►
From YouTube: Antrea Community Meeting 02/12/2020
Description
Antrea Community Meeting, February 12th 2020
A
A
I've
been
talking
for
a
minute
realized
that
I
was
on
mute,
so
I
say
that
the
recording
has
been
started
and
for
today
I
did
not
no
one
came
up
with
any
particular
topic
to
discuss.
Therefore,
I
assume
that
today
it's
going
to
be
a
pretty
much
standard
meeting
about
checking
on
release
status,
discussing
issues
and
possibly
identifying
topic
topics
for
next
early
scenes.
I
believe
that
0.40
should
be
out
next
week.
A
Okay
sounds
good
so
for
making
things
easier,
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
since
I.
Have
a
thousand
open
windows
are
try
and
share
exactly
the
one
that
we
need,
which
I
think
is
this
one?
Yes,
you
should
be
seeing
now
that
zero
four
zero
four
zero
issues
target
for
the
next
release.
We
need
to
verify,
let's,
let's
do
a
check
of
the
status
over
each
open
item.
B
A
A
D
C
A
So
now
we
should
take.
Probably
the
first,
let's
see
if
there
is
any
update
on
the
issue,
because
I
did
not
verify
that
no,
not
no
update
on
the
issue.
I
see
that
we
have
an
internal
ticket
for
allowing
you
know
for
publishing
our
log
servers
to
a
public
IP
address,
but
unfortunately,
I
did
not
see
much
progress
on
that
ticket.
So
now,
I
would
like
to
discuss
with
you
whether
you
think
we
should
keep
pursuing
the
throughout
route
or
route
if
you're
British
and
keep
pushing
for
that
or
define
I
have
a
different
solution.
A
We
were
considering
sharing
the
OpenStack
log
server
I.
Think
our
logs
are
not
there
I'm,
not
using
that
much
space.
So
I
guess
there
could
be
a
little
bit
of
space
for
the
entry
logs
and
the
other
option,
of
course,
would
be
publishing
the
logs
to
some
public
storage,
so
not
public,
so
like
ec2
or
s3,
or
whatever.
A
A
Yes,
that's
right.
That's
me,
I
mean
ec2
and
s3
the
thing
that
I
believe
that
if
we
go
into
that
direction,
we
just
need
to
figure
out
that
somebody
that
sponsors
this
activity
right,
because
our
or
are
there
free
cloud
credits
or
whatever
for
open
source
I,
don't
think
that
anyone
is
giving
out
those
credits
anymore
a
few
years
ago.
They
used
to
do
that,
but.
B
B
We
cannot
right
now
why
we
just
I
mean.
Apparently
we
cannot
like.
Well,
actually
I,
don't
know
it.
May
it
may
be
possible
I
think
what
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
expose
the
Jenkins
server
to
the
internet.
So
you
can
just
like
Jenkins
UI
is
known
as
an
unprivileged
user,
not
logged
in
user
and
just
look
at
the
logs.
B
A
Okay,
but
is
a
someone
already
working
on
this
or
is
that
a
or
e
suggests
that
if
we
want
to
use
a
BMC
testbed,
it
could
be
made
available
to
us
I
think
Zhang
Sheng
store
it.
Okay,
all
right
good!
Then
then
we
are
going
to
deter
I
think
that
we
can
commit
a
go
in
this
direction.
Maybe
we
can
check
with
John
Sean
in
the
next
few
days
to
see
what's
the
status
there,
all
right,
then,
for
publishing
the
ant
CTL
binaries
for
different
platform
in
releases.
A
A
A
C
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
Perfect
then,
this
is
a
one
I,
remember
kind
of
which
one
I
know
I'm,
not
sure
I,
remember
which
one
was
the
issue.
Let
me
see
again
I
think
we
discussed
it
last
week
as
well
in
detail,
but
maybe
no
so
this
one
was
a
part
of
the
kind
test.
Failing
and
I
don't
remember
if
it
was
the
issue
that
you
thought
it
could
appear
only
unkind
or
whether
it
was
a
potentially
and
he
should
a
cool
appear
everywhere.
It's
issue
354,
sorry,
244.
B
B
A
A
B
One
I
will
merge
before
the
release.
Yes,
at
the
moment,
it's
actually
failing
the
tests
on
art
as
well,
even
though
it's
working
for
me
on
a
local
cluster
and
so
I
don't
understand,
what's
causing
it
what's
causing
it
and
I
need
to
investigate
it.
Maybe
it's
a
difference
in
the
obvious
calmodulin,
though
it
shouldn't
matter
so
I'm
still
looking
into
this
okay
and
make
it
should
make
the
release.
If
I
can.
A
B
A
By
the
way,
I
noticed
that
you
tell
you
they're
like
what
a
bunch
of
issue
as
a
good
the
first
issue,
thanks
for
that
and
I
think
that
you
know
this
is
one
of
the
things
that,
in
my
opinion,
if
we
fix
it
or
that
fix
it,
it
doesn't
change
it.
It's
good
to
keep
these
issues
open
to
attract
contributors
and
of
them
ramp
it
up
on
the
project.
A
A
Let's
keep
it
open.
That's
fine,
so
I
guess
that
this
concludes
the
discussion
of
the
zero
four
zero
release
and
the
payload
now
looks
much
smaller,
but
all
the
issues
that
we
saw
we
see
targeted
year.
She
would
easily
make
it
into
the
release.
Ax
and
I.
Don't
know
if
Cody
or
anyone
else
has
any
comment
on
that
zero.
Four
zero
Alisa.
E
Figured
out
we're
using
something
similar
to
what
Spotify
used
and
so
basically
I'm
generating
a
a
license
file
and
we'll
get
that
checked
in
this
week.
I've
got
a
couple
things
to
clean
up
on
the
way
it
scrapes
that
and
then
we
may
then
we'll
have,
to
probably
add
some
manual
fix
up
to
that
as
we
go.
E
E
The
website
is
merged
into
a
branch
I'm,
making
some
final
updates
that
Wendy
requested
we're
pretty
much
ready
to
go.
I've
already
tested
it
with
metal
fly.
Everything
is
working
as
expected.
There
I've
got
to
get
our
domain
moved
over
for
the
launch
of
that,
and
one
final
look
off
from
suzanne
an
open
source
and
in
our
source
group,
and
then
I
think,
that's
all
the
updates.
E
There
was
one
other
thing
that
the
matrix,
so
I
think
we're
pretty
clear
now
on
the
test
matrix,
I've
talked
to
all
the
project
managers
there,
obviously
we're
we're
we're
targeting
some
additional
testing
of
ontario,
so
we're
going
to
work
with
Rahul
on
doing
some
of
the
public
cloud
testing
and
get
that
written
up
with
the
matrix
that
we've
determined
it's
it's
just
primarily
looking
at
I've
been
to
Amazon
Linux
too
and
photon.
Those
are
the
three
primary
OS
is
that
that
we
need
to
get
working
as
soon
as
possible.
A
C
A
E
I'm
not
doing
security
review,
yet
this
is
strictly
licensing,
and
so
the
licensing
file
will
list.
Basically
we
have
a
blurb
at
the
top.
That
says,
you
know
we're
grateful
or
entry
is
built
using
some
other
great
third-party
software.
We're
grateful
to
these
authors.
You
know
their
requirements
require
us
to
list
their
licenses,
and
so
then
it
has
a
list
of
all
the
licenses.
A
Good
I
think
that
I
don't
see
a
high
priority
at
the
moment
for
also
setting
up
a
vulnerability
scan
process.
This
is
something
that
maybe
we
can
think
in
a
few
months.
Time
will
be
a
nice
to
a
feature,
but
I
don't
see
it
as
mandatory
at
the
moment.
What's
your
feeling
about
honorable
discount
code?
Is
this
something
that
right.
E
A
So,
since
it
seems
that
there
is
a
I
mean
II,
if
there
is
no
other
topic
or
feature
that
you
would
like
to
bring
in
today's
meeting,
I
will
just
like
to
spend
some
time
with
you
reviewing
the
issues
that
were
opening
the
were
mostly
by
us
in
the
past
week
to
figure
out
if
there
is
any
particularly
serious
issue
that
we
should
target
for
the
next
release
and
validating
whether
there
are
some
issues
that
could
have
implications
that
we
are
not
seeing
at
the
moment.
So
the.
E
Only
other
thing
I
was
gonna
target
before
you
go
on
to
that
goes,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
close
the
review
process
down
on
the
CNC
F.
It's
been
out
there
for
folks
to
comment
on
if
anybody
would
like
to
add
any
final
comments
of
that,
I
need
to
basically
pull
it
out
of
the
word
doc
and
put
it
back
into
our
Mart
down.
So
just
okay,
aware
of
that
sounds
good
perfect.
A
C
C
C
A
Right,
perfect,
okay,
so
we
have
an
interesting
feature
that
has
been
pushing
and
the
shamming
I
hope
that
I
got
her
name
correctly.
Asked
me
if
we
want
the
opinion
me
to
see.
If
we
support
this
one
and
I
said
no,
we
don't
support
it,
but
to
maybe
something
that
we
would
like
to
have
it
in
our
roadmap.
In
now,
in
theory,
I
believe
even
CP
wants
to
be
part.
Sorry
Andrea
wants
to
be
part
of
mortis
with
with
the
country
are
doing
the
primary
interfaces
and
them
some
other
CNI
plug-in.
A
A
A
Don't
see
a
requirement
for
that
at
the
moment.
That's
why
I
was
asking
Holly
for
primary,
but
if
we
see
an
area
where
an
tree
could
be
managing
the
secondary
interfaces,
then
then
I
don't
even
know.
If
it's
mold
yeah
it
can
be
the
finger.
The
thing
is
that
the
way
that
andrea
works,
you
know
for
secondary
interfaces.
A
Well,
maybe
yeah
we
can.
We
can
figure
out
the
scenario,
but
at
the
moment
you
know
it
will
not.
It
will
be
probably
more
I'm
afraid
that
it
seems
that
I'm
more
looking
for
it
looks
like
more
a
solution.
Looking
a
problem
looking
for
a
solution
for
a
solution,
looking
for
a
problem
than
an
actual
needy
that
we
are
going
to
address,
so
I
will
say
that
if
we
want
to
enable
mortis,
then
perhaps
let's
just
start
with
ants,
we
are
managing
the
primary
interfaces
and
then
something
else
is
secondary.
A
A
So
in
my
experience
you
know
when
we
talk
about
mortis,
we
are
mostly
referring
to
telco
use
cases,
and
the
secondary
interfaces
is
typically
not
one
of
the
Sienese
that
we
are
used
to.
No,
the
secondary
interfaces
is
typically
some
pass
through
some
actually
attached
to
be
line.
Interface,
I
said
RV
or
stuff
like
that.
A
But
we
can,
we
can
work
with
charming
that
asked
for
this
feature
to
refine
the
requirements
perhaps
and
and
see
if
we
can
target
something
likely
for
that
0-6
release.
I.
Don't
think
that
we
will
have
enough
time
in
here
for
anything
in
zero,
five
for
this
in
this
area
and
that's
all
about
mortis
and
I.
So
quite
a
lot
of
activity
called
e
on
your
issue
for
creating
the
website.
Instead,.
E
Correct
so
when
you
the
website
was
delivered,
it
was
delivered
as
a
a
jekyll
build.
It
was
located
in
a
recursive
site,
site
directory
that
didn't
make
really
a
lot
of
sense.
So
what
I
was
originally
gonna
do
is
just
check
out
the
check
out
the
PR
and
make
some
edits,
there's
actually
a
significant
number
of
edits
that
need
to
be
made.
E
A
A
Since
a
city
is
not
working,
this
means
that
if
you
add
entrant
coverage,
you
will
never
known
it.
I
guess
this
is
the
point
of
this
issue,
which
makes
sense
all
right.
So
let's
go
to
the
issue
list
and
these
two
ones
I
did
not
even
a
chance
to
read
them
because
they
were
filed
in
the
past
today.
I
think
since
you're
just
waking
up
I,
don't
think
that
you
two
had
a
chance
to
read
them
right:
I'm
talking
about
379
and
381
No.
A
So
let's
read
them
together.
Let's
do
this
exercise
so
working
issue
for
Brody
and
I
plugin
announcement
and
upstream
template
test
improvements
per
conversation
with
others
in
signatory
country,
our
communities.
We
decided
to
move
work
that
ties
together
a
broad
range
of
testing
and
Enterprise
readiness
work
into
an
upstream
initiative
which
you
try
to
drive
forward
once.
E
We
finish
mode
so
Jay
and
I
had
a
long
conversation
with
he
incident
yesterday
about
the
upstream
policy
testing
that
he
is
working
on
making
improvements
with
he's
actually
talked
to
KC
and
some
other
folks
and
Singh
network
about
the
improvements
to
that
testing.
We
would
like
that
those
improvements
to
originate
from
Andrea
and
and
and
work
on,
establishing
some
of
the
initial
testing
here
and
then
migrate
that
over
to
upstream,
so
that
we
can
have
that
be
a
donation
to
upstream
Signet
work.
E
E
A
E
E
A
When
you
say
they're,
not
comprehensive
enough,
you
are
referring
to
the
absolute
tests
not
to
Karluk
all
right,
correct,
all
right
cool
and
finally,
we
have
this
issue
open.
The
batch
ran
like
seven
hours
ago,
which
was
recipe
are
attached
to
it,
which
makes
me
think
it
might
be
a
serious
bug,
so
network
policy
not
apply
the
too
old
policy
toward
pause
that
it
should
be
how
to
reproduce,
create
a
network
policy
which
applies
to
more
than
one
pod.
Only
one
pod
is
isolated.
A
This
bug
was
introduced
with
this
particular
commit
one
it
and
we
need
isolating
a
slice
and
storing
the
items
addresses
you
must
not
use.
The
address
of
the
loop
enter
a
term
variable
as
it's.
The
team
same
address
stick
in
different
values
in
each
loop,
iteration,
otherwise
the
story,
the
items
would
eventually
continue
one
last
item
and
that
to
me
it
seems
something
that
yes,
yes,
a
patch
seems
that
they
were
I
saw
that
it
wasn't
like
a
no
maybe
I
was
I
was
wrong,
not
the
wreath.
It
is
a
pull
request.
A
At
first
glance,
it
doesn't
seem
like
the
pull
request
is
something
that
we
cannot
review
in
a
week,
but
I
from
what
I
gather
from
this
issue.
Basically,
we
have
a
basic
programming
error.
That's
causing
network
policies
to
not
be
enforced
correctly
and
I
will
recommend,
adding
it
to
zero
for
zero
milestone.
Or
what
is
your
feeling
here.
A
B
A
Will
III
believe
that
we
need
to
get
in
touch
with
the
report
which
is
coming
and
ask
for
yeah
exactly
we
would
like
to
support
Marcus.
How
would
you
like
to
use
it
Andrea
with
maltose,
isn't
going
to
be
the
primary
interview
with
the
primary
interface?
What
are
you
envisioning
for
the
secondary
interfaces?
You
know
just
to
have
a
fairly
good
picture
of
how
a
deployment
with
Andrea
mortis
should
look
like
okay,
so
I
guess
now
it's
open
discussion.
A
B
I'll
bring
up
something,
so
we
started
opening
some
TRS
for
Windows
support,
which
is
great,
but
it
seems
that
at
this
time
we
have
like
a
new
plan
to
have
any
Windows
testbed
for
CI
testing.
So
that
seems
a
bit
backwards
to
me.
I
do
think
that
before
we
start
merging
too
much
code
for
Windows
support,
which
would
like
consider
how
we're
gonna
like
verify
that
this
test,
this
code
works
as
part
of
the
as
possible.
A
D
A
Ideally,
the
approach
the
ideal
approach
will
be
to
have
you
know.
A
sort
of
a
development
process
were
everything
that
you
do
works
end
to
end,
even
if
in
a
fairly
basic
way
and
then
over
time
you
expand
on
it,
but
I
realize
that
this
may
not
be
possible.
So
if
you,
if
there
are
a
set
of
patches
that
need
to
be
merged
first
before
we
can
ever
end
to
end
behavior,
then
it
is
fine,
because
otherwise
the
only
alternative
that
I
see
is
the
feature
branch.
A
Yeah
feature
branches
are
typically
used
when
you
have
something
that
you
know
like
a
long
project
that
it
might
take
you
months,
and
you
want
to
merge
patches
quickly
without
going
through
a
few
review
process.
And
then,
once
you
have
things
working
end
to
end,
we
can
merge
the
feature
branch
banking
back
into
the
back
into
the
master
branch.
Of
course,
the
annoying
part
of
the
feature
branch
is
that
it
will
tend
to
the
rarity
with
master
branch
and
therefore
you
know
when
you
merge
back
it's
going
to
be
painful.
D
E
D
D
A
A
A
A
B
D
C
D
We
can
you
ending
with
I
mean
the
only
reason
we
came
is
one
of
Holies,
like
you
can
confirm
really
better
when
the
we
need
unsupported,
where
Stan
will
GD
workflow
D
just
was
this
tequila
and
it's
things
that
you
find
around,
so
it
can
still
have
a
checks
on
the
tier
still
working.
Even
the
deep
down
support.