►
From YouTube: Batch 2 July 13 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting
Description
Batch 2 July 13 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting
A
A
We
again
want
to
thank
the
community
for
their
efforts
to
slow
the
spread
of
kogen
19
in
arcadia.
All
votes
will
be
taken
through
a
roll
call
vote
this
evening.
If
you
wish
to
make
public
comment
during
the
public
comment
period
or
for
an
individual
agenda
item
during
the
meeting,
there
are
two
ways
to
do.
So,
if
you
are
logged
onto
the
zoom
meeting,
webinar
click
on
raise
your
hand
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
your
screen.
A
Then
it
is
time
for
public
comment
on
the
item
on
which
you
wish
to
speak.
Staff
will
unmute
you.
You
will
have
two
minutes
to
comment.
You
can
also
access
the
meeting
by
phone
call
the
number
listed
on
the
agenda
and
enter
the
meeting
id
also
listed
on
the
agenda
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
This
will
raise
your
hand
when
it
is
time
for
public
comment
on
the
item
on
which
you
wish
to
speak.
Staff
will
unmute
your
phone.
You
will
hear
a
prompt
that
will
indicate
your
phone
is
unmuted.
C
D
B
Maguire
is
absent
and
steve.
I
just
wanted
to
note
I
I
admitted
johnny
late,
so
we
do
have
more
than
a
quorum
if
you
need
to
bow
out
early.
If
you
leave
we'll
still
have
a
quorum.
D
Okay,
I'll
stick
it
I'll
stick
around
for
a
few
minutes
and
then
I'll
buy
one
in
a
bit.
E
F
Thanks
sorry,
for
being
late,
I
could
not
the
link
wasn't
in
my
calendar,
and
so
I
had
to
look
really
hard
find
it.
I
finally
found
like
the
meeting
code
in
the
agenda
in
the
meeting
packet.
So
sorry
about
that,
usually
I
can
just
click
to
come
in.
A
Okay,
so
we
have
roll
good,
okay,
so
minutes
approval
parks
and
recreation
committee.
Regular
meeting
may
11th
2022
any
public
comments
on
the
minutes.
A
All
right,
we
have
a
motion
by
kohl's
second
by
mcavoy
and
we
will
have
a
vote
so
calls.
G
D
A
Okay,
oral
communications:
it's
a
time
period
is
provided
for
people
to
address
the
committee
on
matters
not
on
the
agenda.
At
the
conclusion
of
all
oral
communications,
the
committee
may
respond
to
statements
any
request
that
requires
committee.
Action
will
be
set
by
the
committee
for
a
future
agenda
or
referred
to
staff.
B
H
Go
ahead,
yes,
thank
you.
This
is
I'll
talk
later
about.
H
You
know
the
gateway
area
plan
and
on
the
later
time,
but
on
this
one
I
just
wanted
to
encourage
the
parks
and
recreation
committee
to
maybe
form
a
subcommittee
or
hold
a
special
meeting
to
discuss
the
gateway
area
and
parks
in
an
open
spaces
of
the
gateway
area
plan
in
greater
depth
at
a
later
time.
H
I
think
you,
as
a
committee,
would
have
a
lot
of
input
to
give,
and
so
also
with
the
two
new
members
that
came
on
community
or
park
and
rec
committee
members
that
came
on
it
would
give
them
a
chance
to
maybe
get
familiar
more
with
the
gateway
plan,
and
I
also
wanted
to
throw
out
there
that
jennifer
dart
with
the
economic
development
committee
they
they
chose
to
go
into
greater
depths
and
do
actually
hold
a
special
meeting
next
week
to
cover
more
of
this
in
detail.
H
But
jennifer
dart
made
a
great
an
excellent
template
for
them
and
I
was
hoping
that
she
possibly
turned
that
template
over
to
your
committee
as
well,
because
it
was,
it
was
really
useful
for
them.
So
anyways,
that's
what
all
I
wanted
to
say
for
the
time
being.
Thank
you.
I
I
You
can
also
take
it
up
when
the
gateway
item
is.
A
Okay,
moving
on
to
new
business,
elect
chair
and
vice
chair
a
new
fiscal
year
time
to
elect
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair,
any
public
comments
been
received
on
this
item.
B
B
I
would
I'll
just
chime
in
here,
I'm
not
sure
offhand.
I
mean
I'm
sure
that
there
is
probably
in
the
committee
protocol
manual.
I
haven't
actually
delved
into
it
recently
myself,
but
I
can
speak
generally,
which
is
to
say
that
the
chair
typically
assists
with
agenda
preparation
and
holds
the
meetings.
B
The
chair
also
often
is
appointed
to
attend
any
special
meetings
or
study
sessions
at
the
request
of
the
city
council
when
those
are
held.
So,
for
example,
most
recently
at
the
end
of
may
sheldon
attended
a
joint
study
session
and
then
the
vice
chair
is
typically
the
second
person
if
the
chair
is
unable
to
attend
or
participate
in
a
meeting.
The
vice
chair
steps
in
and
fills
that
role
and
definitely
sheldon
chime
in
if
I'm
missing
any
key
key
elements.
But
that's
the
the
nutshell
job
description
that
I
could
provide.
A
Yeah,
it's
it's
not
much
more
extra
work.
If
you
were
wondering
that
being
said,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
continue
to
be
the
chair
for
one
more
year.
If
no
one
else
is
interested.
Certainly,
if
someone
is
interested,
it
is
fun
to
go
and
talk
to
the
city
council
and
get
some
of
their
feedback,
but
I'm
perfectly
happy
to
do
it
for
one
more
year.
E
That
sounds
great
to
me
and
you
have
so
much
more
experience.
You've
got
some
new
people
in
the
committee.
E
If
nobody
else
wants
to
do
it,
I'm
happy
to
do
vice
just
because
of
the
experience
that
I
can
garner
from
you.
But
it's
not
something
I'm
super
anxious
to
do.
I'm
just
willing
to
do
it
if,
as
long
as
sheldon
is
repeating
because
of
his
experience
so,
but
having
said
that,
if
anybody
else
is
interested
you're
very
welcome
to
it.
A
And
can
we
treat
that
nomination
as
a
motion?
Okay?
So
we
have
a
motion
by
martin
in
a
second
by
coles,
we'll
have
a
vote
coles?
Yes,
heath!
Yes,
martin,
yes,
jane.
A
J
Sure
well,
good
evening
committee,
I'm
emily
sincourin
director
of
environmental
services
department
and
our
department,
also,
you
know,
includes
our
parks
and
recreation
division
and
this
spring
and
early
summer,
looking
from
direction
and
recommendations
from
the
parks
and
rec
committee
and
just
looking
at
our
parks
goals.
We
really
focused
on
community
outreach
around
bloomfield
park.
So
bloomfield
park
is
a
small
neighborhood
park
in
west
arcada.
J
It
is
off
of
zedner
avenue.
It
is
about
a
100
foot
by
100
foot
area
that
in
2020
had
equipment
removed
due
to
those
equipment
being
much
older
and
kind
of
safety
concern.
So
since
that
time
it
has
been
an
open
grassy
space
and
from
our
engagement
with
the
community,
we
really
learned
that
people
really
utilize
this
space
as
an
as
an
open
space.
It's
a
destination
in
the
neighborhood,
but
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
seeing
improvements.
J
Your
committee
provided
recommendations
to
the
also
with
the
open
space
parks
and
trails
special
tax,
ad
hoc
group,
and
that
group
recommended
to
the
city
council
to
support
funding
for
placement
of
equipment
at
bloomfield
park
in
this
year's
fiscal
year
budget
that
was
approved
by
the
council,
as
well
as
additional
funding
for
around
a
total
of
64
000
for
a
first,
you
know
what
could
be
considered
a
first
phase
or
some
improvements
at
bloomfield
park
and
so
city
staff.
This
spring
early
summer
really
reached
out
within
the
neighborhood.
J
We
mailed
postcards
with
a
online
survey
that
people
could
take.
We
had
25
responses
and
we
also
held
an
an
in-person
park,
visioning
meeting
at
the
park
on
june
2nd,
and
we
had
about
two
dozen
adults
and
youth.
J
I
would
say
there
was
a
range
of
input,
but
there
really
seemed
to
be
interest
in
retaining
some
of
the
grassy
open
area
for
free
play
in
the
neighborhood,
while
also
really
augmenting
some
of
the
amenities
that
would
bring
families
and
community
members
together
there.
J
We
asked
questions
around
the
if
we
would
like
to
see
equipment
or
amenities
added
to
bloomfield
park.
What
types-
and
we
really
heard
that
there
was-
would
be
an
interest
in
having
more
picnic
tables
or
benches
as
gathering
spaces
in
the
neighborhood,
as
well
as
some
exercise
or
more
high
intensity
level
of
activity
kind
of
play.
That
would
be,
for
you
know,
adults
and
youth
as
well
as
some
other
more
youth
oriented
equipment.
J
There
is
definitely
a
range
of
interests
and
responses.
There
was
a
lot
of
interest
in
having
a
dog
park,
you
know
in
arcata,
and
the
you
know
interests
a
lot
of
people
in
the
survey
noted
they
they
take
their
dogs
to
bloomfield
park.
We
do
want
to
note
that
bloomfield
park,
you
know,
is
not
a
as
like.
Many
of
our
all
of
our
city
parks
are
for
dogs
there
to
be
on
leashes.
There
is
a
fence
existing
fence
around
bloomfield
park.
There's.
J
J
But
our
department
put
together
a
kind
of
preliminary
cartoony
sketch
of
what
potential
improvements
could
be.
And
so
I
will
just
share
my
screen
for
that
here.
J
Real
quick,
and
so
this
is
a
kind
of
first
take
just
to
invite
conversation
from
the
committee
and
community
members,
and
this
really
takes
into
account
that
there
was
interest
in
having
improvements
while
also
retaining
an
open
space
area
by
having
more
of
the
features
being
accessible
with
concrete
pad
seating
gathering
areas,
as
well
as
a
water
fountain
having
continuity
between
the
two
areas
of
the
park,
but
having
some
sort
of
playful
barrier
between
the
two
and
then
people
had
more
interest
in
more
of
a
wood
chip
surfacing
and
then
potential
pieces
of
equipment
that
we
could
further
research
and
see
if
it
would
fit
with
the
input
from
the
community
and
the
our
current
budget
to
implement.
J
So
these
were
the
I'll
just
kind
of
walk
through
there's
one,
that's
sort
of
a
youth-oriented
spinning
play
equipment.
This
is
more
of
moving
parts
of
like
an
outdoor
elliptical
machine
as
an
example.
This
is
more
of
like
upper
body
strength.
J
This
is
more
of
footwork.
K
J
J
But
again,
that's
just
an
example
of
something
that
could
happen.
It's
like
netting,
where
you
like,
run
like
up
and
down
between
the
nets
spaces,
or
it
could
be
more
like
more
of
a
climbing
element
as
well.
G
F
I
also
I
have
this
is
jane.
I
I
have
a.
I
don't
know,
question
comment,
but
I
noticed
in
the
comments
it
seemed
like
many
people
were
asking
for
a
dog
park
and
oh
bonnie.
I
just
saw
your
hand
I'm
so
sorry.
I
wasn't
looking
at
my
little
dots
of
people
go
ahead.
Let
me
just
I.
I
noticed
that
several
that
looked
like
there
were
a
good
number
of
people
asking
for
a
dog
park
and
I
realized
that
people
are
playing
in
this
open
grass
area.
F
I
think
I
read
that
as
well,
but
that
it's
not
necessarily
within
city
ordinance
of
playing
without
a
leash
in
that
space,
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
where
that
conversation
went.
Yeah.
J
Yeah
definitely
we
had
a
lot
of
those
conversations
in
person
at
the
outreach
event,
and
you
know
people
in
reality.
You
know
every
evening
take
their
dogs
with
a
throwing
with
a
ball
and
dogs
play
in
the
grassy
area
and
also
kids
play,
and
they
seem
to
have.
I
mean
it.
A
lot
of
people
that
go
to
the
park
see
each
other
in
the
neighborhood.
J
People
wanted
that
grassy
open
area
for
continuing
to
have
a
dog
run
kind
of
de
facto,
as
well
as
people
also,
you
know
shared
that
for
one
youth
birthday
and
one
adult
birthday
in
the
neighborhood
they
like
put
up
badminton,
and
you
know
that
that
play
area
is
for
is
for
humans.
You
know
as
well.
We
heard
a
lot
of
that
input.
As
far
as
a
dog
park
designation.
J
You
know,
community
members
voiced
that
they
would
love
to
see
a
dog
park
in
arcata.
They
did
not
feel
that
a
opening
bloomfield
as
a
just
as
a
doug
dog
park
that
would
attract
people
from
across
the
city
and
across
the
region.
They
didn't
feel
that
would
be
a
good
fit
because
of
the
size
of
bloomfield
and
the
limited
street
parking
on
the
adjacent
street.
E
I
just
I
actually
have
four
little
questions.
One
thing
is
restrooms.
Is
that
a
thought?
The
other
thing
is
that
if
you
do
let
people
bring
your
dogs
and
throw
the
ball
that
you've
got
a
lot
of
dogs
off
leash
and
you're,
also
attracting
small
children,
and
that's
when
bites
tend
to
happen.
E
E
So
that
would
be
one
thought
with
the
picnic
tables
to
maybe
come
up
with
with
some
sort
of
chair
or
stool
arrangement
rather
than
the
long
seats,
and
then
the
last
thing
would
be
liability.
Is
there
some
kind
of
insurance
that
the
city
has
to
carry
for
this?
That's
different,
because
it's
a
play
area
and
do
any
of
these
equipment
items
that
are
being
added
impact?
You
know
the
liability
or
some
of
them
more
dangerous
and
risky
than
others,
because
children
can
fall.
J
Yeah
great
thanks
for
those
questions
for
a
restroom,
the
it
is
having
a
restroom
is
a
larger
level
of
development
at
any
city
facility
and
that
will
not
fit
within
our
64
000.
You
know
dollar
budget
installing
a
restroom
would
would
be
even
more
would
be
more
than
that
we've.
The
city
has
prioritized
having
restrooms
at
our
really
highly
utilized
regional
and
community
parks,
and
many
of
those
restrooms
are
that
need
is
filled
by
a
portable
restroom.
J
We
are
looking
at
some
of
the
our
proposed
improvements
at
carlson
park
having
a
vault
toilet
as
well
as
potentially
at
the
marsh,
with
our
proposed
boat,
launch
enhancement,
new
boat
launch.
Those
were
two
that
are
really
proposed
for
some
new.
You
know
permanent
restrooms,
and
but
at
this
time
with
budget
and
maintenance,
we've
not
been
able
to
prioritize.
J
You
know
restrooms
at
our
smaller
neighborhood
park,
seeing
that
we
see
those
uses
be
more
within
the
neighborhood
closer
to
where
people
are
are
living,
but
that's
a
great
that's,
a
great
thought
to
continue
for
all
of
our
parks
conversations
they
definitely
agree.
The
the
city
will
not
be
would
not
be
promoting
this
grassy
area
for
use
by
dogs
at
the
at
the
meeting.
J
You
know
we
reiterated
our,
you
know
the
city's
code,
and
that
is
why
we're
really
we're
looking
at
having
a
having
a
barrier
between
the
two
spaces
and,
having
that
be
a
you
know,
it
could
end
up
being
a
short.
J
You
know
fence,
but
maybe
it
could
be
something
more
creative,
that
is
a
barrier,
but
is
also
it
could
be
played
on
or
could
have
some
more
beautification
elements,
so
that
would
really
need
to
be
worked
in
the
design
phase
would
love
any
feedback
on
that?
You
know
this
representation
in
the
concept
design
was
of
like
stumps
or
or
fake
stumps
that
serve
as
a
barrier,
but
could
also
be
like
stepped
on
and
incorporated
into
part
of
the
play
structure
and
then
for
benches.
J
Community
members
have
not
voiced
that.
Currently
there
are,
there
is
a
picnic
table
at
the
park
currently
as
well
as
trash
cans.
I
did
not
note
that
previously
community
members
have
noted
they
haven't,
had
concerns
of
use
of
those
for
longer
periods
of
time
or
overnight,
but
that
is,
you
know,
certainly
something
that
that
can
be
considered
in
the
design
and
then
the
the
city
carries
liability,
insurance
for
all
of
our
parks,
facilities
and
properties,
and
any
of
the
improvements
here
here
proposed
would
fit
within
our
existing
coverage.
J
Any
other
thoughts
or
suggestions
to
you
know
reflections
from
the
memo
or
suggestions,
for
you
know
improving
this
concept
and
again
this
is
more
at
the
concept
stage,
but
the
next
steps
would
be.
You
know,
researching
specific
elements
and
working
with
our
engineering
department
for
cost
estimating
more
of
the
hardscape
improvements.
G
K
J
Great
emily,
I
would
note
that
I
do
see
that
sheldon
dropped
off,
but
he
is
as
an
attendee
thank
you
that
he
could
be
could
come
back.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
if
he
has
any
comments
and
some.
J
Yeah
well,
I've
certainly
heard
you
know
consideration
for
design
of
the
benches
and
picnic
tables
and
perhaps
considering
a
second,
a
second
picnic
table
and
considering
really
need
for
a
barrier
between
the
two
areas
of
the
park
and
having
that
be
something
that
maybe
could
be
more
of
a
play
element
as
well.
A
I
I
think
this
park,
it's
kind
of
fortuitous,
that
it
we
took
down
all
that
equipment
and
it's
just
kind
of
become
a
grassy
field.
I
think
it's
really
become
a
destination
for
that
neighborhood,
specifically
in
that
community.
I
happen
to
know
a
lot
of
people
that
live
around
there
and
and
they
love
it
just
for
that.
So
you
know
I
think
I
don't
know
if
I
would
be
so
concerned
about
what
kind
of
equipment
goes
in
there.
A
I
I
think
just
making
it
a
nice
community
gathering
area
is
something
that
I'm
I'm
getting
from.
The
community
input
here
is
to
kind
of
keep
it.
That
way.
You
know.
Certainly
a
couple
pieces
of
equipment
is
always
nice
at
a
park,
but
yeah
more
picnic
tables
more
benches,
just
just
really
make
it
a
nice
gathering
area
for
parties
and
community
events,
and
things
like
that,
and
it
may
be
some
sort
of
incentive
to
really
keep
the
grassy
area
nice
and
lush
and
and
well
maintained
nice.
A
But
then
I
think
so
you
guys
are
gonna.
Take
these
suggestions
and
come
back
to
us
with
more
a
more
detailed
plan.
Is
that
the
idea.
J
Yeah,
that's.
The
idea
was
to
get
just
recommendations
and
thoughts
to
then
advance
this
concept
more
into
what
specific
elements
would
be
and
starting
to
work
on.
You
know
what
is,
you
know,
cost
estimates
what
would
be
feasible
to
implement
within
our
budget
and
again
we
would
be
aiming
for
improvements
to.
K
J
I
mean
we've
been
taking
notes
on
the
suggestions,
and
that
is
the
you
know,
recommendations
that
we'll
take
to
further
this
concept.
L
Okay,
great,
can
you
hear
me?
Thank
you
emily
great
okay,
just
my
reflections
and
feedback
first,
I
just
want
to
give
a
cheerleading
comments.
Perhaps
some
of
you
might
have
seen
the
photo
and
shout
out
in
the
june
8th
mad
river
union
about
the
event
in
the
article
it
said
that
more
than
20
interested
community
members
responded
to
a
city
invitation
to
help
envision
and
plan
improvements
for
bloomfield
park,
city
staff,
encouraged
participants
to
share
thoughts,
ask
questions,
discuss
details,
write
down
preferences
and
take
an
online
survey.
L
I
did
attend
that
event.
There
were
a
lot
of
kids
there.
I
thought
it
was
very,
very
well
received,
so
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
do
a
year
to
the
arcata
community
and
yada
staff
parks
and
rec
committee,
and
thank
you
and
yay
to
the
measure,
a
tax
ad
hoc
group
for
prioritizing
bloomfield
park
for
this
fiscal
year.
L
So,
thank
you
so
much
and
then,
regarding
my
feedback,
the
water
fountain
idea
is
so
great,
I'm
just
wondering
perhaps
a
human
end
or
a
human
and
dog
type
water
fountain
would
be
wonderful
sort
of
like.
What's
that
I
believe
at
greenview
park
and
then
thank
you
debbie
for
your
comment
about
the
additional
picnic
bench
tables.
Yes,
and
I
think
sheldon
mentioned
that
too.
Yes,
thank
you
very.
That
would
be
great.
L
It's
a
very
popular
place
for
gathering,
so
just
wanted
to
give
the
perspective
of
a
community
member
that
lives
nearby
and
and
thanks
again
to
everybody
that
has
brought
us
to
this
level
and
to
this
juncture
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
B
And
fred,
I
will
allow
you
to
talk
in
one
second
moonlight.
I
think
you
have
an
older
version
of
zoom,
I'm
getting
a
notification,
so
I
can't
change
your
role
back
to
an
attendee.
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
so
please
stay
muted
and
then
we'll
unmute
you.
If
you
have
additional
public
comment
and
fred.
I
will
allow
you
to
talk
here
just
one
moment:
okay,
go
ahead.
B
M
Yes,
hello.
First,
I
want
to
thank
the
committee
for
all
their
work
that
you're
doing
a
few
things.
The
on
the
google
maps
the
park
was
located
in
the
wrong
location.
They
had
it
be
at
city
hall,
I've
put
in
a
request
for
that
to
be
changed.
My
experience
with
google
maps
is
it.
It
just
takes
a
few
days
and
bloomfield
will
be
located
in
the
proper
place
on
zender
street.
M
In
terms
of
the
oh,
I
kind
of
agree
with
what
sheldon
had
to
say
that
it
seems
in
reading
the
responses
that
you
collected,
that
a
lot
of
people
like
it
as
an
open
space
or
by
and
large
as
an
open
space
and
to
divide
it
up
into
part
of
it
being
for
equipment.
Part
of
being
open
seems
counterproductive
to
me
personally.
I've
used
to
walk
in
that
neighborhood
I've
been
to
the
park
about
a
dozen
times.
I
personally,
I
like
the
open
space,
but
I
also
enjoy
the
community
input.
E
Yeah,
since
it's
mislocated
on
the
lab,
I
just
map,
I
just
have
a
quick
question:
is
this
ending
up
being
within
the
new
gateway
region
at
all,
or
is
it
north
of
there.
J
Now
this
this
is
north
and
west,
and
I
will
share
my
screen
for
bloomfield's
location.
J
And
here
is
11th
street
and
so
bloomfield
park
is
north
of
11th
on
zedner.
You
know
and
is
the
equivalent
of
you
know
like
two
city
lots,
and
so
it's
about
100
feet
by
a
hundred
feet,
500.,
yeah
and
just
for
yeah.
J
So
for
you
know
orientation,
it
is,
you
know
within
walking
distance
of
other
of
other
parks,
and
you
know
green
green
view
park
has
had
you
know
a
lot
of
recent,
more
recent
great
upgrades
and
just
for
discussion
from
the
committee
mountain
view
park
is
another
part
that
in
2020
older
much
older
equipment
was
also
removed,
so
just
to
give
that
context
of
where
the
parks
are
located.
E
A
G
So
I
think,
when
getting
questions
about
the
rails,
people
think
it's
the
rails
are
going
to
be
a
trail.
Now.
Is
that
correct
the
whole
there's
a
hole,
the
railroad
that
goes
through
there.
I
Yeah
some
of
the
plan
area,
some
of
some
of
the
rails
within
the
plan
area,
are
proposed
to
be
converted
to
trails.
I
did
have
a
little
bit
of
a
presentation
if
the
committee
was
interested
in
seeing
it
it's
fairly
short,
but
just
orient
you
to
what
we're
doing
tonight.
F
I
F
Be
clear
before
we
start
that
I
just
want
to
check
in
with
the
committee
and
let
you
know
that
I
have
a
conflicting
meeting
and
I'll
be
needing
to
leave
it
about
10
till
7,
and
so
I
don't
mean
to
be
rude
and
slide
off,
but
I'm
I'm
going
to
offer
that
up
now,
so
that
I'll,
just
quietly
exit.
But
I'm
excited
to
hear
more
about
this
david.
Please
go
ahead.
I
Okay
yeah,
thank
you
for
that,
and
I
think
emily
had
mentioned
that
you
had
a
conflict
earlier
as
well.
Okay,
so,
okay,
so
I
just
want
to.
I
want
to
be
very
succinct,
because
I
want
to
preserve
the
majority
of
this
time
for
the
committee
to
have
you
know,
questions
or
deliberations,
but
just
to
give
a
setup.
I
want
to
go
over
the
purpose
of
the
meeting
the
process
and
timeline
the
materials
that
are
in
your
packet
and
then
to
really
refine
on
the
app
on
the
ask.
I
Excuse
me
so,
first
off
just
you
know,
we
have
a
couple
new
committee
members,
I
believe-
or
actually
maybe
not
at
this
point,
but
we
we
have
just
to
remind
you.
The
gateway
area
plan
is,
and
there
are
some
maps
in
your
packet,
so
you
can
orient
to
where
those
are
at
gateway
area
plan
is
going
to
be
an
element,
new
element
of
the
general
plan,
and
the
purpose
of
this
is
really
to
provide
high
quality,
mixed
income
use
and
ownership
in
a
revitalized
neighborhood.
I
Through
this
new
planning
process,
the
gateway
area
is
one
of
several.
It's
the
first
of
many
rezones
that
we'll
be
doing
to
increase
the
the
potential
housing
stock
and
economic
opportunity
within
the
city
of
arcata,
without
expanding
out
into
the
bottomlands
and
and
also
just
to
orient
you
we
gave
links
within
the
staff
report.
The
full
plan
is
online
and
the
sections
relevant
to
this
committee's
review,
as
we
saw
it,
are
also
included
in
the
in
the
packet
in
the
staff
report.
I
I
Yeah,
okay,
great
okay,
so
the
the
attachment
b
in
your
packet
gives
a
a
breakdown,
a
more
detailed
breakdown
and
and
what
I
tried
to
do
in
that
attachment
was
because
there
were
a
lot
of
questions
about
a
lot
of
different
elements
of
of
the
process.
I
What
the
process
is
right
now
the
planning,
commission
and
all
the
committees
are
reviewing
the
draft
document
concurrently,
they're
all
getting
a
packet
similar
to
the
one
that
you
received,
that
has
the
relevant
information
along
with
some
supporting
material
to
help
you
get
through
the
material.
I
This
first
pass
review,
while
you're
looking
at
these
drafts
is
going
to
take.
You
know
one
to
three
months,
depending
on
how
long
the
committees
take
to
you
know
to
get
through
the
material
staff
is
going
to
collate
the
recommendations.
Now
we're
going
to
ask
you
to
make
formal
recommendations
to
the
city
council
we're
going
to
collate
those
in
a
couple
of
different
ways
that
I'll
show
you
in
a
minute
we're
going
to
send
that
to
the
city
council.
I
The
city
council
is
going
to
take
this
first
pass
information
and
basically
make
some
decisions
about.
You
know
if
there
are
conflicts
in
recommendations
that
come
forward
and
then,
ultimately,
that
information
is
going
to
be
sent
back
in
its
final
form
for
review
to
any
committee
that
wants
to
review
it,
and
so
the
information
that
you
pass
forward
of
the
planning
timing
commission
in
the
city
council,
ultimately
you'll
be
able
to
see
that
again
and
it's
possible
if
necessary,
that
we
go
through
a
second
pass.
I
I
The
reason
why
I
go
into
this
is
to
to
get
the
context
for
the
timeline
context
for
the
ask
committee,
we're
really
hoping
that
you'll
be
able
to
provide
your
recommendations
in
a
formal
vote
tonight.
I
So
the
you
know
this,
this
early
input
will
again
be
used
to
to
refine
the
plan.
I
So
now
I
want
to
touch
base
a
little
bit
on
the
materials
that
are
in
your
packet
first,
there's,
of
course,
obviously
the
link
to
the
plan
itself.
We
really
encourage
you
to
review
that.
The
committee
has
seen
this
plan
a
couple
of
times.
We've
come
to
the
committee
a
couple
of
times
in
sort
of
a
conceptual
phase.
Once
after
the
the
plan
was
out,
you
had
some
discussion
at
that
point.
I
The
discussion
that
you
had
is
actually
included.
The
summary
of
that
discussion
is
included
in
the
table,
which
I
believe
is
attachment
c
to
your
packet
at
the
very
top
in
the
green
box,
and
then
we
also
have
a
separate
summary
of
discussion
that
was
taken
at
the
committee,
and
so
you
can
take
this
in
one
of
a
couple
of
different
ways.
A
table
includes
all
of
the
policies
that
we
believe
are
relevant
to
this
committee.
I
We
summarize
them
there
in
case
that
helps
you
to
focus
your
your
your
thoughts
on
those
specific
policies.
We've
provided
room
for
recommendations
for
modifying
those
policies
if
you
choose
to
and
room
to
to
add
new
policies.
So
the
idea
here
is
that
the
committee
is
going
to
through
its
deliberations,
determine
whether
or
not
there's
a
body
of
policies
that
you
all
want
to
dig
into
in
a
little
more
detail,
provide
staff,
a
recommendation
to
that
and
then-
and
it
could
be-
that
hey
look.
I
I
Ultimately,
what
staff
will
do
with
that
is
to
summarize
it
for
the
planning,
commission,
the
city
council,
let's
see
in
the
following
ways,
if
you
come
up
with
changes
that
you
want
to
see
and
and
again
I
mean
you're
more
than
welcome
to
go
in
and
wordsmith.
If
that's,
what
you
feel
is
the
best
use
of
your
time.
What
I
might
recommend
you
do
is
you
give
the
general
direction
you'd
like
to
see
the
policy
to
go
to
go,
and
then
you
let
staff,
do
that.
I
Word
smithing,
but
if
you
want
to,
you
know,
provide
specific
language
you
can,
but
to
the
extent
that
these
changes
don't
change
the
overall
direction
of
the
draft,
that's
been
provided
or
they
you
know
they
affirm
the
policy
changes,
so
they
have
non-substantive
changes
or
they
reaffirm
policies
that
are
already
in
there.
You'll
see
them
in
line.
I
As
you
see
this
green
bar
here,
this
is
a
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission
and
what
we'll
do
with
those
recommendations
is
color
code
them
so
that
we
can
tell
you
know
all
of
the
green
proposed
changes
came
from
the
planning
commission.
Maybe
the
parks
and
rec
committee
will
be
yellow
and
you'll
be
able
to
see.
I
As
you
look
through
the
document
visually
where
those
changes
came
from
now,
there
are
some
recommendations
that
are
going
to
come
from,
you
know,
committees
or
from
the
public
that
are
not
going
to
either
align
with
the
existing
policy
or
be
non-substantive,
and
so
what
we
will
do
with
those
changes
is
that
we
will
summarize
them
in
a
table
for
the
planning
commission,
the
city
council,
to
review
letting
them
know.
You
know
where
this
policy
is
located.
I
What
the
topic
is
what
the
recommendations
were
for
that
topic,
what
the
source
was,
what
the
recommendations
were
and
what
those
policy
implications
might
be,
and
then
ultimately,
staff
will
make
a
recommendation
to
the
city
council
and
the
city
council
will
choose
so
in
this
example.
Here
you
see,
the
you
know,
gateway
building
height
has
been
a
hot
topic.
Some
people
think
it
should
be
limited
to
three
some
say
four,
some
say
six
and
ultimately
the
the
city
council
will
have
to
make
a
decision
about
this.
I
You
know
where
they
want
to
land
where
they
want
to
direct
staff
to
make
the
amendment
and
then
we'll
ultimately
make
that
amendment
you'll
see
that
amendment
come
back
in
that
second
phase
of
review
now.
The
last
thing
I
want
to
share
with
you
is
these
upcoming
committee
meetings.
The
intent
here
is
through
july
and
august
that
we
will
have
gotten
to
every
single
committee
and
shared
with
them.
I
So
with
that,
the
ask
again
is
that
your
committee
would
make
a
formal
vote
for
any
modifications
you
see
fit.
If
you
don't
think
modifications
are
necessary,
you
can
take
a
formal
vote
to
you
know
to
forward
it
on
as
it
is
or
decide
as
a
committee
not
to
vote
on
it.
That
could
be
a
tacit
vote
for
adopting
it.
I
As
is,
and
you
know,
we
would
love
to
get
that
from
you
tonight,
but
there
are
some
alternatives
that
we
can
discuss
if
you're
interested,
if
you
don't
feel
like
you-
can
make
it
through
all
that
material
this
evening.
I
So
with
that
I'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
you
might
have
and
and
encourage
the
committee
to
make
its
deliberations
and
vote.
G
I
Yeah,
so
the
you
can
make
recommendations
on
anything
that
the
committee
feels
is
important
to
make
a
recommendation
on.
We
tried
to
with
attachment
c
we
tried
to
concentrate
the
body
of
policy,
that's
in
the
gateway
area
plan
that
we
felt
like
would
be
of
of
interest
to
you,
and
so,
if
there
are
areas
outside
of
that,
that
are
of
interest
to
you,
you
just
mentioned
you
know-
are
the
rails
going
to
trails,
for
instance,
I
don't
believe
that's
in
the
the
section
that
you
have
no,
because
they.
I
A
One
clarification
I
would
like
is
what
what
is
going
to
happen
with
the
dedicated
bike
path
on
l
street?
How
is
that
going
to
change?
Is
there
going
to
be
a
replacement
for
that?
What
I'm
not
really
clear
what
the
plan
is
for
that.
I
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
The
plan
incorporates
the
trail
in
its
ex
existing
location,
and
so
the
proposal
is
to
maintain
the
trail
in
its
existing
location.
I
Yeah,
absolutely
and
I'll
get
you
a
reference
to
this
specific
image
that
shows
how
that
would
be
incorporated.
G
I
K
I
I
There's
a
looks
like
four
foot
green
space
to
the
two
travel
lanes
for
the
bikes
approx:
six
foot
green
space
that
separates
one
way,
southbound
lane
of
traffic
and
then
angled
in
parking
and
I'll
bring
that
up
in
just
a
second
here.
G
G
I
So
here's
the
you
know:
here's
the
plan
so
for
this
portion,
there's
again
there's
a
six
foot
sidewalk
here:
12
feet
of
bike,
lane
six
foot
of
separation,
a
12
foot,
travel,
lane,
eight
foot
and
then
a
10
foot
wide
sidewalk
over
here
and
then
scrolling
down
to
the
in
front
of
the
creamery
building.
I
You
know:
there's
a
variable
four
foot
wide
to
approximately
six
eight
foot
wide
out
here:
green
space,
twelve
feet
of
bike,
lane
six
feet
of
green
space.
That's
the
existing
green
space,
12-foot
travel
lane
then
angle,
then.
G
I
Yeah,
I
don't
know
that
it's
been
surveyed,
I'm
not
exactly
sure
where
the
parking
or
where
the
property
lines
lay.
But
this
is
the
current
proposed
design.
If,
if
the
l
street
component
goes
through.
G
G
I
G
You
can
barely
fit
down
l
street
if
there's
cars
parked
in
front
of
their
house.
K
I
Okay,
there's
there's
a
50
foot
right
away,
so
I
think
every
the
the
trail
and
is
intended
to
stay
in
its
exact
same
space.
So
you
know
we.
Obviously
this
isn't
survey
level
quality
drawing
and-
and
you
know
the
parking
may
need
to
be
modified,
but
there's
there's
definitely.
G
I
B
I
So
one
one
thought
about
how
to
get
through
this
material
would
be.
If
you
had
specific,
you
know,
recommendations
on
you
know
any
of
the
policy.
You
know,
if
any
of
you
felt
the
need
to
what
happened
to
our
committee
members,
emily.
B
I
Yeah,
sorry,
sorry,
you
missed
a
bit
of
that
chair.
We
were
just
talking
about
how
to
how
to
transitioning
from
the
discussion
on
l,
street
and
and
thinking
about
how
to
get
through
the
material.
If
there
were
policy
areas
that
any
of
the
committee
members
wanted
to
put
forward
as
as
potential
to
to
discuss.
If
you
want
to
go
through
the
material
that
way
or
if
you
want
to
continue
to
just
kind
of
talk
through
some
of
the
higher
level
concepts.
A
I
I
do
have
a
couple
more
questions
and
let
me
see
here
so
in
attachment
c.
Thank
you
so
much
for
putting
that
together.
That
was
very
helpful.
The
suggestions
for
language
modifications
now
is
that
suggestions
that
you
gathered
from
this
committee
and
as
something
that
you
would
maybe
like
a
motion
or
a
recommendation
for
us
to
encourage
you
to
include
in
this
gateway
plan.
D
I
I
Okay,
okay,
attachment
c
yeah,
so
this
green
box,
basically
we
compiled
from
your
previous
conversations
on
this.
You
had
the
general
comments
above
and
then
anything
where
any
one
individual
person
suggested
language
modifications
we
put
in
these
five
bullets,
okay
and
so
so
yeah,
you
could
certainly
say
hey.
These
are
the
five
things
we
talked
about
last
time.
We
want
to
take
a
motion
to
adopt
these
five
things.
I
That
would
be
perfectly
reasonable.
You
know,
or
if
there
are
other
things
that
you
want
to
add,
you
could
add
to
those
as
well.
I
G
G
I
A
A
One
two:
three:
the
fourth
bullet
point
down
differentiate
definition
of
open
space
in
table
eight,
to
make
clear
the
differentiation
between
passive
and
active,
open
space
in
the
gateway
area-
and
you
know
you
had
mentioned
that
we
shouldn't
get
into
wordsmithing
and
I
100
agree
with
that.
But
I
I'm
curious
to
get
your
opinion
like
how
what
kind
of
language
could
we
add
or
how
could
we
modify
this
gateway
plan
to
really
stress
the
importance
of
creating
more
active
recreation
possibilities
in
the
gateway
plan?.
I
I
think
you
just
laid
it
out
right
there
chair,
I
think
if
we
just
added
to
this
policy,
this
body
of
policy-
that
especially
where
we're
talking
about
the
publicly
accessible
private,
open
space
that
the
city
would
encourage-
or
you
know
that
the
policy
emphasizes
active
recreation
spaces
and
and
then
I
think
the
discussion
that
we
had
last
time
is
that
the
specific
types
and
then
we
listed,
we
listed
out
a
couple
of
examples
and
then
I
think
the
specific
types
of
active
recreation,
recreation,
amenities
that
we'd
want
to
see
in
those
spaces
can
be
listed
in
the
amenities
table.
I
If
we
go
that
route
for
the
you
know,
the
community
amenities
and
so
people
would
see
like
the
community
specifically
wants
basketball
courts
or
the
community
specifically
wants.
You
know
tennis
courts
or
whatever,
whatever
the
the
balance
is,
that
comes
out
for
those
active
sites,
but
I
think
the
language
that
you
just
used
is
exactly
what
I
would
envision
emphasizing
and
so
so
the
way
this
would
work
is
you
know
if
the
committee
agrees
to
that,
you
would
take
a
formal
vote
on
that,
and
then
we
would
change
that
language.
I
A
G
G
Yeah
one
of
my
items
was
to
not
include
passive
recreation
in
with
the
the
over
view
of
recreation
like
we
have
all
these
recreation
spots,
but
all
but
one
are
passive.
You
know
they're
marched
they're
a
you
know
a
creek.
You
know
I
don't
want
to
include
those
as
recreation
spots
and
that,
but
I
don't
know
how
to
word
that
you
know
I
guess
the
active
recreation.
I
Yeah,
I
think
that
was
part
of
the
idea
behind
this
differentiate
the
definition
of
open
space,
to
make
clear
the
difference
between
passive
and
active
open
space.
Okay,
so
we
want
to
distinguish
active
recreation,
which
I
think
a
lot
of
the
a
lot
of
the
sites
that
are
identified
within
the
areas
that
are
identified
for
a
publicly
accessible
open
space.
A
lot
of
those
would-be
active
recreation,
type
amenities.
G
C
I
I
So-
and
we
looked
at
this
last
time
too-
so-
here's
here's
the
gateway
area
outline
in
yellow
and
then
whoops
all
of
the
area
outlined
in
red.
This
entire
area
here
is
identified
as
private
open
space,
and
so
we
can
emphasize
in
this
private
open
space
that
we're
looking
for
active
recreation,
amenities.
I
I
Many
of
those
spaces
may
be
able
to
provide
that
the
reason
why
this
area
was
selected,
I
think,
is
because
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
with
the
vacant
sites
that
are
existing
and
also
because
there
was
higher
development
potential
in
these
sites,
and
so
they'd
be
able
to.
You
know,
offset
the
cost
of
providing
that
that
active
record
or
providing
those
recreation
amenities
by
the
you
know
by
the
the
increased
development
potential,
but
certainly
sites
outside
of
this
area.
I
Oh
also
because
they're
central,
this
is
kind
of
central
to
to
the
area.
But
we
cannot.
You
know,
I
mean
clearly
areas
outside
of
that.
Have
the
ability
to
select
as
one
of
their
amenities
that
they're
providing
active
recreation,
or
you
know
other
other,
publicly
accessible,
open
spaces
that
provide
those
opportunities
as
well.
G
Okay,
because
you
know,
if,
like
the
the
checkerboard
square,
the
plaza,
I
think
we
need
to
identify
a
space
for
that
before
this
whole
thing
starts
because
I
don't
think
anybody's
gonna
donate,
but
maybe
I
I
just
I
mean
with
my
experience
on
the
parks
and
rec
committee.
I
Yeah,
so
this
is
on
one
part
of
the
reason
why
this
is
located
here
again
because
it's
central,
but
this
is
on
a
group
of
parcels,
it's
all
in
one
ownership,
so
this
provides
a
unique
opportunity
to
to
provide
a
fairly
large
space
that
could
be,
you
know
open
to
the
public,
and
you
know
it
may
be
similar
to
the
plaza.
Maybe
it's
more
of
a
park.
I
I
don't
know
you
know
kind
of
we
have
to
go
through
that
that
process
to
see
what
is
the
desire
for
that
area
and
the
reason
why
it's
saying
it
that
it's
to
be
determined
where
the
exact
location
is
it's
on
that
parcel
somewhere,
but
we
just
need
to
master
plan
it.
I
don't
want
somebody
to
look
at
this
map
and
say:
oh
that's
exactly
where
that
place
is.
Where
that's
going
to
go
so
once
you
get
through
the
master
planning
process,
then
you
would
have
better
understanding
of
where
it
would
be
located.
G
I
I
don't
think
that
it's
possible
to
do
that,
given
the
the
design
parameters
that
need
to
be
identified
way
before
there
was
ever
a
project
proposed
there,
and
so
one
of
the
one
of
the
graphics
that
we're
developing
for
for
this
area
is
going
to
show
sort
of
a
you
know.
A
potential
master
plan
scenario
and
it'll
show
that
that
open
space
and
it'll
show
how
the
development
within
that
site
could
be.
You
know
it
could
support.
F
I
It's
going
to
be
very
conceptual,
and
so
so
when
that
proposal
comes
in
they're
going
to
have
to
show
that
they've
got
the
open
space
on
that
site,
that's
one
of
the
amenities
that
we're
saying
we
want
to
see
this
amenity
on
this
site,
because
this
is
where
the
the
opportunity
lies.
Another
example
of
that
is
the
creek
daylighting
that
opportunity
that
is,
on
the
car
wash
slot.
I
Similarly,
there's
a
special
amenity
that
we
want
to
see
out
of
this
site,
and
so
that's
that's
kind
of
the
concept
here,
but
then,
when
it
got
to
the
point
of
actually
coming
in,
for
you
know
the
master
plan
for
this
site,
they
would
have
to
refine
where
the
exact
location
of
that
would
be
at
that
time.
I
G
I
It
does,
I
think
this
is
a
visionary
document.
The
idea
is
that
it's
aspirational
and
it
points
the
direction
that
we
want
to
see.
The
city
go
the
benefits
that
the
way
that
the
the
way
that
the
plan
is
structured
right
now
or
the
way
it's
proposed
to
be
structured.
I
Is
that
a
developer
when
they
look
at
this
plan
and
they
look
at
the
form
based
code,
that's
associated
with
it,
they
would
know
what
the
community
wants
them
to
build.
We
would
know
as
the
community
what
is
going
to
get
built
and
instead
of
going
through
public
process,
that
then
requires
them
to
spend
money
reassessing
reevaluating.
I
You
know
coming
up
with
plans
doing
it
by
themselves.
They
put
that
money
into
the
community;
instead
they
put
that
money
into.
For
example,
you
know
a
plaza
sized
public
open
space,
and
so,
if
that
developer
wants
to
take
advantage
of
the
streamlined
permitting,
then
that's
what
they're
going
to
give
to
the
community
right
now,
our
process,
that's
you
know
largely
based
on
discretionary
review.
I
We
would
never
be
able
to
get
that
from
a
discretionary
review.
You
know
that
that's
just
too
yeah.
It's
not
proportional
to
the
to
this
to
the
project,
and
so
so
the
the
way
that
the
community
amenities
are
structured.
We
can
say:
look
we've
got
this
vision,
for
you
know
large
open
space
over
here
and
you're
going
to
come
in
and
you're
going
to
give
this
to
us
and
in
exchange
you're
going
to
get
streamlined
permitting
so
yeah.
I
do
think
that
it's
possible.
I
I
The
you
know,
the
property
owner
that
owns
this
property
down
here
has
been
involved
and
engaged
the
entire
time
and
is
very
excited
about.
You
know
the
potential
of
being
able
to
develop
this
in
the
future
and
is
fully
aware
of
the
requirement
for
the
the
you
know
park.
Dedication.
If
you
will.
D
I
G
I
Yeah
I
mean
I,
I
wouldn't
at
this
stage,
get
so
specific
about
what
the
amenities
are
going
to
be
because
we
don't
know
the
development
pattern.
I
mean
this
isn't
like
a
project
review
where
we're
going
to
sit
down
and
say:
okay.
Well,
let's
put
a
tot
lot
here:
let's
put
a
basketball
court
here,
let's
put
a
you
know:
bocce
ball
court
there,
because
we
don't
know
when
these
things
are
going
to
develop.
What
we'll
have
is
a
list
of
amenities,
and
you
know
we
can.
I
We
can
certainly
say
you
know
we
want
to
encourage
these
kinds
of
of
uses,
but
I
wouldn't
get
at
this
point
to
the
level
of
trying
to
identify
where,
specifically
those
would
be
because
you
might
miss
out
on
the
opportunity
to
have
them
in
the
district.
If
that
particular
parcel
doesn't
get
developed.
D
E
Could
I
could
I
interject
something
you
mentioned
active
places
of
exercise,
or
you
know
amenities.
It
seems
like
that,
can
get
pretty
complicated
in
terms
of
commitment
for
space
like
basketball,
courts
and
things
like
that.
E
You
don't
even
really
need
a
lot
of
space
or
equipment
to
do
that,
and
you
could
maybe
even
get
the
businesses
to
all
pick
their
favorite
exercise
and
then
plug
it
in
somewhere
the
place
to
be
determined
later.
You
know
pull-ups
courtesy
of
whatever
company,
and
that
gives
little
you
know,
16-foot
square
areas
that
are.
K
A
I
think
that
that
sounds
like
a
really
great
idea.
My
concern
bonnie
is
that
as
the
population
of
arcadia
increases
and
what
this
you
know,
gateway
plan
implies
is
that
it
is
going
to
we're
going
to
see
such
overuse
of
our
other
playgrounds,
tennis
courts,
bocce
courts,
footsall
courts,
even
baseball
fields
and
soccer
fields
that
it's
it's
really.
You
know
it's
going
to
become
a
burden
on
our
facilities
without
including
more
of
those
types
of
facilities
within
the
gateway
plan.
A
E
Well,
it
looks
like
this
is
so
densely
planned
and
there
seems
to
be
so
much
emphasis
on
pedestrian
free
zone
and
walking,
and
you
know
more
of
the
street
walk
street
movement
kind
of
stuff
that
I'm
not
sure
that
tennis
and
basketball
and
playgrounds
and
all
those
things
aren't
going
to
pretty
quickly
eat
up
the
space.
That's
there.
A
Yeah
and
I'm
not
even
I'm
not
even
necessarily
saying
they
have
to
exist
within
the
gateway
area,
but
you
know
we
need
a
way
to
mitigate
or
offset
some
of
these
active
recreation
places.
So
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
there
is
maybe
even
a
funding
mechanism.
You
know
a
park
in
luffy
that
we
can
collect
from
some
of
these
developments
to
help
us
maybe
build
more
basketball
courts
or
tennis
courts
or
soccer
fields
or
or
pickleball
elsewhere,
yeah.
A
I
Now,
there's
right
now,
there's
a
parking
recreation,
so
the
park
in
luffy
is
related
to
subdivisions
that
don't
donate
park
space.
I
So
then
they
pay
those
those
park,
fees
in
lieu,
but
there's
also
a
recreation
fee
for
new
construction,
and
I
believe
emily
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
believe
that's
one
percent
of
the
value
of
the
project,
and
so
you
know
the
there's
going
to
be
an
ongoing
funding
mechanism
that
that
piece
doesn't
change
in
you
know
in
this
project
and
just
to
give
you
a
sense,
the
and
this
this
is
going
to
be
a
rough
estimate,
but
the
sorrel
place
the
44
unit,
four-story,
building
on
the
former
isaacsons
property
paid
220
000
into
our
recreation
fee
for
new
construction
fund,
so
that
one
project
was
200
220
000.
A
Yeah-
and
I
think
that's
fantastic-
I'm
just
my
concern
is
that
that
money
is
not
going
to
be
earmarked
for
active
participation.
I
know
I
keep
using
that
word,
but
I
mean
I
am
generally
concerned
about
the
amount
of
use
on
some
of
our
fields
and
playground,
equipment
and
stuff
like
that,
and
you
know
just
to
make
sure
that
it
doesn't
just
go
to
maintaining
what
we
already
have
we're
going
to
need
to
grow
and
I'm
just
there
may
be
code
written.
That
does
exactly
that.
I'm
just
not
privy
to
that.
A
Yeah-
and
I
think
I
see
a
lot
of
language
in
this
to
provide
open
spaces,
and
so
I'm
not
I'm
not
that
concerned
about
there
being
enough
open
space.
But
I
am
concerned
about
just
people
just
our
parks,
other
parks
being
overrun
with
people.
I
And
to
bonnie's
point
earlier:
there
is
a
a
loop
within
here.
I
These
green
dots
dashed
lines
are
basically
the
proposed
new,
and
this
green
solid
line
is
the
existing
l
street
and
so
that
that
mile
loop,
that
you're
talking
about
already
exists
and-
and
I
think
that
you
know
those-
you
know-
exercise
stations
that
you
talked
about,
I
think
could
be
incorporated
in
here
and
then
yeah
sheldon
to
your
point,
one
of
the
other
things
that
we
had
talked
about
in
that
you
know
the
red
box
is
encouraging
people
to
put
in
you
know
some
of
the
smaller
scale.
I
You
know
active
recreation
amenities,
but
then
everything
that
gets
built
in
this
area,
everything
that
gets
built
throughout
the
city
is
going
to
contribute
to
the
you
know
the
recreation
fee
for
new
construction
or
parking
luffys
that
helps
support
that
and
then,
in
addition,
you
know
we
can
include.
A
That's
great,
and
then
I
think
you
know
just
to
maybe
debbie
just
if
I
can
kind
of
summarize
what
you
were
saying
just
to
make
sure
that
I
I
understand
what
you
were
saying.
One
of
your
concerns
is
that
these
developers
are
going
to
come
in
and
you
know
if
they
have
a
list
of
amenities
that
they
can
choose
from.
They
may
all
choose
an
open
space
or
they
may
all
choose.
A
You
know
the
same
thing,
that's
easiest
for
them
to
do,
and
you
know
then
we
just
end
up
with
a
whole
bunch
of
small
little
open
space
parts
and
and
nothing
for
kids
to
run,
jump
and
climb
on.
You
know
nowhere
for
people
to
play
basketball
and
so
so
david.
My
question
is:
is
there
already
riding
in
this
gateway
plan
that
allows
the
city
to
kind
of
be
like
when
a
developer
comes
in
to
be
like?
No,
we
have
enough
of
those.
A
We
really
need
you
to
to
build
or
contribute
to
these
other
parts
that
we
want.
I
Yeah,
definitely
I'm
sorry
debbie
go
ahead.
Oh.
A
I
So
yeah
the
there
is
language
in
the
document.
Currently
that
you
know
says
that
we
are
going
to
you
know
periodically
review
so
we'll
do
you
know
constant
reviews
to
make
sure
we're
getting
the
right
balance
and
then
the
way
that
the
community
amenities,
you
know
we
don't
currently
have
them
drafted
for
review.
But
what
we've
been
talking
about
to
ensure
that
you
don't
get
you
know
everybody
picking,
just
the
the
you
know
the
simplest.
You
know
things
that
that
they
could
provide
is
number
one
tiering
them.
I
So
you
would
have
to
pick
from
you
know
different
levels
of
amenity.
You
couldn't
just
pick
all
the
easy
ones
you'd
have
to
pick
through.
You
know
some
hard
ones,
some
medium
ones
and
some
some
easy
ones
and
then
packaging.
Those
in
a
you
know
in
groupings,
and
so
you
know,
they're
gonna
have
to
be
somewhat
vague,
so
there's
not
gonna,
be
like
a
you
know.
I
Is
there
a
top
lot
in
this
one
but
we'll
be
able
to
structure
them
in
packages
so
that,
if
you
know
if
we
have
need
for
let's
say
you
know
five,
you
know
a
quarter
acre
sized.
You
know
publicly
accessible
active
recreation
sites
within
the
district.
I
We
would
have
five
packages
that
have
that
as
one
of
the
amenities
and
then
once
that
package
is
selected
once
all
five
of
those
packages
are
selected,
the
option
is
no
longer
on
the
table
for
someone
to
come
in
and
take
one
that
you
know
continue
to
add
that
if
that
ends
up
being
the
easiest
one,
so
we're
gonna,
I
think
we're
gonna
have
a
real
diversity
of
you
know
those
community
amenities
through
the
tiering
and
the
packaging
process,
to
ensure
that
we
get
that
diversity
and
then
there'll
be
periodic
reviews
where
we
say
hey
are
we
are
we
accomplishing
the
goals
of
this
plan
and
if
not,
then
we
need
to
slightly
tweak
things
to
make
sure
that
we
do.
A
So
just
theoretical
question:
if
we
were
to
move
and
add
some
of
these
language
modifications,
when
might
we
see
this
document
with
those
language
modifications
with?
Maybe
some
of
those
tiers
like
you
were
talking
about?
For
you
know
the
needs
for
the
community.
I
Yeah,
so
the
the
the
recommendations
that
align
with-
and
I
think
the
majority
of
these
do-
I'm
not
looking
at
them
right
now,
but
the
ones
that
align
with
the
you
know
the
the
existing
direction
of
the
document
that
are
really
just
enhancing
understanding.
I
Those
would
be
added
in
with
that
color
coding
that
I
talked
about,
and
those
would
be.
You
know
before
the
the
planning
commission,
the
city
council
and
then
ultimately,
they'll
make
the
final
decision
about
what
to
include.
They
might
look
at
those
color-coded
changes
and
say
yeah.
These
look
great,
let's
throw
them
in
or
they
might
look
at
the
color-coded
changes
and
say
well
we're
not
happy
with
these.
I
But
if,
if
you
took
action
tonight
adopted
these
changes,
you
would
see
them
modified
in
the
document
in
subsequent
draft
releases
and
those
would
be
before
next,
they
would
be
before
the
the
city,
council
and
the
planning
commission,
and
then
you
would
see
them
come
back
again.
At
the
end,
most
likely,
I'm
sure
the
planning,
fish
and
city
council
are
going
to
want
to
see
one
final
review
once
we
have
the
finalized
document
with
all
the
changes
that
they
had
recommended.
A
I
Yeah
one
of
the
things
that
we're
really
part
of
the
reason
why
we're
trying
to
get
to
all
the
committees
in
july
and
august
is
so
that
the
commission,
if
possible,
can
see
some
of
these
recommendations
coming
out
of
the
committees
before
you
know
they
do
they
finish
their
work.
I
They
feel,
like
they'd,
be
more
supported
in
their
work
if
they
can
get
that,
and
so
you
know
this
isn't
like
the
only
opportunity,
though
I
mean
this
document
is
going
to
be
somewhat
flexible
until
it's
adopted,
we're
really
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
project
description,
that
we
can
start
our
environmental
review
on.
I
But
if
this
committee
came
back
and
said,
hey
you
know
we,
you
know
we
want
to
modify
our
recommendation
and
make
sure
that
not
only
are
there
taught
lots,
but
that
they're,
you
know
our
half
cup
court
basketball.
You
know
opportunities
or
whatever
you
know
what
you
wanted
to
add
something
like
that:
that's
not
going
to
impact
the
overall
project
description.
I
G
Could
I
mean
I
look
more,
I
didn't
look
at
attachment
c
as
well
as
in
depth,
as
I
did
the
first
part
of
this.
G
Could
we
I
don't
want
to
make
it
go
forward
like
look
meet
in
august
and
do
it
or
do
we
need
to
like
do
it
tonight.
I
You
know
it's
really
it's
to
the
the
committee's
discretion.
If
you
want
to,
you
know,
set
up
a
subcommittee
and
have
that
subcommittee
work
on
it.
You
could
do
that
if
you
want
to
have
special
meetings
between
now
and-
and
you
know,
whenever
you
make
your
decisions
so
that
you
could
all
work
together
on
it,
you
could
do
that.
I
You
could
just
wait
until
your
next
regularly
scheduled
meeting
and
take
action.
Then
the
planning
commission
is
looking
at
these
documents
concurrently,
and
so
you
know,
they'll
be
they'll,
be
seeing
the
documents
we're
going
to
come
back
later.
I
have
a
brief
report
out
on
the
parks
rec
element
later
on,
we'll
be
coming
back.
I
You
know
with
that
as
well,
so
there's
there's
gonna
be
opportunity
for
you
to
look
at
these,
but
at
some
point
you
know
if
the
if
the
council
is
on
a
timeline
to
you
know
to
you
know,
meet
the
you
know
end
of
year,
early
next
year
as
the
overall
timeline
objective,
you
know,
there's
there's
going
to
be
a
point
at
which
they've
you
know
they've
made
some
critical
path
decisions
that
you
know
that
if
you
have
significant
recommendations,
you
know
you
should
you
should
probably
get
them
in
sooner
rather
than
later.
G
I
Could
you
could
leave
yeah?
You
could
leave
that
to
staff
if
you
as
a
body
vote
on
you
know
these
bullet
points
and
any
additional
items
that
you
want
to
see
embedded
in
the
document.
We
will
either
embed
those
in
the
document.
I
You
know
draft
the
language
embed
them
in
the
document
and
those
those
can
come
back
to
you.
You
can
review
those
again
before
this
this
time
frame
that
I'm
talking
about.
I
mean
that's,
that's
not
an
issue
but
and
then,
if
you
had
additional
recommendations
later,
you
know
you
know
at
some
point
you're
going
to
cross
the
threshold.
You'll
you'll
have
missed
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in
on
it,
but
but
we're
not
at
that
point
now.
I
I
If
you
tell,
if
you
tell
me
you
know,
if
your,
if
your
body
says
hey,
we
voted
unanimously,
or
we
voted
majority
vote
to
to
ensure
that
the
you
know
the
you
know,
for
instance,
sheldon's
issue
that
that
many
of
these
amenities
that
we
emphasize
active
recreation,
I
can
find
a
place
in
the
document
to
weave
that
into
the
policy
language
and
and
that
specific,
and
it
totally
is
in
alignment
with
what
this
document
is
intended
to
do.
I
I
believe
that
was
the
original
intent
of
this
document
that
helps
clarify
what
the
intent
was.
We
can
embed
that
in
line
into
the
document
identify
it
code,
it
in
color
coding
as
the
park
and
rec
committee's
recommendation,
and
then
that
would
move
forward
you'd
be
able
to
see
it
again
as
soon
as
that.
That
change
is
done
as
well.
I
A
I'm
I'm
interested
johnny
or
bonnie.
Do
you
have
any
any
two
cents
to
weigh
in
on
this.
D
G
I
So
what
I
what
I
heard
so
far,
you
know
there's
kind
of
these
five
bullet
points
and
then
with
the
addition
to
clarify
that
there's
support
for
the
existing
bike
lanes
to
maintain
the
existing
bike
lane
bike
lanes,
I
heard
to
you,
know-
add
some
language
potentially
around
some
of
the
active
additional
language
around
the
active
recreational
amenities
that
could
be
included.
Everything
from
you
know
the
the
you
know,
trail
side,
exercise,
equipment
to
you
know
smaller
hot
lots
of
the
recreational
amenities
and.
A
Yeah
so
debbie
I
I
just.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
give
johnny
a
chance
to
speak
if,
if
he
has
anything
to
say
johnny.
K
Yeah,
hey
thanks
part
of
part
of
what
I
do
when
I'm
out
at
the
parks
I
pay
attention.
K
E
A
F
A
Bonnie,
thank
you.
That's
exactly
where
I
was
going.
I
want
to
move
this
along,
and
I
also
want
to
make
sure
we
have
public
comments,
but
that
would
be
my
suggestion.
I
think
these
suggestions
for
language
modifications
are
something
you
know
after
public
comment,
we
could
have
a
motion
to
make
sure
they're
included
in
the
gateway
plan,
and
then
I
would
be
all
for
having
a
a
special
meeting
in
august.
A
A
You
know
to
make
sure
there
aren't
any
other
recommendations
we
want
to
include,
but
unless
there's
anything
dire
from
the
committee,
I
would
like
to
move
on
to
public
comment
on
this,
and
I
just
want
to
remind
the
public
that
this
is
a
parks
and
recreation
committee.
So
please
keep
your
comments
within
the
realm
of
the
parks
and
recreation
departments,
and
I
you
know
this
is
the
third
time
this
has
been
on
our
agenda.
A
B
We
do
and
before
we
go
into
verbal,
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
the
three
written
public
comments
that
the
city
received
and
forwarded
to
committee
members
after
the
agenda
was
published
and
before
this
meeting.
B
If
this
were
an
in-person
meeting,
we
would
have
those
written
comments
available
for
folks
to
read
if
they
wanted
to
at
the
meeting,
because
we
are
on
zoom
if
any
community
members
are
wanting
copies
of
those
written
comments.
Please
email
the
city,
environmental
services,
email
address,
which
is
e-services,
city
of
arcata.org,
and
we
can
provide
those
to
you.
B
The
three
written
comments
we
received
were
one
was
from
fred
weiss.
One
was
from
chris
richards
and
one
was
from
arcata
playhouse.
Let
me
just
pull
that
up
real,
quick
playhouse
arts.
I'm
sorry,
so
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
those
committee.
Members
have
all
received
those
ahead
of
this
meeting
and
we
can
provide
copies
of
those
upon
request.
B
If
you
are
wanting
to
comment
on
this
agenda
item,
please
raise
your
hand
now,
so
that
we
can
take
a
gauge
of
how
many
members
we
can
anticipate
commenting.
I'm
seeing
three
four
hands
raised
now:
okay,
thanks
for
that
administrative
piece,
jim,
I
will
allow
you
to
talk
first
and
sheldon.
I
apologize
are
we
let's
see
so
we
have
four.
Are
we
going
a
minute
and
a
half
two
minutes.
D
I'll
speak
as
quick
as
I
can.
I
appreciate
the
time
my
comments
are
related
to
the
l
street
section
of
the
rail
to
trails,
and
it
does
relate
to
some
of
the
open
space
conservation
policies
which
I
will
pull
back
on.
The
l
street
section
of
the
rail.
The
trails
quarter.
Footprint
is
a
diamond
and
rough,
and
it
is
an
existing
right
away
right
now
it
identifies
identified
primarily
as
the
primary
accessible
public
space
in
the
gateway
on
the
draft
plan
back
at
page
17..
D
It
satisfies
the
concept
of
open
spaces
presented
in
the
package
page
on
15,
connecting
a
series
of
green
spaces
trails
and
protected
reed
belts
and
daylighted
creeks.
In
addition
to
pocket
wetlands,
it
already
offers
some
forms
of
active
and
passive
recreation
and
connecting
with
the
past
to
the
north,
with
shea
park
steward
park,
and
just
the
present
as
the
just
the
east
is
also
the
steward
park.
President
yale
street
path
serves
as
a
coordinative
trail
network.
The
arcade
of
wildlife
sanctuary
to
the
south
when
the
great
northern
railroad
trail
is
complete.
D
D
B
Next
up
we
have
fred.
I
will
allow
you
to
talk
okay,
you're
on.
M
Yes,
thank
you
first
sheldon.
If
it's
ten
minutes,
there's
four
people,
that
would
be
two
and
a
half
minutes
per
person.
I
want
to
thank
you.
I
refer
you
to
my
letter,
which
I
think
you've
already
gotten.
I
will
be
posting
this
on
the
arcata1.com
website,
as
well
as
further
comments
that
I
have,
because
I
can't
fit
them
all
in
in
two
and
a
half
minutes
debbie.
I
support
what
you're
saying
about
l
street.
It's
not
a
question
of
whether
it
fits.
M
I
think
david
is
correct,
that
it
will
fit,
but
it
will
more
or
less
destroy
the
nature
of
the
pathway
as
it
is
now.
That's
the
bigger
point.
Let's
see
the
amenities
program,
I
urge
the
committee
to
get
very
clear
about
that.
You
can
ask
david
further.
My
understanding
is
that
the
amenities
are
if
the
developers
want
something
beyond
what
the
city
already
allows.
In
other
words,
if
the
city
has
four
stories
is
a
based
here,
they
want
five
or
six
stories.
They
have
to
provide
some
amenities.
M
It
is
not
required
that
they
provide
these
amenities.
It's
it's
a
benefit
for
them
in
exchange
for
a
benefit
for
the
community,
but
there's
nothing
that
requires
them
to
do
it.
Third,
the
large
plaza
area.
As
I
said
in
my
letter,
it
might
be
5
10
20
30
years
before
that
happens,
I
think
you
need
to
plan
for
parks
in
other
places
in
the
meantime,
because
we
don't
know,
as
as
david
has
said,
we
don't
know
when
developers
are
going
to
do
things.
M
So
there's
got
to
be
lots
of
different
flexibilities
here,
given
the
size
and
the
scope
of
this,
what
you're
doing
here
providing
parks
for
tens
of
thousands
of
people
over
the
years?
It's
really
important
that
you
do
a
good
job.
I
support
you
with
everything
that
you're
doing
and
whether
you
are
having
extra
meetings
or
whatever
it
takes
to
get
clear
on
it.
Let's
see.
B
That
was
well
now
we're
at
a
minute
and
50.
sheldon
I'll
defer
to
you,
but
since
we
set
that
outset
at
90
seconds,
my
thought
was
being
consistent
for
all
of
public
comment.
It
is
up
to
the
pleasure
of
the
chair
how
you'd
like
to
move
forward.
A
H
Okay,
I
will
talk
fast.
I
will
dump
out
my
pitch
for
l
street,
it's
a
huge,
so
I
will
just
send
that
in
a
letter
to
you
all
the
committee
folks,
I
things
that
aren't
being
said
is
that
if
you
look
at
figure
10c
and
10d
in
the
draft
of
the
gateway
plan,
the
the
trail
is
going
to
be
relocated
on
the
north
end
of
that
trail.
That
wasn't
said,
and
that
wasn't
clarified,
there's
also
easements
from
property
owners
that
own
the
easements.
H
Alongside
of
that
north
end
of
the
trail,
and
some
and
also
the
city,
does
not
own
the
rights
to
the
rail
itself,
so
those
will
have
to
be
acquired
by
the
city
and
most
likely
it
will
be
eminent
to
me
knowing
the
nature
of
who
owns
those
easements,
I'm
not
sure
about
the
rails.
H
So
I
just
kind
of
want
to
throw
out
that,
because
the
the
trail
is
going
to
be
relocated
in
those
areas
and
moved.
H
I
I
really
really
really
highly
suggest
that
you
do
not
make
a
formal
vote
tonight
that
you
do
a
subcommittee
or
a
special
meeting
at
a
later
date
and
really
bring
in
those
other
like
jane
and
steve
on
the
community
committee
members
to
really
go
over
the
details
of
this.
The
vagueness
of
the
gateway
area
plan
is
it's
really
frustrating
for
the
community
members
so
as
as
clean
and
concise
of
your
recommendations
would
be
so
helpful
to
us
and
the
city
moving
forward.
H
So
I
suggest
that
you
don't
make
a
formal
vote
and
go
ahead
with
a
subcommittee
or
a
special.
I'm
sorry.
B
Okay
and
it
looks
like
chris
richards-
you
are
the
last
community
member
with
your
hand,
raised
on
this
round
of
public
comment,
so
I'll.
Allow
you
to
talk
and
then
we'll
give
one
last
opportunity
in
case
there's
anyone
who
didn't
get
to
speak
go
ahead.
C
Okay,
I'm
unmuted.
I
won't.
I
won't
waste
too
much
of
your
time,
rambling
on
about
how
much
time
I'm
not
going
to
use
but
yeah.
Just
thank
you
for
your
efforts
and
I
appreciate
that
you're
willing
to
look
at
a
special
meeting
or
subcommittee
and
really
dive
in
and
make
sure
you've
written
things
the
way
that
you're
comfortable
with
them
that's
great.
I
do
want
to
mirror
a
couple
of
other
comments
with
the
l
street.
I
mean
I've
been
down
this
road
or
not
per
se.
With
david
numerous
times.
C
There
needs
to
be
another
plan
because
they
do
not
have
access
to
property
in
numerous
places.
The
rails,
the
north
end
to
even
develop
that.
So
I
think
moving
towards
a
people-friendly
zone,
which
it's
already
really
working
well
and
evolving
towards
something
quite
wonderful
and
that
could
also
really
increase
the
availability
as
a
public
owned
space
for
open
space
for
folks.
I
I
think,
really
evaluating
that
and
realizing
that
it's
most
likely
not
going
to
happen
anyway.
C
B
L
Thank
you
so
much.
I
was
just
hoping
that
staff
might
give
an
explanation
of
what
a
subcommittee
is
for
some
of
the
new
members
and
for
some
of
the
community
members
that
are
attending
tonight.
So
I
just
thought
I'd
ask
that
question
if,
if
staff
might
want
to
provide
that
information,
thank
you
so
much.
B
A
Great,
we
have
any
thank
you
so
much
from
the
community.
I
I
took
some
very
good
notes.
You
all
had
some
very
good
suggestions
that
will
definitely
be
taken
into
account.
Do
we
have
any
other
responses
from
committee
members
to
those
public
comments.
G
Yeah
sheldon,
I
had
one
thing
for
david.
I
did
have
someone
approach
me
that
said
that
they
that
part
of
the
trail
they
donated
or
is
an
easement
and
would
they
be
contacted
if
it
changes,
and
I
refer
them
to
the
city.
G
So
I
I
wasn't.
I
knew
that
when
we,
when
we
had
the
ribbon
cutting
for
the
trail,
those
people
came
that
donated
part
of
the
land
for
the
trail.
I
Yeah
I'd
have
to
look
into
more
detail.
I
can't
really
speak
to
that,
but
yeah.
If
there
was,
I
know
there
were
certain
sections
that
we
had
to
get
easements
on,
and
I
I
don't
think
that
this
because
it
was
specifically
for
the
trail.
I
don't
think
that
this
would
change
those
easements
or
the
need
for
those
easements.
We'd
still
need
to
have
easements
or
to
acquire
a
fee
title.
I
I
A
A
I
I
think
these
are
pretty
good
language
modifications
to
the
gateway
project
and
I
think
it
would
get
the
ball
rolling
in
our
court
as
far
as
getting
some
things
we
want,
but
I
absolutely
agree
with
debbie
and
the
public
and
johnny
that
we
do
need
to
have
a
special
meeting,
and
I
I
think
in
august
I
don't
know
if
we
necessarily
need
a
subcommittee,
and
one
of
the
questions
from
the
public
comment
was
to
describe
what
a
subcommittee
is
emily.
Could
you
do
that
sure.
B
Yeah
I'd
be
happy
to
so
typically
subcommittees
are
formed
to
discuss
specific
topics
or
are
tasked
with
specific
objectives.
Subcommittees
cannot
be
comprised
of
a
quorum,
so
it
would
need
to
be
three
members
or
less
the
way
subcommittees
flow
or
the
subcommittees
will
dig
into
their
specified
topic
or
objective
and
then
take
those
develop.
A
recommendation
they'll
take
that
recommendation
to
the
committee
and
then
the
committee
will
vote
on.
You
know
supporting
the
subcommittee's
recommendation
or
not,
and
I'm
using
the
term
recommendation.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
like
a
verbage
recommendation.
B
B
Often
you
know
that
task
is
memorialized
by
recommendation
and
then
the
committee
votes
on
it
so
for
this
particular
instance
just
to
use
the
the
subcommittee
consideration
as
an
example
if
the
subcommittee,
if,
if
the
parks
and
rec
committee
wanted
to
make
a
recommendation
based
off
of
subcommittee
findings
in
august,
a
subcommittee
would
need
to
be
formed.
That
subcommittee
would
need
to
meet
and
dig
into
the
material
and
develop
a
recommendation
in
time
for
the
august
special
meeting
agenda
setting
and
david
jump
in.
B
I
B
So
yes,
a
subcommittee
if
to
flow
a
subcommittee
in
the
context
of
the
gateway
a
subcommittee
could
be
formed
tonight.
That
subcommittee
would
dig
into
the
subject
matter
come
up
with
a
recommendation
and
in
theory
that
recommendation
will
be
brought
forth
to
the
committee
in
august.
So
certainly
for
committee.
Consideration.
I
And
if,
if
you
did
perform
a
subcommittee,
then
you
know
either
emily
or
I
or
both
would
be
available
to
that
subcommittee
to
you
know,
bounce
questions.
You
know
whether
or
not
you
know
there
was
a.
You
know,
concern
that
that
was
raised
if
that
was
included
in
the
document
already,
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
we'd
be
able
to
assist
that
subcommittee's
work.
A
So
I
I
think
the
best
tact
for
our
committee
would
just
be
to
have
a
special
meeting
in
august.
You
know
because
steve's
not
here,
jane's,
not
here,
and
then
we
have
our
two
new
members
and
I
I
would
just
think
you
know
it's
not
a
huge
committee.
We
can
all
look
through
this
work.
We
can
bring
our
ideas
to
the
table
at
a
special
meeting
in
august.
A
E
But
I
think
for
now
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
accept
the
language
modifications
as
they're
as
they're,
given
so
that
david
can
move
ahead
with
something
to
work
with,
and
then
we
can
make
have
another
entertain.
Another
motion
about
a
meeting
after
that.
I
E
I
Oh
I'm
sorry,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
whether
we
were
going
to
add
to
the
language
modifications
that
are
in
attachment
c
additional
support
for
the
existing
bike
lanes.
And
then
I
don't.
I
didn't
see
a
real,
strong
emphasis
on
active
recreation
and
then
I
took
some
notes
about
skatepark
hot
lot
and
I
think
last
time,
sheldon
you'd
mentioned
bocce
ball.
G
Well,
sorry,
go
ahead,
go
ahead,
I'm
done
on
the
suggested
language
modifications.
The
second
bullet
point
says:
add
a
public
acquisition
program
and
intend
to
acquire
land.
No
wait.
Sorry!
The
third
one
specifically
identifies
funding
within
the
gateway
area
to
be
reinvested
specifically
within
the
gateway
area.
I
heard
sheldon
saying
that
you
know
collect
money,
but
it
may
not
be
used
in
the
gateway
area.
It
would
be
used
to
offset
like
tennis
courts.
Someplace
else.
That's.
I
Already
yeah
that's
already
a
program,
so
it's
not
being
created
by
this
gateway
program.
We
can
certainly
you
know,
add
to
the
recommendation,
continue
to
support
the
recreation
fee
for
new
construction
and
parking
loo.
Okay,.
E
G
I
G
E
A
B
G
A
I
Yes,
good
evening,
chair
and
committee
members
again,
so
this
will
be
very
brief.
We
would
hope
to
be
able
to
have
a
at
least
a
draft
outline
of
the
parks
and
rec
element
for
you
at
this
point
in
the
process.
You
know
there's
a
lot
going
on
you're
getting
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
material,
so
maybe
it's
better
that
it
worked
out
this
way
that
we
don't
yet
have
it.
I
But
again
we
are
not
only
in
the
process
of
doing
the.
You
know
the
gateway
area
plan,
but
we
are
also
in
the
process
of
you,
know
developing
amendments
to
our
our
general
plan.
Our
long-range
planning
document
tend
tends
to
be
a
20-year
plan
for
most
of
the
elements,
and
so,
as
you're
all
very
aware,
the
parks
and
rec
element
is
so
old.
I
It
was
printed
on
a
dot
matrix
printer,
and
so
it's
in
desperate
need
of
update
has
been
for
years,
and
I
I
just
have
to
acknowledge
that
I
promised
julie
neander
that
we
would
get
it
updated
in
this
general
plan
update
and
so
I'm
following
through
on
that
darn
it
okay.
So
basically,
where
we're
at
right
now
is
the
plan
western
consultant
is
working
on
the
draft
and
they're
basing
it
on
the
park
and
rec
master
plan.
I
So
that's
where
we're
drawing
a
lot
of
the
inspiration
from
and
even
though
that
document
is,
you
know
it's
about
10
years
old
now
at
this
point
you
know
it
reflected
pretty
heavy
investment
in
the
community's
input
and,
I
think
is
still
pretty
pretty
relevant
to
you
know
to
the
body
of
policy
that
we
need
to
develop
out
of
that.
I
So
what
I
hope
to
have
for
you,
possibly
even
by
your
special
meeting
in
august
at
the
very
least,
is
a
you
know,
an
outline
summary
of
what
the
new
parks
and
rec
element
would
would
look
like
and
what
the
content
would
be
and
that'll
give
you
an
opportunity
to
start.
I
You
know
weighing
in
on
on
that
document
and
making
sure
that
we've
got
the
you
know
the
the
right
policy
balance
in
there
very
shortly
after
that,
perhaps
by
your
regularly
scheduled
meeting
in
september,
we
should
have
a
draft
of
that
parks
and
rec
elements
for
you
to
to
look
at
so
there'll.
Be
a
couple
of
opportunities
coming
up
in
the
next
couple
of
months
to
really
weigh
in
on
the
language
there
so
yeah.
I
think
that's
that's
the
the
update
that
I
have
for
you.
I
G
Input
should
we
email
you.
I
Yeah
that'd
be
great
yeah.
If
you
have
some
some
items.
Some
ideas
about
you
know
policy,
language
or
policy
areas
that
we
should
concentrate
and
focus
on,
feel
free
to
send
those
along
individually
and
we'll
try
and
incorporate
that
into
the
draft
and
bring
that
back
to
to
you
for
your
review.
G
And
it
might
get
caught
when
they
do
the
master
plan,
because
it's
adding
like
river
access,
the
bike,
the
regional
bike,
stuff.
You
know
the
stuff,
that's
happened.
You
know
the
website.
D
G
And
then
also
I'd
like
to
make
sure
we
keep
in
there
the
forest
revenues.
I
know
karen's
keeping
a
line
item.
There
was
a
ballot
measure
that,
when
they
bought
the
forest,
that
the
gross
was
part
of
the
gross
would
go
towards
parks
and
wrecks,
and
that's
what
helped
purchase
a
lot
of
our
neighborhood
parks
and
people
forget
about
that
and
karen
says
she
had
in
her
budget.
I
I
K
A
Okay,
there's
not
much
for
us
to
comment
on
so
if
there
are
any
public
comments
specifically
to
the
parts
and
recreation
element
of
the
general
plan,
I'd
like
to
keep
those
at
60
seconds
per
person.
B
M
Yeah,
thank
you
on
the
letter
that
I
sent
to
the
committee.
I
refer
you
to
item
nine,
there's
a
page
missing
in
the
packet.
It's
similar
to
what
what
is
here,
the
strategic
infill
redevelopment
program,
review
process.
Detail
was
supplied
to
the
city
council
on
june
22nd
in
the
planning
commission
on
june
28th.
There
are
three
pages
I
urge
you
to
get
the
third
page,
that's
missing
from
the
packet.
M
B
I
have
a
lot
of
updates,
but
I'll
hold
mine
until
the
end,
so
that
committee
members
can
speak
first.
A
B
Yes,
me
too
sure
yeah,
unfortunately
it
got
broken.
We
did
put
a
new
hoop
on
order
and
I
believe
we
received
that
backboard
this
week,
so
I
think
it'll
be
getting
installed
soon.
G
I
want
to
ask
sheldon
how
the
council
went
with
the
goal
setting
session.
A
A
A
They
did,
but
I
one
was
for
recreation
opportunities
for
teens,
which
I
thought
was
a
really
interesting
one.
That's
I
think,
that's
probably
one
of
the
hardest
things
to
implement.
I
mean
who
knows
what
teenagers
are
actually
into
or
what
they
would
actually
show
up
for,
but
that
was
a
really
interesting
one,
and
I
can't
remember
the
other
two
honestly.
B
I
will
keep
it
succinct
and
I'm
happy
to
go
into
greater
detail
and
discuss
items
as
the
committee
desires.
So
one
thing
I
wanted
to
draw
the
committee's
attention
to
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
in
a
second
is,
certainly
we
have
brought
the
gateway
forward
to
this
committee
and
the
parks
and
recreation
element
of
the
general
plan
will
be
coming
back
to
this
committee
or
coming
to
this
committee.
B
There
are
other
pieces
or
components
of
the
general
plan
that
I
wanted
to
make
the
committee
aware
of
so
the
quickest
way
to
get
to.
I
have
the
city
website
up
just
to
help
with
the
navigation
of
the
draft
plan
elements
the
quickest
way
to
get
there
is
to
google
sirp
arcata
and
then
click
on.
Actually
I'm
going
to
go
back.
B
So
if
you
I'll
just
walk
you
through,
if
you
google,
arcata
serp,
that
will
take
you
to
the
city
website
strategic
infill
redevelopment
program
and
then
from
there
I've
lost
my
general
plan
david.
Could
you
help
me
navigate
to
the
general?
Oh
there
we
go
so
under
strategic
info
redevelopment
program,
click
down
to
general
plan
updates,
and
then
that
will
take
you
to
the
three
updates
that
are
currently
drafted
and
available
for
public
review
and
comment.
I
just
wanted
to
make
committee
members
aware
of
those
three
elements.
B
If
the
committee
wants
to
speak
to
or
wants
to
have
any
of
these
elements
brought
back
specifically
to
the
parks
and
rec
committee,
let
me
know,
and
we
can
make
that
happen,
so
that
was
just
a
plug.
While
we've
been
on
general
plan
related
topics,
we
have
a
cal,
recycle
farm
and
ranch
cleanup
grant
that
we
have
had
for
a
couple
years
now
aimed
at
cleaning
up
the
unoccupied
and
illegally
dumped
areas
of
carlson
park.
B
It
has
taken
quite
some
time
to
get
a
contractor
to
start
that
work
and
I'm
super
excited
to
say
that
that
work
started
with
redwood,
adult
and
teen
challenge
this
past
week
so
monday
and
tuesday.
I
think
they're
going
to
come
back
next
week
and
it
was
a
really
great
effort.
We
worked
with
ricology
who
brought
dumpsters
as
well
as
the
cooperation
humboldt
street
outreach
team
funded
through
dhhs
and
engaging
with
some
of
the
residents
at
carlson
park
and
bringing
the
solid
waste
they
did
not
want
and
wanted
removed.
B
B
West
news
is
this
committee,
as
you
know,
had
approved
at
the
may
meeting
the
basketball
mural,
as
well
as
the
murals,
to
be
mounted
at
valley
west
park
closer
to
the
playground,
the
basketball
court
mural
is
going
to
be
starting
next
week,
and
that
should
be
done
by
the
end
of
next
week,
assuming
there's
no
hang-ups
and
the
the
murals
that
will
be
freestanding
at
valley
west
park.
Those
should
be
installed
by
the
end
of
this
month.
B
So
we'll
get
to
see
a
lot
more
artwork
in
valley
west
in
the
next
couple
weeks
also
happening
in
valley.
West
is
our
recreation
supervisor.
Colin
groom
has
been
coordinating,
pop-up
event,
programming
in
valley
west.
So
our
goal,
through
working
with
the
city
council,
is
to
hold
three
pop-up
events
in
valley
west
right
now,
we're
looking
toward
a
horse
tournament
and
shootout
at
the
valley,
west,
basketball,
court,
and
that
will
be
timed
right
after
the
mural
is
completed.
So
it's
kind
of
like
a
double
you
know
ribbon
cutting
as
well
as
programming.
B
We
are
nailing
down
that
date,
hopefully
here
in
the
next
couple
days,
we
will
also
be
having
the
bike
rodeo
in
partnership
with
kuna.
So
I
think
that
will
happen
in
mid-august
and
then
it's
september
we're
looking
at
having
a
movie
night
and
we're
nailing
down
dates
for
that
as
well.
So
there's
going
to
be
some
additional
programming
coming
to
valley
bus
which
we're
super
excited
about,
I'm
just
going
to
keep
going
on
the
valley
west
train.
B
We
received
a
wcb
grant
for
development
of
the
river
access
parking
area
and
multi-use
staging
area
for
carlson
park,
so
we
have
about
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
on
carlson
park
development
through
wcb
we're
hoping
construction
will
start
in
2023
or
2024
all
right.
That
is,
let's
see.
Those
are
all
my
valley.
West
updates
today
marks
the
halfway
point
in
our
summer.
B
Camp
programming
season
and
our
recreation
supervisors
have
just
been
amazing
in
navigating
offering
a
really
robust
summer
camp
program
with
really
high
caliber
programs,
as
well
as
navigating
the
continued
impacts
of
kobit
19..
We
are
anticipating
shea
exercise,
equipment
construction
to
happen
in
mid-august.
B
The
redwood
park
rfp
for
design
will
be
going
out
soon,
and
we
also
have
a
banner
that
talks
about
the
playground
equipment
theme
desire
for
input
on
playground,
equipment
theme
for
redwood
park.
There's
like
a
little
tiny
url
to
a
survey.
So
that's
going
to
be
hung
at
redwood
park.
B
We
have
online
surveys
that
folks
can
fill
out
that
we'll
be
notifying
the
community
about
and
emailing
our
all
of
our
recreation
families
so
that
they
know
where
they
can
take
the
survey
to
provide
input
on
playground,
amenities
and
themes
for
redwood
park
and
then
we'll
have
hard
copy
surveys
at
our
camp
check-in
registration
table.
So
a
family
wants
to
fill
out
hard
copy
surveys
to
provide
input.
They
can
there
just
looking
at
my
list
here
making
sure
I'm
here
you
email
this
us.
The
survey
also
sure
yeah.
B
Okay
and
then
last,
but
certainly
not
least,
we
are,
we
were
recently
awarded
a
million
dollars
for
the
arcade
ballpark
improvements,
as
some
of
you
are
probably
aware
of
by
now.
I
wanted
to
speak
a
little
bit
to
that
in
sharing
that
it
is
not
a
typical
public
grant
process
that
we
were
awarded
those
funds,
but
senator
mcguire
had
reached
out
to
the
city
in
hopes
that
we
could
prepare
a
proposal
for
their
considerations
through
the
state
budgeting
process.
That
proposal
was
successful.
B
It
will
include
a
new
facade
right
on
the
front,
as
well
as
an
improved
entryway,
and
I
have
a
concept
I
will
share
real
quick
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
what
the
facade
could
look
like
in
in
coming
up
with
this
proposal,
I
will
share
that
city
staff
relied
on
needs
that
had
been
expressed
from
previous
community
needs
assessments
and
concepts
designs,
and
I
think
that
the
parks
and
rec
committee
had
provided
some
input
on
potential
ballpark
improvements
around
april
2017,
and
so
those
were
all
incorporated
in
the
concept
proposal
and
again
we'll
be
moving
forward
through
the
more
formal
design
process
which
will
have
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in
on
as
well.
B
A
Okay,
so
moving
on
the
agenda,
future
meeting
dates
consider
special
meeting
in
august.
I
think
we
have
well
considered
that
what
do
you
need
from
us
to
make
sure
that
happens?.
B
What
I
will
do
is,
I
will
have
bella,
send
out
a
doodle
poll
to
committee
members
so
that
we
can
come
up
with
a
time
that
works
well
for
everyone,
and
then
we
will
get
that
scheduled.
A
And
then
so
what
will
be
on
the
agenda
for
that
meeting?
Is
the
gateway
area
plan
and
then,
if
there
is
an
update
on
the
general
plan,
if
we
could
include
that
that's
wonderful.
A
And
then
the
next
meeting
after
that
will
be
september,
14th
2022
at
6
p.m.