►
From YouTube: FY19 Budget Work Session (CIP) - June 12, 2018
Description
To view the agenda, go to http://arlington.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=2
A
B
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
The
schedule
is
we're
going
to
start
with
government
facilities
go
into
parks
and
recreational
into
community
conservation.
Before
we
have
people
come
up
and
make
a
presentation
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
highlighted
something
that
I've
talked
about
with
you
directly,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
the
community
gets
an
update
on
it.
I've
been
talking
about
the
financial
constraints
we
face
and
you'll
see
in
each
of
these
presentations.
C
We
have
here
about
we're,
focusing
on
maintaining
a
state
of
good
repair
for
our
hundreds
of
buildings,
parks
and
other
assets,
and
we
don't
have
funds
available
to
build
new
facilities
beyond
those
we've
already
committed
to
so
I
wanted
to
emphasize
this.
In
light
of
the
conversation,
that's
being
had
right
now
about
the
level
of
funding
that
the
Arlington
public
schools
are
seeking
in
their
CIP,
and
that
were
mentioned
at
the
joint
work
session.
We
had
I
think
at
this
point
two
weeks
ago
to
update
you
in
order
to
accommodate
the
public
schools
request.
C
The
county
would
have
to
defer
or
eliminate
somewhere
between
45
to
55
million
dollars
of
capital
investments
in
the
first
five
years
of
my
proposed
CIP
now
just
to
re-emphasize.
My
proposed
CIP
was
a
difficult
set
of
proposals
that
we
basically
abandoned
some
some
things
that
were
in
previous
CIPS,
for
example,
land
acquisition
funds
and
the
neighborhood
conservation
program
at
a
higher
level.
We
did
that
in
order
to
maintain
the
state
of
good
repair
to
accommodate
the
Arlington
public
schools
request
on
the
county
side,
we
would
have
to
make
cuts
that
I
deem
unacceptable.
C
C
The
amount
set
aside
for
the
state
of
good
repair,
you're
gonna,
hear
about
today
and
those
maintenance
capital
dollars
as
you'll,
also
hear
today,
are
the
bare
minimum
of
what
we
felt
was
needed
to
maintain
our
parks
and
facilities
and
also
transportation
and
technology,
and
what
we
needed
to
pave
our
roads.
We
also
would
have
to
defer
a
commencement
of
the
Jennie
Dean
Park
and
fire
station
eight
to
no
earlier
than
fiscal
year.
2025,
which
means
the
facilities
would
not
open
until
years.
C
So
there
is
actually
a
little
bit
of
good
news.
I
feel
like
I'm,
coming
always
giving
you
bad
news,
but
last
week
when
we
sold
our
county
and
school
bonds
as
part
of
that
sale
in
the
bids,
the
school,
the
school
portion
of
those
bonds
received
a
bond
premium
of
fifteen
million
dollars.
So
that's
fifteen
million
dollars
we
had
not
anticipated
would
be
available
that
fifteen
million
dollars
can
be
invested
by
ApS
in
their
facilities.
C
All
the
scenario
I
just
painted
out
for
you
assumes
that
they
have
that
fifteen
million
dollars
in
hand
other
scenarios
which
I'm
not
even
prepared
to
contemplate
would
be
cutting
our
commitment
to
Metro
and
so
I.
Just
that's
by
way
of
introduction,
as
you
go
through
and
hear
these
presentations
on
the
state
of
good
repair
I
encourage
you
to
ask
questions
about.
You
know
whether
you
share
my
assessment
about
the
importance
of
those
investments
in
the
state
of
good
repair
and
the
choices
that
will
be
required.
Mr.
B
Manager,
thank
you
and
before
we
move
on
to
those
presentations,
wanted
to
create
an
opportunity
for
colleagues
to
make
any
comments
or
asking
questions
about
what
the
managers
just
shared
I
appreciate.
You're
doing
it
you're
doing
it.
You
know,
as
we've
noted
before,
with
our
CIP
sessions
schedules.
D
Really
helpful
helpful
information
to
have
are
we
going
to
get
it
presented
in
a
different
way?
Come
to
us,
perhaps
in
an
official
memo
that
we
could
share
with
people
because
I'm
thinking
you
know
this
is
important
information
people
maybe
are
hearing
it,
but
they're.
Not
it's
always
helpful.
To
have
something
ready.
Are
we
gonna
send
something
official
to
the
school
board
to
let
them
know.
D
This
is
of
our
concerns
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
some
other
ways
to
kind
of
yeah
process
it
a
little
bit
and
get
this
information
out
there,
because
I
think,
as
we
all
may
have
questions
and
doing
trade-offs.
We
always
like
our
community
help
us
make
those
trade-offs
and
and
we'd
like
them
to
be
able
to
give
us
feedback
and
they'll
need
this
information
to
do
that.
So.
B
Let
me
make
sure
I'm
understanding
the
request,
so
we
know
the
school
board
will
move
towards
taking
a
couple
of
actions
which
is
both
passing
a
resolution
about
what
they're
asking
for
in
terms
of
the
referenda
for
the
next
two
years,
but
also
passing
their
own
CIP.
We
will
then,
of
course,
have
an
opportunity
in
passing
ours
to
make
kind
of
formal
record,
but
I
think
what
you're
describing
is
prior
to
getting
there.
How
can
we
share
this
interim
analysis
done
by
the
county,
manager's
office
yeah.
D
C
I
I
would
be
I'm
happy
to
share
this
analysis
and
can
put
it
in
a
letter
to
the
superintendent
and
make
that
publicly
available.
We
could
do
that
today.
I
would
also
note
that
the
schools
are
not
done
on
their
side
with
their
deliberations,
so
that
you
know
the
analysis.
I
have
is
from
a
scenario
they
put
out
two
weeks
ago
and
I
fully
anticipate
if
past
is
prologue
that
there
will
be
additional
iterations
on
their
side.
D
Would
be
great
and
if
you
decide
it's
better
to
wait
until
we
see
what
schools
is
doing,
I
mean
I
know
we
can
get
out
there
too
fast.
But
it's
important
for
the
dialogue.
E
So
mr.
manager
I
appreciate
your
your
candor
and
your
transparency
here
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
in
this
regard.
Let's
say
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know
what
our
colleagues
on
the
school
board
are
going
to
do,
or
you
know
move
forward
with
in
the
final
analysis,
but
let's
say
they
were
to
come
in
instead
of
having
two
years
slightly
over
10%,
they
were
to
come
in
at
under
10%,
maybe
close
to
10%.
E
C
I
would
say
that
I'm
gonna
defer
a
final
answer
on
that
until
I
see
how
it
is
that
they
proposed
if
they
came
in
to
the
10%,
to
actually
go
to
the
market
and
actually
draw
down
the
funds
that
they
need,
I'm,
pretty
optimistic
that
we
would
be
able
to
make
it
work
with
some
chain
with
a
few
changes.
Maybe
we'd
have
to
adjust
a
few
things
that
would
be
I
think
it
would
be
workable,
but
I.
You
know
the
Devils
in
the
details.
F
E
C
E
Are
it?
Are
we
clear
as
to
what
they
are
basing
their
enrollment
projections
on?
Are
they?
Are
they
basing
it
on
build-out
of
the
general
land
use
plan
by
you
know
a
certain
period
of
time
at
max
strength?
Are
they
merely
extrapolating
current
trends
into
the
future
at
some
fixed
percentage
increment?
E
Are
they
I
mean
we're
doing
a
much
better
job,
I
know
of
sharing
statistics
with
them?
We've
got
our
demographers,
they
got,
they
have
their
demographers,
we're
talking
with
each
other.
We,
you
know
always
have
when
we
approve
a
new
site
plan.
We
have
enrollment.
You
know
school
pyramid
projections
for
that
particular
proposal.
You
know
X
students
at
X
level,
but
I'm
just
wondering
if,
if
you
might
have
anything
to
say
about
how
projections
inform
what
they
are
are
coming
up
with
and
and
whether
or
not
we
think
that
that's
realistic
or
not
so.
C
I'm,
you
know
Samir,
you
know
I'm
looking
at
you,
we
just
had
this
conversation
this
morning.
I
think,
let
me
state
as
a
general
principle
and
if
there's
anything
that
you
want
to
add
to
that
feel
free,
which
is
that
when
our
demographers,
which
we
had
a
conversation
with
this
morning,
are
going
and
providing
information
on
the
schools
which
we
worked
very
closely
with
them
and
giving
them
our
assumption
about.
You
know
absorption
rates
and
of
projects
fertility
rates,
the
whole
nine
yards
that
we
have
as
part
of
the
assumptions.
C
We
are
including
everything
that
this
board
has
approved
and
everything
that
we
think
would
be
readily
absorbed
as
part
of
the
general
Land
Use
Plan
over
the
next
five
years
or
ten
years.
So
I
think
the
answer
is
that
we've
accommodated
all
of
that
and
we'd
be
happy
to
provide
you
with
some
further
detail
and
what
exists.
What
exactly
because
I
asked
the
question
earlier
today
is:
does
the
does
the
10-year
projection
and
include
everything
in
the
General
Land
Use
Plan?
The
answer
is
no,
but
it
includes
a
lot
of
it.
G
H
Thank
you,
I
actually
just
wanted
to
understand,
as
we
were
talking
about
sort
of
the
iterative
kind
of
nature
between
the
school
board
CIP
and
our
CIP,
which,
ultimately,
just
like
the
budget,
includes
their
CIP
correct.
So
so
when
we
adopt
we
adopt
these
and
the
counties
of
the
schools
is
sort
of
a
subset
of
that
and
part
of
that.
So
in
that
inner
iteration,
where
they're
gonna
I
think
next
Thursday's
that
right
so.
H
First,
twenty
first
yeah
thank
you,
they're,
going
to
adopt
their
CIP
that
comes
to
us,
we're
gonna
sort
out
what
we
need
to
sort
out
and
figure
out.
Hopefully,
hopefully,
in
the
ideal
world
we
can
make
what
they
are,
what
they
adopt
work
and
then
it's
not
an
issue,
but
in
the
event
that
we
can't
or
there's
some
other
little
tweak
that
is
needed.
Do
we
send
that?
Does
it
have
to
go
back
to
them
for
further
action
by
them
or
how
does
that
work?.
C
So
the
the
practice
there's
a
practice
and
then
there's
actual
legal
requirement,
which
is
that
the
county
board
will
be
required,
and
the
county
attorney
can
correct
me
because
he's
here
in
July
to
take
a
final
yes-or-no
vote
on
the
resolution
that
the
school
board
passes
as
to
what
appears
on
the
referendum
in
2018.
So
they
will
come
up
with
language
for
that
with
a
dollar
amount
for
2018
that
comes
to
the
county
board,
the
county
board
can
either
accept
it
or
reject
it.
C
You
cannot
change
the
number,
that's
included
by
the
schools
in
2018
now
as
to
the
other
years
that
are
built
into
the
CIP
starting
in
2020
in
the
last
eight
years
of
the
CIP.
The
school
board
will
make
a
recommendation
to
you
and
it
has
been
my
purse
as
long
as
I've
been
here.
Whatever
the
school
board
recommends
is
consistent
with
all
our
financial
policies
and
the
county
board
adopts
that
and
it
becomes
part
of
the
final
plan
and
it's
never
been
sent
back.
C
That
doesn't
mean
that
that
couldn't
happen
in
this
case,
but
as
far
as
that
would
be
become
the
essence
of
the
CIP.
The
schools
would
adopt
something
and
you
could
accept
or
reject
pieces
of
that,
but
the
practice
has
always
been,
at
least
in
the
past,
that
whatever
they've
passed
this
in
the
school
board,
the
county
board
has
adopted
right.
H
B
Think
is
our
manager
noted
in
general
its
precedent,
and
in
fact
we
don't
have
any
indication.
That's
ever
been
anything
otherwise
that
the
the
the
school
board's
CIP
has
been
consistent
with
all
of
our
fiscal
practices,
ie
that
10%
debt
service
to
general
expenditures
cap.
So
we
well
we're
optimistic,
we'll
we'll
continue
with
that
past
practice
and
then
we'll
go
here.
But
do
you
appreciate
the
distinction
that
our
manager
offered
about
the
the
resolution
with
regard
to
the
bond
referendum
and
how
that
differs
a
little
bit
from
the
CIP
all
right?
Thank
you
for
that.
C
I
Our
emphasis
on
this
CIP
requests,
as
you
heard
from
the
manager,
is
maintaining
what
we
have
in
our
aging
inventory,
similar
what
you
heard
from
Mike,
Collins
and
Demetri
McBride.
Last
week,
we
have
a
very
aged
inventory
as
well
on
were
89
buildings,
which
total
about
2.3
million
square
feet.
50%
are
more
than
40
years
old,
and
every
one
of
these,
regardless
of
its
age,
will
need
continued
detention
and
replacement
of
its
core
systems.
I
The
capital
projects
element
of
our
proposed
CIP
continues
delivery
of
our
previous
commitments,
with
some
very
limited
new
investments
for
critical
needs.
Additionally,
in
this,
CIP,
were
proposing
funding
for
both
a
facilities,
condition
assessment
of
our
current
inventory
initiation
of
planning
to
identify
our
long-term
needs,
the
combination
of
which
will
be
able
to
help
us
set.
Our
are
all
funding
priorities
before
we
get
into
the
details
of
our
proposed
CIP,
John
and
June
will
describe
our
major
accomplishments
since
the
last
CIP
was
adopted,.
G
This
caused
less
disruption
to
the
garage
and
building
operations
while
reducing
the
cost
and
time
line
of
the
project
by
50%,
then
that
was
followed
by
the
garage,
concrete
repairs
and
surface
recoding
project
for
the
two-level
garage
and
was
staged
to
start
at
the
end
of
the
sewer
line
project
to
reduce
impacts
of
the
garage
operations
as
well.
The
central
library
boiler
replacement
completed
the
HVAC
upgrades
that
were
started
about
three
years
ago.
The
child
care
Refresh,
addressed
playground,
surface
drainage
fence
and
retaining
wall
issues.
G
The
operations
control
building
at
the
water
pollution
control
plant,
HVAC
upgrades
in
the
lower
two
photos
included
window
replacements,
asbestos
containing
material
abatement
and
an
interior
refresh
as
well,
and
then.
Finally,
the
Fort
C
F
Smith
project,
converted
an
older
building
use
for
storage
into
usable
program
space.
So.
J
In
addition
to
the
capital,
maintenance
complied
projects
that
have
been
completed,
we've
completed
several
other
projects
that
have
improved
the
program
and
operational
needs
for
the
county.
Some
of
these
projects
did
originate
in
2016
and
took
several
years
to
complete.
A
few
of
the
notable
projects
include
doubling
the
capacity
of
the
Barcroft
gymnastics
program,
as
well
as
doubling
the
capacity
for
parking
at
the
Trade
Center
parking
garage.
In
addition,
we
purchased
the
buck
property
this
last
year
and
we
will
be
speaking
later
on
in
the
presentation
about
our
needs,
a
buck
next
slide.
J
Fire
station
eight
we've
also
started
with
the
work
on
that
we've
completed
the
sighting
process
and
we
will
be
rebuilding
at
the
existing
site
along
Lee
Highway.
We've
acquired
three
sites
for
the
temporary
station
and
we
have
convened
and
receive
recommendations
from
the
history
and
legacy
working
group,
which
I
believe
the
manager
will
be
presenting
an
update
at
the
recess
meeting.
J
Next
Tuesday
July
19th,
both
the
RFP
and
the
the
RFP
for
the
architect,
as
well
as
the
RFQ
for
the
construct
construction
manager
at
risk,
are
out
on
the
street
for
solicitation
and
we
are
going
to
begin
design
the
design
process.
This
fall.
We
anticipate
the
start
of
the
construction
for
the
temporary
station
to
begin
spring
of
2019
and
the
permanent
station
in
the
fall
of
2018.
I
I
The
bond
requests
our
own
cat
in
the
category
of
the
12%
for
other
facilities
includes
replacement
of
the
group
home
at
12:12.
South
Irving,
which
you'll
hear
shortly,
is
in
a
very
pitiful
condition
the
removal
of
the
Carlin
Springs
building
and
the
Columbia
Pike
library
replacement,
which
is
targeted
for
fiscal
27.
I
The
other
funding
in
our
the
other
funding
category
includes
the
revenue
stream
for
Boston
garage
maintenance
and
previous
approved,
but
unspent
funds
for
fire
station
eight
and
our
2019
Pago
allocation
of
2.4
million.
The
next
slide
shows
a
bit
of
what
Mark
alluded
to
that.
Our
funding
at
the
moment
is
front-end
loaded
for
the
near
term,
projects
to
complete
fire
station
eight,
which
is
in
the
blue
bars,
and
the
gray
bars,
which
are
the
developer.
Contributions
are
the
money
for
fire
station
ten
when
we
get
out
to
fiscal
22
through
25,
or
so.
I
The
developer
contributions,
as
I
mentioned,
our
fire
station
10
in
the
near
term,
and
the
large
gray
bar
back
in
fiscal
28,
is
a
presumed
developer
contribution
for
one
of
the
two
new
fire
stations
that
are
forecast
in
the
out-years.
The
large
blue
bars
towards
the
end
of
the
slide
are
also
for
the
new
fire
stations
that
funding
is
slightly
higher
because
also
includes
Columbia,
Pike
library,
replacement
and
presumes.
There
are
some
money
to
be
spent
on
land
acquisition.
I
The
distribution
of
funding
and
compared
to
what
was
in
the
previous
CIP,
shows
that
we
have
a
slight
decrease
in
the
maintenance
capital
forecast.
But
if
we're
able
to
maintain
this
level
of
funding
over
the
10
years,
we
will
have
a
sustainable
program
that
will
maintain
our
facilities
in
the
state.
I
The
other
anomaly
on
this
slide
is
the
change
in
government
facilities,
planning
and
construction
funding.
The
17
CIP
contained
two
placeholder
values,
one
of
34
and
a
half
million
dollars,
which
years
was
earmarked
for
the
buck
acquisition.
The
Karlin
Springs
acquisition,
which
now
appears
to
come
to
us
with
no
outlay
and
the
Navy
annex
acquisition,
which
of
course,
is
no
longer
something
we're
considering
the
other
part
of
that
money
was
roughly
15
million
dollars
which
were
put
his
placeholders
in
fiscal
21
and
22
for
any
construction.
That
would
result
from
some
of
those
acquisitions.
I
What
we're
proposing
currently
is
a
limited
value
for
conversion
of
one
of
the
buck
buildings
to
hold
vehicles
that
are
displaced
by
other
projects
and
removal
over
the
Carlin
Springs
proponent
springs.
Building,
so
John
and
June
will
now
go
through
the
details
of
our
proposed
maintenance,
capital
and
capital
funding
projects.
G
Consistent
nine
million
dollar
year
funding
will
enable
the
maintenance,
capital
CIP
catch-up
process
to
continue
addressing
identified
building
needs
the
25
year
old
boilers
at
the
courts,
police
building
and
the
Justice
Center
in
the
top
photos.
Top
and
bottom
photos
operate
24/7
the
year
providing
heating
and
hot
water
and
are
well
past.
Their
estimated
useful
life
court
square
West
HVAC
system
needs
to
be
replaced.
Is
the
life
of
that
building
is
being
extended?
G
That's
the
middle
photo,
and
in
these
photos
they
look
pretty
good,
but
actually
their
pressure
vessels
behind
all
the
nice
screening
on
them
and
that's
what
has
been
failing
over
time,
their
tubes
and
made
out
of
steel
so
25
years.
That's
about
the
time
when
they
do
need
to
be
replaced
residential
program.
Centers
chiller
also
needs
to
be
replaced.
This
is
a
24/7
residential
facility
for
substance,
abuse
in
clients
and
then
the
critical
systems
infrastructure,
HVAC
equipment
at
the
public
safety
communications,
an
emergency
management
six
radio
sites
also
require
replacements
in
the
upcoming
year.
J
So
the
main
takeaway
for
firestation
need
we've
kind
of
talked
at
length
already
about
where
we
are
in
the
process,
but
the
main
change
from
the
previous
CIPS
is
again
that
we
have.
We
are
keeping
the
fire
station
at
the
Lehigh
whale
location,
which
has
increased
the
cost
of
the
project,
which
is
reflected
in
with
a
21
million
dollar
funding
request.
Now
of
that
only
14
months,
14
million
is
new.
The
remainder
is
from
previously
allocated,
but
funds
funding
the
Boston
garage
project.
This
project
is
funded
through
garage
revenues.
J
We've
identified
three
projects
to
work
on
the
brick
facade
is
in
poor
condition,
the
replacement
of
the
traffic
membrane
on
the
level
six
needs
to
be
addressed
and
an
assessment
of
the
fire
egress
stairways.
We
anticipate
that
there
will
be
a
community
process
and
stakeholder
process
for
the
facade
work
as
well.
J
J
As
a
result
of
the
needs
determination,
the
planning
will
be
addressing
short
intermediate
and
long
term
needs
across
all
the
business
lines
within
the
county
based
off
of
service
delivery,
which
is
dynamic,
as
as
you
can
tell
by
the
changing
CIP
requests,
we
will
be
coordinating
with
APs
planning
to
set
mutual
priorities
as
we
work
through
our
needs
assessment,
1212,
South
Irving,
a
new
project.
This
year
the
building
was
built
in
1924
and
was
sold
to
the
county
in
1990.
J
It
has
been
a
group
home
since
the
1970s
and
has
been
active
as
that,
since
then,
we've
been
we've
reaped.
We
are
planning
on
rebuilding
a
group
home
for
arlington,
county
adults
with
developmental
disabilities.
The
cost
includes
planning,
design,
demolition,
construction
and
relocation
of
residents
as
needed
during
construction.
J
The
existing
facility
does
not
need
not
only
programmatic
needs,
but
a
accessibility
issues
are
are
prevalent
in
the
facility.
In
addition,
there
is
the
need
of
structural
repairs
and
upgrades
currently
there's
four
to
five
participants
living
in
the
facility,
and
we
anticipate
four
to
six
participants
in
the
new
facility.
Next
slide.
J
Please,
as
George
mentioned,
the
book
project,
the
book
project,
funding
funds,
the
short-term
improvements
to
1425
North
Quincy
warehouse
to
allow
for
the
relocation
of
the
police
emergency
vehicles
currently
located
at
the
Sikh
building,
where
the
Jenny
Dean
work
will
be
occurring
and
the
fire
station
reserve
vehicles
which
are
currently
stored
at
the
water
pollution
control
plant.
Both
will
be
both
have
planned.
Cip
projects,
the
Carlin's,
the
Carlin
Springs,
the
Carlin's,
the
Carlin
Springs
funding
is
again
for
the
demolition
of
the
hospital
building
which
the
county
does
not
have
a
need
for
it
will.
I
Okay,
so
you've
heard
about
what
we
proposed
to
do.
The
other
part
that
we
wanted
to
address
is
what
we're
not
doing,
and
I'll
speak
to
the
first
three
autumn
shortly,
but
on
the
31st
Street
lot,
which
is
adjacent
to
the
water
pollution
control
plan
is
currently
used
for
art
bus
driver
parking
when
the
plant
starts
its
solids
master
plan
phase
three
in
fiscal,
twenty,
three,
twenty
four.
I
And,
lastly,
we
are
conducting,
as
the
board
had
requested,
an
analysis
of
the
buck
site
to
determine
test
fits
and
cost
estimates
to
implement
the
findings
from
the
je
fact
option
see
at
the
buck
site
and
that
study
will
be
completed.
This
fall
and
will
give
us
an
assessment
of
not
only
the
costs
and
how
well
things
fit,
but
how
we
mitigate
upward
any
impacts
of
these
operations
on
the
neighborhood.
I
The
not
proceeding
will
leave
us
in
the
same
condition
for
the
facilities
needs
that
we
identified
back
in
October
of
2016
on
improvements
on
police,
impound,
fire
logistics,
the
Emergency
Operations
Center
operation
and
the
police
support
vehicles.
So
that's
what
the
study
is
focusing
on
the
moment
when
we
understand
aps,
it
may
be
identifying
some
additional
options:
they'd
like
to
see
studied
at
the
site.
When
we
received
their
request,
we
will
amend
a
phase
three
study
to
address
those
issues
as
well.
I
So,
looking
ahead
summarize
what
you've
heard
from
our
team,
one
of
the
key
issues
in
going
forward
is
maintaining
our
state
of
good
repair
and
a
sustainable
maintenance
capital
program.
Our
projections
are
totally
dependent
on
the
funding
levels
that
we've
listed
here
that
are,
in
our
CIP
request,
both
for
bond
funding
and
for
ongoing
Pago
funding
over
the
next
10
years.
The.
I
Other
part
of
our
goal
over
the
next
looking
ahead
is
complete.
The
existing
projects
within
the
budgets
we've
been
provided
and
collaborate
with
APs
on
opportunities
for
joint
facilities
and
engage
the
community
and
the
other
stakeholders
as
we
begin
to
develop
our
long-term
facilities
plans.
That
concludes
our
presentation
and,
if.
C
I
could
just
add
one
thing,
because
I
think
that
George
didn't
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
it,
but
it
was
likely
to
happen
over
the
next
three
to
six
months.
Is
that
the
current
salt
dome,
which
is
no
longer
usable
for
putting
a
news,
is
going
come
down
and
there'll
be
a
temporary
kind
of
facility
put
at
that
location
that
will
allow
us
to
operate
through
the
winter?
Now
we
have
funds
available.
C
The
funds
available
were
for
a
new
permanent
salt
dome,
but
since
we
haven't
decided
on
where
that
location
is
going
to
be,
the
temporary
location
will
be
with
the
same
place
where
the
permanent
location
is
and
I
will
leave
it
to
you
all
to
determine
what
you
think
is
an
appropriate
time
for
an
interim
or
temporary
use.
But
when
we
build
it
is
probably
going
to
last
for
a
few
at
least
a
few
years,
so
that
you
should
bring
that.
Keep
that
all
in
mind
when
we
talk
about.
B
You,
mr.
manager,
you
anticipated
one
of
the
questions.
I
got
so
it's
very
helpful
if
my
colleagues
will
permit
me
before
we
move
on
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
confirm
one
thing
on
that
went
into
the
penultimate
slide
there
16
about
the
vug
property
and
will
actually
have
an
opportunity
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
of
these
phase.
3
analyses
on
Saturday
as
part
of
the
hearing
that
we'll
be
doing
about
the
lease
agreement
for
the
white
fleet,
but
I
just
wanted
to
confirm.
Mr.
B
I
Sir,
that's
correct,
and
there
is
there
was
a
study
done
by
ApS
to
look
at
fitting
out
one
of
the
buildings
for,
if
you
like
to
term
swing
space
classrooms
and
they
developed
a
cost
estimate
and
my
understanding
is,
they
didn't
feel
the
cost
was
affordable
to
do
that.
But
that
information
is
available
as
part
of
the
phase
3
findings.
Okay,.
B
Just
want
to
make
sure
I
know
wound
its
way
through
the
J
fact.
Last
year
was
important
to
study
schools
uses
already.
That
has
been
part
of
the
discussion
to
date.
The
question
now
ahead
is
for
the
longer
term
what
schools
might
be
requesting
of
us
this.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
So
I'll
hold
the
rest
of
my
questions
and
go
to
mr.
Vista.
First
thank.
E
You,
madam
chair,
so
just
a
couple
of
questions
on
on
some
discreet
facilities,
the
Ballston
parking
garage.
It
seems
like
we're
we're
always
putting
and
I
realized
that
that
we're
funding,
repairs
and
maintenance
out
of
out
of
revenues.
But
do
we
think
that
this
is
it
or
I
mean
as
this
or
as
the
garage
going
to
be
in
a
constant
state
of
repair?
K
F
Go
ahead
so
a
couple
of
things.
First
of
all,
you
know
that
garage
is
as
I
think
facilities,
transportation,
folks
would
say
it's
like
four
different
garages,
all
built
from
the
like
the
first
part
being
from
the
1950s
on
and
so
I
think.
It's
fair
to
state
that
the
level
of
maintenance,
capital
state
of
good
repair
investments
needed
over
the
next
10
to
15
years
is
just
continues
to
be
substantial,
so
I
think
what
we
have
in
the
CIP
is
a
good
start,
but
I
would
say
that
you
will
always
see
sizeable
funds
for
reinvestment.
F
F
Some
of
you
might
remember
that
the
board
actually
agreed
to
raise
those
parking
rates
a
few
years
ago
or
five
or
six
years
ago,
in
order
to
fund
that,
in
order
to
fund
those
capital
improvements,
I
would
say
that
in
the
near
term,
the
majority
of
those
revenues
are
going
to
support
the
investments
needed
to
support
the
partnership
to
make
that
garage
as
functional
as
it
can
be
for
the
intended.
You
know
for
the
the
expanded
or
the
improved.
Excuse
me
to
support
the
the
redevelopment
and
the
growth
in
users.
F
You
know
the
growth
and
in
occupancy
that
we're
expecting
those
dollars
so
that
growth
in
revenue
has
been
factored
in
to
those
projections.
So
we
know
that
the
facade
is
our
next
priority.
We
have
assumed
that
it
will
start
in
the
next
two
years.
It
could
take
a
little
bit
longer
because
I
think
the
dollars
are
pretty
in
well
focused
on
you,
the
stuff
that
we
have
underway
to
support
the
partnership.
F
E
Well,
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
we're,
anticipating
significant
revenue
boosts
as
result
of
Ballston
quarter
and
june.
You
mentioned
some
aspect
of
community
engagement.
Going
forward.
Did
I
hear
that
correctly?
What
sort
of
community
engagement
do
we
need
to
rehab
a
parking
garage?
What
level
would
that
pee
and
Briah
hell
first
hierarchy
of
Community
Engagement,
so.
J
Some
similar
to
when
the
bridge
was
taken
down.
There
was
a
community
engagement
process
that
we
we
just
feel
that,
because
it's
one
a
county
facility,
it
could
be
done
through
the
P
FRC
process,
or
it
could
have
its
own
just
kind
of
feedback
loop
that
that
we
will
take
into
account
as
we're
redoing.
The
facade
I.
E
J
F
A
few
comments
received
that
as
part
of
the
overall
redevelopment
that
we
would
be
able
to
accommodate
facade
improvements
at
the
same
time,
you
know
the
revenues
and
the
dl
just
didn't
work
out
that
way,
but
there
were
comments
that
when
we
get
to
that
point,
we
said
we
would
make
sure
we
engaged
with
the
appropriate
stakeholders
but
you're
right
we're
not
going
to
be
consulting
with
the
community
on.
You
know
the
what
type
of
adhesive
we
use
for
the
new.
E
Do
have
a
question
about
another
facility
and
that's
the
pike
library.
So
if
we
could
go
to
the
slide,
that
that
mentions
the
pike
library
and
then
recalling
also
the
slide
that
talked
about
you
know,
joint
County,
Schools
uses
and
planning
and
so
forth.
I'm
just
wondering
how
you
see
the
planning
for
a
new
Pike
library
intersecting,
with
the
possibilities
that
the
Career
Center
working
group
and
the
school
system
is
now
talking
about
for
Columbia
Pike.
Well,.
I
But
there's
two
parts
to
that:
I
understand
the
near
term:
increases
in
seating
for
schools
at
the
Career
Center
does
retain
the
library,
but
a
long
term
goal
is
to
have
a
library
facing
Columbia
Pike
itself
and
in
support
of
the
the
library
staff
and
a
library
director.
We
have
continued
to
support
that
request
and
we
don't
know
whether
it
would
be
a
rental
space
or
an
acquisition
or
exactly
how
it
would
fall.
So
the
number
to
that
extent
is
a
place
over
and
it's
I
believe
out
in
that
2627
fiscal
year
timeframe.
E
E
C
There's
a
library's
subcommittee,
I
think
of
the
Career
Center
working
group
that
got
a
briefing
on
a
lot
of
the
research.
That's
been
done
and
I
think
that
it's
an
at
best,
there's
very
few
examples
and
it's
an
awkward
fit
to
have
a
at
the
high
school
level
have
a
have
a
a
community
facility
for
library
patrons
along
with
high
school
students.
There.
F
I
think
one
thing
that
might
be
helpful
is
follow-up,
for
the
board
is
that
we
would
resend
the
white
paper
that
both
county
staff
and
schools,
library
staff
worked
on
together.
That
was
presented
to
you
all
and
then
also
to
the
Career
Center
working
group
in
the
subcommittee,
because
I
think
will
remind
you
that
there
are
some
other
constraints.
Regarding
you
know,
and
in
a
sort
of
County
general
library.
F
We
can't
maintain
all
the
filters
technology
filters
that
are
required
on
public
facing
computers
that
are
needed
and
required
by
schools
even
for
high
school
levels,
and
there
are
some
operational
issues
like
that
that
serve
to
be
constraints
and
how
you
do
it.
Even
the
high
school
libraries
are
behind
secure.
You
know
check-ins
they're,
buried
within
the
high
schools.
You
have
to
check
in
you
have
to
go
to
the
office
and
so
that
in
some
ways
doesn't
lend
itself
to
the
educational
right.
F
I
B
To
follow
up
on
the
pike
library
question
and
and
really
wanted
to
associate
myself
with
Miss
Cowens
comments
about
what
a
good
body
of
work
that
was
I
found
it
actually
to
be
fascinating.
It
was
a
real
exploration
of
the
difference
and
missions
between
our
public
library
and
the
school's
library,
and
in
that
regard,
really
thinking
about
how
the
the
forum
would
follow
the
function.
So
it
was
a
great
piece
of
work
and
I
know
has
been
really
a
touchstone
for
our
library
subcommittee
of
the
Career
Center
working
group.
B
Let
me
ask
one
other
question
about
the
Columbia
Pike
library
and
we
all
had
mentioned
in
the
presentation,
and
in
this
document
we
see
the
2.8
million
for
fiscal
27
for
planning
money.
Could
you
give
me
a
sense?
One
of
the
things
I
think
that
has
been
discussed
within
the
working
group
is
the
idea
of
a
potential
least
commercial
space
as
a
home
for
that
library.
B
The
way
we
see
with
a
pop-up,
for
example,
in
Crystal
City,
do
you
have
a
sense
of
just
sort
of
the
ball
parks
or
either
the
the
monetary
considerations
or
just
some
of
the
considerations?
You
might
share
with
us
at
this
point
recognizing
it's
very
preliminary
about
fitting
out
a
least
commercial
space
for
a
library
relative
to
funding
the
planning
and
construction
of
a
library.
If
we
were
to
go
that
route
off-site.
I
Well,
I,
don't
think:
we've
we've
looked
at
it
from
that
aspect
and
our
conversations
with
the
library
director
and
jointly
with
parks
on
the
joint
planning
of
an
expanded,
Quincy
Park
in
a
central
library.
My
understanding
from
the
library
director
she's
seeking
a
new
facility
that
more
dresses
current
needs
for
technology
and
meeting
spaces.
The
makerspace
the
3d
printer,
were
putting
in
things
in
that
ilk
as
a
to
traditional
stacks
I'm.
B
J
However,
we
are
thinking
that
it's
going
to
be
a
fit
out
in
either
case
we're
not
the
plan
wouldn't
be
to
build
a
standalone
library,
so
the
placeholder
dollars
are
really
for
a
tenant
space
or
a
fit-out
space.
At
this
point,
but
again
we're
still
working
through
that
it's
still
far
further
out,
but
very.
B
H
Had
some
of
the
same
questions
and
and
the
conversation
actually
just
I'll
comment
real
quick
on
the
that
issue,
but
really
all
these
I
think
it
just
reminds
me
of
the
fact
that
we
we
need
to
be
very
cognizant
as
a
community
that
there
are
operational
solutions
in.
There
are
capital
solutions
and
we
have
a
very
limited
capital.
So
we're
gonna
have
to
really
expand
our
minds
on
how
what
we
can
do
operationally
I
think
to
to
accommodate
as
many
different
things
as
we
can.
Mr.
H
L
As
mr.
mayor
indicated,
it
was
just
recently
we
did
another
structural
evaluation,
and
so
over
the
last
couple
of
weeks,
we've
been
trying
to
put
together
a
game
plan
on
what
that
looks,
like
literally
while
I'm
sitting
next
to
Romney,
and
the
tour
down
here
he's
showing
me
sketches
of
what
a
potential
solution
might
look
like,
so
we
haven't
costed
it
out.
Yet
the
existing
money
that
is
set
aside,
the
2.4
million
I,
believe,
is
bond
money
and
then
we'll
have
to
determine
the
appropriateness
of
that
money
for
a
temporary
solution.
L
The
temporary
solution
is
likely
to
be
a
canvas
structure
and
how
it'll
look
and
fit
in
the
neighborhood.
We
have
not
yet
quite
figured
out.
We
have
to
reach
out
to
that
neighborhood.
Obviously,
with
this
this
approach,
our
goal
is
to
maintain
public
safety
throughout
the
winter
and
to
be
really
aggressive
for
us
to
go
after
this,
but
we're
going
to
try
to
go
after
this
and
take
down
the
existing
salt
tank
and
erect
a
canvas
structure
on
the
existing
site,
so
the
exact
timeline
and
acquisition
strategy.
L
Structural
engineers
report
said
you're,
basically,
at
the
end
of
life,
the
tank
walls
are
failing
and
the
was
about
five
or
six
years
ago.
George
and
team
did
a
repair
to
the
roof
in
the
columns
and
that's
still,
okay,
but
it's
now
a
different
failure,
mode
of
the
tank
and
the
skin,
and
that's
a
lot
more
difficult
to
control
and
maintain
and
fix.
L
H
I
H
C
C
To
serve
the
some
of
the
details
and
the
you
know,
it's
at
the
board's
discretion
this
year,
when
we
view
the
site
plan
coming
in
for
Virginia
hospital
center,
that
the
board's
already
expressed
his
preference
for
part
of
the
compensation
in
return
for
the
Edison
site
that
Carlin
Springs
site
be
be
chosen.
We
have
not
ruled
out
the
possibility
that,
as
soon
as
the
transaction
is
consummated
that
Virginia
hospital
Center
might
not
need
to
stay
there
for
a
while
until
they
find
another
location
for
the
urgent
care
facility
in
their
pediatric
clinic
or
pediatric
program.
C
So
I
want
you
to
use,
so
it
won't
be.
If
the
board
approves
the
project,
we're
not
gonna
be
going
out
and
leveling
the
building
the
next
day.
It
might
be
there
for
another
year
or
two,
but
as
George's
explained
to
me
many
times,
it
could
be
used
for
that.
But
the
way
it
was
constructed,
it's
actually
probably
the
least
effective
space
we
could
ever
have
to
reprioritize
for
anything
else.
Given
the
way
the
the
building
was
constructed
and
the
maintenance
needs
for
it,
it's
I'm
gonna
come
close
thing.
I
H
Then
it's
a
zero-sum
game
for
us
and
we
could
continue
to
let
allow
that
situation
perhaps
to
continue
so
I
will
trust
that
you
guys
will
do
that
sort
of
analysis,
but
but
just
looking
I'm
looking
for
things
that
we
might
not
absolutely
have
to
have
in
here.
So
the
next
question
would
be
1212
south
Irving.
D
M
H
H
M
M
H
Keep
to
keep
capacity
at
six
and
have
we
or
would
it
be
part
of
this,
so
planning
starts
I,
think
in
2021,
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
have
that
page
and
for
me
anymore,
but
as
part
of
this
effort,
would
we
look
at
other
options
or
alternatives,
or
we
would
only
exclusively
look
at
rebuilding
on
that
site.
H
In
other
words,
is
it
possible
that
we
could
we
could
approach
a
developer
and
do
some
kind
of
private
public
partnership
where
we
take
take,
you
know
half
a
floor
in
a
building
somewhere
or
do
something
you
know
do
something?
That's
it
just
look
at
other
options
about
how
we
might
meet
the
needs
for
these
members
of
our
community
and
that
does
not
necessarily
involve
rebuilding
this
home.
For
four
point:
three
million
dollars
I'm.
K
K
The
building
that
they've
been
in
in
the
house
that
they've
had
for
many
many
years
they
have
made
do
in
it,
and
we've
had
different
type
of
people
with
different
types
of
disabilities
that
we
couldn't
place
there
because
of
the
accessibility
and
that
building,
whereas
we've
only
been
licensed
for
six.
It
is
a
is
a
large
old
house
that
has
two
or
three
more
bedrooms
up
on
a
third
level
up.
We
can't
get
to
it.
K
Well,
it's
an
old
stairwell
and
it's
not
conducive
to
having
people
live
in
that
manner,
but
we
do
find
that
this
is
a
valuable
resource
that
that
we
need
for
persons
of
disabilities
that
have
different
types
of
constraints,
some
of
which
have
behavioral
issues
where
it
is
much
more
conducive
to
having
a
home
environment
with
more
close
supervision.
So
we
find
it
very
valuable
and
we
it
would
be
hard-pressed
to
to
not
have.
This
is
one
of
our
options.
Well,.
H
I
I
greatly
appreciate
your
advocacy
and
I'm
very
proud
to
live
in
a
community
that
that
cares
for
all
members
of
our
community,
so
I'm,
not
questioning
at
all
the
need
for
for
the
right
kind
of
facility
in
the
accommodations
I'm
suggesting
mr.
manager
that
I
hope
as
we
as
this
moves
through
the
Meccans
of
the
county.
H
D
I
just
had
a
follow-up
question
for
mr.
Manuel
sorry
to
interrupt,
so
you
made
a
statement
somewhat
intriguing
on
the
salt
dome,
which
we
really
got
to
deal
with,
that
you're
gonna,
take
the
salt
and
move
it
somewhere.
So
just
thinking
about
how
this
playout,
sometimes
where
are
you
thinking
of
moving
it
or
what
kind
of
options
do
we
have
for
another
place
to
wait
for?
Well,
that's.
L
A
great
question
which
we
were
debating
at
length
last
Friday
and
we
did
not
have
the
answers
yet
we
may
have
to
sell
the
salt.
We're
exploring
our
options
to
see
if
VDOT
or
other
neighboring
jurisdictions
might
have
a
little
bit
of
capacity
where
we
could
rathole
it,
but
we
may
have
to
sell
it
off.
We
don't
really
have
other
places.
To
put
it,
we
may
be
able
to
shovel
things
around
on
the
site
and
displace
other
functions
on
the
site.
L
Right
now,
the
salt
spreaders
are
stored
there
if
we
shuffled
them
somewhere
else
that
might
up
create
a
little
space
for
us
to
put
some
under
a
tarp
which
would
reduce
our
risk
going
into
the
winter,
depending
on
the
timing
of
when
we
can
get
this
done.
So
there's
a
lot
of
risk
elements
we're
trying
to
balance
here,
as
we
try
to
figure
out
this
solution,
but
we
don't
have
another
location
in
the
county
to
store
the
salt
yeah.
D
D
L
Point
is
to
keep
the
salt
dry
right
in
to
have
the
operating
space
to
load
it
safely
and
consistently.
But
it
will
it's
clearly
not
going
to
be
the
long-term
solution
for
the
community.
I
think
the
community
has
other
things
in
mind,
but
will
now
just
have
to
go
to
the
community
with
this
interim
step
that
they
weren't,
anticipating
yeah.
L
B
E
So,
just
just
to
follow
up
on
that
sign
I'm,
trying
to
reconcile
that
the
discussion
that
we've
had
on
the
salt,
dome
and
and
next
steps
with
the
fact
that
you've
indicated
in
the
CIP
that
there's
no
money
for
for
planning.
So
how
are
we
going
to
do
this
community
engagement
and
and
really
grapple
with?
What
comes
next?
If
we
don't
have
a
line
item
queso.
C
Won't
be
much
more
direct
than
everybody
at
this
end
of
the
table
has
been,
which
is
that
we
will
be
consulting
with
the
local
civic
associations
about
our
plan
to
take
down
the
salt
facility
and
will
provide
some
discussion
and
we,
it
will
be
on
the
scale,
we'll
be
communicating
and
consulting
to
a
small
amount,
but
we
need
to
get
this
temporary
facility
up
before
the
winter.
So
there
is
nothing
you
can
then
to
follow
on
today.
C
B
D
B
I
B
Great
answer:
let
me
ask
his
well
I
just
wanted
to
one
thing
that
wasn't
feature
in
your
presentation,
but
on
page
c106
regarding
V
and
C
105
106
energy
efficiency
projects.
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
as
we
talked
about
the
air
program
and
the
dedicated
utility
tax
during
the
operating
budget
and
I
know,
this
is
funded,
largely
I
believe
through
Pago.
B
So
this
is
one
of
those
priorities
that
has
a
real
nexus
between
our
capital
improvement
plan
and
our
our
operating
budget
and
I
noted
it
on
one
c106
that
there
there
was
Pago
money
featured
in
the
out-years,
and
so
that's
is
that,
would
it
be
correct
to
say
that
sort
of
aspirational
we're
hoping
we're
going
to
be
able
to
restore
eco
money
for
energy
efficiency?
What.
I
We
did
when
the
manager
said
we
should
plan
for
an
increase
from
1.2
to
4.2
million
dollars
for
Pago.
We
allocated
that
money
between
the
bulk
of
it
going
to
the
maintenance,
capital
program
and
small
elements
going
to
the
energy
program,
facilities,
furnishing
equipment
and
those
activities
that
are
typically
supported
with
Peggle.
You
want.
B
C
Was
the
the
point
that's
important
to
emphasize
and
I
think
this
came
up
in
the
last
presentation
is
that
we
are
assuming
operating
budgets,
which
is
where
the
pay-go
levels
are
set
will
be
higher
in
the
out-years
than
they
are.
What
the
board
adopted
in
fiscal
19
in
order
to
provide
the
increment
I,
think
it's
three
or
four
million
dollars.
So
that
is
an
aspiration
and
that's
something
that
we'll
have
to
talk
about
as
we
go
through
getting
budget
guidance
for
the
operating
budgets.
C
Its
note
will
be
no
small
feat,
given
the
budget
pressures
that
we
have
to
try
to
find
the
additional
funds.
But
that
was
really
when
you,
when
you
you've,
exhausted
all
your
bond
balances
and
you've
exhausted
everything
with
northern
rigid
transportation
authority
and
you've
exhausted
existing
balances.
The
the
other
place
to
go
to
maintain
the
state
of
good
repair
was
to
come
and
say
we
would
do
that
in
the
operating
budget
and
I
try
to
keep
that
as
small
as
possible.
No.
C
B
E
You
miss
Reed
and
and
I
appreciated
mr.
guts.
All's
creativity
in
terms
of
talking
about
the
populations
that
we
do
need
to
take
care
of
in
terms
of
residential
living
facilities.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
given
the
fact
that
they
will
have
to
be
relocated,
at
least
temporarily.
When
do
you
start
that
process
of
communicating
with
the
parents,
the
permanent
caregivers
and
so
forth?
I'm
sure
it's
a
delicate
situation,
and
what's
how
do
you
deal
with
that?
So.
M
The
advantage
of
that
is
that
with
designing
or
constructing
a
new
facility
is
that
we
can
tailor
that
home
similar
to
what
we
did
at
the
Lincoln
Street
home
a
couple
of
years
ago.
Some
of
you
may
have
recall
seeing
that
home
to
accommodate
medical
complexities
that
these
individuals
present
with
that
that
just
provides.
You
know
opportunity
of
designing
something
with
their
needs
in
mind.
M
So
we
would
start
almost
immediately
as
opportunities
become
available
of
other
beds
becoming
available
in
other
group
homes
that
are
currently
in
the
county
of
relocating
those
individuals
that
are
currently
there.
So
that
would
start
as
soon
as
possible
once
we
know
that
this
is
going
to
be
something
that
we're
moving
forward
with.
Okay.
E
C
Okay,
so
we
will
now
move
on
to
the
Department
of
Parks
and
Recreation
local
Parks
and
Recreation
presentation,
and
we
are
graced
by
the
presence
of
Lisa
Grandal,
Peter
Lusk
and
the
department
director,
Jane,
Rudolph
and
I
think
miss
Grandal
is
going
to
be
doing
the
presentation,
so
I
will
hand
it
over
to
you.
Lisa.
Thank.
N
You
and
thank
you
for
having
us
today,
I
wanted
to
start
off
by
talking
a
little
bit
about.
What's
in
the
local
parks
and
recreation
program
in
the
CIP,
we
have
five
program
areas,
parks,
maintenance,
capital
parks,
master
plans,
the
synthetic
turf
program,
our
trails,
modernization
and
the
parks,
land
acquisition
and
open
space.
So
the
focus
of
all
these
programs
is
major
renovation
and
replacement
of
our
existing
investments
and
also
the
implementation
of
Park
master
plans.
N
So
similar
to
the
last
presentation,
I'm
going
to
quickly
run
through
some
of
our
key
accomplishments
since
the
last
CIP,
so
under
our
parks,
maintenance,
capital,
we've
completed
six
major
projects
at
Bluemont,
Highview,
Quincy,
Stratford,
Tuckahoe
and
Wakefield
high
school,
the
Politan
springs.
Construction
starts
this
summer
on
the
skatepark.
Actually
within
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
alcove
ax,
Heights,
Henry,
Clay,
Park
and
Madison
Manor
are
currently
in
indesign
wrapping
up
the
conceptual
design
phase,
and
then
we
have
a
couple,
others
that
are
going
to
start
by
the
end
of
the
year.
Bluemont
Park.
N
As
far
as
park
master
plans
goes.
We
are
in
the
final
phase
of
tyrol
hill
park
under
construction.
This
is
actually
the
fourth
phase
of
a
project.
That's
been
going
on
for
about
15
years.
This
is
the
restroom
picnic
shelter.
There
will
be
a
futsal
court,
plaza
site,
furnishings,
site
circulation,
landscaping
and
site
drainage,
and
that
should
open
later
this
summer,
a
big
one
for
us
has
been
the
Jenny
Dean
Park
master
plan
and
design
guidelines.
We've
developed
those
through
the
four
MRV
process.
N
Another
large
park
master
plan.
For
us,
our
major
one
is
Long
Bridge
Park
phase
two.
This
is
the
county's
first
design-build
project.
The
project
scope
is
based
on
a
extensive
community
input
process
that
we
carried
on
and
back
in
2016
in
2017,
we
had
a
procurement
evaluation
and
selection
process
and
had
four
pre
qualified
bidders.
We
went
through
a
process
for
some
additional
public
engagement
in
October
and
selected.
The
design-build
team,
the
county
board,
approved
our
tract
in
November
and
since
that
time,
over
the
last
six
or
seven
months,
significant
design
work
has
been
completed.
N
We're
at
a
point
where
we
applied
last
month
for
our
limits
of
disturbance.
Permit
one
of
the
great
things
about
the
design-build
is
it's
going
to
allow
us
to
advance
construction
while
we're
still
completing
the
final
design,
so
we
anticipate
breaking
ground
next
month
on
the
park,
and
that
would
be
the
site
work
and
the
foundation
work.
We
will
also
be
submitting
for
our
building
permits
by
the
end
of
the
summer.
In
addition,
I
would
mention
that
we
have
work
going
on
with
a
subcommittee
of
the
long
bridge
park
committee.
N
Currently,
if
you
drive
by
the
park,
you'll
see
that
long
bridge
number
three
is
being
replaced
and
that'll
be
done
in
the
next
60
to
90
days
and
then
we're
getting
ready
to
get
underway
with
the
Gunston
bubble,
synthetic
turf.
So
this
is
the
turf
inside
the
bubble
structure
as
far
as
trail,
modernization
and
land
acquisition.
We
have
some
improvements
that
are
getting
ready
to
get
underway
this
summer.
N
On
the
Custis
trail,
a
section
that's
along
I
66
from
North
Adams
Street
to
McCoy
Park
we've
also
over
the
last
two
years,
acquired
a
little
over
five
and
a
quarter
acres.
This
is
the
last
parcel
there
on
18th
Street
north
at
Benjamin,
Banneker
Park,
the
two
new
parcels
we
acquired
to
create
the
new
park
at
20th
and
Ives,
and
then
a
very
large
parcel
that
was
transferred
to
the
county
from
ApS
to
expand,
Zachary,
Taylor
Park.
N
So
now
moving
into
what's
in
this
CIP,
the
local
parks
and
recreation
program
has
213
million
over
the
next
10
years.
The
majority
of
our
program
is
paid
for
by
the
Geo
bonds.
We
also
have
short-term
financing
Pago
and
then
some
other
smaller
sources.
A
couple
of
things
to
note
that
we've
shifted
most
of
our
capital
maintenance
over
the
years
to
the
Geo
bonds.
It
also
pays
for
the
bigger
projects
for
the
park.
Master
plans,
synthetic
turf
conversion.
N
Some
key
considerations
for
this
year
and
I
think
you're
starting
to
get
the
theme
here.
So
for
us,
it's
about
state
of
good
repair,
our
what
would
be
considered
maintenance
capital.
We
have
a
separate
maintenance
capital
program,
but
also
synthetic
turf
and
trails.
Modernisations
are
also
about
maintaining
what
we
have
and
then
as
far
as
existing
commitments,
we
in
the
first
couple
years
of
the
CIP
would
be
implementing
projects
that
have
County
Board
adopted
plan.
N
Differences
between
the
27
or
the
2017
2016
adopted
versus
proposed
as
you'll
see
at
the
top
there.
Our
maintenance
capital
numbers
have
gone
down
pretty
substantially.
Part
of
that
was
particularly
in
this
first
year
here,
ability
to
complete
projects
that
we
have
underway.
Some
of
the
ones
that
we've
gotten
into
are
a
little
more
involved
like
what
we're
going
to
be
getting
into
with
bloom
on
tennis
courts,
where
we're
right
on
the
Four
Mile
Run
embankment.
So
we
have
some
RPA
issues,
they're
going
to
need
more
extensive
community
engagement.
N
N
N
We
replace
the
bubble
structure
down
at
Gunston,
as
well
as
the
restrooms
that
are
exterior
to
that
replacing
some
of
our
facilities
at
lacey,
woods,
the
athletic
field,
picnic,
shelter,
basketball,
court,
replacing
the
playground
at
Monroe,
Park,
restroom
renovations
at
Madison
Manor,
and
then
the
playground
and
picnic
shelter
at
Gunston,
which
would
pretty
much
complete
the
Gunston
renovations
for
our
synthetic
turf
program
over
the
next
two
years.
This
would
be
a
little
over
six
point:
three
million.
This
is
keeping
us
up
with
our
synthetic
replacement
on
an
eight
year.
N
N
Our
trail
model
modernization
program
is
relatively
modest.
At
a
little
over
1.1,
we
did
an
updated
assessment
of
trail
conditions
that
we
just
completed,
and
the
program
covers
trail
replacement,
full
replacement,
which
is
part
of
what
we're
doing
at
Benjamin
Banneker
as
part
of
that
project,
and
also
milling
and
repaving
to
extend
the
useful
life
so
we'll
use
this
assessment
to
determine
which
sections
of
trail
we're
going
to
do
next.
So.
N
The
the
next
couple
slides
are
the
large
projects
that
are
Ganner
in
the
first
two
years,
Rasen
highlands
park
plus
little
over
5.5
million.
It's
a
master
plan
that
was
adopted
by
the
board
back
in
September
of
2016.
It's
a
coordinated
plan
for
Rosslyn
Highlands
Park,
some
adjacent
outdoor
spaces
at
the
Wilson
school
site,
and
also
a
playground
across
North
18th
Street,
at
a
site
owned
by
app'.
N
N
The
largest
one
for
us
is
Jenny
Dean
Park
a
little
over
16
million,
as
I
mentioned
before.
We
just
completed
the
form,
RV
framework
plan
and
we'll
be
bringing
the
master
plan
to
you
in
September.
The
park,
as
it
lays
out,
has
been
part
of
a
tremendously
extensive
community
process
and
really
is
replacing
all
the
facilities
that
are
currently
in
the
park,
with
a
better
layout,
better
protection
of
the
four
mile
run
stream
valley
and
a
much
enhanced
street
frontage
along
four
mile
run.
N
I
would
note
for
this
project
because
I
know
it's
one
that
the
manager
put
out
there
earlier
for
consideration.
This
is
like
a
massive
capital
maintenance
project.
This
really
is
replacement
of
everything.
That's
there
on
our
assessment
assessment.
You
know
cycles.
This
is
all
things
that
have
been.
We
are
way
overdue
and
replacement.
Aren't
ada-accessible,
don't
have
the
right,
stormwater
control,
so
it's
too
big
for
maintenance
capital
program,
but
but
I
just
wanted
you
to
understand
that.
N
That's
that's
really
what
it,
what
kind
of
project
it
is,
and
lastly,
I
want
to
talk
about
the
15th
Street
Park
in
Crystal
City.
This
is
a
small
amount.
Two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
1.8
was
already
funded
in
FY
2017.
This
uses
the
tax
increment
financing
it'll,
be
the
first
project
that
we're
doing
down
there
to
implement
the
parks
and
open
space
identified
in
a
Crystal
City
sector
plan.
It's
about
thirty,
three
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet
and
it's
going
to
be
a
new
park.
N
That's
created
by
reconfiguration
of
15th
Street
between
Clarke
Bell
and
crystal
Drive.
The
project
is
time
so
that
it's
planned,
designed
and
ready
to
be
constructed
immediately
following
completion
of
the
street
project,
so
they
will
just
be
doing
basic
rating
out
and
stabilizing
it,
and
then
we
will
come
in
and
build
the
park.
So
we
are
going
to
be
beginning.
Our
public
engagement
in
FY
2019
with
a
community.
N
N
As
far
as
unfunded
needs
for
us,
the
largest
one,
is
the
land
acquisition
and
open
space
program.
I
know
that
all
of
you
have
been
to
our
public
space
master
plan
meetings
along
the
way.
The
Pops
plan
recommends
the
addition
of
30
acres
of
new
public
space
over
the
next
10
years.
We
do
have
a
program
balance
of
three
and
a
half
million
and
that
will
be
used
to
fund
high-priority
opportunities.
N
Certainly,
there
are
other
opportunities
to
acquire
open
space
and
we'll
continue
to
use
those
tools
through
site
plans,
form
based
code,
implementation
of
sector
plans,
TDRs
and
easements,
but
it
is
going
to
be
it's
going
to
be
challenging
to
try
to
meet
the
goals
of
what's
in
the
Pops
plan.
I
did
want
to
mention
that
the
County
signed
a
letter
of
intent
with
WETA
recently
to
expand
Jenny
Dean
Park,
and
that
would
be
almost
an
acre
of
land.
N
It's
to
develop
a
management
model
and
design
for
a
new
boathouse
on
completion
of
the
environmental
assessment
by
the
National
Park
Service.
The
Park
Service
is
wrapping
up
its
EA
process
and
we
will
be
holding
a
public
meeting
on
that
this
summer
at
WL,
high
school
and
so
the
announcement
for
that
is
going
to
be
coming
out
very
soon.
So
this
is
exciting
to
see
this
finally
completed,
that
portion
of
it
and
moving
forward
Quincy,
Park
and
Central
Library
is
an
opportunity
to
really
reinvigorated.
N
Eeen,
it's
a
major
capital
maintenance
project
for
us.
We've
got
lots
of
facilities
there
that
are
in
poor
shape,
particularly
the
the
tennis
courts.
The
library
was
built
in
1959.
It's
it's
way
outdated
and
doesn't
meet
the
the
current
library
needs,
but
the
idea
is
to
develop
a
plan
first
for
the
whole
site,
which
will
then
allow
us
to
start
implementing
where
the
the
permanent
Park
facilities
are
going
to
go
as
they're
replaced.
N
Sterlington
Park
and
Gateway
Parker,
two
new
ones
for
us
that
were
not
in
the
last
CIP
Shirlington-
is
about
an
11
and
a
half
acre
linear
park
going
from
Walter
Reed
South
Walter
Reed
Drive
to
South
Shirlington
Road
has
been
part
of
the
for
MRV
process
and
will
allow
us
to
make
a
lot
of
new
improvements
to
that
part
and
then
Gateway
park
again
a
major
capital
maintenance
kind
of
thing
too
big
for
that
program.
This
would
be
a
master
plan
and
future
renovation
of
this
very
unique
park
bell
tower
I-66.
N
It
is
a
substantial
project
for
sure
about.
27%
of
the
project.
Funds
are
going
to
come
from
site
plan
contributions
and
the
Rosslyn
sector
plans.
Certainly
focused
on
this
as
a
major
gateway
into
the
park.
It's
a
lot
of
concrete,
there's
some
opportunities
to
do
some
things
there
to
bring
it
down
to
a
more
human
scale.
B
Think
we'll
have
some
I'd
love
to
ask
one
myself
about
Crystal
City
miss
Garvey.
Next
there
are
a
series
of
projects,
I
think
some
of
which
you
alluded
to
including
15th,
Street,
Park
and
then
later
Crystal,
City
gateway,
Park,
I,
think
distinguished
from
Rosslyn
gateway,
Park
and
also
Metro
Market
Square.
We've
been
thinking
a
lot,
I
think
here
about
Metro
Market
Square
recently
in
terms
of
the
future
station
entrance
for
the
Metro,
a
couple
of
site
plan,
amendments
and
rezoning
that
were
likely
to
see
and
I
think.
B
We've
all
heard
a
lot
from
the
community
about
Metro,
Market,
Square,
potentially
being
a
pretty
transformative
project
for
not
only
the
residents,
but
the
economic
development
potential
would
like
to
get
your
reaction
to
at
least
one
proposal.
That's
been
surfaced
which
would
be
to
divert
or
swap
out
funding
for
the
15th
Street
Park
and
even
potentially
the
Crystal
City
gateway
Park
to
move
Metro
Market
Square
up
earlier.
Any
reactions
are
concerns.
You'd
have
with
that
sure.
N
Well,
to
two
things
so
one
we
have
to
be
ready
to
go
when
when
des
is
done
with
the
road
project
and
we'll
have
to
do
something
with
that
almost
acre
3/4
of
an
acre
park,
and
so
the
timing,
the
timing
of
it
is
in
the
in
how
its
funded
is,
will
allow
us
to
meet
that.
But
I
think
the
other
thing
is
with
Metro
Market
Square.
N
They
would
have
done
the
adaptive
reuse
on
the
other
building
before
they
built
the
new
building
that
they
were
proposing
and
the
new
building
and
the
Metro
would
have
had
to
being
constructed
before
we
could
have
gone
forward
with
anything
for
the
park.
So
I
think
it
would
have
been
a
few
years
down
the
road
before
we
would
have
been
able
to
actually
do
any
improvements
to
to
the
park.
N
N
C
I
just
wanted
to
add
one
thing
on
that,
but
leaving
leaving
aside
my
concern
about
JB
G's
very
recent
within
the
last
two
days.
Requests
there
is
nine
that
was
going
to
come
in
July
they've
asked
that
that
be
postponed
further,
the
cost
associated
with
doing
the
18th
Street
park
and
I'll,
let
Lisa
a
pine
on
that
too.
Switching
out
the
money
there,
the
amount
of
monies
that
would
be
involved
with
the
18th
Street
Park
is
of
quantities
so
much
larger.
That
I
think
you
might
want
to
try
to
give
some
perspective
on
that
sure.
N
So
the
15th
Street
project
again
is
landscaping.
You
know
pathways
seeding
things
like
that,
the
other
the
Metro
Market
Square
is
intended
to
have
potentially
something
like
whether
it's
a
covered
building
or
covered
a
roof
way.
It's
built
over
top
of
a
metro
station,
so
there's
and
very
urban
as
far
as
you
know,
Plaza
and
things
like
that.
So
yes,
it's
going
to
be
significantly
more
expensive.
The
15th
Street
money
would
not
have
covered
it.
Okay,.
B
All
of
that
is
helpful,
though
I
think
disappointing
right.
This
is
an
area
that
were
whether
it's
the
the
potential
loss
of
n
VTA
funds
for
creating
the
second
station
entrance,
certainly
disappointing
to
hear
that
now
we're
looking
at
delays
again
of
those
two
major
commercial
projects.
Certainly
it's
a
part
of
the
county
where
we're
eager
to
see
revitalized,
but
I
really
appreciate
it.
The
circumstances
you've
just
shared
with
us,
miss
Grendel
about
why
that's
not
feasible.
Let
me
go
next
to
miss
Garvey,
so.
D
O
D
Go
right,
I
knew
it
was
something
really
good.
Thank
you,
I
think
we're
working
so
busy.
We
forget
about
these.
Oh
thank
you.
They
deserve
a
hand
for
that.
So
now
that
we're
down
in
South
are
like
I've,
just
almost
moved
right
over
to
Virginia
Highlands
Park,
because
we
didn't
talk
about
that.
We
continue
to
get
questions
and
concerns.
There
was
gonna,
be
master
planning.
What
could
you
just
talk
a
little
bit
about?
What
are
the
plans
for
Virginia
Highlands
Park
right
now
sure.
N
So
we
came
to
the
board
last
November
and
proposed
as
part
of
the
the
managers
update,
that
we
would
put
this
project
on
hold
at
Virginia
Highland
until
we
had
completed
the
public
spaces
master
plan
and
until
we
had
finished
up
some
of
the
other
master
planning
work,
that's
currently
underway.
So
we
both
had
that
as
a
long-term
proposal
and
as
a
short-term
that
we
would
take
down
some
of
the
fencing
which
we
have
done
and
we're
in
the
process
of
just
kind
of
assessing
how
that
is
working
out.
N
We
do
still
have
the
little
over
five
hundred
thousand
that
we
have
in
our
capital
maintenance
that
would
be
used
for
that
master
planning
when
we're
ready
to
go
forward,
and
so
I
think
we're
on
track
to
bring
the
public
space
master
plan
to
the
board
towards
the
end
of
this
year
and
I.
Look
at
my
director,
but
I
think
you
know
we
will
evaluate
where
we
are
once
once.
We've
completed
the
Pop's
plan
as
far
as
putting
forward
a
proposal
on
what
we
would
do,
the
master
plan.
That's.
D
B
H
H
You
mentioned
funding
for
synthetic
turf
of
six
point
three
million
in
completion
of
2020,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
that
comes
up
because
in
our
books
on
page
I'm,
starting
on
page
C
44,
it
looks
like
we're
actually
really
closer
to
thirty
thirty
million
twenty
nine
point:
five
million
over
the
full
ten
years,
CIP
for
the
synthetic
turf
program.
So
what's
the
what
am
I
missing
here
so.
N
H
N
The
reason
it
says,
completion
2020
out
of
the
synthetic
turf
program
fields,
one
in
four
at
Longbridge.
We
will
those
are
replacements,
we'll
do
those
rather
quickly
the
upper
TJ
field
and
that
conversion
is
going
to
need
a
public
engagement
process
before
we
actually
do
that
project
and
then
because
it's
a
conversion-
and
that
is
much
more
extensive,
with
engineering
and
stormwater
and
all
the
things
that
go
along
with
it.
It's
going
to
take
us
a
little
while
to
get
a
design
before
we
can
actually
get
it
in
construction
right.
H
F
H
N
Eight
years
is
the
standard
for
the
industry.
What
we
do
is
we
have
a
zmax
test
done
every
year
on
all
of
our
fields,
which
basically
assesses
the
head
impact
attenuation.
So
that's
a
big
driver
when
the
field
gets
to
the
point
that
there
could
be
a
head
injury
and
there's
tolerances
within
that
GMAX,
then
we
need
to
replace
it.
So
when
we
work
with
the
various
synthetic
turf
manufacturers,
whoever
gets
the
low
bid,
they
have
to
come
in
and
do
repairs.
N
So
if
it's
about
reselling
a
seam
or
things
like
that,
that
gets
done,
but
we
have
found
by
and
large
that
by
the
time
they
get
into
their
eighth
year,
they
are
getting
they're
bumping
up
against
that
G
max
level
where
they
need
replacement.
We've
had
a
few.
The
high
school
fields,
in
particular
may
stretch
a
little
bit
longer
and
we've
gotten
to
the
point
where
we've
stretched
them
and
are
doing
them
each
in
a
different
year.
N
I
think
people
are
less
likely
to
do,
drop
and
play
at
the
high
school
fields,
because
they
assume
that
they're
pretty
programmed
most
of
our
other
fields.
In
addition
to
all
the
scheduled
play,
if
nobody's
on
them,
somebody
will
get
on
it
for
a
drop
in
play,
but
that's
that
still
seems
to
be
where
the
industry
is
and
when
we're
we
check
in
with
our
you
know,
colleagues
in
Fairfax
and
other
local
jurisdictions,
but
that's
but.
H
In
terms
of
putting
this
into
practicality,
then
we're
assuming
for
planning
purposes
every
eight
years,
but
we
do
the
G
max
tests,
so
we
don't
replace
them
before
they
need
to,
and
likewise
we
don't
allow
them
to
deteriorate
to
a
point
of
danger.
But
if,
for
some
reason,
a
feel
were
being
used
faster
right.
H
So
on
this
table
here
the
the
the
projected
synthetic
field
replacement
and
the
note
there
is
that
there's
some
assumptions
about
cost
sharing
with
for
the
high
school
sites
with
ApS.
So
does
that
mean
that
the
APS
share
is
not
reflected
in
this
table
and
therefore
is
not
reflected
in
that
total
of
twenty
nine
point,
five
million,
or
does
that
just
mean
that
so.
N
H
N
H
So
then
the
other
question
I
have
is
Pop's
is
coming
out
with
also
some
recommendations
on
on
unprogrammed
open
space,
and
you
addressed
it
a
little
bit
in
the
conversation
about
Virginia,
Highlands,
Park
and
an
elsewhere.
But
it's
also
on
the
list
of
unfunded
Wright
land
acquisition
and
and
in
general
parks,
and
so
I
wanted
to
understand
that,
where
it's
reflected
in
the
CIP
in
our
investment
strategy
here
the
the
way
that
that
we
balance
investment
in
both
active
uses
and
resources
like
synthetic
turf
fields
and
then
also
the
more
passive
natural
spaces.
H
N
N
Certainly
15
Street
Park
is
really
an
entire
Park,
that's
casual
use
and
when
we
get
to
our
capital
maintenance
projects
when
we're
bundling
some
of
these
things
we're
doing
Henry,
Clay
and
Madison
right
now,
as
we
are
renovating
it,
there
are
spaces
that
are
in
and
around
the
other
facilities
and
we're
working
with
the
community
on
how
to
better
design
those.
So,
rather
than
there
being
a
separate
category
for
casual
use,
it
gets
worked
into
some
of
our
capital
maintenance
and
certainly
for
our
larger
Park
master
planning
categories.
N
H
I
appreciate
that
very
much
and
mr.
manager
I
would
just
suggest
that
perhaps
if
it
would
not
be
an
undue
burden
that,
if
there's
a
way
to
kind
of
roll
that
up
in
a
certain
way
like
like
in
New
Marais,
where
we
have
where
we
are
making
investments
in
them
in
the
casual
use
space
and
show
that,
because
I
think
it's
really
easy
to
open
up
the
book
and
look
at
you
know
significant
some
sums
of
money
that
we're
investing
and
very
specific
capital
assets.
Sometimes
the
forgive
the
pun.
H
But
you
know
the
fourth
gets
lost
in
the
trees
right.
Other
trees
get
lost
in
the
forest.
In
terms
of
that,
we
are
investing
and
actually
so
that
we
as
decision-makers
can
make
sure
in
fact,
that
our
investment
strategy
is
is
in
balance.
I
personally
would
find
that
very
helpful.
I
know
there
are
members
of
the
community
that
would
as
well
write.
B
B
E
You
know
mr.
manager,
you
have.
This
is
a
lean,
CIP
and
I
know
you
really
grappled
with
with
the
choices
that
you
made.
It's
the
first
CIP
in
a
number
of
years,
where
the
dollar
amount
actually
went
down
as
I
believe,
and
so
just
as
lady,
just
as
you
have
laid
out
your
choices,
the
board
needs
to
needs
to
make
decisions
itself,
based
on
what
you've
proposed
and
I'm
just
wondering
in
the
interest
of
transparency,
and
so
that
we
can
really
consider
all
options.
E
You
know
you
laid
out
in
your
earlier
discussion
in
the
context
of
what
the
schools
may
be
coming
forward,
with
potential
delays
or
postponements
to
a
number
of
projects,
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
and
and
I
realize,
you're
not
going
to
be
prepared
to
answer
this
question
today.
But
I
would
like
to
know
what
sort
of
debt
service
savings
and
other
funding
economies
would
be
realized
if
we
were
to
defer
some
or
all
of
Long
Bridge
Park
phase,
two
in
particular
the
Aquatic
Center
portion
by
two
four
or
six
years.
C
I
would
that,
to
the
extent
that
there
were
any
debt
service
savings
from
not
selling
bonds,
I
think
that
I
feel
comfortable
at
saying
those
savings
would
be
outweighed
by
additional
costs
that
might
accrue
to
the
county
for
having
to
go
out
and
building
a
cost
premium
for
walking
away
from
a
design-build
contract
that
we've
already
awarded,
not
to
mention
the
potential
for
I
would
say:
unlimited
amounts
of
litigation
and
dispute
over
at
current
expenditures
over
the
project.
So,
but
we
will
do
our
level
best
to
give
you
that
answer.
Okay,.
E
C
P
All
right
good
evening,
yes,
so
the
short
answer
is:
we
are
moving
forward:
the
Nok
Town
Square.
We
are
finishing
up
the
utility
design
work
now
and
it's
going
to
be
going
out
to
bid
this
fall
on
the
utility
side
in
terms
of
the
undergrounding,
but
the
actual
Town
Square
itself
and
the
on
site
improvements.
We're
looking
going
to
construction
in
the
middle
of
next
year,
which
will
be
the
plaza
itself,
but
the
first
phase
of
that
is
under
grounding
of
utilities
and
that's
going
to
take
place
to
this
fall
and.
E
B
B
C
P
So
community
conservation,
part
of
on
the
untrim
to
the
knock
town
square
in
Penrose,
it
was
a
program
called
the
commercial
violin
ization
program
that
was
bonded
back
in
2004
out
of
that
program.
There
were
two
projects
that
were
funded.
It
was
knockdown
square,
which
was
part
of
the
novel.
It's
an
action
plan
in
Penrose
Square,
so
the
purpose
of
the
commercial
modernization
program
was
to
enhance
streetscape
and
utility
undergrounding,
landscaping,
lighting
public
art,
open
spaces
and
transportation
improvements
with
these
public
infrastructure
projects.
P
P
Two
is
you
know,
phase
one
is
on
site
now
it's
been
part
of
the
long
term
plan
to
expand
Penrose
Square,
but
that's
going
to
be
associated
with
any
redevelopment
of
the
CVS
site,
and
so
it's
projected
in
the
CIP
to
happen
in
the
19,
the
28
FY
28
time
frame
and
the
difference
in
cost
is
for
as
just
a
cost
increase
of
construction
of
3%
per
year.
During
that
timeframe,
so
again
knock
Town
Square
you
can
see
on
the
right
is
the
conceptual
drawing
that
has
been
approved
and
we're
actually
working
on
construction
drawings.
P
Now,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
first
phase
of
it
is
perimeter
utility
undergrounding
of
the
the
power
and
the
related
utilities,
and
so
most
of
that
will
take
place
along
Shirlington
Road
and
has
to
go
off-site.
And
so,
as
we
got
into
the
design
process
and
started
negotiating
with
utility
companies,
we
realized
that
we
needed
some
additional
funding
to
make
that
happen
to
the
north
you'll.
P
Have
you
have
the
Shelton
housing
development,
which
already
has
the
utilities
underground,
so
we're
will
be
picking
up
where
they
left
off
and
continuing
to
move
south
along
Shirlington
Road
just
below
24th
and
again.
The
reason
for
this
request
is
for
additional
cost
increases
associated
with
those
until
you,
until
the
undergrounding
and
as
I
mentioned
again,
Penrose
square,
its
awaiting
a
proposal
from
the
developer
to
redevelop
the
CVS
site.
So
this
funding
is
simply
a
placeholder
in
the
CIP.
For
when
that
project
moves
forward,
that
we
will
be
able
to
complete
the
the
square.
Q
Thank
You
chick
way
good
afternoon
I'm
here
to
do
the
presentation
on
the
neighborhood
conservation
program.
The
first
slide
I
think.
Most
of
you
know
what
the
neighborhood
conservation
program
is
about,
but
just
as
a
program
overview,
we
are
a
unique
grassroots
program,
a
bond
funded
program
that
does
projects
in
neighborhoods,
based
on
lots
of
community
collaboration.
Those
projects
come
from
the
ground
up,
typically
based
on
the
neighborhood
conservation
plans
that
each
neighborhood
puts
together.
Most
of
our
projects
include
sidewalk,
curb
and
gutter.
Q
We
do
full-scale
Park
projects,
pedestrian
enhancement,
street
lighting,
beautification
traffic
management,
and
we
also
do
stormwater
projects
just
to
go
over
a
few
of
our
accomplishments.
Over
the
past
couple
of
years,
the
street
improvement
projects
that
we've
completed:
20th
Street
North,
that's
in
the
Cherry
Dale
neighborhood,
south
firown'
Street
down
and
Aurora
highlands
near
Crystal
City,
where
you'll
see
the
the
picture
below
that
depicts.
Q
What
a
typical
NC
project
looks
like
19th
road
north
in
the
Waverly
Hills
neighborhood,
south
Lang
Street,
a
good
project
near
Gunston
right
across
the
street,
from
Gunston
middle
school,
Williamsburg
Boulevard,
north
Ohio
Street,
which
was
a
trail
project.
Some
stormwater
upgrades
vacation
Lane,
a
good
intersection
improvement,
pedestrian
safety
project
near
Taylor,
Taylor
elementary
school,
and
we
also
have
a
project
in
South,
courthouse
Road,
which
is
in
a
multi-family
section
of
Columbia
Pike
for
sort
of
apartment.
Buildings
were
affected
by
that.
So
we're
really
proud
of
that
that
project.
Q
Those
are
not
easy
to
do
through
the
NC
program,
so
park
improvements
we
contributed
to
the
rocky
run
phase
to
Chestnut
Hills
is
in
the
the
Yorktown
neighborhood
Woodlawn
park
in
waco,
Aquifer
Woodlawn,
which
is
more
or
less
a
full-scale
renovation,
and
then
Oak
Grove
Park,
which
is
just
recently
completed
street
light
projects.
We
did
a
couple
of
12th,
Street,
south
and
5th
Street
south.
Q
This
is
a
snapshot
of
what
our
active
portfolio
is.
These
projects,
29
of
them,
are
all
County
Board
approved
projects
you'll
see,
six
of
them
now
are
currently
in
construction.
27%
are
being
prepped
for
construction
right
now.
The
13
of
them
are
an
active
design
and
we
have
only
two
projects
they're
at
30%
design.
At
this
point.
Well,
we
also
have
a
proposed
project
Q.
These
are
projects
that
neighborhoods
have
submitted
to
us
for
consideration.
Q
Q
Five
million
is
half
a
million
a
year
over
the
course
of
ten
years,
so
this
slide
was
intended
to
show
or
to
give
you
a
snapshot
of
the
the
costs
of
the
construction
cost
of
the
NC
of
an
NC
project,
so
I'm
mostly
hard
costs.
The
soft
costs
aren't
included
in
here.
Of
course,
I
will
say
that
the
street
streetscape
amount
is
probably
close
to
half
of
the
project.
Q
The
site
control
management,
which
is
the
MOT
erosion
sediment
control,
comprises
about
10%
stormwater
drainage,
about
a
quarter
of
our
projects
are
require
some
type
of
stormwater
upgrades
you'll
see
the
the
little
asterisk
there
that
that
discusses
sort
of
what
kind
of
partnership
we
have
with
the
stormwater
group.
So
if
an
NC
project
remedies
a
known,
flooding
issue
or
includes
major
pipe
size
than
the
stormwater
group
would
help
us
pay.
The
difference.
Q
I
will
say
that
I
think
still
most
of
this
burden
is
is
placed
on
the
NC
program
and
I
do
want
to
say
that
most
one
of
the
other
caveats
is
that
when
we
do
Li
D
projects
low
impact
development
that
the
stormwater
group
pays
for
all
of
that,
including
the
design
work
and
the
implementation
of
that.
So
we
have
a
good
partnership
with
them.
On
that
li
d,
low
impact
development,
bio
retention,
retrofits.
Q
You'll
see
water
mains
and
meters
are
in
there
about
10%,
then
we
have
surface
paving,
which
we
have
another
good
partnership
with
the
es
on
that
with
the
paving
program
and
then
some
smaller
amounts
of
landscaping
and
streetlights.
We
only
looked
at
five
NC
projects
here,
so
it's
a
Wednesday,
it's
completely
comprehensive,
but
it
does
give
you
a
little
bit
of
a
snapshot
of
where
the
costs
come
from.
Q
Q
Q
Proposed
to
be
fun
to
detail
so
over
the
course
of
the
two-year
cycle,
with
the
proposed
CIP
2
million
per
year,
4
million
total
it
would
likely
fund
with
the
existing
types
of
projects
that
the
neighbor
conservation
program
does
now
2
to
4.
New
projects
over
that
cycle
and
those
projects
would
be
typical
of
the
types
of
projects
at
the
NC
program
would
do
continuing
with
the
let's
see.
Unfunded
needs
detail.
Q
So,
while
the
the
proposed
CIP
for
the
neighborhood
conservation
program
allows
the
program
to
access
existing
approved
bond
money,
it
does
greatly
reduce
the
amount
of
new
projects
that
we'll
be
able
to
implement
and
approve
in
residential
neighborhoods,
so
that
that
impact
will
be
a
substantial
reduction
in
the
approval
priority
projects.
So,
instead
of
funding
12
or
15
projects
over
the
course
of
two
years,
the
it
will
only
allow
us
probably
to
fund
two
to
four
and
the
next
slide
really
just
shows
a
graph
of
our
funding
stream.
Q
Q
We
anticipate
roughly
3
projects
so
looking
ahead,
given
the
significant
demand
that
still
currently
exists
for
projects
in
residential
neighborhoods,
it's
going
to
be
extremely
important
for
the
county
to
manage
the
expectations
about
about
the
amount
of
projects
that
they
will
be
able
to
see
funded
in
the
future.
And,
lastly,
the
county
may
wish
to
reconsider
the
structure
of
the
NC
for
a
ram
in
the
role
of
the
neighborhood
Conservation,
Advisory
Committee
and
a
reduced
funding
environment.
A
E
So
mr.
McIntosh
and
mr.
manager,
the
and
and
I
appreciate
mr.
McIntosh,
your
last
bullet.
Can
you
could
you
get
that
back
on
the
screen
for
a
second
okay,
the
county
may
wish
to
reconsider
the
structure
of
NC
and
so
forth.
So
NC,
particularly
in
recent
years,
has
faced
a
great
deal
of
criticism:
delivery,
delays,
cost
overruns,
quality
control
issues,
a
tortured,
lengthy
and
uncertain
selection
process
that
seems
to
favor
neighborhoods
with
more
robust
civic
associations.
E
At
the
same
time,
in
recent
years
we
have
stood
up
a
neighborhood
complete
Street
program,
which
arguably
has
more
objective
criteria:
more
grounded
in
safety
metrics
than
the
NC
program,
and
let
me
also
interject
in
my
neighborhood
of
Terra
leeway.
Heights
we've
been
a
bit
a
beneficiary
of
a
number
of
positive
neighborhood
conservation
projects
over
the
years,
and
it's
done
a
great
deal
of
good.
What
I'm
wondering
is
given
recent
history.
Is
there?
What
is
the
manager
brainstorming
about
in
terms
of
different
or
more
objective
criteria?
Can
can
we
mend
it
rather
than
end
it?
E
C
The
I'm
gonna,
let
Tim
take
the
bulk
of
the
question
there,
but
the
intersection
with
the
neighborhood
Complete
Streets
program
is
something
that
I
give
a
lot
of
thought
to
and
putting
together
the
CIP
and
weren't
we
weren't
quite
able
to
pull
together
all
the
material
that
we
needed
to
determine
whether
that
might
be
a
better
way
to
do
some
of
the
safety
projects
in
the
community.
It's
more
focused
into
some
of
the
safety
aspects
with
limited
dollars.
C
Maybe
the
argument
could
be
that
some
of
them
should
go
to
neighborhood
Complete
Streets,
but
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
mr.
McIntosh,
because
he
has
the
unfortunate
circumstance
of
thinking
about
this
24
hours
a
day,
and
he
has
briefed
me
on
some
suggestions
and
some
thoughts
that
are
by
no
means
my
recommendation,
but
I
wanted
to
get
the
benefit
of
that.
Madam.
H
Chair
in
the
interest
of
time,
maybe
I
can
ask
my
question
on
this
real,
quick
and
then
mr.
McIntosh
can
roll
that
into
one
answer
and
hopefully
kill
two
birds,
which
is
which
is
just
the
the
cost
matrix
that
you
showed
us.
Rather,
if
you
could
just
speak
to
in
your
answer
to
my
colleague,
rather
not
that
cost
matrix
and
the
methodology
behind
that
and
everything
has
been
shared
with
the
NCAC
and
more
broadly
sort
of
in
your
answer-
how
the
engagement
with
the
our
neighborhood
conservation
advisory
committee,
what
they
think
about
all
of
this.
Q
Just
to
answer
that
question
real
quickly,
that
particular
slide
no
has
not
been
shared
with
them,
though.
We've
had
conversations
about
that
slide
and
the
content.
That's
in
that
for
for
many
years
now,
so
they're
they're
keenly
aware
I,
think
of
of
what
those
costs
are
and
how
they've
crept
up
over
the
years.
But
to
get
to
your
response,
your
question,
mr.
Vyas,
that
I
think
that
over
the
years
we've
seen
the
project's
creep
up
significantly
in
cost
I
think
a
million
and
a
half,
almost
two
million
dollars
for
a
sidewalk
project.
Q
I
think
we
all
know
is
probably
not
sustainable.
I
think
you'd
be
hard-pressed
to
really
say
that
all
the
projects
that
we
do
through
the
NC
program
aren't
critical
safety
projects
that
we
do
in
neighborhoods,
because
I
believe
they
are,
but
moving
forward
in
a
reduced
funding,
environment
I
think
we
have
to
think
a
little
differently
about
the
kinds
of
projects
we
deliver.
Q
There's
still
a
great
need
for
what
we
do,
there's
still
great
need
for
projects
and
residential
neighborhoods,
so
I
think
we
have
to
think
more
strategically
about
how
we
implement
some
type
of
project.
In
a
reduced
funding
environment-
and
that
probably
would
include
some
sort
of
tactical
measures
similar
to
what
other
programs
are
doing.
Some.
Q
I
guess
yeah,
it's
it's
smaller
scale,
projects
that
that
don't
require
all
the
hardscape
work.
I
know,
Complete
Streets
is
thinking
about
these
types
of
things.
There
are
other
programs
in
des
that
are
working
on
these.
It's
not
really
under
the
guise
of
tactical
urbanism,
and
so
it's
a
lot
of
lines,
painting
bollards
different
types
of
projects
that
can
delineate
walkways
or
intersections,
create
that
safety
environment
for
for
residential
neighborhoods.
B
Do
as
well
I
appreciate
that
the
the
level
of
detail
you've
you've
already,
given
that
in
just
a
couple
of
weeks,
as
you
mentioned
and
I,
think
you
know,
one
of
the
questions
all
have
is
if
we
accept
the
manager's
recommendation
to
move
forward.
To
is
whether
it
makes
sense
to
do
multi-year
funding
rounds
instead
of
annual
funding
rounds.
But
I
am
really
intrigued
by
the
idea
of
the
tactical
projects
that
don't
require
hardscaping
I
know.
B
This
is
something
that
a
lot
of
our
community
members
actually
including
some
ones
that
maybe
traditionally
haven't
been
as
represented
in
the
NCAC,
have
thought
about,
particularly
members
of
our
bike
community
and
bicycle
advocacy
community.
So
really
really
appreciate
that
reflection.
Mister,
if
I
said,
did
you
have
further
questions?
No.
E
B
B
I
have
to
say
the
the
the
visualized
state
that
we
see
on
the
slide
and
also
the
the
description
within
the
CIP
sounds
a
lot
and
looks
a
lot
like.
What's
already
there,
so
I'm
a
little
unclear
about
what
the
additional
nearly
five
million
dollars,
although
granted,
it's
well
into
the
out-years,
mean
for
Penrose
square.
P
B
P
B
N
So
let
me
just
add,
depending
upon
how
the
the
site
develops,
the
other
half
of
the
park
is
actually
supposed
to
come
through
form
based
code.
So
if
that
is
how
it
develops,
then
there
would
be
no
cost
for
the
land,
but
the
cost
would
be
in
the
development.
So
we
did
some
things
and
we
did
the
first
phase.
The
public
art
is
a
little
closed,
so
it
doesn't
quite
function
as
how
it's
supposed
to
so
one
of
the
pieces.
Whoops
was
supposed
to
be
further
away.
N
B
See
excellent,
thank
you
for
that
all
right.
Colleagues,
any
other
questions.
Okay,
I
think
we've
all
taken
the
time
sensitivity
to
heart,
so
we
appreciate
it
and
it
doesn't
mean
we
won't
be
in
touch
with
further
questions.
We
know
this
is
an
area
of
the
CIP
that
probably
absorbs
one
of
the
greatest
blows
and
with
respect
to
NCAC
I
know,
we've
all
been
already
hearing
from
members
and
we'll
continue
the
conversation
with
them.
So
thank
you,
mr.
McIntosh,
for
the
good
thinking
to
start
that
conversation
I.