►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Right,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
welcome
to
our
community
capital
improvement
plan
work
session
of
june
14th
tuesday.
This
is
chair.
Katie,
crystal
speaking,
joined
in
person
by
my
colleagues,
libby
garvey,
matt
deferenti
takes
care
and
tonight,
and
I
believe
we
are
joined
virtually
by
christian
dorsey.
Our
vice
chair
is
that
correct.
Mr
dorsey.
A
Afternoon
he
is
joining
us
remotely
from
columbus
ohio
where
he
is
attending
the
national
association
of
regional
council's
annual
conference,
thanks
for
dialing
in
we
are
here
convening
to
discuss
three
elements
of
the
cip,
the
facilities
and
energy
efficiency,
sections
parks
and
recreation
plans
and
the
community,
the
arlington
neighborhoods
program,
the
or
entity
formerly
known
as
neighborhood
conservation.
We're
really
excited
about
the
new
name
and
the
presentation,
and
I
would
like
to
remind
everybody
who
might
be
following
along.
A
You
can
see
the
presentations
available
on
the
county
website
if
you
go
to
arlingtonva.us
and
search
capital
improvement
program,
recipe,
capital
improvement
plan.
Without
further
ado,
I
am
going
to
turn
it
over
to
the
county
manager
to
get
us
started
on
the
first
of
the
presentations.
Thank.
C
You,
madam
chair,
and
members
of
the
board,
we,
as
you
noted,
we
have
four
areas
to
go
through
today.
The
first
one
covers
a
large
number
of
county
facilities.
George
maye
is
here
and
we're
going
to
kick
that
off
turn
it
over
to
mr
may,
george.
D
D
Next,
we
are
asking
to
continue
our
investments
and
our
92
own
county
buildings
will
maintain
our
state
of
good
repair,
we're
also
addressing
emerging
priorities
by
leveraging
underused
or
vacant
spaces,
while
recognizing
the
value
of
a
space
reserve
to
address
additional
operational
needs
as
they
develop,
including
our
need
for
swing
space,
we're
also
improving
our
energy
performance
with
selection
of
high
efficiency
equipment.
That's
based
on
joint
work
between
our
facilities,
maintenance
and
design,
and
construction
teams
and
the
air
team
to
identify
energy
and
carbon
use
reduction
opportunities.
D
And,
finally,
we
are
requesting
planning
funds
to
better
balance.
Our
long-term
needs
with
underdeveloped
land
and
buildings,
and
next,
please,
in
terms
of
achieving
racial
equity.
Our
two
requests
are
are
to
serve
underserved
areas
in
southwest
arlington
at
5519
columbia,
pike
we'd
like
to
exercise
our
land
purchase,
option
in
fiscal
24
for
a
future
fire
station
site
that
will
serve
the
growing
population
at
the
west
end
of
the
pike
and
reduce
dependence
on
fairfax
fire
department's
mutual
aid.
D
D
Project
deliveries,
since
our
last
reporting
to
you
include
completion
of
third
floor
renovations
in
the
bossman
center
in
construction,
completion
and
startup
fire
department
services
in
both
fire
station
10
and
roslyn,
and
the
temporary
fire
station
8
and
on
langston
boulevard
projects
underway
with
our
previous
commitments
include
completing
the
separation
of
the
adjacent
doctor's
office.
Building
from
the
virginia
hospital
building
at
the
carlin
springs
site,
replacements
of
fire
station
8
and
the
dhs
group
home
at
1212
south
irving,
the
new
group
home
will
be
a
net
zero
building
with
a
geothermal
field.
D
D
D
D
This
slide
shows
a
specific
facility's
requests
will
be
funded
with
a
requested
november
22
bond
referendum,
which,
for
the
most
part,
covers
our
needs
in
fiscal
23
and
24..
We'll
go
into
more
detail
on
each
of
these
projects
in
the
coming
slides,
the
distribution
across
the
county
for
our
major
facilities
program
requests
are
shown
here.
D
F
Good
afternoon
I'm
michelle
congdon
for
facilities,
design
and
construction.
This
year's
bond
request
contains
11
defined
entries,
half
billed
on
the
previous
year's
authorizations
and
are
sequential
projects
that
complement,
completed
or
ongoing
work.
This
chart
depicts
a
prioritized
overview
of
requests
by
fiscal
year,
highlighting
bond
bond
premium
and
paygo
for
the
10
years,
at
approximately
190
million.
On
the
next
few
slides,
I
will
detail
the
bond
requests.
F
Our
highest
priority
is
carlin
springs,
the
old
virginia
hospital
center
building.
This
funding
will
provide
for
the
demolition
of
the
large
non-functional
empty
building
that
creates
an
attractive
nuisance
and
poses
certain
risks
to
the
community.
After
the
building
removal,
the
site
will
have
greater
flexibility
for
both
interim
and
long-term
uses
and
in
fy
2025.
Preliminary
funding
is
reserved
for
a
site
planning
study.
The
magnitude
of
costs
on
this
phase
is
due
to
the
extensive
footprint
of
the
facility
regulatory
requirements
to
remove
widespread
mold
and
asbestos
before
demolition
for
worker
safety
and
stormwater
compliance
requirements.
F
3700
south
four
mile
run
project
includes
requests
for
infrastructure
improvements
to
replace
windows,
solar
ready,
roof
replacement
and
a
pilot
for
electric
boilers.
This
work
will
prepare
the
building
to
be
ready
for
to
receive
cultural
and
arts
programs,
which
is
the
first
step
in
the
process
in
order
to
be
ready
to
implement
recommendations
for
programs
to
move
to
this
facility
in
the
future.
F
As
development
grows,
growth
continues
in
arlington.
The
coverage
needs
of
the
fire
department
have
increased
to
provide
service
in
underserved
areas
such
as
the
west
end
of
columbia,
pike.
The
county
has
an
option
to
purchase
the
land
at
5519
columbia,
pike
where
a
test
fit
has
determined
its
viable
use
for
a
new
west
end
fire
station
that
meets
the
fire
department's
program
and
response
needs
followed
by
land
acquisition
in
fy,
23
design
and
construction
will
begin
in
fy
24-26
continuing
to
support
our
expanding
fire
department
needs
in
the
fy
2223
cip.
F
It
was
approved
for
the
design
and
construction
to
relocate
the
fire
marshal
and
fire
prevention
office
from
1020
hudson
street
to
the
thomas
building.
Our
fy
24
and
25
requested
funding
is
to
consolidate
the
remaining
fire
administrative
offices
from
both
bosman
to
the
sixth
floor
in
the
thomas
building
to
increase
both
space
and
staff
efficiencies.
F
In
addition,
a
new
situational
awareness
center
will
be
established
to
share,
monitor,
filter
and
disseminate
key
information
during
a
critical
public
safety
event
or
special
event.
A
substantial
portion
of
the
new
funding
is
to
address
the
immediate
infrastructure
issues
that
facilities
management
has
been
experiencing
since
acquiring
the
building
in
november
of
2012..
F
F
Our
next
entry
is
comprised
of
various
projects
at
the
quincy
site,
that
includes
site
planning
for
operational
uses
and
general
maintenance
items
such
as
hvac
roof
and
fire
alarm
system
replacements
in
the
out
years.
1425
north
quincy
street
is
a
continuation
of
funding
to
complement
the
relocation
of
fire
and
police
apparatus
and
emergency
vehicles
that
was
completed
this
spring.
This
project
includes
the
fit
out
of
remaining
space
located
in
the
building
for
fire
logistics
located
at
the
old
fire
five
facility.
F
Proceeding
with
this
next
step
will
create
future
opportunities
for
redevelopment
of
their
aurora
hill
site
building
on
the
trade
center
optimization
plan
completed
in
2020
in
fy
2023
as
part
of
our
pager
request,
fdnc
was
funded
to
look
at
the
aps:
structured
and
electric
bus
parking
and
best
uses
for
proposed
vacated
areas
for
non-essential
trade
operations
recommended
in
the
phase.
One
study,
this
request
is
a
placeholder
that
will
implement
the
findings
of
the
fit
study
in
a
phased
manner.
F
Our
next
project
is
continued
funding
for
the
boston
public
garage
to
expand
the
condition
assessment
for
flooding
to
include
the
building
facade
to
be
followed
by
the
recommended
repairs,
columbia.
Pike
library
was
recently
renovated,
in
collaboration
with
arlington
public
schools,
from
a
two-story
library
to
a
reduced
one
story
differing
from
previous
cips.
This
request
is
to
redevelop
the
recently
purchased
parcel
at
3108
columbia
pike
as
a
potential
mixed-use
partnership
to
relocate
the
library
in
anticipation
of
aps's
growth
in
the
next
few
years.
G
G
The
first
grouping
is
our
csi
and
fire
station
projects,
including
upgrading
the
fire
station
I.t
closets
due
to
security
concerns
with
we
will
be
adding
one
new
hvac
unit
at
the
fire
station.
One
and
eight
cameras
and
card
readers
in
supporting
of
standardization
of
the
county
fire
station's
it
closets.
G
G
Fire
training
academy,
facade
repairs,
exterior
facades
are
are
needed,
are
in
need
of
repairs
due
to
warrior
frustrations
from
cracks
next
slide.
Please
moving
on
to
phase
two
of
the
detention
facility,
vav
replacements
of
the
existing
27
year
old,
pneumatic
vav
boxes,
with
digital
controls
and
more
energy
efficiency
equipment.
G
Lastly,
at
madison
community
center,
the
hvac
and
roof
will
be
replaced,
including
asbestos
abatement.
The
existing
roof
is
37
years
old
and
has
reached
the
end
of
its
useful
life
similar
to
fire
station
5.
The
new
roof
will
have
a
higher
r
value
increase
energy
efficiency
and
reduce
the
future
utility
expenses.
H
These
principles
are
more
clearly
recognized
in
this
snapshot
from
the
facility,
cip,
michelle
and
rami
just
reviewed
each
of
these
projects
with
you.
But
this
slide
more
clearly
demonstrates
embedded
environmental
code
benefits
such
as
electric
replacements
of
end-of-life
equipment,
reach
code
standards,
bless
you
and
upgrades
to
building
envelopes,
energy
performance
options,
including
renewables,
and
even
the
integration
of
biophilia
and
contemporary
technology
and
the
fire
station
5
green
roof.
H
In
addition
to
energy
performance
standards
deployed
directly
by
fmb
and
fdc,
the
air
team
implements
government
sector
actions
under
the
community
energy
plan
and
collaboration
with
facilities
and
others.
Briefly,
I'm
sorry
with
facilities
briefly
defined
in
six
programs
on
the
next
two
slides
next
place.
H
Next,
please,
the
cip
also
addresses
on-site.
Renewable
energy
and
storage,
resiliency
systems
publicly
accessible
ev
charging
hubs
on
government
sites,
increased
electrification
of
county
facilities
and
development
of
tools
to
inform
decarbonization
and
county
facility
upgrades
shown
here.
Air
also
supports
fmb
in
the
sighting
and
installation
of
an
ev
charging
network,
matched
to
the
county's
own
fleet.
H
Taken
together,
these
investments
respond
to
core
goals
under
multiple
cep
sectors,
including
renewable
energy,
government
leadership,
buildings,
transportation
and
resilience
beyond
facilities.
Air
also
works
with
cphd
and
dhs
to
promote
energy,
equity
and
sustainability
and
affordable
housing
and
group
housing
consistent
with
the
board's
express
addition
of
an
equity
lens
to
the
2019
community
energy
plan,
through
the
cip,
development
of
decarbonization
tools,
ongoing
training
in
best
practices
and
strategic
procurement,
the
partnership
between
air
and
facilities
is
actively
collaborative
and
dynamic
both
operationally
and
in
the
development
of
this
proposed
facility.
Cip.
D
D
Further
combining
programs
or
removing
unusable
buildings
creates
planning
opportunities,
as
you
heard,
from
dimitri
in
the
energy
area,
all
of
the
facilities
groups
are
collaborating
and
seeking
opportunities
for
energy
reduction
and
how
best
way
best
means
to
electrify
end
of
life.
Gas
heating
systems.
D
However,
I'd
be
remiss.
If
I
didn't
say
we
have
some
challenges
and
they're
they
come
in
several
areas.
First,
in
delivering
our
programs
within
current
budgets
and
timelines
will
be
a
challenge.
We
see
a
lot
of
pricing
volatility
and
unexpected
increases
complied
combined
with
supply
chain
uncertainties.
D
As
an
example,
in
april,
we
learned
that
a
major
children
manufacturer
was
increasing
prices
for
previously
committed
and
signed
orders,
and
it
was
an
arbitrary
move
on
their
part,
but
it
resulted
in
a
10
or
a
57
000
price
increase
for
the
replacement
chiller.
You
heard
rami
described
going
into
the
detention
center.
D
Additionally,
the
lead
times
are
really
increased
dramatically
before
the
pandemic.
The
lead
time
for
tiller
was
10
to
16
weeks.
Now,
it's
35
to
40
weeks
and
the
same
thing
is
occurring
in
even
the
more
mundane
areas
of
office
furnishings.
We
used
to
be
able
to
get
furnishings
in
six
weeks
from
request.
D
A
Thank
you
so
much,
mr
may,
and
it
is
our
intent,
mr
manager,
right
to
take
a
break
there
before
moving
into
our
next
areas.
Great,
thank
you
so
much.
We
really
appreciate
presentations
from
across
the
teams.
We'll
have
some
time
now
for
questions
before
we
do
that.
I
want
to
know
we
are
joined
by
the
chair
of
our
c2e2
commission,
which
I
understand
is
working
on
a
letter
for
us.
Did
you
want
to
make
remarks
to
your
mcintyre?
I
Hey,
yes,
I'm
john
mcintyre,
chair
of
the
climate
change
energy
and
environment
commission
just
for
the
record,
but
just
we
are
still
looking
at
it
and
we
you
know
because
of
the
timing,
it's
going
to
be
fairly
late
in
the
month
before
we
have
our
formal
letter,
but
just
based
on
what
we
have
said
in
the
past
and
looking
through
the
these
first,
you
know
appreciate
the
greater
emphasis
on
environment
throughout
through
in
the
cip.
I
I
think
that's
you
know
moving
in
the
direction
that
we
would
like
to
see
and
would
like
to
see
more.
I
think
our
biggest
concern,
particularly
on
facilities,
remains
the
issue
of
electrification
in
buildings.
It's
been
mentioned
issues
that
there
are
going
to
be
some
pilots,
but
I
think
you
know
we're
getting
to
the
point
that
the
county
probably
should
be
making
a
commitment
to
electrify
all
our
buildings
and
kind
of
set
a
timeline
as
equipment
has
to
be
replaced.
I
There
are
a
number
of
hvac
systems
being
replaced
in
the
cip,
so
just
understanding
which
ones
are
actually
using
fossil
gas
and
making
the
best
opportunity
to
actually
replace
those
at
this
point.
Otherwise,
we
are
locked
in
for
another
15
to
20
years,
as
we
wait
for
those
system
to
age
out,
so
that
would
be
one
area.
I
The
other
area
that
we
brought
up
in
last
year's
cip
letter
was
the
transparency
issue
and
I
think,
there's
still
a
lot
of
room
for
some
additional
transparency
in
the
overall
cip,
and
I
think,
frankly,
I
think
the
county
is
actually
missing
an
opportunity
to
highlight
some
of
the
progress
that
they're
making
in
what
what
they're
looking
for,
for
example,
the
transition
of
the
art
bus
system
as
well
as
the
fleet
system,
and
what
that
means
in
terms
of
our
carbon
emission
goals,
small
for
the
county,
but
pretty
big
for
the
county
government,
the
same
with
the
solar
panels,
the
solar
on
the
rooftops.
I
Now,
in
many
of
these
cases,
some
of
these
will
be
exploratory
and
any
estimates
of
of
what
the
gains
are
going
to
be.
You
know
has
to
be
understood
that
they
are
estimates,
but
I
think
it's
worth
pointing
out
that
you
know
what
we're
gaining
for
these
and
again
we
keep
coming
back
to
the
electrification
and
moving
away
from
fossil
gas.
So
you
know
being
more
explicit
on
that,
I
would
say
even
for
the
storm
water
management.
I
I
know
you
haven't
gotten
to
that,
but
since
I
have
the
floral
I'll
kind
of
continue
on
that,
but
you
know
opportunities
to
I
mean
we're
spending
a
lot
of
money
on
it.
It's
very
important
just
you
know,
and
it's
not.
I
I
can't
be
a
lot
of
extra
work
because
it's
got
to
be
built
into
the
project
planning,
but
just
some
sense
of
what
are
we
getting
out
of
that
money
in
terms
of
reduced
storm
water,
runoff,
flood
protection,
improved
water
qualities,
those
issues
I
mean
those
are
issues
that
have
to
be
part
of
the
contracting
process.
So
again,
you
know
where
the
exact
plans
are
not
necessarily
a
lot
in
in
place
that
they
should
have
a
good
good
opportunity
to
know
exactly
what
we're
trying
to
get
out
of
that.
I
That's
just
a
little
bit
of
transparency
of
saying:
what's
the
so,
what
on
on?
What
we're
expending,
and
even
on
the
electrification
and
the
energy
performance
again,
is
you
know
how
much
we're
saving?
I
think
there
was
one
table
in
in
the
cip
that
kind
of
reference
some
some
savings
in
money,
some
savings
due
to
energy
performance,
but
again
highlighting
those
issues
to
know
you
know
getting.
I
What
we're
getting
out
of
our
spending
is
useful.
I
mean
I
worked
in
the
intelligence
community
as
an
analyst
and
one
of
the
thing
we
got
pounded
into
it
was
the
so
what
you
could
talk
about
what
was
happening,
but
from
the
perspective
of
the
policy
makers,
it
was
the
so
what
and-
and
that
would
be
the
same
thing
and
again
most
of
these
things
should
be
clear,
as
they're
they're
doing
the
planning,
because
they're
part
of
the
contracting
process.
I
If
you
don't
know
what
your
end
goal
is
you
can
it's
hard
to
actually
get
contribute
to
put
forward
what
you
want
and
then
the
final
thing
I
would
actually
note
is
the
natural
resources
plan
is,
is
starting
to
move
in
the
direction
of
treating
that
as
the
kappa
as
an
asset
for
the
county
and
putting
money
in
that
for
reforestation
and
invasive
removals,
and
that
is
that
I
think
we're
excited,
and
I
know
the
other
commissions
are
excited
about
about
putting
that
into
into
the
cip,
and
we
look
forward
to
seeing
those
projects
as
they
develop.
A
A
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
can
you
help
me
understand
the
situational
awareness
center?
I
know
that
miss
garvey
might
support
it,
but
I
don't
know
exactly
what
it
is
just
yet
I
mean
I'm
looking
here.
J
I
looked
a
little
bit
in
the
and
I
don't
know
who
the
question
is
best
directed
to,
and
I
just
saw
the
mr
schwartz's
look.
So
we
have
a
plan
now.
J
I
just
we
have,
how
does
it
relate
to
the
you
know?
We
we
steered
clear
of
the
emergency
communications
center
physically,
I
think,
and
how
does
this
relate
to
the
ecc?
Given
the
vast
changes
that
have
happened,
maybe
you
could
speak
a
little
to
it.
I
can
also
sure
follow
up
with
dr
miller,
if
he's
appropriate,
but.
L
He
should
be
coming
online
in
just
a
moment.
Okay,
I
think
the
situational
awareness
center
will
consolidate
a
lot
of
the
public
safety
information
flows,
namely
the
watchdesk
from
the
ecc,
maybe
embedded
in
the
situational
awareness
center.
It
also
serves
to
bring
in
a
lot
of
the
information
and
data
streams
from
special
events
that
we
anticipate
will
be
participating
in
a
lot
more
in
this
fall
and
bring
a
lot
of
departments
in
the
county
in
one
room
in
one
setting
able
to
manage
and
coordinate
either
live
emergency
incidents
or
extended
events.
J
Got
it?
I
think
that
that
that
helps
me,
but
it
would
be
the
lead
staff
of
fire
ecc
in
a
specific,
with
respect
to
a
specific
event,
and
maybe
also
some
table
tops,
is
that
kind
of
correct.
L
More
of
a
flexible
space
to
bring
in
as
needed
in
all
students
to
scale
up
so
any
staffs
from
department,
environmental
services,
public
safety,
any
anyone
who
would
be
involved
in
coordinating
counting
operations
from
an
event
or
if
it
was
an
emergency
quickly
bringing
in
those
response
agencies
to
manage.
It
would
also
be
a
good
place
to
interface
with
county
executive
leadership
to
bring
them
a
little
closer
to
the
information
decision
making.
For
these
events.
C
So
we
have
currently
we
have
an
emergency
operations
center
over
in
court
square
west,
which
we
have
not
actually
fully
activated
in
the
physical
sense.
Even
over
the
last
two
years,
we've
been
doing
a
lot
of
that.
Virtually.
What
we're
talking
about
here
is
this
isn't
meant
to
replicate
that
it
would
be
in.
Let's
see
the
best
example
I
can
come
up
with
is:
if
there
were
a
situation
in
the
county,
there
was
an
immediate
threat.
We
will
be
able
to
gather
the
right
people
there
tap
into
all
our
assets
and
coordinate
it
electronically.
C
I
don't
know,
there's
multiple
databases
right
now.
We
have
traffic
cameras
in
one
place
that
we're
looking
at.
We
have
we're
monitoring
our
sewer
and
water
in
one
place.
Our
watch
desk
is
in
another
place.
This
is
meant
to
consolidate
them
in
one
physical
location
to
bring
all
the
virtual
assets
together.
K
L
C
It's
a
great
hub
and
if,
if
I
could
just
mention,
I
think
we
were
fortunate.
We
just
learned,
I
think
last
week
that
senator
kaine
was
able
to
get
some
funding
for
this
in
the
mark
up
on
the
senate
side
in
the
appropriations
process.
So
I'm
never
going
to
say
it's
a
done
deal
but
we're
optimistic
and
I
think
it
recognizes
the
need.
C
We
are
one
of
the
few
major
urban
jurisdictions
that
doesn't
have
a
facility
like
this
that
we're
able
to
sort
of
we
have
a
watch
desk,
which
I
I
don't
want
to
overstate
it,
but
it's
literally
a
desk
with
one
person
at,
and
this
is
meant
to
create
more
physical
space
with
more
monitors
and
that
kind
of
thing
it's
it's
a
relatively.
C
A
You
was
there
any
more
to
be
said
about
that
emergency
situational
analysis
living
all
right.
A
B
Oh,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
I
guess
this
question
is
for
for
mr
schwartz,
even
though
it's
a
question
arising
from
mr
may's
presentation,
the
price
and
volatility
that
we're
experiencing
here,
but
we'll
also
experience
across
all
of
the
the
functional
program
areas.
B
Do
we
have
a
strategy
to
assess
and
deal
with
this,
and
so
what
I'm
looking
for
is
whether
or
not
we're
analyzing,
whether
or
not
the
pricing
increases
and
volatility
are
sort
of
real
and
based
on
real
factors
which
we
expect
will
persist,
or
we
we
view
them
as
transitory
and
if
so,
whether
we're
employing
different
approaches
like
negotiating
with
suppliers
delaying
purchases.
Maybe
looking
for
regional
cooperation
through
cooperative
purchasing
to
address
it,
I'm
looking
for
a
little
sense
of
how
we're
analytically,
assessing
the
circumstances
that
we're
experiencing.
C
C
I
know
you
and
I
have
talked
about
regional
approaches
and
those
take
a
long
time
to
build
collaboration,
we're
working
on
that
for
smaller
size
purchases
through
cog
and
northern
virginia
regional
commission
also-
and
I
and
we
I
may
let
george
or
our
other
people
comment
on
this,
which
is
what
we're
laying
out
here
is
a
10-year
plan,
and
there
are
a
few
things
that
were
actually
right
now
in
the
in
the
queue
to
actually
go
ahead
and
do
the
contracting
on
and
george
mentioned,
a
few
of
them.
C
But
many
of
these
we
have
been
fairly
cautious
about
building
in
price
escalators,
because
we
don't
know
when
we
get
a
year
or
two
or
three
down
the
road,
whether
those
prices
that
we're
estimating
right
now
will
actually
increase.
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you,
I
think
inflation
is
transitory,
but
at
this
point
it
would
be,
I
think,
would
be
unfortunate
if
we
built
in
a
10
or
a
15
increase
in
the
costs
in
the
plan,
assuming
that
those
would
actually
be
realized.
C
So
all
those
strategies-
and
I
will
let
george
or
you
know,
romney
and
michelle,
who
have
to
actually
negotiate
and
maybe
even
bring
up
examples
of
what's
going
on
in
our
building
right
now,
where
you
have
a
lot
of
work
going
on
and
you
just
sort
of
stare
at
and
you
say
it's
coming
along
when's
it
going
to
open
and
the
furniture
can't
show
up
for
three
or
four
months
as
you
mentioned.
But
if
you
have
specific
examples.
G
I'm
not
used
to
this
so
yeah.
We
did
the
two
approaches.
We
we
I'll
give
you
one
example
fire
station
six:
we
we
got
our
proposal
about
a
year
and
a
half
to
do
all
10
doors
of
the
fire
station
by
folds.
The
estimated
cost
for
the
doors
were
450
000
to
replace
all
10..
G
So
we
waited
until
the
cip
kicked
for
false
church,
which
was
last
july,
and
we
we
got
the
funding
and
we
told
false
church
we're
ready
when
we
went
back
to
the
contractor.
The
price
went
up
to
640.,
so
we
didn't
have
funds
to
do
this.
So
the
contractor
told
us
just
wait
until
december
prices
will
go
down.
G
We
wait
until
december
right
now
we're
at
980
000
wow.
So
that's
the
approach.
We
did
the
first
approach
for
waiting.
The
other
approach
is,
we
did
go
and
negotiate
with
train
on
the
chillers.
We
asked
them.
You
know,
you
know.
Why
did
the
price
go
up?
18
I
mean
we
told
you
we're
gonna.
They
said
the
manufacturer
chain
said
they
don't
care.
If
we
they
sell
us
or
they
don't.
This
is
the
price
you
either
take.
It
or
leave
it
and
that's
the
approach.
G
E
B
It
just
it
pleases
me
to
hear
that
where
we
can
wait
for
these
dramatic
shifts,
which
we
suspect
are
not
necessarily
based
on
permanent
inflationary
factors
that
we're
taking
a
more
cautious
approach.
So
thank
you.
A
Thanks,
I
appreciate
the
line
of
questioning
and
that
really
sobering,
but
elucidating
example,
ms
garvey.
K
Thank
you,
a
question
on
libraries.
K
Looking
at
the
description,
which
I
don't
mean
I
know,
miss
diane
crash
is
not
here,
but
when
we
did
a
tour
one
of
the
things
that
sort
of
jumped
out
is
that
they
have.
We
have
a
vault
to
keep
a
lot
of
supplies
in
and
and
memorabilia
and
ephemera.
I
think
you
call
it,
but
it's
not
fireproof.
C
And
I
know
you
and
I
have
talked
about
this-
and
I
not
only
you
and
I
and
many
of
the
people
in
this
room,
history
buffs,
but
it's
only
as
good
as
we
can
to
make
sure
we
safeguard
those
materials.
We
have
an
opportunity
as
we
go
ahead
and
plan
the
columbia,
pike
library
and
also
make
further
investments
to
see
if
we
can
build
in
something
that's
more
permanent
into
that,
and
so
we're
absolutely
keeping
that
in
mind
as
part.
C
K
K
M
You
I
have
a
question
on
the
trade
center,
so
I
I
try
to
understand.
M
I
I
understand
that
we
are
implementing
the
the
optimization
plan
and
the
findings
of
the
basic
of
the
minimization
plan,
but
I
have
the
impression
that
it's
a
little
bit
it
is
slow,
so
it's
two
million
now
two
million
in
two
years
and
three
and
a
half
million
further
in
the
out
years
of
the
cip.
So
what
is
the
plan
for
the
for
for
the
trade
center?
I
realized
this
is
a
place
where
we
have
so
many
functions.
M
That
are,
you
know
in
need
of
optimization,
and
we
have
had
a
lot
of
conversations
here
of
how
do
we,
you
know,
optimize
the
delivery
of
services
from
that
center.
So
what
is
what?
What?
What's
behind
the
the
cip
appropriation.
F
E
F
That
study,
we're
going
to
look
at
you
know
viable
options
for
moving
things
off
the
trade
center.
You
know,
as
we
you
know,
compile
all
these.
You
know
planning
studies,
for
you
know
26
and
old
dominion
and
any
other
properties
we
own
that
are
not
fully.
F
You
know
used
so
we'll
be
looking
at
that
and
where
we
can
put
those
things
so
right
now
we
just
have
some
minimal
money
in
there
as
placeholders
until
we
can
really
determine
what
is
going
to
go
where
and
exactly
how
much
that
will
cost
for
those
relocations
and
then,
and
then
you
know
what
we're
going
to
backfill
at
the
trade
center.
So
if
something
leaves
the
trade
center,
what
can
we
do
to
better
organize
the
space
at
the
trade
center?
C
C
C
Look
in
that
direction,
but
this
is
something
that's
been
enormously
frustrating
to
me
and
michelle
cognin
just
brought
it
up,
which
is
that
four
years
ago
arlington
public
schools
came
to
us
and
said
we
don't
have
enough
room
to
park
our
school
buses,
and
if
you
go
down
to
the
trade
center
they're
pretty
much
all
over
the
place,
I
don't
mean
that
in
a
bad
way,
they're
just
everywhere.
C
This
is
a
question
about
whether
we
want
to
have
all
our
school
buses
in
one
place
or
whether
we
want
to
have
them
distributed
in
the
county
is
something
that
we
haven't
really
addressed
head
on
in
many
years,
and
so
we
have
a
lot
of
work.
We
want
to
do
down
at
the
trade
center
a
lot
of
moving
pieces.
We
have
to
settle
them
one
at
a
time.
I'll
give
you
another
example:
the
impound
lot
there's
an
impound
lot,
which
I
view.
As
I
don't
know.
C
If
you
ever
watch
dragnet,
you
know
sergeant
friday,
whatever
it's
a
1940s
kind
of
invention,
which
is
maybe
there's
a
different
way
to
use
that
space
and
impound
cars
in
conjunction
with
alexandria
or
regional
solution.
We
have
to
just
start
piece
by
piece.
Moving
away
from
that
and
you
look
at
it.
The
thing
is
a
sprawling
one.
It's
it's
like
the
people
who
wrote
the
community
facility
study
must
be
having
a
heart
attack.
It's
just
I'm
not
trying
to
densify
incredibly,
but
it's
all
just
very
flat
and
laying
out
in
one
story.
C
So
we
have
to
pick
a
piece
and
we
have
to
work
on
it.
We
were
going
to
work
on
this
on
the
buses,
but
I
think
that's
up
in
the
air
right
now
that
is
the
biggest
and
most
intensive
use
of
that
property.
We
have
to
solve
that
and
we
have
to
partner
with
schools
in
the
interim
we're
going
to
look
at
things
like
the
impound
lot.
C
A
I
appreciate
that
a
question
of
my
own
about
the
lee
community
center
under
it's
included
under
the
facility
condition,
assessments
and
planning
studies,
there's
also
a
footnote
within
the
cip
that
we've
got
about
an
additional
quarter
million
dollars
in.
I
believe
this
bond
referendum
in
fiscal
2024
for
planning
this
may
be
a
question
for
follow-up
from
either
cphd
and
or
aed,
but
from
the
from
from
the
facilities
perspective.
A
What
do
you
all
foresee?
This
is
relatively
near
term?
Is
that
just
about
assessing
the
the
sort
of
remaining
life
of
the
league
community
center,
about
which
I
think
we're
not
that
optimistic
or
is
it
about
planning
for
the
future
of
it?
I
know
a
lot
of
that
is
to
be
informed
by
plan
links
and
boulevard,
as
well
as
sort
of
the
future
provision
of
cultural
affairs
resources,
but
but
from
where
you
sit
what
is
encompassed
within
that
work.
E
D
Event
there
needs
to
be
a
relocation
so
and,
as
you're
probably
also
aware,
the
programs
at
lee
community
center
to
coin
a
phrase
are
running
on
borrowed
time
right
because
your
handlers
are
old
and
we
have
no
means
to
repair
or
replace
them.
So
the
second
part
of
your
question,
I
believe,
is
embedded
in
the
langston
plan
on
looking
at
options
at
the
site,
most
of
which
is
when
I
read
the
the
current
version
of
the
study.
E
A
Both
a
use
determination
for
the
future
of
the
site
to
be
done
and
then
also
kind
of
exciting
process
for
the
current
uses
at
4,
700.
D
J
J
Am
I
under
madison
the
madison
center,
we're
not
going
to
do
solar
ready
there
is.
Is
that
right
and
I
just
sort
of
3700,
I
think
we're
going
to
make
it
solar
ready
but
not
purchase
the
solar
panels?
G
So
basically,
we
we
still
don't
know
we're,
so
we
don't
know
exactly
what
will
how
to
make
it
solo
ready.
So
I
think
when
we
have
the
agreement
with
with
the
ppe
ppa,
then
we'll
we'll
do
that
part
with
madison
it's
easier
to
accomplish
it,
because
the
structural
is
already
there
and
getting
power
to
the
roof
is
much
easier.
It's
one
level
and
it's
easier
to
do
that.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
a
bigger
cost
on
the
afterwards
to
do
it
afterwards.
J
I
gather
that
fairfax
has
recently
moved
to
net
zero
and
and
for
all
government
buildings,
and
I
just
wondered
that
doesn't
mean
we
should
do
it.
It
just
they're
a
bigger
purchasing
entity
and
the
price
of
solar
has
gone
so
so
high.
But
I
wondered
if
you
could
provide
context
and
my
understanding
what
fairfax
has
done
there
right
and
or
you
know,
or
can
you
get
a
context
as
to
that
type
of
decision
and
I
think
that's
to
miss
mcbride.
H
I'll
defer
to
to
facilities,
but
I
believe
I
could
be
wrong.
They
went
to
net
zero
for
new
construction
in
terms
of
of
solar.
As
you
know,
I
just
wanted
to
add
the
ppa
contractor
and
vendor
situation
in
virginia
all
the
other
49
states
around
the
world
is
extremely
unreliable
right
now,
the
ppa
that
we
had
executed
the
vendor
has
come
back
at
least
twice
and
asked
to
renegotiate
the
price
at
the
same
time,
they're
falling
back
and
and
just
collapsing
on
installations
with
other
counties
and
cities
in
virginia.
H
H
There
was
a
trade
sanctions
and
trade
bar
and
an
international
trade
proceeding
that
was
blocking
any
imports
from
all
southeast
asian
countries
that
was
just
lifted
for
four
countries,
accepting
china
by
the
administration
in
the
past
two
weeks.
In
addition,
the
administration
has
activated
the
american
defense
act
in
order
to
help
stimulate
domestic
production,
which
we
think
is
a
great
thing.
I
think
we
should
probably
expect
the
pricing
for
domestic
products
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
higher.
H
The
only
thing
that
I
would
say
is
that
in
this
particular
area,
we
encourage
and
urge
some
patients
because
remember
that
these
ppa
agreements
are
for
anywhere
from
20
to
30
years.
So
the
deal
that
you
lock
in
today
is
the
deal
you
live
with
almost
forever
so
right
now,
there's
just
volatility,
unreliability
ambiguity
and
you
from
week
to
week
it
all
changes.
H
So,
if
there's
a
hesitation
to
install
the
solar
right
away,
the
other
thing
that
we'll
be
doing
is
doing
more
analytics
on
comparing
the
price,
because
if
the
ppa
vendor,
with
all
of
those
additional
administrative
and
profit
margins,
plus
they
have
equity
investors
and
their
equity,
investors
are
bringing
a
lot
of
pressure
to
bear
on
them.
Now
and
really,
you
know
doing
risk
mitigation.
J
Thank
you
very
much.
I
got
a
briefing
on
monday
and
some
of
this,
but
I
can
use
refresher
and
and
the
eagerness
you
you
gather,
but
I
also
understand
and
saw
the
coverage
of
the
executive
order.
So
thank
you.
That's
very
helpful.
A
K
H
They're,
probably
the
the
core
strategy
in
terms
of
ensuring
resilience-
and
we
have
been
very
very
conceptually
talking
about
where
microgrid
hubs
might
work
at
the
most
optimal
service
and
really
situate
us
in
in
terms
of,
if
there's
real
inoperability
and
we're
talking
about
an
interruption
of
power.
That
would
be
at
least
three
days
so
the
ability
to
serve
vulnerable
populations,
the
ability
to
also
deliver
those
core
services
and
operations
would
be
you
know.
Certainly
you
would
rely
on
a
microgrid.
K
H
The
resilience
that
you
see
built
into
the
cip
may
not
look
like
a
lot
of
money
over
the
10-year
cip.
The
microgrids
are
expensive.
They
are
a
significant
investment,
but
the
the
investments
that
you
see
are
both
scheduled
and
and
scaled
to
pace
us
in
those
analytics,
because
those
are
going
to
take
a
lot
of
analytics
and
it
might
even
take
a
lot
of
public-private
partnership
discussions
as
well.
K
N
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
mr
defronti's
question,
which
was
tied
to
joan
mcintyre's
question
about
electrification
and
addressed
that
in
a
little
bit
more
detail
with
current
information
as
it
turns
out,
it
was
just
yesterday
that
mike
moon
and
I
went
through
a
detailed
conversation
with
stephen
burr
who's
great
on
dimitra's
staff,
about
electrification
in
our
modeling.
N
In
the
context
of
the
cip.
We
are
trying
to
figure
this
out
in
a
way
that
gets
us
the
maximum
co2
reduction
for
the
money
over
time.
So
we've
got
this
whole
inventory
of
90
facilities,
we're
trying
to
pick
out
some
of
those
and
model
them
as
representative
samples
of
the
types
of
facilities
we
have
and
the
dynamics
we
have.
Each
facility
is
unique
situation
in
terms
of
its
heating
and
cooling
loads
and
the
site
itself,
and
the
site
itself
has
many
angles.
N
So
there's
the
roof
of
area
that's
available
for
solar
panels
or
heat
pumps,
there's
the
site
area
that
may
or
may
not
be
available
for
geothermal
and,
if
we're
lucky
to
be
next
to
one
of
jane's
parks.
When
we
work
out
a
deal
to,
you
know,
put
a
geothermal
filled
and
then
that
can
work
out,
but
not
every
site
has
that
some
sites,
if
we
can
make
the
technology
work
and
bring
in
you
know,
heat
pumps,
for
example,
insufficient
numbers
and
they
fit
on
the
roof
or
on
the
site.
N
There
may
or
may
not
be
enough
electrical
capacity
in
the
dominion
distribution
system.
At
that
point,
so
then
you
have
to
factor
that
into
the
cost
of
bringing
increasing
the
electrical
service
to
the
site
and
then
on
the
site
with
transformers
and
switch
gears
and
so
forth.
So
we
are
trying
to
model
all
those
site-specific
factors
in
a
way
that
can
be
a
resilient
tool
so
that
in
future
budgets
and
future
cips,
we
can
give
you
a
more
coherent
strategy.
N
That's
actually
based
on
the
modeling
and
the
data
and
we're
hoping
to
illuminate
that
to
to
both
the
board
and
the
community
and
c2e2,
with
some
cogent
examples,
and
literally
it
kind
of
indicated.
Mr
d
franti,
the
the
court's
police
building,
for
example,
which
is
like
an
example
building
with
enormous
demands
right
and
so
we'll.
N
That
may
be
one
that
we
throw
into
the
mix
as
an
example
of
what
what
it
would
take,
others
on
much
lower
demand
like
a
nature
center,
or
something
may
be
much
easier
to
achieve,
depending
on
its
site
specifics.
So
it's
actually
kind
of
a
complex
analysis
for
each
site,
we're
trying
to
find
a
way
to
model
it
and
simplify
it.
So
we
can
communicate
it
and,
of
course,
have
a
coherent
strategy
that
gets
the
max
bang
for
the
buck.
As
we're,
you
know
as
we're
moving
through
implementation
of
the
cep.
A
M
Thank
you,
mr
emmanuel,
just
to
follow
up
on
that.
So
I
I
perfectly
understand
the
need
to
model
each
facility
or
each
unit,
let's
say
so
that
we
can
actually
devise
the
best
strategy
to
to
reduce
the
the
the
the
carbon
emissions.
So
how
does
this?
How
is
that
supposed
to
work?
Is
that?
Are
we
going
to
be
reporting
on
that?
Are
we
going
to
have
a
energy
assessment
for
every
building
or
every
facility
and
say
so?
M
This
is,
for
example,
a
facility
that
needs
that
that
that
is
at
that
level
today,
and
we
want
to
put
to
bring
it
to
that
level,
and
this
is
the
the
amount
of
effort
or
investment
that
we
have
is
that
is
that
the
plan,
because,
for
example,
in
the
in
a
smaller
items
of
air,
there
is
a
advanced
energy
audits
line
item,
for
example.
So
is
that
part
of
it.
N
Let
me
I'm
not
sure
I
understand
your
question,
but
I'll
just
try
to
say
that
we're
trying
to
be
solution,
oriented
and
action
oriented
to
where,
like
we
have
a
model
that
gets
us
close
enough
to
where
we
then
know
which
facilities
to
move
into
design
process,
or
I
go
tell
romney
or
successor,
to
convert
this
one.
Let's
throw
some
additional
money
on
it.
It's
not
just
replace
it's.
It's
replaced
with
different
and
upgrade
this
other
system.
So
let's
adjust
our
budget
estimate
accordingly
so
and
we
we're
trying
to
move
relatively.
M
Quickly,
I'm
just
trying
to
to
figure
out
how,
on
on
our
side
on
the
public
side,
we
will
be
able
to
to
see
you
know,
register,
record
change
and
measure
success.
That's
that's
the.
H
The
item
that
you
refer
to
inside
the
cip
is
actually
for
renewable
energy
and
it's
looking
at
a
number
of
sites
and
it's
looking
at
what
the
capacity
of
those
sites
are
for
the
production
of
on
on-site
generation
of
energy.
So
then
we
can
look
and
be
better
informed
and
whether
or
not
it
makes
sense
for
the
government
to
own
the
system
and
operate
and
maintain
it
or
whether
it's
a
piece
they're
going
to
be,
of
course,
facilities
that
ppa
vendors
are
going
to
say.
H
No,
it
doesn't
pencil
out
for
us,
but
then
we'll
be
able
to
come
to
the
board,
to
the
county
manager,
obviously
go
to
greg
and
mike
first
and
really
look
at
kind
of
the
financials
and
the
analytics
on
what
about
those
sites
you
know,
is
it
worth
doing
solar
or
is
it
maybe?
Are
there
other
measures
that
can
get
us
to
just
as
much
energy
efficiency
and
greenhouse
gas
emissions
reductions
and
not
just
simply
the
solar
roof?
I'm
not
saying
that's,
not
a
good
measure,
but
this
tool
will
give
us
that
sophistication.
A
Thank
you.
It's
really
helpful
explanation
on
an
entirely
different
note.
I
have
what
is
possibly
the
least
sophisticated
type
of
question
of
the,
but
why
does
it
cost
so
much
ilk
with
regard
to
the
carlin
springs
demolition?
Ms
kang
and
you
started
to
explain
that
to
us
about
why
it's
just
simply
taking
down
that
building
has
an
estimated
price
tag
of
nearly
seven
million
dollars.
You
know
some
of
the
the
mold
or
of
asbestos
mediation.
A
Can
you
just
help
us
understand?
Maybe
it
was
a
little
more
granularity
about
how
how
it
is
that
a
demo
project
does
get
that
expensive.
Maybe
is
there
some
estimate
of
kind
of
cost
per
square
foot
that
you
can
help
us
understand?
You
know
the
size
of
this
project
relative
to
others.
The
the
scale
of
the
work
required,
the
number
of
workers,
the
size
of
the
contract.
You
know
it's,
it
is
it's
sort
of
startling
to
think
you
know
there
is
some
at
least
anyway
small
facilities.
A
We
could
probably
build
for
that
amount.
So
just
helping
understand,
helping
me
understand
a
little
more
how
we
get
to
such
a
significant
price
tag
for
a
demolition
project.
F
Or
it
is
a
large
building,
as
george
talked
about,
so
it
is
140
000
square
feet
173.,
so
it's
a
large
building
so
per
square
foot.
It
is
accurate
to
some
of
the
current
prices
that
we're
paying
now.
Okay,
there
are
some
specialty
functions
that
are
in
that
building
that
we
wouldn't
normally
see
in
a
regular
building.
There
are
some
like
swimming
tanks
that
used
to
be
used
for
like
therapy
and
pools
in
the
bottom
of
the
facility.
F
All
that
needs
to
be
remediated
and
pulled
out.
So
there's
some
additional
things
that
typically,
we
would
not
see
in
a
regular
building
like
if
it
was
an
office
building
or
something
like
that.
It's
an
expansive
landscape
also
and
then
we
do
have
like.
We
talked
about
there's
a
lot
of
asbestos
in
the
buildings.
It's
within
the
walls,
the
you
know
the
old
flooring
and
then
also
wrapping
around
a
lot
of
the
pipes.
Okay,
you
know
so
that
is
there
and
then
there's
also.
F
You
know
there's
a
lot
of
mold
that,
because
the
big
the
building
has
been
vacant
for
a
long
time,
the
bolt
has
spread
and
we
weren't
able
to
contain
it
so
that
has
kind
of
taken
over
a
lot
of
the
building.
So
that
is
more
expensive
to
remediate
that
and
that
you
know
you
can't
by
code.
We
can't
send
somebody
in
just
to
demo,
because
people
are
like-
oh
just
demo,
it
yeah,
but
the
point
is
that
a
lot
of
that
will
then
become
airborne.
F
F
So
it's
a
lot
of
specialty
items.
There's
a
lot
of
abatement,
there's
a
lot
of
the
mold
that
we
have
to
do
for
remediation,
there's.
Also
the
way
the
building
is
built
into
the
site
on
the
on
the
slope
that
we
then
need
to
go
back
and
backfill.
Some
of
that
you
know
that
area
and
then
also
do
the
storm
water
management.
That's
required.
A
Got
it
so
it's
actually
not
something:
it's
not
just
taking
down
the
buildings.
It's
also,
I
don't
know
if
regrading
would
be
the
appropriate
verb,
but
but
essentially
treating
the
site
so
that
the
the
topography
will
be
different
and
stronger.
F
A
Got
it
that's
helpful,
thank
you,
and
that
is
useful
to
know
too,
that
it's
an
air
quality
issue
for
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
right
as
much
as
it
is
for
the
workforce.
Okay,.
A
It
any
other
questions
for
our
facilities,
team
or
our
building
energy
efficiency
contacts.
I
know
miss
mcbride
will
see
you
again
and
probably
a
few
few
other
cip
programs.
This
is
only
but
one
facet
of
your
work
one.
I.
A
E
C
O
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
for
having
us
having
myself
and
others
today
before
I
get
started.
I
just
wanna
mention
that
there
are
some
key
staff
involved
in
putting
the
cip
together
this
year,
jane
rudolph
who's.
Here
today
with
me,
we
have
our
assistant
director,
becky
schmidt,
castle,
capital
asset
manager,
bob
capper
and
our
budget
specialist,
brittany,
canny,
all
whom
were
critical
in
developing
this
year's
proposal,
and
I
will
be
available
to
answer
your
questions
when
we
get
to
that
point
in
time.
O
I'd
like
to
start
with
an
overview
of
the
thinking
that
goes
into
how
we
assemble
our
10-year
cip.
We
look
at
continuing
our
existing
commitments
to
products
that
have
appeared
in
previous
cips
existing
projects
that
are
underway
and
projects
that
engage
that
we
have
done
engagement
with
the
community
on.
We
evaluate
how
those
projects
will
help,
keep
up
our
state
of
good
repair
and
reduce
the
load
on
our
lifecycle,
replacement
costs.
We
look
at
how
we
are
distributing
our
investments
across
the
county
and
how
those
proposed
products
further.
O
O
To
mention
briefly,
some
key
projects
in
the
crp
are
the
arlington
boathouse,
roslin
gateway
park
and
crystal
city
parks
projects.
We
have
two
new
programs
for
emerging
uses
and
natural
resiliency,
which
we'll
talk
about
later
in
the
presentation
and
lastly,
we
were
making
looking
at
making
a
significant
investment
and
converting
two
natural
grass
fields
at
kenmore
middle
school
to
synthetic
turf.
O
With
the
county's
evolving,
efforts
on
achieving
racial
equity,
dpr
has
been
looking
at
how
the
core
questions
such
as
who
benefits,
who
is
burdened
and
who
is
missing,
are
addressed
when
looking
at
these
questions,
we
begin
to
see
a
picture
of
where
our
projects
are
located,
the
access
and
quality
of
our
amenities
and
how
they
relate
to
various
neighborhoods
and
the
density
of
residents
near
facilities,
which
has
an
impact
on
the
quality
and
experience
and
use
of
those
amenities.
O
More
specifically,
we
review
how
capital
projects
are
distributed
and
their
relationships
to
their
adjacent
neighborhoods
in
managing
our
assets.
You've
heard
me
talk
previously
about
our
asset
management
study.
This
is
typically
a
formulaic
process
that
looks
at
where
assets
are
the
current
state
of
repair
and
where
they
are
in
their
life
cycle.
Dpr
is
looking
at
adding
an
equity
indicator
to
that
formula
that
could
have
an
impact
on
prioritization
and
where
we
select
our
projects.
O
Our
long
range
planning
looks
at
ensuring
robust
community
engagement,
who
is
involved.
Who
do
we
miss?
How
do
we
engage
in
providing
a
variety
of
opportunities
to
bring
more
residents
into
those
processes?
And,
lastly,
our
projects,
according
with
our
public
spaces
master
plan,
specifically
the
level
of
service
and
access
delineated
in
that
document,.
O
It's
always
good
to
take
a
moment
and
review
some
of
our
recent
accomplishments.
These
projects
were
able
to
navigate
constrained
budgets
over
the
last
several
years
and
challenges
associated
with
coven
during
the
design
and
construction.
The
county
opened
the
long
bridge
aquatics
and
fitness
center.
Last
september,
dpr
made
progress
on
our
synthetic
turf
replacements,
with
a
replacement
of
the
field
at
virginia
highlands
park,
and
we
opened
two
playgrounds
in
cicala
saw
and
ross
of
the
highlands
park,
as
well
as
more
progress
made
in
our
trail
and
bridge
replacements
and
very
recently
opened
jenny
dean
park.
O
Dpr
manages
a
broad
range
of
assets.
I
think
this
slide
might
be
becoming
familiar
to
folks
now,
but
across
147
parks
and
almost
a
thousand
acres
of
land
assets
that
need
to
be
maintained
or
replaced
include
81
playgrounds,
180,
different
types
of
courts,
17,
static
fields,
nine
dog
parks,
25,
restrooms,
slew
of
convenience
cemented
such
as
tables
benches
grills
and
drinking
fountains.
In
addition,
we
have
126
26
acres
of
natural
resource
conservation
areas
and
maintain
250
000
trees
that
account
for
about
69
of
our
canopy
cover.
O
With
all
those
assets,
the
question
is
sometimes
raised
and
how
we
manage
them
to
keep
up
a
good
state
of
good
repair
and
where
we
are
with
that
work.
That's
a
lot
of
management.
O
Some
highlights
include:
23
million,
invest
in
our
parks
and
playgrounds
since
2018
that
have
provided
for
the
renovation
or
new
construction
of
25
parks.
The
24
20-year
life
cycle
of
renovation
allows
us
to
reduce
our
ongoing
maintenance
costs,
make
progress
on
our
list
of
projects.
O
The
county
has
invested
10
million
dollars
in
nine
synthetic
fuel
replacements
and
won
turf
conversion
since
2018.
each
of
these
have
about
the
eight
to
ten
year
life
cycle,
and
we
are
able
to
progress
through
our
rotation
of
these
fields.
We've
invested
about
5
million
in
our
trail
and
bridge
program,
and
each
trail
once
it's
done,
has
about
20-year
life
cycle
and
we've
replaced
over
two
and
a
half
miles
of
trails
since
2018.,
when
we
evaluate
bridges
and
fords,
they
have
about
a
50-year
life
cycle
of
the
67
bridges
in
the
water
forwards.
O
This
year
I
think
you're
familiar
the
county
has
introduced
a
new
mapping
tool
that
will
allow
residents
to
find
the
location
and
information
on
projects
that
are
underway
or
funded.
This
map
specifically
boils
it
down
to
show
20s
dpr
projects
that
are
funded
in
various
stages
of
design,
permanent
construction
with
15
proposed
projects,
potentially
on
the
way
the
map
begins
to
show
the
county's
investment
in
denser
neighborhoods
and
helps
us
identify
gaps
for
future
investment.
O
As
a
quick
overview
and
we'll
turn
to
the
slide
a
bit
later,
dpr
cip
is
comprised
of
five
buckets:
a
maintenance
capital
park,
master
plan
trail
and
bridge
modernization
program,
land
acquisition,
aesthetic
turf
program.
The
rest
of
the
presentation
will
follow
these
categories
within
the
overall
cip
parks.
Mass
plan
account
for
just
over
half
the
project.
O
Funding
a
core
of
our
funding
is
allocated
to
the
parks,
maintenance
capital
program,
with
the
remaining
three
programs,
comprising
the
remain
a
quarter
of
our
funding.
General
obligation
bonds
account
for
almost
two-thirds
of
how
we
pay
for
our
programs.
The
rest
of
the
funding
is
funding
is
roughly
evenly
split
between
develop
developer
contributions,
tiff
and
other
funding
sources,
such
as
our
partnership
with
marymount
university
and
aps.
O
Dpr's
20
2022
bond
referendum
is
proposed
to
be
just
about
20.4
million
dollars.
The
parks
maintenance
capital
projects
in
that
total
are
construction,
funding
for
more
baileys
branch
and
woodmont
parks,
which
had
their
design
previously
funded
and
douglas
park,
which
is
for
design
and
construction.
O
O
O
As
design
funding
was
previously
approved,
construction
funding
is
proposed
for
billy's
branch
park
to
address
the
asian
playground.
The
project
is
a
partnership
with
the
arlington
neighborhoods
program
and
they
will.
This
is
about
a
50
50
partnership
woodmont
park,
a
playground
shares
some
similar
issues
to
bailey's
branch
and
that
the
playground
manufacturer
is
no
longer
in
existence
and
we
can't
replace
the
parts
and
when
they
fail,
we
have
to
remove
them.
Funding
will
provide
for
replacement
of
that
playground.
O
Okay,
the
projects
starting
this
slide
are
now
found
in
our
master
plan.
Category
generally,
the
following
projects
have
appeared
in
previous
cips,
with
the
exception
of
our
two
new
programs
emerging
uses
and
natural
resiliency,
and
we'll
talk
about
them
in
a
bit
in
23
and
25,
we
are
proposing
to
master
plan
design
and
construct
three
urban
parks
in
the
virginia
square
area.
O
These
three
parks,
murray,
mori,
herself,
milliken
and
gumball
are
three
small
parks
that
will
be
looked
at
comprehensively
so
as
we
don't
have
so
we
have
compliment
complementary
uses
rather
than
duplicative
features
with
the
county's
understanding
that
wta
plans
to
move
to
their
campbell
lab
building
by
the
end
of
2023,
flooding
in
23
and
24
will
allow
the
county
demolished
existing
building
two
parking
lots
and
a
portion
of
27th
street
south
and
will
be
able
to
incorporate
these
lands
into
jenny
dean
park
and
finish
our
master
plan
work.
There.
O
Short
bridge
park
has
had
an
adopted
master
plan
since
2018.
and
dies
is
expected
to
finish
up
its
trail
work
connecting
the
four
mile
run
trail
to
route
one
very
soon.
This
work
completes
infrastructure
that
will
enable
dpr
to
move
forward
with
our
design
and
construction
in
fy,
23
and
25.
For
this
three
and
a
half
acre
park
at
the
mouth
of
four
mile
run,
the
project
includes
a
plaza
dog
run,
casual
spaces,
cipher,
nursings
and
storm
water
management
facilities.
O
The
project
involves
a
lower
roslin
site
which
is
adjacent
to
the
potomac
river
for
direct
water
access
and
an
upper
rosin
site
on
land
of
the
county
owns
four
support
facilities
with
funds
for
master
planning
previously
approved
and
network
anticipated
to
start
at
the
end
of
this
year
or
very
early
next.
This
proposed
funding
would
allow
design
to
start
in
fy
24
in
construction.
The
lower
site,
starting
27.,
the
cip,
assumes
60.
This
will
be
county
funding
and
40
developer
or
partner.
O
Funding
for
construction
on
the
lower
site
just
want
to
note
that
construction
upper
site
is
outside
of
this
10-year
cip.
However,
the
planning
design,
where
provided
by
the
cp,
will
allow
the
county
to
get
a
good
handle
on
the
program
cost
and
any
potential
phasing
of
that
upper
site.
O
O
It
also
conveyed
multiple
pedestrian
bridges
and
structures
that
are
now
the
county's
responsibility
to
maintain
the
project
for
the
purpose
of
the
cip
has
been
divided
into
east
and
west
sides,
with
fort
myers
drive
being
the
dividing
line
proposed
funding
is
for
1.8
million
in
fy
25
for
design
of
the
design
work
of
the
east
side,
15.8
million
for
construction
of
the
east
side
in
27
and
1.8
million
for
the
design
of
the
west
side
out
in
fy.
32.
O
cp
calls
for
a
healthy
amount,
almost
5
million
of
funding
to
be
offset
by
developer
and
other
funding
sources.
The
amount
and
timing
that
funding
may
impact
the
ultimate
timing
of
the
ultimate
build
out
of
the
project.
O
Phase
one
of
penrose
square
opened
in
2012,
the
approved
adjacent
domain
is
moving
forward,
is
expected
to
be
completed
by
the
end
of
2024..
This
project
will
convey
to
the
county.
The
public
space
that
comprises
the
phase
two
area
of
the
penrose
park,
master
plan
and
funding
here
in
26
and
27
will
allow
the
design
construction
of
build
out
of
that
park.
Master
plan
and
expanding
the
existing
uses.
O
Previous
cips
have
included
funding
for
variety
of
crystalline
parks
and
public
spaces.
However,
this
category
has
always
been
a
bit
of
a
challenge
for
us
due
to
the
fluidity
of
the
market
and
how
development
has
actually
played
out
in
crystal
city
with
the
advancement
of
amazon's
developments
and
some
adjacent
projects.
We
are
pretty
able
now
to
get
a
firmer
handle
on
the
timing.
O
Priority
of
the
park
development
sequencing
in
crystal
city
with
the
timing,
the
adjacent
development
known
and
heavy
investment
by
the
county
in
a
new
metro
access,
elevator,
funding,
23
and
24
will
allow
the
design
of
metro
market
square
to
follow
that
elevator
work.
The
second
crystal
city
project
is
phase
one
of
center
park,
which
will
be
a
new
two-acre
century-located
park,
a
program
for
use,
active
uses
and
gathering
space
in
25
and
27.
O
O
O
The
way
people
use
our
parks
continually
evolves
or
subject
to
outside
forces
such
as
a
covic
pandemic.
Traditionally
we
discuss
these
uses,
get
them
into
the
cip,
the
outer
years
of
cip.
Then
we
plan
we
design
and
we
construct
meeting
might
be
10
to
12
years
before
we
are
seeing
a
reaction
to
something
that
we're
dealing
with
now.
This
program
is
intended
to
proactively
allocate
funding
to
address
issues
in
more
real
time.
O
As
an
example,
funding
in
fy23
is
set
to
fund
design
and
construction
of
a
permanent
permanent
pickleball
facility
at
the
walter
reed
community
center,
based
on
a
court
study
that
the
county
is
currently
undertaking
with
the
community
in
the
future.
This
program
might
address
uses
such
as
skateboarding
pump
tracks
or
dog
parks
in
a
proactive
manner.
O
The
natural
resiliency
program,
similarly,
is
supposed
to
be
funded
every
other
year,
starting
in
fy24.
This
program
is
to
address
what
is
currently
being
discussed
in
the
community
of
soft
capital
or
soft
assets.
Traditionally,
trees,
streams
and
biophilic
elements
have
been
aspects
of
our
capital
projects.
However,
this
program
will
pull
them
together,
front
and
center
as
focused
projects.
O
Large-Scale
reforestation
or
invasive
removals
could
be
undertaken.
With
this
program,
dpr
manages
small
streams
and
erosion
issues
throughout
our
147
parks
and
a
thousand
acres,
and
these
streams
are
generally
tend
to
be
outside
of
the
priority
stream
projects
addressed
by
the
stormwater
program.
However,
they
do
need
care
and
to
have
erosion
issues
addressed.
Additionally,
the
program
may
provide
the
ability
to
provide
biophilic
elements
to
existing
projects
and
the
last
interesting
area
that
this
program
would
like
to
explore
is
looking
at
flood
resilient
projects.
O
These
might
be
projects
that
provide
some
kind
of
flood
capacity
and
recreational
amenities
in
the
same
area
that
might
flood
and
then
go
back
to
recreation.
Recreational
uses
once
the
water
is
receded
and
we've
been
looking
at
similar
projects
in
other
communities
that
do
this
take
a
moment
to
talk
about.
Some
of
the
notable
products
that
are
in
the
more
out
years
of
the
cip
quincy
park
has
some
aging
facilities,
such
as
our
tennis
courts.
That
will
need
to
be
addressed.
O
However,
it
seems
appropriate
to
look
at
quincy
park
comprehensively
prior
to
making
any
major
investment.
The
cip
proposes
funding
in
2031
to
begin
master
planning
work
to
see
how
the
users
work
together
and
to
relate
to
other
uses
such
as
the
library
shillington
park,
will
be
the
second
public
space
to
be
dressed
as
part
of
the
four
mile
run
valley
initiative
with
design
and
construction
starting
in
2031..
O
The
inclusion
of
fairfax
drive
public
spaces
is
driven
directly
by
the
recent
adoption
of
the
clarion
sector
plan.
Update
funding
in
2029
will
begin
the
master,
planning,
design
and
construction
of
the
spaces
call
for
that
plan.
Similarly,
virginia
highlands
park
is
included
as
a
result
of
the
recent
adoption
of
the
pentagon
city
sector
plan.
Funding
will
allow
for
the
master,
planning,
design
and
construction
to
begin
in
2028..
O
Our
trail
and
bridge
programs
is
proposed
to
be
funded
annually,
starting
in
2023.
This
program
provides
for
assessment
and
place
over
40
miles
of
trails
and
and
bridges
and
forwards.
Recently,
we've
replaced
one
bridge
in
lebanon
park
for
the
second
bridge,
entering
the
permit
stage
for
replacement.
We
are
currently
starting
replacements
for
bridges,
alcova
heights
and
bluemont
parks.
Both
of
these
bridges
need
replacement,
have
severe
ada
issues
recently
completed
trail
work
includes
million,
paving
of
portions
of
arlington
boulevard,
blue
mont
junction,
four
mile
run
trail
and
some
others
and
we'll
begin
design.
O
O
A
priority
action
in
our
public
spaces
match
plan
is
the
recommendation
of
the
30
acres
of
new
public
space,
be
added
to
our
inventory
over
the
next
10
years.
This
program
is
meant
to
strategically
acquire
that
property.
In
order
to
accomplish
the
goal,
this
program
has
not
been
funded
since
2017.
However,
the
cip
proposes
addressed
that
starting
in
2023.,
even
without
dedicated
funding.
O
I'd
like
to
just
make
a
note
here,
it
doesn't
mean
that
the
county
has
not
made
progress
towards
adding
towards
the
public
state's
master
plan
goal
the
table
at
the
bottom
of
the
slide
on
the
left
on
the
bottom
of
the
slide
shows
property
that
has
been
acquired
or
conveyed
to
the
county
in
a
way
that
the
county
permanently
controls.
This
includes
our
last
acquisition
at
fort
scott
park
and
property
like
vdot
land
at
jenny,
dean
that
was
conveyed
to
the
county.
O
These
types
of
amount
for
about
just
over
five
acres,
the
table
on
the
right
shows
public
spaces
that
have
either
already
been
implemented
or
approved
as
part
of
site
plans,
and
will
be
and
will
be
coming
along.
The
road
that
place
public
access,
easements
over
permanently
owned
land
and
total
about
seven
acres
so
altogether
about
12
acres
of
publicly
accessible
land
has
been
added
to
our
inventory
since
2019.
O
Synthetic
turf
program
provides
replacement,
inventory,
synthetic
turf
fields.
This
chart
shows
our
fields
on
their
10-year
replacement
cycle.
The
turf
field
at
wakefield
high
school
will
be
placed
in
23
with
washington,
liberty
and
williamsburg
middle
school
fields
in
24..
O
It
might
be
noted
here
that
the
schedule
includes
12
million
to
convert
two
fields
at
kenmore
middle
school
to
synthetic
turf.
This
is
a
sizeable
project
due
to
a
large
amount
of
grading,
fencing
light,
stormwater
facilities
needed
to
make
that
conversion
and
the
county
was
able
to
coordinate
with
the
partners
at
aps
to
find
a
year
that
work
for
both
parties
in
our
cap
in
2030.
O
So,
just
briefly,
returning
this
slide,
we
looked
at
earlier,
shows
our
program
summary
and
the
wrap
up
of
our
five
categories.
It
totals
almost
272
million.
Over
10
years,
we
were
able
to
achieve
a
fairly
balanced
yearly
total
over
the
10
years,
except
in
27,
where
we
have
two
major
projects
in
gateway
and
boathouse
converging.
O
This
slide
shows
a
breakdown
over
funding
sources.
I
think
the
takeaway
that
I
might
leave
you
with
here
is
that
of
our
272
million.
We
have
significant
outside
funding
sources
to
help
to
phrase
some
of
these
costs.
We
have
over
15
million
developer
funding,
13
million
other
funding
sources
such
as
partnerships
with
marymount
and
aps,
and
over
50
million
in
tiff
funding.
O
Land
acquisition
has
been
a
challenge
for
us
in
the
past,
but
the
cip
begins
to
address
that
the
fluidity
of
the
market
in
crystal
city
has
been
challenging
for
our
program.
However,
we
believe
that
events
have
converged
to
give
us
a
level
of
confidence
this
year
and
how
to
proceed
with
park
investment
there
in
regard
to
the
boathouse.
The
cip
continues
to
meet
our
commitments,
as
outlined
by
our
agreement,
national
park
service
for
2029
and,
lastly,
we're
very
excited
about
our
two
new
pro
program.
O
A
You
so
much,
mr
beach,
I
do
not
believe
we
were
joined
by
any
commissions
in
person
today.
I
will
note
that
we
are
in
receipt
of
letters
from
both
the
parks
and
recreation
commission,
as
well
as
the
sports
commission,
the
former
which
weighs
in
particularly
on
that
goal
of
the
acquisition
of
land
acquisition,
the
latter,
which
is
generally
supportive,
but
note
some
some
concerns
and
urgency
around
turf
conversion,
which
I
know
mrs
garvey
in
particular,
is
prepared
to
follow
up
on.
A
So
with
that,
I
will
open
it
up
for
questions.
Mr
dufranti,
I
see
you
with
the
first
light.
J
Yeah,
can
you
just
confirm
synthetic
turf
versus
grass
turf?
I
remember
distinctly.
What
I
think
was
synthetic
turf
when
I
was
in
high
school
playing
soccer
on
it
and
it
was
like
concrete
and
it
was
hard
to.
I
mean
it
was
very
difficult
to
play
on
the
is
it
the
grass
turf
that
has
the
this
is
darker
usually,
and
it
has
the
little
it
seems
more
forgiving
on
your
for
exercising
more
forgiving
is.
Do
I
have
that
right,
you're.
O
Correct,
actually,
I
have
played
on
the
same
turf
that
you're
referring
to
back
in
the
olden
days,
but
turf
has
come
a
long
way.
The
synthetic
turf
that
we
use
now
is
actually
grass
fiber
generally
an
inch
and
a
half
to
two
inches
of
grass
fiber,
and
then
there
is
a
some
kind
of
infill,
rubberized
or
other
material
that
takes
up
about
an
inch
of
that,
and
so
it
is
a
forgiving
surface
for
impact.
O
In
fact,
there's
an
attenuation
on
there
that
you
can
play
football
on
it
and
there's
a
measurement
to
make
sure
it's
one
of
the
ways
we
maintain.
Our
10-year
cycle
is
making
sure
that
attenuation
number
is
maintained,
and
so
they
age
out
and
the
attenuation
goes
down
and
it
becomes
a
safety
issue.
But
these
fields
are
much
different.
They
play
a
lot
like
natural
grass,
more
like
natural
grass
and
they're.
Actually,
some
benefits
for
playing
there,
rather
than
perhaps
compacted
natural
surfaces.
O
I
don't
believe,
that's
the
goal.
I
think
that
we
have
a
number
where
we're
probably
getting
fairly
close
to
maintaining,
where
we'll
just
maintain
a
inventory
of
them.
There
are
a
few
more
conversions.
I
think
that
are
probably
key
for
rectangular
and
perhaps
in
the
diamond
area,
but
I
don't
think
the
goal
is
to
convert
all
of
them.
There
is
a
need
to
have
a
mix
and
there's
a
cost
to
to
maintaining
those
fields,
but.
P
I
just
want
to
be
clear:
we
still
have
many
grass
actually
grass
fields
that
have
dirt
under
them
not
like.
So
we
have
our
grass
fields
and
we
have
our
plan
for
synthetic
turf
fields
and
then
some
conversions,
so
they're
two
different
materials,
but
the
con
the
style
that
you're
describing.
P
A
And
if
you'd
like
to
physically
hold
a
sample
of
that
infield,
I
didn't
invite
you
to
my
home,
which
is
constantly
littered
with
those,
because
we
have
an
adult
soccer
player
in
our
in
our
house.
But
no
thank
you
and
actually,
I
apologize
so
struck
by
now
versus
where
we
were
four
years
ago.
The
time
of
public
spaces
master
plan
when
there
was
a
real
challenge,
around
field
maintenance
field,
scheduling,
and
I
think
the
fact
that
that
program
to
me
feels
I
know
it
doesn't
feel
to
south
this
way.
A
Someone
on
autopilot
represents
a
pretty
amazing
amount
of
work
by
our
sports
commission
by
our
staff
by
the
leagues
themselves
to
really
improve
scheduling
and
maximizing
those
turf
fields
for
heavier
use.
So
a
big
thanks
to
all
involved,
mr
carantonis
and
ms
garvey
with
questions
boy.
M
I
I
fully
appreciate
the
the
utility
of
the
synthetic
turf
I
mean
it
at
the
level
of
use
that
we
have
here.
There
is
absolutely
not,
I
don't
know
if
well.
This
is
this
is
for
a
follow-up.
M
If
we,
if
we
provide
also
the
evening
use
everywhere,
I
think
most
of
the
synthetic
terps
are
lit
right
in
the
in
the
night,
so
so
that
that
maximizes,
the
views
even
more
the
only
the
only
question
that
I
don't
remember
it
has
been
answered
at
some
point
is:
what
is
the
end
of
life
of
these?
They
are
they.
They
are
have
a
very,
very
useful
for
about
10
years.
But
what
happens
after
that?
O
So
there
is
a
recycling
program
for
the
turf
that
comes
off
the
fields,
I'm
not
sure
of
all
the
details,
but
the
when
they're
replaced.
When
you
construct
a
new
field.
There
is
a
stone
sub
base
and
a
drainage
system,
and
then
the
turf
and
the
infill
when
you
replace
them,
just
the
turf
in
the
infield
is,
is,
is
replaced
and
so
that
turf
is
recycled
as
well
as
the
infield.
M
And
part
of
the
materials
themselves
are
recycled
already,
so
you
know
the
from
tires,
etc.
So
one
completely
different
question
here
on
the
master
planning
list,
the
the
virginia
highlands
park
is,
is
slated
to
be
master
planned
relatively
late
in
the
cip.
What
what?
What
is
what
what
manages
this
timeline?
What
is
the
commanding
variable
here.
O
So
I
think
a
couple
things
factor
into
where
several
of
these
projects
line
up
there's
been
a
lot
of
questions
about
projects.
Not
you
know
like
them
a
little
sooner
or
a
little
later.
Virginia
highlands
is
a
you
know.
It
is.
It
is
a
result
of
the
work
that
was
done
as
part
of
the
pentagon
city
sector
plan
update,
but
it
becomes
a
new
project
for
the
10-year
cip,
and
so
when
we
formulate
the
cip,
we
are
really
trying
to
look
at
some
of
things.
O
We
have
commitments
for
have
shown
up
in
previous
cips
and
things
like
that.
So
it's
a
matter
of
working
it
in
to
the
correct
overall
kick
timeline
as
far
as
budgeting
our
projects
as
dprs
relates
to
the
rest
of
the
the
cip
across
the
county.
There
is
some
advantage
of
the
time
frame.
That's
there.
It
will
allow
some
time
for
aps
to
get
a
handle
on
what
they
may
want
to
do.
M
Thank
you,
the
other.
The
other
part
that
I
wanted
to
ask
is
the
pender
square
phase
two,
so
this
building
will
you
know
they
will
begin
with
demolition
now,
so
we
count
that
you
know
two
and
a
half
years.
This
will
be
done,
so
is
there
is,
but
the
the
panera
square,
the
the
cip
appropriation
for
apparent
school
kicks
in
in
fiscal
year
26..
A
M
O
So
this
timing
does
put
if,
if
the
development
holds
this
timeline,
which
is
the
first
variable-
and
so
they
are
estimating
end
of
24
to
be
complete
with
their
building,
that's
that
you
know
that
will
that
remains
to
be
seen
if
that
timeline
holds.
This
would
start
us
in
subsequent
work
on
the
design
and
the
construction,
so
there
would
be
an
interim
period
as
part
of
the
approval.
O
I
think
the
board
did
several
months
ago
there
was
an
interim
parks
plan
that
came
with
that
approval,
so
the
developer
will
be
making
an
investment
on.
I
won't
call
it
grandiose,
but
some
investment
in
seating
and
pathways
and
some
landscaping
features
and
trees
in
there.
It's
not.
I
don't
want
to
make
it
sound
more
than
it
is,
but
it
is
an
interim
plan
to
make
it
more
than
the
grass
area
that
may
have
been
with
penrose
one.
M
Okay,
I
I
just
wanted
to
to
wrap
my
handle
around
what
the
the
timing
of
all
this
is.
I
I
yield
a
question
on
the
land
acquisitions.
A
All
right,
we'll
come
we'll
definitely
do
another
round.
Ms
garvey
and
mr
dorsey
yeah.
K
So
I
have
several
questions,
but
I'll
start
with
the
kenmore
one.
That's
fine,
and
it
was
really
three
questions
one
and
you
I
think
you
may
have
said,
but
I
didn't
quite
catch
what
it
was
why
the
kenmore
field
is
costing
so
much
more.
K
I
gather
it
has
something
to
do
with
stormwater,
but
if
you
talk
a
little
more
about
that
and
then
it
was
originally
going
to
be
doing
being
in
the
cip
for
doing
a
lot
earlier
and
now
it's
way
out
at
the
end,
which
has
some
folks
concerned,
and
then
I've
been
asked.
If
people
can
raise
money,
is
there
a
way
that
they
could?
You
know,
move
it
up
or
help
get
some
of
the
fields
done.
If
there's
stormwater
things
I,
I
gather
they're
all
probably
mixed
up.
K
O
I
think
I've
got
and
jotted
them
down,
so
I
have
the
three
that
I
I
think
I
forget
one.
Let
me
know
so
I
think
the
first
place
to
start
is
is
kenmore
and
the
estimate
that
is
in
this
cip
for
2030
and
some
of
the
conversation
that
has
happened
around
there
was
an
estimate
in
our
10-year
replacement
schedule
in
the
fy
19-28
cip,
that
last
adopted
10-year
cip
had
in
our
out-year
replacement
or
mid-year
replacement
in
2021,
roughly
about
5
million
dollars
to
do
that
project
in
21..
O
What
I
can
say
to
that
end
is
that
we
have
we
approached
our
estimating
for
that
replacement
cycle
differently
now
than
we
did
in
previous
cips.
At
that
time
we
were
using
a
placeholder
number
if
you
will,
and
so
all
conversions
were
two
million
dollars.
All
replacements
were
a
million
dollars,
and
so
when
you
took
those
numbers
and
you
escalated
21,
it
came
out
to
the
roughly
5
million
dollars
that
was
in
that
cip.
O
Currently,
we
are
actually
doing
site
analysis
and
evaluation
before
we
put
an
estimate
in
that
in
that
document
there
a
little
bit
more
robustly,
and
so
what
we
have
found
is
that
there's
significant
grading,
a
great
change
at
kenmore,
and
this
is
a
sizable
area.
This
is
two
fields
and
actually
a
little
bit
more
because
it
incorporates
some
of
the
diamond
field
there.
So
it's
a
very
large
turf
project,
there's
significant
grading
that
you
have
to
do
to
make
that
a
playable
service
all
the
way
across.
O
We
have
some
ada
issues
that
we
have
to
address
to
be
able
to
connect
those
facilities
to
restrooms
that
are
located
at
the
schools
and
there's
some
elevation
issues
there.
O
We
also
have
stormwater
facilities
that
just
were
not
as
robustly
addressed
as
they
were
now
they're
they're
more
robustly
addressed
now,
according
to
current
regulations
than
they
we
have
we're
anticipating
in
2019,
as
well
as
just
things
that
we
know
has
part
of
those
projects.
Lighting
fencing
things
like
this,
so
our
estimate
has
it
at
about
a
nine
and
a
half
million
dollar
project
and
that,
if
you
take
that
in
escalated
from
now
to
2030
is
the
12
million
project
in
our
cip.
O
The
project
in
2020,
2019,
cip,
should
have
been
a
nine
and
a
half
million
dollar
project,
most
likely
at
that
time
as
well,
but
it
was
just
a
different
approach.
It
was
placeholder
numbers
route
years
and
things
like
that,
so
we
feel
we
have
a
pretty
good
grasp
on
the
actual
cost
of
this
of
this
project.
So
that's
sort
of
how
why
it's
so
expensive
and
how
we
got
to
where
we
are
2030
is
the
year.
You
know
we
are
partners
with
the
schools
with
the
way
we
approach
the
cip,
particularly
joint
facilities.
O
2030
was
a
year
that
they
had
less
of
a
commitment
for
replacement
costs
currently
of
our
current
inventory.
Also
for
us
of
balancing
across
our
programs.
It
was
the
year
that
worked
for
both
both
entities
in
2023
to
locate
it
there
can
people
raise
funding.
Certainly,
I
think
we
have
that
we've
done
that
before
gunston
is
a
is
a
opera.
You
know
it's
a
great
example
of
funding
that
came
in.
O
Did
I
lose
power
there?
We
go
that
that
was
able
to
enable
that
project,
and
so
I
think
that
the
year
of
2030
provides
opportunity
for
funding
to
be
raised,
and
if,
depending
on
how
that
goes,
you
know
we
will
have
subconscious
cips
between
now
and
then
that
adjustment
could
be
made
to
the
year
that
that's
in
the
cip.
K
O
It's
more,
it
was
more
of
the
the
number
work
of
the
two
cips
and
I
and
I'm
not
blaming
this
on
aps.
I
don't
want
to
give
that
impression
at
all
when
we
look
across.
If
you
look
at
our
10-year
cip,
chart
that
we
have.
There
are
certain
years
that
have
fairly
heavy
investment
from
aps,
because
they
have
to
meet
their
their
joint
allotment
of
the
sharing
cost
there,
and
so
in
2013
and
29
or
23
31.
They
were.
K
So
if
the
money
weren't
a
problem-
and
I
don't
know
that
these
folks
could
raise
enough
for
the
aps-
we
could
move
it
up.
There's
not
a
physical
management
reason.
We
couldn't
move
it
up.
It's
mostly
money
is
that
the
case.
O
From
a
from
a
project,
implementation
and
on-site
challenges
for
schools,
I
don't
believe
there
will
be
anything
that
will
withhold
that.
I'm
sorry!
What
could
you.
K
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
have
a
question
about
the
boat
house
project
and
one.
If
someone
can
speak
to
the
capacity
of
the
external
partners
to
raise
40
percent
of
the
project
budget
can
do
you
have
a
status
update
of
where
they
are
to
date
and
secondarily,
what
are
our
conceptions
for
how
this
boathouse
could
be
be
used
to
provide
broader
benefit
to
to
provide
river
access
to
arlingtonians
beyond
those
who
may
participate
in
crew
sports.
O
So
it's
a
two-part
question,
and
so
the
first
part
is
that
the
funding
split,
I
believe
you
asked
about
the
60
40
funding
split,
so
part
of
that
is
the
funding
is
in
2027,
which
will
allow
several
years
for
our
our
partners
to
organize
and
create.
You
know,
donation
or
fundraising,
targets,
and
things
like
this.
We
part
of
when
you
do
work
like
that,
is
they
kind
of
need
to
know
the
have
something
to
sell
or
something
to
be
a
design
to
be
able
to
work
towards.
O
So
at
this
point,
I
don't
believe,
there's
a
formal
commitment
for
any
of
our
partners
to
have
funding
targets
or
in
hand
that
is
work.
That's
gonna
begin
when
we
get
into
our
master
planning
work
here
in
the
fall
in
order
to
begin
to
work
with
them
and
understand
our
goals
and
the
neat
use
and
the
program
of
that
facility
and
able
to
kind
of
implement
a
program
for
that
them
to
be
able
to
go
out
and
raise
funding.
There
are
also
other
avenues
that
I
don't
know
at
this
time.
O
If
we,
you
know,
have
a
sense
of,
but
there
are
other
federal
dollars
things
like
this-
that
we
will
need
to
kind
of
work
towards
to
see
if
we
can
bring
all
that
together
to
make
the
project
funding
complete.
B
So
to
push
on
that
funding
piece
a
little
bit
and
then,
if
you
can
get
to
use
and
access
to
others
beyond
the
rowing
community,
is
there
a
conceivable
scenario,
given
the
external
deadline
of
2029,
that
arlington
county
could
be
left
holding
the
bag
for
delivery
of
the
project?
However,
it
is
conceived
because
of
the
failure
to
receive
federal
dollars
or
the
inability
of
a
partner
to
or
partners
to
raise
the
requisite
funds.
O
So
I
think
that
it
will
be
part
of
the
overall
approach
as
we
sort
of
go
in
a
measured
way
of
looking
at
our
master
planning
work
and
then
our
design
work.
I
think
we
will
have
to
work
with
our
partners
in
other
locations
who
have
to
outline
commitment
and
make
a
judgment
as
to
the
future
cips
how
we
adjust.
What
we
are
going
to
do,
or
the
scope
of
the
project,
for
example,
is
another
way
to
account
for
that
issue.
O
If
the
funding
commitments
are
one
one
way,
we
can
adjust
scope
and
things
like
this
as
well
to
kind
of
meet,
have
them
meet
in
the
middle.
I
don't
know
if
I've
answered
that
far
enough
for
you,
but
if
I
can
move
to
the
second
part
of
the
question,
if
you'd
like.
O
So
I
think
we
talk
about
the
boathouse
as
far
as
the
rowing
committee,
I
community,
I
think
the
roman
community
as
folks
obviously
have
a
very
high
level
of
interest
and
would
like
to
see
this
come
to
fruition.
I
think
that,
from
a
dpr
perspective,
one
of
the
most
exciting
things
about
the
boathouse
is
access
to
the
water.
O
One
of
the
things
we've
consistently
heard
across
almost
all
the
planning
efforts
that
I've
been
involved
with
two
rounds
of
the
public
spaces
master
plan
update
is
access
to
the
water
is
an
issue
for
arlington
as
a
community.
O
It
has
always
been
a
priority,
both
in
our
last
version
and
the
new
version
to
provide
access,
and
so
I
could
not
imagine
any
boathouse
that
would
not
provide
a
means
to
provide
other
access,
such
as
kayak
or
canoe
educational
opportunities
around
that
to
me,
that's
a
critical
part
of
the
project,
and
that
would
be
key
for
having
a
successful
project
in
the
end.
K
Yeah
just
to
follow
up,
is
it
possible
to
get
access
to
the
water
before
the
boathouse
gets
built
and
others
can?
Is
there
a
way
we
can
get
the
site
so
that
we've
got
people
can
get
down,
because
you
don't
need
a
boathouse
for
a
canoe
right
or
even
to
go
down
and
stand
by
the
river.
O
So
I
we
might
have
to
come
back
with
an
answer
on
that
question
because
our
acts,
so
I
guess,
there's
two
ways
to
look
at
this
question.
So
we
have
access
to
the
water
via
roosevelt
island
in
other
locations.
You
know,
arlington
residents
have
access
to
that,
so
I
don't
need
to
be
facetious,
but
there's
a
there's,
a
pretty
broad
access
way
that
that
is
controlled
by
the
county
to
get
to
the
water.
O
The
there's
several
levels
of
agreement
still
to
go
through
the
park
service
and
a
physical
structure
is
so
integral
into
their
access
and
how
we
create
those
agreements.
It
would
be
something
we
would
have
to
have
a
conversation.
If
there's
any
pre-access,
we
could
have
or
something
like
that.
It's
just
it's
just
not
an
answer.
I'm
sure
I
certainly
have
a
certain
answer
to
right
now:
okay,.
P
I
would
also
just
highlight
also
this
is
a
very
complicated
engineering
project
of
how
we're
going
to
achieve
it
and
access
to
the
water's
eric
or
mr
beach
excuse
me
was
saying:
that's
like
being
able
to
get
close
to
the
water
but
to
actually
put
into
the
water
there's
dredging
that
needs
to
happen.
There's
understanding
of
like
you,
can't
just
go
down
and
put
a
floating
dock
in
the
water.
So
I
think
eric
is
right.
There's
a
lot
of
work.
P
We
need
to
do
with
national
park
service,
to
understand
the
site
and
understand
what
we
can
do
there.
So
we
will
definitely
keep
you
all
posted
as
we
go
through
this
early
work
with
them
this
coming
year,
but
I
think
we'll
learn
more
as
we
kind
of
get
into
it.
K
A
P
Right
correct:
you
need
to
build
a
floating
dock
as
well
to
actually
provide
the
physical
access
into
the
water
and
there's
a
lot
of
because
it's
that
narrow
air
could
speak
more
to
it.
But
the
narrow
canal,
like
there's
gonna,
be
dredging
that
needs
to
get
done
and
other
types
of
work.
So
there's
just
a
lot
to
to
be
done.
A
All
right,
well
sticking
with
rosalind.
I
wanted
to
ask
just
a
couple
questions
about
gateway
park.
I
am
interested
if
we
can
in
moving
up
the
planning
dollars,
if
not
the
the
actual
construction
dollars.
I
think
there
is
a
real
opportunity
here
for
potentially
a
really
major
public-private
partnership
in
one
of
our
big
urban
parks.
We
certainly
have
some
committed
or
or
agreed
upon,
developer
contributions,
but
but
more
importantly,
I
think
there
are
quite
a
few
development
interests.
A
Private
interest
resident
interests
in
the
area
that
I
would
love
to
see
us
be
able
to
kind
of
organize
around
the
tent
pole
of
an
adopted
plan
of
what
we
know
is
going
to
be
a
you
know,
complex
and
expensive
project,
so
but
my
question's
actually
relatively
specific,
which
is
that
right
now
that
planning
money
of
about
1.8
million
is
designated
in
fiscal
2025..
A
If
we
are
interested
in
moving
that
up,
I
want
to
confirm
that
the
likely
earliest,
given
just
staff
capacity,
would
probably
be
fiscal
2024
right,
not
2023,
and
if
so,
could
you
just
for
purposes
of
sort
of
how
I
spend
my
time
over
the
next
few
weeks?
We
would
then
need
to
add
that
to
the
planning
dollars
for
gateway
park,
if
we
were
to
do
it
in
fiscal
2024,
that
would
need
to
be
part
of
the
bond
referendum,
for
this
fall.
Is
that
right.
A
O
So,
to
help
clarify
a
little
bit
just
so
we're
all
speaking
the
same
language.
The
county
actually
has
funds
to
begin
a
master
plan
in
hand
and
so
the
master
plan
workers.
We
were
funded
from
a
and
I'm
going
to
draw
a
blank
on
an
adjacent
development
down.
There
had
already
provided
about
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
on
funding
already,
so
that
is
in
hand.
So
we
are
looking
at
starting
master
planning
work
later
this
year.
O
I
want
to
just
kind
of
make
sure
I'm
transparent
and
that,
because
gateway
is
fairly
complex,
we
need
to
do
a
structural
analysis
and
we
have
to
do
some
other
information
collection,
so
the
community
engagement
side
of
that
most
likely,
probably
will
not
start
until
early
next
year
or
next
year.
Sometime,
the
funding
in
25
is
for
design
work,
it's
to
take
an
adoptive
master
plan
and
translate
that
into
design
for
the
construction
documents.
O
O
I
will
just
mention
that
that
will
put
a
little
bit
larger
gap
between
the
design
and
when
the
construction
starts,
which
sometimes
but
I'm
hesitant
to
mention
this,
but
you
could
also
address
it
the
other
way.
You
could
also
move
the
design,
the
planning
farther
out
to
be
a
little
bit
less
gap.
That
way,
and
I'm
not
suggesting
that's
what
we
want
to
do.
But
that's
the
the
timing
of
the
cip
was
to
keep
an
even
pace
rhythm
to
it.
A
That's
a
great
point,
and
especially
given
warship
with
you
know,
just
sort
of
really
significant
escalations.
I
can
imagine
the
challenges
of
having
an
adopted
design
right
with
with
playing
allies
for
their
art.
What
does
seem
exciting
to
me
is
potentially
the
timing
of
you
know
the
sort
of
relatively
expeditious
sequence
of
the
adoption.
The
master
plan
with
the
design
to
follow
design
might
then
tie
neatly
into
the
next
two-year
cip
update.
A
So
if
there
there
were
opportunities
for
either
advancing
the
public
contribution
or
maybe
advocating
for
more
private
contribution
to
expedite
as
well.
C
C
You
know
we
love
the
roslin
bed
they're
great
partners,
and
I
think
that
if
we
have
the
design
work
done
earlier
than
we're
anticipating,
we
will
not,
as
of
right
now,
have
the
extra
cash
for
construction,
but
we
could
think
about
planning
with
perhaps
the
bid
on
some
additional
contributions
from
them
if
they
were
interested,
so
there
might
not
be
as
long
a
gap
between
when
we
complete
the
design
when
we
start
construction.
C
So
we're
excited
about
that,
especially
given
that
the
businesses
there
see
the
upside
yeah
for
having
that
kind
of
a
gateway
facility
into
the
county
for
people
in
roslyn
to
use-
and
I
know
that
we
we'd
be
excited
if
we
could
do
it
earlier.
We
just
have
to
you
know
we're.
We
have
to
be
pay
attention
to
what
the
costs
are
going
to
be.
A
Absolutely
thank
you,
mr
manager,
okay,
so
round
two
of
questions,
mr
differentiate,
would
you
like
to
start.
J
Sure
I
didn't
I
didn't
quite
I
don't
know
how
best
to
do
this.
I
didn't
quite
get
to
on
kenmore.
I
wanted
to
see
if
there's
a
way
to
structure
the
the
conversation
as
to
moving
that
forward
right.
The
cip
is
iterative,
so
you
know
there's
9
million
to
12
million
in
terms
of
cost,
and
if
there
are
any
funds
that
could
be
freed
up,
do
you
have
any
advice
or
thoughts
about
how
to
structure
that?
J
I
suppose
it's
not
totally
dissimilar
from
the
boathouse
in
the
sense
that
there's
a
there
there
could
be
a
a
private
partnership
component,
but
is
there?
Is
there
any
way
to
do
that
or
sort
of,
because
saying
you
can
raise?
Funding
is
different
from
actually
getting
it
getting
that
funding
on
hand,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
thoughts
about
that
or
if
that's
a
follow-up
written
question,
I'm
trying
to
kind
of
take
miss
garvey's
questions
and
and
figure
out.
O
So
I
think
that
in
looking
at
how
kenmore
plays
into
the
overall
cp
and
the
replay
or
replacement
conversion
schedule
that
we
have
obviously
it's
fairly
sizable,
so
it
does
impact
not
only
that
it
also
impacts
some
of
our
other
projects
and
things
that
we
do.
I
do
think,
though,
that
unless
we
were-
and
I'm
not
saying
this,
but
as
an
example,
unless
we're
thinking
about
moving
it
into
the
next
two
years,
I
think
that
we
could
take.
O
We
could
work
with
our
partner
agencies
to
try
to
define
how
much
dollars
they
may
be
able
to
bring
to
the
project
and
what
impact
that
may
have
on
what
year
could
go
in
and
how
that
impacts
escalation.
And
then
that
would
be
something
we
might
revisit
in
the
next
cip.
O
P
I
agree,
I
don't
think
right
now.
It
would
not
be
feasible
to
move
it
into
these
first
two
years
and
so
we'd
have
to
work
with
our
partners,
potentially
first
to
figure
out
a
framework
of
how
much
they
could
raise.
I
think
in
the
cip.
It
indicates
it
could
be
up
to
two
million
dollars
of
private
funding.
P
We
also
have
a
70
30
split
with
aps,
so
there's
a
coordination
that
would
need
to
happen,
public,
private
and
then
with
aps,
and
so
I
think
there
might
be
opportunities
if
we
were
to
maybe
move
it
up
potentially
a
year
or
two,
but
I
think
in
the
this
two-year
cycle.
That's
not
I'm
not
sure
that
would
be
ability
to
raise
that
kind
of
funding
in
two
years
as
well.
So
I
think
mr
beach
is
correct
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
continue
that
conversation.
J
J
But
that's
that's
helpful
for
me
and
that
covers
the
only
other
thing
that
I
might
follow
up
is
remembering
the
process
for
the
language
on
the
bonds
and
three
urban
you
know
is
the
slide
slide,
12
sort
of
the
same
as
what
we
would
put
in
the
language
for
the
bonds
or
is
there
words
wordsmithing?
That
happens.
J
I
know
we
want
to
keep
flexibility,
but
I
also
wonder
if
you
know
three
urban
parks
or
emerging
uses,
there's
probably
a
few
thousand
people
who
might
want
the
word
pickleball
in
there,
but
I
don't
think
it
only
has
to
be
pickleball,
but
I
just
mean
emerging
recreational
uses
I
feel
like
there
are
in
california.
I
used
to
vote
on
stuff
that
I
never
understood
what
I
was
voting
on.
So
I
just
you
know
as
far
as
bonds,
and
so
I
wondered
if,
if
this
isn't
the
final
language
or
how
does
that
work
so.
O
A
Process
wise,
if
I
could
just
confirm
we
will
vote
on
the
bond
language
at
the
same
time
we
adopt
the
safety
in
july.
Correct.
So
that's
a
great
question.
I
actually
think
there's
probably
some
iteration
to
be
done.
I
have
the
same
bugaboo
that
you
do
and
wanting
the
language
to
balance
broadness
to
actually
pursue
different
projects,
but
but
being
specific
enough
that
we're
being
transparent
the
community
so
just
flagged
that
for
body
work
for
us
to
weigh
in
and
in
on.
C
We
try
very
hard
just
as
speaking
as
a
former
dmf
director
to
keep
as
maximum
flexibility
for
us
as
staff,
and
the
community
has
a
real
hard
time
with
that
as
they
should,
because
they
want
to
get
very
specific.
But
you
can
get
into
a
situation
where
we
would
set
aside
on
the
emerging
uses
or
these
kinds
of
things
where
you
set
aside
a
chunk
of
money
and
if
you
say
it's
for
pickleball,
for
example,
and
then
you
go
ahead
and
you
build
a
project
and
it
comes
in
under
budget.
C
Then
you're
left
with
money
that
you
can
only
use
for
pickleball,
and
I
will
tell
you
at
my
house
that
would
be
greeted,
but
I'm
not
sure
in
other
places
that
people
would
feel
the
same
way
about
it.
So
we
try
to
balance
it
by
having
the
the
bond
language
itself
be
somewhat
generic
and
then
the
explanation
that
comes
with
it
to
be
fairly
specific.
C
M
I
just
wanted
to
circle
on
the
back
on
the
perennial
question
about
what
drives
our
decisions
or
the
proposal
of
how
much
money
we
put
in
the
parks
acquisition
fund.
So
that
was
you
know,
headlining
the
the
parks
and
recreation
commissions
letter
that
we
received
today.
So
the
the
question
is:
how
does
the
the
goal
and
the
in
our
master
plan
the
third,
the
30
acres
acquisition
goal?
M
How
is
it
served
by
the
by
the
money
that
we
put
there
or
is
it
or
is
it
just
an
auxiliary
pot
of
money
and
we
have
other
other?
You
know
sources
that
we
can
serve
the
and
react
opportunities.
So
how
we
go
about
that.
O
So
the
how
the
exact
dollar
amount
of
set,
I
think
I
would
need
to
expand
the
to
some
of
my
some
of
my
colleagues
to
kind
of
talk
through
that,
but
what
I
can,
what
I
can
mention
is
that
we
have
the
goal
in
the
public
space
master
plan
of
the
30
acres
over
10
years
during
the
presentation.
I
did
talk
about
some
of
the
other
ways.
We
do
that.
That
may
not
be
a
direct
acquisition
or
a
cost
with
the
five
million
dollars
in
the
cip
in
the
past.
O
The
county
has
been
very
help.
You
know
very
helpful
to
us
in
that
have
identified
when
opportunities
have
arose
if
the
dollars
weren't
there
to
help
us
find
other
funding
sources.
For
that
I
believe.
For
example,
the
wat
building
w
eta
building
is
not
being
purchased
out
of
land
acquisition
funding,
but
it
was
important
to
the
county
to
you.
Folks
thank
you
and
to
the
manager
that
other
sources
were
found.
O
So
I
would,
what
I
would
want
to
say
is:
although
the
number
is
low,
not
many
opportunities
have
slipped
by
when
it
has
been
important
for
us
to
be
able
to
acquire
them,
and
so
just
another
way
to
think
about
it.
A
little
bit.
K
A
K
Yeah,
thank
you
a
couple
of
if
I
can
just
quick
planning
questions
on
the
the
nature
centers.
You
know
we
have
some
folks
concerned
about
the
nature
centers
there.
I
think
from
the
note
on
page
7
c73,
it
looks
like
it's
250
000
in
bond
funding
for
planning
for
lee
and
the
nature
centers
and
I'm
not
quite
sure
if
it's
spread
over
so
could
you
explain
to
me
exactly
how
much
money
is
going
to
be
available
for
planning
for
the
nature
centers
and
when.
P
I
might
need
to
call
my
colleague
greg
emanuel
back
up,
because
that
actually
is
in
the
des
budget
for
planning,
but
that
is,
I
think
that
funding
is
for
the
nature,
centers
and
lee
too,
and
lee
center,
as
well
as
those
are
the
kind
of
facilities
that
are
managed
but
like
as
a
facility
are
managed
by
des,
and
then
we
occupy
them.
So
any
kind
of
future
planning
for
the
nature.
Centers
is
a
partnership
between
our
two
departments.
N
We
can
get
back
to
you
on
the
detailed
breakout
if
we
knew
that,
but
I
think
it
is
lumped
together.
C
You
know
we
we've
had
a
lot
of
conversation
about
this
during
the
budget
process
and
I
think
we're
we've
laid
out
some
money.
I
I
will
tell
you
what
was
in
my
mind,
at
least
when
we
put
this
together,
which
is
that
the
nature
centers
both
of
them
were
properties
and
jane
you're,
going
to
help
me
here
a
little
bit
we're
acquired
or
in
some
cases
I
think,
even
given
to
us
both
of
them,
I
think,
sit
in
the
middle
of
resource
protection
areas.
C
Okay,
so
there
is
some
considerable
challenges
about
how
we
would
go
about
rebuilding
them
as
soon
as
we
touch
them,
it
becomes
a
real
massive
undertaking
and
we
might
want
to
think
about
doing
something
different.
C
Having
said
that,
I
know
how
beloved
they
are
in
the
community
and
it's
I
will
just
say
from
my
perspective-
and
I
know
duke
banks-
and
I
have
talked
about
this
for
many
years,
which
is
that
the
challenge
of
redoing
them
and
doing
them
in
a
way
that
would
really
be
faithful
to
what
we
want
to
do
to
have
them
be.
The
kind
of
experience
we
want
is
an
enormous
undertaking.
C
E
P
That
that
is
not
really
ada
accessible.
Currently,
so
there's
just
a
lot
of
challenges
with
how
they're
sited
and
the
buildings
themselves
department,
environmental
services
does
up
do
a
lot
of
upkeep
to
keep
them
going.
P
They've
replaced
roofs,
they've
improved
the
ac
plumbing
other
pieces
so
that
the
buildings
themselves
are
currently
for
what
they
are
in
good
shape,
they're,
just
what
we're
looking
for
is
what's
the
future
of
nature
centers,
and
I
think
just
the
timing
of
the
cip
and
other
projects
is
why
they
were
put
out
sort
of
an
out
year
to
give
us
some
time
and
space
to
do
some
thinking
about
planning
and
there's
other
sort
of
shorter
term,
more
operational
things
that
came
out
of
the
budget
budget
session
that
we
had
that
we're
gonna
be
working
on
more
currently,
which
is
like
nature's
current
center
hours
and
programming.
P
G
P
K
K
So
might
it
be
possible
to
move
up
the
planning
some
at
least
thinking
about
it,
because
it
sounds
like
you're
really
thinking
even
about
how
are
we
going
to
do
it
and
I'm
wondering
if
that
could
be
moved
up
a
little
earlier
than
31,
not
not
doing
how
difficult
that
would
be
to
move
up,
because
it
sounds
like,
as
I
say,
a
lot
of
planning
needs
to
be
done.
I'm
not
I'm
not
saying
we
need
to
plunge
in
and
build.
I
think.
P
K
Yeah,
so
maybe
I
guess
what
I
mean
I
might
be
thinking
just
listening
to
all
of
that
is
that
possibly
it
sounds
like
what
we
might
want
to
be
doing
is
thinking
about.
What's
a
nature
center
of
the
future,
actually
going
to
look
like
so
it,
which
would
be
a
very
different
kind
of
question,
and
maybe
that's
something
that
could
be
done.
K
P
Dpr
made
undertake
not
really
a
facility
study
that
dpfds
would
do
so.
We
can
get
back
to
you
with
some
like
if
you
were.
K
D
K
K
P
Right
now
is
just
I
think
it
was
mentioned
earlier.
You
know
we
also
are
updating
the
forestry
natural
resources
management
plan
and
that,
while
not
well
nature
education
and
things
are
disgusting.
We're
not
specifically
talking
about
the
nature
centers.
I
think,
as
that
process
comes
about,
that
will
also
give
us
an
opportunity
to
have
some
conversations
about
sort
of
the
nature,
education
and
opportunities
in
the
county,
and
that
draft
that
first
draft
should
be
coming
out.
This
should
be
will
be.
K
E
K
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
want
to
return
to
the
gateway
park,
conversation
that
you
initiated
earlier
and
to
ask
if
there
are
any
plans
to
coordinate
the
scoping
of
what
the
project
might
look
like
in
conjunction
with
the
transportation
efforts
for
fort
myer
drive,
considering
they're,
not
only
proximity
but
feeding
off
of
of
one
another.
Is
there
a
way
to
think
about
timing?
O
Well,
I
would
answer
probably
there's
potential
in
all
of
that.
I
think
that
part
of
our
work
coming
up
here
in
the
fall
and
going
into
next
year
will
be
to
look
at
how
all
that
coordination,
what
the
opportunities
are
to
certain
synergies
on
project
work,
because
you're
you're
correct
in
that
you
know,
if
there's
some
work
at
on
four
mile
drive
that
helps
sculpt
what
we're
moving
into.
We
should
take
advantage
of
that.
I
think
that
you
know
the
planning
down
there
has
been.
O
We
have
an
indication
of
what
how
that
all
should
come
together
through
the
sector
plan,
work
that
was
done
previously
and
also
some
of
the
substance
work
that
our
colleagues
and
des
have
done,
and
so
I
think
we
have
a
sense
of
where
it
is.
I
think
the
planning
we're
gonna
fall
here
will
allow
us
to
dig
into
that
a
little
bit
more
to
understand
where
we're
going
to
go
and
and
how
we're
going
to
get
there
not
physically.
O
But
the
process
which
we're
undertaking
and
allow
us
to
have
those
conversations
and
really
look
at
what
we
can
do
to
to
you
know
improve
or
to
leverage
both
aspects
of
it.
A
Great,
thank
you
all
right
before
we
wrap
up
my
last
question
pickleball.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
understanding
the
proposal
as
laid
out
under
emerging
uses.
So
I
I
think,
if
I'm
understanding
the
milestones
correction,
I
want
to
make
sure
I've
got
this
correct
because
I
know
I'll
be
asked
about
it.
So
the
idea
is
actually
that
we
would
in
2023
both
design
the
reconstruction
of
the
existing
quartz
for
pickleball
use
at
walter
reed
and
actually
do
that
reconstruction.
O
So
the
exact
timeline
of
when
they
would
open.
I
don't
necessarily
want
to
comment
on
that.
I
think
the
money
is
funded
for
23,
meaning
that
it
would
be
available
for
us
early
next
year
once
the
the
bonds
are,
you
know,
sold,
so
we
would
begin
our
design
work.
At
that
point,
we
would
move
from
design
right
into
the
construction
shortly
thereafter
the
design
you
know
that
process
we
will
engage
our
users.
O
O
But
there
will
be
that
aspect
in
that
design,
work
to
engage
the
community
and
then
move
to
the
construction
towards
the
latter
part
of
23,
because
once
we
have
design,
we
also
have
to
go
through
permanent
things
like
that.
Honestly,
construction
may
actually
start
in
24
with
this.
So
I
think
that
I
don't
want
to
be
overly
aggressive,
but
I
do
think
you
know
with
expectations,
to
have
conversations
with
everybody.
O
A
K
One
quick
question:
not
yet
because
just
one
other
question
on
quincy
park,
I've
been
spending
too
much
time
with
diane
crash,
because
we're
looking
at
probably
redoing
that
the
library
I
mean
they're,
all
I'm
assuming
that
there's
going
to
be
just
because
the
section
on
quincy
parked
hardly
mentions
library,
I'm
assuming
there
might
be
some
holistic
planning
with
both
any
any
things
that
are
done
with
the
library
in
the
park.
At
the
same
time,.
O
Absolutely
I
think
when
we
get
into
quincy
park,
you
know
we
can
we
when
we
define
the
scope
of
the
master
plan,
we
will
know
a
little
bit
more
at
that
point
as
well,
some
of
the
thoughts
from
the
library
side
and
how
we
look
at
that
site
holistically
how
we
incorporate
how
they
relate
to
each
other
and
even
you
know,
synergistic
uses
of
the
park
and
the
library
as
they
relate
to
each
other.
Thank
you.
K
M
Jones,
quick
clarification
on
the
pickleball
investment,
so
how
much
more
capacity
are
we
going?
I
mean
in
terms
of
available
fields
is:
is
that
that
investment
going
to
bring
in
in
walter
reed,
and
is
this
the
only
place?
So
you
know
pickleball
is
played
across
the
county.
P
So
I
can't
say
we're
going
to
have
it's
going
to
be
two
more
courts
or
whatever
the
really
key
piece
of
what
the
walter
reed
is,
that
it's
gonna
be
a
dedicated
pickleball
facility,
meaning
that
those
courts
will
not
be
used
for
tennis
or
basketball,
and
that
is
what
the
recommendation
was
coming
out
of
the
public
space
master
building
and
that
what
has
been
the
real
call
from
mem
from
people
who
play
pickleball.
P
There's
sort
of
two
things
that
they've
really
been
interested
in
one
is
having
a
dedicated
facility
again
came
at
that
recommendation
from
the
public
spaces
master
plan
and
two
just
increasing
the
number
of
opportunities
to
play,
which
is
also
looking
at
how
we
stripe
other
courts
to
have
pickleball.
So
that,
too,
is
something
we're
looking
at.
We
actually
have
an
engagement
that
is
out.
That's
asking
people
about
other
locations
in
the
county,
where
we
would
stripe
pickleball
courts
both
on
tennis
courts
or
on
basketball
courts.
A
Thank
you
so
much
big,
thank
you
to
our
team,
obviously
quite
a
bit
in
the
pipeline,
and
we
appreciate
you.
Mr
mcintosh,
has
been
incredibly
patient
to
brief
us
next
on
the
arlington
neighborhoods
program.
So
we'll
do
the
last
time
a
changing
of
the
guards
today.
Thank
you
again
to
dpr.
C
So
next
up
we,
you
know
we
was
the
neighborhood
conservation
program,
but
now
is
our
arlington
neighborhoods
program
kind
of
come
up
and
tim
has
also
changed.
His
name
he's
no
longer
tim
mcintosh
he's
timothy
mcintosh.
Q
Thank
you
and
good
afternoon
first
off,
I
want
to
say
on
a
personal
note,
I
am,
I
think
it's
really
awesome
to
be
here.
This
is
the
first
time
I've
been
in
this
room.
Live
I've
been
coming
into
work
in
person,
but
it's
really
awesome
to
be
back
here.
So
thank
you.
I'm
joined
here
today,
virtually
in
the
ether
somewhere
by
our
neighborhood
services,
division,
chief,
chique
and
joku,
and
our
budget
analyst
steve
bakal.
Q
So
let's
go
ahead
and
get
started.
We
are
now
the
arlington
neighborhoods
program.
This
is
also
pretty
cool,
and
last
week
the
ncac
no
longer
the
ncac
voted
to
change
their
committee
name
to
the
arlington
neighborhoods
advisory
committee.
So
both
of
these
were
really
an
outgrowth
of
our
excuse.
Q
Me
evaluation
that
we
spent
two
years
on
and,
as
you
know,
it
was
finalized
in
2021,
so
we're
really
excited
to
be
moving
along
a
lot
more
to
come,
as
we
continue
to
think
about
rebranding
the
program,
but
this
is
an
important
step
in
the
right
direction.
So
with
that,
our
ask
this
year
is,
is
really
a
balance
between
maintaining
the
existing
programmatic
functions,
while
continuing
to
move
through
what
we're
titling
our
implementation
framework,
which
basically
addressed,
addresses
a
lot
of
the
recommendations
that
were
in
that
final
report.
Q
So,
regarding
racial
equity,
this
is
it's
something
we're
obviously
going
to
look
at
as
we
look
at
all
components
of
the
program.
The
implementation
framework
that
we
put
together
addresses
six
areas
of
our
program,
which
includes
neighborhood
plans.
It
also
includes
projects,
of
course,
the
ncac.
Q
So
as
we
look
to
improving
the
program
based
on
those
recommendations,
we
will
be
using
that
equity
lens
and
addressing
those
five
racial
and
social
equity
questions
and
considerations.
So
it's
something
that
we
we
are
committed
to
doing
and
something
we'll
we'll
do
as
we
get
through
our
framework.
Q
I
do
want
to
mention
that
in
the
short
term,
one
of
the
things
we
are
considering
is
a
change
to
our
point
system,
which
is
our
guide
to
how
we
approve
projects.
We
know
that
in
the
short
term,
I
think
we
can
include
in
equity
component
consideration
we're
thinking
about
this.
We
want
to
do
this
sooner
rather
than
later
so
more
to
come
on
that
next
slide.
Please,
let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
completed
projects
in
fy
2021.
Q
We
had
six
of
them
one
park
project
and
five
street
improvement
projects,
and
I
think
it's
always
good
to
kind
of
reflect
on
the
good
work
that
we've
done
so
over
the
next
couple.
Slides
you'll
see
some
good
before
and
after
pictures
next
slide.
Please
first
one
is
our
park
project,
which
is
which
is
edison
park
in
the
arlington
forest
neighborhood.
Q
As
you
know,
a
quarter
to
a
third
of
our
portfolio
are
park
projects,
and
eric
mentioned
our
partnership
that
we
are
going
to
have
with
bailey's
branch
park
in
the
future
next
slide
north
quintana
street.
This
is
a
classic
sidewalk
project
that
we
do.
You
can
see
on
the
left,
no
sidewalk
street's
in
pretty
bad
shape.
Q
We
incorporated
a
five
foot
sidewalk
with
the
roadway
redone
and
then
lots
of
utility
work,
which
you
can't
see
in
this
picture.
Next
slide,
please
george
mason
drive.
This
is
a
little
bit
more
atypical
of
a
roadway
than
we
would
work
on,
but
I
think
it's
a
great
great
one
to
highlight,
because
it's
a
good
pedestrian
safety
up
upgrade.
You
can
see
there
where,
on
the
left,
where
there's
no
median,
where
we
added
one,
it
creates
a
nice
pedestrian
refuge
in
the
middle
there.
Q
Further
along
the
back,
you'll
see
the
updated
median
as
well
and
to
date,
trees
have
been
planted
in
all
of
those
areas
as
well.
So
it's
in
the
next
couple
years,
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna,
look
really
good
when
the
trees
start
to
mature
next
slide.
Please
so
just
getting
talking
about
our
active
projects.
These
are
projects
that
are
approved
by
you
all
they're,
all
county
board
approved
projects
they're
in
some
phase
of
design
or
construction
up
on
the
left.
There
you'll
see
that
we
have
about
six
or
seven
that
are
actively
in
construction.
Q
I
do
want
to
highlight
one
on
north
larimore
street,
which
is
just
an
awesome,
beautiful
intersection
project
that
we
partnered
with
the
office
of
sustainability,
environmental
management
and
created
a
really
really
nice
rain
garden,
if
you're
out
about
some
time
and
get
a
chance
to
to
take
a
look
at
it's
at
9th
and
larimore,
and
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
brian
hannigan-
I
think
some
of
you
may
or
may
not
know
that
a
few
weeks
ago
he
passed
away.
Q
He
was
president
of
the
dominion
hills
association
for
many
many
years
and
he
advocated
for
a
long
time
for
this
project
and
he
never
saw
it
completed,
but
maybe
we'll
have
an
opportunity
to
do
something
to
dedicate
this
to
him.
I
just
think
it's
a
a
really
cool
project
and
he
did
a
lot
of
work
to
help
us
get
it
through
up.
Let's
see
down
in
active,
we'll
go
to
the
right
side
up
top.
Q
These
are
projects
that
are
probably
the
most
recently
approved
by
you
all
and
so
they're
in
kind
of
an
earlier
phase
of
design
and
the
ones
below
that
are
a
little
more
further
along.
These
are
ones
that
we
anticipate
we're
going
to
be
constructing
later
this
year
and
moving
into
next
year,
probably
about
half
this
year
and
the
other
half
next
year.
Q
Next
next
slide,
please
so
here's
our
program
funding,
summary
there's
a
total
in
the
10-year
cip
of
85.2
million,
80
million
of
that
is,
is
bond
money
5.2
of
that
is
paygo
money
over
the
next
10
years,
so
breaking
down
and
parsing
out
a
little
bit
that
80
million
64
that
would
be
new
bond
funding
and
16
million
of
that
is
previously
approved
bonds.
So
this
this
is
a
these
are
projects
that
we
have
essentially
in
our
portfolio
now
that
are
county
board,
approved
projects
next
slide,
so
just
to
break
out
even
more.
Q
The
16
million
dollars
of
these
previously
approved
projects.
Q
We
we
have
two
categories
here:
one
is
unallocated,
one
is
active,
the
one
on
the
right
are
active
projects
again,
those
are
projects
that
you
all
have
approved
and
that
we're
working
on
in
design
and
getting
to
construction
and
that
breaks
down
even
further
to
the
cash
we
have
on
hand,
which
is
three
million
dollars
that
will
pay
for
upcoming
construction
projects.
The
unissued
money
is
seven
million,
that
is
bond
money
that
will
be
sold
once
we're
ready
to
construct
those
projects
that
are
going
to
be
done.
Q
Probably
next
year,
the
una
unallocated
money
consists
of
the
2021
bond,
which
is
2
million,
and
on
the
left
at
the
bottom,
we
have
4
million
dollars
in
savings,
which
is
pretty
nice
and
it's
mostly
a
result
of
us
not
having
to
go
out
to
bid
and
using
an
on-call
contractor.
Q
We
save
a
lot
more
money
when
we
can
use
an
on-call
contractor,
we
always
do
our
cost,
estimating
with
bid
prices
just
to
protect
ourselves
and
because
we
can
never
anticipate
whether
or
not
we
will
or
won't
have
to
go
out
to
bid.
So
it
was
nice
to
have
that
extra
savings
and
those
will
be
reprogrammed
and
reallocated
into
into
future
projects
the
2021
bond
money,
the
the
arlington
neighborhoods
advisory
committee.
It
doesn't
roll
off
the
tongue
yet,
but
it
will.
Q
Q
This
is
our
program
summary
I
kind
of
went
over
most
of
the
numbers,
so
I
won't
go
over
all
of
these
numbers
here.
I'll
just
highlight
that
you'll
see
the
fy
23
and
fy
24
numbers,
which
are
2
million
each
year
and
the
new
bond
issue,
as
you
see,
is
64
million.
That
plus
the
16.2
of
the
previously
approved
funding
is
where
we
get
that
total
of
85.2
that
I
highlighted
earlier
next
slide.
Please,
how
are
we
going
to
spend
the
money?
It's
always
a
question.
People
ask
so.
Q
Over
over
the
next,
essentially
four
fiscal
years,
we'll
be
spending
we,
we
do
seem
to
construct
about
five
to
seven
projects
every
year,
so
our
our
plan
is
to
essentially
spend
that
16.2
million
over
the
course
of
the
next
four
fiscal
years
and
starting
next
year,
we'll
probably
do
another
four
to
five
projects
and
next
slide.
Please,
no!
Q
Q
Again,
looking
at
that
potential
to
incorporate
that
equity
component
or
category
into
our
points
system,
and
also
we'll
we'll
need
to
balance
the
need
for
staff
to
to
continue
to
work
on
and
make
progress
on
the
implementation
framework
while
maintaining
the
existing
programmatic
functions.
So
that's
it
quick
and
dirty
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Please.
M
M
Would
it
be
useful
to
to
shift
some
money
in
the
fiscal
year,
23
24,
to
add,
for
example,
million
dollar
on
each
and
dedicate
that
or
use
that
to
leverage
more
equity,
centered
program
deliverables
so
that
we
get
yeah
that
we
we
get
to
steer
the
program
towards
the
the
more
equity
weighted
decision
making
that
we
want
to
have
sooner
rather
than
later,.
Q
Right,
I
think
well
just
to
clarify
we're
we
have
started.
I
wouldn't
say:
we've
made
a
lot
of
progress
on
this
equity
component
category.
It's
a
little
trickier
with
us,
because
you
know
the
projects
come
from
the
ground
up,
so
we're
having
to
balance
how
we
fund
projects
based
on
what
neighborhoods
would
like
to
do,
and
obviously
what
the
county
would
like
to
do.
But
to
answer
your
question,
yes,
I
think
so
I
think
it
would.
It
would
help
us
probably
target
some
of
those
neighborhoods
that
maybe
don't
necessarily
have
projects.
Q
I
think
it
could
encourage
them
to
include
projects
while
also
not
undermining
the
projects
in
our
our
pipeline
that
have
been
there
for
a
while
as
well,
because
we
want
to
be
respectful
to
those
neighborhoods
that
have
been
waiting
quite
some
time
for
projects
that
we
have.
So
I
think
we
can
strike
a
balance
there
absolutely.
M
K
It's
going
to
be
yeah
I'll
just
follow,
I
think
the
the
equity
you
know
getting
that
into
the
the
program
is
really
good
because
I
think
their
neighborhoods.
There
may
be
a
lot
of
runners,
a
lot
of
people
who
are
too
busy
and
they
get
it's.
You
know
they
get
less,
they
already
have
less
and
they
get
less
because
they
don't
have
the
wherewithal
sometimes
to
to
do
the
typical
arlington
way.
So
I'm
glad
we're
doing
that
and
I'll
be
interested
in
sort
of
the
checklist
I
mean.
K
Sometimes
you
can
go
into
a
neighborhood
and
you
can
tell
whether
this
is
a
wealthy
neighborhood
or
not
by
like
the
amount
of
trees
they
have,
or
you
know,
there's
some
really
basic
basic
things
that
hopefully
will
kind
of
come
out
with
the
checklist,
and
we
can
start
to
rebalance
some
of
those
inequities,
and
I
appreciate
you
working
on
that
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
to
seeing
it.
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
J
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
I'll
just
say,
as
we
look
as
we
consider
the
possibility,
the
the
the
figment
of
our
imagination
that
there
might
be
savings.
This
is
to
align
myself
with
mr
carantonis.
J
It's
an
area
I'm
interested
in,
but
I've
discovered
in
conversation
with
you
know
in
the
work
that
you've
done
that
it.
I
need
need
to
really
understand
the
details
of
implementation,
and
I
appreciated
that
last
slide
because
less
you
know,
I'm
searingly
aware
of
the
amount
three
or
four
years
ago
that
I
was
that
advocates
said
should
be
in
the
program
based
on
the
increased
cost,
but
I
also
want
to
be
programmatically
at
least
rigorous
enough
to
understand,
but
I
want
to
put
enough
of
a
point
on.
Q
Yeah,
I
thank
you
for
for
saying
that.
I
do
want
to
note
that
as
staff
we're
also
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
we
can't
do
it
all
our
committee
and
I
right
now
we
have
a
really
good
executive
committee
that
changed
over
and
started
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
All
three
of
them
are
committed
to
working
on
this
with
us
and
they
all
really
understand
the
importance
of
incorporating
equity
into
everything
we
do
so
it's
not
just
projects.
We
want
to
consider
how
we
make
nc
plans
a
little
more
accessible
and
equitable
for
neighborhoods.
Q
We
know
that
these
are
done
by
volunteers,
so
they're
not
easy
to
do,
and
so
how
can
we
make
them
a
little
easier
for
some
of
those
neighborhoods
that
don't
have
the
bandwidth
as
some
of
the
others?
So
I'm
looking
forward
to
working
with
them
as
well,
because
they're,
a
big
part
of
what
we
do
and
they've
been
partners
with
us
for
a
long
time.
Q
A
The
question
one
of
the
I
think
historic
pressures
on
the
the
program
has
been
the
sort
of
sense
that
it's
the
only
game
in
town
to
get
some
some
kind
of
neighborhood
core
services.
Things
addressed,
and
I
was
really
encouraged
to
hear
as
part
of
our
transportation
session
last
week,
that
there's
proposed
in
the
cip,
almost
12
million
dollars
for
a
new
sidewalk
and
curb
maintenance
programs.
I
think,
was
described
as
a
tripping
hazard
blitz,
which
I
like
love,
that
wartime
analogy
and
declaring
war
and
tripping
hazard.
A
I
wonder
to
what
extent
you're,
seeing
that
or
kind
of
other
emerging
work
in
perhaps
vision
zero
as
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
you
know
direct
some
of
the
pressure
that
has
historically
been
on
the
neighborhoods
program
to
deliver
that
you
know
particular
multimodal
infrastructure
towards
another
program
or
another
funding
stream.
Or
is
that
distinct
enough
from
what
the
neighborhoods
program
has
always
done?
That
it's
hard
to?
Imagine
that
actually
making
a
dent
in
the
type
of
demand
for
for
these
dollars.
Q
Sure
no
thank
you
for
the
question.
I
I
think
I
think
it
can
make
a
dent.
It's
it's
tricky,
because
we
I
I
think
you
all
know
at
least
have
a
good
idea
of
how
our
process
works.
We
have
a
petitioning
effort
right
and-
and
so
we
might
determine
as
we're
going
through
this
framework,
that
there
are
just
some
projects
that
may
not
be
appropriate
for
the
nc
program
and
probably
should
be
funneled
to
another
program.
Q
It.
It
makes
me
disappointed
to
know
that
an
important
sidewalk
project
doesn't
pass
our
petition
and
effort,
and
we
don't
we
don't
like
when
that
happens.
So
we
want
to
work
with
the
other
programs
in
the
county.
This
is
vision:
zero,
neighborhood,
complete
streets
to
the
extent
we
can
to
partner
with
them
on
determining
hey,
which
projects
might
be
appropriate
for
you
all,
which
ones
might
be
better
suited
for
us.
Q
That's
a
discussion
we'll
have
to
have
with
them
and
with
the
staff,
but
we're
keenly
aware
that
it's
something
we
we
need
to
figure
out
so
that
we
can
neighborhoods
can
have
options
to
do
different
types
of
projects.
I
think
there's
a
role
for
all
of
us
to
play
and
I
think
I
think
we
can
partner
and
make
it
happen.
Hopefully
we
can
figure
some
of
that
out
during
our
framework.
A
Great,
thank
you
sure
mr
dorsey.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
to
pick
up
on
where
this
conversation
all
is.
I'm
just
wondering,
mr
mcintosh,
if
there
is
a
way
to
sort
of
develop
a
compendium
of
formerly
neighborhood
conservation,
best
practices
in
terms
of
projects
that
have
been
funded
so
that
we
can
maybe
get
at
the
equity
angle
a
little
bit
differently.
B
Appreciating
that
we've
sought
to
find
opportunities
to
fund
things
through
other
vehicles,
but
you
know
for
circumstances
where
neighbors
may
not
necessarily
neighborhoods
may
not
necessarily
be
aware
of
what's
possible,
aware
of
what's
done
and
not
knowing
that
it
might
be
applicable
to
their
particular
community.
Is
there
a
way
we
can
be
proactive
in
advertising?
Q
Thank
you,
mr
dorsey,
for
the
question
I
I
would
say
absolutely.
I
think
I
think
we
can
do
that
for
sure
they.
As
you
know,
each
neighborhood
is
is
different,
and
so
some
projects
may
be
better
suited
in
some
neighborhoods
than
others.
So
I
think
first
we
have
to
look
at
what
type
of
neighborhood
we're
talking
about,
and
once
we
look
at
that,
we
can
also
assess
what
those
needs
are.
Some
neighborhoods
don't
necessarily
need
sidewalks.
Q
There
are
a
lot
of
neighborhoods
that
have
their
sidewalks
in
place,
so
they
might
have
a
different
type
of
project
that
they
need
to
look
at,
and
so
I
think
what
you're
saying
makes
sense
and
I
think
it's
something
we
can
do
and
there's
there's
no
reason
why
we
can't
find
appropriate
projects
for
different
types
of
neighborhoods
throughout
the
county.
Absolutely,
thank
you
sure.
A
Well,
on
that
note,
thank
you.
It's
exciting
to
see
the
evolution
of
the
program
is
that
the
name
is
perhaps
the
most
recognizable
change,
but
by
far
not
the
only
one,
so
it's
I
find
it
especially
exciting
to
be
able
to
look
at
a
proposal
to
fund
this
program
more
generously
and
with
with
further
bonds
as
a
way
of
implementing
all
of
that
really
difficult
work
that
you
all
have
undertaken.
So.
A
A
Excellent
all
right,
mr
manager.
I
believe
that
concludes
our
session.
Today,
we
thank
you.
We
will
be
back
soon
to
talk
about
a
couple
of
remaining
areas
of
our
cip,
but
most
imminently
we'll
see
everyone
back
in
this
room.
All.
C
A
Thank
you
very
much
all
right
and
we
will
see
everybody
most
imminently
on
saturday
for
our
regular
meeting
aboard
until
then,
we
are
addressing.