►
From YouTube: Board of Equalization Hearing June 8, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
today
is
june
8th
2021,
and
this
is
the
arlington
county
board
of
equalization
hearing.
We
have
six
cases
on
the
agenda
and
we're
gonna
start
with
the
first
case,
which
is
rpc
one:
five:
zero,
six,
two
zero
one,
two,
the
property
is
located
at
2610
16th
street
north
miss
helen
abazi
is
here
to
tell
us
about
the
property.
Mr
bozzi,
you
can
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
your
case.
Please.
B
B
We
had
found
out
about
a
house
for
sale
from
some
people
from
some
realtor
and
it
is
an
old
house
that
actually
was
not
that
had
been
rented
to.
You
know
in
10
groups
of
tenants
for
a
number
of
years,
and
it
belonged
to
an
old
lady
who
was
not
in
good
condition
and
has
not
been
updated,
but
also
it's
not
very
updatable
house.
It's
one
of
the
small
houses
in
arlington,
particularly
in
north
arlington,
that
these
days
builders
buy
they
demolish
them
and
they
build
much
more
expensive
houses.
B
B
So
this
is
what
we
did
in
fact,
while
it
was
still
there,
someone
went
and
looked
at
the
house.
There
is
a
report
about
the
internal
condition
of
the
house.
The
house
is,
has
multiple
rooms
and
additions
from
the
1930s?
B
B
So
we
continued
to
rent
it
to
people
and,
at
this
moment,
yeah
for
its
affordable
housing
effectively.
At
this
moment
it
is
rented
to
two
people,
someone
just
moved
out.
Someone
is
looking
into
you
know
joining
this
group
house.
So
then
we
get
appraisal,
an
assessment
saying
that
the
house
is
worth
1.2
1.5
million.
B
The
amount
of
taxes
is
something
like
30
30
percent.
I
am
sorry
because
I've
sent
it
to
you
about
30
of
the
gross
income.
We
bought
the
house
by
the
way.
How
much
did
I
put
down
if
we
got
35
of
the
gross
income?
So
we
bought
the
house.
B
We
actually
had
to
change
the
heater
and
in
order
to
make
it
livable
and
the
the
question
is
about
using
the
house
as
a
you
know,
renting
assessing
the
house
as
a
rental
property
they
and
assessing
the
house
at
the
price
that
we
bought
it,
which
is
in
fact
demolition
for
they.
B
For
the
contractor,
there
are
two
appraised
assessments
of
that
level.
Whatever
this
house
would
have
been
sold
at
this
house
by
now,
it
would
have
you
know
a
million
1.7
1.8
tab.
The
trouble
is
that
by
demolishing
the
house,
you,
you
know
a
family
of
high-income
family
with
it
and
move
in
and
three
tenants
would
have
to
find
their
way
into
arlington
county
somewhere
from
manassas
from
prince
george's
county
from
further
out.
B
We
found
out-
and
this
is
one
thing
that
we
wanted
to
explain:
houses
apparently
in
arlington
seem
to
not
be
counted
as
rental.
In
order
to
have
a
house
is
rental,
it
needs
to
be
an
apartment,
but
a
house
is
supposed
to
be
live
debt
and
you
know
there
are
houses
that
are
supposed
to
be
residential,
someone's
living
there
and
they're
assessed
accordingly.
B
The
trouble
again
with
this
is
that
it
makes
it
it
gives
the
advantage
to
the
wealthy-
and
we
know
very
well
arlington
county-
can
do
very
well
by
high
income
housing.
It's
just
that
the
teachers,
the
firemen,
the
policemen,
the
you
know,
the
bartenders,
the
supermarket
workers
cannot
live
there,
and
this
is
the
kind
of
housing
we
provide
at
the
same
time
how
affordable
housing
is
it
dire
scarcity?
B
B
B
B
C
They
had
decided
at
the
time
to
use
it
by
leasing
one
room
at
a
time
by
and
also
a
common
used
kitchen
and
a
common
used
bathroom.
So
at
the
time
we
felt
that
we
didn't
want,
of
course,
to
keep
them
or
to
tell
them,
I
mean
to
leave
their
house
and
they
requested
us.
Actually
they
implored
us
to
keep
them
as
well,
because
they
said
that
it
was
convenient
going
to
the
work
by
using
the
metro.
C
So
this
is
what
we
decided
to
do
and
as
we
speak
since
one
of
them
already
left,
the
income
from
the
house
is
reduced
to
approximately
1
900
per
month.
As
we
speak.
So
the
gross
income
not
taking
into
account
the
expenses,
is
going
to
be
approximately
around
between
22
to
23
000
per
year.
So
we
kindly
request
to
take
that
into
account
and
consider
us
and
give
us
a
tax
rate
that
we
will
be
able
to
keep
it
and
provide
the
type
of
services
to
individuals
who
need
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
All
right,
thank
you
before
we
hear
from
the
county,
I'm
going
to
ask
mr
bluestone,
if
you
would
turn
your
camera
off,
so
that
the
members
of
the
board
can
peer
up
in
the
grid,
and
you
can
come
back
on
when
it's
time.
For
your
case,
sir,
thank
you.
Okay,
speaking
for
the
county
is
miss
churchill.
Ms
churchill,
you
can
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
the
property.
D
Yes,
good
morning,
my
name
is
nicole
churchill
and
I'm
a
residential
appraiser
here
in
arlington
county.
This
property
was
virtually
inspected
march
15
of
2021,
but
we
did
physically
inspect
the
interior
and
exterior
of
this
property.
Last
year,
due
to
the
2020
appeal,
the
property
is
a
one
and
three
quarter
story:
brick
veneer
home,
two
bedroom,
two
half
bath
and
one
full
bath
with
an
unfinished
basement.
D
The
year
built
is
1939,
effective
ages,
1955.,
the
quality
is
average
plus
the
finished
square.
Footage
is
1677
square
feet.
The
appellant
feels
the
value
of
the
improvement
is
not
fair
and
equitable
according
to
market
values
and
feels
the
property
should
be
valued
on
the
income
approach
due
to
it
being
a
rental.
D
The
appellant
provided,
two
comparables,
both
of
which
were
in
prior
years,
analysis
2324
north
16th
street,
which
is
rpc
one
five
zero
six
one
zero
zero
two,
which
is
in
neighborhood
five,
zero,
six,
zero,
five
one.
This
property
is
a
one
and
a
half
story:
brick
veneer
home
with
four
bedrooms,
two
full
baths
and
a
finished
basement,
and
this
property
sold
for
900
000
on
624
2019
as
a
land
sale.
Before
the
current
analysis
period,
1607,
north
bryant,
street
or
brian,
I'm
sorry.
D
D
D
D
Rpc15051018,
this
property
is
a
one-story,
brick
veneer
home
with
three
bedrooms:
one
full
bath
and
partially
finished
basement
year,
built
1925,
effective
age,
1945,
quality,
very
good,
minus
finished
square
footage
is
1
303..
This
property
sold
for
1.2
million
on
8
24
20,
and
the
current
assessment
value
is
1
million
150
1
400..
D
This
property
is
a
one
and
a
half
story:
aluminum
siding
home
with
four
bedrooms:
one
half
bath,
one
full
bath
an
unfinished
basement
year,
built
1923,
effective
ages,
1960
quality
is
good
and
finished.
Square
footage
is
one
thousand
four
hundred
and
thirteen,
this
property
sold
for
one
million
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
on
eleven
eighteen
of
nineteen.
D
The
final
comparable
is
2616th
street
north,
which
is
rpc
1562-14.
This
property
is
a
three-story
cement,
cement,
fiber,
siding
home
with
six
bedrooms,
one
half
bath,
full
five,
full
bathrooms
and
a
finished
basement.
Your
built
is
20
20
and
the
effect
of
age
is
2020.
With
the
quality
of
iv
iv
minus
finished
square
footage
is
4052..
D
D
This
comparable
is
located
two
lots
down
from
the
subject
and
sold
as
a
land
sale
containing
only
five
thousand
three
hundred
and
sixty
square
feet
of
land,
whereas
the
subject
has
eight
thousand
four
hundred
and
eighty
square
feet
of
land.
All
the
comparables
reviewed
and
provided
by
the
department
have
older,
effective
ages,
similar
to
the
subject
and
confirm
the
current
assessment
value.
D
E
D
D
It
there's
nothing,
there
is
a
four
percent
size
adjustment
on
the
property,
but
that's
the
only
factor.
F
E
A
A
E
G
G
Miss
churchill,
I
was
just
curious-
is
there?
Is
there
another?
You
said
that
average
plus
was
the
lowest
in
the
neighborhood.
I
mean
what's
the
next
step
down
and
how
would
that
affect
the
the
value
of
the
building.
G
D
H
D
D
Okay,
this
sale
occurred
in
2019
and
was
an
off-market
sale
and,
through
a
review
filed
last
year,
the
quality
was
changed
from
very
good
minus,
an
average
plus
to
average
plus
and
condition
changed
from
average
to
fair,
fair
due
to
the
almost
original
home,
with
no
updates.
This
property
quality
and
effective
age
appear
in
line
with
the
neighborhood
in
current
condition.
D
The
comparers
provided
all
had
older,
effective
ages,
similar
to
the
subject
and
confirmed
the
concurrent
assessed
value
again.
The
fourth
comparable
provided
is
two
lots
down
from
the
subject
and
was
a
land
sale
that
sold
for
1.3
million
during
the
analysis
period
and
had
significantly
less
lot
square
footage
than
the
subject.
D
B
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
Undoubtedly.
If
we
give
it
to
the
developer
tomorrow,
we
will
sell
for
1.3
million
or
whatever,
and
it
will
there
will
be
just
like
bryant
street,
the
way
miss
churchill
mentioned
and
the
property
to
the
two
blocks
down
the
street.
There
will
be
a
two
million
dollar
construction
there.
It
just
that
three
tenants
and
there
could
be
four
tenants
in
there
also,
if
possible,
but
three
denims
will
have
to
travel
like
40
miles
in
order
to
come
to
work.
B
This
is
the
big
difference,
and
this
is
why
we're
asking
that
it
be
valued
on
the
basis
of
the
income
now
miss
churchill,
which
of
course,
everyone
understands
the
difficulties.
Ms
churchill,
you
say
that
in
order
for
the
units
to
be
valued
on
the
income
base,
it
has
to
be
four
units.
A
single
family
residential
cannot
be
valued
on
the
basis
of
the
of
income.
B
Is
there
a
way
to
appeal
this
regulation?
Where
do
we
go?
Because
I
really
don't
want
to
give
this
house
I'm
sorry.
I
have
I'm
70
years
old,
I've
seen
too
much
in
the
area.
I
don't
want
to
give
this
house
to
the
developer.
I
find
it
very
unfair.
B
We
live
in
such
times
that
we
give
so
much
benefit
so
much
profit
to
the
people
who
can
afford
it.
I
don't
want
to
throw
out
three
people,
so
I
want
to
be
you
to
help
me
to
figure
out
how
to
make
this
valued
to
the
eight
hundred
thousand
nine
hundred
thousand,
that
we
see
that
we
saw
as
comparables
that
have
been
demolished.
B
C
Well,
just
one
thing
to
to
add
to.
A
We
have
to
fix
it:
okay,
okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
it's
just
among
the
board
members
I
mean
I'll
start.
I
mean,
I
think
it's
a
very
gallant
issue
that
that
that
are
are
doing,
because
I'm
probably
one
of
the
loudest
voices
for
affordable
housing,
but
that's
not
how
we
assess
properties
here
and
that's
a
personal
decision
to
take
the
rents
on
that.
I
don't
believe,
as
mr
medskin
had
said
earlier,
that
it's
just
about
the
land.
There
is
a
house
on
it.
A
You
know
it's
unfortunate
and
I
I
certainly
sympathize
with
what
the
appellant
is
asking,
but
we
don't
assess
properties
based
on
income
on
the
residential
side.
So
I
you
know,
I
don't
feel
that
anything
that
the
appellant
has
provided
sways
me
from
the
county's
assessment
of
the
million
1673,
but
mr
hoffman.
G
G
You
know
you
might
have
three
tenants
in
there
today,
but
it's
still
worth
one
point
whatever
to
to
a
builder,
so
the
value
is
going
to
be
the
highest
value
on
the
market,
so
you
might
get
some
advice
from
somebody
that
I
mean
barnes
might
even
have
an
opinion
on
this
call,
but
there
are
ways
to
restrict
the
value
of
the
property
legally.
That
would
then
you
know
if
you
put
a
covenant
on
there,
that
that
restricted
redevelopment
and
maintained
its
status
as
an
affordable
rental
project.
G
For
that
couldn't
be,
you
know,
removed
by
a
builder
that
that
down
the
road
or
a
successor
and
a
sign,
then
then
the
county
would
have
to,
in
my
opinion,
not
being
a
lawyer.
I
Thank
you,
madam
madam
chairman.
This
is
for
the
owners,
the
the
actual
providers
of
lomod
housing,
arlington
housing
corp,
those
different
owners.
I
Just
like
mr
hoffman
said,
the
problem
is
that
for
a
single-family
house,
the
county,
it
takes
a
lot
of
overhead
on
the
part
of
the
housing
department,
with
the
county
to
to
go
through
the
proper
steps
in
order
to
provide
that
benefit
to
the
providers
of
lomat
housing,
and
the
belief
was
that
there
wasn't
enough
bang
for
the
buck
so
to
speak
with
single-family
houses.
I
The
person
that
that
you
might
want
to
chat
with
would
be
your
local
delegate,
miss
dooley
and
I
both
know
patrick
hope
very
well,
and
this
is
a
subject.
That's
very
important
to
him.
There's
been
some
recent
legislation
at
the
general
assembly.
I
think
you're.
I
agree
with
everything
you
said,
but
you're
you're
you're,
making
your
pitch
to
the
wrong
body.
It's
got
to
go
to
the
general
assembly
and
or
county
board.
J
Yeah,
I
know
I
I
I
think,
given
the
logic,
that's
run,
the
comps
that
the
county
came
up
with
are
reasonable,
and
also
just
with
with
barnes
what
you're
saying
one
of
the
issues,
because
I've
done
it,
you
have
to
bring
it
up
to
code
standards
and
that
takes
some
money
to
investment
into
the
property
in
order
to
get
that
tax
discount,
but
as
a
single
family.
Right
now,
I
can't
see
why
it's
out
of
line.
A
H
Yes,
like
any
other
property
that
we
that
comes
before
us,
you
know
we
have
to
assess
the
property
the
way
the
property
is
as
it
is
right
now
we
don't
really
speculate.
What
could
be
done
with
it
in
the
future,
it
could
be
sold
to
a
developer.
It
could
be
sold
to
another
investor
who
decides
to
renovate
it
in
this
case
you
know
the
appellants
decided
not
to
do
major
work
to
it
and
just
keep
the
tenants
there,
but
that's
the
decision
they
had.
H
A
K
A
All
right,
we
have
a
second
with
mr
panoranda,
all
in
favor.
F
A
A
Okay.
The
second
case
on
the
agenda:
do
we
have
mr
sankovic
online?
No
okay!
Well,
since
that's
the
last
case
of
miss
churchill,
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
hear
that
without
him,
I'm
going
to
ask
miss
abbazi
if
you
can
turn
your
camera
off,
please.
Thank
you,
okay.
So
the
second
case
on
the
agenda
is
rpc18022011.
A
D
The
property
is
a
two
story:
six
bedroom,
two
full
bath
home
unfinished
basement
and
the
year
built
is
1910
with
an
effective
age
of
1970
and
the
quality
is
average
plus
the
appellant
states
that
the
property
has
not
been
renovated
or
remodeled
and
was
built
in
1911
and
does
not
compare
to
the
other
properties
in
the
area.
It
is
a
corner
lot
with
zoning
setbacks,
requirements
and
the
assessment
value
should
be
primarily
in
the
land
and
not
the
current
structure.
D
This
property
is
a
two-story,
brick
and
brick
veneer
home
with
three
bedrooms:
one
half
bath,
two
full
baths
and
a
finished
basement,
the
property
sold
for
nine
hundred
and
sixty
nine
thousand
nine
hundred
on
ten
thirty
nineteen,
the
current
assessment
value
is
nine
hundred
and
seventy
nine
thousand
two
hundred
this
property
has
a
higher
effective
age.
Lesser
finished
square
footage,
a
finished
basement
and
one
half
bath
as
compared
to
the
subject.
D
D
D
D
This
property
has
a
higher
quality,
higher,
effective
age
and
greater
finished
square
footage
as
compared
to
the
subject
you
can
see
from
the
comparables,
provided
that
the
assessed
values
are
higher
and
reflective
of
the
higher
effective
ages,
which
accounts
for
the
updates
that
have
not
been
done.
No
sales
comparables
were
provided
by
the
appellant.
D
D
D
or
those
I've
read
our
comparables.
I
apologize.
The
the
appellant
did
not
provide
comparables
of
their
own
as
a
result
of
the
review,
the
virtual
inspection
and
information
submitted.
We
determine
the
assessment
to
be
fair
and
equitable,
and
it
is
recommended
that
you
confirm
the
2021
value
of
984
thousand
three
hundred.
Thank
you.
A
L
Sure
so
the
the
property
has
not
been
renovated.
I
believe
the
age
is
actually
older
than
the
stated
one
people
told
me
it's
more
in
the
you
know,
early
1900s
and
literally
there's
been
no
renovations
done
to
it.
L
It's
got
a
kitchen
on
the
second
floor,
so
I
sent
the
virtual
pictures
and
I
guess
my
my
point
is:
I
do
not
feel
those
are
comparables
they're,
really
it's
hard
with
covet,
but
if
the
actual
house
condition
on
the
interior
is
you
know
really
not
a
finished
basement
bathrooms
have
not
been
updated,
kitchen
has
really
not
been
updated,
and
so
I
don't
really
need
the
full
eight
minutes.
L
No
one's
gonna
pay
me
close
to
a
million
dollars
for
it,
and
so
that's
that's
the
basis
of
mine,
and
so
I
tried
to
try
to
actually
find
comparables
to
offset,
but
just
don't
feel
like
any
of
those
houses
have
not
been
renovated,
not
refinished
and
all
bathrooms,
and
things
are
not
in
the
condition
of
the
of
the
comparables.
So
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
present.
I
D
D
D
E
For
the
department
you
heard
the
account's
last
words
about
virtually
no
updates
in
this
well
over
100
year
old
improvement,
whereas
you
have
an
effective
date,
much
more
recent
than
the
construction
date,
although
by
no
means
very
modern,
could
you
name
a
couple
of
the
improvements
you
saw
that
brought
it
up
to
the
current
infected
age.
D
You
can
see
from
even
the
pictures
that
the
appellant
provided
that
there
is
a
new
stove.
There
is
updates,
even
though
we
said,
there's
no
updates,
it
might
have
been
minimal.
There
are
updates
to
the
kitchen
and
the
bathrooms,
and
some
interior
we
do
have
the
year
built
as
1910,
and
so
when
looking
at
even
the
small
renovations
to
the
bathrooms
in
the
kitchen,
1970
was
what
we
thought
was
conservative
to
bring
it
up
to.
D
Please
again,
as
you
can
see,
by
the
pictures
provided
by
the
appellant,
there
were
some
renovations
made
to
the
kitchen
and
bath
and
exterior
fixtures
to
the
building
reflecting
the
1970
effective
age
and
as
a
result
of
the
review,
virtual
inspection
and
information
submitted,
we
determined
the
assessment
to
be
fair
and
equitable,
and
no
changes
were
made.
It
is
recommended
that
you
confirm
the
2021
value
of
984.
L
Like
I
said,
I
appreciate,
I
know
it's
not
easy,
especially
with
covet
to
do
assessments,
but
it's
strictly
land
value,
no
one's
going
to
offer
me
any
money
for
that
house
and
then
renovate
it
structurally
or
anything.
L
So
it
is
complete,
tear
down,
and
hopefully
it
can
be
assessed
more
on
just
a
land
value,
because
although
there
have
been
a
stove,
that's
50
years
old
or
a
bath
fixture,
it's
really
just
land
value
in
my
opinion,
and
that's
consistent
with
what
I've
received
from
the
market
also,
so
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
present.
Thank
you.
Okay,
thank.
G
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
the
assessment
is
pretty
good
one
of
the
things
that
is
jumping
out
now
that
we've
been
through
a
bunch
of
residential
cases
is
it
looks
like
like
this
one
and
the
last
one
you
know
when
you
have
an
older
property,
that's
being
used
as
a
rental
and
the
neighborhood
increase
might
be
seven
or
eight
percent
year
over
year,
if
you're
a
landlord
you're,
not
necessarily
seeing
that
over
the
last
year.
G
So
that's
why
a
lot
of
I
think
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
these
cases
this
year,
because
landlords
got
hit
pretty
hard
and
so
to
get
a
get
something
in
the
mail
that
says
your
property
is
now
worth
eight
percent
more
because
the
neighborhood
went
up
and
you
look
around
and
well
a
bunch
of
houses
got
torn
down
and
a
bunch
of
two
million
dollar
homes
got
built
and
sold,
and
that's
why
the
neighborhood's
up,
not
because
your
renters
are
paying
anymore.
G
It's
a
it's,
a
it's
a
punch
in
the
stomach.
So
I
totally
sympathize
with
that
and
you
know
I'll
just
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
A
I
I
think
that
the
owner
may
be
underestimating
the
value
of
this
lot.
You
know
it's
easy
walking
distance
to
the
metro.
It's
right
behind
market
commons,
it's
in
lion
park,
which
is
one
of
the
top
neighborhoods
in
the
county,
and
it's
a.
I
think
the
square
footage
is
about
2
000
over
over
the
zoning.
What's
the
square
footage,
it's.
D
I
Over
the
zoning
it's
it
is
so
I
you
know,
I
think
the
value's
there.
A
Yeah,
I
would
agree,
I
I
look
at
this
and
I
think
we
don't
assess
based
on
future
use
or
the
fact
that
you
know
the
palin
or
anybody
else
may
think
it's
a
tear
down
and
we
all
get
unsolicited
offers
and
unsolicited
offers
do
not
equate
to
market
value.
I
mean
if,
if
this
was
put
on
the
market
it
didn't
sell.
That
would
be
a
different
story,
but
just
to
get
something
in
the
mail.
A
They
generally
lowball
you
to
start
with
just
because
they
want
to
pick
it
up,
and
you
know
they'll
offer
cash
and
whatnot.
But
to
me
I
look
at
the
appellant's
estimate.
A
value
of
825
is,
you
know
less
than
the
land
value
and
there
is
value
in
the
home.
It
may
not
be
ideal
and
it
may
not
be
a
two
million
dollar
house,
but
there
is
a
cost
of
a
house
there.
There's
cost
of
you,
know
electric
plumbing,
all
kinds
of
connections
and
and
infrastructure
to
the
house.
A
So
I
think,
with
the
evidence
presented,
I
think
the
county's
assessment
of
the
984-3
stands
for
me.
H
I
totally
agree
with
all
the
statements
that
were
made-
I
think
you
know
like
in
the
previous
case.
We
don't
really
assess
properties
on
based
on
what
could
be
done
in
the
future
and
particularly
in
this
case,
I
think
that
the
value,
if
it
were
sold
to
a
developer,
it
would
be
picked
up
in
no
time
so
yeah.
I'm
I'm
fine
with
the
assessment.
The.
K
A
A
M
A
Okay
and
then
do
we
have,
I
don't
know
how
to
pronounce
the
first
name.
Sarah
boo.
M
Yes,
sarah
was
here.
A
Okay,
all
right,
okay,
so
you're
so
you're
on
okay.
The
third
case
on
the
agenda
is
rpc,
one,
seven,
zero,
three,
three,
two,
seven,
four:
the
property
is
located
at
seventeen,
thirty
arlington
boulevard,
and
we
have
mr
saraboo,
the
owner
of
the
property
and
mr
cereby.
You
can
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
your
property,
sir.
M
Sure,
thank
you
very
much.
I'm
calling
today
to
appeal
that
my
property
has
been
uprised
more
than
the
market
value.
Now
before
we
go
down
to
the
details,
I
would
like
to
say
that
appraisals
are
very
hard
and
especially
to
find
the
comparable
properties,
but
fortunately
my
property
is
a
condor
unit
in
an
apartment
building.
It
is
very
similar
to
other
condo
units
and
all
the
interiors
of
the
condo
units
are
very
similar,
the
same
fixtures,
the
same
wooden,
flooring
and
etc.
M
M
A
Okay,
thank
you,
sir
mr
carvajal.
If
you
would
like
to
tell
us.
N
Sure,
good
morning,
everybody
excuse
me.
The
subject
is
unit
number
301
at
the
weldon
condominium.
The
unit
has
one
parking
space
and
is
located
on
the
third
floor.
It
is
a
studio
unit
and
is
only
421
square
feet.
N
The
weldon
condominium
is
comprised
of
56
units
built
in
the
1960s
but
converted
to
condos
in
the
2000
in
2005.,
although
there
weren't
any
sales
of
studio
units
in
the
2021
analysis,
past
analysis
have
shown
different.
N
I'm
sorry,
past
analysis
have
shown
that
most
of
the
different
models
at
the
weldon
condo
trend
together,
like
I
said,
the
welding
condo,
is
comprised
of
56
units,
the
smallest
being
the
421
square
foot
studio
and
the
largest
being
a
900
square
foot
two
bedroom.
The
majority
of
the
inventory
is
comprised
of
one
bedroom
units
that
are
around
700
square
feet.
This
year's
analysis
showed
that
a
17
increase
to
model
base
rates
was
necessary
and
the
trend
was
applied
to
all
56
units,
since
we
do
not
have
a
recent
sale
of
a
studio
unit.
N
N
Adjustments
to
the
neighborhood
were
made
on
the
conservative
side
and
the
subject
was
assessed
for
180
400
for
2019
and
2020..
Although
we
did
not
see
any
sales
of
studio
units
in
2019
and
20,
the
assessment
value
was
kept
unchanged
due
to
us
not
observing
any
change
in
overall
market
value
in
that
building
for
those
two
years.
N
N
it
confirms
the
trend
that
we
had
observed
that
the
values
were
increasing
at
the
weldon.
All
three
comps
are
in
their
original
condition,
except
for
comp
1,
which
has
updated
appliances.
The
department
asked
that
the
board
please
consider
confirming
the
department's
2021
assessment
value
at
200,
2
300,
based
on
the
sales
provided
and
the
presentation
today.
Thank
you.
N
I
Yeah,
I
guess
I'm
confused
on
comps
one
two
and
three,
the
price
that
the
people
paid
is
greater
than
the
assessment.
Am
I
missing
something.
N
I
I
A
N
E
For
the
appellant
you
mentioned
some
sales
and
and
comparables
that
you
thought
made
sense
and
they're
for
sales
that
are
in
the
in
this
current
calendar
year.
Did
you
discuss
at
any
time
with
the
department
the
what
they
termed
the
assessment
period?
What
are
the
range
of
dates
of
sales
that
they
use
to
compare
taxpayers
properties
to
comparable
properties.
C
A
E
M
Hello
is
that
question
addressed
to
me
to
saraboo?
Yes,
okay,
I'm
so
sorry!
Okay,
can
you
repeat
the
question?
Please.
E
Very
quickly,
the
department
uses
what
they
call
an
assessment
period,
12
12-month
period
close
to,
but
not
up
to
the
beginning
of
the
current
assessment
year,
this
year,
of
course,
2021
or
january
1st
2021,
but
the
the
properties
that
you
compared
yours
to
were
sold
in
this
calendar
year,
which
is
outside
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
The
department's
assessment
period
vaguely
mid
2019
to
vaguely
mid
2020..
Did
you
ever
discuss
that
with
them,
because
your
again,
your
comparables,
don't
jive
with
standard
appraiser
practice?
M
No
sir,
this
is
me
hearing
about
it
for
the
first
time
I
did
to
the
boats.
I
mean
the
previous
appraiser
that
my
property
is
priced
more
because
of
other
properties
being
sold
per
square
foot
is
much
lower,
but
I
didn't
know
that
there
is
a
time
limit
that
we
have
to
adhere
to,
and
I
was
not
aware
of
it.
Okay.
N
Sure
the
county
has
no
further
information,
no
new
information
to
add.
We
did
take
a
look
at
the
comparables
submitted
by
the
appellant.
N
N
So
if
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
those
on
the
on
our
website,
where
homeowners
can
submit
their
applications
to
the
board,
we
do
have
instructions,
kind
of
guiding
them
through
the
process,
as
well
as
explaining
the
sales
analysis
period
and
how
our
department
comes
up
with
rss
values,
and
we
want
them
to
be
informed
about
that
before
they
they
make
their
appeal
application.
Thank
you.
A
M
Sure,
while
I
was
hearing
about
the
time
limit
that
we
have
just
discussed,
I
was
able
to
pull
up
a
property
in
the
same
unit.
1730
arlington,
boulevard,
apartment,
208,
sold
on
september,
10th,
2020
per
square
foot,
sale
price
for
the
said.
Property
is
459
dollars.
M
Even
if
we
were
to
go
by
that
estimate
to
be
in
2020,
my
property
is
being
uprised
per
square
foot
for
479.
So
clearly,
there
is
a
higher
appraisal
on
my
condo
unit
compared
to
the
other
condos
I
I
accept.
Maybe
there
is
a
scenario
where
the
building
has
been
under
the
price
and
the
prices
are
catching
up,
but
in
the
process
of
catching
up
my
particular
unit
has
been
oppressed
much
much
higher
than
the
current
value.
M
H
I'll
start
it
I
mean,
I
don't
see
where
we
can.
I
mean
I
don't
see
where
I
can
make
any
suggestion
to
change
anything.
We
don't
access
units
based
on
the
square,
footage
or
the
value,
for
you
know,
per
square
footage,
and
I
agree
with
the
county.
I
think
the
values
have
gone
up
and
they're
continuing
to
go
up
a
couple,
one-bedroom
units
that
are
available
right
now,
one
is
with
a
pending
contract.
It
was
listed
at
315,
the
other
one
is
listed
at
323,
so
I
think
the
values
are
going
up.
I
I
I
came
up
with
5.2
percent
and
I
came
up
with
a
value
of
191
000
and
you
know
it
sounds
like
the
rest
of
you
all
aren't
going
to
follow
my
logic,
but
that's
that's
where
I
think
the
value
ought
to
be
otherwise.
You've
got
a
inequitable
situation
as
far
as
assessed
values.
E
E
Property
and
this
past
year
it's
gone
up,
12
percent
and
they
think
it's
probably
still
too
low,
and
I
admire
and
support
the
the
stair
stepping
increase
by
the
county
and
what
the
one
bedrooms
that
barnes
mentions
are
also
recipients
of
that
stair-stepping
and
not
getting
well
all
you
know
all
at
once
in
one
year.
So
I
I,
although
I
agree,
they're
too
low,
I
I
I
support
the
way
the
department's
taking
care
of
this
entire
neighborhood.
A
Yeah,
I
agree
with
mr
mathkin.
I
think,
to
lower
it
essentially
back
to
the
sales
price
from
2018
of
190
is
too
low.
The
whole
building
is
low.
They
all
need
to
go
up.
You
know
if
they
would
have
gone
up,
20
or
30
percent.
We
would
have
probably
seen
the
majority
of
the
56
units
in
here
because
of
the
huge
increase,
so
I
think
the
county's
done
the
best
that
they
can
do
and
equally
they're
all
under
assessed
from
my
standpoint
but
okay
briefly,
mr
lawson.
A
A
H
I
think
the
appellant
did
not
do
himself
a
favor
by
providing
comparables
outside
that
are
really
at
a
higher
price
on
the
studio
units.
So
you
know,
based
on
what
a
studio
unit
is
assessed
at
in
the
building,
compared
to
other
studio
units
in
the
building
and
compared
to
the
neighborhood.
I
don't
think
it's
under
assist.
I
mean,
I
think
it's
probably
that.
A
Okay,
I'm
sorry,
okay,
six
to
one
without
mr
lawson,
so
the
county
is
confirmed
at
202
300..
Thank
you,
mr
cerevo.
Thank.
M
K
I'm
here
I
have
a
screen
share,
please
and
hope
that
this
will.
K
How
do
I,
how
do
I
do
that?
Oh
here,
okay,.
A
K
Great
that
my
unit
is
in
the
can
you
see
my
screen
share.
K
K
Is
located
in
the
hyde
park
condominium
building
open
market
sales
data
is
the
gold
standard,
as
I've
been
listening
to
you
speak
about
this
for
establishing
fair
and
equitable
assessment
value.
Yet
the
assessor
ignored
the
sales
data
for
unit
1211..
K
It
was
purchased
in
june
28
2018
for
483
000,
which
was
thirteen
thousand
two
hundred
and
twenty
five
dollars
below
the
existing
assessment.
Less
than
six
months
later,
the
assessment
went
to
505
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
K
K
The
assessment
today
with
the
cross
board
increases
would
be
528
827
dollars,
not
the
540
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
that
exists
unit
1211
is
not
equitably
assessed
with
similar
units
that
have
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars
in
upgrades
and
improvements
and
with
sales
prices
over
forty
thousand
dollars
more
than
paid
for
unit
twelve
eleven
case,
one
unit,
twelve
eighteen
same
floor.
A
nearly
identical
floor
plan
purchased
twenty
nine
days
earlier
than
I
purchased
my
unit.
The
amount
paid
was
530
000
for
that
unit.
K
K
This
is
their
kitchen
beautifully
done,
a
completely
redone
foyer
and
entry
sequence,
a
unit
in
great
condition,
redone
bathrooms,
great
condition
in
the
bathrooms.
The
the
balcony
has
been
tiled
beautiful,
overlook
right,
here's
my
unit,
it
was
a
rental
unit
for
15
years.
Its
remodeling
has
been
done
cheaply.
The
floor
is
not
tiled,
but
these
linoleum
squares,
the.
I
included
this
in
my
presentation,
a
dishwasher
that
makes
it
impossible
to
stand
at
the
sink
and
and
transfer
dishes
into
the
dishwasher.
K
This
is
the
bathroom,
very
modest
improvements.
The
balcony
here
on
my
unit,
no
tiles,
no,
no
upgrades,
no,
nothing!
Here's
the
foyer
of
my
department
of
my
apartment,
you
know
wall-to-wall
carpeting.
The
two
units
are
not
comparable.
This
is
what
you
see
when
you
peel
back
the
carpeting
delaminating
a
parquet
floor
mold.
This
is
this
is
one
of
the
reasons
that
the
unit
sold
for
less
than
unit
1211.,
linking
convectors
that
have
not
been
repaired
need
to
be
replaced.
K
There's
there
was
a
serious
problem
with
pipe
corrosion
that
is
going
to
in
order
to
repair
the
pipe
corrosion.
My
unit,
you
have
to
totally
remove
the
bathroom.
The
the
bathtub
units
in
the
bathroom
give
me
a
break
12
18
purchase
for
46
thousand
dollars
and
twenty
five
dollars
more
in
2018.
K
What
they
did
in
this
in
this
unit
is
they
got
rid
of
the
walk-in
closet
that
approaches
the
bathroom
and
totally
remodeled
the
unit,
here's
their
I'm
sorry.
This
is
my
walk-in
closet.
This
is
what
they
were
able
to
do
by
combining
the
walk-in
closet
with
the
bathroom.
Give
me
a
break
again.
They
paid
43,
000
more
and
today,
with
all
those
improvements,
their
assessment
is
2
000
less
than
my
unit.
This
is
simply
not
equitable.
K
Finally,
my
unit
1211
now
overlooks
a
massive
construction
site
with
construction
from
the
fourth
quarter
of
2020
until
the
second
quarter
of
2026,
three
seven
to
eight
story,
buildings
with
732
units
and
77
000
square
feet
of
retail
space
will
replace
one
story,
retail
space
and
a
ground
floor
parking
lot
with
a
mature
tree,
canopy,
all
of
which
is
being
ripped
out
unit,
is
less
valuable
than
when
I
purchased
it.
Here
was
the
view
that
I
had
parking
lot
in
mature
tree,
canopy
one-story
retail
buildings,
and
this
is
the
beginning
of
the
construction.
K
The
tree
canopy
has
been
cut
down
and
and
the
rest
of
these
trees
will
be
cut
down
because
an
eight-story
building
is
going
up
there.
This
is
the
pile
driver,
part
of
my
existence
until
the
second
quarter
of
2026
is
the
constant
annoyance,
bright
lights
brought
to
the
construction
site
shining
into
my
bedroom.
K
Here
is
what
we're
getting
totally
mediocre.
Infill
buildings
is
that
the
county
approved
here's.
My
unit
is,
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
my
cursor.
My
unit
is
on
this
quarter
of
the
building.
It
will
look
out
at
the
sea
at
the
roof.
732
heat
pumps
in
these
buildings.
This
is
not
comparable
to
what
I
paid
when
I
purchased
the
building
and
those
those
three
buildings
are
now
filling
the
site.
I
think
infill
is
great.
I
enjoy
the
neighborhood
I
live
in,
and
I
realize
that
probably
more
people
should
be
living
at
density.
K
The
way
that
I
do,
and
yet
the
county
approved
a
unit
that
went
from
the
current
residential
density
of
92
units
per
acre
on
our
block
in
in
on
our
site,
the
high
park,
it's
87
and
a
half
units
per
acre
and
what
was
approved
for
this
harris
theatre
redevelopment
is
a
29
increase
with
118
units
per
acre.
The
assessment
should
not,
it
should
be
reduced,
not
increase.
Thank
you
very
much.
N
Okay,
the
subject
is
unit
1211
at
the
hyde
park
condominium.
It
is
located
on
the
12th
floor
and
is
1702
square
feet.
It
is
a
two
bedroom
and
has
two
bathrooms.
There
is
no
needed
parking
space.
We
conducted
a
interior
inspection
of
the
unit
which
showed
original
parquet
floors
that
had
some
water
damage
an
updated
countertop
in
one
bathroom,
but
overall,
a
unit
that
is
close
to
its
original
build
condition.
N
No
changes
were
made
to
the
property
record
following
the
interior
inspection.
Overall,
the
2021
analysis
for
hyde
park
was
clear
of
the
nine
sales
observed
during
the
analysis
all
had
prices
that
were
higher
than
their
2020
assessment.
It
was
clear
that
the
building
had
to
trend
upward.
The
decision
was
made
to
increase
the
model's
improvement
base
value
up
10
percent.
N
This
occurred
to
all
one
bedroom
and
two
bedroom
models,
but
no
change
was
made
to
the
efficiency
or
the
three
bedroom
models.
Although
we
only
observed
nine
sales
within
the
analysis
for
2021,
the
good
news
is
that
the
analysis
included
both
fully
renovated,
slightly
renovated
and
original
condition
units.
N
This
indicates
to
us,
at
least
in
this
building,
that
the
location
or
desirability
of
this
building
is
greater
than
whether
the
unit
has
been
renovated
or
not.
This
is
not
always
the
case,
as
we
saw
with
a
condo
case
two
weeks
ago,
where
a
clear
and
quantifiable
difference
in
market
value
could
be
observed.
N
N
N
The
appellant
mentions
that
comp
one
sold
for
43
125
more
than
his
did
two
years
ago,
due
to
the
updates
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
the
market
and
assessment
value
has
increased
eight
percent
over
that
time
period.
Eight
percent
translates
translates
exactly
to
forty
three
thousand
one
hundred
comp
two,
which
is
unit
number
three,
twenty
four,
which,
from
listing
pictures,
we
saw
that
unit
324
is
still
in
its
original
condition.
N
N
This
example
confirms
what
we
have
seen
previously
at
hyde
park,
that
there
is
no
significant
market,
no
significant
difference
in
market
value
between
renovated
and
non-renovated
units
for
larger
two-bedroom
units.
The
same
phenomenon
can
be
observed
in
one
bedroom
and
efficiencies
in
the
analysis,
although
the
appellant
does
mention
that
the
year
that
his
that
his
unit
sold,
there
was
another
that
was
updated,
that
sold
for
a
little
more.
That
is
true,
but
overall,
what
we
see
is
that
there
usually
is
no
difference
in
market
value.
N
The
effect
on
market
value
from
the
construction
project
across
the
street
and
how
our
department
would
pick
up
any
differences
in
market
value
was
explained
to
the
appellant.
During
our
visit
to
the
subject
property.
In
order
for
the
department
to
be
equitable
throughout
the
entire
county,
we
will
only
make
negative
adjustments
to
assessment
values
if
they
are
observed
and
can
be
quantified
with
sales.
This
is
true
of
busy
streets,
construction
sites,
commercial
lighting,
obstructions
or
changes
to
view,
etc.
N
Arlington
is
constantly
evolving
and
there
are
always
major
construction
projects
occurring
throughout
the
county.
When
we
conduct
our
analysis,
we
we
pay
special
emphasis
on
which
direction
the
sales
are
facing
and
whether
there
are
any
upcoming
or
current
projects
or
factors
that
might
affect
their
market
value.
N
N
Sometimes
things
that
you
would
consider
to
be
significant
outside
influences
turn
out
not
to
have
that
much
effect
on
market
value.
Due
to
a
building's
desirability
or
location,
but
sometimes
we
see
the
opposite-
that
an
outside
factor
will
have
an
effect
on
market
value,
and
when
that
is
evident
again,
we
will
make
the
appropriate
changes.
N
The
subject's
current
assessed
value
of
540
200
can
be
verified
as
equitable
with
other
units
at
hyde
park,
and
it
can
be
considered
a
fair
opinion
of
market
value.
Considering
the
sales
that
were
observed
in
the
analysis,
the
department
kindly
requests
that
the
board,
please
confirm
the
2021
assessment.
I
I
N
We
are
aware
of
that
happening
in
a
lot
of
condominiums.
We
keep
an
eye
on
it.
Every
time
they
a
condominium,
updates
its
bylaws.
They
record
an
amendment
to
the
declaration.
We
see
that
so
we
are
aware
of
which
buildings
have
it.
So
far,
we
haven't
been
able
to
quantify
any
value
attributed
to
that,
though,.
G
Yeah
for
the
county,
I'm
I'm
trying
to
look
it
up
right
now,
but
maybe
you
have
the
information,
the
comp
one,
the
breakdown
between
land
and
improvements.
Do
you
have
that
handy.
G
O
N
For
this
year's
assessment,
comparable
number
one,
the
improvement
value
is
390
100.
and
the
land
value
is
148
100..
N
G
N
Sure
the
county
has
no
further
information
to
add.
We
just
ask
that
the
board
please
consider
our
methodology,
as
well
as
the
information
submitted
in
today's
packet.
Thank
you.
K
I
would
respectfully
ask
that
you
really
slow
down
and
look
at
reality
here.
There
is
a
huge
construction
site
and
mr
carvajal
says
that's
happening
all
over
the
county.
K
The
phased
nature
of
this
puts
a
construction
site
outside
of
my
window
for
over
five
years
and
for
them
to
say
well,
we'll,
wait
and
see
the
the
sales
see
that
register
in
the
sales
makes
no
sense,
because
there
won't
be
sales
to
compare
that
to
because
no
one
would
walk
into
my
unit
and
say
I
want
to
live
in
a
construction
site
for
the
next
five
years.
You'd
the
only
purchases
would
be
made
if
people
are
lied
to
about.
K
What's
going
to
be
going
on
outside
the
window
and
the
I
just
don't
find
the
argument
credible
that
units
with
and
without
improvements
they
see
no
difference,
they
actually
don't
know.
What's
in
most
of
those
units,
they
they
have
not
looked
at
them,
and
I
think
that
you
have
to
go
back
to
2018
and
say
why
is
46
000
in
their
in
these
two
comparables
not
registered?
I
just
think
this
is
so
unfair.
I
Yeah
I'll
share
a
couple
thoughts.
My
office
was
in
this
building
for
years
and
years
and
I
knew
a
lot
of
the
residents.
This
is
an
older
condo
and
the
floor.
Space
is
much
greater
than
newer
condos,
because
developers
nowadays
are
after
a
number
of
units
and
that's
more
important
than
the
size
of
the
units.
So
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
that,
like
hyde
park
and
chatham
house,
because
it
has
a
you
know,
the
units
are
just
simply
bigger.
I
It
is
an
older
unit,
though,
and
I
have
heard
that
they've
got
some
problems
with
piping,
not
just
in
the
units
but
also
throughout
the
building,
and
they
put
into
place
the
prohibition
against
washing
machines,
because
apparently
the
pipes
just
cannot
handle
it.
I
hear
about
the
construction
and
you
got
a
grocery
store
right
next
door.
When
my
office
was
there,
we
had
no
grocery
store
nearby
and
getting
lunch
was
a
dilemma,
so
I
think
that's
a
benefit
to
have.
I
You
know
the
grocery
store
next
door.
This
project
has
tons
of
parking.
I
Nobody
has
to
buy
a
parking
space
because
there's
so
much
and
you
know
I
really
looked
carefully
and
I
listened
very
carefully
to
the
owner's
presentation
and
try
as
I
might.
I
didn't
see
anything
that
the
county
did
erroneously.
G
Yep
thanks,
I
could
sympathize
with
the
construction
issues.
That's
not
really
moving
me
on
this
one
as
much
as
the
comparable
one
sale
and
the
improvements
did.
G
The
appellant
did
a
pretty
good
job
of
highlighting
the
differences
between
those
units,
and
so
I
do
have
an
issue
from
a
matter
of
equalization
with
the
500
sale
price
for
essentially
the
same
shell
with
probably
forty
thousand
plus
dollars
worth
of
renovations
to
it,
and
why
the
improvements
for
the
subject
property
would
be
valued
at
two
thousand
dollars
higher
than
that
when
we've,
when
I've
seen
the
pictures
now
and-
and
I
kind
of
understand
the
condition
that
it's
in
so
I
mean
I,
I
would
support
a
reduction
on
the
improvements
to
take
it
underneath
comp.
G
G
G
G
Match
that
it
just
it
doesn't
seem
fair
that
the
improvements
would
be
higher
than
comp
one
after
you
look
at
the
pictures
on
the
listing,
I
mean
it's
got
kind
of
modern
new
wall
covering
wood
wall
coverings,
brand
new
floor
brand,
new
kitchen.
G
It's
it's
ready
to
go,
and
this
unit's
got
a
lot
of
issues
in
it
right
now.
So
I
have
an
issue
with
that.
H
Yeah
greg
the
main
difference
between
comp
one
and
the
subject
is
the
floor
value
it's
a
thousand
dollar
per
floor
and
I
check
all
the
other
units
and
that
tier
they
all
have
the
different
value
of
a
thousand
dollars.
I
H
Go
up
or
down-
and
you
know
I
disagree-
that
this
is
not
a
building
that
is
not
going
to
be
attractive
to
be
sold.
I
mean.
Currently,
there
was
a
unit
listed
last
month,
a
two
bedroom
two
bath.
H
It's
the
same
tiers
comp
ii
unit,
1024
it
listed
for
625
000
and
he
had
a
contract
within
eight
days,
so
it
is
pending
right
now,
but
the
values
are
there.
The
size
of
the
units
like
barnes
says.
I
think
this
is
something
that.
H
So
you
know
I
don't
really
have
a
question
specifically,
but
I
think
this
is
something
that
you
know
the
difference
in
their
values.
There.
J
Jose,
can
you
see
if
it
if
that
unit
that
went
on
the
market
was
on
the
other
side
of
the
building,
look
not
looking
into
the
same
view
and
has
been
renovated?
I.
H
Between
renovated
units
and
non-renovated
units,
I
think
in
any
market,
but
as
far
as
assessments,
I
think
the
assessment
is
applied
equally
in
the
building
and
based
on
the
size
of
the
units
and
based
on
the
tiers.
So
I'm
not
convinced
that
the
assessment
should
be
changed
in
this.
E
I
excuse
me
I'm
sympathetic,
certainly
what
mark
just
said,
because
it's
true,
but
I
thought
the
department
addressed
that
by
saying
as
jose
referenced.
E
The
location
and
desirability
of
this
building,
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
primarily
because
of
space
per
average
space
per
unit
is
such
that
upgrades
of
a
person
of
improvement
property
doesn't
make
as
much
difference
as
it
does
to
other
condominiums.
It
just
started,
and
I
I
thought
the
other
explanations
addressing
directly
what
appeared
to
be
quality
arguments
by
the
appellant
were
fully
explained
in
this
particular
case.
G
Yeah,
let
me
just
let
me
just
run
through
my
calculations
here.
I
don't
know
that
I
have
support,
but
I'll
do
it
anyway,
because
I
think
it
comes
out
to
a
fairly
conservative
number
if
you
took
the
improvements
and
you
gave
them
a
five
percent
discount
on
that
which
is
about
39.
G
G
Okay,
we
can
establish
that
so
take
that
five
percent
discount
the
total
value
comes
up
to
520
595
dollars.
That
is
roughly
six
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
below
the
price
of
the
unit.
That
is
the
same
exact
size
and
fully
renovated
that
sold
in
april
of
2020
during
the
assessment
period.
Think
that's
pretty
fair.
G
G
M
A
M
G
G
Yeah,
just
to
finish
my
my
the
rest
of
my
rationales,
jose,
you
brought
up
some
listings
and
and
pending
contracts
that
are
currently
going
on
now.
This
is
nine
months
after
the
the
date
of
review.
For
anything,
so
I
mean
look
if
if,
if
these
units
start
flying
off
the
shelves
at
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
plus
in
this
current
year,
then
next
year
he's
going
to
get
hit
with
another
increase.
E
I
think,
as
far
as
it
goes,
comparing
these
two
units,
which
are
very
very
similar,
of
course
it
is
a
little
bit
of
full's
choice.
We've
got
a
very
large
building
with
mass
appraisal
and,
of
course,
nobody
went
into
1011
and
said.
Oh
look
at
that
and
then
went
to
1211
and
said:
oh,
this
isn't
as
good.
So
I
think
I'll
go
with
10
11.
they
were,
they
were
not.
Information
is
not
perfect
in
the
world
of
real
estate
sales
and
once
again
I'll
repeat
but
the
appellant
said.
E
We
look
for
upgrades
and
the
concomitant
value
and
we're
not
finding
them
that
much
here.
So,
as
I
said
many
times,
I
don't
like
one
data
point.
As
a
as
a
trend,
I
get
into
construction
one
one
quick
thing:
this.
This
project
has
been
percolating
for
three
four
years
and
now
obviously
is
in
process,
and
there
will
be
a
lot
of
construction
for
a
while
with
fairly
small
buildings.
E
What
I
didn't
hear
the
the
appellate
say
is:
oh
our
view
is
going
to
be
impaired
significantly,
and
the
answer
is
because
it
isn't,
because
the
the
new
buildings
are
gonna
be
much
lower.
When
harris
teeter
was
built,
there
was
lots
of
of
banks
from
hyde
park
community
that
their
lovely
view,
which
it
certainly
was,
was
going
to
be
impaired
and
a
one
story.
A
building
went
up
and
it's
instead.
So
it's
certainly
annoying
to
get
piledrivers.
H
H
The
bathrooms
were
upgraded,
the
kitchen
was
upgraded,
it
may
not
be
with
the
granite
and
all
the
you
know,
expensive
stuff,
but
it's
not
in
it.
It
wasn't
a
bad
condition
when
it
was
sold
and
the
bathrooms
like
the
pictures
are
renovated.
You
know
they
are
they
look.
In
my
opinion,
they
look
great.
So
it's
not
a
unit
that
we're
comparing
to
that
it's
an
original
condition
to
something
that
is
fully
renovated.
So
I'm
not
convinced
that
an
adjustment
should
be
made
in
this.
In
this
case,.
H
As
far
as
assessments,
yes,
as
far
as
the
condition
you
know,
I
think
it's
subjective
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
how
much
of
a
renovation
if
we
start
looking
at
that,
I
mean
we're
going
to
be
having
a
big
issue
comparing
units
in
each
building
as
how
much
renovation
was
then
and
how
much
they
spent
and
you
know,
are
we
looking
at
asking
people
to
prove
how
much
money
they
spend
renovating
to
see
to
make
adjustments?
I'm
not
prepared
to
do
that.
G
I
I
I
actually
had
a
very
close
friend
that
got
beat
out
on
the
unit
that
jose
was
mentioning.
She
knew
nothing
about
this
project
and
I
told
her,
I
said,
go
look
at
hyde
park
and
she
was
like
wow.
This
is
just
great,
and
so
I
think
I
think,
if
there's
a
a
discrepancy
here,
I
think
it's
like
the
last
case
where
I
just
got
out
voted
that
maybe
top
one
should
be
higher
rather
than
you
know.
The
subject
should
be
lowered
and
you
know
again.
I
I
just
know
how
desirable
this
is
and
yeah.
You
know
I
had
to
put
up
in
my
condo
with
construction
next
door,
and
you
know
that's
just
the
way
it
is
when
it's
done.
I
think
it's
probably
going
to
increase
the
value
the
owner
may
disagree,
but
I
have
noticed:
values
have
gone
up
a
lot
due
to
boston
common
renovation.
I
J
I'm
sorry
my
camera's
not
working
for
some
reason,
but
I
I'm
looking
at
this
and
what
you're
talking
about
barnes
is
in
the
future
and,
yes,
it
may
or
may
not
go
up
and
I
think
you're
right.
It
may
go
up,
but
I'm
looking
at
this
one
and
I'm
thinking
that
if
someone
went
to
buy
this
unit,
they
are
at
least
going
to
consider
the
cost
of
bringing
this
thing
up
from
granite,
countertops
and
bad
floors
and
pipes
in
basic
bathroom.
J
A
H
J
A
Okay,
so
it's
five
to
two
without
mr
yates
and
mr
hoffman,
the
county
is
confirmed
at
540
200..
Thank
you,
mr
bluestone.
A
A
Yeah,
I
think
he's
frozen
as
well.
Okay,
moving
along
to
the
fifth
item
on
the
agenda:
rpc18003195,
the
property
is
1276
north
wayne
street
and
mr
robert
barton
is
here
to
talk
about
his
property.
Mr
barton,
you
can
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
this
property.
F
Sure,
good
morning
this
is
unit
811.
It
is
a
two-bedroom
two-bath
condominium
with
one
parking
space
in
the
williamsburg
condo,
which
is
an
approximately
30
year
old
condominium
building.
F
Does
not
reflect
the
reality
of
the
competition.
Some
of
the
units
in
the
building
have
one
parking
space.
Some
have
two
or
more
mine
has
one
parking
space.
The
appraiser
has
a
has
given
an
assignment
of
eighteen
thousand
dollars
per
parking
space,
and
it
also
differentiates
units
based
on
one
thousand
dollars.
F
Just
as
a
couple
of
procedural
notes,
do
you
understand
the
procedural
posture
I
submitted
a
request
for
review.
The
the
response
to
the
review
was
not
actually
issued
until
april
27th,
and
I
received
it
sometime
in
may,
and
I
submitted
the
appeal
on
april
15th,
because
I
was
under
the
understood
that
we
had.
I
had
to
file
the
appeal,
even
if
we
hadn't
received
the
letter
denying
the
review,
so
my
appeal
letter
does
not
did
not
have
the
benefit
of
knowing
what
specific
comparables
were
being
taken
into
account.
F
Having
sat
here
most
of
the
morning,
just
as
a
reminder
of
what
the
standard
that
we're
looking
at
is
fair
market
value,
and
that
is
supposed
to
mirror
what
an
arm's
length
transaction
would
be,
and
that
is
what
the
property
would
sell
for.
As
of
the
date
of
the
assessment,
which
in
this
case
is
january,
1st
2021.
F
The
appraiser
uses
three
properties
that
are
it
deems
comparable
all
or
two
bedrooms.
The
first
one
unit
911
is
a
similar
model,
one
floor
above
me
that
was
substantially
renovated
and
then
two
other
units.
The
second
unit
708,
had
two
different
parking
spaces.
F
Differences
in
square
footage
is
already
taken
into
account
by
the
because
the
appraiser
assigns
different
land
values,
so
that
is
taken
into
account
when
it
already
is
baked
into
the
appraisals
that
it
has
come
up
with.
If
you
take
a
look
at
the
comparables
and
there's
no,
it
does
not
appear
that
there's
some
difference
in
waiting.
F
So
what
I've
done
is
simply
take
the
average
sales
price
of
these
three
comparables
without
any
adjustments,
and
that
average
comes
out
to
731
thousand
dollars
and
that's
just
assuming
that
they're
all
comparable
in
condition
and
everything
else.
That's
what
that's!
What
a
comparable
price
if
you
average
out
those
sales
are,
if
you
take
into
account
the
fact
that
unit
708
has
two
parking
spaces
and
assumes
that
the
eighteen
thousand
dollar
value
for
the
parking
space
is
correct.
F
F
F
I
understand
that
the
county
uses
cuts
off
the
date
as
of
august
30th
under
the
virginia
code
58.1-3379.
The
code
specifically
allows
the
board
to
consider
sales
through
december
31st,
2020
december
31st,
as
the
prior
prior
to
the
date
of
the
assessment,
which
in
this
case
would
be
december.
31St
2020.,
I'm.
I
cannot
figure
out
why
the
county
cuts
it
off
when
it
does,
but
it's
certainly
having
been
presented
with
this
should
be
considering
this
sale.
It
is
the
same
model,
it
is
less
renovated
than
unit
911.
F
You
can
look
at
the
pictures
on
911
and
see
that
it
was
substantially
renovated
unit
311.
The
only
note
in
the
counties
it's
contained
in
the
package
that
they
sent
me
their
sales
analysis.
Analysis
says
that
there's
only
one
photo.
That's
true.
If
you
look
on
redfin,
if
you
look
on
trulia,
you
can
find
the
photos
of
unit
311.
F
F
That
is,
that
unit
311
had
two
parking
spaces.
If
you
adjust
the
price
of
311
to
subtract
out
eighteen
thousand
dollars
and
then
add
what
the
county
adds
for
the
increase
of
one
thousand
dollars
per
floor,
the
comparable
value
for
eight
eleven-
it
would
be
seven
hundred
and
thirty
seven
thousand
dollars.
F
F
F
Even
if
you
consider
it,
though
it's
what
I
have
proposed
as
the
actual
value
for
811
or
the
revised
value
supported
the
appraiser
in
response
in
the
materials
that
I
received
makes
a
notation
and
it
claims.
Although
I
cannot
figure
out,
it,
does
not
specify
what
2021
sales
support
the
valuation,
but
but
I
would
note
that
the
virginia
code
58.1-3
prohibits
consideration
of
sales
after
1231
of
the
assessment
date,
which
only
makes
sense
because
the
assessment
is
supposed
to
be
in
this
case
as
of
january
1st
2021.
F
So
what
has
happened
in
2021
as
a
matter
of
law
is
irrelevant.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
if
you
look
at
unit
808,
it
is
another
two
bedroom
with
one
parking
space
where
the
sales
closed
april,
30th
2021
it
is
in
the
county's
records
it
was
sold
for
667
thousand
dollars.
It
was
assessed
at
683
thousand
dollars
and
I'd
also
note,
contrary
to
the
county's
assertion
that
the
appraisals
always
are
lower
than
the
actual
market
sales
unit.
F
311
was
appraised
at
760
000,
although
it
had
sold
just
three
months
before
for
750
000.
For
those
reasons,
I
believe
the
amount
of
the
assessment
and
fair
market
value
811
should
be
reduced
accordingly.
N
Sure,
thank
you.
The
unit
is
number
811
at
the
williamsburg
condo.
The
subject
is
two
bedroom
and
has
two
bathrooms.
It
is
1
317
square
feet
and
is
located
on
the
8th
floor.
The
2021
analysis
of
the
williamsburg
condo
was
similar
to
many
other
mid
to
high
race
condo
analysis
that
we
saw
for
that
time
period.
There
were
eight
sales
that
occurred
in
the
analysis.
All
eight
sales
sold
above
their
2020
assessed
values.
N
N
N
I
believe
this
is
due
to
the
building's
year
built
of
1992
and
that
the
original
build
quality
of
the
interior
of
the
units
at
the
williamsburg
was
high,
considering
the
year
built.
In
other
words,
the
interior
holds
up
pretty
well.
The
last
two
sales
of
the
subject's
model
that
are
not
included
in
the
comp
sheet
are
unit
411,
which
sold
in
2018
for
739
thousand.
N
It
was
in
its
original
1992
condition.
At
that
time
the
appellant
mentions
unit
311
as
a
late
sale,
comp
that
was
not
used
because
it
didn't
fall
within
the
analysis
period,
although
we
do
have
our
analysis
period.
The
reason
the
department
did
not
use
the
sale
was
because
it
was
not
listed
in
the
mls
which
the
department
uses
as
its
determination
of
whether
it
was
publicly
listed
or
not
unit
311
sold
in
september
2020
for
750
000..
N
For
the
2021
analysis,
we
started
to
see
a
slight
possible
difference
in
market
value
between
renovated
and
non-renovated
units.
There
were
three
original
condition
units
that
sold
in
the
analysis
and
they
had
slightly
higher
assessment
to
sale
ratios
than
other
units
which
have
slight
renovations,
but
not
a
big
enough
difference
to
make
a
change
in
assessment
values.
Although
we
saw
this
even
with
the
increase
in
value
for
2021,
the
assessment
to
sale
ratio
for
original
condition
units
are
still
lower
than
where
we
would
like
to
see
them.
N
If
this
trend
continues,
it
will
show
us
that
the
original
condition
units
are
at
a
correct
level
of
assessment
and
that
renovated
units
need
to
start
having
higher
assessed
values
in
mass
appraisal.
Our
best
tool
to
identify
changes
in
market
value
is
the
ratio
study.
Without
enough
data
points,
there
is
no
way
for
us
to
quantify
what
the
difference
is
between
an
updated
and
not
updated
unit.
N
N
Eventually,
items
will
become
dated
and
if
other
market
factors
don't
have
a
big
effect
on
desirability
for
location,
then
changes
in
update
level
will
start
to
appear
in
the
market
value
the
higher
the
original
build
quality.
The
longer
the
transition
will
take.
We
might
be
in
that
transition
period
right
now,
but
it
is
not
enough
to
make
a
quantifiable
change
to
assessed
values
on
all
266
units
at
the
williamsburg.
N
I
N
Yes,
so
the
the
only
way
we
can
see
sales
are,
if
they're
recorded
with
the
clerk's
office.
Obviously
this
is
going
to
happen.
You
know
a
couple
days
after
maybe
up
to
two
weeks
after
the
sale
occurs,
but
we
do
take
late
sales
into
consideration.
N
I
N
Sure
the
department
has
no
further
information
to
add.
We
just
ask
that
you
please
confirm
the
assessment
at
747
400..
Thank
you.
F
Certainly,
what
I
heard
the
county
say
is
that
it
did
not
dispute
what
I
came
up
with
in
terms
of
averages.
It
applied
some
ratio
of
five
to
five
to
ten
percent,
not
you.
It
basically
threw
out
its
own
comparables,
that's
what
it's
doing
in
this
case
it
mentioned
411
I
mean
that
was
not
mentioned
anywhere
in
what
it
presented.
I
think
that's
improper
for
it
to
raise.
F
F
It
should
be
considered
when
I
referred
to
sales
dates,
I'm
referring
to
closing
dates,
because
that's
all
I
can
take
account
based
on
those
and
what
should
be
properly
considered
as
comparable,
essentially
the
county
throughout,
to
or
ignored
to
comparable
sales
and
coming
up
it
overly
weighted
as
a
matter
of
practical
things,
a
unit
that
was
substantially
renovated
by
its
own
admission,
which
was
911
that
should
at
least
be
discounted,
if
not
pronounced
it,
to
do
a
proper,
fair
market
value.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
it's
just
among
the
board
members
and
I
just
want
to
put
out
there.
I
I've
got
some
internet
issues.
I
can
see
the
verizon
truck
out
there
and
my
router
is
flashing
like
no
tomorrow.
So
if
I
drop
off
mr
panoranda,
would
you
jump
in
here,
but
okay,
so
now,
just
with
board
members?
H
I'll
go
ahead
and
start
I'm
looking
at
the
comparables
that
both
provided
and
the
unit
311
that
the
appellant
mentioned
I
mean
unit
311
is
assessed
right
now,
it's
760
hundred
and
I
think
the
majority
of
that
is
in
the
second
part
in
spot
that
they
have
eighteen
thousand
and
the
other
five
thousand
difference,
I'm
assuming
that
is
going
to
be
in
the
floor
value.
H
So
again,
like
the
previous
cases
on
condominium
units,
I've
looked
at
the
building,
I've,
you
know
the
tiers
and
I
don't
see
how
this
is
assessed
differently
or
not.
Equally,
with
the
other
units
in
the
over
the
same
size
and
same
you
know
same
tier,
so
I'm
okay
with
the
assessment.
The
way
it
is.
E
E
Also,
I
wanted
to
love
the
department
on
explaining
the
relative
value
of
updates
from
building
the
building
that
over
time
they
get
more
important,
as
the
original
fixtures
get
more
dated
and
the
williamsburg
most
likely
is
right
at
that
inflection
point,
and
I
don't
know
what
that
bodes
for
the
2021
tax
period.
Nor
do
it
at
this
point
to
whitecare,
but
I
appreciate
that
explanation.
A
Okay,
do
I
have
a
second,
mr
matzken?
It's
a
motion
in
a
second
to
confirm
the
county
at
747-400,
all
in
favor.
A
Okay,
it's
unanimous
the
county
is
confirmed
at
747
400..
Thank
you,
mr
barton.
Thanks
do
we
have
mr
augustine
on
the
call.
A
Okay
good
morning-
and
I
believe
I
saw
mr
duvet
okay
all
right.
The
final
case
is
rpc
one
one,
zero,
four
zero
one,
two
three
properties
located
at
sixty
two
eighty
fifteenth
place
north,
mr
patrick
augustine,
is
here
to
tell
us
about
his
property.
Mr
augustine,
you
can
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
the
property,
sir
sure.
P
Thank
you
good
morning,
everyone-
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
here
to
make
the
appearance-
and
this
has
been
a
learning
experience
for
me.
So
thank
you
for
that
I'll
be
fairly
brief.
I
refinanced
my
home
right
at
the
beginning
of
the
calendar
year
here
and
had
a
professional
appraisal
that
came
in
at
650
000
and
that
limited
the
amount
of
money
I
could
borrow
on
the
property.
P
So
I
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to.
You
know
present
that
evidence
before
the
board.
Here
I
recognize
there
are
it's
difficult
to
make
comps
in
this
neighborhood.
The
appraisal,
you
know,
took
some
comparable
properties,
not
within
the
madison
manor
neighborhood,
because
I
think
we're
the
only
townhouse
complex
within
this
neighborhood,
but
kind
of
across
66
into
the
east
falls
church
area.
P
I
understand
there
are
probably
interior
improvement
differences,
but
my
property
is
appraised
at
the
highest
throughout
the
community
and
about
twenty
thousand
dollars
higher
than
the
average,
and
I
know
the
appraiser
from
the
county
did
note
that
the
other
property
that
sold
concurrently
was
updated
to
have
the
same
age
as
my
property
in
their
revision,
but
that
property
sold
for
seven
thousand
dollars
more
than
mine
and
is
now
appraised
for
eight
thousand
dollars
less.
P
So
I'm
just
a
bit
confused
by
how
there's
a
fifteen
thousand
dollar
delta
between
that
property
and
mine.
So
that's
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
I
really
appreciate
you
studying
the
issue
here
and
at
the
core
of
it.
I
had
a
professional
appraisal
done
to
confirm
a
loan
size,
and
you
know
that's
my
application
here
in
terms
of
what
I
feel
the
value
is
based
on
the
rest
of
the
community.
So
thanks
for
your
time.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
sir,
and
for
the
county.
We
have
derek,
oh
derek.
O
I'm
here,
okay,
good
morning,
everyone,
the
property,
is
a
two-story
bricktown
home
ever
a
basement.
It
is
an
end
unit
and
it
was
built
in
1979.
O
Originally,
the
effective
age
of
the
property
was
a
2004
and
upon
the
review,
I
did
look
into
the
neighborhood
and
the
14
other
properties,
and
I
did
find
another
property
that
was
very
similar
with
the
updates
and
I
ended
up
lowering
the
effective
age
five
years
from
2004
to
1999,
and
I
did
review
the
updates
that
were
listed
in
the
original
or
the
last
sale
in
2014
the
kitchen's
been
renovated.
O
The
bathrooms
have
been
renovated,
so
an
effective
age
of
plus
20
years
of
the
year
built
1999
was
in
line
with
those
renovations
and
it
matched
the
other
comparable
sale.
O
The
lowest
effective
age
in
the
neighborhood
is
actually
1990,
so
there
have
been
updates
to
some
of
the
other
properties,
just
not
as
extensive
as
the
the
current
subject.
The
appellant
submitted.
The
appraisal,
which
I
did
review
and
the
appraisal
had
four
comparable
sales,
and
I
did
review
those
one
of
the
sales
was
before
the
analysis
period.
Another
one
was
an
active
listing.
That
was,
after
the
analysis
period
and
then
two
of
them
were
actually
within
the
analysis
period.
O
If
you
look
at
their
sales
prices
and
then
the
assessments
of
those
properties,
those
sales
prices
were
actually
in
line
where
the
assessments,
I
should
say,
were
in
line
with
those
sales
prices
in
the
year
that
it
sold.
The
assessments
were
lower
than
the
sales
prices
listed
on.
You
know
the
appraisal
report,
so
I
felt
that
those
were
in
line
as
well,
and
I
didn't
see
room
to
make
a
further
adjustment
and
the
active
listing
that
was
used
in
the
appraisal
report.
O
It
has
now
sold
it
sold
for
700
000,
but
the
active
listing
in
the
appraisal
report
was
listed
at
6.89
so
that
that
was
an
update.
But
in
reviewing
the
submitted
appraisal
report
and
looking
at
the
sales
provided
the
effective
ages
of
the
all
the
other
properties,
the
neighborhood
being
1990,
I
did
make
an
adjustment
down
to
1999,
which
I
felt
was
in
line
with
the
updates
and
there
wasn't
any
further
adjustment.
So
I
do
recommend
confirming
the
current.
A
H
All
right
we're
going
to
questions
any
questions
from
mr
matzking.
E
Quick
question
for
the
department
derek:
could
you
confirm
a
comparable
three
that
there's
only
one
full
bath?
That's
pretty
unusual.
O
H
P
O
I
think
that
was
regarding
comp,
three
camels.
E
J
H
No
all
right
we're
going
to
wrap
ups.
Mr
dube.
O
Sure
and
reviewing
the
appraisal
report
and
looking
at
the
comparables
and
reviewing
all
the
properties
in
the
neighborhood.
I
felt
like
the
adjustment
made
in
the
initial
review
of
bringing
down
the
effective
age
in
1999
and,
given
that
all
the
other
properties
at
1990,
I
thought
I
think
it
is
in
line,
and
there
wasn't
any
further
adjustment
recommended.
So
I
did
recommend
confirming
the
revised
assessed
value.
That's
already
in
place.
P
Yes,
sir,
I
I
appreciate
that
review
again
I'll
stand
up
behind
the
appraisal
that
was
done
professionally,
and
I
will
again
just
reiterate
that
the
adjustment
that
was
made
to
get
it
more
in
line
with
my
neighbor
within
this
complex,
which
I
appreciate
that
there's
still
a
fifteen
thousand
dollar
difference
on
net
between
what
I
bought
at
what
they
bought
at
and
now
what
they're
appraised
at
and
what
I'm
appraised
at.
P
So
I
understand
that
there
may
be
differences
in
the
property,
but
I
don't
understand
how,
between
the
five
or
six
years
since
the
concurrent
sales
that
one
property
mine
has
been
going
up
in
appraisal
much
faster
than
that
other
property,
and
there
has
been
no
other
renovation
or
other
explanation
for
that.
So
I'll.
Just
close
with
that
and
again,
thank
you
for
taking
a
look
at
this
property.
H
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
we're
gonna
go
into
just
the
board
members
any
comments,
mr
huffman.
G
Yeah,
I
just
say
derek
as
usual:
I
appreciate
kind
of
going
through
the
the
comps
in
the
in
the
bank
of
america
appraisal
and
taking
the
time
to
kind
of
address
each
one
and
and
look
at
the
appellant's
arguments
objectively
and
just
kind
of
address,
all
the
points.
So
to
me,
I'm
I
think
it's
it's
been
pretty
well
evaluated.
The
county's
got
a
good
number
and
I'm
comfortable
with
it.
H
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
madsen.
E
I
think
the
appellant's
one
of
his
key
contentions
needs
to
be
addressed
very
quickly,
and
that
is
that
this
appraisal
is
not
the
same
kind
of
appraisal
and
we,
of
course,
have
gone
over
this
many
times
as
many
appellants.
E
It's
not
the
same
kind
of
appraisal
as
for
a
mortgage
loan
appraisal,
mary
being
a
mortgage
lender,
can
use
probably
a
little
bit
better
words
than
I
but
they're
different
kinds
of
appraisals
based
on
different
criteria
and
second,
this
appraisal,
even
if
it
were-
and
it
is
not.
The
same
kind
of
appraisal
is
way
way
out
of
the
assessment
period
and
therefore,
for
two
reasons
we
shouldn't
have
any
bearing.
I
No
comment,
mr
chairman,
I'm
also
comfortable
with
the
reduction.
H
Okay,
thank
you
yeah.
I
I
agree.
I
think
the
county
did
a
very
good
job
and
you
know
making
the
adjustment
to
reflect
the
effective
age.
I'm
I'm
I'm
okay
with
it.
H
I
think
the
county
is,
you
know,
proven
to
be
right.
In
this
case,
I
don't
really
see
any
other
evidence
except
the
information
that
is,
you
know,
out
of
the
analysis
period
to
be
considered,
so
I'm
not
comfortable
to
make
any
changes.
I'm
okay
with
it.
G
Emotion,
I'll
make
a
motion
if
that's
all
right,
jose
to
confirm
the
reduced
assessment
of
the
county
at
674
700.
H
H
Thank
you,
everybody
any
other
business
that
we
have
for
now.
Yes,
go
ahead,
barnes.
I
Yes,
I
wanted
to
share
that
I'm
gonna,
be.
I
may
be
a
little
bit
late
tomorrow.
I've
told
our
chairman
mary.
I
I
H
I
know
I'm
I
mean
I'm
in
delaware
right
now.
The
thing
that
you
see
in
the
back
is
something
that
my
son
built
for
halloween.
So
when,
when
he
used
the
last
year,
this
is
actually
his
bedroom.
So
I'm
I'm
just
in
there
just.