►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Because
this
is
a
county
requirement
and
it's
posted
I
believe
on
our
website.
The
commission
aging
website.
A
A
I
wanted
to
offer
committee
members
the
last
chance
to
comment-
and
my
plan
is
just
listen
to
your
comment.
I
I
think
we
do
not
need
any
more
discussion,
so
I
hope
I
heard.
Some
people
did
not
have
an
opportunity
to
see
the
most
recent
draft
of
the
letter,
which
is
unfortunate
because
I
did
attach
it
to
the
email
I
sent
on
Sunday,
but
now
I
heard
from
Erica
marine
and
Kathy
Scruggs
and
I'd
like
to
ask
those
three.
A
Do
you
have
anything
else
to
add
comment
on
the
letter?
The
Sunday
edition.
A
Could
I
just
add
I
forgot
to
add
an
important
thing.
Several
people
questioned
why
it's
addressed
to
Katie
Crystal,
yes
and
yeah.
She
is
the
County
Board
liaison
to
the
Commission
on
Aging
and
Rachel.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
it's
our
protocol
to
address
the
letter
to
our
liaison.
A
B
No,
no
I
thought
it
was.
You
know
with
everybody's
comments,
I
think
it
just
got
better
and
better.
Thank
you
very
much.
D
No
I
I
made
my
comments
before
and
I
I'm
only
now,
looking
at
the
the
copy
that
you
sent
on
Sunday,
so
I
wonder
if
we
should
just
sort
of
walk,
walk
through
it
or.
A
Well,
it
might
not
be
a
bad
idea
for
those
people
who
didn't
see
it.
The
major
I
mean
there
was
some
wordsmithing,
but
the
the
major
piece
that
was
added,
oh
I,
should
add
to
besides
the
wordsmithing
Erica
added
some
data
on
people
who
or
older
adults
who
intend
to
age
in
place.
A
A
It
begins,
however,
the
Commission
on
Aging
makes
the
following
three
recommendations
as
the
county
pursues
the
expanded
housing
options,
so
the
first
recommendation
and
and
I
like
I,
very
much
like
the
way
Erica
phrased
this,
because
I
couldn't
come
up
with
the
way,
is
a
comment
on
Universal,
Design,
okay
and
the
second
was
a
parking
comment
on
parking
where
we
take
no
position.
A
But
we
do
point
out
that
many
older
adults
have
difficulty
walking
the
one
quarter
or
a
half
a
mile
to
Transit
and
then
our
final
comment
is.
We
do
recommend
that
the
board
limit
development
to
58
units
per
year
and
end
this
cap
in
five
years.
This
particular
proposal
came
up
during
the
County
boards
deliberations
on
the
request
to
advertise
and
it
they
voted
down.
A
No
cap
and
this
58
unit
cap
was
discussed
by
the
board
without
a
position
taken
by
them.
So
it
is
in
the
proposal.
A
So
those
were
the
major
points
that
were
added.
A
F
Good
for
me
putting
myself
on
mute,
I
thought
I
wasn't,
but
anyway,
you
use
the
term
accessible,
inclusive
and
accessible,
and
the
term
accessible
is
used
a
couple
times.
One
two
third
paragraph:
the
proposed
enhanced
housing
options
and
provide
newly
constructed
smaller
ground
unit,
ground
for
units
and
more
accessible
choices
and
I.
Don't
know
that
there's
anything
in
here
that
or
my
question
is:
is
there
anything
in
the
plan
that
addresses
accessible
choices?
F
No,
then
I
would
take
that
out.
Okay
I
mean
we
can
put
it
in
as
one
of
our
recommendations
that
we
that
the
county
keep
an
eye
on.
A
How
the
how
this
works,
when,
when
they're
is
a
zoning
proposal
pending,
is
when
the
board
rules
on
it
or
decides
on
it,
they
can
only
take
from
they
cannot
add
to.
G
A
In
that,
it's
a
description
of
the
possibility
that
those
units
that
will
be
built
will
be
more
accessible
than
possibly
people
in
their
current
home.
F
D
H
Yes,
I
do.
Can
everyone
hear
me?
Yes,
so
I've
been
watching
the
back
and
forth
on
the
emails
I
I've
read
the
various
iterations
I
read
the
Sunday
one
that
was
sent
out
so
I've
seen
everything
that
you
know
has
been
written
up
and
I
see
no
direct
advocacy
for
older
adults.
In
this
letter
you
know,
I
see
the
word
affordable,
which,
after
the
email
exchange
and
what
was
said
by
the
County
Board
I,
saw
the
email
exchange
with
Kathy
and
Claire
in
terms
of
affordable
and
the
confusion.
H
H
I
see
you
know
accessible
and
Universal
Design
mentioned,
but
I
saw
no
direct
advocacy
advocacy
for
seniors,
specifically
around
Ingress
and
egress
thresholds
stairs
lower
level
senior
preference
I
didn't
see.
Any
of
that
you
know.
Falls
are
one
of
the
major
reasons.
Seniors
lose
their
independence.
You
know
Cindy,
you
mentioned
a
moment
ago
about
current
their
current
home
they're,
leaving
their
home
because
of
fall
risks,
and
here
we
are
we're
going
to
put
them
in
another
place.
H
It's
just
a
smaller
version
of
their
home
and
we
haven't
advocated
or
addressed
any
of
those,
and
so
you
know-
and
that's
just
inside
the
house
outside
the
house-
we're
really
ignoring
the
parking
space
requirement.
We're
missing
an
opportunity
to
try
to
do
something
there
for
for
seniors.
I
saw
the
cap
that
the
county
said
this
didn't
come
from
us.
This
came
from
the
county,
I
didn't
see
any
language
on
data
Gathering
that
we
requested
and
how
we
will
present
that
data
to
iterate
going
forward
for
older
adults.
A
Okay,
just
on
the
issue
of
Universal
Design,
that
is
not
again,
as
I
said
earlier,
on
these
zoning
proposals.
That
is
not
an
issue
on
the
table
right
now,
so
this
is
not
the
vehicle
for
the
County
Board
to
address
that
issue.
B
Hi
now
can
you
hear
me
yep,
okay,
all
right,
I'm
and
I'm.
Sorry
for
putting
my
hand
up
again,
but
I
had
not
I
didn't
see
this
on
the
screen.
When
I
first
made
my
comments
and
I'm,
it
may
be
inappropriate.
Just
tell
me,
but
in
the
second
recommendation
talking
about
Mobility.
B
I
can
recall
that
well
certainly
I
know
I
did
that
there
may
be
other
solutions
to
provide
easier
access
to
public
transit,
or
you
know
that
there,
that
is
something
that'd,
be
nice
if
they
would
look
at
also,
but
that
would
just
be.
There
may
be
other
ways
to
address
this,
and,
and
although
we
could
even
mention
you
know
about
the
what's,
the
the
little
bus
or
the
cab
that
comes
you
know,
I
mean
there
are
other
ways
to
address
getting
to
Transit
than
just
walking.
B
B
I
would
also
wonder:
would
there
be
a
place
for
us
to
to
reference
the
AARP
brochure.pdf,
whatever
all
about
renovating
your
home
in
advance?
You
know
if,
if
you
did
want
to
stay
in
the
same
house
and
again,
I
would
say
on
the
affordable
housing
master
plan.
We
had
quite
a
discussion
on
whether
or
not
we
meant
that
Aging
in
place.
B
Does
it
mean
you're
the
same
house
that
you're
living
in
now,
or
does
it
mean
in
the
same
county
or
in
the
same
and
and
we
thought
that
we
had
made
it
clear-
we
rejected
the
part
about
in
your
own
house
and
so
Aging
in
place,
yes,
but
that
could
be
in
the
neighborhood
that
could
be
in
a
new
dwelling.
That
could
be
lots
of
possibilities.
A
H
H
A
A
For
my
listening
to
the
the
board's
deliberations
as
well
as
the
Planning
Commission,
they
understand
that
we're
not
talking
about
low-income
affordability,.
A
What's
being
referenced
here
when
they,
when
they
mentioned
the
word
affordable,
is
it
will
be
less
expensive
than
the
current
cost
or
the
average
cost
of
newly
constructed
single-family
homes
in
Arlington,
which
is
around
1.25
million
right
now?
It's
my
understanding,
so
you
have
to
you,
know,
read
it
for
or
think
of
affordable
in
in
that
context
and
I
think
the
unfortunate
result
is
that
some
people
got
carried
away.
A
You
know
thinking,
affordable,
just
affordable
to
lower
income
individuals,
but
I
will
I'll
go
through
it
again
and
consider
whether
the
word
attainable
works,
better
it'd.
H
Be
just
my
yeah,
if
not
maybe
defining
so
that
you
know
older
adults,
particularly
low
income,
older
adults
that
may
not
be
attending
these
virtual
meetings
regularly.
Don't
understand
that
affordable
means
something
different
than
what
they
may
be
accustomed.
H
You
know
to
it,
meaning
or
you
know,
interpreting.
However,
it's
translated
to
their
language
and
I
think
that's
important,
because
we
are
dealing
with
older
adults
that
their
language
is
a
barrier
and
you
put
affordable
into
a
translator
in
Spanish
it
kicks
out,
you
know,
affordable
and
in
Spanish.
It
means
something
very
different
from
what
we're
describing
here.
So
right.
G
H
A
D
So
if
we
use
the
word,
if
we
do
use
the
word,
affordable,
I
kind
of
like
attainable,
but
if
we
use
the
word
affordable,
we
might
want
to
just
in
parenthesis.
Define
it
a
little
bit
so
that
people
don't
get
confused
because
I
think
that's
a
good
point,
foreign
in
parentheses
or
in
a
footnote.
Just
so
that
everybody
knows
that
we're
not
talking
about
affordable
housing
for
low-income
people.
I
Yes,
I
think
that
the
the
idea
of
of
the
circulating
this
letter
ahead
of
time
and
asking
for
comments
was
so
that
we
could,
at
this
point,
look
at
the
letter
and
and
either
accept
or
reject
it
and
not
be
wordsmithing
it
at
this
stage
and
I
say
that,
because,
while
I
don't
agree
with
every
word
or
every
point
in
the
letter,
we've
discussed
this
for
hours
and
I
think
that
the
letter
represents
a
compromise
between
all
the
things
that
you've
heard
us
say
in
the
past
and
to
go
at
this
point
to
go
changing
a
word
here
or
there
opens
it
up
because
not
everybody,
you
know
it
not
everybody
agrees
and
then
we'll
get
into
one
of
these
things
where
we
have
comment
after
common
after
comment
and
and
so
on
on,
I,
don't
want
to
do
that.
I
A
Thank
you
Maureen
very
much
because
that's
what
I
was
hoping
for,
because
we
cannot
that's
what
I
was
hoping
for
a
shorter
meeting
today.
You
know
continue
this
my
thought.
You
know
people
have
commented,
I
understand.
A
You
know
some
people
have
issues
with
certain
parts,
but
I
think
overall,
what
I
hear
is
we
can
agree
to
this
and
if
not,
when
I
present
it
to
the
Commission
on
Aging
I'll,
just
note
them
that
there
wasn't
total
agreement
by
the
committee,
but
this
was
the
majority
of
the
people
on
the
committee
agreed
to
the
letter.
J
Please
do
okay,
I,
guess,
I'm,
not
sure,
because
of
what
Maureen
was
recommending
back
on
the
issue
of
affordable,
you
could
say
financially
attainable
or
more
financially
attainable
or
you
could
say,
more
affordable.
You
know
so
it's
an
adjective
rather
than
affordable
housing,
so
those
might
be
ways
to
Nuance
it.
J
That
would
please
you
know
people,
and
then
there
were
two
areas:
I
guess
now
that
we're
meeting
I
didn't
realize
I
should
bring
them
up
by
email
earlier,
but
there
were
two
areas
that
are
part
of
the
options
within
the
RTA
that
I
thought
you
all
might
be
interested
in
weighing
in
on,
but
it
may
be
too
late.
You're,
not
revising
the
letter.
A
Okay,
do
I
hear
any
major
I
mean
overall
disagreement
with
the
letter
as
it
is,
but
I
will
consider
I
think
that
point
on
defining
affordability,
because
there
has
been
so
much
controversy
over
that
point.
That's
worthwhile
wordsmithing
in
the
letter
and
I
like
Alice's,
a
recommendation
more
to
say
more
financially,
affordable.
J
Now
Cindy,
sometimes
you
hear
it
more
financially
attainable,
so
you're
getting
away
from
the
word
affordable,
all
together,
which
is
a
way
to
avoid
that
confusion.
So
yeah,
that's
even
better,
more
financially
attainable
because,
as
we
said,
the
middle
housing,
especially
new
construction,
won't
be
the
most
affordable
on
the
market,
but
by
its
size
we
hope
it's
more
financially
attainable
and,
of
course,
over
time
as
it
ages.
As
a
at
you
know,
in
the
stock
of
housing.
You
know
more
so
over
time.
K
A
Okay,
I
was
gonna
say
that
in
early
March
the
Planning
Commission
is
going
to
hold
a
hearing
on
this
and
I'm
going
to
recommend
to
the
Commission
on
Aging
that
a
a
similar
letter
be
sent
to
the
chair
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
we,
the
commission,
on
it,
to
get
into
the
record
and
the
Commission
on
Aging.
We
may
or
may
not
testify
in
person
at
that.
It
depends
on
on
how
many
people
have
signed
up.
A
A
K
Nature,
yeah
Cindy,
it's
Linda
I'm,
so
sorry,
I've
been
listening.
All
the
time,
I
think
the
letter
it
strikes
at
the
points
that
we
think
are
most
important
to
make
with
respect
to
this
particular
regulatory
matter.
I
want
to
thank
you
all
and
everyone
else,
who've
taken
all
the
time.
The
word
Smith
that
as
carefully
as
you
have
thank
you
thank.
A
You
Linda
I
was
just
gonna
say
all
this:
the
work
we
put
into
this
for
people
who
may
not
remember
our
our
housing
committee
work
plan
that
was
completed
several
years
ago.
A
This
was
an
objective
in
the
work
plan
and
the
objective
was
to
increase
the
supply
of
residential
housing
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
missing
middle
units
in
area
zoned
as
single
family.
So
I
think
we
certainly
have
worked
to
hopefully
move
closer
to
achieving
that
objective.
A
H
H
We
have
the
call
recorded
I
think
it
should
be
available
there.
A
Okay,
Anthony
you're
you
as
a
commission
member
you're,
welcome
to
raise
that
at
the
commission
meeting
and
Rachel.
Are
you
still
honored
Rachel?
Yes,
and
my
do?
We
need
to
keep
minutes
of
this
meeting?
Yes,
okay,
well,
I'm,
taking
notes
so
Anthony
I
will
note
in
the
minutes
your
objection.
H
Yes,
please
with
the
reasoning
that
I
had
explained
earlier.
Thank
you.
A
I
I
made
a
note
of
those
thank
you,
okay,
but
so
moving
on
just
an
update
and
another
objective
of
this
committee
is
to
work
on
the
issue
of
affordable,
Assisted
Living
and
there
are
two
Assisted
Living
projects
in
the
works
both
by
Sunrise
is
the
developer.
The
first,
which
I've
mentioned
before
at
a
housing
committee
meeting,
is
the
sunrise
of
North
Arlington
on
Glebe
Road
and
the
plan
there
is
to
knock
down
the
current
building
and
build
something
brand
new.
A
The
developers
or
the
owners
of
Sunrise
feel
that
their
current
structure
is
just
too
outdated
to
renovate
and
they
need
a
new
structure.
So
they
there
was
a
meeting
of
the
long-range
planning
committee,
which
basically
was
an
informational
meeting.
A
Changes
are
needed
to
both
the
greater
land
use
plan
and
change
needed
to
zoning,
to
construct
the
new
building
on
that
North
Arlington
site,
and
the
next
step
is
we're
awaiting
the
report
from
staff
as
to
whether
the
plans
for
the
development
of
this
new
Facility
Fall
within
the
greater
land
use
plan,
and
if
they
do,
then
the
developer
will
receive
approval
from
the
County
Board
in
the
Planning
Commission.
A
To
go
forward
on
their
and
file
site
plan
documents,
so
this
one
is
just
in
the
works
and
it's
a
way
away
from
the
site
plan.
A
But
the
second
development
on
for
assisted
living
is
sunrise
of
South
Glebe,
and
this
is
a
piece
of
property
on
between
7th
South,
7th
and
South
8th.
A
Methodist
Church
used
to
be
on
that
site
because
or
the
developer
bought
it
and
they're
going
to
construct
a
new
assisted
living
facility
there,
and
the
plan
is
currently.
A
I
wrote
that
for
over
I
think
over
a
hundred
units
I
think,
is
what
they're
planning
and
all
in
the
preliminary
stage,
although
they
are
getting
ready.
A
That
one
is
at
the
point
where
the
site
plan
review
committee
is
being
formed
and
I
on
the
behalf
of
the
Commission
on
Aging,
requested
that
the
Commission
on
Aging
be
part
of
the
South
Glebe
Road
site
plan
review
committee,
Linda
and
I
had
a
meeting
with
the
developer
last
week
and
we
continue
to
push
for
some
affordable
units
which
be
which
would
be
at
a
cost
either
at
below.
The
market
rate
would
be
available
in
these
two
facilities.
A
H
Cindy
I
didn't
see
any
email
out
to
the
group
about
the
developer.
Meeting
you
and
and
Linda
had
was
that
open
to
all
the
Commissioners.
A
On
the
housing
committee,
or
is
that
just
open
too?
No,
it
wasn't
a
public
meeting.
K
K
This
was
purely
an
update
for
the
purpose
of
the
housing
for
the
purpose
of
us,
knowing
what
was
going
forward
because
there's
been
a
lot
of
miscommunication
about
just
what
a
glup
does,
and
people
were
asking
for
designs
and
all
kinds
of
other
things,
and
that
gloves
application
does
not
consider
that.
So
this
was
purely
an
update
meeting.
H
C
And
just
a
reminder
that
if
any
meetings
are
three
or
more
Commissioners,
they
need
to,
there
needs
to
be
public
notice
for
that.
So
there
are
some
meetings
like
this
that
are
informational
in
nature.
That
will
only
have
Linda
as
the
chair
and
the
committee
chair
for
some
of
those
meetings
that
take
place.
H
Is
there
anywhere
Rachel
that
or
Linda
that
these
meetings
would
be
notified
to
other
people
so
that
Commissioners
could
attend?
Is
there
a
way
to
kind
of
track
those
meetings?
So
if
a
commissioner
wanted
to
attend,
they
could.
K
A
Now
the
the
meetings
of
the
Planning
Commission
either
you
know
the
long-range
Planning
Commission,
that
committee
or
the
site
plan
review
committee.
A
A
And
as
I
said,
the
Commission
on
Aging
I
mean
I
will
continue
to
follow
and
be
the
point
person
on
on
both
these
projects.
A
D
Other
questions,
yeah
yeah
I,
have
a
question
Cindy
on
the
Glebe
Road
Sunrise.
You
said
there
were
two
things
that
have
to
come
before
we
get
to
the
site
plan
review
committee
and
one
of
them
was
the
glop
and
one
of
them
was
the
they.
A
It
that's
what
I
thought
too,
but
evidently
foreign
whatever
you
know.
They
have
all
the
all
these
Zone
zoned
areas
and
whatever
we
did
this
or
whatever
was
done
for
that
project
on
old,
free
Highway,
which
is
now
changed
to
some
other
I.
Think
it's
now
Jericho
Road.
A
So
that
gets
technical
because
I'm
sure
the
developers
would
rather
not
you
know,
go
for
the
zoning
change,
it
adds
to
their
costs
and
the
the
good
news
from
the
meeting
was
we
may
have
made
some
some
may
have
gained
something
some.
A
The
developer
informed
us
that
there
is
a
good
possibility
or
there's
a
possibility
at
least
that
the
South
Arlington
Sunrise
site
will
have
likely
to
have
some
affordable
units,
that's
how
they
phrased
it.
A
So
we
will
keep
advocating
on
that.
A
And
and
oh
and
I
should
also
add
that
I
saw
the
the
county
has
contracted
with
a
consultant
to
begin
a
study
on
affordable,
assisted
living
in
Arlington,
and
this
was
actually
playing
a
part
of
the
affordable
housing
master
plan
implementation
framework
that
was
completed
last
year
that
they
wanted
to
do
the
study
and
a
year
later
they
finally
contact
contracted
with
the
Consultants.
But
the
good
news
is,
it
is
gonna,
it
is
gonna
happen.
So
that's
good
well.
D
Just
from
an
age
friendly
perspective,
that
is
a
perfect
example
of
what
we
it
in
in
the
age
friendly
plan.
We
would
call
an
outcome
because
we
advocated
through
the
affordable
housing
master
plan
framework
yeah.
For
that
and
it
did
it,
and
here
it
is
happening
yeah
right.
A
D
I
Good
did
I
could
I
make
a
comment
about
the
the
sunrise
thing
it
kind
of
what
you
said
me.
It
kind
of
raises
a
red
flag
for
me
and
I.
Don't
think,
there's
anything
we
can
do
about
it,
but
but
in
trying
to
encourage
them
to
include
affordable
units
in
those
in
those
facilities.
It
bothers
me
that
they're
willing
to
do
it
in
South
Arlington,
but
not
North,
Arlington.
A
G
I
G
A
Right,
you're,
absolutely
right
and
the
reason
they
gave
us
that
why
they
couldn't
do
it
in
North
Arlington
is
because,
because
the
number
of
units
planned
isn't
a
sufficient
number
where
they
could
still,
you
know,
make
a
profit
or.
A
It
wasn't
financially
feasible
for
them
and
I
absolutely
agree
with
you,
and
we
will
continue
to
push
this.
You
know
unfortunately,
Christian
Dorsey
was
the
board
member
who
was
as
well
as
Katie
Crystal,
who
were
really
interested
in
this
area
and
getting
doing
something
about
affordable,
assisted
living,
and
both
of
them
are
not
going
to
run
for
re-election,
but
so
so,
when
the
commission
meets
with
the
other
County
board
members,
you
know
we're
deaf
at
least
I
hope
Linda,
that
this
will
be
one
of
the
issues.
B
A
A
H
A
This
stage
we
it's
not
defined,
and
we
need
to
have
more
discussion
on
that
foreign.
H
A
C
C
So
as
we
receive
information
we'll
you
know
that
will
be
reported
out
and
then
there
will
be
a
broader,
probably
Community,
engagement
plan
that
cphd
plans,
but
right
now
you
know,
Cindy
is
is
providing
all
of
the
information
that
is
available,
but
it
is
a
topic
that
this
this
commission,
and
especially
the
housing
committee
under
Cindy's
leadership,
has
really
been
following
closely
and
the
advocacy
coming
out
of
the
Elder
Care
zoning
study
and
what
was
approved
by
the
County
Board
in
in
2020.
This
is
a
direct
effect
impact
of
that.
C
So
the
information
that
Cindy
provided
is
is
the
the
update
that
we
currently
have
and
we'll
continue
to
share
that,
as
we
gather
as
we
receive
more
information
about
what
is
available.
A
Right
and
at
this
point
you
know
our
meetings
with
the
developers
with
even
County
board
members,
affordable
is
meant.
You
know
it's
less
than
current
market
rate,
but
we're
not
at
the
point
yet
to
get
in
and
into
any
specifics
as
to
you
know
how
much
less
than
the
market
rate
so.
D
I
was
yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
say
for
Anthony's
benefit
because
he's
a
new
member
of
this
committee
that
over
a
number
of
years
we
have
discussed
that
topic
of
what
affordable
means,
and
you
know
we
have
talked
a
lot
about
whether
we,
whether
we
should
go
for
the
auxiliary,
Grant
or
some
other
level,
and
you
know
you
could
see
that
strategically
from
a
number
of
different
viewpoints,
but
I
think
that
that's
you
know
in
Alexandria
they
had
I,
think
a
number
of
auxiliary
Grant,
a
badge,
and
so
that's
that's
one
way
we
could
go
so
in
defining
affordable.
D
H
Hey
Erica
thanks
I
know:
Arlington,
has
you
know
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
units
committed
and
I
think
that
number
continues
to
grow.
I.
Think
that's
phenomenal.
I.
Just
think
that
if
we
continue
to
use
the
word
affordable
in
other
places
that
it
doesn't
mean
the
same
thing
it
does
for
that
affordable
housing,
we
might
be
creating
an
issue
down
the
road
of
mistrust.
H
C
It's
in
the
name
of
of
the
work
that
they're
they're
directly
doing,
but
I
I
think
definitely
to
your
point
Anthony.
It's
it's
thinking
about
the
word
and
the
language
and
even
the
use
of
the
word
senior
and
and
what
that
can
entail.
But
some
of
this
it
is
progress
that
the
consultant
is
on
on
board
and
you
know
oftentimes.
C
We
invite
speakers
to
the
full
Commission
on
Aging
meetings
and
so
looking
at
having
staff
provide
staff
from
cphd
provide
some
of
the
updates
around
that
information
and
then,
if
there
are
other
engagement
for
engagement
sessions
or
meetings
or
working
groups,
as
we
receive
that
information,
we
will
share
it.
But
the
study
is
the
senior
housing
affordability
study.
D
Does
that
mean
Rachel
that
is
broader
than
affordability
and
assisted
living?
It
sounds
like
it
does
no
Helen's
shaking
her
head.
No,
no!
No.
G
I
mean
this
really
is
the
affordability
of
I
mean
when
we,
the
affordability
of
assisted
living
in
nursing
home,
but
really
focusing
in
on
the
Assisted
Living
component
of
it.
So.
D
Too
bad,
they
didn't
put
that
in
the
title.
I'll
talk
about
it
exactly
exactly.
A
Finally,
I
wanted
to
get
people's
thoughts
on
the
community
engagement
Forum
every
year.
The
Commission
on
Aging
holds
a
community
engagement
forum
where
we
get
feedback
from
the
committee
from
the
community
on
issues
affecting
older
adults
and
it
help
helps.
A
You
know,
form
our
work
plan
for
the
come
for
the
year
and
at
these
Community
engagement
forums,
the
one
for
this
year
is
scheduled
to
be
held
on
March
20th
at
in
person
at
the
Unitarian
Church,
and
it's
in
the
morning,
I
believe
is
when
we
start,
but
we
always
do
a
little
survey
with
people
attending
where
in
in
the
housing
area,
we
asked
about
some
aspect
of
housing
to
get
feedback,
and
in
the
past
we
asked
the
question
like
how
much
are
you
able
to
pay
towards
Assisted
Living?
A
And
this
is
all
you
will
see
very
unscientific,
but
we
do
get
some
feedback
from
and
another
year
we
asked
where.
Where
do
you
see
yourself
living
in
the
next
five
years
to
see?
A
If
you
know
they
plan
to
stay
in
Arlington
in
their
own
home,
and
these
were
like
multiple
choice-
questions
where
we
gave
some
options
with
always
the
other
option
as
the
final
one
where
they
could
write
in
someone
something
and,
and
then
another
year
is
asking
if
they,
if
the
individual
had
difficulty
in
paying
for
housing
in
the
county,
and
then
we
may
have
offered
some
options.
You
know
why.
Why
was
it
difficult?
A
So
my
question
is:
does
anyone
have
any
thoughts
on
a
question
for
for
this
year
for.
A
And
Audrey's
been
going
to
the
planning
meetings
for
the
Community
engagement
forum
and
I.
Don't
know
Audrey
of
you
all
have
thought
of
anything
for
the
housing
questions.
F
The
housing
question
last
year
was
so
there's
two
questions.
There's
the
questions
that
are
in
the
survey
which
I
don't
have
in
front
of
me
and
then
there's
the
question
that
was
used
in
the
focus
groups.
Yeah
we
have
and
a
focus
group
question
was
pretty
broad.
It
was
just
I
mean
what
concerns
do
you
have
about
housing
now
and
in
the
future.
F
Yeah
I
can
show
you
or
somebody
can
share
I,
have
it
up
on
my
screen.
The
report
from
last
year's
Community
engagement,
yeah.
F
A
No,
this
is
this
could
be
for
us
and
as
well
as
area
on
aging
folks
staff,
but
for
us
we
we
will
this
year
in
2023,
we
will
be
reviewing
our
work
plan,
so
I
think
for
this
year
in
particular,
it
will
help
inform
us.
You
know
whether
our
what
parts
of
our
work
plan
may
need
to
be
may
need
to
be
changed.
A
H
Yeah
for
the
community
engagement
Forum
did
we
hold
something
like
this
again
I'm
new
since
November,
but
it's
my
first
time
hearing
about
it.
Did
we
ever
hold
something
like
this
for
the
expanded
housing
options,
slash
missing
middle,
to
get
feedback
from
old
adults
specifically
to
what
would
be
important
for
them
to
stay
in
their
neighborhood,
leaving
their
single
family
home.
A
A
It
wasn't,
we
always
hold
this
in
March.
It
wasn't
specifically
addressed.
H
Maybe
we
should
include
some
questions
for
that
that
we
could
keep,
because
from
your
letter
it
looks
like
there's
going
to
be.
You
know
some
time
before
the
cap
is
removed,
which
may
give
an
opportunity
if
things
do
roll
forward
to
iterate.
It
would
be
good
for
us
to
know
what
we
should
keep
our
eye
on
to
iterate
and
hearing
directly
from
the
individuals
who
this
would
affect.
H
I
I
see,
you
know,
I
see
a
lot
of
value
in
gathering
that
data
at
that
meeting,
because
I
think
that
could
help
us.
You
know
I
mentioned
one
of
the
reasons
I
didn't
like
and
and
rejected
the
letters,
because
there's
no
data
Gathering.
That
was
just
one.
You
know
this
could
be
a
means
to
help
us
understand
what
data
as
a
commission,
to
look
for
to
gather
anybody
have
any
thoughts
on
that
anybody
see
value
in
that
other
than
me.
I
Well,
I
was
wondering
if
we
might
ask
a
question,
like
that's
a
little
broader
than
that,
but
like
what?
What
barriers
do
you
see,
given
that
we
know
that
people
want
to
age
in
place?
You
know
that's
kind
of.
We
have
a
lot
of
doubt
about
that,
but
so
what?
What
do
people
see
are
the
barriers
from
them
being
able
to
age
in
place
and
we
might
draw
out.
A
That's
good
and
I
think
that
can
be
combined
with
Anthony's
interest
and
I
think
Anthony
or
you
you
are
on
the
on
the
right
track
to
to
get
some
data
about.
If
given
the
option
of
downsizing
to
a
smaller
home,
not
in
a
multi-family
building,
let
that
be
of
interest
but.
H
Rachel,
how
do
we
advertise
this
right
now,
because
this
is
the
first
time
I'm
hearing
about
it
and
I'm
pretty
sure
all
the
older
adults
that
I
interact
with
in
in
Hispanic
communities
and
other
communities
here
in
Arlington
and
South
Arlington
particular
have
not
heard
about
this?
How
do
we?
How
are
we
advertising
in
yeah
through
these
other?
H
H
C
No
for
anyone
who's
attended
any
of
the
commission
meetings
over
the
last
few
months.
We've
mentioned
it.
We
have
a
planning
committee,
and
we've
also
mentioned
that
at
the
commission
meetings
and
our
next
meeting
is
on
Tuesday
February
21st,
and
so
we
have
a
number
of
different
individuals
from
the
community.
Who've
been
participating
in
the
planning
of
of
this
event.
C
Carlos
Velasquez,
who
is
a
commissioner,
has
been
helping
to
develop
some
updated
flyers.
I,
put
a
link
in
the
chat
for
the
option
for
registration.
It's
going
out
through
the
Arlington
County
newsletter,
so
the
inside
Arlington
newsletters
that
come
out
Arlington,
neighborhood
Village
is
hoping
to
promote
the
event.
The
commission's
public
information
and
Outreach
committee
is
helping
to
advertise
as
well.
C
C
Susan
Ryan
from
the
greenhouse
project
will
be
talking
about
some
creative
options
for
housing.
For
older
adults
in
the
community.
The
theme
is
going
to
be
reimagine
aging,
and
so
everyone
has
a
chance
to
attend
in
person
or
virtually
depending
on
on
preferences
availability
and
then
we'll
have
staff
and
Commissioners
throughout
the
community.
Helen
and
I
will
continue
to
give
updates
at
the
commission
meetings,
and
we
really
I
think
you
know
Maureen
really
really
highlighted.
A
point
is
that
we
do
want
to
keep
the
conversation
Broad
and
not.
C
We
know
how
passionate
everyone
is
about
missing
middle
and
so
the
event
will
take
place
on
March
20th,
which
will
be.
C
C
And
so
you
know
we
know
we
have
over
900
people
connected
to
real
estate
tax
relief
programs.
We
do
highlight
some
of
those
data
points
each
year
and
there's
a
presentation
that
we
provide
shandia
over
the
last
few
years
has
done
a
phenomenal
job
of
doing
a
summary
report
of
the
community
engagement
forum
and
then
the
feedback
that
we
collect,
both
from
the
breakout
sessions
from
the
surveys
that
we
that
we
collect
from
the
information
that's
gathered.
C
All
of
that
goes
into
a
summary
report
and
really
helps
to
shape
the
age-friendly
Arlington
action
plan.
But
again
our
next
planning
meeting
is
going
to
be
February
21st
at
one
o'clock
on
Microsoft
teams
and
if
anyone
is
interested
in
attending
that
I
believe
we
have
that
on
our
calendar
of
events.
And
it's
it's
welcome
to
anyone
who
wants
to
join
the
planning
session.
I
C
No
sorry,
we've
it's
34
000
of
individuals,
age,
60
and
above
good
thing.
B
I
asked
you
34
000,
and
it's
60.,
okay
and
well.
So
those
are
the
kinds
of
numbers,
because
I
never
can
keep
them
straight,
that
if
I
have
it
on
a
little
flyer
of
the
demographics,
you
know,
for
example,
just
how
many
people
are
we
talking
about
and
how
many
of
them
live
in
single-family
homes,
how
many
of
them
live
in
apartments?
B
How
many
of
them
are
you
know
in
which
zip
codes
I
was
on
the
retr
project
a
few
years
ago
and
It's
that
kind
of
data
that
I
think
is
really
helpful
for
people
to
understand
the
scope
of
what
we're
talking
about
so
that
that
would
be
his
suggestion.
I
would
have
as
if
there,
if
that
data
could
be
provided,
so
that
when
you're,
reflecting
on
what
policies
should
be
out
there
or
what
programs
should
be
funded,
it
helps
to
know
well.
How
big
is
the
problem.
C
No,
absolutely
thank
you.
Kathy
I
think
those
are
great
points
and
that's
one
of
the
things
there's
so
much
information.
We
try
to
capture
as
much
as
we
have
and
share
that
at
the
engagement
forum,
and
just
thank
you
for
your
service
on
the
real
estate
tax
relief
program.
That's
something
that
serves
over
900
households
in
Arlington
and
really
helps
people
who
who
have
trouble,
affording
property
taxes
who
need
a
an
exemption
or
deferral
to
be
able
to
continue
to
live
in
the
community.
So
thank
you
for
for
mentioning
that
program.
A
Yeah,
thank
you
and
data
is
another
issue
that
was
part
of
our
work
plan
or
okay.
What
pieces
of
data
are
missing
that
the
committee
never
was
able
to
get
to
in
in
Prior
years,
because
we
have
bits
and
pieces,
but
we
need
to
pull
it
all
together.
A
A
Okay,
our
next
I'm,
not
sure
when
the
next
meeting
will
be,
and
if
it's
after
March
in
March
my
term
as
a
Commission
on
Aging
member,
expires
and
I,
observe
on
the
commission
for
two
years.
A
So
I
will
be
going
off
I
plan
to
still
stay
involved
with
this
committee
and
Audrey
has
graciously
agreed
to
become
chair.
So
I,
don't
know
what
her
plans
will
be
for
our
next
meeting
and
whether
we
we
will
need
to
meet
in
March.
We
have
been
meeting
every
other
month,
but
so
stay.
A
That's
the
term:
that's
right,
just
the
term
expires.
Okay,
great
great!
Well,
thank
you
again
for
everybody's
input
into
the
this
work
on
what
is
it
now
expanded
housing
options,
but
I
I
do
appreciate.
Never
I
appreciate
everybody's
comments.
So
thank
you.
Thank.