►
From YouTube: Apopka Planning Commission Meeting February 14, 2023
Description
Apopka Planning Commission Meeting at City Hall on February 14, 2023 at 5:30 PM. To view the meeting agenda visit: https://www.apopka.gov/agenda
#CityofApopkaFL #ApopkaPlanningCommission
A
A
C
A
Opposed
motion
carries
at
each
meeting.
We
have
a
public
comment
section
prior
to
going
through
the
agenda
for
any
items
or
anything
that
is
not
on
the
item
on
the
agenda
itself.
Each
individual
item
on
the
agenda
will
have
a
public
comment
section.
So
if
you're
here
to
comment
about
a
particular
item,
then
you
can
wait
until
that
item
is
on
the
agenda.
D
D
The
adoption
schedule
right
now.
This
is
obviously
Planning
Commission
for
recommendation
to
city
council
city
council
scheduled
right
now
for
March
1st
for
the
first
reading
and
second
reading
is
scheduled
for
March
15th
for
second
reading
and
adoption,
provided
everything
goes
good
for
you
with
both
both
boards.
D
D
We
didn't
want
the
the
lot
width
for
a
duplex
to
be
twice
as
big
as
a
single
family,
basically
because
it
doesn't
have
to
account
for
the
the
the
setbacks
between
the
buildings,
because
it's
a
duplex.
The
second
one
is
on
table
10.2
point
B
or
0.4
B,
which
is
under
the
definitions
section,
and
that
one
we
I
was
supposed
to
have
added
in
the
third
line,
says
well,
the
whole
thing
I'll
just
read
the
whole
thing.
This
way
it's
clarified
on
a
single
family
dwelling.
D
D
So
that
being
said,
I'll
there's
a
couple
real,
easy
ones
that
that
we're
working
on
the
first
one
is
the
arbor
there's
some
Arbor
regulations
that
we
had
to
amend
this
is
this
is
on
section
two
2.5.4
and
there's
some
exemptions
that
that
are
put
in.
We
actually
had
to
take
out
the
last
line
in
there
in
accordance
with
what
was
passed
by
Florida
legislation.
So
we
just
took
it
out.
D
That
was
a
quick,
real,
quick
and
easy
another
one
is
in
regards
to
of
the
informational
meeting
being
waived
instead
of
just
myself.
It
can
also
be
the
community
development
director
or
the
designee,
because
we've
got,
we
do
have
some
people
that
can
make
those
decisions
besides
myself,
so
it
allows
you
to
play
hooky
well,
if,
if
Gene
needed
to
do
it,
we
can
do
that
too
yeah
and
then
the
next,
like
four
or
five
pages.
What
we're
doing
is
combining
the
comprehensive
plan
or
text
map
and
Zoning
into
one
section.
D
Basically,
it
it
eliminates
a
whole
section
in
the
Land
Development
code,
so
we're
trying
to
slim
down
the
land
of
element
code,
because
the
requirements
for
the
advertising
and
the
notifications
are
all
the
same
for
all
three
of
those.
So
it
just
kind
of
made
sense
to
slim
it
down.
Instead
of
showing
the
same
thing
for
about
six
pages,
it
just
kind
of
helps
in
the
Land
Development
code
itself.
D
And
then,
however,
the
hardship
cannot
be
self-imposed
or
the
result
of
the
property
owner's
own
actions,
so
in
other
words,
if
we
do
have
karst
topography,
if
we
have
a
strange
shape
that
makes
the
property
a
lot
more
unusable.
We
can
utilize
that,
as
a
reason
to
do
to
Grant
a
variants
so
that
helps
that'll
help
with
all
of
you,
with
some
of
the
decisions
that
we
were.
D
E
F
D
This
is
another
big
one
under
3.1.3
organization
of
zoning
districts.
This
is
the
base.
Zoning
District
same
same
location
under
we
were
adding
a
new
section
for
for
residential
subdivisions
established
prior
to
March
6
2019,
which
is
when
we
adopted
the
the
most
current
Land
Development
code.
May
maintain
primary
structure
setbacks.
This
is
front
rear
side
at
a
minimum,
as
originally
approved.
D
What's
been
happening
is
because
I
mean
we've,
we've
got,
you
know,
20
000
residents,
residential
structures
in
town
and
a
lot
of
those
subdivisions
had
different
setbacks,
and
when
we
established
the
new
code,
we
tried
to
make
everything
uniform
for
some
of
the
base:
zoning
districts,
residential
zoning
districts
that
we
have,
which
meant
that
we
were
going.
Some
of
the
districts
went
from
20
to
25
each
for
a
setback.
D
Others
might
have
been
the
reverse,
but
instead
of
having
to
worry
about
having
to
Grant
a
variance
for
something
that
they
wouldn't
have
had
to
worry
about
a
variance
in
the
past.
This
establishes
or
allows
us
to
utilize
those
old
codes
for
each
of
those
subdivisions.
Most
of
them
are
usually,
you
went
from
25
to
20
feet.
It
allows
us
to
utilize
that
in
fact,
as
we
have
a
variance
that's
coming
up
tonight,
that
it's
exactly
that
case,
they
originally
had
a
setback
of
20
feet.
D
When
we
adopted
the
new
code,
it
went
to
25
feet.
In
that
case
the
the
applicants
they're
trying
to
get
a
jump
on
the
approval
or
this
middle
of
building
plans
to
build,
in
addition
to
the
house
for
the
mother,
and
if
that
passes
tonight
good,
if
it
doesn't
pass
in
a
month,
it
it'll
be
codified
in
the
land
of
element
code
that
they'd
still
be
able
to
do
it.
So
that's.
D
D
A
A
D
That
yeah
yeah,
unfortunately
a
lot
of
times,
like
you
just
said,
Common
Sense,
doesn't
necessarily
Prevail.
Okay,
yeah,
you
all
know.
This
is
a
pretty
exacting
thing.
We
we
don't
get
to
be
arbitrary
on.
You
know
how
we're
interpreting
the
code.
The
code
is
what
it
is
and
then
in
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
3.3.6,
the
residential
two
family
District
and
the
let's
see
here,
the
RMF
residential
multi-family,
District
and
rmu,
the
residential
mixed
use
districts.
D
We
are
making
some
changes
to
the
lot
width
requirements,
some
of
the
square
footage
requirements
and
we're
also
putting
in
specifications
regarding
an
alley
because,
as
you
as
you
recall,
some
of
the
smaller
lots
that
were
requiring
them
to
have
rear
loaded.
We
did.
We
had
some
some
information
regarding
alleys,
but
it
wasn't
specified.
So
this
specifies
that
basically,
it's
an
18
foot
alley.
D
That's
the
road
right
away,
part
in
the
alley
itself,
they're
all
private
by
the
way
and
it's
14
foot
of
passable
and
then
two
feet
on
each
side
for
like
the
curve
and
gutter.
So
that
way
it's
an
eight
we
get.
We
have
an
18
foot
alley,
that's
established,
but
it
also
requires
there's
another
section
farther
on
that
requires
that
no
parallel
parking
is
done
on
the
Alley,
because
it's
only
18
feet
and
that
they're
lit
for
lighting,
because
otherwise
it's
a
it's
a
dark
alley
and
we
also
for
safety
purposes.
D
Another
one
that
came
up
under
the
mixed
use
district
for
the
downtown.
We
were
running
into
some
issues
regarding
minimum
square
footage,
so
under
3.6.3
we
did
it
put
in
some
minimum
square
footage
for
for
homes.
In
this
case,
it's
a
minimum
living
area
is
1350
square
feet
for
multi-family
750
square
feet
for
one
bed,
900
square
feet
for
a
two
bed
or
or
bigger.
D
D
Industrial
uses,
one
of
the
things
that's
been
coming
up
is
we've
been
having
a
lot
of
companies
wanting
to
come
in
and
just
park
trailers
arbitrary
on
on
property.
They
are
supposed
to
be
paved,
but
then
there's
nobody
to
take
care
of
them.
There's.
Basically,
it's
open
storage
at
that
point.
So
what
we're
recommending
is
that
that
any
outside
storage
is
a
principal
use
such
as
that
provide
a
primary
building
and
then
we'd
get
the
specifications
for
that.
Building
thousand
square
feet
has
to
have
utilities.
D
It
can't
just
be
a
pole,
barn
or
something
that
that
has
sides
on
it.
That
includes
a
bathroom
and
is
also
a
in
in
line
with
the
land
of
element
code
with
the
minimum
design
standards.
So
that
way,
we're
getting
an
actual
usable
piece
of
property,
whether
it's
for
rentals
or
or
storage
of
trucks
or
anything
else,
but
it
should
have
a
a
use
there
that
can
actually
be
used.
You
know
once
when
somebody's
going
to
park
a
truck.
D
And
then
there's
a
specification
regarding
accessory
structures
so
that
we
don't
have
somebody
coming
in
and
putting
in
three
or
four
sheds.
We
are
limiting
it
to
one
accessory
structure,
as
described
in
table
10.2
Point
four
point:
B,
those
include
garages,
util
or
utility
sheds
on
single-family
Lots
we've
been
having.
D
We
actually
had
somebody
that
put
in
three
sheds
along
along
the
back,
and
you
know
the
whole
idea
is
to
keep
a
certain
percentage
of
your
lot,
is
open
space
and
they've
been
just
filling
them
up
and,
as
you
recall,
one
of
the
I
think
it
was
two
glitch
amendments
ago
we
did
increase
the
size
that
a
utility
shed
or
a
garage
could
go
in
there.
A
utility
shell
can
go
instead
of
200
square
feet.
I
believe
I've
got
it
up
to
500
square
feet,
so
it
makes
it.
D
Another
thing
we
ended
up
doing
was
bicycle
parking
originally
was
only
required
in
a
couple
different
districts,
The
mixed-use
District
in
the
mixed
use,
East
Shore
district,
and
we
were
having
issues
with
that
because
we've
got
the
kpi.
That
does
is
not
a
mixture
East
Shore
District,
but
the
developments
weren't.
There
was
nothing
that
said
they
had
to
put
in
part
or
a
bicycle
parking.
So
we
took
out
those
two
districts
and
just
made
it
for
all
developments.
D
A
real,
simple
one
that
somebody
pointed
out
regarding
open
space,
set-aside
standards,
the
original
language
for
vehicular
parking
areas
or
Lots.
You
weren't
supposed
to
include
the
the
Landscaping
areas
towards
your
open
space,
because
it's
a
requirement
like
the
the
one
space,
every
10
or
one
landscape,
Island,
every
10
spaces.
You
can
recluse
the
outside
area,
but
not
the
interior
parking
lot
area,
so
vehicular
parking
area
or
Lots,
including
landscape
islands,
are
not
included
in
your
open
space
calculations.
D
Little
wordsmithing
is
the
main
thing.
Another
thing
that
was
occurring
and
I
think
we.
We
did
a
variance
for
this
for
walls.
We
were.
We
were
concerned
that
we
were
going
to
have
some
developments
that
have
interior
walls
that
aren't
Exposed
on
the
exterior
to
exterior
traffic
and
if
it's
behind
a
building
nobody's
going
to
see
it,
except
for
the
occupant.
So
it's
like
Winn-Dixie.
D
D
It
gave
us
some
discrepancy
in
regards
to
a
15-foot
height
maximum,
so
we're
still
saying
a
maximum,
but
it's
still
going
to
be
more
designated
whether
or
not
they
can
do
that
by
the
city
engineer,
so
that
so
that
we
we
have
a
little
bit
of
discussion
regarding
the
developments
and
it
it.
You
know,
we're
more
concerned
what
the
buildings
going
to
look
like
from
the
road
and
what
the
use
is
and
how
big
it
is,
and
the
setbacks
things
like
that.
D
Another
one
that
came
up
this
is
the
like.
I
said
it's
it's
glitch.
It
can
be
something
we're
looking
for
in
the
future
or
something
that
comes
up
as
a
is
a
question.
Some
homes
have
three
car
garages,
but
they're
only
they
can
only
put
in
an
18-foot
driveway.
So
when
you're
pulling
in
you,
it's
a
it's
a
hard
turn
to
try
to
get
in
there
and
if
you
don't
hit
the
side
of
the
the
garage
you're
gonna
go
over
the
the
Swale
area
so
for
a
two-car
garage.
Obviously
it's
18
feet.
D
D
Private
streets
right
now
cannot
have
speed.
Humps
we've
been
putting
speed
humps
on
a
lot
of
public
streets,
but
we
do
have
private
streets
that
are
fairly
large
subdivisions,
and
so
we
updated
the
private
Street
requirement
to
allow
for
Speed
humps.
They
still
have
to
be
in
accordance
with
code,
the
the
size
of
the
speed
hump,
the
height
the
location,
the
distance
between,
and
they
still
have
to
have
permission.
D
D
Another
big
one
that
came
through
with
from
the
fire
department
is
building
numbers.
What
we
we
had
no
regulation
as
to
what
size
those
numbers
had
to
be
so
we
have
a
minimum
of
four
four
inches,
no
matter
what
kind
of
building
and
then
for
residential
dwelling
units.
Those
have
to
be
a
minimum,
well,
four
to
six
inches
multi-family,
four
to
ten
inches
in
non-residential
structures.
Four
to
ten
inches.
Also,
however,
it
could
be
bigger,
depending
on
the
type
of
structure.
D
In
other
words,
say,
the
hospital
wanted
to
put
their
their
their
their
number
on
the
building,
but
they
wanted
to
put
it
up
top
next
to
Advent
Health,
that's
not
going
to
be
a
10
inch.
You
know
it's
not
going
to
be
a
10
inch
letter
that
would
have
to
be
a
little
bit
bigger
and
that,
in
that
case,
it
would
probably
count
as
part
of
their
signage.
D
They
aren't
going
to
do
that,
though,
but
we
do
want
to
take
into
account
some
of
the
35-45
foot
tall
industrial
Warehouse
buildings
that
are
going
in
that
are
they're
up
that
high
and
they
might
want
that
unit
or
that
building
number
on
the
building
because
they
have
different
unit
numbers.
That
would
be
where
the
doors
are.
So
you
put
the
building
number
up
on,
or
the
address
number
up
on
top
of
the
building.
It
makes
it
easier
for
emergency
emergency
response.
D
D
We
were
having
questions
regarding
kiosks,
male
kiosks
and
they
wanted
to
put
them
out
by
the
road
where
people
are
just
stopping
in
the
middle
of
the
road
to
go,
get
their
mail
or
they
were
putting
them
in
the
clubhouse,
but
they
were
just
out
in
the
open.
So
we
were,
we
actually
looked
at.
Gene
did
a
really
good
job
on
this
one.
We've
got
seven
items
that
actually
outlined
the
design
of
the
kiosk.
It
needs
to
be
fairly
compatible
with
the
design
of
the
subdivision
itself.
D
We
also
require
a
cover
over
it
that
way
when
you're,
when
you
do
stop
in
park
and
go
to
your
to
your
mailbox,
you
aren't
going
to
get
wet.
If
it's
raining,
you
can
take
your
time.
You
can
look
at
your
mail
and
then
put
the
key
back
in
close
it
up
and
then
run
to
your
car,
and
you
know,
hopefully
don't
step
in
a
puddle,
but
we
also
took
into
account
the
mail
service
themselves
because
they
are
going
behind
usually
to
put
the
mail
in
the
slots.
They
don't
open
each
individual
door.
D
Another
one
that
we
did
in
the
land
of
element
code,
the
majority
of
the
residential
subdivisions.
We
talk
about,
what's
called
a
build
two
line.
I
know
I
described
that
one
time
I
think
was
when
we
were
first
adopting
the
Land
Development
code
and
we
were
having
some
questions
so,
instead
of
having
to
describe
it
every
time
we
put
a,
we
put
an
actual
definition
in
which
I
believe
is
going
to
end
up
helping.
D
There
might
be
some
that
are
all
20
foot
and
we
don't
want
a
house
going
five
feet
from
the
sidewalk
or,
if
there's
five
they're
all
five
feet
from
the
sidewalk,
then
that
could
be
five
feet
from
the
sidewalk.
So
basically
it's
it's
trying
to
keep
that
line
of
sight
open
so
that
we
we
aren't
looking
into
your
neighbor's
window,
because
you
built
back
back
from
the
the
build
to
line.
D
D
And
then,
if,
if
the,
if
there
is
a
a
break
in
the
block,
it
was
not
specified
as
to
how
wide
that
break
should
be.
So,
we
did
put
in
25
feet
wide
for
a
break.
That's
basically
about
a
paved
Street
width,
but
usually
that's
where
they
can
put
trails
and
sidewalks
and
walking
ways
between
between
blocks
between
buildings.
D
And
the
last
one
that
we've
got
is
the
density
intensity
in
open
space
for
the
Village
Center,
the
employment
district
and
The
Interchange,
and
then
we
also
added
in
the
med
tech
district
for
the
floor
area
ratio.
We
dropped
the
flurry
ratio
for
the
Village
Center
to
0.15
and
we
got
rid
of
the
average
and
the
balance
and
the
maximum
the
average.
D
Hence
we
get
rid
of
the
the
term
of
bedroom
community
for
Apopka
we're
past
that
now
and
then
for
density.
We
originally
had
a
minimum
dwelling
unit
per
acre
of
four
and
for
an
employment
District.
We
really
don't
care
if
people
are
living
on
that
property,
if
the
hospital
they
go,
they
bought
52
Acres
up
on
the
North
side
of
kelly
park
off
of
it.
D
It's
it's
it's
that
type
of
thing
you
don't
want
to
mix
the
residential
in
the
storage
or
residential
in
the
hospital
that
there's
enough
other
property
around
that
they
can
get
those
units.
So
we
drop
that
to
zero
as
a
minimum.
Maximum
7.5
same
thing
with
the
interchange,
District
The
Interchange
is
supposed
to
be
for
Commerce,
so
we
dropped
that
to
zero.
Also
maximum.
G
H
H
H
D
D
Okay,
here
it
is
yeah,
this
is
under
fences
and
walls,
and
basically
it
states
I'll
make
sure
what
district
is
walls
taller
than
six
feet
may
be
approved
by
the
DRC
development,
Review
Committee
as
part
of
a
development
plan,
provided
the
wall
is
One.
Internal
not
does
not
face
or
is
viewed
by
an
adjacent
property
or
or
adjacent
right
away,
has
significant
landscape
screening
and
does
not
exceed
15
feet
in
height,
is
poured
in
place
or
tilt
wall
and
meet
all
engineering
specifications?
D
For
the
city
engineer,
what
happened
with
Winn-Dixie
is
because
it
was
higher
than
six
feet.
Six
feet
is
basically
a
segmented
block
wall,
different
requirements
for
that,
so
the
so
they
don't
have
to
worry
about
washing
out
because
of
all
the
rain
water
when
they
go
higher
than
six
feet.
What
we're
doing
is
saying
it's
a
port
in
place
wall
so
that
it's
a
solid
wall,
that's
being
still
tied
back.
B
D
D
I
D
I
J
D
A
A
B
B
K
K
Existing
future
land
use
the
proposed
future
land
use.
Designation
of
very
low
density.
Suburban
is
compatible
with
the
area
because
properties
in
division
have
the
same
future
land
use
designation.
It
is
also
compatible
with
the
requirement
and
policy
3.5
of
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
that
properties
north
of
ponken,
Road
and
West
of
Rock
Springs
Road
are
restricted
to
no
more
than
two
dwelling
units
per
acre.
This
application
is
also
being
processed
simultaneously
with
the
rezoning
application,
which
is
the
preceding
item
on
the
agenda.
K
M
Mr
chairman,
we
find
the
proposed
change
in
future
land
use
from
residential
Estates
to
very
low
density,
Suburban
residential
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
Land
Development
code
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
areas
recommending
approval
of
the
future
land
use
Amendment.
Based
on
the
findings
and
facts
presented
in
the
staff
report.
Thank.
A
K
For
the
record
Gene
Sanchez
of
the
Community
Development
Department,
this
is
a
request
to
recommend
approval
of
the
change
of
Zoning
for
1450
and
1520
West
Kelly
Park
Road
fronti
transitional
to
rsf-1a
residential
single-family
State
zoning
District.
This
is
the
companion
item
for
the
previous
future
land
use
Amendment
request
the
RSA
won
the
rsf-1a
zoning
District
that
the
the
applicant
is
proposing
is
compatible
with
the
future
land
use
designation,
a
very
low,
suburban
and
is
also
compatible
with
the
area
the
DRC
recommends
approval.
K
B
A
I
I
can
do
this
one
Mr
chairman,
okay,
the
motion
I
moved
to
find
the
proposed
change
in
zoning
from
transitional
to
rsf-1a,
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
Land
Development
code,
incompatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
areas,
recommending
approval
of
the
proposed
changes.
Zoning
based
on
the
findings
and
facts
presented
in
the
staff
reports
and
Exhibits.
A
A
K
Again,
Gene
Sanchez
with
the
Planning
and
Zoning
division.
This
is
a
request
to
recommend
approval
of
the
future
land
use
Amendment
of
the
city's
property
on
Ma
board
from
low
Destiny
residential,
with
a
maximum
of
five
Doling
units
per
acre
to
low
medium
density,
residential,
permitting
up
to
seven
and
a
half
units
per
acre.
The
property
is
located
in
the
Southeast
Southeast
corner
of
Hawthorne
Avenue
and
Ma
nma
board
Street,
approximately
1.09
acres
in
size.
K
The
future
land
use
designation
is
also
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
as
the
properties
to
the
southwest
and
Northeast
already
carry
a
low,
medium
density.
Future
land
use
designation.
The
DRC
recommends
approval.
The
proposed
recommendation
is
to
recommend
approval
of
the
future
land
use
change
staff.
I
I
D
I
B
D
Nothing
on
that
little
strip
right
right
now
looks
like
we
got
three
homes.
We
saw
some
different
designs,
it'll
be
three
homes,
that'll
be
facing
Hawthorne
and
then
there'll
be
another
driveway
right
along
the
eastern
boundary
and
then
so
the
so.
The
homes
will
face
that
that
eastern
boundary
they'll
be
four
going
along
there
going
into
that
southern
parcel.
So
that's
last
parcel
will
have
they're
going
to
combine
those.
E
A
N
Yeah
suspect226
MMA
board,
Street,
okay,
that
first
of
all,
there's
been
only
two
homes
on
that
block
of
ma
boy
Street,
since
the
60s
that
land
has
been
inquired
about
being
purchased
for
years,
and
we
were
always
told
that
it
would
be
a
parking
lot
for
the
park
and
that's
it
and
we're
befuddled
here
about
how
the
city
engaged
with
the
Minnesota
Alliance
or
is
them
to
purchase
that
property.
We
don't
know
we'll
offered
to
the
public
or
anyone
else
to
purchase
it.
Was
it
donated
or
anything
like
that?
N
N
It's
gonna
be
shooting,
there's
gonna,
be
drugs
and
the
same
thing
all
right.
It's
already
bad
enough
that
they
put
the
dean
Center
there.
There
are
parking
lots
that
are
too
short.
Cars
are
hanging
in
the
road
and
now
you're
talking
about
pudding,
possibly
sidewalks
up
and
down
there.
You're
going
to
take
five
feet
of
my
yard
and
I'm
I'm,
just
not
happy
with
it
and
my
family's
not
happy
with
it.
N
So
you
know
that
that
I'm
not
satisfied
with
that
whatsoever,
and
neither
is
my
mother
and
neither
my
any
of
our
family
and
we
grew
up
there.
We
built
the
park
across
the
street
with
Mr
Jimmy
Baker
with
our
hands
okay,
so
we
we
know
this
land.
We
know
a
lot
of
new
people
come
here
to
the
city
of
Apopka.
They
make
decisions
on
things,
names
on
things
and
all
of
that
stuff
because
they
don't
know
the
history
of
Apopka
and
especially
on
that
side
of
town.
N
D
Well,
if
you
look
at
the
properties
along
7th,
Street
Along
on
both
sides
of
7th
Street,
this
is
actually
meeting
the
code.
The
lots
are
a
minimum
of
50
feet.
Each
there'll
be
three
as
I
mentioned,
facing
board
Street
and
so
there'll
only
be
two
you're
about
the
same
width
as
the
neighboring
of
the
facing
ma
board.
The.
N
N
If
it
goes
through,
you
guys
are
going
to
be
hearing
about
it
in
a
year
or
two
and
it's
going
to
be
the
same
old
thing
and
it's
right
there
at
our
door
and
we're
going
to
have
homes
facing
our
the
side
of
our
yard
and
our
backyard,
no
privacy.
You
know
nothing.
Somebody's
driveway
will
be
right
there
at
the
edge
of
our
backyard
or
inside
of
our
yard,
and,
like
I
said,
we've
been
there.
N
N
D
N
It's
just
a
dirt
field.
Well,
it's
grass
there,
but
you
know
my
again.
Our
concern
is
like
I
said:
we've
been
here
all
tonight
and
we
we
we
know
what
it's
going
to
turn
into
so
I,
don't
know
how
how
many
of
you
guys
have
been
on
that
side
of
town
or
that
side
of
the
tracks
or
whatever,
but
that's
exactly
what
it's
going
to
turn
into,
and
you
know
we
we
don't
want
it
to
happen
all
right.
Thank.
O
N
J
J
H
I
N
B
I
H
N
A
D
B
D
I
I
O
O
One
of
the
things
that
prompt
this
and
some
of
you
may
be
familiar
when
we
had
a
number
of
killings
in
Apopka.
This
goes
back
six
years
or
so
I
sat
on
the
task
force.
The
community
was
engaged
with
the
task
force.
There's
a
task
force
recommendation,
that's
well
publicized
out
there.
Some
of
the
recommendations
address
housing.
Some
of
the
recommendation
address
job
training,
youth
prevention
programs.
It's
a
Litany
of
recommendations
that
came
from
that
task
force,
and
this
goes
back
eight
years.
The
city
council
then
was
engaged
regarding
Surplus
property
and
building
affordable
housing.
O
It
was
discussed
before
public
forum
with
the
city
Commissioners
and
the
mayor
at
the
time,
as
well
as
the
sitting
mayor
and
the
City
commissioners.
This
was
engagement
to
address
affordable
housing.
Yes,
that
property
has
been
considered
for
a
number
of
issues
and
a
parking
lot.
Some
of
the
things
that
has
been
I,
guess,
evaluated
or
or
risk
versus
rewards
is
the
consideration
of
an
expansive
parking
lot
versus
affordable
housing
I'm.
Here
today,
we've
partnered
with
the
ministerial
Alliance
to
purchase
and
develop
that
property.
O
The
tax
rolls
I'm
being
conservative
over
approximately
maybe
20
years,
if
not
more
open,
discussion,
we're
definitely
open
to
discussion,
but
a
lot
of
consideration
has
gone
into
the
high
demand
and
need
for
affordable
housing
and
I
apologize
that
you
know,
Mr,
Smith
and
I
has
not
have
not
had
the
opportunity
to
converse
but
I
I.
You
know
what
our
objective
has
been
is
to
respond
to
a
need
and
that
need
is
affordable.
Housing
I
was
listening
to
Mr,
Smith
and
I.
O
We've
considered
economics
of
the
land
and
the
development
to
build
homes
that
are
going
to
be
affordable
and,
as
everybody
knows
in
the
environment
that
we're
in
right
now,
it's
tough
but
again
wanted
to
come
up
here
and
speak
to
it,
because
this
is
not
something
that
started
yesterday.
This
started
well
over
eight
years
ago,
and
it's
in
the
record-
it's
you
know
so.
We've
had
this
discussion.
I
just
wanted
to
come
and
get
put
a
little
meat
on
the
bones.
If
you
would
okay.
H
H
So
here
we're
looking
at
seven
hose
Mr
Smith
says
he
doesn't
like
seven
homes
he'll
put
in
three
homes,
but
it
sounds
like
there's
room
for
negotiation
between
whoever
buys
that
property
and
find
middle
ground.
We
absolutely
need
affordable
housing
in
Apopka.
It's
like
squeezing
blood
out
of
a
turnip
right.
You
know
you're.
Q
Q
H
O
I'm
sure
that
I'm
sure
they
would
be
open
to
having
a
conversation.
I
mean
again.
This
has
been
discussed
in
a
lot
of
the
issues.
The
reason
why
we
reached
the
number
of
seven
homes
looking
at
how
many
homes
can
sit
on
that
plaque,
I'm,
not
a
developer,
so
I
I
can't
tell
you
all
the
things
that
was
taken
into
consideration,
but
you
know
a
lot
of
the
issues
as
it
relates
to
planning
and
architecture
and
drain.
O
It
has
gotten
expensive
before
even
the
slightest
Dirt
has
ever
been
moved
and
there's
some
yet
still
challenges,
but
I
can
assure
you
and
again
I
I
gotta
apologize
to
you
know,
Mr
Smith.
This
conversation
could
have
should
have
taken
place
a
long
time
ago,
but
I'm
sure
the
ministerial
Alliance
will
be
open
to
definitely
having
a
conversation
and
before
I
leave.
One
of
the
things
that
you
know
that's
been
discussed
multiple
times
regarding
the
parking
lot.
O
One
of
the
considerations,
if
that
property
became
a
parking
lot,
was
the
consideration
of
another
Hazard
of
it
becoming
a
hangout.
The
in
the
things
that
come
along
with
that,
so
I'm
sure
the
alliance
would
definitely
be
open
and
Mr
Smith
I
apologize
to
you
for
not
having
the
conversation
that
we
should
have
had.
O
We've
explored
and
again
this
goes
back
eight
years
we
entertained
and
sat
down
with
Orange
County,
which
at
the
time
had
first-time
homebuyer
funds,
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
opportunities
over
the
past.
Eight
nine
years
have
come
and
gone
and
we're
still
looking
at
more
opportunities.
We've
been
engaged
regarding
some
of
the
first
time
home
buyers,
funding.
But
timing
is
everything.
D
B
J
D
A
B
B
A
B
B
B
H
B
N
A
A
I
know
at
that
Park
and
in
in
reference
Mr
Smith
I
spent
10
years
coaching
on
that
field,
so
I'm
very
aware
of
that
area
right
directly
behind
we're
talking
about
density
directly
behind
the
ball
field,
which
is
kind
of
catty
corner
to
this
property.
There's
two
Parcels
there,
the
two
smaller
parcels
both
of
them
have
duplexes
on
it
and
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
the
one
directly
behind
the
ball
field
on
the
on
that
border
is
M.A
board.
A
Street
has
like
four
or
six
units
on
it
and
it's
not
a
quarter
acre
they're,
duplexes
or
little
apartments.
There
see
the
see
the
houses.
If
you
look
directly
behind
the
the
clubhouse
look
at
that,
that's
one
two,
three
four
five
six
buildings
and
I
know
there.
Each
building
has
two
dwelling
units
in
it.
J
A
H
C
B
F
B
A
C
K
K
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
variance
from
Land
Development
code,
section
5.5,
a
which
restricts
fences
in
residential
zoning
districts
to
six
feet
in
the
rear
yard
and
side
yards.
The
applicant
has
installed
the
wooden
fence,
that
is
seven
feet
and
three
inches
in
height
fence
was
installed
without
a
permit
which
was
reported
to
code
enforcement.
A
code
enforcement
hearing
was
held
on
December
13
2022,
and
the
applicant
was
informed
to
explore
the
variance
process
for
defense
height
requirement.
K
K
K
Also
make
another
determination
on
whether
or
not
a
hardship
exists
based
on
the
applicant's
responses
to
the
next
set
of
variance
criteria,
which
is
also
included
in
this
packet,
based
on
the
responses,
the
variance
criteria,
information
submitted
and
collected
by
staff
and
lack
of
physical
surrounding
shape,
topographical
condition,
other
physical
environmental
conditions
that
are
unique
to
this
to
this
property.
The
planning,
Division
and
transportation
coordinator
object
to
the
request,
as
no
evidence
of
hardship
exists.
Other
DRC
members
did
not
have
any
objections
to
the
request.
A
J
A
R
A
B
R
B
R
J
B
B
A
A
A
So
it
seems
to
me
that
it's
a
code
violation
is
a
little
over
the
top
here.
For
for
something
that
doesn't
I,
don't
see
how
this
is
damaging
in
any
way
to
the
neighborhood
and
the
fact
that
there's
other
houses
in
the
neighborhood
that
have
the
exact
same
thing
set
up
on
the
back
of
their
house,
but
because
they
were
done
be
found
two
times
before
2019
in
a
subdivision.
A
It
was
built
in
the
late
80s
and
I
also
know
that
the
homeowners
association
had
approved
them
to
put
this
fence
up
in
that
manner,
and
their
rules
are
the
same
as
city
of
Apopka.
As
far
as
six
foot
now
I
realize
city
of
Apopka
trumps,
the
HOA,
but
the
fact
that
the
HOA
approved
it
kind
of
negates
the
thing
that
it's
a
problem
in
the
neighborhood.
So
I.
Just
want
to
point
that
out.
C
A
So
on
that
I
do
not
know
but
I'm
sure
the
applicants.
Here
we
can
probably
discuss
that
further
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
and
give
my
and
again
I'm
not
trying
to
chastise
anybody,
but
this
seems
a
little
over
the
top
that
we're
getting
that
this
person
needs
to
get
a
variance
on
something
that
a
few
years
ago
was
completely
legal
and
really
doesn't
have
any
bearing
on
anybody
around
them,
except
the
person
directly
gone
so.
S
E
S
S
H
A
S
A
H
H
A
T
Piedmont
Oaks
Drive
Apopka,
okay,
the
four
pictures
up
here,
the
two
that
are
on
the
right
are
the
people
that
live
behind
Rita
where
she
has
I'm.
Assuming
is
an
eight-foot
fence.
I
didn't
measure
it
except
it
may
be.
Seven
foot
three
I,
don't
really
know
the
other
two
pictures.
The
top
one
on
the
left
is
the
fence
that
is
between
my
house
and
Rita's
house.
T
I
oppose
this
because
it
it's
probably
really
pretty
in
Rita's
backyard.
It's
a
nice
fence.
I
wish
I
had
that
fence,
but
I
know
when
it's
time
for
me
to
replace
my
fence
in
order
for
my
backyard,
to
look
bright,
I'm
going
to
need
to
mirror
that
I,
don't
really
want
to
upset
my
neighbors
on
that
are
next
door
to
me.
T
T
A
A
T
Kidwell
well,
what
I
can
tell
you
is
I
called
when
this
was
going
up
and
the
current
president
of
the
HOA
came
to
Rita's
house
to
try
and
speak
to
her
about
this.
It
was
I
have
a
picture
of
approximately
the
same
fence.
That's
in
the
top
left
corner.
It
wasn't
complete
at
that
point
in
time.
You
know
I.
The
last
thing
I
really
want
is
to
quarrel
with
my
neighbor
I
hate.
This
I
don't
like
going
outside
and
feeling
like.
T
We
can't
talk
to
each
other,
but
it
is
what
it
is
and
I
did
call
you
know:
I
I
just
felt
like.
If
I
have
to
follow
the
rules,
then
she
should
have
to
follow
the
rules.
If
I
have
to
get
authorization
from
the
HOA
to
put
up
a
fence,
then
she
should
prior
to
that
and
actually
I,
don't
think
that
if
that
fence
hadn't
been
standing
there
I
truthfully,
don't
think
she'd
have
gotten
approval,
I
feel
bad
I.
T
Don't
want
her
to
have
to
take
it
down
because
of
the
expense,
but
for
myself
I
would
like
it
taken
down
it.
Just
it's
an
eyesore
in
my
backyard.
There's
this
fence
on
one
side,
excuse
me
and
then
the
breast
is
so
when
the
time
comes,
I
either
mirror
this
or
my
backyard
continually
looks
strange
to
me.
Let.
T
Well,
because,
in
terms
of
the
height
in
terms
of
the
height,
why
why
well?
Because
I
would
like
it
to
match
what's
on
one
side
of
my
I,
don't
want
one
side
of
my
pen
or
one
side
of
my
backyard
one
way
and
the
other
the
back
and
the
other
property
line.
Another
way
it
to
me.
It
just
looks
bad.
It
just
needs
I
mean
that's
a
personal
preference,
I.
Suppose,
okay.
T
A
C
T
J
T
G
G
T
T
T
G
T
The
other
side
must
not
have
a
problem
with
it.
I
I
didn't
speak
to
her
about
it.
I
didn't
want
to
get
someone
else
involved
in.
You
know
something
that
was
bothering
me.
You
know
and
caused
more
issues.
No,
it's
this
it's
the
side.
This
is
a
common
lie.
I
mean
my
Rita's
house
is
here.
My
house
is
here
between
those
houses
is
where
this
fence
is.
What.
B
T
U
H
So
it
sounds
like
noun,
the
the
rear
fence
that
blocks
the
the
property
that
has
all
the
construction
equipment.
That's
one
thing,
but
if
Rita
could
lower
the
height
of
this
defense
between
your
property
and
her
property
to
six
feet,
I
want
to
put
words
in
your
mouth.
Is
that
what
you're?
Looking
for
I.
A
A
T
T
Your
property
I
have
a
fence.
Yes,
we
actually
took
down
the
fence
that
was
on
the
property
line
when
Rita
was
putting
this
up,
not
really
realizing
at
all
that
she
was
putting
this
up.
She
had
actually
shown
me
a
picture
of
of
this,
or
at
least
a
similar
picture
of
this
fence
and
I
said
Brita
it.
That
is
really
nice,
but
will
the
HOA
approve
it?
She
told
me
she
was
just
putting
it
up.
T
A
President,
so
the
defense
is
the
only
way
to
to
make
it
look
correct
and
obviously
that
was
I
guess
the
design
was
to
step
the
fence
up
from
the
six
foot
at
the
front
where
it's
actually
looks
like
it's
the
same
height
as
your
fence,
Step
It
Up,
gradually
to
the
back
to
make
the
eight
foot
across
the
back,
and
it
begs
the
question
you
said
you
don't
like
the
fact
that
it
doesn't
match
the
other
side.
Okay.
T
If
it
was
six
feet,
I
would
have
no
issue,
because
I
could
put
up
a
six
foot
wooden
fence.
You
know,
and
the
thing
of
it
is,
is
actually
I
wonder
when
the
time
comes
and
I
want
to
put
up
a
fence
if
I
decided
to
mirror
that
am
I
going
to
be
able
to
even
get
a
permit
without
coming
like
this
and
and
asking
for
a
variance
well.
A
T
A
L
Yeah
I'm,
a
friend
of
Rita's
and
I,
came
because
I've
kind
of
seen
this
thing
develop
a
little
bit
and
in
her
backyard,
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
when
you
go
outside
and
read
his
backyard
and
you
look
to
the
left
to
this
lady's
property
they've
also
built
a
big
shed
there
and
they
have
I've
noticed
on
several
occasions.
They've
got
heavy
equipment
back
here,
they've
got
backhoes;
no,
no,
no!
No!
No!
The
people
on
the
other
side.
L
L
We're
all
the
trash
and
stuff
correct
the
pictures
on
the
right,
and
so
when
Rita
comes
out
there
and
looks
at
that.
Sometimes
you
see
the
top
of
a
backhoe.
They've
got
trailers
back
there,
they've
got
all
kinds
of
stuff
and
it
looks
kind
of
catty
corner
across
that
corner.
Rita
has
to
look
at
that
Big
Shed
that
they
built
and
the
thing
is
super
high.
You
can
see
it,
you
can
see
it
even
with
her
fence
being
at
seven
foot
three.
L
So
that's
really
an
eyesore
and
when
you
go
across
from
the
back
of
the
fence
down
the
property
line
between
their
properties,
you
can
still
see
that
shed
as
high
as
her
fence
is
right
now
and
that's
why
I
don't
understand
why
she
had.
You
know
they're
upset
about
that,
because
what
it's
basically
done
is
block
off,
whatever
permit
that
guy
has
or
whatever
his
land
uses,
is
he's
basically
using
it
for
a
commercial
property
and-
and
you
know,
there's
a.
L
Speak
yeah
there's
a
lot
of
noise
when
he
brings
the
equipment
in
and
out
of
there
and
the
fence
that
we
just
put
up
now
has
helped
block
all
that
noise.
From
that
whole
side,
so
I
mean
it
just
seems
a
good
reason
in
common
sense
that
you
know
if
the
neighbor,
if
you
did
want
to
build
a
fence,
I
would
want
to
build
it
higher
I'm.
A
A
L
I
was
just
trying
to
be
polite,
I
understand
but
I
understand,
but
and
that's
Rita's
problem
and,
like
you
say
when
they
said
it
was
okay
for
the
board
to
do
it.
I
mean
she
didn't
you
know.
Just
she
didn't
realize
it
was
going
to
be
a
problem
with
the
neighbor,
so
I
mean
my
thing
would
be.
If
she
ever
builds
a
fence,
she
should
build
it
a
little
bit
higher
and
get
a
variance
and
get
it
done
properly,
and
that
way
it
would
improve
her
property.
L
Also
and
I,
don't
see
where
she
understands
it.
Just
because,
on
one
side
of
her
house
the
fence
is
a
little
bit
higher
by
the
other
side
of
the
house,
I
mean
because
there's
only
what
a
little
over
a
foot
difference
and
actually
and
when
you
look-
and
you
see
that
picture
when
it
comes
where
the
gates
are
Rita's
fence-
is
not
very
much
higher
than
than
the
neighbor's
fence.
So,
okay.
A
A
L
A
C
C
H
D
H
S
H
H
J
H
D
A
M
M
M
J
K
A
J
A
K
K
K
The
applicant
was
informed
the
that
a
Land
Development
code
amendment
was
being
processed
to
allow
a
20-foot
setback
for
Residential
Properties
within
the
residential
based
zoning
districts,
including
the
subdivision
okiva
run.
The
LDC
amendment
is
tentatively
scheduled
to
be
heard
before
Planning
Commission
today,
which
it
was,
and
before
City
Council
on
March
1st
2023
for
the
first
reading
and
March
25th
2023
for
second
reading
and
adoption.
The
applicant,
however,
wish
to
proceed
with
this
variance
request.
K
The
police
department
has
determined
that
approving
this
request
is
inconsistent
with
the
intent
of
the
current
setback.
Requirements.
Planning,
Division
and
transportation
coordinator
have
determined
that,
based
on
the
applicant's
responses
to
the
variance
criteria,
there's
no
hardship.
Therefore,
they
object
to
the
approval
of
this
variance
application.
Other
DRC
members
did
not
have
any
objections
to
the
request.
Staff
and
applicant
are
available
for
questions.
J
Q
You
did
pretty
good
John
armino
2424,
Cedar,
Hill,
Drive
I'm,
sorry,
this
won't
be
as
entertaining
as
the
last
variance,
but
I
just
try.
I
know
it's
going
to
be
it
was
the
setback
was
20
foot
before
then
it
was
25
feet.
I
understand
it's
going
back
to
20
feet,
so
it's
just
trying
to
get
a
jump
start
make
an
addition
to
the
home
before
March,
just
building
materials,
and
just
you
know
anything
to
get.
You
know
built
sooner
and
my
mother
in
there
sooner.
G
J
B
A
B
A
I
J
A
A
K
Sanchez
with
the
Community
Development
Department,
this
is
a
special
exception
request
to
allow
an
independent
living
facility
used
in
the
rsf-1a
zoning
District.
The
property
is
located
at
2021
Old,
Dixie,
Highway,
North
of
U.S
441
and
east
of
Shopkin
Lester
Road,
approximately
10.4
acres
in
size,
Ariel
shows
residential
uses
on
the
north
east
and
west
in
a
mix
of
residential
commercial
in
the
south.
K
The
ilf
is
planned
to
be
an
age-restricted
55
plus
Community,
with
supportive,
passive
and
active
on-site
recreational
amenities.
In
a
total
of
140
units
to
hire
senior
residents,
the
applicant
has
redesigned
the
site
to
accommodate
the
number
of
items
discussed
at
last
month's
Planning
Commission
meeting,
and
here
is
the
new
site
plan.
That's
been
redesigned.
K
C
F
A
V
Oh
perfect,
okay
and
no
I
don't
believe
we
have
to
get
any
licensure.
The
only
restriction
that
we
have
is
the
55
and
up
restriction
on
the
use
itself.
So
we
don't
have
any
memory
care,
skilled
nursing
and
we
don't
require
licensure
similar
to
an
assisted
living
facility.
So
I
don't
believe.
In
our
end,
user
told
us
that
we
wouldn't
need
operational
permits
such
as
those
so
I.
Don't
think
there
was
a
conflict.
Okay,.
Q
V
As
you
heard
from
staff
tonight
is
a
request
for
an
approval
of
a
special
exception
to
allow
an
independent
living
facility
in
the
rsf-1a
zoning
just
to
contextualize
again,
I
know
you
all
had
a
presentation
similar
to
this
some
weeks
back.
This
shows
you
the
outline
of
where
the
project
is
located.
We
have
some
uses
to
the
north
that
are
single
family
residential,
except
keep
in
mind
that
those
properties
are
actually
zoned
for
multi-family,
residential
under
RMF
zoning,
to
our
North
to
our
East.
We
have
single
family
residential
to
our
South.
V
We
have
commercial
build
outs
into
our
West.
Some
additional
single-family
residential
homes
were
located
along
Old,
Dixie
Highway,
and
our
proposed
plans
show
you
a
prior
site
plan
of
putting
in
the
boxes
the
different
uses
that
have
changed
or
the
parts
of
the
plan
that
we
have
modified.
So
when
I
show
you
the
next
plan,
this
is
again.
The
revised
plan
has
some
similar
features
to
what
we
had
shown
you
a
couple
weeks
back
in
terms
of
the
compatibility
of
the
design
to
be
compatible
with
residential
the
same
100
foot.
V
Minimum
setbacks
are
still
shown
on
this
plan
and
the
same
number
of
units
are
still
shown
on
this
plan,
something
to
keep
in
mind
with
a
special
exception
request.
If
we
were
building
this
project
today
by
right
under
rsf
1A
zoning,
we
would
have
25
foot
setbacks
and
we
would
be
building
to
35
feet
of
height.
So
the
request
tonight
is
not
with
regards
to
anything
that
has
to
do
with
height
the
one
plus
foot
height,
additional
add-on
was
actually
approved
by
staff
administratively,
which
is
allowable
by
code.
V
So
really,
the
only
request
tonight
has
to
do
with
the
use
itself,
and
so
something
that
is
good
about
a
special
exception
is
that
your
code,
contemplates
special
exceptions,
are
compatible
with
conditions
imposed,
so
we've
added
additional
voluntary
conditions,
above
and
beyond
what
anybody
in
the
community
would
get
if
we
just
came
for
a
buy
right,
rsf-1a
zoned
residential
subdivision,
so
that
means
four
times
the
setbacks.
So
again,
if
we
pull
permits
tomorrow,
we'd
have
25
foot
setbacks.
If
you
go
with
a
special
exception,
we
are
offering
minimum
100
foot
setbacks
from
the
property
line.
V
There
was
a
point
of
contention
at
the
last
hearing
about
the
clubhouse
portion
closest
to
those
properties
to
the
north
that
are
existing
today
being
three
stories
and
that
appearing
Too,
Tall
35
feet
of
height
is
permitted
by
right
today
on
our
property,
it's
permitted
by
right
on
all
the
properties
around
us
too.
So
three
stories
can
be
built
on
all
those
properties
to
the
north.
They
could
knock
their
houses
down
and
get
up
to
35
feet
in
height.
V
So
we
took
that
down
the
clubhouse
from
three
stories
to
a
one-story
plan
and
the
remainder
of
the
building
height
is
really
necessary.
When
we
talk
to
our
edit
operator,
this
gives
us
the
types
of
corridor
lengths
that
we
need
to
cater
to
a
specific
aged
population.
You
don't
want
to
have
lengths
of
corridors
being
too
long
to
get
from
clubhouses
to
units
to
access
points
gives
us
more
exterior,
open
space,
greater
setbacks
from
the
neighboring
properties
and
less
of
an
environmental
impact.
V
Our
updated
plan
has
amenities
that
include
pickleball,
community
garden
and
gazebo,
our
clubhouse,
that
we
showed
you
with
a
pool
and
then
an
outdoor
walking
trail
with
a
dog
run.
We
removed
some
of
the
amenities
that
also
drew
some
complaints
at
the
last
hearing.
So
we
took
off
the
plan.
The
tennis
courts,
sand,
volleyball
courts,
cornhole,
badminton
and
horseshoe
pit
areas,
so
we're
confident
that
we
still
have
a
really
nice
mix
of
some
active
and
passive
opportunities
for
folks.
V
That
would
live
here,
but
we
took
away
some
that
the
residents
had
said
might
have
been
too
loud
and
since
the
last
hearing
that
we
had,
we
did
send
a
letter
to
everybody
who
spoke
so
the
folks
that
came
and
spoke
at
the
hearing
we
sent
a
letter
to
their
house.
I
spoke
to
one
on
the
phone
and
another
one
via
email.
V
What
would
other
buys
be
required
today
and
again,
you
couldn't
impose
that
in
a
buy
right
zoning,
but
a
special
exception
allows
for
the
opportunity
to
add
some
of
those
conditions
to
ensure
compatibility
and
buffering.
So
we
are
going
to
be
adding
bamboo
walls
adjacent
to
all
residential
lots,
so
around
the
perimeter
of
our
property
around
any
residential
lot.
V
So
the
questions
or
comments
that
came
up
the
last
hearing
about
whether
there
was
going
to
be
a
visual
impact
to
the
project
there
most
certainly
will
not
be
bamboo,
could
not
be
required
if
we
built
by
right,
but
bamboo
is
something
we
are
offering
as
an
additional
condition.
Also,
we
are
still
going
to
have
a
Type
e
landscape
buffer
under
your
code.
So
not
only
will
we
have
a
bamboo
wall.
The
type
e
landscape
buffer
is
a
30
foot
wide
buffer.
V
That
is
also
going
to
have
one
canopy
tree
per
every
30
feet
and
shrubs
at
42
inches
on
the
center
of
planting
and
those
have
to
be
planted
again
both
of
those
at
certain
Heights
in
certain
intervals.
So
we're
going
to
be
having
understory
trees,
canopy
trees,
a
shrub
line,
a
bamboo
wall
all
planted
around
the
perimeter
of
our
property,
none
of
which
would
be
required
if
we
developed
a
typical
single-family
residential
home,
buy
right
today
on
that
property.
V
This
shows
you,
the
enhanced
Landscaping
plan,
so
you'll
see
a
very
dense
green
perimeter
around
our
property
everywhere
that
we
have
adjacent
residential
on
the
North
Southeast
and
to
the
west
and
there's
some
existing
trees.
That
will
remain
on
site
as
well,
and
this
would
be
one
of
the
conditions
of
approval,
so
you
would
be
approving
the
special
exception,
subject
to
the
additional
add-ons
that
are
shown
both
in
our
site
plan,
as
well
as
our
enhanced
Landscaping
plan
that
was
submitted
to
your
staff
for
their
records
as
well.
V
V
However,
you
want
to
have
them
shave
down
on
the
sides
for
height
purposes
or
whatever
height
we
want
to
get,
but
that
would
provide
that
six
screening
wall
between
us
and
our
neighbors,
not
that
we
don't
believe
our
project
is
going
to
be
worth
looking
at,
but
the
neighbors
said
that
they
wanted
the
screening
and
again
this
is
the
type
of
screening
they're
going
to
get
better
than
anything
that
they
would
get
today
if
we
built
under
rsf-1a
another
question
last
time
was
what
does
it
look
like?
What
is
a
line
of
sight
compatibility?
V
V
So
the
red
squares
on
the
screen
show
you
where
an
existing
single-family
home
could
be
built
by
right
today
and
I,
just
showing
the
north
property
line.
You
could
use
this
on
the
west
and
the
East
property
lines
as
well.
This
shows
you
the
homes
in
red
25
feet,
step
back
from
the
property
line,
no
Landscaping
buffer,
that's
how
close
they
would
be
to
the
other
homes
that
exist
today.
V
There's
a
lot
of
criteria
you
all
been
here
for
a
while,
so
I
won't
go
over
everything
in
too
painful
detail.
Of
course,
if
you
have
questions
happy
to
answer
them,
but
all
the
special
exception
criteria
have
been
analyzed
by
your
staff.
They
agree
that
we
are
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comp
plan,
especially
with
the
need
for
this
type
of
housing.
V
There
are
elements
of
your
comprehensive
plan
that
talk
specifically
about
diversity
of
Housing
and,
interestingly
enough,
there
are
no
operating
ilfs
in
the
city
of
Apopka
today,
so
we
would
be
the
only
one
so
providing
a
good
diversity
of
housing
for
a
55
and
up
age,
restricted
community
here
in
the
city
that
otherwise
does
not
exist.
So
we
know
that
there
is
a
market
void
because
there's
nobody
else
in
the
market
currently
offering
this.
The
project
will
not
just
comply
with
the
applicable
zoning
District
standards.
V
V
It
will
be
appropriate
for
the
location
and
is
compatible
with
the
general
character
of
the
surrounding
lands,
as
you
saw
in
the
staff
report,
it
says
this
allows
local
residents
to
be
able
to
age
in
place.
It's
mostly
comprised
of
residential
housing
around
us,
with
some
real
heavy
commercial
across
the
way.
So
otherwise
this
provides
a
nice
transitional
use
between
what
exists
to
our
South
and
our
Northeast
and
our
West.
V
V
We
had
that
adequate
screening
and
buffering
with
the
setbacks
that
were
proposing
four
times
the
standards,
with
the
buffering
that
we're
proposing
on
the
walls
as
well
as
our
30
foot
of
additional
landscape
buffering
under
the
type
e
provisions
of
your
code
also
is
going
to
be
designed
in
an
attractive
manner
to
minimize
any
adverse
visual
impacts,
which
we've
confirmed
by
the
line
of
sight
study
in
terms
of
lighting
we're
going
to
have
dark
sky
lighting.
So
there
won't
be
any
visual
or
lighting
impacts
on
the
properties.
V
Adjacent
to
us
confirm
that
as
well
with
staff
that
that
would
be
part
of
our
plan.
It
will
also
maintain
safe,
convenient
ingression
egress
off
the
project
site
going
on
to
Old
Dixie
Highway.
It
will
be
designed
in
a
safe
and
convenient
manner.
There
are
five
foot
sidewalks
already
along
Old
Dixie
today,
of
course,
if
Pam
tells
us
anything
needs
to
be
done
from
a
transportation
standpoint.
When
we
go
to
submit
those
plans,
we
will.
V
We
have
a
great
preservation
of
green
space
on
the
property,
we're
not
overburdening
existing
public
facilities,
and
we've
proved
that
through
the
Tia
and
also
there's
capacity
to
serve
the
project
for
utilities
and
then
we'll
comply
with
all
other
relevant
regulations.
So
our
request
is
approval
of
the
special
exception.
V
I
Thanks
for
the
enhanced
buffering
and
going
back
after
our
discussion
last
month,
thank
you
for
taking
that
into
consideration
here.
I
just
look
forward
to
hearing
if
there's
any
further
Community
feedback
around
there,
but
the
one
question
I
did
have
and
I
know
this
may
be
more
related
to
to
the
staff
and
the
City
attorney,
but
the
city
council
meeting
two
weeks
ago
this
the
plan,
the
site
plan
for
this
was
brought
up,
but
it
was
tabled
to
March
1st.
Is
that
to
make
changes
to
this.
F
J
I
F
V
Think
first
reading
first
and
second
got
pushed
so
we
had
to
push
both
of
them,
and
that
was
again
just
to
come
back
tonight
because
we
originally
didn't
know
whether
we
were
going
to
be
able
to
get
some
extensions
on
the
contract.
Quite
frankly
is
the
only
reason
why,
the
last
time
we
took
the
vote
on
the
future
land
use,
instead
of
tabling
everything
to
come
back
before
you
tonight,
because
we
knew
we
still
had
a
month
left
of
hearings.
D
V
V
Yep
so
every
letter
we
sent
out
that
were
sent
on
131
and
2-2
were
in
response
to
those
who
showed
up
both
at
this
hearing,
as
well
as
at
that
hearing
of
public
comment
right
yep.
So
we
we
sent
those
letters
out
immediately
after
both
of
the
hearings,
so
that
we
could
solicit
feedback
from
the
folks
who
had
come
and
spoken.
V
And
I
had
sent
two
follow-up
emails
to
one
of
the
individuals
who
lived
to
the
West.
He
had
asked
for
some
information,
so
I
sent
the
follow-up
with
all
of
the
information.
The
buffers
I
basically
set
a
lot
of
the
slides.
The
same
thing
I'm
showing
you
tonight
followed
up
again
and
said
any
other
questions.
Hadn't
heard
back
yet
and
then
the
other
individual
I
spoke
to
on
the
phone
twice
was
fine.
I
V
Really
is
a
beautiful
visual
buffer
I
mean
they
use
it
a
lot
in
places
like
The,
Villages
and
anywhere
that
you
want
to
have
a
nice
large
screen.
Trees
are
amazing.
We
still
have
a
bunch
of
them
in
our
plan,
but
from
a
visual
blockade
standpoint,
canopy
trees
can't
be
planted
close
together
right,
but
clumping
bamboo
can
so.
It
literally
creates
a
wall.
D
D
The
subdivision
to
the
north
that
has
probably
had
at
least
four
cars
going
through
the
wall
into
the
somebody's
backyard,
so
that
we're
kept
getting
broken
apart.
The
property
owner
planted
bamboo
and
the
last
one
that
went
through
was
probably
about
six
or
eight
months
ago,
and
it
stopped
after.
It
went
through
the
brick
wall
on
the
bamboo.
V
B
V
B
L
B
B
Mean
I
would
think
you
don't
have
to,
but
I
would
think
you
should.
My
opinion
is
because
it's
not
Ada
required
for
some
reason
and
a
system
I
mean
that's
just
an
independent
living
when
you
first
notified
every
all
the
neighbors.
How
many?
How
many
letters
did
you
send
out?
Did
you
send
certified
mail
or
just
first
class
mail,
I.
V
K
V
B
A
F
My
concern
is
that
what
was
raised-
and
the
applicant's
presentation
is
that
this
as
an
independent
living
facility,
an
independent
living
facility,
is
not
defined
under
the
LDC,
so
there,
what
is
defined
is
assisted
living
facility,
adult
living
facility,
extended
congregate,
care,
adult
foster,
home
boarding,
house
or
rooming
house,
child
foster,
home
Continuing,
Care
retirement,
community,
emergency
shelter
or
home
or
Family
Daycare
home.
Those
are
the
group
living
uses
that
are
permitted
under
the
rsf-1a
zoning
District.
F
F
In
essence,
what
this
use
is
is
a
multi-family
age-restricted
community,
no
different
than
a
deed,
restricted
age,
restricted,
single-family,
home
Community,
as
though,
as
many
of
those
I
haven't
seen
many
around
here,
I
came
up
from
Palm
Beach
County,
where
their
dime
a
dozen
where
you
have
54
communities
or
my
my
mother-in-law
lives
in
a
55
and
over
Community
their
duplexes.
The
only
restriction
is
that
that
they
must
to
meet
the
Fair
Housing
Act.
They
must
at
least
strive
for
100
occupancy
by
by
persons
that
are
55
and
over
so
the
issue
is.
F
The
applicant
must
show,
with
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
the
amenities
and
the
services
that
are
being
provided
are
consistent
with
that
of
an
assisted
living
facility
or
a
Continuing
Care
retirement
community,
in
order
to
be
consistent
with
what
would
be
subject
to
an
to
this,
to
a
to
a
special
exception
use
and
not
just
getting
a
multi-family
use
through
the
back
door
on
a
single-family
zoning
District.
Now
they
will
have
the
density
by
accomplishing
their
future
land
use
Amendment.
F
So
that's
it's
a
weird
backdoor
way
of
getting
this
use
in
because
they
can't
get
this
use
in
because
they
didn't
meet
the
densities.
However,
the
zoning
code
and
allows
for
group
living
uses
to
meet
these
to
meet
these
requirements
to
meet
these
under
a
special
exception,
but
but
because
they
don't
offer
the
amenities
at
assisted
living
facility
or
Continuing
Care
retirement
community
provides
but
are
merely.
This
is
just
a
department
complex
for
people
over
55,
then
they
needed
to
meet
the
density.
F
But
at
this
point,
I
believe
that
I
I
don't
think
they're
Allowed
by
right.
Nor
are
they
eligible
for
a
special
exception
based
on
the
use,
as
they
have
provided
to
this.
To
this
commission,
so
if
the
applicant
shows
he
shows
you
enough
evidence
that
they're
consistent
with
those
defined
terms
and
you're
comfortable
with
that
then
go
ahead
and
prove
it
as
a
special
exception,
but
I'm
just
advising
you
that
part
of
the
application,
as
well
as
what
the
code
provides.
F
That's
giving
me
some
heartburn
to
advise
you
one
way
or
another
that
can
I
advise
that
this
is
a
legally
permitted
special
exception
use,
based
on
the
evidence
provided
in
the
application.
I
mean
I
I.
My
advisement
is
it's.
This
is
multi-family
with
an
age
restriction
and
it's
not
consistent
with
what
the
definitions
are.
I
mean
if
you
want
me
to
read
the
definition
under
our
code
unassisted
living
facility.
F
It's
a
facility
that
provides
living
and
sleeping
facilities
and
care
for
four
or
more
individuals
who,
because
of
Advanced
age
or
physical
or
mental
disability,
require
intermittent
assistance
in
performing
the
activities
of
daily
living,
which
may
include
the
supervision
and
or
administration
of
medication
in
a
protective
environment.
Such
care
includes,
but
is
not
limited
to
meal
preparation,
laundry
services,
housekeeping
personal
observation
and
direction
in
the
activities
of
daily
living
transportation.
F
For
routine
social
and
medical
appointments
and
the
availability
of
a
responsible
adult
for
companionship
or
non-clinical
counseling,
the
use
does
not
include
a
nursing
home
facility.
A,
continuing
care
retirement
community,
which
is
defined
and
is
listed
as
a
special
exception
use,
is
an
integrated
development
that
offers
senior
citizens
a
full
Continuum
of
housing
options
and
assistance,
ranging
from
fully
independent
dwelling
units
to
assistance
with
Personal
Care
in
assisted
living
facilities
to
long-term
skilled
nursing
care
in
a
nursing
home
facility.
F
L
F
I
have
a
concern
about
on
the
consistencies.
However,
the
applicant
can
come
and
state
that
their
amenities,
their
facilities
and
they
can
show
and
prove
to
you
with
confidence,
substantial
evidence
that
they'll
meet
what
our
code
defines
as
a
group
living
use
as
an
assisted
living
facility
or
even
a
Continuing
Care
retirement
community,
and
they
meet
that
and
you
believe
they've
met
that
burden.
Then
you
can
go
ahead
and
and
approve
it.
F
F
I
will
never
predict
who
can
win
a
court,
but
I
believe
that
the
city
is
on
strong
footing
that,
based
on
what
has
been
presented
and
I,
take
and
also
take
into
consideration,
because
this
matter
was
tabled
and
brought
forward.
I
need
to
take
into
consideration
what
the
applicant
presented
at
the
first
meeting,
in
which
their
representative
stated.
F
Oh
no,
that
I
think
the
question
was
is
this:
was
the
lane
of
the
term
that
was
used
kind
of
kind
of
kind
of
you
you
go
in
and
you're
going
to
get
you're
going
to
graduate
from
one
level
of
care
to
the
next
level
of
care
kind
of
to
I,
don't
want
to
say,
die
in
place.
I,
don't
think
that
was
the
term
age
in
place.
Thank
you
and
I
think
it
was
stressed.
It
was
like
no
I'm.
F
So
and
I
think
the
applicant,
the
the
representative
for
the
applicant
at
that
point
said
no.
No.
This
is
not
an
agent
place,
because
if,
if
you're
going
to
need
further
care,
you're
going
to
go
somewhere
else
and
I
think
the
intent
of
the
code
is
to
take
into
an
age
in
place.
If
This,
Were,
A
use
where
you
had
independent
living
facilities
in
one
aspect
of
the
set
of
the
location
and
then
an
assisted
living
facility,
not
other
I.
Think
then
you
can
justify
well.
F
B
V
V
So,
in
terms
of
the
way
that
we've
analyzed
this
under
your
code,
your
code
does
have
what
I
would
consider
to
be
some
Antiquated
definitions.
So
it
doesn't
necessarily
capture
everything
that
is
in
what
a
senior
living
bubble
of
the
market
would
capture
whether
that
I
mean
your
code
doesn't
talk
about
skilled
nursing,
it
doesn't
talk
about
memory
care,
but
it
talks
about
assisted
living
facilities
and
those
are
certainly
components
of
some
assisted
living
facilities.
V
But
you
also
have
Standalone
nursing
facilities
and
Standalone
Memory
Care
Facilities,
but
your
code
doesn't
talk
about
those,
so
we
have
something
that
would
fall
under
your
definitions
for
group
living
uses
where
it
talks
about.
You
know
if
you
look
broadly
group
residential
facilities,
boarding
or
rooming
houses.
All
of
these
fall
under
something
that
is
age
restricted
to
seniors.
V
So,
while
I
agree
that
the
exact
term
of
independent
living
facility
is
not
within
your
code,
this
is
restricted
so
that
only
those
55
and
up
would
be
able
to
live
there,
and
it
is
different
than
a
traditional
multi-family
development.
First,
we
provide
dining
housekeeping
activities,
24-hour
security,
concierge
services,
emergency
response
and
third-party
care
services
that
can
come
on
site,
so
those
are
not
offered
at
a
traditional
multi-family
development.
V
So
that
is
specific
to
the
fact
that
we
have
seniors
as
our
residents
on
the
property
and
so
under
that
group
living
facility
and
under
the
definitions
that
you
have
in
your
code,
where
it
talks
about
how
these
are.
These
can
include
assisted
living
facilities,
group
residential
facilities
that
provide
more
than
just
dwellings.
They
provide
other
services
as
well.
V
So
the
fact
that
we
have
our
clubhouse
to
provide
those
dining
services
to
our
residents
so
that
they
don't
have
to
cook
every
day
that
we
offer
the
cleaning
of
their
units
to
help
with
those
that
are
age
restricted
to
not
have
to
do
those
Services
either.
All
of
that
is
built
in
to
the
monthly
care
package
that
we
give
to
our
residents.
Do
they
need
a
nurse
in
each
of
their
units?
V
No,
we
don't
have
licensed
nurses
on
staff,
that's
something
that
is
separate,
but
your
definitions
are
very
broad
under
your
group
living
uses
that
would
allow
us
to
fall
under
that
special
exception.
So
I,
don't
think.
We've
had
this
conversation
before
discussing
the
the
concierge,
the
health
care
services
that
can
come
on
site,
the
meals
being
provided
or
the
housekeeping
that
gets
provided
to
our
residents.
I.
Think
that
makes
us
distinct
from
what
is
a
traditional
multi-family
use.
V
We
certainly
went
down
this
path
working
with
staff
since
last
June,
so
it
wasn't
a
back
door
by
any
means.
I
mean
this
is
the
first
time
I'm
hearing
tonight
that
there
might
be
a
question
about
the
definition
but
I
think
also
too
in
the
housing
element
of
your
comprehensive
plan.
It
talks
about
how
group
housing
facilities
again,
which
you
know,
group
living
uses
and
group
housing
facilities,
different
terms
being
used
different
in
your
comp
plan
and
your
code,
but
they
are
kind
of
encompassing
some
broader
range
of
uses,
says.
V
Group
housing
facilities
are
presently
allowed
in
all
zoning
categories
by
special
exception
in
the
city.
So
your
comp
plan
very
clearly
says
group
housing
facilities
are
allowed
by
special
exception
in
every
single
zoning
category.
So
what
we
are
asking
for
is
the
exact
type
of
group
housing
facility
that
per
your
comp
plan
is
allowed
in
every
single
zoning
category
by
special
exception.
So
our
request
for
a
special
exception,
very
much,
is
in
line
already
with
broad
definitions,
as
well
as
what
your
comprehensive
plan
sets
out.
J
F
F
Want
you
to
be
clear
in
any
of
that
distinction,
because
your
pre,
your
predecessor,
did
not
make
that
that
basically
just
said:
no,
no
we're
not
providing
any
services.
That
was
the
first
red
flag
when
that
was
up,
and
then
it
was
tabled
at
that
point
which
led
me.
It
would
because
the
presentation
was
being
made
asking
for
a
special
exception
for
Alf,
and
then
the
applicant
gets
up
and
says:
no
we're
not
we're
not
agent
place
that
that
first
part
of
the
application
leads
me
to
believe
it
and
and
based
on
the
presentations.
F
The
neighbors,
but
a
lot
of
the
neighbors
concerns.
Weren't
related
to
the
use,
it
was
going
to
be
the
impacts
of
the
property,
the
sight
lines,
the
buffering
and
all
those
the
the
use
in
that
the
use,
at
least
in
those
cases,
is
irrelevant.
However,
if
the
applicant,
if
you
believe
the
applicant
has
satisfied
the
issue
that
the
use
is
consistent
with
a
group
home
that
would
then
enable
them
to
be
eligible
for
the
special
exception,
then
go
right
ahead
and
and
Rule
now
I'm
going
to
be
more
comfortable.
F
That
I
am
applicant,
that
any
challenges
that
are
made
by
a
third
party
that
both
the
city
and
the
applicant
have
a
stronger
footing
to
argue
as
such.
Just
simply
stating
that
we
have
a
you,
know,
kind
of
an
advanced
enhanced
residential
use
Alone
and
that
the
only
thing
that
differentiates
this
resident,
multi-family
residential
use
from
any
any
other
multi-family
residential
use,
is
that
the
tenancy
is
restricted
to
those
55
or
over
I
mean
not
to
give
away.
But
I
I
qualify
for
that
in
four
years.
F
A
F
V
F
D
I,
don't
know
how
could
I
want
to
a
couple
things
really
a
couple
things
really
in
a
nutshell,
just
to
summarize
Miss
Taylor,
basically
Justified
the
special
exception,
with
the
with
the
extra
amenities
that
they're
going
to
be
offering
for
the
for
the
facility.
In
addition,
they've
also
answered
pretty
much
every
question
regarding
the
property,
the
site
line,
distance,
the
bamboo,
the
the
perimeter
buffering
the
types
of
uses
and,
where
they're
putting
it
up
and
basically
they
answered
all
the
questions.
Mr.
A
V
And
it
just
Just
One
Last
point
I,
don't
want
to
belabor
this
too
much
longer,
but
I,
I,
agree
and
I
appreciate,
because
if
there
is
ever
a
challenge,
I'd
like
the
record
to
be
as
clean
as
possible,
I
think
one
of
the
really
operative
sentences
in
that
group
living
facilities,
definition
is
accessory.
Use
is
common
to
group
living
facilities,
include
recreational
facilities,
administrative
offices,
food
preparation
and
dining
facilities.
That's
everything
that
we
have,
plus
we
do
our
added
care.
V
V
Correct
but
we
still
have
all
the
other
things
that
check
every
box
that
they
say
use
is
common,
are
wreck
administrative
offices,
food
preparation,
dining
facilities
and
that's
specific
to
a
group
living
facility
definition
in
the
code.
So
we
would
meet
those
definitions
because
of
the
additional
uses
that
we
are
providing,
which
weren't
specified
at
the
first
hearing.
V
Which,
under
your
code
group
living
facilities
includes
a
lot
of
different
senior
care,
but
it
specifically
says
accommodations
are
not
where
you
need
more
than
modest
Health,
Care
Services,
because
those
are
nursing
homes
and
those
go
under
your
health
care
uses
category.
So
that's
why
I
think
the
distinction
was
being
drawn,
that
we
weren't
a
health
care
use
category.
We
didn't
have
those
extra
services
that
make
you
an
assisted
living
facility
or
a
nursing
home.
V
J
A
I
mean
not
to
simplify
it,
but
it's
like
parsing
words
is
this.
Is
that
that
I
think
the
bigger
question
in
front
of
us?
Is
it
appropriate
for
the
area
to
give
an
exception?
Is
it
something
that
fits
in?
Is
it
something
that's
transitional
from
residential
to
Commercial,
and
then
you
know
the
the
getting
down
to
the
nitty-gritty
on
how
that
is
specifically
defined.
A
You
know,
would
it
matter
if
it's
an
independent
living
facility
or
it
was
we
wanted
to
give
it
a
special
exemption
for
a
retail
in
an
area
that
was
residential?
It
I
think
it's
more
that
we're
going
to
look
at.
Is
this
applicable?
Does
it
make
sense?
Is
everybody
happy
with
it?
Is
it
does
it
prove
the
city?
Is
it
a
good
transition
and
I
think
we're
getting
down
into
the
details
about
what
the
code
says
specifically
and
trying
to
hinge
everything
on
that
I
think
we
make
just
a
good
judgment
decision
based
on.
I
To
your
point,
Mr
chairman
I
think
the
applicant
has
made
that
argument
that
this
is
a
good
use
for
this.
They
have.
They
have
worked
very
hard
with
the
neighbors
to
make
sure
that
the
neighbors
concerns
were
placated.
They've
listened
to
our
concerns
to
make
sure
that
they
have
appropriate,
buffering
and
made
significant
changes,
their
side
and
I'm
very
satisfied
with
that
and
I
I'm
perfectly
fine
making
making
a
motion
to
move
to
approve
this
special
exception
exemption.
J
K
271
parking
spaces
are
proposed
in
addition
to
the
building
setback
of
131
feet,
there's
an
existing
opaque
fence
as
well
as
proposal
of
southern
magnolia,
winged
Elms,
shimmered,
Oaks
and
high-rise
live
oak
trees
adjacent
to
Lakeside
residential
subdivision.
The
applicant
meets
the
open
space
requirement
with
a
proposal
of
a
mulch
Trail
along
the
top
of
pond
one.
The
easternmost
portion
of
the
project
area,
which
connects
to
The
Pedestrian
walkway
at
the
front
of
the
site,
size,
design,
accordance
with
the
requirements
and
intent
of
the
Land
Development
code.
K
K
B
K
K
Yeah,
that's
what
they
they
did.
Is
they
provided
it's
actually
more
than
25
feet
of
setback
and
buffering
I'm.
Sorry,
it
escapes
me
how
wide
that
buffering
is,
but
it's
more
than
it's
above
and
beyond
what
the
requirement
is
per
code
for
that
alternative,
and
because
there
was
an
opaque
fence
there.
The
applicant
chose
to
have
the
25
foot
wide
landscape
buffer
rather
than
providing
a
five
foot
wide
buffer
and
a
wall.
P
A
A
K
For
the
record
Gene
Sanchez
with
the
Planning
and
Zoning
division,
this
is
a
request
to
recommend
approval
of
the
Natura
Vista
major
development
plan.
Property
is
located
in
the
Southeast
corner
of
Wilkins
Street
and
Orange
Blossom
Trail,
approximately
3.09
acres
in
size.
The
aerial
shows
residential
uses
on
the
north
and
east.
The
windward
Hills
plan
development,
which
is
a
mix
of
residential
and
Commercial
uses
on
the
south
in
the
Orlando
Apopka
airport.
In
the
West,
the
major
development
plan
details
the
construction
of
46
multi-family
units
within
the
mues
GT
mixed-used
Esure,
Gateway
sub-district.
K
The
project
consists
of
two
apartment
buildings
and
two
garage
buildings.
With
the
proposed
Building
height
of
almost
40
feet,
total
of
six
of
69
parking
spaces
are
required
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
98
spaces,
including
four
accessible
spaces.
The
mdp
shows
a
side
along
the
project:
a
sidewalk
along
the
front
project
Frontage
on
State
Road
441,
connecting
to
an
internal
walkway
and
a
continuation
on
the
sidewalk
through
the
Wilkin
Street
Frontage.
The
applicant
is
required
to
preserve
0.3,
acre
10
of
the
project
area
for
active
or
passive
Recreation
and
amenity.
K
They
are
proposing
approximately
one
acre
for
dog
park
and
green
space.
State
Road,
441
front
and
book
and
frontages
are
decorated,
with
a
mix
of
southern
magnolias
and
crepe
myrtles
winged
Elms
adore
the
landscape
parking
Islands.
This
project
will
have
two
full
access
connections
to
Wilkins
Street,
which
is
more
than
adequate
to
serve
a
development
of
this
size.
The
applicant
is
required
to
rebuild
Wilkins
Street
and
widen
slightly
so
emits
mean
it
meets
minimum
City
standards.
K
The
right
turn
lane
will
be
striped
on
Wilkin
street,
so
thorough
movement
right
turn,
movement
on
Westbound,
Wilkin
Street
are
separate,
Lanes.
Finally,
a
modified
right
turn.
Lane
will
be
constructed
on
us-441
to
allow
driver
wishing
to
make
a
right
turn
onto
Wilkins
Street
to
move
right
out
of
the
lane
of
traffic
while
making
the
turn
the
architectural
renderings
meet
the
city's
intent
of
the
development
design
guidelines.
K
A
K
Jean
Sanchez
with
the
Community
Development
Department.
This
is
a
request,
recommend
approval
of
the
Oaks
at
Monroe
major
development
plan.
The
property
is
located
north
of
State,
Road,
436
and
south
of
Monroe
Avenue,
approximately
5.74
acres
in
size.
The
aerial
shows
residential
uses
on
the
North
and
Commercial
uses
on
the
east,
south
and
post
commercial
on
the
west.
K
K
K
The
applicant
is
required
to
preserve
10
of
the
project
area
for
open
space
or
humanity,
and
they
are
proposing
17.
Approximately
one
acre
there
are
many
program
includes
a
clubhouse
pool
and
a
dog
park.
The
State
Road
436
Frontage
is
embellished
with
Hollies
and
preserved
oak
trees
live
oaks
and
southern
magnolias
are
placed
along
the
western
and
Eastern
boundaries.
Live
Oaks
also
front
the
Monroe
Avenue
Frontage.
K
This
project
will
have
a
single
access
to
the
roadway
Network
on
Monroe
Avenue.
A
second
emergency
access
will
also
be
provided
on
Monroe
Avenue
via
stabilized
surface
and
locked
gate
project
also
has
cross
connectivity
to
the
West
near
the
southwest
corner
of
the
project.
Based
on
the
city's
Land
Development
code,
section
5.16.5,
B3
D2.
There
shall
be
a
rebuttal
presumption
that
a
left
turn
lane
shall
be
required
for
all
residential
and
non-residential
developments
and
last
Away
by
city
council.
K
K
K
S
I
G
A
I
G
A
U
K
Sanchez
with
the
Planning
and
Zoning
division,
this
is
a
request.
You
recommend
approval
of
the
wingspan
ABC
Kelly
Park
major
development
plan.
We've
seen
this
property
before
it
is
located
on
the
northwest
corner
of
Kelly
Park
Road
and
Plymouth
Sorrento
Road,
approximately
21.36
acres
in
size
and
just
to
clarify.
There
is
a
note
on
there
on
the
cover
sheet
of
the
staff
report,
stating
that
the
future
land
use
for
this
is
County
rule
is,
has
actually
been
amended
and
adopted,
and
the
current
future
land
use
designation
for
this
property
is
mixed
use.
K
K
The
major
development
plan
proposes
a
total
of
368
multi-family
units
encompassing
156
one-bedroom
units,
168,
two
bedroom
units
and
44
three-bedroom
units,
and
that
equates
to
approximately
18
dwelling
units
per
acre.
The
commercial
development
consists
of
45
200
square
feet
for
restaurants,
retail
and
office
uses
with
the
proposed
total
floor
area
of
0.75.
K
The
proposed
access
point
for
this
project
are
on
Kelly,
Park,
Road
and
Plymouth
Sorrento
Road.
Please
disregard
the
the
statement
about
the
southernmost
access
on
PSR
and
blooming
Sorrento
Road.
They
actually
are
only
proposing
one
access
on
there.
It's
a
full
access
with
write-in
and
left
turn
Lanes
at
at
this
entrance
and
at
the
time
Kelly
Park
Road
is
right
into
four
lanes.
The
full
access
may
be
closed
off
by
a
median
resulting
in
right
and
right
on
only
or
right
and
right
out,
left
in
Access
connection
to
the
site.
K
The
amadi
Open
Space
Program
comprises
of
2.74
Acres
that
includes
covered
Pavilion
pocket
parks
with
benches
plazas
pool
with
deck
and
Lounge
areas,
as
well
as
green,
passive
spaces
and
a
playground.
The
project
site
is
embellished
with
red
maple,
southern
magnolia,
Live
Oak,
Japanese
blueberry
and
the
Hoon
aholic
trees.
K
B
U
B
U
P
B
Back
again,
thank
you.
Some
of
your
Ada
accessible
parking
doesn't
make
sense,
is
supposed
to
be
the
closest
accessible
to
the
entrances
like
I'll.
Give
you
an
example,
building
three
type:
one
we've
got
one
in
the
middle
of
the
parking
lot
and
then
they
got
one
next
to
a
storm
area.
I
mean
you,
don't
need
access
to
a
storm
area.