►
From YouTube: County Board Work Session - February 13, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Good
evening,
everyone
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
convene
us
tonight
we're
here
to
talk
about
the
the
work
plan
for
Community,
Planning,
Housing
and
Development,
and
mr.
manager
I.
Think
our
order
of
operations
is
a
few
words
for
me
before
I
turn
things
over
to
you
is
that
right,
so
just
like
to
take
a
moment
to
thank
all
those
in
attendance
I
know
mr.
Duffy
will
recognize
the
staff,
but
we're
delighted
to
have
you
here
and
I
many
of
our
planning
commissioners,
as
well
as
our
joint
facilities
advisory
commissioners.
A
A
This
department
does,
as
well
as
the
work
of
our
planning,
commissioners
and
other
civic
volunteers
throughout
our
Langton
County.
So
we
appreciate
you
and
I
think
you're
you're,
so
in
demand
that
it
does
present
us
with
some
trade-offs
which
I
know
we'll
have
an
opportunity
to
do
tonight.
We'll
have
a
public
presentation,
colleagues
from
C
pH
D.
We
have
also
had
them
share
with
us.
A
A
few
parking
lot
issues
things
that
have
not
made
it
on
to
their
work
plan
but
which
we
may
wish
to
consider
and
just
in
terms
of
setting
our
objectives,
we
want
to
be
clear.
We
will
not
be
amending
the
work
plan
in
real
time,
but
what
we
will
aim
to
do
is
give
some
feedback
about
things
that
maybe
are
not
currently
included,
that
we
might
like
to
see
included
what
we
would
deep
prioritize
in
exchange
and
some
other
feedback.
A
C
You,
madam
chair
I'm,
gonna,
be
very
brief
at
first,
the
first
and
last
I
wanted
to
thank
all
the
C
PhD
staff-
that's
here
and
that
are
listening
and
thank
them
for
all
their
hard
work
that
they
did
on
last
year's
work
plan,
which
is
an
incredible
amount.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
mr.
Duffy.
He
has
a
presentation
that
he
would
like
to
start
and
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
D
You
County,
Manager
and
good
evening,
chair
crystallin
members
of
the
county
board
again.
You've
received
a
copy
of
the
report
that
that
I'll
present
to
you
this
evening
and
in
the
introduction
I
noted
that
there
are
three
basic
parts
of
this
document.
The
first
part
very
brief,
but
very
important,
provides
an
overview
of
our
current
staff
complement
and
the
functional
relationships
between
our
various
sections
and
staff.
D
The
second
part
provides
an
overview
of
our
work
program
by
various
elements
for
each
of
our
three
sections,
and
there
is
also
a
summary
page
at
the
end
of
that
part.
That
gives
an
overview
of
the
work
program
elements
for
each
of
the
the
sections
and
then
lastly,
there
was
part
of
that
section.
There
is
a
summary
of
elements
not
included
as
part
of
this
year's
work
program,
but
could
be
part
of
future
work.
Programs
and
I'll
talk
about
the
source
of
those
a
little
bit.
D
What
I'd
like
to
do
this
evening
is
really
focus
my
presentation
on
those
first
two
parts,
and
then
we
could
come
back
to
the
third
part.
The
board
has
questions
about
specific
elements,
because
that's
what
the
third
part
does.
It
provides
key
milestones,
objectives,
schedules
and
staffing
related
to
all
of
our
key
work
program
elements.
So
I'd
like
to
begin
from
there
and
again
I.
Think
a
table
of
contents
provides
a
good
overview,
we're
fortunate
Arlington
to
have
really
an
outstanding
planning
team,
really
the
finest.
D
If
I
said
many
times,
the
finest
I've
had
the
chance
to
work
with
in
my
professional
career
and
tonight
we
have
our
three
section
leaders
here
in
terms
of
jennifer
smith,
who
leads
our
comprehensive
planning
section
Aaron
Schreiber,
who
leads
current
planning
and
Chris
Kreider,
who
heads
up
our
urban
design
and
research
team.
The
organizational
chart
that
I
have
on
this
on
the
screen,
as
on
page
five
of
the
report,
provides
a
good
overview
of
our
37
positions
and
their
current
assignments.
D
D
We
are
very
close
to
connecting
interviews
for
the
public
facilities
coordinator
position
very
important
for
the
work
that
je
FAC
and
P
FRC
is
involved
with.
We
are
also
very
close
to
hiring
an
individual
to
serve
as
our
zoning
coordinator
and
a
principal
planner,
so
we're
working
through
these
critical
positions
for
the
planning
division
of
the
department
and
I
expect
by
March.
We
will
have
filled
all
of
those
positions,
so
that's
been
a
major
effort
for
our
senior
staff
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
next
slide.
Very
briefly,
it's
a
functional
organizational
chart.
D
I
know
the
board
has
seen
this
in
the
past.
The
reason
I
wanted
to
focus
on
this
briefly
is
that
historically,
we've
been
divided
into
three
separate
sections
that
focus
on
our
comprehensive
planning,
sector
planning,
work,
current
planning,
our
site
plan
and
use
permit
reporting
and
urban
design
and
research.
D
We
are
in
the
process
of
reassessing
how
we
work
and
rebuilding
how
we
work
as
a
team
and
looking
across
these
sections
to
ensure
that
both
existing
and
new
staff
have
opportunities
to
both
professionally
grow
in
various
aspects
of
our
work
program
and
work
collaborative
teams.
We
can't
continue
to
work
in
in
small
sections.
D
So
it's
important
to
note
that,
because,
as
we
go
through
the
work
program,
you'll
see
that
many
of
the
projects
are
built
on
teams
in
cross,
sectional
involvement
and
certainly
interdepartmental
involvement
as
well-
and
that's
that's
important
to
note
so
I'd
like
to
go
through
basically
beginning
with
comprehensive
planning,
just
an
overview
of
the
key
projects
again
for
each
section
and
I
want
to
begin
on
page
eight,
with
the
four
mile
run
valley
initiative.
All
the
board.
D
Members
know
that
on
February
20th
we'll
reach
a
very
important
advisory
point
when
we
come
to
you
with
an
early
draft
of
what
become
a
framework
plan
and
the
guidance
that
you
provide
us
at
that
time
will
be
extremely
important
in
terms
of
ensuring
that
we
meet
our
schedule
deadlines
for
both
the
area
plan,
as
well
as
the
gennadiy
master
plan.
The
board
knows
it's
been
a
very
contentious
and
challenging
process
and
staff
has
done
an
outstanding
job,
including
Richard
Tucker
who's
been
the
project
manager
for
the
area
plan
working
closely
with
DPR.
D
That's
an
important
decision
point
and
staying
on
schedule
with
formal
Run
Valley
is
very
important
to
the
balance
of
this
work
program
so
that
we
can
complete
your
charge
and
proceed
on
other
projects
as
well
in
terms
of
Lee
highway.
I'm,
really
pleased
to
let
you
know
that
yesterday
we
released
the
RFP
for
the
corridor
planning
work,
which
is
a
goal
that
we've
been
working
towards
thanks
to
the
work
that
Jennifer
Smith
and
our
Natasha
who's
kneading.
The
project
had
put
into
that.
D
One
area
that
continues
to
require
specific
attention
from
our
comprehensive
planning
section
as
well
as
urban
designer
research,
are
the
special
general
Land
Use
Plan
studies
that
glup
studies,
the
board
recalls.
We
just
completed
one
for
the
Washington
Kirkwood
area,
very
complex
study
involving
hundreds
of
staff,
hours
and
resources.
We
have
three
studies
that
are
that
are
underway
that
should
be
completed
to
the
spring
or
early
summer,
and
we
have
a
third,
the
Shirlington
village
request
that
came
in
in
December
from
the
Federal
Realty
investment
trust.
D
The
board
members
may
see
some
communication
from
the
Shirlington
civic
association
who's
very
supportive
of
this
effort.
But
again,
the
special
general
ents
plan
require
a
lot
of
staff
attention
and
time,
and
it's
in
the
efforts
that
we
focus
on
really
stem
from
the
policy
guidance
that
the
county
board
gave
us
a
number
of
years
ago.
D
They're,
very
exhaustive,
very
extensive
and
the
applications
really
require
that
so
I
think
stepping
back
and
looking
at
both
the
timing,
and
maybe
even
the
cost
of
these
applications
might
be
a
good
thing.
Comprehensive
plan
amendments,
our
staff.
We
were
working
with
DPR
and
des
on
the
public
spaces
master
plan
and
the
master
transportation
plan,
which
is
the
bicycle
element
that
we'll
be
moving
forward
later
this
year
and
certainly
involving
lrpc
in
the
planning
commission.
D
The
newest
initiative,
and
certainly
one
that's
extremely
important-
is
the
child
care
initiative
with
the
completion
of
the
draft
child
care
and
efficient
action
plan
and
the
public
meetings
recently
we're
anticipating
the
board
will
give
us
further
guidance
on
our
priorities.
Again,
we
now
have
staff
in
place,
Kimberly
vaca,
who
will
be
serving
in
that
role
and
so
we're
very
anxious
to
get
started
with
that
during
2018.
D
Where
we'll
be
looking
at
how
we
can
provide
some
increased
flexibility,
if
you
will
to
end
some
ability
to
enable
new
construction
in
context
with
a
surrounding
neighborhood
in
these
HDD
areas
that
that
have
been
recognized
and
also
through
that
process,
identifying
what
incentives
we
can
put
in
place,
whether
from
a
use,
regulatory
or
otherwise,
that
might
ensure
that
we
can
preserve
affordability
but
also
increase
both
affordable
and
other
units
to
make
it
attractive
to
achieve
the
objectives
of
the
affordable
housing
master
plan.
A
new
element
that
we've
introduced
will
look
at
two
family
dwellings.
D
Bringing
some
recommendations
possible.
Zoning
ordinance
amendments
forward
from
that
we
have
some
definitions
to
deal
with
in
terms
of
the
neighborhood
form
based
code,
as
well
as
in
the
zoning
ordinance
to
implement
the
affordable
housing
master
plan,
how
we
define
low
and
moderate
income
households
and,
lastly,
the
board.
D
D
We've
recognized
that
we
need
to
take
a
hard
look
at
the
process
in
Arlington
working
with
the
Planning
Commission.
The
zoning
committee
to
study
certain
types
of
zoning
ordinance
amendments
that
might
stem
from
clear
policy
guidance
that
the
County
Board
gives
us,
and
possibly
from
legislative
amendments
at
the
state
level
or
other
actions
where
we
should
be
able
to
address
a
number
of
zoning
Ward's
amendments
in
a
more
nimble
or
quick
way.
If
I
could
and
some
of
those
could
involve
transfer
of
development
rights.
You
know
that
the
county
attorney
has
advised
us.
D
We
should
amend
that
section.
The
state
legislature
is
looking
at
telecom
amendments
and
we're
anticipating
some
changes
there
to
catch
up
with
the
changing
state
legislation.
The
board
adopted
the
residential
parking
requirements
earlier
last
year
and
addressing
flexibility
at
the
board's
site
plan
special
exception
approval
level,
particularly
in
the
RC
district,
are
three
types
of
examples
of
zone
code
amendments
that
we
should
work
on
in
a
different,
different
manner.
D
We've
discussed
this
with
with
zoko
very
briefly
and
we're
going
to
begin
to
bring
together
a
plan,
an
approach,
if
you
will
later
this
year,
to
carry
those
out
one
of
the
elements
that
this
is.
That
is
important
to
note
that
it's
in
our
zoning
study
and
amendments
and
that's
dealing
with
the
s3a
zoning
districts,
the
second
phase,
if
you
recall
that
the
county
board
approved
the
ability
for
parking
and
dimensional
amendments
for
EPS
facilities.
Now
we
need
to
come
back
and
look
at
that
for
other
community
facilities.
D
This
is
an
outgrowth
in
part
of
the
community
facilities
study
to
ensure
what
limited
land
resources
we
have
some
flexibility
to
ensure
that
can
balance
the
need
for
community
facilities,
as
well
as
preserve
public
spaces
and
relate
well
to
surrounding
neighborhoods.
So
we
are
going
to
complete
that
work.
It
probably
won't
begin
until
later
in
2018,
given
the
other
elements
of
our
work
program
just
to
go
through
several
other
elements:
Columbia
Pike
we're
going
to
continue
to
implement
the
plan,
focus
on
form
based
code
applications.
D
We're
also,
you
need
to
work
with
je
FAC,
the
joint
facility,
Advisory
Committee
gently,
convened
by
this
board,
and
certainly
the
Arlington
Public
School
Board.
As
you
know,
our
office
will
be
providing
staff
support
for
that
effort.
We've
been
working
closely
with
the
two
chairs,
which
are
here
which
are
here
tonight,
to
provide
both
administrative
and
professional
support,
we'll
be
looking
at
a
number
of
projects,
including
phase
3
of
the
buck
property
working
with
des
and
facilities
it'll
be
important
that
we
continue
to
come
back
and
talk
about
our
demographic
forecasting
and
student
enrollments.
D
Regarding
that
that
issue,
we're
also
working
with
lrpc
to
develop
a
new
policy
for
the
22:32
determination,
that's
required
for
siting
public
facilities
and
will
shortly
be
engaging
once
again
with
lrpc
and
the
Planning
Commission
reporting
back
to
the
manager
in
the
board.
With
that
new
policy,
our
planning
with
jbg
and
the
Crystal
City
Civic
Association,
particularly
on
block
G.
The
board
will
see
one
of
the
first
site
plans
in
your
Saturday
as
part
of
your
Saturday
at
gen,
we'll
be
continuing
to
work
to
implement
the
Crystal
City
sector
plan.
D
I've
highlighted
just
briefly:
I
won't
go
through
all
of
these,
but
you
can
see
that
there
are
12
site
plans,
special
exception
applications,
five
that
are
currently
under
review
again.
You'll
see
the
first
of
these,
the
Crystal
City
Central
District
Phase
two
plan
in
February.
At
your
board
meeting
again,
we
had
11th
and
Vermont
plan
as
well
working
at
the
Red
Cross
site,
the
Crystal
City
Central,
District
phase,
1
plan
and
certainly
Virginia
hospital.
These
are
active
site
plans.
D
One
thing
that
we're
about
to
bring
forward
to
the
county
manager
in
March
is
our
annual
review
and
update
of
the
standard,
4.1
administrative
regulations
and
standards
site
plan
conditions.
These
are
critical
there
elements
of
all
the
site
plans
that
you
see
and
the
current
planning
staff
is
completing
work
with
other
departments
on
that
we've
reviewed
these
with
nei
up
and
we're
reviewing
them
with
the
site
plan
review
committee
shortly.
D
For
several
years
now,
we've
been
customizing
conditions,
they're,
normally
associated
with
site
plans,
special
exception
applications
we're
down
to
about
34
conditions.
Many
of
those
conditions
stipulate
process,
seizures
and
various
types
of
administrative
elements.
We
think
we
can
modify
that
and
tailor
that
better
to
serve
future
ApS
facilities.
It
will
be
reporting
that
to
the
manager
and
the
board
in
the
in
the
months
to
come
and
also
how
we
deal
with
relocatable
facilities.
D
If
you
recall,
last
summer,
we
had
six
or
seven
interior
improvements
that
relocatable
x',
how
we
manage
that
and
ensure
that
we
can
review
and
approve
the
recommend.
Approval
of
those
in
a
timely
fashion
is
something
that
will
be
be
looking
at.
We
process
well
over
two
hundred
nearly
three
hundred
administrative
change.
Applications
that
relate
to
site
plan
use
permits,
inform
based
code
projects.
We
do
that
very
carefully
working
with
the
Zoning
Administrator
and
that's
a
major
part
of
the
work
that
Chris
Kreider
and
his
staff
do
with
our
site
plan
team.
D
Continuing
to
provide
professional
administrative
support
to
the
Planning
Commission
also
continues
to
be
a
high
priority
for
the
staff,
ensuring
that
we
can
that
we
examine
how
we
focus
on
those
services.
I
think
will
be
important
again
continuing
in
2018
just
one
example
that
that
we'll
be
pursuing
I
think
in
April
we
have
been
reviewing
how
we
coordinate
and
facilitate
public
notice,
one
of
the
forms
of
public
notice.
We
provide
our
letters
to
civic
associations
regarding
applications.
D
D
Again
we
have
a
work
program
that
we
provided
to
the
SPRC
chair
for
completing
the
SBR
SPRC
operating
guide,
which
we
discussed
with
the
county
board
in
in
December
at
your
joint
work
session.
With
the
Planning
Commission,
we
expect
to
have
that
work
done
by
June
and
will
be
writing
updates
on
that.
As
we
proceed
over
the
next
three
or
four
months,
so
we
will
finally
complete
that
important
effort
with
the
Planning
Commission
in
terms
of
APs
parting
public
schools
and
the
public
facility
review
committee.
D
D
One
site
plan
reviews
all
the
facade
and
landscape
plan
reviews
that
that
we
conduct
or
through
Chris's
office,
you
may
recall,
I-
think
we
reported
in
managers
notes
that
we
reinvented
the
landscape
plan
review
process
to
create
a
better
and
more
clear
and
comprehensive
approach
to
that
with
the
various
landscape
design
professionals
during
the
course
of
last
year,
and
we're
continually
look
at
opportunities
to
do
that.
We
support
form
based
code
application
review
and
certainly
again,
the
administrative
application
review
or
key
part
of
our
staff
that
are
registered
architects
and
registered
landscape
architects.
D
All
the
site,
inspections,
post,
4.1
site
plan
approval
are
performed
by
Chris
and
his
staff
and
again
the
interdivisional
inner
part
will
support
that.
Our
design
provides
on
a
number
of
fronts
is
just
very
important
to
support
many
other
projects,
including
capital
projects
in
Arlington
County,
and
that
some
of
that
support
includes
landscape
standards.
I
think
we
reported
to
the
board
that
we
we
revised
the
Department
of
Community
Planning
housing
developments,
landscape,
stand
a
report
or
continue
to
work
with
the
urban
forester
on
the
county
standards
and
hopefully
will
complete
that
later
this
year.
D
So,
there's
a
wide
range
of
projects,
as
you
can
see
for
special
glup
studies
to
the
block
plans
where
Chris
and
his
staff
play
a
critical
role
and,
lastly,
I
wanted
to
talk
about
our
research
team.
As
you
know,
the
county
plays
a
lead
demographic
forecasting
role
for
for
our
community
and
our
two
staff
members
do
an
outstanding
job.
We've
been
working
very
closely
with
Arlington
Public
Schools
on
student
enrollment
and
projections.
D
D
We're
now
looking
at
a
document
that,
for
probably
20
years
or
more,
has
been
a
staple
of
work
produced
by
our
demographic
staff
and
that's
the
2018
or
Arlington
County
profile.
It
has
been
a
document,
a
paper
document
and
we
recently
had
a
focus
group
with
several
departments
to
think
about
how
we
can
reinvent
that
and
make
it
as
much
as
strategic
as
as
possible,
and
so
we'll
be
reporting
more
on
that
in
the
months
ahead.
We
continue
to
work
with
Metropolitan
Washington
Council
of
Governments
on
the
forecasting
we're
about
to
enter
around
9.1
I.
D
Think
the
most
important
effort
will
begin
this
year.
You
know,
move
on
to
2020
is
beginning
to
organize
for
the
US
census.
This
involves
significant
staff
resources
and
if
you
were
here
for
2010,
you
know
there
were
significant
community
involvement,
ensure
we
had
a
complete
count,
one
of
the
important
efforts
that
we've
done-
and
this
is
something
very
new
and
they
long
overdue-
that
our
staff
took
a
lead,
convening
I'm
interdepartmental
team
with
Public,
Safety
and
other
county
agencies.
D
To
begin
to
prepare
our
first
multifamily
address
file,
we
are
about
80
to
85
percent,
complete
on
that
we're
hoping
to
complete
that
in
March.
For
the
first
time
we
will
have
a
data
file
that
will
support
our
sense
is
taking
and
our
complete
count
efforts
but
most
importantly,
provide
resources
for
public
safety,
community
engagement
and
outreach,
and
it's
a
great
achievement,
I
think
and
our
research
staff
loved
the
lead
and
facilitated.
That
effort
will
continue,
update
our
GIS
maps,
I
think
to
other
areas
that
our
staff
have
done.
D
A
really
outstanding
job
in
we
facilitate
the
formation
of
the
Northern
Virginia
DMV
tomography.
Network.
We
bring
together
demographers
from
all
the
communities
in
Northern
Virginia
to
focus
on
how
we
can
improve
our
forecasting
and
population
estimates
and
so
on,
and
that
also
ties
in
with
the
Weldon
Cooper
Center
annual
reports
that
come
through
the
Commonwealth
and
University
of
Virginia
and
through
those
efforts,
we've
made
great
strides
in
supporting
Weldon
Cooper
and
some
modifications
to
their
forecasting
efforts
that
we'll
see
in
the
future.
D
D
But
in
addition
to
that
this
year,
we've
included
a
summary
of
projects
that
currently
aren't
in
our
work
program
but
have
been
recommended
for
future
study
or
consideration
by
a
number
of
sources
and
the
source
of
of
these
come
from
three
areas.
One
at
the
work
session,
the
Planning
Commission
had
with
the
County
Board
December
planning
commissioners
recommended
a
number
of
these
projects
that
come
forward.
Many
of
those
are
part
of
this
list.
D
The
5-year
update
of
the
of
the
county's
comprehensive
plan
identifies
a
number
of
recommendations
from
the
Planning
Commission
as
well,
so
we've
used
those
sources
in
large
part
to
compile
future
planning
projects
that
you
may
want
to
discuss
tonight
and,
lastly,
future
Zoning
projects
that
also
stem
from
work
that
zoko
has
been
doing
through
Commissioner
Guerin,
as
well
as
from
a
number
of
other
sources
that
have
been
discussed
in
past
work
program
development.
So,
with
that
chair,
crystal
I'll,
stop
and
again
I
can
refer
the
more
detailed
sections
of
the
report.
A
Thank
you
I
think
that
slide
14
really
says
it
all
in
terms
of
number
of
projects
that
will
be
underway.
Colleagues,
I'm,
actually
gonna
exercise
my
prerogative
his
chair
and
asked
the
first
question
before
we
launch
in
because
I
think
it
may
help
in
framing
some
of
the
trade-offs
conversation
later
on
I'm,
very
pleased
to
see
a
zoning
ordinance
amendment
process
for
established
policy
guidance
and
code
changes
as
a
kind
of
way
of
thinking.
A
I
wonder
if
we
can
maybe
give
it
a
slightly
easier
name
or
an
acronym,
whether
we
call
it
Zeo
a
limited
or
zoning
ordinance.
Amendment
fast-track
or
something
like
that,
but
I
know,
there's
a
real
interest,
certainly
on
all
my
part
and
I.
Think
for
a
number
of
my
colleagues
to
be
able
to,
hopefully
in
partnership
with
the
Planning
Commission,
look
to
do
things
more
effectively
and
I
think
we
have
a
little
bit
of
precedent
last
year
when
we
sought
to
act
to
allow
outdoor
facility
uses
in
unplanned
areas
to
address
the
more
urgent
need.
A
So
I
wanted
to
see
if
I
could
maybe
establish
a
little
bit
more
of
a
common
understanding
about
what
the
opportunity
is
here
and
maybe
ask
a
little
bit
to
begin
to
get
a
sense
of
sort
of
what
the
threshold
is
for
established
policy
guidance
I.
Think
it's
a
little
bit
of
a.
We
know
it
when
we
see
it,
but
is
it
your
sense
that
you
know
when
things
are
brought
perhaps
to
the
board
by
petition
come
forward
to
the
Planning
Commission
or
others?
Where
is
that
with
the
sort
of
threshold
nature?
D
A
Think
that's
very
helpful,
actually
and
I
think
to
some
extent
the
the
residential
parking
flexibilities
and
the
RC
districts
is
sort
of
a
perfect
example,
because
that
came
out
of
an
existing
board
deliberation,
in
fact
that
desire
to
follow
up
on
the
RC
districts.
What
about,
for
example,
I
know?
A
number
of
us
have
been
interested
in
this
idea
of
the
two
family
dwellings
non-conforming
to
family
dwellings.
A
D
But
again,
in
many
cases,
as
I've
said,
the
the
drafting
of
the
code
is
not
the
challenging
part.
It
is
really
ensuring
that
the
right
level
of
engagements
occurs
and
I
think
we
can
develop
a
process
with
the
Planning
Commission
to
do
that.
There
now
to
be
really
the
first
step
for
us
to
come
up
with
that
effort.
If.
E
I
can
follow
up
madam
chair,
so
mr.
Duffy,
just
so
I'm
understanding
of
that
last
example
that
chair
crystal
brought
up
aside
from
the
board
determining
that
it
that
it
should
take
a
higher
level
of
priority
within
the
affordable
master,
affordable
housing
master
plan.
Can
you
give
us
a
sense
of
how
difficult
you
think
it
is
from
a
policy
perspective
to
actually
provide
an
address
for
the
issue
as
it
is
emerged
for
us
before
us?
I'll
just
be
very
clear.
E
D
When
I,
when
I
talk
about
prioritizing,
should
we
focus
more
attention
to
that
zoning
issue
rather
than
the
a
do
you
issue
I
think
getting
some
direction
from
the
Borden
areas
like.
That
would
be
very
helpful
because
you
did
give
us
some
direction
to
come
back
with
the
with
the
freestanding
ad
you
and
the
dimensional
requirements
and
testing
and,
and
that
will
require
some
work.
D
A
F
Thank
you
I'm
glad
that
we're
leading
off
with
this
topic,
because
I
think
it
is
very
important
that
we
provide
incentives
not
just
for
owners
of
these
duplexes
but
frankly
for
landlords,
because
a
lot
of
these
a
lot
of
these
duplexes
are
renter
occupied
and
it's
my
view
that,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
incentivize
renovation,
rehabilitation
and
so
forth
that
it's
going
to
be
better
for
the
for
the
folks
who
live
there
as
well
as
better
for
those
communities,
so
one
question:
I
do
have
mr.
Duffy
and
I
appreciated
your
you're.
F
Trying
to
teeing
up.
You
know:
do
we
do
we
prioritize
this
versus
the
freestanding
ad
you
in
the
back?
It
would
be
my
perspective
just
right
off
the
cuff,
since
you
have
you
teed
it
up.
My
answer
would
be
yes,
because
the
structures
are
there.
Now
the
neighbors,
the
neighborhood
nose
the
nose
it's
an
it's
more
of
a
known,
quantity
and
I.
Think
it's
easier
gonna
be
easier
to
work
with
well.
F
Implementation
to
family
dwellings
is
the
caption,
but
then
the
sentence
says
this
will
respond
to
county
board
and
Planning
Commission
interest
in
addressing
non-conforming
issues
in
one
and
two
family
dwelling
zoning
districts
and
then
I'm
just
wondering
how
can
we
may
or
or
marry
up
you
know
the
one
family
to
the
two
family
because
on
another
slide,
I
think
on
the
big,
the
big,
comprehensive
slide,
where
you
list
everything.
What
was
it
slide?
15?
Maybe.
G
Evening,
thank
you.
Yes,
as
mr.
Duffy
said,
we
will
need
to
scope
this
out,
but
we
do
see
alignment
with
the
housing
conservation
districts.
You
may
some
of
the
properties
within
the
housing
conservation
district
have
two
family
dwellings,
so
as
we're
looking
at
how
they
can
contribute
to
the
housing
servation
district,
there
may
be
issues
there,
non-conforming
issues.
G
So
that's
why
we're
elevating,
after
some
conversations
and
considerations
by
Planning
Commission
in
this
board,
elevating
the
two
family
dwelling
district
study
this
year,
because
we
think
that
there's
some
alignment,
but
this
piece
of
it
starts
to
look
in
the
our
zone,
like
specifically
the
r27
zoning
district.
There
is
some
non-conforming
issues
for
the
semi-detached
and
the
duplex
in
those
districts,
but
we
know
in
those
districts
there
are
some
one:
family,
housing,
that's
occurring
there.
G
So
while
this
is
labeled
to
family-
and
we
think
the
majority
of
the
work
would
be
focused
on
two
family
dwellings
in
those
kinds
of
areas,
there
probably
needs
to
be
a
component
of
the
scope
that
looks
at
one
family
non-conforming
issues
as
well.
So
that's
why
the
detailed
paragraph
recognizes
that
you
know
I
think
we
need
to
spend
a
little
bit
of
time
to
scope
this
out,
but
we
can
certainly
take
the
feedback
to
you
know.
A
B
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something
for
my
myself
because
we're
talking
about
these
specific
changes
which
are
which
are
great,
and
then
you
also
talked
about
simply
looking
at
how
we
do
the
process
in
general.
I
think
are
you
thinking?
Are
these
two
different
things?
In
other
words,
there's
one
effort
to
try
and
fix
the
process
in
general,
and
then
we
have
all
the
specifics.
So
the
question
is
this
sort
of
feels
chicken-and-egg,
II
well,.
A
D
We
took
it
away,
we
took
it
out
of
that
category
and
but
you're
right
board.
Member
Garvey.
We
need
to
work
with
the
Commission
to
have
a
standard
procedure
to
work
through
these,
so
that
we
can
the
board
can
say
fine,
that's
how
we
should
proceed
and
then
we'll
be
in
a
better
position
to
address
these
in
the
future
as
well,
which.
B
Is
great-
and
that
sounds
to
me,
like
a
good,
a
good
thing
to
do
and
I
think
it
can
make
your
work
more
efficient
and
our
work
more
efficient?
What's
your
timeline
for
that,
in
other
words,
are
you
thinking
of
doing
that
concurrently?
Is
that
something
you're
just
hoping
to
do,
while
we
figure
out
these
other
ones,
while
we're
going
that
I
was
just
wondering
how
you're
thinking
of
approaching
it
well.
D
We're
we
thought
this
might
be
a
priority
for
the
board
to
look
at
this,
and
so
just
as
it's
clear
that
you
want
us
to
scope
out
how
will
approach
the
two-family,
duplex
non-conforming
question.
We're
gonna
need
to
work
with
zoko
zoning
committee
of
the
Planning
Commission
over
the
next
several
months,
so
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
get
back
with
you
on
both
of
those
shortly
after
the
budget
is
considered
in
in
April.
So
in
the
spring,
I
think
we
can
come
back
report
on
those
to
you.
Thank.
B
D
B
D
We
can
try
just
one
thing,
just
the
board.
We
were
fortunate
last
year
from
the
board
to
give
us
and
who
was
so.
She
had
planned
her
position
to
work
both
on
childcare
on
on
zoning
work.
So
we
now
have
that
position
filled
we're
really
pleased
with
the
candidate
we
hired
and,
secondly,
we're
getting
close
with
a
new
zoning
coordinator.
A
H
Thank
you
and
I'm
gonna.
Be
very
brief.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
So
I
just
wanted
to
pile
on
essentially
to
what
you
heard
from
my
colleagues,
but
to
underscore
that
you
know
I'm
looking
at
slide
29
here
in
the
deck
that
addresses
this
idea
and
and
and
frankly,
rather
than
a
semantics.
Sometimes
matters
rather
than
call
it
fast-track
I
would
recommend.
H
D
Agree
and
as
the
board
knows,
we
sometimes
reinvent
process
and
procedures
all
the
time
to
work
more
efficiently
effectively.
This
will
be
one
that
I
think's
important
for
staff
and
the
Commission
to
work
on
and
in
terms
of
the
the
low
overhead
I'm,
really
confident
that
our
professional
staff
will
be
able
to
take
the
lion's
share
of
this
and
move
forward
with
it,
particularly
since
you've,
given
this
this
position
last
year,
so
more
to
come
in.
E
Just
the
last
one
on
this
particular
issue,
because
I
fully
understand
everything
the
year,
you're
telling
us
about
scoping
and
wanting
to
do
it
right.
But
when
you're
dealing
with
specific
cases,
I'm
wondering-
and
please
just
give
me
your
frank
assessment
as
to
the
wisdom
of
figuring
out
whether
or
not
the
use
of
special
exception
use
permits,
would
be
an
appropriate
way
to
deal
with
a
specific
circumstance
while
at
the
same
time
continuing
the
work
on
scoping.
E
A
As
others
gear
up
to
ask
questions
on
other
topics,
speaking
of
things
that
we
might
be
able
to
look
to
reduce
or
pull
off
the
plate,
I
was
really
intrigued.
Mr.
Duffy,
to
hear
you
that
you
may
come
back
to
us
to
revisit
the
guidance
on
special
glup
studies,
I
think
we've
all
having
just
lived
through
a
couple
either
as
board
members
or
Planning
Commission
chairs
have
the
opportunity
to
really
see
exactly
how
big
of
a
staff
undertaking
those
are
and
I
would
be
interested
I'm
actually
suspecting.
A
D
And
we
have
done
some
work
on
that
and
our
director
we've
talked
with
Claude
about
that
I
think
we
had
some
early
discussion
with
the
manager
as
well.
A
special
glove
study
is
merely
a
request
filed
by
an
applicant,
a
correspondence.
There
is
a
charge.
There
is
a
fee
associated
with
it.
It's
often
accompanied
by
a
change
for
zoning
as
well
as
there
is
a
fee
associated
with
des
review.
D
We
think
if,
if
we
are,
if
we're
enabled
to
do
it
by
the
Commonwealth
on
our
own
Orange
zoning
regulations,
finding
ways
to
recapture
that
is
one
thing.
But
to
should
should
there
be
a
two-part
process
with
this,
whereby
there's
a
decision
made
before
we
get
to
scoping
it
out
whether
this
is
a
change
that
that
that
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
board
want
us
to
proceed
with.
D
If
you
recall,
when
the
special
glup
study
process
was
developed
a
number
of
years
ago,
we
were
receiving
applications
for
site
plan
special
exception
special
gallopping
Saul,
woven
into
one.
The
board
made
a
decision
to
decouple
those
focus
on
the
policy
question
first
and
then
on
the
details
with
a
site
plan.
But
again
these
cases
are
becoming
pretty
significant.
I
mentioned
that
we'll
see
one
in
Shirlington.
D
This
is
the
parking
lot.
That's
part
of
the
Federal
Realty
investment
trust
Holdings
there
and
there's
great
interest
from
the
community
that
could
quickly
become
while
it
may
be
very
well
warranted,
could
quickly
become
a
small
area
plan
and
that's
what
we
want
to
revisit
and
come
back
to
the
board,
with
some
recommendations
for.
A
F
In
terms
of
what
you're
going
to
have
room
for
and
what
you
might
envision,
that's
not
explicitly
referenced
mr.
Duffy
just
a
couple
of
items,
the
Maywood
historic
guidelines.
So,
as
you
know,
Joan
Lawrence
and
H
ALR
B
has
taken
the
initiative
to
start
a
community
process
that
is
well
underway
and
and
so
far
well
received
with
the
Maywood
community
about
revisiting
how
the
how
the
historic
guidelines
work
in
particular
streamlining.
So
we
take
take
some
things
from
you
know
from
having
it
from
the
h
al
RB
and
allow
the
decisions
to
be
made
administratively.
D
On
the
on
the
the
may
would
study,
we
work
very
closely
with
the
historic
preservation
staff
and
we've
done
a
number
of
things,
with
assistance
from
Chris
Kreider,
his
staff
and
the
architectural
staff.
If
there's
a
need
to
provide
some
support
there,
we
certainly
will
consider
that
Jen.
You
want
to
talk
about
the
pike
so.
G
For
Columbia
Pike
we're,
certainly
monitoring
the
work
that
AED
is,
is
undertaking
and
we'll
wait
to
see
what
the
results
of
that
are.
I.
Think
what
you're
seeing
in
this
body
of
work
is
that
you
know
we're
at
capacity.
So
if
there
are
next
steps
that
we
may
need
to
handle,
you
know
maybe
zoning
ordinance
amendments
or
any
kind
of
planning
work.
We
would
have
to
prioritize
that,
and
we
would
do
that.
G
F
I'm,
just
hoping,
and
who
knows
what
the
studies
going
to
show
if
it's
just
gonna
be
a
statistical
compendium
or
if
it
actually
might
provoke
some
new
ideas,
for
you
know,
different
development
zones
or
land
uses
or
conceivably
adjustments
of
the
glop
who
knows
I
just
I
just
want
us
to
be
able
to
anticipate
and
be
nimble
enough
to
to.
You
know
to
embrace
it,
to
the
extent
that
we
can't
to
bring
the
pike
up.
D
Was
Jenn
smith
indicated?
You
know
we
are
engaged
with
aad
and
the
pike
on
the
outcome
of
that
study.
It
is
it
progresses
and
so
I
think
we
can
be
strategic
enough
to
look
for
those
opportunities
and
respond.
We
build
certainly
some
capacity
in
our
work
program
to
be
able
to
tackle
things
Yeah
right.
F
And
and
one
other
item
just
for
the
manager,
mr.
manager,
in
our
in
the
open
data
discussion
that
we
had
a
week
or
two
ago,
you
indicated
that
you
hope
to
have
somebody
in
each
of
the
departments
to
kind
of
spearhead
the
open
data
initiative
from
their
perspective
and
always
be
looking
at
things
to
you
know,
to
push
out
in
a
more
manipulative
and
interactive
fashion,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
C
PhD
had
identified
the
mastermind
for
that.
F
D
Great
just
just
to
respond
I
noted
that
the
work
that
our
staff
is
doing
to
reinvent
this
profile
report,
the
board
members
have
seen
that
document,
which
is
an
annual
publication
in
keeping
with
the
managers
priority
for
the
the
data
portal.
We
need
to
reinvent
that
and
again
we're
working
with
a
number
of
departments
across
the
organization
we
met
with
them.
Last
Friday
had
a
focus
group
session.
D
F
B
D
You
board,
member
again
for
your
your
commitment
to
address
that
and
we
have
followed
up.
They
are
now
looking
the
more
localized
approach
to
forecasting
to
take
an
account.
The
different
factors
that
differentiate
Northern
Virginia,
for
maybe
other
parts
of
the
Commonwealth,
will
be
reporting
back
on
that,
and
so
we
were
in
a
we're
in
a
much
better
position.
Now,
with
Weldon
Cooper
and
they've,
been
very
responsive,
I,
think
and
I
know
the
board
has
reached
out
and
made
that
a
priority,
so
I
think
is
we
get
ready
for
their
next
report.
H
About
I
actually
want
to
ask
about
Lee
highway.
Before
we
go
to
J
Fang,
we
could
ask
ginger
what
she
cares
about
most
we'll
put
her
on
the
spot,
so
I,
real,
quick
on
Lee
Highway
I,
just
want
to
understand,
because
I
actually
thought
that
this
was
supposed
to
start
in
this
fiscal
year,
and
so
it's
actually
really
not
gonna
get
kicked
off
til
next
fiscal
year
or
we're
coming
in
late
in
this
year
bottom
line
fiscal
year,
calendar
years,
I,
actually
thought
that
we
would
be
further
along
by
now
than
where
we
are
so.
H
G
As
mr.
Duffy
said
that
we
issued
an
RFP,
we
have
always
said
that
we
needed
consultant
effort,
so
you
issued
an
RFP
yesterday
and
we
will
be
going
through
a
hiring
process,
and
so
at
this
point
we
anticipate
that
by
the
time
we
get
through
that
and
have
a
contract,
it
would
be
the
spring
timeframe,
and
you
know
without
completing
that
process,
it's
hard
to
say
absolutely
that
you
know
it
a
firm
timeframe.
G
We
did
have
some
staffing
resources
changed
last
year,
so
that
is
really
mostly
the
and
why
we
are
more
delayed
than
where
we
thought
we
were
going
to
be.
We
have
indicated
to
some
folks
with
the
Lee
Highway
Alliance
with
our
schedule,
and
we
will
continue
to
update
the
community
via
the
web
and
other
mechanisms.
H
D
H
G
Would
be
doing
that
in
the
spring
we
would
be
announcing
the
charge
in
the
May
time
frame.
We
are
expecting
to
establish
a
fairly
large
group.
We've
got
14
different
civic
associations
along
Lee
Highway,
different
Commission's
that
need
to
be
part
of
this
and
different
housing
business
owners
developers.
G
We
are
looking
to
include
some
at-large
members,
and
so
we
will
be
interested
in
promoting
this
community
forum,
which
is
the
group
that
we
are
talking
about
and
when
that
gets
announced,
having
an
open
application
period
for
some
at-large
members
to
submit
an
application.
That
would
then
be
ready
to
fold
into
the
group
when
we're
ready
to
launch
the
community
meetings
right.
H
Well,
I
definitely
appreciate
all
of
the
work
that
you're
doing
to
move
this
along
I
will
say
that
I've
heard
from
from
several
folks
sort
of
a
little
bit
of
of
angst.
As
you
know,
the
original
intent
here
was
to
really
capture
the
momentum
that
the
Lee
Highway
Alliance
had
created,
and
there
efforts
and
I
would
encourage.
H
You
I
think
that,
to
the
extent
that
we
could
get
that
application
process
up
and
out
there
and
allow
members
of
the
community
to
apply
and
get
on
with
making
those
appointments,
I
think
that
might
be
a
step
that
we
could
take.
That
is
not
necessarily
contingent
on
the
consultant
or
the
or
the
rest
of
it,
and
in
that
way
you
we
try
to
recap
folks
some
certainty
that
this
process
actually
really
is
coming
to
fruition.
We.
E
I
could
just
add
a
brief
comment
because
I
appreciate
member
guts,
all's
concerns
which
I
know
very
well
reflect
the
sentiment.
That's
out
there
on
the
street.
I
just
want
to
underscore,
even
though
Miss
Smith
was
unassuming
about
this,
we
lost
the
principal
planner
who
was
devoted
to
this
project.
Someone
who
was
very
difficult
to
replace
within
the
organization
took
a
long
time
to
find
someone
suitably
qualified
to
fill
the
role.
E
We
think
we
have
done
that
so
that
really
the
loss
of
momentum
is
not
due
to
a
shift
in
priorities,
but
the
unavoidable
circumstance
of
someone
deigning
to
do
something
better
for
their
own
lives.
But
I
will
say
that
staff
has
done
a
great
job
of
keeping
me
as
the
designated
liaison
to
this
effort
in
the
loop.
The
entire
step
of
the
way,
and
even
though
what
may
be
perceived
as
a
loss
of
momentum
from
the
community
was
never
really
internalized
in
the
way
staff
viewed
it.
So
this
is
moving
with
with
all
due
haste.
A
H
H
D
Have
a
principal
planner
position,
Leonard
that
we
have
advertised
for
on
Friday
HR,
Human
Resources
should
provide
us
with
with
a
list
of
qualified
candidates
and
then
we'll
begin
interview
process.
My
goal
is
to
do
everything
possible
to
get
that
stat
person
on
by
the
end
of
March,
if
at
all
possible
at
least
conclude
the
interview
process
as
well
as
have
hopefully
finalized
a
commitment
at
that
point
and
and
then
we'll
be.
Finally,
full
staff
with
with
J
factor.
H
All
right
and
then
and
the
slide
here
this
the
second
bullet
about
the
the
work
program
for
J
fact.
That
is
something
that
I
just
want
to
understand.
How
that
fits
in.
That's
something
that
we
will
the
the
2x2
Leadership
Committee
is
going
to
be
looking
at
or
how
does
what
is
the
role
between,
with,
with
this
board
the
school
board
and
the
the
J
fact
chairs?
How
does
that
fit
in
to
do
what
do
your
work
plan.
D
C
The
in
ginger
and
Greg
can
feel
free
to
correct
me
and
also
Katy
who
participated
in
this
last
year.
The
guidance
comes
from
the
2
by
2
group
and
through
mutual
conversations
between
the
two
county
board
members
and
school
board
members,
and
if
you
recall,
420
most
of
2017,
the
focus
was
on
some
very
specific
kinds
of
tasks.
C
As
far
as
what's
next,
we've
offered
some
suggestions
here
and
I
think
the
suggestions
are
in
in
form
of
focusing
on
the
demographic
work
and
then
also
the
getting
of
briefing
on
Phase
three
beyond
that,
there
isn't
anything
specific
that
we're
recommending,
so
that
really
use
some
discretion
to
the
board.
Members
on
that.
A
Having
served
as
the
liaison
last
year,
I,
you
know
I.
We
have
a
little
bit
of
a
circular
challenge
here,
insofar
as
it's
hard
for
the
J
fact
to
shape
its
work
plan
without
good
staff,
guidance
and
I
think
it
can
be
hard
to
I'm
speculating
here,
but
it
can
be
hard
to
designate
the
staff
resources
until
you
know
what
the
work
plan
is.
A
But
what
is
certainly
the
case
is
I
know:
there's
been
a
strong
interest
in
among
the
J
fax
liaisons,
as
well
as
I
believe
the
leadership
of
the
Commission
itself
in
sketching
out
a
long-range
planning
exercise,
and
so
I
would
just
associate
myself
with
mr.
Rochelle's
comments.
I
think
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there
is
the
I
think
mr.
A
afew
described
it
well
earlier,
when
you
said
it's
professional
as
well
as
administrative
support
to
the
J
fact
that
there
are
the
resources
prioritized
to
help
them
both
scope
out
that
work
plan
and
then
carry
forward
on
it.
You
know
mr.
Getchell
I've
talked
about
this
there's.
You
know
I
find
myself
almost
wanting
something
like
a
deliverable
right
and
in
some
ways.
D
B
Isn't
a
finer
point,
it's
probably
even
a
broader
one,
it'll
like
mr.
Duffy
to
expound
a
little
bit
if
he
wants
I
mean
in
talking
to
the
J
fact
chairs.
He
understand
as
they
they
feel
like.
They'll
have
enough
support
to
do
the
specific
one-offs
that
we've
been
doing,
but
they
are.
Their
task
is
to
do
the
ole.
B
It's
the
demographics
and
their
sense
is
that
with
the
staff
that
it
seems
to
be
their
plan
to
have
this
year,
they
won't
be
able
to
do
that,
which
is
their
the
work
that
we've
sort
of
tasked
them
to
do,
and
I'll
just
throw
in
another
issue.
That
I
think
we
need
to
keep
in
mind
is
I
understand.
The
school
system
has
got
its
own
planning
group
started
now.
They've
got
some
professional
people
doing
their
own
planning
right.
This
is
what
I've
been
doing
since
the
case.
They.
D
Have
hired
a
new
professional
to
be
our
counterpart
on
the
demographic
forecasting
side
and
another
planner
too,
to
assist
with
their
facilities
planning?
We
certainly
have
worked
with
both
of
those
individuals
since
they've
come
on
board.
I.
Think
the
thing
to
note
is
when
we're
talking
about
long-range
facilities
planning,
while
planning,
can
play
an
important
role
to
facilitate
and
engage
it's
going
to
require
an
interdepartmental
effort,
a
fairly
significant
commitment
of
time,
beyond
what
our
work
program
has
so
again.
D
B
Put
a
little
more
finer
point,
so
the
school
system
is
kind
of
they're
charging
ahead
with
their
planning
for
what
that
sounds
like
what
they're
gonna
be
doing,
which
they
need
to
do
about
that
school
facilities
and
part
of
what
J
FAC
is
supposed
to
do.
Is
the
overall
look
and
folding
school
facilities
into
it
and,
if
they're
not
actually
doing
that.
C
It's
my
sad
task
here
to
remind
you
of
the
conversation
we
had
about
this
last
year
when
I
was
asked.
This
question
I
said
that
the
most
immediate
thing
we
needed
to
do
was
to
complete
the
needs
assessment
on
the
county
side,
which
was
the
complement
to
the
apps
app
and
where
we
are
on.
That
is
that
we
don't
have
any
dedicated
resources
associated
with
doing
that
needs
assessment.
The
one
needs
assessment
that
we
are
doing
right
now
is
in
the
concert.
C
Part
of
the
Pops
plan
that
need
assessment
itself
is
proving
to
be
a
big
task
and
I
think
I'm,
hoping
that
if
we
get
through
the
pops,
the
the
public
space
that
element
of
the
public
space
analysis
and
I'm,
hoping
that,
if
we
get
past
the
CIP
formulation,
that
there
will
be
some
staff
resources,
but
right
now
there
aren't
the
resources
that
we
we
need
to
do
that
full-on
assessment,
which
would
be
a
precursor
to
an
element
of
the
comp
plan.
If
the
board
directed
us
to
go
there.
C
B
H
Chair,
thank
you
and,
and
and
I
just
have
to
absolutely
agree
with
miss
Garvey
and
I
think
that,
to
the
extent
that
it's
a
resource
issue
and
I'm,
obviously
still
feeling
my
way
through
this
process
and
I
know
we're
getting
ready
to
to
take
on
the
budget.
And
there
is
a
relationship
between
the
work
plan
here
and
we
want
to
pile
on
our
wish
list
and
I
respect
that
you
guys
as
professionals.
You
manage
our
expectations
and
what
you
can
do
and
deliver
within
the
resources
that
we
provide
you.
H
So
this
comment
is
maybe,
for
my
colleagues
as
much
as
it
is
for
staff
here,
which
is
that
I
think
it
is
so
fundamental
that
if
we
don't
get
in
front
of
these
planning
issues,
these
long-term
big-picture
planning
issues
that
that
schools
is
at
the
crux
of
that.
We're
gonna
be
spinning
our
wheels
on
everything
else
from
here
on
out,
and
we
have
a
window
of
opportunity
right
now
to
try
to
get
back
on
track
and
get
caught
up
and
get
in
front
of
the
demographics
that
we're
facing,
and
so
I
really
hope.
H
C
I
could
just
in
last
year,
when
I
proposed,
the
budget
I
suggested
two
positions
related
to
this
entire
project.
One
was
the
j
fact
position,
which
now
resides
in
c
PhD
and
I'd:
ask
for
an
additional
position,
whether
it
was
going
to
be
located
in
the
department
of
management
finance
to
do
the
needs
assessment
and
because
of
the
constraints
we
had
last
year.
We
couldn't
see
our
way
clear
to
do
that,
so
that
was
a
choice
we
made
back.
C
Then
I
will
tell
you
right
now,
given
the
budget
that
we're
facing
I
am
NOT
coming
to
the
board
next
week,
with
a
request
for
that
position.
So
the
board
is
interested
in
doing
it.
We
should
make
sure
that
we
put
a
pin
in
that
conversation
when
we're
having
a
budget
conversation
and
make
that
an
explicit
trade-off,
because
there
will
be
options
on
the
table
if
you
want
to
trade
that
out
for
another
thing,
that
would
for
another
item
that
we
funded.
B
Yeah
I
totally
haven't
been
on
the
losing
vote
on
that
one,
because
I
did
vote
for
you
to
have
that
position.
I
would
be
happy
and
I'm
glad
mr.
Getchell,
it's
interested
to.
A
A
I
think
that's
fair
I
find
that
we've
sort
of
found
our
way
into
a
particular
ally
and
and
I'm
I
think
it
may
actually
not
be
the
question
before
us.
The
question
I'm
at
least
trying
to
get
to
is
not:
when
will
the
needs
assessment
of
county
facilities
be
completed,
I
think
it's
certainly
a
related
issue
and
it's
an
important
one.
I
think
we
felt
the
lack
of
it
when
we
talked
about
prioritizing
on
the
buck
property.
A
So
I
wouldn't
disagree
that
it's
important
I
might
suggest-
and
this
is
just
one
just
my
own
opinion,
but
from
working
with
the
J
fact
that
the
the
best
thing
the
J
phat
could
produce
for
us,
I
might
suggest,
would
not
just
be
working
with
staff.
A
master
list
of
needs
and
potential
places.
I
think
there
is
a
there
is
an
amount
of
degree
of
long-range
planning
that
could
be
done.
That
guides
us
to
think
about
principles
for
the
phase
development
of
public
facilities,
for
example.
A
That
brings
forward
priorities
for
school,
siting
decisions
to
accompany
you
know,
other
work
done
by
the
community
facilities,
study
and
so
forth,
and
so
again
I.
Don't
disagree
with
the
value
and
the
need
of
such
a
you
know:
kind
of
comprehensive
list
of
facilities,
requirements
on
the
county
code
side,
but
I
also
don't
want
us
to
lose
the
threat
of
what
I
think
is
the
real
conversation
here,
at
least
for
me,
which
is:
do
we
think
in
the
SI
PhD
staff
work
allocated
to
the
J
FAC?
D
Chair
I
think
you
mentioned
what
I
think
we
might
call
I
think
we
discussed
with
the
JFX
chairs
phase
development
facilities
planning
as
a
way
to
think
about
siting
and
how
colocation
facilities
and
so
on.
If
we
can,
you
can
certainly
sitter
how
that
would
fit
within
our
work
program
to
develop
a
set
of
principles
if
you
will
or
objectives.
A
Right,
I'll
try
once
more
than
I
think
we
can
move
on
I,
I
suppose
what
I'm
suggesting
this
is
what
I
met
earlier
when
saying
it's
a
sort
of
a
circular
challenge,
because
I
don't
want
to
say
what
the
deliverable
for
J
FAC
this
year
should
be
I.
Think
that's
something
that
needs
to
be
done
in
consultation
with
the
J
fat,
but
I
think
what
we
have
heard
from
their
leadership
is
it's
hard
for
them
to
sketch
out
what
the
deliverables
are.
A
D
Yes,
and
that
will
be
the
new
public
facilities
coordinator
and
me,
the
public
will
report
to
the
director
and
so
we'll
be
working
together,
along
with
probably
drawing
from
other
staff
within
the
division
as
well.
So
but
first
things.
First
I
need
to
get
this
professional
on
board
and
my
goal
is
to,
by
the
end
of
March
early
April,
to
be
in
a
position
where
that
individuals
sitting
down
with
je
FAC
and
we
begin
to
begin
to
develop
the
plan
for
the
plan.
If
you
will.
A
E
E
B
It's
pretty
I'm
just
sort
of
contemplating
the
fact
that
we
don't
have
an
assessment
of
what
our
needs
are,
and
that
just
feels
to
me
so
absolutely
basic,
so
that's
kind
of
where
I
that
and
I
get
head
nods
from
the
other
end
of
the
table.
Thank
you.
Mr.
Getchell.
It's
good
you
and
I
together
on
J
FAC,
yeah
I,
don't
know
where
my
other
colleagues
are,
but
that
you
know
maybe
I
could
be
persuaded
differently.
H
I'm
sure
I
agree,
Libby,
I,
think
that
would
what
it
comes
down
to
mr.
Dorsey,
for
me,
is
it's:
it's
I,
don't
know
enough
to
know
how
this
is
going
to
fit
into
our
budget
conversation
and
how
do
we
and
I
don't
necessarily
think
that
we're
gonna
end
up
micromanaging
the
budget
anyway
right
but
I?
What
I
think
is
very
clear
is
that
we
speak
that
there's
clear
board
direction
that
ultimately
making
sure
that
Jay
fat
can
move
forward
what
they
need
to
accomplish
this
year
versus
what
will
be
in
out
years.
H
What
are
you
planning
to
plan
the
plan?
The
needs
assessment,
all
of
that
I
get.
It
is
going
to
have
a
timeline
to
it.
What
I
think
is
we?
What
I
hope
we
can
be
very
clear
on
is
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
that
J
fact
has
the
resources
to
move
forward
definitively
deliberately
and
with
all
due
haste,
because
time
waits
for
no
one
and
we're
gonna
continue
to
grow
and-
and
we
cannot
forestall
any
longer
getting
to
the
right
place
to
get
the
needs
assessment
done
and
all
the
others.
Thank
you.
A
F
C
I
may
be
the
only
person
at
this
table
who
has
a
very
jaundiced
view
of
having
a
homeless
to
the
comp
plan,
not
because
I
think
that
they
would
be
and
I'm
saying
that,
because
I've
had
mr.
Williamson
mr.
Duffy
everybody
sitting
on
this
side
of
the
table
at
one
point,
another
argue
somewhat
persuasively
to
me
that
it
would
be
a
welcome
addition
to
the
plan
and
what
my
response
has
been
is
that
in
lieu
of
what
and
we
have
to
add
an
element
to
the
comp
plan
is
a
very
extensive
effort.
C
So
I
just
put
that
out
there
I'm
of
all
the
people
on
this
side
of
the
table.
Doing
one
most
cautious
on
it
and
I
think
it's
a
fertile
subject
for
conversation
and
I.
Think
if
the
first
place
I
do
want
to
go
is
with
this
needs
assessment
to
figure
out
what
our
inventory
is,
so
that
we
can
make
a
better
judgment
on
that
I.
F
Mean
that
that
that
that
sounds
like
a
good,
you
know,
foundational
precursor,
I,
guess
and
and
schools
I
mean
to
the
extent
that
we
go
down
the
road
of
community
facilities.
I
mean.
Certainly,
schools
are
a
part
of
that.
So,
okay!
Well,
thank
you.
I
do
have
another
question
unrelated,
so
we'll
all
remember
when
we
were
here.
D
Since
we
completed
the
comprehensive
planning
planning
product
that
we
think
is
been
well
received
and
serves
as
a
communication
piece
both
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
their
boards
and
commissions
in
the
community
at
large,
we
have
it.
We
have
had
discussion
with
the
county's
communication
staff
and
and
the
production
team
about
doing
that
and
trying
to
think
about
other
elements.
It
is
complicated
and
has
to
fit
into
another
schedule,
I
hate
to
say,
but
but
it
does
so
we're
going
to
continue
to
work
on
two
fronts.
D
This
larger
front
that
looks
at
larger
County
policy
and
comprehensive
planning
and
then
on
a
smaller
front,
we
just
completed
an
effort
that
I
think
we
had
in
managers
notes
last
week
and
we
provide
to
the
Planning
Commission.
If
you
recall
last
year's
work
program,
we
thought
it
was
important
to
step
back
and
develop
a
really
comprehensive
historic
at
the
Pentagon
city
phase
development
site
plan
for
a
number
reasons:
40
years
in
the
making.
Certainly
many
of
us
weren't
here
when
that
begun
and
how
its
its
evolved
and
come
to
where
it
is.
D
We
we
did
that
PDS
B
before
we
did
sector
planning
to
understand
where
we've
come
from,
what
it
means
and
how
its
evolved
in
what
context
it
provides
for
smaller,
incremental
improvements
or
projects
that
come
in
so
we're
looking
at
both
of
those
fronts.
The
longer-term
broader
policy
and
these
smaller
projects
like
that
that
really
can
inform
I,
mean
you've
heard
the
Planning
Commission
chair
talk
about
the
need
for
we
need
this
context,
understand
how
the
prints
a
plan
informs
these
efforts.
This
is
one
step,
I
think
we've
taken
recently
to
to
get
us
there.
F
Mr.
Duffy
I'm
glad
that
you
mentioned
that
that
Squibb
for
manners
managers
notes,
because
when
we
think
forward
to
August
for
the
county,
fair
and
how
libraries
always
does
such
a
great
job
with
our
history
Center.
Maybe
you
think
about
working
up
some
sort
of
display
about
the
history
of
Pentagon,
the
city
crystal
city,
in
terms
of
development,
going
going
back
decades
and
I.
Think
that
would
be
very
well
received
by
the
community.
We'll.
B
John,
were
you
thinking
of
something
really
complex
or
something
simple,
because
I
hadn't
thought
about
that
in
a
while
about
the
video
idea
I
mean
we
just
recently
did
a
real,
quick
video
of
like
understanding
your
county
board
meeting.
It
was
pretty
quickly.
It
was
actually
something
I.
Think
more
that
you
know
our
communication
shop
did
not
I
guess
we
had
something
to
do
that.
D
B
F
D
Prepared
to
do
that,
we
just
need
a
commitment
from
the
production
staff
because
they
back
to
the
resource
issue
again
it
just
has
they
have
to
have
the
capacity
for
it,
we're
ready
and
willing
and
able
to
do
that
and
to
bring
these
pieces
together.
We
think
it's
a
great
thing
to
build
a
library
or
programs
like
that
and
we'll
continue
to
hopefully
advance
that
in
18.
D
A
H
A
E
Mr.
Duffy,
you
you,
you
spoke
briefly
about
it
and
if
you
want
to
give
us
a
little
bit
more
color,
that
would
be
great
about
the
focus
for
this
year
on
kind
of
breaking
down
some
of
the
vertical
silos
and
having
the
sections
work
a
little
bit
more
horizontally.
That
sounds
great.
If
you
can
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
some
of
the
outcomes
you
you
hope
to
get
from
that
and
then,
as
we
look
at
in
the
second
part
of
the
question,
is
we
look
at
slide?
E
15,
I,
guess,
with
all
of
the
future
future
projects?
Have
we
thought
to
any
extent
that
any
of
these
items
could
be
pushed
further
along
or
accelerated
further
by
including
other
departments?
It
looks
like
at
first
blush.
You
know
some
may
lend
themselves
to
collaboration
with
DPR
or
AED
and
whether
or
not
cross
departmental
collaborations
could
actually
get
some
of
these
things
out
of
neutral.
Earlier.
D
Almost
all
of
them
are
kind
of
require
collaboration,
I'll,
just
pull
one
out
that
that
I
think
is
important,
and
if
we
had
the
resources
to
work
with
AED
on
and
that's
this
evolution
of
office,
space
demand
implications
for
County
policies
and
plans.
If
your
call,
EDC
I,
think,
did
a
amazing
piece
of
work.
Looking
at
the
future
of
our
office
market,
we
have
millions
of
square
feet
of
office
space
that
are
planned
for
in
our
sector
plans
giving
that
how
office
space
is
evolving
in
terms
of
its
size.
D
Its
application
changes
is
pretty
dramatic
and
it's
going
to
continue.
What
were
the
implications
of
that
for
many
of
our
plan
recommendations?
Should
we
develop
a
policy
from
the
board
standpoint
to
address
that
it
has
many
implications,
economic
land
use
and
so
on
again,
just
one
we're
working
in
partnership,
I
think
is
really
important.
D
We'd
like
to
tackle
a
number
of
these
I
think
it's
important
that
we
can
you
to
come
back
to
this.
Some
of
these
we
may
have
to
revisit
as
we
proceed
into
2018
and
19,
given
things
that
could
be
on
the
horizon
so
again
in
terms
of
the
first
part
of
your
question,
what
are
we
doing
to
ensure
that
we
can?
D
We
can
integrate
our
staff
and
we're
working
at
several
levels
and
and
clods
one
of
one
of
the
things
that
he's
asked
us
certainly
to
do,
and
this
is
really
important
that
as
we
as
new
staff
come
on
board
that
we
cross
train
them,
so
that
staff
can
professionally
develop,
be
versatile
and
have
the
so
that
their
work
can
be
applicable
across
a
larger
spectrum
of
work.
We
just
need
to
do
that.
D
We're
starting
to
do
that
with
the
with
a
couple
of
new
positions
with
existing
positions,
we're
currently
integrating
work
with
associate
planners
that
historically,
a
focus
just
on
use,
permit,
bringing
them
into
the
site
plan
process
as
well.
Aaron
Schreiber
is
working
with
his
team
to
ensure
Scioscia
planners
and
principal
planners
are
sharing
work
assignments
and
shadowing
each
other
to
ensure
that
we're
they're
working
together,
I
think
there's
a
number
of
other
things.
We
can
do
to
manage
the
talent
that
we
have
at
that
level.
D
I
think
what
we're
also
doing
is
ensuring
that,
while
we
have
these
three
sections
with
individual
section
managers,
for
example,
urban
design
and
resource
Chris,
Kreider
staff
has
been
very
involved
in
in
the
glove
studies
in
Crystal
City
in
a
number
of
other
efforts.
So
that
has
to
be
successful
for
us
to
achieve
our
mission
and
we're
looking
for
every
opportunity
to
put
that
to
the
prize,
both
with
individual
staff,
with
teams,
as
well
as
across
the
board.
The
division
and.
E
Maybe
management,
oriented
and
non
sexy,
but
I
commend,
commend
you
all
for
that
work.
I
think
it's
everything
I
know
about
professional
development
tells
me
that
people
welcome
the
opportunity
if
they
cannot
necessarily
grow
vertically
to
be
able
to
expand
their
professional
expertise
and
the
buckets
that
they
work
and
so
terrific.
D
A
And
unsexy
I
would
love
to
hear
a
little
more
about
the
multifamily
address
file.
I,
think
that
was
that's
really
an
despite
that's
right.
It's
a
actually
a
pretty
intriguing
piece
of
work
because
it
potentially
goes
to
one
of
our
biggest
pain
points
around
civic
engagement,
which
is
including
renters
in
particular,
and
some
of
our
planning
conversations.
So
if
you
could
say
a
little
more
about
actually
what
is
meant
by
multifamily
address
file
and
any
opportunities
for
civic
engagement
that
we
see
there
well.
I
Thank
you
for
noting
that
that's
been
a
very
important
effort
for
us,
starting
last
fall.
What
we've,
what
we've
done
is
we
recognize
that
there
are
over
400
individual
apartment
complexes
in
the
county
and,
prior
to
this
effort,
we've
really
only
captured
the
street
address,
so
what
we've
been
doing
is
reaching
out
and
part
of
the
reach
out
to
is
building
relationships
with
these
apartment
property
owners.
So
we
now
have
a
very
comprehensive
list
of
who
the
contacts
are,
how
to
reach
them.
I
The
management
companies
in
the
last
couple
weeks,
we've
gone
on
sites,
many
of
the
properties
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
collect
information
from
and,
as
the
director
alluded
to
we're
at
89%
as
of
today,
getting
all
that
information.
What
this
helps
us
with
is
through
our
intern
of
our
interdepartmental
reconnaissance.
I
We
have
our
GIS
staff
that
does
a
great
deal
of
mapping
we'll
be
able
to
geocode
these
addresses
into
points
so
you'll
be
able
to
select
and
analyze
it
greater
for
our
public
safety
staff,
knowing
what
units
ago
to
is
obviously
very
important
and
having
so
we're.
Looking
at
centralizing
this
information,
both
with
GIS
and
DTS
in
terms
of
our
they
control
most
of
the
data
and
and
they
will
host
it,
what
we'll
do
going
forward
is,
as
new
projects
come
onboard,
we
will
start
to
collect
this
information.
I
The
unit
numbers
we're
not
interested
in
the
occupancy
or
who
the
occupants
are,
and
we've
reiterated
this
time
and
time
again.
This
is
really
about
being
able
to
identify
the
individual
units,
and
one
of
the
true
benefits
will
be
when
we
do
have
a
civic
engagement
initiative
around
a
particular
neighborhood
or
particularly
development
for
the
first
time
we'll
be
able
to
reach
that
the
dwellers
of
that
building,
as
opposed
to
the
property
owner
who
may
not
even
be
located
in
the
county.
D
A
bit
on
what
Chris
said:
I
really
want
to
thank
Chris
and
the
research
team.
This
was
a
requirement
that
came
to
us
from
the
Census
Bureau,
and
we
saw
an
opportunity
to
expand
this
and
ensure
that
this
would
benefit
the
entire
county.
So
so
this
is
a
great
addition
and
we'll
be
reporting
more
on
this
in
in
March
or
April
back
to
the
board.
That's.
A
Terrific
thank
you,
meaning
our
outstanding
questions
or
issues.
Well,
I.
Let
me
try
my
best
to
summarize
some
of
what
I've
heard
tonight
and
colleagues
I'll
check
in
along
the
way.
I
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
items
that
you
heard
from
us.
Maybe
that
don't
necessarily
have
consequences,
but
I
think
that
the
emphasis
of
the
board
was
probably
pretty
clear
and
certainly
chief
among
that
was
just
the
prioritization
of
long-range
facilities.
A
Planning
with
the
je
FAC
I
think
we
are
hearing
that
there
will
be
the
support
coming
on
board
to
assist
the
Commission
and
its
work
planning,
but
because
the
Commission's
work
plan
is
such
a
symbol
of
a
body
of
work
in
which
I
think
all
of
us
are
very
interested.
It
is
one
that
we
will
place
a
lot
of
emphasis.
A
We
talked
about
the
the
mr.
Gretchen's
term.
I
love
this
low
overhead
zoning
ordinance
amendments.
So
it
sounds
like
we
are
looking
after
the
budget
for
for
cpg
to
bring
forward
to
us
both
what
that
process
might
look
like
it
may
be.
A
few
priority
topics
as
well
as
I,
would
associate
myself
with
mr.
Dorothy's
interest
in
potentially
coming
up
with
something
like
a
special
exception
use
permit
in
some
of
those
cases
to
deliver
maybe
more
immediate
relief
to
those
affected
by
zoning
ordinance.
A
Changes
that
we
might
you
know
endorse
without
the
full
process
we
talked,
and
there
is
some
interest
in
this
idea
of
two-family
dwellings
and
and
I
know.
We
discussed,
potentially
after
a
budget
adoption
or
after
budget
adoption,
asking
staff
to
bring
forward
a
scope
for
addressing
both
the
urgent
needs,
and
maybe
the
smaller
zoning
ordinance
amendments
and
also
the
kind
of
bigger
picture
for
potential.
If
there
are
potentials
for
expansion
of
this
use,
I
think
we
we
heard
you
mr.
A
Duffy
say
that
that
the
might
the
right
place
for
that
might
be
kind
of
a
trade
for
the
accessory
dwelling
exterior
accessory
dwelling
work.
You
know
I'm.
Of
course
this
is
the
situation
in
which
we
always
find
ourselves
I'm,
not
especially
enthusiastic
about
making
that
trade
I
would
have
liked
to
have
seen
that
work
wrap
up,
but
can.
A
E
Mr.
Duffy,
you
mentioned
that
that
was
going
to
take
some
some
work
and,
as
I'm
gonna
tell
you
what
I
understood
our
guidance
to
be
and
then,
let's
make
sure
we're
all
reconciled,
because
I
was
never
at
least
envisioning
that
it
would
be
a
lot
of
work.
I
thought
the
direction
from
the
board
was
for
staff,
recognizing
that
its
preferred
option
was
to
treat
new
construction
and
existing
buildings.
E
The
same
was
for
staff
to
come
up
with
other
ways
in
which
this
issue
was
addressed
from
some
other
jurisdictions
you
determine
which
ones
you
want
to
compare
us
to,
not
for
you
necessarily
to
go
through
the
process
of
from
the
ground
up
re-engaging
on
a
recommendation,
but
to
provide
the
board
with
some
other
ways
of
thinking
about
an
approach.
That's.
A
Appreciate
that
so
I
think
well,
maybe
just
plan
to
see
more
from
you
in
the
next
iteration
of
the
work
plan
about
relationship
and
then
the
final
note
that
I
had
captured
was
I.
Do
think.
There's
a
lot
of
interest
on
hearing
more
a
little
bit
about
how
we
approach
special
glup
studies
and
requests
as
a
way
of
potentially
managing
the
workload
I'm,
not
only
in
2018
but
going
forward.
What
did
I
miss
did
I,
not
capture
anything
that
we
want
to
make
sure
direction.