►
From YouTube: Apopka City Council Meeting February 16, 2022
Description
Apopka City Council Meeting at City Hall on February 16, 2022 at 7 PM.
To view the meeting agenda visit: http://www.apopka.net/agenda
#ApopkaCityCouncilMeeting #CityofApopkaFL
A
B
Let's
assume
the
attitude
of
prayer,
most
gracious,
god,
our
father,
we
come
once
again
and
say
thank
you
for
the
many
blessings
god
bestowed
upon
us.
Thank
you,
father
for
this
opportunity
to
serve
in
this
great
city.
We
ask
of
god
for
your
continued
guidance
and
your
blessings
upon
all
that
we
shall
say
and
do
and
we
pray
father
things
that
we
do
will
be
positive
effect
to
the
citizens
of
this
city.
We
pray
these
in
our
son.
Jesus
name,
amen,
amen.
A
B
Day
february
is
black
history
month
an
annual
celebration
of
achievements
by
african-americans
and
the
times
recognizing
their
central
role
in
u.s
history.
The
origins
of
black
history
month
began
in
1915
with
historian
college
wilson
and
minister
jesse
e
morton
that
year
they
founded
association
for
the
study
of
negro
life
and
history
and
associated
dedicated
to
researching
and
promoting
achievements
by
black
african
americans.
B
C
D
B
A
A
A
motion
by
commissioner
bankston
second
by
commissioner
velasquez,
all
those
in
favor
aye
all
opposed
motion,
carries
unanimously.
Next
up.
We
have
a
proclamation
for
the
future
farmers
of
america
week
and
what
we'd
like
to
do,
maybe
is
we'll
we'll
read
them
out:
I'm
going
to
list
the
schools
that
are
here
tonight
represent
tonight
and
then
we'll
we're
going
to
come
down
and
get
a
picture
with
each
of
the
different
schools.
A
We
have
wekaba
high
school,
christine
navares
advisor
aaron
davis,
apopka
middle
school
allison
wells
advisor
duncan
sykes
piedmont,
middle
school
jayden,
klingensmith
advisor
vanessa,
maxwell,
wolf,
lake
middle
school,
riley,
berger
advisor
missy,
thornton
ocoee,
couldn't
make
it
tonight,
windermere
high
school
lexi,
porter
advisor
amy
patterson
and
the
alumni
representative,
suzanne
archer
and
our
own
where's
john
kloran
over
there
in
the
corner
too.
Yes
from
so
with
that,
let
me
read
the
proclamation
and
then
we'll
come
down
and
get
the
pictures
with
each
of
the
different
schools
and
the
proclamation
reads.
A
A
C
C
A
A
Off
where
y'all
go,
we
got,
commissioner
smith,
I'm
sure
wants
to
say
a
few
things
being
a
former
ffa
teacher
commissioner
smith.
It's
this
is
your
show.
B
Thank
you
mayor,
and
it
is
indeed
a
pleasure
for
me
to
be
here
to
honor
and
witness
the
proclamation
been
given
to
the
ffa
in
honor
of
national
ffa
week.
For
four
years
I
wore
the
ffa
jacket
at
apopka
high
school
as
a
member
of
the
ffa,
and
then
I
served
40
years
as
an
ffa
advisor
to
ffa
organizations
here
in
orange
county.
So
I'm
proud
to
see
you
all
tonight
and
continue
to
carry
on
the
legacy
of
the
ffa.
B
A
A
Okay:
next
up,
we've
got
presentation.
The.
F
Mayor
before
you
do
that,
I
was
gonna,
do
this
under
a
gender
review,
but
I
to
I'm
going
to
do
it
now
if
you'll
allow
me
before
we
get
into
presentations.
We
have
a
commissioner
commissioner
benson.
That
would
like
to
say
some
words.
E
It
was
such
an
honor
to
serve,
and
I
wanted
to
come
out
here
to
make
this
statement
as
a
citizen
of
the
city
as
well
as
the
honor
to
serve
there.
I
believe
in
the
principle
of
serving-
and
I
believe
what
jesus
said
to
his
12
applies
to
all
of
us,
that
the
greatest
among
you
will
be
the
servant
of
all
when
service
is
at
heart
of
what
we
do.
Our
businesses
succeed,
our
churches
succeed,
our
community
succeeds
and
we
succeed.
E
I
believe
that
when
we
work
together,
we
truly
shine
and
that's
my
pledge
to
continue
to
do
so.
I
believe
in
apopka
and
in
her
future,
and
I
believe
we
are
emerging
into
a
place
of
leadership
in
northwest
orange
county
in
the
orlando
metroplex.
E
Yes,
we've
grown
from
the
sleepy
little
town
that
I
met
first
in
1982,
but
I
believe,
as
we
continue
to
come
together,
we
can
retain
the
core
of
what
has
always
made
us
great.
A
true
hometown
feel
a
love
for
god
and
our
fellow
man
a
great
place
to
raise
our
children
a
place
that
has
produced
world-class
musicians,
athletes,
educators,
aviators
and
many
more.
E
E
I
want
to
take
that
same
passion
and
be
our
voice
in
our
state's
capital
capital,
broadening
both
our
reach
and
our
horizons
together.
With
god's
help,
I
will
do
my
best
and
you
know,
there's
such
a
unique
there's
there's
times
in
history
that
where
things
seem
to
converge
and
come
together,
I
feel
like
that's
happening
for
us
as
apopka
and
we've
all
served,
and
I
believe
everyone's
here
serves
from
the
heart
and
to
me
it's
an
extension
of
what
I
believe
we
can
do.
E
So
again,
as
I
stated,
that's
that's
my
heart
and
I
felt
that
it
was
appropriate
to
first
speak
to
you
and
let
you
know
that
as
well,
because
I
value
you
and
I've
come
to
enjoy
our
time
together,
and
I
will
continue
to
be
there
until
such
time
as
I
have
to
step
down.
So
we
got
some
more
road
together
and
if
you
can
endure
me,
let's
do
it
together.
A
A
G
G
Common
example
of
a
cross
connection
include
a
garden
hose
submerged
into
a
container
with
potential
contaminated
water
or
a
direct
connection
to
a
storage
reservoir
or
a
well
well
water.
If
this
is
a
possibility
of
a
cross
connection,
the
city
required
a
backflow
preventer
to
protect
the
main
water
supply,
as
you
can
see
from
the
diagram
here
here,.
G
This
here
is
is
one
of
those
backflow
preventers.
Now
what
is
a
it's?
A
backflow
preventer,
a
backflow
prevent
preventer,
protect
the
city
main
water
supply
from
contaminants,
it
it
stopped
water
from
the
residential,
commercial
or
industrial
flow,
from
flowing
back
into
the
main
supply
line.
So,
for
example,
on
this
picture-
and
this
picture
here
you're
going
to
see
this
is
the
main
supply
line
that
is
coming.
This
has
like
75
psi
and
it
flows.
This
is
a
backflow
well
preventers,
and
this
is
the
line
in
the
in
the
residential.
G
G
So
basically,
there
are
times
when
this,
when
the
main
supply
lines,
the
demand
that
this
happened
very
rarely,
but
for
fires
and
and
every
so
those
pressure
goes
down
and
the
tendency
for
the
water
to
flow
backwards.
So
without
the
prevent
backflow
preventers
any
contaminant
in
those
lines
that
you
have
can
flow
backwards
into
the
main
supply
lines,
and
that
is
the
main
purpose
of
a
block
of
the
backflow
preventers.
G
Now
the
type
of
residential
black
group
well
prevented.
Here
you
can
see
this
is
a
dual
check
and
this
is
a
dual
checkbook
device.
These
two
right
are
really
involved
in
reclaimed:
surface
area,
the
the
other
one
here
is
pressure,
vacuum
breakers
and
a
reduced
pressure.
These
backflow
here
are
more
in
portable
water
service
area
that
are
required
to
have
where
residents
are
required
to
have
baffled
well
preventers,
and
you
can
see
out
there.
We
have
a
demonstration
of
all
those
fours
that
are
out
there.
G
Now
that
I'm
going
to
provide
to
you
a
chronology
of
the
cross
connection
pro
and
pro
program
here,
existing
fdp
role,
65-555.360.
G
yeah
around
around
those
times.
Those
rules
went
through
revision,
amendment
from
the
florida
dp
change
of
coding.
Everything
else.
It's
only
in
2014
that
we
had
the
existing
rule
was
revised
and
finalized
where
it
says
that
required
a
submission
of
annual
cross-connection
well
report
to
begin
in
2016.
G
G
G
What
happened
in
2020
was
fdp,
came
out
to
do
the
routine
audit
of
our
water
treatment
plan.
At
that
time,
one
of
the
employees
right
informed
one
of
the
city
staff
that
the
2019
cross
connection
report
has
not
been
submitted
and
what
staff
did
staff
submitted
that
they
went
through.
They
compiled
all
the
information
and
they
submit
that
report
in
2019
to
the
ep.
To
comply
with
their
requests
now
in
2021
there
was
a
binion
road,
a
civil
spillage
occur
and
that
occurred
in
may,
27
2021.
G
G
Fine
fdp,
then,
sends
a
consent
order,
and
in
that
consent
order,
we
were
able
to
mitigate
that
by
paying
the
500
administrative
p,
but
also
we
we
registered
with
them
to
an
implant,
a
pollution
prevention
project
to
mitigate
define,
in
which
case
we
bought
an
electric
vehicle
and
electric
and
a
charging
station.
G
G
G
In
january
2022
we
mailed
a
portion
of
residential
customer
notification
of
a
testing
requirement.
What
happened
during
that
mail?
We
staff
inadvertently
forget
to
attach
some
attachment
to
some
of
these
letters.
So
as
a
result
we
received
some
calls.
We
asked
dep
for
an
extension
for
february
11.
We
then
corrected
that
and
we
comply
in
february
11.
All
the
revised
notifications
of
the
testing
requirement
was
mail
out
to
the
resident
and
to
the
residential
customer.
G
So
in
summary,
city
had
met
all
the
fda
consent
order.
World
requirement
we
had
the
administrative
prepaid
by
the
city
electric
vehicle.
First
charging
station
was
purchased.
We
distributed
all
the
risk
assessment
survey
to
the
customer.
We
amended
the
cross
connection
ordinance
and
manual,
and
we
notified
all
the
residential
customer
of
cross
connection
testing
world
requirement.
The
city
went
forward
in
here.
G
G
Moving
forward.
We
have
approved
the
backflow
test.
Contractor
has
been
provided
to
all
customers,
so
every
customer
who
received
those
letter
from
us
receive
an
approved
list
of
all
the
backload
tests.
That's
contracted.
We
also
the
residential
customer
may
elect
to
have
the
city
perform
required.
Backflow
testing,
which
runs
approximately
60
dollars.
Repair
costs
will
be.
If
you
need,
the
backflow
will
prevent
it
to
be
repaired.
The
cost
will
be
itemized
based
on
site,
specific
need
and
the
con.
G
If
you
need,
if
the
backflow
is
not
working,
you
need
a
conversion
of
the
backflow
well
device
that
will
cost
three
hundred
dollars.
The
city
will
perform
the
service
and
they
will
be
built
in
tree
insulation.
Those
were
all
set
up
and
set
up
well
in
the
ladder,
one
of
the
things
that
the
city
went
forward
here
that
we
are
doing.
We
are
researching
some
vendors
to
see
if
we
can
purchase
in
bulk
right.
Two
types
of
dual
backflow
well
prevent
this.
G
If
and
I
think
we
got
a
code
and
they
runs
around
65
now,
so
if
we
purchase
them
in
in
bulk,
we
can
then
provide
it
at
cost
to
the
plumber
to
the
contract
at
cost.
So
in
order
it
will
reduce
the
the
cost
to
the
customer
right.
Maybe
it
would
be
less
than
than
the
300
as
we
stipulated
that
if
the
city
had
to
do
it
right,
and
that
really
conclude
this
presentation
that
I
have-
and
we
have
staff
here
myself
and
to
answer
any
any
question
that
arrives
here-
questions
yeah.
H
So
I
think
you
know
to
say
that
I
have
not
feel
that
a
whole
bunch
of
calls
are
related
to
this
topic.
I'd
be
lying,
it's
almost
daily
that
I
get
a
note
or
an
email
or
telephone
call
from
the
public
related
to
this
matter.
You
know,
obviously
I
think
we
missed
an
opportunity
to
educate
people
in
the
mail
piece
itself.
You
know
a
lot
of
people
got
the
letter
and
you
know
like
we
had
discussed
in
december.
H
You
know
backflow
and
cross
connections,
not
on
the
vernacular
of
a
lot
of
people,
and
so
when
they
got
the
letter
in
the
mail
there
was
some
confusion.
The
the
idea
so
just
help
me
work
through
this.
So
the
letter-
and
I
received
one
at
my
house
as
well,
so
it
says
that
once
the
date
of
certification
needs
to
happen
which,
on
mine,
it
was
march
1st
to
say,
was
the
date
to
trigger
it,
and
I
had
to
have
something
done
within
14
days.
H
This,
the
ordinance
that
we
passed
section
8
section
78
to
11,
basically
says
that
the
backflow
has
to
be
certified
every
two
years
right
and
then
the
the
subtext.
To
that
basically
says
devices
shall
be
replaced
or
sorry
repaired,
re-tested
or
replaced
within
14
days
if
they
fail
to
meet
performance
standards.
So
what
I'm?
H
What
I'm
questioning
is
why
the
urgency
in
the
14-day
period
now
versus
I'm
assuming,
since
we
have
to
submit
reports
on
a
quarterly
basis,
to
the
dep
that,
as
long
as
we're
showing
measured
steps
to
say
that
we're
doing
this
thing
in
a
in
a
measured
way,
I
would
think
that
would
satisfy
the
requirement
for
from
the
florida
dep.
Is
it?
Am
I
wrong
in
that
thinking
right.
G
G
So,
despite
that,
we
had,
I
think,
was
march
just
some
date
and
that
that
letter
we
are
flexible,
but
we
want
him
to
engage
with
us
call
us
we.
We
hire
a
10
person
there.
We
we
would
like
to
engage
with
them
if
they
say
they
cannot
meet
that
deadline
or
economy
to
meet
what
the
14
days,
we
will
work
with
them,
but
we
want
them
to
get
in
contact
with
us
so
that
we
can
work
with
them
to
make
sure
that
they
comply.
H
Yeah,
so
I
mean
obviously
you
know
the
letter
that
you,
the
first
letter
that
you
sent
out
was,
prior
to
the
february
1st,
that's
in
the
consent
order,
and
so
everything
else
in
terms
of
timeline
and
things
like
that.
I
think
we're
safe
in
terms
of
consent
and
you
you
brought
up
a
point
here
talking
through
the
cost,
so
orange
county.
I
think
we
discussed
this
in
december
as
well.
Orange
county
just
puts
three
dollars
on
water
customers,
bills
that
are
applicable
for
the
backflow.
H
I
would
suspect-
and
I
don't
know
the
final
numbers
for
the
surveys
that
were
returned,
but
there's
probably
a
high
percentage
of
people
that
took
the
letter
that
they
received
and
it
went
in
the
garbage,
and
so,
if
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
whole
bunch
of
backflow
testing
ourselves
anyways,
why
would
we
not
just
do
it?
Citywide
get
the
benefit
of
the
economy
of
scale.
Pricing,
and
just
I
mean
60
bucks.
H
60
bucks
for
a
test
is
two
dollars
and
fifty
cents
per
pay
period.
If
we
have
to
test
it
every
two
years,
can
we
not
still
explore
that
option
because.
A
I
Well,
and
again,
with
the
when
you
say
with
the
county
charging
it
monthly,
but
the
county
owns
those
devices,
that's
not
owned
by
the
customer,
they
actually
own
something
on
the
customer's
private
property.
That's
why
they
that's
how
they
were
able
to
do
the
get
that
all
in
place.
I
mean
I
wasn't
up
here,
but.
H
Well,
the
but
the
the
point
that
I'm
making
is
you're
going
to
have
a
high
volume
of
people
that
don't
do
this
on
their
own
they're,
not
going
to
proactively,
go
out
and
test
their
their
devices
and
the
way
that
our
manual
is
published
or
approved.
It
basically
says:
if
they
don't
do
that,
they're
going
to
get
done
in
letters
to
say:
hey,
you
haven't
done
it.
H
You
need
to
do
it
you're
going
to
get
another
letter
at
an
increased
cost
to
the
city
again
and
then,
if
they
still
don't
do
it,
then
we
go
out
there
at
the
cost
to
either
the
city
or
a
third
party
to
do
the
testing,
and
then
we
build
it
back
to
there.
So
if
we're
doing
that
anyway
as
an
option,
why
would
we
not
just
do
it
citywide
and
just
get
the
economies
of
scale
again
for
the
price.
I
I
So
I
mean
I
I
worked
with
what
I
had
earlier
when
you
were
talking
about
the
14
days.
My
experience
has
been
if
they
get
it
tested
and
I
don't
get
it
get
it
in,
I
never
get
it
and
then
I'm
chasing
tests.
So
that's
why
it
said
you
need
to
give
us
within
14
days.
I
need
to
receive
the
test
that
was
done
just
because
you
know
do.
I
know
you've
done
it
or
not.
I
mean
how
long
does
it
take
to
send
an
email?
That's.
H
H
I
H
J
H
I
I
H
So
maybe
this
is
a
question
for
the
attorney.
Mr
rodriguez.
Is
the
ownership
dynamic
between
orange
county
and
say
the
city
of
apopka?
Does
that
bear
in
any
decision-making
process
that
we
might
take
as
a
council
to
say,
hey,
let's
just
take
ownership
of
this
bill,
our
clients
and
just
do
the
certification
testing.
It
is
your.
It
would
be.
K
K
If
there's
a
do,
we
end
up
with
an
issue
where
we
have
liability
issues,
because
something
may
happen
on
someone's
private
property
on
an
item
that
is
titled
to
the
city
and
which
you
know
it's
on
private
property
without
necessarily
a
controlled
oversight
of
the
city,
and
those
are
the
issues
that
we
raise
and
we're
concerned
and
when
we
look
at
it's
or
orange
county
is
the
outlier
when
it
comes
onto
the
issue
of
who
owns
these
these
devices?
K
If
you
look
at
all
the
other
municipalities,
it
is
the
property
owner's
responsibility
to
have
the
device
and
the
property
owner's
responsibility
to
main
to
maintain
the
device.
So
if
it
is
the
council's
prerogative
to
emulate
orange
county
and
to
take
title,
then
we're
looking
at
you're
you're
going
to
have
to
look
at
a
schedule
of
how
of
transitioning
all
of
these
devices
within
the
city.
K
That's
yeah,
so
that's
one
of
the
things
we
were.
We,
you
know
needed
to
weigh
when
looking
at
the
ordinance-
and
that
was
not
an
aspect
that
was
amended
from
from
the
prior
ordinance,
the
ordinance
that
was
adopted.
It
was
not
a
wholesale
overhaul
and
we
were
not
asked
by
dep
to
overhaul
our
ordinance
the
aspect
of
the
devices
being
owned
by
the
by
the
resident
that
was
in
our
prior
ordinance
and
that
carried
over
to
the
to
the
current
ordinance.
K
H
Yeah
and
I'm
not
necessarily
suggesting
that
we
should
purchase
and
install
new
devices.
I
think
it
may
be
a
hybrid
effect
there
of
doing
the
certifications
and
then,
if
they,
if
it
does
fail,
then
it
would
be
on
the
homeowner's
responsibility
to
replace
that
device.
But
I'm
just
I'm
just
trying
to
be
a
realist
here.
You
know
I'm
assuming
that
a
majority
of
people
are
not
going
to
do
the
testing
themselves,
and
so,
if.
I
And
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
early
to
say
everybody's
going
to
choose
us
because
it's
been
five
days
and
we've
gotten
over
175
tests.
In
already
those
those
the
the
private
vendors
have
been
very
responsive.
So,
but
it's
so
new,
I
I
can't
give
you
percentages
and.
A
Commissioner,
one
of
the
things
you
know
I've
we've
I've
had
obviously
a
number
of
conversations.
One
is,
you
know,
have
each
of
the
hoas
pick
them
up.
I
mean
they.
Could
they
could
contract
with
one
plumber
to
do
their
whole
neighborhood
and
that
would
be
a
a
way
to
reduce
the
cost,
because,
obviously
they
go
from
house
to
house
to
house
they
can
get
a
better
a
better
deal
than
that
same
plumber
going.
A
I
Well
I'll
tell
you,
I
really
think
they
they're
kind
of
in
the
in
the
red,
because
they
were
having
staff
go
out
and
test
they've
got
vendors,
but
we
were
still
going
out
to
test
and
doing
stuff.
I
mean
which-
and
you
know
all
of
a
sudden,
no,
the
the
contract's
used
up-
and
we
can't
finish-
I
can't
speak
to
that.
I
just
three
dollars-
is
really
low.
I
I
It's
a
half
an
hour
to
do
a
test
if
the
if
the
device
is
accessible
which
most
of
these
are
not
so
you're
cutting
sod
off
the
top
of
the
the
top
of
the
box
cleaning.
It
out
hooking
up
your
meter
because
of
course
everything's
below
ground,
and
then,
if
it
fails
you
you
know,
you've
spent
all
that
time
and
then
you've
got
to
do
the
repair.
I
So
and
it's
it's
so
iffy,
but
I
I
think
60
50,
maybe
because
it's
us
and
and
we
get
breaks
on
everything,
but
the
testers
are
some
of
them.
They
started
at
45
and
they
went
up
to
55.
Just
because
they've
got
to
dig
for
half
an
hour
and
that's
not
what
they
normally
do.
They
normally
have
their
meter
and
a
screwdriver
and
they
go
test
the
device
they
don't
normally
have
to
take
the
sod
off
and
and
then
take
the
sand
or
from
around
it
now
in
two
years
it
won't
be.
I
H
I
Figure
is
an
average
of
what
we
pulled
the
vendors
because
yeah
I
mean
I'm
getting
paid,
I'm
working
I'm
getting
paid
anyway.
I
can
go,
do
a
test
and
I
can
say:
okay,
well,
we'll
only
charge,
you
20
bucks,
but
that's
not
fair
to
the
customer,
the
guys
who
are
in
business
to
do
that.
We
know
we
already
said
from
the
beginning:
we
weren't
going
to
try
to
be
in
competition
with
the
local
vendors.
H
So
I
guess
the
last
point
to
make
is,
though,
just
for
the
general
public,
the
people
that
are
in
this
room,
the
people
that
are
watching
or
people
that
will
continue
to
call
us.
The
14
days
is
not
a
firm
and
fast.
I
That's
just
like,
if
I
give
you
a
month
and
14
days
after
that
month,
I
haven't
got
a
test.
I
I
need
to
contact
you
to
see.
Did
you
do
it
in
that
period
of
time
or
did
you
do
it
and
your
tester
didn't
send
it
to
me?
So
then
I'll
go
to
them
and
get
it,
but
I
have
to
have
it
to
update
my
records
to
be
able
to
put
it
on
that
report,
to
send
it
to
ep.
B
I
I
I
L
C
B
All
right,
then,
my
next
question
is:
I
see
that
it
says
that
if
the
city
performed
the
surfaces,
it's
going
to
be
built
in
three
equal
installments.
If.
B
B
Okay,
but
I
guess
I've
gotten
emails-
that
some
of
these
certified
inspectors
have
gone
out
and
some
of
them
want
to
charge
250
as
opposed
to
the
60,
and
then
one
even
told
them
that
the
device
needs
to
be
above
ground.
So
it's
going
to
cost
them
a
thousand
dollars.
So.
I
A
A
E
Was
my
question
same
thing?
I
think
we
probably
all
get
similar
emails.
How
do
we
protect
the
citizens
they're
being
forced
to
do
something
by
a
regulation
now
to
protect
themselves
and
there
ought
to
be
some
way
to
cap
so
that
they're
not
gouged?
E
As
you
said,
I
think
we
have
a
liability
issue
there,
but
I
think
it
would
be
a
lot
more
affordable
for
some
knowing
okay
60
bucks
extra
this
month
is
no
big
deal,
but
for
others
it's
it's.
Even
that
can
be
a
challenge.
So
I
think
there's
got
to
be
a
way
that
we
could
spread
it
out,
and
I
don't
know
if
we
could
do
it
a
per
month
basis
on
something
like
that.
D
F
Let
me
say
this,
so
you
so
it'll
be
clear
too.
I
think
it's
important
that
one
of
the
reasons,
of
course,
as
you
know,
we've
hired
paula
to
run
this
program,
but
we
have
also
hired
a
some
help
for
her
with
the
phones,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we
can
answer
all
the
calls
and
and
and
not
let
any
step
through
so
we're
answering
calls.
F
F
We
we
say
three
installments
for
the
300
or
whatever
those
fees
may
be,
but
we
do
have
a
mechanism
and
utility
billing
that
allows
us
to
do
longer
periods
of
time
where
we
can,
they
can
sign
an
agreement
and
extend
that
out
and
because
we
have
that,
for
some
people
for
their
water
bills,
some
people-
you
know
if
they
have
a
big
water
bill,
one
month
or
whatever,
and
and
we've
allowed
them
to
to
make
payments
over
time.
So
we
do
have
all
those
mechanisms
in
place.
F
So
I
think
it's
good.
It's
important
that
the
public
knows
and
something
we
probably
need
to
make
sure
we
put
on
our
website
with
this
presentation,
needs
to
go
there
as
well,
but
that
we
need
to
put
on
there
that
they
can
call
us
for
anything,
so
don't
feel
pressured
or
whatever
you
know,
if
you
have
a
problem
with
your
vendor
or
whatever
call
paula
and
let
her
work
through
whatever
the
issues
may
be,.
E
Yeah,
I
would
just
like
to
see
an
option
if
the
citizens
would
like
that
to
say
you
know
what,
if
it's
a
60
payment,
I'll
opt
into
that
and
then
anything
that's
found
that
you
know
is
the
the
larger
cost
that
will
go
back
to
them
and
we
work
with
them
on
how
to
cover
that.
But
I
just
think
that
would
be
a
much
easier
way
for
our
people
to
be
able
to
deal
with
that
again,
not
purchasing
the
unit
outright.
E
M
Do
we
have
because
I've
gotten
a
lot
of
calls
from
neighbors
just
on
the
block
that
I
live?
The
first
question
is
where's
the
backflow,
and
so
I
you
know,
I
don't
know
whether
to
say
the
right
side
of
the
house,
the
left
side
of
the
house,
it's
underground,
it's
in
the
back,
it's
in
the
front.
How?
How
do
we
identify
those
homes?
Well,
let
me
just
say
rock
springs
ridge.
Where
is
that
backflow.
I
Okay,
so
I
try
to
let
them
visualize
it
one
side.
You
have
a
purple
meter
on
one
side
of
your
property
line
at
the
street
and
they
usually
say
yeah.
Then
you
have
the
black
meter,
the
black
box
on
the
other,
and
it
has
a
round
disc
about
five
inches
round
and
that's
the
actually
the
transmitter.
So
that
is
your
water
meter
and
on
the
customer
side
within
three
feet,
you'll
find
a
second
black
box.
M
So
one
of
the
neighbors
had
asked
she
didn't
know
that
she's
a
widow
she
doesn't
really
trust
a
vendor
to
come
in
and
be
truthful
or
she's.
You
know,
she's
got
some
issues
where
she
would
probably
be
one
of
the
customers
who
would
prefer
the
city
right
to
come
out
and
do
it.
So
are
you
organizing
a
schedule
where
I
can
at
least
give
those
residents
the
option
of
you
don't
have
to
go
to
an
outside
vendor?
I
We
are,
we've
started
a
list
okay,
but
until
it
all
shakes
out,
I
need
to
see
everybody
so
then
I
can
schedule
it
effectively.
You
know
not
just
because
like
I'll
order
it
by
street
so
that
we're
doing
it
by
street
or
by
subdivision
instead
of
well
this
guy
called
first
and
he's
over
here
and
this
one
called
first
and
so
we're
driving
all
around.
We
need
to
once
it
all
gets
shaken
out
and
everybody's
you
know
said:
yes,
we
want
you
in
a
month
or
so,
because
then
I
have
to
decide.
I
M
Okay,
so
they
would
be
using
the
services
of
the
city.
Yes,
so
now,
as
you
schedule
them,
of
course,
many
of
them
are
going
to
be
waiting
for
you
to
come
to
their
homes
to
do
this
inspection,
but
then
you
have
a
lot
of
residents
who
are
worried
about.
Am
I
going
to
make
the
date
that
I'm
required
to
have
it
inspected
when,
when.
I
D
C
M
I
E
M
The
the
inquiries
that
I
did
get
a
lot
of
the
neighbors
were
like
where's,
the
backflow
and
a
lot
of
them
don't
want
to
go
to
outside
vendors,
because
they've,
already
kind
of
read
that
some
vendors
charged.
C
M
The
test
and
and
they
can
work
with
the
utility
if
they
can't
afford
to
pay
the
sixty
of
in
one
okay.
So
that
gives
me
an
option
for
those
residents,
but.
H
B
And
I
have
one
last
question
for
our
older
residents
and
what
I
mean
older
construction
in
the
older
homes,
where
there
is
no
want
to
make
sure
I
got
there
talking
about
the
house
where
there
is
no
backflow
preventer.
How
are
we
going
to
handle
that.
I
N
I
System
in
older
parts
of
the
city-
and
we
didn't
even
know
it-
I
mean
they
might
not-
have
pulled
a
permit.
So
we've
got
to
get
this
done
first
and
then
we'll
just
have
to
do
that.
That's
what
I
had
to
do.
The
first
in
in
orange
county
boots
on
the
ground,
walking
we'd,
take
a
street
and
any
time
we
saw
sprinkler
heads
make
the
note.
Talk,
knock,
knock
and
verify
that
there
is
a
device
or
not
a
device
and
explain
you
know
you
are
you
are
going
to
have
to
do
an
installation?
I
E
A
Good
okay,
everybody's
questions
answered
yes,
awesome
all
right!
Well!
Thank
you,
paula!
Thank
you.
D.O
edward
okay
agenda
review,
edward
any
changes.
A
A
A
A
We've
got
shen,
shantovis,
bornet
communication
technician;
five
years
lead
communications
technician,
we've
got
danielle
murray
maintenance
worker;
one
we've
got
nordstrom
aaron,
nordstrom
van
nordstrom
communication
technician.
Five
years,
we've
got
tyler,
gough
maintenance
worker,
one
utility
service
worker;
two
we've
got
justin
lemieux
police
officer.
Five
years
we've
got
jennifer
fiburn
five
years,
we've
got
oscar
santos
firefighter
first
class,
we've
got
mason,
mahar
maintenance
worker,
one
maintenance,
worker,
two
utility
service
worker,
two
sanitation
equipment
operator.
A
A
All
right
next
up
public
comment,
susan.
O
O
I
did
receive
the
payment,
but
today
I
was
accused
of
having
the
city
pay
for
the
entire
repair
my
irrigation
system,
instead
of
the
portion
that
was
just
damaged.
I
want
to
state
that
I
clearly
instructed
the
irrigation
company
to
separate
the
repairs
that
were
that
were
required
to
be
made
in
the
area
that
was
affected
by
the
city's
project,
and
I
provided
a
detailed
invoice
showing
the
exactly
the
repairs
that
were
made
in
that
area.
O
O
O
I
was
worried
that
the
claim
would
be
denied
again
with
no
investigation.
I
was.
I
was
assured
by
mr
bass
that
he
would
contact
the
insurance
company
the
next
day.
The
very
next
afternoon
I
got
a
letter
dated
january
5th,
two
weeks
prior
to
the
meeting,
denying
the
claim,
with
no
communication
from
the
insurance
adjuster
previous
to
that.
O
They
agreed
to
meet
me,
but
only
if
it
was
a
recorded
meeting
since
I
felt
somewhat
intimidated
to
go
to
a
recorded
meeting
on
my
own.
I
initiated
and
brought
an
attorney
with
me.
So
at
the
meeting
I
was
informed.
It
didn't
have
to
be
recorded.
After
all,
the
irrigation
system,
repair
charges
were
called
into
question,
and
then
I
was
denied
continued
to
deny
liability
for
my
clay
for
damages.
O
O
O
O
O
O
I
had
to
live
with
sandbags
around
my
house:
keep
electronics
and
valuables
off
the
floor
every
time
it
rained.
I
had
watched
the
door
because
to
make
sure
I
wasn't
going
to
flood
again,
the
drainage
consultant
study
that
was
performed
plus
other
evidence
showed
that
the
stormwater
system
caused
the
flooding.
O
O
O
I
don't
know
if
that's
how
all
insurance
claims
are
handled
without
any
benefit
of
any
investigation,
but
I
don't
know
what
I've
done
to
deserve
this
treatment,
because
I've
suffered
both
financially
emotionally
physically,
but
I'm
67
years
old.
I
don't
deserve
this
treatment.
I
don't
deserve
to
be
pushed
aside
and
I
don't-
and
I
don't
like
my
integrity
being
called
into
question
because
I
did
present
proper
invoices
to
the
city
for
that
irrigation
repair
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
B
F
We'd
make
that
call
yes,
commissioner,
for
for
you
and
for
the
rest
of
the
city
council,
I
want
I
want
to
to
kind
of
give
you
a
little
update,
because
I've
been
working
really
really
hard
with
pam
through
this
whole
process,
and,
first
and
foremost,
let
me
tell
you
that
when
the
insurance
company,
when
our
insurance
company,
when
someone
files
a
claim
with
our
insurance
company,
the
city
is
out
of
it.
We
can't
get
involved
in
that
process,
so
the
insurance
company
does
their
whatever
they
do.
F
I
know
they've
asked
for
data
they've
asked
for
information.
They
ask
for
reports,
they
may
follow
up,
they
may
not,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
the
insurance
company
will
make
their
call
and
they
will
either
accept
the
claim
get
with
the
city
and
tell
us
what
we
need
to
do
or
deny
the
claim
so
on
that
portion
of
the
of
the
process.
There's
not
a
whole
lot.
We
can
do
that
we
can.
All
I
can
do
is
tell
the
insurance
company.
F
Please
make
sure
you
follow
up
with
our
citizen
with
our
customer
and
make
sure
that
you,
you
know,
go.
Do
everything
you
need
to
do
in
your
process?
One
of
the
things.
That's
that
I
find
interesting
in
this
situation
is
so
when
pam
came
to
the
meeting
on
january,
the
20th
and
because
I
had
I
did
not
know
that
she
had
not
received
the
denial.
Did
she
had
not
received
any
letter
because
insurance
company
hadn't
said
anything
to
us
a
lot
of
times
they
don't.
F
They
will
communicate
with
the
with
the
individual
first
and
then
they
will.
You
know,
get
with
us.
So
the
letter
was
dated
january,
the
5th,
when
I
I
did
after
that
meeting.
Like
I
told
you
after
the
meeting
on
the
20th,
I
went
the
next
day
and
I
got
with
christy
our
risk
person,
and
I
said
you
need
to
get
with
the
insurance
company
and
find
out
what's
going
on
why
pam
hasn't
received
her
letter.
F
So
she
got
the
insurance
company,
because
pam
came
in
that
day
that
next
day,
the
exact
the
day
after
the
council
meeting
to
fill
out
her
paperwork
so
that
we
could
take
care
of
the
irrigation
issue
that
we
took
care
of
on
the
damages.
The
part
that
that
were
damaged,
so
we
took
care
of
that,
and
then
we
called
the
insurance
company
to
tell
them
hey
what
what's
going
on?
Have
you
communicated?
Why
haven't
you
communicated?
F
Well,
they
did
they
sent
a
letter
out
dated
january
the
5th
they
mailed
a
letter
out
and
apparently
pam
had
not
received
that
letter
as
of
the
20th,
but
the
next
day
the
21st.
When
she
left
us
and
went
home
apparently
she
had
received.
She
got
the
letter
dated
january
the
5th,
so
insurance
company
did
send
out
a
second
letter,
because
we,
you
know
that,
like
I
said
in
that
meeting,
I'd
go
back,
we'll
tell
them
to
to
follow
up,
so
they
did
send
the
second
letter
and
she
got
that
second
letter
as
well.
F
So
that's
the
process
and
that
that's
how
it
all
works
and
we've
done
everything
from
the
city
side
that
we
can
do
so.
I
mean,
if
and
michael
can
speak
to
the
legal
side.
We
usually
if
we
get
a
denial
from
our
insurance
company
and
our
insurance
company
tells
us
hey.
We
feel
good
about
this.
We're
confident
about
this
from
the
city's
liability
side.
That's
what
we
usually
go
with
or
work
through
and
then
from
that
point
you
know
the
attorney
would
take
over
yeah.
H
The
only
great
area
that
I
have
is
so
and
again
not
to
put
words
in
anybody's
mouth,
but
so
you
get
the
denial
letter.
Is
it
exhaustive
in
terms
of
why
it
was
denied
and
who
would
they
have?
Who
would
they
have
spoken
to
either
at
the
city
level
or
miss
ripley's
level?
To
say
you
know?
Were
there
any
other
facts
that
were
presented
so
or.
O
First
time
I
got
it
was
immediately
after
the
first
flood
and
they
told
them
they
didn't.
Give
me
any
reasons.
They
said
the
reasons
were
proprietary
and
they
had
no
reason.
They
couldn't
give
me
any
reasons
they
and
they
weren't
obliged
to
give
me
any
reasons.
So
there
was
no
way
to
appeal
it
because
they
said
they
didn't
have
to
give
me
any
reasons,
and
the
man
was
quite
rude.
It
was
a
different
insurance
company
and
he
refused
to
to
deal
with
me
any
longer.
O
So
then,
after
we
came
up
with
the
the
the
drainage
consultant
report,
and
I
saw
how
the
wording
in
there
showed
that
there
were
some
some
problems
with
the
systems
and
it
would
pretty
clearly
show
that
there
were
some
issues
with
the
system.
Then
why
my
my
house
flooded,
I
said
okay.
This
is
why
I
should
file
for
review,
because
it
pretty
clearly
showed
there
were
some
issues
that
caused
the
flooding.
So
that's
when
I
asked
for
a
writ
to
have
the
claim
reviewed
I
sent
it
in.
O
I
got
one
two
word
response
saying
thank
you
and
I
sent
other
emails.
I
nev
the
person
who
sent
me
the
denial
letter.
I
never
even
heard
of
before
never
had
any
communication
with
anybody
from
the
company
never
asked
for
for
any
other
additional
information.
I
said
emails.
Volunteering
photos,
documents,
reports,
anything
they
wanted
nothing,
so
they
never
contacted
me
never
made
any
on-site
visits
never
asked
for
any
information
in
my
initial
email,
I
actually
my
father
was
having
spinal
surgery,
so
I
only
sent
them
some
information.
O
I
said
that
I
would
be
happy
to
provide
additional
information,
because
this
was
just
the
beginning
stages
and
I
was
dealing
with
my
father
and
nothing
nothing.
So
I
don't
know
how
they
and
actually,
I
received
a
letter,
a
denial
letter
before
that,
with
no
contact
whatsoever
before
they
even
and
you
called
me
and
warned
me,
I
was
going
to
get
a
letter
denying
it
before
and
before
I
even
sent
anything
over
nothing.
I
got
the
original
denial
letter
before
anything
was
even
started.
F
M
F
E
K
I
can't
speak
for
the
insurance
company.
I
also
will
not
want
this
matter
we're
currently
now
in
a
com
public
comment
period
also
she
has
hired
an
attorney.
So
at
this
point
any
questions
issues
discussions
regarding
liability.
The
matter
is
now
in
in
legal
hands.
I
would
advise
to
cease
any
discussions
in
regards
to
liability,
as
this
matter
may
result
in
litigation.
K
So
at
this
point
that
my
advice
would
be
to
not
discuss
matters
of
liability
or
denial
liability
because
the
property
owner
has
sought
and
obtained
legal
counsel
all
right
well,.
O
I
did
bring
him
with.
I
haven't
paid
him
anything
because
I
was
asked
to
come
to
a
recorded
meeting
and
I
was
questioned
why
I
had
to
come
to
a
recorded
meeting
when.
Why
was
the
meeting
going
to
be
recorded
in
the
first
place?
I
mean:
are
all
meetings
recorded
when
they
come
to
you
for
to
for
for
a
question
and
answer
session.
K
I
was
allowing
the
questions,
but
but
because
that
question
was
pointed
pointed
to
the
scope
of
liability.
It
is
at
that
point
where
I
I
am
advising
the
council,
because
the
property
owner
has
came
to
the
city
with
legal
counsel.
I
have
an
obligation
to
advise
that
that
there
may
be
communications
that
have
to
be
counseled
to
council,
and
I
mean
council
c-o-u-n-s-e-l
that
issues
in
regards
to
liability,
because
this
may
be
potential
issues
in
potential
litigation.
O
Okay,
all
right,
I
just
so.
I
felt
it
was
necessary
to
update
you
since
this
happened
last
month
and
what
I
thought
was
going
to
happen
happened,
because
that
was
my
fear.
When
I
came
here
in
desperation
last
month
that
I
hadn't
heard
anything
and
that
my
I
was
going
to
get
a
denial
without
investigation
and
the
very
next
day
a
letter
came
doing
exactly
that.
O
So
and
then
I
was
just
a
little
upset
that
I
was
accused
of
overcharging,
the
city
for
my
irrigation
repair,
and
I
can
show
you
invoices
of
what
I
paid
for
my
irrigation
repair,
which
was
three
times
what
the
city
paid
for
their
portion,
and
I
can
assure
you
that
I
didn't
charge
the
city
for
more
than
what
the
damages
were
when
they
put
in
the
system.
So,
okay.
E
O
I
just
don't,
I
just
don't
know
why
we
have
to
go
this
far.
Why
I
mean
I
just
like
to
settle
this,
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
go
legal
action.
I
mean
I
don't
see
the
necessity
to
go
legal
action,
it's
just
a
claim
against
the
city.
This
is
the
city
has
insurance.
Why
is
it
have
why?
Why
am
I
being
put
through?
This
is
my
question.
K
O
So,
there's
no
way
for
me
personally
to
to
appeal
the
decision
with
the
with
the
insurance
company
because
they
have
not
even
see
my
my
problem
is
the
procedure
the
insurance
company
takes.
They
do
not
do
any
type
of
investigation
in
three
denials,
they've
not
done
any
investigation,
and
I
think
the
city
needs
to
be
aware
of
that.
Their
insurance
company
does
no
investigation
when
they
deny
a
claim
and
I'm
not
the
only
person.
I've
talked
to
a
neighbor
who
had
the
same
thing
happened.
O
They
had
an
issue
with
this
with
the
city,
no
investigation,
and
they
had
a
claim
tonight
immediately.
So
I'm
not
the
only
one.
This
has
happened
and
they
had
people
from
the
fire
department
back
up
their
issue
with
with
the
city.
So
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
typical
thing
with
the
but
the
insurance
company
that
the
city
uses,
but
I
think
that's
something
that
bears
investigation
besides
my
case,
so
I'd.
Q
And
this
petition
is
as
follows
that
we,
the
undersigned
residents
of
apopka,
have
abiding
concerns
about
southwick
commons
apartments
proposed
for
development
at
461,
east
7th
street.
That's
right
there
at
the
corner
of
6th
street
and
alabama
street,
and
we
also
have
a
lot
of
concerns
about
how
possible
changes
in
the
apopka's
center
development
agreement
would
impact
our
future
projects
in
the
city
center,
and
we
are
very
much
opposed
to
any
actions
to
amend
this
standards
and
design
conditions.
Q
Q
and
right
now
we
have
about
38
residents
from
charter
oaks,
6th
street
tilden
avenue
even
alabama
avenue
who
have
signed
our
petition.
We
have
others
who
want
to
sign,
but
we
haven't
connected
with
them.
Q
Okay,
thank
you
thank
you,
and
would
you
like
this.
R
R
A
Yeah,
it
goes
back
to
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
you
know:
misinformation
out
there
about
how
this,
how
it
works
or
how
water
can
get
contaminated.
So
as
long
as
you
have
a
pressurized
water
system,
so
you're
above
50
or
60
pounds,
there's
absolutely
no
way
that
you're
going
to
get
contaminants
into
the
water
supply.
Okay,
the
only
only
way
that
you
can
get
contaminants
in
the
water
supply.
If
the
system
the
what
the
potable
water
system
fails.
So
it
goes
to
zero
water
pressure.
A
Then
you
have
the
ability
not
not
that
it
could
happen,
because
you
still
got
to
have
a
a
leak
in
the
pipe,
so
they
could
suck
this
bad
water,
bad
chemicals
whatever
into
the
pipe.
That
would
then
be
pushed
back
into
the
water
system.
So
it's
not
a
and
when
you,
when
that
happens,
when
you
have
a
water
break,
you
get
a
water
boil
notice
right.
So
you
we've
got
the.
A
R
Do
have
that
for
confirmation,
another
point
of
clarification
for
the
city
to
do
the
work.
Is
it
sixty
dollars
for
the
test?
Yes
and
okay,
and
then,
in
my
letter
it
just
it
said
the
up
to
three
hundred
dollars
to
change
the
device
out
which
it
almost
sounds
like
we
might
need
to
do
if,
because
the
device
here
is
300,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be
tested,
except
for
every
two
years,.
A
The
the
testing
I
mean
we
could
also
if
we
needed
to
bring
on
two
more
people
to
you
know,
obviously
have
to
come
back
for
a
budget
amendment
to
take
that
on,
but
I
mean
I've
never
wanted
to
want
to
compete
with
the
private
sector.
So
I
mean
if
if
the
private
sector
will
do
the
right
job
at
the
right
price,
I'd
rather
them
make
a
buck
than
us.
You
know
take
that
that
responsibility
on,
but
but
if,
if
that's
what
we
need
to
do
we'll
do
it?
Okay,.
R
A
F
R
N
R
Way
we
know
we
are
not
doing
this
for
city
profit
or
any
personal
profit.
Here's
the
link,
if
you
have
a
problem
and
then
I
like
how
it
was
addressed
that
those
that
can't
afford
it.
There
is
a
workaround
to
try
to
help
those
people
and
it
sounds
like
we
have
addressed
those
that
do
not
have
internet
access
for
their
information.
So
I'm
happy
to
hear
that
you've
addressed
those
needs
too
and
then,
in
closing,
I
just
will
have
to
say
my
opinion
of
how
the
letter
came
about
I'm
not
pleased
with
it.
R
I
felt
it
was
rather
punitive.
It
did
seem
to
well.
It
did
gather
the
neighborhood
together
because
I
think
we
had
over
300
posts
on
our
our
facebook,
so
we
did
have
some
unity
of
community,
but
I'd
rather
have
it
at
one
of
the
concerts
instead.
Thank
you.
A
Well,
and
that's
you
know
we
do
they
were
at
the
concert.
You
know
saturday
night
and
so
we're
gonna.
Be
there
again
this
this
this
saturday
night.
We
also
we've
been
to
a
couple
of
the
farmer's
markets,
so
we're
trying
to
get
you
in
places
where
you
wouldn't
normally.
I.
E
E
Well,
they're
figuring
that
out
I
wanted
to
you
had
mentioned
about
not
competing
with
the
private
sector.
I
don't
know
why
we
can't
contract
with
them
at
a
set
price
for
those-
maybe
that's
another
option,
but
we
can
think
through
that
process,
so
sure
yeah.
I
would
agree
in
that
sense.
I
don't
want
it.
Is
there
anyone
to
take
away
from
them,
but
you
know
just
for
the
convenience
of
our
citizens.
N
M
B
C
S
T
S
T
S
Cases
were
not
brought
forward
for
review
by
any
of
the
officers
on
the
scene
instead
by
this
captain
after
he
took
a
look
at
the
videos
and
raised
a
red
flag
running
it
then
up
the
chain.
The
captain
was
also
put
under
a
different
investigation
and
he
retired
after
two
decades
on
the
job
they
say
their
experience
last
year
is
a
perfect
example
of
why
officers
don't
speak
up
when
something
just
doesn't.
D
J
Yes,
my
name
is
leroy
bell.
I
live
at
2308
blue
meadows,
court
apopka
florida,
I'm,
the
chairman
of
the
double
a
triple
c
double
a
triple
c
mean
apopka
area
concerned.
Citizen
coalition
and
there
have
been
citizens
had
some
concerns
about
going.
What's
going
on
in
apopka
apopka,
congratulations
on
your
new
move
for
the
39
and
you
just
came
up
and
stated
that
apopka
is
a
good
place
to
live.
J
J
J
J
J
J
It's
public
record,
all
you
got
to
do
is
go
down
to
the
county
clerk
out
clerk
of
the
court,
read
the
facts,
and
then
you
say
this
is
a
place
to
come.
Raise
your
family.
J
We
had
a.
We
had
a
discussion
about
annexation
of
the
day
and
you,
commissioner,
bankston
brought
up
the
reason
they
did
the
parking
lot
up
here,
because
people
didn't
feel
safe
coming
to
apopka
because
it
was
so
close
to
the
south
side
of
apopka.
J
J
Is
it
and
commissioner,
now
I
end
with
this-
it's
just
not
a
hit
on
you.
It's
just
the
way
you
felt
and
there's
nothing
wrong
with
that.
A
police
officer
came
forward
well
sent
a
anonymous
letter
to
the
city
council
and
didn't
nobody
know
who
it
was,
and
I
think
he
was
called
a
coward
because
he
wouldn't
put
his
name
on
it.
J
E
You
know
we're
not
we're
not
a
lawyer
judging
jury
here,
but
we
have
the
responsibility
to
investigate
and
look
into
those
things
when
something's
done
wrong,
it
should
be
dealt
with
in
the
right
manner.
We
still
have
to
deal
with
the
legal
process,
so
I
don't
I.
I
can't
speak
directly
to
those
to
you
right
now,
but
I
believe
those
things
will
be
playing
out
in
the
legal
process
and
you
know
again
they
they
should
be
and
where
wrong
is
exposed,
it
needs
to
be
dealt
with.
J
I
agree
100,
but
my
concern
is
this:
you
do
have
the
power
you
do
have
the
power
to
make
sure
that
every
officer
you
know
we
that
we
had
the
proud
boys
already
we
had.
We,
we
had
one
of
the
boys
from
from
up
at
january,
six
that
was
from
up
here
up
at
the
capitol
one
of
those
guys.
C
J
J
J
You
got
you
you'll
see
it
yourself
just
go
to
the
clerk
of
the
court.
The
only
thing
I
ask
is
this:
you
do
have
the
power
to
go
down
to
the
police
department
from
a
to
z,
whoever
in
involved
whoever
was
on
that
scene
that
night
or
that
day
they
need
to
be
put
on
administrative
leave
until
we
work
our
way
through
all
this,
because
I
tell
you
what
what
if
it's
going
to
be
your
child,
yours,
yours
or
yours,
what,
if
you're
going
to
be
one
of
your
cousins,
your
nephew?
J
A
V
Good
evening,
council,
my
name
is
donald
bynum.
I
live
at
4308
caledonia
avenue
and
my
question
goes
back
towards
the
preventers,
the
backflow
presenters
and
while
I
was
sitting
here,
I
was
talking
with
paula
about
there's
some
confusing
information
in
here
about
either
replacement
or
repair.
V
If
say,
if
your
system
fails,
you
say
it
has
to
be
replaced
and
what's
stated
here
in
the
letter
about
the
dual
check,
I
believe
it
is
called.
D
V
What
I
got
today
to
be
replaced,
but
paula
straightened
me
out
and
said
it's
only
parts
that
has
to
be
replaced
in
five
years.
Okay,
so.
A
A
V
Okay,
a
little
better
communication
on
that.
Okay,
absolutely
because
I'm
like
well
wait
a
minute.
You
know
whatever
that
cost
is
yeah,
because
five
years
from
now
prices
are
going
to
go
up
on
everything
and
each
and
every
one
of
us
know
that
you
know.
So.
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
statement.
If
parliament
wanted
to
add
something
to
it
sure
she
can,
because
you
know
I.
A
Got
my
question
answered?
That's
right.
We
appreciate
no,
we,
you
know
it's.
We.
The
problem
is
when
you're
kind
of
immersed
in
it.
You
know
what
what
needs
to
be
done
and
yet
from
the
layman.
Sometimes
you
don't
understand
what
we
kind
of
take
for
granted,
and
so
I
I
you
know,
I
I
understand
you're.
I
And
and
his
what
had
happened
was
that
when
he
called
the
vendor
the
vendor
offhanded,
oh,
but
it
has
to
be
replaced
now.
He
knows
it
doesn't
have
to
be
taken
out
and
replaced.
He
I
know
this
vendor.
He
knows
that
it's
just
the
guts
inside
the
parts
inside,
but
one
of
the
reasons
we
did
put
that
in
up
up
to
conversion,
because
if
your
device
fails
and
there's
the
device
and
there's
two
valves
on
either
side,
if
all
of
that's
got
to
be
replaced,
it's
less.
I
If
you
just
go
to
the
conversion,
if
you
just
put
the
new
device
in
you
know
we
don't
we
wanted
to.
Let
them
know
that,
instead
of
having
a
repair
bill
for
250,
when
you
can
get
a
brand
new
device
that
doesn't
need
anything
for
ten
five
years,
that's
why
we
tried
to
put
a
little
bit
of
information
on
those
other
options
as
far
as
doing
the
conversion
to
a
dual
check,
as
opposed
to
the
double,
because
with
them
being
in
the
ground,
this
long,
a
lot
of
them
are
failing.
I
Y
Good
afternoon
everyone
sylvester
hall,
3091
rolling
hills,
lane
apopka
florida.
Y
I
gotta
beat
that
I
got
a
beat
down
from
my
wife,
the
last
the
last
city
council
meeting
we
had
because
she
she
watched
she
watched
the
film
if
she
watched
the
video
and
she
said,
you're,
a
retired,
veteran
23
years,
all
types
of
pressure.
Why
do
you
let
somebody
get
you
rattled?
And
commissioner
benson?
Y
Y
Y
It
was
shot
down
on
mirrors
and
principle,
and
then
here
you
change
your
mind
and
say:
hey
look.
I
wish
I
had
a
went
along
with
that
now
that
I
know
more
information,
the
principles,
the
merit
didn't
change,
and
so,
when
she
said
we
don't
care
about
the
politics,
that's
exactly
what
she
was
doing
playing
politics
and
I'm
here
to
educate
people,
because
I'm
tired
of
seeing
this.
I
am
tired
of
seeing
this.
Y
We
have
to
come
together
as
one
and
stop
these
shenanigans
and
that's
how
I
felt
and
that's
what
bothered
me
now
to
your
credit.
I
know
you
told
me
to
come
and
talk
to
you.
Yes-
and
I
will
do
that
not
once
you
told
me-
you
told
me
twice,
but
I
had
my
reserve
because
of
that
and
when
we
talk
about
leadership
and
how
we
treat
people,
if
people
don't
know,
there's
something
better
and
they
their
customer
getting
what
they're
getting
they
don't
know
any
better.
Y
People
are
not
going
to
give
you
your
best
effort
unless
they
know
you
care
about
you.
So
I
watch
y'all
read
off
20-year
service
award,
25-year
service
award
and
it's
just
a
name
written
and
I'm
like.
Okay,
we're
all
people,
because
I
just
attended
a
service
award
last
month
and
it
went
totally
different.
But
it's
it's
the
difference
of
leadership.
Y
It's
a
different
vision,
your
city,
your
town,
is
only
going
to
go
as
far
as
your
leader
vision
for
that
city,
and
so
when
I'm
looking
at
this
and
I'm
saying
wow,
I
wonder:
did
those
people
really
see
this?
Did
the
video
to
show
that
they
was
recognized,
but
this
is
how
it
is
at
some
of
the
other
places
at
30
years
at
20
years
you
get
150
bucks,
not
a
whole
lot,
but
just
a
little
token
appreciation.
Y
Y
Okay,
I'll
just
just
yeah,
let's
just
go
ahead
and
do
it
they
get
the
chance
to
come
to
the
city
chamber.
They
get
a
chance
to
take
a
president
or
take
a
picture
with
their
mayor,
their
their
supervisors
and
things
like
that.
So
it's
a
grant.
It's
a
grand
event
and
you
get
a
chance
to
go
outside,
take
pictures
with
your
family
and
your
loved
ones.
That
was
able
to
that
was
able
to
come
there
and
support
you
for
your
years
of
service.
Y
Y
At
I
see
my
time
is
is
going
way
over
here,
yeah,
and
I
know
it's
mayor,
you're,
quick
to
say
yeah,
but
when
somebody
else
came
up
here
and
spent
seven
minutes
with
nothing
said
that
person
chastised
the
commissioner
with
nothing
said
he
cursed
was
nothing
said,
and
so
we
see
the
difference
in
preferential
treatment,
and
that
has
to
stop
now
what
I
got
on
here,
I'm
not
gonna,
go
I'm
not
gonna,
go
ahead
and
do
that
because
it's
gonna
take
too
much
of
my
time.
Y
Y
If
we
don't
see
if
nothing
wrong
with
that,
we
have
serious
problems
and
serious
concerns
here,
and
so
now
what
you
didn't
hear
in
the
video
is
the
communication
between
the
public,
who
we
are
sworn
to
serve
and
protect.
One
of
the
neighbors
was
saying:
hey
leave
it
alone.
Somebody
turn
around
one
of
the
police
officers
turn
around
and
say,
shut
the
f
up
the
neighbors
say
you
don't
talk
to
me
that
way,
and
he
said
another
neighbor
said:
don't
challenge
him
they're
the
police.
They
can
do
whatever
they
want.
Y
I
favor,
the
police,
like
I
say,
police,
are
under
under
underpaid
and
undervalued,
but
as
the
bad
ones,
when
step
out
of
line
give
everybody
else
a
bad
name,
and
nobody
stands
up
with
any
courage,
just
call
them
out
and
say,
and
then
when
they
do
they're
cast
out
of
the
force.
That
needs
to
stop,
because
I'm
a
respected
time-
and
I
don't
want
to
get
a
whooping
when
I
go
home,
but
look
for
more
from
me
on
this
manner.
Look
for
more
for
me
on
this
and
that
annexing
discussion.
Y
Y
So
that
told
us
what
you
really
felt
about
south
africa.
So
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
it
because
I
don't
have
the
time
to
but
look
for
more
to
come
for
me
on
this
matter.
It's
time
out,
we
need
leadership,
it's
time
out
for
business,
that's
old
and
it's
time
out
for
the
good
ol
boy
system,
the
last
debate
you
said:
I'm
gonna,
protect
you
and
I
was
thinking
who
is
he
gonna,
protect
and
from
who.
Y
So
these
things
really
bothered
me
as
a
citizen,
and
I'm
I've
been
in
apopka
for
23
years,
I
own
not
one
but
two
business-
that
planned
on
bringing
jobs
to
this
community,
but
I
want
to
make
sure,
there's
a
community
that
you
said,
mr
banks,
it's
a
community
that
we
all
can
thrive
in
and
that's
what
needs
to
be
done
and
that's
the
leadership
we
need
moving
forward.
E
I
changed
my
mind
because
we
have
had
several
issues
come
here
that
only
had
one
vendor
and
all
of
them
have
gone
through.
This
was
not
to
accept
it.
It
was
only
to
have
the
opportunity
to
examine
it
after
I
sat
back
and
listened
to
it,
we
lost
an
opportunity
that
would
have
brought
jobs.
Possibly
would
have
brought
education
would
have
done,
would
have
done
all
of
the
things
that
all
of
us
say
we
want
I've
served
for
26
years.
Here,
sir,
our
church
is
right.
There
considered
south
apopka.
E
Paul
said
you
know
you
make
me
speak
as
a
fool
to
defend
myself.
I
don't
like
to
do
that,
but
we've
done
that
consistently
for
26
years
we
have
a
monthly
outreach
and
we
feed
people
in
south
apopka.
We've
consistently
done,
we've
done
free
giveaways,
we
told
all
our
people,
you
know
what.
Why
have
a
garage
sale?
Bring
it
all
here
and
let's
give
it
to
people
that
are
in
need,
we've
done
feeding
programs,
we
do
leadership.
E
I've
served
for
26
years
in
different
ways.
This
to
me
is
an
opportunity
to
do
that.
I
want
to
do
that.
We've
we've!
Well,
let
me
see,
let
me
just
let
me
just
continue.
I
never
said
that
everyone
lives
in
harmony
that
breaks
my
heart.
As
a
minister,
I'm
constantly
working
to
see
people
come
together.
My
son
had
a
knife
pulled
on
him
on
last
election.
E
We
could
have
pursued
that
and
made
a
big
deal
I
didn't
want
to,
because
I
thought
all
it
was
going
to
do
was
bring
greater
divide
in
this
city.
What
I
want
to
do
is
bring
that
together.
I've
asked
to
have
meetings
and
been
shut
out.
I've
sought,
after
all
of
anything's,
been
brought
before
me.
I've
dealt
with
and
I'll
continue
to
do.
The
reason
that
I
changed
my
mind
was
because,
when
I
looked
at
this,
it
hurt
the
citizens
of
south
apopka
the
most
as
far
as
the
parking
lot.
E
The
whole
point
of
that
was
so
that
it
would
begin
to
develop
business
and
cause
this
area
to
be
redeveloped.
That
is
my
heart
and
that's,
I
think,
all
of
our
goal,
and
so
this
isn't
I
mean
there
are
there's
leadership
going
on,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
all
the
problems
are
solved.
There
still
needs
to
be.
I
agree
with
those
things
I'd
like
to
work
together.
That's
why
we've
established
a
school
that
ministers
to
250,
kids
and
two-thirds
of
them
are
minority.
E
We've
got
to
stop
listening
to
the
shadowy
voices
and
start
listening
to
our
heart.
I
think
we're
speaking
the
same
thing,
but
we're
c
we're
overcoming
things
that
have
been
here
for
for
for
decades
in
our
in
our
differences.
That's
what
we
need
to
work,
for.
I
will
do
that
I'll
continue
to
do
that
and
the
reason
again
I
stand
by
why
I
made
that
decision.
There's
not
I've
been
accused
of
being
a
good
old
boy,
and
it's
like
by
the
good
old
boys.
E
I
I
I'm
totally
against
a
good
old
boy
system
that
would
begin
to
cause
people
to
the
back
room
deals.
I've
never
had
that.
There's
not
one
person
on
this
deus
up
here.
Not
one
of
them
have
ever
said
something
to
me
behind
the
scenes.
Given
me
so
much
as
a
glance,
a
little
wink
or
a
nod
to
steer
me
any
different
direction.
When
I
come
in
here,
I
only
know
what
I've
studied
and
there's
not
one
person
here
that
has
ever
done
that
with
me
and
I
haven't
with
them.
E
You
know,
and
so
we
do
need
to
fix
some
things.
Don't
take
my
my
my
statements
here
is
to
think
that
we
live
in
shangri-la
or
heaven
yet,
but
I
do
believe
we
have
a
wonderful
community.
I
do
stand
with
our
police
department.
If
there's
something
wrong,
we
need
to
deal
with
it,
absolutely
just
as
in
our
city.
If
it
is,
we
need
to
deal
with
that
there's
a
process.
E
There
are
things
that
can
be
said
and
things
that
can't
be
said,
and
it's
not
to
hide
behind
anything.
I
wish
there's
things
I
wish
I
could
say,
but
because
the
legal
process
is
what
it
is
as
we
were
instructed
earlier,
there
are
things
that
we're
not
allowed
to
do
or
it
could
actually
harm
the
citizens
that
we're
supposed
to
represent.
So
that's
my
heart,
you
know
that
doesn't
mean
we
do
everything
right,
but
we
do
it
the
best
that
we
know.
A
I
want
to
ask
it
too:
thank
you,
okay,
who's,
susan,
okay,
thank
you
all
right.
Next
up
we
have
the
consent
agenda.
We
have
six
six
items
on
the
consent
agenda.
A
Anybody
need
to
pull
any
items,
if
not
like
to
ask
for
a
motion
to
prove
all
six
items
on
the
consent
agenda,
so
got
a
motion
by
commissioner
smith.
Second,.
E
W
W
Good
evening
bobby
howell
planning
manager,
major
development
plan
has
been
submitted
for
a
300
unit,
residential
subdivision,
consisting
of
124
single-family
detached
units
and
176
townhome
units
developed
in
two
phases
located
east
of
south
benion,
road
and
south
of
william
avenue.
The
properties
are
approximately
95.09
acres
in
his
own
pd
by
a
pd
master
plan
that
was
approved
by
the
city
council
on
december
15
2021.
W
The
major
development
plan
is
consistent
with
all
elements
of
the
approved
pd
master
plan,
including
lot
sizes
unit
sizes,
access
and
open
space.
The
development
review
committee
recommends
approval.
The
planning
commission
unanimously
recommends
approval,
and
the
recommended
motion
this
evening
is
to
approve
the
magnolia
terrace
major
development
plan
staff
and
the
applicant
are
available
for
questions.
H
A
Okay,
anybody
from
public-
we
should
speak
on
this
matter,
if
not
we'll
close.
The
public
hearing
look
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
major
or
the
magnolia
terrorist
major
development
plan.
D
P
This
is
a
development
agreement
for
apopka
429,
as
required
by
our
code
for
all
pd
projects.
It
pretty
much
details.
What
are
what
they're
required
to
do
and
I'd
say
the
high
points
of
the
agreement
are
the
transportation
impact
fee
credits
and
the
water
sewer
and
reuse
impact
fee
credits.
I
can
answer
any
questions.
The
applicant
and
his
team
is
here
and
oh,
I
guess
I
should
show
you
where
this
is
on
the
map.
This
is
the
project.
That's.
D
P
A
X
N
All
right,
so
this
is
for
br
arena
approach,
the
city
for
a
lease
of
property
for
soccer
fields,
beach,
volleyball
elite
training.
So
what
we're
looking
at
is
they
requested
space
of
the
city.
They
contacted
community
development,
community,
it's
parks
and
rec
related,
so
community
development
contacted
me
and
I
went
through
some
areas
for
them
to
see.
N
They
were
happy
with
the
east
east
gross,
the
old
little
league
facility,
and
and
so
we
were
able
to
set
up
a
plan
so
again,
no
commitment
today
from
city
council
as
far
as
there's
nothing,
financial,
nothing
legal.
This
is
just
about
negotiating.
N
This
is
what
they
want,
primarily
a
soccer,
an
elite
training
facility
for
primarily
soccer,
but
they
also
have
beach
volleyball
there
any
usage
with
the
site,
so
they
have
some
other
sites
in
their
letter
of
interest.
That
would
still
require
city
approval
based
on
zoning
and
legal,
and
all
that
it's
eight
acres
out
of
the
12
or
so
at
the
site.
37
000
a
year
for
10
years
with
a
10-year
renewal
option
and
we're
requesting
formal
negotiating
approval-
and
this
is
this-
is
not
their
layout.
N
But
this
kind
of
gives
an
idea
of
what
it
could
look
like.
This
is
a
city
layout
that
we
put
in
so
it
accommodates
space
for
water
plant
expansion,
they're,
looking
at
putting
in
around
four
and
a
half
million
dollars
into
the
site,
that's
their
money
that
they're
putting
in
that's,
not
city
money
and
then,
like
I
said
we
just
we
get.
We
get
paid
rent
on
the
site,
so
we're
just
looking
to
have
approval
of
city
council
to
for
us
to
go
forward
with
negotiating
the
lease.
A
E
N
I
don't
know
they're
just
not
necessarily
there
for
their
training,
so.
N
N
Those
that
represents
beach,
volleyball.
N
E
N
That's
water,
plant
expansion,
that's.
N
Yeah
they'll,
yeah
they'll,
add
bathrooms
to
their
site.
The
bathrooms
are
looking
concession
there.
N
N
A
Okay
yeah
now.
Well
I
want
to
thank
brian
and
vlad.
For
you
know,
vlad
was
one
kind
of
got
us
the
design.
Here
I
don't
that's
what
it'll
end
up
being
eventually,
but
you
know
it's
it's
a
revenue
source
for
us
and
additional
fields
for
our
kids,
as
well
as
kids
from
all
over
the
area
that
can
come
play
and
the
only
unfortunate
part
about
this
whole
the
whole
project
there.
I
don't
know
if
you
know
this
problem,
but
that's
where
I
played
pony
baseball.
That
was
my
pony
baseball
field.
C
A
But
anyway,
so
no,
I
appreciate
you
know
brian
and
vlad
have
done
a
lot
of
work.
You
know
trying
to
negotiate.
I
know
we've
got
kind
of
a
semi-agreement
we're
working
through
michael's
kind
of
putting
the
finishing
touches
on
an
agreement
and
a
great
group
out
of
brazil
and
they're
trying
to
kind
of
make
this
a
nationwide.
You
know
we'll
be
one
of
many
sites,
and
so
it
could
be
a
long
term
could
be
some
some
decent
economic
activity
for
people
coming
in.
A
N
They
reached
out
to
they
reached
out
to
community
development.
They
were
just
looking
for
space
in
in
the
city.
They
they're
looking
in
space
all
over
central
florida
from
here
haines
city
out
towards
tampa
they've,
been
all
over.
I
think
they're
looking
to
expand
into
texas,
too
they're,
just
moving
in
from
brazil
they're
trying
to
move
into
the
united
states,
so
they
were
looking
at
central
florida
area
and
just
looking
for
for
land
that
they
could
use.
U
A
X
Okay,
roger's
back
at
7
west
main
street.
I
think
it
is
a
great
opportunity,
but
I
think
we
are
neglecting
the
fact
that
different
football
programs
use
this
field
during
the
football
season
for
practice
and
things
that
nature
so
at
least
consideration
on
maybe
leaving
an
area
for
what
they
do.
X
I
don't
know
if
they
lease
it
or
use
it
free,
but
the
more
and
more
I
see
this
is
is
great
for
the
city,
but
it's
it's
a
revenue
source
for
you
guys,
but
it
also
puts
a
burden
on
someone
else,
put
a
burden
on
someone
else,
because
majority
sports
already
cost
a
lot
of
money
and
they
always
try
and
look
for
places
to
use
the
field
and
all
those
particulars.
So
hopefully
you
can
kind
of
take
into
account
whether
you
know
the
pad
with
four.
X
Maybe
it
can
be
still
a
parking
part,
a
pocket
park
that
would
maybe
still
meet
the
needs
of
the
average
citizen
that
just
want
to
go
out
and
throw
a
ball.
Because
at
this
point,
if
you
lived
in,
I
guess
the
city
center
of
apopka,
you
got
to
go
away
to
northwest
rec
or
over
to
edwardsville.
X
I
guess
you
there's
really
no
place
for
somebody
that
can
get
out
and
run
so
I
think
we
need
to
at
least
take
into
account
some
of
the
things
the
features
for
communities
that
don't
have
parker
parks
and
things
in
open
space
of
that
nature.
I
know
you've
mentioned
several
times
about
open
passive
space,
but
we
need
to
take
account
what
people
are
using
for
now
and
because
everybody
got
to
always
pay
for
some
and
you're
still
paying
taxes,
so
at
least
take
into
account
for
people.
X
That's
there
from
usually
june
is
when
they
start
up
their
football
season
to
november,
but
I
know
every
afternoon
five
or
six
o'clock
you
have
teams
out
there
practicing
on
the
south
side
where
dream
lake
is
as
well
as
the
north
side.
So
hopefully
you
can
kind
of
bring
that
into
the
fold.
Thank
you.
X
I'm
just
going
by
what
I
see
when
I'm
driving,
so
I
don't
know
if
they
know
this
or
not
or
if
you
charge
them
to
use
those
fields,
I'm
not
sure
what
I'm
just
saying.
What
I
see
just
I
saw
a
guy
out
there
with
his
kids,
throwing
the
ball
around
pulling
tires,
I'm
just
saying
just
for
the
average
person
they
don't
have
to
pay
just
to
play,
there's
only
getting
there.
Thank
you.
M
A
A
L
Number
2895
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida
amending
the
future
land
use
element
of
the
apopka
comprehensive
plan
of
the
city
of
apopka.
Changing
the
future
land
use,
designation
from
commercial
to
mixed
use
for
certain
real
property,
located
north
of
east
cemeron,
boulevard
and
west
of
sheila
avenue,
comprising
5.67
acres,
more
or
less
and
owned
by
3r
corp,
providing
for
severability
and
for
an
effective
date.
A
E
U
U
E
A
B
Lot
of
the
shopkins
senate.
P
We
don't
know
for
certain
right
now,
but
I
have
been
talking
with
the
applicant
and
proposing
to
them
what
I
think
are
going
to
be
their
access
options.
P
P
A
P
Yeah
it's
this
is,
I
mean:
we've
had
conversations
with
kim
and
shane
the
owner,
and
I
have
tried
I've
reached
out
to
the
the
folks
next
door.
P
They
they
don't
really
want
to
do
apartments,
but
they'd
like
to
do
development,
and
I
think
they're
going
to
come
in
and
talk
to
us
because
they
need
this
project
to
do
cross-access
and
that
cross-access
is
going
to
go
to
monroe
and
the
shopping
center.
I
think
that
we'll
be
able
to
find
good
access
for
everyone.
L
Ordinance
number
2896
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida
amending
the
future
land
use
element
of
the
apopka
comprehensive
plan
of
the
city
of
apopka.
Changing
the
future
land
use,
designation
from
county
rural
to
city,
industrial
for
certain
real
property
located
north
of
east
keene,
road
and
west
of
claircone
road
comprising
12.74
acres,
more
or
less
and
owned
by
aed,
doer
nursery
2019
trust
providing
for
severability
and
for
an
effective
date.
A
N
A
I
got
it
ordinance
number
2897.
A
M
A
J
L
Ordinance
number
2899
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida
to
extend
its
territorial
and
municipal
limits
to
annex
pursuant
to
florida
statute.
171.044
the
here
and
after
described,
lands
situated
and
being
in
orange
county
florida
owned
by
gnb
sorrento
llc,
located
north
of
west
kelly
road
park,
west
kelly
park,
road
and
east
of
plymouth,
sorrento
road
providing
for
directions
to
the
city,
clerk,
severability
conflicts
and
an
effective
date.
B
B
E
F
E
Okay,
so
yeah.
Basically,
what
I
wanted
to
do
is
just
bring
back
just
to
our
attention,
just
something
that's
that's
been
important
for
me
all
along
and
just
looking
digging
into
the
reserve
policy
guidelines
from
the
the
gfoa
and
going
back
I
I
wish
I
had
gone
back
and
and
reprinted
for
everybody.
The
proposal
I
put
back
in
2017
at
the
time.
If
you
remember
I
spoke
with
actually
was
robert
e
lee,
not
the
one
we
would
all
think
of
right
off
the
bat.
E
Dr
robert
t
e
lee
bob
was
assistant
professor
of
graduate
school
political
science,
florida
gulf
coast
university
bottom
line
was
when
I
was
first
starting
to
serve.
We
had
the
opportunity,
through
florida
league
of
cities
for
different
training.
For
us,
as
leaders-
and
I
know
different
ones
of
us
have
gone
through
that,
and
we
were
dealing
with
issues
then,
and-
and
so
I
proposed
some
questions
to
him
and
he
basically
reaffirmed
these
different
things
that
I
thought
that
I
understood
in
reading
this.
E
So
I
wanted
us
just
to
not
necessarily
we
don't
have
to
go
in
depth
here
other
than
to
to
look
at
here's.
The
reasoning
behind
that
why
I
believe
we
need
to
set
a
policy,
it's
actually
recommended
that
we
have
a
policy
and
then
there's
recommendations
in
how
to
approach
that
and
that's
up
to
interpretation
for
every
single
city.
E
So
I'm
going
to
try
and
keep
this
brief
because
it's
been
a
longer
night
for
everybody,
but
the
fund
balance
guidelines
for
the
general
fund.
This
is
what
was
emailed
to
you.
Just
wanted
to
touch
on
a
couple
of
things
on
page
2
of
6
gfoa
recommends
that
governments
establish
a
formal
policy
on
the
level
of
unrestricted
fund
balance
that
should
be
maintained
in
the
general
fund
for
gaap
and
budgetary
purposes
going
on
down
appropriate
level,
and
this
is
where
I
think,
there's
confusion
again.
E
There's
difference
of
of
opinion
on
this
from
different
financial
people.
So
this
is
where
we
all
just
take
this
in
and
look
at
all
of
these
pieces
and
say
what
fits
for
us
and
that's
the
bottom
line
appropriate
level.
The
adequacy
of
unrestricted
fund
balances
that
in
the
general
fund
should
take
into
account
each
government's
own
unique
circumstances
and
that's
the
real
key
again,
for
example,
governments
that
may
be
vulnerable
to
natural
disasters,
which
we
are
more
dependent
on
a
volatile
revenue
source
and
and
that
we're
trying
to
get
to
something
stable.
E
I
think
we've
all
been
working
on
that.
What
is
the
level
of
service-
and
we
don't
have
that
answer-
so
it's
still
a
little
bit
in
flux,
but
I
don't
think
that
one's
a
big
issue
necessarily
for
us
but
also
potentially
subject
to
cuts
in
state
aid
and
or
federal
grants,
may
need
to
maintain
a
higher
level
in
the
unrestricted
fund
balance
going
on
to
the
next
page.
On
page
three
in
in
that
first
paragraph,
if
you
start
the
word,
nevertheless,
gfoa
recommends
at
a
minimum
underlying
that
word.
Minimum.
E
That
to
me,
is
the
starting
point:
we're
building
a
house
that
to
me
is
the
foundation.
Every
house
has
to
have
that
and
we
can't
build
a
slab
and
say:
we've
got
a
house,
it's
something
to
build
on,
but
again
as
a
minimum
that
the
general
purpose
government,
regardless
of
size,
maintain
unrestricted
budgetary
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund
of
no
less
than
two
months
of
regular,
regular
general
fund
operating
revenues
or
regular
general
fund
operating
expenditures.
E
Anybody
who's
listened
to
dave
ramsey.
We
know
that's
like
his
his
three
to
six
months.
Listen,
we
know
that's
the
standard
for
the
minimum
when
we
go
to
figure
out
what
is
that
number
for
us?
Where
does
that
need
to
be
so?
I
think
we
would
all
agree
in
that.
My
concern
is
that
their
recommendations,
beyond
that
we
haven't
really
parsed
into
that
to
really
see
why
I'm
pulling
for
a
little
bit
higher.
So
let
me
just
jump
down
number
six
there
just
a
couple
sentences
later.
It
says.
E
Furthermore,
a
government's
particular
situation
often
may
require
a
level
of
unrestricted
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund
significantly
in
excess
of
this
recommended
minimum
level.
So
again,
it's
subjective
right
now,
but
it
shows
that
there
are
situations
where
it
should
possibly
be
significantly
higher.
Is
that
what
we
need?
That's
the
question
you
know
I'd
like
for
us
as
a
as
a
group
to
be
able
to
work
through
and
and
get
the
the
corporate
mindset
on
that.
E
In
any
case,
such
measures
should
be
applied
with
within
the
context
of
long-term
forecasting,
therefore,
thereby
avoiding
the
risk
of
placing
too
much
emphasis
upon
the
level
of
unrestricted
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund
at
any
one
time,
so
the
flexibility
factor,
if
you
remember,
when
I
made
the
presentation
back
in
2017,
I
researched
it,
I
found
some
different
ones,
actually,
a
city
out
of
out
of
california,
that
they
had
done
the
same
process
and
then
looking
at
the
cities
around
us.
E
V
E
E
So
I
mean
I'm
looking
through
these
like
winter
park,
so
29.52
claremont,
25.1,
ocoee
46,
an
assigned
fund
balance,
they're
they're,
just
kind
of
all
over
the
board.
One
was
even
as
high
as
60
percent.
They
address
what
to
do
if
it's
too
high.
I
do
believe
that
there's
a
point
where
it's
too
high
and
where
we're
we're
hamstringing
ourselves
from
monies
that
we
can
use
for
things
that
we
should
use
them
on.
But
when
I'm,
when
I
made
the
recommendation,
I
tried
to
be
conservative
in
that
and
really
give
us
room.
E
So
what
I
had
looked
at
the
cities
that
we
were
kind
of
comparing
ourselves
to
at
the
time
things
that
we
wanted
to
be
aspired
to
be
they
were
all
in
the
30
to
35
percent
range.
I
suggested
25
so
as
not
to
try
and
just
push
it
to
the
ultimate
limit.
I
also
recommended
that
we
give
ourselves
a
five-year
window
to
renew
those
funds.
So
again
it
wasn't
that
we
can
never
use
them
when
we
have
a
need.
E
An
infrastructure
need
a
community
need,
that's
important
enough,
that
we
do
go
ahead
and
utilize
those,
but
I
just
want
that
policy
of
what
are
we
going
to
do
to
make
sure
they
get
put
back,
because
I
don't
want
to
be
underinsured.
If
that's,
you
know
a
way
to
look
at
it,
you
know
the
more
assets
you
have.
You
need
insurance
man,
it's
tempting
to
take
those
premiums
and
pay
them
on.
You
know
you
got
to
get
new
new
shoes
for
the
kids
or
whatever.
E
That
is,
you
know
the
practical
things
of
life,
but
we
put
ourselves
in
a
dangerous
place.
So
let
me
just
quickly
go
through
the
rest
of
this
and
then
the
second
thing
that
you
have
there,
which
I
think
we
can
look
at
then
and
go
from
there-
is
a
reserve
policy.
Why
is
it
important?
E
The
size
of
government
reserves
acceptable
uses
of
reserves
and
it's
basically
a
template
that,
if
maybe
in
the
future,
we
can
do
a
workshop
situation
where
we
do
take
these
boil
it
down
a
little
bit
more
and
come
up
with
something
that
I
believe
is
safe.
Moving
forward
to
safeguard
us
as
a
city
that
we
have
a
policy
which
is
recommended
by
the
the
gfoa
and
others
so
again,
picking
up
where
we
were
on
page
three
of
six
of
the
first
document,
such
measure
should
be
applied
within
the
I'm
sorry.
E
I
read
that
next
sentence
in
establishing
a
policy
governing
the
level
of
unrestricted
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund.
A
government
should
consider
a
variety
of
factors
including,
and
they
listed
several
here-
first
one,
the
predictability
of
its
revenues
and
the
volatility
of
its
expenditures.
So
again,
that's
something
that
we
have
to
look
at
and
be
subjective
about.
How
does
that
affect
us?
Do
we
have
certain
volatility
within
our
budget
that
we
need
to
look
out
for?
E
I
know
we
did
this
last
with
our
last
budget,
because
we
knew
we
need
to
advance
in
police
and
fire,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
and
not
just
spend
that
also
that
we
would
have
it
to
try
and
make
steps
forward.
We
well.
Let
me
keep
going
here
and
I'll
get
to
my
next
point.
It's
perceived.
This
is
number
two
perceived
exposure
to
significant
one-time
outlays.
Such
as
disasters,
immediate
capital
needs
and
state
budget
cuts,
we
actually
faced
the
disasters
after
this
was
presented.
E
E
I
believe
to
recoup
the
monies
that
fema
promised
and
that's
what
I
had
mentioned
at
the
time
I
had
found
different
ones
said
they
had
taken
it
up
to
five
years
to
get
those
monies
back,
so
we
want
to
have
the
buffer
in
case
we're
in
that
situation,
and
we
have
that
one-time
incident
that
we
can
deal
with
whatever
we
need
to
until
those
monies
come
back
and
then
they
replenish
it
again.
All
of
those
decisions
are
we
have
the
reserves.
How
much
do
we
want
to
dig
into
them?
E
You
know
we
can
as
long
as
we
put
them
back
number
three,
a
potential
drain
upon
general
fund
resources
from
other
funds
as
well
as
availability
of
resources
and
other
funds.
That's
that's
typical
to
what
we
deal
with
number
four:
the
potential
impact
on
the
entity's
bond
ratings.
Oh
and
let
me
go
back
number
two
state
budget
cuts.
If
you
remember
they
almost
put
us
in
a
situation
with
the
doubling
the
homestead
exemption
that
would
have
cut
in
was
it
a
million
and
a
half
dollars.
I
think
at
the
time
that
we
didn't
have.
E
C
E
Wise
level
to
go
at
again
number
four,
the
potential
impact
on
the
entity's
bond
ratings
and
the
corresponding
increase
cost
of
borrowed
funds.
Again
I
talked
with
dr
lee
on
that
and
he
said
there
are
certain
things
that
we
should
not
be
putting
on
on
time
anything
really
under
such
as
air
conditioners
cars.
You
know,
vehicles
things
like
that.
E
We
should
be
funding
those
within
our
budget
if
we're
at
a
place
where
we're
beginning
to
borrow
to
cover
those
things,
even
though
they're
historically
low
rates,
he
said
that
is
not
good
policy,
that's
not
good
practice,
and
so
we
were
facing
some
of
those
things
back
then,
and
again,
maybe
like
you,
I
I
had
to
learn
those
things
and
and
that's
how
I
begin
to
to
learn
and
understand
that.
However,
I've
done
budgets
for
several
years-
and
this
is
just
got
a
lot
more
zeros
behind
it.
E
E
The
fund
pal
fund
balance
policy
should
define
conditions
warranting
its
use
and
if
a
fund
balance
falls
below
below
the
government's
policy
level,
a
solid
plan
to
replenish
it,
basically
that
they
talk
about
somewhere
here
describe
the
time
period
over
which
one
that's
not
it.
I'm
sorry.
I
didn't
highlight
that
one,
but
they
pointed
more
towards
a
a
one-year
time
limit
to
try
and
restore
those.
I
had
suggested
it
up
to
a
five
year
which
can
help
it
last
past,
a
single
administration,
so
it
doesn't
hamstring
someone
at
the
same
time.
E
It's
something
that
we
have
put
a
policy
that
says
we
will
aim
to
bring
that
back
to
those
levels
that
keep
us
safe
and
keep
us
covered.
So
that's
the
nuts
and
bolts
the
heart
of
it.
There
again,
you
all
have
had
time
to
look
at
that.
E
I
would
like
to
propose
that
sometime
in
the
future,
we
go
ahead
and
and
have
a
time
that
we
set
whether
it
be
a
workshop,
whether
it
be
something
that
we
want
to
do
here,
if
that's
enough
time
that
we
can
really
dig
into
this
more
that
you
all
have
chance
to
look
at
that
and
maybe
come
up
with
your
own.
E
I
made
that
decision
because
I
felt
like
it
could
better
serve
here
and
work
together
with
these
things.
This
is
something
I'd
like
to
to
leave
behind.
If
that
happens,
and
I
think
it's
something
that's
worth
looking
at,
I
think
we
can
do
what
works
for
us
as
apopka.
We
can
look
at
what
others
do,
but
we
can
tailor
this
to
what
works
for
us
and
doesn't
hold
too
much,
but
doesn't
leave
us
undercover
and
that's
that's
well.
A
E
And
one
thing
I
did
propose
back
in
2017
was
taking
that
25,
but
reserving
a
portion
of
it,
and
I
think
it
talks
about
that
in
this
document
to
reserve
a
portion
of
it
for
things
such
as
storms
and
then
others
for
things.
Whether
you
know
again,
if
we
didn't
have
that
we
wouldn't
have
got
camp,
we
will
now.
Of
course
I
voted
against
that
to
reiterate.
If
everyone
wants
to
throw
darts,
not
because
I
don't
believe
in
it,
I
believe
in
it
greatly,
but
my
concern
was
just
in
other
measures.
E
You
know
the
bottom
line
is
we
were
able
to
do
that
because
it
was
there
for
us
to
dip
into
because
it
was
seen
as
the
whole
as
a
good
move
and
again
afterward
had
you've
been
able
to
share
with
us
all
the
things
you
knew.
E
I
might
have
changed
my
mind,
but
the
bottom
line
is,
you
know
something
that
will
put
us
in
a
position
and
that's
my
three
main
points
is
things
that
we
can't
control
one-time
events,
our
own
volatility
of
our
our
budget
and
the
opportunity
when
they
come
along
that
we
would
have
enough
reserve
that
we
could
move
on
that
on
behalf
of
the
people
and.
A
There
is
250
000
and
we
replenish
every
year.
Obviously
this
year
we've
done
really
well
now,
we'll
have
to
spend
a
lot
more
to
to
get
all
of
it.
But
it's
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
added.
It's
not
not
a
not
a
tree
falling
in
your.
You
know
your
lap,
but
it's
still
it's
something.
It's
an
unexpected
expense.
C
A
H
Yeah
yeah
and
we've
had
this
conversation
before
I
I
don't
on
its
surface.
It's
not
something.
I
would
have
a
whole
bunch
of
friction
towards
it's.
D
H
You
know,
like
the
last
time
that
we
had
our
kafir
presented
to
us.
I
asked
our
auditor
at
the
time.
You
know
what
do
you
think
is
a
healthy
percentage
and
he
said
20
or
higher,
which
is
fine,
but-
and
I
think
you
were
going
towards
us
at
the
end
of
your
comments,
if
you
want
to
build
up
to
25,
to
ensure
those
storm
events
or
forces
of
nature
kind
of
events
where
you
have
because
I'm
just
jotting
down
like
three
things
like
movement
of
people
considerations.
H
So
some
cities
have
bridges
right
that
they're
responsible
for.
N
H
We
don't
really
have
that
from
our
perspective.
Maybe
I
don't
think
john's
road
is
our
road
right
where
the
new
subdivision
is
over
by
marshall
lake,
but
but
point
point
being
is:
if
something
were
to
happen
to
that
bridge
right,
you
have
emergency
access
through
breckenridge,
so
you,
you
kind
of
look
at
it
from
a
movement
of
people,
perspective
roadways,
things
like
that
emergency
services,
obviously
police
fire
personnel
to
be
able
to
service
our
population.
H
E
E
I
came
down
from
that
because
that
we
don't
have
some
things
that
maybe
another
city
has
and-
and
I
recall
that
remember
you're
asking
that
question
and
him
saying
the
20
like
I
said:
different
ones
are
going
to
give
different
standards
and
when
I
talk
to
the
professor
there,
who
does
he
they
actually
teach
cities
and
his
accolades
are
just
amazing
as
far
as
his
background
for
that.
So
it
helped
to
weigh
that
a
little
bit
for
me.
E
But
again,
that's
why
I
think
if
we
have
that
conversation
really
look
and
drill
down
on
that,
you
know
if
apopka
needs
to
be
at
another
place.
I
think
we'll
see
that,
but
I
just
think
that
was
a
good,
maybe
starting
place
point
for
the
conversation.
We
may
look
at
this
and
dig
down
and
say
you
know.
Maybe
we
do
need
to
be
a
little
more
where
claremont
is,
or
or
winter
garden
or
whatever
a
little
bit
higher.
But
again
it's
apples
and
oranges,
sometimes
they're
cities,
but
every
city
is
unique.
E
M
Okay,
so
everyone
has
gotten
an
opportunity
to
speak.
So
yesterday
we
attended
the
discussion
over
at
the
community
center
regarding
the
potential
of
an
annexation
for
south
apopka
and
at
the
end
I
was
not
able
to
share
my
opinion
or
my
thoughts.
So
today
I
took
the
opportunity
to
kind
of
write
something
down
so
as
we
have
given
everyone
else,
a
kind
of
a
platform
to
speak.
M
The
full
city
council
was
present
and
at
the
conclusion
of
the
meeting
three
commissioners
spoke,
but
I
was
not
given
the
opportunity
to
voice
my
opinion
or
give
an
input
into
the
subject
matter
during
the
hours.
Following
the
meeting
that
meeting,
I
received
calls
from
constituents
expressing
their
dissatisfaction
and
concerns
wanting
to
know
why
I
was
not
given
the
opportunity
to
speak,
so
I
would
like
to
share
my
thoughts
following
that
discussion
that
took
place
during
the
hour
and
a
half
public
noticed
community
meeting
during
the
discussion.
M
M
A
The
only
thing
I
want
to
say
I
mean
you
weren't
silenced,
I
just
the
letter
of
the
law
was
11
o'clock
and
we,
we
probably
should
have
cut
off
a
speaker
earlier
since
you'd
had
time.
I
I
I
agreed
it
wasn't
my
meeting
and
I
and
I
I
would.
I
would
agree
that
you
should
have
the
opportunity
to
speak,
but
we
went
literally
went
past
11
o'clock,
which
was
not
illegal
with
our
legal
notice.
We
we
we
passed
our
time
that
we
we
could
be
together
as
a
as
a
commission.
A
So
I
I
apologize
for
it
wasn't
my
meeting,
but
but
I
understand
your
frustration
so.
M
It
wasn't
that
I
was
frustrated,
it
was
once
I
got
home.
I
did
start
to
get
a
text
and
then
I
got
some
calls
and
they
said
we
never
heard
from
you.
So
as
a
representative,
the
constituents
had
a
right
to.
M
And
so
all
I
could
say
was
the
meeting
was
over,
but
throughout
the
day
I
was
getting
phone
calls
and
again
they
kept
saying
we
didn't
hear
from
you.
What's
your
stance,
I
am
a
candidate,
I'm
a
commissioner,
but
I'm
also
a
candidate
running
in
the
next
election
and
the
representatives
part
of
that
discussion
was
to
hear
from
all
of
us.
M
That
was
the
purpose
of
the
meeting
that
the
president
of
the
chamber
had
was
because
they
were
asking
her
for
our
positions,
and
so
she
organized
this
so
that
we
can
express
our
positions
and
three
of
the
commissioners
were
able
to
do
that
and
and
actually
the
one
that's
actually
have
running
for
election
was
not
able
to
do
it
so
today,
I'm
I
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
share
my
my
opinion,
or
you
know,
share
my
thoughts
of
what
I
felt
the
meeting
was
about
and
what
I
took
away
from
the
meeting.
M
So
today
I
get
the
opportunity
for
those
who
are
listening
via
the
youtube
and
for
those
that
are
still
remaining
here.
This
is
my
opinion
of
what
I
took
away
from
that
meeting
yesterday.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
Well
just
to
follow
up,
but
you
know
if
I
would
have
known
that
I
would
have
gladly
given
that
time
I
apologize.
I
would
have
preferred
to
allow
you
for
those
very
reasons
and
my
understanding
is
that,
because
it's
a
noticed
meeting,
we
will
get
in
trouble
if
it
goes
beyond
that
not
to
try
and
shut
you
out.
I
wish
I
had
not
talked
as
long.
Maybe
you
would
have
gotten
in
there.
So
I'm
glad
you're
able
to
express
that
as
well.
That's
it
and.
E
B
And
I'm
just
going
to
say,
commissioner,
the
last
question:
I
noticed
that
you
were
not
going
to
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
and
I
was
getting
the
attention
of.
B
It
wasn't
anything
personal
at
you.
Just
time
expired,
and
so
we
we're
glad
to
hear
your
position
and
your
comments
here
tonight
and
lastly,
I'm
just
going
to
say
that
I
did
spend
a
couple
days
in
tallahassee
last
week
I
was
able
to
speak
to
some
of
my
senators
and
our
representatives
and
was
well
received
by
all
of
them
that
I
spoke
with
and
some
things
that
we
addressed
was
rental,
assistance
and
workforce
housing.
B
That's
become
a
very
necessity
throughout
the
state
of
florida,
and
especially
here
in
our
very
own
city,
and
we
talked
about
sovereign
immunity
that
there's
a
bill
that
could
hurt
our
cities
if
it's
passed,
and
so
we
did
present
them
what
they
compromised
and
we
just
have
to
wait
and
see
which
way
they
decide
to
go
with
it.
But
we
also
congratulate
them
on
the
things
that
they
were
doing
to
support
their
local
cities
and.
B
Which
is
going
to
be
of
help
to
our
cities
as
well
and
so
overall
was
well
received
and
was
glad
to
have
the
opportunity
to
go
great.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
K
I
understand
I
need
to
need
to
double
check
that,
but
the
meeting
is
noticed:
it's
a
no
it's
a
meeting
time
that
there'll
be
a
public
meeting.
Usually
there
isn't
an
end
time
at
a
say,
a
public
meeting
like
like
this
meeting
tonight.
It
goes
until
it's
it's
adjourned,
but
that
I
will
double
check.
However,
because
it
was
not.
K
The
meeting
was
not
a
city
meeting
that
was
a
private
meeting
which
they
invited
commission
members
in
order
to
comply
with
sunshine
law.
You
have
to
notice
it
to
the
public
that
that
two
or
more
commissioners
may
be
will
be
present
and
therefore
because
they're
present
or
to
comply
with
sunshine,
they
may
speak.
We've.
K
H
Okay,
so
just
for
future
reference,
because
if
we
have
community
meetings
like
that
going
forward,
we
should
just
listen
a
begin
time
because
then
there's
no
time-bound
nature
to
it.
But
my
my
hang
up
is
talking
about
it.
Wasn't
a
city
meeting,
because
the
public
notice
that
went
in
the
sentinel
says
notice
is
hereby
given
that
the
city
of
apopka
and
the
committee
of
one
apopka
outreach
will
host
a
committee
meeting
on
tuesday
february
15th,
so
that
screams
that
we
hosted
that
so
who,
from
the
city
of
apopka,
is
the
host
of
that
meeting.
A
Well,
I'll
give
you
the
answer
right.
You
know
when,
when
kate
put
the
meeting
together,
she
said
you
know
I'd
like
to
do
this
meeting
and-
and
she
said
what
about
you
know
inviting
the
commissioners
as
well.
If
they
don't
want
to
invite
them,
I
want
to
be
able
to
speak,
so
I
mean
I'll
take
full
credit
that
you
know.
I
noticed
it
so
that
you
could
come
to
the
meeting
and
speak
otherwise.
We
just
all
sat
there
and
said
nothing.
A
So
I
without
counsel
I'm
michael,
I
just
I
took
one
of
our
public
notices
from
susan
and
just
put
put
some
times
and
dates
on
it
and
and
send
it
to
the
sentinel
we
were.
We
were,
you
know
bound
by.
You
know
I
had
have
enough
time
to
get
it
in
the
paper,
so
it
was
not
a
you
know
just
to
give.
I
could
have
just
not
noticed
it
and
we'd
all
sat
there
and
said
nothing
or
I
gave
you
the
opportunity
to
speak.
A
H
A
Okay,
at.
A
All
right,
brian,
I
know
you're
going
to
be
here
this
late
once
you
come
up.
You
just
help
me
with
this,
the
trekking
group,
I
don't,
I
don't
have
any
slides
or
anything
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
brief
you
on
a
we
got.
A
we've.
Had
a
group
come
in
they're
out
of
canada
got
13.
A
Yeah
so
anyway,
what
they
want
to
do
is
they
want
to
get
our
ropes
course
up
and
running
in
in
a
much
more
sophisticated
cool
way
and
want
to
to
partner
with
the
city
at
camp?
We
want.
C
A
N
Yeah
I
mean
they're
looking
to
put
a
lot
of
money
into
camp
wewa
and
and
do
a
lot
a
lot
of
capital
to
create
a
fun
zipline
and
tree
trial,
treat
kind
of
net
course
yeah.
I
didn't
bring
any
slides
to
and
also
upgrade
our
climbing
wall
and
maybe
do
some
stuff
with
our
with
our
boats
and
stuff.
N
As
far
as
operating
goes
but
yeah
it's
I
mean
you're
talking
about
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
of
equipment
into
camp
wealth,
and
then
they
would
operate
that
as
really
to
create
make
camp
we
a
destination
for
people
who
want
to
do
zip
lines.
You
know
outside
of
summer
camp
and
and
in
my
mind,
to
be
something
where
it's
going
to
increase
our
camp
registration.
It's
going
to
increase
our
rental
opportunities
as
a
benefit
to
us.
It's
going
to
put
camp.
N
We
are
really
as
a
as
a
prime
location,
retreats
and
and
company
company
retreats
kids
coming
out
there.
So
it's
a
it's
a
great
opportunity
and
then
you
know
they're
looking
for
a
long-term
investment
that
includes
capital
and
operating.
A
Have
any
questions
we'll
obviously
have
to
have
a
probably
back
next.
C
N
They
have
a
zip
line.
They
have
a
course
in
daytona
beach
and
one
of
their
parks
in
daytona
beach.
I've
been
to
it,
but
olivier
lives,
close
he's,
probably
within
20
minutes
of
here
so.
A
So
we'll
definitely
want
to
have
him
meet
with
each
one
of
you
independently
to
kind
of
go
over
the
program
and
then
we're
working
trying
to
work
through
a
contract
that
so
giving
them
opportunities
to
rent
and
then
us
to
get
equipment
that
we
wouldn't
otherwise
probably
get.
So.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
brian.
I
appreciate
you
hanging
around
for
that.
A
Let's
see
that
was
number
f:
okay,
real
quick,
the
palmer
risser
property.
I
don't
know
if
you
that's
the
property
that
was
on
it's
in
foreclosure
is
now
going
to
auction
on
what
is
the
date
here.
What's
that
march
22nd,
so
it's
the
202
acres,
it
will
go
to
auction
and
they've
got
an
interesting.
It's
a
it's
a
what
they
call
the
there's
a
particular
name
for
the
the
auction.
Where
you
have
somebody.
A
What's
it
called
a
stalking
horse
bitter,
so
there
will
be
a
bidder
that
puts
a
bid
out.
That
will
be
the
minimum
bid.
I
don't
know
how
it
works,
but
anyway,
so
we've
had
quite
quite
a
lot
of
interest.
I
know
they've
talked
to
jim,
they
talked
to
myself
and
edward,
so
I
think
we
will
have
four
or
five
bidders
and
we're
talking
in
the
40
million
range
is
what
this
that
200
acres
will
go
for.
So
a
lot
of
interest
out
there.
A
You
know
it's
because
it's
inside
the
kelly
park,
interchange
so
interesting
things
to
come.
I
think
within
30
days
after
paid
for
the
complete
all
40
million
dollars
has
to
be
paid
within
30
days.
So
interesting,
coming
up,
let's
see
talked
about
the
south
polk
annexation
discussion,
local
bill,
our
local
bill
house,
bill
1431,
is
made
through
all
three
committees.
Now
is
ready
for
the
house
floor
and
then,
if
it,
when
it
gets
off
the
house
floor,
it
goes
to
the
senate.
A
A
Let's
see
city
of
apopka.
I
know
that
susan's
gonna
be
next
next
commission
meeting
we're
gonna
be
going
over
the
edgewood,
greenwood
cemetery
or
the
replatt
or
new
planting
of
all
the
land.
You
know
we're
down
to
like
less
than
25
plots
left
in
our
com,
our
entire
cemetery.
So
she'll
come
to
us
the
next
council
meeting
to
go
over
the
the
plots
and
how
that
will
all
lay
out
for
you,
city
lobbies
will
open
back
up
on
monday.
The
21st
you've
got
the
the
coveted
numbers.
A
A
It
was,
it
was
a
great
band
and
great
weather
and
great,
you
know
great
company,
so
it
was
a.
It
was
a
great
night
to
be
out
at
the
amphitheater.
So
with
that
we'll
call
it
a
night.