►
From YouTube: Apopka Planning Commission Meeting June 9, 2020
Description
Apopka Planning Commission Meeting at City Hall on June 9, 2020 at 5:30 PM.
To view the meeting agenda, please visit http://www.apopka.net/agenda
#CityofApopkaFL
A
Our
first
order
of
business
of
is
approval
of
the
minutes
of
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
held
on
May
the
19th.
Does
anyone
have
any
changes
to
the
minutes?
If
not
do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
them
as
submitted
a
motion
by
Commissioner
Washington?
Is
there
a
second
second
second
by
Commissioner
Guster?
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
I
need
discussion,
then
we'll
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no,
and
that
carries
unanimously.
A
We'll
have
a
public
comment
period
in
connection
with
every
item
on
the
agenda,
but
if
anyone
has
any
general
comments
they
would
like
to
make
now
is
the
time
to
do
it
and
seeing
none.
We
will
proceed
with
the
first
item.
It's
a
request
to
recommend
approval
of
the
land
development
code,
glitch
amendments
to
we
have
a
staff
presentation.
B
Thank
You
chair,
Jim,
hit
Community
Development
Director.
This,
as
you
just
mentioned,
is
our
first
or
second
amendment
to
our
proposed
amendments
to
the
land
development
code.
The
first
one
was
actually
actually
the
land
development
code
was
updated
on
March
6th
2019,
and
then
we
had
our
first
set
of
amendments
that
was
adopted
on
Ghent
on
January
15
2020
that
contained
about
20
19
different
changes.
This
particular
one
again,
there's
10
articles
in
the
land
of
Elmo,
along
with
a
couple
appendices,
and
this
one
affects
14
of
those.
B
The
schedule
for
adoption
right
now
is
today
for
the
course
of
Planning
Commission
City
Council's
first
reading
is
scheduled
for
July
1st
at
1:30.
In
the
afternoon,
and
then
City
Council
second
reading
and
adoption
is
proposed
for
July
15th,
this
one
there's
also
a
couple
sections
in
here
that
are
being
proposed,
amendments
that
are
coinciding
with
a
land
development
or
a
comp
plan
change,
which
I
believe
you
already
saw
in
regards
to
the
ALS
and
nursing
homes.
So
this
is
the
second
part
of
it.
Of
course.
B
B
So
if
you'll
bear
with
me,
I'm
going
to
run
through
these
real
quick
if
there's
something
that
you
just
need
a
clarification,
I
can
pull
the
actual
section
up
and
we
can
take
a
look
at
that.
Just
you
know
back
and
forth,
hopefully,
at
a
time
a
little
bit
of
time
to
look
at
this
without
falling
asleep,
but
because
it's
a
kind
of
a
long
ordinance,
as
was
the
first
one.
So
the
first
part
is
article
2
under
administration.
B
This
basically
changes
the
plat
approval
process
from
quasi-judicial
to
standard,
which
basically
means
that,
instead
of
having
to
hear
it,
as
you
know,
plants
are
very
technical,
they
have
to
follow
code,
they
have
easements,
they
have
setbacks,
they
have.
You
can
get
very
detailed
on
the
plants
well
by
the
time
those
get
to
City
Council,
and
here,
of
course,
it's
pretty
much
vetted
every
legal
thing
that
has
to
be
done
for
a
plat,
so
instead
of
we
can
always
pull
it
out
and
discuss
it.
B
But
this
way
we
can
also
put
on
the
consent
agenda
without
having
to
do
a
formal
presentation
for
it.
So
the
second
one
is
basically
correcting
a
number
and
item
for
dry
for
a
driveway
and
a
sidewalk
reference.
It's
real,
quick,
quick,
simple
one.
The
third
portion
is
an
under
article
for
the
use
regulations.
The
principal
use
table.
B
We've
actually
got
a
couple
different
sections
in
here
that
we're
putting
in,
for
a
special
exception
for
assisted
living
facilities
and
nursing
homes,
there's
two
different
line
items
under
CC
and
then
there's
also
another
section
regarding
commercial
vehicle
sales
and
rentals,
adding
that
to
Il.
We
already
have
it
in
the
commercial,
regional
and
commercial,
so
we
figured
il
that's
kind
of
it
can
go
there
in
it.
Also,
you
know
a
lot
of
the
IL
or
the
low
density
or
low
industrial
uses
are
on
the
outskirts
of
town.
So
that's
it's
still
not
downtown.
B
Obviously,
standards
for
the
first
specific
two
principal
uses.
Turning
into
that
page,
real,
quick,
so
I
make
sure
I
don't
this
is
the
portion
that
basically
we're
adding
accessory
dwelling
units
to
four
different
zoning
categories?
One
is
the
mud
or
the
mixed-use
downtown
agriculture
for
minimum
one
acre
and
the
residential
Country
Estates,
which
is
also
a
minimum
of
one
acre
and
those,
and
then
the
RSF
one,
a
also
a
one
acre
minimum.
B
B
The
other
part
that
was
clear
that
I
had
to
clarify,
because
we
also
wanted
to
make
sure
we
kept
our
standards
regarding
mobile
homes,
a
mobile
home
or
a
symbol.
Similar
off-site
constructed
dwelling
unit
is
not
supposed
to
be
used
as
that
accessory
dwelling
unit.
It's
supposed
to
not
be
a
portable
unit
that
you
can
go
in
and
just
drop
it
down.
B
Maybe
it
wasn't
cost-effective
for
a
small
small
development
to
go
in,
so
we
were
looking
at
some
of
the
other,
the
other
cities
and
what
they
were
actually
utilizing
for
their
thresholds.
And
so
we
we
popped
that
up
to
250
units,
which
is,
it's
still
considered,
a
small
development
for
a
lot
of
the
developments
that
we've
got
there.
A
lot
of
those
are
a
lot
of
the
single-family.
Developments
are
going
around
three
to
four
hundred,
so
we
figured
250
would
actually.
B
C
C
B
Ranged
anywhere
from
from
150
200
up
to
about
500
units,
so
it
was
we
we
picked
the
the
100
was.
It
was
something
to
get
in
the
books,
but
as
it
turned
out,
it
was
just
a
little
bit
too
low
to
make
it
affordable
for
developers
to
go
in
and
basically
spend
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Putting
in
a
pool
house
and.
C
B
Staff
was
looking
for
excuse
me.
Staff
was
looking
for
a
number
and
a
lot
of
the
developers
that
we
were
developments
that
we
were
having
they
were
coming
in
at
about
a
hundred
units,
or
so
so,
some
of
the
smaller
ones.
So
we
thought
well,
let's,
let's
get
him
written
at
the
beginning
and
we
got
a
lot
of
law
degree
from
the
developers
we
work.
B
We
would
not
end
up
getting
a
lot
of
the
infill
products
that
we
were
getting
at
that
time
carrying
on
through
now,
and
so
we
wanted
to
be
a
little
bit
more
flexible
with
that
with
that
type
of
unit,
and
then
the
other
thing
that
actually
some
of
you
brought
up
is
that
some
of
these
larger
developments,
they've
got
75
85
foot
wide
Lots.
They
could
actually
put
a
pool
in
themselves
anyway,
so
we
were
thinking
a
lot
of
these
are
putting
pools
in.
C
B
D
B
The
next
one
is
the
nursing
home.
This
is
continuing
care
retirement
community
and
then
the
next
one
after
that
was
healthcare
uses,
and
those
are
the
two
that
we
added
in
the
nursing
homes
and
assisted
living
facilities
may
be
allowed
as
a
special
exception
in
the
commercial
land
use
category
and
consistent
with
the
land
development
code,
with
a
maximum
intensity
of
2.0
F
AR,
and
shall
also
be
the
primary
use
and
a
standalone
development.
B
Those
two
items,
those
last
two
items
are
key,
because
what
we
don't
want
occurring
is
a
al
F
going
in
a
commercial
shopping
center
and
that
that
stops
that
right
there
they
do
have
to
be
standalone.
We
had
a
couple
excuse
me:
we
had
a
couple
of
developers
that
were
looking
at
putting
in
lft's
on
some
property
and
the
properties
that
they
had
were
actually
good
locations.
They
were
back
behind.
Some
commercial
units
are
commercial
developments,
but
the
FA
are
the
floor
area
ratio.
B
The
only
thing
they
could
get
is
maybe
130
to
140
thousand
square
feet,
and
a
lot
of
these
are
over
200,000
square
feet.
There
are
multi
stories
are
usually
two
three
stories
mixed,
sometimes
even
four
stories.
Of
course,
we
do
have
35
feet
for
the
majorities,
so
they
would
have
to
come
in
for
variants
or
to
go
higher
than
the
35
feet,
but
so
what
we
wanted
to
do
is
allow
for
a
decent
development
like
this
we're
all
aging
in
place
kind
of
thing.
B
B
B
The
pool
could
be
five
feet
from
the
property
life,
provided
it's
not
in
a
utility
easement,
which
actually
wasn't
spelled
out
the
distance
for
the
pool
was,
but
of
course,
what
do
you
have
around
the
pool
but
a
pool
deck
so
the
pool
deck
itself
he
said
well,
the
pool
is
five
feet.
He
figured
he
could
put
the
deck
foot
from
the
property
line.
No,
you
can't
be
that
close
to
a
property
line
and
still
maintain
your
fence
or
your
property
line
or
anything
else.
B
So
we
clarified
that
and
made
sure
that
both
the
deck,
the
deck
itself
can
be
five
feet
or
more
depending
on
if
it
falls
within
a
utility
easement,
so
you
can't
go
into
utility
easement
and
it
has
to
be
a
minimum
of
five
feet
away
from
a
property
line,
so
that
was
a
clarification
page
26.
This
is
one
that
has
been
coming
up.
A
few
different
times
is
the
stacking
space
for
drive-throughs.
B
B
The
key
for
this
one
is:
we've
got
eight,
but
if
they
can
demonstrate
that
they
do
not
infringe
on
parking
spaces
or
they
wrapper
on
the
building
in
a
decent
way.
We
can
make
that
decision
as
long
as
they
have
eight.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
they
can
still
wrap
around
the
building
and
not
infringe
on
parking
spaces,
especially
like
I
think
it
was
Zaxby's.
We
had
some
problem
there
with
the
with
the
assisted-living
earliest.
B
Parking,
thank
you,
I
was
gonna,
say
disabled,
but
that's
not
correct
terminology,
but
the
accessible
parking
spaces
were
across
the
parking
lot.
Well,
we
changed
that
to
a
better
location,
but
anybody
that
still
has
to
cross
some
of
that
traffic
is,
we
want
to
make
sure
they're
safe,
so
that
was
there
was
to
help
design
that,
but
it
also
give
us
a
little
bit
of
flexibility
with
how
these
are
approved.
F
B
Typically
ordering
window
to
where
you
actually
pick
up
the
food
now,
if
the,
if
there's
more
spaces
behind
the
ordering
kiosk,
if
there's
like
one
or
two
more
extra
spots,
I,
can
take
that
into
consideration.
But
this
is
like
you
want
to
be
able
to
give
at
least
eight
parking
spaces,
because
at
lunchtime
and
dinnertime
it
backs
up.
They
all
back
up.
That
way
gives
us
a
little
bit
like
I
said
flexibility,
but
also,
for
is
nothing
I
mean
that's
nothing
street
light
assessment.
B
This
basic
will
require
all
the
develops
to
enter
into
a
street
light
special
assessment
agreement
that
basically
the
property
owners,
the
new
HOA
actually
have
to
has
to
pay
into
to
take
care
of
the
the
streetlights
Orange
County.
Has
it
right
now,
a
lot
of
other
cities
have
it
right
now,
but
instead
of
the
city
taking
up
the
bill
of
once
the
subdivision
is
completed,
it
falls
on
kind
of
like
common
mowing
areas.
It's
usually
the
HOA
that
pays
for
those
things
and
that's
what
this
does
is
establish,
establish
that.
B
The
other
thing
that
was
interesting
is
we
had
a
couple
different
references
regarding
our
utilities,
design
and
construction
standards
manual,
and
it
wasn't
labeled
correctly.
So
we
change,
we
made
sure
the
title
actually
was
reflected
correctly
in
our
land
development
code.
In
a
couple
spots,
traffic
impact
analysis,
we
added
bicycle
and
pedestrian
improvements,
because
we
are
a
bicycle
friendly
community
we're
working
that
way.
I
think
I
mentioned
this
at
one
of
our
other
meetings.
B
We're
looking
to
put
in
about
2.2
miles
of
downtown
Apopka
trail
downtown
it'll
go
six
Street
down
Michael
gladden
up
Hawthorne
out
5th
Street
to
6th
Street,
yeah
kind
of
a
good
wrap
your
yeah
it's
all
around,
but
what
we
want
to
do
is
you
have
that
connectivity
between
all
of
our
parks
going
north
to
south
and
in
separate
developments,
so
this
in
in
terms
of
your
traffic
improvement
program.
This
requires
that,
to
be
part
of
that.
B
Let's
see
here,
oh
and
then
the
other
part
that
ended
up
we,
we
ended
up
getting
a
whole
new
section,
dealing
with
general
development
design
and
improvements
provisions.
We
had
one
section
that
was
part
of
a
previous
article
that
had
nothing
to
do
with
development,
and
so
we
took
it
out
of
that
and
we
did
not
get
it
into
the
land
development
code
section
until
now.
B
But
this
way
it
is
in
one
spot,
it's
in
with
all
the
other
development
requirements
and
it
deals
with
clearing
grubbing
sodding,
seating
inspections,
water
pressure,
so
check
the
certificate
of
acceptance,
and
it's
everything
that
the
city,
engineers
and
and
our
inspector
people
have
to
have
to
have
in
order
to
get
a
site
so
that
it's
developed
properly.
There's
a
lot
more
stuff
in
there
than
what
I
understood
but
I'm
going
by
our
experts,
which
I'm
not
in
regards
to
the
actual
development
of
the
site
itself.
B
The
next
couple
are
basically
the
same
type
of
thing:
FEMA
had
different
requirements
for
updates
for
rainfall
amounts,
so
we
updated
the
rainfall
amounts.
There
was
also
something
in
regards
to
slopes,
and
this
was
kind
of
interesting.
This
is
on
page
36
of
the
ordinance
itself.
We
had
minimum
slopes
with
ratios
and
then
maximum
excavation
depths,
and
if
you
look
at
that,
it
had
two
two
one.
Three
two
one,
five,
two
one
six,
two
one,
but
it
didn't
have
four
two
one
we
had
at
41.
It
was
just
like.
Why
was
that
left
out?
B
It
was
copied
from
the
original
code
and
so
we're
updating
that
non-conforming
signs.
This
is
under
Section,
eight
point:
five.
We
did
not
have
anything
in
our
code
that
actually
allowed
staff
and
code
enforcement
to
remove
signs
that
have
been
out
there
for
five
six
years
that
are
haven't
been
used
in
five
or
six
years
and
look
like
they
haven't
been
used
in
five
or
six
years
that
no
longer
conform
to
our
code,
in
our
code,
of
course,
has
monument
Sciences
are.
Is
our
big
thing?
B
Well,
there's
a
lot
of
signs
that
are
out
there
that
are
non-conforming,
but
we
had.
We
had
no
mechanism
to
actually
go
to
the
property
owners
say
this
does
not
meet
code.
If
your
site
redevelops,
it
would
not
need
code,
you
could
not
use
it
anymore,
so
we
put
in
some
some
regulations
to
remove
those
signs.
B
Closed
dilapidated
doesn't
meet
current
code
and
I
believe
I
put
a
six-month
time
period
in
here,
yeah
reconstruction
or
repair
assigned
within
six
months
after
damaged
or
has
diligently
pursued
within
eight
consecutive
months
and
building
permit
is
required.
So
basically
six
to
eight
months.
If
you
aren't
doing
anything
with
that
sign
and
it's
non-conforming.
C
B
The
time
it's
the
businesses
of
close,
like
we've,
got
up
on
the
north
east
corner
of
Park
Ave
and
Sandpiper
the
old
gas
station.
That's
there
I
think
it
was
a
chevron.
Well,
they
when
chera
I
moved
out,
they
took
their
canopies
and
they
took
their
pumps
and
put
dirt
over
it,
and
that
was
it.
It
was
non-conforming
pump
Island
anyway,
but
the
sign
is
still
there
and
the
sign
is
it's
a
tall
sign.
B
It's
still
a
pedant,
it
hasn't
been
used
for
much
of
anything,
but
when
they
want
to
redevelop
the
site,
they
can't
redevelop
that
sign.
They're
gonna
have
to
bring
a
monument
signed
in
and
most
of
the
times,
they're
going
to
be
electronic
signs
anyway,
but
because
it
the
owner,
has
wanted
to
do
a
gas
station
again.
They
now
have
to
do
the
setbacks
and
the
canopy
and
the
signage
/
code
and
/
/
state
statutes
and
regards
to
visibility
for
the
actual
price
pricing
sign
the
most.
B
F
B
Do
have
under
the
definition
sections
we
do
have
a
section
for
clear
site
visit,
clear
sight
triangles
and
on
major
roads,
basically
create
a
triangle
on
a
major
road.
It's
50
feet
back
from
the
corner,
not
of
the
pavement,
but
of
the
property
line,
which
usually
means
the
sidewalk
itself.
So
you
drive.
Basically,
if
it's
on
a
corner,
you
drive
go
down
50
feet
that
way.
If
it's
on
a
major
corner,
you
get
50
feet
the
other
way,
and
then
you
do
a
triangle.
B
B
We've
got
easement
language,
let's
see
here.
Oh
yeah
encroachments
within
the
five
foot
setback
again,
not
within
a
utility
easement,
so
it
basically
can't
put
things
in
a
utility
he's
been
to
cover
utilities,
the
other
one
that
came
up.
We
originally
had
utility
sheds
maxed
out
at
a
hundred
square
feet.
Well,
as
it
turns
out,
Planning
and
Zoning
staff
approves
normal,
smaller
sheds,
but
the
building
code
requires
a
building
permit
for
sheds
or
small
structures
that
are
over
120
square
feet.
So
there
was
a
20-foot
lapse
in
between
there.
B
So
if
we
didn't
review
it
under
it
and
I
say
110
feet,
somebody
builds
her
own
shed.
I
haven't
seen
that,
but
there
was
a
couple
people
that
were
coming
in
like
that.
So
what
I
did
I
just
up
this
to
120
square
feet,
so
that
if
it's
that
staff
planning
zoning
staff
can
approve
it,
if
it's
bigger
than
that,
then
he
goes
for
a
building.
Permit.
B
And
then,
last
but
not
least,
the
Kelly
Park
interchange,
we
did
not
have
a
portion
there.
We
talked
about
concept
plans,
but
it
didn't
match
what
we
had
in
our
rest
of
our
code
for
standard
review.
So
I
changed
the
line.
We
changed
the
language
to
standard
review
procedures
in
the
land
development
code,
which
is
under
the
administration
section
under
Article
two.
So
basically
we're
matching
different
things,
and
this
is
kind
of
a
typical
thing.
B
All
in
all,
a
lot
of
these
are
brand
new
things,
a
lot
of
emerge.
You
know
things
that
staff
has
observed
that
we
needed
to
make
changes
for,
and
the
whole
idea
is
that
the
land
development
code
is
not
a
ingrained
thing.
We
can
make
changes
to
it
as
we
see
the
changes
in
need
so
and
I'm
here
for
any
other
questions.
Okay,
any
questions
of.
A
G
A
B
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
proposed
rezoning
master
plan,
sliced
major
development
plan
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
land
development
code
and
neighborhood
overlay
district
recommend
approval
of
the
rezoning
of
the
subject
parcels
from
T
transitional
to
MU,
KPI,
mixed-use,
Kelly,
Park,
interchange,
assignment
of
the
neighborhood
overlay
district
and
the
master
plan.
A
Slash
major
development
plan
based
on
the
findings,
in
fact
presented
in
the
staff
report
and
exhibits,
subject
to
the
applicant
obtaining
all
approvals,
as
required
per
the
Orange
County
Charter,
and
the
amended
and
a
local
agreement
for
public
school
facility
planning
and
implementation
of
concurrency
for
the
property
owned
by
Quintero,
Holdings
LLC
and
located
at
38
45
and
40
11
golden
gem
Road.
We
have
a
staff
presentation.
H
Thank
You,
mr.
chairman,
good
evening,
Bobby
Hall,
Senior
Planner,
the
owner
of
the
property,
is
requesting
a
rezoning
of
91.9,
four
acres
of
property
from
transitional
to
kelly
park,
interchange
mixed-use,
with
a
neighborhood
overlay
or
character,
or
zone
overlay,
to
develop
a
single-family
residential
subject,
subdivisions
subject
to
the
requirements,
the
Kelly
Park
interchange,
a
scope
properties
composed
of
two
parcels
and
is
located
at
38
45
and
40
11
golden
gym.
Road,
the
vicinity
map
shows
the
location
of
the
parcels
say.
Ro
429
to
the
east
golden
gym.
H
Road
to
the
west
surrounding
properties
consists
primarily
of
single-family
residential
agricultural
and
rural
uses.
Surrounding
zoning,
which
shows
properties
that
are
in
the
city
primarily
have
a
transitional
zoning.
That's
in
the
purple.
The
subject
properties
outlined
in
the
black.
The
property
is
located
within
the
one-mile
radius
from
the
State
Road
429
Kelley
Park
Road
interchange,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
graphic
here.
That
radius
is
concentrated
from
where
you
see
the
the
star
in
the
center,
and
it
goes
in
a
one-mile
radius
outwards,
as
you
can
see
with
the
circle.
H
H
H
H
H
There
is
a
condition
of
approval
in
your
staff
reports.
Approval
number
four:
it's
changed
a
little
bit
and
I'll
get
to
that
in
just
a
moment,
these
their
architectural
elevations,
which
are
consistent
with
the
form
based
code,
and
this
is
what
the
developer
intends
to
build.
So
the
condition
number
fours
changed
a
little
bit.
It
is.
The
applicant
is
required
to
obtain
all
approvals
if
required,
as
set
forth
in
the
Orange
County
Charter
and
amended
interlocal
agreement
for
public
school
facility
planning
and
implementation
of
concurrency.
H
A
I
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
my
name
is
Jimmy
Crawford
I'm,
a
project
attorney
for
cantero
Holdings,
who
is
the
owner
of
Park
View
Preserve.
We
do
have
with
us
today,
Jose
Quintero,
who
is
representing
the
owner,
Julius
Julie,
CMAs
James,
who
is
a
another
project
attorney
that
works
on
a
different
aspect
of
it
and
Jeff
summit
who's.
The
project
engineer:
we
have
worked
with
staff
and
they
have
worked
with
us
since
some
time
early
last
fall.
This
projects
been
through
many
different
iterations
and
changes
suggested
by
staff.
I
We
appreciate
their
hard
work.
We
don't
have
a
pride.
We
agree
with
the
staff
report.
We
don't
have
a
formal
presentation.
We
would
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
questions.
I
can
talk
great
about
this
project
for
an
hour
and
a
half,
but
if
there
aren't
questions
about
it,
I
don't
want
to
waste
everybody's
time.
Okay,
any.
A
F
A
J
J
The
language
here
is
not
accurately
reflecting
what
the
staff
and
the
applicant
worked
on,
and
it's
very
minor,
it's
that
that
this
is
a
condition
with
approval.
This
is
an
approval
with
conditions
and
the
condition
is
it's
basically
that
you
know
they're
obtaining
all
approvals,
as
required
by
the
Orange
County
Charter.
If
any
are
necessary,
it
wouldn't
be
clear
that
we
have
to
be
there's
an
if
any
language,
because
right
now,
the
the
entire
notion
of
the
appellee
approvals
in
regards
to
the
Orange
County,
a
Orange
County
School
Board,
are
in
flux.
J
D
A
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
fund
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
transmittal
of
the
future
land
use
amendment
from
county
rural
to
city,
commercial,
max,
FA,
our
point
0.25
to
the
Florida
Department
of
Economic
Opportunity,
when
the
properties
owned
by
Khan
call
your
band
joint
venture,
LLC
and
Williams
family
trust
and
located
north
of
West
Orange
Blossom
Trail
west
of
State
Route
429.
We
have
a
staff
presentation.
K
The
subject
area
is
highlighted
in
yellow
and
located
north
of
West
Orange,
Blossom,
Trail
and
west
of
State.
Route
429
to
the
north
is
a
nursery
in
single-family.
Homes
to
the
east
is
State.
Route,
429
woodlands
and
Plymouth
Sorrento
Road
to
the
south
is
a
Morrison
subdivision
and
the
state
route
429
connector
road
to
the
west
is
the
Morrison
subdivision
and
single-family
homes.
K
K
Subject
area
is
approximately
23.73
acres
with
county
rural
feature,
land
use
and
this
feature
land
use.
Amendment
is
being
processed
simultaneously
with
the
next
agenda
item,
which
is
a
proposed
feature.
Land
use
amendment
to
high
density
residential
for
subject.
Property
is
north
adjacent
of
this
23.73
acres,
and
these
two
large
scale
feature
Landis
amendments
are
for
an
area
that
is
referred
to
as
the
Floridian
town
center.
K
The
development
review
committee
recommends
approval
of
the
large-scale
future
land
use
amendment
from
county
rural
to
city,
commercial,
and
the
recommended
motion
for
this
evening
is
to
find
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
incompatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
transmittal
of
the
future
land
use
map,
designation
from
county
rural
to
city,
commercial,
maximum,
floor
area,
ratio
of
0.25
to
the
Florida
Department
of
Economic
Opportunity.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
I
do
believe.
K
L
Good
evening,
commissioners,
my
name
is
Andrew
McGowan
with
GI
consultants.
Our
address
our
office
is
located
at
618
East
South
Street
in
Orlando
Florida.
So
thank
you
for
your
consideration
tonight.
As
Phil
mentioned
this,
this
presentation
will
be
about
this
agenda
item
and
the
following
agenda
item,
which
are
part
of
the
same
project.
One
is
the
commercial
portion
and
one
is
the
residential
portion.
L
So,
as
Phil
said,
a
lot
of
this
will
be
a
repeat
of
what
Phil
said
so
I'll
go
quickly,
but
as
Phil
said
that
the
overall
project
will
be
seventy
three
point:
eight
seven
acres
and
is
located
in
west
popke,
adjacent
to
u.s.
441,
plymouth,
sorrento
road
and
the
connector
road,
which
is
now
congratulations
owned
by
the
city.
So.
L
As
he
said,
the
the
property
is
bounded
to
the
north
and
the
east
by
CFX
owned
property,
including
State
Road
429
itself.
The
to
the
south
is
city
of
Apopka
right
away,
including
the
connector
road
and
the
associated
stormwater
pond
to
the
west
are
single-family
residential
and
a
church
and
the
the
most
recent
development
on
the
property
included,
mobile
homes,
single-family
homes,
a
church
and
a
plant
nursery.
L
So
the
the
current
future
land
use
of
the
property
is
county
rural
because
when
it
was
annexed,
the
zoning
was
not
or
the
land
use
was
not
applied
at
that
time,
so
it
retained
its
County
designation.
One
do
you
part
in
occurs
the
existing
residential
to
the
west,
the
average
built
density
of
that
property
of
many
of
those
subdivisions
is
about
3.75,
some
are
lower,
some
are
higher
and
then
recently
there
was
a
successful
annexation
for
the
last
remaining
piece
of
property.
L
L
The
proposed
future
land
use
for
the
entire
site
will
be
about
50
acres
of
HDR,
which
is
15
units
per
acre
and
commercial
at
not
quite
23
acres,
and
that
is
at
0.25.
Fa
are
max
the
zoning
again.
Zoning
was
not
assigned
when
the
property
was
annexed,
so
it
still
retains
its
a1
county
zoning
and
we
are,
we
will
be
proposing
a
PUD
for
the
entire
site.
L
And
just
to
get
a
little
feel
of
the
character
of
what
will
be
proposed,
the
in
the
apartments
there'll
be
three-story
apartment
buildings
and
will
include
a
pool,
an
amenity
area.
There
will
be
pedestrian
connections
to
the
town
center
and
I
have
some
photos
from
actual
product
that
has
been
constructed
by
the
developer
in
prior
prior
multifamily
developments,
and
these
are
a
few
photos
that
demonstrate
the
character
of
the
buildings
and
the
place
that
they're
planning
to
create
here.
A
few
amenity
concepts.
L
There
will
be
a
pool
and
playground
area
that
will
be
part
of
this
development
and
some
nice
interior
amenities
phases
as
well
will
be
part
of
this
for
the
town
center
it'll
be
about
a
two
hundred
thousand
square
foot
town
center
of
retail
and
professional
office.
Probably
a
single-story
not
including
the
hotel
site,
but
it'll,
be
a
pedestrian
friendly
area
with
lots
of
walkability
and
we'll
have
an
anchor
grocery
site,
and
here
are
a
few
photos
of
the
retail
town
center
character.
L
And,
as
for
the
hotel,
like
I,
said,
it'll
be
about
120
keys,
it'll
be
a
four
to
five
story.
Apartment
and
it'll
be
located
at
the
intersection,
as
you
can
see,
circled
at
southfork
and
the
429
to
get
that
visibility
from
the
expressway
and
just
a
couple
of
photos
of
representing
the
character
of
the
hotel
for
the
AL
F.
It
will
be
an
al
F
or
an
IL
f,
also
a
three
story
building,
and
these
are
similar
products
to
what
is
being
envisioned
for
this
site.
F
G
It
looks
like
you
and
you
go
south
through
the
parking
lot
and
then
you
take
a
right
into
a
field
eventually
that
goes
over
to
Herman
Smith.
Yes,
so
I'm
guessing
all
that
land
is
now
acquired
by
you,
but
it
just
didn't
when
I
first
looked
at
this,
it
didn't
look
like
that.
So
I
just
want
confirmation
that
that's
sure.
L
L
G
G
L
The
and
I'm
happy
to
defer
to
the
traffic,
but
the
large
majority
of
the
traffic
to
the
the
project
will
be
coming
from
connector
road
in
South
Fork,
just
because
that's
how
they
connect
to
the
major
roads,
the
connection
to
the
north,
at
least
at
this
time,
there's
there's
not
as
much
traffic
that
comes
from
the
north.
Obviously
the
the
majority
is
is
coming
from
the
big
roads
in
the
expressway.
G
M
M
L
A
O
D
M
O
P
P
F
P
D
P
B
P
D
Q
P
A
A
A
F
Q
A
A
All
right,
our
next
item
is
a
request
to
fund
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
transmittal
of
the
future
land
use
amendment
from
county
rural
to
city,
high
density,
residential,
that's
a
0
to
15
dwelling
units
per
acre
to
the
Florida
Department
of
Economic
Opportunity
for
the
properties
owned
by
Collin,
Collier,
Baines,
joint
venture
LLC,
Williams,
family
trust
and
Eugene,
and
Willie
Williams,
and
located
north
of
West
Orange
Blossom
Trail
west
of
state
route.
429.
That
was
to
have
presentation
good.
K
Evening
planning
commissioners
Phil
Martinez
pleasure
to
with
the
city's
Planning
Division
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
large-scale
future
land
use
amendment
from
county
rural
to
city,
high
density,
residential
15.
For
approximately
fifty
point,
two
acres,
the
subject
area
is
highlighted
in
yellow
and
located
north
adjacent
of
the
previous
agenda
item
for
the
commercial
feature
land
use
to
the
south.
K
This
large
scale
of
future
land
use
amendment
for
approximately
fifty
point.
Two
acres
to
residential
high
15
is
being
processed
simultaneously
with
the
commercial
feature
land
use,
which
is
the
South
adjacent
light
blue
is
the
Development
Committee
recommends
approval
of
the
large-scale
future
land
use
amendment
from
County
Burrell
to
city,
high
density,
residential
1502.
K
The
1520's
per
acre
and
recommended
motion
for
this
evening
is
to
find
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
transmittal
of
the
future
land
use
map
designation
from
county
rural
to
high
density,
residential
15
0
to
15
joining
in
his
per
acre
to
the
Florida
Department
of
Economic
Opportunity.
This
is
my
presentation
and
I
are
happy
to
address
any
questions.
Okay,.
A
Any
questions
of
staff,
Thank,
You
Phil
and
the
petitioner
I
think
said,
he's
available
to
answer
questions.
You
will
have
any
questions
of
the
petitioner
nope.
Okay,
then
we'll
close
the
presentations
open,
the
public
hearing.
Anyone
wish
to
appear
before
the
Commission
on
this
item.
Seeing
none
I'll
bring
it
back
to
the
Commission.
Q
A
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
approval
of
the
future
land
use
amendment
from
county
rural
to
city,
commercial,
subject
to
the
findings
of
the
staff
report
for
property
owned
by
AE
d,
do
or
nursery
10:19
trust
located
north
of
East
Keene,
Road
west
of
Clare
kkona
Road.
We
have
a
staff
presentation.
K
Good
evening
planning
commissioners,
so
Martinez
planner
to
with
the
city's
Planning
Division,
the
applicant,
is
proposing
a
small
scale,
feature
land
use,
amendment
from
county
rural
to
city,
industrial
for
approximately
four
point.
Ninety
four
acres,
the
subject
area
is
highlighted
in
purple
and
located
north
of
East
Keene
Road
at
west
of
Clarke
Ono
Road
to
the
north
is
the
class
act
farm,
which
is
an
equestrian
center
and
the
State
Route
four
one
four
to
the
east,
our
vacant
properties
and
the
Penny
Lane
shopping
center,
as
well
as
Clarke
owner
Road
to
the
south.
K
K
The
development
review
committee
recommends
approval
of
the
small
scale
feature
lanius
amendment
from
county
rural
to
city,
industrial
and
the
recommended
motion
for
this
evening
is
to
find
the
proposed
future
land
use
amendment
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
approval
of
the
change
of
future
land
use.
Designation
from
to
city
industrial
subject
to
the
findings
of
the
staff
report.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
I
do
believe.
K
M
M
M
R
Good
evening
my
name
is
Tara
tender
I'm,
an
attorney
at
lounge
drawers,
dick
to15,
north
Yola,
Drive
Orlando
Florida
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
My
presentation
would
basically
just
be
repeating
what
your
staff
has
already
told
you
and
they
have
a
pretty
thorough
staff
report
as
well
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
have,
we
agree
with
staffs
recommendation
for
support.
Really.
R
This
was
prompted
by
a
need
to
clean
up
an
annexation
agreement,
condition
from
2014
where
the
land
was
supposed
to
have
been
assigned
a
future
land
juice
and
a
zoning
designation
under
the
city
when
it
was
annexed
from
Orange
County
and
that
hadn't
happened
yet,
and
so
we've
had
some
conversations
with
staff.
They
asked
us
to
go
through
that
rezoning
and
future
land
use
process.
Now
we
talked
to
them
and
given
what
the
use
of
the
property
is
and
what
it
would
be
in
the
future.
This
was
the
most
compatible
land
use
and
Zoning.
R
Also
given
what's
happening
in
the
surrounding
area,
again
happy
to
answer
any
questions
specific
as
to
the
use
of
a
medical
marijuana
treatment
center.
If
you
have
any
that
is
relayed
and
preempted
to
the
state
of
Florida
Department
of
Health,
but
we
have
been
transparent
with
your
staff
and
told
them
happy
to
give
you
our
plans,
even
though
there's
no
authority
to
review
them
aside
from
building
code
and
fire
code,
compliance,
okay,.
A
A
K
Martinez
planner
with
the
city's
Planning
Division.
This
is
a
proposed
rezoning
from
T
transitional
districts
to
il
light
industrial
district
for
the
same
subject
property
as
the
previous
agenda
item,
in
which
the
proposed
light
industrial
district,
the
proposed
light
industrial
zoning
district
is
compatible
with
the
proposed
industrial
future
land
use.
The
development
review
committee
recommends
approval
with
a
small
of
the
rezoning
from
transitional
district
to
light
industrial
district
and
recommend.
K
A
motion
for
this
evening
is
to
find
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan,
incompatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
areas,
recommending
approval
of
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
from
T
transitional
districts
to
il
light
industrial
districts
for
the
property
owned
by
AED,
er
nursery
2019
trusts
and
located
at
251
east
Keene
Road.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
the
applicant
and
I
are
happy
to
address
any
questions.
Okay,.
A
C
A
A
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
Carl
Hills
Road
self
storage,
major
development
plan
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
in
the
1993
land
development
code
and
recommend
approval
of
the
major
development
plan,
subject
to
the
conditions
of
approval
and
findings
of
the
staff
report
for
the
property
owned
by
a
space
storage,
Claire,
coma,
LLC
and
located
at
2,200
corraled
Hills
Road.
That
will
staff
presentation.
H
Thank
You
mr.
chairman,
once
again,
Bobby
Hall,
Senior
Planner.
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
of
a
major
development
plan
for
a
self
storage
facility
located
at
2200
coral
Hills
Road
that
will
be
developed
in
two
phases.
The
vicinity
map
shows
the
location
of
the
proposed
facility
on
the
screen
for
14th
to
the
south,
and
it's
off
of
coral
Hills
Road
and
can
be
accessed
by
a
Clark
hona
Road
site
is
accessed
by
a
full
access
point
located
on
Coral
Hills
Road,
which
is
right
here.
H
Phase
one
will
consist
of
two
buildings:
totaling
52,000
875
square
feet
in
area
that
are
labeled
as
buildings.
A
and
B
building
a
is
thirty.
Eight
thousand
five
hundred
square
square-foot,
hybrid
climate-controlled
self
storage,
building
and
building
B
is
at
14000,
375
square
foot,
non-climate,
controlled
self
storage.
Building
an
outdoor
boat
RV
parking
area
will
be
provided
within
the
center
of
the
site
on
Phase
one
once
Phase
two
commences.
This
will
become
a
eighty
one
thousand
nine
hundred
fifty
square
feet
of
climate-controlled
self
storage.
H
Will
be
a
twenty-four
unit?
Canopy
covered
RV
parking
area
which
would
be
constructed
on
the
southern
portion
of
the
site
and
that'll
be
constructed
with
phase
two
as
a
condition
of
approval.
Only
operable
vehicles
may
be
permitted
to
be
stored
in
the
RV
area.
The
vehicles
shall
not
be
inhabited.
Stormwater
retention
is
proposed
to
be
located
on.
The
northern
portion
of
the
site
site
is
not
currently
served
by
city
reclaimed,
water
and
wastewater
lines.
H
With
that
in
mind,
public
Services
has
agreed
to
the
provisions
of
an
agreement
which
will
allow
the
applicant
to
construct
a
wastewater
treatment
system
on
the
property
prior
to
the
city
and
installing
of
waste
water
collection
system
in
the
vicinity
of
the
property,
and
that
agreement
will
be
presented
to
the
City
Council
for
ultimate
approval
or
denial,
and
a
landscape
plan
consists
of
a
pallet,
that's
permitted
under
the
land
development
code.
Florida-Friendly
landscaping,
architectural
elevations
are
consistent
with
the
development
design
guidelines,
as
noted
in
the
land
development
code
as
well.
H
A
G
G
Q
A
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
hidden
lake
reserve
subdivision
plan
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
land
development
code
and
the
final
development
plan
and
recommend
approval
of
the
plat
subject
to
the
findings
of
the
staff
report
for
the
property
owned
by
TGIF,
comma
LLC,
located
at
501
Old
Dixie
Highway,
and
we
have
a
staff
presentation.
S
Good
evening,
commissioners,
Jean
Sanchez
with
the
Community
Development
Department.
This
is
a
request
to
recommend
approval
of
the
plat
for
the
Hidden
Lake
reserve
subdivision.
The
property
is
located
north
of
Old,
Dixie,
Highway
and
east
adjacent
of
Apopka
elementary
school.
Here's,
the
aerial
of
the
property
showing
single-family
residential
uses
to
its
northeast
and
a
portion
of
the
west,
the
property,
the
property
is
approximately
thirteen
and
a
half
acres.
S
Some
may
recall
the
above
shown
preliminary
development
plan
that
was
recommended
for
approval
by
this
Commission
on
June
12th,
2018
and
subsequently
approved
by
City
Council
in
August,
15
2018.
Since
then,
a
new
applicant
getting
the
project
and
the
and
proposed
some
minor
changes
to
the
development
plan
shown
is
the
final
development
plan,
with
the
minor
changes
proposing
a
dog
park
walking
trail
as
well
as
parking
on
street
and
in
the
pool
facility
area
on
June
3rd
2020.
The
City
Council
approved
this
proposed
final
development
plan.
S
A
F
A
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
lakeside
phase,
one
final
development
plan
and
plat
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
the
1993
land
development
code
and
recommend
approval,
subject
to
final
review
by
the
city,
surveyor
and
city
engineer
prior
to
recording
the
plat
and
the
findings
in
the
staff
report
for
the
property
owned
by
Avatar
properties,
inc
and
located
south
of
marshall
lake
west
of
state
route.
451.
We
have
staff
presentation.
H
Thank
You
mr.
chairman,
once
again,
Bobby
Howell,
Senior
Planner,
the
property
is
located
south
of
Marshall,
Lake
and
west
of
State
Road
451
and
the
surrounding
properties
are
primarily
single-family
residential
in
nature.
The
applicants
requesting
approval
and
of
amendment
to
the
approved
final
development
plan
and
plan
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
8
retaining
walls
in
phase
one
of
the
development,
which
consists
of
177
single
family
units.
The
reason
for
the
addition
of
the
retaining
walls
is
that
the
developer
wants
to
provide
flatter
rear
yards
and
currently
exist
on
the
site.
H
E
Name
is
Sofia:
Sara
go
I'm,
one
of
the
engineers
with
Afghan
engineering,
2221,
Lee,
Road,
Suite,
27,
Winter,
Park,
Florida,
three
to
seven
eight,
nine
I.
Don't
really
have
any
a
presentation
but
I'm
hearing.
You
know
if
you
guys
have
any
questions.
I
wasn't
one
of
the
things
staff
or
the
presentation.