►
Description
FY21 (2020-2021) Planning Work
Program Presentation
A
All
right,
ooh,
that's
kind
of
loud
good
afternoon,
everybody
for
some
reason.
This
seems
a
little
louder
than
usual
I'll.
Try
to
not
overdo
anyway.
Welcome
to
our
C
PhD
proposed
fiscal
year,
2021
planning,
division,
work,
plan,
work
session,
so
I
use
work
a
couple
of
times
which,
when
we
get
into
this,
it's
pretty
clear
work
I
think
is
the
theme.
There
is
a
lot
of
work
going
on
well
I!
B
A
B
A
Have
a
big
meeting
tonight:
that's
fine!
They
don't
need
to
be
here
and
it's
wonderful
to
have
our
staff.
I
will
note
that
our
colleague
Eric
cutshall,
he
is
under
the
weather,
so
he
will
not
be
joining
okay.
So
it's
just
the
four
of
us,
but
I
think
we
will
hold
down
the
fort
and
I.
Think
I
will
just
say
that
this
is
when
you
look
at
I.
Would
I
looked
over
the
the
presentation
and
the
work
we
got.
I
mean
this
is
very
full.
A
There
is
a
lot
here
that
we're
doing
we've
got
long-range
planning
like
that
development
issues.
We
got
zoning
issues,
housing
housing,
pops
up
a
number
of
times,
as
it
should
staffs
going
to
be
presenting
their
accomplishments
to
us
and
their
proposed
plan
and
priorities
moving
forward
and
what
they're
hoping
to
get
from
us
is
some
feedback
from
board
members
and
actually
played
a
Commissioner
to
like
some
of
your
input
on
what
we
think
about
these
proposed.
The
proposed
plan
and
the
priorities.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
happy
to
be
here.
Every
year
we
have
a
planning
work
plans
session
with
the
board,
where
we
lay
out
priorities,
there's
one
particular
slide
and
in
today's
presentation,
which
I
think
is
particularly
telling
it's
all
those
things
that
we
never
discussed
last
year,
that
we
ended
up
doing
it
anyway,
there's
a
lot
of
those,
and
so
as
much
as
planners
like
to
plan.
Sometimes
things
just
happen.
C
We
have
a
lot
of
efforts
gonna
into
this
plan
and
collaborating
with
sister
agencies
parks
and
des
and
AED,
and,
as
with
all
things
requires
a
balance,
and
so
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
the
man
who
balances
many
plates
on
the
end
of
one
of
those
sticks
and
spins
them
all
Bob
Duffy,
who
is
going
to
be
assisted
by
other
planning
staff.
Thank.
D
You
County,
Manager
and
good
afternoon
to
the
County
Board,
and
certainly
the
chair
and
vice-chair
of
our
planning
commission
I'm,
looking
forward
to
this
presentation
to
say
afternoon
of
our
preliminary
FY
21
work
program.
The
slide
that
you
have
before
you
and
page
3
of
the
presentation.
I
want
to
just
give
a
brief
overview
of
what
I'll
cover
this
afternoon
and
again.
This
is
a
lot
of
material
to
digest
it.
D
Preliminary
work
program
covers
I'm,
going
to
talk
about
our
organization,
staffing
I
want
to
highlight
some
major
accomplishments,
as
the
manager
said,
I
think
we've
accomplished
or
in
the
process
of
accomplishing
what
we
set
out
in
last
year's
work
program
with
you,
as
well
as
a
number
of
other
important
elements
that
staff
was
able
to
produce.
I
want
to
talk
about
our
commitment
to
innovation
and
in
terms
of
planning
policy
and
practice
organization,
staff
process
and
engagements.
D
There
are
a
number
of
tables
that
are
attached
to
this
presentation
and
I'll
talk
about
those
in
a
minute
that
provide
a
great
level
of
detail
in
terms
of
each
of
the
projects
or
programs
that
we're
pursuing,
and
then
there
are
some
attachments
that
describe
each
of
the
projects
in
more
detail.
So,
first
as
I
lead
into
the
work
program,
I
want
to
thank
the
great
work:
the
gen
Smith
Aaron,
Schreiber,
Chris,
Kreider
and
Joann
Harrison,
and
the
entire
planning
staff
have
done
to
help
us
put
together
this
presentation
and
work
program
for
you
today.
D
Without
them,
this
certainly
would
be
impossible,
and
so
they've
done
an
outstanding
job
in
in
preparing
this.
For
for
the
presentation
today,
again,
an
organizational
chart
you've
seen
this
a
number
of
times.
As
you
know,
we
have
two
major
sections,
current
planning,
which
is
led
by
Aaron
Schreiber,
comprehensive
planning
led
by
Jennifer
Smith
in
the
urban
design
section,
which
is
important
to
not
only
the
functions
of
the
Planning
Division,
but
the
entire
department
and
many
other
departments.
D
So,
looking
a
little
further
into
our
current
staffing
and
organization,
31
staff
today,
I
want
to
note
that
during
the
course
of
last
year
he
would
release
resources,
did
a
comprehensive
study
of
all
of
our
planning
titles
and
made
some
important
recommendations,
some
that
we've
been
wanting
to
pursue
for
some
time,
and
that
is
the
creation
of
a
new
supervisory
level
section.
Now
these
are
existing
positions
that
appear
in
bold
they're,
not
new
positions.
They
involve
reclassifications.
D
For
example,
Jen
Smith
was
reclassed
for
planning
supervisor,
to
planning
manager,
Erin
Schreiber
for
planning
supervisor
to
planning
manager,
and
we
have
three
new
position:
titles
that
affected
principal
planners,
that
enable
them
to
play
a
larger
role
in
more
of
a
supervisory
and
management
role
within
their
sections,
which
is
important
for
the
development
of
our
staff.
We
haven't
had
this
position
between
a
planning
supervisor
and
our
principal
planner,
so
it's
a
way
to
enable
development
of
our
staff
in
some
important
ways.
D
The
half
position
would
increase
one
of
our
associate
planners
who's
playing
a
key
role
with
housing
Arlington
and
we're
asking
for
a
new
principal
planner
to
assist
in
the
comprehensive
planning
work
program.
So
we've
based
the
work
program
you'll
see
today
on
our
staffing
resources
and
needs
just
to
highlight
some
of
the
accomplishments
over
this
past
year.
D
Again,
we
we
projected
10
site
plan
applications
be
approved
that
we're
actually
nine
involving
5.6
million
square
feet
over
three
thousand
residential
units
and
when
you
look
at
the
community
benefits,
particularly
the
implementation
of
our
affordable
housing
master
plan,
a
commitment
of
over
thirty
four
million
dollars.
Now
that
includes
the
Amazon
Met
Park
commitment,
but
thirty
four
million
dollars
a
significant
milestone
for
the
county.
With
two
hundred
seventy
seven
CAF's
again
plays
a
large
role
of
helping
meet
our
goals
of
our
affordable
housing
master
plan.
On
the
annual
basis.
D
D
There
were
14
Planning,
Commission
meetings
during
the
past
year,
52
subcommittee
or
committee
meetings
of
the
Planning
Commission
involving
SoCo
lrpc
and
SPRC,
a
considerable
commitment
of
time
by
our
citizen
planners,
and
it
certainly
should
be
noted,
housing
arlington
again,
as
you
can
see
in
mid-year,
we
pivoted
to
play
a
key
role:
working
with
the
housing
division
on
missing
middle
pre-planning
and
scoping,
as
well
as
a
number
of
zoning
ordinance.
Amendments
dealing
with
institutional
parking
regulation,
changes,
elder
care
phase
one
and
again
following
the
significant
flooding
issue,
the
the
county
experienced.
D
Our
staff
played
a
key
role
with
the
emergency
recovery
office
that
was
set
up
and
certainly
we're
now
working
with
DES
staff
on
the
flood
recovery
committee
work,
that's
underway.
As
you
know,
we're
going
to
be
very
actively
involved
with
apartment
of
public
wreck,
Parks
and
Recreation
with
a
biophilic
cities
network
that
application
is
complete
and
I
believe
it's
been
submitted,
Erin
Schreiber
at
his
staff
or
working
with
DES
on
vision,
zero
and
again
the
orling
Terron
initiative
continues
to
be
a
major
effort,
particularly
the
Clarendon
in
other
parts
of
our
commercial
districts.
D
D
Our
organization,
staffing
and
process
engagement
and
I've
highlighted
some
of
the
areas
that
are
going
to
be
key
for
us
and
have
been
key
for
our
operations,
whether
it's
housing
and
community
equity,
resiliency
biophilia,
or
of
a
natural
areas
planning
for
public
facilities
and,
most
importantly,
working
with
my
partner,
the
Zoning
Administrator
who's
with
us
today
to
think
about
how
we
can
work
together
to
form
a
more
21st
century.
Zoning
ordinance
in
terms
of
practice,
maintenance
and
amendments
terms
of
the
organization.
D
Housing
Arlington
has
given
us
a
new
opportunity
to
reorient
restructure
staff
to
tackle
that
major
priority
for
our
community
in
terms
of
cross
functional
assignments
inside
the
department
inside
the
division,
and
that's
going
to
continue
to
be
the
poor
important
as
our
work
program
continues.
We
continue
to
support
work
on
a
number
of
fronts
on
staffing.
I
won't
go
into
all
of
these,
but
again
it's
important
that
we
continue
to
mentor.
D
Again,
we
continue
to
work
with
our
planning,
commissioners
on
the
SPRC
scheduling
and
reporting,
and
one
thing
that
we've
started
to
work
on
in
Chris
Kreider,
working
with
the
Zoning
Administrator
and
myself.
We
tackle
about
a
hundred
and
thirty
to
150
administrative
reviews
and
approvals
every
year,
some
of
them
involving
things
like
moving,
add
or
additional
events,
small
changes
either
to
a
facade
or
to
landscaping
that
we
can
simplify,
and
so
we're
going
to
be
reporting
back
to
the
county
manager
later
this
year
on
how
we
can
do
that.
D
D
Lastly,
engagement
continues
to
be
paramount
and
I'm
going
to
focus
on
two
recent
initiatives
that
that
we
that
we've
put
into
practice,
but
lastly,
I
want
to
note
that
our
ongoing
collaboration
with
the
Planning
Commission
will
continue
to
be
vitally
important.
Given
the
work
program
this
coming
year
and
providing
planning
commissioners,
particularly
many
of
our
new
commissioners,
you've
appointed
with
ongoing
and
continuous
learning
opportunities
and
resources,
we've
done
a
number
of
things
in
that
area,
but
in
terms
of
examples
of
technology.
D
New
tools
that
we've
been
able
to
put
together
that
are
pretty
important
and
we're
using
a
new
technology.
Kinivo
thanks
to
Brian
who's,
helped
us
with
our
communication
staff
on
this
and
Jessica
marguerite
from
the
department's
communication
team.
We
now
have
introduced
what
we're
calling
a
virtual
walking
tour
all
of
the
site
plan
review
processes
begin
usually
with
some
form
of
walking
tour.
Now
we
won't
do
that.
D
We
have
a
new
tool
that
enables
commissioners
and
the
community
to
experience
the
site
to
online,
provide
questions,
get
feedback
and,
as
you
can
see,
for
staff
to
continually
load
new
information
into
this,
so
we
have
a
virtual
approach
to
understanding
the
site
and
the
project
in
terms
of
comprehensive
or
long-range
planning.
The
board
will
recall
recently
we
had
a
major
community
work
session
with
Ally
highway,
and
our
project
manager
is
using
a
new
tool
that
enables
the
community
to
have
a
continuous
dialogue
with
staff
on
issues
that
were
subject
of
that
work
session.
D
As
many
of
the
board
members
know,
you've
seen
the
big
boards
that
we'll
have
at
the
work
session
asking
citizens
property
owners
businesses
to
provide
us
with
their
comments
and
ideas.
Now,
we've
translated
that
into
an
online
communication
tool
that
allows
readers
to
add
their
comments
and
thoughts
on
an
ongoing
basis.
We've
gotten
a
great
response
to
this
new
tool
and
you
can
see
one
of
the
comments
above
so
all
of
those
yellow
circles
represent
comments
that
we
receive
we're
recording
these,
and
it
continues
the
outreach
effort
well
beyond
the
work
session
itself.
D
So
two
great
examples,
this
next
slide
I
think
is
extremely
important,
not
only
in
terms
of
the
factors
that
influence
our
upcoming
work
program,
but
also
the
lens
of
equity,
biophilia
sustainability
resilience
that
we're
going
to
have
to
continue
to
look
at
as
a
planning
team
as
a
county
as
we
address
some
of
these.
These
factors,
the
work
program
that
I'll
present
this
afternoon
is
within
the
scope
of
our
current
staff
resources
and
capacity.
Again,
it
addresses
plan
growth
and
I
want
to
stress
plan
growth
that
that
would
part
of
part
of
the
work
program.
D
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
just
give
you
some
highlights
of
the
planning
division,
work
program
for
FY,
21
and
I've
organized
them
around
three
areas:
core
functions.
These
are
the
functions
programs
projects
that
we're
required
either
by
county
regulation.
The
zoning
ordinance
or
by
state
legislation
such
as
are
some
of
our
comprehensive
planning
work
and
our
work
with
the
Planning
Commission
itself.
A
number
of
housing
planning,
housing
and
Zoning
initiatives,
some
many
of
which
we've
already
started
and
will
continue
into
this
coming
year
and
third,
most
important
and
the
manager
referenced.
D
D
We
believe
that
there'll
be
approximately
15
major
site
plan,
applications
that
could
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
County
Board.
Remember.
Last
year
we
projected
10.
We
got
pretty
close,
so
the
planned
growth
continues
to
move
forward
in
table.
2,
that's
attached
to
the
presentation.
We've
highlighted
those
projects
that
we
can
talk
more
about
those
in
a
minute,
we'll
see
at
least
two-phase,
develop
and
site
plans.
The
first
that
the
board,
Planning
Commission,
will
see
will
be
lead.
It
related
to
Shirlington
and
the
work
staff
is
doing
there
as
well
as
the
WIDA
application.
D
We
will
likely
process
200
use
permit
in
site
plan
amendment
applications,
both
in
terms
of
renewals
and
new
application
over
the
coming
year.
As
indicated
earlier,
our
support
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
its
committees,
the
SPRC
lrpc
and
zoko
working
Erin
Schreiber
and
his
staff
working
with
planning
commissioners
picked
up
on
the
SPR.
Sea-Side
have
done
some
important
things
to
help
with
the
scheduling,
an
organization
of
agendas
with
SPRC
to
be
sure
that
we'll
be
able
to
tackle
the
volume
of
work
that
you
see
above
and
we're
pretty
confident
that
we
can
get
there.
D
But
again,
it's
going
to
require
close
collaboration
with
our
commissioners.
We'll
continue
to
support
the
public
facility
review
committee,
which
the
county
board
approves
we're
going
to
see.
The
Career
Center
is
an
important
aspect
of
our
work
program
next
year.
Again,
some
of
the
planning
initiatives
that
are
underway
and
will
complete
or
make
great
progress
in
over
the
coming
year,
Shirlington
special
general
land
use
plans,
study
you'll
see
that
in
the
spring
the
highway.
D
We
are
initiating
the
Pentagon
City
phase
development
site
plan,
we're
looking
at
a
March
start
with
this.
As
you
know,
the
MOA
has
been
signed
by
the
major
property
owners
on
Friday.
We
received
a
number
of
proposals
with
a
consultant
to
do
that.
Work.
Tuzik
is
in
the
process
that
working
with
purchasing,
we
have
interdepartmental
team
that
will
be
reviewing
those
and
will
be
proceeding
towards
a
contract
very
shortly
housing
arlington.
D
There
are
a
number
of
components
to
this
and
again
our
acting
housing
directors
here
is,
along
with
richard
tucker
and
they'll,
be
able
to
address
more
of
these
more
of
these
elements
of
our
work
program,
whether
it's
enabling
over
400
family
dwellings
and
several
of
our
zoning
districts
to
make
improvements
and
make
sure
that
housing
stock
is
retained
to
our
housing,
conservation,
district
recommendations,
new
zoning
tools
and
work
on
the
missing
middle.
We
have
a
full
range
of
zoning
ordinance
amendments
that
we
can
discuss
with
you
and
again
there
is
a
separate
attachment
F.
D
We
have
a
work
program
that
will
initiate
that
work
and
again,
that
involves
multiple
departments
as
well
as
Arlington
public
schools
and
again
several
new
areas
that
really
are
an
outgrowth
of
of
other
work.
Stormwater
management
we're
actively
involved
with
the
committee.
The
DES
is
formed
to
make
recommendations
this
spring
to
the
county
manager,
the
bio
facility
I
feel
like
cities
network
and
as
part
of
the
update
of
the
landscape
element
of
the
comp
plan.
D
We're
also
going
to
be
working
in
parallel,
and
this
will
involve
our
Landscape
Architecture
staff
to
begin
the
process
of
updating
some
of
our
landscape
standards,
which
is
long
overdue.
This
will
help
get
ahead
of
some
of
the
recommendations
from
the
public
spaces
master
plan,
the
biophilic
principles
that
the
board
has
embraced
in
the
resolution
and
some
other
opportunities.
D
So
following
the
work
program,
the
summary
there
are
a
series
of
tables
and
the
tables
provide
greater
information
for
each
of
the
projects
and
some
that
I
haven't
covered.
I've
tried
to
provide
some
highlights
this
afternoon.
It
defines
the
actual
program
and
project
in
the
various
sub
elements
or
parts
of
that
work
program
or
project.
D
Now,
it's
always
important
to
understand
what
are
some
of
the
things
that
again
we
have
limited
planning
services
in
FY
21
and
some
that
we
believe,
unfortunately,
that
we
have
to
recommend
you
consider,
including
in
future
work
programs
in
terms
of
the
planning,
limited
planning
services
will
be
scheduled
to
begin
our
five-year
update
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
This
is
required
by
the
Commonwealth.
D
While
we
can
start
that
it's
going
to
be
in
a
limited
capacity
in
Ind
FY
21,
there
are
a
number
of
conference
of
plan
updates
implementation
participation
that
we
play
what
will
be
involved,
but
the
frequency
and
the
level
of
involvement
will
have
to
back
off
on
slightly
the
general
Angie's
plan.
Some
studies
are
recommendations,
we're
completing
the
Shirlington
recommendations
to
bring
forward
in
the
spring.
D
We,
while
we
provided
some
staff
support
to
ad
on
the
for
my
run,
Valley
Arts,
District
formation.
Our
role
will
be
more
limited
in
that
during
this
next
year,
the
zoning
ordinance
for
the
Crystal
City
plan
dealing
with
building
height
amendments.
As
you
know,
we've
been
working
with
with
jbg
on
exploring
the
feasibility
of
this.
D
We
believe
we
may
have
a
path
forward.
Does
it
require
some
further
work,
and
this
will
likely
be
undertaken
in
the
third
quarter
of
this
year
with
bringing
recommendations
in
the
final
quarter
of
21,
but
we
leave
believe
we
may
have
some
options
to
move
forward
with
this.
We
continue
to
meet
with
the
developer
about
this.
This
opportunity
again
public
facilities
planning
one
area
I
want
to
note
that
we've
added
what
we're
calling
a
small
business
support.
Again,
there
are
a
number
of
project
areas
that
we
undertook
last
year
that
were
related
to
small
business.
D
During
this
coming
year,
we
are
going
to
look
at
the
Columbia
Pike
ground
floor
uses
determine
whether
we
can
expand
opportunities
for
alternative
uses
to
continue
to
support.
Revitalization
of
the
pike
I
think
an
important
opportunity
that
we're
also
going
to
include
in
our
work
program
is
to
look
back
at
the
current
special
exception
and
permitted
uses
that
are
within
the
zoning
orders.
To
date,
some
of
them
may
be
outdated
and
may
be
better
suited,
moving
from
special
exception
or
a
use
permit
to
permitted.
D
The
implementation
of
the
form,
our
own
Valley
glop
and
zoning
amendments
again
work.
The
DS
leading
continues
on
the
public
arts
district,
which
will
have
we
informing
that
effort.
We
have
included
a
major
zoning
study
of
public
districts
in
turning
districts
to
support
public
facility
operations
and
again
we
may
need
to
postpone
that
the
childcare
initiative
phase
two
again
we
postponed
that
last
year.
We
may
have
to
do
that
again.
This
year
there
have
been
a
number
of
recommendations
in
terms
of
the
sign
ordinance
to
open
the
ordinance
up
and
study
amendments.
D
But
we
do
not
plan
on
opening
the
sign
ordinance
up,
but
we've
made
that
clear
to
chamber
staff,
and
recently
you
heard
about
the
need
I
think
we
discussed
with
one
of
our
our
managers
of
some
of
our
successful
farmers
markets
about
having
off-premise
signs
and
our
lova
and
I
discussed
this,
and
we
can
provide
a
little
more
detail
on
this.
If
you've
got
a
question
about
it,
we'll
probably
have
to
put
off
any
major
revisions
to
our
four
point.
D
Is
there
I
need
to
rethink
what
a
sector
plan
is?
Well,
we
need
sector
plans
as
we
in
them
over
the
last
several
decades
in
the
future,
and
how
would
an
alternative?
How
would
alternatives
to
approaching
that
level
of
detail
planning
which
has
been
so
important
to
our
lling
ttan?
How
could
that
apply
in
Boston
or
Virginia
square,
where
we
have
two
of
our
oldest
sector
plants?
D
This
is
ultimately
something
that
we're
going
to
need
to
tackle
and
fortunately,
given
our
level
of
staffing
and
the
commitments
it
may
be
challenging,
but
I
suspect
that
planning
commissioners
will
have
something
to
say
about
this,
so
just
to
highlight
some
of
the
limited
planning
services
and
some
of
the
areas
that,
unfortunately,
we
think
we
will
not
be
able
to
get
to
an
FY
21
and
may
have
to
go
back
to
22.
So
chair,
Garvey,
I'm,
gonna,
complete
that
part
of
my
presentation
and
it
opened
up
for
County,
Board
and
Planning
Commission
discussion.
Thank.
A
You
and
we
do
have
our
Planning
Commission
up
yet
before
I
turn
it
over
to
our
Planning
Commission,
though
I
I
want
to
welcome
I'm,
not
sure
arlov
Obama
own
administrator,
thank
you
for
being
here
with
us
and
I
wanted
to
see
if
the
either
the
manager
or
simio.
If
you
wanted
to
make
any
comments,
I
will
draw
my
colleagues
attention
to.
A
If
you
get
the
way
back
of
the
slide,
deck
slides,
46
and
47
have
a
little
more
detail
on
priority
items:
they're
kind
of
in
different
sort
of
buckets,
long-term,
short-term
and
condensed
process
and
I,
don't
know
mark.
If
you
wanted
to
sort
of
address
what
that
is
a
little
bit,
you
and
I
had
talked
about
that
just
a
little
bit
actually.
C
Okay,
so
we
had
over
the
last
year
or
two
we
have
a
convert.
We
have
a
constant
conversation
that
takes
place
among
board
members
and
between
board
members
and
staff
that
talk
about
studies
related
specifically
to
the
zoning
ordinance,
and
we
try
to
come
up
with
a
typology
that
puts
them
in
buckets,
and
so
the
buckets
have
a
long-term
study
bucket,
a
short-term
review
in
a
condensed
process,
essentially
with
each
of
those
goes
a
certain
level
of
public
engagement.
C
As
you
work
your
way
down
that
list,
the
public
engagement
is
less
and
the
process
is
less
with
an
understanding
that
we
will
be
quicker
and
getting
to
some
things.
And
so
that's
that's
the
typology
we've
we've
used,
and
so,
if
you,
if
you
have
thoughts
about
whether
we
put
things
in
the
right
buckets
or
whether
there
are
things
that
belong
in
out
of
the
bucket
those
I
think
those
are
theirs.
That
slide
and
there's
a
another
slide
following
that
which,
which
also
has
some
additional
items.
That's
the
future
list.
C
That
is,
those
are
all
things.
Those
are
all
things
that
are
ongoing,
it's
just
in
its
future
right,
yes,
there's
a
future,
and
then
we
even
have
a
bonus
slide
slide
48,
which
is
things
we
just
didn't,
want
to
put
in
a
bucket,
because
right
now
we're
not
exactly
sure
what
they
are
and
where
they
would
go.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
So
folks,
that's
as
I
said,
there's
a
lot
for
us
to
process
and
we're
not
gonna
begin
to
finish
it
here,
but
I
think
that's
that's
helpful
too,
for
you
to
kind
of
explain
a
little
bit.
Thank
you
and
thank
you
mr.
Duffy.
So
now
we'll
go
to
our
Planning
Commission,
then
any
thoughts
or
recommendations
or
comments
you'd
like
to
make
thank.
B
You
very
much
I
want
to
start
by
saying
how
impressed
the
Planning
Commission
remains,
both
by
staffs
ability,
their
knowledge
and
competence
and
their
ability
to
interact
with
our
very
engaged
public,
including
the
Planning
Commission,
because
it's
one
thing
to
know
material
and
it's
another
to
be
able
to
explain
it
to
everyone.
We
have
a
lot
of
planning
commissioners
who
are
not
planners,
but
also
the
scope
and
breadth
of
what
we
can
accomplish
with
all
this
expertise
and
dedication,
as
well
as
the
ambitiousness
of
these
work
programs
both
last
year
and
this
year.
B
And
a
lot
of
this,
of
course,
is
in
response
to
demand,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
demand
and
we
continue
to
think
both
short
term
with
the
projects
at
hand
and
long
term
with
how
to
plan
for
the
areas
and
how
to
improve
upon
what
we're
already
doing.
We're
impressed
as
well
with
the
repeated
innovation
and
addressing
a
lot
of
these
issues.
B
For
example,
the
upcoming
PD
SP
and
trying
to
consider
community
benefits
at
a
higher
level,
considering
several
upcoming
projects
in
Crystal
City,
all
at
once,
and
with
the
board
and
staff
actions
that
align
with
our
community
visions,
for
example,
some
of
the
recent
actions
that
allowed
for
flexibility
with
the
community
pool
sighting
and
the
permitted
revisions
to
the
interiors
of
non-conforming
homes.
We
know
our
jacent
jurisdictions
actually
zone
those
sort
of
uses
out.
B
So
it's
really
heartening
to
see
that
these
reflect
what
we're
hearing
in
the
community
and
the
vision
that
we
have
how
we
want
to
sort
of
celebrate
our
own
diversity
and
our
Community
Development.
We
also
feel
we're
starting
to
see
some
of
this
progressive
action
and
planning
aligned
with
our
visions
reflected
in
some
of
our
recent
SPR
seas.
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
snowball
effect.
B
As
this
comes
forward
with
the
key
bridge
Marriott
and
the
focus
on
the
natural
landscape
and
with
artists
and
their
focus
on
biophilia
being
very
responsive
to
both
the
discussions
that
they
had
with
Lee
highway
early
in
the
planning
process
and
what
they
heard
from
the
community
in
the
SPRC,
we're
very
pleased
to
see
additional
staffing
options
and
we're
always
really
heartened
and
gratified
to
see
staff
mobility,
to
see
staff
able
to
move
up
and
see
opportunities
for
them.
We're
intrigued
by
mr.
E
B
Of
that,
before,
especially
in
our
era
of
growth
and
change,
and
we're
grateful,
as
always
for
the
staff
responsiveness
to
the
Planning
Commission
issues
as
we
take
on
our
work
of
facilitating
the
public
engagement
around
these
identified
planning
issues.
So,
for
example,
we
had
presentations
from
staff
last
year,
which
were
extremely
helpful
to
PC
in
terms
of
the
Rosslyn
sector
plan
in
the
Crystal
City
sector
plan.
B
The
virtual
tours
it's
becoming
more
more
difficult
to
have
actual
walking
tours
and
we'll
miss
them,
but
we're
getting
really
busy
and
it's
dark
or
it's
you
know,
weathers,
doesn't
cooperate
and
just
recently
something
small
staff
was
able
to
put
up
our
draft
motions
during
the
Planning
Commission
hearings
which
you've
always
had.
But
we
haven't
had
in
everybody
processes
that
information
differently,
and
that
was
a
big
benefit
to
some
of
our
members.
B
So
key
issues
around
which
the
Planning
Commission
is
especially
concerned,
and
we
want
to
highlight-
and
these
are
things
that
we
hear
from
the
broader
community-
which
we
feel
we
represent
and
also
what
we
observe
in
our
own
review,
of
the
plans
and
policies
when
we
look
at
long
range
planning,
zoko
amendments
and
so
on.
The
first
one,
commissioner
LAN
Tommy
is
going
to
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
and
mr.
Duffy
did
give
you
a
highlight
on
this.
B
Updating
our
old
sector
plans,
as
well
as
the
glup
in
the
zoning
ordinance
as
much
as
possible
to
reflect
our
current
development
vision
and
goals,
and
this
is
related
to
the
issue
that
you
might
have
heard
if
you
watch
the
PC
last
Monday
regarding
desired
development
density,
sort
of
being
precluded
by
current
planning
documents
and
policies.
The
second
is
our
desire
to
continue
to
support
the
design
and
placemaking
opportunities
for
our
Civic
infrastructure,
essentially
ensuring
that
we
don't
look
back
in
25
years
at
bridges
or
other
public
facilities
and
think
boy.
B
F
You
Commissioner
Guerin,
first
of
all,
I,
do
want
to
join
myself
to
the
comments
that
Commissioner
Garin
is
made
about
staff
we've
a
very,
very
solid
working
relationship
with
staff
they're
highly
competent.
They
know
what
they're
doing
the
advice
they
give
us.
The
work
they
do
with
us
has
been
in.
My
experience
has
been
absolutely
first-rate,
so
I
want
to
give
them
that
shout-out
right
here,
but
also
as
noted
by
Commissioner
gear
and
a
theme
that
has
emerged
from
the
many
site
plans
that
have
been
reviewed
by
the
planet.
F
Commission
is
the
growing
disparity
between
the
newest
policy
elements
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
the
existing
glup
designations,
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
site
plan
process.
Specifically
our
goals
for
affordable
housing,
transportation
and
environmental
sustainability
are
often
frustrated
by
the
glove
and
zoning,
and
this
includes
the
sector
plans
and
phased
development
site
plans.
I
have
a
couple
of
short
examples.
The
ball
stand
sector
plan
is
now
older
than
a
number
of
our
planning.
Commissioners
and
I.
Think
two
of
the
county
board
members.
F
It
is
so
old
that
not
only
is
Ballston
mostly
built
out,
but
the
building's
constructed
under
it
are
now
ripe
for
redevelopment.
All
of
us
see
the
deficiencies
in
the
sector
plan,
but
unless
it's
changed,
those
flaws
and
limitations
will
be
locked
in
for
another
couple
generations,
as
Ballston
2.0
is
built
under
its
rules.
Another
example
will
be
before
you
this
weekend.
The
Planning
Commission
voted
to
recommend
approval
of
seven
townhouses
within
walking
distance
of
the
courthouse
Metro
and
this
building
on
Beach
Street.
F
This
is
a
site
that
good
planning
principles
cry
out
for
more
density
and
everyone
involved
desired
more
units
on
this
site.
Yet
the
governing
club,
designation
and
the
forty
year
old
PDS
be
precluded
anything
more.
It's
simply
not
economic
or
practical
for
smaller
sites
such
as
this
one
to
go
through
the
uncertainty
of
the
glup
change
process.
Remember
40
years
old,
that's
when
the
courthouse
Metro
may
not
even
have
been
open.
F
At
that
point,
we
have
numerous
sites
like
this
throughout
the
Metro
corridors
that
are
governed
by
grossly
out-of-date
sector
plans,
PDS,
peas
and
site
plan
procedures.
Our
stated
policies-
favoring
walkable
mixed
uses
in
these
areas,
simply
cannot
be
fully
realized.
Due
to
these
outdated
plans,
we
cannot
realize
our
goals
for
affordable
housing,
vision,
zero
economic
equity,
environmental
sustainability,
stormwater
management
and
greenhouse
gas
reduction,
without
allowing
the
density
necessary
to
support
them,
we're
also
in
competition
with
Tyson's
rest
and
town
center
and
a
resurgent
DC.
F
We
need
to
bring
these
foundational
plants
into
the
21st
century,
we're
going
to
need
to
think
a
different
approach
on
this,
because
you
know,
if
we're
doing
them
one
by
one
we're
talking
at
least
10
years
before.
If
we
do
that
1-1
plan
by
one
plan,
one
process
by
one
process
approach,
putting
it
off
two
years
and
then
adding
on
to
that
the
time
to
do
it,
we're
talking
10
years
out
we're
talking
half
a
century,
possibly
for
some
of
these
plans.
A
Wow,
that's
great
I
think
we
know
I
think
we
have
so
that's
not
exactly
on
the
agenda,
but
this
is
a
I'd
like
to
have
us
discuss
a
little
bit.
I
would
also
say,
if
you
all
don't
mind
solar
for
work
sessions,
I
like
to
be
a
little
informal,
I
thought,
I'd.
Call
you
Elizabeth
and
Jim
and
you'd.
Call
me
Libby.
Is
that
okay,
all
right?
Okay,
good
all
right!
Well,
yeah!
A
So
let
me
see
if
any
of
my
colleagues
first
want
to
kind
of
chime
in
I
do
think
this
issue
of
these
aged
plans
is
probably
a
really
good
one.
It's
not
quite
the
sector
plan,
but
maybe
we
could
talk
about
a
little
bit
then
get
into
maybe
the
more
the
more
specifics,
but
I
think
that
discussions
not
a
bad
one
to
have.
If
anyone
would
like
to
chime
in
or
has
any
thoughts.
G
That's
the
caption
board
member
who
is
younger
than
the
Boston
sector
plan,
yeah,
no
I.
This
is
a
really
an
excellent
question.
I
think
this
is
more
of
a
thought
which
is
to
kind
of
continue.
The
conversation
is
that
it
seems
to
me
that
the
challenges
with
each
of
our
sector
plans
with
respect
to
their
ability
to
offer
enough
density
to
truly
meet
the
needs.
Housing
lies,
but
also
as
you've
so
well
pledged
and
all
of
the
related
benefits.
But
the
challenge
is
almost:
it
seems
to
me,
idiosyncratic
sector
planned
by
sector
plan
in
Boston.
H
G
Find
a
place
in
the
in
the
upcoming
work
plan
in
the
next
year
or
two
to
prioritize
something
that
scale.
There
are
others
throughout
the
county
that
are
more
recent,
but
perhaps
reflect
at
the
time
consensus
that
we've
hopefully
worked
our
way
past
right
and
so
that's
sort
of
an
interesting
but
separate
question,
which
is
not
simply.
How
old
is
something
and
does
it
bite
into
fitch
age
need
a
fresh
look,
but
rather
do
we
want
to
challenge
a
then
community
consensus?
F
I
So
when
we
talk
about
rethinking
these
things
in
effect,
aren't
we
suggesting
that
perhaps
we
need
to
orient
our
community
towards
not
so
specifically
planning
areas
with
height
maps
and
specific
levels
of
density
and
becoming
a
little
bit
more
conceptual
and
in
in
effect,
retraining?
Everyone
in
how
we
participate
in
planning
processes
if
we
are
to
allow
contemporary
thinking
to
actually
be
be
meaningful
in
a
planning
process,
so
am
I
thinking
about
it.
The
right
way
is
that,
where
you're
you're
having.
F
It
for
me
yes,
I'm
wondering
whether
we
are
in
fact
too
prescriptive
in
a
lot
of
ways,
and
that's
not
just
the
sector
plans,
but
the
zoning
ordinance
itself
are
there
ways
we
can
loosen
things
up
be
more
flexible
and
another
example.
We
have
all
sorts
of
garages
in
this
county
right
now.
Well,
we
know
right
now
that
they're
underutilized
in
the
in
our
B
corridor.
What
else
could
be
done
with
those?
F
Could
we,
let's
say,
have
them
become
fulfillment,
centers
or
transfer
points
for
goods
going
from
the
UPS
truck
to
little
drone
delivery
things
our
zoning
ordinance
doesn't
even
contemplate
something
like
that.
Yet
the
space
is
there.
Maybe
we
could
use
it.
Things
were
evolving
so
fast
that
there
are
uses
that
we
barely
even
have
thought
of.
Yet
how
do
we
deal
with
them
without
going
through
this
huge
long
years,
long
process
to
get
them
addressed?
F
That's
one
thing:
is
there
some
way
we
could
make
our
zoning
ordinance
allow
more
things
by
right
be
more
flexible,
and
this
is
the
thought
exercise
of
course,
because
the
yes
and
you're
right,
the
practicality
of
things
and
then,
when
you
get
down
to
the
block
by
block
again
we're
going
to
run
into
trouble
mm-hmm.
But
that
doesn't
mean
we
can't
or
shouldn't
address
it
and
try
to
tackle
it.
I
just.
B
D
Yeah,
as
I
said
earlier,
this
is
one
of
the
most
important
things.
I
think
we
should
start
thinking
about.
It's
already
pursue
so
we
entered
this
next
decade.
Our
sector
plans
are
the
plans
for
our
metro
station
areas
or
our
Metro
corridors
have
to
have
foundational
elements
so
that
there's
some
strength
and
some
guidance
not
just
a
vision
but
some
recommendations
that
will
ensure
that
we
have
the
capacity
to
implement
those
plans.
D
But
many
of
our
plans
today
don't
have
various
metrics
or
opportunities
to
review
the
progress
of
those
plans
and
be
able
to
open
certain
elements
up
and
make
adjustments,
economic
other
forms
of
change.
It
is
just
a
different
world
in
many
ways
for
planning
today,
not
just
here
in
Arlington
but
across
the
region
of
the
nation,
and
so
this
would
be
an
opportunity,
I
think
for
Arlington,
because
we're
so
rare
so
well
recognized
across
the
country
for
our
pioneering
work
with
smart
growth
in
metro
station
planning.
D
We
think
what
should
that
plan
be
for
the
future?
Is
it
for
each
station
area?
Is
it
for
elements?
Is
it
for
the
corridor
we're
in
the
middle
of
an
important
planning
effort
for
Lee
highway,
which
I
hope
will
embrace
some
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
with
our
factors
today
and
the
presentation?
So
but
again,
this
takes
some
work
and
it
takes
some
commitment
of
staff
time
we're
fortunate.
We've
got
two
professional
planners
who
serve
as
chair
and
vice
chair
of
the
Planning
Commission
as
well
as
other
citizen
planners.
D
A
I'd
love
a
reaction
from
our
Zoning
Administrator.
If
we
do
things
by
right
and
not
to
sit
down
and
to
does
this
leave
you
kind
of
its
pain,
I
mean
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
and
we'll
let
the
lawyers
weigh
in
later.
Macisaac.
Don't
worry,
maybe
not
now,
but
because
there's
a
lot
I
mean
this
isn't
as
simple
as
it
sounds,
but
I
think
it's
absolutely
crucial
to
address
so
any
thoughts
that
you've
got
I.
J
Okay,
because
you
have
a
very
specific
context
in
mind
about
where
you
think
it's
okay,
but
if
it's
applied
broadly
there's
a
lot
of
unknowns,
and
so
when
those
come
out
then
then
we
have
these
conversations
again
about.
How
could
this
be
and
how
could
this
feel
Albay
right
and
why
isn't
there
a
process
and
I
should
be
able
to
have
input
in
this
and
what
works
here
may
not
work
there.
A
D
That
would
be
part
of
the
first
step
I
think
in,
and
this
is
an
area
where
staff
working
with
our
Planning
Commission,
which
has
such
a
large
role
under
under
Virginia
statutes
in
terms
of
comprehensive
planning
and
implementation,
that
it
would
be
one
of
those
great
opportunities
for
a
level
of
collaboration.
So
so
again,
we'll.
K
K
And
so
you
know
it's
not
a
shock
to
you,
but
that
will
be
a
piece
of
what
drives
this
I
really
appreciate
that
you
brought
this
point
and
I.
Think
Boston
is,
you
know,
that's
a
concrete,
tangible
thing
in
addition
to
housing
and
so
I'll
seek
out
brown-bag
conversations
and
probably
asked
for
that
with
staff,
because
that
will
make
it
come
more
alive
for
me
and
I'll
be
a
better
partner
in
that
regard.
Thank.
A
G
Had
a
question
related
to
this
issue
and
that
one
of
the
residents
of
the
taeju,
a
area
had
brought
up
to
me
recently
and
said
I'm
mulling
on
it
for
a
while,
which
was
from
this
individuals
perspective
anyway,
that
sort
of
perceived
incompatibility
with
a
sector
plan
happening
and
a
bike
element.
The
bike
element
that
had
been
updated,
the
sort
of
decision
to
not
pursue
a
protected
bike
lane
within
a
sector
plan
when
they
felt
that
the
bike
element
might
might
have
carried
the
day
or
ought
to
have
carried.
H
G
D
Well,
when
we
update
an
element
of
the
cop
plan,
such
as
the
master
transportation
plan,
we're
always
going
to
go
back
and
look
at
some
of
the
sector
plan
recommendations.
However,
again
in
in
five
or
ten
year
period,
there
are
there's
new
technology
or
there
new
engineering
practices
or
new
ax.
That
really
rise.
D
To
a
point
where
we
just
couldn't
have
conceived
of
some
of
those
things
when
we
were
working
on
a
plan
so
board
member,
that's
really
the
essential
part
of
this.
How
can
we
keep
these
sector
plans
current
and
have
them
mesh
closely
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
so
there's
greater
clarity
and
certainty
for
everyone
involved,
and
it's
not
it's
not
an
easy
thing
to
do.
It
would
require
reinventing
possibly
some
of
the
things
that
we
do
have
done
in
the
past,
but.
G
D
The
sector
plan
certainly
goes
into
greater
detail.
I
think
the
master
transportation
plan,
for
example,
reflects
some
of
the
recommendations.
You
know
we
come
to
the
board
with
revisions
proposed
revisions
to
the
MTP.
You
know
their
plan
elements
based
on
studies.
We
do
with
the
General
Land
Use,
Plan
and
other
updates.
You
know
we
were
in
the
process.
We
will
talk
about
later
today.
I
hope.
The
Clarendon
plan
implementation,
which
is
a
good
example
of
where
there
could
be
elements
of
the
MTP,
as
well
as
the
club
in
the
sector
plan
itself.
D
A
I
If
there
are
some
some
help
out
there
to
maybe
do
a
lot
of
this
thought
work
for
us,
while
you're
implementing
a
very
important
plan
work
program.
Excuse
me
and
MS
Boehm,
you,
you
said
it
very
well,
everybody
everybody
wants
certainty
until
they
desire
to
do
something,
that's
not
allowed
and
they
want
flexibility,
so
we're
trying
to
marry
all
of
that
stuff
and-
and
while
we
would
love
to
be
able
to
point
to
something
as
dispositive
is,
why
we're
pursuing
a
particular
policy
direction.
I
A
You
the
word
crowdsourcing,
keeps
popping
into
my
head
I'm,
not
sure,
but
this
is
this
is
major.
Thank
you
so
much
for
bringing
this
up
and
and
appreciate
this
and
we're
certainly
not
gonna
solve
it
now,
but
I
think
Christian.
You
really
stated
how
important
it
is
and
somewhat
took
a
little
bit
on
the
same
issue,
and
then
we
will
get
to
the
what's.
What's
here
on
the
agenda,
so
I
noticed
last
year
we
did.
You
said
we
were
going
to
do
10
sector
plans
and
we
did
nine
this
year
we
say
we're.
A
Hey
Aaron,
so
the
where
I'm
headed
with
this
is
the
number
of
sector
plans
the
number
of
months
in
the
year.
How
many
months
we've
already
gotten
through
workload,
is
what
I'm
really
kind
of
focusing
on
just
a
little
bit
for
Planning
Commission
and
us
I
mean
how
much
are
we
gonna
have
to
be
processing
per
month
here,
coming
up
just
wondering.
L
What
you're
seeing
thank
you
for
having
me
and
I'm
Aaron
I
brought
the
Planning
Division.
What
you
see
in
table
number
two
is
we
were
trying
to
track
those
applications
for
you
to
show
you
where
they
are
in
the
lifecycle,
so
it
was
correct
and
in
that
last
year
we
anticipated
ten
site
plans
coming
forward
to
the
board.
L
Only
nine
ten
did
but
I
think
that
if
you
look
at
how
how
many
applications
we
viewed
and
how
many
reviewed
it
was
about
twice
as
many
so
we're
trying
to
show
you
the
difference
from
our
work
capacity
standpoint,
how
many
are
reviewing
at
any
one
time
versus
how
many
come
to
the
board?
What
we're
showing
you
in
this
table,
we
highlighted
those
in
yellow
for
the
ones
that
we
anticipate.
That
would
be
coming
to
the
Planning
Commission
into
the
county
board
in
calendar
year.
L
20
and
I
know
where
sometimes
mixing
between
calendar
year
in
fiscal
year,
but
I
wanted
to
just
give
you
that
idea
of
the
volume
that's
there
and
then
we
focus
in
on
going
forward
the
15
applications
we
were
taking
those
out
of
what's
currently
in
our
final
queue.
All
of
those
should
get
approved
this
fiscal
year.
So
when
we
say
15
we're
really
picking
up
in
the
preliminary
category
and
then
we're
running
all
the
way
through
the
preliminary
and
then
we
picked
up
a
few
anticipated
projects
as
well.
A
L
Don't
think
it's
necessarily
that
we
have
to
slow
down
I
think
that,
as
mr.
Duffy
mentioned,
there
have
been
some
staffing
changes
that
have
come
along
recently,
we're
actively
recruiting
for
a
new
site
plan
review
coordinator
position,
which
should
provide
additional
capacity
to
one
of
our
now
six
principal
planners
who
review
site
plan
projects.
L
I
think
we've
also
implemented
some
significant
changes
with
the
Planning
Commission
regarding
the
site
plan
review
committee
that
has
allowed
us
to
be
more
efficient
and
to
prove
projects
through
the
process,
not
necessarily
quicker,
but
with
more
with
a
more
of
an
anticipated
schedule
to
bring
them
along.
So
it's
allowed
us
to
spread
our
capacity
amongst
those
six
principal
planners
to
handle
two
or
three
applications
at
any
one
time.
That
is
a
significant
volume,
but
it
is
something
that
appears
to
be
doable
for
the
foreseeable
future.
Great.
D
Board
members
last
year,
if
you
recall
you,
you
gave
us
a
new
principal
planner
as
part
of
the
current
planning
team
and
that's
made
a
big
difference.
We've
also
been
looking
to
train
and
engage
other
principal
associate
planners
within
and
outside
of
the
section.
For
example,
we've
had
some
of
our
associate
planners
who
historically
have
worked
on
use
permits
actually
to
work
with
there
and
more
senior
member
of
the
staff
on
on-site
plant
activity.
D
Most
recently,
one
of
urban
design
staff
Brad
Wallace,
has
been
working
on
the
key
bridge
Marriott
site
from
the
urban
design
team.
So
again,
one
of
our
commitments
to
our
staff
remains
versatile
and
giving
them
having
the
opportunity
to
develop
across
sectional
lines
has
been
important
and
made
a
difference.
I
think
the
last
thing
that's
made
a
difference.
D
It's
working
with
the
site
plan
review
committee
and
we
have
a
finite
number
of
meetings
every
year
to
schedule
with
a
site
plan
review
committee
to
make
sure
that
we
get
those
scheduled
early
and
and
work
within
work
with
agendas
for
each
of
those
meetings
too,
to
ensure
we're
not
only
efficient
but
also
comprehensive
in
this
important
review
process
so
that
partnership
again
with
the
Planning
Commission
SPRC,
has
made
a
difference.
Okay,.
A
B
You
heard
me:
we
had
more
than
50
meetings
last
year
that
it's
sufficient
with
our
public
engagement
to
have
a
full
conversation
about
these
issues
and,
of
course,
staff
is
always
there.
So
we're
not
missing
anything
big
and
we're
still,
you
know
we're
trying
to
make
changes
to
accommodate
these
ambitious
schedules
as
well.
All.
D
Though
retreating
from
staffing
for
the
pike,
revitalization,
the
only
reason
is
vacant
is
that
Jen
Smith
is
hiring
some
staff
to
fill
vacancies
and
we
have
one
of
these
new
senior
supervisory
positions
that
she'll
be
recruiting.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
our
work
program
well,
thought
out
and
supported
by
the
board
before
we
made
some
of
those
decisions,
so
we'll
fill
that
gap
very
shortly.
D
A
G
D
And
I
lova
describe
this
in
in
more
detail,
but
we've
been
working
with
the
zoning
staff
on
developing
a
new
consolidated
work
program
for
zoning
ordinance
that
not
only
covers
what
we've
recommended
in
this
year's
work
program,
but
well
beyond
that.
So
our
lova
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
address
that
a
little
bit
describe
the
work,
we're
doing.
J
J
J
Can
we
handle
some
of
those
and
get
them
off
of
this
work
plan
and
just
done
on
a
regular
basis
so
that
we
can
make
the
most
of
it.
So
we
have
about
50.
We
came
up
with
the
system
using
the
condensed.
Most
of
ours
were
condensed
or
maybe
short
term,
that
zoning
would
take
the
lead
on
and
we
batch
them
based
on
things
that
made
sense
about.
You
know,
starting
small,
with
typos
and
incorrect
graphics
and
moving.
J
These
are
things
that
zoning
in
its
operation
has
done
for
decades,
but
the
text
doesn't
match
our
practice,
so
those
on
paper
might
appear
to
be
policy
changes,
but
in
practice
may
not
be,
but
they
were
gonna.
They're
gonna
require
a
little
more
public
conversation,
and
so
that's
how
we
and
so
we
work
together
on,
is
this
a
policy
change
whose
bucket
should
it
go
in,
and
we
kind
of
have
a
plan
for
the
first
three
or
four
batches
and
we'll
see
how
it
goes.
I
think
that.
D
Bringing
this
report
forward
to
the
manager
this
spring
and
I
think
you'll
be
very
impressed
with
it.
This
is
pretty
significant,
because
this
enables
both
of
our
staff
to
work
together
but
expands
the
capacity
of
our
staff
within
the
department
to
tackle
these
zoning
amendments
historically,
some
that
planning
would
prayer
reports
and
appear
before
you
or
their
zoko
committee.
This
gives
us
more
bandwidth
again
to
do
some
of
this.
So
again,
what
I?
D
G
C
G
Resonate
with
so
I'm
very
encouraged
by
what
you're
describing
because
I
do
think
it's
something
that
sort
of
been
long
needed
right
and
you
all
are
really
the
eyes
and
ears
and
your
teeth
about
these
little
things
that
are
kind
of
out
of
whack.
You
need
to
be
trued
up
with
actual
practice
in
reality.
G
I
think
that
questions
that
I
have,
though,
and
and
I
suspect,
that
the
items
that
we
see
at
the
board
level
are
very
much
one
hair
beyond
purely
technical
there's,
a
small
amount
of
policy
judgment
right
and
that's
where
I'm
trying
to
channel
our
colleague,
Eric
cuz
I,
know
he'd,
be
pushing
this
money.
But
it's
really
of
interest
to
me
too,
and
I'm
gonna
use
an
example.
Although
I
was
excited
to
hear
that
you
think
you
might
have
a
solution
to
that
example.
G
So
I
look
forward
hearing
that,
but
the
sign
ordinance,
the
temporary
signs
for
farmers
markets
I
think,
is
a
great
example
of
this.
So
I
want
us
to
talk
about
that
substantively,
but
I'm
also
going
to
just
try
to
use
it'll
straight
of
Lee,
because
it's
not
actually
purely
technical
to
allow
open-air
markets.
It
does
require
a
little
bit
of
policy
judgment,
but
I
would
argue
it
requires
all
a
littlest
bit
of
policy
judgment,
and
so
my
question
is
like
how
what
are
our?
G
Is
there
a
category
that
we
can
get
to
and
I
know?
This
is
something
that
Eric
and
I
too,
have
been
pushing
for
interested
in
those
things
that
we
really
do.
You
know
believe
this
community
can
work
through
expeditiously
that
don't
require
four
meetings
of
zoko,
an
extensive
community
engagement
with
every
neighborhood,
but
we
don't
want
to
just
have
lingua
languor
like
languish,
so
so
the
the
items
that
fall
in
that
gray
area
or
just
a
hair
beyond
technical,
is
there
a?
Is
there
a
thought
in
this
framework
for
for
them
the.
D
D
J
I
I
think
if
we
use
our
terminology,
it
probably
could
be
a
condensed
process.
Okay,
I
think
the
difficulty
is
what
always
seems
like
a
small
thing.
Can
some
type
started
to
a
larger
thing,
so
we
start
out
saying
this
is
a
no
brainer.
It's
it's
very
straightforward.
It's
very
simple
and
all
we
have
to
do
is
X,
and
then
they
scope
creeps
once
you
start
talking
about
things
it's
like
well,
can
you
add
that?
J
And
this
is
almost
the
same
and
can't
you
just
include
that,
because
the
process
takes
months,
you
want
to
try
to
maximize
it.
So
you
want
to
maybe
group
it
with
something
else
and
not
take
things
piecemeal,
one
at
a
time
so
I
mean
I,
think
it
I
know
the
issue
that
you're
talking
about,
and
it
seems
like
pretty
straightforward,
but
we
haven't,
we've
talked
about
it
at
higher
level.
We
haven't
talked
about
actually
putting
it
in
and
where
it
would
fall
in
terms
of
the
next
year.
So.
D
G
Well,
I
definitely
don't
want
to
lose
the
threat
on
the
farmers
market
piece
in
particular,
but
also
not
sure
I'm
leaving
this
conversation
entirely
satisfied
that
we
have
a
way
of
thinking
about
these.
These
pieces
I'm
certainly
enlightened
and
reminded
that
these
one-offs
are
not
always
one
offs.
No-Brainers
are
rarely
that,
but
I
know
you
know.
G
Eric
has
articulated
an
an
ideal
sort
of
practice
that
we
might
be
in
where
we
know
that
they're,
probably
just
going
to
be
a
few,
whether
they
are
condensed
or
low
overhead
is
a
term
we've
used
before
zoning
or
amendments
that
we're
entertaining
at
any
given
time
and
I
worry
sometimes
that,
because
we
batch
these
seeming
one
offs
with
others,
they
sort
of
don't
get
done
right.
We
have
big
hairy
questions
about
the
future
of
our
sign
ordinance,
for
example,
and
I
would
hate
for
for
us
to
lose
small
opportunities
and
again
I'm.
G
D
I
think
when
we
went
owning
and
planning
bring
this
report
forward
to
the
manager,
I
think
you're
gonna
see
outside
the
policy.
There
are
nine
areas
that,
where
a
number
of
these
amendments
that
could
be
processed
through
this
more
I'll
call
it
expedited
process
over
time
could
occur,
and
it's
very
comprehensive
but
again,
and
it
could
over
time,
continue
to
be
updated.
So
I'd
ask
the
board
for
the
opportunity
to
bring
this
forward,
discuss
it
with
the
manager
and
then
find
the
right
approach
to
have
for
the
discussion
with
the
board
about
it.
I
So
that
the
question
comes
not
can
you
move
this
up,
I'm
not
going
to
I
realize
that
has
implications
throughout
the
work
plan.
That's
not
where
I'm
going
the
question
becomes.
Is
it
a
practice
elsewhere
that
we
would
ever
that
people
would
ever
pursue
or
implement
provisional
ability
to
do
something
while
a
locality
is
studying.
D
A
I
J
A
H
Gonna
say:
there's
nothing
unusual
about
it.
It
is
simply
a
zoning
ordinance
amendment
that
you
are
gonna
put
on
the
books
and
you're
gonna
suffer
the
consequences
of
it
and
then
you
may
repeal
it
at
some
later
date.
Anybody
who
took
advantage
of
it
would
be
vested
and,
and
those
would
be
perhaps
the
outliers
so
I
mean.
The
consequential
question
is
the
one
you
asked.
What
is
the
consequence
of
that?
You
know.
H
If
it's
a
really
bold
initiative,
you
may
decide
that
it's
really
just
an
awful
idea
and
yes,
someone
has
taken
advantage
of
it,
but
otherwise
there's
no
sort
of
magic
category
where
these
are
like.
You
know,
temporary
or
you
know,
I
fear
to
say
a
pilot
or
a
temporary
zoning
ordinance
provision.
You
simply
amend
the
zoning
ordinance,
you
allow
it
and
whatever
comes
comes,
and
then
you
can
repeal
it
if
you
don't
like
it.
Thank.
G
A
D
We're
anticipating
at
least
three
new
major
site
plan
applications
in
and
this
graphic
that
I'll
put
on
the
screen
illustrates.
So
you
can
see
Washington
Boulevard
crossing
the
map,
diagonally
Wilson,
Boulevard,
running
diagonally,
tenth
Street
to
the
bottom,
and
so
the
the
four
areas
that
appear
in
red
or
site
plans
that
the
county
board
has
previously
approved,
including
the
Shushan
project,
appears
as
number
three,
the
the
VFW
number
one
and
two
the
residential
project
at
Washington
and
Kirkwood.
D
But
if
you
look
in
the
right-hand
corner,
you'll
see
four,
which
is
the
Joyce
motors
application
which
we
currently
have
and
five
and
six
applications
for
the
Silver
diner
and
the
Wells
Fargo
sites.
We
anticipate
those
will
be
coming
in
this
year,
and
so
those
two
blocks
in
many
ways
that
make
up
part
of
the
Western
gateway
of
Clarendon
are
also
blocks
that
have
recommend
opportunities
for
how
should
we
cite
the
new
fire
station
if
that's
possible?
D
A
new
Park
childcare
facilities
and
other
road
improvements
in
this
area,
so
Jen
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
pick
up
where
I
sort
of
left
off.
But
again
this
is
an
opportunity
we
believe
to
work
with
the
Planning
Commission
with
the
RPC
provide
a
good
overview
of
what
the
plans
recommendations
are
and
make
some
decisions
for
moving
forward.
E
We
have
some
highly
specific
sector
plan
recommendations
that
we're
also
codified
in
the
zoning,
so
it
will
be
important
for
us
to
go
back
and
look
at
updates
to
the
sector
plan
which
will
have
a
direct
impact
on
the
zoning,
as
well
related
to
the
topic
that
you
were
talking
about
earlier.
As
part
of
this
work
session,
there.
D
Are
a
number
of
use
and
height
related
recommendations
from
the
sector
plan?
As
you
know,
it's
a
form
based
plan
was
integrated
into
the
actual
Clarendon
zoning
ordinance
and
again,
the
community
facilities.
Part
of
this
focus
in
those
two
blocks
that
the
gens
described.
So
we
think
it's
extremely
important
that
we
work
with
the
community
and
with
the
Planning
Commission
to
revisit
the
plan,
understand
what
those
commitments
and
recommendations
are.
D
C
C
As
a
matter
of
fact,
we
have
greater
demand
there,
and
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
is:
we've
had
one
or
two
meetings
with
George
Mason,
the
Center
for
Digital
innovation,
and
they
are
trying
to
figure
out
where
the
Kansas
department
stores,
which
I
it's
nine
nine
they
when
we
said
that
we
were
gonna.
Do
this
look?
They
said?
Oh
please,
please
get!
C
A
A
G
G
However,
you
know
there
certainly
seems
sound
and
it
seems
like
a
way
to
ensure
that
the
proposed
applications
and
opportunities
proceed
in
a
way
that
is
not
only
consistent
with
some
of
the
spirits
or
big
ideas
of
the
sector
plan,
but
actually
better
reflect
their
reality.
Much
like
we're
discussing
in
our
prior
conversation,
so
I
am
supportive.
A
G
G
I
think
they've
done
a
really
fabulous
job
and
it's
actually
represented
a
pretty
good,
inter
division,
handoff
right
that
was
from
CPG
to
over
to
AED
for
this
follow-up
work,
but
I'm
trying
to
really
get
my
head
around
pretty
specifically
what
limited
support
means
with
regard
to
the
working
group
and
so
I'll
give
a
specific
instance
of
what
I'm
talking
about.
So
the
the
group
is
right
now
considering
a
soar
variety
of
models
that
could
apply
here.
G
Looking
at
other
examples,
nearly
all
of
them
have
as
a
next
step,
zoning
or
view
review
of
potential
arts
and
entertainment
uses,
and
that
makes
sense
right.
If
we're
gonna
create
a
makerspace,
we
need
to
ensure
that
that's
compatible
with
the
zoning
there.
So
I
guess.
My
rather
pointed
question
is
just
when
you
all
say
limited
support.
Is
there
a
potential
to
still
do
that
kind
of
analysis,
I
think
I?
G
What
I
worry
about
is
there's
a
perception,
rightly
or
wrongly,
whether
it's
fair
did
this
work
really
stalled
out
right
after
the
the
four
mile
run
plan
was
completed
and
I.
What
I
really
want
to
avoid
is
that
arts,
an
industry
group
concluding
its
work
and
then
it
kind
of
not
going
anywhere
until
we
have
this
the
planning
staff
capacity
to
do
that.
Zoning
analysis
so.
E
I
think
we
will
intend
to
continue
with
the
arts
district
and
see
how
we
can
support
that
piece
of
it
and
give
them
some
preliminary
feedback
in
terms
of
compliance.
You
know
our
use
is
allowed
in
the
zoning
or
not
some
limited
feedback,
I
think
it's
really
when
you
get
into
now.
What
do
we
do
with
that,
and
how
do
we
make
changes
into
the
zoning
ordinance
that
we
would
need
to
think
about
when
the
timeline
when
we
can
accommodate
and
fit
that
work
into
our
work
plan?
Okay,.
G
You
know
it's
hard
to
say
that
that's
gonna
be
a
problem
until
we
know
what
the
arts
and
industry
group
is
going
to
propose
if
they're
going
to
do
it
pretty
light
touch,
that's
heavy
on
the
marketing
and
so
forth,
and
your
feedback
is
plenty
right.
Just
knowing
one
of
these
uses
are
compatible
or
not,
if
they're
hoping
to
do
something
greater
I
think
it
could
potentially
be
sort
of
deleterious
for
overall
efforts.
G
If
we
were
to
say
that
we
can't
do
anything
to
effectuate
those
recommendations
for
at
least
another
six
months,
maybe
longer
so
I,
don't
suppose
I
have
any
any
feedback
or
thoughts
or
even
requests
to
shift
around
resources
at
this
time.
But
it
is
something
that
I'm,
maybe
would
just
flag,
is
something
I
hope
we
can
stay
in
touch
about,
and
you
know
with
the
economic
development.
Colleagues,
if
it
looks
like
we're
cruising
towards
a
bigger,
more
ambitious
plan,
a
little
car,
more
CPH
tea
time,
I
suppose
I,
don't
have
anything
more
pointed
to
say.
G
Then,
let's
just
stay
in
conversation
right
and
see
if
we
can
avoid
it.
Something
like
that
work
grinds
to
a
halt.
Again
my
other
question,
or
actually
request
with
the
childcare
initiative
bumping
that
off
to
fiscal,
22
or
future
I
think
that
makes
sense.
You
know
we
got
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
done
and
staff
are
spectacular
and
such
a
loss
for
our
community
that
Kim
Vodka
has
moved
on,
but
was
really
a
wonderful
teammate
and
lead
I
think
from
C
PhD
on
that.
So
it
makes
sense
to
me
that
the
work
has
moved
forward.
G
G
Further
I
would
really
love
to
be
able
to
see
some
data
about
the
impacts
that
the
first
round
of
zoning
ordinance
and
childcare
ordinance
revisions
have
made,
because
if
we
really
have
a
lot
of
optimism
that
we
kind
of
took
a
whack
at
some
of
the
biggest
barriers
that
are
that
are
is
really
important.
Part
of
our
economy
is
growing
and
thriving.
Then
then,
maybe
it
actually
isn't.
G
As
urgent
that
we
take
on
some
of
those
incentives
and
other
pieces
if,
after
the
initial
push
it
was
petering
out
and
we're
still
back
to
sort
of
the
same
challenges
of
lack
of
supply,
that
we've
had
I
may
react
differently
next
year
than
I.
Would
this
year
to
the
idea
of
deferring
it?
So
that's
my
request
for
everybody
board.
D
Member,
we
can
certainly
provide
a
report
and
update
on
how
it's
how
we're
succeeding
with
that
first
phase
of
work.
I
think
you
see
some
of
we're
succeeding
every
and
every
board
meeting,
with
a
number
of
whose
permits
that
are
coming
forward
to
expand
child
care
at
the
at
the
home
level.
So
we
will.
We
will
report
back
to
the
manager
to
the
board
on
that.
It's.
A
Exciting
I
would
like
to
actually
ask
because
I
after
all
of
our
consent,
items
and
I
asked
the
staff,
that's
I'd
like
to
keep
a
running
total
of
what
we're
doing
so.
Yeah
Samiha
is
on
it.
Yeah
no
I
think
it's
absolutely
crucial
to
do
and
I
absolutely
agree.
Anything
else
that
you
wanted
to
okay,
great
Matt,
just.
K
A
couple
first
on
this
slide
the
site
plan
conditions
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
understand
the
the
process
for
reconsidering
our
level
of
energy
efficiency,
because
lead
is
mentioned
with
respect
to
form
based
code
I'm,
not
trying
to
advance
that
more
further
up
where
it
says,
standard
site
plan
conditions
update
we're
not
pushing
yet
the
the
possible
or
are
we
pushing
yet
the
possibility
of
going
to
a
higher
standard
of
energy
efficiency
in
our
buildings?
Well,.
D
We're
working
closely
with
the
DES
staff
effect
here
in
Schreiber
and
I
met
last
week
with
staff
to
discuss
how
we'll
be
moving
forward
with
them
on
that.
In
addition,
what
we
do
in
the
interim,
while
those
new
policies
are
being
brought
forward
to
the
County
Board,
and
we
think
we
have
a
way
forward
to
that
so
I
don't
want
the
board
to
come
away
with
thinking
that
we're
not
focusing
on
that.
D
But
again,
this
is
you
know:
we've
over
time
have
reduced
the
number
of
site
plan
conditions
from
a
large
number
down
to
a
very
manageable
number
and
on
an
annual
basis.
We
step
back
and
review
those
with
the
departments
and
sometimes
make
changes.
I,
don't
think
we'll
need
to
do
that
comprehensive
review
this
year.
But
if
there
are
amendments,
certainly
we
bring
those
to
the
county
manager
and
the
county
board
will
start
to
see
those
as
part
of
site
plan.
D
K
D
K
It
I
think
I've
the
rest
of
my
questions.
One
is
on
permanent
Arlington
phase.
Two
one
is
on
the
role
that
C
PhD
plays
with
storm
water
recovery
and
then
just
a
follow
up
question
on
lead.
Highway
I'll
share
those
in
writing.
If
that's
okay
and
then
follow
up
later
and
then
just
leave
with
one
final
thought,
which
is
mindful
that
planning.
K
This
is
something
that
occurred
a
little
bit
later
last
year
and
there
was
a
desire
to
move
this
up
and
I
appreciate
you
doing
that.
Livy
and
I
know
we're
in
the
process
on
housing,
Arlington
I,
just
keeping
in
orbit
are
you
know
we
have
to
grow
our
economy
as
a
whole,
but
also
housing,
Arlington,
finding
that
leader
and
then
all
the
energy
that
we
can
put
into
housing.
Arlington
is
kind
of
I
just
feel
like
that's
worth
mentioning,
because
you
know
what
gets
measured
gets
done
and
we're
in
it
to
our
work
session.
K
D
As
I
hope,
the
word
program
indicated
it's
our
top
priority,
both
our
work
here
in
Arlington
our
work
with
our
regional
partners
and
our
work
with
the
city
of
Alexandria.
As
we
continue
to
meet
with
them.
We
put
together
an
outstanding
team
of
joint
planning
and
housing
staff
who
make
that
only
priority,
whether
it's
the
missing
middle
dealing
with
the
two
family
zoning
amendments
dealing
with
housing
conservation,
district
recommendations,
though
coming
forward
for
this
year.
It
is
our
top
priority
and
one
of
the
most
important
priorities,
certainly
for
our
County
yeah.
A
D
Boards
here
I'm
going
to
pull
a
slide
up.
It's
one
of
the
later
exhibits
that
that
I
included
and,
as
you
know,
last
year,
we
certainly
did
some
great
work
and
in
some
ways
the
phase
one
of
the
child
care
initiative
really
supports
small
businesses
D
care
homes.
We
did
some
major
revisions
working
with
Aaron
and
his
staff
on
revising
their
renewal
cycles
for
use
permits
and
we're
very
active
involved
in
permit
arlington
lodging
and
supporting
that.
D
But
we
have
four
areas
that
we're
going
to
be
committed
to
this
year
and
that's
the
form
the
Columbia
Pike
form
based
code,
those
ground
floor
uses
and
we're
working
with
aad
very
closely.
Based
on
the
study
that
was
done
for
the
pike
ad
is
going
to
advance
preliminary
recommendations
that
will
begin
to
work
with
and
bring
forward
his
code
amendments
the
outdoor
cafes,
again
board
member
Dorsey
I
heard
you
there's
a
way
to
move
this
forward
to
get
to
the
next
cycle.
D
We
will
work
hard
to
do
that,
one
of
the
something
that
we
have
not
done
and
we've
not
talked
a
lot
about,
but
stepping
back
and
reviewing
many
of
our
special
exception
use,
permit
uses
and
paren
by
right
uses
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
Their
relationship
to
small
businesses
is
something
we're
going
to
review
and
bring
some
recommendations
forward
to
the
county
manager
into
the
board.
D
How
we
might
be
able
to
modify
some
of
those
some
might
be
outdated
and
some
might
be
able
to
handle
more
administrative
Lea
or
through
a
different
approach
to
use
permits
the
city
of
Alexandria.
Does
it
very
differently?
They
have
a
large
spectrum
of
administrative,
related
special
use,
permit
approvals,
but
it's
a
very
different
approach
and
again
on
an
annual
basis.
We
see
about
a
hundred
and
thirty
to
150
administrative
permit,
applications
that
come
to
the
Zoning
Administrator
or
review
and
approval
those
come
through
our
office.
D
D
Those
really
shouldn't
require
that
level
of
staff
review
and
Chris
Kreider
and
his
team
will
be
working
with
the
Zoning
Administrator
and
myself
to
revise
that
process,
make
it
streamlined
and
again
this
ties
in
with
permit
arlington
to
a
degree
as
well
so
well
there'll
be
no
formal
zoning
amendments,
I
believe
in
talking
with
the
Zoning
Administrator.
This
will
be
some
internal
processes
that
could
have
pretty
significant
implications
for
many
businesses
that
file
applications
in
Arlington.
That's.
A
I
You
so
I'm
sorry
for
the
vagueness
of
this
question,
but
I
do
mean
it
sincerely.
You
know
one
of
the
dissatisfying
elements
of
this
conversation
for
me
every
year.
It's
you
know:
you're
you're,
giving
us
your
honest
assessment
of
your
capacity
and
naturally
we
would
love
for
you
to
be
able
to
add
more
and
do
it
faster,
but
never
do
we
explore
whether
there's
anything
that
we
could
do
to
actually
facilitate
this
work,
getting
done
more
quickly,
so
I'm
gonna
throw
that
out
there
for
you
to
consider.
I
You
do
not
have
to
answer
it
now
if
it's
uncomfortable
or
requires
further
thought,
but
I
think
if
there
is
a
way
that
we
can
be
helpful,
that
that
it
should
be
articulated
because
it
we
all
desire
to
get
the
stuff
done
and
not
to
just
give
you
an
impossible
task
to
try
and
achieve
every
year.
So
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that.
Thank.
F
A
We
were
recognizing
planning
commissioners
Nia,
it's
very
nice
to
see
you
you
Begley.
Thank
you.
Anything
else
marks
me.
Colleagues,
all
right,
so
this
has
been
a
great
discussion.
Do
you
staff
feel,
like
you
have
enough
feedback?
The
one
thing
that
I
picked
up
that
I
hadn't
expected?
Was
this
discussion
prompted
by
the
Planning
Commission,
that
we've
got
these
older
plans
and
they
may
really
be
getting
in
the
way?
A
The
same
way
all
of
these
nitpicking
things
are
getting
in
the
way
we've
got
to
figure
out
a
better
way
to
do
it
and
following
up
on
Christian
statement,
I
think
we
do
want
to
be
helpful
and
I
was
only
half
joking
when
I
said
crowdsourcing
I
mean
I
really
feels
like.
There
may
be
some
ways
to
get
some
really
good
minds
out
there.
Helping
us
on
this.
Just
you
know
throwing
out
some
advice,
please
to
see
the
stuff
on
small
business.
A
I
will
say:
I
am
increasingly
concerned
about
small
businesses
here
and
I
feel
like
just
as
we
have
an
affordable
housing
crisis,
and
we
have
a
crisis
of
the
ability
of
small
businesses
to
survive
here
and
I.
Think
it's
the
same
thing:
it's
the
cost
of
the
real
estate
and
I'm
thinking,
sometimes
more
and
more
what
we
do
with
housing.
We
maybe
need
to
look
at
it
at
a
way
of
doing
that
for
businesses,
I,
don't
know
what
form
that
will
take,
but
I
do
think.
A
We
need
to
be
thinking
about
that
because
things
are
growing
and
changing
really
fast,
and
if
we
don't
don't
do
something
we're
going
to
turn
around
and
look
and
what
happened.
Everybody
so
anything
else,
all
right,
I!
Think
with
that
we
are
done.
It's
not
a
our
work
session.
I
think
it's
about
an
hour
and
45
minutes.
I
do
have
so
we
are
concluded.
I
have
one
motion,
though
I
have
to
make.
Thank
you.