►
From YouTube: FY 2020 Budget Work Session - Wrap Up 1
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
With
that,
we
can
begin
our
very
intimate
final
wrap-up
work
session.
We've
got
members,
d4
aunty,
vice-chair
Garvey
and
share
dorsey
attending
in
person.
Member
guts
all
is
on
the
phone,
and
we've
got
a
wonderful
but
wonderfully
small,
but
committed
crowd
of
onlookers
in
the
audience,
and
probably
many
at
home.
D
This
work
session
is
intended
to
a
go
over
any
wrap-up
conversations
and
questions
that
our
board
members
may
have
as
we
complete
the
budget
process,
and
this
is
the
time
to
surface
any
requests
for
information
that
you'll
be
needing
to
make
some
decisions
for
the
budget
which
we
intend
to
do
on
tuesday
of
next
week.
We
also
have
our
first
opportunity
to
hear
from
our
fiscal
affairs
Advisory
Commission,
which
will
walk
us
through
its
review
of
certain
departmental
areas
and
programmatic
functions,
as
well
as
an
overview
of
their
comments
on
the
budget
as
a
whole.
D
E
I'll
just
cut,
there
are
a
few
things
I
had
on
my
list
of
items
to
cover,
and
so
we
don't
need
to
do
them
all
before.
The
fact
presentation,
but
one
thing
I
wanted
to
do,
was
to
a
subject
that
didn't
get
a
full
airing
during
the
Friday
work
session
with
the
school
board
was
a
description
of
how
much
of
that
half
cent
that
I
had
proposed.
As
part
of
my
budget.
We,
if
you
remember
I,
proposed
a
penny
and
a
half
increase.
E
F
Some
of
the
pieces
of
around
the
Halfpenny
to
the
on
the
county
side
was
3.9
million
dollars.
It
was
baked
into
the
managers
proposed
budget.
The
manager
recommended
funding
the
school
resource
officers,
which
totaled
almost
$700,000
of
that
Halfpenny
school
nurses
totaled
about
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
a
total
of
almost
nine
hundred
between
the
two,
which
is
about
almost
25
percent
of
the
of
the
Halfpenny
itself.
F
There
are
some
other
decisions
that
supported
schools
as
you're
aware:
the
support
for
aquatics
of
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Our
total
support
there
for
schools
with
with
that
programs
just
over
four
hundred
thousand.
In
addition
to
the
revenue
sharing
agreement,
you
advertised
fee
increases
for
schools
to
support
that
that
programming
on
their
side
and
all
toll
for
all
the
support
that
the
county
provides
to
schools
on
our
side
of
the
ledger,
not
included
in
the
revenue
sharing,
is
now
exceeding
ten
million
dollars.
F
D
G
G
F
G
E
E
We
have
arrangements
with
the
schools
where
we
provide
them
some
funds
to
take
care
of
some
of
the
grounds
and
fields
on
some
of
the
schools,
but
they
also
in
a
reciprocal
relationship,
help
us
and
some
other
situations.
So
you
know,
after
a
while,
we
we
we
can
get
into
some
real
tiny
little.
You
know
additions
and
we
don't
think
that's
really
significant
or
worth
it.
The
point
would
just
be
that
we
actually
we're
happy
to
support
the
schools
on
those
items.
D
And
thank
you
for
for
going
through
and
calculating
that
you
know
it's
an
important
part
of
the
public
conversation
when
we
talked
about
guidance
to
you,
mr.
Schwartz,
it
was
to
accommodate
for
the
growth
in
schools
in
terms
of
operating
new
programs,
but
you
know
almost
a
million
of
that
is
born
on
the
county
side
of
the
ledger,
in
addition
to
the
calculable
cost
that
ApS
had
with
operating
the
new
facilities.
D
H
Thank
you,
Thank
You,
chair,
Dorsey,
members
of
the
board,
it's
good
to
be
here.
This
is
the
first
time
that
I've
spoken
to
you,
all's,
chair
and
I
know.
You
mentioned
that
this
is
a
little
different
approach
for
a
fact.
Usually,
we've
come
to
the
specific
work
sessions
for
the
departments
and
provided
our
feedback,
and
we
had
a
conversation
amongst
the
Commission
and
felt
that
this
was
maybe
a
better
way
to
advise
you
all
so
we're
trying
it
out
this
year.
We
appreciate.
H
So
we
reviewed
for
kind
of
focus
areas
and
then
have
a
slide
on
additional
consideration:
C
PhD
economic
development
and
Amazon
kind
of
together
compensation,
Pago
maintenance
and
then
additional
considerations.
So
on
C
PhD,
we
recommended
by
an
11
to
1,
to
0
vote
that
the
county
board
adopt
the
manager's
proposed
budget
for
FY
2024
C
PhD
as
a
focus
for
future
considerations.
A
lot
of
interest
in
in
how
do
we
as
the
as
a
county,
respond
to
the
pending
arrival
of
Amazon?
H
H
H
H
G
C
C
Just
so
I
have
that
context,
not
because
I
mean
in
a
full
full
low
unemployment,
almost
no
unemployment,
no
structural
unemployment
economy,
I'm
fully
with
the
the
recommendation
here,
but
that
and
also
a
little
bit
on
the
defined
contribution
to
find
benefit
benefit
process.
Maybe
if
there's
the
appropriate
four
pages
of
context
for
next
year,
that'd
be
really
helpful
for
me
thanks.
H
And
then,
last
of
the
the
four
areas
we
reviewed
you
nana
for
the
manager's
proposed
budget
on
on
Pago
and
maintenance.
The
second
recommendation,
the
second
vote
on
this
reaffirming
us:
the
importance
of
continued
funding
for
maintenance
in
order
to
preserve
those
assets
and
and
reduce
future
financial
obligations.
H
And
then
just
some
final
additional
considerations
with
regard
to
the
school's
transfer
recommendation.
Fac
recommends
the
county
board
support
the
county
managers
proposed
transfer
to
Arlington
public
schools
and,
to
the
extent
possible,
finds
efficiencies
and
services
prioritize
and
supporting
populations
in
need
and
critically
evaluates
non
instructional
staffing
and
then
the
final
request,
based
on
kind
of
the
myriad
of
requests
that
came
in
from
the
community,
was
we
specifically
looked
at
the
doorways
funding
request
and
voted
unanimously
to
support
the
doorways
request
for
additional
funding
for
the
crisis
hotline,
and
that
concludes
the
presentation.
Okay,.
D
H
So
it
specifically
came
from
one
of
our
members
who
was
interested
in
reviewing
this
one,
in
particular
talking
about
the
the
success
the
doorways
has
had
and
taking
over
this
really
critical
need
within
the
community
and
recognizing
the
the
excellent
job
they've
done
and
and
responding
to
that
yeah
demand
all
right.
So
thank
you.
Any.
H
E
D
The
school's
proposed
budget,
so
this
is
all
based
on
the
managers
right
right
right,
thank
you,
and
even
though
you
didn't
have
a
chance
to
consider
it.
If,
if
there
is,
if
there
are
any
comments
and
we'll
take
them
strictly
as
comments
and
not
the
considered
opinion
of
the
wrath
of
the
fact,
just
we'd
welcome
hearing
any
thoughts
you
may
have,
but
don't
feel
obligated.
G
H
H
G
Mr.
guts,
all
there
yeah
just
let
it
go
all
right.
You
know,
I'll
just
keep
up
okay,
so
you
know
one
of
my
favorite
groups,
usually
cuz
I,
just
think
what
they
recommend
is
usually
so
worthwhile
is
the
CSB.
Did
you
discuss
any
of
those
at
all,
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
that
particular
came
up
at
all
or
you
know.
H
We
one
of
the
things
that
I've
been
conscious
of
is
coming
into
this
role.
As
fact,
chair
is
not
getting
kind
of
beyond
our
level
of
expertise
and
felt
without
I
mean
doorways.
We've
we've
opined
on
it
before
I,
believe
we
pile
pine
on
it
either
last
year.
The
year
before-
and
you
know,
I
didn't
really
want
to
just
you
know,
make
a
recommendation
on
something
that
we
didn't
really
have
the
full
information
on
it
and,
as
you
all
know,
the
budget
season
is
very,
very
fast
and
furious
and
and
I.
H
G
That
would
be
great,
I
mean
if
you
want
to.
Obviously
my
colleagues
I
can't
tell
you
alone
what
to
do.
I
mean
I
do
think
we
keep
hearing
from
you
know.
We
have
our
first
responders
here
and
they're
often
talking
about
the
issues
they
deal
with
with
mental
health.
It
shows
how
much
it's
wrapped
up
and
I
keep
sometimes
saying.
If
we
can
put
a
little
more
money
into
mental
health,
we
would
actually
save
money
on
the
other
end.
G
I,
don't
know
how
true
that
is,
but
that
would
be
an
interesting
thing
to
look
at,
but
I
appreciate
you
not
a
pining
on
something
hadn't
really
looked
at
and
then
I'll
just
put
on
my
my
former
school
board
hat
and
I
appreciate
the
suggestion
that
we
look
at
non
instructional
staff
on
the
school
side,
but
in
principle
we're
not
meant
to
do
just
so.
You
know
people
understand
it
in
principle.
It's
meant
to
be
a
school
board
that
works
on
that.
G
H
Something
the
membership
has
been,
maybe
not
something
that
in
particular,
but
finding
better,
better
ways
to
collaborate
with
the
schools,
especially.
We
now
have
a
member
on
FAC,
who
is
a
member
of
the
budget
advisory
committee
committee
and
so
trying
to
find
the
opportunities
to
work
together
and
kind
of
be
proactive
in
that
regard.
I.
G
G
C
Just
on
the
the
pay-go
and
the
maintenance
I
know
that
was
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
in
last
year's
budget
right
was
there
discussion
of
the
there's
a
we
sort
of
sought
to
make
a
significant
investment
to,
in
light
of
being
a
little
different,
more
difficult
or
different
budget
situation
last
year,
was
there
discussion
at
the
in
the
fact
about
the
pay-go
I
know,
I
know
you
sent
over
some
materials,
but
was
there
an
extensive
discussion
about
the
amount
that
was
provided
or
no?
It.
C
B
E
What
we
did
this
year,
which
I
think
is
the
right
thing
to
do-
is
we've
counted
bond
premium
for
the
bond
sale
in
June,
the
one
that
hasn't
happened
yet
so
that's
two
months
from
now,
and
that's
estimated
to
be
another
seven
million
dollars.
So
what
you
see
is
essentially
about
fourteen
and
a
half
million
dollars
of
infusion
of
bond
premium.
That
typically
wouldn't
have
been
part
of
the
equation.
Now
that's
good,
and
it
also,
but
it
comes
with
certain
limitations
that
money
is
one-time
money
that
has
to
be
spent
on
capital
items.
E
We
don't
have
any
flexibility
on
that.
Similarly,
the
schools
are
still
just
nothing
wrong
with
this.
They
are.
They
have
not
taken
the
enlightened
approach.
I
have
of
counting
the
bond
premium.
Coming
in
June,
so
that
will
actually
help
them
not
in
a
way
that
will
help
with
their
budget
cap,
but
will
help
them
with
their
capital
expenditures
as
they
move
into
the
CIP,
which
is
a
good
thing.
Okay,.
D
Mr.
Allen,
if
I
can
move
to
the
compensation
discussion,
chart
I,
don't
know
whether
or
not
this
report
is
gonna
live
anywhere
else
besides
this
meeting,
but
if
it
does
line
three
there's
a
typo
where
it
says
defined-contribution,
where
I
think
you
mean
defined-benefit
in
the
first
bullet,
but
substantively
to
the
extent
that
you
can
I'd
love
to
discuss
some
of
the
tension
that
existed
in
point
number.
D
D
H
H
I
think
where
that
stems
from
is,
is
I,
think
you
will
just
want
a
better
understanding.
The
methodology
behind
the
proposed
increase,
you
know
and
I
think
there's
just
the
desire
amongst
facta
to
maybe
have
a
better
understanding
of
how
do
we
get
to
3.25%?
And
you
know
what
is
the
rationale
behind
that
number?
H
So
I
think
it's
you
know
for
it's
our
oh.
This
is
a
kind
of
show.
Our
work
responds
if
you
go
and
I
think
you
know
shows
some
of
the
things
that
that
we're
thinking
of,
as
as
we
look
to
not
just
this
budget
season,
but
but
next
year
as
well.
So
how
are
we
gonna
think
about
our
work
plan
as
we
we
move
into
advising
you
all
on
FY,
21,
well,.
D
As
soon
as
you
all
can
figure
out
what
might
be
some
useful,
not
only
information
but
other
resources
that
might
help
you
sort
of
coalesce
around
some
FAC,
unified
fat
guidance
on
this,
let
me
know:
okay
and
we'll
figure
it
out,
because
I
think
we'd
welcome
a
citizen's
perspective
on
that.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
G
G
D
E
So
I
was
okay,
just
what
I
wanted
to
do
was
walk
through
and
I.
Don't
know
if
we're
able
to
project
it
on
the
screen.
The
final
County
Board
guidance
and
notes
that
accompanies
the
fiscal
19
budget
and
what
I
consider
to
be
a
model.
The
County
Board
only
had
seven
items
they
talked
about,
talked
about
that
you
provided
guidance
at
length.
So
let
me
just
very
quick
quickly
summarize
the
items
now
list
the
seven
and
then
I'll
go
back
through
them.
The
first
was
on
public
safety
compensation.
E
The
second
was
on
the
Lee
Highway
planning
process.
The
third
was
Arlington
independent
media.
The
fourth
was
on
the
Northern
Virginia
juvenile
detention
center.
The
fifth
was
on
the
residential
utility
tax
in
the
air
program.
Six
was
on
a
cost-benefit
analysis
for
development
projects
and
number
seven
was
the
mental
health
therapist
for
young
adults
that
was
added
so
I'm
happy
to
walk
through
each
of
those
in
great
details.
E
It's
a
very
short
few
sentences.
The
way
I
read
it
was
Deer
County
manager,
don't
propose
cutting
the
Lehi
way
planning
process
again,
since
I'd
done
it
twice
and
I.
Think.
But
I
didn't
actually
see
that
in
the
text
there,
but
essentially
saying
that
where
you
were
allocating
funding,
we
the
process
is
underway,
and
we
have
a
consultant
on
board
and
I'm
had
the
opportunity
to
speak
at
the
kickoff
back
in
February.
It
will
be
a
several
year
process.
We're
also
continuing
our
conversations
with
the
Lee
Highway
Alliance
on
their
funding
request.
E
They
I
think,
as
you
know,
of
requested
some
additional
funds
beyond
what
I
had
proposed
in
the
budget
and
those
funds
are
as
I
understand.
It
focused
on
being
able
to
have
one
of
their
staff.
People
work
some
more
hours,
given
the
intensity
of
the
process
involved
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
that.
E
Moving
on
to
number
3,
which
was
Arlington
independent
media.
If
you
remember
last
year,
there
had
been
a
proposal
that
I
put
in
the
proposed
budget
about
reducing
the
ongoing
funding
by
$70,000
that
led
to
a
lot
of
I
think
consternation
on
the
part
of
some
people
in
the
community
and
the
board
essentially
added
it
back
and
said
that
there
needed
to
be
a
study
of
the
underlying
rationale
for
our
approach
with
independent
media
and
also
a
look
at
Arlington
TV,
which
is
the
county's
based
network.
And
there
was
a
report
that
was
done.
E
We
hired
a
consultant
that
report
was
fairly
lengthy
about
40
or
50
pages.
It
ran
through
all
the
items
that
are
included
here
in
the
guidance.
The
sum
and
substance
of
the
that
recommendation,
which
I've
included
in
my
proposed
budget
was
that
we
would
continue
our
policy
of
reducing
the
operating
assistance
to
a
I
M
by
5%
each
year
that
my
budget
this
year
cuts
that
the
adopted
level
from
last
year
by
5%
and
also
since
the
70,000
that
you
added
last
year
was
in
one-time
money.
E
I
also
included
that
70,000
again
this
year,
less
the
5%
and
we
have
and
I
think
mr.
Getchell
has
been
the
one
who's
been
meeting
with
mr.
Laval
E
and
the
members
of
the
a
I
am
board
continuing
conversations
with
them.
The
issues
on
the
operating
side,
I
think
they've
recognized
they've
made
more
than
a
valiant
effort
on
fundraising
and
I.
Think
I've
had
some
success
there.
E
Our
biggest
challenge
has
to
do
with
their
space
and
where
they're,
located
and
they're
in
the
process
of
discussions
about
a
potential
lease
changer
and
I
I'd
really
I'm
a
few
weeks
behind
on
the
status
of
those
conversations,
but
they
are
from
my
take
is
that
they
have
felt
at
least
through
this
year's
process
that
they've
been
dealt
with
fairly
and
the
underlying
issues
were
appropriately
addressed
in
the
report
and
I.
Don't
know
if
the
board
has
heard
differently,
but
that
is
what
I've
heard
from
a
I.
E
I
Falling
out
of
my
chair
so
as
you
know,
that
is
a
joint
study
with
our
partners,
the
cities
of
Alexandria
and
Falls
Church
and
so
Alexandria,
hopefully
led
the
procurement
for
us.
A
contractor
has
been
selected.
They
are
in
contract
negotiations,
now
we're
hopeful
that
that
will
be
wrapped
up
the
contract
itself,
the
next
30
to
45
days
and
then
the
study
effort.
I
E
That
is
the
update
on
that
particular
item.
The
number
five,
which
is
the
residential
utility
tax
in
air.
There
have
been
a
lot
of
conversations
that
have
continued
on
past
the
guidance
here
and
so
I
will
say
as
much
as
I
like
to
take
credit
for
things.
We've
done
well
on
this.
One
I
think
that
we've
fallen
short
of
the
mark,
which
was
to
try
to
come
up
with
a
way
to
quantify
all
the
spending
throughout
all
our
programs
related
to
sustainability.
E
E
The
last
two
years
there
haven't
been
any
reductions
there
and
then
the
amount
of
investments
that
we
have
made,
specifically
in
County
facilities
or
County
efforts
to
save
energy,
and
so
you
get
into
a
situation
where
you'll
have
boilers
and
HVAC
systems
that
need
to
be
replaced,
and
we
have
used
the
capital
funding
in
the
air
program
in
the
past
to
do
some
of
those
replacements.
But
it
turns
out.
We've
also
used
funding
in
the
general
Pago
budget
to
do
some
of
that
work.
E
So
we
have
pulled
that
all
together
made
a
good-faith
estimate
as
to
what
the
cost
is.
I
think
that
I
feel
very
comfortable
saying
that
the
amount
of
money
that
we
have
spent
on
the
county
side,
plus
the
report
we've
received
a
report
from
Arlington
Public
Schools
about
their
2019
spending,
not
their
2020
spending
comes
to
more
than
the
5.2
million
dollars
in
receipt
receipts
from
the
residential
utility
tax.
So,
as
I've
said
before,
I
think
when
the
board
is
going
through
and
looking
at
the
response.
E
E
That
our
hope
is
sometime
in
the
summer
that
we'll
come
up
with
a
template
that
will
actually
be
able
to
look
at
and
and
go
to,
the
probe
specific
programs
and
get
some
details
on
I.
Don't
want
to
minimize
the
degree
that
that's
a
challenge
but
I've
been
told
by
des
staff,
they're
working
on
it
pretty
hard.
Okay,.
E
Next,
one
is
development
projects,
cost-benefit
analysis.
Now
this
was
a
conversation
that,
in
various
forms,
has
been
held
over
the
last
three
or
four
years,
and
the
community
facilities
study
had
talked
about
the
need
for
economic
and
fiscal
impact,
analyses
as
part
of
special
exception,
site
plans
and
and
work
under
the
form
based
code.
We
went
back
and
forth
on
that.
We've
gone
back
and
forth
on.
E
It
is
a
with
myself
and
this
board
in
previous
boards
and
I
was
asked
to
submit
a
report
by
into
the
calendar
year
and
I
beat
it
I
think
by
nine
hours.
That's
essentially,
it
was
a
three
page
document
which
is
publicly
available,
which
tried
to
make
some
distinctions
between
economic
impact
and
fiscal
impact
and
and
said
that
the
the
place
where
we
could
make
the
better
investments
would
be
in
the
fiscal
impact
studies,
as
opposed
to
the
the
broader
economic
and
now
impact
and
with
that
I
have
committed
since
then
to
work.
E
Given
that
the
time
and
energy
it
would
take
to
pursue
that
more
fully
could
bump
up
into
some
of
the
work
plan
needs
that
we
have
then
I
think
with
the
county
board,
has
a
work
session
on
the
planning
work
plan
later
this
month
and
I
know
that
I
haven't
done.
I
has
a
few
more
notes
on
this.
I
haven't
done
a
thorough
job,
explaining
what
it
is
that
we'll
cover
in
the
fiscal
impact
analysis,
but
it
won't
be
looking
at
just
impact
of
one
project.
E
That's
been
approved
just
looking
at
broader,
the
broader
series
of
projects
that
have
been
approved
and
also,
if
I'm,
not
mistaken,
we'll
take
a
look
at
not
just
site
plan
approved
projects,
but
some
of
the
by
right
development
in
the
county.
One
of
the
biggest
drivers
of
the
changing
face
of
the
county
is
the
by
right
development.
That's
done
in
residential
neighborhoods
and
the
impacts
that
that
has,
and
so
that's
a
much
broader
and
I
think
a
just
as
equally
important
concept
that
then,
what
was
laid
out
in
the
community
facility
study
could.
G
G
E
Overlapping
with
that
is
the
question
about.
We
have
received
an
inquiry
from
the
residents
of
OH
about
going
back
and
they
had
some
questions.
They
have
had
questions
the
last
two
or
three
years
after
we
had
done
an
analysis
of
the
impact
of
all
the
projects
and
that
in
that
area
and
I
think
it's
absolutely
the
right
time.
E
Given
the
potential
development
that's
coming
down,
the
road
I
would
note
that
all
that
Dell
development
had
been
conceived
as
part
of
our
plans
and
we've.
We
talked
about
that
during
the
vote
that
the
Board
took
last
month,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
to
be
looked
at
and
hopefully
get
the
community
involved
in
that
conversation
last,
but
certainly
not
least,
and
I.
E
Remember
miss
Garvey
last
year
that
you
were
the
one
I
think
who
had
advocated
for
the
mental
health
therapist
for
young
adults
and
putting
in
for
a
pilot
to
test
for
funding
for
two
years
to
see
if
this
expenditure
could
lead
to
additional
positive
impacts
and
the
what
I'd
like
to
report
on
that
is.
The
position
has
been
filled
and
I.
E
Don't
know
how
many
months
the
person's
been
on
board
I
think
I'm,
not
sure,
but
that
we
will
be
back
to
you
with
an
analysis
once
the
person
has
been
in
place
for
a
year
and
I
would
subscribe
to
your
view,
which
you
stated
earlier,
which
is
we?
The
investments
we
make
in
mental
health
and
prevention
and
treatment
are
money
well
spent
and
I.
E
Think,
as
the
board
acknowledged
when
we
were
having
the
conversations
with
Virginia
Hospital
Center
and
also
though
you
have
not
asked
me,
I-
think
some
of
the
requests
from
the
Community
Services
Board
bears
some
very
serious
scrutiny
by
it
by
the
County
Board,
because
there's
I
think
and
there's
I
can
safely
say.
Incremental
investment
in
this
area
will
still
yield
benefit
and
with
that
I
will
be
quiet
and
take
any
questions
you
have
on
those
items.
Okay,.
C
D
E
Okay,
okay,
so
next
next
stop
yep,
you
ready
all
right!
I
have
no
idea
I'll
find
out
on
how
you
respond
real
quickly,
something
that
I
didn't
focus
on
a
great
deal.
You
know,
if
you
have
additional
inquiries
on
this
I
wanted
to.
Let
you
know
what
material
you
could
expect
in
the
next
24
to
48
hours.
I've
already
mentioned
the
residential
utility
tax
in
the
air
follow-up
that
will
be
coming.
Also,
the
board
received
testimony
from
Linda
Lindbergh
in
the
office
of
the
registrar
and
the
electoral
board
concerning
some
of
their
potential
needs.
E
We
have
a
follow-up
response
on
that
that
is
prepared
and
will
be
going
out.
We
also
had
some
questions
about
the
population
in
the
detention
facility
that
I
think
the
chair
had
asked
the
sheriff.
We
have
information
on
that.
That's
prepared
to
go
out.
We
also
have
a
summary
which
we
provided
in
the
work
session,
but
I
think
we'll
pull
it
all
together
in
one
place,
which
is
the
pay
as
you
go
capital
and
I.
Think
mr.
dafonte
got
it
part
of
that
question.
E
E
Yeah
30,
if
you
include
ongoing
in
one
time
so
I
went
part
of
the
way
of
explaining
that
14
million
of
that
is
associated
with
bond
premium.
That
typically
wouldn't
be
there.
So
we
went
from
five
to
15
is
the
way
I
really
like
to
think
about
it,
but
there
is
that
other
14
million
lying
around,
so
the
questions
there
have
to
do
with
ongoing.
As
the
fiscal
affairs
Advisory
Commission
said,
I
think
it
was
very
important
to
increase
the
ongoing
investment
and
the
additional
one-time
funds
were
set
aside
for
a
series
of
projects.
E
We
have,
we
were
asked
questions
about
the
trade
center.
Optimization
study
we'll
have
some
responses
on
that.
What's
what
you
know
sort
of
why?
What
are
the
sources
of
the
funding?
And
then
there
was
a
request
from
from
Katy
Krystal
about
to
do
a
summary
of
what
County,
Board,
initiated
studies
and
special
projects
are
underway
and
a
listing
of
those
and
sort
of
the
costs
that
we're
going
with
them.
I
know
you
don't
remember
it
I,
remember
it
vividly
so
we're
putting
that
together.
D
All
right
so
with
that
outline
of
material,
that's
going
to
be
forthcoming
in
the
next
24
to
52
hours.
Are
there
any
other
areas
that
are
essential
for
budget
decision-making?
That
people
have
itch
for
I
will
speak
for
myself
and
say
those
last
pieces
of
information
fully
equipped,
but
go
ahead.
Mr.
D
Ferengi.
C
But
I
would
love
to
follow
up
in
the
next
48
hours
of
can
and
then
there's
a
little
edification
on
the
solid
waste
process
would
be
the
other
thing
that
I'd
love
with
respect
to
composting
and
where
we
are
on
that
not
judicious
about
spending
in
this
year
as
a
piece
of
you
next
year.
But
I
would
love
to
know
where
we
are
so
that
we're
ready
to
implement.
If
we
can't
this
year,
we're
ready
really
to
implement
sue.
E
Yes,
I
mean
it's
my
hope
and
it
may
not
that
won't
be
in
the
next
48
hours,
but
certainly
by
the
end
of
this
week,
we
covered
it
I
think
in
about
30
seconds
in
the
des
work
session,
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
done
on
that.
The
a
couple
of
components
that
I
think
need
further
refinement
have
to
do
with
the
education
campaign
associated
with
it
and
also
the
logistics
about.
If
the
board
were
so
inclined,
we
have
a
contract
right
now
with
American
disposal
service
which
does
our
recycling
and
trash
pickup.
E
We
have
an
add-on
provision
in
there
to
see
there's
anything
else.
We
would
have
to
do
in
the
contract
to
affect
that
and
what
kind
of
schedule
would
be?
What's
the
status
of
composting
facilities?
There's
a
there's,
a
lot
of
work,
that's
been
done,
but
we
have
never
presented
it
publicly,
and
so
my
goal
would
be
not
necessarily
to
present
all
of
that
by
Friday,
but
to
lay
out
how
we're
going
to
present
it
and
have
the
conversation
and.
D
E
And
I
do
think
and
I
don't
want
to
overstate
it
because
other
jurisdictions
have
already
done
it.
So
I
think
it's
something
that
can
happen
and
I
think
it's
a
really
a
question
for
the
board.
It's
a
policy
decision
I
think
it
is
different,
a
little
bit
different
in
kind
about
some
of
the
other
processes
we
have
in
place,
because
it
will
require
people
and
it's
done
all
over
the
world.
E
So
it's
not
particularly
daunting,
but
to
change
their
practices
in
their
kitchen
as
opposed
to
what
it
is,
what
sort
of
receptacle
they
drop
a
bottle
into
so
I
think
we
will
need
to
do
some
educating
we're
finding
specifically
right
now
when
it
comes
to
glass,
recycling,
I
think
our
biggest
challenge
is.
We
have
spent
a
very
long
time
thinking
one
way
and
educating
people
another
way
to
have
them
change,
behavior,
not
because
we
tell
them
they
should,
but
because
they
understand
is
the
right
way
to
do.
E
Take
some
time
and
so
I
think
that
if
you
were
to
snap
your
fingers
today
and
say
we
will
do
it,
I
would
say
that
we
would
need
at
least
several
months
worth
of
conversation
and
education
and
people
would
need
to
understand
what
was
involved
and
I.
Think
there'll
be
some
people
who
say
they
don't
want
it,
and
we
always
have
that
when
we're
imposing
a
in
Newfie.
Oh
you.
G
Have
a
few
questions:
I,
don't
I!
Think
I
just
want
to
verify
some
things.
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
more
a
little
discussion,
so
there
have
been
some
folks
proposing
that
there'd
be
some
relief
on
basically
vehicle
tax
for
veterans,
disabled
veterans
and
I
understand.
After
discussing
with
mr.
Stevenson
that
there's
there
are
a
lot
of
things
in
place
already
for
these
folks
to
use
that
they
would
qualify
for
and
I
just
want
to
double
check
that.
That's
that's
the
case.
Do
you
want
to
just
outline
that
for
me
one
more
time
right.
F
So
there
are
exemptions
on
the
real
estate
side
right
now
that
they
would
qualify
for
there's
also
for
handicapped
equipped
vehicles.
There's
a
reduction
in
the
personal
property
property
tax,
I.
Think
to
this
specific
item,
a
larger
policy
discussion
that
the
board
would
need
to
have
to
see
if
that's
right,
for
for
our
community
and
for
right.
G
And
I
and
I
appreciate
your
me
with
that
I.
It's
basically
because
I
know
if
the
vehicles,
if
someone
is
disabled,
a
vehicle
to
be
able
to
drive,
which
is
really
important,
it
can
be
very
expensive
and
the
fact
that
we
have
they
qualify
already
for
a
reduction
makes
me
feel
much
better
about
the
whole
situation.
So
I'm
good
with
I
just
wanted
to
just
kind
of
verify
that
here
and
then
we
discussed
a
little
bit
when
in
one
of
our
work
sessions,
I
think
with
the
juvenile
courts
or
with
the
judges.
G
I
We're
actively
working
that
the
space
that
Earl
or
move
them
from
eight
to
twelve.
So
it's
not
a
huge
square
footage
requirement.
He's
also
been
in
some
conversations
with
Cynthia
Johnson
over
at
schools,
because
there
are
some
nice
linkages
there.
So
Earl
and
I
are
meeting
on
it
again
next
week
and
I,
don't
I
guess
I
would
say
this:
I
don't
wouldn't
view
it
as
a,
but
we
can
report
back
separately.
I,
don't
think
it'll
be
a
need
to
be
a
big
budget.
Conversation.
G
It's
fine,
mostly
I,
just
want
to
know
that
it's
and
that
really
isn't
a
numbers
thing
I
think
that's
trying
to
find
the
space
I
just
wanted
to
know
that
it
was
like
happening
and
it
is
excellent.
That's
that's
all
I
needed
to
know,
thank
you
and
then
we
had
someone
had
to
come
and
talk
to
us
about.
Could
we
please
freeze
and
not
eliminate
the
neighborhood
conservation
position?
I
understand,
that's
actually
a
Tier
two
and
not
something
that
you're
proposing
in
this
in
this
budget,
so
that
right.
E
So,
on
on
the
neighborhood
conservation
program,
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
up,
because
I
have
provided
there,
one
of
the
questions
that
were
asked
and
I
provided
as
part
of
the
spreadsheet
that
I
gave
to
you
an
estimate
I
think
that
we,
the
position
which
is
currently
occupied
by
Katie
Brown
Henry
and
she's
Lee
she's
in
the
drop
program
she's
leaving
in
July.
We
we
think
that
we
have
the
support
network
available
and
C
PhD
to
provide
the
tasks
that
she
did
and
so
we're
not.
E
E
Question
there
but
I
think
neighborhood
college
later,
but
on
neighborhood
conservation
know
we
have
all
the
staff
resources.
We
need
and
I'm
gonna
be
coming
to
you
next
week
with
the
roster
of
people
who
will
be
working
on
that
study
so
that
we
can
report
back
to
you
in
time
for
the
next
CIP
to
see
what
level
of
funding
or
program
structure
might
be
appropriate.
That's.
E
Right
and
so
that's
something
that
I
think
that
you
should
take
a
serious
look
at
because
it
never
was
my
intention
previous
years,
I
put
our
proposal
to
cut
the
program,
but
that
it
was
not
my
goal
this
time.
My
goal
this
time
was
to
see
if
there
was
an
alternative
service
delivery
approach
that
could
deliver
the
same
if
not
more,
at
a
lower
cost
and
those
conversations
simply
haven't
gone
far
enough
along.
E
G
D
D
D
E
E
To
say,
and
then,
if
there's
anything
else
you
want
to
do,
which
is
that
we
have
provided
all
of
you
a
copy
of
the
spreadsheet
and
we're
happy
to
walk
anybody
through
how
it
works.
It's
not
a
basic
spreadsheet,
it's
pretty
complicated,
but
we're
happy
to
do
that
and
we
have
built
in
a
sheet
that
allows
you
to
make
assumptions
about
what
tax
rate
you
would
like
to
adopt
and
also
which
of
the
reductions
that
were
proposed
in
the
budget.
E
You'd
like
to
keep
or
change,
and
then
also
we
have
listed
everything
that
we
heard
through
testimony
that
we
think
is
a
request
from
outside
groups
that
we
quantify
that
correctly
and
also
summarizes
the
funding.
That's
going
to
Arlington
public
schools.
So
we're
happy
to
answer
any
additional
questions
on
any
subjects.
D
G
E
Didn't
do
it,
but
I
think
Emily
or
Richard
did
pre-populated
the
field
for
the
quarter
penny
for
Metro,
because
that
was
something
that
there
was
a
little
bit
of
uncertainty
about,
but
we
have
solidified
those
numbers,
that's
an
ongoing
contribution
that
we
have
to
make,
and
so,
if
the
board
chose
not
to
do
that,
quarter,
penny,
which
is
certainly
your,
then
there
would
have
to
be
a
series
of
offsetting
reductions.
Ongoing
amman,
I
think
it
comes
to
it's
about
1.9
million
or
about
two
million
dollars.
So
that's
that's
all
laid
out
there.
G
E
G
D
G
D
D
C
Nt
I'll
just
hope
to
follow
up
on
as
you
determine
as
you
determine
what
is
I
mean.
You've
got
to
be
a
hundred
percent
that
you
have
those
one-time
funding
but
may
be
useful
to
have
a
short
conversation
about
what
determines
when
one-time
funding
is
a
is
available
and
I.
Think
that's
probably
a
conversation
later,
but
that's
it.
That's
all.
I
have
on
that
memo.