►
From YouTube: Argo Contributors Office Hours 16th Sep 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
I
believe,
all
right
so
recording
started
yeah,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started.
It
looks
like
the
first
topic
on
the
agenda
is
triaging
and
discussion
feedback,
so
I'm
not
sure
who
added
this.
You
want
to
speak
up
and
we
can
get
started
talking
about
it
yeah.
Thank
you.
B
Yeah,
so
thanks,
so
this
is
again
we
are
doing
it
for
every
week
right.
So
after,
like
few
minutes,
we
can
discuss
on
the
last
week's
pricing
and
discussion
warner
and
go
let's
primary
and
secondary
and
get
their
sheets
there
and
then
fix
on
the
next
series,
or
next
week,
pricing
and
secondary
warnings.
C
Yeah,
so
I
was
in
the
rotation
to
do
the
gr
and
the
discussion
the
it
was.
The
volume
is
low
on
the
discussion,
so
there
wasn't
really
anything
much
that
I
I
I
can.
I
can
bring
up
so
there's
a
few
questions
answered
and
just
about
it,
I
on
the
triad-
I
I
frankly
I
didn't
have
much
time
last
week
to
do
working
on
the
triage,
so
yeah,
so
so
that's
yeah,
so
that
you
know
pretty
much
the
feedback.
C
I
can
provide
this
time
so
yeah.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
So,
let's
see
so
this
week
it
was
you
and
hong.
It
looks
like
so
next
in
the
rotation
would
be
gone.
Daniel
john.
Do
you
want
to
go
triage
with
daniel,
or
do
you
want
to
do
it
yourself?
I'm
not
sure
how
much
experience
daniel
has
so.
A
Oh
okay,
all
right,
never
mind
that,
should
we
maybe
reach
out
to
him
offline
and
see
if
he
wants
to
do
it
still
or
should
we
move
down
the
list.
B
We
can
do
our
primary.
Can
you
see.
E
Yes,
daniel's
daniel's,
fresh
daniel
yeah,
yeah,
okay,.
D
And
can
someone
relay
them
the
message?
Sorry,
what
sorry?
What
was
the
message?
Well
he's
he'll
be
on
triojian.
Maybe.
C
Go
to
whoever
is
in
in
the
meeting.
I
think,
unless
we
know
that
daniel
will
be
available
to
to
take
over
next
week's
round
yeah.
B
That
is
right
actually
so
who
are
in
the
meeting.
I
think
it
will
be
better
to
exist
here.
I
think,
rather
than
following
up
later
that
could
be
discussed
if
they
are
not
available.
E
Okay,
yeah
I'll
I'll
ask
him.
If
I
can
ask
him
about
next
week,
is
that
helpful.
A
F
It
doesn't
look
like
he
is
here
either.
I
can
do
instead,
daniel
or
edan
just
because
they
bought
some
holidays
right
now.
I.
B
B
Yeah,
so
one
thing
is
like
what
we
are
doing
is
primary
can
be
a
member
secondary,
may
not
be
a
member,
they
can
work
along
with
primary
and
they
can
post
comments
as
a
part
of
means.
Still,
users
can
comment
on
the
tickets
about,
but
remember
I
think
they
can.
The
primary
will
be
at
least
a
member
who
can
add
the
labels
or
remove
the
tickets
or
not
so
that
permissions,
I
think
it
was
already
proposed,
is
made
by
gst
and
nation.
A
Got
it
okay,
all
right
pasha,
do
you
want
listen.
F
A
Okay,
that's
quick
thanks
tom!
I
think
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
move
move
you
guys
to
the
appropriate
on
the
list,
so
we
don't
lose
track
of
the
order.
So
I'll
move
pasha
down
here
and
I'll,
keep
you
there
hon
all
right,
so
hong
will
be
primary
and
pasha
will
be
secondary
for
the
discussions
in
issue
moderation
this
week
that
works
for
everybody.
A
Does
anybody
have
anything
further
to
discuss
with
the
triage
discussion
feedback
all
right,
so
next
we'll
move
on
to
the
1.1
release,
so
I'm
not
sure.
B
From
the
last
weekend
before
last
week,
we
are
discussing
about
the
early
status,
I
think
right
now.
I
think
we
are
in
a
good
shape.
I
think
so.
There
are
two
pending
tickets,
which
are
kind
of
open,
but
I
think
we
will
be
making
it
really
scared
by
friday
or
monday.
So
if
anyone
wants
to
have
anything
that
it
takes
only
once
no
features
allowed
at
this
point,
but
any
box
or
anything
that
is
important,
please
let
us
know
about
other
that
I
think
we
are
on.
D
No
yeah,
the
the
two
remaining
were
just
graphite
metric
support.
Both
of
them
are
actually
external
contributors.
So,
but
I
know
that
leader
election
salesforce
really
wanted
that
one
in
so
they're
they're
sharper
than
that
one
and
it's
actually
not
by
salesforce
but
they're.
Who
he's
sending
prs
to
the
pr
to
try
and
get
that
one
in
before
the
one
that
one
because
they
want.
They
really
want
the
leader
election
by
one-on-one.
D
And
graphite,
I
think,
is
just
there.
It
just
needs
to
be
rebased.
D
Yes,
oh
is
someone
alex.
Will
you
be
reviewing
the
dynamic
scaling.
G
I
think
it's
maybe
india
from
into
it
is
the
most
appropriate
person,
because
we
spend
so
much
time
on
that
feature
and-
and
me
too,
I
will
try
to
help
you.
D
Okay,
yeah
that
one
that
one
is
ready.
No,
the
testing
is
passed
and
refactoring
has
been
done.
B
Yeah,
if
the
android
is
already
validating
actually
from
monday,
I
think
yeah
he
will
be
reviewing
along
with
the
next
year.
B
Just
the
topic
came
in
so
we
have
two
new
members.
A
few
contributors
I
want
to
introduce.
There
is
andrey
and
leo
as
a
part,
I
think
andrew
we
have
already
mentioned.
He
is
a
member
already
and
leo
is
a
new.
J
Sure
so
in
2017
I
started
working
with
kubernetes.
So
that's
where,
when
I
started
doing
golang
and
I
moved
from
from
java
development
to
golang-
I
don't
I
don't
plan
to
go
back
to
java,
so
I
really
love
doing
kubernetes
and
golem
development
and
I
contributed
to.
J
I
was
more
on
the
on
the
on
the
consumer
side
when
it
comes
to
argo
projects.
So
I
worked
as
a
consumer
of
argo,
workflows,
argo,
cd
and
argo
roll
outs
for
about
two
and
a
half
years
and
contributing
doing
some
small
contributions
here
and
there.
J
Api
gateway
in
algorithm,
so
it
can
be
used
as
a
traffic
router
while
doing
canneries.
So
I
know
a
little
bit
of
you
know.
I
I
think
I
know
I'm
comfortable
as
a
user
of
the
three
different
projects,
the
three
different
different
bigger
projects,
but
in
terms
of
development,
I
know
a
little
bit
more
on
the
on
the
argo
rule
outside
that's
a
little
bit
about
me.
K
K
Yeah
so
as
on
the
argo
I'm
just,
I
started
from
working
on
argo
as
in
into
it
five
six
months
ago,
but
I'm
just
meeting
like
just
first
time
so
glad
to
meet
you
guys.
A
Thanks
guys
welcome.
G
All
right,
I
was
waiting
for
a
second
to
tune
in,
so
I,
since
we're
talking
about
argo,
1.1
release,
we
spent
like
several
hours,
I
think,
last
week
with
jc
and
we
added
a
bunch
of
issues
to
1.2
milestone
and
this
time
I
think
this
milestone
is
more
contributors
friendly.
I
would
say,
because
the
focus
is
on
stability,
and
it
has
a
lot
of
you
know
good
first
issues,
so
if
you're
interested
in
contributing
it's
there,
it's
like
just
filtered
by
good
good
first
issue
and.
D
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
it's
about
time
for
more
of
a
hygiene
release
for
one
rollouts,
glass,
1.0
and
1.1
they're
actually
pretty
packed
with
with
new
functionality,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
things
like
the
ede
test.
I
think
we
really
need
to
get
that
stable
in
github
actions
as
well
as
there
could.
The
unit
testing
refactoring
is.
D
The
unit
tests
are
pretty
complicated.
I
think
this
could
be
refactored
as
well
and
there's
some
smaller
things
that
I
think
would
be
contributor,
friendly
or
new
contributor,
friendly.
B
I
think
yeah
over
1.2.
We
can
discuss
more
in
detail,
probably
next
contributor
meetings
once
we're
not
going
to
discuss
time
and
we
can
go
over
more
more
in
depth
on
what
is
each
mindstone
and
probably
we
can
request
for
other
characters
to
highlight
anything
else
or
are
also
interested
in
more
contributions
so
yeah.
That's
it.
A
Great
yeah
sounds
good,
we'll
make
sure
we
discuss
that
more
and
further
for
the
meetings
all
right.
If
no
one
has
any
other
topics
or
questions,
we
can
move
on
to
posh's
topic,
so
the
ability
to
restart
the
github
action.
You
want
to
speak
on
that
pasha.
F
Sometimes
we
have
lucky
tests
in
our
rbcd
and
just
because
of
it
I
need
to
create
additional
commits
to
my
pull
request
for
start
this
actions,
so
I
would
propose
to
add
some
weight
or
start
it
for
persons
for
contributors
who
don't
have
permissions,
because
it's
really
uncomfortable
to
work
with
this
and
in
quarters.
For
example,
we
have
special
like
comment
that
allow
you
to
do
it
directly
from
pull
request,
so
I
would
to
raise
it
because
it
happens
for
me
very
often,
and
it's
it's
really
some
kind
of
headache
for
me.
G
F
And
and
in
addition,
I'll
just
comment
in
this,
so
even
if
you
will
to
do
this,
some
checks
happens
not
just
because
of
not,
for
example,
semantic
pull
request
check
just
because
I'm
quickly
press
create-
and
I'm
manually
I
forgot
to
change
this
semantic
name
before
open
pull
request.
I
don't
have
a
way
to
restart
all
these
checks.
For
the
start,
semantic
pull
request
check.
I
need
to
run
or
it's
part
of
github.
Okay,
it's
part
of
github
actually
so
now.
D
It's
configurable:
it
needs
to
be
configured
a
bit
more
wider,
like
it
there's
different
ways
you
can
configure.
We
didn't
configure
anything
but
the
default.
I
think
it
requires
all
commits
to
have
the
semantic
pull
request
which
is
kind
of.
If
you
made
the
mistake
to
not
do
it
for
their
first
commit,
then
it's
you
have
to
either
re-um
amend
your
initial
commits,
but
I
think
we
can
easily
add
a
semantic
pull
request,
config
file
to
just
say
any
of
the
commits.
I
should
have
a
a
title
title.
D
I
think
we
can
but
semantic
easily
fix
with
the
other
yeah
the
triage,
exactly
not
the
triage,
the
restarting
the
actions,
I
think
we'll
have
to
use
a
bot
for
that,
because
there's
no
privilege
I
can
see
to
give
that
in
github.
D
G
G
D
Yeah,
I
think
it's
possible
because
if
you
know,
if
you
contribute
to
say
kubernetes
or
something
someone
a
a
member
or
a
mother,
where
says
okay,
the
test
right,
I
think
I
don't
know
if
that
applies
for
all
pr's
like
or
all
changes
to
the
pr
after
they
make
that
comment
or
if
it's
you
know
just
that
one
time,
but
I
feel
like
bot
might
may
be
able
to
like
say:
okay,
this.
This
pr
is
okay
to
test
or
retry
going
forward
as
soon
as
it's
the
the
maintainer
realizes.
E
Is
that
something
we
could
at
least
just
do
for
members,
because
you
know
members
you've
made
several
commits
you've
been
invited
on
the
project
like
like
for
pasha
to
restart
it
yeah.
I
think
it's
a
problem
for
me
because
I'm
open.
D
F
D
The
issue
is
actually
on
github:
they
only
provide
four
roles
to
choose
from
triage
or
triage
right
admin
and
like
owner.
I
think
so.
D
F
Okay,
so
we
need
to
decide
and
if
you
need
to
help
miscreate
such
what
for
sure
I
can
help
with
this.
So
we
just
need
to
decide
what
what
is
the
better
way
to
do
it.
So
maybe
till
next
contribution
meeting
you
just
can
answer
one
question:
can
we
do
such
roles
or
no
and
depend
on
this?
I
can
start
to
create
this
bot.
F
L
I,
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
say
no
to
disabling
flaky
e2e
tests.
L
F
L
A
All
right
pasha
did
you
have
any
anything
more
to
add
on
that
topic,
or
was
that
I,
I
think,
that's
it
great.
Thank
you
all
right.
Does
anybody
else
have
any
topics
that
they'd
like
to
discuss
we're
quite
quite
early
today,
so
if
anybody
has
any
anything,
they
want
to
bring
up,
please
feel
free.
A
Otherwise,
we'll
get
you
back
about
a
half
hour
of
your
time.