►
From YouTube: Apopka City Council Meeting June 15, 2022
Description
Apopka City Council Meeting at City Hall on June 15, 2022 at 7 PM.
To view the meeting agenda visit: http://www.apopka.net/agenda
#ApopkaCityCouncilMeeting #CityofApopkaFL
A
B
B
D
B
And
to
the
republic
for
which
it
stands,
one
nation,
under
god,
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all.
Back
the
other
day
on
june
14
1777
congress
adopted
the
stars
and
stripes
as
official
flag
of
the
united
states.
The
national
flag
was
based
on
a
flag
by
the
continental
army
in
1776,
the
flag
had
13,
red
and
white
alternative
stripes
and
13
stars
represented
the
original
colonists,
which
became
the
first
states
as
new
states
entered
the
union.
B
More
strikes
and
stars
were
added
in
1818,
congress
enacted
their
law
that
the
13
original
strikes
be
restored
and
on
it
stars
he
added
to
represent
the
new
states.
Today
the
flag
has
13
stripes
to
represent
the
original
13
colonies
and
50
stars
to
represent
the
current.
If
the
states
on
june
14
1877
the
flag
day
was
observed
on
the
100th
anniversary
of
the
adoption
of
the
stars
and
stripes,
several.
B
A
F
F
Currently,
you'll
find
the
homeless
sleeping
in
city
parks
in
the
woods,
in
trenches
and
on
church
lawns.
They're
constantly
exposed
to
the
elements
as
they
sleep.
Many
are
vulnerable
to
thunderstorms,
insects
and
snakes
in
the
summer
and
frigid
temperatures
in
the
winter
and
they're
an
open
target
to
anyone
that
wants
to
do
them
harm
the
bottom
line.
Is
this:
the
homeless
need
housing.
F
They
need
a
designated
space.
You
know
there
are
many
homeless
individuals
that
have
regular
jobs,
full-time
jobs,
but
still
they
can't
afford
the
cost
of
the
high
rents
in
this
market.
F
F
F
F
You
have
priorities
such
as
building
a
tax
space,
creating
new
jobs
and
beautifying
the
city,
making
it
an
attractive
place
by
bringing
our
concerns
tonight,
we're
simply
saying,
as
you
move
the
city
forward
as
you
take
it
to
the
next
level
and
place
it
on
the
cutting
edge
that
you
leave.
No
one
behind
leave,
no
one
behind.
G
I
I
Three
years
ago,
when
I
attended
a
meeting
asked
before
I
was
four
years
ago
now,
when
melissa
byrd
first
came
on
board
at
wolf
lake
middle
middle
elementary
school,
don't
recall,
which
and
one
of
the
associate
or
assistant
superintendents
was
there
as
well
indicated
that
the
school
board
had
a
mandate
to
approve
all
new
development.
I
You
know
me
well
enough.
I
went
to
teresa
and
the
barber
right
away
and
I
said,
show
me
the
memo.
Well,
there's
no
memo!
Oh
well.
Can
you
tell
me
the
last
time
in
the
15
years
the
school
board
has
said
no
development
and
there
was
zero.
As
you
know,
I
think
it
was
a
couple
years
ago
for
the
first
time
we
had
an
issue,
I
think,
was
with
hamrick
that
the
school
board
was
in
here
and
doing
it.
We
have
to
get
more
affirmative
in
addressing
this.
I
We
need
to
address
it
with
the
school
board.
Right
now
the
school
board's
indicating
hey.
It's
up
in
tallahassee
if
we
need
to
put
together
a
team
to
go
up
to
tallahassee
in
rattle
cages.
We
do
we
all
know.
It's
been
beaten
to
death
all
the
shootings
in
schools.
When
you
look
at
the
overcrowding,
the
inordinate
amount
of
overcrowding
in
our
schools
here
in
apopka,
we
are
our
target.
You
could
go
up
in
the
stairwell
and
kill
two
or
three
hundred
students
in
the
high
school
tomorrow,
not
tomorrow.
I
I
guess,
if
you're
off
at
school,
you
cannot
move
if
you've
not
stopped
by
the
school
to
look
at
apopka
high
school
at
class
change.
You
can't
move
up
and
down
the
stairwell,
and
I
said
I've
talked
about
before
wolf
lake
middle
all
the
kids
have
to
go
to
the
auditorium
and
they
have
to
go
to
the
gymnasium
at
the
beginning
of
the
day,
so
they
can
be
watched
because
of
all
the
fighting.
There
are
400
over
capacity
now
we
know
the
k
through
eight
on
kel
the
new
kelly
park.
I
I
We
got
one
coming
in
in
2022
and
with
the
development
you
have
the
table
now,
that's
the
12
spaces
for
portables
are
going
to
be
filled.
Probably
within
two
years.
We
can't
continue
to
keep
jamming
kids
into
our
schools,
the
quality
of
education.
You
look
at
many
schools
across
the
country,
even
across
the
state.
I
J
J
J
I
believe
you
believe
that
we're
not
addressing
things
for
all
the
people.
Mr
mayor,
you
know
it.
I
know
it
it's
time
we
talked
about
it.
Why
we
spend
so
much
time
shoving
this
away.
We
get
focused
on
you
know,
you
have
a
you,
have
here's
the
crisis,
you
have.
J
You
have
a
homeless
crisis,
you
have
a
housing
crisis,
you
have
a
mental
health
care
crisis,
you
have
a
problem
with
seniors
and
those
with
disabilities
who,
because
of
their
low
incomes,
can
no
longer
keep
a
roof
over
their
head,
and
all
we
hear
about
is
the
drug
issue.
We
have
here's
a
little
fact
you
might
want
to
consider,
and
I'm
surprised
nobody
has
researched-
that.
The
fact
is
is
that
home
drug
addicts
don't
become
homeless,
homeless
people
become
drug
addicts.
That's
a
fact:
do
you
do
your
research?
J
Why
would
you
believe
a
pastor?
I
can
tell
you
anything
I
want,
but
it's
getting
old
and
brian
I've
known
you
for
a
long
time
you're,
the
mayor.
When
are
you
going
to
actually
do
something
other
than
the
rumor
that
I
recently
heard
that
you
as
mr
mayor
that
you
yourself
want
to
clear
the
homeless
of
apopka
and
clear
them
out
of
apopka?
J
Now
here's
the
thing.
The
only
reason
I
believe
this
was
said
by
somebody
is
because
my
mobile
teams
come
out
here
twice
a
week.
We
are
currently
we
have
added
450
homeless
people
from
apopka
to
our
roles
that
we
are
offering
mental
health
care
to
providing
medications.
With
my
psychiatric
nurse
practitioner,
we've
tried
transportation
to
to
to
appointments
for
medical
medical
care.
J
We
are
helping
people
get
their
id's,
their
birth
certificate,
social
security
card,
social
care
benefits,
va
benefits,
food,
stamps,
phones,
we're
surprised,
providing
everything
they
possibly
need
to
leave
to
to
be
able
to
even
survive,
and
what
we
get
is
we
see
harassment?
We
have
seen
harassment
of
the
homeless.
We've
witnessed
it.
Nobody
can
tell
me
it
doesn't
happen.
I
have
witnesses
with
my
own
eyes,
but
what
sickens
me
even
more
is
that
I've
had
board
members
that
have
gone
out,
people
that
were
vice
president
at
darden.
J
J
This
will
never
change
until
we
come
together
as
a
public
and
private
organizations.
You
got
several
people
in
this
room
that
stood
up
here
that
are
trying
to
do
something.
You've
got
an
organization
that
doesn't
take
a
cent
of
government
money
that
comes
over
here
provides
transportation
for
your
200,
your
450
homeless.
People
provides
all
these
services
and
we
have
to
chase
them
down
day
to
day
because
they
are
being
moved
to
put
place
to
place.
Creating
changing
homelessness
is
not
arresting
it
away,
it
won't
happen.
J
I
don't
care
who
you
are
my
daughter's,
a
police
officer,
so
she
laughs
every
time
she
hears
something
well
just
arrest
them,
then
what
they
spend
three
days,
the
33rd
and
they
get
released
you
baker
at
them.
They
spend
30
days
at
aspire
and
they
get
released,
but
nothing.
There
is
no
follow-up
care.
What
have
you
whatsoever
and
at
some
point
it's
got
to
change.
We
can't
keep
doing
it
the
way
we
do
and
expect
something
different.
H
Good
evening
my
name
is
alex
robinson
live
at
1997
metal,
chris
drive
in
apopka
florida.
I'm
come
tonight
in
reference
to
our
homeowners
association
and
I'm
speaking
in
reference
to
rogers
road,
I'm
a
100
service
connected
veteran.
I
hurt
my
leg
on
the
jump
and
and
I
cannot
walk
long
distance,
I'm
I
use
a
walker
and
I
use
a
scooter,
but
on
rogers
road
there's,
no
sidewalks,
it's
very
serious
because
of
the
fact
I
hope
people
don't.
H
I
hope
that
no
one
loses
their
life
because
I
was
taking
pictures
this
afternoon
and
I
almost
got
hit
twice:
there's
no
sidewalk
to
walk
on
the
road,
there's,
no
lighting.
If
they
come
down
at
night
and
since
I
moved
in
in
2015
and
leicester
ridge,
they
actually
put
in
two
or
three
more
subdivisions
at
the
end
of
that
road.
H
So
you
can
imagine
the
traffic
that's
going
down
that
road
and
it's
coming
down
a
hill
in
which
you
cannot
see
if
you
come
out
of
the
subdivision
and
what
what
I
wanted
to
ask
is:
can
they
put
a
sidewalk
there
for
the
disabled
veterans
and
the
disabled
people,
and
also
people
just
walking
on
the
road
before
someone
lose
their
life,
walking
down
that
road?
H
And
that's
all
I
wanted
to
address
tonight
to
see
what
the
city
of
apopka
can
do
for
this
matter
because,
like
I
said,
I
hope
no
one
loses
their
life
before
something
has
to
be
done
about
the
situation
and
there's
no
sidewalk
whatsoever
on
the
left
side
of
the
road,
nor
goes
down
from
my
sidewalk
to
the
road
of
leicester
ridge
either.
A
Thank
you.
We
got
a
couple
folks
from
our
public
services
are
here
tonight,
so
they'll.
Take
a
note
for
you.
Thank
you.
You're
welcome,
idiot.
Okay,
all
right
consent
agenda.
We've
got
six
items
on
the
consent
agenda.
Anybody
need
to
pull
any
of
those
items.
We've
got
questions
if
not
I'd
like
to
see
a
motion
to
approve
the
six
consent
agenda
items
so
got
a
motion
by
commissioner
smith.
Second,
second
by
commissioner
nesta,
all
those
in
favor
aye.
C
E
Good
evening,
the
item
for
you
today
at
this
present
time
is
a
request
to
waive
the
time
limits
for
resubmittal
of
a
petition
pursuant
to
section
2.4.12
d,
1
a
of
the
land
development
code.
This
item
is
a
quasi-judicial
procedural
matter,
so,
first
put
on
notice
to
those
there
will
be
no
public
comment.
E
E
E
The
petitioner
said:
southwick
commons
is
requesting
that
their
matter
that
was
presented
before
the
council
in
get
the
right
date,
but
I
believe
it
was
in
may
or
april
sorry
be
reconsidered
by
the
city
council.
The
matter
that
was
considered
was
a
request
to
amend
the
development
agreement
for
the
city
center
project
to
remove
language
that
was
affecting
their
application
under
the
land
development
code.
Any
matter
that
is
brought
before
the
council
for
a
public
hearing
cannot
be
resubmitted
to
the
council
for
a
time
period
of
one
year.
E
The
four
criteria
for
such
a
waiver
include
one
that
there's
a
substantial
change
in
circumstances
relevant
to
the
issues
or
facts
considered
during
review
of
the
prior
application
that
might
reasonably
affect
the
decision-making
body's
application.
Other
relevant
review
standards
to
the
development
proposed
in
the
new
application.
E
E
Three,
the
new
application
proposed
to
be
submitted
is
materially
different
from
the
prior
application
or
four.
The
final
decision
on
the
prior
application
was
based
on
a
material
mistake
of
fact,
the
petitioners
have
submitted
their
request
and
have
submitted
that
they
meet
standards.
One
two
or
four,
the
main
impetus
of
their
request
is
that
they
have
are
now
stating
that
section
760.26
florida
statutes
deems
that
the
development
agreement
as
written
is
violative
of
the
statute,
in
that
it
purportedly
discriminates
on
the
basis
of
source
of
funding.
E
E
We
are
not
here
to
re-litigate
the
basis
of
their
application.
We
are
not
here
to
re-litigate
any
substantive
matters
regarding
their
their
application.
The
only
matters
to
be
presented
and
decided
upon
here
tonight
are
whether
or
not
the
applicant
meets
one
of
the
four
criteria
to
be
reheard
under
the
land
development
code
they
require.
In
order
for
such
a
matter
to
be
adopted
to
be
passed
and
re-heard.
E
The
code
requires
two-thirds
of
this
council
to
vote
in
the
affirmative.
Two-Thirds
constitutes
four
votes,
so
four
of
you
must
vote
in
the
affirmative
to
reconsider
the
matter.
If
such
a
vote
is
taken,
and
this
council
elects
to
reconsider
the
matter,
the
matter
will
be
brought
at
the
next
scheduled
public
hearing
next
scheduled
council
meeting,
in
which
the
application
will
be
reconsidered.
E
L
Thank
you
mayor
and
commissioners
for
your
time
this
evening,
rebecca
wilson,
215
north
iola
drive
here
on
behalf
of
southwick.
I
agree
with
your
attorney
that
tonight
we're
here
asking
you
to
consider
to
consider
the
reconsideration
of
our
application,
which
was
to
amend
the
restated
development
agreement
with
southwick
commons
for
the
12.82
acre
apartment
site
in
order
to
allow
affordable
housing.
L
I
agree
with
your
your
attorney
with
regard
to
the
code
sections
that
are
applicable,
as
he
stated.
L
We
believe
that
we
meet
the
criteria
set
forth
in
number
one
that
there's
been
a
change
in
the
relevant
facts
in
number:
two
that
there's
additional
information
that
might
reasonably
affect
the
decision-making
of
this
body
and
number
four,
that
the
final
decision
on
the
the
application
was
based
on
a
material
mistake
of
fact,
since
the
meeting
on
may
4th,
we
have
provided
to
the
city
attorney
two
state
statutes
that
we
believe
should
have
been
considered
statute,
760
760.26,
which
makes
it
unlawful
to
discriminate
in
land
use
decisions
or
in
permitting
of
development
based
on
race,
color,
national
origin,
sex,
disability,
familial
status,
religion
or
except,
is
otherwise
provided
by
law.
L
The
source
of
financing
of
a
development
or
a
proposed
development,
our
request
went
right
to
the
source
of
financing
and
then
secondly,
we've
also
provided
him
with
section
712.065,
which
requires
the
extinguishment
of
discriminate,
discriminatory
restrictions,
and
we
have
letters
that
have
briefed
him
on
our
legal
opinion
on
those
matters.
We
wanted
to
bring
this
back
to
the
board
in
order
to
give
this
group
the
option
to
rehear
this
matter
and
change
that
decision,
since
the
may
4th
denial
and
I'll
put
these
letters
in
the
record.
K
Obviously,
the
first
time
around
it
was
a
three
to
two
vote.
I
don't
know
if
hearing
it
again
will
change
that
vote.
K
I
think
it
will
just
delay
it
again,
but
what
I
would
like
to
know
is:
if
you
don't
get
the
vote
tonight,
what
would
be
the
next
step
for
wendover's
corporation?
What
would
be
his
next
step?
Well,.
M
Well,
that
was
definitely
part
of
the
discussion
there.
But
again
to
me,
our
responsibility
with
those
who
have
already
been
there
presently
was:
was
the
developers
agreement
and
going
back
on
that
one
of
the
key
issues
there
was
the
market
rate,
so
the
fact
that
that
other
was
discovered
or
discussed.
As
part
of
that,
I
don't
see
that
that
information
wasn't
available
at
that
time.
M
I
mean
I
hear
you
bringing
it
forward
now
as
an
argument
against
that,
but
I
think
we
still
have
the
whole
of
the
issue,
so
I
don't
think
that
was
the
criteria
or
only
that,
at
least
in
my
my
decision-making
process,
so
I'm
having
a
tough
time
getting
to
that
bar
on
on
these
different
ones.
I
guess
I
would
like
to
ask
concerning
that.
M
Up
this
other
statute,
760
point
wherever
it
is
0.26
that
was
already
available
at
that
time
is
the
argument
that.
L
C
K
E
So
this
isn't
like
this
isn't
a
legislative
action
that
was
adopted
in
between
or
s
shortly,
subsequent
to
the
council's
first
action
on
the
application,
so
that
it
was
not
considered
is
not
really
a
basis,
but
that
it's
the
the
basis
under
one
and
under
one
two
is
either
new
or
additional
information
that
is
available.
E
That
was
not
available
at
the
time
of
review
and
as
to
subsection,
two
7626
was
available
that
the
applicant
did
not
present
it
at
the
time
for
it
to
be
considered,
it
was
available
for
review
that
it
wasn't
that
it
was
reviewed
or
not.
I
would
press
into
issue
that
I
think
that's
an
issue
of
law
that
has
not
been
determinatively
decided
by
the
courts
of
the
state
of
florida,
and
it
is
actually
my
position
that
I
think
that
some
of
the
language
in
760.26
may
be
inconsistent
with
federal
jurisprudence.
E
In
regards
to
the
fair
housing
act
and
how
it
is
to
be
interpreted
in
regards
to
source
of
funding,
especially
with
that
caveat
in
7626,
which
is
accepted
as
otherwise
provided
by
law,
that's
for
the
courts
to
decide
and
no
court
in
florida
has
decided
yet
on
the
language.
There's
no
court
rulings
on
760.26
for
the
record.
I
want
to
respond
also,
because
council
raised
that
the
other
issue
that
should
have
been
considered
was
section
7,
12
point
last
year,
065
right
now,
council
is
correctly
reading.
E
Subsection
2
of
712065,
which
is
a
discriminatory
restriction,
is
not
enforceable
in
this
state
and
all
discriminatory
restrictions
contained
in
any
title
transaction
recorded
in
the
state
are
unlawful,
aren't
enforceable
and
are
declared
null
and
void.
Any
discriminatory
restriction
contained
in
a
previously
recorded
title
transaction
is
extinguished
and
severed
from
the
record
recorded
title
transaction
and
the
remainder
of
the
title
transaction
remains
enforceable
and
effective.
E
E
Hence
the
source
of
the
funding.
When
it
comes
to
source
of
funding
and
decision,
then
land
use
matters.
The
11th
circuit,
which
is
the
federal
circuit
that
governs
the
state
of
florida,
has
been
all
over
the
place
in
making
determinations
whether
or
not
there
are
certain
where
there
is
a
claim
of
a
discriminatory
intent
when
it
comes
to
in
certain
federal
cases
in
regards
to
public
housing,
sorry
subsidized
housing
or
low-income
housing.
E
E
It
calls
into
question
that
this
this
would
not
be
applicable,
and
I
think
the
intent
of
712
712
is
is
basically
to
eliminate
certain
deed
restrictions
that
may
have
existed
prior
to
the
1960s
and
they're
out
there
in
where
neighborhoods
prohibited
african
americans
from
purchasing
homes
prominently
and-
and
I
mean
where
I'm
from
south
florida-
there
were
many
deed
restrictions
that
prohibited
jews
from
owning
property.
So
it's
those
private
deed
restrictions
that
are
deemed
null
and
void
under
712..
E
Now
the
issue
is
to
the
issue
and
what's
at
issue
in
this
case
and
in
their
request,
is
the
language
in
regards
to
the
source
of
funding.
I
don't
believe
712
covers
that,
because
that
is
not
a
classification
that
has
been
deemed
at
least
in
the
federal
courts
as
one
that
is,
that
warrants
the
same
protection
as
race,
national
origin,
religion,
disability
that
doesn't
that
doesn't
fall
there.
E
That
says
that
local
governments
may
still
take
into
consideration
and
made,
and
it's
not
deemed
discrimination
if
a
project
to
sudden
deny,
if
there's
a
denial
of
a
project
for
affordable
housing,
if
the
city
intends
to
reduce
or
not
have
a
cons,
a
high
concentration
of
affordable
housing
within
their
jurisdictions.
So
there's
certain
caveats
in
in
those
other
two
states
that
have
similar
laws
to
what
florida
attempted
florida,
I
believe,
is
overbroad
and
over
vague,
but
that's
for
the
courts
to
decide.
E
L
Mayor
may
I
just
because
there's
a
clear
lack
of
understanding
of
how
these
two
laws
work
together
and
and
generally
the
jurisprudence
of
of
fair
housing.
Let
me
first
get
to
the
point.
I
think
we
very
squarely
fall
within
number
four
and
we
only
have
to
meet
one
criteria
and
that's
the
final
decision
that
this
board
made
was
based
on
a
material
mistake
of
fact,
and
I
do
believe
that
you
have
been
led
to
believe
that
the
decision
you
made
was
lawful,
not
discriminatory
and
is
not
violative
of
these
florida
statutes.
L
L
M
Well
again,
I
don't
understand
if
this
was
already
available,
why
it
wasn't
brought
up
to
try
and
refute
that
when
we
were
discussing
it
before
so,
but
to
me
again,
it's
we've
made
an
agreement
with
those
and
others
who
have
already
invested
there.
We
can't
have
the
the
bully
factor
come
in
that
you
know.
M
We
have
the
right
to
go
this
way,
regardless
of
what
you've
already
agreed
with
others.
We
are
very
open
to
the
product
that
is
produced
and
if
we
were
doing
this
across
the
board
in
this
city,
I'd
throw
a
fit,
because
we
do
need
that
workforce,
housing
and
those
different
things
it's
the
problem
is
we've
already
made
an
agreement
with
the
public
about
this
and
the
standard
there.
M
The
expectation
is
just,
I
didn't
see
it
being
met
in
the
argument,
so
that
was
my
criteria
not
based
upon
these
other
particular
issues,
though
they
were
discussed.
You
know.
L
So
I
I
think
our
point
is:
if,
if
you
make
an
agreement,
that's
discriminatory,
it
may
be
better
to
fix
that
agreement,
but.
L
M
When
you
have
a
development
based
upon
the
ability
for
those
who
come
in
to
sustain
their
business
model-
and
they
you
know,
as
I
said,
you
know-
and
I
guess
you
had
said
that
you're
friends
with
the
gentleman
that's
why
I
did
really
specifically
talk
to
him
about
that
that
he's
feeling
that
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
these
other
criteria
of
race
or
disability.
Anything
like
that.
It
has
to
do
with
a
certain
expectation
that
they
went
in
there
to
develop
believing
that
this
was
going
to
be
on
a
higher
end
market.
M
That
would
sustain
what
they
have.
So
to
me,
it's
not
that
issue
again.
We
are
very
willing-
and
I
want
to
see
this
type
of
housing
develop
in
the
city.
It
just
goes
back
to
what
the
specific
agreement
there
was
for,
based
upon
the
luxury
housing,
the
description
of
that
and
all
of
those
who
are
being
impacted
by
that
are
saying.
M
This
is
not
what
was
agreed
upon
with
us
as
citizens
here
and
developers
here.
So
that
was
my
key
issue,
and
it
wasn't
these
other.
I
I
did
not
see
it.
It
would
never
support
something
that
is
racial
or
discriminatory
against
handicapped.
Absolutely,
not
that's.
You
know,
that's
not
what
we're
about.
We
have
laws
in
place
for
whatever
development
that
it
does
go
ahead
and
consider
those
with
disabilities
to
make
sure
they
have
access.
M
B
E
I
do
not
believe
it
does,
based
on
what
the
case
law
is
in
regards
of
how
we're
going
to
examine
this,
I
can't
predict
how
the
courts
will
rule,
but
I
do
believe
we
do
have
a
rational
basis
under
the
development
agreement
in
order
to
justify
the
language
that's
placed
within
it
and
how
the
courts
will
review
such
a
matter.
E
I
believe
that
we
have
a
sustainable
argument,
I'm
not
guarantee.
I
will
never
guarantee-
and
I
know
my
my
colleague
here
will
also
never
get.
She
won't
guarantee
a
result
for
her
client.
I
will
not
guarantee
a
result
for
you,
but
I
I
do
believe
we
have
a
sustainable
legal
argument
in
legal
defense
to
support
the
language
in
the
development
agreement
that
will
result
in
the
language
not
being
discriminatory
under
760.26.
N
A
K
All
right
so
here
I
just
want
to
kind
of
reiterate
something
because
you
just
said
this:
you
feel
you
have
a
rational
support.
Unsure
of
how
first
you
said,
you're
unsure
of
how
the
courts
will
rule
you
feel
you
have
a
substantial
argument
that
you
can
support
the
language
not
being
the
this
discriminatory.
E
E
What
I
am
stating
is,
I
believe
we
have
a
valid
sustainable
defense
and
what
I
meant
by
rational
basis
is
that
I
believe
that
the
basis
upon
which
the
courts
will
review
in
order
for
because
it's
a
discriminatory
statute,
one
of
the
cl
one
of
the
under
the
usually
the
arguments
are
the
petitioner,
the
person
who's
filing
the
action
is
going
to
claim.
This
is
the
the
discrimination
that
it's
that
it's
based
upon
now,
because
the
issues
discrimination
on
the
basis
of
source
of
funding.
E
I
believe
that
that
the
courts
do
not
review
that
in
the
same
manner
as
discrimination
on
the
basis
of
race,
color,
national
origin
or
physical
disability.
There
is
a
different
standard
of
reviewing
here.
I
don't
want
to
get
caught
up
in
the
legal
weeds,
and
I'm
also
now
we're
outside
of
the
scope
of
the
matter.
That's
before
you
tonight,
but
my
position
is
as
much
as
they
believe
they
have.
A
valid
legal
argument
to
state
that
that
are
the
development
agreement
is
inconsistent
with
760.26.
E
E
K
E
E
Based
on
the
information
they're
providing
and
at
that
point
again,
you
know,
staff's
recommendations
are
going
to
be
based
on
what
we
believe
are
the
the
positions
and
then
it's
it's
you're
going
to
decide
whether
or
not
the
request
of
the
applicant
is
enough
to
support
amending
the
development
agreement.
Let's
remember
they
asked
to
amend
the
development
agreement
on
two
on
two
aspects.
E
One
was
the
the
decline
in
the
permitted
uses
that
did
not
permit
apartments
that
were
not
of
market
rate
and
non-subsidized
or
subsidized.
That
was
one.
The
other
request
was
to
remove
the
stylistic
and
you
know
the
design
standards
they
were
requesting.
They
wanted
some
of
those
to
be
relaxed
so
that
their
their
request
was
two-pronged.
It
would
come
back
before
you
again
with
the
same
request
to
remove
the
language
and
the
permitted
uses
in
regards
to
market
rate
and
subsidized
and
to
amend
the
design
standards
that
were
placed
for
the
city
center.
A
M
M
If
we
go
that
route,
then
what
about
the
others
who
are
already
invested,
who
are
already
involved?
Can
they
not
come
and
try
and
sue
the
city
to
say,
wait
a
minute?
My
investment
was
made
based
upon
this
expectation
again
that
to
me,
is
the
criteria,
not
this
other
issue,
although
it
was
discussed,
so
I
I
just
don't
see
us
getting
there
based
upon
that.
M
M
E
I'm
just
concerned
about
litigation,
no
other
way.
We,
I
believe
we
have
a
valid
defense
and
valid
legal
arguments
in
support
of
the
development
agreement
and
counter
to
I
mean
if
the
intent
is
for
the
the
petitioner,
in
this
case,
to
bring
an
action
both
on
the
floor
of
statutes
and
probably,
if
we're
going
to
look
at
disparate,
fair
housing
under
disparate
impacts.
E
I
believe
that
the
the
jurisprudence
that's
out
there
supports
the
city's
decision
on
this
matter
and
as
much
as
they'll
have
experts
to
bring
forward
showing
in
a
disparate
impact.
The
city
is
going
to
have
its
own
experts
to
show
that
there
one
there
is
no
disparate
impact
and
two
that
the
city
has
a
rational
basis
to
support
the
language
that's
contained
in
the
development
agreement,
and
that
such
a
basis
is
rational
and
not
and
non-discriminatory.
K
All
right!
Well,
I
just
for
the
record.
I
want
to
just
say
this
from
the
very
beginning:
when
taurus
sold
the
parcel
taurus
knew
who
they
were
selling
it
to.
K
K
Okay,
so,
but
we
know
him
here,
I
knew
him
in
orange.
County
is
building
affordable
housing
so
when
he
accepted
the
funds
from
the
orange
county,
the
two-
I
guess
it
was
two
million
dollars
and
they
sent-
I
guess-
paperwork
here
for
us
to
sign,
because
I
have
that
again.
I
know
that
I
spoke
to
mr
james
hitt
yesterday
and
he
said
there
was
nothing
in
here
that
would
have
allowed
him
to
indicate
that
the
property
that
they
bought
was
strictly
for
luxury
apartments,
but
still
we
signed
it
as
agreeing
to.
E
A
K
E
So
we're
at
if
I
made
that
issue
was
decided
at
the
prior
hearing
we're
here.
What
we're
here
today
is.
They
believe
that
something
was
missed,
that
there
was
a
mistake
made
and
it
has
to
come
back
before
this
council
for
a
vote.
E
E
What
we
have
now
is
we
have
a
current
land
owner
who's
come
in
requesting
an
amendment
to
a
development
agreement
that
request
for
an
amendment
was
denied
at
the
present
time.
Their
plans
for
their
use
have
not
been
reviewed
by
the
planning
commission
and
have
not
come
before
the
city
council
for
you
to
approve
or
deny
those
plans
yet
yeah.
All
we're
at
is
a
denial
of
an
amendment
to
a
development
agreement.
E
That's
the
state.
We're
in
right
now
is
that
they
asked
to
amend
a
development
agreement,
and
this
council
voted
against
amending
the
development
agreement
and
now
they're
just
asking
for,
in
the
simplest
of
terms
a
second
byte
of
the
apple,
and
they
believe
that
they
meet
one
of
the
four
criteria
in
order
to
earn
that
second
byte
at
the
apple,
which
is
the
request
to
amend
the
development
agreement
and.
C
A
P
Good
evening
mayor
commissioners,
so
last
month
we
lost
three
of
our
garbage
trucks
to
a
fire
on
the
public
services
facility,
and
we
were
there
for
critical
services.
We
lost
two
of
the
three
front
load
trucks
that
we
used
for
commercial
garbage
and
we
lost
one
of
the
three
that
we
use
for
our
residential
yard
waste
pickup.
P
So
we
have
to
replace
them.
We
were
able,
in
the
interim,
to
get
three
rentals
to
get
us
by
until
we
can
order
or
replace
them
in
some
way,
and
since
then,
we've
also
found
two
diesel
powered
trucks
to
replace
two
of
those
rentals.
P
P
We
have
a
with
that
purchase
agreement.
We
also
have
a
buyback
option
on
those
trucks,
because
at
some
point
we'll
want
to
replace
or
well
not
at
some
point,
we'll
be
placing
orders
for
the
cng
trucks
which
can
take
up
to
14
16
months
to
get
so,
we
would
buy
these
diesel
engines
to
use
in
that
interim.
When
we
get
those
back,
we
can
sell
the
diesel
trucks
and
then
put
the
cng
into
operation.
So
we
have
a
guaranteed
buyback
option.
P
K
P
P
Brand
new,
the
others
20
as
one
year
old.
P
Relatively
short
term,
in
in
terms
of
garbage
trucks,
the
one
should
be
ready
now
or
towards
the
end
of
this
month
and
the
other
one.
They
estimate
around
the
october
november
type
time
frame,
yeah.
K
M
P
A
Because
they
see
the
depreciated
value
was
like
105
on
the
average
of
the
cost
of
three
of
them.
So
we
didn't,
even
with
the
insurance
money,
we
can't
even
buy
quite
one
truck
based
on
the
depreciated
value.
It's
like.
If
you
wreck
your
car,
you
don't
get
right,
a
brand
new
price.
You
get
the
depreciated
value
so
yeah,
it's
gonna.
M
Q
N
M
R
Questions
no,
the
one
comment
you
would
help
me
out
with
that
with
great
information
is
just
the
insurance
that
we're
getting
on
those
trucks
is
approximately,
I
want
to
say,
388
000,
so
it
does
cover
one
full
truck
and
a
little
bit
of
the
second
one.
P
N
R
M
A
Any
other
questions:
okay,
anybody
from
public
wishes
speak
on
this
matter.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
Look
for
a
motion
to
authorize
an
emergency
designation
for
public
services
to
purchase
a
2023
and
2022
wiki.
I
guess
super
duty
front
load
garbage
truck
both
on
mac
te
chassis,
all
those
in
favor
all
right,
all
right.
O
Good
evening,
everyone
I'm
joe
patton,
the
director
of
human
resources,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
forth
this
rfp
with
the
committee's
recommendation.
O
Just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background,
we
wanted
to
go
out
to
our
providers
to
find
out
if
it
was
beneficial
for
us
to
become
self-funded
and
for
those
that
don't
know
what
self-funded
is
it's
an
insurance
program
that
where
the
city
would
bear
all
the
responsibility
or
all
the
risks
for
an
insurance
for
health
insurance,
where
the
premiums
are
paid
into
the
city
and
the
claims
are
paid
by
the
city.
So
we
did
a
two
prong
approach.
O
We
did
it
for
a
self-funded
and
we
also
went
out
for
a
bid
for
a
fully
funded,
which
is
a
traditional
insurance
where
we
pay
a
set
premium
and
they
handle
they
take
all
the
risk
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
it
is
somewhat
beneficial
for
groups
that
become
large
enough
to
become
self-funded.
O
It
becomes
beneficial
because
one
there
aren't
as
many
risks
taken
as
far
as
costs
for
taxes,
so
on
and
so
forth,
different
administrative
fees
that
we
would
recoup
where
the
insurance
company
actually
recoups.
All
those,
so
we
don't,
we
don't
see
any
of
those
savings
we
also
take
on
when
we
pay
premiums.
We
take
on
those
risks
as
far
as
their
pool,
so
if
they
have
a
bigger
pool,
sometimes
it's
cheaper,
but
it
depends
on
that
pool.
O
We
also
take
that
risk
for
individuals
that
maybe
there
is
a
city
out
there
that
has
higher
pre
or
higher
costs
payments
going
out
for
claims.
So
those
are
some
of
the
risks
that
that
go
in
with
that,
but
it's
it's
mainly
proven
to
be
beneficial
to
cities.
For
that,
so
we
went
out
to
a
two-prong
approach
to
organizations
that
wanted
to
bid
with
that.
We
looked
at
all
the
information,
the
rfp
proposals
that
came
back
that
was
discussed
by
the
committee.
O
They
weren't
clear.
They
didn't
provide
all
the
information
that
we
requested
and
some
of
the
information
that
was
not
clear
were
premiums
that
we
we
requested,
and
we
requested
a
certain
spreadsheet
to
be
completed
that
they
did
not
complete.
None
of
them
completed
actually
to
help
us
better,
evaluate
their
proposals.
O
O
O
Also,
the
rates
that
were
submitted
were
higher
than
the
rates
that
we
were
going
to
be
paying
with
the
current
or
the
future
rate
increases
that
we
were
going
to
receive.
So
based
upon
that
information,
we
could
not
make
a
clear
decision
or
a
fully
educated
decision
on
whether
to
go
self-funded
or
to
change
providers.
A
Yes,
okay,
any
questions
for
joe
and
what
just
so
everybody
just
for
the
public's,
not
what's
the
you
got
kind
of
a
generalized
premium
for
for
the
year.
Yes,.
O
Actually,
our
premiums
are
usually
for
our
base
plans,
usually
eight
hundred
dollars.
I
think
this
year
it's
eight
hundred
dollars
and
seventy
five
cents
for
our
base
plan.
Then
we
have
buy
up
plans
that
individuals
can
move
into.
So
if
you're
you
have
a
base
plan
and
then
you
have
maybe
a
cadillac
plan
that
you
have
out
there
that
provides
more
coverage
or
you
know
different
aspects
of
coverage
that
they
want
to
go.
Maybe
they
want
to
go
outside
of
a
network
or
go
to
any
doctor.
They
want
to.
A
O
It's
just
two
parts,
so
this
this
our
recommendation
is
to
reject
the
rfp
that
was
that
was
presented
to
us
so
that
we
can
continue
with
our
current
provider
along
with
that
is
that
we
also
would
like
to
this
is
for
last
year.
These
are
the
base
plans
right
here.
So,
if
you
look
at
this,
this
will
give
you
the
base
plan
for
this
current
year,
the
one
on
the
columns
to
the
right
for
fy2223.
O
A
And
I'm
just
I'm
just
trying
to
run
a
real
quick
calculation,
the
the
city's
health
insurance
premium
for
the
year.
So
what
the
city
pays
not
what
the
employees
pay
will
be
north
of
five
million
dollars.
Just
so
you
know
total
budget,
let's
say
of
you,
know:
100
million
bucks.
So
it's
a
it's
a
it's!
A
good
chunk
of.
O
So
our
second
second
objective
tonight
is
to
bring
forth
with
you
the
rates
for
this
year.
We've
never
done
this
before
from
what
I
understand.
So
this
is
the
first
time
we've
brought
rates
to
you
and
in
that
aspect
I
had
handed
out
a
sheet
for
you
to
the
rates
the
proposed
rates
this
year.
So
with
that,
within
those
rates
we
are
including
in
that
a
health
incentive
for
individuals
to
go
out
and
get
a
health
screening.
O
So
what
we're
proposing
is,
within
those
health
rates,
those
premiums
we're
proposing
a
65
a
month
incentive
to
go,
get
your
health
screening.
Now
this
health
screening
is
it's
blood
work,
and
then
you
come
in
and
talk
to
the
doctor,
it's
about
an
hour
total
time
that
it
takes
an
employee
to
do
this.
The
employees
will
be
allowed
to
do
this
during
their
working
hours,
just
as
long
as
operational
commitments.
O
So
the
majority
of
our
claims
have
to
do
that.
So
this
is
a
target,
a
project
that
we're
trying
to
target,
to
get
individuals
to
come
in,
see
the
doctor
learn
about
their
health.
There's
lots
of
studies
out
there
that
nine
out
of
10
individuals
don't
know
how
to
handle
their
health
or
have
information
about
where
they
stand
on
their
health.
Now
and
also
what
we
have
is
that
individuals
within
the
organization
this
is
only
going
to
be
for
active
employees,
individuals
on
our
staff,
such
as
police
and
fire.
O
They
automatically
get
this
incentive
because
they
are
required
to
do
the
health
screening
anyway,
so
they
don't
have
to
do
anything
extra
for
that
so,
and
we
also
started
this
incentive
where
we
started
paying
individuals,
25
dollars,
incentive
award
to
come
in
and
get
their
health
screening.
This
was
during
the
month
of
march
april
and
may,
and
some
of
those
folks
have
already
done
that
project.
K
K
K
O
When
we,
when
we
talk
about
saving
money
with
our
claims
right,
it's
about
the
claims
coming
in,
we
don't
see
the
claims.
Okay,
we
we
see.
Basically
so
many
people
or
there
are
so
many
claims
for
cancer.
There
were
so
many
claims,
but
we
don't
see
names.
We
don't
see
what
the
claims
were
actually
for,
except
for
a
generalized
area,
so
we
can
kind
of
pinpoint
where
all
this
comes
from
that's
from
the
insurance
company.
O
No,
I
said
it
pinpoints
where
the
claims
are
concentrated
in.
So,
if
you,
if
there
is
a
person
that
has
a
claim
for
cancer,
we
don't
know
what
it
is
or
who
the
person
is,
but
they
will
give
us
a
generalized
amount
of
how
much
money
we're
spending
on
claims
for
certain
diseases,
certain
medications
so
on
and
so
forth.
We
have
no
idea
who's
who's
got
it
who's
who's
doing
it.
K
O
We
don't
know
that
it's
coming
from
public
safety,
we
don't
know
it's
coming
from
public
services,
we
don't
know
who
it's
coming
from.
O
O
So
so,
with
that
respect,
this
is
this
is
basically
what
our
the
effect
on
is
an
example
of
effect,
so
our
rate
is
80
800
and
75
cents.
That's
our
total
rate.
If
you
have
an
individual
that
goes
in
for
their
screening,
they
pay
nothing.
O
M
O
That's
better
for
them,
it's
better
for
them,
it's
better
for
actually
it's
better
for
everyone
as
a
pool,
because
if
we
get
our
health
under
control
and
help
individuals
and
help
them
understand
how
you
know
what's
affecting
them,
if
anything
is
affecting
them,
it
actually
brings
down.
Our
costs
brings
down
their
costs.
So
hopefully
we
can
control
premiums.
O
K
K
Okay,
so
do
we
have
anything
in
place
as
a
city
to
encourage
our
staff,
whether
it
is
to
exercise
to
we.
C
O
K
O
So
that's
a
good
question,
so
some
other
things
that
we're
trying
to
do
is
we're
trying
to
come
up
with
some
incentives
for
our
programs
for
healthy
eating.
You
know
we
do
have
information
that
goes
out
to
the
employees
from
my
health
on
site
from
our
clinic
that
promotes
healthy
eating,
and
you
know
to
look
at
your
health
and
to
exercise
and
also
for
from
our
insurance
carrier.
They
they
are
coming
out
with
some
programs
as
well.
O
So
we're
also
talking
about
coming
up
with
some
information
or
some
programs
about
maybe
some
weight
loss
challenges.
We're
in
we're
in
discussion
right
now
with
mount
dorado
to
challenge
them
to
a
weight
loss,
type
thing
they
they
said
they
were
interested
in
that.
So
we're
continuing
to
talk
to
them
about
that.
Okay,.
C
N
O
Against
their
city,
you
know,
weight
loss,
make
it
a
little
fun
and
hopefully
drum
up
some
some
interest
in
that
also
some
other
exercise
challenges.
Maybe
at
camp
wewa,
maybe
getting
some
pedometers
for
for
people
for
walking.
You
know,
walk
challenges
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
we're
trying
to
come
up
some
some
some
stuff
that
would
help
along
that.
K
B
I
like
the
idea
of
the
incentive
of
giving
back
the
65
to
the
employees,
but
I
do
have
one
other
question:
that's
not
even
related
to
your
presentation,
and
that
is
that
I
think
it
was
three
years
ago.
We
asked
the
question
if
the
commissioners
could
use
the
clinic.
O
B
O
A
R
O
A
Okay,
all
right
any
other
questions,
not
anybody
from
the
public
wish
to
speak
on
this
matter,
not
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion
to
reject
the
rfp
2022-71
regarding
the
health
insurance
coverage,
continuing
with
public
risk
management
and
approving
rates
for
fy
23.
2022-23
got
a
motion
by
commissioner
bankston.
That's
right,
my
commissioner
nesta
all
those
in
favor
aye,
all
opposed
motion
carries
unanimously
all
right.
Public
hearing,
ordinance,
number
2921.
G
Ordinance
number
2921
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida
amending
the
future
land
use
element
of
the
apopka
comprehensive
plan
of
the
city
of
apopka.
Changing
the
future
land
use,
designation
from
city
future
land
use
in
progress,
fluip
and
county
rural
to
mixed
use
for
certain
real
property
generally
located
on
the
south
corner
southwest
corner
of
ondike
road
and
plymouth,
cemento
road
owned
by
david
l,
bachel,
wanda
s,
mcclarty,
larry,
m,
everly,
senior,
family
trust
and
karine;
f,
everly,
family
trust
comprising
39.67
acres,
more
or
less
providing
for
severability
and
for
an
effective
date.
A
M
G
Ordinance
number
2922
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida,
changing
the
zoning
from
t
transitional
district
to
kpi,
mu
kelly
park,
interchange,
mixed
use,
zoning
district
and
neighborhood
overlay
district
for
certain
real
property
located
on
the
southwest
corner
of
van
dijk
road
and
plymouth.
Sorrento
road
comprising
39.67
acres,
more
or
less
and
owned
by
david
l,
baffle,
wanda
s,
mclarty,
larry,
m,
everly,
senior,
family
trust
and
corrine;
f,
emily
everly
family
dressed
providing
for
directions
to
the
community
development,
sell
severability
conflicts
and
an
effective
date.
A
D
M
C
G
Ordinance
number
2926,
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida
amending
the
future
land
use
element
of
the
apopka
comprehensive
plan
of
the
city
of
apopka.
Changing
the
future
land
use,
designation
from
county
rural
to
city,
mixed
juice,
for
certain
real
property
generally
located
on
the
north
side
of
the
intersection
of
kelly
park,
road
and
chandler
road
owned
by
robert
t
and
elena
j
hutter,
comprising
9.53
acres,
more
or
less
providing
for
severability
and
for
an
effective
date.
G
Q
A
C
G
Number
2930
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida,
changing
the
zoning
from
t
transitional
district
to
kpi,
mu
kelly
park,
interchange,
mixed
use,
zoning
district
and
neighborhood
overlay
district
for
certain
real
property,
located
east
and
west
of
state
road,
429,
west
of
plymouth,
sorrento
road
and
adjacent
to
joey,
mcguckin
road
comprising
31.93
acres,
more
or
less
and
owned
by
pm,
s-1
reo
llc,
providing
for
directions.
The
community
development
director,
severability
conflicts
and
an
effective
date.
G
A
Any
changes
no
changes;
okay,
anybody
from
the
public
wish
to
speak
on
this
matter,
not
we'll
close.
The
public
hearing
look
for
a
motion
to
adopt
ordinance
number
2930,
so
move
got
a
motion
by
commissioner
bankston.
Second,
second
by
commissioner
nesta,
all
those
in
favor
aye,
all
opposed
motion
carries
unanimously
next
up
ordinance,
number
2940.
G
Ordinance
number
2940
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida
to
extend
its
territorial
and
municipal
limits
to
annex
pursuant
to
florida
statute.
171.044
the
here
and
after
described,
land
situated
and
being
in
orange
county
florida
owned
by
harvey
godwin
located
at
5206
plymouth,
sorrento
road,
providing
for
directions
to
the
city,
clerk,
severability
conflicts
and
an
effective
date.
A
G
Ordinance
number
2941
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
apopka
florida
to
extend
its
territorial
and
municipal
limits
to
annex
pursuant
to
florida
statute.
171.0444
the
hearing
after
described
land
situated
and
being
in
orange
county
florida
owned
by
harvey
godwin
or
sap
rodney
d
life
estate,
rem,
sandra
d,
sapp
and
pm
s1
reo
llc,
located
on
the
northwest
corner
of
plymouth,
sorrento
road
and
kelly
park,
road
providing
for
directions
to
the
city
clerk,
several
ability,
conflicts
and
an
effective
date.
A
A
G
Q
Thank
you,
jim
head
community
development
director.
Sorry,
you
got
to
sit
through
this
one.
This
is
the
first
reading
for
ordinance
2937
as
as
the
city
clerk
mentioned.
This
is
for
the
abandonment
of
our
lone
dri,
which
is
in
the
north
part
of
the
city
as
part
of
the
kelly
park,
interchange
development
plan.
Q
This
dri
was
originally
approved
back
with
ordinance
2230
back
in
december
of
2011,
and
there
were
about
12
13,
different
requirements
that
were
part
of
that
dri
that
have
not
been
satisfied.
They
haven't
been
satisfied,
since
basically,
it
was
approved
and
that
basically
comes
down
to
the
original
group
of
assemblers
of
the
properties
that
basically
did
not
do
what
they
were
supposed
to
do
in
order
to
get
the
property
going.
Q
There
was
one
there
was
a
couple
things
that
were
done,
but
it
was
at
the
city's
purview,
not
at
the
applicants
or
the
dri
person.
That
was
the
form
based
code,
which
is
now
part
of
our
land
development
code,
and
even
at
that
time,
when
it
when
that
was
first
done,
it
was
done
separately
and
when
we
did
the
recodification
and
the
redevelop
in
the
redo
of
the
land
development
code,
we
included
that
as
part
of
the
land
development
code.
Q
So
it's
a
lot
more
enforceable
versus
just
a
document
that
tried
to
guide
the
developments
up
there.
So
some
of
those
items
that
that
were
not
completed
was
the
school
capacity
agreement
for
the
development
itself.
There's
originally,
there
was
about
540
550
acres.
I
can
only
count
520
acres,
so
that's
with
all
the
different
property
owners
that
were
there
and
by
the
way
they
have
all
been
notified.
They
are
all
calling
me
asking.
Is
this
still
on
track
to
get
abandoned?
They
want
to
get
going.
Q
We
are
processing
plans
for
the
development
within
the
kpi
and
and
those
properties
that
are
part
of
the
dri.
Q
We
can
approve
them,
but
they
can't
build
or
pull
any
permits
or
anything
until
this
dri
is
abandoned,
so
we
did
go
before
planning
commission
last
night.
I
was
kind
of
trying
to
make
sure
this
was
on
a
fast
track
so
that
we
could,
you
know,
get
these
developers
going.
It
went
before
planning
commission
last
night.
Q
It
was
unanimous,
a
decision
to
recommend
to
city
council
for
for
approval
of
the
abandonment
and
then,
of
course
tonight
is
the
the
first
reading
for
the
ordinance,
and
then
we
have
the
second
reading
scheduled
for
july
6th.
That's
a
1
30
in
the
afternoon
meeting.
Q
So
a
couple
of
those
things,
one
that
I
mentioned
was
the
school
capacity
agreement
was
never
done.
The
zoning
and
the
land
use
were
not
done
completely.
There
was
a
lot
of
properties
that
were
up
there
with
a
we.
We
changed
it
to
transition
from
zip,
zip
or
zoning
in
progress.
That
was
something
that
was
done
back
a
while
ago,
and
so
at
least
it
now
has
an
actual
zoning
category,
but
that
we
change
to
the
different
districts
that
we
have
within
the
kpi
itself.
Q
There
was
no
open
space
agreement.
There
was
no
wildlife
management
plan.
There
was
no
residential
or
recreation
parks,
agreement,
potable
water
and
non-potable
water
agreements.
There
was
none
of
that.
There
was
no
storm
waste
water
management
program,
there
was
no
police
or
fire
or
ems
agreements.
Q
In
addition,
the
biannual
bi-annual
report
was
never
filed,
so
basically
they
they
they
were
abandoning
the
dri.
Without
even
you
know,
without
our
action
and
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
the
florida
legislation
changed
and
basically
they
took
out
any
requirements
regarding
dris,
but
for
those
that
are,
you
know
those
cities
and
municipalities
and
counties
that
did
have
dris
we
in
order
to
get
rid
of
them,
we're
going
through
this
process
of
abandonment.
Q
In
addition,
I
just
wanted
to
point
this
out.
Rdri
is
north
of
kelly
park
road
with
this
little
pinpoint
here
connecting
and
then
south
of
kelly
park
road.
The
war
property
was
originally
part
of
the
the
dri
and
they
pulled
out
at
the
last
minute.
So
it's
a
very
disjuncted
dri
in
the
first
place
that
doesn't
really
function
good
because,
there's
you
know
large
property
owners
here.
Q
There
were
large
property
owners
here,
but
some
of
those
smaller
ones
in
between
just
didn't
make
it
conducive
for
for
actual
development
or
the
coordination
for
that
development,
and
at
this
stage
right
now
we
do
have
a
couple
major
players.
Actually
we've
got
about
three
major
players
that
are
working
with
what's
left
of
the
dri
in
order
to
get
in
order
to
get
a
development
within
the
kpi
concentric
circle.
Q
I
don't
have
that
on
here,
but
it
basically
goes
out
to
right
right,
actually
right
about
here
and
then
down
to
happy
lane
on
detroit
on
the
north
side
and
then
chandler
road
over
on
the
east
side.
That's
that
mile
diameter
circle
that
we've
got
orange
county
was
also
notified
in
regards
to
the
abandonment.
We
have
not
heard
anything
negative
regarding
this
when
we
were
originally
going
to
do
this.
Q
There
were
a
couple
property
owners
that
just
wanted
to
make
sure
what
they
were
getting
rid
of,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
put
in
to
the
to
the
ordinance
is
that
the
vested
rights
that
were
originally
part
of
the
dri
we
are
going
to
continue
those
on
in
the
land
development
code.
Q
I'm
sorry
in
the
comprehensive
plan
when
we,
when
we
update
that
so
there's
approximately
a
little
over
9
million
square
feet
of
non-residential,
that
includes
hotels,
office,
industrial
park,
quite
a
few
other
things
and
there's
a
little
over
1
500
units
that
were
approved
as
part
of
the
dri.
Those
are
already
getting
chewed
up
by
the
developers
that
are
coming
in.
So
they
already
know
that
and
it's
just
whoever
comes
in
first
gets
them.
Q
So
obviously
I'm
here
for
any
questions,
but
that's
our
report.
Any
questions.
M
Know
when
this
began,
I
mean
several
years
ago
before
I
was
even
here.
I
knew
some
of
the
developers
that
were
trying
to
make
this
happen
and
part
of
the
promise
was
we
were
going
to
see.
Possibly
this
be
an
area
where
restaurants,
you
know
shopping,
those
things
could
happen,
and
so,
with
this
going
away,
is
this
going
to
end
up
just
being,
as
you
said,
first
comes
first
serve
and
probably
just
nothing
but
houses.
I
don't
want
to
hear
that
just.
M
Q
We
already
have
three
developers
that
that
I
know
of
that
up
in
this
area.
Here
we've
got
the
main
developer
here.
They
they
do
have
some
commercial
on
the
lower
portion,
but
we
also
have
another
developer
in
this
area
that
is
looking
to
bring
in
just
a
commercial
and
a
mix,
a
true
mix
product
where
you'd
have
commercial
on
the
first
floor
and
residential
up
above
and
then
residential
in
the
back
side.
So
basically
they
this
this
main
corridor
area
in
here
is
our
village
center.
Q
That's
the
part
that
has
to
get
developed
in
accordance
with
our
form-based
code.
That's
our
that's
our
linchpin!
We
we
have
that
intact
and
it's
part
of
the
development
requirements.
The
group
that
ended
up
buying
the
rachelle
holdings
piece.
They
also
have
an
agreement
already
to
buy
the
risser
property.
Here
we
already
have
a
general
plan.
Q
That's
they're
going
through
the
approval
process
that
will
be
coming
to
all
of
you
for
some
industrial
warehousing,
which
is
job
creation
in
the
north
and
the
southern
portion,
which
is
the
industrial
park
area,
and
then
they
also
have
a
a
large
section
up
here,
which
is
in
the
in
the
village
center
for
commercial
and
then
segwaying
into
some
residential,
and
we
do
have
a
plans
for
a
road
coming
down.
Q
Effie
drive
into
this
section,
that'll
actually
have
a
roundabout
and
that'll
also
continue
down,
underneath
the
429,
with
joey
mcguckin
road
over
to
the
plymouth
sorrento,
and
then
we'll
also
eventually
get
the
connection
going
up
to
plymouth
rental,
so
we're
getting
those
the
network,
the
road
network
in
there,
and
also
the
the
the
commercial
needs
and
requirements
that
are
part
of
that.
Q
Obviously,
when
we,
when
we
end
up
having
six
or
seven
hundred
units
here
and
then
on
the
east
side,
we've
got
a
few
hundred
over
here
a
few
hundred
up
here
and
then
we've
got
another
development,
that's
looking
into
putting
in
some
apartments
and
some
commercial
along
plymouth,
sorrento
and
the
front
area
along
kelly
park.
Q
Q
One
of
the
things
that
did
occur
with
publix
is
they
originally
bought
the
property
as
an
investment,
and
I
already
saw
the
potential
for
that
and
they
said
well
we're
going
to
hold
on
to
it
for
five
years.
Well,
two
and
a
half
years
they
built
the
publix,
and
that
brings
the
residential,
but
it
also
brings
other
competition,
other
types
of
commercial
entities
that
want
to
feed
off
of
that
type
of
commercial
commercial
venture.
Q
D
M
N
Q
That's,
that's.
That's
the
type
of
development,
that's
gonna!
That's
gonna
be
happening
up
in
this
area
here
and
then
I've
already
talked
with
the
property
owners
down
here
about
their
development
and
that
it's
not
supposed
to
be
just
fronting
kelly
park
that
it's
supposed
to
actually
be
a
village
center.
Where
you
can
go
in
and
do
shopping,
not
just
see
it
on
the
front
on
the
front
of
the
road,
and
we.
C
Q
C
K
It's
rolling
right
now,
when
you
drive
up
there,
you
see
the
properties
that
were
residential
or
a
lot
of
them
have
been
sold.
Some
of
them
of
the
residents
have
been
already
torn
down
yep.
I
have
seen
that
so
that's
kind
of
moving
in
that
direction.
Sure.
Q
And
real,
quick,
the
other
thing
that
we
do
have
this
area
right
up
here
is
the
the
52
acres
that
orlando
health
purchased
right.
So
when,
when
we
see
the
rooftops
coming
in,
that's
when
this
will
end
up
coming
in
because
they're
serving
that
area.
B
I
noticed
that
it
said
the
school
concurrency
agreement
had
expired,
and
so
I'm
going
to
assume
that,
as
these
other
developers
come
in
to
start
developing,
that
we
are
going
to
make
sure
that
the
school
board
is
on
board
and
then
second
of
all,
I
know
pam
is
not
here
tonight,
but
as
we
continue
all
this
development,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
infrastructure
for
those
roads
keller
park,
as
well
as
round
lake
road
that
they're
leaving
us
some
right
away
so
that
we
can
expand.
Yes,.
Q
R
Yeah
to
add
to
that
as
well,
prior
to
being
elected,
I
was
going
to
a
lot
of
drc
meetings
and
pam's
a
little
pit
bull,
getting.
R
A
Q
Q
I
I'm
sorry
ron,
olson
3156
rolling
hills
lane.
My
only
comment
is:
let's
look
at
putting
in
what
we
call
frontage
roads
as
opposed
to
just
kelly
park.
Four
lane
run
we're
running
the
same
thing.
We
have
with
rock
springs
ridge
with
the
publix
location.
Now
we've
got
traffic
moving
along
at
45
miles
an
hour
and
there's
no
means
for
people
to
get
out.
There's
constant
accidents
there.
So
look
at
the
development
is
part
of
frontage
roads
which
will
lead
into
it.
So
we
have
a
couple
light
entrances.
Q
Okay,
I'll
answer
that
the
kelly
park-
interchange,
the
kpi
form-based
code-
does
require
grid
grid
system,
so
everything
is
going
to
be
interconnected.
We
only
have
one
major
development
right
now,
but
we
already
have
them.
They
have
already
built
that
connector
road
to
go
to
the
south,
and
so
that
that
is
our
connector
road
that
that
will
be
leading
to
the
south
to
joey
mcguffin.
As
I
mentioned,
that's
the
east-west
connection.
Q
So
if
somebody
is
living
on
the
western
side,
they
can
go
to
the
public's
without
having
to
go
out
on
a
major
road
they'll,
be
able
to
go
over
to
joey
mcguck
and
take
the
north
road
going
up.
Basically,
instead
of
going
out
to
plymouth,
sorrento
they'll
be
able
to
go
up
to
the
publix
without
having
to
go
out
of
the
major
road.
It's
called
capture.
A
C
A
E
Good
evening
last
last
council
meeting
you
adopted
or
the
previous
ordinance,
which
established
the
city's
pre-treatment
guidelines,
as
well
as
the
oil
and
gas
oily
grease
program
and
the
surcharge
program.
This
resolution
is
now
implementing
that
program
establishing
the
fee
schedules
in
relation
to
that
program.
It's
pretty
straightforward.
So,
as
we've
noted,
this
is
something
that
the
city
we
have
been
doing
by
moving
over
all
of
our
fee
schedules
to
be
adopted
by
resolution.
E
This
is
just
a
further
example
of
this.
It's
all
straightforward
there.
If
you
have
any
other
additional
questions,
I'll
be
here
to
answer
them.
A
C
D
C
A
K
Okay,
so
of
course
we
had
the
swearing-in
of
two
newly
appointed
or
sworn
in
police
officers.
We
all
attended
that
ceremony
here.
So
a
welcome
to
the
two
new
police
officers.
K
Of
course,
the
mayor
and
I
did
attend
the
retirement
of
flags
at
the
elks
lodge
and
there
was
probably
about
an
hour
burn
of
burning
flags.
But
you
know
a
lot
of
people.
Don't
understand
that
when
we
retire
american
flags
we
don't
throw
them
in
the
garbage.
We
do
a
respectful
ceremony
and
each
individual
flag
that
is
put
into
the
fire
is
actually
saluted
by
the
boy
scouts
and
their
masters,
and
it's
a
real
solemn
ceremony.
K
So
someone
had
written
to
me
and
said
that
they
kind
of
objected
to
seeing
the
american
flags
burn.
So
I
had
to
kind
of
describe
it
as
a
cremation
of
the
american
flag
because
they
do
not
belong
in
the
garbage
can
so
you
know
I
I
I
understood
the
person
who
wrote
me
and
said
that
that
it
was
disturbing
that
they
realized
that
that's
how
we
retire
our
flags,
but
that
is
the
procedure
to
retire
the
flags.
K
We
all
attended
the
state
of
the
county,
of
course,
for
orange
county,
and
then
yesterday
we
had
the
miss
apopka
send
off
and
everyone
got
to
meet
our
beautiful
victoria
sonsa,
who
is
going
to
be
representing
the
city
of
apopka
on
the
state,
competition
for
miss
florida,
and
I
just
kind
of
want
to
add
this-
that
we
have
over
377
between
cities,
villages,
counties
and
villages,
and
only
67
cities
do
represent
for
the
miss
florida.
Competition
and
our
city
has
been
representing
on
that
stage
for
over
50
years.
K
So
that's
a
big
honor,
and
so
I
wish
miss
victoria
sonsa
sonsa
a
lot
of
luck
as
she
goes
to
represent
our
city
next
week.
So.
C
M
A
couple
things
I
want
to
bring
up
one,
I'm
assuming
here,
that
everybody
got
the
same
email,
but
I
know
there
was
question
about.
We
had
to
take
certain
things
off
of
line
because
of
the
problem
with
how
they
show
themselves,
so
the
agendas
in
minutes
specific
specifically
minutes
was
requested.
That
is
there
a
way
to
access.
Is
that
something
that
is
accessible
or
is
that
part
of
that
that
we
are
not
able
to
do
okay,
and
is
that
a
paramount
issue
to
deal
with
that
portion?
N
Don't
know
I
don't
know
the
process.
Simple
word
document
we've
already
made
a
a
compliant
document
out
of
it.
We're
gonna
get
with
susan
over
the
next
couple
of
days,
make
sure
she's
familiar
with
filling
it
out,
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
attaching
it
when
the
agenda
is
created.
So
it's
it's
not
a
huge
aspect.
You
just.
I
just
need
to
know
what
you
want
on
there.
N
You
know
document-wise
so
putting
the
minutes
on.
It's
not
a
big
deal.
N
M
N
M
M
Thank
you.
The
other
thing
is
actually.
I
called
on
our
illustrious
rod
olson
and
ask
him
to
drive
around
with
me,
and
you
know,
since
I've
been
here
in
the
city,
there's
just
always
that
question.
Why
does
well
I'll
just
call
it
operation
facelift?
I
think
there's
just
some
things
that
I
would
just
like
to
see.
Why
can
we
not
look
sharper
than
we
do
and
what?
What
is
the
mechanism
is
that
something
that
is
on
the
individual
businesses?
Is
there
something
that
was
in?
M
It
was
within
our
purview,
and
so
we
just
went
and
looked
and-
and
you
know
I
ask
you,
you
know-
will
show
me
because
you
know
he
had
challenged
all
of
us
to
go
and
tour
the
city.
So
I
want
to
know
what
is
he
sitting?
What
are
seeing?
What
are
citizens
seeing-
and
I
know
at
times
when
citizens
respond
to
us,
we
generally
bring
it
up
and
many
times
it
is
dealt
with,
but
there's
just
a
certain
level
of
curb
appeal
that
I
think
is
just
important
for
us
going
ahead.
M
You
know
and
trying
to
draw
economic
development
and
moving
forward,
and
if
we
can
mainly
focus
on
our
main
corridors,
you
know
our
east-west
south
and
get
those
more
up
to
speed,
I'm
not
sure,
but
my
thought
was
to
either
put
a
task
force
together
a
a
group
of
people
how
we
would
to
say,
let's
find
out,
such
as
I've
gone
and
looked
at
some
other
cities
and
say
you
know,
sanford
looks
very
beautiful,
we
know
well,
I
remember
years
ago
it
didn't
look
as
well
as
it
did.
How
did
they
get
there?
M
N
A
A
We
had
three
people,
so
seven
didn't
even
bother
to
to
listen
to
them
first,
one
which
was
kind
of
like
setting
the
goals,
and
I
mean
I
tell
you
it's
a
it's
a
great
program,
but
but
if
you
don't
get
people
yeah
to
buy
into
it
and
at
least
at
least
listen
in,
so
we-
and
so
you
know
nicole-
was
asking
me:
should
we
go
ahead
and
you
know
have
our
next
meeting.
I
said:
let's
wait.
Till
school
starts
back.
A
M
And
I
had
called
nicole
said
I
wanted
to
meet
with
her
and
find
out.
How
is
this
working?
I
guess
for
me,
how
are
others
getting
there?
I
want
to
find
out
that
mechanism.
Is
it
just
getting
the
citizens
buy-in
or
is
there
some
other
way
that
they're
approaching
it
and
the
two
things
that
I
noticed
a
lot
there's
a
lot
of
just
the
weeds
in
the
sidewalk,
something
that
again,
if
it's
sprayed
and
killed
it
just
really
changes
a
lot.
The
other,
of
course,
is
the
the
pressure
washing
and
I
don't.
C
M
A
D
M
A
B
R
Buildings
up
making
sure
they
have
just
some
type
of
consistency.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
huge
asset
there,
and
I
was
actually
talking
to
mr
hit
yesterday
about
the
same
exact
thing.
So
it's
funny
that
you
brought
that
up
and
I'm
you
know
it's
like
how
do
we,
when
you
go
to
certain
cities,
mount
dora
winter
garden?
What
have
you
there's
consistency?
I
think
that's
the
thing
that
you
kind
of
like
as
you're
driving
through
it's
consistent,
there's
consistent,
either
upkeep
or
fringes
on
buildings.
R
Things
like
that
so
and-
and
I
brought
up
you
know,
can
we
just
at
least
get
consistent
plants
along
our
corridors?
Yeah,
somehow
incentivize
the
business
owners
landowners
to
have
just
consistent
plants?
That's
it
and
he
brought
up
a
great
point.
Well,
nick
you
got
a
water
room,
valid
point.
E
R
You
know
in
a
lot
of
south
florida
municipalities,
they
have
the
same
exact
and
our
attorneys
brought
that
up
multiple
times
of
they
have
the
same
exact,
color
buildings
or
palette
of
color.
So
creating
that
consistent,
ac,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
what
really
transforms
our
our
front.
Frontages
our
main
corridors
there.
So
I
agree.
I
think
we
should
do
it
I'd.
I
would
just
encourage
us
to
maybe
get
ahead
of
even
getting
a
a
a
task
force
together.
Let's
try
to
brainstorm
up
here.
R
M
M
Just
that
level
yeah
and
I
just
love
to
see
that
in
our
presented
place,
I
do
understand
that
441
is
a
state
highway
and
it's
it's
a
challenge
there,
but
I
just
want
to
know
what
can
we
do
and
what
have
others
done
to
get
there?
Is
that
something
we
should
consider,
or
is
it
just
merely
a
similar
program
that
we're
already
working
on.
A
Well,
I
mean
like
we
were
it's
been
a
couple
months
ago,
the
women's
club,
their
their
street,
their
road
designations
from
park
avenue
or
is
on
park
avenue
from
441
down
to
voton.
So
I
went
out
with
them
that
morning
and
we
we
covered
three
had
like
maybe
10
or
12
volunteers.
We
covered
our
that
area,
and
so
they
have
to
do
it.
I
think
it's
three
times
a
year
is
under
the
code
now.
Is
that
enough
to
keep
it
where
you
want?
J
A
K
The
only
other
thing
also
mayor
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
streets
that
says
this
street
is
maintained
by
someone
I
know
they
have
one
with
the
boy
scouts,
one
with.
A
A
I
mean
that's
a
pretty
that's
a
valid
question.
I
think
one
of
the
things
the
nice
thing
about
this.
The
keep
america
beautiful
program
is
that
you
grade
every
month.
You
grade
those
those
thoroughfares.
So
it's
a
one
to
four
and
it's
a
pretty
pretty
hard
core
to
get
down
to
a
one
which
is
you
know
perfect,
so
you
what
you
try
to
do.
Is
you
try
to
make
those
incremental
changes,
so
you
go
from
a
three
or
something?
A
Hopefully
you
never
get
to
four,
because
they
even
show
you
what
a
four
looks
like
what
three
two
and
a
one
and
so
trying
to
get
there
and
keep
it
there
is.
The
you
know
is
going
to
be
the
challenge,
but
the
program
is
really
good
program.
I
tell
you-
and
you
know-
maybe
we
put
it.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
share
it.
I
probably
can't
because
it's
probably
copyrighted
but
it'd
be
nice
to
we'll
get
some
snippets
out
there
for
everybody
to
take
a
look
at,
but
now
listen.
A
It
was
a
probably
two
hour,
two
and
a
half
hour,
introduction
to
what
what
they
hope
to
accomplish.
But
it's
all
it's!
It's
all
based
on
facts.
It's
it's
very
you
know,
detail
oriented
is
not
just
hey.
We
want
it
to
look
good.
You
know
it's
measuring
the
that.
How
that
looks.
Yeah,
it's
it's!
It's
it's!
It's
really
really!
Well
done!
So
I
was
I
was.
I
was
impressed
with
with
the
presentation
so
we'll.
Well,
let's
not.
A
B
Smith,
yes,
and-
and
I
accepted
that
challenge
as
well-
to
drive
around
and
look
and
see
what
we
can
do
to
improve
our
city
and
it's
not
all
residential
and
what
I've
seen
is
a
large
majority
of
it
is
commercial
properties
that
are
not
being
maintained
and,
as
commissioner
nessa
said,
you
got
to
water.
It.
D
And
so
I've
I've.
B
Spoken
to
code
enforcement
about
several
of
those
properties,
and
some
of
them
are
already
in
violation,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
maybe
the
citation
that
we
passed
in
our
last
city
council
meeting
will
maybe
speed
that
process
up,
rather
than
being
a
long,
drawn-out
process
that
helped
to
get
our
city
looking
better,
especially
on
our
main
quarters.
Sooner
than
later,
I
had
the
opportunity
to
attend
the
world
council
of
mayors,
where
they
also
allow
city,
councilmans
and
county
commissioners
to
attend
as
well
and
was
able
to
sit
with
the
mayor
from
cuba.
B
The
mayor
from
the
virgin
islands,
the
mayor
from
haiti
and
several
meals
from
across
the
united
states,
and
it
was
a
very
impressive
event,
a
two-day
event,
and
so
I
really
enjoyed
doing
that
as
well
and
attended
the
state
of
the
county.
And
of
course
we
look
like
we
own
a
great
path.
If
we
can
fulfill
all
the
things
that
was
presented
to
us
at
the
state
of
the
council.
B
I
want
to
thank
those
of
you
that
attended
the
hall
of
fame
on
last
night,
where
I
was
inducted
into
the
florida
ffa
hall
of
fame
and
thank
the
mayor
for
the
proclamation
that
was
presented
at
that
event
as
well,
and
commissioner
nessa
for
your
attendance
being
there
to
support.
There
was
an
event
also
this
weekend
at
the
alarms
of
williams
park,
called
boots,
bikes
and
something
it
was
a
very
nice
event
very
well
attended
and
had
no
consequences,
no
issues
or
anything,
but
a
very.
R
N
R
R
Very
cool
to
see
and
congratulations
the
other
thing
I
want
to
discuss
at
last
night's
planning
commission
meeting.
They
went
over
and
kind
of
had
some
dialogue
about.
What's.
R
A
a
hardship,
I
would
definitely
recommend
everybody
up
here
to
watch
that
recording
last
night
start
around
minute.
29
goes
to
about
minute,
25
or
45.
So
it's
about
15
minutes
of
just
discussing
what
a
hardship
is
in
reference
to
getting
a
variance
approved
so
they're
just
having
a
challenging
time
making
a
decision
for
applicants
to
to
get
a
variance
approved.
So
it
would
just
help
us
if
we
just
have
start
thinking
about
creating
a
somewhat
of
a
loose
definition.
R
R
Comes
across
their
desk,
the
other
thing
is
roadways
I
had
on
social
media
and
some
other
people
reach
out
on
what
are
we
doing
about
our
roads?
Things
like
that?
Are
we
keeping
up
with
with
all
the
new
development
that
we
have
going
on,
and
we
do.
I,
like,
I
said
earlier
that
we
have
a
lot
of
great
plans.
Kelly
park
has
a
whole.
I
think
it
was
like
three
or
four
months
ago
that
maybe
even
longer
than
that,
but
they
did
a
whole.
J
R
Kelly
parks
going
to
be
redeveloped,
so
I
think
that's
a
certain
amount
of
it
in
the
kpi.
So
that's
exciting
golden
jump
can
be
repaved
and
widened
and
make
sure
that
it
has
a
side
to
it
so
that
it's
safer
441
is
going
to
start
having
it's,
not
pedestrian
islands.
I
can't
think
of
the
word
right
now,
but
they're
going
to
start
having
mediums.
R
Because
there's
there's
been
a
lot
of
deaths
on
that
road
with
pedestrians
walking
by
so
this
gives
them
a
safe
avenue
to
be
able
to
cross
co-apopka
road
is
going
to
be
taken
care
of
as
well,
then
we're
getting
the
light
on
jason
dwelling
kelly
park
for
the
new
kelly
park
school.
So
that's
great,
and
I
know
that
that
parking
situation
is
being
discussed
there
with
rock
springs
ridge
and
all
that.
So
I
know
that's
on
on
the
city's
radar
as
well
and
and.
R
Discussing
was
the
past
minutes
being
posted,
and
then
I
know
I
there
was
some
discussion
too,
and
I
just
don't
want
this
to
get
cold
the
south
apopka
workshop.
I
know
we're
looking
at
that-
probably
hopefully
like
an
august
september-ish
time
frame.
Okay
to
that,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
expectation's
being
built
correctly
and
and
that
that's
what
we
can
look
forward
to
so
that's
it.
C
A
I
don't
think
under
city
administrative
report-
I
guess
only
you
would
say
is
we've
met
with
all
of
the
departments
once
and
so
we
hadn't
even
added
up
the
numbers
yet
to
see
where
we
are
in
relation
to
the
income
coming
in,
but
oh
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
a
lot,
a
lot
of
wants,
so
we're
you
know
we're
going
to
see
what
we
can
do
and
so
we'll
we'll
hopefully
have
the
numbers
that
only
we
have
now
just
the
avalor.
We
don't
have
a
sales
tax
projection.
K
I
know
that
mayor
deming
said
that
the
county
did
very
well
this
year,
considering
post
covid.
A
R
A
Million
dollars,
like
ocoee
we'd,
be
in
a
different
position
too,
but
we
didn't
we
got
seven,
so
I
mean
that's
kind
of
what
it
is.
So
basically
we
got
the
money
back
that
we
lost
due
to
to
sales,
tax
losses
and
all
the
other
revenues.
So
we
you
know
we
we
broke
even
and
the
county
and
the
other
cities
around
us
came
out
smelling
like
a
rose
so
anyway,
michael
anything.
E
Report
aside
from
just
when
you
were
mentioning
the
beautification
drive-by
and
what
other
cities
doing
you
brought
back
flashbacks
of
when
I
was
in
private
practice
in
south
florida,
just
as
an
example,
city
of
boca
raton
has
a
community
appearance
board
and
every
single
site
plan
any
type
of
redevelopment.
Anything
after
you
go
through
your
whole
process
and
getting
approved
by
the
city
council.
E
You
have
to
then
appear
before
the
community
appearance
board,
to
make
sure
that
your
project
looks
the
way
boca
raton
is
supposed
to
look
and
most
of
the
times
it
was
called
cutting
a
huge
check
to
the
city
of
boca
raton,
so
that
they
would
then
make
it
look
like
the
city
of
boca
raton
looks
so
that's
one
avenue
if
you
wish
to
go
that
that
route.
I
think.
That's
the
extreme,
though.
A
All
right
mayor's
report
this
weekend,
we've
got
two
things
going
on.
We
have
one
of
our
apoca
celebrities
garden.
Marcus
right
here
from
apopka
is
going
to
be
over
at
the
chamber
of
commerce.
He's
got
like
seven
million.
A
He's
going
to
be
here
talking
about
you
know,
vegeta,
you
know
plant
materials,
you
know
interior
plants,
exterior
plants,
so
he'll
be
at
the
city
or
the
excuse
me,
the
chamber
of
commerce
chamber
of
commerce
from
one
to
three
and
then
from
one
to
seven.
We've
got
the
juneteenth
ceremony
or,
and-
and
you
know
festivities
out
at
alonzo
williams
park
that'd
be
from
one
to
seven,
so
garden,
marcus
from
one
to
three
at
the
apopka
chamber
and
the
juneteenth
celebration
from
one
to
seven
out
at
alonzo
williams
park.
A
Then
I'll
leave
with
july
4th
six
to
nine
we've
got
from
six
to
seven
will
be
some
kid
activities.
We
got
face,
painting
balloon
tying:
we've
got
a
a
small
rock
climbing
wall,
all
kinds
of
things
for
the
kids
and
then
at
seven
we've
got
the
band
comes
on
and
then
at
nine
or
soon
after
dusk,
we'll
have
fireworks.
So
we
will
see
you
guys,
then
thank
you.