►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
I
would
like
to
share
a
few
logistical
points
for
those
members
or
Commissioners
participating
remotely
tonight's
meeting
is
available
as
a
broadcast
with
closed
captioning
on
Comcast,
Xfinity
channels,
25
and
1085,
Verizon,
FiOS
channels,
39
and
40,
and
the
County
website
audio
of
tonight's
meeting
is
available
via
phone
if
Commissioners,
presenters
or
speakers
lose
internet
connectivity
during
tonight's
meeting,
please
reconnect
with
us
by
phone
for
other
presenters
and
speakers
joining
us
through
Microsoft
teams.
Please
keep
your
phones
and
devices
muted
until
you're
called
upon.
A
Please
turn
off
sound
to
any
other
devices
around
you
to
minimize
interference
and
please
keep
your
cameras
off
until
the
clerk
calls
on
you
to
speak.
When
called
upon
to
speak,
you
must
unmute
Yourself
by
clicking
on
the
microphone
icon.
That's
located
on
your
meeting
command
bar
the
moderator
does
not
have
the
ability
to
unmute
you
once
you
have
spoken.
Please
turn
your
cameras
off.
If
you
are
dialing
in
by
phone
press
star
6
to
unmute,
we
will
have
no
public
speakers
tonight.
All
speakers
will
be
virtual.
A
If
you
are
dialing
in
by
phone
and
unable
to
see
the
screen,
we
will
provide
an
audible
warning
when
30
seconds
are
remaining.
Each
speaker
will
have
two
minutes
to
speak.
You
will
be
muted
when
your
time
has
concluded
the
meeting
chat
is
active
for
presenters
or
Commissioners
who
need
technical
assistance.
Only
please
do
not
use
the
meeting
chat
for
discussion.
Public
comment,
question
questions,
questions
about
agenda
items
or
requests
for
more
information.
All
public
comment
must
be
shared
verbally
for
the
record
during
the
assigned
public
testimony
period.
Lastly,
this
is
a
public
forum.
A
E
F
C
C
I
was
prepared
to
speak
yet
again
tonight
about
lot
size,
parking,
annual
caps,
Geographic
dispersion
and
so
on.
But
we're
way
beyond
that
now
those
of
us
opposed
to
the
missing
middle
proposal
are
fighting
the
Gauzy
unrealistic
dream
of
achievable
home
ownership
for
everyone
who
wants
to
live
in
Arlington
we've
been
pointing
out
the
inconvenient
facts
about
missing
middle
to
an
audience
that
would
rather
believe
in
the
housing
equivalent
of
Santa
Claus.
No
wonder
they
don't
want
to
listen
young
and
moderate
income.
C
People
want
to
own
a
piece
of
Arlington
and
raise
a
family
here
and
I
don't
blame
them,
but
the
sad
fact
is
that
most
of
them
won't
be
able
to
afford
whatever
ownership
opportunities
missing
middle
creates
and
if
they
could,
they
could
probably
afford.
What's
on
the
market
today
in
Arlington,
in
the
form
of
older
houses
townhouses
and
the
like
I'm,
assuming
that
the
imbees
aren't
dreaming
of
the
small
rental
apartments
that
missing
middle
will
actually
provide,
especially
in
the
largest
multiplexes,
they
all
seem
to
favor
Without
Limits
everywhere
in
the
county.
C
The
county
has
raised
the
expectations
of
the
pro
missing
middle
side,
to
the
extent
that
no
one
will
be
happy
you
when
the
dust
settles.
Those
of
us
who
own
single
family
houses
on
small
Lots,
especially
near
Metro,
fear
that
a
behemoth
with
six
small
rental
apartments
and
inadequate
parking
will
be
built
next
door.
Those
current
renters,
looking
to
own
a
family-sized,
condo,
duplex
or
townhouse,
will
find
it
just
as
or
even
more
expensive
than
the
older
single-family
houses,
condos
and
townhouses
on
the
market
today,
so
they'll
be
upset
too.
C
G
Hi
and
thank
you
for
having
me
tonight
thank
you
to
the
Commissioners
for
all
your
hard
work
and
to
all
the
public
speakers
tonight
who
are
spending
their
time
to
to
chime
in
and
help
shape,
Arlington's
future.
My
name
is
Danielle
aragoni
I'm,
a
resident
of
Arlington
County
I'm,
currently
managing
director
of
policy
at
National,
Housing,
Trust
and
I've,
been
listening
to
some
of
the
testimony
and
I
can
say
with
confidence
that
there's
a
lot
of
good
work
that
has
been
done.
G
A
lot
of
planning
has
been
done
to
get
us
where
we
are.
Those
who
remain
opposed,
don't
recognize.
It
seems
many
of
the
concessions
that
have
been
made
over
the
last
three
years
in
studies
through
the
course
of
Open
Door
Mondays
and
civic
association
meetings
and
forums
like
this,
where
the
county
has
Heard
County
and
the
commission
have
heard
feedback
and
Incorporated
that
into
the
plan,
I've
been
a
little
frustrated
by
some
of
the
mistruce
that
have
been
promoted
throughout
this
process,
one
of
which
says
that
seniors
will
be
displaced.
G
I
previously
served
as
aarp's
director
of
livable
communities,
where
we
promulgated
missing
middle
and
other
Housing
Solutions.
Like
this,
exactly
so
that
seniors
could
could
age
in
place
in
the
communities
that
they
love
and
have
housing
Alternatives
available
to
them.
That
currently
simply
don't
exist
when
only
single
family
homes
are
available
in
many
neighborhoods
throughout
DC
throughout
Arlington.
My
apologies
I've
been
frustrated
by
the
mysteries
about
the
environmental
harm
that
would
be
caused
by
this
plan.
That's
also
not
true.
G
In
a
formal
role,
I
worked
at
EPA
in
our
land
use
and
smart
growth
office,
where
we
demonstrated
that
higher
density
development
is
actually
the
very
best
way
to
protect
open
space,
watersheds,
Energy,
Efficiency
and
address
climate
resilience.
We
promote
a
research
that
clearly
demonstrates
the
water
and
energy
benefits
of
housing.
Exactly
like
this
and
finally
I've
been
pressured
about
the
Mysteries
that
this
isn't
a
housing
solution.
G
It
is
it's
not
complete,
it's
not
perfect,
but
it
is
an
essential
precursor
to
creating
the
needed
Supply
that
will
then
be
followed
on
by
subsidies,
incentives
and
other
programs
that
will
make
housing
even
more
affordable.
It
absolutely
begins
with
zoning
change
to
bring
the
supply
online
so
that
we
can
welcome
members
to
our
community
I've
been
thinking
for
your
comments.
H
Yes,
hi
good
evening,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
Speak
to
you
on
behalf
of
a
group
of
PhD
level,
economists
and
Arlington
citizens.
We
have
Decades
of
experience
in
the
public
and
private
sector.
We've
sent
the
Arlington
County
Board
a
detailed
letter
explaining
that
there
has
been
no
serious
economic
analysis
done
related
to
the
missing
medal.
No
cost
benefit
analysis,
no
stakeholder
engagement
plan
that
is
reasonable.
The
few
premises
put
forward
do
not
stand
up
to
any
kind
of
scrutiny.
H
H
Reloading
homes
makes
them
eligible
for
the
highest
use.
Developers
will
look
to
maximize
their
profits.
The
results
are,
the
prices
of
existing
homes
will
be
more
Out,
Of
Reach
for
those
who
could
have
previously
afforded
them.
The
change
in
housing
prices
will
be
close
to
zero
for
any
missing
middle,
build
out
rate.
Why
there's?
Just
too
many
apartments
in
Arlington
look
around
you
there's
apartments
everywhere
for
a
few
extra
housing
units
to
make
any
difference
whatsoever.
H
In
addition,
the
real
cost
of
construction
makes
them
prohibitive
from
a
cost
perspective.
Developers
are
building
for
the
high
skill
High
income
earners
that
are
currently
drawn
to
Arlington
because
of
the
abundance
of
well-paying
jobs.
The
end
result
is
that
the
missing
mineral
will
benefit
a
very
narrow
segment
of
the
population
while
displacing
those
who
need
housing
the
most
towards
middle
income
and,
in
particular,
low-income
families.
So,
given
the
inadequacy
and
lack
of
compelling
economic
arguments
in
favor
of
the
missing
middle,
we
believe
this
proposal
is
an
unjustifiable.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
Thank
you,
I
oppose
missing
middle.
It
is
not
supported
by
any
real
analysis.
This
is
something
that
I
would
expect
from
our
Republican
friends,
since
it
borrows
from
Republican
ideology.
It
is
based
on
the
belief
that
if
we
elect
the
developers
subdivide
the
county,
whichever
way
they
want,
ignoring
environmental
and
other
negative
consequences,
this
will
somehow
magically
solve
some
housing
problem.
I
expect
that
it
will
badly
exacerbate
stormwater
problems
and
overwhelm
the
infrastructure
in
the
county.
No
one
has
done
any
real
analysis
of
this.
It
will
also
likely
dramatically
and
keep
increase.
I
Gentrification
New
York
City
was
ahead
of
the
curve
in
promoting
greater
density.
Now
we
can
see
videos
on
YouTube
of
new
six
unit,
rental
apartment
buildings,
with
massive
roof,
decks
and
balconies
on
what
were
previously
streets
of
only
detached
homes
or
townhouses
in
Bedford
Stuyvesant,
which
is
now
being
called
Stuyvesant
Heights
by
the
developers.
I
can
see
the
same
thing
in
Arlington's
future
in
Halls
hill
and
in
single-family
neighborhoods
in
South
Arlington,
where
there
are
now
relatively
affordable
single-family
homes.
I
J
I
oppose
the
middle
I'm,
an
immigrant
from
the
former
Soviet
Union
and
I
grew
up
in
an
apartment
building.
Our
parking
lot
was
always
full
and
my
dad
had
to
park
the
car.
Far
away
our
school
was
overcrowded.
There
were
about
40
students
cramped
into
a
small
classroom.
We
weren't
learning
much
during
breaks.
My
teacher
would
lock
herself
and
cry
one
of
my
happiest
days
since
coming
to
America
was
when
I
was
able
to
outbid
a
developer
and
purchase
a
single
family
house
on
a
pretty
large
lot
in
Arlington
is
missing.
Middle
is
adopted.
J
A
developer
would
be
able
to
bid
much
more
for
a
property,
since
the
developer
would
be
able
to
construct
and
construct
multiple
houses
on
the
property.
This
would
prevent
the
people
like
me
from
being
able
to
purchase
a
single
family
house
with
a
yard
for
the
kids,
but
it's
also
a
bad
storm
water
issue
in
the
neighborhood
and
allowing
more
houses
on
Lots
would
make
it
much
worse.
J
Missing
middle
would
also
create
parking
problems,
especially
if
developers
are
not
required
to
construct
parking
on
site.
It
would
also
change
the
character
character
of
a
quiet,
neighborhood.
I'm
also
worried
that
the
increased
density
will
cost
School
overcrowding,
excessive
traffic
and
the
lack
of
parking
spaces.
The
housing
is
expensive
in
Arlington
and
most
low
or
middle-income
families
will
not
be
able
to
afford
multi-family
homes
anyway,.
D
K
K
Missing
middle
is
also
about
dreams,
but
not
of
the
home
ownership
variety,
because
most
of
the
units
will
be
rental
for
developers
who
will
reap
double
or
triple
on
the
Lots.
They
flip
missing
middle
is
a
dream.
Come
true
for
people
of
color,
missing
middle
is
a
pipe
dream
because,
according
to
the
County's
own
data,
most
of
them
can't
afford
to
buy
or
rent
missing
middle
units
for
whites
who
can
afford
missing
middle
units.
Today's
ignored
impacts
such
as
congestion,
lack
of
parking,
overcrowded
schools,
increased
runoff
and
decreased
Street
canopy
will
become
tomorrow's
neighborhood
nightmare.
K
As
for
the
non-profits
pushing
missing
middle,
including
voice,
Sierra
Club,
the
faith
community
and
until
recently
the
NAACP,
their
leadership
is
living
in
a
dream
world.
Either
they
are
willfully
ignorant
of
the
County's
own
data,
showing
that
missing
middle
will
be
Out,
Of
Reach
of
most
of
their
constituents,
or
they
are
just
deliberately
misleading
them.
When
missing
middle
gears
up
whole
neighborhoods
will
be
flipped
or
emptied
of
low-income
residents,
most
of
them
seniors
or
people
of
color.
K
Who
can't
afford
the
increased
property
taxes
that
missing
middle
will
bring
if
Arlington's
so-called
Progressive
Community
were
interested
in
anything,
but
self-righteous
virtue,
signaling,
it
would
propose
Housing
Solutions
that
work,
not
one
that
even
yimby's
characterize
as
supply-side
trickle-down
housing
like
voodoo
economics
missing
middle
is
a
bad
dream.
Thank
you.
L
I
object
to
missing
mental
housing
anywhere,
I
specifically
object
to
proposal
5A
and
any
other
proposal
that
reduces
traffic
parking
on
Parcels
below
one
per
unit
that
would
be
built
in
in
the
proposed
parking
should
not
be
tied
to
any
on-street
parking
already
in
the
neighborhood.
I
object
to
any
parking
allowed
in
front
of
a
dwelling
specifically
B1
and
B2
on
page
40
of
The
Proposal
would
allow
two
or
three
cars
to
be
parked
between
the
the
the
front
property
line
in
the
front
of
the
house.
L
That
goes
against
the
context
of
just
about
every
neighborhood
in
Arlington
County
and
doesn't
fit
the
context.
There's
been
no
analysis
conducted
now
for
the
house
proposed
missing
metal
housing
and
we've
got
65
000
people
plan
to
come
to
Arlington
in
the
next
20
years
with
buy
right
housing.
That's
expected
to
be
developed
already
and
Arlington.
County
has
no
plan
to
accommodate
that
growth.
No
plan
for
infrastructure,
no
plan
for
schools,
no
plan
for
storm
water,
no
plan
for
sanitary
sewer,
no
plan
to
accommodate
a
25
increase
in
population
without
missing
middle
housing.
L
I
recommend
that
you
re-eliminate
any
restriction
on
parking
to
0.5
as
per
post,
because
right
now
we
only
have
23
000
people
a
day
using
buses
in
Arlington
County.
That's
down
50
percent
from
over
12
years
ago,
and
there's
been
a
constant
decline
in
transit
use
from
2014
when
it
was
at
46
000.
It
went
down
to
39
000
per
day
in
2019.,
so
all
the
work
and
all
the
pounding
of
everybody's
chest
in
Arlington
County
about
Transit
oriented
development
and
how
we
need
to
plan
around
Transit.
M
I'm
Andrew,
Elby
and
I
live
in
Lion
Park,
where
there's
mostly
single
single-family,
zoned
housing
and
I've
never
really
participated
in
Arlington
politics,
except
for
voting.
Oh
I've
never
been
to
a
commission
meeting
or
a
County
board
meeting.
Apparently
I've.
Never
written
prepared
comments
to
use
in
a
setting
like
this,
but
I
favor,
the
most
permissive
form
of
missing
middle
realizing.
It's
not
going
to
bring
about
a
Utopia
it'll
just
make
some
some
difference
around
the
edges
and
that's
I.
Don't
have
any
other
points
to
add
to
the
debate.
N
N
Our
current
housing
stock
and
Zoning
practices
reserve
the
vast
majority
of
the
county
for
the
affluent
and
failed
to
meet
the
broader
needs
of
our
growing
Community.
A
status
quo
is
the
very
definition
of
inefficient
land
use,
expanded
housing
options,
reduce
costs
and
help
us
avoid
the
loss
of
senior
middle
and
working-class
residents
who
are
vital
to
our
racial,
cultural
and
economic
diversity.
Let
me
make
a
few
specific
points
on
issues
of
greatest
concern
to
us
and
I.
N
Refer
you
to
our
letter
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
a
more
detailed
summary
of
our
positions
regarding
1A
missing
metal
housing
should
include
up
to
six
units
across
all
of
Arlington.
More
units
simply
means
more
of
the
most
affordable
units
regarding
2A
and
10B.
Missing
middle
housing
and
specifically
six
units
should
be
allowed
on
any
feasible
lot.
This
directly
addresses
the
racist,
exclusionary
zoning
practices
of
our
past
regarding
5C
and
E.
Arlington
has
a
housing
crisis
and
not
a
parking
crisis.
Let's
incentivize
housing
people
and
keeping
land
green
regarding
7B.
N
New
housing
options
should
not
be
capped.
We
need
as
much
financially
attainable
housing
as
we
can
get.
Our
current
zoning
is
the
largest
single
barrier
to
the
County's
vision
of
a
diverse
and
inclusive
world-class
urban
community.
It's
time
to
take
down
this
barrier,
we
urge
that
you
approve
the
most
expansive
version
of
the
RTA.
Thank
you.
O
My
name
is
Kathleen
oatal
and
I
have
been
a
single
family
homeowner
in
Arlington
for
12
years
I'm
a
school
counselor
in
Fairfax
County
and
my
husband
has
been
a
teacher
with
Arlington
Public
Schools
since
1995.,
when
I
became
pregnant
with
our
first
child
in
1999,
we
were
renting
in
the
courthouse
neighborhood,
but
we
could
not
afford
to
buy
a
home
here.
So
we
moved
out
to
Loudoun
County,
where
we
lived
for
10
years.
My
husband
commuted
almost
two
hours
to
work
every
day
to
and
from
work.
O
The
only
thing
that
kept
him
teaching
in
Arlington
and
not
transferring
to
teaching
Louden
was
that
at
the
time,
teachers
in
Arlington
were
paid
significantly
more
than
teachers
in
Loudoun
County.
This
made
the
commute
worth
it
today.
Teachers
in
Arlington
often
make
less
money
than
teachers
in
Fairfax
and
Loudoun.
It's
easy
to
look
up
the
salary
scales
online
and
see
that
it
would
not
be
worth
it
for
a
young
teacher
to
commute
to
Arlington
from
Fairfax
or
Loudon.
Today.
O
If
we
want
Arlington
to
have
top-notch
schools
which
we
cannot
have
without
good
teachers,
we
must
act
now
to
create
housing
opportunities
for
them
here
in
our
County.
This
will
attract
and
keep
our
excellent
young
teachers
here.
Otherwise
their
easy
decision
will
be
to
leave.
Yes,
we
need
to
pay
teachers
more,
but
we
also
need
to
create
more
housing
opportunities
for
teachers
and
other
young
people
who
are
the
future
of
Arlington.
We
cannot
afford
to
wait.
O
P
Hello
I'm,
a
homeowner
here
in
Arlington
I,
live
in
a
condominium
with
my
wife
and
our
two
kids.
It's
a
great
place
and
I
wish
more
people
had
the
same
opportunity.
We
did
to
live
in
a
great
place
like
Arlington.
Regarding
the
missing
middle
proposal,
it's
already
a
pretty
restrictive
proposal
just
because
it
doesn't
give
any
extra
size
to
buildings,
any
Fourier,
Ratio
or
massing
or
height.
So
that
alone
it's
going
to
be
not
delivering
a
ton
of
units
and
so
I
encourage
the
Planning
Commission
to
recommend
the
most
flexible
least
restrictive
options
possible.
P
Q
Land
and
I'm,
representing
atag
the
Arlington
tree
Action
Group.
As
many
of
you
know,
the
current
tree
canopy
requirements
for
new
buy
right.
Development
in
Arlington
are
20
canopy
in
20
years
for
eho
properties,
the
County,
Board
and
staff
are
proposing
a
new
requirement
for
trees,
four
shade
trees
for
each
project,
with
two
to
four
units
and
eight
shade
trees
for
each
project
with
five
to
six
units.
While
this
requirement
is
an
improvement
over
the
previous
one
tree
per
unit
policy,
it
still
falls
short
from
guaranteeing.
Q
If,
however,
the
developer
chooses
to
use
large
size
trees,
the
situation
is
better,
but
there
are
still
several
instances
where
the
result
is
less
than
20
percent
canopy,
particularly
in
r10
and
R20,
is
a
tag
is
recommending
that
the
eho
proposal
based
tree
requirements
on
our
Zone
rather
than
number
of
units
we
can
guarantee
a
20
tree
canopy
on
all
Lots.
If
we
require
four
large
shade.
Q
R
Being
a
parent
has
taught
me
that
kids
have
this
funny
way
of
getting
straight
to
the
heart
of
something
you
know,
issues
that
can
seem
you
know
fraught
and
complicated
to
us.
Grown-Ups
can
seem
so
easy
and
simple
to
them,
and
so,
as
you
consider
the
proposal
to
expand
housing
options
in
Arlington,
I
hope
you
remember
the
equity
statement
that
the
commission
passed
a
few
years
ago.
R
You
recognize
that
zoning
laws
have
concentrated
people
of
color
within
certain
parts
of
the
community
and
you
committed
to
making
Arlington's
land
use
laws
and
policies
more
Equitable
for
all
arlingtonians,
there's
so
much
complexity
in
the
various
options
that
you're
accustomed
to
managing
of
things
like
Aesthetics
and
parking
and
lot
size
minimums.
R
But
amidst
all
of
that,
there
is
a
simple
truth:
more
flexibility
means
more
homes
and,
as
the
vice
chair
of
the
housing
Committee
of
our
local
NAACP,
that's
why
our
Branch
supports
the
most
flexible
options
and
urges
the
Planning
Commission
to
recommend
approval
of
those
options.
Contrary
to
what
you
heard
from
one
of
the
speakers
tonight,
more
flexibility
means
more
homes
and
more
homes
are
what
we
need
truly
to
make
Arlington
for
not
just
my
daughter
but
for
everyone.
Thank
you.
T
I'm
Alexander
taneski,
representing
the
Ashton
Heights
civic
association.
We
celebrate
our
residents
and
found
that
78
oppose
the
expanded
housing
proposal.
While
most
support
the
original
policy
goals
of
increasing
affordable
housing
options.
80
must
believe
that
the
policy
will
not
do
so.
We
believe
that
this
proposal
will
generate
corporate-owned
luxury
rental
apartments
that
are
already
widely
available
in
the
county,
rather
than
the
affordable
family,
housing
and
Home
Ownership
opportunities
that
we
would
welcome.
Accordingly,
we
urge
the
county
to
proceed
cautiously,
taking
moderate
steps
now
and
studying
the
impact
of
these
developments
before
going
all.
G
T
On
an
irreversible
policy
decision
that
will
direct
directly
impact
hundreds
of
immediate
neighbors.
That
being
said,
if
this
proposal
must
move
forward,
we
support
the
following
options:
option
2B,
increasing
the
number
of
permitted
dwellings
by
lot
size
across
the
entire
County,
because
the
burden
of
expanded
housing
should
be
shared
equally
across
the
county
and
density
should
be
determined
by
lot
size
option
7
a
institution
of
a
cap,
but
the
cap
should
be
no
more
than
21
units
per
year
and
should
include
limits
to
ensure
that
expanded
housing
developments
are
spread
throughout
the
county
option.
T
5A
a
minimum
of
0.5
parking
spaces
with
a
parking
survey
because
we
know
in
reality
our
residents,
despite
living
right
next
to
the
Metro,
still
rely
on
cars
for
daily
needs.
It's
already
hard
to
drive
down
some
of
our
streets.
So
parking
survey
is
absolutely
necessary
to
ensure
that
we
can
accommodate
all
of
the
vehicular
traffic,
including
guests
and
delivery
men.
T
The
12
or
more
new
residents
May
create
option,
4A,
no
change
to
lot
coverage
requirements;
option
11a,
tiered
caps
on
Gross,
floor
area
and
option;
12a
no
accessory
dwellings
because
we
want
to
preserve
tree
canopy,
maintain
the
same
building
scale
as
single-family
homes
and
ensure
that
density
is
aligned
with
lot
size.
Thank
you.
U
Foreign
starts
in
the
middle.
We
came
to
Arlington
in
1998
on
orders
from
the
Marine
Corps,
an
artillery
lieutenant
and
a
Mexican-American
teacher.
Expecting
our
first
baby.
We
felt
fortunate
to
find
a
brick
Colonial.
We
could
affordably
rent
from
a
state
department
family
on
South
Wayne
Street
the
next
year
we
anxiously
entered
Arlington's
real
estate
market
and
were
blessed
to
find
a
seller
that
favored
a
neighborhood
teacher's
bed
over
a
higher
one.
We
settled
on
South
Pershing
Street
now
with
baby
number
two
that
first
home
purchase
was
our
middle
class
entree
to
Arlington.
U
We
also
benefited
from
an
APS
perk
for
first-time
home
buyers,
a
five
thousand
dollar
one-time
bonus
which
helped
us
with
closing
costs.
We
have
thrived
here
since
I
am
now
in
my
28th
year
teaching
in
Arlington
Public
Schools.
My
Marine
is
now
a
patent
attorney
and
those
two
babies
graduated
their
way
through
Arlington's,
fine
schools
and
on
to
college
that
hot
real
estate
market
has
continued
into
our
benefit.
Now
that
we
are
homeowners,
we
moved
in
the
early
2000s
to
a
fixer-upper
across
the
street
from
our
elementary
school
in
Lion
Village.
U
Each
Halloween
brings
hundreds
of
current
and
former
students
to
our
front
porch
tough
times
for
other
students,
bring
them
to
my
front
porch
for
Solace
safety
and
advice
from
a
trusted
teacher.
However,
seventy
percent
of
my
colleagues
at
Key
have
to
live
outside
of
Arlington
as
middle
housing
opportunities
lesson.
Instead
of
engaging
with
neighborhood
students,
these
teachers
commute
at
Route
66..
They
are
now
moving
to
neighboring
school
districts
because
the
cost
of
housing
and
the
commute
is
too
much
communities
Thrive.
When
their
teachers,
police,
nurses
and
promising
young
people
can
be
neighbor.
U
D
We
think
we
think
there
might
be
something
interfering
with
your
microphone.
Do
you
have
a
phone
or
something
else
going
that
might
be
interfering.
V
W
Oh,
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
moment
and
express
my
support
for
the
proposal
to
me.
It's
a
very
honest
and
simple
question
of
what
this
community
will
look
like
in
another
30
years
and
the
homes
that
that
a
generation
ago
were
able
to
be
lived
in
and
purchased
by.
People
of
you
know
more
modest
means
they're
all
disappearing
and
in
their
place
large
homes
that
will
mean
in
another
generation,
perhaps
that
the
vast
majority
of
our
land
will
be
occupied
by
the
exclusively
wealthy.
Let's
not
let
that
happen.
W
X
Hello,
can
you
see?
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
hello?
My
name
is
fazidine
I'm
an
attorney
and
a
deputy
Outreach
director
at
Dara,
Hijra
Islamic,
Center,
Dara
hedra
is
a
member
of
voice
and
although
our
organization
is
on
Route
7.,
we
have
almost
three
thousand
members
of
our
congregation
that
live
in
Arlington
I'm
here
tonight.
To
ask
you
to
allow
more
houses
to
be
built
across
Arlington
and
not
to
draw
red
lines
again.
X
So
the
missing
middle,
as
you
know,
couldn't
be
here
tonight,
because
they're
working
second
jobs
and
I
really
would
like
to
urge
you,
my
dear
colleagues,
to
do
the
right
thing.
The
just
thing
is
to
approve
the
most
expensive
version
of
the
missing
middle
plan,
and
that
includes
six
plexes
everywhere,
because
we
need
more
houses
everywhere.
Thank
you.
So
much.
D
Y
Hello,
my
name
is
Pacheco
and
I
support
the
middle
missing
housing,
I've
lived
in
Arlington
for
the
past
year
and
a
half
I
love
living
here
because
of
the
walkability
energy
and
diversity.
I
come
from
an
immigrant
family.
When
we
first
moved
to
the
United
States,
affordable
housing
was
our
only
option.
Having
that
opportunity
to
have
low
income,
housing
gave
my
family
the
opportunity
to
prioritize
Necessities
like
food
clothes,
enrichment
after
school
activities.
For
us
growing
up,
I
can't
imagine
what
Necessities
we
would
have
to
cut
out
and
how
that
would
have
affected
my
upbringing.
Y
Due
to
the
temporary
assistance.
My
family
was
able
to
get
on
their
feet
and
start
a
company
and
I
was
able
to
go
to
college
move
here
and
no
longer
have
to
the
need
to
utilize,
affordable
housing.
Thankfully
I
would
love
for
other
people
to
have
the
same
opportunities.
I
did
that's.
This
is
why
we
ask
that
you
take
pass
on
the
most
expansive
of
the
middle
missing
housing
on
the
missing
middle
option.
Thank
you.
Z
Z
Yet
rent
and
home
values
have
increased
to
the
point
where,
sadly,
we
are
losing
the
diversity
that
makes
Arlington
such
a
vibrant
place
to
live.
I
was
pleased
to
read
the
planning
commission's
2020
statement,
acknowledging
that
restrictive
zoning
policies
passed
in
1961
and
still
in
effect
today
leave
people
of
color
with
no
hope
of
owning
a
home
in
Arlington,
and
the
commission
has
shown
leadership
in
your
commitment
to
changing
laws
that
limit
home
access
for
middle-income
workers
like
teachers,
nurses,
firefighters,
young
families
and
single
adults.
Z
We
need
to
provide
opportunities
for
households
to
buy
or
rent
in
every
neighborhood
in
Arlington.
To
make
this
proposal
successful
I
urge
you
to
recommend
the
most
flexible
option,
which
is
to
a
if
your
recommendation
includes
further
restrictions
on
the
number
of
units
allowed
parking
mandates
or
proximity
to
Transit.
Then
the
results
will
not
be
consistent
with
the
planning
commission's
own
stated
vision
and
goals.
Z
AA
AA
AA
Let
me
tell
you
why
by
right,
development
and
the
private
sector
always
have
profit
as
and
as
their
motive,
not
affordability.
This
policy
of
buy
right
development,
relying
on
that
to
create
affordability,
is
a
false
premise.
You
need
to
hit
the
pause
button
and
get
this
right
in
terms
of
the
four
to
six
plexes,
of
course,
they're
more
affordable
because
they're,
the
smallest,
if
you're
going
to
sit
squeeze
six
units
into
a
building
the
size
of
a
single
family
home,
those
are
going
to
be
one
bedroom
units.
AA
I
think
you'd
be
surprised
to
hear
that
last
year,
according
to
the
MLS
55
of
the
sales
in
Arlington
we're
one
in
two
bedroom
units,
we
do
not
need
more
rental
condos.
We
do
not
need
more
small
units,
but
we
need
are
three
bedroom
units,
and
so
we
encourage
you
to
consider
duplexes
and
tries
at
the
most,
because
that
will
create
the
housing
that
all
these
people
who
have
been
renting
here.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
AB
Good
evening
my
name
is
Alice
Hogan
I'm,
a
lifetime
arlingtonian
and
I've
been
watching
and
studying
this
missing
middle
proposal
really,
since
it
came
into
the
2015
master
plan,
when
allowance
for
Housing
Solutions
had
a
panel
in
2016
and
since
the
study
was
launched
in
2019-2020,
this
proposal
really
looks
at
three
things:
Supply,
housing
type
and
inclusion,
and
so
with
that
lens,
we
can
see
that
many
of
the
needs
that
we
have
in
Arlington
will
be
well
met
by
this
proposal.
AB
Good
planning
in
Arlington
that
I
have
watched
over
these
many
decades
addresses
our
community
needs
and
is
responsive
to
changes
that
are
happening
just
as
we
did
with
the
Metro
Corridor
it's
time
to
for
this
generation
to
do
something
new.
While
that
planning
did
its
job,
it
also
had
other
impacts,
which
was
to
keep
those
neighborhoods
80
percent
of
our
County
the
same
as
it's
always
been.
AB
We
can't
continue
to
live
that
way
if
we
want
to
live
our
values,
it's
time
to
make
some
changes
and
to
welcome
some
gentle
density
across
our
County
planning
can
also
undo
our
old
zoning
right.
So,
while
old
planning
was
exclusionary,
we
can
use
the
same
tool
to
be
inclusive
and
that's
what
we
have
an
opportunity
to
do
in
our
County
and
you
as
Commissioners
to
vote
on.
AB
So
we
use
this
lens
Supply
type
and
inclusion
with
your
own
racial
Equity
solution
resolution
and
that
of
the
counties
and
so
I
will
share
with
you.
My
can
my
recommendations
and
if
time
I'll
go
back
with
a
few
more
comments,
1A,
we
need
as
many
units
as
we
can
you've
heard
from
other
speakers
that
we
only
need
certain
types.
That's
not
true.
Our
population
is
growing
by
tens
of
thousands.
We
need
every
kind
of
unit
we
can
get
and
anywhere.
AB
We
can
get
it
and
we
cannot
house
our
growing
population
on
the
corridors
alone
and
so
getting
those
sixes
everywhere.
We
can
is
the
way
to
open
up
the
neighborhoods,
the
very
neighborhoods
that
are
exclusionary.
D
E
Good
evening,
I'm
Peyton
Chung
after
planning
school
at
Virginia
Tech
in
Arlington
I,
now
develop
missing
middle
scaled
housing.
I
can
attest
that
Raleigh's
missing
metal
text.
Changes
have
made
it
possible
for
me
to
offer
smaller
lower
priced
houses
to
people
priced
out
of
places
like
Arlington
Arlington's.
Bullseye
planning
relies
on
two
necessarily
high
cost
housing
types,
land
intensive,
detached
houses
and
capital
intensive
high-rises.
The
result
is
high.
Housing
costs
missing.
Middle
housing
requires
less
land
than
attached
houses
and
less
materials
in
labor
than
high-res's.
E
Yet
it
can
only
reach
its
full
potential
for
lower
costs
if
it
becomes
widespread
and
well
practiced.
That
means
allowing
more
units
in
more
locations
and
not
rationing
it
with
a
countywide
cap.
Redevelopment
is
a
slow
process.
Only
three
tenths
of
one
percent
of
Arlington's
detached
houses
are
for
sale.
Today,
progress
towards
the
County's,
Equity,
affordability
and
sustainability
goals
should
not
be
further
limited.
The
text
incentivizes
Flats,
but
building
codes
and
blending
practices
still
favor
feed,
simple
townhouses.
Further
steps
could
adapt
building
codes
to
enable
Flats
review.
E
Townhouse
Urban
Design
challenges
require
access,
easements
that
driveways
contribute
to
the
street
Network
and
allow
townhouse
accessory
dwelling
units.
I
commend
the
county
for
Progress
made
to
date.
The
zoning
change
may
seem
momentous,
but
even
the
dry
and
bitter
pill
of
zoning
reform
is
not
magical.
Zoning
merely
shapes
changes
that
are
already
occurring
anyways
and
the
best
we
can
do
with
zoning
is
to
shift
the
unjust,
unsustainable
status
quo.
Last.
E
B
Hi,
can
you
hear
me
yes,
I
would
love
to
see
the
Slate
wiped
clean
from
Arlington's
racist
path,
but
there
is
no
data
showing
missing
middle
will
correct
that
I
want
to
welcome
you
neighbors,
but
I
do
not
want
to
bid
goodbye
to
my
elderly
neighbor,
to
people
of
color
and
to
middle
class
families
I
want
this
commission
to
plan
as
its
chain
charge
to
do.
We
need
measures
to
prevent
gentrification
before
we
proceed.
Speakers
claim
revenue
from
new
neighbors
will
pay
for
everything.
Will
it
cover
a
neighbor's
flooded
basement
from
poor
storm
water
management?
B
No,
will
it
cover
increased
taxes
and
displacement?
No,
will
it
help
teachers
and
firefighters
move
here?
No,
will
it
prevent
sprawl
and
healthy
environment?
No
people
will
still
move
to
Loudon
because
they
get
more
house
for
the
money,
not
because
they
aren't
enough
two-bedroom
apartments
in
Arlington.
Evidence
shows
that
when
you
budget
full
cost,
each
news
resident
is
a
net
revenue
loss.
A
missing
middle
supporter
claimed
that
APS
knows
how
to
managed
numbers
in
recent
school
board
meetings.
Aps
teachers
testify
larger
class
sizes,
have
dramatically
increased
their
burden
and
reduced
quality
of
learning.
B
Our
larger
classes
are
failing
black
Hispanic
and
English
Learners
before
the
pandemic,
and
they
continue
to
do
so
again.
We
are
faced
with
the
lack
of
planning,
others
request.
No
parking
minimums
elderly
residents
along
the
Orange
Line
already
have
difficulty
getting
in-home
assistance
and
medical
care,
because
no
parking
is
available
for
providers.
This
problem
will
become
more
rampant,
not
to
mention
that
these
zoning
changes
discriminate
against
people
of
disability
and
are
inherently
not
Ada
accessible.
B
D
AC
Hi
everyone,
my
name,
is
Patrick
Lozada
and
I
live
in
the
Douglas
Park
neighborhood
of
Arlington
I
want
to
speak
up
in
favor
of
the
expanded
housing
option
proposal,
an
urge
that
the
county
select
an
option
that
supports
six
plexes
applies.
Current
building
standards
for
detached
single
residential
structures
has
no
parking
mandates
near
Transit,
imposes
no
caps
on
permits
and
provides
flexibility
in
terms
of
lot
coverage
and
design
standards.
AC
AC
I'm
concerned
that
some
Arlington
residents
struggles
with
literacy
may
have
left
them
unable
to
read
the
118-page
staff
report,
the
external
analysis
by
the
folks
of
the
partnership
for
economic
Solutions,
the
racial
and
Equity
studies,
the
infrastructure
plans
published
by
the
county
and
to
effectively
engage
with
multiple
rounds
of
community
outreach
and
engagement
since
2019
when
this
process
starts
to
hear
some
people
on
this
call
start
talk.
You
would
think
this
started
yesterday
and
then
nobody
thought
about
it
thoroughly.
If
you
read
those
studies,
you
will
find
that
the
expected
yield
is
redeveloping.
AC
19
to
21
properties
into
missing
middle
housing
depend
that
the
new
housing
will
decrease
the
minimum
household
income
needed
to
afford
a
property
from
four
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
to
one
hundred
and
twenty
four
thousand
to
one
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars,
and
the
zoning
changes
would
result
in
housing
attainable
for
39
of
black
households,
39
percent
of
Latino
households
and
60
percent
of
Asian
households
in
the
Washington
Metro
Area.
Instead,
they
would
rather
yell
and
scream.
AC
D
AD
Hello,
everybody
I
moved
here
a
year
and
a
half
ago
to
make
Arlington
my
home
and
within
a
year,
I
was
able
to
find
a
church
I
attend
regularly
where
I
have
friends
across
Generations
I
have
a
job
nearby,
so
I
don't
need
to
go
through
an
awful
commute
to
get
there
and
I
work.
I've
made
connections
with
colleagues
who
are
now
friends
in
the
area.
AD
I
work
in
I
also
volunteer
locally
to
make
Arlington
a
better
place
and
I
regularly
use
a
library
walk
to
my
grocery
store.
Forget
the
need
of
my
car
until
I
have
to
visit
my
family
in
the
suburbs.
I
think
this
place
is
a
wonderful
place
for
people
of
many
different
walks
of
life
to
connect
and
share
a
community,
but,
as
I've
learned
about
this
Gem
of
a
place,
I
also
learned
that
fewer
and
fewer
people
are
able
to
avoid
to
live
in
this
great
City.
AD
Arlington
is
home
to
many
renters
like
me,
getting
priced
out
by
restrictive
and
exclusionary
zoning
laws
laws
written
decades
ago
to
segregate
this
community
on
the
basis
of
race.
The
impacts
of
this
policy
are
still
seen
today
and
still
affect
long-time
residents.
Young
people
who
move
here
like
me,
young
people
who
have
grown
up
here
and
like
to
stay
here,
I
urge
the
commission
to
recommend
the
most
expansive
option
on
the
RTA.
So
future
residents
can
look
forward
to
a
future
here.
AD
Certain
professionals
like
me
who
move
here
can
see
in
attainable
future
so
long
time,
residents
see
a
future
for
the
kids
and
so
that
young
people
who
grow
up
here
and
want
to
contribute
to
the
community
can
and
stay
here,
because
I
want
this
to
be
a
place
for
renters
owners,
transients
and
long-time
residents
to
share
I
support,
10B
6,
plexes
2A
and
no
caps
I
want
to
make
this
a
place
for
my
long-term
home,
but
I
can't
do
that
if
I
also
get
priced
out.
Thank.
D
AE
Good
evening
my
name
is
Claudia.
Delgadillo
I
strongly
support
the
missing
middle
housing
proposal
that
would
bring
more
housing,
accessibility
to
people
like
me,
I'm,
a
teacher
teacher
at
Arlington,
Public
Schools
and
a
parent
of
a
teen
and
a
young
adult
my
husband
and
I
own,
a
small
duplex
in
the
Green
Valley
neighborhood
about
five
blocks
from
there.
My
two
sisters
own
two,
more
spacious,
duplexes,
they're,
next
door.
AE
Neighbors,
my
parents
owned
one
of
those
homes
for
25
years
before
selling
it
to
one
of
my
sisters,
owning
a
little
piece
of
Arlington
has
brought
stability,
a
sense
of
community
and
prosperity
towards
lives.
My
parents
build
generational
wealth
and
my
siblings
and
I
can
do
the
same
for
our
children.
Furthermore,
living
where
I
work
has
enhanced
my
commitment
to
my
profession
and
has
improved
my
quality
of
life,
I
wish
my
teacher
friends,
APS
staff,
my
students,
families
and
young
and
future
professionals
could
have
the
same
experience.
AE
AE
This
is
why
especially
support
inclusion
of
six
plus
six
plexes
and
a
plan,
as
these
will
increase
accessibility
to
first-time
homeowners.
Thank
you
for
your
support.
V
Good
I
am
Nancy
Tate
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
League
of
Women
Voters
of
Arlington
and
Alexandria
City,
the
lake
has
only
supported,
affordable
housing.
As
part
of
that
effort,
we
support
increasing
the
housing
Supply
and
reducing
exclusionary
zoning
by
such
means.
As
the
missing
metal
zoning
changes,
we
fully
support
these
and
approval
of
the
RTA
before
the
commission.
V
We
believe
the
county
needs
to
reverse
historic,
systemic
racism
in
our
residential
zoning
and
we
believe
these
changes
would
address
both
past
inequities
and
the
County's
future
needs.
The
league
supports
higher
density,
zoning
and
current
lower
density
areas.
We
need
to
spread
demand
for
housing
over
far
wider
swath
of
Arlington.
V
We
need
to
reduce
the
Relentless
upward
pressure
on
Arlington
home
prices.
We
need
to
see
single-family
Zoning
for
the
exclusionary
zoning
that
it
is.
We
need
neighborhoods
that
reflect
all
arlingtonians,
not
just
those
with
means
taking.
This
step
will
show
Arlington's
commitment
to
the
fair
housing
act:
Title
VII
of
the
Civil
Rights
Act
of
1968,
which
established
an
obligation
for
localities
to
affirmatively
advance,
fair
housing.
V
The
changes
under
consideration
by
the
county
are
sensible
and
measured.
This
is
an
opportunity
to
right
the
wrongs
of
the
past
and
to
build
the
Arlington
we
want
for
all
of
our
children.
The
league
urges
the
commission
to
adopt
the
most
expansive
version
of
the
RTA
options
before
it
and
to
do
so
without
delay.
Thank
you.
D
A
You
so
the
matter
is
now
with
the
commission.
Thank
you,
everyone
who
came
on
Monday
to
speak
in
person
and
all
of
our
virtual
speakers
tonight
so
and
by
way
of
orienting
us
to
how
we
will
proceed
tonight,
we
want
to
do
so
as
efficiently
as
possible,
ensuring
that
we
are
able
to
get
to
all
questions
and
comments,
but
also
recognizing
that
this
has
come
before
us
previously
and
we've
gotten.
A
Some
good
information
in
the
interim
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
understands
that
we
have
gotten
reports
from
our
fellow
commissioner
commissions
to
name
a
few
we've
gotten.
A
report
from
commissioner
Lynn
tell
me
about
Transportation
we've
gotten
some
letters
from
Housing
Commission,
we've
gotten.
You
know
a
number
of
letters.
You
guys
have
all
read
them
tonight.
What
we're
going
to
end
up
doing
is
we're
going
to
be
following
the
staff
report.
A
We
will
I've
asked
commissioner
Weir
to
go
ahead
and
T
our
motions
up
tonight,
so
he
will
be
presenting
the
first
motion
on
the
amendment
to
the
general
land
use
plan.
If
there
is
any
discussion
on
that,
I
expect
that
there
will
not
be
very
much
discussion,
we'll
have
that
and
then
we
will
dispose
of
that
motion.
We
will
then
follow
with
the
second
motion,
which
is
the
Crux
of
Y.
Of
of
the
comments.
He
will
read
the
entire
second
motion,
which
is
on
the
staff
report,
both
A
and
B.
A
We
will
go
through
each
part,
then
sequentially
and
address
any
questions
or
comments.
The
discussion
will
then
provide
amending
motions
or
amendments
to
the
main
motion.
Following
that
we
will
have
some
additional
motions.
I
know,
commissioner.
Peterson
has
no
no
motion,
no
additional
motions,
okay,
so
we'll
look
and
see
if
there's
any
further
motions
that
need
to
be
addressed
as
well.
So
with
that
said,
commissioner
Weir
can
we
have
the
first
motion
hold
on
one?
Second,
two.
AG
Yeah
all
right
good
for
anyone
following
along
there
was
some
discussion
about
whether
or
not
the
questions
were
procedural
or
substantive,
and
so
thank
you.
Madam
chair
I,
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
County
Board
atop
adopt
the
resolution
attachment
one
attached
to
the
staff
report
to
amend
the
general
land
use,
plan,
booklet
and
map
attachment
to.
AH
A
A
AI
Just
a
quick
question
for
staff,
so
staff
continues
to
represent
that
there's
a
the
low
density
stays
one
through
10
or
1
through
14
I.
Forget
I,
don't
have
the
exact
number
in
front
of
me
in
the
glove
map
and
I
know
it's
because
you
believe
the
averaging
over
time
is
there.
How
will
we
address
that
in
the
future?
Is
what's
staff
plan
for
that.
AK
Thank
you
so
I'm
Kelly
Brown
for
the
record,
with
the
planning
division,
so
I
mean
one
of
the
things
that's
in
the
staff
report
is
that
we
will
be
monitoring
the
implementation
of
the
missile,
the
aho
development
over
time,
and
so
that
will
certainly
provide
us
an
opportunity
to
evaluate
the
extent
to
which
implementation
is
happening,
but
I
think
it's
also
important
to
recognize
that
this
is
a
long-term
Vision
that
we're
looking
to
establish
and
something
that
would
not
necessarily
happen
over
five
years
but
30
years
into
the
future.
AL
Thanks
I'm
just
going
to
follow
up
on
that
a
little
bit,
I
understand
the
glove
map
to
be
a
planning
tool,
and
so
I
would
just
like
to
note
that
we
probably
ought
to
try
to
get
ahead
of
it
instead
of
sort
of
delay
so
like
if
an
R5,
you
know
we're
de
facto
allowing
for
up
to
50
units
per
acre.
That's
our
policy!
That's
a
plan
that
we,
you
know
want
to
implement.
I
I,
just
think
we
ought
to.
AL
A
A
AF
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
Steph
I
know
that
you
have
probably
answered
these
before,
but
for
our
record
tonight.
Would
you
just
ensure
that
we
have
correct
understanding
so
if,
in
fact,
someone
needed
a
parking
space
because
of
some
sort
of
disability,
temporary
or
permanent,
they
could
reserve
this
in
front
of
their
unit.
Correct.
AF
AF
Thank
you.
The
next
question
I
have
is
how
you
might
see
this
working
in
practice,
so
assuming
that
a
change
like
this
goes
through
any
individual
homeowner
could
opt
to
take
advantage
of
this.
While
they
were
residing
on
the
property
or
they
could
sell
and
whoever
bought
the
property
could
opt
to
do
it.
It
would
be
lot
by
lot
as
an
option
going
forward.
Is
that
correct.
AF
I'm,
referring
to
checking
to
embracing
this
option
going
forward
right,
trying
to
gain
some
clarity
around
the
questions
that
we
heard
and
and
thinking
that
you
might
be
able
to
help
with
that.
So
how
you
see
someone
envisioning
this?
How
you
see
this
might
work
out
right.
AJ
AF
AJ
AF
Thank
you
and
then
is
there
anything
to
break?
Is
there
anything
to
preclude
some
of
our
affordable
housing
developers
from
also
behooving
themselves
of
these
changes,
because
we
had
heard
that
these
would
not
result
in
affordable
units
and
I
know?
Typically,
our
affordable
housing
developers
have
provided
larger
developments
with
more
units,
but
there's
nothing
to
stop
them
from
building
affordable,
duplex
six
bucks.
AF
Thank
you.
This
is
as
much
to
make
sure
that
this
is
part
of
our
discussion
going
forward.
I
do
have
one
more
clarifying
thing,
but
it
has
to
do
with
the
trees,
so
I'll
hold
off
on
that.
Thank
you.
AG
Just
this
is
a
follow-up
on
commissioner
urine's
question.
There
would
be
nothing
that
would
preclude
there's
no
density
floor.
Is
there
anything
that
would
preclude
an
affordable
housing
developer
from
accessing
the
ahif
for
a
project
like
this.
AM
Does
that
work?
Okay
here
we
go,
there's
nothing
to
preclude
them.
However,
just
because
of
the
structure
of
the
notice
of
funding
availability,
they
might
there's
a
scoring
system.
So
we'd
have
to
look
at
how
a
smaller
project
would
score
as
compared
to
a
larger
one.
AG
AN
Thank
you,
I
had
a
follow-up
question
on
the
disability
parking
question:
is
there
a
time
limit
on
how
long
that
those
permits
are
for
or
how
many
times
they
can
be
renewed.
AJ
I
I,
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
If
the
you
know,
if
the
space
is
created,
how
how
that's
monitored
over
time
or
if
you
know,
if
an
individual
moves
away
and
it's
no
longer
needed
I
I,
don't
know
how
that's
how
that's
worked
out.
AJ
Yeah
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
I
might
have
to
follow
up
on
that
and
we
do.
We
do
have
Angie
de
la
Barrera
from
the
Department
of
Environmental
Services
on
the
line,
I'm,
not
sure
if
she
would
have
an
answer
to
that,
but
I'll
give
her
an
opportunity
to
turn
her
camera
on.
Thank
you.
If
she
does.
AO
Good
evening
for
the
record,
I'm
Angie
De,
La
Brea,
with
DS
Transportation
Planning
in
my
understanding
from
this,
is
that
those
signs
are
placed
in
front
of
a
household
so
for
the
need
for
the
handicap.
When
it's
no
longer
needed,
those
signs
will
be
removed.
AO
Hopefully
that
answers
a
little
bit
the
question
but
you've
seen
those
signs
in
places
where
handicap
allowed
parking
here,
those
signs
would
be
removed
if
it's
no
longer
the
person
living
in
that
house.
A
Thanks,
thank
you.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
we
will
now
move
on
to
the
main
motion.
Commissioner
Weir
is
going
to
again
read
the
entire
motion
and
we
will
go
through
it
categorically
and
sequentially
for
our
discussion.
Okay,
commissioner,.
AG
Just
give
me
one
moment:
I've
got
the
wrong
document
up
in
front
of
me.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
AG
The
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
County
Board
adopt
the
attached
ordinance
attachment
3
to
amend,
reenact
and
re-codify
the
Arlington
County
zoning
ordinance,
including
articles
3,
10,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16
and
18
to
establish
regulations
for
expanded
housing,
option
development,
eho
development
for
property,
zoned,
R20,
r10,
R8,
R6
or
R5,
see
attachment
4
with
an
effective
date
of
July
1
2023
in
a
manner
that
incorporates
the
elements
in
sub
item
a
and
sub
Item
B.
A
A
AG
AG
The
plan
Langston
Boulevard
area,
should
it
be
adopted
under
its
current
map
and
I
think
that
the
commission
is
specifically
interested
well
among
other
things,
but
I
think
that
a
number
of
members
of
the
commission
are
specifically
interested
in
the
ability
of
current
single-family
homes
within
the
plb
area
to
Avail
themselves
of
eho
options.
So
I'll
just
turn
the
floor
over
and
and
let
you
respond.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
AK
Sure
so
in
within
the
plan,
Langston
Boulevard
core
study
area,
there
are
a
number
of
sites
that
have
our
zoning,
and
so
as
the
vision
for
plan,
Langston
Boulevard
is
being
refined
and
a
plan
is
being
produced
for
that
area.
There
will
be
consideration
of
how
to
address
those
our
Zone
properties.
AK
The
thinking
is
that
if
there
are
our
Zone
properties
that
are
adjacent
to
Parcels
commercial
Parcels,
where
assemblage
might
be
needed
to
realize
a
planned
goal,
then
those
areas
would
be
not
eligible
for
eho
development
and
there
would
be
tools
brought
forward
with
the
implementation
of
plan
Langston
Boulevard
to
to
make
sure
that
that
happens.
AJ
AG
Thank
you.
The
the
second
question,
I
have
and
I
think
this
is
a
follow-up
is
Madam
chair
you'll
have
to
come
back
to
me.
I've
lost
my
train
of
thought.
AH
Yeah,
this
is
a
follow-up
on
that.
It
also
involves
Planet
Boulevard.
As
you
know,
plan
Langston
Boulevard
has
well.
It
encompasses
the
entire
corridor,
from
Roslyn
to
East
Falls
Church
early
in
the
process,
the
county
determined
not
to
include
the
area
plans
for
Cherrydale
and
East
Falls
Church,
due
to
lack
of
resources.
AH
The
idea
was
that
those
would
then
be
done
as
a
subsequent
follow-up
once
planned.
Langston
Boulevard
for
the
other
three
areas
would
be
would
be
completed.
I
want
to
be
careful
and
be
sure
that
we
are
not
going
to
be
creating
something
within
Cherrydale
or
East,
Falls
Church.
That
would
preclude
our
ability
to
look
re-look
and
update
those
two
area
plans
that
all
along
there
has
been.
We've
been
told
that
there
would
be
a
follow-up
update
of
those
two
area
plans.
Those
two
neighborhoods
seem
to
be
amenable
to
that
and
I
want
to
be.
AH
AK
So
if
I
may
just
clarify
something
about
the
intentions
for
the
Cherrydale
and
East
Falls
Church
area
plans,
when
we
were
scoping
the
plan
Langston
Boulevard
process,
the
decision
was
made
to
exclude
the
Cherrydale
revitalization
district
and
East
Falls
Church,
because
those
areas
already
had
plans
in
place
to
to
realize
a
Community
Vision
for
those
areas.
AK
The
the
decision
at
that
time
was
to
Once
once
there
was
a
network
plan
from
a
transportation
perspective
for
plan
Langston
Boulevard
to
determine
if
changes
would
need
to
be
made
as
a
follow-on
effort
to
the
Cherrydale
plan.
I,
don't
think
that
there
was.
There
was
an
intention
at
the
outset
to
come
back
to
East
Falls
Church
East
Falls
Church,
that
plan
being
fairly
recently
adopted.
AK
There
has
not
been
an
indication
in
the
planning
division
work
plan
that
we
would
come
back
to
Cherrydale
and
East
Falls
Church
I
understand
we
are
hearing
from
stakeholders
now
that
there's
interested
interest
in
in
re-looking
at
those
areas
and
that's
something
that
we
can
certainly
consider
so
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
staff's
understanding
of
you
know
what
has
been
signaled
about
Cherrydale
and
East
Falls
Church
over
the
past
10
years
or
so
with
regard,
though,
to
option
10A
and
excluding
eho
development
in
planning
districts.
I
think.
AK
There
would
there
would
certainly
be
an
opportunity
opportunity,
through
a
future
planning
process
in
in
either
of
those
areas,
to
consider
what
the
appropriate
vision
is
and
as
I'm
indicating
for
plan
Langston
Boulevard
determine
what
properties
need
to
be
dedicated
or
or
targeted
for
plan
goals
and
which
properties
would
be
appropriate.
AH
I
just
want
to
follow
up,
the
concern
I
would
have
is
not
that
we
couldn't
replant
it
later
on.
Is
that
for
that
replanting
takes
place
sort
of
they
could
be
facts
on
the
ground,
created
that
if
ehos
were
allowed
within
those
planning
areas,
that
someone
would
then
build
a
let's
say
a
duplex,
for
example.
AH
That
presumably
would
be
there
for
at
least
30
years
so
that
in
that
sense,
even
though
we
may
theoretically
replant
it,
that
fact
is
there
and
isn't
going
to
change.
Whereas
if
we
hold
off
on
that,
when
the
replanting
comes,
it
could
give
the
opportunity
for
more
more
than
just
a
duplex,
even
more
than
just
a
six
a
six
Plex,
and
it
would
happen
sooner
rather
than
later,
even
if
it
takes
a
couple
of
Cycles
before
it
makes
the
work
plan.
AN
Sorry,
oh
I
was
trying
to
decide
if
my
question
was
still
necessary,
I
guess
just
kind
of
time
for
my
own
clarification
in
terms
of
the
timing
of
how
these
decisions
will
be
made
in
these
areas.
You
know
blanks
Boulevard,
Cherrydale,
East,
Falls,
Church,
so
areas
that
have
a
plan
in
place
already.
AN
AK
Okay,
so
there's
oversimplifying
so
I
can
clarify
so
in
East,
Falls
Church,
there's
three
properties
that
are
have
our
zoning
and
I.
Don't
think
that
we
would
want
to
re-look
at
East
Falls
Church,
simply
because
of
those
our
Zone
properties.
AK
We
would
be
looking
at
these
fellows
church,
for
other
reasons,
so
just
to
set
East
Falls
Church
aside
for
a
moment
in
Cherrydale,
there
are
some
properties
within
the
revitalization
district
that
are
adjacent
to
areas
where
the
planned
Vision
has
not
yet
been
realized,
and,
as
commissioner
Len
tell
me
just
indicated,
if
we
were
to
allow
eho
development
on
those
properties,
there's
a
concern
then
that
those
areas
would
be
less
susceptible
or
or
there
would
be
less
opportunity
to
to
realize
the
planned
Vision,
because
they
would
have
already
sought
reinvestment
and
realized
reinvestment
through
eho
development.
AK
There
are
some
properties
in
Cherrydale,
however,
our
Zone
properties
that
are
adjacent
to
areas
where
the
plant
Vision
has
already
been
realized.
So
there
has
been
mixed
use
development.
AK
That's
that
has
happened
per
the
planned
Vision
on
the
on
the
corridor
in
those
areas
it
it
may
be
appropriate
to
adjust
the
boundaries
of
the
revitalization
district,
to
remove
them
so
that
they
could
then
take
advantage
of
eho
development.
It's
a
limited
number
of
properties,
and
we
could
look
at
that
as
a
near-term
effort
to
remove
those
properties
separate
from
re-examining
the
entire
vision
for
Cherrydale,
because
it
is
it's
kind
of
like
a
scalpel
type
change
that
we
could
make
to
exclude
those
properties
where
it's
clear.
AK
AN
AN
AK
AN
S
Thank
you,
madam
chair
Miss,
Brown
picking
up
on
your
response
to
commissioner
Steinberger.
My
understanding
about
the
Cherrydale
plan
is
that
there
are
the
way
the
boundaries
were
drawn.
S
There
are
some
several
properties
for
which
they
are
kind
of
partially.
You
know
those
those
properties
are
partially
inside
the
boundary
and
partially
outside
that
the
boundary
was
not
drawn
very
artfully
in
some
instances,
I'm
wondering
if,
as
you
look
at
that
boundary
with
that
scalpel,
you
would
be
able
to
kind
of
address
that
issue
as
well.
AK
Along
property
lines
for
those
properties
that
we
would
recommend
to
exclude,
there
might
be
some
properties
that
we
just
don't
even
look
at,
because
the
plan
goals
haven't
been
realized
and
we
would
want
to
kind
of
save
a
study
of
those
areas
for
when
we
replan
sherrydale
in
the
future.
AP
I
think
I
might
be
a
little
confused
now,
because
in
looking
at
the
staff
report,
I
thought
this
scalpel
work
would
be
done
kind
of
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
I'm
just
looking
at
it.
It
says
you
could
boundary.
Adjustments
could
remove
sites
that
are
unlikely
candidates
for
redevelopment
via
site
plan
or
a
form-based
code
use
permit
process,
thus
making
these
sites
eligible
for
development.
So
that
would
be
like
an
individual
homeowner
wants
to
redevelop
their
site
and
then
they
would
have
to
go
through
this
process
or
you're.
AJ
I
think
what
what
that
language
is
referring
to
is
that
those
properties
today
have
the
ability
to
seek
a
rezoning
in
a
site
plan,
and
so
changing
the
boundary
would
take
that
ability
away,
but
then
would
make
them
eligible
for
ehl,
which,
for
for
many
of
these
properties,
probably
would
be
the
most
likely
course
of
of
Redevelopment.
Okay.
AP
And
so
then
a
follow-up
question
would
just
be
you
know.
I
was
learning
today
about
you,
know
fees
permitting
costs,
I'm,
not
sure
how
much
a
site
plan
or
a
form-based
code
use
permit
process
would
cost
an
individual,
but
is
you
know,
depending
on
how
expensive
that
is?
Is
there
a
way
to
waive
the
fees
for
those
people
just
because
others
are
just
able
to
develop,
buy
rights
so
for
somebody
in
this
District
I
wouldn't
want
to
penalize
them
for
and
make
them
pay
to
have
to
do
this
extra
step?
AJ
I
think,
just
just
to
clarify
that
the
the
vision
for
these
areas
is
not
for
individual
R
zones
properties
to
redevelop
at
a
higher
density.
It's
for
assemblage
of
land
to
happen,
so
it
wouldn't
be
individual.
Probably
the
the
examples
that
we've
seen
in
Cherrydale,
where
this
has
already
occurred,
has
been
an
affordable
housing
developer,
who
has
assembled
parcels
to
to
build
along
Langston
Boulevard
and
that
included
some
arzoned
parcels
that
were
part
of
a
site
plan
and
a
rezoning.
AJ
A
AI
I,
don't
have
a
motion
this
evening
and
but
I
do
want
to
just
for
the
record
state
that
staff's
support
for
the
carve
out
application
of
the
particularly
infringing
I'll
call
it
our
Lots
on
the
Cherrydale
plan
coming
forward
concurrently
with
Langston
Boulevard
is
comforting
to
this,
commissioner,
given
that
Mr
fusarelli
sits
behind
them
and
was
listening
to
the
whole
thing
and
chose
not
to
interject
himself.
AI
That
being
said,
this
is
it's
interesting
here
and
just
for
my
colleagues,
this
is
the
Chinese
grocery
store
or
the
Chinese
takeout
in
Boston.
It's
now
a
nail
spa.
This
is
the
plumbing
store
next
to
the
Presbyterian
Church
on
the
Columbia
Pike's
order.
AI
So
this
is
the
coverage
assemblages
that
don't
occur
because
of
other
people's
individual
choices,
so
I
would
generally
prefer
10B,
not
be
the
method,
because
I'm
aware
of
many
of
the
opportunities
on
the
Pike
that
staff's
aware
of
in
the
neighborhoods
form-based
codes,
where
our
lot
is
necessary
for
the
assemblage
of
the
vision
to
be
achieved,
I
still
haven't
found
the
three
lots
in
East,
Falls
Church,
but
I
believe
you
that
they
exist,
but
the
ones
on
Cherrydale
I
do
think,
don't
meet
the
vision
and
I
would
hate
to
see
the
highest
order
of
development
for
any
site
in
Arlington
to
be
exclusively
a
single
family
with
Adu,
so
a
duplex
or
quad
books
would
be
better,
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
known.
A
Oh
actually
never
mind
yeah,
no,
no.
We
had
agreed
in
speaking
with
many
Commissioners
today
that
there
should
actually
be
a
vote
on
this
recommendation
on
each
recommendation
on
each
staff's
recommendations
for
the
record
to
the
county
board.
So
let's
go:
let's
go
down
the
list
now.
This
is
on
staff's
recommendation
and
a
commissioner
Bagley
I
an.
AF
A
Steinberger
aye
wine,
Peterson,
aye,
sarley
hi
and
tell
me
all
right:
Hughes
aye,
aye,
Patel,
I
10A
carries
10
to
zero
second
issue
maximum
gross
floor
area.
This
is
option
11.
A
AH
Yeah
on
this
I,
frankly
have
no
preference
between
the
two
of
them.
How
would
we
vote
when
we're
sort
of
would
leave
it
up
to
the
board
decide
rather
than
than
us,
making
a
recommendation?
We
may
have
that
come
up
in
other,
in
others,.
A
Sorry,
excuse
me
11
a
11b,
it's
a
hybrid
option,
so
we're
going
with
the
staff's
recommendation,
we're
removing
the
staff's
recommendation.
So
do
you
agree
with
the
table
right,
the
the
hybrid
option
right
that
staff
is
presented?
Okay
and
if,
if
not,
if
there's
an
amendment,
you
know
a
motion
to
amend
it,
that
that's
fine
too,
but
right
now,
I'm
just
asking.
If
there's
any
clarifying
questions
on.
AH
AG
Could
you
explain
the
200
square
foot
Delta
between
duplexes
and
semi-detached
is?
Is
that
the
the
stairwells,
the
fact
that
a
semi-detached
has
two
stairwells,
or
something
else
or
yes,
or
in
between.
AJ
I
I
think
it's
it's
really
the
you
know
we
have.
We
have
two
options
that
were
advertised
11a
and
11b,
and
11b
was
developed
as
sort
of
a
not
from
the
Planning
Commission,
but
staff
sort
of
interpretation
of
the
zoko
discussions
and
and
how
they
were
going,
and
so
staff
is
recommending
just
a
hybrid
of
those
two
which
the
the
way
that
that
works
out.
There's
an
extra
200
feet
for
for
semi-detached
there.
AJ
AG
A
S
Colleagues,
Madam
chair,
yes,
not
to
be
the
greatest
stickler
here
of
Robert's
Rules,
but
if
we
are
going
to
have
additional
motions
here
on
each
of
these
individually,
somebody
should
be
moving
them.
Yes,.
A
S
Yes,
I,
don't
think
necessarily.
We
need
to
do
that
because
I
think,
commissioner,
we're
already
moved
it
in
this
instance.
S
That's
right
and
it
is
somewhat
duplicative,
but
if
you
know
if
it
gives
folks
comfort
that
they're
kind
of
doubly
endorsing
some
of
these
or
we
have
a
greater
chance
to
discuss
them
before
we
vote
on
it,
I
guess
I
can
understand
it,
but
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
required
here.
Yeah.
AG
Matter
Madam
chair
can
I
take
a
stab
at
this.
Well,
you
may
have
a
motion,
but
my
so
my
understanding
just
is
that
you're
effectively
as
Commissioners
roll
said,
there
is
a
motion.
That's
seconded
on
the
floor
to
endorse
I.
Think
you're,
sort
of
taking
a
straw
poll
to
just
reaffirm
right
is
that
well.
AI
Particular
item
okay,
Madam,
chairman
I,
suggesting
that
before
you
call
the
role
that,
even
if
a
motion
is
not
an
alternate
motion
placed
on
the
table,
that
those
who
don't
support
the
main
motion
have
an
opportunity
to
be
called
to
say
why
they
vote.
No,
because
that's
on.
AO
A
AP
AI
A
Hotel
I,
so
the
eyes
the
motion
carries
eight
to
zero.
Madams
are
eight
to
two.
AG
Exactly
right
so
I'm
gonna
move
for
reconsideration.
Okay,
it's
a
scary
motion.
I
promise,
my
colleagues
that
it
only
sounds
scary,
I,
I,
move
for
reconsideration.
Does
the
reconsideration
motion?
Is
it
just
a
reopen
discussion
or
is
it
or
is
it
the
actual
substitute
motion
as
well?
If.
AG
The
I'm
gonna
move
for
reconsideration
to
to
endorse
option
11b.
AG
AG
I
I'm,
mindful
that
my
colleagues
might
not
be
interested
in
taking
us
up
on
this,
but
I'm
also
mindful
that,
among
the
overwhelming
majority
of
the
public
speakers
that
we
had
nearly
all
of
them,
who
spoke
to
individual
items,
recommended
specifically
option
11b
and
so
I
I
would
like
us
to
take
the
moment
to
consider
whether
or
not
that's
what
we
want
to
recommend.
AF
S
Yeah
so
I'm
fine
with
the
motion
for
11b
I
think
my
question
is
more
procedural
in
that
we
just
adopted
the
hybrid
option.
AG
The
the
Commissioners
rule
the
chair
had
had
started
to
call
the
role,
and
so
I
I
decided
at
that
point
that
the
easiest
way
to
actually
try
to
get
the
substance
on
the
floor
was
to
let
the
vote
proceed
and
then
do
this.
A
Okay,
so
what
I
think
commissioner
schroll
was
saying
that
we
would
have
to
reconsider
you're
asking
for
the
for
a
vote
to
reconsider,
so
we
can
reopen
the
matter
to
have
that's
fine,
okay!
So
let
right
now,
let's
just
be
clear
on
what
we're
doing,
because
commissioner
Weir
has
now
told
us
what
it
is
that
he'd
like
to
have
done,
which
is
to
have
an
option
to
only
endorse
option:
11b,
okay,
so
right
now
all
we're
doing
is
moving
on
commissioner
Weir's
motion
to
reconsider
our
prior
vote
to
allow
him
to
make
his
next
motion.
A
AG
AL
AI
A
AG
A
AG
I
moved
the
Planning
Commission
endorse
option,
11b,
okay,.
A
A
Only
11b
commissioner
Bagley,
nay,
commissioner,
gearing
no
siren
Burger
all
right,
Peterson
aye,
sarley.
AI
A
S
A
A
Okay,
commissioner
Weir's
motion
is
to
re-adopt
the
staff's
recommendation.
So
let's
go
through
the
role
again,
commissioner
Bagley.
A
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
commissioner
Peterson,
are
you
the
second?
Thank
you,
commissioner
Peterson's
a
second
commissioner
Bagley
aye
Garen.
AF
A
A
A
K
Madam
chair
I
I
have
five
five
recorded.
A
A
AN
AL
So
I
did
the
problem
that
I
did
my
homework
early
and
so
I
got
like
a
a
defunct
version
of
all
of
the
information
I,
so
I'm,
just
looking
for
the
new
report
on
the
parking
I
think
I
just
found
it.
Is
there
any
adjustments
that
happened
since
the
previous
report?
If
you
may
help
me
cheat
sorry.
AJ
AG
Thank
you.
Madam
chair
I
moved
at
the
Planning
Commission
to
recommend
option
five:
a
substituting,
a
Transit
proximate
requirement
of
0.25
spaces
per
unit
and
a
provision
for
parking
reduction
of
no
less
than
0.25
spaces
per
unit
based
on
on-street
parking
surveys.
AP
AG
All
right,
it's
my
understand.
I'm
doing
this
in
lieu
of
5c
I
had
it
I
had
it
intended
initially
to
move
an
amended
5c.
AG
The
the
reason
that
I'm
doing
5A
and
I
just
want
to
State
this
for
the
benefit
of
Staff,
as
it
goes
in
recording
the
commission's
recommendation
for
RTA
compliance
purposes,
I,
don't
know
whether
it's
better
to
recommend
an
amended
5A
that
goes
down
to
0.25
from
5
or
an
amended
5c
that
goes
up
from
zero
to
0.25.
The
point
is
I.
Think
0.25
is
the
number
that
I
want
the
commission
to
consider
and
it
would.
It
would
only
be
a
or
C
I'm
open
to
a
separate
consideration
of
option.
AH
A
AF
Commission,
commissioner,
and
then
tell
me,
would
you
remind
us
what
those
are
and
then
I
wanted
to
say,
I
wanted
to
weigh
in
on
that
yeah.
AH
Yeah
5e
is
the
add-on.
It
was
one
that
I
think
commissioner
Steinberg
or
commissioner
Peterson
had
had
originally
proposed
at
the
RTA
stage.
To
limit
the
curb
cut
there'd,
be
no
curb
cut
can't
be
would
be
the
same
as
the
number
of
space
spaces
that
are
allowed
inside.
So,
if
you
had
only
one
space
off
off
Street
space,
you
could
not
then
get
a
curb
cut,
because
the
curb
Cut's
equivalent
of
one
space
it
privatizes
a
public
space.
AH
5C
is,
as
commissioner
Weir
mentioned,
that's
the
to
Transit,
which
you
could
go
down
actually
down
to
zero,
rather
than
you
know,
he's
proposing
one
quarter
a
space.
This
gives
the
option
of
actually
going
to
zero.
S
Thank
you,
Miss
Johnson
Madam,
chair
question
for
staff.
If
I
might
on
commissioner
Weir's
motion
wondering
if
you
could
weigh
in
on
the
kind
of
RTA
question
that
commissioner
Weir
raised
about
whether
this
approach
was
better
than
you
know,
facilitating
the
amendment
through
5c
I.
AJ
Think
if
I,
if
I,
could
just
get
clarification
on
commissioner
Weir's
motion,
it
would
it's
basically
it's
5A,
but
for
the
transit
proximate
sites,
how
that's
defined
in
5A,
rather
than
0.5
spaces
per
unit,
the
requirement
would
be
a
minimum
of
0.25
spaces
per
unit.
Is
that
correct.
AG
AG
Not
looking
at
the
in
the
interest
of
trying
to
be
on
the
same
page,
Mr
lad,
I'm,
not
what
I'm
looking
at
right
now
is
attachment,
six,
which
basically
pair
it
which,
which
you
know
this,
isn't
the
text
of
The
Proposal
right.
But
the
text
in
in
attachment
six
presents
5A
and
5c
is
as
basically
parallel,
but
for
0.5
as
opposed
to
zero
James.
AJ
Stephen
right,
but
for
the
for
the
so
the
parking
reduction
is
under
5A
and
5c.
The
parking
reduction
is
the
same,
and
it's
for
the
areas
that
are
not
Transit
proximate
that
have
a
requirement
of
a
minimum
of
one
space
per
unit.
With
the
parking
study,
if
that's
satisfactory,
it
could
be
reduced
to
0.5,
so
I
think
reducing
that
further,
for
the
parking
study
to
to
0.25
would
be
out
of
scope.
Okay,
so.
AG
I'm
persuaded
so
I'm
gonna.
Do
this
so
I'm
going
to
seek
unanimous
consent
to
withdraw
the
motion
so
that
I
can
either
fix
it
or
so
that
another
motion
can
can
be
made.
AH
A
Okay,
moved
by
commissioner
and
tell
me
seconded
by
commissioner
Hughes,
commissioner
Hughes
would
like
to
speak
to.
AI
It
so
I
suggest
for
my
fellow
colleagues
that
we
begin
this
motion
with
commissioner
Antonio's
main
motion,
because
it's
the
furthest
to
the
the
least
amount
of
parking
possible
on
the
site
and
then
move
our
way
up
to
possibly
commissioner
Weir's
motion
and
then
two,
if
they
necessary
to
staff's
recommendation
or
any
further
amendments
that
are
necessary.
That
was
kind
of
the
goal
in
the
withdrawal
so
that
we
could
begin
at
the
least
amount
of
parking
on
the
site
and
then
move
our
way
up
to.
A
AG
AL
AD
A
AD
S
AN
AN
AN
I
think
it
might
be
beneficial
for
the
County
Board,
as
they
review
the
record
to
understand
where
the
feelings
of
the
commission
are
on
some
of
the
other
parking
options
that
are
out
there
and
I
personally
felt
that
the
staff
recommendation,
which
I
apologize,
that
this
requires
me
to
amend
my
motion,
but
it
would
be
the
staff
recommendation,
which
is
both
5A
and
5c.
Sorry,
no
5A
and
5e
I.
Would
that's
what
I'm
moving
or
want
to
move?
AN
A
A
S
Adam
Madam
chair,
yes,
question
question
for
commissioner
Steinberger:
are
you
moving
just
five
e?
No.
AN
S
That
right,
okay,
so
I,
appreciate
that
I
I.
Don't
think
this
is
something
that
that
makes
sense
in
lieu
of
us.
Just
adopting
5c
I
can
understand
the
five
E
being
moved,
but
at
some
level
5A
and
5c
conflict
with
each
other,
and
therefore
our
recommendation
would
be
conflictual
as
well
on
that
map.
AN
S
A
All
right,
listen
we're
going
to
vote
on
this.
This
is
an
emotion
to
adopt
the
county
manager's
recommendation
of
5A
and
5e
commissioner
Bagley
aye,
commissioner
Garen,
nay
Steinberger,
aye,
Weir,
Peterson,
nay,
nay,.
A
All
right,
listen!
The
motion
fails
seven
to
two
all
right:
we're
gonna
move
on.
Yes,
so
commissioner,
Peterson.
AP
Well
so
too,
commissioner,
hughes's
Point
earlier.
If
we
want
to
explain
why
we
voted
a
particular
way.
I
actually
was
pretty
supportive
of
5c
with
5e,
but
had
just
wanted
to
increase
the
parking
ratio
slightly
to
0.25.
So
I
had
thought
that
was
going
to
be
proposed
next
and
would
have
supported
that
and
then
I
can't
go
back
and
change
my
vote.
So
that's
all
it
was
the
order
of
the
voting.
AI
A
Right,
let's
move
on
okay,
we're
gonna
go
to
two
requirements.
There's
one
option
here:
6A
commissioner
Garen
I
have
a
question.
Well,
commissioner:
Geron.
AF
No,
no
I
just
had
a
question
and
it
was
the
issue
that
was
raised
and
the
forestry
and
natural
resources
letter
that
there's
a
discrepancy
between
the
narrative
and
the
proposed
language.
Are
you
familiar
with
that?
Yes,.
AJ
There's
we
received
a
yes.
AJ
So
the
line
on
line
255
is,
is
incorrect
and,
and
that
will
be
updated
for
the
for
the.
AF
AG
Yes,
the
tonight
we
heard
a
proposal
from
Arlington's
reaction
group
about
tying
the
number
of
trees,
specifically
to
the
our
district.
Does
that
proposal
Square
with
the
RTA.
AJ
That
proposal
would
be
out
of
scope
for
what
was
advertised.
Thank
you.
AN
Commissioner,
could
that
be
the
subject
of
further
analysis
and
study
that
the
staff
would
consider,
as
some
of
the
analysis,
we're
looking
at
as
eho
goes
forward?
If
each
goes
forward.
AJ
I
mean
we've
committed
that
we
would
Monitor
and
evaluate
and
report
back
on
on.
What's
Happening
and
part
of
the
reason
that
you're
evaluating
what's
happening
is
to
see
what's
working
and
what
maybe
isn't
working,
and
so
if
this
has
ever
opened
up
again
that
you
know
it
could
be
something
that
we
consider
we
and
we
would
have
the
data
of
what
is
actually
being
provided
in
terms
of
trees
and
tree
canopy.
AF
I'm
chair,
thank
you,
Mr
LED,
I.
Think
that's
a
really
important
issue
that
I
want
to
make
sure
is
captured
in
our
report.
A
lot
of
the
comments
that
we've
heard
over
the
last
couple
of
years
look
at
the
proposed
budding
of
heads
between
our
tree
canopy
policy
and
this
very
worthy
policy
as
well,
so
I'd
like
to
suggest
that
that
be
specifically
underscored
as
something
that
we
do
want
to
keep
an
eye
on
going
forward.
Thank
you.
A
AI
AF
A
Yeah
and
thank
you,
commissioner,
for
also
appointing
clarifying
that,
because
he
had
sent
a
note
to
me
and
I
was
actually
reminiscent
in
bringing
that
up
this
time.
Are
there
any
more
questions
on
this
option?
All
right,
I'm
going
to
seek
unanimous
consent
to
adopt
the
staff's
recommendation
for
6A
any
objection,
fantastic.
Now
we're
on
to
accessory
accessory
dwellings
that
is
option
12.
A
A
A
A
AI
A
A
Now
I
got
it
boy:
what
time
is
it
10
to
9
o'clock?
All
right,
listen,
the
the
is
there
a
motion
on
this
Madam.
AG
Chair
I
would
move
to
endorse
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
option
1A
two
family
dwellings,
townhouses
of
three
units
and
multiplexes
of
up
to
six
units.
Second,.
A
Was
that
Hughes,
okay,
we're
seconded
by
Hughes
any
comments,
questions
that
need
to
be
addressed:
fantastic
Bagley,
hi,
Garen,
aye,
Steinberger,.
AG
AL
AD
A
E
AL
I
will
be
voting
against
option
2A
and,
and
my
thinking
and
my
understanding
of
the
process
is
that,
by
having
restraint
on
some
of
these
options
right,
it
allows
the
county
to
negotiate
incentives
and
fundamentally,
any
reservations
that
I
have
about
this.
Entire
process
is
because
I
find
I
believe
that
it
needs
to
be
completely
driven
by
incentives
and
every
time
we
give
away
the
farm,
we
are
left
with
nothing
to
incentivize
or
bring
developers
to
the
table.
AL
S
Yes,
just
quickly
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion,
as
we
heard
from
any
of
our
speakers
over
the
course
of
money's
hearing
and
and
tonight
you
know,
adopting
2A
will
allow
this
to
be
the
most
flexible,
the
most
permissive
across
the
county,
which
is
something
that
I
certainly
support,
so
I'll
be
supporting
commissioner
awareness
motion.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
commissioner
Bagley,
nay,
commissioner
Garen
aye,
commissioner
Steinberger.
A
Hi
Weir
aye,
Peterson,
aye,
sarley,
nay,
then
tell
me
hi,
cues,
I
sure
aye
Patel
I.
The
motion
carries
eight
to
two.
A
AG
AF
AG
AF
Yes
go
ahead,
commissioner.
I
will
not
be
supporting
this
motion.
There
are
a
lot
of
reasons.
This
is
timely
to
move
forward
on
Missy
Miller
housing
eho,
but
I
do
believe
that
it's
our
responsibility
to
balance
the
many
competing
priorities
that
are
laid
in
front
of
us
and
I,
don't
think
we're
necessarily
looking
for
larger
Footprints
in
smaller
yards.
AJ
So
I
think
the
way-
and
this
is
addressed
a
little
bit
in
the
staff
report-
and
this
is
obviously
it's
a
it's
a
complex
issue-
the
the
difference
between
4A
and
4B.
It's
they
both
have
the
same
maximum
4A
would
require
you
to
have
the
rear,
detached
garage
to
earn
your
way
to
that
maximum
4B
would
just
reallocate
the
garage
allowance
to
to
the
main
building.
AJ
The
way
that
we
looked
at
this
in
our
staff
report
is
by
requiring
a
rear,
detached
garage
which
is
required
to
be
eight
feet
from
the
building,
so
it
pushes
it
deeper
into
the
yard,
where
there's
more
likely
to
be
existing
trees,
you
know,
could
have
a
detrimental
effect
on
on
tree
canopy
by
by
encouraging
the
rear
garage,
rather
than
the
main
building,
which
you
know
would
allow
for
a
larger
building
footprint
again.
AJ
That
would
be
limited
by
the
main
building
footprint
standard,
but,
to
the
extent
that
you
haven't
reached
the
main,
the
maximum
main
building
footprint,
it
could
be
a
larger
building,
but
that
larger
building
would
be.
You
know
generally
closer
to
the
front
of
the
property
rather
than
the
rear,
detached
garage
which
would
be
for
deeper
in
the
property,
where
typically
there's
more
existing
mature
trees.
So.
AJ
AF
A
That
correct
that's
correct,
it's
a
big
allocation!
Thank
you,
commissioner,
and
tell
me.
AH
Oh
yeah,
that's
why
I
would
be
supporting
4B,
because
the
idea
would
be
for
some
people
rather
than
cars,
but
also
it'd,
be
concentrating
the
structure
inside
the
lot
rather
than
around
the
around
the
outside,
where
I
think
it
is
logical
to
think
that's
where
the
trees
tend
to
be.
Unfortunately,
too
often
in
Arlington,
they
scrape
the
site
anyway,
which
is
terribly
unfortunate,
but
that
happens
by
right
with
single
families
right
now
that
don't
go
out
to
the
edge.
AH
A
You
all
right,
commissioner,
so.
AL
I
have
a
comment,
so
I
would
have
preferred
to
have
had
the
incentive
in
place
for
something
different
in
a
garage.
So
then
this
is
the
ho.
It's
unlikely
to
build
a
garage
so
we're
embedding.
The
five
percent
into
the
base
number
I
would
love
to
keep
that
five
percent
out
and
and
earn
that
through
some
sort
of
a
process
which,
like
affordability
or
the
size
or
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
this
is
why
I'm
voting
against
10B.
S
A
S
A
I
the
motion
carries
eight
to
two
and
then
the
last
one
under
two
will
be
annual
limits
on
permits.
This
is
option:
seven
option:
seven,
everyone
following
Along
on
your
bingo
cards,
Madam.
S
Mr
ladder
Miss
Brown
kind
of
wondering
if
you
could
explain
the
process
by
which
the
County
Board
would
disperse
permits
or
for
the
58
permits
that
are
called
for
and
7c.
How
would
those
be
allocated?
AJ
So
as
as
part
of
the
advertisement,
the
the
County
Board
left
it
open
that
that
there
could
be
a
method
of
geographical
distribution,
of
whatever
number
of
permits
are
adopted
if,
if
indeed
a
cap
is
adopted,
we've
been
advised
by
the
county
attorney
that
the
the
only
legally
permissible
way
to
do.
That
would
be
based
on
the
five
zoning
districts
that
we
have
R5
R6,
R8,
r10
and
R20,
and
so
they
could.
If
the
number
is
58,
they
could
allocate
those
58
permits
among
those
five
zoning
districts.
AJ
We
know
that
those
zoning
districts
aren't
distributed
evenly
and
in
fact
you
know,
two-thirds
of
properties
are
R6
and
the
remaining
third
are
the
other
four.
So
that's
an
option.
That's
available
to
them.
Something
that's
suggested
in
the
staff
report
is
that
the
board
could
also
combine
zoning
districts.
So
you
don't
end
up
with
a
situation
where
you
have
like
you
know.
One
permit
is
allocated
to
R20,
because
that's
such
a
small
proportion
of
of
the
county.
S
AH
Yeah
I
will
say
that
I
am
not
at
all
happy
with
the
idea
of
a
cap
in
the
first
place,
so
I
would
be
voting
against
a
cap,
but
if
there
has
to
be
a
cap
I
strongly
against
the
7c,
simply
because
I
think
that
would
we
would
have
it
would
discourage
it
would
discourage
these
type
of
it
would
discard
ehos.
AH
We
would
never
know
that
that
project
was
what
wasn't
there.
What
you're
doing
is
you're
skewing
the
information
that
you'd
be
getting
on
missing
middle,
going
forward
as
to
what
the
actual
demand
is
and
how,
where
they
could
go
so
I
would
be
strongly
against
7c
again.
My
first
choice
is
is
to
have
no
caps,
but
if
there
is
going
to
be
a
cap,
it
should
be
County,
Wide
and
not
geographically
distributed.
Okay,.
A
So,
commissioner,.
AP
I
A
AN
A
AN
AH
A
AI
Thank
you
that
does,
however,
enter
commercial
and
tell
me
is
because
our
districts
generally
confine
themselves
to
different
geographic
regions
based
on
a
density
allocation
from
north
to
south
on
the
county,
our
6
and
R5,
clustered
between
Langston
Boulevard
and
the
Columbia
Pike
Zone.
All
the
way
down
to
a
few
larger
Lots
in
the
Pentagon
City
area,
with
most
r-tents
in
our
20s
north
of
Langston
Boulevard.
AP
Yeah
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
all
know
that
staff
is
seems
to
be
in
the
report
recommending
against
very
much
this
our
district
kind
of
disbursement,
because
it's
going
to
end
up
with
like
really
weird
numbers,
and
so
maybe
it's
a
non-issue.
If
that's
my
only
point.
AN
So
I
have
a
question
on
the
timeline
of
for
the
permitting
process
and
when
units
might
actually
hit
the
market
under
the
an
eho
plan.
So
if
we,
if
there
is
a
cap
on
the
number
of
permits
whatever
that
number
is,
that
refers
to
be
that
first
count
your
first
calendar
year,
so
you
would
apply
for
a
permit.
Is
that
permit
only
good
for
a
certain
period
of
time
by
which
you
would
have
to
have
started
or
completed
your
project.
AJ
I
I
think
you
know,
and
we
even
have
to
look
into
whether
you
know
once
you're
granted
a
permit.
It
would
expire
but
I
think
for
the
it
wouldn't
expire
within
that
year
period
and
then
the
clock
would
reset
on
January
1st
of
the
next
year.
So
if,
if
someone
received
a
permit
and
didn't
you
know,
didn't
build
the
project,
I
don't
know
and
it's
a
new
zoning
permit.
So
we
might
have
to
make
a
determination
as
to
you
know
whether
that's
in
perpetuity
or
whether
it
expires
at
some
point.
AJ
But
if
it's
approved
in
2024
and
it's
not
built
in
2025,
you
would
get
another
58
permits.
If
that's,
if
that's
the
number.
AN
AN
So
hypothetically
I
could
I
think
it's
not
likely
that
the
first
year
I
would
have
no
units,
because
people
would
need
time
to
build
them
and
then
maybe
in
year,
four,
whatever
I
could
have
100
or
more
units.
Because
that's
when
units
actually
came
online,
you
know
up
to
58
whatever
per
year.
So
the
the
cap
is
a
control
to
a
point,
but
only
to
a
point.
AJ
AN
AJ
I
I
don't
know
if
I
can
answer
that,
but
you
know
I
mean
think
about
it
and
think
about
it.
In
terms
of
you
know,
site
plan
projects
that
that
you
hear
and
make
recommendations
on
right.
So
the
County
Board
will
approve
a
certain
number
of
site
plan
projects
in
a
year.
Many
most
of
them
get
built
within
a
certain
period
of
time.
AN
AN
A
AP
I
had
questions
related
to
some
issues
brought
up
by
commissioner
Steinberger
during
the
RTA,
which
was
specifically
about
like
the
cap
and
getting
into
the
queue,
and
is
there
any
way
to
give
preference
to
individual
homeowners
that
are
doing
conversions?
I,
know
the
parks
and
rec
program
offers.
You
know
priority
sign
ups
for
lower
income,
families
or
people
that
qualify
for
fee
reductions,
and
then
residents
get
you
know
in
line
next
and
then
out
of
town
people.
So
is
there
any
way?
AP
Have
you
looked
into
making
sure
that
Arlington's
who
want
to
convert
their
home,
which
might
be
better
for
the
affordability
of
you
know?
The
ehos
would
would
be
able
to
make
sure
that
they
can
get
stuff
done
as
they
might
be
working
a
little
bit
slower
because
it's
an
individual
homeowner
compared
to
a
builder
who's
got
a
whole
team
and
lawyers
and
people
who
do
this
professionally.
You
know
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they
don't
get
to
the
head
of
the
line
and
take
up
all
the
permits.
AJ
AF
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'm,
going
to
be
supporting
this
motion.
I
remain
concerned.
AF
I
will
be
supporting
commissioner
Weir's
proposed
motion,
but
given
that
we
have
been
zipping
through,
these
I
wanted
to
say
why,
in
case
in
case,
we
quickly
get
out
of
here
tonight.
I
I've
had
some
concerns
about
this
going
forward.
AF
AL
Just
wanted
to
clarify
I
got
a
little
confused
by
commissioner
steinberger's
logic
exercise,
so
the
the
permits
have
no
impact
on
the
number
right
so
53
per
year,
no
matter
what
no
matter.
What
came
to
be
built
I
just
want
to
be
clear
about
that.
So
January
1st,
there's
a
whole
new
batch
of
53
permits
ready
to
go
no
matter
how
many
permits
got
built
last
year.
Right,
yes,.
AJ
AG
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
finds
that
expanded
housing
option
development
meets
several
goals
articulated
across
the
many
elements
of
Arlington
County's
comprehensive
plan,
including,
but
not
limited
to
goals
involving
housing,
economic
sustainability,
environmental
sustainability
and
neighborhood
vibrancy
and
Myriad
kinds
of
diversity
and
Equity
considerations.
However,
the
commission
finds
no
rationale
in
Arlington,
County's,
comprehensive
plan
or
other
planning
documents
upon
which
to
recommend
annual
limitations
to
expanded
housing.
Option
permits.
A
You,
commissioner,
schrall
for
the
second
any
I,
don't
think
at
this
point
we
need
any
further
discussion.
Do
you
commission's
Harley.
AL
So
I
will
be
voting
against
this
motion.
I
think
the
cap
I
personally
disagree
with
it,
but
I
think
it
does
provide
a
sort
of
a
safety
gauge
on
this
experimental
and
new
zoning
ordinance
that
we're
bringing
to
bear
and
I
think
it's
just.
It
allows
us
the
opportunity
to
slow
it
down
and
I
doubt
that
we
will
hit
53
on
the
first
year,
but
I
think
I
will
be
voting
against.
Commissioner
Weir's
motion
because
I
believe
cap
is
serves
a
good
function.
AF
Yeah
just
to
be
clear,
I'm
sorry
I
am
not.
I
am
also
supporting
caps,
I
think
that
was
clear,
but
against
this
motion,
thank
you.
Yep.
AN
I
have
mixed
feelings
about
the
effectiveness
of
a
cat,
but
I
do
think
that
it
is
an
appropriate
way
to
push
our
way
into
these
expanded
housing
options
and
seeing
what
we,
what
that,
the
impact
that
has
on
the
county
while
I
don't
know
if
caps
are
a
perfect
way
to
manage
it
and
I,
don't
think
a
sunset
provision
is
going
to
do
anything
further.
AN
I
think
at
this
point
in
time,
I'm
not
prepared
to
support
commissioner
wears
motion.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Let's
go
commissioner
Bagley.
Your
vote.
Hey
commissioner,
Kieran,
nay,
Steinberger,
nay,
we're
aye,
Peterson,
nay,.
AL
AI
A
A
AI
I
moved
to
amend
commissioner
steinberger's
motion
to
add
the
sunset
provision
of
three
years
into
the
motion.
A
AF
A
Okay,
it's
hughes's
Amendment
with
garen's;
second,
is
it
self-explainage
or
I.
AI
Know
you'd
like
to
speak.
Thank
you
madam
chair
I
I
as
I
I
voted
to
support
the
No
Cap
solution.
As
my
preferred
alternative
I
understand
the
need
some
people
in
the
community
feel
for
the
cap
and
having
been
a
commissioner
who
voted
to
remove
the
cap
on
adus
myself.
AI
I
am
enlightened
by
my
colleagues
who
reminded
me
that
it
can
help
the
community
transition
to
something
that
can
feel
scary.
So
for
me,
I
can
support
the
cap,
but
I
would
like
it
to
be
self-deleting
and
so
I'm
willing
to
support
it.
When
we
have
the
sunset
provision
added
into
it
and
I.
Think
three
years
is
more
than
enough
time
for
failure,
success
to
be
visioned
and
seen
through
the
community
and
staff
to
come
back
to
change
it
if
necessary,
to
the
County
Board.
Okay,.
AG
I'm
prepared
to
support
the
motion
to
amend
only
because
I
think
that
caps
are
fundamentally
a
political
decision
upon
which
the
commission
does
not
have
a
basis
to
make
a
recommendation.
So
I
will
be
opposing
7A
as
amended.
Even
though
I
will
be
supporting
the
motion
to
recommend
that
a
7A,
if
adopted
sunset,.
S
Yeah
just
quickly
I'm
gonna
be
opposing
this
motion.
S
S
Don't
see
a
logical
way
how
we're
really
going
to
do
this
in
a
in
an
equitable
fashion
and
as
as
commissioner
Steinberger
kind
of
elucidated
through
her
questioning
caps,
aren't
actually
a
protection
against
development
in
any
one
year,
so
I'll
be
opposing
this
okay.
A
And
I'll
just
get
to
speak
actually.
Finally,
I
will
concur
wholeheartedly
with
commissioner
schroll's
comments
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
very
clear
for
the
record
about
commissioner
Schultz
comments
and
I
think
that
commissioner
Steinberger
did
all
the
work
for
us
for
all
the
reasons
why
we
shouldn't
have
caps
and
all
the
reasons
why
we
shouldn't
be
looking
at
sunsets
as
well.
So
thanks,
commissioner
Steinberger,
let's
go
to
a
vote
on
this
amended
motion.
Wait.
AN
AI
S
AL
T
A
No
Patel
I,
so
the
motion
carries
eight
to
one.
A
AI
This
allows
the
letter
and
the
County
Board
to
know
how
we
all
feel
separately
about
a
timeline
for
for
any
cap
that
they
should
choose
to
elect,
and
then
this
vote
now
would
be
on
the
actual
cap
with
a
sun
setting
provision.
AF
AI
A
You
Commissioner
Karen,
I'm,
sorry
Bagley,
aye,
Garen,
ayeinberger,
aye,
Weir,.
AG
A
Aye
sorry
Lynn
tell
me
no
Hughes,
okay,.
S
A
Nay,
motion
fails
five
to
five:
that's
no
recommendation
yeah.
So
are
there
any
issue,
any
other
emotions
on
seven
on
annual
caps?
Okay,
commissioner
Peterson,
you
have
a
separate
motion,
say.
AP
Again,
yes,
thank
you
well
so
first
I
wanted
to
just
say
to
staff.
Thank
you
very
much
for
adding
into
your
staff
report.
Educational
materials
for
homeowners
staff
will
develop
educational
materials.
To
summarize
the
changes
for
the
public
and
determine
the
best
means
to
share
this
information
with
homeowners
and
Civic
associations,
particularly
those
located
in
the
county
identified
in
the
attached
racial
and
socioeconomic
Equity
analysis.
I
appreciate
you
all
doing
that.
AP
I
am
going
to
reintroduce
the
same
emotion
that
I
had
at
the
RTA
only
because
I
am
hoping
for
something
more
than
just
materials.
To
summarize
the
changes
that
have
been
adopted,
because
that
could
just
be
like
a
press
statement
and
I'm
hoping
for
going
farther,
and
you
know
like
here's,
how
you
would
do
it
here-
are
the
steps.
AP
Here's
an
ombudsman
that
you
can
reach
out
to
so
I'll,
be
introducing
that
again
and
I
also
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
including
the
plan
to
meet
with
a
Housing
Commission
subcommittee,
member
and
broader
community
outreach
to
consider
Community,
Land
trusts,
which
was
also
a
motion
that
I
had
proposed
during
the
RTA.
So,
thank
you.
So
my
motion
for
tonight
is
the
Planning.
AP
I
will
just
also
add
that
I
believe
commissioner
sarley
will
be
introducing
a
motion
for
a
design
book
that
I
think
could
be
part
of
the
materials
and
resources
that
could
be
provided
to
these
neighborhoods.
Okay,.
A
AL
A
I
the
motion
carries
ten
to
zero.
Any
commissioner
sarley
have
another
motion.
AL
Yeah
I'll
make
that
motion
now,
let's
see
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
the
County
Board
direct
the
county
manager
to
have
staff
commission
a
series
of
possible
design,
Solutions
and
a
guidebook
format
to
provide
conceptual
architectural
drawings
and
designs
for
new
eho
buildings
and
conversions
of
existing
single-family
homes
to
potential
applicants
focusing
on
homeowners
who
wish
to
transition
their
property
from
single-family
homes
to
ehos.
AL
AL
Yeah
I'll
just
talk
to
it
a
little
bit.
Ehls
are
a
new
type
of
building
and
the
guidebook
would
help
demystify
what
is
possible
possible.
What
is
possible
and
illustrate
ideas
acceptable
to
community
sleuth
house
solutions
for
hurdles
and
help
homeowners
interested
in
converting
their
properties
to
Ho,
along
with
developers
who
are
interested
but
remain
risk-averse.
A
Thank
you.
Customer
service.
AN
I
just
wanted
to
I
will
be
supporting
this
motion
and
I
wanted
to
say
that
I
think
that
the
idea
of
having
a
design
guide
and
offering
that
support
to
members
of
the
community
is
really
essential.
I
think
that
we've
seen
through
the
course
of
this
process
over
the
last
several
months,
some
of
the
signs
around
the
county
that
have
popped
up
and
some
of
the
misinformation
about
sort
of
what
would
be.
AN
I
write
design
for
some
of
the
ehos
that
are
possible
and
I
think
that
there
may
have
been
a
strategic
effort
to
choose
some
of
the
ugliest
possible
buildings
on
some
of
those
images
and
I
would
strongly
suggest
that
that
is
not
the
only
thing
available
and
that
a
design
guide
you
know
working
with
our
very
accomplished.
County
staff
is
a
way
to
indicate
and
to
really
support
that.
What
comes
out
of
this
process
are
buildings
that
are
that
add.
AN
You
know
both
housing
units
and
you
know,
really
can
add
Beauty
to
the
environment
of
Arlington
and
can
be
something
that
really
fits
naturally
into
the
environs
in
the
you
know
whether
single-family
homes
around
or
other
multiple
unit
dwellings,
whatever,
but
I,
think
it's
really
important
that
we
offer
that
support
to
homeowners
developers,
whoever
is
going
to
be
taking
on
these
ehl
projects.
So
I'm
I'm,
very
grateful
to
commissioner
Charlie
for
having
this
motion
and
I
will
support.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
so
I
just
have
a
question
about
the
motion
and
commissioner
Weir
is
actually
the
one
who
probably
should
be
saying
this,
but
my
mic
is
on.
It
says.
The
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
County
Board
direct,
the
county
manager
to
have
staff
commission
a
series
of
possible
design
Solutions
in
a
guidebook
to
format,
to
provide
conceptual
I
I,
actually
like
this
idea.
But
I,
don't
like
this
notion
that
we're
now
directing
them
that
they
have
to
issue
some
kind
of
nofa
to
have
a
design
book
develop
that
theoretically
could
be
done.
AL
Fair
point
and
I:
don't
really
have
a
particularly
strong
stance
on
this.
The
the
incentive
there
is
to
essentially
create
fresh,
bring
fresh
blood
into
the
conversation
and
have
Consultants
that
have
not
been
involved
with
the
ho.
Take
a
fresh
look
at
this,
and
also
you
know,
staff
is
a
little
bit
overburdened
as
we
just
reviewed
the
work
plan
on
the
last
lrpc,
so
it
was
sort
of
given
out
and
allow
sort
of
external
Consultants
to
to
join
the
team.
So.
AI
Madam
chair
I,
just
would
remind
that
in
state
code
this
commission
itself
can
employ
its
independent
Architects
if
necessary,
to
establish
any
analysis
or
planning
we
need
so
I,
don't
think
advising
the
County
Board
that
we
believe
is
a
fresh
set
of
eyes
or
any
other
method
of
achieving
a
better
vision
for
a
much
better
presentation
of
of
eho
is
outside
of
our
bounds.
AG
I
I'm
I'm
I,
if,
if
we
have
internal
staff
capacity,
whether
it's
fresh
eyes
or
not
right
I
mean
fresh
eyes
is
a
fair
point.
But
if
we
have
internal
staff
capacity,
I
just
think
it
would
be
I
would
be
fine
with
I'm
I'm
process.
Agnostic
is,
is
my
concern.
I
just
I
was
also
curious
about
whether
whether
you
had
a
a
particular
rationale
for
treating
it
as
a
vendor
project,
as
opposed
to
in-house
staff
capacity.
A
Don't
you
I,
don't
believe
that
we
need
to
prescribe
the
process
like
the
recommendations.
The
Beneficial
part
of
this
recommendation
is
the
benefit
the
community
gets
from
it,
and
that
is
a
design,
guidebook
and
so
I
would
move
to
amend
this
motion
to
remove
the
directive
that
they
have
to
commission.
This
guidebook
versus
determine
how
best
to
be
able
to
bring
about
this
guidebook.
AL
Perhaps
we
can
just
add
or
commission
let
staff
do.
AL
R
A
Prepare
provide
possible
design
Solutions
in
a
guidebook
format,
to
provide
conceptual
architectural
design,
drawings
or
designs
for
new
eho
buildings
and
conversions
of
existing
single-family
dwellings
for
potential
applicants.
Focusing
on
homeowners
who
wish
to
transition
their
property
from
single
family
dwelling
to
an
eho
seconded
by
by
commissioner
Lynn.
Tell
me
sure.
AQ
A
We
had
some
discussions
previously
about
whether
we
would
what
I
think
there
was
a
recommendation
that
we
would
seek
some
form
of
like
regulatory
zoning
ordinance
amendments
versus
see.
This
is
which
is
more
advisory
or
guidance
material.
So
that
would
be
the
difference
because
we
Planning
Commission
has
in
some
way
looked
at
this
topic
all
right.
Let's,
let's
vote
on
the
sorry.
AG
I
just
want
to
add
for
my
colleagues,
commissioner
sarley,
but
my
colleagues
as
well
I
I
think
it's
perfectly
fine.
If
this
is
outsourced,
work,
product
right,
I,
I
have
and
others
on
this
commission
have
encouraged
staff
to
find
ways
to
Outsource
work
before
I
truly
am
process.
Agnostic,
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
understood.
N
A
AN
A
Is
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
County
Board
direct,
the
county
manager
to
have
staff
prepare
possible
design
Solutions
in
a
guidebook
format,
to
provide
conceptual
architectural
drawings
or
designs
for
new
eho
buildings
and
conversions
of
existing
single-family
dwellings
for
potential
applicants
focusing
on
homeowners
who
wish
to
transition
their
property
from
single
family
dwelling
to
an
eho?
So
the
difference
between
this
amendment
and
what
commissioner
sarley
presented
is
commissioner
sarley's
motion
directs
directs
staff
to
have
to
Outsource
it.
The
the
amended
motion
allows
them
to
decide
if
they
need
to
Outsource
it
or
not.
AL
A
And
tell
me
hi
Hughes
hi
Shiro
aye,
Patel
I.
The
motion,
the
emotion
to
amend,
carries
ten
to
zero.
A
AL
A
Sarly
and
we're
I
think
we've
discussed
this
several
times
in
several
iterations
in
several
different
spaces.
Most
recently
at
lrpc
I,
don't
know
if
we
necessarily
need
to
have
any
further
discussion
on
this.
Can
we
go
to
voting
all
right
badly
hi
Karen,
aye
Steinberger
hi
we're
Peterson
aye
sarley
aye,
one
tell
me:
hi
Hughes
hi
Cheryl,
aye,
Patel
I
motion
carries
ten
to
zero.
A
AL
More,
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
County
Board
establish
an
eho
monitoring
monitoring
group
with
well-defined
metrics
and
staff
support.
The
group
should
provide
a
quarterly
report
detailing
developers,
interest
and
proposals
at
each
stage
of
the
process
and
include
comedian,
engagements
and
commission
review,
planninghousing
Transportation,
natural
resources,
parks
and
other
issues
as
they
emerge,
such
as
an
infrastructure,
social
flood
control,
Etc.
A
AL
To
clarify
that
this
is
just
to
keep
track
of
what
we're
doing,
and
this
committee,
for
instance,
could
remove
the
Caps
suggest
the
board
removed
the
Caps
earlier
than
expected,
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
Okay,.
AG
AH
Yeah
I
concur
with
commissioner
Weir.
The
idea
is
a
great
one.
I
think
staff
is
already
committed
to
doing
this.
I,
don't
like
prescribing
how
it
would
be
done.
Okay,.
A
Commissioner,
Bagley
I:
oh
I'm,
sorry,
oh
I'm,
sorry,
commissioner
I'm,
sorry
I'm!
So
sorry,
let's
have
something
to.
AP
My
colleagues
comments,
I
was
wondering
commissioner
Charlie.
Can
you
explain
how
what
you're
proposing
is
different
than
what
is
in
the
staff
report
for
tracking
and
Reporting.
AL
Not
really
I
mean
it
was
just
I
was
just
trying
to
compound
that,
so
maybe
I
could
even
Riff
Off
the
language
from
staff
and
change
it.
But
it's
the
same
thing.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
I
think
my
one
emphasis
would
be
civic
participation.
Greater
input
from
the
community
perhaps
would
be
the
the
motion
that
I
would.
The
part
of
the
motion
that
I
would
emphasize
thank.
A
AG
AL
A
S
AP
It
might
be
emotion
based
on
a
staff.
Okay,
commissioner,
Peterson
is
a
question
yeah,
so
I
actually
have
a
question
about
the
tracking
and
Reporting.
Thank
you
for
queuing
this
up
for
me,
commissioner
sarley.
AP
So
in
the
bulleted
list
of
all
of
the
things
you're
going
to
be,
including
for
monitoring,
demographics
is
not
listed,
and
I
was
wondering
about
that.
Since
Equity
is
one
of
the
big
aspects
of
this
project
and
I
know,
we
can't
demand
to
get
that
information
from
people,
but
it
could
be
like
an
optional,
a
piece
of
information
that
somebody
could
submit
when
they're
applying
for
a
permit.
So
I'm
just
wondering
why
we
aren't
collecting
demographic
information.
AJ
I
I
think
it's
a
fair
question.
I
think
the
you
know.
The
only
way
to
do
it
would
be
just
you
know,
send
a
survey
to
to
the
address,
and
you
know.
Certainly
we
could
consider
that,
but
in
terms
of
you
know
normally
when
we
look
at
demographic
Trends,
we're
looking
at
a
census,
tract
level
and
changes
at
a
census,
tract
level
are
going
to
happen
over
decades
and
not
quarterly
as
yeah,
as
was
recently
suggested.
AP
Okay,
so
I
guess
I
hear
what
you're
saying,
but
I
I
think
it's
important
that
demographics
be
part
of
this
list
only
because
it
has
been
such
an
important
part
of
this
conversation
this
entire
time,
and
so
knowing
that
I
I
would
like
to
propose
a
motion
to
put
that
bullet
on
this
list
and
knowing
that
it
might
not
be
possible
to
find.
AJ
I
think
we
agree
with
it
and
I
think
we
can
certainly
add
it
to
the
list
as
as
something
that
we'll
look
into
the
the
best
way
to
do
that.
AP
AE
N
AL
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
have
to
confess
that
I'm
very
much
in
support
of
eho
and
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
doing
a
really
good
work.
AL
AL
You
know-
and
this
is
not
just
staff-
this
is
us
as
a
community,
and
this
is
the
board
I
think
there's
a
few
enforced
errors
along
the
way
that
we
could
have
avoided
and
I
would
really
ask
the
County
Board
to
avoid
a
similar
process
in
the
future
and
not
put
the
cart
in
front
of
the
horse
where
we
had
several
years
of
hypothetical
planning
and
arrived
to
like
a
five-week
process
once
we
actually
got
to
the
substance
of
the
issue,
but
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
think
it's
really
great
that
our
community
is
embracing
this.
AL
You
know
a
little
trepidatiously,
but
it
is
I
think
you
know
we
ought
to
try
to
bring
some
of
the
people
that
are
not
coming
along
quite
as
willingly
and
help
them
see
and
also
I
think
we
ought
to
be
a
little
bit
more
patient
with
people
that
are
a
little
risk-averse
right,
including
developers
which,
in
my
opinion,
you
know
we're
gonna,
have
to
go
out
of
our
way
to
attract
them
to
work
here,
but
I
do
strongly
support
the
plan
density,
the
planned
growth
and
what
we're
about
to
prove,
or
we
have
approved
here.
AL
You
know,
really
needs
to
keep
going
We,
Can't
Stop
on
our
Laurels.
We
can't
just
assume
that
we
did
it
and
we
really
need
to
pursue
I
think
really
excellent
planning
opportunities
that
we
have
and
I
talk
about.
The
15-minute
city,
which
I
think
is
really
something
that's
very
achievable
in
Arlington
and
I'd
love
to
maintain
a
momentum
and
a
sort
of
enthusiasm
that
I've
seen
with
some
of
my
colleagues
with
staff
and
I
think
that's
about
it.
AL
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
to
everybody
who
has
participated.
It's
been
a
multi-year
process.
It
hasn't
just
been
from
December
until
March
staff
has
labored
on
this
for
many
many
many
years
and
many
many
hundreds
of
thousands
of
hours
I've
been
put
into
this
process,
including
lots
of
hours
by
this
commission
itself.
Thank
you
all
for
all
of
your
time
and
attention
whether
it
came
before
the
Planning
Commission
as
a
whole,
whether
it
came
in
front
of
Soco,
whether
it
came
in
front
of
long-range
planning
and
every
iteration
of
it.
A
Thank
you
very
much
to
Miss,
Johnson
and
Miss
Martin.
Thank
you
very
much
to
all
of
our
everybody
that
is
assisted
on
this
I'm.
Like
now
blanking
on
your
last
name
episode.
Thank
you
so
much
for
every
person
that
has
helped
move
this
process
along
the
way.
Thank
you
to
my
colleagues
for
being
brief
and
succinct
and
to
the
point
I
appreciate
all
of
all
of
the
public
comment.
I
know
my
colleagues
do
as
well.
A
We
are
now
adjourned.
Thank
you.