►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
E
C
Gerald
before
it
Joan
Lawrence
here,
Robert
Madden,
Rebecca
Meyer,
here
Katie
Myers
here
Mark
Turnbull,
Andrew
Winchell.
Here.
A
A
B
And
welcome
to
this
week's
meeting,
here's
the
last
meeting
around
it.
The
Texas
have
to
turn
the
first
2022
new
state
legislation
that
requires
certain
kind
of
improved
boards
and
commissions,
including
HRV,
to
have
an
in-person
Forum
to
conduct
something
business
so
there'd
be
hearings
are
provided
a
hybrid
environment
both
in
person
and
streamed
online
from
the
public
May
attend
evidence
to
get
you
to
virtually
vice
president
members
of
the
board
and
members
of
the
public
join
us
this
evening.
Today's
meeting
is
available
for
students
website
via
teams,
there's
also
a
dollar
option.
B
B
Public
speaker
is
not
sponsoring
items
on
the
agenda.
Pre-Registration
online
at
today's
hearing
was
required.
It
speaks
about
what
we
go
with
that
and
the
meetings
has
acted
for.
Business
can
be
technical
advice
only
should
not
be
used
for
discussion.
Public
comment
or
questions
about
the
agenda
or
requests
for
more
information
must
be
shared
her
to
the
record
during
the
during
sign
public
testimony.
B
B
About
taking
a
moment
to
review
the
minutes
from
last
month,
the
questions
or
comments
or.
H
B
J
B
B
K
C
Abstaining
you're
abstaining,
big
problem,
Miss
Lawrence,
yes,
Meyer,
Ms,
Myers,
yes,
Mr
munchel,
here.
L
B
B
K
A
K
Much
Heidi
for
Paris
is
also
here
calling
in
thank.
F
You,
okay,
so
the
pre-1937
contributing
one
story:
dwelling
at
2317,
North,
Kenmore
Street,
is
described
in
the
2003
Maywood
National
register
nomination
as
follows:
the
three
houses
at
2311
through
2317
North
Kenmore
Street,
were
initially
constructed
according
to
identical
plans.
They
are
asymmetrical.
Buildings
executed
in
brick,
veneer
with
off-center
front
Gables,
and
a
central
round
arched
entrance
with
stone
surrounds
in
May
2022.
The
hlrb
approved
COA
2214
to
replace
an
existing
original
rear
Edition
with
a
slightly
larger
Edition
and
to
add
a
stoop
in
the
rear
and
expand
the
existing
rear
slave
patio.
F
The
applicant
also
applied
to
install
a
new
air
conditioning
unit
at
the
southeast
corner
of
the
property.
The
applicant
is
proposing
now
to
raise
the
root.
The
rich
line
of
the
home
by
four
feet
to
conform
to
the
building
code.
The
existing
chimney
would
be
extended
to
the
above
the
new
Ridgeline.
Let
me
get
to
an
elevations,
because
this
is
the
existing
and
this
will
be
the
new
elevation.
So,
as
you
can
see,
that's
the
four
foot
height
increase.
F
The
applicant
also
proposes
to
install
a
new
shed
Dormer
in
the
rear
east
facing
elevation,
which
would
provide
additional
head
height
in
the
Second
Story.
The
Dormer
would
have
hardly
plan
collapsiding.
Imagine
asphalt,
shingle
rethink
and
two
pairs
of
six
over
one
wooden
windows
to
match
thick
number
one
windows
on
the
ground
floor.
Lastly,
the
applicant
proposes
to
install
a
window
well
in
the
front-facing
basement
level
to
allow
window
egress
from
the
basement.
F
The
window
well
would
terminate
at
the
ground
level
on
a
concrete
pad
which
would
double
as
the
air
conditioning
foot
there.
You
can
see
that
the
design
Review
Committee
consider
this
application
as
February
1
2023
hybrid
meeting
Mr
Rancho
noted
that
the
proposed
increased
Ridgeline
height
would
change
the
character
of
the
1.5
story,
home
from
the
right-of-way
to
a
more
imposing
front
roof
view
from
the
street.
Mr
Davis
did
not
object
the
application,
but
recommended
that
the
full
commission
discusses
item,
so
the
hlrp
has
approved
if
you
go
through
the
drawings.
F
F
This
is
the
previously
stamped
images.
This
is
the
home
on
the
corner.
F
These
are
submitted
by
the
designer
just
to
show
you
the
three
homes
and
their
relative
scale,
so
the
hlrv
has
approved
many
requests
for
additions
and
they
would,
since
the
establishment
of
the
lhd,
many
is
footprint
enlargements
in
the
rear.
F
The
current
proposal
would
allow
for
additional
usable
space
without
expanding
the
footprint
of
your
existing
home,
which
self
supports,
even
though
the
subject
property
is
a
call,
a
lot
which
means
more
visible
and
on
an
interior
lot,
the
proposed
shed
Dormer
will
add
functional
space
to
the
home
in
a
lesson
treated
happen
than
a
bum.
Bum
addition,
however,
staff
agrees
with
the
DRC
that
raising
the
height
of
the
Ridgeline
by
four
feet
may
impact
the
character.
F
The
dwelling
and
its
relationship
with
its
triplet
Neighbors
From,
the
right-of-way
relevant
language
from
the
mainward
design
guidelines
includes
in
Maywood.
The
relatively
uniform
scale
of
houses
is
one
of
the
most
important
elements
that
contributes
to
the
overall
character
of
the
neighborhood
scale
of
relative
proportion
and
size
of
a
building
to
a
pedestrian
absorber
of
a
building
to
neighboring
buildings
and
of
a
building
to
its
surroundings.
F
In
2014,
the
hlob
approved
an
application
of
the
neighboring
sister
home
2315
with
Kenmore,
which
is
the
middle
one,
to
raise
the
height
of
the
existing
side,
gable,
roof
and
construct
a
two-story
rear,
Edition
COA
1413.
The
properties
Ridgeline
was
raised
by
four
feet
to
accommodate
the
rear
Edition
after
a
3D
SketchUp
model
was
presented
in
the
December
2014
DRC
meeting.
The
historian
preservation
staff
report
from
2014
States,
the
drawings
Illustrated
that
raising
the
roof
would
have
minimal
negative
impact
to
the
proportions
of
the
facade
or
the
streetscape
is
in
grade.
F
While
staff
recognizes
that
this
action
was
permitted
on
the
neighboring
home
in
2014
projects
and
they
would
have
considered
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
The
HPP
staff
therefore
would
welcome
a
discussion
about
whether
the
proposed
additional
four
feet
of
height
is
appropriate
in
this
case,
and
if
a
compromised
design
solution
could
be
reached
with
a
slightly
lower
Ridge
line
that
could
still
provide
added
space,
but
with
the
Ridgeline
closer
to
the
original.
F
The
proposed
window
well
will
be
a
below
grade
and
should
not
adversely
affect
the
view
of
the
home
from
the
street
while
providing
livable
space
below
grade
the
proposed
materials
are
appropriate
and
may
work
as
per
appendix
cement
by
reward
siding
appendix
D,
appendix
G.
A
wooden
windows
are
appropriate
and
they
would
lhd
so
I'm
going
to
go
again
through
the
drawings.
But
that
concludes
the
staff
report.
F
So
when
you
see
this
image,
it
is
with
the
additional
four
feet:
the
middle
one
I'm
talking.
O
O
F
P
F
So
that
that,
as
you
can
see,
this
is
the
addition
that
they
had
gotten
approved
a
small
part
on
the
bottom
that
was
previously
approved
and
so
they're
going
to
continue
to
build
that.
And
then
the
additional
part
is
the
shed
Dormer
that
you
see
there
and
that
you
can
see
from
here
from
the
side.
So
in
that
Second
Story,
the
shed
Dormer
is
the
new
addition,
and
you
can
see
the
window
well
in
the
bottom
right.
P
You
just
can
this:
this
is
TR
again,
just
add
a
little
bit
of
color
to
this.
We
we
have
started
the
job
We've
we've
excavated
some
stuff
in
the
interior
of
the
basement
for
drainage
and
waterproofing
and
the
like.
P
But
ultimately
the
reason
why
we're
back
in
right
now
is
because
the
building
department
issued
some
comments
on
the
building
permit
application
that
dealt
with
the
capacity
and
the
size
of
the
existing
joists
on
the
second
floor,
and
so
in
order
to
conform
with
code,
we
have
to
increase
the
size
of
the
joist
and
by
their
and
therefore
increase
the
size
of
the
Headroom
up
up
on
the
second
floor.
So
the
second
floor
can
be
usable
and
accessible
by
stairs,
which
was
always
the
original
intent.
Q
F
Q
F
Which
I
I
feel
like
Andy's
mentioned
this
before,
because
of
the
the
way
that
the
two-dimensional
elevations
show.
It
tends
to
look
a
little
bit
sharper
than
in
real
life.
A
D
A
We
had
conversation
questions
on
this
years
ago,
because
I
recall
the
cable
is,
can
increased.
A
D
K
G
A
K
Go
ahead,
hello:
this
is
Heidi
pictures,
I'm,
sorry
I
was
muted.
Before
so.
I
couldn't
talk.
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
you
can
okay.
Thank
you.
So
the
TR
touched
on
a
couple
of
issues
about
why
we
are
submitting
again
for
the
changes.
K
So
it's
actually
a
true
hardship
because
we
need
to
comply
with
building
code.
Originally
we
were
originally
when
they
bought
the
house.
The
attic
or
half
story
was
finished
and
there
was
even
like
a
bed
up
there
and
whatnot,
but
it
was
only
accessed
by
a
pull-down
ladder.
So
in
our
project
we
proposed
to
do
an
interior
stair
both
to
the
lower
level,
the
basement
and
up
to
the
second
level,
because
originally
the
house
right
now
has
no
Interiors
there.
So
by
the
time
we
do
that
and
put
an
Interiors
there.
K
Then
the
building
code
requires
us
to
upgrade
everything.
Even
if,
even
though
originally
we
were
just
trying
to
say
we're
just
getting
storage
up
there
because
there
wasn't,
there
wasn't
an
egress
window,
there
was
an
insulation
per
code
or
upgraded
to
code
and
there
also
wasn't
the
ceiling
height.
But
by
the
time
we
do
an
interior
stereo,
then
it
triggers
a
whole
bunch
of
other
requirements
that
we
must
meet
for
building
code.
K
So
we're
actually
really
up
against
a
hardship
here
so
we're
by
proposing
to
raise
the
ridge
by
four
feet,
we're
getting
the
bare
minimum
that
we
need
basically
to
get
two
bedrooms
up
there
and
a
bathroom.
If
you
look
at
that
cross
section
at
the
very
last
sheet
that
shows
the
ceiling
height,
and
that
is
all
the
very
minimum
that
we
need
for
code
and
we're
not
increasing
the
building
footprint
like
we
did
for
Becky
and
Tiara's
house
that
on
their
house
that
we
did
several
years
ago.
We
were.
K
We
also
raised
it
by
four
feet,
but
we
had
a
bigger
addition.
So
then
the
obviously
then
the
square
footage
increased
and
we
didn't
have
to.
We
could
continue
on
with
the
roof
lines,
but
in
this
house
we're
already
we're
maximizing
every
space
that
we
can,
but
it's
not
increasing
on
the
footprint
and
not
not
increasing
on
the
lock
coverage.
F
Put
this
up,
so
you
can
see,
on
the
left
hand,
side
that
addition
is
kind
of
visible
in
the
two
images
on
the
left,
the
front
view
of
the
Side
Edition.
So
you
can
see
there's
that
second
Gable
to
the
the
middle
house,
two
three
one
five
and
then
on
the
bottom.
You
can
see
that
additional
Edition
that
Heidi
just
mentioned,
that
is
on
the
rear
of
two
three
one:
five
that
is
not
planned
to
be
on
the
rear
of
t317.
M
M
B
Heidi
I
have
a
question:
would
it
be
possible
to
lower
I
mean
possible
sorry
to
raise
it
rather,
but
by
anything
less
than
I
mean
if
it
were
three
feet
or
three
and
a
half
feet?
Would
that
would
that
work
in
terms
in
terms
of
your
Headroom
and
clearances.
K
K
On
the
second
floor,
that
ceiling
height
when
it
continues
to
slip
down
towards
the
Front
Street,
that's
at
the
that's
the
minimum
that
we
can
have
so
we're
we've
already
like
we're
trying
to
keep
the
roof
line
low,
even
though
everyone
has
pointed
out
so
that
the
middle
house
was
raised
by
four
feet
several
years
ago
and
that
grade
that's
actual
photography
is
higher,
so
this
house
is
Ridge
is
still
going
to
be
lower
than
the
adjacent's
house
and,
as
I
think
it
was
Dick
would
have
pointed
out.
H
Right
now
and
another
question
from
Heidi
with
the
front
of
the
house
as
opposed,
even
though
it's
in
the
two-dimensional
drawing
it
looks
like
there's
a
lot
more
roof
or
how
would
that
compare
the
house
next
door.
K
It
would
be
exactly
the
same.
It's
being
raised
four
feet
just
like
right.
R
J
What
about
like?
What
was
the
siding
above,
like
the
left
side,
window
I.
D
O
J
The
pitch
I
mean
it:
that's
not
the
current
project,
so
we
don't
really
need
I,
I,
don't
know
if
I
would
approve
the
how
it
looks
almost
like
the
entire
structure
goes
up
with
that
siding.
R
Happen,
yes,
I,
don't
have
an
issues
to
the
situation,
but
the
phrase
of
the
group
I
think
that
there's
more
value
in
retaining
the
house
and
the
character
does
have
I'm
making
it
work
for
the
homeowners
today
than
there
is
lower
enough
foot
and
make
it
so
it's
not
usable
can
I
I.
A
I,
don't
disagree
with
one
of
them
sayings.
Basically,
you
have
three
one-story
bungalows
and
we
now
look
at
appear
to
be
from
the
front
at
least
a
one
and
a
half
stars,
and
it's
really
interesting
I
promise.
So
you
are
changing
the
real
size
of
the
house
from
the
streets
for
the
humidity
and
so
I
think
that,
given
what's
taking
place
in
adjoining
houses,
you
know
we're
gonna.
Have
this
possibly
the
same
issue
down
the
road
on
the
one
on
the
far
right
on
the
left?
That
was
the
original
characters,
all
three
of
themselves.
R
L
I
also
agree
with
what
Rebecca
and
Dickens
said
as
well.
I
think
is,
is
probably
the
best
ideal
option
for
the
actual
homeowner
given
what
they
have
and
I
think
also
four
feet.
Race
keeps
relatively
reasonable
in
compared.
S
F
Say
from
a
stop
perspective,
it's
because
we're
not
we're
not
asking
tonight
it's
just
that,
because
we
review
homes
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
We
need
to
analyze
why
the
argument
for
which
we
support
this,
because
otherwise
saying
one
of
the
very
tool
houses
across
the
street
came
to
us
and
they
wanted
four
additional
feeds.
We
would
without
an
argument
about
each
individual
home.
We
may
need
to
then
legally
approve
for
additional
feed
on
every
house
at
infinitum.
S
Three
stories:
the
next
door
in
this
case
is
one
on
the
side
of
three
right.
You
know,
so
it's
not
I'm,
not
that
house
across
the
street
this
later
and
the
other
way
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
it.
So
I'm
I'm
having
trouble
understanding.
Why
we're?
We
would
want
to
design
these
people
and
whatever
looks
realistic
right
and
it's
somewhat
compatible
and
sympathetic
to
what
was
done
in
the
house
next
door,
which.
H
Is
all
the
same
style
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
not
saying.
Okay,
we've
raised
the
roof
once
four
feet
that,
therefore,
everyone
who
wants
a
forefoot
increase
in
the
bridge
line,
gets
it
but
I
think
considering
the
house
itself
and
how
it
fits
into
its
environment.
And
this
is
this
is
not
necessarily
a
precedent.
M
H
You
know
I
think
we
have
to
take
those
into
into
account,
otherwise
they
can't
do
what
they
you
know
can't
model
the
house
in
a
way
that's
going
to
be
usable
and
that's
not
necessarily
the
standard
for
start
preservation.
B
D
B
B
The
roof
original
iron
raids
is
specific
roof
version.
Rays
is
is
in
accord
with
merely
guidelines
which,
which
was
anti-reserve.
The
relative
scale
of
houses
in
the
neighborhood.
A
C
G
P
A
I
B
C
B
I
Okay,
the
next
item
is
COA
23-03.
This
is
a
Columbia
Pike
four
base
code
project
located
at
2910
Columbia
Pike
involving
the
historic
facade
of
the
Arlington
Hardware
building,
which
the
hlrb
has
purview
over
so
in
June
2004.
The
Columbia
Station
project,
also
known
as
the
Halstead
building,
was
the
first
Columbia
Pike
Farm
based
code
project
involving
a
used
permit
approval
for
a
large
residential
building
with
ground
floor
retail
and
the
preservation
of
the
existing
historic
facade
of
the
Arlington
Hardware
building,
which
is
the
subject
of
this
current
application.
I
F
I
It
with
many
stories
behind
it
and
also
to
go
up
on
the
left,
which
has
my
one
of
my
favorite
restaurants,
Boss
Dog,
Cafe,
all
right.
So
just
so,
you
know
the
hlrb
has
heard
of
this
project
in
the
past,
as
per
the
farm
based
code
requirements
to
hlrb,
granted
a
series
of
coas
for
both
the
Arlington
Hardware
buildings,
facade
renovation
and
for
the
construction
of
the
new
residential
building
that
was
done
in
2004,
but
also
in
2009.
I
At
the
time,
the
P
Brennan's
Irish
Pub
restaurant
owner
moved
into
the
Arlington
Hardware
building
space
brought
mezzanine
modifications
as
an
informational
item
to
the
hlrb
meeting
to
seek
their
support
of
the
project.
The
applicant
at
that
time
worked
with
staff
in
the
hlrb
to
develop
an
overall
design
for
the
restaurant
that
aligned
with
the
overall
purpose
and
intent
of
the
form-based
code
and
the
architectural
style
for
the
area,
and
for
that
project
in
2009.
The
HL
would
be
unanimously
voted
to
endorse
plans
for
the
interior
determinant.
I
The
mezzanine
would
not
detract
from
the
building's
historic
authenticity
and,
in
fact,
totally
improve
its
exterior
parents,
but
the
Brennan's
Restaurant
closed
in
2017
and
the
two
level
space
has
been
vacant
for
the
past
five
years,
just
to
kind
of
go
over
a
little
bit
of
History
the
Arlington
Hardware
building,
which
again
that's
identified
as
a
historic
facade
and
form-based
code.
I
It
was
instructed
around
1920
the
hardware
store
opened
in
1931
and
was
operated
by
David,
Eisen
and
members
of
his
family
until
the
business
closed
in
2004,
and
just
so
you
know
there
were
alterations
done
to
the
historic
facade
in
the
past.
In
1996
there
was
an
electrical
fire
that
required
the
building
to
be
renovated
and
we
believe
that's
a
time
when
Windows
window
Administration
patterns
changed.
We
do
have
some
historic
photographs,
questions.
I
Okay,
so
here
is
the
Arlington
Hardware
building
pre-1996,
because
because
it'll
has
a
lot
of
its
signage,
you
can
also
see
the
windows,
the
Second
Story,
which
are
six
over
one
wood
windows,
those
as
well
as
you
can
see
that
there's
been
some
changes
to
the
first
story.
It
has
a
type
of
cladding
treatment
that
has
like
this
metal,
vertical
metal,
clapboard
type
book
thing
going
to
it,
and
the
storefront
windows
are
these
large
glaze
window
panes.
I
D
I
The
Redevelopment
project
that
was
happening
so,
let's
talk
about
the
application,
the
applicant
and
the
new
restaurant
owners
proposing
to
modify
the
first
story.
The
building's
historic
facade,
The
Proposal,
includes
removing
the
large
plate,
glass
windows
that
are
located
on
both
sides
of
the
recessed
main
entry
and
demolishing
the
exterior
wall
below
the
windows.
The
applicant
proposes
to
install
a
bi-fold
window,
which
will
be
supported
by
a
track
system
that
would
allow
the
windows
to
fold
inside
the
interior
of
the
restaurant's
space.
I
So
the
DRC
considered
this
application
at
its
February
1st
2023
hybrid
meeting
and
after
discussing
the
project
determined
that
enlarging
the
window,
openings
was
not
appropriate,
but
bi-fold
windows
that
match
the
existing
window
opening
would
work.
The
applicant
indicated
that
after
the
meeting
had
closed
and
we
were
contacting
them
the
next
day,
the
applicant
indicated
that
they
had
already
purchased
the
custom
built
bi-fold
window
system
and
requested
that
their
application
be
placed
on
the
discussion
agenda.
I
So
staff's
recommendation
is.
We
do
not
recommend
the
approval
of
the
subject
application
as
submitted,
as
we
showed
some
of
the
historic
photographs
kind
of
indicating
some
of
the
changes
that
had
happened
and
that
after
the
1996
electrical
fire,
it
had
been
renovated
and
reopened
as
a
kitchen
garden
shop
until
it
closed
in
2004..
Both
those
photographs
kind
of
show
the
first
story
on
fenestration
pattern
changing,
but
there
was
still
the
large
plate
glass
windows
that
you
that
you're
kind
of
seeing
right
now
here
on
the
drawings.
I
So
the
reason
we're
not
approving
the
project
is
because-
or
we
do
not
recommend
approval
is
because,
according
to
the
guidance
provided
in
the
form-based
code,
we're
supposed
to
follow
the
Secretary
of
interior
standards
for
rehabilitation
and
that's
really
the
most
guidance
we
have
in
the
form-based
code.
On
this,
we
determined
that
the
subject
application
does
not
comply
with
standard
number.
Two
number
nine
and
number
10
of
the
secretary's
interior
standards
standard
number.
I
Although
the
staff
does
not
consider
the
existing
fixed
windows
or
their
existing
Administration
pattern
to
be
character-defining
features,
staff
does
consider
the
window
and
door
sizing
and
spatial
relationship
on
the
facade
to
be
character-defined
features.
Staff
would
support
a
bi-fold
window
or
another
type
of
operational
window
that
would
fit
within
the
existing
window.
Openings
and
that
concludes
the
stock.
A
A
If
they
open
this
up
to
the
sidewalk
level,
you're
going
to
have
spill
on
them
onto
the
sidewalk,
and
it's
going
to
become
a
palace.
If
this
was
cyborg
a
much
wider
sidewalk
where
you
could
spill
out
of
the
street
or
into
the
sidewalk,
it
would
be
another
issue
perhaps,
but
when
they
think
the
fact
that
there's
such
a
narrow
side
work
here
reinforces
here,
I
do
if
you
drop
the
windows,
all
the
way
down,
you're
just
going
to
have
more
problems.
A
F
G
Hi
yeah,
yes
hi
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
so
the
only
thing
that
I
want
to
add
is
that
the
air
circulation
and
this
restaurant
space,
we
confirmed
everything
with
the
zoning
months
in
advance
and
that
that
is
the
reason.
The
doors
were
all
repurchased
and
they're
already
in
the
storage,
and
this
is
what
was
brought
in
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
before
that
everybody
in
the
zoning
said
that
you
guys
are
good
to
go.
You
guys
could
go
ahead,
do
what
there
are
no
conditions
for
the
massage
until
February.
G
So
now,
what
up?
My
understanding
is
that
this
for
the
electric
issue
that
happened
in
1996
the
whole
Windows,
the
front
was
changed.
G
The
concrete
slab
currently,
which
is
18
inches
below
the
window,
so
they
recommended
that
we
can
still
do
it
in
the
current
Opening
space.
But,
as
you
guys
can
see,
we
have
nothing.
There
is
no
space
in
the
front
where
we
can
put
any
chairs
or
tables
or
what
anything.
There's
no
patio
and
this
place
is
literally
hidden.
G
M
I
The
performance
code,
commercial
area
identifies
different
historic
buildings
or
historic
facades
that
the
hlrb
has
kind
of
authority
over
with
providing
a
COA
for
it,
and
this
is
identified
as
a
historic
facade
in
the
commercial
form-based
code
and
therefore
that
means
that
we
have
purview
over
how
that
historic
facade
is
preserved.
If
you
think
of
the
lovely
projects
we've
seen
lately
with
the
form-based
code,
it
is
up
to
the
interpretation
of
how
the
hlrb
wants
to
apply.
What
a
historic
facade
is.
H
I
I
understand
from
what
I
understand,
Mr
Khan
has
had
conversations
with
zoning
over
the
past
few
months
it
was
brought.
The
project
was
brought
to
our
attention
on
January
12th
of
this
year,
where
zoning
was
working
with
the
customer
because
they
were
proposing
the
changes
with
the
windows.
You
sliding
windows
and
when
that
kind
of
exterior
changes
were
being
posed,
zoning
was
doing
their
research
discovered
that
it
was
a
historic
facade
and
then
contacted
us
to
see.
Is
this
a
type
of
project
that
you
used
to
receive
HL
orb
review.
G
I
would
like
to
ask
something
so
I
personally
spoke
with
Mr
Gomez
at
the
zoning
department
when
we
nearly
first
signed
the
lease
back
in
November
2022.
G
and
then
afterwards,
I
spoke
to
the
gentleman
again
in
May
of
20.
Well,
I'm,
sorry
2021,
yes,
may
last
year
may
so.
I
spoke
to
him
again
and
I
had
a
lengthy
conversation
with
Mr
Gomez,
and
he
said
he
double
checked
everything.
This
building
is
a
2004..
That's
when
it
was
constructed
the
residential.
There
are
no
conditions
with
the
facade
he
explained.
You
know
he
explained
everything
that
if
there
was
any
conditions,
I
would
have
to
go
through
through
you
guys,
but
luckily
I
don't
have
to
do
this.
G
So
then
I
confirmed
with
him
I
was
like
sir.
Is
it
okay
for
me
to
purchase
these
doors
because
these
doors
are
gonna?
Take
three
four
months
for
them
to
deliver
these
doors
and
he
said
yes,
Mr
Khan,
you
can
go
ahead,
do
it
there's
no
problem
whatsoever
and
then,
after
everything,
like
I
purchased,
the
doors
send
the
joints
in
and
that's
when
I
had
a
call
from
him
and
he's
three
weeks
ago,
literally
three
or
four
weeks
ago
that
hey
he
made
a
mistake.
He
made
an
error.
G
This
is
a
historical
landmark
and
I
was
like
sir
I'm
stuck
I'm
like
I.
Don't
understand
this
I'm,
like
I,
already
got
the
space
I
spent
so
much
money,
literally
all
my
savings
into
this
place,
just
because
I
was
able.
Obviously
I
love
the
place.
You
know,
but
I
was
able
to
open
the
front,
at
least
in
the
summertime
and
he's
like
well
I
made
a
mistake.
I
made
an
error,
so
I
don't
know
what
you
do.
I'm
like.
I
Thank
you,
Mr
Khan,
for
providing
more
details
on
that.
On
the
discussions
we've
been
having
with
zoning,
we
have
been
very
sensitive
to
trying
to
be
to
be
getting
all
the
information
that
we
can
about
your
project.
I
We
knew
that
this
would
be
brought
up
during
the
discussion,
and
we
talked
to
zoning
the
zoning
staff
member
you're,
speaking
of
as
well
as
leadership
and
zoning,
and
wanted
to
just
find
out
again
how
this
miscommunication
ended
up
occurring
and
from
what
they
indicated
to
us
is
that
they
do
not
have
discussions
about
things
like
go
ahead
and
purchase
certain
features
or
materials
or
Windows
and
floors,
and
that
that
was
not
something
that
they
do
until
you
receive
an
official
permit
from
them
and
they
have
not
issued
you
any
permit
from
what
we
understand.
G
Okay,
well,
obviously,
Mr
Goldman
is
not
gonna.
Take
accountability,
accountabilities,
but
that's
fine,
but
my
only
thing
is
that,
since
this
is
a
historical
landmark,
what
I
understood,
but
the
changes
were
made
in
1996,
the
new
concrete
slab
was
added,
so
we're
not
trying
to
break
anything,
that's
a
historical
like
when
the
changes
will
all
be
made
and
what
what
I'm,
having
a
hard
time
understanding,
is
that
it
would
be
a
different
story.
G
There
was
no
change
whatsoever
and
everything
was
historical,
but
if
everything
was
changed
in
1996,
this
is
recently.
So
what
seems
to
be
the
issue
now,
if
I,
just
because
we're
just
talking
about
the
concrete
slab
which
is
18
inches
on
the
bottom,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
this?
How
is
that
a
historical
when
it
was
recently
changed.
I
I'm
happy
to
address
that
Mr
Khan,
so
I
understand
we're
not
replaced
reply
tario,
but
based
on
the
changes
that
were
done
in
1996.
We
do
know
that
the
win,
or
at
least,
if
anything,
we
don't
even
have
to
really
talk
about
what
happened
in
1996.
We
can
talk
about
what
happened
in
2004,
because
this
is
stored.
Facade
did
have
the
windows
replaced
at
the
Second
Story
and
the
first
story.
I
We
know
that
that
has
happened,
but
the
pattern
that
you're
seeing
now
the
fenestration
pattern-
the
storefront
window
sizes
that
we're
looking
at
that
has
the
kind
of
the
larger
window
plus
the
transom.
That
has
been
consistent,
so
we've
been
able
to
see
prior
to
1996,
and
so
that
is
the
aspect
of
the
facade
that
we're
trying
to
protect
and
then
with
the
changes
that
you're
proposing
to
kind
of
create
a
full-size
bifolding
window
space
that
enlarges
that
window.
Opening
the
hlrb
needs
to
decide.
I
If
that
is
something
that
they
don't
want
to
allow
or
if
they
want
to
protect
that
or
if
they
feel
that,
because
they
aren't
dealing
with
historic
material
below
the
windows
that
the
windows
have
been
replaced,
they
can
decide
what
they
feel
is
appropriate.
With
this
historic
facade.
B
Sort
of
I
think
thank
you,
Mr
Khan,
but
I.
Think
at
this
point,
I
think
we'll
we'll
continue
this
discussion
sort
of
in
in
a
round
format,
so
I
said
so
Jim's
startup
so
because
you're
you're,
taking
on
the
particular
about
it.
H
Yeah
I
mean
unfortunate
that
there
was
a
miscommunication
but
I
think
that
I
support
keeping
the
original
Administration
pattern.
I
wonder
if
there's
some
way
to
modify
what
he
has
already
ordered.
It
seems
like
cutting
it.
Making
it
shorter
shouldn't,
be
a
huge
issue,
but
you
know
again:
I
don't
know
no.
G
No,
no,
no
ma'am,
it
I
apologize
to
cut
you
off,
but
I
spoke
with
three
different
companies
already.
G
The
problem
is
that
it's
aluminum
foil,
so
aluminum
well
to
cut
it
short
that
every
company
that
I
spoke
to
they're,
saying
there's
nothing
that
could
be
done
so
either,
basically
the
doors
that
I
already
have
and
they're
just
waste.
If
I
don't
get
an
approval,
I
have
to
go
and
order
the
new
ones
and
obviously
spend
all
that
money
I
gave
so
they
can.
They
cannot
modify
them.
O
H
Thank
you,
I
I
would
think
that
the
the
ones
you've
ordered
might
be
able
to
be
sold,
but
in
any
event,
I
mean
I'm.
Thinking
of
a
restaurant
that
I
visited
in
Boston.
That
has
a
similar
configuration
of
Windows
like
this,
with
a
solid
portion
on
the
bottom,
and
then
they
have
the
bifolds
above
and
it
works
really
well
so
I
I
think
that
you
know
I'm.
H
Sorry,
I
really
am
I,
think
maybe
there's
a
way
to
recoup
your
losses
on
the
original
order,
but
and
I
I
would
support
bi-fold
windows
in
the
size
of
the
original
window
or
these
windows
that
are.
Q
And
then
the
department
of
interior
standards
does
dictate
that
new
editions
or
Replacements
should
not
be
made
in
kind
or
be
distinct
from
the
original
I
wonder
if
it
makes
sense
to
use
the
already
purchased
doors,
not
a
reward
for
buying
them
without
a
permit,
but
then
to
defrost
the
bottom
to
maintain
kind
of
that
visual
line,
but
make
sure
it's
distinct
as
a
way
to
somehow
kind
of
bridge
that
historic
portions,
but
still
allow
continued
use.
R
I
think
and
I
know.
This
was
something
that
we
talked
about
in
the
DRC
meeting
and
suggested
that
same
Restaurant
in
Boston
that
have
the
bifold
windows
but
I
think
looking
around
at
the
neighborhood
and
the
surrounding
buildings.
There
is
not
a
precedent
of
floor
to
ceiling
doors
or
Windows
in
any
of
the
retail
they're
all
have
that
18
to
24
inch
base
and
I
think
being
able
to
see
the
historic
photos
between
the
DRC
meeting
and
now
is
really
helpful.
R
I
do
think.
There's
value
in
preserving
the
original
Administration
opening
I
would
support
deviating
and
doing
the
bifold
Windows
as
a
sympathetic
to
the
reason
of
needing
airflow
in
the
restaurant
and
the
change
that
they
use,
but
I
think,
given
the
fact
that
those
bifold
doors
are
not
code
required
and
cannot
be
used
per
code
and
that
it's
such
a
narrow,
sidewalk
I,
don't
think
that
there
is
a
case
for
deviating
from
the
historic
facade.
L
Yeah
I
I
completely
agree
with
that
as
well.
That
would
be,
it
would
be
out
of
character
for
all
the
other
buildings
around
there,
especially
in
Columbia,
Pike
and
I
also
would
support
that
as
well,
and
it
would
in
terms
of
the
Bible
windows
and
potential
options,
do
in
your
flu
issues,
but
I
do
think
that
the
Federation
issues
have
been
proposed
on
Healthcare.
D
B
M
I
don't
know
I
I,
don't
really
quite
understand
what
the
point
of
having
to
hold
to
the
ground
Bible
to
where
it
is.
If
there's
nothing,
you
know
just
for
your
circulation.
What's
the
point
really
it's!
It's
sort
of
unfortunate:
what's
happened
with
the
zoning
group,
but
I
think
the
applicant
is
confident
that
he
was
sometimes
she
cut
up.
The
zoning
and
doctors
and
lawyers.
S
J
I
did
I
just
had
a
couple
comments.
You
know.
I
was
just
kind
of
trying
on
my
own
to
to
see
if
there
should
have
been
something
the
applicant
should
have
picked
up
on
in
his
own
research,
because
I
do
think
he
should
probably
be
relying
on
the
city
he
should
have
looked,
but
I
do
want
to
say
you
know
very
quick
research
doesn't
pop.
This
up
has
a
story.
J
So
that
I,
don't
think
the
final
opinion,
but
I
did
have
a
further
question.
So
I
am
just
really
surprised.
I
mean
I'm
a
little
confused,
but
I
think
everyone's
saying
that
these
current
Windows
size
has
never
been
changed.
I
J
I
F
We
do
also
have
some
text
a
description
of
people
visiting
to
see
the
window
displays
because
the
windows
were
used
for
display
in
the
30s.
So
we
have
like
not
images
but
written
language,
saying
that
people
would
go
and
look
at
the
window
displays
and.
J
It's
a
1920
building.
That's
so
we
don't
know
what
the
windows
looks
like.
C
M
F
F
J
Size:
okay,
good!
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
clearing
that
up.
Okay,
so
yeah
I
think
mine
were
basically
just
comments
that
that
I
I
do
think.
J
To
us,
but
I
I
do
actually
so
I
had
to
do
a
two-step
process.
On
my
quick
little
search
and
I
I'm,
pretty
sure
I
did
find
that
it
was
historical
Columbia.
J
Pike
and
if
this
is
similar.
D
A
The
DRC
meeting
that
I
think
are
a
recommendation,
was
basically
this
coming
before
it's
important,
because
I
thought
the
type
of
Windows.
They
were
sympathize
because
of
the
width
of
the
cyborg
and
very
narrow
that
there's
no
option
to
putting
tables
side
restaurant
typical
and
appreciate
the
fact
that
I
want
to
get
some
fresh
air
into
it.
A
You
select,
the
windows
were
proposed
if
they
were
set
on
the
same,
if
you
will
raise
I.
Think
it's
about
2
by
2
inches
would
be
a
reasonable
needed
to
be
brought
to
the
full
board
because
of
the
form-based
code
passes,
I'm,
surprised
quite
frankly
that
they
actually
we
had
this.
So
they
do
not
say
there
was
nothing
said
about
the
fact
they
had
purchased
these
windows
at
the
DRC
meeting.
B
B
So,
essentially,
here
everybody's
comments,
I
think
it's
and
I
would
also
agree
thanks,
but
I
think
this
is
fortunate
sort
of
was
was
transpired
here
in
terms
of
sort
of
the
the
is
it
where
I
purchased
since
we're
the
order
of
approval,
but
I
kind
of
echo.
What
others
have
said,
I
think
that
it
would
be
inappropriate
sort
of
it'll
be
inappropriate
rather
per
these
part
of
the
Interior
standards
to
to
allow
an
awful
hit
when
the
SS
locations
so
I
think
that
sort
of
given.
P
D
G
Sorry
I
have
one
question:
I
apologize
so
just
to
understand
this
correctly.
So
if
I'm
able
to
basically
order
new
windows,
but
so
you
guys
are
saying,
I
can
put
the
windows,
but
in
the
current
Opening
space
only.
B
F
That
meeting
would
be
on
March
1st,
so
see
who
get
the
documentation
together
by
March
by
one
week
before
so
about
a
week
ahead
of
March,
one
which
I
wish
I
knew.
What
that
day
was
I
could
put
you
on
the
DRC
agenda,
and
then
you
would
know
that
day
if
you're
going
to
be
put
on
the
consent
or
there's
agenda,
which
would
give
you
a
lot
more
information
about
whether
you
need
to
adapt
that
design
and
come
back
with
some
more
options.
We
also
recommend
coming
forward
with
options.
F
So
if
you
were
interested
in
the
bifolds
but
also
would
consider
sliding
or
would
consider
overhead,
we
recommend
coming
in
with
as
many
options
as
possible,
so
that
the
hlrb
can
give
you
a
full
understanding.
Okay,
I.
G
So,
like
I
said
before
I
know:
Mr
Gomez
is
recalling
so
in
the
original
plan.
When
I
leave
this
space
when
I
spoke
with
the
zoning,
my
original
plan
was
to
push
the
windows
and
the
door
like
at
least
six
feet
in
the
restaurant,
so
I
can
have
a
patio
outside,
and
at
that
time
they
told
me
that
same
exact
thing,
that
there
is
no
conditions
on
a
facade
and
you're
able
to
do
that.
So,
but
when
I
looked
at
the
cost
to
do
all
that,
it
was
way
too
much.
G
D
G
Whatsoever,
I
ran
and
ordered
and
placed
the
order
and
paid
all
this
and
got
the
doors
in
and
then
submitted
the
drawings
to
them
to
get
an
approval
because
technically
I
was
given
a
go,
be
like
yeah,
you
can
do
it.
Just
have
a
have
the
have
the
architect
and
engineer
to
submit
the
plans
and
when
we
did
that
and
that's
that's
when
he
came
back
and
we
can't
recanted
his
statement
and
be
like
hey
I
made
a
mistake
and
his
exact
words
are
exactly
as
it
could.
I
made
a
mistake.
I
Mr
Khan
this
is
this-
is
Lauren
Ferris
I
wanted
to
just
kind
of
also
mention
if
you
are
considering
so
first
off.
We
basically
just
said
that,
if
you
want
to
explore
window
options
within
the
window,
openings
come
back.
Yeah.
D
I
The
Dr,
the
DRC
on
March
1st.
We
would
need
that
material
from
you
by
next
Wednesday
and
that
that
would
be
reviewed
and
they
would
determine
what
would
be
the
next
best
step
for
you.
That
being
said,
just
so
that
you're
completely
clear
with
this
building,
any
changes
that
are
being
made
to
the
exterior
needs
to
come
to
this
board
to
the
hlrb.
That
also
includes
signage.
G
No
not
yet
I
was
planning
on
submitting
the
application
next
week.
Okay,.
I
I
I
Let
everybody
know
that
we
will
be
having
a
discussion
with
Sony
tomorrow
to
let
them
know
what
the
outcome
is
of
this
evening,
to
also
find
to
understand
what
happened
with
communication,
because
it's
been
a
while
at
least
I
haven't
seen
it
since
I've
been
here.
So
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
understand
what
did
happen
and
make
I
also
do
like
Miss
Myers
renovation
of
trying
to
make
it
as
easy
as
possible
for
residents
and
business
owners
to
be
able
to
identify
in
the
documents.
I
What
is
going
on
with
the
properties
that
they're
in
I
know,
I
can
find
it,
but
I
also
look
at
them.
Every
day,
so,
I
think
that
it's
a
good
point
to
raise
to
to
the
appropriate
people.
Thank.
M
D
M
C
M
Was
it
was
the
it
was
the
21st
Avenue
shed
in
the
backyard
garage,
and
it
had
to
do.
C
We
need
to
make
sure
the
internal
processes
are
working
like
they're
supposed
to
and
there's
really
something
didn't
quite
go
right
this
time.
So
we
will
follow
up
with
zoning
and
do
our
best
to
try
to
prevent
this.
J
From
happening
again,
I
have
one
I,
have
one
more
comment
not
to
get
too
into
the
details,
but
maybe
to
give
the
applicant
a
little
advice
on
what
he's
looking
for
I
don't
know
if
anyone
was
looking
at
the
smaller
window
in
the
larger
window,
but
it
looks
like
on
their
drawings
that
it's
just
it's
just
one
big
window,
so
I
didn't
know
if
I.
J
H
O
D
S
B
I
hope
that
will
make
a
motion
so
I'll
sit
here,
so
I
moved
to
hlov
denied
their
opposed
Columbia
Farm
basic
code,
modifications
at
2910,
Columbia,
Pike
they're.
Both
modification
does
not
comply
with
standards.
Two
nine
and
ten,
the
Secretary
of
interior
standards,
rehabilitation.
B
Earning
thoughts
on
them
with
each
other.
Thank
you.
H
C
Okay,
please
respond.
Yes,
if
you
support
the
motion
as
proposed
Mr
Aiken.
L
K
S
A
B
F
This
is
our
final
discussion
agenda
item
for
the
evening
before
I
start
can
I
confirm
I
believe
Mr
author's
on
the
line.
Do
we
have
the
RJ
West.
E
D
F
Thank
you
so
much.
Okay,
so
middle
of
the
final
door
schedule
for
an
ongoing
Rehabilitation
project
for
the
Sears
home
at
3421,
21st
Avenue,
North,
constructed
Circa
1933
is
most
likely
an
example
of
the
widespread
model
in
January
2022.
The
hrb
approved
20
COA
2131
for
the
demolition
of
an
existing
1980s
era,
rear
Edition
and
construction
of
a
two
and
a
one-half
story.
Rear
Edition
in
June
2022,
the
hlrb
approved
COA
2131a
to
scale
back
the
initial
project
to
only
renovate
the
historic
house
and
remove
the
80s
Edition
in
October
2022.
F
The
hlrb
approved
some
window
changes
in
the
home
of
the
garage
in
the
current
application.
The
applicant
proposes
to
modify
the
doors
in
COA
2131,
so
the
front
door
would
be
sorry.
These
are
the
previously
stamped
plans.
So
you
see
where
the
doors
are.
Then
let
me
pull
up.
Okay,
so
the
front
door.
There
we
go,
we'll
change
from
a
10
light,
Dormer
to
a
panel
door
with
two
rows
of
three
clear
glass
lights
over
two
vertical
solid
fur
wooden
panels.
F
F
The
applicant
is
also
submitting
our
final
garage
door
choice
for
the
new
construction
two-car
garage.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
la
Madre
the
double
doors
from
the
overhead
door:
company
in
solid
Cedar,
with
three
clear
glass
lights
in
the
top
of
each
door.
The
DRC
committee
I
don't
know
why
I
said
that
the
DRC
consider
these
this
application,
that
is
February
1st
2023
hybrid
meeting.
The
DFC
had
no
questions
or
concerns
and
places
item
on
the
consent
agenda.
F
However,
the
applicant
had
disability
the
garage
door
brochure
before
the
deadline,
but
forgotten
to
make
Mark
the
preferred
style,
so
it
was
not
reviewed
by
the
DRC.
Therefore,
this
application
was
moved
to
the
discussion
agenda
in
terms
of
Staff
recommendation.
We
recommended
prequel
subject:
application
the
proposed
doors
will
be
solid
wood
and
clear
glass,
which
is
appropriate
per
chapter.
Five
of
the
mayor
design
guidelines
and
the
garage
door.
E
Thank
you,
yes,
I
do
actually
Serena.
Thank
you.
The
the
plan
calls
for
two
individual
doors,
not
a
double
door.
Well,.
E
A
To
open
I'll
work
instead
of
uber
as
a
doors
but
consistent
garages,
a
new
garage.
C
So
please
say:
yes,
if
you
support
the
motion:
Mr
Aiken,
yes,
Mr,
Davis,
yes,
Ms
Foster,
yes,
Ms
ham,.
G
A
B
Okay,
now
on
to
the
chairman
report,
I
said
one
quick
for
Unique
one.
So
last
two
prize
ago,
I
spoke
with
our
the
accounting
board
days
on
living
Garden,
a
physician
conversation
teachers
and
some
thoughts
about
about
preservation
here
and
there,
but,
but
once
we're
once
we're
like
this
thing,
that
I
was
interesting,
very
interesting.
Actually
I
should
mentioned.
B
She
mentioned
the
idea
of
of
the
day,
trailer,
hlrb,
sort
of
sort
of
taking
on
or
sort
of
discussing
or
thinking
more
about,
Austin's
prehistory,
that's
something
that
we're
not
really
tasked
with,
obviously,
on
an
unsort
day-to-day
basis,
we're
more
of
an
architectural
board.
However,
it
should
be
staff.
It
has
told
me
that
the
potentially
archaeological
sort
of
programmer
person
could
be
part
of
the
future
of
18
Edition
HPP
in
the
future.
B
C
Could
I
have
one
follow-up
to
that
in
terms
of
each
other
being
capacity?
You
know
you're
allowed
to
have
up
to
15
members,
and
so
you
have
two
vacancies
right
now,
so
something
to
think
about
going
forward.
You
know
getting
some
archaeological
expertise
on
the
commission
might
be
a
way
to
also
explore
topics
that
we
don't
normally
discuss
so
or.
B
The
county
budget
process
is
sort
of
actually,
it's
kind
of
departments
will
be
receiving
a
draft
budget.
I
think
it
seems
like
next
Tuesday
and
the
now
kids,
so
it
can
sort
of
kick
off
and
the
accounting
budgeting
sort
of
discussion.
D
B
Of
a
horse
trading
process,
so
it's
part
of
that
hlrb
staff
and
also
leadership,
also
also
the
coordination.
Rather,
we
went
before
I
guess,
the
kind
of
manager,
the
staff
and
so
forth
and
I
sort
of
putting
forth
putting
forth
our
case.
Foreign.
C
So
that's
a
great
segue
staff
report.
We
have
a
few
things
to
mention.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everyone.
You
know
please.
We
would
appreciate
your
your
help
in
trying
to
promote
the
historic
preservation
fund.
We've
talked
about
it
a
few
times
at
the
last
few
meetings.
There's
been
a
lot
of
really
good
Community
interest
in
it.
So
we
know
we've
got
some
applications
in
progress
and
we've
been
meeting
with
people
who
have
questions
and
want
to
discuss
projects.
C
So
there
is
still
plenty
of
time
for
folks
to
apply
so,
please,
you
know,
send
people
to
us.
If
you
hear
friends
and
neighbors
and
others
you
might
be
interested
or
who
have
some
interesting
projects,
we'd
love
to
talk
to
them.
Next
I
wanted
to
mention
a
few
things
about
the
historic
preservation
master
plan.
As
our
chairman
mentioned,
we
are
hopefully
in
the
home
stretch.
C
I've
been
trying
to
be
better
about
giving
you
all
regular
updates
on
the
latest
update
is,
we
are
still
waiting
on
the
final
I
shouldn't
say
the
full
complete
draft.
That
is
graphically
designed
we're
waiting
on
that
from
our
consultant,
and
we
need
to
get
that
through
accounting
leadership
over
the
next
couple
weeks,
and
our
goal
would
be
to
release
the
draft
of
the
plan
to
the
public
in
March.
C
To
learn
about
the
draft
from
the
consultant
team
to
ask
questions
to
really
kind
of
study
the
document,
and
then
we
would
be
bringing
the
document
back
to
you
at
a
future
date.
C
So
with
that
we've
been
working
with
the
consultant
to
tentatively
schedule
that
special
session
in
April
the
week
following
our
regular
meeting.
So
we
were
hoping
to
do
that
on
Wednesday,
April,
26th,
probably
same
time,
6
30.
We
can
work
that
out,
but
we
wanted
to
kind
of
take
a
quick,
strap
hold
to
see
how
many
of
you
would
be
available
to
attend
that
and
we
would
offer
it.
You
know
hybrid.
C
So
you,
if
you
can't
physically,
come
in
here
under
the
room,
that's
fine,
but
we
did
want
to
make
sure
that
there
was
sufficient
time,
which
is.
Why
is
why
we
felt
it
more
into
its
own
special
needing
so
just
at
first
glance,
putting
you
all
on
the
spot.
Does
that
seem
like
a
doable
date
either
for
in
person
or
remote?
M
D
F
C
C
Okay,
okay,
well,
we'll
coordinate
as
it
gets
closer
it's
a
baby,
okay,
all
right!
Well,
we
have
some
time.
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
they're.
You
know
most
of
you
could
be
there
and
so
we'll
get
things
firmed
up
with
the
consultant
and
then
report
back
and
let
you
know
about
that
date.
C
N
Hopefully
you
got
my
email
earlier
this
month,
asking
for
some
volunteer
assistance
at
our
open
house
event,
so
I'm
going
to
just
reiterate
some
points
I
made
in
that
email
and
make
the
call
again
for
help
at
that
event,
and
so
it's
happening
Saturday
May
6th
from
12
to
3.,
and
it
is
going
to
be
one
of
the
biggest
events
that
our
program
putting
on
as
part
of
our
engagement
plan,
so
we're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
other
events
happening,
but
this
is
really
the
big
one
and
it
is
being
held
at
Central,
library's
Auditorium,
it's
open
to
the
entire
community.
N
So
we're
really
hoping
we
have
a
good
turnout,
we're
going
to
do
a
lot
of
promotion
for
it.
We
ask
that
you
all
definitely
promote
it
within
your
own
circles,
friends,
neighbors
family.
We
really
encourage
everybody
to
come,
but
because
it's
one
of
our
biggest
events,
we
really
need
help
with
volunteering.
N
So
the
event
itself
is
going
to
have
a
lot
of
different
like
learning
stations.
Most
of
them
are
going
to
touch
upon
the
plan
and
kind
of
how
we
approach
preservation
in
the
county.
We're
also
going
to
have
a
lot
of
stations
that
talk
about
that
our
spaces
for
our
partners,
both
internal
and
like
County
departments
and
also
external
Partnerships,
so
they
get
to
share
some
of
their
information
as
well
and
how
we
work
together.
N
But
for
you
all
the
specific
role
we've
really
use,
some
assistance
with
is
there's
two
one
is
closers.
It's
exactly
what
it
sounds
like
you
just
walk
around.
You
talk
to
people
you
see.
If
anyone
has
any
questions,
the
other
one
are
table
sitters.
We
have
two
tables
that
we
could
utilize.
Some
of
your
help
at
one
is
the
welcome
table
exactly
what
it
sounds
like
and
the
other
one
is
the
halrb
table.
N
So
we
want
to
use
this
opportunity
for
you
all
to
explain
to
you
think
you
do
who
you
are
that
type
of
thing.
N
So
all
that
being
said,
if
you
guys
could
get
back
to
me,
if
you
think
you
could
attend
even
if
you
could
just
attend
for
an
hour
or
two,
you
do
not
have
to
be
there
for
a
whole
event.
We're
going
to
be
there
all
day.
So
if
you
want
to
help
set
up
or
break
down
and
also
welcome
that,
but
just
go
ahead,
and
let
me
know
if
you're
available-
and
that
would
be
perfect
and
thank
you
for
those
who
already
have.
C
C
C
And
that
was
everything
we
had
on
the
staff
report.
I
do
want
to
not
forget
to
do
the
quick
poll
just
so
we
can
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
people
in
person
for
March
and
that
meeting
your
next
meeting
will
be
March
15th.
So
everyone
quickly
get
out
your
calendars
sign
so
much
you
guys.
Oh
the
eye,
support.
C
So
with
that
see,
I'll
just
do
roll
call
really
quickly,
and
let's
just
let
me
know
if
you
can
be
here
in
person-
John,
yes,
Amari,
yes,
Alex,
possibly,
okay,
Carmella.
S
Probably
it's
spring
break
I,
don't
I'll
either
be
here
or
South
Carolina.
So,
okay.