►
From YouTube: Board of Equalization Hearing May 24, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
May
24th
2023:
this
is
the
Arlington
County
Board
of
Equalization.
Here
we
have
six
cases
on
the
agenda.
We
will
start
with
the
second
case
on
the
agenda
rpc-31019030
at
2446,
South,
Monroe
Street,
just
so
that
the
record
reflects
I,
know
Mr
Cooper
as
a
lobbyist
in
Richmond,
but
feel
I
can
be
objective.
So
if
the.
A
A
D
D
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
yes,
thank
you.
So
my
home
at
2446,
South
Monroe,
is
a
duplex
adjoining
2448
South
Monroe,
each
of
our
homes,
24
46
and
24
48
were
built
on
the
same
day
at
the
same
time,
they're
both
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
with
the
same
kitchen
that
was
updated,
maybe
10
years
ago,
or
so
with
very
modest
cabinet
and
shelving
updates.
E
D
There's
a
similar
duplex
to
mine
across
the
street
from
mine,
which
is
actually
a
three
bedroom.
Two
bath
mine
is
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
with
a
with
a
rear
Edition.
That's
also
assessed
much
lower
than
my
home,
something
like
504
and
then
quite
frankly,
I
just
believe
that
my
home
should
be
Flag
Day,
483,
200
assessment,
currently
just
like
my
neighbor
on
the
other
side
of
the
wall
of
my
duplex
home
and
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
show
you
pictures.
D
If
you
need
it,
but
I
think
I
understand
you
can
call
up
the
properties
I've
mentioned
alive
and
and
I
do
defer
back
my
time
to
you
and
to
the
staff.
I
also
want
to
thank
staff
for
their
diligence
in
helping
me
bring
forward.
This
matter
to
your
attention
today,
thank
you
very
much.
F
Hi
good
morning,
the
subject:
property
is
a
two-story
brick
side
by
side.
It
was
built
in
1945,
with
an
effective
age
of
1990
and
a
quality
of
good.
The
property
recently
sold
in
September
of
2021
for
565
000..
At
the
time
of
the
sale.
Several
changes
were
made
with
a
record.
The
effective
age
and
quality
were
increased
to
account
for
updates
throughout
the
home,
including
the
kitchen
and
bathrooms.
The
appellant
believes
that
their
home
is
being
assessed
for
more
than
fair
market
value.
F
F
Since
the
time
of
the
appellance
review,
I
myself
have
gone
back
and
re-reviewed
those
other
two
properties
and
increased
them
and
brought
them
more
in
line
to
where
they
needed
to
be
to
take
into
account
the
updates
that
they
have
and
such
an
exterior
inspection
of
the
home
was
completed
and
interior
photos
from
the
2021
sale
of
the
subject.
Property
were
used
to
verify
the
record
using
the
information
gathered
from
the
review.
No
changes
were
made
during
the
appeal,
the
appellants
neighborhood
510086,
on
average
increase
of
2.7
percent.
F
The
subject
is
in
line
with
this
increase
again.
The
two
come
submitted
by
the
appellant
used
in
the
case
had
outdated
records
and
they
have
since
been
inspected
and
had
their
records
updated.
These
updateds
will
be
reflected
in
their
2024
assessments.
F
E
E
F
Weird
to
me
just
give
me
one
moment:
please
just
pull
up
that
record.
F
So
I
I
apologize
I
think
at
the
time
that
this
comp
sheet
was
populated.
It
pulled
the
the
sales
price
from
August
of
2021
and
there
was
a
second
sale,
which
is
the
one
that
I'm
citing
here
or
was
trying
to
set
here,
which
was
December
of
2021
with
a
sales
price
of
578
000.
F
E
E
The
other
one
is
on
land
assessments
generally
in
multi-family,
duplexes
triplexes
robe
causes
the
size
of
the
a
lot
of
land
referring
to
it.
The
villain
has
just
brought
up,
doesn't
really
matter,
you
know
in
single
family
you
have
a
stair
stepping
in
ranges
and
things
go
up,
50,
smaller
or
larger.
In
these
other
kinds
of
homes.
Don't
really
matter
is
that
the
case
here
he
decided
that
they
have
larger
land
the
next
door
neighbor,
but
that.
F
G
Is
for
the
county?
How
come
all
your
comps
are
quite
a
distance
away?
Aren't
there
any
right
there
where
this
property
is.
F
Not
within
the
last
analysis,
these
were
the
closest
ones
that
I
was
able
to
come
across
in
the
2023
analysis
and
they're
they're,
not
terribly
far,
they're
just
down
the
road.
If
you
look
at
the
comp
map
on
page
four.
F
Yeah,
so
we're
looking
for
sales,
that's
sold
within
the
analysis
that
show
similar
homes
just
looking
at
what
comparable
properties
are
selling
for
to
see.
If
that
are
that
our
current
assessed
value
is
in
line
for
the
subject
through
sales
of
that
neighborhood.
H
And
you
look
at
the
houses
around
this.
Some
of
the
values
of
the
improvements
are
much
lower.
You
you
take
a
look
at
those
that
they
had
not
been
updated.
So
basically,
what
if
I
interpreting
what
you
said
correctly?
You've
re-looked
at
those
other
properties
on
their
improvements
and
they're,
going
up
based
on
the
items
that
the
appellate
of
mentioned
yeah.
F
F
Whack
so
typically
with
side
by
sides
like
this,
they
are
being
held
onto
for
longer
periods
of
time
or
being
updated
without
County
knowledge,
they're,
not
pulling
permits
and
they'll
stay.
Rentals,
not
sales,
and
typically
the
only
time
that
we're
looking
at
properties
are
going
out
is
during
a
sales
inspection,
a
permanent
inspection
or
during
times
of
review.
So
sometimes
a
neighbor
or
somebody
can
point
out,
be
like
hey
I,
think
that
this
assessment
is
wrong,
and
if
we
see
that
it's
out
of
line,
then
we'll
go
ahead
and
correct
it.
F
Luckily,
for
both
the
the
two
that
was
mentioned
by
the
appellant,
there
was
a
rental
property
listing
on
Zillow
that
we
were
that
I
was
able
to
see
and
see
the
updates
that
were
done
to
it
and
then
for
the
other.
One
24
43,
South,
Monroe
I
just
went
back
and
verified
the
plans,
and
such
there
was
an
addition
put
on
that.
F
It
looks
like
the
Edition
was
accounted
for,
but
certain
things
within
the
record
weren't
updated
during
the
time
of
the
Edition
which
I
have
now
taken
into
account
and
corrected
that
and
brought
it
more
in
line
again
with
the
cat.
Our
job
is
to
make
sure
that
these
properties
are
in
line,
but
we
are
constrained
to
the
fact
that
we're
waiting
for
sales
we're
waiting
for
permits.
G
F
I
agree,
but
without
proper
information
we
just
can't
go
changing
records.
We
have
to
wait
for
information,
whether
it's
interior
plans
sales
to
come
through
for
us
to
update
that
we're
not
just
knocking
on
doors
and
asking
people
to
see
the
insides
of
their
home.
A
Okay,
I
have
a
question
for
the
adjoining
unit
to
this.
Yes,
one
is
the
breakdown
of
the
tax
assessment.
F
The
land
on
that
should
also
be
420
000
and
then
the
Improvement
at
the
time
of
the
2023
assessment,
was
63
200
for
a
total
of
483
200.
F
F
To
I
have
updated
it
to
553
900.,
just
looking
at
the
interior
photos
from
the
from
the
rental
listing,
it
has
a
few
fewer
updates,
so
the
effective
age
isn't
as
high,
but
I
brought
the
quality
in
line
with
the
appellants
and
also
sketched
all
of
the
exterior
features
as
well.
A
Yeah
see
that
all
the
time,
any
other
questions,
no
okay.
Despite
us,
if
you
take
a
minute
to
wrap
up.
F
This
yes
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
this
property
was
sold
in
September
of
2021
for
565
000,
which
is
still
above
the
current
assessed
value
in
2023.
F
All
of
the
updates
that
were
needed
to
be
made
were
made
and
I
believe
that
the
County's
assessment
of
558
200
is
fair
and
Equitable
and
I
hope
that
the
board
agrees.
Thank
you.
D
I
feel
as
though
the
property
has
been
over
assessed
and
I
would
respectfully
request
that
for
this
year
the
proper
assessment
of
483
200
B,
considered
by
the
Board
of
Equalization.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
H
G
Good,
faithful
to
you
know
he
had
good
faith.
She
met
at
the
assessed
values
of
neighboring
properties
and
then
the
County's
response
is
oops,
those
neighboring
properties,
we
change
them
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
fair
to
to
do
it
that
way.
I
I
think
that
you
know
you're
looking
at
the
existing
state
of
facts,
not
what
we're
going
to
do
next
year
and
I
think
that
the
value
should
be
the
same
as.
I
I
may
be
alone
in
that
I
would
agree
with
that.
Also,
because
I
know
that
all
these
cops
from
September
of
21
were
basically
prices
and
we're.
Now
you
know
almost
two
years
away
from
that,
because
they're
getting
so
I
think
it'd
be
fair
and
it
just
equalize
it
with
the
neighbors
and
then
let
the
newer
comps
kind
of
take
over.
H
I
G
G
E
E
G
G
G
A
H
B
F
H
I
I
I
E
E
E
E
H
Obviously
not
this
year,
where
we
he's,
they
assist
him
based
on
his
improvements,
and
he
did
he
ever
stop
away
with
it
for
another
year.
That's
how
we've
come
out
in
the
past
sure.
J
A
E
G
I
A
G
A
G
We're
talking
about
they
haven't
caught
up
yet
we're
talking
about.
Do
you
need
property
right.
H
E
A
E
A
G
That
the
reason
is
to
make
it
well
equalize
them
at
the
neighbors.
A
Okay,
so
the
vote
is
four
to
two
in
us
without
Mr
panaranda
and
Mr
matskin,
and
it.
A
A
Rpc
13036022
and
5629
5th
Street
North
Mr
Monas
has
asked
to
withdraw,
but
it
was
within
the
10
days.
So
we
need
to
vote
on
that.
Does
the
county
have
any
objection
to
the
withdrawal.
A
E
I
want
to
let
the
board
know
in
the
in
the
department
know
that
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
Zoom
meetings
with
the
Appellate
and
in
a
community-based
organization,
and
we've
got
a
lot
of
interchange
and
with
them.
But
nonetheless,
I
can
find
myself
his
new
children's
objective,
as
I
normally
am.
With
cases
of
agreement
I'd
like
to
stay
on
the
decision
making.
K
Look
morning,
members
of
the
board
I'd
like
to
address
three
principal
points
about
our
townhouse
located
at
3802
North
Randolph
Court.
K
We
bought
the
house
from
the
original
owners
who
made
no
improvements
to
it.
So,
for
example,
two
of
the
three
full
bathrooms
have
molded
plastic,
countertops
and
sinks
original
tile
floors,
low
end
cabinets
all
from
23
years
ago.
Pictures
of
the
the
two
bathrooms
with
the
molded
plastic,
countertops
and
sinks,
are
in
the
fob,
in
contrast,
the
original
owners
of
the
other
seven
units
in
our
development,
including
the
two,
the
appraiser
treated
as
comparables.
Those
original
owners
selected
upgrades
throughout
their
units.
Some
of
them
have
etched
glass
around
the
front
door.
K
K
Our
house
has
none
of
that
on
page
2
of
59
of
the
appraisal
file,
the
appraiser
states
that
his
interior
inspection
confirmed
that
our
house
has
quote
high
quality,
finishes:
unquote,
supporting
a
quality
grade
of
Roman
numeral,
four,
that
the
same
grade
as
the
alleged
comparable
two
townhouse
units,
but
the
appraiser
then
says
that
the
the
basement
bathroom,
which
you
have
a
picture
of
matches
the
house
quality
and
he's
right
about
that.
The
house
generally
has
Builder
grade
finishes
and
fixtures
like
the
basement,
bathroom,
a
few
of
which
finishes
We
have
replaced.
K
You
know
like
the
shower
and
the
the
principal
bathroom,
in
fact
the
appraiser
when
he
inspected,
the
interior
of
the
house,
asked
me
why
we
hadn't
renovated
the
basement
bathroom,
highlighting
that
he
could
see
the
low
end
quality
of
that
bathroom.
In
contrast,
neither
of
the
two
alleged
comparable
units
in
our
development
have
anything
resembling
our
Builder
grade
bathrooms
and
other
finishes.
K
Also
on
page
2
of
59
of
the
appraisal
file,
the
appraiser
mentions
a
quote:
workout
room
upstairs
in
a
media
room
in
the
basement.
There
is
no
workout
room
in
our
house.
There
is
a
small
room
off
of
the
principal
bedroom
pet
principal
bathroom,
with
the
original
Builder
grade
quality
carpeting
in
that
room,
there's
an
ironing
board
a
sewing
machine
and
a
stationary
bike.
There
is
a
room
in
the
basement
that
was
intended
as
a
media
room.
K
K
First
3818
North
Randolph
Court,
which
is
comparable
number
one,
is
Nat
4142
square
feet.
It
was
listed
for
sale
as
5742
square
feet,
which
is
correct.
You
just
have
to
look
at
the
exterior
of
that
unit
to
see
that
it's
substantially
larger
than
our
house.
In
addition,
it
is
simply
not
possible
that
that
unit's
five
bedrooms,
seven
bathrooms
and
two
full
kitchens-
could
fit
in
a
unit
that
is
only
200
square
feet
bigger
than
ours.
Likewise,
3823
North,
Randolph
Court,
which
is
comparable
number
two,
is
not
3616
square
feet,
but
rather
5061
square
feet.
K
As
per
the
listing
for
that
house
again,
it
is
not
possible
that
a
house
with
four
bedrooms,
five
bathrooms
and
a
three-car
garage-
could
fit
in
a
building
that
is
supposed
to
be.
According
to
the
appraiser
300
square
feet
smaller
than
our
unit.
The
omissions
and
mistakes
in
the
appraisal
file
are
concerning.
As
always,
the
devil
is
in
the
details
and
the
appraisal
file
does
not
have
the
details
right.
K
As
to
the
second
point,
I
wanted
to
address
the
appraiser
ignored
the
comparables
discussed
in
our
submission
to
the
real
estate
Assessor's
Office
of
particular
importance
is
3841
North
Military
Road,
which
is
located
literally
around
the
corner
from
our
house
and
is
no
more
than
150
yards
from
it.
3841
Military
Road
was
built
two
years
ago.
It
is
4954
square
feet
and
contains
six
bedrooms
and
seven
bathrooms
with
a
two-car
garage
and
a
7
000
square
foot
lot.
K
It
is
a
tear
down
replacement,
3841,
Military
Road
sold
for
one
million,
seven
hundred
and
twenty
two
thousand
seven
hundred
forty
dollars
on
June.
Fourth,
twenty
twenty
one
now
I
recognize
that
June
4th
2021
that
sale
date
is
slightly
prior
I
guess
to
the
comparables
period
for
2023
assessments,
but
so
is
the
sale
date
for
3823
North
Randolph
Court
that
the
appraiser
relied
upon
as
one
of
the
two
alleged
comparables.
K
More
importantly,
it
simply
cannot
be
the
case
that
our
house,
which
is
21
years
older
than
3841
Military
Road
at
least
1100
square
feet
smaller
than
that
single
family
detached
house,
has
two
less
bedrooms
and
three
less
bathrooms
and
has
a
smaller
lot
with
no
front
or
backyard,
because
it's
a
townhouse
is
somehow
worth
forty
six
thousand
dollars
more
than
3841
Military
Road.
The
appraised
value
of
our
house
has
to
be
wrong.
K
As
to
the
last
point,
I
wanted
to
raise
the
value
of
our
townhouse
unit
that
that
it
has
been
and
remains
depressed
for
two
basic
reasons:
tear
downs
and
a
limited
market
regarding
tear
Downs,
which
are
pretty
frequent
in
North
Arlington.
Why
would
a
family
pay
over
1.7
million
dollars
for
a
townhouse
with
no
yard
and
no
place
for
children
to
play
when
for
the
same
price?
K
They
can
build
a
large
single-family
detached
house
or
they
can
buy
us
a
large
single-family
detached
house
with
a
yard,
a
place
for
kids
to
play
no
homeowners
association
dues
and
no
shared
wall
with
a
house
next
door
because
of
the
ample
supply
of
tear
Downs.
The
answer
is
most
people
wouldn't
that
market
reality
was
not
taken
into
account
by
the
appraiser
and
helps
explain
what
our
house
was
overvalued.
K
Our
townhouse
development
is
perceived
in
the
market
as
a
seniors
Community,
which
eliminates
most
buyers
from
the
market
for
our
house.
Moreover,
many
seniors
want
to
downsize,
not
buy
a
3
800
square
foot
home
with
no
amenities
or
Services.
They
would
get
in
the
congregate
Care
community
community
to
illustrate
this
point:
3810
North
Randolph
Court,
which
is
next
door
to
argue
that
took
two
years
to
sell,
but
it
was
on
the
market
a
few
years
ago.
Again,
the
appraiser
didn't
take
that
into
account.
K
C
Good
morning
board,
this
is
Andrew
King
I'll
be
presenting
the
case
for
Jorge
ubar
who's
out
of
the
office.
Today
this
is
a
two-story
and
unit
townhouse,
four
bedrooms,
three
and
a
half
bathrooms
and
a
garage
it
was
built
in
2000,
with
an
effective
age
of
2005
and
the
quality
of
IV
minus
the
property
was
inspected
by
Jorge
yabar.
There
were
some
site
corrections
to
the
record.
C
This
case
had
actually
been
a
previous
case
back
in
2021
for
a
review
case,
so
there
are
eight
town
homes
in
this
community
back
then,
we
did
acknowledge
that
this
property
was
a
model
home.
This
property
was
given
a
negative
10
rdf,
that's
a
relative
desirability
Factor
and
we're
using
that
to
account
for
the
fact
that,
while
we're
saying
this
is
still
a
high
quality
property
in
terms
of
design
in
terms
of
layout,
we
want
to
keep
the
quality
in
line
with
the
other
units
in
the
neighborhood.
C
But
we
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
some
of
the
finishes
might
be
less,
so
we
can
roll
that
negative
10
rdf
into
the
depreciation
and
other
factors
that
apply
to
the
property.
C
So
that
is
on
the
property
and
it
has
been
since
2021
just
for
the
edification
of
the
appellant
for
things
like
window
replacement
or
other
maintenance
issues,
there's
no
negative
value
given
to
that
work.
That
needs
to
be
done
to
a
property.
C
C
They
don't
really
have
much.
They
have
little
impact
on
Town
evaluation.
They
serve
different
markets.
You
know
we
don't
want
to
get
into.
You
know
the
square
footage
of
a
townhouse
versus
a
single
family
property.
C
C
You
know
that
that
it
is,
has
the
lowest
valuation
and
should
have
the
lowest
valuation.
The
sales
in
the
comp
sheet
are
strong
comp
one
was
the
sale
using
the
analysis,
3818
Randolph
it
sold
for
two
million.
Forty
eight
thousand,
you
know
I
didn't
look
too
close
into
this
neighborhood.
This
wasn't
my
what
wasn't
my
case
this
year,
but
I
think
the
opponent
said
that
you
know
they
they
listed
it
at
5700,
so
I
think.
C
Maybe
if
you
you
know,
add
that
4100
for
the
finished
area
square
foot
on
the
com
sheet,
plus
that
basement
finish
1600.
Maybe
that
gets
you
there
that's
about
5700,
so
maybe
that's
where
that
overall
number
came
from
and
then
38
23
Randolph,
that
was
a
20
20
21
sale
for
1.9.
C
The
department
feels
that,
with
the
strong
sales
in
the
past
couple
of
years
in
the
neighborhood,
plus
the
application
of
the
negative
10
rdf
to
the
property
to
acknowledge
the
start
as
a
model
home
for
the
community,
we
recommend
a
confirmation
of
the
assessment
at
one
million
768
thousand
one
hundred
dollars.
Thank
you.
G
Yeah,
this
is
for
the
owner
who,
who
built
these
townhouses?
Do
you
know
yeah
John
Albritton,
and
does
your
unit
have
an
elevator
it?
Does
they
all
do?
Okay?
How
about
the
Military
Road
houses?
Does
that
have
one
I.
H
This
is
for
the
county,
just
so
I'm
clear.
The
assessment
on
the
comp
sheet
for
this
house
came
up
to
183
1830..
The
reason
for
that
is
that
10
is
not
reflected.
C
One
eight
thirty
I
believe
is
the
road.
Is
the
changes
made
to
the
record
after
Mr
yabar
went
there
so
we're
defaulting
to
the
original
2023
value
for
the
confirmation,
the
assessment?
But
you
know
in
terms
of
comparing
you
know
you
can
see.
That's
the
1a30
is
after
the
mystery
bars
changes,
but
we're
not
going
to
increase
the
assessment
for
2023.
E
For
the
Department
did
I
understand
you
to
say
that
this
is
the
lowest
assessed
of
the
eight
townhouses
in
this
community
yeah.
A
A
Any
other
questions,
yeah
Mr.
C
C
So,
just
to
re
reiterate
for
the
homeowner,
we
are
acknowledging
the
original
state
of
the
subject
as
a
model
home,
so
it
does
have
a
negative
adjustment
applied
to
it,
combined
with
the
strong
recent
sales
over
the
past
few
years
in
the
neighborhood
hovering
around
the
two
million
dollar
Mark,
the
department
requests
a
confirmation
of
the
assessment
at
one
million
768
100.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
Mister
I
know
I'm
sorry,
I
apologize
for
mispronouncing
I
want
to
put
an
S
in
there.
If
you
would
take
a
minute
to
wrap
up
Sir
a.
K
Lot,
a
lot
of
people
do
want
to
put
an
essay
there.
Yes,
so
so
I
guess
several
things
number
one
I
don't
understand
the
comment
by
Mr
King
about
you
know
it's
going
to
cost
150
000
to
replace
the
windows.
I
mean
a
buyer
is
going
to
see
that
and
they're
either
going
to
reduce
the
price
by
that
or
you
know.
Obviously
we're
going
to
have
to
you
know
come
out
of
pocket
to
make
that
that
is.
K
It
seems
to
me
a
clear
factor
that
should
be
taken
into
account
when
you
determine
fair
market
film,
fair
market
daily,
fair
market
values
would
a
willing,
buyer
and
seller.
Would
you
know
you
know,
sell
the
property
for
both
being.
You
know
knowledgeable
about
all
the
relevant
facts.
The
the
second
thing
I
wanted
to
say
in
wrapping
up
is
the
two
homes
that
just
happen
to
sell.
K
You
know
the
most
recently
the
two
alleged
comparables
are
the
two
biggest
houses
in
the
development
I
mean,
as
I
said,
you
just
have
to
walk
into
the
development
and
see
that
they're
they're
really
big,
and
if
you
walk
inside
they're,
you
know
their
luxury
town
houses.
You
know,
ours
is
a
you
know.
Ours
was
the
model.
It's
a
nice
townhouse.
Yes,
it
does
have
an
elevator,
but
all
of
them
do
but
it's
not
of
the
same
quality.
K
You
know
as
the
other
two,
and
you
know
that
and
then,
when
you
take
into
account,
you
know
3841
North,
Military
Road,
which
Mr
King
just
said
was
was
assessed
apparently
at
a
number
below
which
you're
proposing
to
assess
our
house
and
3841
North
Military
Road
is
much
bigger,
more
bedrooms,
more
bathrooms,
it's
a
single
family,
detached
house.
You
know
the
one
million
seven
eighty
proposed
for
our
house
does
not
make
sense.
A
G
G
I'll
go
ahead
and
share
some
thoughts.
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
buyers
out
there
that
don't
want
a
yard
and
I
guess
if
you
have
kids
it's
great
to
have
the
yard,
but
there's
an
awful
lot
of
home
buyers
that
that
don't
want
the
yard.
They
just
want
all
the
maintenance
outside
to
be
done
and.
G
Set
this
up
when
he
built
it,
he
also
put
elevators
in
and
John
was
a
some
ways,
a
progressive
Builder
and
he.
G
Provide
for
elderly
people
and
handicapped
people,
John
was
probably
the
highest
quality
house
builder
in
Arlington
at
the
time,
and
you
know.
G
Of
course
people
had
an
option
to
upgrade
and
I
I
guess
a
lot
of
them
did
as
far
as
the
the
elevator
I
think
that
adds
a
lot
of
value
to
it.
I.
G
I
I
kind
of
feel
like
the
230
000
difference
between
Dale
price
I,
don't
reflect
a
lot
of
improvements
movements,
and
so
you
know,
as
a
buyer,
even
to
take
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
budget.
I
saw
the
finishes
from
2005.
G
E
Well
so
yeah
I
I
find
too
compelling
Arguments
for
the
Department's
position.
One
is
a
the
least
the
lowest
assessment
property
community
in
ought
to
be,
and
the
second
is.
It
went
up
from
last
year
to
this
less
than
the
average.
It's
probably
ought
to
I
be
fine,
comparing
single
family
houses
to
townhouses.
It's
a
little
bit
dangerous
part.
C
E
So
finally,
the
the
comp
three,
even
though
there
were
two
cup
sales,
is
the
perfect
comparable
and
it
is
still
possessed
on
them,
and
you
know:
there's
100
200
square
feet
between
these
difference,
but
it's
a
percentage
of
total
square
feet.
It's
not
compelling
for
one
bedroom
condo,
it
would
be
compelling,
but
it's
not
a
year
or
so.
H
A
Everything
everything
was
sticky
yeah
all
right,
I
thought
I'd
make
a.
A
A
All
right
next
up,
we
have
I
believe
Richard,
John
Berry.
A
J
A
J
Can
I
go
ahead
and
share
screen
to
to
run
through
the
my
information?
Yes,.
J
So
basically,
the
first
page
spells
out
the
pretty
much
the
the
case
of
the
comparables
that
I
put
together
for
Mr
tron's
home.
The
County's
already
provided
a
slight
decrease
to
this
assessed
value.
That's
on
this
slide
of
only
20
000
and
we're
requesting
a
slight
a
little
bit
more.
J
There
are
by
properties
I've
listed
here.
These
are
Equity
comparables.
They
are
not
sales
comparables,
none
of
them
have
a
recent
sale.
The
most
recent
sale
is
in
2020..
J
The
second
slide
is
the
history
of
the
assessed
eye.
It's
not
that
relevant.
Last
year
this
almost
sold.
It
was
not
an
arm's
length,
transaction.
The
Barry
and
Alex
Alexander
transferred
it
to
their
trust.
You
know
for
estate
planning
purposes
slide.
Four,
has
the
governance
sales
comparables
that
they
used
and
I
actually
will
grant
that
these
sales
comparables
do
provide
justification
of
the
assessed
values?
What
I'm
concerned
about
is
that
there
are
many
properties
within
the
neighborhoods
that
are
assessed
at
or
below
the
subject,
property
and
the
subject
properties.
J
It's
a
nice
community
and
it's
a
nice
home
I
mean
they're
all
all
very
nice,
as
I
show
in
the
the
slides
afterwards,
but
going
back
to
the
comparable
slides
they
all
have
similar
numbers
of
beds
and
baths.
But
the
comparables
that
I've
listed
here
are
larger
and
they're
being
assessed
in
some
cases
for
substantially
the
subject
property.
That's
why
I'm
asking
for
a
reduction
based
on
Equity
comparables,
not
the
sales
comparables
provided
by
the
government?
J
D
J
No,
so
each
home,
if
you
look
at
the
map
on
page
five,
these
are
all
like
walking
distance
within
the
subject
property.
The
subject
property
is
on
right
here
at
the
kind
of
like
a
cul-de-sac,
and
the
other
properties
are
all
in
the
same
neighborhood
each
one
of
them.
If
you
look
sorry
going
back
to
slide
one,
the
assessed
values
or
just
about
at
the
subject,
property
or
below,
but
the
what
I
tried
to
do
is
compare
look
at
the
bedrooms
and
bathrooms
on
the
37.
J
4806
37
actually
doesn't
have
as
much
veterans
or
bathroom,
but
it's
a
much
larger
property
from
the
square
footage
standpoint.
Likewise,
with
all
of
these,
the
the
one
that's
the
most
comparable
I
would
think
is
three
four
to
eight
Glebe
in
terms
of
square
footage,
but
it
has
less
bats,
but
it's
it's
substantially
less
from
a
a
assessed
value
than
the
the
subject.
Property.
J
So
really
don't
know
what
else
to
say.
I
mean
these
are
properties
3875
4904,
which
are
on
the
same
streets
as
the
subject,
property
again
being
assessed
for
less
than
the
subject
property,
but
are
larger
and
in
one
case,
has
more
bedrooms
and
that
than
the
subject.
Property
I
think.
There's
ample
evidence
to
show
that
the
subject
property
relative
to
its
neighbors
is
slightly
over
assessed,
not
grossly,
but
slightly.
C
Good
morning
again
board
this
was
a
another
case
that
was
performed
by
Jorge
Barr,
that
I'll
be
presenting
the
case
for
this
is
a
two-story
single
family,
home
five
bedrooms,
four
and
a
half
bathrooms.
It
was
built
in
1966
with
an
effective
age
of
1995
and
a
quality
of
very
good
plus.
C
There
wasn't
much
information
here
presented
by
the
agent.
The
comps
I
think
that
were
provided
were
mostly
not
that
similar
to
the
subject
property.
C
C
C
At
the
end
of
the
day,
I
think
the
department
sales
comps,
which
are
the
most
direct
indicators
of
value,
do
support
the
value
on
the
subject:
property
comps,
one
and
three
are
very
similar
in
style,
size
and
features
and
have
strong
sales
of
1.4
million
dollars,
and
then
one
million
five
hundred
sixty
five
thousand
again
I.
You
know
I
think
there
wasn't
much
of
a
strong
comps
presented
by
the
agent
here,
I
think
they're
very
different
in
style
and
features.
C
So
for
that
we
recommend
a
confirmation.
Oh
sorry,
a
confirmation
of
the
revised
value
of
one
million
three
hundred
and
seventy
six
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars.
Thank
you.
E
There
are
statements
here,
but
it's
not
apparently
the
operative
word
being
changes
and
I
see,
for
instance,
one
thing
to
detached
garage
appears
to
be
original.
What's
the
change
there
and
I'm
bringing
this
up
in
part
because
the
Improvement
has
been
decreasing,
it's
recommended
to
be
decreased
by
twenty
thousand
dollars,
but
you
know
the
upstairs
bathroom
renovated.
Okay,
I
get
that
there's
a
change,
but
some
upper
overhang,
one
foot.
Is
it
bigger
or
smaller?
Please
give
this
a
little
bit
more.
You
know
change.
E
This
is
up
because
we
see
it
often
the
change
is
decrease
or
increase
in
the
overall
Improvement
value
here
other
than
a
couple
of
them.
I,
don't
know
whether
it's
bigger
or.
C
C
Sure
so,
I
think
a
lot
of
the
comps
provided
by
the
appellant
were,
you
know
different
style
different
in
size,
different
in
features.
C
Some
of
them
are
issues
where
we'll
we'll
go
out
throughout
the
year
and
update
these
records
if
they
are
older,
but
they
weren't
really
that
similar
to
the
subject,
property
and
they're
going
to
have
different
valuations
that
reflect
that
I
think
the
sales
comp
submitted
by
the
department
support
the
revised
valuation
of
the
subject
property
at
one
million
376
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars.
Thank
you.
J
Yes,
I
to
the
point
that
the
comps
provided
don't
match
the
subject.
Property
I
mean
to
the
homes
are
right
on
the
same
street
as
the
center
property
are
very
similar
in
Styles.
You
know
the
two-car
garage
is
facing
the
street
plus.
You
know
two
stories.
I
mean
these
homes
are
built
at
the
same
time
frame
as
well.
One
of
the
other
Ops
has
provided
I
would
classify
as
a
hiring
though,
and
is
basically
three
six
one.
J
Two
North
gleed
is
basically
substantially
Less
in
terms
of
its
assessed
value
than
the
subject:
property
and
actually
sold
for
1.4
million
back
in
2020s,
and
it's
not
a
direct
sales
comparable
given
the
time
frame
of
that
sales.
But
why
is
that
property
down
at
1
million
when
it's
sold
for
1.4
back
in
in
2020.?
So
there
is
evidence
that
the
property
is
over,
assessed
and
I
I
stand
by
our
our
recommended
value
of
1.22.
A
I
Thought
the
original
it
it's
a
great
mod,
look
at
it
next
to
the
some
of
the
comps.
E
J
A
A
A
The
last
two
hearings
don't
have
the
appellant
I,
don't
believe
so
we
will
go
since
we
have
Mr
King,
we'll
keep
you
right
there.
So
number
one
on
the
agenda
is
rpc01013012
at
2827,
North,
Van
Buren,
that's
something!
You
can
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
this
property.
C
Great
board:
this
is
a
one
and
three
quarter
story:
single
family,
home,
five
bedrooms,
three
and
a
half
bathrooms
a
finished
basement,
a
detached
garage
and
a
pool.
The
property
has
a
year
built
of
1948,
an
effective
age
of
2000
and
a
quality
of
very
good
plus
the
appellants
believe
that
they
have
paid
too
much
and
that
the
property
required
work.
The
property
was
inspected.
C
After
reviewing
the
work
on
the
property
and
County
records,
it
was
clear
that
the
last
point
of
renovation
for
the
property
was
1998
when
the
rear
Edition
was
built
on
the
property.
So
an
effective
age
of
2000
was
a
bit
too
aggressive
for
this,
so
the
effective
age
was
pulled
back
some.
It
was
changed
from
1998
to
1990
to
give
a
bit
of
a
buffer
to
that
most
recent
renovation
date
of
1998..
C
The
analysis
was
reviewed
to
see
if
the
quality
was
in
line.
So
despite
the
recent
purchase
price
of
1.3
million
dollars,
many
of
the
properties
in
the
analysis
that
were
in
that
upper
range
of
very
good
plus
were
larger
or
more
recent
builds.
So
taking
that
into
account
with
the
1998
Edition.
The
opening
of
the
kitchen,
the
finishing
the
basement,
the
department
feels
that
the
quality
of
very
good
minus
more
accurately
reflects
the
current
condition
of
the
property.
C
The
Department's
comp
sheet
shows
that
there's
a
strong
Market
in
that
1.2
to
1.4
million
dollar
space
for
these
renovated
and
expanded
older
properties
and
the
Southwest
owned
recent
sale
price
of
1.3
million
dollars
supports
the
revised
valuation
of
one
million
two
hundred
thirteen
thousand
seven
hundred
dollars.
Thank
you.
E
A
E
Probably
unfair
because
you're
not
primary
sister
Mr
King,
but
do
you
know
where
the
the
Ellens
suggested
value
comes
from
you
get
any
feedback
at
all.
C
No
I
don't
know
where
they,
where
they
derived
it
from
they
were
out,
I
mean
they
were
from.
They
were
from
out
of
town,
so
you
know
I,
don't
know
if
they
were
referencing
an
older
Market
that
they
were
in.
A
I
I'll,
do
it
motion
to
confirm
or
again
accept
the
counties
reduced
assessment
of
one
million
two
thirteen
seven
hundred.
G
A
A
B
B
So
this
property
is
a
one
story,
brick
siding
home.
It
has
two
bedrooms
and
one
full
bath.
The
year
belt
is
1950
and
effective
ages.
1960.
the
quality
is
average
negative,
average
minus
even
square
footage
is
910.
With
no
basement
that
Pelham
stated
in
his
application
that
the
house
has
been
assessed
at
689
000
on
Zillow
and
709
941
on
Redfin.
They
believe
that
house
should
be
assessed
at
700
000.,
the
appellant
provided
some
comps,
which
were
reviewed
by
the
department.
However,
the
department
did
use
three
comps
in
the
review.
B
These
are
found
on
page
19
of
the
Boe
packet,
which
should
have
been
page.
Four
one
was
a
land
sale
in
neighborhood,
50,
50,
19
and
the
rest
were
from
neighborhood
50
50
18.
direct
sales
were
difficult
to
find
for
a
single
family
home
that
only
has
921
square
feet
of
finished
square
footage
with
no
basement
so
their
parents,
neighborhood
50,
5019,
Broyhill,
Heights
change
on
average
to
12.9
percent
from
7.6
percent.
The
property's
quality
was
not
in
line
with
the
neighborhood.
As
a
result,
it
was
brought
down
to
average
minus.
B
The
record
has
since
been
updated
to
reflect
these
changes
and,
lastly,
The
appellant
Wanted
their
assessment
to
be
at
700
000,
but
homes
that
sold
for
that
amount
in
our
analysis
period
were
rpc-09003021,
which
was
a
land
sale,
similar
land
increased
from
720
000
to
800
000
in
their
parents,
neighborhood
with
that
palanced
land
being
valued
at
759
500..
So
it's
for
this
reason
would
like
to
ask
the
board
to
confirm
the
2023
assessment
at
821
000..
Thank
you.
E
J
E
B
It
depends
pretty
much
with
the
sales
that
have
occurred
and
what
land
is
going
for
it
and
during
the
analysis
period,
so
it
would
change
it's
not
like
a
standard
percentage.
Well,
maybe.
E
A
better
question
because
I
I
did
miss
okay,
your
your
account
sheet,
because
it
was
out
of
order
I'm.
E
That's
just
my
General
leg:
go
through
a
bunch
of
pages
and
I.
Just
somehow
didn't
see
it,
but
the
the
comparables
that
you
bring
on
your
coffee
are
the
land
prices
going
up
10
or
more
from
one
year
to
the
next
I
guess
you
have
to
go
into
the
data
record.
I
wouldn't
know
that
this
means
a
very
high
increase.
A
B
On
the
sales
analysis,
it's
the.
B
G
Yeah
this.
B
B
So
there
was
a
negative
five
percent
for
North
Harrison
Street,
but
in
2015
it
was
found
that
the
the
properties
didn't
need
the
negative
five
percent.
So
we
removed
it
from
this
property
and
we're
going
to
do
the
same
for
all
the
properties
on
Harrison
Street.
E
E
B
H
H
A
G
And
he's
got
plenty
of
width,
so
you
can
yeah
it's
a
good
one.
I'm
surprised,
they've
dropped
the
five
percent
production
for
Harrison
Street.