►
From YouTube: Community WG Meeting - September 25, 2017
Description
Agenda and Notes:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vgi434dYkkZHs49EK4F4eMmM-3JG4f3qg-N5En-4ubg/edit?usp=sharing
B
B
The
town
halls
were
especially
at
least.
The
message
on
all
was
good
and
very
involved.
I
would
say
very
engaged.
I
was
only
in
one
of
those
because
I
think
they
all
overlapped
at
the
same
time,
in
fact,
but
the
Missis
one
probably
had
like
30
ish
members
attended,
and
we
had
a
lot
of
discussions
around
the
topics
that
G
and
started
in
his
slides
I
think
it
was
good
I.
Think
there's
also
some
follow
up
from
that
at
that
probably
G
or
someone
captured
I.
Don't
remember
who
took
the
notes.
B
A
C
At
least
from
an
outsider's
perspective,
I
thought
the
talks
were
pretty
great.
Actually
there
was
a
lot
of
good
corn
mazes
stuff,
which
is
most
of
why
I
was
there,
but
you
know
there's
TCOs
stuff.
On
the
side.
I'd
say
it
was
probably
balanced
since
I
didn't
hear
one
way
or
the
other
I
also
heard
a
lot
of
people
coming
by
it's.
C
B
B
A
C
A
C
C
Was
there
for
the
hackathon,
the
pre-event
hackathon?
Actually
I
thought
went
down
really
well
across
the
board
I
liked
it
anyway.
As
a
participant
and
I
want
to
say,
we
had
probably
two
or
three
dozen
people
in
that
room.
Hacking
on
stuff
we
did
I
did
ducks
and
we
actually
had
a
whole
table
of
people
doing
docks
yeah.
It
was
pretty
mess
us
focused,
I,
think,
but
that
was
probably
the
point
for
the
hack
one
yeah.
B
C
B
And
Tim
wanted
to
work
on
the
version.
Documentation
and
I
was
going
to
follow
up
with
him
last
time.
Around
I
did
chat
with
him
at
mrs.
Kahn.
He
said
he
didn't
work
on
it
during
hackathon
because
he
was
hacking
with
you
guys
on
getting
the
dioxygen
stuff
working,
so
I
think
he
still
trying
to
see
if
he
can
hack
on
it
or
whether
it
would
be
superseded
by
the
effort
to
go
to
rinks
or
whatever
the
JEM
speech
was
working
on.
Oh
that's,
right,
you're
right
and
he
goes
things
so
I.
Think
Tim
was.
B
C
B
D
D
A
I
know
I
got
a
couple
of
comments
on
that.
I
got
two
people
who
are
like:
why
isn't
their
lunch
nobody's
here?
This
is
such
a
missed
opportunity
for
networking
and
I
got
one
person
who
was
like
I
love
that
there's
no
lunch.
We
don't
have
to
eat
conference
food.
We
can
go
out,
it's
so
great,
so
it'd
be
controversial.
I've.
C
Got
both
camps
I
personally,
love
that
I
got
to
go,
eat
lunch
wherever
I
wanted
with,
like
my
group
of
people.
That
was
great
because
I
made
some
friends
really
cool
people
from
the
CFPB
was
awesome,
but
I
know
my
boss
was
like.
Oh
my
god.
Why
is
there
no
lunch?
We
have
to
go.
Get
food
I'm
like
well
yeah.
This
is
great,
don't
you
think
see
I
think
she
was
looking
for
a
conference.
It's
like
oh
yeah,
50/50,
again
on
that.
B
Conference
bench
usually
a
chance
for
people
to
meet
other
people,
otherwise
I
guess
for
me
both
the
days
I
ended
up
basically
going
out
with
the
mesosphere
people
pretty
much
it
wasn't
that
useful
in
terms
of
networking
and
get
to
know
the
community
and
do
you
know
why
we
didn't
do
lunch?
Did
you
not
get
enough
sponsorship
yeah.
C
Wonder
if
for
future
ones,
there
could
be
like
an
optional
pre
signup
lunch
for
the,
so
you
could
get
a
number
I
had
a
time
of
the
people
who
want
to
go
Network
amongst
unknown
people
and
then
you'd
have
a
smaller
lunch
to
budget
as
well,
and
then
those
of
us
who
don't
want
to
go
to
that
wouldn't
be
pressured
into
it.
I
could
work.
B
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
A
A
E
The
next
action
item
was
for
me
to
post
a
patch
to
update
the
contribution
guidelines.
I
just
posted
one
this
morning.
I
did
not
do
much
on
that
until
this
morning,
so
I
threw
something
together
at
the
last
minute
and
put
it
up,
and
the
next
action
item
was
also
for
me
to
try
to
get
the
newsletter
out.
I
tried
to
get
in
touch
with
you,
org
I
still
couldn't
get
access
to
that
doc.
E
So
I
think
at
this
point
it's
been
a
while,
since
we
gathered
stuff
from
the
committers,
so
I
think
we
should
maybe
just
reboot
the
newsletter
and
try
to
get
like
some
fresh
feedback
from
people.
I
can
check
in
with
York
and
see
what
what
his
status
is
with
it.
But
we
might
want
to
kind
of
check
back
in
with
committers
and
find
out
what
people
have
been
working
on
recently
and
try
to
get
an
issue
out
soon.
B
E
A
A
B
B
F
F
A
B
F
B
D
B
B
D
D
Yeah
I
mean
it
didn't.
This
wasn't
clear
to
me
why
that
change
like
I
feel
like
I
looked
at
that
change
and
it
was.
It
just
looks
like
how
that
we
used
to
talk
to
the
agents
as
well.
So
I,
don't
know
why,
like
maybe
the
master
pages
would
have
worked,
but
I
think
the
agent
pages
wouldn't
have
worked
originally
for
these
people
as
well,
I'm,
not
sure
but
yeah.
B
C
B
I
did
yeah,
I
chat
with
Bennet
about
the
dock,
work
there
and
I
think
we're
planning
to
get
one
set
up
and
we're
trying
to
find
a
space
to
do
it
thing
we're
talking
with
the
help
right
now
to
see
if
they
can
host
that
and
if
they
give
it
space
I
think
the
plan
is
to
and
then
email
to
the
community
and
to
come
over.
So
if
that
works
out,
then
we'll
be
noting
that
so
on
I
think
they
were
still
talking
to
folks
to
figure
out
if
they
can
host
it.
D
B
C
C
E
C
E
This
document
is
kind
of
already
going
in
the
direction
of
the
the
first
time
contributors
guide
that
we
were
talking
about
adding
so
I
was
thinking.
We
could
just
turn
this
document
into
that
and
then
turn
the
existing
submitting
a
patch
page
into
this
advanced
contribution
guide
page
so
I
submitted
I.
B
E
Then
adding
some
links
for
those,
so
this
is
the
new
be
contributors
guide.
It
covers
prereqs
and
then
kind
of
walks.
You,
through
downloading
building
mesas
figuring
out
what
you
want
to
do
and
then
making
some
changes,
opening
up,
PR
and
then
the
latter
section
has
some
general
guidance
about
what
stout
and
live
process
are
and
then,
if
you
want
to
dig
into
JIRA,
to
find
some
work
that
you
want
to
do.
How
do
you
go
about
like.
E
The
advanced
guide
has
requisites,
so
this
one's
saying,
review,
board,
JIRA
RB
tools,
and
then
this
is
mostly
the
same
as
the
existing
submitting
a
patch
guide
where
it
just
kind
of
goes
into
the
standard.
Workflow
first
tells
you
to
set
up
accounts,
get
on
mailing
lists
and
then
yeah.
It's
the
existing
guide,
pretty
much.
A
C
E
C
E
C
Not
great,
but
it
might
help
cover
some
bases,
because
I've
got
a
little
bit
of
a
getting
started
on
that
link
there,
and
then
some
of
this
stuff
is
only
for
Windows,
but
under
here
it
is
I
found
running
unit
tests
is
you
can
run
all
of
them
really
easily?
But
if
you
need
isolate
down
to
one,
you
have
to
go,
learn
exactly
how
Google
test
works
and
all
that
stuff
and
I
saw
briefly
as
you
scrolled,
through
a
mention
of
that
at
the
very
bottom.
But
I've
got
some
more
details
on
that.
One
too.
C
E
C
It
was
in
the
yeah
and
the
newbie
log.
You
had
something
there,
but
yeah
I've
in
the
I
just
linked
to
in
the
notes.
I
have
development
Docs,
most
of
it
as
Windows
oriented,
but
some
of
it,
some
beginner
like
here's,
how
you
can
run
a
single
unit,
test
kind
of
stuff,
okay
feel
free
to
rip
all
that
off.
It's
totally
just
well,
I,
don't
have
a
license
on
this
repo,
so
it's
public
domain,
I!
Guess
you.
E
C
C
E
Yeah
and
I
think
that's
probably
where
we
want
to
we
when
I
like
we
want
to
make
this
a
really
friendly
first
landing
page.
So
if
anybody
has
suggestions
is
like
things
that
we
definitely
need
to
call
out
early
on,
it's
definitely
be
welcome
yeah
and
then
I
think
the
links
that
I
updated
were
in
the
community
page.
E
Yeah
right
now
we
have
this
contributed
patch
or
contribute
a
core
patch
section,
so
I
just
added
another
link
there.
So
we
have
explicitly.
This
is
our
newbie
guide
and
this
is
our
advanced
guide
yeah.
But
the
reviews
up
and
I'll
continue
working
on
it
and
definitely
love
to
get
comments
from
anybody.
Who's
interested
I
can.
A
D
B
C
C
B
Glad
you
guys
enjoyed
yeah.
One
thing
we
should
probably
do
is
try
to
spread
them
out
more
next
year.
We
can
we
get
that
feedback
last
year
as
well,
but
it
didn't
happen
this
year
because
another
tie-up
with
the
Linux
Foundation
and
how
they
run
events
well,
maybe
next
year
we
should
try
to
see
if
we
can
spread
them
apart
better.
We
don't
try
to
squish
them
all
into
the
fall.