►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
Good
evening
welcome
to
the
November
2
2022
meeting
of
the
Arlington
County
Planning
Commission
I
am
commission,
chair,
Daniel
Weir
tonight.
The
commission
will
consider
a
request
to
advertise
for
public
hearings
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
County
board
on
a
general
land
use
plan
Amendment
and
related
issues
to
facilitate
improvements
to
the
Arlington
Junction
Park,
located
at
South
EAD
Street
at
Army
Navy
Drive.
C
Please
clip
your
phones
and
devices
muted
until
you're
called
upon.
Please
turn
off
sound
to
any
other
devices
around
you
to
minimize
interference
and
keep
your
cameras
off
until
the
clerk
calls
you
to
speak
on
the
topic
of
interference
to
my
colleagues
in
the
room.
Please
remember
that
the
microphones
are
very
sensitive
to
mobile
devices
and
try
to
keep
any
cell
phones
in
your
pockets,
or
at
least
a
good
remove
from
the
microphone.
C
Even
if
it's
on
mute,
when
called
upon
to
speak,
you
must
unmute
yourself,
public
speakers,
you'll
be
called
upon
by
the
clerk
at
an
assign
time.
Pre-Registration
to
speak
at
tonight's
hearing
was
required
and
we're
not
able
to
accommodate
any
additional
speakers.
Public
comment
on
our
one
item
will
take
place
within
the
same
time
frames
as
we
would,
as
we
have
historically
provided
providing
speakers
with
three
minutes
to
comment
as
individuals
and
five
minutes
to
speak.
If
representing
an
organization,
the
meeting
chat.
C
If
anyone
is
on
the
chat,
is
to
be
used
for
technical
assistance
and
is
not
a
record
for
the
meeting
and
reminder
that
tonight
is
a
public
forum
and
tonight's
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
posted
to
the
County
website.
All
information
associated
with
tonight's
meeting,
whether
written
or
spoken,
is
subject
to
Virginia
Freedom
of
Information
Act
requirements.
Tonight
we
are
joined
remotely
by
commissioner
Sarah
Steinberger,
who
is
participating
remotely
for
personal
reasons,
the
nature
of
which
will
be
reflected
in
our
written
minutes
of
this
evening's
meeting.
That
said,
Madam
quick.
D
Thank
you
chair.
Our
first
item
for
the
evening
is
a
request
to
authorize
advertisement
of
public
hearings
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
County
board
on
the
following
item:
to
facilitate
improvements
to
the
Arlington
Junction
Park,
located
at
South
E
Street
and
Army
Navy
Drive,
a
general
land
use
plan,
Amendment
from
high
office
apartment
hotel
to
public
for
the
park
located
at
the
Northwestern
corner
of
the
area
bounded
by
Army
Navy
Drive,
12th,
Street,
South
and
South
East
Street.
We
have
Anika
Chowdhury
our
planning
staff
to
present
this
item
this
evening.
E
Thank
you
Mr,
chair
good
evening,
members
of
the
Planning
Commission.
My
name
is
Anika
choudary
associate
planner
with
Arlington's
planning,
Division
and
I'm
joined
tonight
by
staff
from
the
Department
of
Community
planning,
Housing
and
Development,
as
well
as
the
department
of
Parks
and
Recreation.
This
item
is
a
request
to
authorize
advertisement
of
future
public
hearings
for
the
Planning
Commission
and
County
Board
to
consider
a
glop
Amendment
for
a
new
park
that
was
acquired
by
the
county
in
2016
for
the
proposed
Arlington
Junction
Park.
E
The
proposed
Park
site
is
within
the
Richmond
Highway
planning
Corridor
and
is
surrounded
by
recently
completed
and
approved
commercial
and
residential
development,
including
the
Altair
site
plan
2,
the
sage
site
plan
244
and
the
anticipated
Penn
Place
development
site
plan
105..
The
subject.
Park
area
was
formerly
known
as
the
teardrop
parcel
and
part
of
parcel
1D
of
Pentagon
City
pdsp,
later
known
as
the
Penn
play
site.
E
The
County
board
approved
a
Pentagon
City
pdsp
Amendment
for
the
Penn
Place
site,
which
included
approval
of
a
pdsp
Amendment
for
parcel
1D
of
of
Penn
Place,
allowing
mixed-use-based
development,
a
commitment
by
the
developer
to
transfer
ownership
of
the
teardrop
parcel
to
the
county,
a
transfer
of
development
rights,
sending
density
from
the
teardrop
parcel
to
the
pen
Place
site,
in
addition
to
a
restrictive
covenant
to
be
recorded
for
the
property
that
limits
future
use
of
the
property
to
public
open
space.
Recreation
uses
and
Public
Access
in
January
2015.
E
The
County
board
approved
an
amendment
site
plan
2
for
the
Redevelopment
of
400
Army
Navy
Drive
office
site
into
the
adjacent
Altair
development.
While
the
site
plan
was
filed,
the
county
was
advancing
its
streetcar
program
for
the
Route
1
and
Columbia
Pike
corridors,
which
was
then
canceled
in
November
2014..
The
staff
report
for
site
plan
2
noted
that,
with
the
county
no
longer
pursuing
use
of
the
teardrop
parcel
for
streetcar
maintenance
facility,
the
ultimate
use
of
this
site
will
undergo
future
consideration
for
how
the
site
will
be
utilized
by
the
county
in
June
2016.
E
The
the
approved
transfer
of
ownership
of
the
subject.
Park
parcel
was
ultimately
conveyed
to
the
county
by
the
deed
of
severance
transfer,
dedication
and
conveyance
in
October
2019
in
consideration
of
site
plan
244
for
411th
Street
South,
the
Planning
Commission
found
the
right-of-way
vacation
to
designate
the
teardrop
parcel
as
a
public
open
space
as
substantially
in
accordance
with
the
County's
comprehensive
plan
and
the
County
board
approved
the
subject
site
plan
244
supporting
a
land
use
recommendation
for
a
new
park
at
Southeast,
Street
and
Army
Navy
Drive.
E
Given
that
the
county
ownership
of
the
parcel
and
the
vision
for
this
parcel
as
a
public
park
and
as
a
typical
use
for
the
public
land
use
designation.
This
is
a
club
Amendment
request
from
high
office
apartment
hotel
to
public
the
public
land
use
designation,
supports
Parks,
Public,
Schools,
Parkways,
major
unpaved
rights
of
way,
libraries
and
cultural
facilities.
This
designation
is
typically
implemented
by
the
s3a
as
SD
zoning
districts,
yet
other
zoning
districts
may
be
found
in
areas
designated
as
public.
E
In
addition
to
the
proposed
Club
Amendment,
an
Associated
rezoning
from
co,
co,
2.5
and
Co
Crystal
City
mixed
use
to
PS
public
service
is
also
requested
and
would
be
brought
forward
with
the
subsequent
request
for
County
Board
action
on
the
glup
amendment
in
December,
along
with
dpr's
request
for
the
park,
naming
as
the
proposed
Arlington
Junction
Park,
as
well
as
Des
request
for
a
resub
division,
an
abandonment,
a
variety
of
way
and
a
dedication
of
right-of-way
in
addition
to
a
park
in
addition
to
park
easements.
These
subject.
E
E
Engagement
and
lrp's
consideration
the
community
visioning
process
for
the
proposed
Park
sought
extensive
Community
feedback,
as
noted
previously
with
four
online
public
engagement
opportunities
and
online
questionnaires,
which
include
Outreach
on
the
existing
site
conditions
Visions
for
its
future.
The
draft
Park
Design
Concepts,
in
addition
to
the
refinement
of
the
final
Park
design,
which
was
ultimately
adopted
by
the
County
Board
in
2021
through
the
new
park
at
Southeast,
Street
Army
and
Army
Navy,
Drive
final
master
plan
and
design
guidelines.
E
Therefore,
with
no
issues
at
this
time
and
to
enable
consideration
of
the
subject,
requests
in
conjunction
with
the
proposed
rezoning
and
other
related
actions
anticipated
in
December
staff
recommends
that
the
County
Board
adopt
the
attached
resolution
to
authorized
advertisement
of
public
hearings
by
the
Planning
Commission
on
December
5th
2022
and
County
Board
on
December
17
2022
on
the
following
glup
Amendment
from
high
office
apartment
hotel
to
public
for
a
new
park.
This
concludes
staff's
presentation.
Thank
you.
C
We
do
not
have
a
member
of
the
Planning
Commission
who
shepherded
this
item,
and
so
I
am
going
to
momentarily
open
it
up
to
the
floor
for
questions
well,
first
for
suggestions
about
whether
about
high-level
issues
around
which
to
structure
our
discussion
and
and
then
for
questions
for
a
staff.
After
that.
F
With
the
design
here
and
I
have
a
question
about
it
in
the
staff
report,
there's
a
graphic
figure
six
and
that,
if
you
can
just
clarify
for
me
how
users
are
expected
to
use
the
space
is
11th
Street.
There's
not
much
traffic
on
that
portion
correct
is
that
just
in
and
out
of
the
development,
because
it
looks
as
though
the
design
facilitates
going
across
from
one
part
of
the
park
to
the
other
in
a
couple
of
areas
and
not
both
at
the
crosswalk
and.
C
C
A
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman
I
just
have
a
question
about
about
the
zoning
categories
being
considered.
Likewise,.
B
I
would
do
that
category,
but
I
also
have
a
clarifying
question
on
the
map
itself,
with
specifics
to
whether
the
color
we
see
is
the
appropriate
color.
So.
C
We're
going
to
take
that
as
map
commit.
Did
you
have
another
topic
as
well
to
add?
Oh
just
okay,
commissioner
sarley.
G
C
C
A
Thank
you
Mr
chairman.
Let's
see
so
I'm
I'm
interested
if
staff
can
speak
to
the
decision
to
use
or
the
proposal
to
use
PS
instead
of
s3a
and
or
SD,
but
I
think
s3a
would
be
the
more
typical
one
we
would
see
and
then
I
I
guess,
there's
an
adjoiner
to
that.
A
Several
years
ago,
staff
had
on
their
work
plan
zoning
ordinance
amendments
to
permit
additional
height,
address
setbacks
and
things
that
are
mentioned
in
the
staff
report
and
did
not
pursue
them
at
that
time
for
I
think
expediency
and
political
reasons,
with
respect
to
to
a
new
school
being
developed
in
the
county,
I'm
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
whether
revisions
to
s3a
are
on
the
cphd
work
plan,
and
you
know
you
know
if
you
could
speak
to
that
issue.
That
would
be
helpful
as
well.
Thank
you.
E
Sure,
thank
you
so
in
terms
of
the
zoning
category
in
case
I
did
not
clarify
earlier.
The
associated
rezoning
to
the
PS
district
will
allow
for
pylon
lights
in
integral
design
features
specified
in
the
approved
master
plan
to
be
placed
in
their
optimal
locations,
based
on
this
District's,
less
restrictive
setback
Dimensions.
So
in
terms
of
the
existing
co,
co,
2.5
and
CEO
Crystal
City
Zoning
districts
they
allow
for
Parks
via
use.
Permit.
E
A
rezoning
is
requested
to
facilitate
construction
of
this
park
as
a
Buy
Right
Use
consistent
with
the
proposed
public
glup
designation,
and
to
facilitate
construction
with
optimal
light
pole
placement
in
a
manner
consistent
with
the
approved
master
plan.
The
PS
District
also
establishes
less
restrictive
setback
requirements
that
would
allow
for
the
proposed
light
design
in
comparison
to
the
more
restrictive
standards
set
forth
in
the
s3a.
E
The
development
of
the
capital
project
under
PS
would
allow
for
the
schedule
and
delivery
to
move
forward
efficiently
and
is
anticipated
in
2023
until
such
time
that
a
future
zoning
ordinance
Amendment
occurs
to
change
the
minimum
setback
dimensions
in
the
s3a
district
or
allow
the
County
board
authority
to
approve
modifications
of
those
Dimensions.
The
PS
District
can
be
used
now
to
facilitate
the
proposed
Park
design.
A
zoning
study,
as
mentioned
two
week,
examine
these
limitations
to
park.
E
Planning
and
Development
has
been
identified
in
the
public
spaces
master
plan
and
in
as
well
as
the
cphd
planning
divisions,
work
program
forecasts.
In
addition,
the
PS
district
has
been
designated
at
several
other
Arlington
Park
locations
such
as
the
Long
Bridge
Park,
as
well
as
the
genie
Dean
Park
to
facility
the
approved
Park
master
plan.
I
Sure
so
that
the
setback
requirements
for
the
PS
zoning
District
are
more
flexible.
I,
don't
have
the
specific
dimensions
here
in
front
of
me,
but
they're
more
flexible.
That's
part
of
the
reason
why
the
PS
District
was
recommended
for
the
rezoning
the
SD
zoning
district
is
really
intended
for
institutional
uses
like
nursing
homes.
It
has.
Typically
those
projects
are
reviewed
through
site
plans.
So
so
that's
not
a
zoning
District
that
we
would
recommend.
C
Before
we
go
to
any
other
questions
on
this
topic,
I
just
checked
with
the
clerk,
but
I
I
want
to
also
check
with
anyone
online.
We
do
not
believe
that
there
are
any
representatives
of
any
other
commissions
with
us
or
online,
but
I
wanted
to
give
one
all
call
in
case.
I
was
wrong
right.
Okay,
the
clerk
and
I
are
correctly
in
agreement.
Then
that's
great
commissioner
Hughes
did
you
have
a
zoning
question
as
well
still.
B
B
E
B
This
is
incredibly
frustrating
for
me
because
the
most
appropriate
category
for
a
park
remains
s3a
within
the
county.
It's
the
most
consistent.
We
know
of
violations
of
the
height
and
setback
restrictions
for
lights
within
the
county,
specifically
Wakefield
High
School
was
done
with
violations
that
we
know
about
that
are
no
longer
enforced,
and
we
continue
to
ignore
the
fact
that
the
s3a
district
needs
to
be
changed
to
align
with
County
goals
and
avoid
the
technicality
by
simply
choosing
to
make
the
service
heavy
District,
which
PS
remains.
B
The
zoning
District
that
we
fundamentally
anticipate
uses
such
as
industrial
yards
that
are
otherwise
not
permitted
and
applying
it
to
the
wrong
category,
which
is
our
Parks
I.
Don't
support
the
rezoning
for
those
reasons
to
PS,
although
I'm,
fully
supportive
of
the
park
in
an
s3a
designation
and
the
associated
changes
which
easily
could
be
made
without
very
much
controversy,
because
it's
not
about
the
height
of
the
lights
by
just
moving
the
setbacks
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that,
and
I
will
probably
move
publicly
that
the
rezoning
be
made
to
s3a
with
Associated
changes
and.
C
E
I
I
Wouldn't
you
know
be
cast
evenly
throughout
the
park,
so
certainly
understand
the
concern
about
using
the
PS
zoning
District,
but
the
situation
being
what
it
is
that
that
is
really
the
only
zoning
District
that
we
have
available
to
us
to
allow
the
park
to
be
built
with
that
the
lights
placed
in
the
proper
location,
for
you
know
for
the
lights
to
be
cast
evenly
throughout
the
park,
Illuminating
it
at
dark.
You
know
when
people
want
to
be
using
that
space
safely.
B
To
you
is
Staff
unable
to
propose
an
Associated
setback
provision
within
the
zoning
Amendment
and
the
RTA
we're
about
to
put
forward.
I
The
the
scope
of
the
zoning
orange
Amendment
that's
been
discussed
for
several
years
now
would
be
to
allow
modifications
or
flexibility
for
certain
structures
to
be
placed
in
the
setback
area.
That's
something
that
would
need
to
happen
through
a
use
permit
process.
Even
even
if
that
zoning
orange
Amendment
were
conducted,
the
the
scope
of
that
zoning
orange
Amendment
would
be
to
look
at.
I
A
number
of
you
know:
potential
areas
for
flexibility,
not
just
for
lighting,
but
for
other
structures
as
well,
and
so
no
it
that's
not
something
that
staff
would
be
able
to
bring
forward
at
that
time
that
that
really
does
need
to
be
part
of
a
comprehensive
zoning.
Orange
Amendment
study
that
hasn't
been
scheduled
on
the
work
plan.
B
The
scope
of
the
non-conformity
throughout
our
County
in
the
s3a
district
is
quite
immense
at
the
moment,
and
our
continued
failure
to
address
this
and
instead
use
the
PS
district
has
a
work
around
to
the
real
problem,
which
is
a
discussion
of
what
is
an
appropriate
and
equal
use
of
s3a
District
across
the
county
is
continuing
to
be
a
challenge,
which
is
why
I
will
continue
not
to
support
the
PS
designation.
Although
I'm
very
supportive
of
the
park.
C
Thank
you,
commissioner
Hughes.
So
as
I
as
I
forecasted,
what's
before
the
commission
tonight
as
I
understand
it
and
what
it
looks
like
is
being
teed
up
to
go
before
the
board
is
a
request
to
advertise
glup
amendments
it
would
seem
to,
but
but
it
also
that
the
staff
report
indicates
that
there
would
be
a
corresponding
rezoning
request
that
would
go
in
December
and
so
what
I
I
would?
C
My
question,
then,
is:
my
question
is:
why
are
we
not
also
being
asked
to
make
the
recommendation
about
advertising
the
zoning
the
rezoning
and
or
why
is
it
it's
not
looking
good
and
or
if,
if
I'm
right
in
reading
it,
that
the
board
isn't
being
teed
up
to
to
act
on
a
request
to
advertise,
then
why
is
that
not
happening
and
or
what
am
I
missing,
I'll
yield
the
floor?
Thank
you
sure.
I
So
a
a
rezoning
is
different
from
a
zoning
ordinance.
Amendment
a
rezoning
does
not
require
a
formal
request
to
advertise
okay,
so
the
rezoning
is
something
that
can
come
forward
on
its
own
without
without
in
the
previous
month
there
being
a
formal
request
to
advertise.
That's
different
from
a
glup
Amendment,
which
requires
a
request
to
advertise,
because
it
is
the
a
club.
Amendment
would
be
an
amendment
to
the
general
Laney's
plan,
which
is
part
of
our
comprehensive
plan,
and
changes
to
the
comprehensive
plan
require
a
request
to
advertise.
Okay.
C
C
A
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
I
mean
I,
think
it
you
know,
since
this
is
the
RTA.
This
is
our
opportunity
to
convey
what
we
would
like
to
see
in
any
event,
and
so
I
think
this
is
the
opportunity
to
to
convey
if
we
want
s3a
or
we
want
some
other
amendments
to
be
considered
and
appreciate.
Miss
Brown's
clarification,
you
know,
so
it's
not
necessarily
a
limiting
factor
and
we
could
I
guess
revisit
this
next
month,
and
so
it's
not
a
limiting
factor
in
that
way.
A
But
it's
so
you
know
if
people
want
to
take
some
time
and
think
about
it.
This
is
something
we
could
revisit.
You
know
I
guess
in
December
our
December
docket
when
it
comes
back
to
us,
but
I
guess
I
would
suggest
including
it
now.
A
C
If
what
you're
thinking
is
that
we
need
to
that
that
a
an
amendment
to
the
ordinance
needs
to
be
made
at
this
time,
then
not
doing
an
RTA,
the
the
not
including
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
ordinance
in
the
RTA
in
in
November,
would
preclude
the
board
from
considering
such
an
amendment
in
December.
So,
yes,.
A
I
That's
that's
absolutely
correct
if,
if,
if
the
Planning
Commission
wanted
to
make
a
recommendation,
that
staff
pursue
a
zoning
orange
amendment
to
allow
for
more
flexibility
in
the
s3a
district,
that's
that's
something
we
would
need
to
take
back
and
you
know
consider
how
to
respond.
So
I
think
that's
certainly
discussion.
That
could
happen
next
month
when
we
bring
forward
the
request
for
a
recommendation
on
the
on
the
rezoning
itself.
I
If
that's
discussion
you
wanted
to
have-
and
if
there
was
you
know
a
recommendation
you
wanted
to
make
next
month
that
that
could
inform
you
know
that
could
be
accounted
for
in
our
final
staff
report
to
the
board
where
we're
requesting
action
on
the
rezoning,
as
well
as
the
club
Amendment.
Thank.
A
C
Commissioner,
schroll
I
want
to
give
you
some
time
to
think
about
what
you
want
to
suggest.
I
want
to
go,
commissioner
Hughes,
with
actually
with
a
request
sort
of
to
give
us
I'm.
Sorry,
well,
just
to
give
us
a
little
bit
more
background.
C
I
think
that
that
you're,
talking
about
some
history
on
this
issue,
that
that
predates
I,
think
me
and
probably
most
of
the
members
of
the
commission,
and
so
maybe
maybe
I,
ask
you
to
give
a
minute
to
sort
of
organize
a
little
bit
of
background
in
explaining
your
concerns,
and
then
we
go
to
design
or
we
go
to
to
the
next
thing.
Yeah.
Thank
you
for
considering
the
request,
commissioner
Hughes.
C
Now
that
I've
effectively
kicked
them
out,
I
I
want
to
go
I,
guess
to
design
and
we
can
put
a
pin
in
any
other.
C
Did
you
have
anything
else
on
the
zoning
issue
with
commissioner
Sally?
Okay,
unless
anyone
disagrees,
I
think
we
can
put
a
pin
in
the
design
issues
and
and
or
in
the
zoning
issues
and
and
commissioner
gearen,
you
can
maybe
reiterate
your
question
about
the
design
issues,
and
then
we
can
hear
from
his
chattering.
F
F
My
question
had
to
do
with
how
a
user
might
access
that
yeah
that
sure
the
one
on
the
bottom
there
is
fine,
so
it
looks
like
there's
more
than
one
place
to
cross
11th
Street
to
access
the
North
Parcel
from
the
south
parcel
and
so
on.
What
kind
of
traffic
do
we
see
on
the
11th
Street.
E
Thank
you,
commissioner
Kieran.
So
we
have
a
DPR
on
the
line
and
in
terms
of
design
questions
they
are
available
to
answer
your
question.
K
Good
evening
planning
Commissioners,
my
name
is
Max
Ebert
I
am
an
associate
planner
with
the
Department
of
Parks
and
Recreation
and
the
project
manager.
For
this.
To
answer
your
question
about
the
inclusion
of
kind
of
like
this
park,
spanning
both
spanning
11th
Street,
South,
I
love.
Your
inclination
that
you
mentioned
earlier
is
correct.
That
11th,
Street
South
is
only
really
used
to
access
the
interior
buildings
within
this
space.
K
It's
not
a
through
Street
and
wouldn't
receive
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
traffic
in
order
to
kind
of
accommodate
this
we've
coordinated
with
the
Des
and
traffic
and
traffic
explainers
and
transportation
planners
and
Traffic
Engineers
to
incorporate
a
raised
crosswalk
into
the
design
of
the
pro
of
the
park.
K
So
it
would
create
not
only
like
a
visual
connection
between
the
what
what
we,
what
is
called
the
the
North
Parcel
in
the
South
parcel,
but
also
a
physical
connection
as
well,
and
it
would
serve
to
slow
traffic
down
when
coming
to
that
that
connection
point,
that
would
see
the
most
interactions
between
vehicles
and
pedestrians.
H
Yes,
thank
you.
I
also
agree.
The
park
looks
very
nice.
This
may
be
a
question
for
parks
and
rec
staff,
but
I
was
interested
to
know
about
how
this
park
supports
the
green
ribbon.
The
green
ribbon
is
a
signature
feature
of
Pentagon
City
per
the
Pentagon
City
plan
and
looking
at
the
Pentagon
City
plan,
it
does
look
like
this
park
was
supposed
to
support
it
in
possibly
a
couple
different
places.
K
I
can
I
can
take
this
one
as
well.
So
this
this,
when,
when
the
Pentagon
City
plan
was
kind
of
in
its
Inception
phase
and
and
going
through
the
process
of
for
review,
we
made
sure
to
include
this
park
as
part
of
the
the
green
ribbon
when,
when
considering
how
all
the
different
green
spaces
interact
throughout
the
the
neighborhood
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
how
it
connects
to
other
green
spaces
within
the
the
area.
But
I
would
be
happy
to
follow
up
with
the
project
managers.
K
For
for
that,
so
that
we
can
have
a
comprehensive
kind
of
look
at
the
way
that
this
Future
Park
will
interact
with
the
other
existing
and
future
green
spaces
in
the
area.
And
then
that
can
be
included
in
the
report
as
well.
H
Great
and
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
to
say,
I'm
looking
at
the
Pentagon
City
plan,
I,
don't
know
what
page
this
is
page,
93,
I
think
which
shows
a
map
of
kind
of
this
park
as
it
relates
to
the
green
ribbon,
and
there
was
like
a
preferred
placement
and
a
flexible
placement.
So
I
just
was
kind
of
wondering
if
we
kind
of
decided
on
what
the
placement
would
be
and
how
it
might
be
signed.
H
C
Thank
you,
Professor
Peterson,
anything
else
on
design
issues.
Commissioner
Sally.
G
I
have
a
quick
comment
on
the
design.
I
was
comparing
the
design
with
the
pen,
Place
landscape
plan
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
in
some
of
your
illustrations,
you
include
some
of
the
proposed
landscape
plan.
Just
so,
we
understand
a
little
bit
more
of
the
context.
It
seems
like
you're,
responding
It's
seems
like
you're,
responding
to
the
landscape
plan
of
the
pen
place
across
the
street,
but
right
now,
I
think
you
know,
given
that
the
Helix
is
going
to
be
literally
right
across
the
street.
K
Yeah
we
can,
we
can
be
sure
to
kind
of
incorporate
that
as
we're
finalizing
our
our
designs
as
we
approach
permitting
one.
One
thing
that
I
will
mention
is
that
the
the
kind
of
central
very
large
tree
is
an
existing
cottonwood
tree.
That's
one
of
the
the
older
ones
in
the
one
of
the
oldest
trees
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
and
while
it
it
is
mostly
a
happy
accident.
K
We
did
consider
the
the
preservation
of
that
tree
as
a
kind
of
foreground
of
the
Helix
when,
when
perceived
from
from
this
park,
and
and
felt
that
it
added
to
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
wanted
to
preserve
that
tree.
C
Thank
you
last
call
on
design
related
questions.
The
last
category,
I
guess
was
map.
I.
Think
that
that
was
commissioner
Hughes,
who
I'm
gonna
go
fetch
so
we'll
take
two
or
three
minutes.
C
Well,
for
my
colleagues,
while
the
commissioner
Hughes
and
commissioner
should
all
come
back
just
you
know,
because
they
were
on
the
Planning
Commission
in
2015,
when
I
think
that
when
the
the
the
the
teardrop
parcel
was
no
longer
going
to
be
used
for
streetcar
maintenance
right,
the
plans
got
then
adopted.
B
B
Did
you
want
us?
You
had
originally
asked
for
a
background.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
appropriate,
but
if
that's
what
you'd
like
I
mean
we
can
do
that.
But
commissioner
and
I
are
prepared
to
make
a
motion
this
evening.
Commercial
may
have
more
to
add
if
you
like
what.
B
C
A
This,
which
is
that
I,
think
we
should
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
and
then
we
can
get
into
debates
about
so
I,
don't
I
know
we
were
out
of
the
room.
I,
don't
know.
If
you
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
Moving
the
okay
I
would
say
suggest
that
you
know
somebody
moved
that
and
then
we
can
discuss
what
else
we're
doing.
If
anything
so
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
I,
don't
know.
If
commissioner
I'll
I'll
here
Patel
can
move
it
here.
I
got
off
the
motion.
B
B
Thank
you
I
think
you
said
so
we're
asking
to
Move
It
from
High
office
apartment
hotel
to
public,
but
in
both
Maps
we're
keeping
the
color
blue,
but
we're
not
putting
the
green,
which
is
public
versus
the
hashtagging,
which
is
public
ownership
and
yeah
I've
been
around
seven
years,
so
I
see
Miss,
Brown
being
like
yeah
I.
What
am
I
missing
here,
because
I'm
obviously
missing
something
that
is
obvious
to
everybody
else,
but
it's
being
lost
on
me.
E
Sure,
thank
you.
So
the
club
RTA
map,
that's
included
in
the
PC
report,
has
been
updated
and
is
reflected
on
this
slide.
That
shows
the
hatching
of
the
public
ownership,
so
that
has
been
updated,
and
so
it
will
be
green
for
for
the
December
report.
Just
for
your
awareness,
but
since
this
is
a
request
for
advertisement,
it
is
currently
blue
and
hatched,
and
so
the
PC
report
does
not
have
the
most
updated
Club
map.
So.
I
I
Yeah
we're
just
indicating
the
area
where
the
change
would
be
made
and
you're
right.
There
is
two
there's
two
things
going
on:
there's
the
public
ownership
crosshatch,
which
is
very
faint,
but
you
can
see
it
here
on
the
map
that
indicates
that
we,
the
county,
owns
this
property
and
then
on
top
of
that,
what
the
requested
change
is
in
the
designation
is
actually
to
public,
which
would
be
shown
as
green.
So
if
the
board
approves
the
amendment
I.
B
Guess
I
have
two
questions
and
I
apologize,
Miss
Brown.
Are
we
making
the
change
to
put
the
public
ownership
hatches
on
it
as
though
we
we've
already
so
like
if
I
were
to
pull
the
map
today,
the
public
ownership
hatch?
Is
there
because
we
bought
it?
Is
that
also
like
true,
for
example,
like
at
the
old
SunTrust
Bank
on
Columbia
Pike.
I
We
we
make
those,
we
apply,
the
public
ownership
crosshatch
as
an
administrative
update
when
the
county
acquires
property.
So
we
do
that.
That
does
not
require
a
formal,
General
news
plan.
Amendment,
it's
it's
something,
it's
just
part
of
our
tracking
mechanism.
So
actually,
if
you
did
look
at
the
map
tonight,
you
would
notice
it
does
not
have
the
cross
hatch
because
it
has
not.
It
had
not
been
caught,
but
it
is
something
that
we
will
be
applying
moving
forward
and.
B
The
SunTrust
Bank
too,
make
sure
that
one's
got
it
on
it
too.
All
right
thanks,
I,
love,
learning,
new
things,
thank
you
staff,
and
thanks
for
aligning
that.
Commissioner,
thank
you
for
reminding
me.
That's
the
map,
as
is
not
the
one
that
we
will
create,
so
not
very
good.
Commissioner
Joel,
commissioner
Patel.
L
So
I
moved
as
a
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
County
Board
adopt
the
attached
resolution
to
authorized
advertisement
of
public
hearings
by
the
Planning
Commission
on
December
5th
2022
and
County
Board
on
December
17
2022,
to
consider
an
amendment
to
the
general
General
land
use
plan
from
high
occupancy
apartment
hotel
to
public
for
the
new
park
located
at
the
Northwestern
corner
of
the
area
bounded
by
Army
Navy
Drive,
12th,
Street,
South
and
South
East
Street,
which
is
attachment
a
second
okay.
Go
with
your
conversation
that.
C
Is
moved
by
commissioner
Patel
seconded
by
commissioner
schroll,
commissioner
schroll
I'll
call
on
you,
then
for
conversation
and
perhaps
an
initial
Amendment.
A
Well,
commissioner,
Hughes
did
you
want
to
move
it
since
all
right,
fair
enough,
all
right,
I
move
that
the
following
Amendment,
whereas
the
majority
of
parks
in
Arlington
County
are
zoned
s3a
and
whereas
PS
is
a
district
most
appropriate
for
intense
public
uses,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
A
The
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
County
Board
directs
staff
to
prepare
a
zoning
ordinance
Amendment
to
allow
modifications
to
setbacks
by
the
County
Board
within
the
s-3a
zoning
District
to
be
considered
concurrently
with
a
glup
and
rezoning
of
the
teardrop
parcel
I
think
second
I
did
circulate
this
and
I
did
send
this
to
Ms
Johnson.
So
if
we
have
questions
about
the
language,
we
can
pull
it
up.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
I
mean
I
think
as
as
both
commissioner
Hughes
and
I
kind
of
asked
staff
during
discussion.
A
S3A
is
the
more
appropriate
zoning
category
for
public
parks
in
the
county.
Only
a
few
parks
are
not
zones,
s3a
and
so
kind
of
the
only
issue
really
is
the
setback
issue.
It's
not
the
height
issue.
We
do
know
that
there's
height
concerns
in
the
county
and
have
been
expressed
with
other
Parks,
so
we're
not
recommending
that
the
county
staff
take
on
the
hate
issue.
That's
not
before
us
really
this
evening.
It's
not
a
matter
of
concern.
A
We
I
think
commissioner
Hughes
and
myself
I
think
think
that
that
you
know
there
should
be
some
consistency
in
the
zoning
categories
and
that
you
know
this
would
allow
the
modification
to
the
zoning
to
allow
the
flexibility
that
that
is
needed
here.
It
might
be
needed
elsewhere
as
well,
so
that
that's
the
rationale
for
it.
I,
don't
know.
If
commissioner
Hughes
has
anything
he'd
like
to
add.
B
H
So,
just
to
make
sure
I
understand
the
amendment.
We
are
saying
that
there
we'd
be
modifying
the
setbacks
for
all
s:
Three
A's,
not
just
this
particular
project.
A
So
it's
it's
not
modifying
the
other
setbacks.
It's
allowing
the
County
Board
the
ability
to
modify
s3a
just
like
they
have.
The
ability
to
you
know,
modify
parking
in
other
zones
and
downward
deviation
from
a
one
to
one.
They
would
have
an
ability
here
to
modify
a
setback.
You
know,
maybe
it's
15
feet
or
something
they
would
be
allowed
to.
Allow
something.
Maybe
10
10
feet
from
a
lot
line.
H
So
would
this
amendment
delay
the
ability
to
I
mean?
Does
this
require
a
study,
or
can
this
just
be
done
pretty
easily
I,
just
don't
want
to
delay
the
ability
to
safely
install
lights
at
this
particular
Park,
which
then
impacts
the
safety
of
Park
residents,
who
often
women
tend
to
be
more
concerned
with
that
in
general?
Yes,.
A
So
I
mean
I
think
one
of
the
reasons
we
would
want
to
do
this
now
at
the
RTA
I
recommend
it
now
is
that
there's
less
of
a
chance
of
a
delay.
You
know
staff
has
done
this
I
think
some
thinking
on
modifications
to
s3a
previously
and
and
they're.
So
there's
some
staff
work.
That's
already
happened,
I
don't
know
if
it's
necessarily
on
the
exact
same
issues
that
were
here
tonight,
but
staff's
done.
A
Some
thinking
previously
on
modifications
to
s3a
I
mean
we
could
speak
to
Ms
brown,
maybe
about
about
delays
here,
but
I
think
your
previous
answer.
Miss
Brown
was
that
staff
would
have
to
do
some
thinking
about
whatever
we
proposed
and
come
back
to
us
in
December
about
the
implications
of
that.
But.
I
Well,
I
mean
I.
Usually
when
we
decide
to
undertake
a
zoning
orange
Amendment,
you
know
we
have
to
consider
certainly
an
amount
of
time
to
evaluate
you
know
what
the
proposal
would
entail.
You
know
what
potential
unintended
consequences
might
be.
You
know,
what
exactly
were
you
know
proposing
in
terms
of
an
ability
for
modification,
for
example,
are
we
talking
about
allowing
modifications
for
street
lights?
Are
we
allowing
modifications
for
park
benches?
How
tall
you
know?
Would
we
be
willing
to
consider
modifications?
I
You
know
these
are
all
the
types
of
questions
that
would
go
into
scoping.
A
zoning
Awards
amendment
We'd
have
to
consider
what
sort
of
community
engagement
process
would
be
needed.
Consultation
with
other
commissions
I
know
that
this
is,
you
know,
frustrating
to
hear,
but
zoning
orange
amendments
are
not
something
that
we
typically
you
know
can
commit
to
in
in
less
than
you
know,
a
four
to
six
month,
time
frame,
there's
a
request
to
advertise
for
zoning
orange
amendments
as
well
as
the
you
know.
I
If,
if
the
zoning
Awards
amendment
is
advertised,
then
you
know
action
happens
the
next
month.
So
certainly
you
know
if,
if
we
were
to
undertake
a
zoning
orange
amendment
to
enable
a
modification
in
in
this
case,
just
as
a
you
know,
a
hypothetical
scenario,
there
would
be
a
delay
in
the
ability
for
the
park
to
move
to
get
their
permits
for
construction
and
that
that
is
part
of
the
you
know.
We
are
working
within
dpr's
timeline
for
trying
to
commence
construction
on
this
park.
I
I
think
another
consideration
is
that
you
know
I
think
what
the
Planning
Commission
has
expressed.
Interest
in
would
be
a
modification
process
through
use
permit
review,
so
that
would
really
move
this
park.
Out
of
you
know
a
buy
right
process,
which
is
what
we're
really
seeking
to
facilitate
and
support
through
the
PS
zoning
District.
It
would
be
a
park
in
an
area
envisioned
as
a
you
know,
a
public
area
on
the
general
land
use
plan
and
able
to
be
constructed
through
a
buy
right
process.
I
You
know
if
there
were
ever
changes
needed
for
the
park,
it
could
be
considered
through
a
buy
right.
You
know
it.
Changes
could
be
considered
administratively.
So,
even
if
we
move
forward
with
the
zoning
orange
Amendment,
we
would
be
then
pushing
the
park
review
into
a
use
permit
process
further,
delaying
the
the
construction.
I
You
know,
I'll
just
also
I
I,
if
you
don't
mind,
take
the
opportunity
to
let
you
know
that
we
did
consider.
You
know
some
of
the
concerns
with
the
PS
zoning
District.
We
articulated
these
in
the
staff
report,
but
just
to
say
that
again,
here
again,
you
know
the
one
of
the
the
biggest
concerns
or
the
ways
that
the
the
PS
learning
district
is
typically
used
is
to
allow,
for
you
know,
buildings.
I
You
know
large
buildings
and-
and
we
understand
that
that's
you
know
not
something-
that's
needed
for
this
site,
something
that
you
know.
We
certainly
considered
that
there
isn't
a
great
deal
of
available
density
on
this
site.
There's
also
a
restrictive
covenant
for
this
particular
site
in
which
only
Recreation
uses
open
space
and
Public
Access
can
be
permitted
on
this
site.
So
I
certainly
I
understand
you
know
county-wide.
This
is
a
need
there.
I
There
is
a
need
to
look
at
our
public
zoning
districts
and
reconcile
them
with
you
know
what
what
the
county
needs
are,
but
for
this
particular
site
we
believe
that
you
know
the
PS
zoning
district
is
is
appropriate
and,
with
the
other,
you
know,
planning,
considering
operations
available
density
and
such
we
think
that
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
you
might
have
for
other
locations
are
mitigated.
C
J
Yeah
I
actually
have
a
question
for
Commissioners
schrollen
Hughes.
Is
my
memory
correct
that
this
our
frustration
with
the
s3a
goes
back
a
while
that
this
has
come
up
in
other
sites
where
we
were
having
this
almost
the
same
discussion?
J
A
Correct
so
we
had
his,
it
was
it's
similar
but
different.
So
we
had
a
discussion
about
this
with
respect
to
one
of
the
recent
school
project.
Recent
and
put
in
any
air
quotes.
I
think
it
was
like
five
or
six
years
ago,
a
discussion
of
a
school
project
where
we
needed
additional
height
and
staff
was
considering
modifying
s3a
to
allow
for
that.
There
was
a
fair
amount
of
pushback
in
the
community.
A
With
regard
to
the
speed
with
which
the
zoning
ordinance
amendments
were
being
considered
because
there
was,
they
were
going
to
be
applied
additional
height
outside
of
just
schools,
and
it
was
going
to
be
writ
large
across
s3a,
so
the
zoning
ordinance
Amendment
just
went
through
for
additional
hype
for
schools
and
not
for
other
public
buildings
in
s3a,
so
we
will
run
into
that
if
it's
a
public
park
that
wants
lights
and
it's
not
associated
with
a
school,
this
is
sort
of
what
you
know
we
run
into
other
other
places,
and
so
those
amendments,
as
far
as
I
know,
are
sort
of
have
been
placed
in
the
back
burner.
B
I
think
we
also
had
a
Jenny
Dean
Park,
which
is
again
the
reason
why
I
went
to
the
PS
District
in
the
case
of
the
PS
District
of
changing
park.
It
makes
a
little
bit,
I
mean
a
very
little
bit
of
sense
and
I
mean
that
very
generously
to
staff
that
it
makes
a
little
bit
just
the
tiniest
at
Jenny
Dean.
But
I
will
again.
This
gets
to
my
overarching
point.
This
has
been
an
issue
we
have
kicked
on
the
can
for
almost
seven
years.
B
We
gotta
solve
this
thing
and
I'm
just
going
to
point
out
to
staff
Long
Bridge,
Jenny
Dean
and
the
teardrop
all
have
only
one
thing
in
common,
besides
PS,
which
is
their
but
all
three
located
south
of
Arlington
Boulevard
I'm,
letting
you
know
that
right
now
and
it's
public
because
we
have
got
to
solve
the
s3a
conundrum
of
what
is
allowed.
Where
is
it
allowed
and
how
is
it
shown
across
this
entire
County?
B
So
we
we
can
dance
around
the
subject,
but
the
subject
does
need
to
be
addressed
and
the
longer
we
pretend
that
it
somehow
can
be
solved
by
making
it
the
intense
use
that
is
PS,
which
is
used
primarily
for
lot
yards,
which,
if
we
wanted
to
make
something
a
bus
yard
somewhere
we'd
have
to
rezone
it
to
a
PS,
not
an
s3a
or
other
intense
uses.
These
are
what
this
is.
What
PS
signals
to
the
community?
A
wastewater
treatment
facility,
industrial
yard,
for
all
the
materials
we
need
for
running
the
county?
B
That's
what
PS
means!
That's
where
we
use
it.
Yes,
we
use
it
at
Long
Bridge.
Yes,
we
use
it
at
Jenny
Dean,
which
was
so
we
need
to
solve
this,
and
commissioner,
has
put
forward
the
most
balanced
and
I
believe
minimal
change.
That
is
certainly
should
be
supportable
and
it
doesn't,
as
Commissioners
say,
address
the
height
question,
which
again
we
leave
for
yet
another
day.
I'm.
J
Gonna
yeah
I
just
want
to
follow
up.
Thank
you.
So
I
was
correct
on
that.
So,
yes,
I
I,
do
support
the
idea
of
changing
addressing
s3a.
It's
been
way
too
long.
It
needs
to
be
done.
I
don't
want
to
delay
the
development
of
this
park,
for
this
I
think
that
the
park
is
sorely
needed.
It's
been
promised
a
long
time.
J
The
demand
is
there.
Getting
it
done
now,
as
Penn
place
is
developing,
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So
I
will
only
favor
this
if
we
can
go
ahead
and
get
the
park
built
now,
even
if
it
means
just
taking
a
deep
breath
and
going
okay,
fine,
we'll
go
with
with
with
the
other
zoning
District,
but
it
should
be
part
of
make
it
very
clear.
We
do
want
s3a
addressed.
C
Commissioner
Hughes
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
you
and
then
commissioner
Steinberger
is
on
the
line
with
the
questions.
Sorry.
B
Commissioner,
it
doesn't
in
my
mind
at
this
stage,
delay
it.
It
doesn't
change
whether
staff
can
come
back
next
month
and
still
propose
the
PS
District.
If
they
say
you
know
it's
impossible
for
us
to
add
the
three
sentences
or
one
sentence
that
it
requires
inside
the
zoning
ordinance
to
allow
for
the
modification
by
the
County
Board
of
setbacks.
Nothing
precludes
that
by
supporting
it
at
this
stage
to
say,
the
intention
of
the
commission
should
be
that
this
park
should
be
s3a,
because
that's
the
zoning
category
of
nearly
every
Park
in
all
of
Arlington.
M
I
I
I
K
Good
good
evening,
everyone
so
as
far
as
the
timeline
for
the
park
goes,
we're
we're
really
targeting
a
going
to
the
board
for
bid
contract
in
January,
which
would
allow
us
to
start
construction
in
in
March
and
any
any
delay,
and
these
approvals
would
then
delay
when
we
can
get
our
permits
approved,
which
would
then
have
a
subsequent
delay
of
when
we
can
do
go
out
to
bid
for
construction.
K
C
Thank
you,
Mr
Robert,.
C
Okay,
any
other
concerns
on
this
issue,
I'm
going
to
call
on
myself
quickly
before
we
go
on
the
roll
just
to
say
that
I,
commissioner
Hughes,
the
the
reason
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
support
this
is,
is
your
a
practicality
and
awareness
that
that
staff
is
is
in
a
has
the
Liberty
to
come
back
and
and
say
that
it's
simply
not
feasible
to
do
this
study
in
in
this
amount
of
time,
because
I'll
I'll,
you
know,
I
just
reassert
what
I
said
to
commissioner
schroll
a
month
ago,
which
is
that
the
the
appropriate
time
to
weigh
in
the
best
time
to
weigh
in
on
the
staff's
work
plan
is,
is
when
we
meet
with
staff
to
talk
through
the
work
plan
and
I
I
see
this
as
fundamentally
asking
the
board
to
direct
staff
to
to
add
an
item
to
to
re-prioritize
an
item.
C
That's
on
the
work
plan
and
we
we
could
also
just
wait
three
months
to
have
that
conversation
with
them
then,
but
but
since
that's
probably
how
things
will
transpire
I,
I
I
think
that
I
share
commissioner,
tell
me's
sensibilities
with
respect
to
this
motion.
So
for
what
it's
worth?
Thank
you.
C
Then,
it's
just
one
more
time.
If
anyone
else
has
anything
I'm
not
seeing
any
hands,
I'm
just
gonna
go
down.
The
roll
studying
can.
M
C
C
A
You
that's,
whereas
the
majority
of
parks
in
Arlington
County
are
zoned
s3a
and
whereas
PS
is
a
district
most
appropriate
for
intense
public
uses,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
The
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
County
Board
direct
staff
to
prepare
a
zoning
ordinance
Amendment
to
allow
modifications
to
setbacks
by
the
County
Board
within
the
s3a
zoning
District
to
be
considered
concurrently
with
the
glup
and
rezoning
of
the
teardrop
parcel.
F
F
J
H
C
Commissioner
sarley
hi
Commissioners
roll
aye,
commissioner
Steinberger
chair
votes,
I
motion
carries
ten
to
zero.
Are
there
any
other
emotions.
A
C
That
brings
us
then,
to
the
main
motion.
If
there
are
no
other
emotions
remembrance
on
the
floor
as
amended.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Begley.
B
C
Hughes
aye,
commissioner,
would
tell
me
aye,
commissioner
Patel
aye,
commissioner
Peterson
aye,
commissioner
sarley
aye,
commissioner
schroll
aye,
commissioner
Steinberger
hi
chair
votes.
I.
Is
there
anyone
that
I
failed
to
call
on
the
motion
passes
unanimously?
That's
same
people
tend
to
zero.
C
C
Yes,
so
thank
you
again
to
to
staff
for
this
for
the
proposal
we
are
going
to
go
through
PC
business.
Let
me
first
ask
whether
or
not
Mr
Pfeiffer.
If
there's
any
staff
report
items
that
you
want
to
give
I'll
start
with
you
thank.
B
You
Mr
chairman
no
staff
report
this
month.
Okay,.
C
I
am
next,
then,
going
to
go
I.
Think,
commissioner
Peterson,
let
me
start
with
you
for
sprc.
H
Sure,
thank
you.
I
sent
you
all
an
update
with
our
sprc
projects
that
we're
working
on.
We
have
11
active
projects
and
two
to
four
more,
which
are
preliminary
and
could
be
active
at
any
moment.
So
I
appreciate
everybody's
support
in
Sharing
projects
currently
or
in
the
near
future.
When
I
call
you
and
beg
you
to
take
a
project.
So
thank
you
all.
H
We
have
four
rosters
to
either
adopt
or
amend
this
evening,
so
Ms
Johnson.
Can
you
pull
up
the
roster
for
Americana?
Please.
H
Okay,
so
colleagues,
please
have
a
look
at
the
proposed
sprc
subgroup
roster
for
the
Americana
project.
I
ask
for
your
unanimous
consent
in
approving
this
roster.
H
Okay,
so
chair
am
I
allowed
to
say
the
roster
is
approved
or
do
you
have
to
well.
H
Perfect,
thank
you
very
much
and
now
colleagues
I
ask
for
your
Ms
Johnson.
Can
you
pull
up
the
amended
roster
for
Bingham
Center
Silver
Diner.
H
So
colleagues
I
ask
for
your
unanimous
consent
to
amend
the
previously
adopted
roster
for
Bingham
Silver
Diner.
You
can
see
the
changes
in
yellow,
highlight
so
unanimous
consent
to
approve
this
amended
roster.
C
This
is
Bingham
Center
without
objection.
Amendment
is
adopted.
H
H
And
we
got
that
is
that
halt
Boston
holiday
and
I
don't
know?
Is
it
4
600
Fairfax?
They
plan
yeah
colleagues
I
ask
for
your
unanimous
consent
to
amend
the
previously
adopted
roster
for
Boston
Holiday
Inn.
By
noting
the
changes
highlighted
in
yellow.
C
Without
objection,
the
roster
is
adopted,
I
will
Mr
Pfeiffer
note
that
I
believe
that
there
may
be
a
typo
on
Melissa
reggio's,
either
name
or
email
address.
If
there's
any
consistency
there
I
don't
see
that
as
an
issue
for
the
roster.
It's
just
a
technical
issue.
J
B
Commissioner,
Peterson
Ballston
Holiday
Inn
is
also
known
as
4600
Fairfax
Drive.
So
yes,
this
is
the
correct
one
for.
H
Can
I
propose
an
amendment
right
now
that
we
update
the
Boston
holiday
in
roster
to
acknowledge
that
shouldn't,
say
lrpc,
chair,
I
should
say
and.
B
H
C
Thank
you
with
that
objection,
commissioner.
Hughes
not
being
recognized
by
the
chair.
The
roster
is,
is
updated.
C
The
that
they're
swapped.
C
Thank
you,
commissioner
Peterson.
Let's
do
long
range
planning
committee,
commissioner,
might
tell
me.
J
Sure,
first,
coming
up
on
November
9th
next
week
is
missing
middle
phase.
Three,
please
do
start
letting
us
know
who
will
be
attending
in
person.
There
is
not
a
roster
for
this.
J
November
14th
had
been
the
scheduled
lrpc
for
2500
Wilson
Boulevard.
That
would
be
a
special
Club
study
tier
one,
but
that
has
been
postponed
at
the
request
of
the
applicant.
We
do
not
have
a
date
for
that
yet,
but,
as
you'll
see
in
a
moment,
we
will
go
ahead
with
the
roster
anyway,
in
anticipation
of
that
being
scheduled.
J
C
L
J
That's
the
one
I
I
asked
unanimous
consent
to
adopt
the
roster
for
the
2500
Wilson
Boulevard
special
Club
study,
laughs.
J
You,
madam
clerk,
can
you
pull
up
the
roster
for
the
sunrise
tier
two
lrpc?
J
Thank
you.
I
ask
unanimous
consent
to
adopt
the
roster
for
the
2000
North
Glebe
Road,
Sunrise
lrpc.
J
C
I
am
going
to
go
to
commissioner
sarley
for
zoko
Because.
Unless,
unless
you
want
to
speak
up,
you
know,
I
want
I,
want
you
to
save
your
voice.
Commissioner
Sally.
G
So
I
think
you
might
have
heard
there's
a
few
scheduling
issues
afoot.
The
we
have
zoko
coming
on
the
latter
half
of
the
lrpc
meeting
on
the
9th
and
it's
the
same
topic
it'll
just
be
a
continuation
of
the
missing
middle
conversation.
Right
now
we
have
11
to
16th
or
11th
16th
November
16th.
As
the
second
meeting
and
I
forget
the
third
meeting.
J
C
That's
exactly
the
issue.
You'll
you'll
recall
that
that
commissioner
Patel
sent
the
email
to
the
commission
with
the
initial
dates
and
and
Nick
Rogers
almost
immediately
replied
all
or
maybe
it
was
Mr
fusarelli
saying
that
that
you
know,
staff
still
had
to
confirm
availability
of
some
nights.
C
G
And
We've
started
talking
about
some
December
agenda
items,
but
I
will
report
on
that
early
in
December.
F
G
December
13th
I
believe
we
initially
started
with
the
15th
if
I
recall,
correctly
and
I
think
we're
going
with
the
13th.
So
that
will
have
the
conversation
there
will
be
about
the.
C
There
is
a
meeting
scheduled
on
the
13th
topic
to
come
right.
Pfrc,
commission,
commissioner
Steinberger.
M
Nope
nope
I'm
apologies,
I
am
back
I
no
longer
on
mute,
no
real
update
at
this
point
in
time,
I
presented
to
the
school
board
with
regards
to
the
career
center
last
month,
they
will
be
making
a
decision
on
what
recommendation
they
want
to
move
forward
with
the
base
allocation
for
the
design
or
the
expanded,
and
at
that
point,
we'll
move
forward
with
some
additional
dates
for
the
next
steps
on
the
career
center,
I
believe
staff
indicated
there's
some
other
projects
kind
of
working
their
way
through
the
pipeline,
nothing
that
has
meetings
scheduled
yet
that
I'm,
aware
of
thank
you.
M
L
We're
looking
on
December
13th
for
a
proposed
Soco
meeting
on
the
second
phase
of
the
commercial
resiliency
initiative
work.
So
that's
going
to
look
at
enabling
colleges
or
universities
to
occupy
commercial
buildings
and
then
also
looking
at
similar
flexibility
for
the
suite
of
land
uses
that
were
the
heart
of
the
Columbia
Pike
form-based
Coke
ground
story
uses
study
from
last
year.
C
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
commissioner
Patel
commissioner
Hughes
area
working
group.
B
We
will
have
a
meeting
on
the
Bank
of
America
site
next
week
during
the
zoko
meeting,
so
with
the
farm
based
code
we'll
be
meeting
during
that
time
period,
and
the
only
other
thing
of
note
is
that
the
Barcroft
Apartments
Master
Financial
development
plan
was
submitted
and
is
available
on
the
County
website.
For
those
who
are
curious
and
interested
to
review
the
about
40,
some
page
document
on
the
future
of
what
will
become
the
Barcroft
Department's
Redevelopment
plan.
C
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Hughes
I
believe
that
that
is
the
end
of
our
committee
reports
going
to
then
direct
people's
attention
to
the
circulated
draft
minutes
of
the
October
3
Planning
Commission
meeting.
C
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I
would
entertain
unanimous
cons.
I
would
seek
unanimous
consent
to
adopt
the
minutes
of
the
October
3rd
meeting
without
objection.
The
amendments
are
adopted.
J
Completely,
no,
commissioner,
tell
me,
as
you
know,
my
entire
term
as
chair
was
virtual,
so
I
there
are
things
you
didn't
see.
J
I
did
get
a
proper
swirl
of
order
and,
of
course,
our
president
parliamentarian
will
not
be
with
us
forever.
So
I
felt
it
was
prudent
that
the
Planning
Commission
have
an
official
copy
of
Robert's
rules.
J
I
am
passing
this
on
to
the
current
chair
with
the
idea
that
he
will
keep
it
until
it's
time
to
move
on
to
the
next
chair,
that
is,
the
official
Planning
Commission
copy
of
it.
So
thank
you
for
the
rest
of
your
term,
chair,
Weir
I'm
already
in
there
yeah
thank.
C
You
we've
got
it's
it's.
It's
there's
no
way
to
show
this
to
to
Sarah,
but
not
unlike
the
Stanley
Cup.
It
has
a
list
of
the
names
of
past
chairs,
or
you
know,
past
and
current
chair
of
the
of
the
commission.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
C
I
want
to
tell
me
any
other
new
business
before
we
adjourn,
then
I
will
just
say
thank
you
again
to
staff
applicants,
not
not
this
week,
members
of
the
public
not
this
week,
but
but
especially
to
staff
for
consideration
time
and
patience.
This
evening.
The
items
heard
this
evening
are
expected
to
go
to
the
County
Board
on
November,
12th
or
November
15th
this
month,
commissioner
schroll
will
be
representing
the
commission
at
the
board.
Again
many
staff
labor
to
make
this
hybrid
meeting
run
smoothly.