►
From YouTube: Design Review Committee Meeting | March 1, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
I'm
just
going
to
be
opening
remarks
so
welcome
to
the
February
design
review
community
meeting.
We
are
in
an
unexpected
room
because
we're
having
trouble
with
the
electricity
in
the
other
room.
Can
everyone
hear
us
all
right
and.
C
D
A
B
Drc
meetings
are
being
held
in
person
and
streamed
simultaneously
for
those
of
us
joining
us
tonight.
Please
keep
your
devices
muted
in
your
video
turned
off.
Until
your
item
is
being
heard,
meeting
chat
is
active
for
participants
who
need
technical
assistance.
The
public
May
observe
the
meetings,
but
participation
in
the
discussion
is
limited
to
projects
to
applicants
and
members
of
the
halrb
public
comment
is
welcome
at
the
hlrb
meeting.
Information
about
signing
up
to
speech
or
submitting
a
public
comment
for
that
meeting
is
available
on
the
hlrb
website.
B
B
B
Hi
hi,
okay,
so
Mr
Anderson
submitted
these
images.
Well,
this
is
an
example
of
the
new
product.
Marvin
was
not
able
to
submit
images
of
the
one
over
ones
that
he
has
submitted
images
of
the
windows
that
we
would
be
replacing,
and
these
are
based
on
the
design
guidelines
that
were
approved
last
year.
This
would
be
considered
a
standard
or
typical
window.
B
B
The
profiles
aren't
meant
to
match,
they
are
solid
wood
and
there
have.
There
are
also
there's
also
one
casement,
that's
being
replaced
here
are
specs
on
the
profiles.
E
No,
unless
there
are
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
I
guess
just
to
give
maybe
a
quick
little
bit
of
background.
As
everybody
can
see,
there
was
an
addition
put
on
the
house
in
2009,
so
that
addition
has
all
new
windows
and
at
that
time
the
windows,
the
existing
windows
and
the
old
part
of
the
house,
the
original
part
of
the
house
were
refurbished
and
you
know
that
it
worked
as
best
as
it
could
be
done
and
and
honestly
it
now
they're
they've
degraded
rapidly,
and
they
no
longer
function
very
well.
D
F
B
B
Perfect,
thank
you.
Okay,
so
Mr
Anderson
I
will
follow
up
with
information
about
your
item.
It's
going
to
be
placed
on
the
consent
agenda,
which
is
the
first
thing
that
is
heard
in
the
hlrb
meeting
in
two
weeks.
B
I
will
let
you
know
in
advance
if
there
have
been
any
comments
or
if
anyone
has
asked
any
questions
about
the
in-kind
window,
replacement
and
I'll
follow
up
with
any
additional
information.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
us.
E
No,
only
I
guess
any
requirements
for
that
meeting,
any
additional
information
or,
if
I,
understand
the
process
correctly.
This
is
somewhat
simple
from
here.
Is
that
correct?
That's.
B
You
are
welcome
to
cool
in,
since
your
item
is
on
consent.
Stuff
can
represent
you
if
needed.
If
we
have
any
questions
in
advance,
there
is
a
comment
period
where
someone
could
ask
a
question
and
a
commissioner
can
pull
it
anytime
up
to
the
vote,
but
ostaf
could
represent
you
in
that
case
and.
E
B
And
I
will
send
you
your
stamp
plans
the
day
after
the
meeting.
If
it
is
approved.
B
Okay,
moving
quickly
along
so
I've
written
Matt
was
coming,
but
Mr
West
is
here
for
our
second
item,
which
is
the
final
door
schedule
for
the
Sears
Rehabilitation
at
three
four
two
one:
twenty
first
Avenue
full
screen
mode,
so
an
initial
door
schedule
had
been
submitted
and
since
then
the
four
doors
on
the
main
home
have
been
changed,
front
side,
rear
of
the
main
floor
and
the
basement
level
door.
B
So
this
is
the
Wexford
model
just
I
wanted
to
show.
That
is
because
you
can
kind
of
see
the
front
door
in
the
image
it's
coming
through.
So
these
are
the
stamped
plans.
So
here
you
can
see
that
the
doors
that
were
approved
these
are
the
doors
that
are
being
submitted.
I,
don't
know
why
there
had
been
little
notes
saying
what
these
were.
Four,
no.
E
B
Aren't
so
I
believe
this
is
for
the
front
door?
Yes,
this
is
for
this
side
and
rear
doors
on
the
main
floor,
correct
and
then
the
the
clearest
pane
with
the
15
lights
is
for
the
basement.
It's
absolutely
perfect.
F
Is
that
that
is
different
than
the
One
online?
The
one
online
husband
notes,
the
first
one
with
the
half
light
is
the
basement
and
then
the
full
light
is
the
rear
inside
door
of
the
main
floor.
Okay,.
B
F
B
Okay,
so
okay,
so
this
is
still
the
front
door,
and
then
this
is
the
the
basement
door
is
the
pathway,
the
Half
Light?
Okay,
that
makes
more
sense.
B
Apologies,
these
are
the
the
doors
that
are
going
to
be
facing
onto
the
public
spaces,
so
these
doors.
This
is
the
door
to
the
the
courtyard
kind
of
patio
space
in
the
back
and
the
screen
to
porch
on
the
side.
Okay,
sorry
about
that
yeah
and
these
are
still
all
solid
wood.
They
are
great,
so
questions.
H
We're
excited
about
this.
It's
it's
the
first
kind
of
restoration
project
like
this
that
we've
done
well
our
goal.
You
know
the
owners
have
been
great
and
the
architect
Matt,
who
made
the
drawings,
is
fantastic.
H
When
you
stand
in
front
of
the
house
on
21st
our
goal,
is
it
for
it
to
look
as
close
to
what
it
looked
like
91
years
ago,
when
it
was
built
when
we're
done
in
April
or
May
and
and
so
far
we're
you
know,
we're
doing
really
well
we're
even
doing
geothermal,
so
there's
not
even
going
to
be
an
outdoor
unit
out
there
on
this
property,
it's
going
to
look
really
really
close
to
what
I
look
like
all
that
time
ago,
step
inside.
On
the
other
hand,
it's
a
different
story,
but.
H
Going
to
be
awesome,
but
I,
we
appreciate
everybody's,
you
know
going
along
with
us
here.
You
know
it's
the
doors
they're
in
bad
shape,
and-
and
so
you
know
allowing
us
to
do.
This-
will
increase
the
comfort
and
thermal
properties
and
and
Energy
Efficiency
into
space
and
along
with
the
usability
of
it
as
well,
while
maintaining
the
the
nature
of
the
historical
nature
of
the
doors.
At
the
same
time.
So
we
appreciate
the
consideration.
Thank.
B
You,
commissioner,
Meyer:
how
do
you
feel
about
the
proposed
doors.
F
B
Thank
you
and
commissioner
Davis.
B
Thank
you
so,
which
agenda
would
you
like
to
put
them
on.
B
All
right,
okay,
so
same
information
for
you
I
will
send
you
more
information
about
what
the
process
is,
but
you
will
request
on
the
consent
agenda
where
all
the
consent
items
are
voted
on
unlock.
B
There's
a
comment
period
for
people
to
make
comments.
If
they
have
any
members
of
the
public
or
the
commission,
you
are
welcome
to
attend.
There
will
not
be
any
need
for
you
to
speak
unless
it's
called
from
concept
discussion
and
if
you
cannot
attend,
then
start
to
represent
you.
H
Oh,
yes,
you
know
it's
it's
interesting.
G
H
Could
get
on
the
record
since
the
the
you
know
the
committee's
here?
It
was
an
excellent
decision
and
not
in
my
mind,
to
allow
double
paying
windows
and
doors
in
in
Maywood.
It's
I
I
think
it's
a
thoughtful
consideration
with
respect
to
climate
change
and
occupant,
comfort
and
safety
and
energy
deficiency
and
thermal
efficiency
and
all
the
rest
of
it
so
and
it,
and
it's
making
a
big
difference
in
this
in
this
house
in
particular.
So
we
appreciate
that
so
I
just
want
to
get
on
the
record
and
say.
G
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
this
is
project
number
three.
This
is
the
return
of
a
project
on
Kenmore
Street
2317..
B
This
is
an
amendment
to
an
addition
on
the
rear,
Heidi
fataris
for
the
Schmitz
Becky
and
TR
Schmidt.
So
they
came
to
us
last
year
or
2021,
maybe
is
when
they
first
got.
B
It
approved
for
the
replacement
of
an
existing
Edition
in
the
rear
to
be
replaced
by
a
slightly
smaller,
a
slightly
larger,
sorry,
Edition,
and
since
then
they
have
realized
that
for
in
order
to
get
the
right
head
height
for
code
they're
going
to
have
to
raise
the
ridge
line
by
four
feet,
and
so
here's
the
original
existing
front
elevation.
And
then
this
is
the
four
feet:
race,
Ridge
line
and
you'll
see.
B
The
chimney
also
will
need
to
be
raised
to
match
and
then
be
two
feet
higher
than
anything
within
10
feet
by
code.
In
addition,
they
are
requesting
to
put
a
shed
Dormer
on
the
rear,
which
will
span
almost
the
width
of
the
property
in
order
to
provide
that
additional
head
height
for
the
Second
Story.
A
B
Believe
so
Mrs
Harris
are
you
on
the
line
or
anything
yeah.
I
Hello,
I
I'm
here
this
is
Heidi
faterus
I'm.
Sorry,
I
am
driving
carpool
right
now,
so
I'm
just
calling
in
instead
I'm
not
at
the
computer.
So
actually
the
house
right
now
has
an
attic
with
a
pull
down:
stair
and
Becky
and
TR
the
owners
own
the
house
next
door,
and
then
they
bought
this
house
when
it
came
onto
the
market
last
year
and
they're,
really
they
were
trying
to
renovate
it
for
their
grandmother
to
move
in.
I
So
we
were
really
focusing
on
the
first
floor
right
now,
there's
no
basement
access
from
the
inside.
There
was
an
outside
area
way
and
there's
no
interior
stair
at
all.
So
in
our
design
we've
submitted
a
we
decided
to
create
an
interior
stair
to
go
down
to
the
basement
and
then
up
to
the
second
level,
which
officially
is
an
attic
and
I.
I
We
were
trying
to
do
it
basically
Bare
Bones,
because
the
budget-
it's
really
tight,
but
by
the
time
so
I
noted
a
bunch
of
things
and
highlighted
saying
this
is
into
code
and
then,
when
we
submitted
in
for
permit
the
inspector
came
back
and
said
well
by
the
time
you
put
in
an
interior
stair
that
goes
up
there.
Instead
of
the
pull
down,
then
you
can't
do
that
unless
you
do
have
the
ceiling
height,
unless
you
have
the
egress,
you
need
the
insulation.
I
I
So
so,
therefore,
we
had
a
new
design
to
have
to
create
it
as
an
actual
habitable
space
rather
than
just
storage,
and
then
we're
proposing
to
do
two
bedrooms
and
a
bathroom
up
there
to
make
it
more
useful,
there's
also
something
in
the
basement
too.
We
are
putting
in
an
egress
window
in
the
basement.
Now
too
just
into
that
I
used,
it
used
to
be
called
the
laundry
area.
I
B
A
A
B
Yeah,
so
that
included
some
images
of
the
streetscape
just
because
it
is
similar
to
the
houses
next
to
it,
but
this
does
have
a
lower
roof
Ridge
line
right
now,
so
because
you
know
if
we
wanted
to
retain
continuity.
At
least
we
know
that
currently,
as
a
slightly
it's
the
house
on
the
left,
it
does
have
a
slightly
lower
Ridge
line,
so
it
may
not
be
you
know
if
they
were
to
add
a
little
bit
of
white.
It
might
not
be
too
problematic
Amari.
How
do
you
feel
about
this.
D
I
I
would
agree
with
Andy.
It
definitely
will
change
the
the
look
of
the
house,
but
I
think.
But
I
do
think,
though,
that
you
know
sort
of
given
the
context
of
the
of
the
sort
of
houses
on
the
Block.
It
won't
necessarily
change.
I
mean
it'll
it'll
be
higher
in
a
little
more
more
massive
look,
but
at
the
same
time
the
actual
look
at
the
house
is
sort
of
sort
of
remaining
so
much
similar,
because
there
are
a
lot
there
aren't
any
real
changes
to
the
sort
of
front
the
side
itself.
D
That's
it's
nice
to
the
deliverable
character
from
the
side,
so
I
mean
I,
think
it's
I
think
it's
probably
and
also
sort
of
given
the
code
application
reasons.
Why
I
think
that
I
mean
I
think
that
this
kind
of
thinking
about
that
and
I
was
thinking
about
that
we'd
previously
approved
I
guess
you
know
a
more
a
more
more
modest
changes
to
the
house.
A
A
B
A
G
D
Yes,
I
I
agree
with
that
as
well.
I
think
it'll
be
good
to
get
before
the
board
and
and
I
also
agree
that
there's
enough
information
there
that
the
board
can
make
a
decision
based
on
the
information
provided
I
think
it's
a
pretty
good,
pretty
good
set
of
drawings
and
images.
So
it
should
be
good
to
review
for
the
board.
F
Everything
that's
been
stated.
I
also
think
that
it's
great
that
the
vinyl
windows
are
being
replaced
with
wood,
so
I
think
that
is
also
a
great
thing
to
highlight
when
it
goes
before
the
full
board.
B
Howdy
you've
been
to
many
many
of
our
meetings.
I
will
send
you
more
information
about
that
and
we
have
your
full
packet.
So
we
shouldn't
need
any
more
information,
but
I'll
follow
up
tomorrow
and
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions:
do
you
have
any
for
us
right
now.
B
B
B
I'm
trying
to
make
these
incredibly
Pleasant
to
be
at.
B
It
okay
so
well!
He
is
not
here
yet
yeah,
so
we
can't
really
discuss
it
without
him,
but
could
we
at
least
present
the
information
people.
C
Song
and
dance
now:
that's
not
a
problem
I'm
just
going
to
give
a
bit
of
a
overview
history
just
so
that
they
understand
why
they're
seeing
the
property
just
for
the
record.
This
is
Lauren
Ferris
principal
planner,
so
the
property2910
Columbia
Pike
is
located
in
the
commercial
form-based
code
area.
C
This
property
historically
was
the
Arlington
Hardware
building,
and
it
right
now
is
a
historic
facade
and
in
the
commercial
form-based
code.
Originally
this
building
was
called
there's
two
historic
classifications
in
form-based
code,
which
is
historic
structures
and
historic
facades.
Originally,
this
building
did
have
kind
of
the
category
of
it
being
a
historic
structure.
Therefore,
the
whole
building
was
to
be
preserved.
C
However,
there
was
a
Redevelopment
project
proposed
all
the
way
back
in
2004,
probably
a
little
bit
earlier
than
that,
and
it
was
determined
that
a
use
permit
would
be
created
for
this,
because
the
hlrb
agreed
that
it
was
appropriate
for
this
to
be
considered
a
historic
facade,
so
historic
structure
would
mean
that
the
whole
building
is
preserved.
Historic
facade
would
just
mean
the
facade
is
preserved,
there's
not
much
guidance
to
what
is
considered
historic
facade
and
how
to
treat
it
in
the
preservation
world.
C
As
we
know,
preserving
a
historic
facade
is
not
necessarily
A
preservation
treatment,
it's
seen
as
a
compromise
to
try
and
keep
something
tangible,
as
well
as
allowing
for
there
to
be
some
Redevelopment,
and
some
of
you
are
familiar
with
some
more
guidance
that
we've
been
trying
to
provide
each
other
B
members
in
the
DRC
with
how
to
treat
historic
facades.
If
you
think
back
to
our
Claritin
sector,
Plan
update
and
the
original
Claritin
sector
plan,
which
was
adopted
originally
in
2006
and
then
updated
in
last
year,
2022.
C
so
which
for
that
they
give
guidance
that
you
know
10
feet,
should
you
should
preserve
the
historic
facade
and
then
allow
there
to
be
a
step
back
of
10
feet
or
15
feet
or
20
feet.
We
don't
have
any
of
that,
so
it's
really
up
to
the
DRC
and
the
hlrb
to
kind
of
determine
how
they
want
to
approach
preserving
historic
facades.
C
Now,
in
the
commercial
form-based
code,
it
tends
to
say
that
there
needs
to
be
some
type
of
protection
on
historic
facades
and
basically
with
the
approval
of
the
Redevelopment
project,
which
is
you
can
see
kind
of
that
curved
section
to
the
back
of
the
historic
facade.
There
is
a
whole
new
structure
built
behind
it
with
a
lot
of
height,
and
this
was
actually
the
first
commercial
form-based
code
project
approved,
which
was
June
2004.
C
and
the
developer
at
that
time
agreed
that
this
building
would
be
preserved.
So
not
knowing
if
Mr
Khan
has
joined
us
yet.
C
Well,
I'm
happy
to
kind
of
go
over
what
you're.
Looking
at
right.
Now
you
can
see
some
remnants
of
the
historic
facade.
There
has
been
some
new
some
new
elements
that
have
been
added.
It
looks
like
the
first
story.
Kind
of
cladding
is
like
a
new
type
of
metal
vertical
cladding
and
that
the
windows
on
this
property
has
been
there
are.
C
These
are
modern
buildings,
metal
frame,
fixed
on
the
lower
floor
and
the
Second
Story
looks
like
it's
double
hung,
Windows,
I'm,
not
sure
if
those
are
actually
working,
double
hung
windows,
but
so
that
you
have
some
context
why
historic
facade
was
seen
as
a
reasonable
compromise
by
the
hlrv
back
in
2004
was
because
there
had
been
a
lot
of
fire
damage
to
this
building,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
original
material
that
just
was
not
there
anymore,
so
I
think
that's
why
they
found
that
just
preserving
the
historic
facade
was
appropriate
now
with
the
materials
that
you've
received
from
Mr
Khan
on
what
is
being
proposed
for
this
is
that
there
would
be
it
looks
like
he's
proposing
to
demolish
the
double
side-by-side
storefront
windows
that
are
on
both
sides
of
the
main
entrance
and
wanting
to
remove
those
windows
which
are
replacement
windows,
but
remove
those
windows
and
expand
all
the
way
down
to
the
ground
level.
C
By
removing
some
of
the
brick
exterior
wall
he
is
proposing
to
put
in
a
type
of
bi-fold
window,
which
is
very
popular
right
now.
We
know
that
there
are
some
in
the
Claritin
area.
You
see
a
lot
of
these
in
in
Washington,
DC
and
Mr
Khan
I
believe
has
referenced
in
some
emails
between
staff
that
there
are
other
nearby
businesses
that
have
these
types
of
Windows
in
them.
C
I,
unfortunately,
have
not
been
to
Columbia
Pike
in
a
while,
and
just
by
doing
some
research
on
street
view,
I
wasn't
able
to
see
that
completely,
but
I
would
be
interested
to
know
which
businesses
he
was
pointing
out
as
having
using
these
windows
and
basically,
what
the
what
Mr
Khan
will
need
is
a
COA
from
the
hlrb
to
be
able
to
do
this
type
of
work
and
the
DRC
needs
to
determine
if
they
feel
that
this
is
an
appropriate
change
to
this
historic
facade
or
if
they
would
like
to
see
some
other
consideration
for
what
is
being
proposed
and
I
could
probably
keep
talking,
but
I
feel
like
you're,
getting
an
idea
of
what
what
we're
seeing
and
what
the
new
windows
would
look
like
and
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions.
A
C
Cutting
walked
past
this
in
many
times,
because
I
am
a
fan
of
the
Lost
Dog
Cafe,
which
is
just
to
to
the
side
of
this
business.
That
is
a
very
narrow,
sidewalk
and
I.
Don't
think
that
there
would
be
a
way
to
do
some
type
of
outdoor,
seating
and
I
do
but
I
don't
know
what
the
what
the
code
would
require
if
this
was
to
become
more
of
like
a
actual
exit.
But
from
what
I
understand,
it's
meant
to
be
that
indoor
outdoor
type
feel.
B
And
so
what
Michael
and
I
noticed
was
that
he
it
appears
that
the
developers
only
planning
or
the
owner
sorry
is
planning
to
only
demolish
the
to
the
double
windows
on
either
side,
but
is
leaving
the
final
Windows
and
therefore
that
original,
like
you,
see
the
furthest
Windows
it
looks
like
they
are
going
to
be
retained.
So
that's
amazing.
B
The
the
column
next
to
the
door
is
being
retained,
so
the
spacing
will
be
retained
like
that
verticality.
It's
just
going
to
be
going
down
to
the
ground.
I
did
some
research
I
couldn't
find
any
evidence
that
the
this
fenestration
was
original
honestly,
but
I
I
have
no
idea
like
I,
couldn't
find
any
historic
images,
but
yes,
I
think
that
you're
right
then
the
sidewalk
is
extremely
narrow,
he's
not
planning
on
putting
tables
or
anything
outside.
B
It's
just
to
provide
that
feeling
and
that
airflow
in
a
coven
context
for
a
restaurant
that
otherwise
is
entirely
inside.
A
This
was
a
hardware
store,
originally
saw
it
and
I'm
not
sure
that
that
entirely
represents
what
I
would
be
surprised
if
the
windows
were
as
wide
horizontally.
If
you
will
r
the
original
hardware
store
and
I
had
a
whole
first
story
with
Hassan,
if
you
will
is,
is
basically
new,
as
you
indicated
so
I
mean
I.
A
Think
what's
historic,
there
really
is
the
Second
Story
over
the
restaurant
I
just
find
that
if
you
don't
do
something,
this
restaurant
isn't
anywhere
near
as
attractive
as
it
could
be
as
a
restroom
just
because
of
the
lack
of
fresh
air
and
the
fact
that
you
can't
have
any
outdoor
receding,
which
would
tend
to
attract
more
people
to
restaurants.
So
I
think
this
is
a
reasonably
good
step
to
try
and
make
this
a
little
bit
more.
A
The
restaurant
a
little
bit
more
attractive
to
people
that
use
I.
Don't
since
I,
don't
think
that
first
story
is
really
that
close
to
what
the
hardware
store
was
and
certainly
that
large
expense
of
the
windows.
The
width
there
is
I
find
that
this
doesn't
look
right
either.
I
think
this
is
actually
an
improvement
over
that
mass
of
Windows,
a
massive
one-piece
window.
F
Think
I
would
question
opening
that
up
to
the
floor,
given
the
width
of
the
sidewalk
I
can
understand
the
need
to
have
operable
windows
and
I,
don't
know,
I
know
in
Boston,
I
think
it's
Hawkers
Asian
Street
Food
has
the
bifold
path
level
with
indoor
countertop
I
don't
know
if
that
is
something
that
was
studied
to
keep
the
existing
mates
or
the
existing
window.
Opening
I.
F
Hawkers
Asian
Street
Food,
it's
in
Boston,
they
have
the
same
bi-fold
window,
but
instead
of
a
door,
it's
counter
height,
but
it
allows
the
operability
of
getting
fresh
air
in
and
out
and
I
just
question
having
doors
on
a
narrow,
sidewalk.
B
So
I
think
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
speak
for
zoning
but
Lauren,
but
this
was
sent
to
us
from
the
zoning
department.
Do
you
know
how
they
felt
about
floor
to
ceiling
doors.
C
C
So
the
only
thing
that
they
wanted
to
make
sure
was
that
the
design
would
be
reviewed
and
either
approved
or
denied
by
the
hlrb,
because
I
guess,
because
the
because,
if,
if
the
DRC
is
comfortable
with
the
idea
of
the
double
storefront
windows
can
be
replaced
with
a
bi-fold,
but
maybe
not
have
it
be
from
floor
to
ceiling
or
is
it
keeping
within
the
existing
window
opening
size
so
I
guess
it's
kind
of?
C
Would
you
be
comfortable
with
one
or
the
other,
but
I
don't
think
that
it
can
be
used
as
an
actual
I'm?
Assuming
that
you
have
to
determine
if
it's
going
to
be
a
door,
if
it's
going
to
be
a
window,
but
I
don't
have
that
information.
B
D
Echo,
what
Rebecca
mentioned
I
mean
I'm
a
little
bit
reticent
to
sort
of
have
the
I
mean
sort
of
have
the
sort
of
full
height
open
sort
of
doors
on
a
very
narrow,
sidewalk,
I
sort
of
I
get
the
motivation.
Why
but
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
funny
with
a
very
narrow,
sidewalk
I
think
it
would
make
more
sense
to
me
personally.
Doesn't
maybe
have
that
sort
of
counter
height
sort
of
that
sort
of
counter
height?
D
You
know
wide
open,
Windows
there
I
think
that
would
be
a
better
fit
and
also
I
mean
I.
Think
that
I
also
think
that
it
fits
more
with
the
sort
of
historic
characters.
Building
I
mean
I,
I
I
take
it.
D
These
may
not
be
the
original
when
the
openings,
even
or,
and
definitely
not
the
original
windows,
but
I
think
that
the
sort
of
the
sort
of
the
the
more
blockier,
the
more
solid
rhythm
of
sort
of
like
this
sort
of
the
small
window,
sort
of
large
window
door
and
then
a
large
window
in
the
small
window
that
that
feels
more
historically
sort
of
appropriate
to
me
as
well.
Instead
of
having
it
be
all
glazed
I
mean
it
feels
you
know
it's
kind
of
feels
a
bit
better.
So
this
is
all
I
say.
F
I
was
just
gonna
say
looking
at
Google
streets,
it
looks
like
the
buildings
on
this
block
and
across
the
street,
and
restaurants
included
all
have
that
solid
base,
I'm,
not
seeing
any
that
have
the
the
floor-to-ceiling.
D
And
I'd
also
be
curious
too.
If
there
are
any
images
of
the
of
the
of
the
hardware
store,
I,
guess
and
maybe
like
in
you
know
in
your
in
sort
of
years
prior
when
it
was
a
hardware
store
too
like
like
what
the
facade
looked
like,
then
it
was
a
more
more
of
a
solid
mass.
At
that
point,
it
just
kind
of
just
be
kind
of
curious
to
see
that
too.
B
C
Yeah
I
also
tried
to
see
how
far
back
street
view
went,
and
it
goes
back
to
2007
right
when
they
were
putting
up
the
historic
facade
as
the
new
building
behind
it
was
being
constructed
so
and
I
don't
have
any
in
our
historic
photographs
from
the
project
that
was
being
done
back
then.
So.
B
So
it
sounds
like
this
should
go
forward
on
the
discussion
agenda
to
see,
in
addition
to
asking
for
this
additional
information,
it
should
be
discussed
by
the
entire
Commission.
A
Well,
I
I
just
raised
the
question
I
mean
in
my
opinion
this
front.
The
storefront,
if
you
will,
is
really
a
storefront
and
not
a
very
good
front
for
a
restaurant,
considering
the
fact
that
there's
a
very
narrow
sidewalk
and
that's
really
was
my
concern.
I
I
think
that,
as
proposed
they're
not
to
be
floor
to
ceiling
height
they're
proposing
have
we
got
elephant?
Can
you
show
the
elevations?
Yes,
they
should.
A
Okay,
so
floor
to
ceiling,
okay,
yeah,
I
I
would
say
no
yeah
I.
Think
that's
that.
That's
that
this
is
no
longer
the
story
facade
on
the
first
floor
in
any
case,
but
that
that's
going
a
bit
too
far.
In
my
opinion,
I
think
if
they
were
maybe
30
inches
or
36
inches
above
the
sidewalk
before
you
head,
a
window
sill
would
be
maybe
36
inches.
Okay,
all
right!
That
would
be
more
appropriate,
but
the
open
this
up.
That
way,
it
doesn't.
B
So
I
should
go
back
and
ask
it
sounds
like
counter
height
you're,
saying
30,
inches
counter
height
sounds
like
unanimously
something
that
the
board
is
more
interested
in
seeing
so
if
I
will
go
back
to
the
applicant
and
ask
him
if
he's
considered
it
I'll
use
the
example
you
shared
Rebecca
and
see
if
I
can
get
him
some
images
of
that
to
see.
If,
because,
if,
as
you
said,
like
Lauren
I,
don't
think
he
can
use
them
as
egress,
because
they're
not
standard
doors.
B
C
And
I
can
follow
up
with
zoning.
They
I.
Don't
think
that
they
would
have
brought
this
to
my
attention
and
the
drc's
attention
to
review
if
they
couldn't
be,
if
they
weren't
allowable
for
zoning
standards
so
but
I
think
again
if
they
were
using
them
like
an
entry
or
or
exit
in
any
way.
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
red
flag
so,
and
we
can
also
follow
up
with
clh
to
see
if
there
are
any
other
historic
photos
or
any
of
our
trustee
arlingtonians.
C
But
I
just
want
to
make
sure
since
Mr
Khan
is
not
on
the
call
which
I'm
assuming
he's
still
not
here,
that
we
can
provide
the
guidance
that
the
Florida
ceiling,
bifold
Windows,
doesn't
seem
to
be
appropriate
by
the
DRC
and
would
be
more
open
to
a
counter
height,
a
bi-fold
window
and
and
I'm
assuming
Serena.
That
we
could
then
just
go
to
him
and
say
if
he
would
be
willing
to
propose
come
back
to
the
DRC
with
maybe
another
option
that
that
would
be
more.
C
Could
them
be
reviewed
by
the
DRC
for
and
then
maybe
being
considered
by,
the
hlrb
full
hrb
for
discussion?
Well,.
B
F
And
I
would
add
I
know
we
talked
about
the
counter
height
I,
think
my
personal
preference
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
has
one
for
if
they
were
to
do
the
sort
of
counter
height
bi-fold
to
keep
the
existing
masonry
opening
with
the
three
foot
base
right,
foreign.
F
Correct
okay,
yeah
I
think,
given
that
the
windows
aren't
original
and
it's
current
use,
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
wanting
that
ventilation
and
openness
with
the
street
I
just
would
prefer
the
opening
to
stay
the
same
size.
B
Thank
you
all
for
your
discussion.
This
has
been
very
helpful.
This
is
hence
ends.
Are
our
agenda
perfect?
Does
anyone
have
any
final
questions
for
the
group.
D
Yeah
one
question
Lauren
so
was
this
facade?
Was
this
sort
of
built
back
or
or
was
it
sort
of
maintained
in
place
while
they
build
the
building
behind
it?
How
do
you
know
what
sort
of
sort
of
how
that
was
sort
of
cobbled
together,
I
guess.
C
I,
honestly,
don't
know
if
it
got
moved
around
a
lot,
but
just
because
again
I
don't
have
I,
don't
have
anything
other
than
the
board
report
from
2004,
which
is
not
the
detail
that
we
see
now
and
I'm.
Looking
at
the
construction
photos,
it
looks
like
it's
all,
still
it
I
I'm,
assuming
that
it's
in
the
same
location
that
it
was.
C
I
think
that
if
they
were
to
have
it
move
back
more,
they
would
have
done
it,
especially
for
wanting
to
have
a
wider
sidewalk,
but
then
again,
I
also
don't
know.
The
developer
looks
like
they
did
a
pretty
big
step
back
from
the
historic
facade,
so
they
may
have
also
not
wanted
to
lose
much
of
the
space
that
they
would
like
to
build
on.
So.