►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
A
Then
the
commission
will
hear
a
request
to
advertise
for
updates
to
the
clarendon
sector
plan
and,
finally,
the
commission
will
handle
updates
from
commission
committees
and
other
commission
business
if
you
are
here
for
the
arlington
forest
neighborhood
conservation
plan,
the
wendy's
site
or
zoning
modifications
to
the
rixie
building
in
boston.
Those
items
were
heard
last
monday
night
and
will
come
before
the
county
board.
A
Excuse
me
later
this
month,
some
required
items
to
share
for
the
safety
of
our
staff
and
residents.
We
are
holding
tonight's
meeting
virtually
so
welcome
to
commissioners,
county
staff,
applicants
and
community
members
who
are
joining
us
remotely.
We
are
legally
authorized
to
hold
this
virtual
meeting
based
on
the
governor's
executive
orders,
legislation
adopted
by
the
virginia
general
assembly
and
the
county
board's
continuity
of
operations
ordinance
adopted
in
march
2020
before
we
begin
a
few
specifics
to
orient
everyone
to
our
virtual
environment.
A
Excuse
me,
tonight's
meeting
is
available
as
a
broadcast
with
closed
captioning
on
comcast,
xfinity
channels,
25
and
1085,
verizon
files
channels,
39
and
40,
and
the
county
website.
Audio
of
tonight's
meeting
is
available
via
phone.
If
commissioners,
presenters
or
speakers
lose
internet
connectivity
during
tonight's
meeting,
please
reconnect
with
us
by
phone.
I
understand
that
you
can
use
the
phone
number
provided
in
the
team's
invite
that
was
circulated
and
registered.
Speakers
have
also
received
ms
johnson's
number
in
their
speaker.
Registration
confirmation.
A
Excuse
me
for
other
presenters
and
speakers
joining
us
through
microsoft
teams.
Please
keep
your
phones
and
devices
muted
until
you
are
called
upon
and
please
turn
off
sound
to
any
other
devices
around
to
minimize
interference
and
please
keep
your
cameras
off
until
the
calls
on
you
to
speak
when
you
are
called
upon
to
speak,
please
unmute
yourself
by
clicking
on
the
microphone
icon.
That's
located
on
your
meeting
bar
the
moderator
does
not
have
the
ability
to
unmute
you
once
you
have
spoken.
A
You
will
be
called
upon
by
the
clerk
at
an
assigned
time,
pre-registration
to
speak
at
tonight's
meeting
was
required
and
we
are
not
able
to
accommodate
additional
speakers.
Public
comment
will
take
place
within
the
same
time
frames
as
we
would
provide
at
an
in-person
meeting.
Speakers
will
have
three
minutes
to
comment
as
individuals
in
five
minutes.
If
they
are
representing
an
organization
speaking,
it
will
be
provided
on
this
again
by
phone
and
unable
to
see
the
screen.
We
will
provide
an
audible
warning
when
30
seconds
are
remaining
you'll,
then
be
muted.
A
When
your
time
is
concluded,
the
meeting
chang
is
for
presenters
and
commissioners
who
need
technical
assistance.
Please
do
not
use
the
meeting
chat
for
discussion
or
public
comment,
questions
about
agenda
items
or
requests
for
more
information.
A
public
comment
must
be
shared
verbally
before
the
record
during
the
assigned
testimony
period
and
finally,
a
reminder
that
this
is
a
public
forum.
Tonight's
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
posted
to
the
county
website
and
all
information
associated
with
tonight's
meeting,
whether
written
or
spoken,
is
subject
to
virginia
freedom
of
information
act
requirements.
C
D
Good
evening,
everyone,
my
name
is
madam
clerk,
said-
is
alexis
geo,
and
I
am
the
author
of
the
board
report
for
both
zoning
and
planning
and
their
changes
to
the
development
fee
schedule.
D
What
we
are
currently
proposing
for
the
county
board
to
approve
is
a
4.0
inflationary
increase
across
all
development
fees,
which
includes
planning
fees,
zoning
fees,
some
inspection
services,
division
fees
and
some
department
and
environmental
services
fees.
This
inflationary
increase
is
associated
with
the
annual
salary
increases
and
benefit
increases
that
happen
annually
with
our
staff,
and
it
is
to
keep
us
on
pace
with
making
sure
that
the
development
fund
fees
can
pay
for
the
services
being
rendered.
D
We
also
have
a
decrease
being
proposed,
which
is
for
the
landscape
plan
for
one
and
two
family
dwellings.
This
fee
currently
is
we.
The
fee
was,
was
evaluated
by
staff
and
identified
as
a
fee.
That
was
charging
more
than
the
effort
that
was
required.
So
this
these,
the
one
and
two
family
dwellings
are
the
r27
district
dwellings
and
so
as
a
way
to
make
sure
that
our
fees
represent
the
amount
of
work
and
effort
put
into
it
and
because
of
the
types
of
home
they
are
in
our
effort
to
work
in
equity.
D
We
decided
that
this
fee
needed
to
be
lowered
or
could
be
lowered
and
was
and
overall
that
change
is
going
from
an
almost
900
to
166
dollars
per
the
amount
of
staff.
Time
worked
on
said
fee.
D
D
Regular
feed
that
major
site
plans
are
being
charged
for
their
amendments.
This
literally
is
just
a
clarification
so
that
people
who
are
submitting
their
applications
understand
that
the
same
fleet
fee
will
now
be
applied
to
their
submission.
They
are
submitting
for
the
pdsp,
people
are
already
paying
it.
There
is
no
increase
or
decrease
the
fee.
It's
just
making
sure
that
the
fee
schedule
is
clear
to
those
who
are
applying
for
it.
Then
another
typical
question
we
have
and
the
last
one
is
a
resubmission
for
fee
for
site
plan
applications.
D
This
is
just
to
clarify
that
when
the
when
someone
resubmits
a
site
plan
application
after
it's
been
reviewed
the
first
time,
then
you
resubmit
it
with
corrections
that
there
is
a
fee
associated
with
it.
There
are
there
already
is
a
fee
associated
with
it.
This
is
just
letting
people
know
ahead
of
time
that
there
is
a
fee
associated
with
it
and
for
every
resubmission
instead
of
just
the
first
one,
because
sometimes
there's
multiple,
and
that
is
it.
B
A
A
D
It
does
unless
there
are
any
questions.
Yes,.
A
I
thought
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
gear
down
as
fast
as
I
could
are
there
medical
do.
We
have
any
public
speakers
on
this
item.
C
E
Can
you
guys
hear
me
check
my
check
my
check?
Yes,
all
right,
I
had
a
question
for
staff,
commissioner,
with
the
fee
reduction
item.
Just
a
question
for
staff:
when
is
a
landscape
plan
required
under
a
one
or
two
dwelling
unit
review
process?
Would
that
be
exclusively
when
either
greater
than
twenty
five
hundred
square
feet
of
surface
area
development
is
triggered
or
a
complete
redevelopment.
F
Hi
this
is
laura
schaab.
I
can
answer
that
question
for
you
guys,
so
the
that
would
be
the
lda
requirement,
which
is
separate
from
the
landscape
fee
and
the
landscape
plan
review,
so
the
landscape
plan
reviews
are
triggered
in
an
r27
district
when
either
this
the
lot
is
non-conforming.
F
It
has
some
sort
of
site
restrictions
on
it
that
it's
a
non-conforming
lot.
So
if
they
go
to
do
any
sort
of
building
on
the
property,
they
are
triggered
to
meet
a
requirement
for
shrub
coverage.
So
it's
a
very
minimal
change
or
minimal
request
for
for
this
shrub
coverage.
It's
in
the
zoning
ordinance
just
specifically
for
r27s.
F
So
if
they
are,
if
they're
in
a
non-conforming
lot,
it
triggers
that
it's
it's
something
sure
go
ahead.
E
E
F
There
are
other
instances
where,
in
the
other
are
districts
if
it
is
a
non-conforming
lot
again
like
if
there's,
if
there's
some
stipulation
where
I
guess
it's
it-
the
building
isn't
meeting
setback
requirements.
Then
it
does
trigger
this
landscape
plan
coverage.
F
But
r27
is
the
one
that's
very
specific
to
shrub
coverage
and
what
we're
finding
is
that
these
most
of
the
most
the
landscape
plans
that
have
come
in
are
for
small
duplexes,
so
they're,
not
they're,
not
major,
overhauls
or
tear
downs,
they're,
small
duplexes,
where
they're
doing
a
deck
renovation
or
something
on
site.
E
I
appreciate
that
from
staff.
Sorry,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
clear
and
not
lowering
the
fee
where
the
the
general
outcome
or
the
the
triggering
function
of
it
was
redevelopment
significantly.
F
E
Commissioner,
where,
if
you
don't
mind,
I'd
like
to
trigger
another
question,
if
you
don't
mind
as
a
follow-up
now
based
on
auto
response,
not
at
all
all
right.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
So
I
want
to
understand
from
staff.
So
are
you
telling
me
that
we
are
charging
the
r2-7
district
duplex
for
the
landscape
plan
to
meet
shrub
requirements,
the
exact
same
fee
as
we
require
for
the
landscape
plan
for
jbg
on
23rd
street.
F
E
F
B
E
A
Hearing
none
I
am
going
to
I
I.
Unless
someone
is
eager
to
do
so,
I
will
move
the
staff
recommended
motion
I'll.
E
A
I
always
yeah
I
I
prefer
to,
as
as
as
commissioner
schroell
would.
Probably
sympathize
prefer
to
entertain
motions
as
when
presiding
than
to
make
them
myself.
So,
commissioner
schroll,
thank
you.
H
H
E
A
If
you
want
to
step
up
first
well,
are
we
that's?
That's
a
really
good
question,
because
what
that
means
is
that
we'd
be
authorizing
the
hearing
for
tonight.
A
So
the
motion
the
county
manager
recommended
motion
for
us
tonight
is
to
well
for,
for
the
commission
is
to.
This
is
probably
because
this
is.
A
Yes,
this
is
because
it's
dated
from
february
so
it's
carried
over
and
so
the
the
the
county
manager,
the
text
of
the
county
manager
recommendation,
which
is
what
commissioner
schroell
read
and
we
can
we'll
amend
it,
we'll
just
just
meet.
The
actual
dates
is
a
recommendation
to
authorize
hearings
on
the
31st
of
this
month
for
the
board
and
the
7th
of
this
month.
For
us,
and
the
seventh
of
this
month
was
two
days.
A
I
assume
that
that
the
hearings
will
be
in
april.
Can
can
you
give
us
some
dates
that
we
can
swap
in
for
those
and
commissioners
for
all
you
I'll
go
to
you
next
or.
H
So
miss
gayard
might
might
jump
in
here
with
his
answer
or
other
staff,
but
my
what
we
often
have
done
in
the
past,
particularly
on
an
issue
like
this
is
we
are,
I
think,
advertising
tonight's
hearing
and
so
but
and
that's
what
we
we've
actually
done.
This,
where
we've
actually
done
the
rta
for
the
meeting
that
we're
in.
A
E
I
I
think,
commissioner,
I
think
what
has
happened
here
is
that
this
is
we
we,
we
we're
falling
into
the
same
trap.
I
think,
as
we
fell
in
last
month,
with
failing
to
meet
some
of
our
statutory
obligations.
E
So
I
think
I
think
what
we
have
to
do
is
that
the
rta
for
tonight's
meeting
hopefully
was
advertised
for
the
ninth
and
not
the
seventh,
and
we
do
need
to
pick
a
date
to
actually
hold
the
vote.
To
approve
these
in.
A
April
so
ms
is
this:
is
this
teed
up
to
go
to
the
board
for
action
in
this
month,
or
is
it
going
to
the
board
for
action
in
in
a
future
month?.
D
I
don't
know
that's
a
really
good
question.
Madam
clerk,
do
you
have
any
insight
into
that.
A
A
Okay,
the
the
motion
in
the
staff
report
is
authorizing
the
advertisement
of
public
hearings
by
the
board
to
be
held
march
31st
and
by
this
commission
to
be
held
march
7th,
which
was
two
days
ago,
and
so
we
can't
really
recommend
to
the
board
that
they
advertise
hearings
for
a
date
in
the
past,
and
so
I'm
just
trying
to
given
that
the
board
is,
is
going
to
be
holding
this
hearing
now
in
in
march.
B
E
C
A
C
A
A
Tonight,
despite
the
fact
that
the
board
won't
be
able
to
act
on
that
recommendation
between
now
and
now,
but
I
I'm
really
open
to
being
told
I'm
overthinking
this,
commissioner
schroll,
you
still
got
your
hand
up.
H
Yeah
this
is,
you
know
candidly.
I
understand
the
the
logical
challenges
with
the
way
this
is
crafted
and
that
we're
thinking
about
advertising,
something
that
has
already
happened
right,
but
we
have
done
this
previously.
This
is
the
way
we
did
this
last
time
it
came
before
the
commission,
and
so
we've
dealt
with
this
things
like
this
in
similar
fashion
previously
as
a
commission.
So
I
trust,
commissioner.
A
Yeah,
if
I
mean,
if
there's
precedent
for
it,
then
I'm
I'm
not
I'm
not
going
to
be
the
one
to
kick
everything
over.
So
I
I
think
that
the
motion
then
is
given
given
commissioner
gear
and
I'll
go
to
you
in
a
moment.
Actually,
commissioner,
karen,
let
me
go
to
you
before,
I
finish
my
thought
and
you
can
perhaps
save
me
from
articulating
a
bad
one.
I
I'm
not
concerned
with
our
date.
I
think
commissioner
schwab
was
getting
to
this
as
well,
and
our
clerk
pointed
it
out.
It's
fine
if
our
date
said
the
seventh,
because
our
meeting
was
the
seventh
and
this
is
a
carryover
or
recess
meeting.
I'm
only
concerned
about
the
county
board
date
and
staff
can
correct
me
but,
as
as
james
said,
we've
done
this
before
I
don't
know
about
the
board
hearing
dave.
D
Yes,
I
was
instructed
just
to
notify
you
that
this
was
advertised
with
the
county
board
when
the
county
manager
proposed
his
fy
23
budget
in
february,
and
so
this
the
board
report
you're
seeing,
is
the
board
report
that
was
used
for
that,
and
that
was
when
we,
when
we
worked
with
when
I
worked
with
planning
staff
to
figure
out
the
next
planning
commission
date
where
this
would
be
heard
and
that's
how
march
7th
came
about.
So
this
has
already
been
advertised
on
the
county
board
side.
A
So
then,
I'm
gonna
seek
I'm
gonna,
seek
unanimous
consent
from
the
commission
to
withdraw
the
the
initial
motion
and
we
can
just
start
from
from
the
we
can
start
from
scratch
because
the
the
motion
is
made,
I
think,
isn't
completely
in
order,
given
that
it's
it
that
it
is
recommending
action
that
the
board
took
a
month
ago.
Does
that
is
there
anyone
that
does
that
make
sense
to
anyone
or
not
make
sense
to
anyone.
C
A
C
A
Yeah,
so
what
I'm
hearing
from
from
you,
ms
guillot,
is
that
that
the
recommend
the
the
motion
that
commissioner
schroll
made
as
to
is
was
as
made,
was
to
recommend
action
that
the
board
already
took.
And
so
the
motion
that
would
be
in
order
is
not
to
recommend
the
hearings.
But
the
actual
adoption
of
the
of
the
changes.
D
A
Option
great,
so
I
I
I
did
end
up
somehow
overthinking
it
not
somehow
that's
just
what
I
do
commissioner's
role.
I'm
gonna
go
to
you
either
to
seek.
However,
you
want
to
go
about
doing
it,
either
to
seek
consent
to
withdraw
or
amend,
but
to
change
the
given
that,
given
what
we've
given
that
we're
being
asked
to
recommend
the
substance
rather
than
the
advertisement.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
think
I
would
like
to
seek
unanimous
consent,
then,
to
amend
my
emotion
to
strike,
to
authorize
the
advertisement.
H
Well,
maybe
I
should
just
make
the
motion
again
that
might
be
cleaner.
Let
me
just
do
that,
mr
chairman,
so
I
like
asked
unanimous
consent
to
withdraw
my
previous
motion.
H
Adopt
the
the
new
fee
for
the
review
of
landscape
plans
for
one
and
two
family
dwellings
to
address
technical
corrections
such
as
phase
development
site
plan,
amendments,
insight,
plan,
resubmission
fees
and
an
inflationary
increase
of
4.0
percent
and
other
changes
to
the
department
of
community
planning
housing
and
developments.
Cphd's
development
fund
fees,
including
the
department
of
environmental
services,
ges
development,
related
fees,
except
as
noted
in
the
staff
report
dated
february
11th,
2022
and
attachments
a
and
b
effective
july
1st
2022.
A
All
right
is
there
anyone,
commissioner
schroll.
Would
you
like
to
speak
to
the
motion.
A
All
right,
any
other
members
of
the
commission
who
want
to
ask
any
questions
or
weigh
in
on
this
item.
E
I
hope
I
hope,
commissioner
weir.
I
hope
that
that
staff
takes
this
conversation
back
and
reviews
carefully
before
the
county
board
takes
action
to
make
sure
that
we've
met
all
of
our
legal
requirements
such
that
the
county
fees
are
are
what
we
expect
them
to
be,
and
no
one
can
challenge
them.
That
would
be
my
only
comment.
I
think
it
is
necessary
at
this
point,
though,
just
reading
backwards
right
now.
A
Got
it?
Thank
you,
commissioner
hughes.
So
with
that
then
said,
I'm
gonna
go
through
the
role.
Commissioner
bagley.
B
J
A
I
K
J
B
H
H
A
And
I
vote
I
as
well
emotion
carries
11
to
zero.
Thank
you
all
and
thank
you
miss
guild
and
and
ms
johnson
as
well
for
your
help.
So,
madam
chair,
will
you
please
call
the
next
item.
C
Absolutely
our
next
item
number
five
is
a
request
to
advertise.
The
clarendon
sector
plan,
update
and
zoa
request
to
authorize
advertisement
of
public
hearings
by
the
planning,
commission
and
county
board
to
consider
the
clarendon
sector
plan
update
and
zoning
ordinance
amendments.
We
have
brett
wallace
our
planning
staff
to
present
this
item
this
evening.
M
Mr
wallace
we're
looking
at
a
word
document.
A
A
That's
right:
yep
agenda
item
five
clarinet
sector
plan,
update
planning,
commission,
okay,.
L
Good.
Thank
you
sorry
about
that
delay.
Good
evening
everybody.
My
name
is
brett
wallace,
I'm
with
arlington
county
planning,
department,
urban
design,
I'm
here
to
present
the
clarinet
sector
plan
update,
I'm
also
joined
by
other
staff
and
cphd
planning,
as
well
as
other
staff
from
department
of
environmental
services,
transportation
and
the
department
of
parks
and
recreation
so
happy
to
be
here
this
evening.
L
These
documents
relate
to
the
subject
items
which
include
a
request
to
advertise
public
hearings
to
consider
the
following
elements
associated
with
the
clarendon
sector
plan
update
planning
process,
including
the
adoption
of
the
2022
clarendon
sector
plan,
which
is
an
update
to
the
2006
sector
plan
and
the
general
land
use
plan
and
map
and
book
amendments
and
the
arlington
county.
Zoning
ordinance
amendments
to
articles
3,
9
and
18,
including
maps
9.2.5
through
9.2.12.
L
L
B
L
L
All
right,
let
me
know,
what's
going
on,
let
me
try
to
do
this
again.
L
L
Okay,
good
so
going
back,
I
had
just
gone
over
the
the
different
parts
of
the
presentation.
I
won't
repeat
that
we'll
start
first
with
the
study
background
and
overview,
so
the
primary
objective
of
the
study
was
to
evaluate
and
develop
recommendations
for
the
county
board,
consideration
on
focus
updates
to
the
2006
plan's
policy
guidance
and
related
zoning
ordinance
regulations
to
implement
those
updates.
L
The
study
looked
at
refinements
to
detailed
recommendations
for
site
within
the
study
area
and
evaluated
how
conditions
have
evolved
since
2006,
including
the
evaluation
of
current
and
future
service
needs
for
public
safety
in
public
spaces.
The
plan's
vision
statement,
overarching
goals
and
framework
elements
were
outside
of
the
study's
scope.
L
In
terms
of
community
engagement,
there
were
many
stakeholders
involved
throughout
the
process.
The
study
was
primarily
informed
by
the
lrpc,
with
participation
from
other
commissions,
civic
associations
and
property
owners.
Neighboring
civic
association
representatives
participated
from
clarendon,
courthouse,
boston,
virginia
square
ashton,
heights
lion
park
and
lion
village.
L
This
site
plan
has
been
accepted
and
is
currently
on
hold
until
completion
of
this
process
same
with
the
joyce
motors
project,
which
is
proposing
a
residential
project
on
10th
and
irving,
it's
also
been
accepted
and
it
is
on
hold
pending
completion
of
this
process
and
with
the
wells,
fargo
and
verizon
sites
they're,
currently
proposing
a
replacement
bank
branch
for
the
wells,
fargo
commercial
office
and
residential
above
and
the
application
for
that
project
is
is
pending,
but
is
anticipated
to
be
filed
shortly
as
currently
envisioned.
L
These
development
proposals
include
elements
that
do
not
meet
the
detailed
policy
guidance
in
the
clarendon
sector
plan.
In
fact,
in
some
cases
the
proposed
developments
will
require
amendments
to
the
zoning
ordinance
provisions
for
the
clarendon
revitalization
district,
to
enable
approval
by
the
county
board.
L
In
looking
at
the
the
sector
plan
update
the
2022
planning
updates,
are
interval
interwoven
into
the
plan
and
correspond
with
thematic
and
site-specific
policies
and
recommendations,
resulting
in
a
comprehensive
sector
plan
update
that
will
continue
to
provide
guidance
for
the
broader
clarendon
metro
station
area.
L
The
plan
contains
numerous
descriptive
narratives
exhibits
and
maps
which
were
posted
as
drafts
last
week
with
strikethrough
and
underlined
versions
for
the
text,
along
with
other
updated
exhibits.
Additional
editorial
changes
to
updated
references
and
county
policies
were
also
included
with
the
the
posting
that
went
out
last
week.
O
L
Or
other
images,
as
appropriate
in
looking
at
the
table
of
contents
of
the
plan
here,
the
vision
concept,
plan,
framework
and
policies
are
included
in
chapter
two
urban
design
guidelines
describing
details
for
elements
such
as
building
mass
and
composition,
frontage
types
and
streetscapes
are
outlined
in
chapter
three
and
finally,
there's
an
implementation
matrix,
which
is
included
in
chapter
four,
which
includes
strategies
and
actions
that
should
be
taken
in
the
future
to
implement
the
policies
outlined
in
the
plan.
L
L
The
2006
plan
envisioned
a
large
rectilinear
park
on
10th
street
to
be
achieved
in
phases
with
the
redevelopment
and
relocation
of
public
facilities
to
provide
new,
east-west
connectivity
between
north
hudson,
north
irving
and
wilson
boulevard.
A
new
10th
road
was
proposed
in
terms
of
intersection
and
streetscape
improvements.
You
can
see
the
clarendon
circle
improvements
identified,
which
was
completed
in
the
2018
2018-19
time
frame
and
improvements
planned
to
improve
conditions
on
wilson
boulevard,
which
is
currently
not
a
very
pedestrian
friendly
environment
with
narrow,
sidewalks
and
lack
of
street
trees.
L
Other
improvements
were
planned
and
approved
for
washington,
boulevard
and
13th
street
as
part
of
the
recent
clarendon
west
or
the
red
top
cab
approval
project
and
a
flexible
multi-use
space
was
envisioned
on
fairfax
drive
to
support
occasional
markets
and
events,
as
you
can
see
in
a
minute,
many
of
these
improvements
are
included
with
the
proposed
updates,
with
some
going
beyond
what
was
envisioned
in
2006.
L
So
we'll
start
with
the
public
realm
looking
at
the
street
locations
in
the
block
structure,
the
revision
and
minor
shift
in
the
location
for
the
new
10th
road
between
north
irving
and
wilson
boulevard
is
largely
informed
by
more
site-specific
details
and
property
ownership
boundaries.
That
was
not
fully
understood
at
the
time
of
the
2006
sector
plan.
Adoption
staffs
recommended
changes
to
the
block
structure
in
street
locations
were
analyzed
in
the
context
of
the
clarion
and
sector
plan
goals
and
were
discussed
with
the
lrpc
and
the
community
through
several
meetings.
L
L
L
Before
reviewing
the
potential
land
use
scenarios
for
the
county
site,
I
wanted
to
cover
some
important
considerations
that
were
presented
at
the
lrpc,
the
need
for
fire
station
4
and
the
sector
plan
to
account
for
flexibility
in
the
plan
to
account
for
off-site
and
on-site
options
that
may
arise
in
the
future.
L
L
There
are
limited
choices,
decide
a
new
station,
given
the
fire
response
time
and
staffing
and
equipment
needs,
as
previously
presented
at
lrpc
and
an
on-site
fire
station
option
on
the
current
county.
10Th
street
side
is
the
only
option
within
the
county's
control
and
if
the
fire
station
remains
on
site,
the
sector
plan
should
recommend
a
building
form
that
meets
program
needs,
and
we
understand
the
off-site
acquisition
options
and
costs
are
unpredictable
in
the
current
market
and
that
relocation
eliminates
the
need
for
a
temporary
fire
station,
which
increases
the
cost
and
complexity.
L
So,
to
provide
flexibility
for
both
on
and
off
site
options
for
the
fire
station
staff
presented.
These
five
scenarios
shown
here
for
discussion
at
the
december
lrpc
meeting
scenario.
One
is
a
fire
station
that
would
be
co-located
with
housing
on
the
county
site
scenario.
2A
would
be
a
standalone
fire
station
with
surface
parking
and
some
buffer
landscaping
scenario.
L
L
Again,
these
land
use
scenarios
were
shared
with
the
lrpc
in
december
of
last
year.
The
feedback
received
from
the
lrpc
and
community
was
not
supportive
of
scenarios
1
and
2a
that
are
shown
here
with
the
the
red
x
and
it
was
communicated
that
you
know
the
community
and
lrpc
would
only
support
options
with
public
space
opportunities,
and
then
there
were
some
lrpc
and
community
members
advocating
for
either
underground
or
off-site
parking
for
the
fire
station
and
as
well
as
rooftop
public
space
above
a
stand-alone
fire
station.
As
shown
in
scenario,
2b.
L
Station
with
an
approximately
ten
thousand
square
foot
park,
underground
parking
and
potential
rooftop
public
space
and
then
figure
2.8
in
the
middle
is
the
operation
with
a
100
percent
committed,
affordable
housing,
opportunity
on
hudson
street
and
approximately
17
000
square
foot
park.
And
then
the
final
option
would
be
the
fire
station
relocated
again
within
proximity
and
an
approximately
acre
size
park.
L
L
L
Here
it
compares
the
overall
development
and
public
space
recommendations
for
both
for
the
study
area
for
the
sector
plan
and
the
2022
update
recommendations,
including
varying
scenarios
for
the
county's
10th
street
site.
The
recommendations
for
building
heights
and
land
use
would
result
in
a
comparable
amount
of
housing
to
what
was
planned
in
2006.
L
The
the
third
scenario
in
the
far
right
with
affordable
housing
could
result
in
nearly
50
more
housing
units
or
an
increase
of
three
percent
of
additional
housing
above
the
2006
plan,
and
while
none
of
these,
while
none
of
the
recommended
2022
update
scenarios
for
the
10th
street
site,
would
result
in
the
full
50
000
square
foot
public
space.
L
L
L
Currently,
the
clarendon
metro
station
has
the
fewest
committed,
affordable
units
in
arlington's
two
metro
corridors,
as
shown
in
the
graph
below.
Currently,
there
are
82
calves
in
clarendon,
which
represents
just
three
percent
of
the
total
calves
in
the
rb
corridor
and
as
of
2022,
there
are
no
additional
calves
in
the
development
pipeline
within
clarendon.
L
L
L
This
approach
was
used
through
the
lrpc
review
process
and
reduces
the
need
for
an
additional
map
when
reviewing
building
height
and
form
for
step
backs
staff
recommends
reducing
the
depth
of
step,
backs
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
and
including
the
second
floor
in
the
range
of
floors
where
step
backs
could
occur
through
staff
analysis
and
discussions
with
the
lrpc.
It
was
noted
that
the
step
back
depth
can
be
modified
by
the
county
board
through
site
plan
approval
and
has
been
modified
and
reduced
on
projects
that
have
been
approved
since
2006.
L
Introducing
a
step
back
above
the
second
floor
would
allow
more
air
and
light
to
reach
the
sidewalk
and
create
a
visual
break
in
the
building
mass
at
the
pedestrian
scale.
Separating
the
building
base
from
the
tower
updates
to
the
heights
map
also
include
updates
to
the
recent
site
plan
amendment
to
the
clarendon
west
project
or
the
red
top
cab
site.
L
L
In
addition
to
the
urban
design
guidelines
and
emphasis
emphasis
on
the
pedestrian
experience,
staff
proposes,
including
additional
guiding
principles
for
building
step
backs
in
the
sector
plan
to
aid
in
the
future
design
review,
and
these
design
guidelines
are
included
in
the
draft
sector
plan
text
that
was
posted
last
week.
L
Community
members
have
also
expressed
concerns
with
the
2022
updates
proposed
increase
in
building
heights
on
10th
street,
from
55
to
75
feet
between
wilson,
boulevard
and
north
irving
street.
As
part
of
staff's
analysis.
We
looked
at
existing
heights
to
the
east
of
the
study
area
and
found
that
those
buildings
have
a
range
of
heights
above
55
feet,
including
heights
up
to
80
feet
and
110
feet
which
have
provided
a
successful
transition
up
in
height
from
the
north
edge
of
10th
street.
L
The
current
staff
recommendation
results
in
a
modest
increase
in
height
and
development
potential
for
a
few
sites,
but
with
the
proposed
removal
of
redevelopment
options
at
triangle
park
and
verizon.
The
overall
estimated
residential
density
is
approximately
14
percent
less
than
what
was
planned
in
2006.
L
L
I'm
sorry
staff
considers
the
proposed
transition
in
height
appropriate,
given
the
width
of
the
existing
10th
street
that
you
can
see
here
in
the
diagram.
As
you
can
see.
Also
in
the
diagram,
the
orange
dashed
line
shows
the
2006
one
to
three
taper
plane
which,
when
measured
according
to
the
zoning
ordinance,
falls
within
the
center
line
of
the
westbound
tenth
street.
L
So
staff
considered
the
the
plan
width
of
10th
street
at
approximately
104
feet
and
the
overall
distance
from
the
north
side
of
10th
street
to
the
low
density
area
of
approximately
300
feet
as
well.
The
red
transition
line
shown
here
with
the
established
maximum
building
heights
provides
a
similar,
taper
and
transition
from
north
to
south.
L
And
here
in
this
slide,
we
show
the
2006
sector
plan
proposed
modeled
heights
with
the
2022
proposed
heights
looking
to
the
north
east
northeast
as
well.
L
Yeah,
okay,
good,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
still
connected
all
right
thanks.
So
looking
moving
on
to
the
use
mix,
staff
is
recommending
changes
in
the
land
use
to
allow
hotel
use
on
sites
that
are
designated
as
prime
office.
L
O
L
I
mentioned
some
of
the
critical
infrastructure
to
identify
to
remain
within
the
study
area.
The
verizon
telecommunications
facility
on
north
irving
street
in
the
dominion
energy
substation
on
wilson
boulevard,
provide
critical
infrastructure
and
services
to
residences
and
businesses
throughout
the
rb
corridor
and
are
expected
to
remain
in
place
for
the
long
term.
L
On
this
slide,
the
the
building's
current
placement
is
set
significantly
far
back
from
the
street
and
sidewalk,
with
a
large
surface
parking
lot
for
the
service
and
storage
of
automobiles
during
the
2006
planning
process
which
predated
the
adoption
of
the
hri,
the
joyce
motors
building
was
evaluated
for
preservation
prior
to
staff's
initiation
for
the
study
in
2020,
the
property
owner
for
the
joyce
motors
building,
filed
a
site
plan
application
to
redevelop
this
property
and
follow
the
2006
sector
plan,
recommendations
which
did
which
did
not
specify
preservation.
L
However,
the
applicant
has
indicated
their
intent
to
restore
and
reuse
the
facade
panels
as
part
of
of
the
corner
meeting.
The
bill
2
lines,
preserving
the
building
in
its
current
location,
as
recommended
by
the
hlrb,
would
be
inconsistent
with
the
sector
plan's
urban
design
objectives
to
locate,
building
facades
at
the
edge
of
the
streetscape
and
to
discourage
surface
parking
lots
along
10th
street.
It
would
significantly
limit
the
redevelopment
potential
for
this
site.
L
Therefore,
staff
supports
allowing
the
building
facade
to
be
reconstructed
at
the
block
corner
and
proposes
adding
it
to
the
preservation
map,
along
with
a
note
indicating
the
relocation.
The
relocation
would
meet.
The
established
bill,
2
lines
at
the
block
corner
and
the
building
massing
would
help
frame
the
planned
open
space
across
north
irving
street
at
the
county-owned
site.
L
L
The
zoning
ordinance
allows
for
implementation
of
clearing
and
sector
plan
policies
through
through
the
site
plan
process.
The
sector
plan
employs
a
form-based
approach
in
guiding
the
redevelopment
of
clarendon
in
2008
the
county
amended
the
zoning
ordinance
requirements
that
apply
to
much
of
clarendon.
These
amendments
codified,
many
of
the
sector
plans,
policies
and
maps.
L
So
this
slide
provides
an
overview
of
the
various
proposed
zoning
ordinance
amendments
that
were
also
presented
to
the
zoning
committee
earlier
this
year.
In
february,
staff
recommends
amendments
to
articles
3,
9
and
18,
including
maps
to
reflect
proposed
changes
on
based
on
staff,
analysis
and
lrpc
and
other
community
feedback.
L
Additional
background
is
provided
in
the
staff
report,
so
I'll
provide
a
quick
summary
of
the
proposed
amendments
here
and
happy
to
come
back
to
these
in
discussion.
But
the
first
amendment
is
under
the
general
requirements
and
it
would
be
to
allow
flexibility
for
a
buy
right
fire
station
for
parking
and
screening
or
entrance
doors
and
screening
requirements.
L
L
There's
also
an
amendment
to
remove
an
existing
requirement
for
the
parking
management
plan
or
the
pmp,
which
is
now
part
of
the
standard
site
plan
conditions,
further
design
requirements
in
section
9,
with
the
addition
of
heightened
setback,
requirements
to
for
rooftop
amenity
spaces,
to
not
exceed
18
feet
above
the
roof
surface
and
to
be
set
back
in
an
equal
distance
and
then,
as
part
of
related
to
that,
amendment
of
staff
is
recommending
amendment
to
article
13
density,
dimensional
standards
to
create
an
exception
to
permit
additional
height
above
the
maximum
height
limit
for
rooftop
amenity
spaces,
mainly
for
hotel
uses
and
in
doing
so,
staff
is
recommending
a
new
definition
in
article
18.2
for
a
rooftop
amenity
space
to
permit
occupiable
space
at
the
penthouse
level.
L
Above
the
maximum
height
limit
and
in
addition,
staff
is
recommending.
Some
minor
changes
to
the
sidewalk
design
guidelines
table
to
remove
content
related
to
specific
street
tree
species
and
street
tree
sizes,
which
have
been
updated
since
since
2006,
and
to
remove
the
street
tree
map
which
identifies
different
street
tree
species
for
each
street
within
the
sector.
Plan
area,
which
is
not
a
best
practice
today,
and
we
would
make
reference
to
the
recommended
street
treat
list
and
a
consultation
with
the
urban
forester.
P
L
Map
changes
which
are
included
and
were
also
posted
last
week
in
the
clarion
and
revitalization
districts,
are
maps
one
through
eight
and
also
reflect
updated
recommendations
for
block
structure,
street
locations,
use
mix
and
building
heights.
L
And
looking
at
the
glop
amendments,
first,
looking
at
the
existing
glup,
the
properties
within
the
study
area
are
zoned
c3
and
the
existing
glop
designations
are
listed
here
and
are
shown
on
the
map.
L
Any
future
amendments
to
the
club
would
be
considered
during
the
sprc
process
and
could
be
approved
by
the
county
board
at
the
time
of
psych
plan
approval,
an
overview
of
the
glove
map
and
booklet
amendments
also
included,
as
a
in
the
posting
last
week,
to
achieve
a
consistency
between
the
glup
and
an
amen
element
of
the
arlington
county,
comprehensive
plan
and
the
2022
plan.
L
Several
amendments
are
proposed
as
follows,
and
identified
on
in
attachment
two
that
was
posted
last
week
with
the
staff
report
includes
adding
triangle
open
space
symbols
for
future
public,
open
spaces,
changing
designation
from
semi
public
to
public
for
areas
planned
as
the
future
west
end
plaza.
L
Now,
county
owned,
adjust
block
and
street
alignments
and
location
to
correspond
to
planned
or
built
conditions,
remove
vehicular
connections
between
wilson,
boulevard
and
fairfax
drive,
specifically
between
north
side,
social
and
the
tnj
auto
body,
and
to
narrow
fairfax
drive
to
reflect
the
proposed
proposed
conversion
of
travel
way
to
a
linear
park
or
in
shared
street
and
booklet.
Amendments
include
adding
text
to
indicate
the
planning
process
concluded
and
with
an
update
to
the
22
plan
and
additional
editorial
changes
to
updated
references
in
the
the
updated
plan.
L
L
The
globe
maps
that
are
shown
here
are
included
in
the
plan
are
and
are
synced
with
the
implementation
table,
policies
and
strategies
and
actions,
and
the
symbols
here
indicate
areas
where
future
glob
amendments
are
proposed
and
needed
when
redevelopment
occurs.
The
proposed
map
on
the
right
is
consistent
with
the
proposed
updates
to
the
plan,
as
not.
A
Q
Thank
you,
madam
clerk.
Mr
chair
good
evening,
my
name
is
andrew
painter,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
law
firm
of
walsh,
calucci
speaking
tonight
on
behalf
of
war
partners.
We
are
the
applicants
in
the
10th
and
irving
4.1
site
plan
application
and
just
wanted
to
express
our
strong
support
for
the
proposed
request
to
advertise
and
our
sincere
appreciation
to
staff,
especially
mr
wallace,
in
shepherding
the
sector
plan
update
to
get
it
to
this
point.
Q
As
many
of
you
all
know,
ore
partners
is
proposing
the
redevelopment
of
the
site
with
a
new
11-story
multi-family
building,
as
staff
mentioned,
this
project
has
effectively
been
placed
on
hold
for
the
past
24
months,
pending
the
outcome
of
this
planning
process.
So
this
is
a
very
exciting
step
for
us
and
what
is
before
you,
we
believe,
will
provide
greater
consistency
between
the
county's
planning
documents
and
zoning
ordinance,
especially
with
respect
to
the
preservation
of
the
joyce
motors
building.
Q
As
staff
mentioned,
the
current
sector
plan
contemplates
complete
demolition
of
the
building,
and
so
our
team
has
been
looking
for
ways
to
increase
the
supply
of
sorely
needed
housing
near
transit
stations
while
paying
homage
to
the
important
historical
characteristics
of
clarendon's
past.
So,
even
before
we
submitted
our
4.1
site
plan
application,
we
actually
spent
several
months
working
with
the
county's
historic
preservation
program
staff
on
trying
to
devise
the
right
type
of
preservation
approach,
recognizing
the
reality
of
the
condition
of
the
joyce
motors
building
and
its
materials.
Q
And
unfortunately,
the
truth
is
that
this
building
is
in
disrepair.
Its
facades
and
its
structural
supports
have
been
allowed
to
decay
due
to
decades
of
neglect
and
two
of
the
building's
four
facades
are
contaminated
cinderblock
and
are
of
no
historic
value.
And
so
the
plan
that
we
developed
through
our
discussions
with
staff
and
our
preservation
consultant,
was
to
preserve
the
most
historic
and
salvageable
portions
of
the
building.
Q
And
so
that
includes
removing
the
enamel
panels,
sending
them
to
a
historic
preservation
lab
for
restoration
to
their
original
condition
and
then
reinstalling
them
at
the
most
visually
prominent
corner
of
the
property,
which
will
hopefully
become
the
architectural
focus
for
the
new
multi-family
building,
which
itself
adopts
the
principles
of
streamlined,
modern
architecture,
and
we
hope
that
this
will
provide
the
public
with
more
direct
access
to
this
resource,
instead
of
being
separated
from
the
public
realm
by
a
parking
lot
that
contains
partially
assembled
cars
today,
and
so
the
draft
sector
plan
update
now
provides
clear
guidance
in
this
regard
and
in
essence,
this
document
becomes
the
vehicle
that
really
allows
any
preservation
this
resource
and
that's
because
redevelopment
simply
will
not
happen.
Q
If
this
building
and
the
parking
lot
remain,
as
is
where
is,
and
we
save
the
contaminated
brick
in
the
asphalt
parking
lot,
which
then
results
in
taking
half
of
the
development
side
out
of
commission.
And
the
simple
truth
is
that
absent
redevelopment
this
resource
may
be
permanently
lost
if
it's
allowed
to
further
decay
or
if
it's
redeveloped
as
a
matter
of
right,
and
neither
should
be
allowed
to
happen.
Q
So
in
closing
mr
chair,
I've
learned
that
planning
is
all
about
balance
and,
while
not
everyone
may
be
happy
with
every
aspect
of
the
draft
plan
update,
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that,
in
the
final
analysis,
such
a
balance
between
competing
interests
has
been
achieved
and
what
is
before,
you
will
help
preserve
claremont's
neighborhood
character,
while
at
the
same
time
deliver
the
desired
land,
uses
densities,
heights
and
housing
diversity
that
I
think
we
all
want
to
see.
So
we
do
urge
approval
of
the
rta,
and
we
thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration.
K
K
I
thank
you.
I
live
in
aston
heights
and
as
a
way
of
further
introduction,
I
was
involved
in
the
1984
clarendon
sector
plan
and
my
very
old
master
degree
in
land
use
and
environmental
planning
is
from
university
of
virginia.
K
K
Yet
I
do
plan
to
examine
this
document
in
more
depth,
as
I
hope
the
commission
members
you
also
do
so
for
now.
I
have
two
specifics
to
mention
one,
I'm,
a
member
of
the
development
committee
in
ashland
heights,
I'm
not
speaking
for
the
civic
association
because
jack
spills.
There
is,
but
I
will
say
that
ashton
heights
very
much
supports
affordable
housing
in
clarendon.
K
K
K
K
K
K
R
Yes,
hello:
can
you
hear
me
okay,
mr
chairman,
and
planned
commission
members?
My
name
is
jack
spillsbury
and
I'm
representing
the
ashton
heights
civic
association
that
coming
across
okay.
R
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
again
on
this
important
topic.
Let
me
first
also
appreciate
appreciation
for
the
time
effort
and
creativity.
That's
gone
into
the
clarendon
sector
update
process
over
the
past
year,
especially
from
county
staff
and
lrpc
members,
both
from
the
planning,
commission
and
the
other
commissions.
R
My
association
has
spoken
and
submitted
written
comments,
a
number
of
points
and
we
joined
with
other
participating,
all
the
other
person
saying
civic
associations
in
a
series
of
letters
to
the
lrpc
and
the
county
board.
To
underscore
this
priority,
we
remain
convinced
that
the
dedication
of
the
north
10th
street
property
for
active
recreational
space
is
still
needed
to
address
the
complete
lack
of
recreational
space
in
clarendon.
R
To
our
disappointment,
the
draft
plan
posted
march
3rd
fails
to
do
so,
and
it
is
our
hope
that
this
can
still
be
fixed.
So
specifically,
first
we
believe
the
replies.
The
revised
plan
should
explicitly
commit
that
if
the
fire
station
is
relocated,
the
entire
site
should
be
dedicated
as
a
park
as
specified
in
the
2006
plan.
R
Additionally,
the
plan
should
clearly
state
that
in
case
the
firehouse
remains
on
this
site.
Then
the
10th
street
park
should
be
planned
and
integrated
into
the
rooftop
of
the
fire
station
to
forward
it.
The
needed
recreation,
no
fortithy
needed
active
recreation
space
and
without
the
step
the
park,
there
would
be
limited
to
just
10
000
square
feet
which
would
not
meet
this
need.
R
As
my
colleague
indicated,
my
neighbor
indicated,
we
support
affordable
housing
and
we
do
see
many
opportunities
for
expanding
it
in
the
availability
in
and
around
clarendon,
including
in
the
residential
buildings
being
proposed,
as
well
as
those
that
are
being
proposed
just
across
the
street,
from
saint
charles
church
on
kirkwood
place,
which
aren't
aren't
included
in
this
plan,
building,
affordable
housing
without
easily
accessible
recreation
space.
We
believe
would
be
short-sighted.
R
We
do
not
oppose
keeping
the
fire
department
on
site,
but
this
should
not
be
a
reason
for
failing
to
deliver
on
the
community's
need
for
adequate
recreational
space
in
some
clarendon
is
currently
woefully
underserved,
with
no
active
recreations
space
within
a
half
mile
that
metro-
and
this
is
before
adding
new
residents.
R
that
would
lessen
the
need
for
a
park
or
that
would
justify
building
any
multi-family
housing
there
at
that
site.
Instead
of
it.
We
continue
to
believe
that
realizing
this
active
recreational
space
is
essential
for
clarendon's
success
as
an
urban
village,
since
time
is
limited.
I'll
conclude
by
affirming
that
we
would
be
pleased
to
submit
our
proposed
revisions
in
writing.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
mr
spielsberg.
Madam
clerk,
we
have
any
other
commissions
on
this
item.
A
Right,
I
I
thought
that
might
be
the
case,
but
boxes
to
check.
So
the
discussion,
then,
is,
I
believe,
with
the
commission.
Commissioner.
Schroll
I'm
going
to
go
to
you.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
so
miss
in
the
interest
of
time.
Mr
wallace
went
through
a
very
fulsome
overview
of
the
the
process
and
the
recommendations,
and
so
you
know
he
did
a
great
job
of
that.
I
will
not
rehash
that
here
and
the
staff
report
and
the
other
documents
that
mr
wallace
mentioned
also
do
a
very
good
job
of
outlining
the
proposed
changes,
so
those
are
recommended
to
you
in
terms
of
discussion
outline
there
I
think,
are
several
topics
that
I
think
would
be
prudent
for
us
to
discuss
the
thing.
H
The
first
one
is
the
fire
station
for
options.
As
you
heard
from
some
of
some
of
our
public
speakers
in
the
nearby
neighborhoods
there's,
you
know
some
strong
feelings
there.
There
certainly
were
as
communicated
by
mr
wallace
as
part
of
the
lrpc
process.
H
In
addition
to
that,
I
think
public
open
space
more
generally
across
the
study
area,
is
important
to
discuss
lots
of
discussion
about
wanting
to
make
sure
that
we
maintain
the
level
of
open
space
that
was
envisioned
in
the
2006
plan.
Several
you
know
questions
I
think
we
could
could
dive
into
on
that
on
the
height
and
taper
points.
H
Given
that
the
proposal
within
the
study
area
is
to
eliminate
the
taper
just
making
sure
people
feel
like
what
is
being
proposed,
you
know
does
still
achieve
that.
Taper
with
that
height
transition,
you
know,
are
we
kind
of
comfortable
with
those
changes
on
step
backs
as
there's
no
base
staff?
The
revision
from
a
proposed
revision,
not
down
from
a
20
foot,
step
back
to
10
10
feet?
H
Do
we
feel
like
that
is
appropriate,
given
that
there
already
is
flexibility
to
have
that
that
that's
modifiable
and
kind
of
also
some
questions
about
creating
pedestrian
scale
and
about
whether
or
not
the
flexibility
of
having
that
step
back
between
two
and
five
stories
is
appropriate
as
well,
staff
noted
there's
a
new
rooftop
amenity
definition.
H
Okay,
so
we
can
talk
about
that
and
how
that
is
being
integrated.
This
is
certainly
a
historic
preservation
piece
to
this,
as
was
noted
by
by
staff,
and
also
one
of
our
public
speakers,
particularly
on
the
joyce
motors
site,
well
not
included
in
the
2006
plan.
There
is
interest
in
in
that
facade,
preservation
and
the
location
of
that.
H
Then
there's
transportation
related
questions
about
the
new
street
grid.
Some
modifications
to
what
was
included
in
the
2006
plan
in
terms
of
some
streets
are
not
going
to
be
one
way,
there's
going
to
be
some
modifications
to
some
streetscape
standards
and
some
recommendations
there
and
some
new
new
passageways
as
well
as
we're
thinking
about
this.
This
is
an
rta,
so
we
want
to
with
the
zoning
language
we
want
to
be
thinking
about.
H
You
know
crafting
this
as
broadly
as
possible,
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
where
we
want
to
go
with
this,
so
that
what
it's
advertised
can
can
encapsulate
the
various
options
that
we
want
to
consider
recommending
the
board
adopts
next
month.
My
intention
is
to
move
the
county
manager's
recommendations
this
evening.
H
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
their
work
and
the
folks
in
the
community
as
well,
and
certainly
commissioner
sarly
for
his
efforts
in
leading
the
zoco
process.
So
with
that,
mr
chairman
yield
back.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
schroll.
So
it
sounds
like
going
from
your
from
from
your
report
that
we
have
seven
general
areas:
fire
station
number,
four
public
space,
public,
open
space,
height,
taper,
number
four
step
backs,
then
rooftop
amenity,
space,
historic
preservation
and
transportation.
A
G
Thank
you,
chair
scroll.
Just
before
our
deliberations
start,
I'm
required
to
make
a
statement
of
the
declaration
of
interest.
I've
already
entered
this
into
the
record
several
times
during
pc,
but.
C
B
C
N
G
I
I
was
holding
it.
Is
this
better.
G
Yes,
yeah,
I
was
holding
it
so
I
could
read
it,
but
I
will
try
an
alternative
with
this
legal
language.
Okay,
so
I'm
required
to
enter
this
declaration
of
interest
into
the
public
record.
I've
done
it
several
times
during
the
course
of
lrpc
deliberations.
I'll.
Do
it
again
this
evening.
G
A
Without
any
additional
requests
for
topics,
I
will
go
to
fire
station.
Four
anyone
want
to
well,
let
me
actually
anyone
want
to
begin
with
any
questions
for
staff.
A
Don't
everyone
jump
in
at
once,
commissioner.
Tell
me.
P
Sure
I'll
jump
in
right
away.
I
don't
have
any
questions
on
it.
I
do
want
to
support
the
neighborhood
for
its
desire
for
as
much
park
space
on
the
on
the
fire
station
area,
which
includes
the
the
other
side
lot
that
used
to
be
part
of
one
another
arlington
department.
P
P
It's
not
going
to
go
anywhere
anywhere
for
a
long
time,
and
even
if
it
does
there's
so
much
embedded
energy
in
this
building,
it'll
probably
be
adaptive
reuse
in
some
way,
so
the
hope
of
there
being
a
50
000
square
foot
park.
There
was
never
really
reasonable.
That
said,
it
is
appropriate
to
have
a
park
there
of
some
type
to
have
the
recreational
facility.
P
So
I
am
very,
very
supportive
of
having
some
way
that
if
the
fire
station
cannot
be
moved-
and
that
seems
to
be
the
second
fundamental
error
that
when
the
original
sector
plan
was
being
done,
there
seemed
to
be
some
reasonable
possibility
that
the
fire
station
would
be
relocated
from
there
or
maybe
combined
with
the
rosin
one
that
that
plan
subsequently
went
away.
P
There
doesn't
really
seem
to
be
much
prospect
of
the
fire
station
moving,
which
means
we
have
to
deal
with
what
we
have,
which
is
way
less
than
50
000
square
feet,
so
maximizing
the
recreational
space
on
that
that
facility
as
much
as
possible
is,
I
think,
something
that
we
really
need
to
do
given
the
promises
that
were
this
neighborhood
was
led
to
believe
were
made
as
far
as
park
open
recreational
space
in
this
area.
P
Right
here
when
we
talk
about
the
joyce
motor
site,
I'll
sort
of
add
that
into
this
in
a
different
way.
But
I
am
sympathetic
with
that
block
not
being
developed
the
way
the
the
neighborhood
had
expected.
It
would,
and
I
think
that
means
we
need
to
do
what
we
can
to
maximize
open
space.
Recreational
space
park
type
space
in
the
context
of
having
a
fire
station
there,
which
is
important
too.
That's
just
a
statement.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
so
I
want
to
ask
staff
a
question.
You
know
about
the
the
feasibility
of
of
kind
of
co-locating
recreation
space
at
this
location,
not
because
I'm
skeptical,
but
I
because
I
want
to
try
to
make
it
work.
I
believe
I
saw
miss
miss
lasik
on
the
attendee
list.
L
Yeah
just
to
confirm
commissioner,
troy
you're
speaking
to
the
the
rooftop
amenity
spaces
above
the
fire
station.
L
Okay
yeah.
I
I
think,
as
identified
in
the
staff
report
and
miss
lasik
can
chime
in
if
needed,
the
psmp
discourages.
You
know
smaller
indoor
community
facilities
and
you
know
certainly,
as
mentioned
earlier
in
the
presentation,
we
are
recommending
that
in
the
sector
plan
text
that
we
explore
future
opportunities
for
rooftop
spaces
above
the
fire
station,
but
I
think,
as
we've
identified
in
the
text
as
well,
we
have
to
consider
public
access.
The
fire
department
needs
safety
and
security
and
other
items
irena
anything.
To
add.
O
Thank
you.
Thank
you
brett
good
evening.
Everyone
marina
logic
from
the
department
of
parks
and
recreation.
So
just
to
add,
mr
stroll,
commissioner
schroell
on
what
brett
was
saying
one
of
the
recommendations
from
the
there.
So
this
is
a
maybe
a
terminology
discussion
also
so
the
public
spaces
master
plan
talks
specifically
about
community
center
type
of
facilities.
So
the
intent
and
the
recommendation
from
the
public
spaces
master
plan
is
to
not
to
have
this
small
community
center
spread
out
through
the
county.
O
It
creates
a
lot
of
management
issues,
it's
very
costly
for
staff.
We
all
have
to
staff
them.
There
is
always
have
to
be
permanent
staff,
not
one,
but
more
than
that.
So
those
are
very
costly,
oper
and
and
difficult
to
manage
in
some
ways.
So
our
goal
from
the
public
spaces
master
plan
was
to
have
less
larger
facilities,
community
facilities
in
the
in
the
county.
Talking
about
rooftop
spaces.
That
has
been
the
recommendation
from
the
public
spaces
master
plan.
O
I
think
some
of
the
commissioners
have
already
already
mentioned
efficiency
in
use
wherever
we
can
find
the
public
space
and
obviously,
in
such
a
dense
urban
environment
such
as
clarendon,
it
makes
sense
probably
to
explore
rooftop
opportunities
where
that's
available
or
where
the
opportunity
exists.
So
I
hope
that
answer
your
answer
to
your
question.
Yeah.
H
That
that's
great
thank
you
to
you
both
in
terms
of
kind
of
by
way
of
comment
here.
I
don't
think
what
I
was
hearing
from
folks
during
the
lrpc
process.
Was
that
a
desire
for
like
a
community
center?
I
think
they
were
envisioning,
you
know,
so
it
may
not
be
as
as
grand
as
that,
but
I
think
it's
you
know
a
place
to
go,
play
basketball
or
play
tennis
like
so
maybe
some
place
that
you
know.
H
There's
we
don't
know
how
big
it's
going
to
be,
but
the
floor
plates
of
fire
stations
are
around
what
fifteen
thousand
square
feet.
So
I
think,
as
we
talk
about
this
next
time
in
a
month,
you
know,
what's
I
think
we
would
like
to
I'd
like.
I
would
like
to
understand,
what's
feasible
in
that
kind
of
floor
plate,
if
we
didn't
have
something
on
top
of
a
fire
station,
what
could
we
be
considering
and
what's
sort
of
out
of
the
question?
H
So
I
think
that's
one
two,
I
think
yeah
the
ps
psnp
recommendations
about
kind
of
have
co
co-locating
and
having
that
kind
of
process
is
something
we
need
to
be
envisioning
and,
as
we
get
denser
our
public
facilities,
our
fire
stations
are
gonna,
have
to
be
part
of
that,
and
we're
gonna
have
to
find
a
way
that
our
fire
station
is
gonna.
Have
this
type
of
facility
on
top
of
it
and
we're
gonna
have
to
find
a
way
to
make
it
work.
H
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Shirl
going
to
commissioner
hughes.
E
So
I
I
am
going
to
enter
the
public
record
on
this
one,
just
because
this
is
one
of
my
only
pet
peeves
and
I
do
want
to
be
on
the
record
for
it
and
I,
and
this
evening
I
may
very
well
put
forward
emotion
with
respect
to
it,
and
what
we're
hearing
from
the
community
is
is
the
fundamental
trade-off,
and
I
actually
have
heard
this
from
a
community
that
had
this
happen
to
them.
E
With
respect
to
the
pike
and
the
west
pike
and
the
affordable
housing
project
that
was
built
on
county
public
land
and
the
alternative
use,
there
could
have
been
parkland,
it
could
have
been
more
park
space,
it
could
have
been
baseball
field
level
size
spacing.
Instead
it
was
housing
and
that
community
became
frustrated
sometimes
because
of
that,
because
there
are
needs
for
parks
and
other
things
in
the
county.
E
At
some
point
in
the
future,
we
will
have
to
evict
every
single
member
of
that
housing
unit
and
hopefully
rebuild
a
bigger,
better
unit,
and
we
will
displace
them
for
at
least
three
years
while
they
are
displaced,
we
will
disrupt
and
and
challenge
their
family
life,
and
we,
as
the
communities
of
taxpayers,
will
do
that.
There
are
very
few
buildings
in
this
county
older
than
50
years.
E
That's
just
a
fact,
and
so,
when
you
think
about
the
lifetime
of
a
building,
how
we
build
these
buildings,
how
long
they
go,
I
much
rather
see
buildings
used
in
the
interim
for
all
sorts
of
wonderful
things:
tennis
courts.
Commissioner
shull
mentioned
on
the
rooftop.
We
could
have
basketball
courts,
we
could
have
community
gardens,
we
could
have
all
sorts
of
things.
We
could
also
make
it
clear
inside
this
plan,
as
the
community
said
that
every
building
has
to
come
forward
in
the
private
sector
with
on-site,
affordable
housing.
E
That
is
something
we
could
do.
We
have
not.
We've
made
a
bifurcated
choice
between
affordable
housing,
on-site
with
co-location
or
what
staff
tells
us
is
an
unworkable
park
solution
on
the
roof,
and
I
think
that's
wrong,
and
I
also
think
this
is
a
little
bit
careful
here.
We
are
honestly
got
into
this
conversation
years
ago.
It
was
called
public
land
for
public
good.
E
We
tried
to
do
it
on
a
county-wide
policy
basis
that
did
not
go
over
well
and
so
now
we're
trying
to
do
it
sector
plan
by
sector
plan,
and
I
commend
staff
at
least
trying
to
land
in
sector
first,
but
I
don't
think
that
as
a
county,
it
is
a
necessarily
good
thing
to
try
to
co-locate,
affordable
housing
on
current
county
public
land.
I
just
don't
I
really
don't
it's
one
of
the
very
few
things
I
believe
in
so
many
co-locations.
I
I
worked
with
the
legion
to
have
their
building
redeveloped
and
co-location.
E
I
just
do
not
believe
in
the
county's
land
being
done
that
way,
and
so
I
want
to
make
that
record
later
on
this
evening.
I
plan
to
make
a
motion
whether
it
fails
or
not,
that
that
we
direct
staff
to
make
the
clear
preference
for
the
use
of
the
public
land
within
the
clarion
sector
plan
to
clearly
designate
it
for
public
services,
including
parks,
fire
stations,
community,
gardens,
etc.
E
So
for
everyone
to
chew,
on
as
we
move
forward
and
through
this-
and
I
hate
to
bring
this
up
in
this
conversation,
commissioner,
but
it
has
to
be
brought
up
here,
it
is,
it
is
a
fundamental
aspect
of
the
entire
plan.
So
thank
you,
sir.
S
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
this
evening
to
staff
and
also
to
the
public
speakers
who
came
and
shared
their
opinions.
S
I
I
wanted
to
know
if
there's
somebody
from
parks
here
who
could
explain
what
parks
and
rec's
goals
are
with
regard
to
proximity
of
green
space
and
public
space
and
parks
to
residents.
S
I
was
just
I
live
very
close
to
clarendon
and
was
was
thinking
about
like
the
park
space
that
we
do
have
in
our
neighborhood
and
we've
got
the
james
hunter
dog
park.
That's
0.1
miles
from
clarendon
metro
station
11th
street
park
is
0.3
miles
from
clarendon
metro
station
sitcom
park
is
it
kalasawa
park
is
0.4
miles
from
clarendon
metro
station
and
rocky
run
park
is
0.5
miles
so
that
that
is
a
decent
number
of
parks
within
a
short
distance
within
a
half
mile
from
the
metro
station.
S
That
said,
there
are
a
lot
of
people
that
live
in
this
area,
and
this
is
a
very
dense
area
and
I
can
speak
personally.
You
know
walking
a
half
mile
to
a
great
playground
with
three
kids
in
an
area
where
there's
a
lot
of
traffic
could
seem
like
hard
to
do
so.
I
just
wanted
to
get
an
idea.
I
know.
Parks
and
rec
has
metrics
about
like
how
close
a
person
should
have
to
walk
in
order
to
get
to
park
space,
and
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
share
that
with
fest.
O
Thank
you
I'll.
Try
to
answer
your
questions,
so
the
one
thing
that
the
public
spaces
master
plan
adopted
by
the
board
in
2019
has
is,
for
the
first
time
we
had
the
tool
planning
tool
of
level
services.
So
what
we
did
it's
a
very
complex
analysis
where
we
basically
develop
certain
standards,
exactly
what
you
were
saying:
proximity
to
a
certain
amenity,
so
we
chose
to
do
certain
amenities
just
because,
knowing
in
the
dance
urban
environment
as
we
live,
it's
very
important
to
have
certain
experiences
and
they
differ.
O
So,
for
example,
you
were
mentioning
playground,
for
example,
where
you're
gonna
go
with
the
with
a
child.
Playgrounders
probably
should
be
closer
to
your
place
of
residence.
Some
more
unique
type
of
uses
could
be
probably
further
and
you're
willing
to
walk
or
take
a
bus
or
or
drive
to
those
amenities
such
as,
for
example,
community
center
or
similar.
So
so
we
developed
those
standards
and
in
some
instances
it
is
a
10
minutes,
some
some
instances,
it's
20
minutes.
So
it
depends
on
the
amenities.
O
So
I
would
encourage
you
to
take
a
look
at
the
psmp
level
of
services
and
then
maybe
maybe
there
will
be
follow-up
questions
for
us,
so
we
are
willing
to
provide
any
any
kind
of
explanation,
or
we
can
have
more
discussion,
maybe
in
the
next
pc
meeting.
So
because
we,
the
other
thing,
that's
very
important.
The
level
of
services
not
only
takes
into
consideration
proximity,
but
also
takes
into
consideration
population
densities,
so
forecasted
for
the
future
growth
soviet.
O
We
took
all
of
that
information
because
we
knew
it
was
very
important,
especially
because,
with
the
forecasted
growth
of
the
county
in
the
next
several
decades,
that
was
very
important
to
take
somehow
into
consideration.
So
so
there
is
mattresses,
they
are
all
different
for
different
types
of
amenities,
not
all
different.
There
are.
Some
of
them
are
grouped
into
similar
standards,
but
that
is
developed.
O
So
we
have
those
we
don't
have
any
mattresses
for
like
a
park,
so
we
don't
say
there
should
be
like
a
ten
minute
walk
to
a
park
or
a
50-minute
walk
to
park.
On
the
other
side,
we
do
as
a
county.
We
have
joined
several
years
ago
initiative
that
the
trust
republic
land
has
which
is
initiative
to
have
a
park
and
in
a
walking
distance
of
10
minutes.
O
That's
their
campaign
is
called
a
10-minute
walk
to
a
park
and
when
they
did
mapping
for
the
county,
they
realized
that
over
98
of
the
county
residents
have
access
to
a
park
space
and
obviously
they're
different
what
they
provide.
But
so
we
have
a
pretty
good
coverage
on
the
public,
some
sort
of
public
spaces,
close
influence,
proximity
residents,
but
not
too
specific
you're
not
going
to
have
a
dog
park
in
a
proximity.
Obviously
always
so.
O
S
So
what
you're
saying
is
that
the
parks
master
plan
doesn't
easily
answer
the
question
of
whether
this
clarendon
sector
update
is
achieving
the
goal,
a
particular
goal.
It's
it's
like
not
specific
enough
that
we
can
say,
like
this
sector
plan
does
or
does
not
meet
the
goals
of
the
parks
master
plan.
We
can't
do
that
with
the
way
the
two
are
written
so.
O
I
would
say
it
meets
many
goals.
It
meets
the
goal
of
increasing
public
spaces
that
that's
one
of
the
most
important
goals
for
from
the
coming
down
from
the
public
spaces
master
plan,
so
it
meets
the
goal
of
providing
different
types
of
experiences.
For
example,
fairfax
drive
new
public
space,
envisioned
public
space
and
fairfax
drive.
There
is
a
in
the
document
drive
document
we
mentioned
by
providing
some
connectivity
or
access
to
nature
for
residents,
which
we
know.
O
That
is
a
very
important
thing,
especially
in
urban
areas
like
such
as
that,
so
those
are.
There
are
different
goals
in
the
public
spaces
master
plan.
Some
are
very
specific,
such
as
standards,
four
level
services,
the
other
ones,
are
recommendations.
So
I
think
that
this
proposed
the
updates
of
the
sector
plan
as
as
well
as
the
previous
sector
plan
and
adopted
in
2006.
O
T
And
apologizing,
no,
I
I
really
just
wanted
to
convey
that.
I
think
that
the
we've
that
the
proposal
from
staff
really
does
hit
on
an
appropriate
approach
with
the
step,
taper
and
reflective
of
the
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
and
I
think,
we've
kind
of
hit
on
through
going
through
the
review
meetings
with
the
community.
T
G
Thank
you
chair.
We
are,
I
also
wanted
to
acknowledge
and
echo
commissioner
steinberger
and
my
colleagues
respect
and
appreciation
for
the
really
lengthy
review
process
that
has
gone
on
so
far
in
the
really
multifaceted
report.
I
just
had
a
quick
question.
G
I'm
sorry,
I
should
have
gone
back
and
look
right
now
at
an
early
stage,
some
of
the
rooftop
space
was
being
put
forward
as
a
component
of
the
open
space
that
would
be
seen
as
a
public
benefit,
and
I
wonder
if
I
could
just
get
some
clarification
on
whether
that's
still
the
case.
A
L
G
Contribution
to
the
public
space
requirements
or
aspirations
of
clarendon,
not
the
fire
station,
but
some
of
the
other
buildings
at
an
early
stage
that
you
were
talking
about.
You
know:
roof
decks
and
patios,
and
things
like
that.
So
is
that,
is
that
still
something
that
you're,
considering
as
a
contribution
to
the
public
space
on
clarendon.
L
Yeah
I
mean
we,
we
always
look
for
opportunities
for
rooftop,
public
spaces
and
private
projects.
To
my
I'm,
not
aware
of
any
of
the
current
proposals
from
the
applicants
of
public
spaces
on
elevated
or
rooftop
spaces,
I
could
be
wrong.
There's
still
some
pending
applications,
but
for
the
two
that
have
been
accepted,
you
know
I'm
not
aware
of
any
potential
public
space
other
than
you
know.
I
guess
you
could
consider
the
rooftop
space
for
the
hotel
technically
public.
L
G
A
Yes,
thank
thank
you,
mr
wallace.
Thank
you,
commissioner
morton
anything
else
on
a
rooftop
amenity
space.
A
G
Thank
you
again.
I,
as
I've
conveyed
to
my
colleagues,
I'm
very
concerned
not
only
about
the
loss
of
the
joyce
motors,
but
in
general
there
are
an
array
of
you
know,
important
notable
buildings
throughout
the
county
and
here
in
clarendon
that
were
not
taking
as
seriously
as
I
would
like
with
respect
to
joyce
motors.
Specifically,
this
isn't
a
case
as
we
see
kind
of
regrettably,
but
sometimes
out
of
necessity,
where
people
come
in
at
the
last
minute
and
want
to
consider
something
historic.
G
G
As
was
noted
in
the
hlrb
letter,
this
happened
recently
the
same
kind
of
discussion
in
the
courthouse
landmark
building
where
I
was
chair
and
at
that
point,
at
the
sprc
stage,
it
was
explained
to
me.
Oh
this
project,
it's
gone
on
for
so
long.
It's
sort
of
a
fed
to
complete
we've
already
gotten
by
off
on
moving
the
facade.
G
It's
only
an
important
building,
not
an
essential
building.
As
an
aside,
I
don't
know
what
other
component
of
our
comp
plan
we
have,
where
we'd
call
something
important
or
notable
expendable,
but
be
that
as
it
may.
This
is
an
essential
building
which
is
seen
as
the
very
most
important
type
of
resource
in
arlington
and
again
by
the
time
it
gets
to
sprc.
G
It
really
seems
unwise
to
not
express
our
desire
that
the
most
essential
character-defining
type
of
resource,
be
you
know
our
express
our
preference
that
it's
preserved,
we're
sort
of
giving
away
any
opportunity
to
ask
for
mitigation
or
some
creative
alternatives
which
are
abundant
in
clarendon.
G
There
are
many
examples
where
historic
buildings
have
been
saved
in
situ
with
you
know
some
creativity,
so
I
really
feel
if
we
treat
this
building
as
is
proposed
by
the
staff
and
allow
it
to
be
moved,
we
are
really
kind
of
making
the
whole
point
of
our
analysis
of
the
hri
kind
of
irrelevant.
We
see
project
after
project.
We
put
it
in
a
chart,
here's
important
but
we're
tearing
it
down
anyway,
it
really
by
tearing
down
an
essential
building
in
our
historic
heart
of
arlington.
G
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Martin,
commissioner,
tell
me.
P
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
I
do
support
commissioner
morton's
comments.
I've
come
around
on
this
originally
when
I
was
seeing
these
presentations
through
this
lrpc
process.
I
kept
thinking.
Well,
I
don't
know,
I
guess,
there's
not
much.
We
can
do
blah
blah
blah
right
now.
I'm
thinking
more,
our
where
we
went
wrong
in
the
process
with
this
building
is
that
we
are
trying
to
fit
the
building
to
what
the
plan
is.
Rather
than
trying
to
fit
the
plan
to
the
building.
P
P
If
you
look
at
edgewood
and
clarendon
boulevard
at
the
what
used
to
be
market
common,
there's,
a
nice
plaza
across
some
whole
foods,
it's
a
big
chunk
of
space
and
it
was
left
there
because
the
old
cirrus
building
didn't
go
all
the
way
to
the
to
clarendon
boulevard.
So
we
left
that
space.
It
works.
It's
nice,
open
area.
P
We
have
the
same
thing
where
the
circa
restaurant
is
on
clarendon
boulevard
and
I
think
it's
probably
garfield
street,
and
that
was
done
partly
to
accommodate
a
metro
vent,
but
it
leaves
a
nice
amount
of
open
space.
We
have
the
same
thing
at
highland
street
and
wilson
boulevard
where
there
used
to
be
a
little
tiny
cut
off
street
with
the
building
way
set
back.
It's
now
a
nice
open
area
that
actually
works
as
a
public
space.
So
while
the
bill
two
lines
are
important,
they
not
should
necessarily
be
sacrosanct.
P
When
we
looked
at
this
block-
and
I'm
definitely
sensitive
to
the
developers-
needs
to
have
a
building
that
will
pay
for
itself
and
especially
if
we're
going
to
be
taking
a
certain
amount
of
space
away
from
what's
buildable,
this
would
have
been
the
primary
to
say:
fine,
we're
not
going
to
enforce
the
bill
2
line,
let's
go
way
higher
to
make
make
up
the
difference.
I'm
not
sure
that
was
ever
explored
because
we
have
various
height
limits
within
the
clarinet
sector
that
we
just
won't
go
over
this.
P
P
In
order
to
make
up
for
the
difference,
I
don't
remember
exploring
that,
and
partly
maybe
that's
my
fault
for
not
thinking
of
that
early
enough
to
raise
it
as
an
issue,
but
anyway,
my
point
is,
I
would
be
voting
in
favor
of
commissioner
morton's
proposed
amendment
to
this,
because
I
think
that
we
really
should
it
could
have
worked.
P
T
Thank
you.
I
I
would
like
to
align
myself
with
the
comments
made
by
both
commissioners,
morton
and
latontland.
Tell
me,
I.
I
think
that
you
know
to
echo
what
commission
linton
was
just
saying
that
they're
to
a
point,
I
think
we
are
maybe
looking
at
some
of
our
redevelopment
choices
too
narrowly
and
further.
If
we're
we're
in
a
situation
where,
as
commissioner
morton
indicated,
we
are
not
so
far
along
in
the
process,
this
is
a
known
historic
resource.
That's
been
identified
as
essential
on
the
hri,
I'm
not
really
sure.
T
If
we're
not
preserving
this
to
the
level
of
full
preservation
in
sight,
I'm
just
not
sure
what
we
are
going
to
preserve
ever
and
I
feel
like
we're
abdicating
in
that
space,
and
I
I
don't
appreciate
that.
I
also
had
concerns
that
in
terms
of
just
given
what
we've
heard
from
the
applicant
or
potential
applicant
for
for
the
site
as
to
the
condition
of
the
building
and
the
facade,
I'm
just
not
sure
why
moving
it
seems
like
a
viable
option
to
begin
with,
I'm
actually
curious.
T
T
So
I
guess
that's
the
question,
but
before
I
get
before
I
yield
the
floor
to
answer
that
I
would
like
to
you
know
also
just
state
in
case
it
wasn't
clear
yet
I
will
be
supporting
commissioner
morton's
motion.
Thank
you.
T
A
L
Yeah-
and
I
know
that
one
of
the
public
speakers
this
evening
was
representing
the
applicant
and
spoke
to
this
very
topic
and
would
happy
to
welcome
them
to
the
mic
if
they
want
to
add
anything.
I
again,
I
just
want
to
say
that
you
know,
prior
to
this
study
even
beginning
in
2020,
the
applicant
filed
a
site
plan
following
the
sector
plan.
L
You
know,
which
you
know
did
not
require
preservation
of
this.
The
structure
they've
been
very
patient
in
participation
throughout
the
study
process.
We
understand
the
importance
of
the
historical
significance
of
the
building
and,
as
the
applicant
indicated
earlier
during
public
comment,
we
have
had
discussions
with
the
applicant
during
the
preliminary
filing
stages
and
have
been
supportive
of
the
facade,
preservation
and
relocation
to
the
corner
to
again
meet
the
bill.
Two
lines
establish
a
good
quality
streetscape
and
some
of
the
other
components
that
I
mentioned
earlier
in
the
presentation.
L
We
did
not
explore
through
the
study
preservation
in
situ,
or
you
know,
conversion
of
the
asphalt
parking
lot
to
public
space,
as
was
mentioned
by
commissioners
this
evening.
That
was
not
part
of
any
of
the
the
modeling
studies.
L
I
think,
as
indicated
by
the
applicant
earlier,
the
preservation
in
place
would
render
the
site
just
not
a
viable
redevelopment
project.
I
know
that
they
had
mentioned
some
environmental
constraints
to
preservation
as
well.
I'm
not
that
familiar
with
those
so
would
welcome
any
further
additions
on
that
topic.
L
But
you
know
our
recommendation
going
forward
would
be
to
recommend
facade
preservation
with
the
ten
foot
step
back
and
to
relocate
it
to
the
corner.
As
indicated
in
the
previous
presentation.
A
Thank
you,
mr
wallace.
Mr
painter
briefly,.
Q
Yeah,
just
you
know
just
to
echo
some
of
the
things
that
that
staff
had
mentioned,
and
I
did
want
to
recognize
ryan
orr
with
ore
partners
as
well.
But
I
think
the
the
fundamental
premise
is
that
the
project
really
cannot
be
realized
that
the
joyce
motors
building
remains
in
place.
Q
The
application
you
know
it
it's
unreasonable
to
require
full
building
preservation,
giving
the
decaying
state
portions
of
the
building-
and,
as
I
mentioned,
we
are
preserving
the
most
historically
significant
portions
of
the
building
and
other
equally
reliable
sector
plan
goals
such
as
housing
and
land
use
and
heightened
density
and
massing
will
not,
you
know,
should
be
met.
Q
But
without
this
development,
the
land
swap
that
creates
the
developable
parcels
across
the
entire
block
will
not
occur
and
that
the
one
then
will
have
a
ripple
effect
across
multiple
properties
and,
I
think,
chill
redevelopment
of
this
entire
area.
So
ryan,
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
say
a
couple
words
on
this.
A
Thank
you
for
joining
us,
mr
or
briefly,
please,
yes,.
U
I'll
be
brief,
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak,
but
I
mean
just
to
reiterate
andrew's
comments.
I
don't
think
everybody
fully
appreciates
kind
of
what
would
be
left
if
you
do
leave
that
in
place.
So
what's
what's
there
now?
What
you're
really
ending
up
preserving
is
a
contaminated
parking
lot.
That's
full
of
oil
and
gas,
and
things
like
that
that
we
have
to
remediate
as
well
as
if
you
actually
walk
the
property.
The
two
sides
that
did
not
have
the
metal
panels
are
simply
cinder
block.
U
That
is
also
coated
in
oil
and
things
like
that.
So
the
real
architectural
significance
is
those
streamlined,
modern
panels
that
we
are
honoring
through
the
redevelopment
through
the
design
of
the
building
trying
to
replicate
some
of
that
streamlined,
modern
as
well
as
you
know,
naming
the
project,
the
joyce.
So
it's
it's
really.
You
know
we
are
honoring
that
building
in
the
best
way
that
we
can,
by
redoing
those
available
panels,
you're
going
to
be
getting
rid
of
over
100
housing
units.
U
If
you
chop
it
up
in
this
way,
right
near
a
metro,
stop
to
try
to
put
more
public
park
space
where
we're
already
saying
that
we're
going
to
put
a
public
park
across
the
street
as
well
as
damaging
the
ability
to
put
retail
there,
the
loading,
the
circulation
and
everything,
and
then
our
land
swap
agreement
with
the
adjacent
neighbors.
I
just
don't
even
think
that
I'm
not
even
sure
this
entire
project,
the
entire
triangle
gets
developed
at
that
point.
U
So
you
need
to
think
really
hard
about
land
use
planning
here,
what's
most
important,
where
it's
important
to
put
housing
near
metro
stops
in
a
county
where
we've
agreed
to
bring
amazon
the
largest
job
creator
in
the
nation,
we
really
need
to
think
hard
about
putting
housing
near
metro
stops,
that's
the
most
important
thing,
and
while
green
space
and
preservation
is
important,
we're
preserving
the
most
important
part
like
we
said,
and
you
know
cleaning
up,
basically
contamination
and
everything
around
it,
so
that
that's
why
we
have
planned
it
this
way.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
mr
orr.
Mr
la
tell
me,
you've
got
your
hand
up
still
is
that
residual,
or
did
you
want
to
be
recognized
again?
I'm.
Thank
you,
commissioner
hughes.
Before
I
go
to
you
just
in
the
interest
of
of
pop-up
round-robin,
I'm
gonna
go
to
commissioners,
bagley
and
charlie.
V
Okay,
so
me,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
appreciate
the
developers
issues
with
this.
I
am
not
a
developer.
I
am
not
an
architect.
V
Having
said
that,
we
also
have,
I
thought,
a
historic
preservation
program
which,
in
so
many
of
these
meetings,
seems
to
have
to
go
and
and
not
be
maintained
as
a
historic
preservation
program
due
to
constraints
and
possibly
not
finding
all
the
creative
solutions.
I
don't
know
the
creative
answer
at
this
point,
but
I
will
have
to
support
commissioner
morton's
motion
on
this,
because
I
think
at
some
point
either
we
say
we
have
a
historic
preservation
program
where
we
just
don't
have
one,
and
then
everything
goes
to
other
more
pressing
needs.
N
Thank
you,
chair,
we're
I'll,
be
brief.
I
just
want
to
strongly
associate
myself
with
commissioner
mormont
morton's
perspective
on
the
historic
preservation.
I
think
you
know
it
brings
into
question
the
whole
reason
for
planning
if
we're
going
to
ignore
something
that
we
deem
essential,
not
just
important,
but
so
I
think
you
know
this
is
a
little
bit
of
why
I'm
usually
skeptical
of
us
introducing
flexibility
into
some
of
these
plans.
N
It
becomes
a
little
bit
of
a
misnomer,
or
you
know,
essentially
gives
an
out
to
for
us
to
not
commit
to
the
plan
or
essentially
and
out
I
just
and
finally,
I
just
think
architecturally
speaking,
you
know,
architecture
and
creativity
thrive
under
restrictive
conditions.
So
I
think
there
is
a
creative
solution
here.
I
think
there's
easily
not
easily,
but
something
that
can
be
done.
That
could
be
creative
that
could
introduce
architecture
around
it
through
it.
N
E
E
I
just
want
to
read
them
real,
quick,
the
arlington
summit
house
theater,
the
joseph
l
fischer
post
office
on
washington
default
glebe
center,
north
glebe
dan
klein,
building
washington
boulevard
odds,
fellows
hall,
wilson,
boulevard
dominion,
building,
north
island
street
r,
h,
rucker,
building
wilson
boulevard,
texaco
service
station.
That's
this
one:
joy
center,
10th
street,
north
unnamed
commercial
building,
2836
wilson,
woolworth,
building,
20
3185,
wilson
boulevard.
E
I
I
can't
echo
any
stronger
words
and
I
think
was
heard
from
all
the
commissioners
previously
to
me
that
if
essential
means
essential,
then
it
means
essential,
and
that
is
my
fundamental
problem
with
with
it
and
it's
one
of
the
reasons
I
actually
don't
support.
Commissioner
morton.
Your
motion
I
think
later
on
is
that,
and
so
I
said
that
the
piercing
has
a
commission
on
committee
are
just
eating
through
me.
E
Even
in
her
absence,
we
have
to
acknowledge
this
plan
as
2006
and
if
it
is
2006,
then
every
building
on
there
should
stay
and
go,
and
I
believe
I
concur
with
all
the
points
who
say
that
that
being
said,
we
also
have
to
live
and
confine
ourselves
within
the
world
of
virginia
and
we
live
in
the
commonwealth
of
virginia
and
what
we
heard
this
evening
from
both
staff
and
the
applicant
is
that
if
it
stays
without
a
preservation
of
the
facade,
we
are
fundamentally
killing
the
deal
and
when
we
kill
a
deal,
it's
important
to
remember
what
the
alternatives
are
for
that,
because
if
you
think
about
it
very
carefully,
it's
not!
E
Commissioner,
sorry.
I.
I
would
hope
that
we
get
a
creative
solution.
That
comes,
but
I'm
also
realistic
that
it
mostly
more
likely
than
not
that
the
dollars
will
just
chase
something
else.
That's
easier
because
getting
creative
solutions
does
take
a
great
deal
of
dollars
and
that's
normally
what
happens
when
we
held
out
hoping
for
a
better
solution
than
a
a
cvs,
one
story,
suburban
style
at
the
highlander
motel.
E
We
ended
up
getting
dragged
to
court
and
losing-
and
this
is
something
that's
important
to
remember-
and
it's
more
important
to
me-
that
the
preservation
be
better
served
more
architecturally.
Inspired.
Hri's
review
is
always
incredible
from
maybe
you,
architects
leo,
and
you
guys
just
astonished
me
and
that's
the
reason.
I
really
can
support
staff's
position
on
this
tonight
and
it's
also
more
importantly,
for
me.
I
really
do
think
we
need
to
think
more
carefully.
Do
we
have
the
light
right
mix
of
buildings
in
our
essential
list,
and
I
agree
with
all
of
you.
E
If
it's
essential
it's
essential,
it
means
it
doesn't
go
down.
If
you
want
to
bulldoze
the
arlington
cinema
and
draft
house
go
for
it,
I
guess,
but
it
is
to
do
it
and
just
to
remind
everyone
in
virginia
today
by
right
they
can
bulldoze
that
building
and
put
in
whatever
they
can
by
right,
and
that's
just
a
fact.
Nothing
we
can
do,
can
stop
that
and
we
have
to
acknowledge
that
fact
as
a
counter
choice
to
what
we
have
before
us.
G
Thank
you
for
indulging
me
again,
just
since
commissioner
hughes
did
bring
up
economics,
which,
of
course,
is
critical
in
the
historic
preservation
plan.
It
does
mention
specifically
with
respect
to
essential
buildings,
a
variety
of
tools
that
it
encourages
a
county
to
consider
tdr
other
kinds
of
financial
incentives,
preservation,
easements
tax
exemptions.
So
you
know,
I
think,
perhaps
there's
even
some
tools
up
our
sleeve
now
or
in
the
future.
G
If,
if
it's
okay
of
a
quick
comment,
just
about
facade
preservation
versus
real
preservation,
it's
really
seen-
and
we
talked
about
anagonized
in
the
courthouse
landmark
that
this
should
be
seen
as
a
last
resort,
as
opposed
to
what's
called
for
with
essential
buildings
which
is
to
willing
to
protect
despite
challenges
and
difficulties.
G
In
my
reading
of
what
I
can
see
in
this
building,
is
it
really
is
just
sort
of
pasting
on
it?
Doesn't
really?
It
won't
really
stand
alone
with
any
kind
of
integrity
or
any
sense
of
sort
of
an
independent
volume
or
function.
It
doesn't
really
read
as
a
historic
building.
So
again,
the
the
facadism
or
facadectomy
is
really
seen
as
a
last
resort
or
like
a
consolation
prize.
G
The
quote
I
like
that
I
use
often
is
the
problem
with
encouraging
facadism
in
any
way
is
that
then,
in
the
next
conversation
about
the
next
building,
it
becomes
a
starting
point
rather
than
the
ending
point,
and
I
feel
like
we're
just
going
in
that
direction
that
it's
just
fine
to
save
a
scrap
of
a
building
as
opposed
to
real
preservation.
So
thank
you.
J
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
patel.
I
I
a
question
for
staff.
I'm
sure
that
this
has
been
covered
in
the
in
the
report
and
I've
just
missed
it.
The
the
year,
the
that
the
joyce
motors
building
was
constructed
again.
L
Yeah
hold
on.
Let
me
I
have
that
bear
with
me
for
a
second.
E
A
Q
A
And
thank
you,
and
has
anyone
managed
to
find
any
information
on
the
structure
that
was
there
prior
to
49?
I'm
looking
at
some
of
the
aerial
maps
and
I
I
can't
find
it
with
precision
to
to
share
it,
but
best
I
can
tell
the
the
structure
that
was
there
prior
to
a
49
used
was
built
to
the
was
built
to
the
street
rather
than
with
a
parking
lot
set
back.
L
I
don't
have
that
available
at
the
moment,
but
we
can
certainly
look
into
that
and
provide
an
update
at
the
next
meeting
or
post
new
materials.
If
we
can
find
some.
A
I
I
would
appreciate
that
I
I
very
much
sympathize
with
the
comments
that
I
think
most
of
my
colleagues,
that
all
of
my
colleagues
who
have
spoken
on
this
have
have
offered,
and
it's
certainly
you
know
from
my
perspective
it.
It
certainly
is
true
that
that
this
is
the
building,
that's
on
the
historic
resources
inventory,
but
I
think
it's
also
important
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that.
A
In
the
scope
of
the
history
of
the
county,
you
know
a
building
just
didn't
just
spring,
fully
formed
from
the
forehead
of
zeus.
Right,
like
the
first
thing
that
was
ever
built.
There
wasn't
this
and
I
I
would
be
interested
to
know
whether
or
not
you
know
buildings
that
were
there
before
this
one
had
a
a
step
back
or
had
a
more
urban
form.
Well,
this
will
be
before
us
again,
so
I'll
be
interested
to
hear
an
answer
to
that.
Next
time
we
talk
about
it.
A
If
there's
nothing
else
on
historical,
historic
preservation,
should
we
go
to
transport?
Commissioner
steinberger?
Thank
you.
I'm
still
on
historic
preservation.
T
Yeah,
I
I
maybe
it
was
the
zeus
reference,
but
as
a
classics,
major,
I
just
couldn't
let
that
one
go.
I
think
that,
while
I
understand
it's
interesting
to
consider
the
history
and
evolution
of
a
site
over
time,
we
have
the
site
we
have,
and
that
is
what
we
have
made
a
determination
as
a
county
to
put
on
the
historic
register
as
essential
and
that's
what
we're
left
with.
A
T
I
don't
think
that
anyone's.
I
think
that
the
applicant
or
2b
applicant
has
indicated
that
this
is
a
contaminated
parking
lot
and
nothing
can
be
done
with
it.
I
don't
know
that
that
is
a
fear
complete
at
this
point
in
time
and
what
we're
actually
talking
about
is
during
the
building.
I
don't
think
anyone
is
fighting
to
preserve
a
parking
lot
at
that
location
in
front
of
it.
A
I
appreciate
it
moving
along
to.
P
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
if
this
is
really
transportation
or
not,
but
going
to
the
linear
park
off
10th
street
and
kirkwood.
P
P
Terribly
impacted
by
having
what's
in
effect,
an
alley
along
it
in
order
to
have
deliveries
be
made,
so
I
definitely
support
the
whole
concept
of
the
linear
park
and
I
don't
think
it.
The
concept
of
that
is
a
is
at
all
diminished
by
having
that
vehicular
access
for
limited
purposes,
it's
it
will
not
be
a
through
street.
It
shouldn't
be
designed
to
look
like
a
through
street.
There
will
be
a
bike
facility
going
through
it,
which
obviously
would
be
a
protected
one
as
a
practical
matter.
P
So
I
think
that
there
will
still
be
a
role
in
the
transportation
network
for
this
strip
that
will
turn
into
a
park,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
to
go
so
far
to
say
that
it
is
totally
banned
to
have
any
wheeled
vehicles
going
through
it,
and
I
don't
think
that's
part
of
the
plan
at
all.
I
just
wanted
to
put
my
support
in
that
having
what
we're
going
to
be
planning
to
allow
there
does
make
a
lot
of
sense
and
it
still
will
still
be
a
really
good
facility,
even
with
that
there.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Tell
me,
commissioner,
stroll.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
just
wanted
to
pick
up
just
briefly
on.
Commissioner
lynn,
tell
me
recent
point
about
the
linear
park,
just
to
mention
that
that
park
would
be
going
through
a
broader
master
planning
process
when
it
is
constructed,
and
so
there
will
be
more
opportunity
to
get
down
into
the
finer
grain
details
about
some
of
those
items.
H
But
mr
commissioner
lin
tell
me
is
correct
and
and
sort
of
the
broader
points
as
he
saw
them
and
articulated
them,
but
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
there
will
be
sort
of
another
bite
at
the
apple
with
with
with
respect
to
the
park
planning
process
down
the
road.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
schroll.
I
bel
that
I
believe
that
that
covers
the
the
recommended
topics
for
discussion.
If
there
is
no
other,
if
there
are
no
other
topics,
a
commissioner's
role,
I'll
go
to
you.
I
was
about
to
go
to
you
for
a
motion,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we've
disposed
of
any
of
any
conversation
that
that
people
want
to
offer
beforehand.
A
H
I
had
just
yeah,
I
only
have
one
quick
question
and
then
I
I
think
that
concludes
my
my
remarks
or
my
issues.
I
don't
know
about
my
colleagues,
mr
wallace.
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
just
provide
some
description
of
the
the
update
to
this
kind
of
sending
receiving
kind
of
transfer
of
development
rights
map,
because
I
noticed
that
the
the
county
parcel
is
now
a
receiving
site.
H
It
looks
like
so
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
to
that
change
and
how
that
relates
to
to
recently
adopted
county
policy,
about
the
ability
to
exceed
height
density,
etc.
On
to
achieve
you
know,
county
objectives.
L
Right,
thank
you
yeah
and
you're,
referring
to
the
receiving
sites
map.
If
I
can
maybe
I'll
just
pull
that
up.
Just
so
folks
can
see
what
you're
referring
to.
L
As
you
mentioned,
the
the
county
site
along
hudson
street
adjacent
to
the
verizon
building
is
recommended
to
be
included
as
a
receiving
site,
as
is
the
wells
fargo
site
which
is
consistent
with
the
2006
plan.
L
And
so
what
that
means
is
that
additional
height
above
the
maximum
building
height
and
additional
density
above
the
glup
could
be
approved
by
the
county
board
in
exchange
for
community
benefits,
and
so
we're
identifying
that
area
on
the
north
edge
of
the
county
parcel
along
hudson
street
to
potentially
be
extended
above
the
110
foot
height
limit
to
the
128
foot
height
limit,
which
again
would
be
consistent
with
the
wells,
fargo
site
and
the
dark,
orange
and
again
in
exchange
for
community
benefits.
L
And
so
that
was
insa.
A
lot
of
the
modeling
and
the
heights
map.
L
H
Great
thank
you,
mr
wallace.
A
So,
commissioner,
do
you
want
to
kick
us
off
with
with
an
initial
motion.
H
Okay,
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
recommend
that
the
county
board
adopt
the
attached
resolution.
B
A
By
commissioner
land
tell
me,
commissioner:
schroll
do
you
care
to
speak
to
your
motion.
H
You
know
just
to
again,
I
think,
say
a
few
things.
One
appreciates
staff's
work
on
us
on
this
project
over
the
over
the
last
year
or
so
to
the
participants
the
lrpc
process.
I
appreciate
your
collaboration
and
good
work
through
the
process.
H
There
are
a
number
of
changes
that
that
have
been
been
added,
particularly
the
options
for
for
the
fire
station
four
that
are
before
us
this
evening
and
will
be
back
before
us
next
month.
That
are
there,
be
because
of
your
input
and
so
appreciate
that,
and
then
also
you
know
all
the
applicants
that
participated
as
well
and
land
owners
for
their
efforts
through
the
process.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
shirl.
I
believe
that
we
have
additional
motions,
at
least
from
commissioner
morton,
and
I
think
one
other
and
commissioner
hughes,
commissioner
martin,
will
go
with
you.
First.
G
Thank
you,
chair
weir.
I
shared
this
with
my
colleagues
earlier
this
evening
and
I'd
appreciate
if
there's
something
I'm
not
doing
exactly
right,
given
the
rta
stage,
I'd
appreciate
any
guidance
about
that.
G
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Martin,
before
we
get
a
second,
I
want
to
just
ask
staff
if
there
is
are
there
if
there
are
any
form
related
issues
with
respect
to
the
rta
stage,
that
you
would
want
to
make
any
recommendations
on.
A
Okay,
I
I
I
I'm
I'm
trying
to
make
miss
smith.
Thank
you.
C
M
M
Chair
just
to
add
some
clarification
to
your
question:
are
you
asking
would
we
want
to
potentially
change
any
recommendations
that
might
work
in
tandem
with
the
amendment
from.
A
No,
no
I'm
not
I'm
I'm
trying
to
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
to
protect
the
substance
of
what
of
of
what
commissioner
morton
is
trying
to
put
forward
in
a
way
by
by
making
sure
that
that
the
rta
that
it
that
it's
able
to
affect
the
rta
right
in
an
appropriate
way.
M
Sentence
so
my
response
would
be,
I
think,
from
an
advertisement
perspective
we'll
certainly
go
back,
but
I
think
what
my
line
of
thinking
is
at
the
moment
that
we
would
want
to
clarify
in
the
plan
and
in
the
zoning,
so
primarily
for
the
zoning,
so
that
we
have
the
appropriate
scope
of
advertisement
that
there
would
be
the
option
that
staff
has
shared
with
the
commission
tonight,
but
also
that
there's
an
option
to
preserve
the
building.
You
know
in
place
so
that
and
we'll
see
if
the
board
concurs
with
that
at
the
term.
M
You
know
I
mean
we
will
go
back
and
talk
about
that,
but
I
think
that
that's
what
with
the
planning
commission?
If
you
take
action
on
that
tonight
and
the
board
agrees,
we
would
likely
be
advertising
a
range
from
preserving
in
place
or
possibly
with
the
other
end
of
the
range
being.
What
staff's
presenting
tonight,
if
that
makes
sense,.
A
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
This
is.
A
Commissioner,
stroll
is
correct
that
that
discussion
is
on
the
sub
on
the
topic
is,
is
out
of
order?
That's
my
bad.
So
is
that,
mr
commissioner
hughes,
that's
a
second
for
the
purpose
of
discussion.
A
It
was
that
that
was
you,
commissioner,.
A
Commissioner
patel
was
with
the
second,
so
then
discussion
is
now
in
order,
commissioner
hughes
I'll
go
to
you.
E
Thank
you
and,
and
honorable
mention,
commissioner
steinberg
are
trying
to
get
the
second
in,
and
so
this
is
what
happens
when
we
get
out
of
practice
with
doing
these
rtas
in
the
sector
plan,
and
I
was
hoping
commissioner
schroll
is
going
to
jump
in
here.
So,
commissioner
ward,
I
think
that
your
your
your
motion
does
achieve
the
objectives
that
you
desire.
In
my
opinion,
and
as
staff
laid
out,
there
are
ways
we
could
do
this.
You
could
go
through
the
document
yourself
and
say
staff.
E
I
recommend
we
strike
paragraph
4d3,
paragraph
36,
paragraph
14,
36
substitute
x,
y
and
z.
You
could
also
just
make
a
very
broad
statement,
as
you
have
and
at
which
case
should,
should
the
county
board
wish
to
adopt
it?
They
could
direct
staff
to
hopefully
be
prepared
to
have
recommendations
before
them
at
the
advertisement
to
change
or
they
could
hash
it
out
from
the
diocese.
E
Like
sometimes
happens
from
us,
so
all
those
things
are
available
to
us,
and
so
I
think
commissioner
morton
for
the
intentions
of
our
discussion
this
evening
and
for
the
county
board's
advice.
I
think
that
it
will
achieve
your
objectives.
Moving
forward-
and
I
intend
to
offer
something
very
similar
in
my
own
one,
so
I
think
that
it's
very
fair
well,
but
for,
for
instance,
I'm
going
to
be
gone
in
the
long
run
in
a
year
as
a
reminder
for
everyone.
E
As
you
continue
on,
there
are
many
methods
we
could
do.
You
could
strike
it.
You
could
recommend
page
43
strike
this
page
36
strike
this
page
14
strike
that
these
are
very
important,
though.
The
one
thing
that
we
all
have
to
remember
is
that
at
this
stage
we
need
to
do
it
at
the
rta,
because
the
next
time
we
hear
this,
our
hands
are,
are
much
more
tied
and-
and
we
really
do
have
a
harder
time
you
know
making
any
substantive
changes.
E
This
is
the
point
to
do
it,
commissioner
warren,
so
I
think
you've
you've
done
a
good
job
in
crafting
that
and
commissioner
troll
do
it,
and
I
I
won't
be
brief,
but
just
from
my
previous
statements,
I
don't
plan
to
support
it,
but
I
agree
completely
that
if
essential
does
mean
essential,
then
it
should
mean
exactly
as
you
said,
and
I
am
not
a
proponent
at
all
of
of
a
facade
preservation.
I
do
believe
I
understand
the
character
in
place
of
the
building
itself,
where
it
is.
A
Commissioner
hughes,
I
I
had
recognized
you
on
the
in
trying
to
make
sure
that
I'm
gonna
come
back
to
you,
but
I
want
to
give
commissioner
morton
a
chance
to
speak
to
her
motion
before
we
start
getting
into
that.
A
Discussing
the
the
substance
of
it
and
and
apologies
again
all
around
I,
the
the
deviation
that
I
took
was
really
just
to
try
to
make
sure
that
that
we
had
a
that
that
it
was
in
order
to
make
a
substantive
recommendation
at
this
point
and-
and
I
I
agree
that
it
is
based
on
what
we've
heard
commissioner
morton
after
you
speak
to
it.
I
I
just
for
sign
posting,
madam
chair.
A
G
Okay
yeah
thank
you,
and
I
appreciate
the
clarification
by
commissioner
hughes.
I'm
I'm
often
not
exactly
sure
of
the
right
kind
of
intervention
at
the
rta
stage,
so
appreciate
the
clarification.
I
think
I've
really
spoken
to
the
motion
in
a
way
that's
sufficient
for
me
again.
I
I
concur
with
my
colleagues.
If
we're
going
to
be
taking
this
seriously,
we
we
have
to
to
take
a
stand
when
something's
called
essential,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
additional
thoughts
of
my
colleagues
and
I
I
will
leave
it
at
that
for
right
now.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner,
morton
and
and
madam
clerk,
you
you
had
jumped
in
I,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
go
to
you
in
case.
There
was
something
you
needed
to
share
that.
I
missed.
A
Great,
thank
you
sure.
Is
there
anyone
else
who
would
like
to
speak
either
for
or
against
or
or
in
relation
to?
Commissioner
morton's
motion.
A
I
am
going
to
call
the
roll
then
for
voting.
This
is
a
vote
on
commissioner
morton's
amendment
to
the
main
motion,
which
would
add
to
our
recommendation.
B
A
One
second
lost
track
of
my
notes.
Thank
you,
commissioner
bagley
commissioner
kieran.
I
A
Commissioner,
kieran
is
a
no
commissioner
hughes,
no.
B
A
I
vote
no,
that
is,
the
motion,
carries.
A
Seven
to
four:
so
are
there
other
amendments,
commissioner
hughes.
E
Commissioner,
can
you
hear
me
now
yes
and
is
my-
is
the
word
document
in
front
of
the
screen
at
the
moment.
N
E
Is
that
clearer?
Yes,
thank
you
larger
font,
so
this
motion
is
or
moved
to
fundamentally
make
clear,
as
I
previously
stated,
and
this
all
make
it
forward
it's.
I
move
that
the
plane
commission
recommend
the
county
board
direct
county
manager
to
make
clear
preference
for
use
of
public
land
within
the
clarendon
sector
plan,
be
designated
public
services,
including
rooftop
and
co-located
amenities,
eg
parks,
fire
stations,
community
gardens,
tennis,
basketball,
courts,
etc.
J
A
And
commissioner
hughes,
if
you
wouldn't
you
know
but
remember
at
the
end
of
this,
both
commissioner
morton
has
already
circulated,
but,
commissioner
hughes,
a
reminder
when
we
get
there
to.
Please
circulate
the
language.
E
Yes,
can
you
guys
hear
me
now?
Yes,
yes,
I'm
struggling,
I'm
sorry,
everyone!
So
for
those
of
you
who
know
me
well
and
I'll
try
to
be
brief,
because
I
did
speak
on
this
early.
This
may
surprise
you,
but
this
is
actually
one
of
those
fundamental
things
that
I
really
does
sort
of.
Irk
me,
which
is
that
we
are
a
growing
county
and
the
land
we
have
is,
is
very
valuable
and
and
valuing
it
is
even
harder
not
for
our
private
sector.
E
They
have
an
easy
time,
valuing
it
they
they
sell
it
and
trade
it.
So
when
we
make
these
fundamental
decisions
about
co-location
and
things
like
that,
we
we
create
not
only
a
problem
for
ourselves
in
the
future,
but
a
little
bit
of
a
problem
for
ourselves
now,
and
that
is
that
we
do
have
limited
public
land
and
the
public
land
we
have
is
very
valuable.
So
I
I
agree
that
maximizing
its
usage
for
all
sorts
of
things
is
great.
The
community
is
already
lynching.
E
Some
things
there
doesn't
have
to
be
a
mini
community
center.
It
can
be
as
simple
as
a
rooftop
garden.
We
don't
have
one
in
that
area.
These
are
things
that
can
be
explored.
Yes,
it
does
increase
the
cost
of
building
it,
but
it
does
do
two
or
three
things.
So
I
I
really
am
a
strong
believer
that
it's
what
we
forget
when
you
build
a
house,
is
that
very
few
houses
in
multi-family
will
stand
the
test
of
time
and
very
few
community
buildings
that
we
build
are
what
we
intend
them
to
be
doing.
E
50
years
from
now
and
50
years
ago,
most
of
the
buildings
we
have
weren't
doing
what
they
were
doing,
and
so
it's
one
of
those
things
that
really
does
really
something
I
don't
like
to
do,
which
is
to
put
people's
homes
on
land.
I
know,
is
going
to
be
in
a
constant
state
of
demand
flux
because
it
really
does
do
some
some
damage,
and
I
really
hate
to
do
it
to
some
of
our
most
vulnerable
people
and,
as
I
have
said,
we
have
done
this
in
the
past.
E
Well,
there
is
the
raps
process
that
put
the
the
the
condo
building
on
top
of
public
land,
which
again
I
didn't
really
support
very
much,
but
the
that
was
all
high,
very
luxury
units
to
a
commissioner
backwards
previous
point,
but
we
did
do
this
on
the
west
end
of
the
pike
and
we
are
now
searching
for
more
park
land
there,
because
our
parks
master
plan
now
identified
many
red
areas
in
that
in
that
mapping,
zone
of
needed
community
services
that
are
no
longer
available,
and
so,
for
those
reasons
and
the
reasons
that
our
student
this
evening,
I
don't
really
support
the
co-location
of
affordable
housing
on
public
land,
and
this
plan
itself
is
very
adamant
about
that
and
it
is.
E
It
is
a
bifurcated
choice
and
that's
that's
the
real
problem
with
it.
I
hate
that
it
has
to
be
this
way,
but
it
really
is-
and
it's
it's
just
not
a
desire
of
mine
to
put
put
put
people's
homes
on
public
land
that
I
know
is
going
to
change.
So
thank
you,
commissioner,
weir
for
the
time
and
thank
you,
commissioner
patel
for
the
second
and
whether
you
support
or
not.
I
simply
appreciate
the
time.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Schroell
our
communication
hughes,
I'm
going
to
commissioner's.
H
Role
you,
mr
chairman,
question
for
commissioner
hughes
you're
talking
in
your
motion
here
about
public
land
within
the
clarion
instructor
plan,
but
it
seems
from
your
comments
that
you're
speaking
more
explicitly
about
the
the
space
along
10th
street
there's
other
public
space,
including
the
linear
park,
there's
other
others
envisioned,
there's
spaces
that
are
adjacent
to
the
clarinet
circle.
E
Going
here,
thank
you,
commissioner
schroll.
No,
it
it's
fundamentally
in
general,
all
those
spots
and
lands
that
we've
identified
in
there
are
to
be
primarily
designated
for
for
community
and
county
services.
However,
you
wanted
to
find
them
anything
from
emergency
dispatch
centers
on
top
of
fire
stations.
E
You
name
it
I
I
number
one
normally
will
support
it.
It
is
it's
really
the
affordable
housing
component
of
it
within
our
county's
public
land.
That
is
the
it's
the
the
red
line
for
me.
That
really
is
it
so
it
is.
It
is
fundamental.
That's
reason
I
crafted
the
the
the
the
motion
to
really
support
all
sorts
of
priorities
that
we
have
within
our
plan
and
there
are
some
that
I've
missed.
E
J
I
think
my
question
goes
essentially
to
well
it
kind
of
follows
up
and
maybe
asked
for
a
little
bit
of
clarification.
Commissioner
hughes,
the
when
I
looked
at
the
the
draft
plan
there's
no
kind
of
definitions
portion
to
it,
and
so,
when
you
say
public
services
and
then
you
have
some
examples,
including
rooftop,
co-located
amenities,
and
then
you
further
provide
examples
of
that.
Should
there
be
something
in
your
motion
that
says
and
specifically
excludes
housing.
E
I
I
hear
your
point
that
perhaps
some
people
can
define
the
public
service
that
we
do
is
affordable
housing.
At
that
point,
I
would
say
simply
if
that
was
true,
then
why
don't?
We
have
a
public
housing
provider
which
alexandria
does
you
know
we
have
chosen
as
a
community
not
to
to
have
a
public
housing
provider,
be
a
government
entity.
E
We
have
chosen
it
to
be
the
private
sector
through
our
non-profit
development
partners,
primarily
to
provide
comprehensive,
wrap
around
services
in
many
ways
that
far
exceed
fundamentally
some
of
the
things
that
happened
in
alexandria
and
some
of
our
neighboring
jurisdictions,
and
so
I
I
think
that
makes
it
clear
in
my
mind
that
we
as
a
county
have,
at
the
current
mind,
chosen
not
to
implement
a
government
entity
to
oversee
our
our
our
affordable
housing
methods,
and
so
I
I
don't
think
it
needs
any
more
clarity
and
that's
the
reason
I
did
do
the
the
eg
with
the
examples
on
there
and
if
there's
some
things
that
we
should
include,
for
example,
commissioner,
troll
maybe
say
you
know:
emergency
dispatch
center.
E
E
E
We
have
done
this
in
two
locations,
the
most
recent
of
which
is
the
high
rise
above
the
the
fire
station
and
the
wraps
process,
which
is
luxury
condos-
that
I'm
not
even
going
to
go
there,
because
you
can
go
to
listen
to
that
conversation.
E
I
spoke
out
of
the
time
too,
but
before
that
we
did
it
with
affordable
housing
on
the
west
end
of
the
pike
and
as
I
said
today
when
we
look
at
the
the
park
deficiencies
in
arlington
and
we
look
at
the
map,
they
are
there
on
the
west
end
of
the
pike
and
fundamentally
we
took
land
away
from
the
community
center
and
we
gave
it
to
affordable
housing
through
our
partnership
with
appa
that
built
a
very
nice
unit
that
houses
many
people,
but
it
means
that
there's
not
a
park
there
and
it
means
we
have
a
red
spot
and
it
means
we
now
have
to
find
more
land
there
somewhere
and
it's
still
not
there
to
build
those
parks.
E
J
I
don't
I
and
not
to
believe
the
point.
I
don't
necessarily
know
if
you're
standing.
Okay,
I'm
sorry,
my
my
kid
is
actually
still
awake
right
now,
but
I
don't
actually
mind
I'm
not
saying
that
you're
standing
on
this
hill
alone,
I
just
feel
like
the
intent
of
your
emotion.
J
It
feels
kind
of
two-fold
for
me,
the
public
service
component
of
it,
and
then
this
kind
of
exclusionary
component
of
it,
and
so
I
I
just
I
feel
uncomfortable
saying
something
is
designated
a
public
service
without
some
place
to
anchor
that
that
term
and-
and
this
may
just
be
kind
of
a
flaw
for
me,
because
I
do
think
about
words-
all.
E
J
B
E
J
E
We
would
see
we
would.
We
would
see
how
staff
implemented
it
would
be
the
the
clear
function
of
it.
We
would
see
if
the
county
board
were
if
we
were
to
pass
if
it
were
to
be
adopted,
and
if
the
county
board
read
it
and
cared.
You
know
we
could
see
if
staff
changed
anything
in
the
plan
and
how
they
chose
to
implement
it.
They
could
very
well
still
leave
in
affordable
housing
as
a
component
and
then
just
designate
a
preference
order,
or
they
could
do
any
number
of
things
like
it's
just
that's
it.
T
Hi,
I
think
commissioner
patel
really
may
have
gotten
that
sort
of
my
question
or
or
confusion
even
better
than
I
could
have
expressed,
that
this
doesn't
feel
like
a
fully
written
motion,
and
I
don't
know
if
I'm
struggling
with
well,
I
am
struggling
with
sort
of
making
a
state,
including
a
reference
to
public
services
without
defining
public
services
or
referencing
to
where
that
would
be
defined.
T
T
So
I
guess
I'm
struggling
with
that
a
little
bit.
I'm
also.
E
I'm
I'm
open
to
I'm
open
to
amendments
suggested
changes,
unanimous
consent,
motions,
anything
I'm
I
I'm
just
you.
You
all
know
what
my
intent
is
and
I've
made
it
clear.
I'm
not
going
to
hide
it.
It's
the
you
know
it's
to
make
it
so
that
if
you're
going
to
co-locate
things
on
the
site
that
before
you
get
to
affordable
housing,
everything
else
has
to
be
completely
unworkable,
and
I
just
I
don't
think
we
get
there.
If
we
try
to
think
about
it.
That
way,.
J
Commissioner
steinberg,
can
I
jump
in
and
just
say,
could
there
could
that
be
defined?
I
know
what
kind
of
wordsmithing
here
together
now,
but
could
it
be
defined
as
having
the
characteristic
of
serving
the
public
good
and
providing
maybe
like
under
provided
resource
in
that
planning
area?
There's
something
to
that
effect.
T
I
mean
it
can
do
anything
I
think
we're
gonna
struggle,
or
I
guess
I'm
seeing
for
myself,
I'm
going
to
struggle
with
coming
back
to
a
definition
like
public
good.
I
feel
like
there's
a
definition
of
public
services
and
public
goods
that
exists
in
the
arlington.
Canon
of
you
know,
policies
and
procedures.
I
just
you
know.
I
don't
know
enough
to
kind
of
pull
from
that.
A
Yeah,
please
please,
commissioner
peterson.
S
So,
rather
than
saying,
consideration
of
affordable
housing
on
public
land
should
be
the
after.
The
exhaustion
of
other
county
needs.
What?
If
we
said,
something
like
acknowledging
that
arlington
county
policy
prioritizes,
affordable
housing
being
achieved
through
public-private
partnerships
or
through
like
non-profit
partnerships,
because
if
that
is
our
policy,
then
we're
just
acknowledging
that,
like
that's
how
we
do
it
and
we
should
continue
doing
it,
because
that's
our
community's
best
practice.
E
Commissioner,
I,
commissioner
peterson.
I
really
appreciate
appreciate
that
comment
and
my
only
response
would
be
the
the
the
example
I
provided
of
of
the
name
is
killing
me.
It's
like
the
tip
of
my
tongue
of
arlington
mill,
but
it's
not.
It's
not
run,
operated
or
was
constructed
and
built
by
the
county.
It
was
done
so
by
a
non-profit
on
our
county
land,
and
so
that
would
be
my
goal
in
avoiding
that
conversation.
To
be
honest
with
you
just
to
be
clear,.
A
H
Thank
you,
mr
man,
mr
pfeiffer
or
miss
smith,
as
we
are
debating
and
wordsmithing
here
about
an
area
in
the
code
that
does
define
our
public
services.
X
Commissioner,
schroll
hi
hi
everyone
matt
pfeiffer,
with
the
planning
division
and,
if
jen
has
anything
to
weigh
in,
I
will
let
her
do
so
as
well.
The
zoning
ordinance
does
define
community
facilities.
X
Actually
I
don't
know
if
it
defines
community
facilities,
but
it
mentions
community
facilities
as
those
types
of
facilities
that
are
eligible
for
bonus
density.
I
think
many
of
the
items
that
commissioner
hughes
mentions
in
his
motion
would
fall
under
that
rubric.
X
But
again
I
I
think
that
there's
sort
of
a
it
may
be
not
quite
defined
so
I'll.
Let
jen
weigh
in
now
if
she
has
anything
to
add
to
that.
M
Thank
you,
mr
frankfurt
and
the
question
commissioner
troll
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
So
here's
some
additional
feedback
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
We
do
have
use
categories
community
facilities
and
we
also
have
government
facilities.
M
So
I
think
those
two
terms
may
be
relevant
here.
Instead
of
the
term
public
services,
government
facilities
is
where
fire
stations
are
used.
We
use
that
term,
even
in
some
of
the
proposed
texts
that
you
have
before
you
tonight
and
community
facilities
is
for
things
like
like
community
centers
courts.
Things
like
that.
H
Thank
you
both
and
then.
Well,
I
have
you
both
answering
this
question.
Just
I
guess
there
was
some
reticence
by
some
of
my
colleagues
about
you
know:
affordable
housing
being
one
of
the
items
that
could
be
a
community
facility.
X
I
think
that's
accurate,
I
mean,
I
think,
from
the
the
use
table
perspective,
affordable
housing
would
would
be
classified
as
a
residential
use.
H
Okay,
thank
you
both.
So,
commissioner
hughes,
you
know
I
might
I.
H
E
So,
commissioner,
just
to
be
clear-
and
I
would
like
staff-
or
maybe
it's
jen-
to
confine
do-
community
facilities
preclude
housing,
I
believe
communities
facilities
would
include,
are
only
to
mill
and
the
the
site
they're
defined.
That
way,
it's
my
understanding,
like
zoning
district
rc,
I
think,
would
allow
that.
M
Commissioner
hughes,
I
mean,
I
think,
that,
from
the
zoning
perspective
we
would
still
treat
housing
as
a
residential
use.
So
if
the
zoning
you
know.
O
B
M
Right
and
I
know
that
we've
got
an
example
of
that
along
columbia,
pike,
but
right.
The
zoning
allows
both
uses.
E
Correct
and
that's
kind
of
where
I
get
to
again,
which
is
commissioner
patel
saying
words
matter,
and
I
agree
and
commissioner,
commissioner
troll,
I
really
appreciate
you
trying
to
do
it
and
it's
just
my
knowledge
of
the
term
community
facilities
inside
the
zoning
ordinance
knows
that
the
two
by
including
it
it
it
completely.
E
A
Commissioner,
before
we
start
getting
to
to
voting,
which
we
do
have
to
do,
I
want
to
go
to
commissioner
patel.
J
This
is
kind
of
my
last
attempt
to
do
wordsmithing
because
I'm
I'm
I'm
actually
inclined
to
support
this
motion.
I
just
want
to
be
able
to
figure
out
how
to
get
best,
can
we
say
designated
as
a
community
facility
government
facility
or
serving
or
providing
a
service
providing
a
service
by
the
county
or
through
the
you
know.
J
I
had
it
actually
before
so.
Yeah
government
facility
community
facility
or
service
through
the
county.
I
Thank
you,
chairwear.
I'm
inclined
to
support
this.
I
agree
that
this
isn't
maybe
as
specific
as
it
could
be
and
we're
trying
to
wordsmith
on
night
two
after
ten
o'clock,
but
I
think
commissioner
hughes
raises
a
really
critical
point
and
we've
seen
this
happen.
I
I
was
six
years
on
park
and
rec
before
this
is
my
seventh
year
on
pc
and
it
seems
to
be
really
really
easy
to
look
at
our
public
space,
our
open
space
as
something
that's
vacant
and
put
something
on
it
that
doesn't
necessarily
serve
our
public
purpose.
So
I
I
really
appreciate
that
we're
raising
this,
although
I
agree
with
commissioner
hughes,
might
not
go
anywhere.
I
fully
intend
to
support
this.
I
really
appreciate
the
intent.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
guerin.
If
there
are
no
other
speakers,
commissioner
hughes,
let
me
ask
you
to
zoom
out
just
a
little
bit
and
then
try
to
get
unanimous
consent
to
amend
the
motion
to
to
as
written.
E
Before
you
do
so,
commissioner,
I
just
want
to
confirm,
with
my
secondary
commissioner
patel
since
she's
done
the
amazing
job
of
wardsmithing.
Editing
me
at
odark30
that
the
the
language
at
the
bottom
you
want
to
keep
as
well.
Or
did
you
want
to
strike
that?
I
I
don't.
E
All
right,
I'm
I'm
would
be
I
I
would.
I
would
seek
unanimous
consent
I'll
just
with
commissioner
patel's
permission.
Will
I
will
rescind
my
original
motion
and
and
would
seek
the
chair.
Unfortunately,.
E
Us
god
bless
you,
commissioner:
troll
I've
missed
you,
sir,
and
commissioner
weir.
A
Without
objection,
the
motion
is
with
commissioner
hughes:
did
you
need
so
I
I
I
think
that
I
froze
for
a
second.
I
had
announced
that
the
motion
was
withdrawn
without
objection
and
then,
commissioner
hughes,
did
you
you're
seeking
recognition.
E
I
I
am
thank
you,
commissioner,
we're
back
back
to
you
and,
I
believe
is
my
screen
being
sure
good.
So,
sir,
I
would
I
would
move
the
planning
commission
recommend
the
county
board
direct
county
manager
to
make
the
clear
preference
for
use
of
public
land
within
the
clarendon
sector
plan
be
designated
for
government
facilities,
community
facilities
or
other
services
provided
by
the
county,
including
rooftop
or
co-located
amenities,
eg
parks,
fire
station,
community
garden,
tennis,
basketball,
courts,
etc.
J
A
By
commissioner
patel,
commissioner
hughes,
would
you
like
to
speak
further
to
your
motion.
E
I
believe
my
previous
conversation
on
with
the
motion
that
was
withdrawn
will
be
reflected
in
the
record
without
objection
from
my
colleagues.
A
Thank
you.
Is
there
anyone
else
who
would
like
to
speak
to
against
or
otherwise?
Regarding
the
motion.
B
I
G
J
B
B
A
A
That
brings
us
to
the
main
motion
as
amended
as
amended.
Thank
you,
commissioner
troll.
I
will
go
down
the
roll
again
questioner,
bagley.
B
B
B
J
B
A
I
vote
I
as
well
motion
carries
11
to
0..
Madame
clerk,
will
you
please
call
our
next
item.
A
Had
asked
you
to
call
our
next
item?
Oh.
C
I
do
I
miss
him
so
much.
I
was
trying
to
contain
myself.
So
our
last
item
for
the
evening
is
our
pc
committee
reports
and
our
other
business.
So
the
first
thing
we'll
do
is
if
everyone
is
in
agreement,
chairwear
is
to
approve,
adopt
and
approve
our
february
2nd
and
february
3rd
meeting
minutes.
A
That's
that's
what
we
will
do.
Can
I
get
a
mission,
a
motion
to
adopt
the
minutes
of
the
february
2nd
meeting.
A
I
Yeah
my
I
actually
attended
february
2nd,
so
I'm
not
and
I've
made
that
no
to
miss
johnson.
A
So
with
that
objection,
the
the
the
the
minutes
that
would
be.
B
B
G
B
A
I
think,
commissioner
sally,
I
think,
I'm
sorry
yeah
commissioner's
role.
H
Yes,
mr
chairman,
I
intend
to
vote
yes,
but
I
there's
one
further
edit
to
this.
The
february
2nd
I
was
in
attendance
and
on
february
2nd.
I
was
absent
february
3rd.
A
B
A
G
A
Seconded
by
commissioner
morton,
any
amendments.
B
J
J
H
W
A
Wonderfully
brief,
commissioner
peterson
site
plan
review
we'll
go
to
committee
reports,
starting
with
site
plan
review
committee.
Commissioner
peterson,
I
saw
that
you
circulated
your
report.
Is
there
anything
you'd
like
to
add.
S
Yes,
so
I
sent
everybody
a
summary
of
all
the
sprcs
that
are
ongoing
or
preliminary
or
coming
soon.
I
also
wanted
to
let
everyone
know
that
this
monday
march
14th,
mr
pfeiffer,
will
present
staff's
proposed
annual
updates
to
the
site
plan
conditions,
he'll,
be
posting,
a
video
presentation
and
a
draft
of
the
updates
this
friday
in
advance
of
the
meeting.
So
I
welcome
you
all
to
join
the
virtual
meeting
on
monday
at
7
p.m.
To
discuss
the
proposed
updates
thanks.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Peterson,
commissioner,
tell
me.
P
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Yes,
for
the
lrpc
right
now
we
have
the
open
period
for
the
block
m
online
engagement,
that's
open
until
the
14th,
so
I
encourage
all
of
you
to
go
online
to
that
site
and
make
your
preferences
known
on
the
online
engagement.
Otherwise
we
have
other
things
that
will
be
coming
up
later
in
the
year,
but
nothing
has
been
scheduled.
Yet
that's
the
lropc
report.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
electami.
We
will
then
go
to
zoning.
N
We
had
the
meeting
on
february
8th
and
we
covered
what
we
talked
about
tonight.
The
sector
plan
update
the
clarendon
sector
plan
update
and
it's
all
fresh
in
everybody's
mind.
So
I
think
that's
it,
commissioner
patel
do
you
have
anything
to
add.
J
I
do
not,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
taking
the
lead
on
that
february,
8th
meeting.
T
Hi
we
have
the
third
pfrc
meeting
related
to
the
career
center
project
on
march
30th.
So
please
put
a
pin
in
your
calendars
for
that
more
information
and
invites
and
such
to
come.
That
should
be
the
final
kind
of
of
that
type
of
meeting
with
the
group.
There
are
other
kind
of
action
meetings
that
will
be
coming
up
later
in
the
year,
but
that's
the
last
one
for
sort
of
the
feedback
portion.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Steinberger
commissioner
hughes
form-based
code
advisory
working
group.
E
No
updates
this
evening,
commissioner
rare,
although,
if
you
guys
keep
voting
for
all
my
motions,
it's
really
going
to
make
my
reputation
fall.
So
please
stop
that
all
of
you.
A
P
It
was
adopted
last
month,
so
this
is
mercifully
off
the
off
our
agenda.
Nothing
more
to
add.
A
The
last
item
before
we
adjourn
is
I
just
I
want
to
recognize
some
some
bittersweet
news
which
is
to
I
think
most
people
know
this,
but
this
is
going
to
be
commissioner
morton's
last
meeting
as
a
member
of
the
planning
commission,
commissioner
morton
has
been
with
us
for
very
nearly
four
years
and
brings
you
know
what
what
can
I
say
just
a
superlative
wealth
of
expertise
to
to
our
commission
and,
and
I
think
that
we
will
be
at
a
loss
without
you,
and
the
county
will
be
at
a
loss
without
you.
A
If
there's
anything
you
want
to
add,
I
hope
that
you
might
be
able
to
so.
Commissioner
morton.
G
Thank
you
so
much
as
I
think
you
know,
I'm
just
moving
across
the
river
to
the
other
side
of
our
logo
on
the
into
dc
and
I'm
gratified
to
leave
only
after
finally
mastering
how
to
make
a
motion
about
a
vacation
which
I
did
last
month.
I
do
appreciate
so
much
all
that
I've
learned
from
all
of
you
individually.
Many
of
you
have
spent
hours
talking
to
me
both
in
terms
of
parliamentary
procedure,
the
history
of
the
commission,
your
own
areas
of
expertise
and
maybe
even
more.
G
I
appreciate
what
I've
learned
from
you
all.
Collectively,
you
all
work
so
well
together
and
collegially,
balancing
all
of
the
priorities
and
passions
that
everybody
has
and
working
many
many
hours
to
advance
the
county's
growth
in.
I
think,
a
very
positive
way.
G
I'm
hoping
to
remain
involved
with
certain
aspects
of
arlington
going
forward
and
I'll
certainly
be
cheering
you
on
the
sidelines,
and
it's
been
my
privilege
to
work
with
you
and
also
I
want
to
acknowledge.
I've
enjoyed
working
with
staff
and
the
other
commissions
and
the
many
many
citizens
and
I've
encountered
in
the
meetings.
So
thank
you
so
much.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Martin
we
are,
we
will
miss
you
dearly,
madam
clerk.
I
believe
that
that
disposes
of
everything
else
on
our
agenda.
C
A
In
that
case,
no
other
business
on
the
agenda.
We
are
adjourned
until
next
month.
Thank
you,
everyone
and
have
a
good
evening.