and
and
and
we
should
not
use
the
ones
that
are
used
for
corporate
purposes
anyway.
A
So
we
will
try
and
and
address
this
one
as
well
and
perfect.
So,
just
out
of
curiosity,
has
anyone
ever
tried
to
deploy
okd
with
andrea.
A
I
mean
probably
not
probably
not-
I
don't
know
I
yeah,
I
don't
think
so
anyway.
So
that's
that's
all
about
this
pr,
so
you
know
if,
if
you
have
some
time,
please
have
a
look,
also
hobbies
pr,
so
that
we
can
try
and
get
it
in
the
next
century
release,
and
I
believe
that
that
is
all
that
I
had
on
my
agenda
for
today
is
there
anything
else
that
you
would
like
to
discuss.
A
A
Perfect,
it
seems
that
there
are
no
additional
topics
so
as
anticipated,
this
one
is
going
to
be
a
shorter
meeting.
So
I
would
like
to
thank
everyone
for
joining
us
today
and,
as
usual,
thanks
for
all
your
contributions
and
say
that
I
think
this
meeting
is
over,
so
I'm
going
to
stop
the
recording
thanks
again
for
joining
and
talk
to
you
again
in
tweaks
time.