►
From YouTube: Mesos Developer Community Meeting (June 15, 2017)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
D
C
C
E
There
is
a
new
link,
it
just
got
updated
in
slack
and
on
the
top.
So
good
is.
F
E
A
So
I've
asked
Bennett
to
run
the
meeting,
but
we
put
on
the
agenda
is
alright.
Code
seems
like
people
are
going
to
listen
for
that
baby,
so
we'll
get
into
that
in
a
bit.
A
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
cover
other
stuff
like
should
we
go
through
the
I,
don't
know
when
you
what
what
else
it
could
go
through,
but
we
jump
into
the
formatting
thing
right
away:
yeah,
alright,
so,
basically
in
in
conversation
with
other
commuters,
what
we
found
is
that
there
have
been
some
pain,
formatting
code
properly
and
all
the
style
comments
that
are
being
asked
of
contributors
and
also
diversion
from
commuters.
To
remember
and
I,
explained
the
style
guide
for
this.
A
A
Click,
the
search
for
majors,
client
format.
We
have
documentation
for
how
to
use
fine
format,
I
introduced
click
format
as
a
format
event
tool
for
us,
probably
a
couple
of
years
ago.
At
this
point
and
our
style
guide
is
emulated
as
close
as
possible,
with
Clank
3,
3
8
and
the
client
format
file
is
in
our
repo,
and
that
should
be
able
to
get
pretty
close
to
our
current
style
guide
with
that
already.
A
But
what
we
want
to
do
is
actually
close
the
gap
between
the
style,
guide
and
click
format,
so
we
don't
actually
have
to
do
this
manual
formatting
of
Coco
no
time
so
this
tool
is
already
available.
If
you
want
to
get
started,
automating
your
formatting
today,
you
can
follow
this
guy
to
set
it
up,
but
integrate
it
into
your
editor
and
it'll.
Allow
you
to
select
parts
of
the
text
and
format
it
automatically
with
your
sequence,
abilities
or
whatever
your
editor
happens.
To
do.
A
My
nap
is
to
integrate
with
vim
I,
can
just
select
the
section
of
text
and
hit
ctrl
K
and
just
formats
that
section
and
it
gets,
gets
you
a
85%
of
the
way
there.
The
are
5.0
howdy
for
my
right
now
is
5.0.
Yes,
we
check
that
on
your
version,
Costa
cap
or
not.
No,
so
us
that's
so
so
yeah
so
I
have
two
things.
First.
Is
we
have
this
already?
Second
thing
is
going
forward.
A
The
effort
that
I'm
announcing
is
that
we're
gonna
figure
out
what
the
what
the
option,
what
the
new
options
that
are
available,
because
there
have
been
a
lot
of
options
that
have
been
introduced
in
file
format
since
I
last
looked
at
it.
So
what
we'll
do
is
figure
out
how
to
what
set
of
options
most
closely
matches?
What
we
want
and
at
some
point
will
declare
it
good
enough
and
will
format
the
entire
code
base
with
it,
but
ie
hasn't
them
to
do
it
in
one
go
I.
A
Think
I
think
we
would,
you
know,
start
out
mate,
I'm
thinking
something
a
lot
of
the
lines
of
we
can
format.
Stealth
see
what
comes
out
of
it
see
how
many,
how
many
parts
are
like.
Oh
this,
this
is
fine.
This
is
also
fine.
All
right,
that's
good
enough
right
where
it's
like!
Oh
just
actually,
like
really
hinders
your
ability.
We
will
figure
out
if
there
are
options
available
or
if
we
can
maybe
just
can't
like
wrap
no
unformatted
sections
of
the
code.
A
K
L
M
N
A
Okay,
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
the
best
experience
will
be
there,
but
I
want
to
make
strides
like,
for
example,
like
I
would
be
happy
if
our
first
step
is
fine
format
like
if
I
don't
have
to
answer
the
question
of
like.
Oh
my,
how
do
I
format
this
thing?
I'm
like
this
is
what
type
of
I
told
you
that's
fine!
A
Oh
it's
fine
to
me
right
like
if
that,
if
that,
if
we
can
close,
if
we
can
actually
eliminate
the
gap
between
whatever
else
I
got
is
in
correct
format
says
like
that's,
that's
awesome
and
then
going
forward.
We
can,
like
you,
know,
make
it
as
as
people
get
more
experience
with
it
and
the
more.
We
trust
it
right,
because
I
think
there
are
some
suspicion
of
like
oh,
it
might
produce
completely
unreadable
code
right
but
like
as
you
use
as
people
use,
it
I
think
there
will
be
more
gained
trust
and
it's
super
experienced.
A
You
might
be
fine
with
just
formatting
it.
You
know
on
the
way
on
its
way
into
the
repo
I.
Don't
know
right,
but
I
logic
that's
not
going
to
be
the
true
they
want,
so
so
I
want
it
to
be
a
usable
tool
first
and
then
we
can
expand
upon
it
typical,
just
next,
a
sense
yeah.
So
if
you
have
any
like
strong
opinions
around
like
what
we
should
do
or
what
we
shouldn't
do,
my
one
of
the
big
questions
to
me
is
like
so
do
we?
A
A
Format,
Google
Scholar
justice,
I,
don't
remember
if
Google
stock,
Google
style
guide
includes
formatting
stuff
is
the
icon
for
magic,
Google,
iterative,
Google
style,
oh
yeah,
sure
sure
sure
sure
sure
yeah.
So
essentially
we
could
say
our
formatting
spec
is
our
config
point
format.
Config
file,
I
thought
would
be,
don't
be
a
creep
ID.
N
Okay,
well,
if
your
feedback
reach
out
to
me
how
Halloween
night
and
I
can
close
the
gap,
which
means
the
current
style
and
component
the.
A
The
only
thing
that
I
know
of
that
we,
like
the
only
pattern
that
I
know
of
that,
doesn't
add
you
to
the
format
right
now
is
the
four
spaces
versus
two
spaces
invent
for
arguments
and
parameters.
So
we
begin
that
force
cases
coordinates
of
parameters
and
two
spaces
for
every
other
continuation.
Last
time,
I
checked
platform.
I
didn't
have
a
different
option
for
different
types
of
continuation,
Rock
Live
Maps,
but
maybe
they
add,
made
maybe
they're
bad
it's
instead.
A
What
versions
like
is
that
five,
you
looked
at
your
looked
at
three
eight
three,
three
three
eight
yeah
I
mean
coming
so
client
change
their
form
of
cloud
version
schemes,
so
they
kind
of
jump
to
five
really
quickly,
but
it
was
like
three
seven,
three,
eight
three,
no
three,
nine
four,
five:
okay,
so
rather
than
minor
versions,
they
kind
of
went
to
major.
Let's
say
if
they
didn't
fix
that.
How
do
we
do
I?
N
L
Russian
hey
if
week
since
you
said
only
two
things
in
the
agenda-
a
also
use
this
time
to
talk
about
compilers
and
general
virtual
machine
general
Oh,
so
that
is
super
related.
If
we
wanted
to
use
like
playing
five
style,
for
example,
that
would
be
obviously
require
that
conversion
crime
you
have
the
owner
in
our
sure,
okay,
can
I
slack
use
a
spreadsheet,
the
old
old
original
spreadsheet,
and
we
can
talk
about
it.
Okay,
oh
sure,
yeah.
I
L
A
L
H
L
L
B
L
O
B
B
L
A
B
A
A
H
L
On
your
list
acceptable,
so
we
did
this.
What
this
is
the
work?
They
did
to
help
make
your
life
easier,
because
some
people
they
might
be
on
a
version
would
not
know
that
that
is
actually
that
there's
a
way
to
actually
get
GCC
five
to
work
on
that
version,
and
so
we're
just
helping
them
by
doing
that.
B
P
L
P
We
we
deployed
trusty
and
Jesse
at
the
same
time,
but
I
need
to
confirm
whether,
but
because
there
are
other
development
in
the
company,
there
may
be
a
chance.
Somebody
already
get
GCC
five
into
our
environment,
so
I
need
to
track
just.
O
Q
Hey
hey
and
blow
hey
and
sorry,
I'm
late
sounds
like
this
is
the
conversation
following
what
Jacob
has
asked?
Is
that
list?
Yes,
okay,
yeah,
so
sorry
I,
so
we
haven't
been
able
to
get
back
to
do
the
survey,
but
I
guess
we're
now
Julie
collectively
in
this
meeting,
which
is
which
I
think
is
good
and
so
GCC
five
totally
works
with
us:
okay,
cool,
okay,.
B
A
M
I
O
L
Actual
combat
pages
yeah
I'll
bring
it
out,
but
maybe
you
can
check
okay,
so
I
guess
I'll
start
so
we're
having
a
conversation
with
some
folks,
I
think
one
of
things
we're
trying
to
constantly
do
in
the
community
is
be
better
about
in
a
column
over
one
another.
L
When
someone
asks
for
a
shepherd
or
is
trying
to
get
reviews
down-
and
it's
super
hard
right,
everyone's
super
busy
and
it's
just
a
non-trivial
thing-
to
make
sure
that
a
great
job
of
pointing
people
in
there
in
various
parts
the
community
are
asking
for
for
reviews
here
for
things
that
get
Shepard
to
always
get
that
done.
Every
single
open-source
project.
That
I
know
has
this
issue.
So
it's
not
like
a
specific
thing,
so
we
were
talking
about
some
ways.
L
We
could
maybe
make
it
better
and-
and
we
were
recognizing
that
some
folks
over
at
Apple
and
and
spoke
Tomatoes
favorite
writers
you're,
recognizing
that
one
of
the
things
that
companies
often
do
to
help
have
that
accountability
for
this
stuff
is
to
use
tools,
or
so
you
know
you
strum
or
Kanban
or
something
else.
So
the
idea
is
that
we'll
actually
use
a
short
part
of
this
meeting,
which
is
every
two
weeks
and
the
Kanban
board
and
we'll
just
make
it
much
more
explicit.
L
Someone
is
offering
to
Shepherd
something
for
somebody
else
will
drag
it
into
the
Kanban
board
and
just
make
it
super
explicit,
like
yeah,
I'm
gonna
do
this
for
you
and
I'm
going
to
help.
You
review
this
and
it's
just
it's
our
opportunity
to
be
really
explicit
to
other
people
and
say
no
actually
I'm
not
going
to
have
time
to
help
you
with
this,
and
it's
okay
rather
be
set
expectations
appropriately
with
people
and
be
upfront
about
it
or
it's
just
a
good
way
to
like
get
on
the
combo
more
yeah.
L
I'm
gonna
do
this
and
then,
if
you
know
two
weeks
later
and
we
come
back
and
look
at
the
Kanban
board,
nobody
made
progress
to
just
say:
hey
yeah,
I'm,
sorry,
I
can
and
actually
I
can't
be
your
Shepherd
and
or
yeah.
Sorry
is.
This
is
as
far
as
we
got
or
everything's.
Okay,
you
know
we're
making
progress
whatever
it
is.
So
that's
the
idea.
That's
the
thought
is
use.
L
The
open
source
Kanban
board
that
we
have
on
Apache
JIRA
to
track
the
all
the
tickets
and
then
and
then
use
a
little
bit
of
this
meeting
to
kind
of
run,
a
mini
check-in
not
like
a
full
scrum
or
anything,
just
a
mini
checking
like
all
the
tickets,
now
the
stuff
that
people
are
committed
to
within
the
community
feeling
Shepard
so
like.
L
If
somebody
s
ug
to
Shepard
something
you
could
use
this
meeting,
we
would
kind
of
do
it
like
sprints,
in
the
sense
that
you
know
you
could
do
it
all
out
of
band
if
you
wanted
to.
But
this
would
be
a
good
time
in
the
meeting.
For
somebody
to
say,
hey,
I,
love
to
work
on
XYZ
and
Greg
Graham
could
be
like
yeah
I'm,
totally
happy
to
Shepherd
you
on
that
thing
and
would
likely
make
blood
and
like
a
blood
signature
by
putting
in
Kanban
board.
So
it's
a
less
official
I'm
just.
N
L
With
a
shepherd
and
Lanisha
and
a
assignments
and
red
shrimp
ring,
that's
I
see
that's
either
accepted
or
in
progress.
Some
of
everything
it'll
even
just
have
things
within
the
same.
If
two
people
within
the
same
company
are
working
on
something
so
me
and-
and
somebody
was
in
the
same
company
at
Apple-
were
incident.
Something
then
it'll
be
it'll,
show
up
as
well,
so
be
everything,
but
it
also
just
be
a
place
for
people
across
organizations
throughout
the
community.
The
other
comment.
N
N
M
I
Do
we
want
to
do
something
other
than
a
fix,
or
is
a
bit
like
a
good
way
to
work
this
stuff?
How
do
you
want
to
do
it?
We
have
I
mean
we
can
leave
your
components,
for
example,
and
if
you're
trying
to
do
it
like
wall
group,
specific
one
thing,
you're
thinking
about
the
possible
triangle:
groups
two
components,
so
we
can
have
some
grains,
be
based
on
components
and
then
like
each
for
a
working
group,
and
we
can
track
that
way.
They'll
be
visible
the
hospital.
Ok,
we
can
change
that.
I
I
I
Q
What
I'm
feeling
is
so
the
the
apik,
the
apik
concept,
is
already
like,
pretty
formerly
used
in
our
sort
low,
so
you
will
almost
always
either
have,
and
so
either
you
have
issues
that
basically
just
don't
belong
to
any
a
place
or
in
your
path
and
already
grouped
under
the
ethics.
You
don't
have
these
like.
You
should
have
in
ethics,
but
but
not
so
you
don't
have
that
situation,
but
rather
in
terms
of
the
components,
I
think
we're
stone,
I.
Q
Think
they're,
not
you
know,
refine
that
way,
so
that
you
might
end
up
having
lots
of
issues
which,
which
are
are
not
correctly
categorized
so
right
now
on
this
list
there
I
want
to
say
probably
less
than
15
and
purest.
That's
the
15,
epochs
I
think
that's
still
manageable
and
one
thing
would
probably
better
changes,
and
so
the
issues
without
ethics
are
at
a
bottom.
Q
I
I
guess
so:
that's
the
thing
I
was
thinking
about
doing
the
components
is
hoping
once
of
our
group
become
active.
They
would
be
updating
that
part
of
the
swim
lane
during
their
group
meetings,
and
this
meeting
would
probably
be
just
like
a
sinking
on
it.
That's
if
it's
done.
We
have
pics
in
there
to
kind
of
scroll
through
we're
all
that
epics
and
stuff,
like
that.
That
is
just
my
something's.
I
You
would
have
multiple
on
em
I
see
so
basically
would
go
through
every
components
on
the
compare
I
mean.
Hopefully
a
component
straightened,
but
yeah
I
wish
like
this
when
you
gone
to
his
label.
Yeah
labels
me,
but
we
have
other
things
like
tests.
They
kick
ass
as
a
label
which
is
not
like
that
Tommy.
What
look
special-interest
cool,
yeah
yeah,
so
the
component
church,
where
we
can
do
it
component
and
working
the
Frog,
the
actual
physical
components,
and
this,
like
maybe
open
up
your
mood.
N
M
I
One
day
it
could
have
multiple
labels
and
it's
not
clear
how
it's
gonna
show
up
here
and
multiple
labels.
Again,
oh
I'm,
seeing
I'll
take
a
look
at
that
which
would
be
part
of
combine
most
one
I'm,
a
channel
art
to
working,
and
if
you,
a
special
label,
called
working
group
there,
something
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
only
show
those
here.