►
From YouTube: GMT 2018-06-12 API WG
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
So
the
goal
is
that
so
the
goal
is
we
only
use
this
new
concept,
which
is
provider
to
manage
cluster
white
resources
such
as
PBS
columns
or
other,
like
sort
back
like
mother
resources.
That
is
not
tied
to
a
particular
agent.
So
when
we
use
the
resource
well,
but
we
still
want
exclusive
music.
That
means
we
don't
offer
a
resource
to
a
certain
framework
and
that's
the
framework
launched
a
task
and
while
the
tested
running
no
other
farmers
can
use
of
resources.
But
this
is
really
not
not
doable,
because
we
can.
B
We
only
match
agent
Walker
resource
for
now,
and
all
that
all
the
support
we
have
for
the
external
resources
are
like
our
van,
so
frame
rates
need
to
make
sure
that
they
don't
launch
to
test.
That
amounts
the
same
volumes
to
different
note
together.
Otherwise
there
would
be
some
error
or
something,
and
so
the
so
the
concept
external
provider
is.
We
want
to
also
manage
those
resources.
B
Elites
are
external
to
agents
in
menses
and
grants
exclusive
use
it
for
frameworks
and
one
important
one
important
uses,
basically
EBS
volumes
and
in
the
future
we
might
want
to
support
like
TP
use.
Another
use
could
be
like
IV
of
IPs
and
orally,
but
basically,
this
contact.
This
truck
is
why
they
came
at
accurate
ball
to
actually
cause
of
our
custom
resources,
and
our
teacher
will
be
looked
like
this.
B
So
specifically
because
the
first
thing
we
on
the
support
for
external,
shows
it
probably
the
story-
resource'
PDS
button
on
the
back
end,
so
the
design
would
be
like
this.
So
first
I,
let
me
bring
a
little
bit
background,
whether
you
use
and
such
external
resource,
like
external,
reveals
volumes.
You
need
to
first
attach
those
that
part
you
volume
to
some
agent
before
we
are
going
to
launch
attacks
at
the
users
agent,
so
you
need
say,
for
example,
as
take
it
easy
EBS
for
an
example
you
need
to.
B
If
you
want
to
use
the
rebus
or
now
man,
you
need
to
use
a
8
OS
cui
to
tell
it
arrest
to
attach
a
beast
on
to
a
particular
node.
Then,
on
that
note,
it's
that
device
will
show
up
as
a
block
device
like
slash,
dev,
slash,
X
T,
whatever
XV
whatever,
and
then
you
need
to
know
before
you
can
run
become
like
wrong
tasks.
Users
consuming
that
calling
you
need
to
do
a
mount
to
bring
that
volume
into
the
host
file
system.
B
Then,
after
that,
you
can
launch
a
container
that
amount
that
that
not
mounted
EBS
volume
into
the
containers,
rudaba's
and
use
it.
So
so
in
CSI
to
to
accomplish
this,
we
have
CSS
device,
two
components.
One
is
called
control.
The
plugin,
which
is
like
issue
comments.
You
made
our
CI
to
to
ask
them
to
the
task
the
device,
and
one
is
another
plugin
which
will
do
that.
No
do
that
with
one
publish
unknown
which
amount
to
bring
the
resource
actually
on
the
agent
processing.
B
So
to
use
these
two
components
we
also,
we
will
have
the
in
the
SDR
redesign.
We
have
a
come,
fuller
and
a
publisher,
so
it's
similar
it's
kind
of
match
to
what
the
Caesar
by
you
know,
plug
in
the
controller
managed
resource.
We
can
create
volumes,
we
can
remove,
delete,
columns,
we
can
reserve,
or,
and
or
we
can
attach,
which
is
a
new
operation
I'll
cut
about
later,
and
the
publisher
man
will
do
the
client,
like
agents,
I,
think
like
mount
so
apparently
the
the
controller
need
to
be.
B
We
need
to
be
a
and
to
support
leash
a
well.
It's
a
little
hard
like
I,
feel
is
too
complicated
just
to
make
it
a
few
support
advances.
It
sounds
like
a
missus
job,
so
so
the
design
here
is
the
operator
can
launch
the
controller
and
the
CSI
control
of
plugging
in
apart
like
well,
you
can,
you
can
launch
it
through,
like
system
be
from
young
agent,
or
you
can
use
some
friend
other
frameworks
from
the
main
team.
They
say
really
for.
C
B
It'll
be
super
hard
if
you
want
to
run
because
okay,
so
oh
this,
the
computer,
you
have
a
consistent
view
of
how
the
resource
being
used,
how
they
are
like
how
the
monuments
are
created
and
how
they
are
reserved.
So
we
need
a
way
to
like
persist,
have
a
global
view
of
this
external,
these
external
resources.
So
it
can.
We
can
not
run
this
on
every
single
agent
other.
It
will
be
otherwise
will
be
a
huge
overhead
to
like.
You
know,
like
the
coral
for
that
global
view.
C
B
You've
not
yet
another,
so
in
the
design.
Just
as
I
just
said,
it's
I
I
try
to
make
the
missus
design
like
same
simplify
the
design
so
like.
Currently
we
don't
have,
any
man
needs
any
measures
to
ensure
this
life
cycle,
like
hae
amazes
other.
They
may
select
pencil
itself
so
I'm,
relying
on
the
operator
to
use
it
on
a
framework
to
mean
AJ,
for
example,
within
each
marathon
or
you
Aurora
or
like
other
fingers,
that's
like
appropriate
for
monitoring
like
like
a
little
morning,
jobs.
So,
okay.
B
In
this
case,
well,
if
it
lost
connection,
the
metal
tell
is
disconnected
we
were
like.
We
won't
continue
offer
the
visual
is
from
from
the
original
provider.
Okay
for
the
existing.
Yes,
they
would
not
be
effective,
for
those
wonders
already
mounted
in
Tesla's
community
should
be,
it
should
be
working,
but
after
we
recover
it,
the
effort
has
finished
it
and
returned
it
to
the
masses,
we'll
figure
out.
Oh
actually,
this
mystery
surrounding
only
this
I
cannot
know
it's
unsafe
to
it
and
offered
its
after
out
is
it.
B
This
is
latest
no
just
wanting
to
be
stateful
and
yeah,
so
so
we
need
to
when
you
have
any
way
back
by
a
precision
store.
So
so,
let's
test,
so
we
need
like
a
like
a
framework
to
provide
a
safe
for
this
part
and
also
in
need
to
be
able
to
access
to
some
precedence
or
to
recover
state
it
once
it
failover
since
yeah
exists,
yeah.
Yes,
sorry,
no.
B
Is
actually
important
question
oh
I
I
was
like
I
was
debating
about
what
should
I
run
is
just
a
master
which,
like
should
I,
run
three
copies
to
provide
a
graphic,
a
logs
to
maintain
the
positions,
but
I
feel
this
for
hugely
complicated
design.
So
and
since
we
have
a
combo
exhilaration
to
for
annoying
chat,
hacks
I
feel
we
can
just
use
that
and
the
worst
case,
if
people
just
don't
want
looking
for
that,
they
can
run
a
system.
Do
service
on
the
master,
to
run
these
things.
B
Instance,
yeah,
maybe
running
a
mastering
agent
types
items
in
them.
You
know
and
preserved
an
agent
to
only
come
in
such
such
controllers,
nuts
might
be
another
possibility,
so
okay,
so
we
have
this
controller
that
maintain
a
consistent
like
persistent
view,
the
global
view
of
the
resources
provided
by
this
resource
provider
and
perform
the
operations,
and
we
have
publisher
that
to
the
agent
side,
mount
amount,
etcetera
and
then,
as
I
said,
we
need
this
attachment
attached
to
make
it
easy
for
friend,
like
frameworks
to
use
these
external
resources.
We
have.
B
We
have
two
attaching
process
attaching
workflow
the
further
is
called
restore,
inclusive
resort
attachment
which
the
framework
to
simplify
the
API
information
describing
snow
resource
and
like
offer
coming
so
restores
private,
offering
local
resource
and
say
want
to
establish
two
offered
from
one
single
tax
useful
at
local
and
regional
resources,
and
then
the
message
will
figure
out.
Oh
this
resource
is
not
it's
not
really
is
not
attached
to
that
region,
the
ephemeral
to
run
the
app
on
so
it
will
do
the
inclusive
attachment
first
and
well,
but
attaching
or
the
attachment
resources
can
be
expensive.
B
So
for
people
famous
that
won't
really
want
to
control
like
take
like
take
advantage
of
locality
for
attached
Raoul,
it
can
exclusively
say
on
the
ten
resource
and
long
haul
attacks
on
this
resource.
We
will
expose
which
the
agent
that
the
previews
are
attached
to
so
there
you
can
look
into
that
up
in
and
launch
test
schedule
has
based
on
that
information
and
when
this
I
finally
decided
I
want
to
move
this
miss
ball
into
another.
B
B
It's
not
new
can
be
your
layer,
it
just
is
the
framework
used
every
external
resource
on
an
agent
net.
It's
not
attached
to
increase
attachment
will
happen,
always
always
happen.
Yeah.
Okay,
maybe
we
can
add
a
company
again,
but
I
don't
see.
There
is
a
need
for
that
yeah,
because
that
in
visitor
will
not
have
an
if
mess
of
the
tango.
Give
you
the
source
of
attached.
B
So
we
have
this
news
in
Raytheon.
Has
it
been
resources
we
have?
We
have
the
new
offer.
I
mean
like
we
mention
the
offer
to
provide
resources
from
a
particular
resource
provider
and
which
means
we
need
to
make
this
to
require
few
become
optional,
and
you
seen
this
is
unsafe.
We
need
to
have
a
new
capability
saying
that
only
framework,
that's
like
a
tradition
with
this
heavy.
He
will
we
received
such
offers,
and
this
is
how
pleasing
how
Angela
offered
to
FEM
works,
and
in
in
in
this,
the
others,
are
more
deep
detail.
B
She
connects
now
more
detail
design
for
the
supervisor.
We
have
no
necessary
changes
for
for
the
API
we
have
we
and
the
way
we
run
is
service
or
value
of
P
line.
So,
as
I
said,
the
operator
or
the
some
new
mechanic
lunch
apart
community
sauce
provider
controller,
which
will
be
a
binary,
the
exact
executable
that
specified
master.
You
are
the
society
ZK
or
any
other
person
story.
We
can
discuss
this
later
like
further
to
persist.
The
below
view
of
the
resources
and
config
will
be
look
like
this.
B
Like
he's,
the
clear
is
typing
named
by
new
falls.
If
this
exists,
when
you
follow
what,
when
you
offer
on
the
source,
what
reservation
should
be
under
and
how
to
launch
Comfort,
not
plugging?
Basically,
the
nestled
don't
need
to
know
how
come
rebellion,
because
it's
in
arena
part,
but
this
is
for,
like
consistency,
we
all
still
provide
this
a
whole
info
in
the
resource
provided
info
register
to
the
master
master
and
man
I
would
skip
the
details,
but
you
will
see.
B
I
was
just
you'll
see
that
after
the
master
is
a
small
one
and
the
master,
we
see
some
research
parties
of
the
controller
subscribes.
It
will
tell
all
agents-
hey
there's.
No,
there
is
a
new
research
by
surprise
he's
down
to
the
corresponding
publisher.
So
after
the
holidays
are
launched,
you
can
start
used
using
those
those
resources
and
okay
I
also
covered
how
the
increasing
exclusive
setting
works
here
and
there's
an
remaining
in
this
design.
Doc
one
is
the
top.
B
Are
the
polish
supports
and
another
thing
I
haven't
covered
is
how
do
we
allocate
resources
if
the
Z
make
sense
you
use
as
Miss
pessimistic
model?
Does
it
make
sense?
You
use
fire
shearing
for
external
resources.
The
East
are
actually
still
open,
and
this
is
some
discussion
we
had
with
other
other
commuters
about
this
I
list,
some
possibilities,
but
how
we
have
the
resources
actually
still
open
and
we
will
halt
with
probably
another
design
to.
Ladies,
they
do
they
use
out.
B
A
B
A
B
So,
first
of
all
to
support
the
explicit
attachment,
I
both
explained
implicit.
We
introduced
a
new
field
in
in
the
resource
Prado
here,
so
I
call
it
attachment
info.
So
this
was
so.
This
will
be
in
all
about
in
research.
In
some
resources
this
is
optional.
So
if
it
is
set,
that
means
it's
a
colonel
attached
to
an
agent,
so
the
framework
can
look
at
the
offer
they
receive
and
see
that
the
resourceful
name
in
that
offer
contains
the
attachment
field.
B
In
the
displacement
field,
we
have
a
state
ID,
so
the
framework
can
be
scheduled
decision
based
on
the
stages
where,
like
where
X,
Q
and
then,
and
also
we
provide
like
operator
alpha
operations
called
resource
and
detect
resource
to
attach
and
the
to
like
do
resource
conversion.
So
they
are
not
late.
So
these
operations
are,
unlike
reserving
on
reserve,
where
for
a
certain
reserve,
we
are
like
kind
of
guaranteed.
What
we
would
see
with
these
doesn't
succeed
with
meaning
is.
B
So
these
are
like
these
are
the
new
style
operations
that
we
introduced
in
2005,
where
we
step
we
we
the
fabric
when
they
issue
this
these
operations
they
don't
based
on
immediately
effect,
so
those
resource
will
be
like
subtract
from
the
pool
from
offering
out
and
wait
for
the
results
would
come
back
and
then
convert
it,
then,
with
the
converted
resource
and
put
it
back
to
full
and
and
we
will
in
1.6,
we
have
this
resource
feedback.
I'm.
B
A
So
I
guess
yeah.
We
require
that
persistent
volume
resources
be
reserved
before
you
create
a
volume.
Yes
yeah
I
actually
don't
know
if
that
was
purely
for
API
usability
or
if
there
was
some
lower
level
technical
motivation
for
requiring
that
I
don't
know.
If
you
guys
are
aware
of
the
motivations
for
that
at
all.
A
A
Well,
I'm,
just
thinking
about
the
framework
workflow.
If
a
framework
wants
to
definitely
get
that
back
after
the
attach,
then
they
would
want
to
reserve
it.
Maybe
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
my
reason
to
enforce
that
yeah
yeah,
perhaps
not
I
was
just
wondering
off
the
top
of
my
head.
If
I've
seen,
if
we
had
some
underlying
technical
motivation
for
the
persistent
volume
requirement
or
if
it
was
purely
for
API
usability
but
I'm,
not
sure
I,
don't.
B
C
B
I,
just
I
mine
is
my
thoughts
and
probably
put
last
description,
and
if
the
frameworks
wanted
to
reserve
it
could
guarantee
is
comes
back,
we
can
still
do
that,
but
we
can
also
enable
it
possibly
that
will
friend
just
do
this
detach
and
then
hand
over
to
another
member
yeah.
Well,
hello,
Farrell,
you
mean
even
other
reservation,
but
yeah.
A
B
C
B
C
B
Is
just
this
is
just
for
plugging
use,
okay,
yeah
this
we
have
seen
fielding
like
yeah
I,
think
you
don't
pick
to
my
message.
Basically
just
attach
just
a
body
and
all
the
skin
is
even
can
be
made
based
on
this,
and
for
this
is
oh,
we
just
the
framework.
Just
don't
need
you
to
deal
with
these
these
operations
it
just
as
I
said
it's
launched
a
task
on
agent
and
say
I
want
to
use
Excel
resource,
and
after
that
lunch
or
lunch.
Good
Islam
is
issue
and
society
it
has
given.
B
The
researcher
will
also
be
converted
and
after
you
finished,
the
result
will
remain
that
has
on
that
spark
your
agent,
so
the
firm
we
can
actually
do
increase
its
implicit
attachment
through
a
laundry
and
passwords
and
then
start
to
look
at
ok.
This
attack
research,
early
I'll
touch
on
this
agent.
I
mean
canoe,
launch
this
task
on
the
same
agent.
They
are
free
to
do
that.
Ok,
yeah
and.
A
A
B
A
B
B
A
A
B
Will
be
a
binary,
that's
used
specific
for
CSI,
but
generally
design
and
their
supervisor
info
will
be
generic
to
all
external
provider.
So
that's
why
in
actually
one
fight,
we
have
a
field
of
storage,
that's
that
to
deliver
the
CSS,
to
the
clock,
specific
configurations
and
in
the
future.
If
under
support
things
like
TV
or
and
other
things,
we
will
like
other
optional
fields
for
their
specific
information.
B
A
A
B
B
C
B
B
Maybe
a
is
C,
so
impedes
the
using
long
so
and
because,
because
it
is
on
how
the
storage
bagans
works,
so
that's
why
this
is
how
he
had
this
first
as
a
beauty,
and
it
is
a
nicer
match
to
the
the
message
domain,
the
country
missus
domain
so
and
so
the
possible.
A
probable,
even
vision,
is
that
the
publisher,
which
were
the
note,
is
the
one
that
will
run
and
she
said
plug
in
and
get
the
information,
because
sometimes
those
karate
training
can
only
be
obtained
from
the
note
if
you
can
obtain
from
the
controller.
B
So
that's
the
publisher
will
obtain
the
information
through
the
plugin
and
then
dynamically
add
new
labels
or
sorry.
New
attributes
to
agents
agent
can
update
the
attributes
through
the
epistate
manager.
I
have
introduced,
and
yet,
but
with
like.
We
can
you
can
extend
the
PlayStation
to
do
that
and
after
those
attributes
are
exposed
to
the
master
and
then
those
hands
will
be
cooling
the
offers.
So
the
favorites
will
be
aware
of
the
topology
for
each
individual
agents
when
they
receive
off
their
offer
and
they
are
like.
They
are
two
options
we
can
do
here.
B
We
can.
We
can
make
the
framework
just
not
aware
of
pathology
at
all
and
allocator
to
deal
with
those
when
they
doing
allocation,
or
we
can
review
those
information
to
the
framework.
So
ephemeral
can
do
some
of
their
customized
like
schedule
decision
based
on
technology,
and
it
is
still
kind
of
open
and
it
would
be
not.
It
will
not
be
in
the
MVP
for
for
this
for
this
project,
so
I'm
just
mentioning
a
couple
possibility
that
to
supporters.
B
A
D
Definition
so
I
think
using
attributes
is
easier
way
to
like,
say
just
label
those
that
are
attributes
I,
just
labeled
Anil.
They
live
the
aging
with
those
attributes,
that's
related
to
topology
and
then
in
the
allocator,
to
a
simple,
like
a
string
matching
trying
to
figure
out
whether
this
resources
have
this.
D
B
Actually
feel
that
we
may
remove
part
of
the
logic
into
allocated
it
just,
but
it
will
come
together
in
design
like
we
already
have
like
bi
affair
with
them
with
Cola
and
other
things.
We
already
have
X
two-phase
allocation,
I'm,
not
sure
how?
How
are
you
welcome
playing
track
here
if
we
put
the
topology
awareness
into
alligator,
so
this
is
not
like.
It
is
still.
Oh.
D
D
That's
what
they
do
already.
Thank
you
specially
for
things
like
I
didn't
have
all
these
constraint
support
already
like.
If
you
look
at
marathon,
I'm,
considering
or
SDK
constraint,
they
all
have
such
as
already
I.
Don't
think
that
it's
gonna
take
too
long
for
them
to
adapt
to
this
new
thing,
I'm,
just
just
additional
constrains
to
me.
A
Okay,
well,
I
want
to
make
sure
we
leave
time
for
the
second
item
on
the
agenda,
so
I
have
proposed
that
we
leave
it
here.
I
think
the
topology
question
is
a
good
one.
I
would
definitely
encourage
people
to
comment
on
the
dock.
They
have
any
ideas
on
that
score.
Would
anybody
else
like
to
add
anything
more
before
we
move
on.
A
So
the
second
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
minimum.
Allocatable
resources
is
something
that
Ming
has
been
working
on
recently.
Unfortunately,
I
believe
he
had
a
conflict
during
this
time
today,
so
he
wasn't
able
to
join
but
I've
been
working
on
it
with
him.
So
I
could
speak
to
that
here.
Let
me
share
my
screen.
Maybe
he
sent
an
email
out
on
the
dev
list.
B
B
A
A
Currently,
it's
just
hard
coded
in
the
allocator,
so
we
were
proposing
a
master
flag
that
would
allow
someone
to
configure
this.
Somebody
brought
up
Alex
our
proposed.
Perhaps
an
API
call
to
do
it.
Dynamically
and
G
I
know
that
you
had
suggested
thinking
of
thinking
ahead
to
the
possibility
of
adding
a
per
framework,
a
per
framework
refinement
of
this
allocatable
specification.
A
So
you
were
suggesting
perhaps
adding
new
protobufs
and
I
think
that
seems
like
a
pretty
good
idea
to
me.
Perhaps
the
resource
protobuf
isn't
the
isn't
very
well
suited
for
this
particular
purpose,
since
all
we
really
want
is
the
resource
name
and
some
scalar
quantity,
so
yeah
I'm
generally
in
support
of
yeah
thinking
ahead
to
that
API
and
making
this
work
with
it.
What
I
might
suggest
is
that
we
don't
add
all
of
the
proto's
for
a
full
api
now,
but
just
add
what
we
need
in
order
to
specify
a
master
flag.
D
D
Like
just
think
about
allocatable
saying
is,
is
a
global
filter
that
you
want
to
apply
on
a
given
framework.
If
we
were
to
do
this
for
her
framer
I,
don't
send
me
any
resources,
that's
below
on
this
minimal
amount,
I
guess
special
filters
right.
We
had
this
one,
just
like
a
special
global
filter.
I
feel
like
we
should
have
for
those
kind
of
filters.
Saying
I
mean
I.
Think
for
for
full
resource
request.
Is
it's
like
a
filtered?
D
D
Yeah
I
think
the
master
API,
the
only
benefit
is
you
can
do
dynamically.
Updating
that
thing
like
by
I.
Imagine
like
it
should
be
pretty
rare
when
people
wants
to
modify
this
config
yeah
and
if
also,
if
we
have
the
per
frame
of
API
to
allow
each
frame
which
we
tuned
their
minimal
available
resources
they're
like
the
requirement
for
the
master
flag.
Sorry,
the
master
API,
it's
kind
of
weak
right.
A
D
A
D
D
Yes,
the
request
is
like
when
the
friendly
ask
meso
say:
hey
I
want
it's
pretty
much
like
a
limit
like
I
think
we
might
want
to
see
that
as
a
limit,
I
say
that
don't
send
me
more
than
the
requested
resources
to
me,
because
that's
all
I
requested
I
might
have
some
guarantee
using
quota
on
my
roll,
but
I
don't
want
the
the
limit
should
be
I.
Don't
want
the
resource
to
be
unlimited,
like
I
I
do
want
to
throttle
the
allocator
to
only
send
me
up
to
a
given
limits.
A
D
A
B
D
D
Something
to
the
to
the
allocator
I
like
requests,
it's
more
like
that!
I
have
a
hint
for
you
yeah,
it
kind
of
doesn't
make
sense
is
even
like
in
the
world
ever
in
the
world
of
like.
When
could
I
have
care
post
guarantee
and
limit
like
I?
Don't
need
this
request
thing
and,
and
things
a
better
way
to
just
make
requests.
Sorry,
the
coolest
for
like
resource
shake
well.
D
A
A
D
Well,
you
can
think
of
mo
casa
as
an
operator,
yeah
yeah
sure
you
can't
hit
master
API
yeah
I
think
that
the
boundary
between
scheduler
API
and
the
master
API
is
blurred.
Unlike
like
what's
the
criteria,
I
mean
I
think
that
the
fact
that
we
split
scheduler
API
no
master
API
is
kind
of
little
weird
to
me.
Yeah.
A
I
definitely
think
there
will
be
cases
where
multiple
frameworks
are
registered
in
one
role
and
frameworks
would
like
to
tell
the
allocator
what
they
want
without
making
some
claim
for
the
entire
role,
but
just
for
that
single
framework,
so
I
feel
like
the
interface
should
accommodate
that
salute.
But.
D
A
Okay,
well
I,
guess
my
so
we
were
hoping
to
to
implement
something
for
this
global
minimum
resource
minimum
allocatable
resources
setting
in
the
not-too-distant
future.
So
my
hope
would
be
that
we
can
come
up
with
something
that
we
think
won't
constrain
us
too
much
in
the
future
when
we
implement
request
and
or
chunked
quota,
without
going
too
deep
into
the
implementation.
Specifics
of
that
feature,
yeah.
D
A
D
That
will
be
great,
like
cackling,
we'll
be
back
on
this
on.
This
will
be
useful,
because
I
think
that
example
I'll
give
here
is
no
ideal.
Eater
I
think
it
didn't
consider
like
something
like
attributes
agent
attributes
that
we
do
have
a
use
case
for
that
in
the
future.
Things
like,
for
example,
our
I
do
want
to
guess
some
resource
of
a
given
resource
provider
or
I
want
to
request.
D
Koda
I
also
call
an
argument,
resource
provider,
resource
resource
of
a
given
resource
provider,
not
a
given
name
name-
is
like
extra
type
of
resource,
but
it
have
some
list
for
the
same
type
like
disc.
You
have
different
resource
provider,
providing
the
the
resources,
and
maybe
I
want
to
set
pull
down
different
resource
provider
resources.
So
things
like
this
and
also
like
attributes
I
haven't
thought
about
that
yet,
but
this
might
be
related
to
that
uses.
D
I
think
it's
worth
spending
some
time,
like
maybe
one
day,
thinking
about
this
API
ahead
of
time,
so
that
we
don't
go
back
and
check.
No,
it
can't
break
how
I
got
it
I,
but
I
agreed
I
would
not
get
too
complicated.
We
don't
have
to
implement
all
these
just
leave
the
option:
open
smoking,
italics,
yeah.
A
A
No,
okay!
Well,
thanks
for
joining
everybody
appreciate
it
thanks
for
presenting
chunhin
would
encourage
everyone
to
take
a
look
at
that
design.
Dock
and
comment
on
it
and
I
will
send
out
an
email
about
this
minimum
allocatable
resources,
discussion
and
we'll
see
you
in
a
couple
weeks
next
time,
thanks
guys.
Thank
you.