►
From YouTube: Board of Equalization Hearing - June 23, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
start
with
a
meeting
for
today,
June
23rd
and
apparently
we
have
a
couple
of
phases
that
are
you
not
going
to
be
hurt
today?
The
first
phase
has
requested
our
first
pony,
so
we're
going
to
need
a
motion
and
to
accept
this
postponement,
or
we
can
go
ahead
and
clear
it.
It's
up
to
everyone.
What
do
you.
B
A
D
C
E
D
E
A
A
E
Don't
we
just
like
that
he's
asking
for
the
postponement,
I
think
how
we
could
do
this
is.
If
we
just
go
ahead
and
say
we
will
try
and
accommodate
you
we'll
do
this
tomorrow.
If
you
can't
do
it
like,
oh
they
said
you
can
call
in
from
anywhere
he's
been
sent
some
work
at
work.
You
know,
and
it's
it's
approximately
20
minutes
of
time,
so
yeah.
D
E
Know
not
knowing
that
full
agenda.
You
know
as
far
as
putting
him
in
someplace
else,
it's
been
scheduled
and
it's
been
scheduled.
You
know
he's
had
certainly
more
than
enough
time.
Historically,
we
have
not
allowed
it
so
I'm
fine
with
one
day
since
the
schedule
is
light
tomorrow,
but
you
know
otherwise
I
would
take.
I
would
want
to
hear
it.
Let's.
D
E
A
C
A
A
That's
fine
good
morning,
mr.
Cohen,
we
I
know
we
heard
you
chased
us
here
and
guys
you're
familiar.
We
are
going
to
please.
You
have
eight
minutes
to
start
before.
We
start
this
case.
Villages
quick
disclosure,
I,
am
I,
know
mr.
Cronin.
We
go
to
the
same
church
and
same
as
last
year.
This
is
not
going
to
impact
any
decision
or
information
that
I
have
in
this
face.
So
I'm
going
to
proceed
and
stay
with
the
case.
You
can
go
ahead
and
start
with
your
eight
minutes
recipe.
A
F
Thank
you.
The
one
thing
I
will
say
is
that
my
audio
is
not
great,
so
I
may
have
to
ask
you
sometimes
to
repeat
something:
okay,
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
you
all
board
members
for
the
work
you
do
and
I
appreciate
your
time
and
commitment
to
this
process.
I
also
have
to
tell
you
that
I
did
not
expect
that
I
would
need
to
appear
before
you
as
before.
F
The
Board
of
Equalization
this
year
in
2019,
I
did
appear
I
presented
because
it
then
board
members
justifications
in
hard
data
as
to
why
the
assessment
for
my
property
at
11:08,
North,
Stafford
Street,
was
above
fair
market
value.
After
reviewing
the
facts,
the
outcome
reached
by
members
of
the
Board
of
Equalization
was
that
the
assessed
value
be
reduced
from
five
hundred
and
seventy
three
thousand
six
hundred
to
five
hundred
and
fifty
eight
thousand
nine
hundred
fast-forward
to
notification
of
the
2020
Arlington
County
assessment.
F
My
property
assessment
was
raised
to
five
hundred
and
seventy
three
thousand
six
hundred
the
exact
number
that
it
was
reduced
from
in
2019.
So,
at
the
time
when
I
got
the
assessment,
I
took
a
look
to
see
what
was
happening
in
the
community
around
me
and
specifically,
my
condominium
complex.
The
complex
where
my
property
is
located
consists
of
20
condominium
units
there,
piggyback
style
there
are
below
grade
one
level
units
on
the
ground
level,
and
then
there
are
two
level
above
grade
townhouses
above
the
one
level
below
grade
units.
F
For
it
again,
a
total
of
twenty
units.
Mine
was
the
only
unit
of
the
twenty
that
had
a
increase
in
the
assessment.
The
other
assessments
also
remain
the
same
from
twenty
nineteen
to
twenty
twenty,
so
that
was
perplexing
to
me
and
I,
reached
after
the
county
real
estate
assessment
office,
requesting
an
explanation
for
what
the
determination
was
to
increase
the
assessment
on
my
property
I
received
the
following
reply
from
Mr
Ewell,
jörg
caball
job
and
I
apologize.
If
I'm
not
pronouncing
your
name
correctly.
F
The
reason
your
unit
saw
increased
because
was
because
it
went
back
to
2019
original
value.
Without
the
be
ohi's
override
there
would
have
been
no
increase
in
2020,
so
I
guess.
My
question
is:
is
the
policy
of
Arlington
County?
Realist
assessment
office
to
reverse
the
decisions
of
the
BOE.
Furthermore,
what
is
the
explanation?
There
was
no
data
or
justification
for
an
increased
assessment
other
than
it
was
to
override
the
board
Board
of
Equalization
decision
in
supplying
comparable
properties.
F
The
assessment
office
continues
to
choose
non,
similar
properties,
I'm
sure
you're,
familiar
with
the
term
above
great
finish,
space
and
below
great
finish.
Space
you've
been
provided
with
pictures
of
my
unit,
and
you
can
clearly
see
that
it
is
below
grade
one
level
and
therefore
is
valued
differently
than
the
above
grade.
Two-Story
townhouse
style
properties
that
are
the
only
comparable.
The
assessment
office
includes
with
their
reports.
F
Additionally,
I'm
sure
you
all
remember,
July
8th
2019
when
there
was
a
significant
rain,
any
flooding
to
properties
when
the
Arlington
County
storm
drains
backed
up.
Hopefully
none
of
you
were
directly
impacted
by
that
event,
my
below
grade
property
was
affected
by
that
flood
I
suffered
costly
damage
that
was
not
covered
by
insurance
and
did
not
occur
in
upper
level
above
grade
townhouse
tile
units
in
the
community.
I
do
not
understand
why
the
appraiser
would
provide
information
to
both
myself
and
to
you.
F
The
board
of
equalization
that
did
not
include
nearby
one
level
properties
on
Vermont
Street,
that
sold
within
the
dates
of
September,
1st
2018
and
August
31st
2019
for
under
five
hundred
and
thirty.
Six
thousand.
These
properties
need
to
be
a
part
of
the
information
for
you
to
make
your
informed
determinations.
F
Additionally,
the
appraiser
has
supplied
comments
that
have
been
provided
to
you.
I
have
clearly
provided
my
explanation
and
justification
for
my
request
for
the
2028
value
to
remain
at
the
2019
value,
consistent
with
the
other
19
properties
in
the
all
Boston
square
community.
I
note
in
the
appraisers
comments:
first
paragraph:
no
interior
inspection
due
to
quarantine.
Yet
in
the
comments
there
is
a
reference
to
other
models
in
the
community
were
those
inspected.
I
have
addressed
that
fact.
F
I
have
addressed
the
fact
to
excuse
me
that
my
unit
has
not
been
remodeled
or
upgraded,
while
the
other
units
have
been
the
appraiser
comments
acknowledged
the
kitchen
and
baths
are
the
original
for
your
information.
One
bathroom
is
avocado
green,
the
other
harvest
gold,
the
valuation
term
for
that
is
functionally
obsolete.
F
C
F
Are
original
they
have
been
well
cared
for
and
their
original
high
quality
build
construction
makes
them
not
feel
dated
or
old.
Given
these
comments
that
no
inspection
in
interior
inspection
was
done,
I
find
it
to
be
unprofessional
to
make
personal
qualifications
on
something
that
has,
admittedly
not
been
seen.
I'm
wondering
where
are
the
specifications
for
the
original
construction
materials
that
they
can
be
classified
as
being
centigrade
for
high
quality
and
I
will
say
as
a
long-term
contributor
to
the
Arlington
County
tax
revenue
I'm
offended
by
the
use
of
personal
opinions.
F
In
this
description,
the
comments
go
on
to
reference
high
original
bill
quality
still
appears
fine
and
does
not
seem
outdated
or
in
need
of
renovation.
Again,
those
are
personal
opinions
made
without
any
direct
inspection
for
the
board's
information.
There's
also
comments
about
rental
of
the
property.
The
property
has
been
for
rent
for
over
90
days.
It
is
currently
vacant.
I
strongly
disagree
with
the
comments
expressed
at
the
level
of
about
the
level
of
desirability
we
are
in
the
midst
of
a
pandemic.
F
A
G
Thank
you
boring.
The
subject
is
located
in
the
old
Boston
square
condo,
which
is
the
neighborhood
of
20
piggyback
style.
Townhomes
no
interior
inspection
occurred,
but
the
homeowner
was
kind
enough
to
provide
us
with
some
pictures
of
the
exterior.
Last
year,
this
property
saw
the
same
3%
increase
as
all
other
20
units.
In
this
complex,
this
property
appeared
before
the
BOE
last
year,
where
the
value
was
reduced
back
to
its
2018
value.
G
The
appellant
had
a
couple
questions
about
the
values
changing
after
being
changed
by
the
BOE
I'd
like
to
go
into
that
a
little
bit.
Although
the
subject
was
reduced
last
year
by
the
BOE,
the
reduced
value
does
not
stay
fixed
year
after
year
each
year,
every
neighborhood
is
individually
analyzed
during
our
analysis
period.
When
we
conducted
the
analysis
for
the
subjects
neighborhood,
we
did
not
have
any
sales,
which
is
not
that
uncommon
for
a
neighborhood
with
only
20
units.
G
What
we
do,
then,
is
compare
this
condo
townhome
neighborhood
to
others
in
the
area
that
are
similar,
although
not
sharing
the
same
condo
fees
or
amenities.
The
condo
townhomes
that
are
near
can
give
us
a
rough
estimate
of
value
to
see
if
we
are
on
the
right
track
or
changes
are
needed.
That
being
said,
the
department
feels
that
the
subjects
neighborhood
is
closer
to
the
under
assess
side
evaluation,
but
without
definitive
data.
The
conservative
decision
was
made
not
to
make
any
changes
to
the
assessed
values
for
2024
the
subjects
neighborhood.
G
The
subject
was
brought
back
to
its
original
2019
assessment,
which
the
department
feels
is
an
opinion
of
market
value,
with
the
unit
being
brought
back
to
its
original
2019
value.
All
20
units
saw
the
same
equitable
increase
in
value
over
the
last
two
years,
and
the
subject
had
the
same
increase
as
other
ground
level
units
identical
to
it.
This
was
reviewed
in
the
memo
to
the
BOE.
This
was
also
explained
to
the
appellant
via
our
email
conversations
found
in
the
BOE
packet.
G
During
her
analysis
period,
this
neighborhood
was
reviewed
to
make
sure
that
all
20
units
were
equalized
with
each
other
and
they
were
smaller
units
have
smaller
assessments.
Larger
units
would
have
larger
assessments
and
models
that
had
unusual
characteristics
like
being
located
partially
underground.
Like
the
subject,
we're
taking
into
consideration
and
the
appropriate
changes
to
value
had
already
been
taken,
care
of
we're
on
level
units
have
lower
base
values
than
above
grade,
townhome
style
units.
G
This
applies
even
to
in-ground
units
that
are
larger
in
size
than
those
above
them
I'd
like
to
point
out
to
the
board
of
the
20
units.
In
this
complex,
there
are
six
separate
floor
plans
with
differing
square
footages.
In
fact,
the
two
largest
floor
plans,
one
of
which
is
the
subjects
model,
are
both
below
grade
and
have
smaller
assessments
than
even
the
smallest
of
a
grade
townhome
style
unit.
G
The
subjects
increase
is
due
to
our
methodology,
which
we
apply
to
every
residential
parcel
in
the
county.
The
Department
believes
that
there
is
no
issue
with
the
subjects
market
value
or
equalization
amongst
the
20
units
in
this
neighborhood.
If
the
subjects
value
is
reduced,
it
will
not
be
equitable
with
the
other
20
units,
the
comps
that
were
used
show
the
limited
amount
of
sales
we
see
of
similar
type
units
in
this
area.
If
you
take
a
look
at
the
comp
sheet
comp,
one
was
the
last
sale
that
occurred
in
this
neighborhood.
G
Although
comps
2
&
3
are
not
in
ground
units,
they
demonstrate
market
value
in
the
area
and
by
looking
at
historical
trends,
we
can
deduce
that
the
subjects
in
ground
unit
will
be
somewhere
close,
but
below
these
units
value,
it
seems
that
most
people
that
purchase
these
units
either
love
to
live
in
them
or
they
keep
them
as
investment
properties,
because,
unfortunately,
for
us
they
don't
sell
that
often,
so
we
don't
have
enough
market
data.
I'll.
Tell
you
this.
G
The
last
open
market
transaction
in
this
neighborhood
that
occurred
of
an
Inc
ground
unit,
similar
to
the
subject
sold
in
2006.
This
sale
was
sold
in
as
in
condition
the
listing
had
one
picture
and
it
had
all
the
markings
of
a
unit
still
in
its
original
condition.
This
unit
sold
in
2006
14
years
ago
for
five
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
the
department.
G
The
department's
recommendation
for
the
board
is
to
confirm
the
20/20
assessment
at
five
hundred
seventy
three
thousand
six
hundred
which,
by
looking
at
sales
in
the
area
and
how
its
assessment
is
equalized
with
the
other
twenty
units
located
in
this
neighborhood,
can
be
confirmed
as
equitable
and
fair.
Thank
you.
D
D
D
G
G
By
looking
at
all
the
listing
photographs
and
after
you
take
a
look
at
the
building
in
detail
like
we
have
you're
able
to
identify
what
in
original
kitchen
looks
like
or
what
an
original
bathroom
looks
like.
We
know
what
the
original
kitchen
cabinets
look
like.
We
can
tell
if
the
cabinets
have
been
replaced
or
if
they've
just
been
painted.
So
when
we
do
get
those
listing
photographs,
we're
pretty
good
at
identifying.
What's
original
and
what's
been
updated,
but
we're
limited
to
the
information
that
we
have.
F
B
G
Sure,
like
I,
yes,
they
are
all
above
grade
townhome
units
comparable
one
was
the
last
sale
that
occurred
in
the
subjects
neighborhood
the
last
one
of
those
20
that
sold.
That
was
included
just
to
show
you
what
market
value
is
in
that
neighborhood,
comparable
2,
&
3
are
in
a
separate
neighborhood
about
two
blocks
away.
They
are
above
ground
units,
but
we
showed
them
for
just
as
a
representation
of
market
value
in
that
area.
G
G
Correctly,
above-grade
units
are
two
level,
but
they
they've
Aryan
in
size
and
actually
of
the
six
floor
plans
that
are
in
this
neighborhood.
The
subject
and
one
other
model,
have
the
largest
square
footage
of
even
the
above
grade
units.
So
even
though
they're
below
grade
and
they're
only
one
level,
the
square
footages
is
larger
than
the
above
grade
units.
G
A
I'm
gonna
follow
up
with
a
different
question:
I
recall
this
case.
Last
year
we
had
reduces
because
it
was
compared
to
a
different
community
which
is
located
that
in
the
south
of
Wilson
Boulevard.
There
are
also
the
same.
You
know
piggyback
townhomes,
but
they
were
not
really
and
they
were
totally
different.
So
I
know
that
I
had
disagreed
that
he
was.
You
know
they
were
not
good,
comfortable
and
I.
Think
this
year,
we're
doing
the
same
I
think
we're
using
comparables
or
relational
community
like
to
come
comfortable
number
two
comfortable
number
three.
G
Right,
so
what
we
were
trying
to
show
like,
like
I've,
mentioned
thee
in
order
for
us
to
find
a
sale
of
an
inground
unit.
It's
difficult
in
this
area
like
I
mentioned
people
like
to
hold
on
to
them
either
because
they
liked
living
them
or
they
like
them
as
investment
properties,
but
they
just
don't
sell.
So
when
we
don't
see
a
particular
model
cell,
we
can't
just
keep
the
assessment
where
it
is.
We
have
to
trend
it
with
what
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
is.
G
We
see
that
these
above
grade
townhomes
are
increasing
in
value,
so
we
deduced
that
the
the
below
grade
ones
are
as
well.
We
take
into
consideration
that
the
below
ground
units
aren't
going
to
be
as
desirable
as
the
above
grade
townhome
units,
but
that's
reflected
in
the
the
base
value.
Even
though
the
the
subject
is
below
grade.
G
G
E
G
We
factor
in
the
difference
with
the
units
base
value,
basically
the
base
value
for
the
for
the
unit.
If
you
look
at
the
subject,
its
total
assessed
value
is
573
600,
but
its
base
value
is
only
500
3,000,
so
on
top
of
that
value
will
at
land
any
any
other
characteristics
that
have
value
so
comparable.
One
has
a
base
value.
E
G
G
G
A
A
G
Sure,
thank
you.
The
department
doesn't
have
anything
new
to
add.
All
that
we
ask
is
that
the
board
please
take
into
consideration
that
all
these
all
20
units
are
equalized
amongst
themselves,
we're
already
taking
into
consideration
that
there
are
eight
units
in
this
complex
that
are
below
grade
and
their
current
assessments
reflect
that.
A
F
There
were
no
increases
in
the
assessment
of
the
other
19
property
and
there's
been
no
justification
other
than
the
board
reduced
it
last
year,
and
it
was
you
know,
I
presented,
you
listened,
the
Arlington
County
assessment
office
presented
and
the
board
made
a
decision.
So
it's
not
like
there
was
a
increase
in
the
other
properties
assessments
this
year.
They
all
stayed.
The
same.
I
have
not
received
an
explanation
other
than
reversing
the
Board's
decision
as
to
why
it
was
increased.
The
other
thing
I
want
to
say
is
these
units
are
like
blocks.
F
F
A
A
E
Initially,
I
guess
one
there's
some
confusion
on
the
appellant
part
of
that
the
county
has
reversed
our
decision
and
I.
Don't
believe
he
understands
that
it
is
for
one
year
only
and
so
that
that
was
not
a
problem
that
they
did
it.
It's
just
that
they
felt
last
year
and
obviously
this
year
that
there's
no
difference
when
I'm
struggling
with
and
and
also
he
he
brought
up
that
he's
offended
by
the
opinion.
That
was
that
the
county
uses
opinion,
and
this
is
not
a
science.
E
This
is
a
subjective
measure,
whether
it's
a
fee
appraisal
or
if
it's
you
know,
for
tax
assessment.
Initially,
when
I
looked
at
this
I
kind
of
leaned
a
little
bit
towards
reducing
it,
but
as
I
look
at
this
and
I
I
see
the
calm,
one
I
mean
the
key
thing
here
was
that
it's
not
assessed
it
by
42
that
it's
really
assessed
at
633.
That
certainly
helps
me.
You
know
lean
more
towards
you
know
the
county's
decision
here.
E
The
problem
that
I'm
struggling
with
and
I
see
that
you
know
the
appellant
is
saying:
well,
nobody
else
got
increased,
but
nobody
else
was
decreased
last
year.
So
that
being
said,
it
is
all
equalized.
Now
there
are
no
additional
sales
to
say
that
it's
higher
or
lower,
but
I
to
say
that
a
property
in
this
location
has
stayed
the
same
for
two
years.
I
think
that's
probably
an
understatement,
that's
my
opinion.
So
I
would
struggle
with
reducing
this
again.
A
A
B
B
A
You
know
I,
don't
think
they
really
compare
and
I
know
it's
hard
to
find
something
that
is
close
to
the
subject
and
that
are
similar.
You
know
a
piggyback
townhomes
that
one
level,
but
my
problem
is
that
I
thought.
Maybe
the
other
unit
that
is
very
similar
to
the
subject
should
also
be
valued
as
level
now,
since
none
of
the
units
there
were
increased
and
I
know,
maybe
there
are
all
addresses,
but
you
know
I
think,
for
the
purposes
of
implementation.
I
think
they
should
go
back
to
you.
A
Go
back
to
the
body
that
you
said
clever
last
year,
because
that's
what
we
had
established
a
base-
and
you
know
sales
at
the
time
and
if
nobody
else
has
increased
in
making
fidelity
the
fairway
to
this
university.
This
to
go
back
to
the
same
as
it
was
last
year.
You
know,
maybe
sales
will
be,
will
have
to
be
reviewed
overall
to
adjust
everybody,
not
just
one.
D
A
D
A
A
D
Yeah
I
mean
I,
remember
having
quite
a
debate
last
year
about
the
Thompson
everything
and
coming
to
the
conclusion
that
we
wanted
to
reduced
it
and
I.
Don't
really
feel
like
I
got
a
better
sense
of
comps
I've
we've
been
knowing
that
there's
another
unit
out
there
that
the
identical
that's
assessed
it
that
you
know
probably
should
come
in
as
well.
Last
year
and
or
at
least
been
equalized
I,
don't
know,
we've
now
and
oversight
on
our
part
tonight.
Equalized.
H
D
I
do
know
that
you
know
this
is
a
residential
property
being
used
as
a
rental,
property
and
I
can
tell
there's
been
a
beam
in
the
industry.
There's
a
there's,
a
pretty
stark
difference
between
rental
rate
increases
and
for
sale,
products
increases
muscle,
and
this
is
more
of
a
rental
property
than
a
for
sale
home
that
somebody
would
go
out
and
buy,
and
you
know
the
typical
for
sale,
buyer,
and
so,
if
you
see
the
above
grade
ones
that
are
trading
at
three
percent
higher,
you
know
in
2019
versus
2018.
D
You
might
not
get
the
equivalent
difference
in
value.
Is
you
can't
change
the
rent
if
the
rents
haven't
gone
up?
So
that's
my
opinion.
I,
don't
know
I'm
I'm
siding
more
with
Jose
towards
going
back
to
last
year
and
then
equalizing
the
other
property,
and
then
you
know
put
them
on
the
same
footing
and
look
if
we
start
to
see
neighborhood
increases
again
over
there.
Then
you
know
they're
gonna,
both
kind
of
be
at
the
same
starting
point.
B
Not
comfortable
with
Greg
and
Jose's
assessment
because
we're
just
picking
a
number
out
of
the
year
I
having
not
been
a
part
of
the
BOE
last
year,
I
listen
carefully
carefully
and
was
one
of
my
notes
from
when
I
read
this
the
other
day
on.
Why
you
reduced
it
and
now
I
understand
the
the
department,
didn't
make
a
didn't,
provide
good
empirical
analysis
and
why
it
should
be
at
573
how
you
lowered
it
15,000
and
not
25
or
five
I,
don't
know,
but
the
department
didn't
make
the
case.
B
I
think
this
year
they
made
the
case
a
little
better
churning
with
Mary
saying
it's
intuitively.
Excuse
me
not
possible
that
the
value
of
this
stayed
the
same
in
a
nice
project
that
in
two
years
or
three
years,
I,
don't
know
what
it
wasn't.
2018,
so
I
don't
know
if
it's
two
or
three
but
just
picking
numbers,
a
hat
saying
well,
let's
just
go
back
to
last
year,
because
it's
last
year's
makes
me
uncomfortable.
There's
no
thing
to
pick
on
no
cost.
B
You
know
solid
number
take
to
gauge
it,
to
reduce
it
to
558
or
568
or
548,
and
and
fortunately,
a
comparable.
One
now
shows
in
terms
of
the
assessment
value
a
lot
more
positively
than
it
did
before.
That
was
just
out
of
whack
before
and
I
just
have
nothing
to
hang
some
other
number
on.
So
the
last
question
is,
however,
having
said
all
of
that,
to
reduce
some
direct
same
unit
in
the
project
down
to
some
number
that
we
pick.
B
A
B
A
We
can
reduce
this
person
that
we
don't
really
have
I,
don't
think.
Last
year
we
did
anything
with
any
other
unit
because
you
know
like
most
places.
That's
the
only
only
request.
So
we
got
you-
and
you
know
that's
the
only
case
to
deal
with,
but
knowing
in
this
case
that
that's
the
only
identical
unit
you
know
without
really
going
into
details.
So
what
improvements
they
have
I
thought
based
on
John
and
Jason
the
fact
that
they're,
none
of
the
other
units
have
seen
an
increase.
A
A
E
Right
I
will
say
that
I
mean
I,
agree
you
that
if
you're
gonna
lower
one
you
gotta
lower
the
other-
and
you
know
that
certainly
can
happen,
but
I
still
come
back
to
the
premise
that
just
because
a
below-grade
unit
hasn't
sold
that
they
don't
have
something
to
tie
it
to
doesn't
mean
that
the
value
hasn't
gone
up.
You
know,
and
certainly
in
this
area
where
it's
located,
this
is
not
a
declining
market.
E
This
is
not
a
market
that
has
been
stable
for
two
years
and
the
only
reason
it's
going
up
is
because
we
lowered
it
last
year
now,
looking
at
from
a
standpoint
of
equalization
which
that's
what
we
should
be
looking
at,
you
know
this
is
equalized
with
the
other
properties
in
that,
in
that
Association
I
mean
when
you
look
at
comp.
One.
E
You
know
and
they've
done
the
right
thing
looking
outside
of
the
actual
development,
if
there's
no
comps
but
it
sold
in
there,
that's
what
they
have
to
do.
A
fee
appraiser
would
have
done
the
same
thing
if
it
was
lending
purposes.
So
we
do
see
sales.
We
do
see
the
market,
it's
certainly
more
than
stable,
if
not
increasing,
so
I
really
struggle
with
reducing
this
and
reducing
another
unit.
I
think
it
takes
it
out
of
equalization
with
the
other
remaining
units
in
the
project.
Alright,.
D
Mary,
you
convinced
me
I'm,
looking
back
at
my
notes
from
last
year
and
based
I
mean
we
picked
it,
it
was
an
arbitrary.
We
just
wanted
to
hold
steady
with
2018
right
in
nineteen
it.
What
we
didn't
have
a
you
know.
This
unit
has
an
extra
bay
window
or
something
there
wasn't
a
an
adjustment.
It
was
just
holding
steady
with
18
so,
but
I
can
I
can
get
with
your
rationale
that
property
values
have
not
been
flat
for
two
years
and
then
on
the
basis
of
equalization.
D
A
A
A
A
I
You
very
much
I,
so
just
the
background
you
know
are
we
live
in
I,
guess
what
you
could
consider
a
sub
neighborhood
of
Bluemont
on
air,
which
has
an
eclectic
mix
of
older
houses
so
and
and
some
newer
ones
that
have
been
more
recently
constructed.
So
it's
not
a
like
a
1940's
development
where
you've
just
got.
You
know
a
thousand
Colonials
that
are
easy
to
compare
to
each
other.
I
It's
really
sort
of
a
random
mix,
so
I
think
that
makes
the
the
county's
behind
appraisal
method
less
accurate,
I'm
concerned
that
they're
also
because
it's
a
relatively
small
sub
neighborhood
that
has
some.
You
know
its
unique
characteristics
being
right
next
to
Bluemont,
Park
and
border.
Not
you
know
by
the
bloom
on
Junction
trail
and
then
Wilson
Boulevard,
even
other
houses
in
Bluemont
that
are
not
that
far
away
are
not
going
to
be
exactly
comparable
in.
Certainly
in
this
case,
because
there
are
a
limited
number
of
sales
of
similar
houses
to
ours.
I
I
50
602,
Fifth,
Street,
north
again,
the
effective
age
that
is
40
years
newer
than
ours
as
a
larger
finished
area,
and
also
backs
up
to
the
bloom
on
junction
Trail,
which
we
talked
and
then
finally,
their
last
comp
is
700.
North
green
briar
street,
with
the
effect
of
ages,
1998
versus
1965
for
hours,
an
artist
first
built
in
1950,
and
this
one
has
a
much
as
much
more
finished
area
and
a
larger
lot
and
a
wood
deck
and
back.
They
don't
have
anything
like
that.
I
It's
also
in
a
much
more
walkable
location.
So
it's
a
five
minute
walk
to
Safeway
and
ku
patella,
where
we're
15
minutes
for
us
to
walk
in
there.
So
one
mile
to
Boston,
which
is
a
half
mile
closer
than
so
I,
think
the
walkability
is
probably
a
key
factor
there
for
someone
looking
at
that
property.
So
I
would
like
to
ask
you
to
also
consider
the
comparables
I've
listed
in
our
appeal
and
I
just
else.
I
We
have
only
two
bedrooms,
so
it's
too
small
for
most
families
in
the
market
family
homes
and
because
you
only
got
two
bedrooms
and
a
lot
of
the
values
in
the
land,
so
the
most
likely
purchaser
I
believe,
is
a
developer
who
just
tear
the
house
down,
even
though
it's
in
decent
shape.
The
five
comparable
sales
I've
identified
are
more
appropriate
I.
Think
in
the
counties
in
terms
of
the
property
age
and
the
features
and
location
so
57,
16,
eighth
Street
north
sold
for
just
under
five
hundred
thousand
lei
2018
same
lot
size.
I
This
was
listed
as
a
land
sale
as
a
resource
protection
area
and
it
was
torn
down
and
replaced
with
a
1.4
million
dollar
house.
So
I'm
not
saying
we
should
be
a
five
hundred
thousand
because
maybe
there's
something
special
about
this
particular
property
that
made
it
very
low
value,
but
certainly
and
I
think
that
should
weigh
downward
on
our
value.
5611,
7th,
Street
north.
I
I
It
was
a
teardown,
but
before
they
tear
down
it
was
the
Cape
Cod,
with
four
bedrooms
two
and
a
half
baths,
which
is
more
than
us,
also
a
larger.
We
have
704
North,
Jefferson
Street
sold
for
660,
it's
a
larger
lot
more
bed
and
that
more
finished
area
has
a
wood,
deck,
56:37.
Sixth
Street
north
sold
for
655.
That
was
a
short
sale
that
was
a
Cape
Cod,
much
larger
finished
area
and
more
beds
and
baths
on
affected,
throw
one
more
in
5714.
I
Fourth
Street
north
there's,
another
knock
market
sale
for
about
650,
also
larger
finished
and
unfinished
area,
and
a
garage
so
I
know
it's
difficult
to.
You
know
because
of
the
nature
of
the
neighborhood
to
come
up
with
an
exact
comp
or
value,
and
you
know,
as
far
as
what
I
believe
the
property
is
worth,
I,
don't
think
it's
worth
less
than
we
paid
for
it,
which
is
621,
but
I,
really
don't
believe
you.
You
know
fairly
say
that,
as
of
January
1st,
we
should
be
over
six
bid.
I'll
leave
we're
back.
It
should
be.
J
Good
morning
board
nice
to
see
we
can
still
get
our
job
done,
while
observing
social
distancing.
My
first
case
this
year
is
also
my
first
Cove
in
nineteen
case.
We
need
no
interior
and
exterior
and
special
was
conducted
for
this
review
and
the
county
who
did
the
best
it
could
with
the
information
available,
given
the
subject
somewhat
recent
sale.
J
As
a
result,
the
kind
of
used
mor
is
listing
pictures
from
the
subjects
most
recent
sale
on
quick
description
of
the
property
is
that
it's
a
one-story
frame
basement
with
two
bedrooms
and
two
baths
with
the
year
built
of
1950
and
an
effective
age
of
1965
inequality
of
average
plus
the
appellant
feels
they're
not
being
fairly
assessed
when
they
compare
themselves
to
inferior
homes,
mostly
getting
bought
by
developers
and
remodeled
Pelin.
Also
sites
deferred
maintenance
issues
to
his
property.
J
As
reasons
to
lower
the
subjects
assessment,
the
property's
condition
is
in
a
much
more
livable
state
than
most
of
the
comps
provided
by
the
appellant
discounts
mostly
have
inferior
qualities
and
earlier
effective
ages.
The
subjects
assessment
is
a
is
also
supported
by
the
overall
analysis
for
the
neighborhood
that
shows
a
strong
sales
assessment
ratio
of
ninety
seven
point:
five
percent,
with
only
three
sales
having
a
ratio
overall
line,
but
two
outliers
giving
distinction
which
stands
for
no
basement.
One
of
these
comps
also
happens
to
be
one
of
the
cops
provided
by
the
appellant
Mellon.
J
If
these
comps
were
to
be
removed
from
the
analysis
of
the
neighborhood
would
actually
see
a
greater
increase.
The
Palace
neighborhood
is
504
zero.
Four
four
Bonaire
increased
on
average
four
point:
four
percent:
your
sales
that
occur
within
the
analysis
period
in
that
neighborhood,
the
subject
increased
around
five
percent,
which
is
you
know
a
bit
the
other
ones,
the
average
for
the
increase.
So
it's
right.
Around
average
entries
for
the
neighborhood
properties,
great
and
effective
age,
appear
in
line
with
the
neighborhood
and
current
conditions.
J
It
is
recommended
that
the
2020s
s
may
be
confirmed
at
6:51
100,
based
on
the
fact
that
everything
seems
to
be
fair
and
equitable
with
the
neighborhood
and
no
information
wants
to
move
from
the
record.
651
100
can
also
be
confirmed
as
fair
and
equitable
based
on
the
yearly
sales
analysis
that
was
done.
J
I
E
E
J
E
Well,
it
seems
like
it's
more
in
line
with
the
property
next
door
from
a
standpoint
of
improvement.
So
if
you've
got
seventy
sixty
one
and
the
property
next
door
is
sixty-three,
I
mean
a
difference
of
you
know:
thirteen
thousand
dollars,
twelve
nine
and
I
mean
the
difference
in
square
footage
is
approximately
thirty
square
feet
and
in
this
size
house
that's
not
a
lot
of
square
feet.
It's
the
same.
E
I
H
H
K
Yeah
mister,
yes,
this
is
Derrick
debate,
supervisor
yeah
just
for
informational
purposes,
I'm
following
along
just
for
informational
purposes.
This
neighborhood
did
receive
improvement,
increases
across
the
board.
When
we
applied
our
increases
in
the
land,
we
also
saw
that
we
needed
to
bring
our
location
multiplier
up
and
that
was
applied
on
improvements
across
the
board
for
the
neighborhood.
So,
okay.
I
A
I
I
Property
next
door
at
fifty
seven,
seventeen
sixth
Street
north
I,
agree
that
that
is
the
most
directly
comparable,
both
in
terms
of
location
and
in
terms
of
the
design
and
layout
house
and
I
would
also
the
owner.
You
know
just
in
case
you're
questioning
and
provide
that
owner
has
it's
come
to
ask
for
a
reduction
as
well.
I
Its
own
bond
here
was
until
very
recently
owned
by
a
group
of
people
who
are
planning
to
tear
it
down
and
they
would
parent
Leben
focused
on
their
things,
so
they
may
not
be
paying
close
attention
of
the
assessment
there
is
it
had
just
sold
just
a
week
ago
so
next
year,
I
don't
think
I'll
have
much
of
a
basis,
hopefully
to
challenge
you
know.
Assuming
that's
that's
uses
one
of
the
the
comparisons.
Thank
you.
A
B
B
Certain
the
opponents,
approval,
property
versus
comparable
one,
comparable
ones,
clearly
a
better
improvement
and
is
assessed
at
forty
six
percent
higher
and
I'm
going
by
percentages
and
not
dollars
to
try
to
be
fair.
So
is
it
forty
six
percent,
better
improvement?
Now,
maybe
it's
significant
46
percent
of
significant
secondary
the
house
that
would
the
improvement
next
door
that
we
also
looked
at
as
a
reasonable
thing
to
look
at
with
an
unfinished
basement.
B
It's
the
improvements
value
to
assess
a
thirteen
thousand
dollars
less
well
in
order
to
build
a
room
and
smooth
out
the
floor
paint
the
walls-
maybe
it
wouldn't
cost
thirteen
thousand,
maybe
8,000
or
9,000,
but
it's
hard
to
tell
and
we're
getting
to
very
small
variations
and
as
much
as
I
always
appreciated
pellets
coming
and
jogging
our
memories
and
making
us
all
collectively.
You
know
it's
a
line.
I
I
think
it's
way
too
small
of
a
difference.
If
there
is
one
to
if
there
is
one
to
to
make
any
change,
that's
my
comment.
A
D
I'm
with
Ken,
as
far
as
you
know,
I
think
if
you
even
look
at
the
one
next
door
and
you
and
you
there's
a
little
bit
better
improved
basement
on
the
subject
property.
It
looks
like
there's
a
shed
the
year,
we're
kind
of
right
there
where
the
department
was,
or
maybe
you
know,
within
less
than
one
percent.
If
you
try
to
make
those
adjustments,
so
typically,
we
would
lead
towards
just
confirming
the.
E
No
I,
just
I,
guess
I
still
struggle
with
the
three
comes
with
the
the
effective
age.
You
know
and
we're
not
talking
about
a
lot
of
money,
but
you
know
it.
You
know
what
may
not
be
a
lot
of
money
to
you
is,
you
know,
could
be
a
lot
of
money
to
somebody
else
and
so
I.
Don't
think
that
that's
a
reason
not
to
address
it,
because
we
think
the
amount
is
too
small.
You
know
we
certainly
reduced
even
on
a
commercial
property.
E
You
know
a
much
smaller
amount,
but
you
know
to
me:
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
think
that
these
three
comps
when
you
look
at
the
effective
ages,
are
really
comparable
to
the
subject
property,
especially
when
you're
talking
about
a
property,
that's
less
than
900
square
feet.
You
know
to
compare
it
against
something:
that's
1,600
square
feet,
that's
like
night
and
day,
and
so
the
difference
on
a
900
square
foot
piece
of
property
you
know,
would
certainly
be
much
smaller
than
if
we
were
looking
at
something
that
was
1600
or
1800
square
feet.
A
You
know
I
go
by
all
the
properties
that
were
provided
by
the
county
and
also
by
the
appellant
looked
at
all
of
them,
and
some
of
them
probably
did
not
compare
that
overall.
I
think
you
know
the
comfortables
themselves
they
have
more
bathrooms
based
in
has
more
square
footage.
So
I,
you
know,
I
wasn't
really
too
happy
with
those
comfortable
with
especially
space
itself
and
the
quality
of
the
homes.
A
I
looked
at
the
pictures
of
the
subject
property
when
he
was
purchased-
and
you
know
yeah
everything's
in
good
condition
that
the
condition
that
we
would
see
some
of
the
renovated
homes
now,
but
my
reaction
was
well.
The
valley
was
closed.
It's
very
that
yeah
and
I
agree
that
you
know.
In
the
past,
we've
made
that
judgment
space,
so
one
sale,
one
comparable
so
I'm,
okay,
with
making
the
adjustment
position.
You
know
to
equalize
I
guess
with
the
house
next
door
and.
E
They
were
just
saying
this
is
the
last
that
I'll
say
you
know
that
small
amount
I
mean
when
you
look
at
$13,000
again,
seventy-six
one,
that's
17%
I
mean
that's
leaning
towards
20%
of
the
value.
So,
yes,
it
is
a
small
amount,
but
it's
a
significant
amount
of
the
total
value
desk.
So
I
said
my
piece:
I'll.
A
H
Think
it
is
a
teardown
in
that
same
sense
is
what
is
probably
the
house
next
door
and
it
would
probably
sell
for
this
value.
I
mean
that's
that's
what
the
markets
doing
I
could
go
either
way
on
it.
It's
I,
don't
I,
think
it
would
sell
for
this.
I
know:
that's
not
their
objective.
They
want
to
live
there
anyway.
H
A
Yeah
I
think
they're,
like
Mary
said,
the
difference
is
not
much
but
yeah
I
agree.
You
would
sell
it
either
price
that
it
depends
on
what
you
want
to
do
with
it.
You
know
if
you're
looking
at
most
something
that's
going
to
carry
down
like
the
other
property
on
the
7th
Street
a
thing
yeah,
you're,
gonna,
sell
it
and
you're
probably
gonna
pick
something
you
know
a
million
and
a
half,
but
for
this
year
or
what's
there
and
what's
with
the
neighbors
I
think
making
the
exception
is
the
proper
way
to
do
it.
E
A
A
A
A
L
You
very
much
I
purchased
the
home
in
2013
and
for
about
five
years
before
2013
the
property
valued
remained
around
five
hundred
fifty
thousand
give
or
take
ten
and
I
went
up
and
down.
Since
then,
the
property
value
has
gone
up
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars,
which
has
has
climbed
about
thirty
to
forty
thousand
dollars.
Each
year
when
I
looked
at
the
comparable
properties
on
the
assessment
that
was
done,
two
of
them
have
three
bedrooms
and
three
bathrooms
and
are
assessed
to
be
much
more
expensive
than
than
mine.
L
I
only
have
two
bedrooms
and
one
and
a
half
baths
so
to
compare
that
size
of
a
house
to
three
bedrooms.
I
think
is
unfair,
as
you
know,
bedrooms
and
bathrooms
add
more
value
to
the
house,
and
so
I
just
don't
think.
That's
a
fair
about
fair
comparison,
so
that
would
be
the
last
two
on
the
list
of
four
28:15
North
George
Mason
and
5058
27th
Street
north.
The
other
two
comparisons
are
more
similar
in
size
to
my
house,
one
that
sold
most
recently
on
2804
North
edison
street.
L
I
just
don't
see
how
mine
could
be
at
eight
hundred
and
nine
thousand
dollars,
which
was
a
drop
of
a
couple
from
what
the
original
assessment
was,
which
was
eight,
so
they
have
over
8,000
square
feet
of
property
and
I
have
5,300
square
feet
of
property.
So
if
they
sold
800
I
think
that
mine
should
be
valued
at
less
than
them,
the
other
comparable
property
which
is
closer
in
size
to
the
size
of
the
house
and
the
size.
L
The
property
is
2708,
North,
George,
Mason
Drive,
and
they
sold
a
little
while
ago
about
two
years
ago
for
seven
hundred
sixty
thousand
dollars,
and
so
mine
is
a
tiny
bit
bigger
than
theirs.
And
so
that's
why
I
assessed
mine
to
be
the
same
as
last
year,
which
is
seven
hundred
ninety
one
thousand
dollars.
I
still
think
that's
quite
a
high
assessment
and
I
honestly,
don't
think.
L
I
can
probably
sell
the
house
for
that
for
only
two
bedrooms
and
one
and
a
half
baths
of
those
two
full
baths
that
might
be
easier,
but
I
only
have
a
partially
finished
basement
and
my
yard
part
of
its
unusable,
because
every
time
it
rains
it
becomes
a
river.
So
I
actually
have
had
to
rip
out
the
grass
and
put
gravel
there,
because
literally
I
have
to
clear
the
way
so
that
it
can
become
a
river
every
time
it
rains
and
because
I
have
a
dead-end
street
allowed
the
services
don't
end
up
always
coming
here.
L
M
M
The
property
was
inspected
in
March
6
2020
I
did
an
exterior
inspection
only
due
to
several
reasons.
At
the
beginning,
the
homeowner
was
not
able
to
be
home
at
the
time
of
inspection.
A
no
and
after
that
we
have
the
quarantine
issues.
So
I
only
did
the
exterior
inspection
verify
the
measurements
and
confirm
the
improvements
on
the
on
the
property.
This
house
is
a
five
thousand
three
hundred.
Ninety
seven
square
feet
lot
are
six.
The
current
land
valuation
is
649
a
country.
M
M
The
estimated
cost
of
this
porch
was
twenty
thousand
according
to
permanent
records,
also
plus
into
your
updates
to
the
kitchen
Corrections
were
made
to
each
stage
of
the
house
today,
their
actual
measurements
of
the
porch.
We
discover
a
real
concrete
patio,
so
basically
the
sketch
was
updated
to
make
it
to
make
more
accurate
measurements
of
the
house.
The
owner
request
a
review
of
the
assessment
value
of
the
property.
This
request
was
attended
and,
as
a
result,
the
evaluation
was
reduced
on
improvement,
part
down
to
eight
hundred
nine
thousand
dollars
for
twenty
twenty.
M
They
went
up
and
from
six
hundred
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
and
twenty
nineteen
to
six
hundred
sixty
thousand
dollars
in
2020,
and
that
was
close
to
two
point
two
point:
five
percent
increase
for
the
whole
neighborhood
in
this
property
also
about
2.3
percent,
which
actually
is
basically
the
land
value,
increase
the
improvement
value
actually
after
the
radiation
went
down
and
that's
the
reason
why
the
total
assessment
has
to
be
reduced
to
a
hundred
nine
thousand
for
2020.
I.
M
A
A
M
Yes,
the
reduction
I
propose
is
just
to
the
building
value
to
the
improvement
value
based
on
the
conditions
of
the
property.
I
had
the
chance
to
go
to
the
inside
of
the
house,
but
the
homeowner
was
kind
enough
to
show
me
some
pictures
of
interior,
basically
and
also
I
review
the
previous
real
estate
listing
from
2013,
so
to
have
a
very
understanding
of
the
conditions
of
the
house
from
the
interior.
M
Also
I
review
the
account
number
for
provide,
which
is
in
page
5
of
the
package
that
property
was
sold
in
2018,
which
actually
is
before
I
mean
it's
a
much
older
sale,
but
that
was
pointed
by
the
homeowner
as
a
real
comp
of
his
house.
She
mentioned
this
property,
so
I
mean
I
included
this
sale
on
as
a
comp
and
I.
Just
when
I
mentioned
that,
yes,
the
condition
of
these
two
houses
are
similar,
but
the
main
difference
in
the
total
assessment
is
directly
related
to
the
land
valuation.
M
This
house
is
also
in
George
Mason
Drive,
but
it's
on
a
much
busier
section
of
the
road
is.
The
traffic
is
much
much
more
intense
where
this
house
is
located
compared
to
where
the
subject
is
located
and
also
the
lower
sales
price
is
related
to
the
smaller
size
of
it.
This
home
tests
it
slightly
smaller
compared
to
the
subject.
I.
A
M
We
could
we
understand
that
they
might
have
an
additional
bathroom,
probably
in
the
basement.
Probably
they
they
decide
to
add
a
bathroom
upstairs
I
would
say
the
difference
will
be
somewhere
between
10
to
20
thousand
dollars.
Three
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars
difference
for
an
additional
bathroom
in
this
neighborhood,
but.
M
Yes,
so
it's
when
I
mentioned
that
I
have
received
a
compare.
The
request
of
the
owner
I
did
my
best
to
visit
the
property,
do
and
do
a
an
appraisal
of
the
house,
use
the
most
recent
sales
data
to
compare
this
home
to
recent
sales
and
adjust
the
assessment
for
twenty
twenty
to
eight
hundred
and
nine
thousand
dollars,
and
government
recommends
two
to
confirm
this
assessment
for
2020.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
L
You
very
much
the
joy
at
being
on
a
dead-end
street
means
that
you
don't
get
as
many
government
services
on
that
street.
So
that
is
a
trade-off
from
being
on
the
busier
side
of
George
Mason
cuz
I
do
watch
the
snowplows
circle
around
George
Mason
and
never
come
down.
Our
street
house
that
is
on
Edison
Street
is
on
a
side,
a
quiet
side
street
and
they
have
twenty-seven
hundreds
more
square
feet
of
land
than
I
have
and
their
value
to
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars,
and
they
have
flat
land
and
they
don't
have
a
flooding
problem.
A
A
Knowing
I'm
gonna
make
a
comment
as
far
as
the
reduction
of
who
you
know,
it
is
very
tiny,
very
close
to
what
it
was
before,
but
I
looked
at
the
assessments
on
the
time
table
also
one
that
was
the
right.
Obviously,
the
one
on
Edison
Street,
the
assessment
at
8:19
3
and
also
the
assessment
for
I
think
another
party
that
I
had
in
mind
that
I
do
anyway.
A
The
reason
I
was
asking
about
the
number
of
bathrooms,
because
that's
the
only
difference
really
and
so
is
that
you
know
one
and
a
half
bathrooms
is
opposed
to
two
bathrooms,
which
is
you
know,
so
someone
means
a
lot
to
have
a
full
bathroom.
It
is
just
a
half
that,
as
far
as
a
specialty
I
agree
with
the
county,
it's
not
going
to
be
a
major
assess
in
the
majors
value
as
far
as
new
members,
but
I'm
afraid
with
the
position
that
way.
Then,
in
this
slide,
please.
B
A
I'm
not
sure,
and
when
we
haven't
really
been
presented
to
a
lot
of
the
information
that
that
is
affecting
in
the
value
so
I'm,
not
I,
guess
it
could
affect
the
usability.
But
from
my
experience,
people
still
buy
the
properties.
You
know
knowing
that
they
may
be
limited
a
little
bit
more
than
their
neighbor
or
you
know
they
sweep
across
or
you
know
what
block
away
or
something
so
I'm,
not
really
sure
that
would
warrant
any
way.
A
B
Could
make
the
case
fluffy
channel
the
water,
it's
kind
of
a
cool
water
feature
and
as
long
as
it's
not
going
through,
you
know,
kids
playground,
so
I
mean
it's
50/50,
it's
whatever
throw
it
up
for
anybody's
initial
reaction
and
then,
of
course,
if
we
did
decide
that
perhaps
it
was
a
disadvantage.
Could
we
possibly
come
up
with
a
percentage
you
know
discount,
but
it
like
they
do
for
standard
for
traffic
noise
and
anybody
else,
or
is
that
the
end
of
that
I.
D
D
You
know
there's
something
that's
been
surveyed
and
yes,
I
do
have
a
creek
and
there's
a
buffer
and
I
cannot
build
because
I
had
this
buffer
like
we
get
those
cases.
A
lot
like
you
said,
but
you
know
we
had
another
pound
come
in
today,
mr.
Kuhn,
who
said
that
he
was
damaged
by
the
flood.
So
how
much
of
that
is?
You
know
flood
how
much
of
it
is
a
real
permanent
issue.
I
know
with
this
lot:
it's
it's!
You
know
these
are
like
5000
square
foot,
Lots,
so
I.
D
Don't
really
think
it's
holding
back
any
potential
additions
to
the
building
by
having
some
water
back
there
relative
to
the
other
properties,
because
everything
at
least
three
of
the
comparables,
all
kind
of
non-conforming
r6
lots
there
under
under
6000
square
feet.
So
yeah
I
mean
I,
don't
see
a
real
reason
to
look
at
it
in
this
case,
I
think,
what's
more
relevant
to
the
value
of
the
home,
is
the
location
being
on
a
like
kind
of
a
quieter
cold
stack
versus
being
on
the
busy
road
on
George
Mason.
B
E
Right
I
did
agree
with
Gregg's
justiça
I
mean
you
look
at
all
the
adjacent
properties
I
mean
if
that
was
an
issue
in
the
neighborhood
I,
think
we
would
hear
from
more
people
you
know,
or
if
there
was
you
know
additional
evidence
with
pictures
or
something
that
the
flooding
was
really
that
severe
I.
Think
then
it
would
be
something
that
the
county
would
have
to
look
into,
but
without
that
I
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
making
adjustment.
For
that
you
know
and
the
argument
about
the
cul-de-sac,
you
know
we
hear
that
a
lot.
E
Some
people
like
the
cul-de-sac,
cause
it's
quieter
and
kids
can
be
out
there
playing
and
it's
you
know
somewhat
safer.
You
know
in
this
case
you
know
that
brings
up
the
issue
that
you
know.
Maybe
all
the
services
you
know
aren't
given
quite
as
timely.
You
know
I'm
that
type
of
street,
but
you
know
when
I
look
at
the
sales
I,
don't
think
it's
necessarily
affecting
the
marketability
of
it.
So
I
am
somewhat
struggling
with
seeing
a
reduction.
A
D
The
only
other
thing
that
jumped
out
you
know
the
neighbors,
not
complaining,
but
it's
it's
the
house
directly
behind
in
this
like
a
lot.
It's
like
twice
the
size
and
land
value
was.
It
was
only
like
five
thousand
dollars
more
just
in
it
seem
and
whack
I'm,
not
sure
our
PCO
2086
Oh
18
land
at
6:53
for
and
the
subject
was
649
eight.
D
It's
like
George
Mason
is
kind
of
all
equalized
with
George
Mason
and
then
I
think
that's
Dinwiddie
lease
that
those
I
feel
like
those
Lots
there's
so
much
bigger.
But
maybe
it's
a
different
neighborhood
classification.
There
might
be
something
going
on
there,
but
I,
don't
you
know
I,
don't
really
think
it
affects
property
as
much
as
the
other
one.