►
From YouTube: Apopka Planning Commission Meeting April 13, 2021
Description
Apopka Planning Commission Meeting at City Hall on April 13, 2021 at 5:30 PM. To view the meeting agenda visit: http://www.apopka.net/agenda
#CityofApopkaFL #ApopkaPlanningCommission
A
A
A
A
B
A
Second
by
commissioner
guster,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
any
discussion,
then
we'll
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no,
and
that
carries
unanimously
for
all
of
our
items
on
the
agenda
tonight.
We
will
have
a
public
comment
period,
so,
if
you're
interested
in
any
particular
item,
you
will
certainly
have
an
opportunity
to
comment
at
that
time.
However,
we
also
have
a
general
comment
period
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
A
Our
first
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
areas
and
recommend
approval
of
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
from
t
transitional
district
to
rsf-1b
residential
single
family.
Large
lot,
district
for
the
property
owned
by
citrus
ridge,
real
estate,
llc
and
located
at
202,
south
benion
road.
And
we
have
a
staff
report.
C
Good
evening,
allison
williams
planner
one
with
the
city's
planning
division.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
rezone
a
19.11
acre
parcel
from
t
transitional
to
rsf-1b
residential
single-family
large
lot.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
202,
south
binyan
road.
It
was
annexed
into
the
city
on
december,
4th
2004.
C
A
A
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
quasi-judicial
item
for
the
commission's
consideration.
It's
a
request
to
approve
a
special
accept
exception
to
allow
an
assisted
living
facility
alf
in
the
cc
community,
commercial
zoning
district
for
the
property
owned
by
marshall
howard
and
located
at
1265
rock
springs
road
and
since.
C
A
E
Report,
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
good
evening,
bobby
howell
planning
manager.
Last
month,
a
special
exception
was
approved
on
the
two
properties
to
the
north
here
for
a
70
000
square
foot
assisted
living
facility.
A
couple
days
later,
it
was
determined
that
this
piece
of
property
was
not
included
in
the
special
exception
approval
and
that's.
Why
we're
here
tonight
to
seek
approval
for
the
special
exception
on
the
subject.
Property
staff
and
the
applicant
are
here
for
questions.
A
A
A
Well,
I
guess
he
does
not.
You
don't
want
to
know.
Okay.
In
that
case,
we
will
close
the
public
hearing
open
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
What's
your
pleasure.
A
A
Okay,
our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
proposed
amendment
consent
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
transmittal
of
the
future
land
use
map
designation
from
residential,
very
low,
suburban.
That's
max
two
delegates
per
acre
to
industrial
max
.6,
far
to
the
florida
department
of
economic
opportunity
for
the
property
owned
by
nancy
mann,
trust
and
located
at
444,
hermit
smith
road,
and
we
have
a
staff
presentation.
G
Good
evening,
gene
sanchez
with
the
community
development
department:
this
is
a
request
to
recommend
approval
of
the
nancy
mann
trust
future
land
use
amendment
from
residential,
very
low,
suburban
to
industrial,
the
the
proposed
project
or
I'm
sorry.
The
proposed
project
site
is
approximately
78.9
acres
located
south
of
hogshead
road,
I'm
sorry
located
south
of
hawksaddle
and
west
of
hermit
smith
road,
a
request
to
assign
a
future
land
use
designation
of
industrial
is
compatible
with
the
designations
assigned
to
budding
properties.
G
G
The
drc
recommends
transmittal
of
the
change
in
future
land
use
and
the
recommended
motions
to
recommend
transmittal.
The
future
land
use
map
amendment
from
residential,
very
low,
suburban
to
industrial,
to
the
florida
department
of
economic
opportunity,
staff
and
applicant
are
available
for
questions.
A
A
It
is
available
to
answer
questions
any
questions
of
the
applicant
okay,
we'll
close
the
presentations,
bring
it
back
to
well
we'll
open
the
public
hearing.
First,
anyone
wish
to
appear
before
the
commission
on
this
item
and
seeing
none
we'll
close.
The
public
hearing
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
What's
your
pleasure.
I
Mr
chairman,
I
move
that
we
find
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
transmittal
of
the
change
in
future
land
use
from
residential,
very
low,
suburban
max
2
dwelling
units
per
acre
to
industrial,
max
0.6,
floor
area
ratio
for
the
property
owned
by
nancy
mann,
trust
and
located
at
444,
hermit
smith.
Road.
A
A
A
Sorry
not
sure
that
was
the
appropriate
for
that
one.
But
we'll
accept
your
motion.
We
have
a
motion
by
commissioner
lorendo
and
the
second
by
commissioner
ryan,
any
discussion
other
than
the
fact
that
we
have.
A
Maybe
okay,
in
that
case,
we'll
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no
and.
A
A
Okay,
our
next
item
for
the
same
property
is
a
request
to
find
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
consistent
with
a
copper.
G
G
A
Any
questions
of
staff-
and
I
guess
the
participant-
doesn't
have
a
presentation
but
is
available
for
questions
any
questions
of
the
petitioner
in
that
case,
we'll
close
the
presentations
open,
the
public
hearing.
Anyone
wish
to
appear
before
the
commission
on
this
item
and
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearing,
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
What's
your
pleasure.
D
Mr
chairman,
I
make
a
motion
to
find
a
proposed
change
of
zoning
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
areas
and
recommend
approval
of
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
from
rsf-1a
district
to
1l
district
for
the
property
owned
by
nancy
mann
trust
and
located
at
444,
hermit
smith.
Road.
A
A
A
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
approval
of
the
request
to
apply
the
future
land
use
designation
of
mixed
use.
That's
zero
to
15
dwelling
units
per
acre
and
1.0,
far
for
the
property
owned
by
pmdw
ventures,
llc
and
located
at
2600
peterson
road,
and
we.
G
G
The
city's
future
land
use
map
shows
that
the
subject
property
has
an
existing
future
land
use
designation
of
mixed
use.
However,
during
a
title
search,
no
documentation
was
found
that
a
mixed-use
future
land
use
designation
was
approved
on
the
property
to
correct
the
discrepancy.
The
applicant
requests
the
mixed-use
future
land
use
designation,
be
formally
re-approved
on
the
subject
property.
G
The
current
designation
of
the
entire
property
is
mixed-used
east
shore
gateway
sub-district
and
is
compatible
with
the
mixed-use
future
land
use.
Designation
drc
recommends
approval
of
the
proposed
amendment.
The
recommended
motion
is
to
recommend
approval
of
the
request
to
apply
the
future
land
use
designation
of
mixed
use
for
the
property
owned
by
pmdw
ventures.
Subject
to
the
findings
of
the
staff
report,
staff
and
applicant
are
available
for
questions.
D
I
have
a
question
it
says
here:
there
is
a
an
adjacent
piece
of
property,
3.7
acres,
which
is
not
part
of
this
application,
but
it's
also
owned
by
the
applicant
at
a
future
date.
Will
this
come
back
to
our
attention.
G
A
Okay,
other
questions
and
does
the
applicant
have
a
presentation
or
just
available
for
questions?
Okay,
any
questions
for
the
applicant
okay.
Thank
you.
We'll
close
the
presentations
open
the
public
hearing,
anyone
wish
to
appear
before
the
commission
on
this
item.
So
if
you
would
come
up
and
give
us
your
name
and
address
for
the
record,
please.
J
J
All
we
got
was
something
that
showed
the
blacked
out
area
of
the
38
acres
previously
owned
by
coca-cola
and
that
3.8
acres
that
had
been
owned
by
another
company
prior
to
that-
and
today
was
the
first
time
we'd
seen
anything
about
where
those
nine
acres
was
going
to
be
located.
It
was
up
for
public
review,
so
my
official
notice
that
I've
got
shows
this
big
40,
some
some
acres
but
doesn't
show
the
nine
acres,
and
so
I
had
to
come
down
here
to
find
out
where
exactly.
J
This
was
going
to
be
designated
because
I'm
right
next
on
the
east
side,
the
property
line
right
there
and
I
didn't
have
any
idea
how
it
was
going
to
impact
me
so
I'm
kind
of
con.
I
was
kind
of
confused
about
the
notice
and
a
little
bit
about
exactly
what
the
plans
are.
Did
I
hear
something
said
about
school,
or
was
it
going
to
be
cleared
through
us
through
the
school
system?
Or
what
did
I
hear
exactly?
J
What
is
the
property
going
to
be
intended
to
be
used
for
this
mixed-use
designation
doesn't
mean
anything
to
the
average
guy.
I
have
no
idea
what
city
o'clock
is
going
to
do.
G
So
if
I
get
this
correctly,
the
question
was:
what
was
the
the
plans
for
this
property?
Currently,
the
development
review
committee
is
reviewing
a
subdivision
plan
that
includes
200
units
with
a
mix
of
single
family
and
townhomes.
A
Okay,
now
that
hadn't
been
for
that,
has
that
been
formally
submitted
to
the
city.
G
A
formal
application
has
been
submitted,
it's
it's
being
reviewed
right
now.
It
hasn't
been
approved
by
drcs.
A
Okay,
all
right
very
good,
and
so
does
that
answer
your
question,
or
do
we
some
of
the
detail
on
what
they're
actually
proposing
will
be
in
another
phase
of
this.
A
J
A
I
Mr
chairman,
I
move
that
we
find
the
proposed
amendment
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
recommend
approval
of
the
request
to
apply
the
future
land
use
designation
of
mixed
use,
0
to
15
dwelling
units
per
acre
and
1.0
far
for
the
property
owned
by
pmdw
ventures.
Llc,
subject
to
the
findings
of
this
staff
report.
A
A
Unanimously.
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
master,
slash
major
development
plan
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
land
development
code
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
areas,
recommending
approval
of
the
proposed
change
of
zoning
from
t
transitional
district
to
mu,
kpi
kelly
park,
interchange,
district,
mixed
use
and
assign
the
transition
overlay
district
and
approve
the
master
major
development
plan.
Based
on
the
findings
and
facts
presented
in
the
staff
report
and
exhibits,
and
we
have
a
staff
report.
H
Good
evening,
planet,
commissioners,
phil
martinez,
planner,
two
with
the
city's
planning
division.
The
applicant
is
proposing
a
rezoning
from
t
transitional
district
to
mu,
kpi
kelly
park,
interchange,
district,
mixed
use
with
the
transition
overlay,
along
with
a
master
plan
and
major
development
plan.
H
H
The
property
is
owned.
Transitional
district
and
in
accordance
with
the
kelly
park,
interchange
form
base
code.
The
applicant
is
requesting
kelly
park,
interchange,
district
zoning
with
a
transition
overlay.
The
subject
property
has
mixed
use,
future
land
use
which
is
compatible
with
the
proposed
kelly
park,
interchange,
district
zoning.
H
H
Access
access
to
the
site
is
proposed
off
of
the
east
adjacent
golden
gem
road
with
two
future
access
points
being
proposed,
one
at
sadler,
road
to
the
south
and
the
other
access
point
or
future
access
point
being
proposed.
At
the
northwestern
end
of
the
development,
the
applicant
has
provided
10.4
acres
of
open
space
where
5.33
acres
is
required.
H
H
A
D
A
B
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
another
item.
It's
a
request
to
approve
a
special
exception
to
allow
outdoor
storage
as
a
principal
use
in
the
il
light,
industrial
district
for
the
property
owned
by
cherry
holdings,
one
llc
and
located
at
3723
hogshead,
road
and
3636
flood
roads,
and
since
it's
cuisine,
judicial,
I
would
ask
if
anyone
in
the
audience
requests
affected
party
status
and
seeing
none.
I
would
ask
commission
members
if
anyone
had
had
ex
parte
communications
on
this
item.
H
The
subject
properties
are
highlighted
in
yellow
and
located
west
of
hermit
smith,
road
and
north
of
hogshead
road
to
the
west
are
industrial
and
agricultural
properties
to
the
north
is
a
railroad
and
west
orange
blossom
trail
to
the
east.
Our
residential
properties
and
to
the
south
is
hogshead
road.
The
property
is
currently
zoned
il
light
industrial
district,
where
outdoor
storage
as
a
principal
use
requires
a
special
exception.
H
The
development
review
committee
recommends
approval
of
the
special
exception,
and
the
recommended
motion
for
this
evening
is
to
prove
a
special
exception
to
allow
outdoor
storage
as
a
principal
use
in
the
il
light
industrial
district
at
3723,
hogshead,
road
and
3636
fudge
road
subject
to
the
conditions
of
approval
and
findings
of
the
staff
report.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
the
applicant,
and
I
are
happy
to
address
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
A
Nope:
okay,
thanks
we'll
close
the
presentations
and
open
the
public
hearing.
Does
anyone
wish
to
appear
before
the
commission
on
this
item
and
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearing
bring
it
back
to
the
commission?
What's
your
pleasure.
B
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
by
commissioner
guster.
Is
there
a
second.
D
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
nottingham
major
development
plan
consistent
with
the
land
development
code
and
the
comprehensive
plan
and
recommend
approval
of
the
major
development
plan
subject
to
a
right
turn.
Lane
eating
into
the
site
from
punkin
road
are
being
provided
on
the
plans
prior
to
presentation
of
the
major
development
plan
to
the
city
council.
We.
E
E
And
3081
pontcam
road
and
is
approximately
23.4
acres
in
size.
Major
development
plan
proposes
the
construction
of
a
46
lot.
Single
family
subdivision
ariel
shows
the
location
of
the
property,
and
the
major
development
plan
proposes
46
lots.
The
property
will
be
zoned
to
rsf-1b
a
minimum
lot
size
of
8
000
square
feet,
minimum
lot,
width
of
75
feet,
setbacks,
front
yard,
25,
side,
10
and
rear
of
25
feet.
Access
to
the
subdivision
is
via
poncan
road.
E
Two
public
streets
are
proposed
within
the
development
storm.
Water
retention
is
proposed
on
track
c,
which
is
back
here
on
the
northern
portion
of
the
property
per
the
requirements
of
the
land
development
code.
20
of
the
site
is
reserved
for
open
space.
A
landscape
buffer
will
be
provided
along
pond.
Can
road
and
adjacent
to
ag
zone
property?
That
is
here.
E
The
development
review
committee
recommends
approval
and
status
approval
and
staff
in
the
applicant
are
here
for
questioning.
The
motion
should
be
that
the
major
development
plan
is
approved,
subject
to
a
right
turn,
lane
being
provided
leading
into
the
site
from
poncan
roads.
So
a
right
turn
lane
would
be
required
here
on
the
plan
before
the
prop
before
the
plan
goes
to
city
council.
F
Luke
classen
appian
engineering,
two
two,
two
one
lee
road
winter
park,
florida,
three,
two,
seven,
eight,
nine,
just
a
clarification
for
the
right
turn
lane.
My
client
has
no
problem
providing
the
right
turnley,
but
that
road
is
an
orange
county
road.
So
we
just
wanna
make
sure
that
provided
orange
county
allows
it.
If
they
don't
allow
it
there's
not
much.
We
can
do
okay,
but
right
now
it
looks
like
they're
gonna
allow
it.
So
I
don't
think
we'll
have
a
problem.
I
just
wanna.
A
Okay,
well,
it's
the
recommended
condition
from
the
staff.
Is
that
there
be
a.
A
F
A
Okay,
all
right
any
any
any
questions
of
the
applicant
okay.
Thank
you.
We'll
open
the
public
hearing.
Anyone
wish
to
appear
before
the
commission
on
this
item
and
seeing
none
we'll
close.
The
public
hearing
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
What's
your
pleasure.
A
A
E
I
A
All
right
any
questions
of
staff:
okay,
does
the
petitioner
have
a
presentation
and
seeing
none
we'll
close
the
presentations?
I
open
the
public
hearing.
Anyone
wish
to
appear
before
the
commission
on
this
item
and
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearing,
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
What's
your
pleasure.
D
A
C
A
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
a
request
to
find
the
retail
at
rock
springs.
Road
and
tanglewood
drive
plat
consistent
with
the
land
development
code
and
recommend
approval
of
the
plat
subject
to
the
findings
of
this
staff
report
for
the
property
owned
by
unicorp
companies
and
located
at
1752,
1760,
1774
and
1788
rock
springs
road.
We
have
a
staff
presentation.
G
G
The
rock
springs
retail
plat
proposes
a
combination
of
four
parcels
and
subdividing
it
into
three
lots
with
a
common
area
track
that
will
serve
as
cross
access,
private
drainage,
private
utility,
easement
and
open
space.
A
site
plan
for
lot
3
has
been
approved
for
retail
use,
drc
recommends
approval
and
the
recommended
motions
to
find
the
retail
iraq
springs.
Road
and
tango
would
drive
plaque
consistent
with
the
land
development
code
and
recommend
approval
of
the
plat
subject
to
the
findings
of
the
staff
report.
Staff
and
applicant
are
available
for
questions.
Okay,.
A
B
Mr
chairman,
I
make
a
motion
to
find
the
retail
at
rock
springs.
Road
and
tanglewood
drive
flat
consistent
with
the
land
development
code
and
recommend
approval
of
the
plat
subject
to
the
findings
of
the
staff
report,
property
owned
by
unicorp
companies
and
located
at
1752,
1760,
1774
and
1788
rock
springs
road.