►
From YouTube: Site Plan Review Committee | April 4, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
get
started.
Welcome
to
the
April
3rd
site
plan
committee,
subgroup
meeting
for
Crystal
Towers
three
I.
B
A
C
C
A
Okay,
excellent
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
orient
everyone
to
our
hybrid
environment
and
cover
a
few
specific
about
how
the
meeting
will
run
members
of
the
public
May
attend
here
in
person
or
electronically,
using
the
team
slain
provided
on
the
sprc
webpage,
the
project
webpage,
the
County's
events
calendar
and
the
email
notifications
sent
to
sprc
email
subscribers
and
there's
a
dial
in
about
option
for
those
who
wish
to
use
it
for
our
subgroup
members
joining
virtually.
If
you
lose
internet
connection
during
the
meeting,
please
reconnect
to
my
phone.
B
A
D
A
E
A
A
C
A
Turn
off
any
other
devices,
so
there's
no
feedback.
Thank
you
and
thanks
for
joining
us.
Okay.
So
here
we
are
for
our
membership
of
the
public
who
like
to
provide
feedback
and
comments.
You'll
be
called
on
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
you'll
be
given
a
couple
of
moments
to
speak.
A
If
you
wish
to
speak
into
your
name
in
the
meeting
chat-
and
this
is
a
public
forum
so
with
that
yeah
anything
associated
with
the
meeting
tonight,
written
or
spoken
is
subject
to
Freedom
of
Information
Act
requirements,
that's
fairly
standard
for
all
of
our
meetings.
Now.
A
With
that
I'd
like
to
do
introductions,
let's
do
the
SPOC
Members
First,
with
your
name
and
affiliation
I'm,
Elizabeth
Garrett,.
C
A
Online
Mr
Lynn
tell
me.
K
Yes,
good
evening,
Mike
Dowell,
the
new
Crystal
and
Pentagon
City
Council
chair.
Thank
you.
A
Excellent,
thank
you
and
Steph.
Please.
F
This
pageant
it's
Courtney
Badger,
with
the
planning
division.
I
A
O
A
A
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Yes,.
F
So
I
will
get
this
loaded
up.
I
will
be
giving
a
presentation
on
behalf
of
Staff
along
with
Joanne
four,
and
we
just
yeah.
F
F
Has
submitted
for
two
new
buildings
on
the
crystal
Towers
block:
they're
infill
buildings,
Residential
Building,
about
where
my
laser
pointer
is
and.
F
A
couple
of
updates
to
the
project
since
last
time
we
talked
I
mentioned
this
last
time.
There
is
a
deviation
from
the
Crystal
City
staff
that
recommends
that
Podium
should
engage
the
recommended
Bill
2
line
within
two
feet
for
a
minimum
of
80
of
the
frontage.
Previously
they
were
not
meeting
that
they
have
since
responded
to
our
staff
comments
and
updated
so
that
they
are
within
that
two
foot.
F
The
second
update
is
the
podium
separation.
The
sector
plan
has
guidance
that
there
should
be
a
minimum
of
4
Podium
separation.
Previously
they
were
showing
a
30-foot
separation,
they've
now
updated
it
to
a
45
and.
F
Of
try
and
refresh
where
we're
talking
about
it's
between
the
crystal
Flats
building,
which
is
existing
the
very
most
left
building
on
this
view
in
the
new
residential
building
and
then
I'm
going
to
briefly
mention
this
and
I
know
the
applicant's
going
to
go
into
much
more
detail
on
this.
But
we.
F
P
F
Test
PRC
meeting
there
was
interest
in
having
this
pedestrian
area
between
the
buildings
have
a
connection
through
it.
So
the
applicant
has
submitted
this
concept
of
a
potential
connection
that
goes
through
that
around
to
18th
Street
and
all
of
them
kind
of
get.
F
M
Courtney,
this
is
the
same
information
that
we
presented
before
just
to
let
folks
know
on
each
Street
we
are
going
to
be
having
an
enhanced
bicycle
facility
which
is
going
to
mimic
what
is
going
to
be
installed
in
front
of
that
Park
between
the
12th
and
15th
Street
block,
so
we'll
be
a
raised
median
and
then
the
bike
lane
against
the
curb
with
the
parking
outboard.
There
are
some
areas,
the
South
that
we
are
still
having
to
work
with
fire
marshal
to
understand
what
can
be
built
there
to
make
sure
there's
fire.
B
M
For
the
proposed
building
and
try
and
provide
as
much
protection
as
we
can
for
the
bicycle
facility,
so
that's
still
being
worked
out.
You
believe
we
have
a
path
forward
and
then
on
18th
Street
I
know.
One
of
the
big
questions
folks
have
been
asking
about
is
the
median
so.
M
A
median
on
18th
Street
in
front
of
the
driveway
entrances
on
the
north
and
south
side
that
has
been
removed
for
construction.
When
our
project
is
completed,
this
fall
the
median
will
be
returned.
So
all
those
driveway
entrances
again
on
the
north
and
south
side
of
18th
Street
in
this
vicinity
will
be
right
and
right
out
only.
M
B
M
F
So
now,
shifting
over
to
over
to
the
sector
plan,
identifies
the
space
on
15th,
Street
and
Southeast
Street
as
an
existing
open
space,
and
that's
number
18..
It's
labeled
as
an
existing
Park
Plaza
and
the
recommendation
is
to
have
it
a
landscaped
corner
with
trees
and
paths
which
is
what's
there
now.
F
For
a
Target
size
of
6
000
square
feet
with
an
asterisk
that
that's
subject
to
refinement
and
I
just
want
to
go
into
just
a
little
bit
of
history
on
this
corner.
So
when
The
Lofts
590
was
approved
back
in
February
of
2002,
it
was
approved
with
the
condition
that
they
report
a
public
access
easement
on
this.
F
The
applicant
for
this
project
is
now
proposing
to
add
on
to
that
added
proximal
experiment.
So
I
bring
the
space
up
to
over
5000
Square.
F
P
P
F
Improvement,
looking
at
the
landscape
plan
holistically,
these
numbers
are
from
the
plans
that
are
in
our
system
and
I
understand.
They've
been
updated
recently,
so
the
applicant
will
correct
these
numbers,
but
the
the
point
is,
they
are
removing
trees
and
they
and
we'll
get
more
into
the
details
of
discuss
the.
F
The
Crystal
City
sector
plan
recommends
a
17.6
so
they're
right
in
that
briefly
talking
about
sustainability
and
Community
benefits,
they
are
participating
in
the
Green
Building
incentive
program
coming
in
at
the
2.5
far
level.
So
this
includes
meeting
the
Baseline
prerequisites
that
are
required
for
that
program
and
they
are
also
doing
the
legal
legal
certification.
F
G
F
Also
proposing
new
solar
on
the
existing
Crystal
other
community
benefits
that
they
are
earning
is
still
being
negotiated,
but
it
will
be
based
on
the
goals
of
the
crystal
categories.
F
F
That
that
kind
of
concludes
our
presentation.
I'll
just
briefly
talk
about
next
steps,
we're
at
the
second
sprc
meeting.
Our
next
step
is
to
go
to
commission
meetings,
Planning
Commission
and
then
on
to
the
county
court.
So
with
that
I'll
turn
it
back
to
you.
B
N
Application,
it's.
L
N
Summary
I'll
go
through
the
revisions
in
a
little
bit
in
a
little
bit
more
details
and
staff.
I
will
talk
about
parking
both
existing
and
proposed,
as
well
as
our
strategy
for
pick
up
a
drop-off
talk
about
the
changes
to
site
circulation,
the
changes
and
really
modernization
of
the
each
streetscape
of
sidewalks
talk
a
lot
about
trees.
Both
impacts
as
well
as
plantings,
get
a
little
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
about
open
space
and
then
also
talk
about
sustainability
as
well
as
touching.
C
B
N
C
N
So
as
staff's
presentation
noted
in
response
to
the
comments
received
during
sprc1,
we
have
revised
the
podium
separation
to
be
the
40-foot
design
guideline
from
the
sector
plan.
We
have
been
able
to
find
a
way
to
incorporate
through.
C
N
N
N
B
C
N
C
O
N
O
N
N
One
of
the
unfortunate
impacts
that
we
realize
when
we
continue.
C
C
N
We
were
able
to
get
people
around
Bristol
plasma
than
they
had
nobody
to
go,
and
so
we
have
introduced
a
sidewalk
that
connects
that
pedestrian
passage
down
to
18th
Street,
but,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photo
on
the
bottom
left,
that
is
currently
existing
parking
and
we
would
need
to
remove
four
additional
trees
in
order
to
accommodate
that
sidewalk
connection,
though
I'm
sure
we
can
talk
about
that
more
in
and
then
on
the
revised
retail,
based
on
continued
discussions
with
staff,
we
have
been
able
to
revise
the
engagement
of
that
retail
Frontage
to
meet
the
two
foot
distance
from
the
Mercury
of
the
bill.
N
2
line
or
about
60.
The
portion
that
has
remained
at
five
feet
is
really
in
coordination
with
the
location
of
the
the
underground
electrical
vault.
So
that's
what's
really
driving
our
inability
to
bring
the
entirety
of
the
front,
and
so
here
we.
N
Sufficient
time
in
order
to
develop
the
specific
rendering
that
might
show
this
best,
but
you
can
see
the
previous
submission
on
the
left
and
then
on
the
revised
plan.
You
can
see
how
that
facade
starts
to
step
out.
So
it
steps
out
about
three
feet
to
create
that
to
to
create
the
the
two
foot
engagement
with
the
build
too
much
so.
N
About
parking,
the
existing
Crystal
Towers
building
has
931
parking
spaces,
and
so
that's
divided
up
between
surface
parking
spaces.
A.
C
N
And
so
one
of
the
core
elements
that
that
was
driving
the
plan
from
its
Inception
was.
We
knew
that
we
had
underutilized
surface
parking
and
how
could
we
potentially
think
about
re-utilizing
or
repurposing
that
existing
parking
in
a
way
that
was
more
productive
but
that
left
sufficient
parking
to
meet
in
place
demand
So?
The
plan
proposes
to
remove
166
surface
spaces
and.
B
O
N
So
now
pick
up
drop
off
in
our
conversations
with
residents.
One
of
the
things
that
quickly
became
apparent
was
the
focus
on
the
kind
of
ease
of
pickup
drop-off,
given
the
existing
condition,
and
so
as
part
of
the
plan.
We
have
worked
in
this
kind
of
Entry
Courtyard
circulation
that
allows
us
a
pickup
drop-off
for
up
to
10
spaces.
I
think
we
would
actually
be
able
to
fit
more
than
that
and
actual
utilization
and
then
also
provides
us.
The
ability
for
four
kind
of
box
trucks
or
deliver
in.
N
Past
talking
a
little
bit
about
changing
circulation,
this
is
the
existing
vehicular
and
pedestrian
circulation.
The.
N
N
N
Circulation,
one
of
the
goals
we
had
was
to
keep
many
of
the
circulation
paths
accessible
from
what
exists
today.
Do
you
still
have
the
ability
to
come
off
beads
to
circle
around
this
internal
Courtyard
and
go
back
out
to
circle
around
through
the
extended
driveway
down
to
18th?
One
of
the
significant
changes
we
have
made
is
to
consolidate
those
three
points.
The
one
entry
point,
the
two
exit
points
into.
N
And
renovated
access
point
that
would
be
both
entry
and
exit
at
the
South,
and
this
would
coincide
with
striping
changes
to
the
interior
to
accommodate
the
new
two-way
traffic
Additionally.
The
proposal
includes
a
proposal
includes
the
additional
pedestrian
route.
To
the
extent
somebody
would
like
to
cut
the
corner
again
with
the
trade-off
of
the
four
trees
that
I
mentioned.
C
N
But
provides
access
around
Crystal
Flats
to
the
extent
somebody
wants
to
utilize,
the
new
South
Side
look
and
looking
at
the
existing
streetscape
one
of
the
real
benefits
I
believe
this
project
is
providing
is
to
modernize
the
streetscape
on
this
section
of
these.
So
it
Trends
between
seven
and
a
half
feet
down
to
just
under
five
feet,
but.
N
N
N
With
Street
trees,
light
poles
as
well
as
shy
zones
for
the
retail
in
terms
of
pedestrian
site
access
again,
one
of
the
goals
of
the
project
was
to
maintain
the
site,
access
and
desire
lines
that
exist
today.
So
we.
N
C
N
Do
have
some
changes
proposed
up
at
the
existing
open
space
at
the
corner
of
15th.
It
eats
that
we
think
simplifies
it
as
well
as
take
some
of
the
additional
circulation.
N
C
N
Even
with
the
existing
five
foot
sidewalks
and
with
the
hedges,
if
very
mature,
and
are
edging
into
that
five
foot
area,
so
here
you
would
have
to
retail.
With
you
know,
three
foot
shy:
Zone
eight
foot,
clear.
J
N
N
N
O
B
N
N
Looked
on
the
balance
of
the
property
and
we
have
found
potential
locations
for
up
to
an
additional
16
trees,
and
that's
something
that
we
plan
to
continue
to
revisit
to
see.
If
there
are
additional
opportunities
and
thinking
about
the
trees,
we
try
to
kind
of
break
down
the
categories
for
why
are
the
trees
being
removed?
So
there
are
four
trees
being
removed
to
do
due
to
poor
health
like
they
have
to
be
replaced.
N
N
Coming
out
of
the
last
sprc,
we
have
gone
back
and
looked
at
the
plan
and
found
three
additional
native
trees
that
are
located
kind
of
within
that
existing
driveway.
N
The
tree
is
located
within
conflict
with
the
modernized
streetscape
set,
the
trees
that
are
native
but
are
being
proposed
to
be
removed
for
the
development
and
then
many
of
the
non-native
trees
are
in
and
around
that
existing
driveway
and.
B
N
To
the
north
of
15th,
where
the
proposed
retail.
N
N
C
C
N
Certain
portion
looks
like
it
falls
on
Lost,
590s
Property
and
a
certain
portion
falls
on
crystal
Towers
property,
so
the
700
square
feet
that
we
are
proposing
to
add
on
to
the
existing
easement.
It's
that
open
space
area
up
above
5
000
square
feet
and
then
just
looking
at
the
diagram.
It
appears
that
the
remaining
thousand
square
feet
or
so
falls
on
Lost
590
property.
It
could
be
provided
at
some
point
in
the
future
forward,
but.
N
B
O
N
C
C
N
The
prerequisites
for
the
0.25
bonus
far
one
of
the
things
that
you
want
to
touch
on
because
it
is
a
little
bit
new
is
for
the
renewable
energy
compliance
pathway,
one
for
on-site,
renewable
energy
would
require
approximately
a
35
kilowatt
solar
array
on
the
building.
Given
the
a
lot
of
the
restrictions
around
roof
area,
we.
Q
N
Of
the
existing
Crystal
Towers
North
building,
so
almost
double
the
total
amount
of
solar
provided,
but
in
a
way
that
I
don't
believe
anybody
has
proposed
where
it
would
be
located,
adjacent
right,
part
of
the
same
site
plan,
but
on
the
existing
building.
Instead
of
us
reverting
back
and
just
buying
credits
on
EV
charging.
N
N
That
this
number
will
climb
up
as
we
advance
to
Planning
Commission
for
construction.
It's
a
24-month
duration
on
the
multi-family
building
and
a
12-month
duration
on
the
retail
we,
the
Baseline
phasing
is
that
these
projects
would
deliver
at
the
same
time.
So
we
would
start
the
retail
approximately
12
months
after
starting
the
multi-family.
N
To
market
conditions,
so
we
will
be
looking
for
flexibility
for
facing.
C
A
Thank
you
so
the
discussions
now
at
the
sprc
I'd
like
to
see
first,
if
there
are
any
questions
to
the
project
updates.
I
A
N
A
P
A
N
H
D
Explain
why
you
have
this
retaining
wall?
Yes
and
so
I'm,
starting
to
go
down
the
path
from
east
to
west
I'm,
initially
lower
than
normal?
And
then,
when
it
ramps
up
I'll,
be
up.
N
D
C
C
D
N
D
P
O
D
O
O
Correct
and
what
one
clarification
on
that,
when
robbers
talk
about
ramping,
ramping
technically,
is
over
five
percent.
Yes,
this.
D
D
I'm
very
impressed
yourself
what
other
comment
question
I'm
understanding
this
like
right.
You
have
a
dog,
peeing
area
and
then
an
area
with
fun
kind
of
Cheers
and
is
there
a
barrier
between
them.
O
D
C
O
C
D
A
D
Lot
of
it
sounds
very
very:
what
are
you
going
to
do
out
of
season.
N
O
N
Of
the
specific
kind
of
operations
and
how
it
works,
I
don't
know
that
we
have
that
fully
figured
out,
but
we
can
go
and
think
through
and
and
see
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
and
talk
to
some
potential
tenants
to
see
how
they
might
handle
it,
whether
it
would
be
three
season
or
whether
they
would
build
temporary
enclosures
I
know
that
tenants
have
gotten
very
creative,
given
the
need
to
have
outdoor
dining
during
covid
and.
C
N
E
N
N
A
F
A
A
Through
this
site,
green
pads,
the
what
I
don't
know
what,
where
the
discussion
is
on
access
to
the
underground
across
the
street
I
know
that's
come
up
as
well
the
desire
line
to
cross
the
site,
the
direct
entrance
to
the
alley
in
the
whole
issue
of
it
being
a
super
block.
So
these
are
just
the
things
that
I
got
from
my
last
notes
from
the
last
meeting.
But
Chris
do
you
want
to
start
I.
C
N
D
A
Excellent
well
we'll
take
that
up
next.
That
was
one
of
my
questions.
Okay
to
Chris's
question
about
medical
requesting
onions.
M
So
I
just
want
to
pull
this
up,
so
these
folks
are
like
me
and
the
more
visual
people.
M
But
anyways
the
the
long
and
the
short
of
it
is.
We
did
look
at
this
and
it's
not
something
from
a
county
staff
perspective.
We
are
comfortable
introducing
because
of
the
existing
entrance
exit
points
for
the
Marriott.
C
M
The
east
side
and
the
driveway
on
the
west
side,
with
the
crystal
Towers
introducing
some
sort
of
mid-block
there
was
creating
a
lot
of
challenges
and
safety
concerns
from
our
staff
perspective,
with
all
the
vehicles
turning
into
and
exiting
that
area.
So
it's
not
something
we
support.
M
It's
not
something
we
I
believe
is
a
safe
movement,
which
is
why
we
do
not
want
to
introduce
the
mid
block
Crossing
in
that
location
or.
C
L
M
With
those
entrances
and
exits,
any
sort
of
Crossing
does
introduce
those
click
points,
and
that
is
not
something
we
are
supportive
of.
When
we
look
at
this
block,
you
look
at
the
North
End
at
15th
Street,
you
have
a
crossing
at
15th
Street,
the
south
end
at
18th,
Street,
there's
a
Crossing
as
well.
L
Is
going
that
a
lot?
We
were
really
hoping
to
see
some
progress
on
that
this
would
be
a
major
way
to
encourage
people
to
use
the
underground
and
be
able
to
bypass
eventually
an
accurate
Route
1
and
a
lot
of
people
who
live
on
that
site
and
really
encourage
doing
all
we
can.
Even
if
we
meet
some,
you
know
pretty
significant
Investments
to
identify
and
invest
in
plot
Crossing.
There
I
think
that's
pretty
important
from
the
neighborhood
point
of
view.
A
Thank
you,
I've
known
of
this
okay.
Is
there
more
on
that
we're
still
on
Transportation,
okay,.
D
Well,
I
will
give
my
own
skill
that
I
give
all
the
time
of
the
garage
yes
and
concentrating
entrance
and
exit
all
in
one
spot
on
the
south,
I
think
living
through
living
there
and
using
it
all.
The
time
may
look
okay
on
paper,
but
it's
very
hesitant
and
there's
already
a
loading
dock
there,
and
this
new
building
will
add
a
second
moving.
D
D
There's
also
serious
topographical
Challenge
from
the
driveway.
That's
there
now
to
the
street
and
sidewalk.
So
it's
a
really
tight
thing
and
trying
to
get
people
to
safely
go
in
and
out,
while
they're
negotiating
and
loading
dock
with
trucks
all
day
long.
They
are,
theoretically,
they
can
go
out
the
garage
depending
on
how
it's
controlled
and
striped
and
go
all
the
way
through
the
property
and
out
to
burn.
D
But
you
go
under
a
building
which
is
a
very
low
seal,
yeah,
so
they're
going
to
be
plenty
of
vehicles
that
can't
do
that,
even
if
they
thought
it
was
a
good
way
to
to
skirt
it.
So
it's
just
by
having,
if
there
wasn't
a
retail
building,
they
could
at
least
maintain
a
safety
valve
by
maintaining
the
north
exit.
D
C
D
Still
have
congestion
on
the
South
exit,
but
now
you've
got
in
out
only
in
one
spot
in
a
very
congested
spot
and
I.
Just
I
think
it's
going
to
be
very
dangerous.
I,
don't
see
how
it's
actually
going
to
work.
I
remain
hopeful,
so
as
long
as
I'm
happy
to
actually
use
it,
but
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
unfortunate.
We
tried
very
hard
to
at
least
retain
the
North
exit
and
no.
A
D
Out
south
or
north,
but
but
the
north
now
goes
into
what
is
now
surface
parking
and
but
all
of
which
will
go
away
with
the
retail
and
and.
C
D
A
C
A
K
Yes,
I
I,
think
Ben
and
you
folks
are
are
asking
the
right
questions
that
mid-block
Crossing
does
is
something
that
should.
It
would
be
good
to
look
at
that
again
really
hard,
because
the
Crystal
City
sector
plan
has
a
policy
that
really
talks
specifically
to
getting
pedestrian
rounds
through
these
big
Urban
blocks
and
the
the
super
block
there
is
is
considerable.
K
We're
missing
two
roads
and
so
I
I
think
there's
a
good
question
there,
because
it
looks
like
it's
a
great
a
lot
of
fun
to
be
a
car
in
that
super
block,
but
not
not
great
to
be
a
pedestrian.
I
did
have
a
specific
question.
If
you
go
back
to
The
Pedestrian
paths
slide,
I
are
those
pedestrian
ways.
Are
they
publicly
going
to
be
publicly
available,
or
are
people
coming
into
the
site
going
to
see
a
lot
of
no
trespassing
signs
which
is
kind
of
the
default
in
this
area?.
N
So
we
don't
anticipate
putting
up
any
node.
Trespassing
is
not
currently
being
proposed
as
an
area
for,
but
it
will
be
open.
K
Okay,
so
that's
that's
a
really
big
point,
because
I
know
you're
trying
hard
to
get
meet
the
intent
of
the
Crystal
City
sector
plan,
but
that
that
pedestrian
access
through
these
super
blocks
and
that's
a
big
super
block
is,
is
really
important
and
I
know
the
shape
of
that
original
structure
is,
can
make
it
difficult,
but
I
I
really
would
like
to
make
sure
that
that
is
not
something
that
escapes
it
would
really
like.
K
Those
in
you
know
to
meet
the
intents
of
the
sector
plan
for
those
pedestrian
routes
to
be
available
to
the
public,
with
you
know
in
in
in
in
the
full
sense
of
it,
with
no
no
new
trespassing
signs
or
long
lists
of
rules
just
make
it
so
the
public
can
walk
through.
H
Just
want
a
kind
of
second
Mr
Alba,
saying
here:
I'd
really
like
to
see
a
Public
Access
season,
easement
on
anything
talking
about
as
a
public
pathway,
we've
seen
far
too
many
other
site
plans
where,
when
we
don't
get
easement
one
cranky
resident,
who
decides
that
vagrants
are
walking
down
the
sidewalk
and
sleeping
or
something
and
that
it's
unsafe
and
all
of
a
sudden.
You
know
that
Public
Access
goes
away
and
the
county
has
no
recourse.
If
there's
not
a
public
accesses,
there's
a
way
to
do
it
as
a
cycling
condition.
H
D
C
D
E
E
A
C
N
Development
and
then
you
know
if
they
ran
out
of
permits
that
we
would
not
provide.
So
we
wanted.
N
We
are
ensuring
sufficient
parking
Supply
in
order
to
be
in
waste
demand
for
the
existing
residents,
and
so
we
feel
that
we've
been
able
to
strike
that
balance
with
the
number
of
spaces
that
we're
taking
away
relative
to
the
number
of
spaces
that
are
being
preserved
for
the
existing
building.
Then
providing
parking
at
a
more
aggressive
ratio
right,
but
that
would
be
available
for
the
new
town.
A
So
the
the
idea
is,
anyone
can
elect
to
purchase.
N
Would
be
depending
on
how
much
Supply
we
have
that
if
we
started
to
have
more,
if
we
start
to
have
less
demand,
then
we
would
offer
up
a
second
space
understood
right.
That's.
A
Yeah
Jim
and
Ben
feather
Harrison,
so
Jim
gonna
tell
me
an
event.
J
Yeah
hi
thanks
yeah
I
just
want
to
join
the
discussion
on
the
mid-block
crossing
and
the
circulation
internal
to
the
site,
and
then
I
you
know
want
to
align
myself
with
the
other
commenters.
J
Certainly
this
is
a
these
are
very
long
blocks.
If
there's
any
way,
we
could
have
mid
block
Crossings
I'm.
Definitely
in
support
of
that
to
say
well,
that's
where
the
driveways
come
out,
so
it's
dangerous.
Well,
a
streak
comes
out,
it's
dangerous
and
we
have
Crossings
at
every
corner.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
really
works
for
me
as
a
reason
not
to
have
a
mid
block
Crossing,
you
know
having
a
signalizing
it.
J
If
we
have
to
do
that,
we
do
that,
but
other
than
that
we
have
lots
of
streets
coming
into
intersections,
that
don't
have
street
lights.
I
mean
the
street
signals,
but
we
do
have
have
Crossings.
So
you
know
a
mid-roll.
The
desire
is
going
to
be
there.
People
are
going
to
be
doing
it.
I
think
it's
safer.
If
we
make
it
official
rather
than
just
let
people
be
Crossing
wherever
they
want
to
cross,
because
they
don't
want
to
walk
all
the
way.
J
To
the
end
of
the
block,
which
is
a
really
long
block
as
far
as
the
internal
circulation,
we
had
a
discussion
like
this
when
we
were
having
the
sprcs
for
crystal
houses
just
south
of
this
site
and
one
of
the
things
I
think
if
I
remember
we
came
up
with
was
we
had
those
internal
circulation
streets
be
more
like
streets?
They
have
sidewalks
when
we
were
still
looking
for
parking,
we
would
allow
parking,
but
it
would
have
to
be.
J
Parallel
would
have
to
be
parallel
parking
not
head
in
parking,
so
it
read
like
a
street
so
that
there
would
be
that
circulation
through
the
crystal
houses,
site
and
I.
Think
it
came
out
pretty
much
that
way
that
there
are
sidewalks,
you
know,
should
it
get
built,
but
there
would
be
sidewalks
along
those
internal
circulation
streets.
They
do
read
like
streets
if
we
had
something
like
that
here
too,
that
it
isn't
just
for
cars
cutting
through
that.
J
A
You
so
then
Sarah
then
Joe
McIntyre.
L
L
We
have
so
much
on-site
parking
and
so
much
street
parking
and
I
think
we
really
need
to
undo
the
tower
in
the
park,
or
this
is
really
the
tower
in
the
parking
lot
style
building
we
have
and
there's
so
much
surface
parking
that
could
really
be
turned
into
streets
into
trees
into
Greenery.
So
it
would
really
encourage
you
know,
because
especially
worth
losing
so
many
mature
trees
end
up
getting
to
the
next
topic,
but
I'm
framing
it
as
a
parking
issue.
We
should
really
try.
This
is
going
to
be
probably
our
last
opportunity.
L
Really,
you
know
the
service
parking
that
does
not
match
the
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
in
the
direction
of
God
I
did
want
to
say,
I
appreciate
the
improved
pedestrian
circulation
and
the
connection
now
between
the
The
Pedestrian
area,
although
I
do
hope
that
it's
really
well
lit
right,
especially
if
you
have
a
building
on
one
side
and
a
and
a
retention
wall
on
the
other
with
the
seating
above
it
particularly
when
you
don't
have
that
restaurant
being
used
like
area,
could
become
a
little
unsafe
feeling
dark.
L
Unless
you
have
it
really
well
lit
so
I'd
encourage
the
applicant
to
think
about
what
kind
of
lighting
elements
they
could
do
to
make.
That
sort
of
a
safe,
welcoming
area.
Q
I
wanted
to
pull
this
bed
a
little
bit
more
on
the
number
of
parking
spaces
allocated
for
units,
so
the
building.
That's
currently
the
site.
I
guess
that's
the
Lofts.
Are
those
residents
allowed
to
purchase
more
than
one
parking
space
So.
Q
N
B
C
Q
Okay,
the
existing
existing
restaurants,
okay,
so
with
the
new
tower,
the
thinking
is
that
we'll
see
where
demand
is
and
then
potentially
some
units
would
be
have
the
opportunity
to
purchase
a
second
parking
pass.
But
it's
not
guaranteed
correct.
Will
there
be
an
impact
on
the
existing
units
in
the
lock
building?
Would
they
also
find
their
ability
to
have
a
second
for
Green
Space,
go
away,
I'm,
just
trying
to
understand
yeah.
O
N
Q
N
Q
C
Q
It
in
a
highly
unsafe
Manner-
and
we
know
human
behavior-
is
doing
that.
It
seems
silly
to
ignore
that
people
are
doing
that
in
a
safe
manner.
I
understand
this
may
not
be
it
highly
desirable
to
encourage,
but
we
should
at
least
make
it
safe
people.
A
G
Yeah,
just
kind
of
adding
on
to
the
thoughts
about
the
internal
pedestrian
flow
and
parking
is
to
maybe
think
long
term
about
how
hopefully,
and
maybe
even
encouraging
residents,
to
kind
of
reduce
ownership
and
kind
of
Designing
things,
so
that
one
can
pave
the
way
to
expand
that
internal
internal
flow
with
you
know
again,
adding
more
open
space
as
well,
and
maybe
even
thinking
about
things
like
supporting
car
share,
Arrangements
and
other
other
types
of
options
that
would
make
it
more
appealing
or
at
least
provide
some
incentives
for
for
people
to
not
own
their
own
car.
P
D
D
A
D
Dropping
up
people,
picking
up
people,
dumping
up
stuff,
it's
Non-Stop
and
to
have
people
park
there
and
they
legitimately
hurt
their.
D
M
M
M
A
M
It's
something
the
owner
Robert
can
request,
accounting
to
look
at
changing
the
use.
Okay,.
M
J
P
M
The
18th
Street,
complete
Street
project
is
introducing
that
protected
bicycle
facility
on
the
North
and
South
Side,
so
there
actually
isn't
going
to
be
any
parking
along
18th,
Street,
Frontage,
yeah.
M
Yeah
so
when
they
redesign
eats,
they
are
going
to
be
doing
some
changes
all
the
way
down
to
18..
You
all
can
look
at
requesting
having
those
spaces.
M
M
A
A
J
It's
charging.
You
said
you're
going
to
be
looking
into
having
more
more
charging
stalls
in
the
parking
garage,
so
yeah,
the
more
you
can
do
the
better,
because
really
they're
going
to
be
more
and
more
electric
cars.
All
manufacturers
are
going
that
way.
So
it's
going
to
be
in
the
interest
of
your
tenants.
The
other
thing
is
in
your
bike:
room
you're
going
to
have
to
have
charging
ability
because
electric
bikes
are
really
growing
I,
don't
think
you
want
them
to
be
charged
up
in
the
apartments
and
I.
N
We
talking
about
it,
okay,
for
how
to
accommodate
that,
not
only
within
the
proposed
building
within
our
existing.
G
Yeah,
just
just
second
the
thought
about
the
electrification
and
might
also
want
to
look
at
some
of
the
surface,
surface
parking
and
opportunities
for
making
sure
or
installing
charging
net
stations
there
as
well.
To
accommodate.
Since
much
of
your
parking
is
the
surface,
lots
and
I
don't
know
whether
to
what
extent
it
might
work
to
have
charging
with
solar
panels
actually
a
little
bit
of
shady
and,
of
course,
fewer
parking
spaces.
Overall,
but
again
the
you
know,
thinking
about
you
know
going
towards
electric
vehicles.
A
Prepare
your
questions,
here's
my
summary:
what
I
heard
on
Transportation
very,
very
strong
support
from
mid
clock
Crossing
on
ease,
we
understand
where
the
county
is
coming
from
with
it,
but
the
reality
is:
people
are
fallible
and
they're
already
Crossing
there.
A
The
idea
of
making
The
Pedestrian
pass
through
the
site
available.
No,
no
trespassing,
science,
preference
for
Public
Access
easements
for
this
looking
at
pickup
drop-off
opportunities,
especially
on
Eid
since
18th,
is
no
longer
an
issue
and
exploring
more
charging
opportunities
both
for
the
bikes
and
the
cars,
including
some
that
are
on
site.
We
don't
have
to
access.
The
garage
sounds
good,
okay,
good
all
right.
Moving
on
to
open
space
and
Landscaping
okay,
would
you
like
to
start
thank.
I
You
do
you
know
out
of
the
116
..
How
much
do
you
have
an
account
of
how
many
are
canopy
trees
and
how
many
are
underscore.
C
O
M
O
Like
three
to
ten
inch,
caliper
was
49
trees,
three
of
which-
and
this
is
removed,
three
of
which
were
poor
health
and
then
greater
than
10
inch.
Caliper
was
26.,
one
of
which
was
poor
health.
I
I
would
just
discourage
as
I'm
summing
for
this
one,
so
I'm
trying
to
get
up
to
speed
many
canopy
future
health.
You
know
be
healthy
and
grow.
There
is
I
mean
it's
the
ornamental
tree,
so
great
them,
but
you
know
they
don't
provide
the
kind
of
environmental
benefit,
Cooling
and
everything
else
that
the
canopy
trees
do
and
to
work
with
the
county
and
make
sure
that
the
planning
toxins
are,
as
you
know,
up
to
speed
and
as
big
and
functioning
to
the
you
know.
The
there's.
I
I
I
Just
kind
of
mentioned
it
with
the
a
deep
green
roof
that
will
somehow
kind
of
merge
with
a
canopy
or
what
have
you
I
I,
don't
know
what
did
you
have
to
have
some
kind
of
plan
with
that
or
did
I
just
misuse
that.
O
Yeah
I
think
yeah.
So
so
we.
N
We
have
tried
to
differentiate
the
types
of
green
roofs
that
we
would
be
installing
right.
So,
on
top
of
on
tops
of
the
building,
we
would
be
doing
exits
of
green
roof.
But
we
do
have
this
identified
portion
of
intensive
green
roof.
N
It
would
allow
us
to
get
sufficient
soil
debt
in
order
to
have
fuel
plants
right
right,
and
so
that
would
be
located
if
you
have
been
to
Crystal
towers,
that
we
are
proposing
to
structurally
strengthen
the
existing
Lobby
okay
and
then
have
that
section
on
top
of
the
existing
Lobby
that
connects
into
the
proposed
building
the
Intensive
rebrook.
Okay,
so
taking
the
sustainability.
I
One
last
thing:
are
you
using
bird
friendly
glass?
We
are
especially
around
the.
N
A
Classes,
if
you're
going
to
be
developing,
that
intensive
green
move,
you're
going
to
need
temporary
friendly
glass
around
that
as
well,
what
we're
finding
is
people
put
in
all
the
stuffer
to
put
in
the
plantings,
but
the
birds
are
going
to
fly
into
the
glass
because
you
just
attracted
them
there.
So
I'm,
not
sure.
That's
an
issue
with
your
green
roof.
With
regard
to
the
canopy
I
understand
the
conversations
that
we're
having
with
Tracer
move
trees
being
replaced.
A
N
A
A
C
A
C
A
G
Yeah
I
had
a
couple
questions
on
the
a
bird
friendly
class.
What
did
you
have
actually
estimated
or
number
for
what
the
birth
bird
Collision
threat?
Factor
was
on
that
and
whether
that
you
know
we
kind
of
looked
for
achieving
15
or
below.
G
Yeah
I'm
not
100
sure
what
the
gbi
requires
in
terms
of
and
how
it
relates
to
that
number,
but
kind
of
looking
at
the
I
think
coming
from
the
Audubon
Society
and
other
groups
that
look
at
that
that
that's
kind
of
considered
the
gold
standard
of
bird
friendly
glasses
is
achieving
those
numbers
below
15
on
how
they
calculate
it.
G
On
the
question,
you
encourage
that
you're
doing
solar
on
the
one
building,
but
it
also
actually
looks
like
there
might
be
even
more
room
for
putting
solar
on
on
other
parts
of
that
roof
and
whether
you
know
we're
considering
that,
as
is
just
a
way
of
boosting
the
amount
of
renewable
energy
that's
produced
on
the
site
for
the
whole
complex.
N
Yeah
I
mean
that
we
have
looked
at
solar
to
see
what
the
potential
would
be.
They
went
this
building
or
what
this
project
is
committing
to
is
up
to
a
65
kilowatt
array,
at
least
a
65.
G
C
O
C
A
Have
and
I
know
you
and
your
colleagues
you've
been
working
in
this
community
for
a
while
we're
adding
a
lot
of
people
to
this
community
and
we
don't
really
have
the
ability
to
add
a
lot
of
open
space.
So
I
think
we
have
to
do
a
really
good
job
with
the
space
that
we
have
and
you
do
have
that
space
there
you're
not
gonna
plant
on
those
little
Hills
that
go
from
the
parking
lot
up
to
the
sidewalk.
A
If
you're
not
gonna,
do
anything
other
than
plants,
something
not
going
to
build
anything
there,
your
own
trees
there
now
so,
if
you're
going
to
add
trees.
This
is
the
time
to
add
all
the
other
plantings
and
not
disturb
the
roots.
It's
just
like
you
have
an
opportunity
and
I
think
it
might
go
a
long
way.
I
saw
it
was
done
with
the
treatments
on
oh
one
of
the
jbg
properties,
where
they
added
not
just
the
trees
but
the
shrubs
and
the
perennials.
It
looks
really
nice,
it's
a
little
mini
habitat.
A
D
D
D
That
one
of
my
apartment,
which
was
awesome
and
I'm
sure
that
fig
tree
well,
it
shouldn't
have
to
go
because
it's
not
anywhere
near
the
construction,
but
I
do
think
that
if
that
can't
be
preserved
in
that
level
of
multi-layered,
not
necessarily
canopy,
because
it
certainly
won't
happen
in
my
lifetime.
But
I
think
the
notion
of
trying
to
to
make
a
richer
environment
for
The
Pedestrian
is
really
important.
A
And
it's
quite
biophilic
yeah
yeah.
Then
then
Michael.
L
Yeah
I
share
just
everyone's
sentiments
about
the
loss
of
trees.
I
think
we're
just
really
being
it's
screwed
over
here
by
ancestors
and
bad
planning
that
was
allowed
that
led
to
these,
you
know,
really
great
trees.
You
know
we
are
really
rude.
The
decisions
that
were
made
many
years
ago
and
I
really
hope
we
can
find
some
more
trees
and
more
biophilia.
You
know
why
not
put
green
roofs
on
the
existing
and
the
existing.
It's
not
quite
biophilia,
but
more
more
greeners
than
the
existing
buildings,
and
things
like
that.
L
Are
we
talking
about
the
the
new
open
space
or
the
refined
open
space,
as
well
as
that
part
of
the
section?
Yes,
I'm
kind
of
confused
by
what's
happening
there
about
if
there's
really
an
addition,
it
sort
of
looks
like
it's
we're
losing
Green
Space
in
some
ways.
L
If
we're
getting
some
more
pavement
for
where
Suites
are
going
and
I
I,
can
someone
walk
through
a
little
bit
more
about
what
the
proposed
pocket
park
is
going
to
be
like
compared
to
the
current
like
where
we
are
losing
plantings
or
gaining
plantings
compared
to
patio
seeding
and
basically
de
facto,
seating
serving
retail,
which
is
nice?
But
you
know
it's
a
benefit
for
the
retail
clients
of
the
property
owners
as
much
as
anyone
else
in
terms
of
public
space,
so
that
would
be
helpful
and
appreciated.
N
C
N
And
provide
a
little
bit
more
structure
purpose
to
the
pocket
park
it
as
a
part
of
the
Baseline.
We
are
expanding
the
easement
area
by
700
square
feet,
but,
to
the
extent
that
there
are
comments
on
the
nature
of
these
enhancements
are
certainly
open
to
them.
We
do
want
to
provide
access
back
in
between
the
buildings,
because
that
is
how
people
going
to
the
Lost
parking
lot.
You.
N
If
they
were
coming
off
of
each
street,
so
that
was
opponent
adding
in
some
outdoor
seating
felt
like
a
way
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
definition
and
purpose
rather
than
just
being
purely
circulation.
N
And
then
we
have
taken
some
of
the
pathways
away
and
filled
it
with
green
space.
In.
L
N
L
So
we
are
sort
of
right,
like
the
debate
about
you,
know
we're
losing
green
space
but
gaining
public
space,
which
sort
of
is
frustrating
from
like
a
neighborhood
in
a
realized
experience
point
of
view
like
right
when
we've
talked
about
this
for
other
developments,
but
really
from
neighborhood
point
of
view
from
a
user
there's.
No,
you
don't
you
don't
see
the
space
as
differentiated,
but
who
owns
it?
L
It
is
sort
of
the
way
it
is
I
do
think
that
an
alternative
to
tables
and
plantings
might
be
like
enhanced
Green
Space,
maybe
like
some
interesting
ways
of
thinking
through
sculptural
seating,
with
green
space
interspersed
and
planting
Central
Spurs,
rather
than
your
just
kind
of
typical
tables
and
chairs
that'll
be
used
by
you,
know,
retail
people
and
end
up
with
food
discarded
but
sort
of
like
maybe
like
a
little
mini
Refuge
sort
of
thing
where
you
can
sit
and
relax,
but
not
necessarily
eat.
N
N
Them
to
being
on
our
portion
of
the
property,
so
given
the
the
property
line,
runs
through
and
then
goes
at
an
angle
up
through,
and
so
we
are
restricted
or
we
want
to
be
restricted
to
just
proposing
the
enhancements
on
our
portion
of
the
property
rather
than
going
and
proposing
them
on
somebody
else's
property,
because
we're
trying
to
be
good
neighbors.
So
that
was
one
of
the
restrictions
that
we
had
and
thinking
through
how
the
proposed
enhancements
might
be.
K
Yes,
thank
you
yeah
I'd,
like
to
add,
to
my
add,
to
the
other
voices
suggesting
more
more
commitment
to
the
tree.
Canopy
I,
you
know
I
really
would
I
think
if
we're
going
to
pick
up
on
some
suggestions.
Like
Mr
Lynn,
tell
me
mate
about
the
the
sidewalks
along
the
interior
Road
system,
you
may
we
could
look
at
the
you
know
improving
the
Landscaping
overall,
we
we've
seen
in
other
site
plans.
K
The
developers
have
repeatedly
told
us
that
when
you
have
the
equipment
on
site
and
you're,
You,
Know
You're
Building
say
this
this
pocket
park.
That's
that's
the
point
at
which
you
know
refreshing.
The
Landscaping
through
the
whole
area
will
never
be
any
less
expensive
because
you
have
this.
That
equipment
on
site
already
and
I'm
really
attentive,
I
mean
I
I,
really
like
the
idea
that
we're
preserving
these
structures.
D
Thank
you,
yeah
two
questions.
Your
intensive
Ruth
I
thought
I
heard
earlier
that
there
were
two
of
them
or
is
it
just
the
one?
It's
really
just
a
1A
I
wasn't
sure
where
the
second
one
would
be.
D
O
Yeah
sure
and
Boardwalk
we
probably
maybe
jumped
a
little
bit
ahead
and
sang
that
material.
But
the
idea
is
there.
B
O
The
era
that
we're
showing
some
of
the
seating
that
is
within
that
critical
root
zone,
so
we
don't
want
to
do
any
sort
of
traditional
Pavements
digging
into
the
prison.
So
you
know,
maybe
it's
not
a
boardwalk
quite
the
way
that
would
be
conducive
here
coming
up
flush
off
a
sidewalk,
but.
C
O
Yeah
I
was
gonna,
say
the
there's
that
North
sidewalk,
that's
being
removed.
I
think
that's
one
of
the
areas
we're
talking
about
adding
green
back.
The
other
thing
I'd
add,
is
at
the.
J
O
O
A
C
A
Having
the
sidewalks
read
like
the
streets,
adding
more
Greenery,
well
that
especially
the
areas
that
might
not
be
actively
used
throughout
the
year
and.
A
Joe
would
like
to
know
the
threat
Factor
on
the
glass,
probably
at
the
time
that
ghost
during
hearing
and
with
this
new
open
space,
consider
more
green
refuge
and
less
seeding,
and
then
we
started
to
move
into
I,
think
sustainability,
Community
benefits
and
Janet
asked
your
question
about
adding
more
soil
around
the
roof
and
I
think
others
supported
that.
So
are
there
more
comments
on
the
sustainability
and
Community
benefits?
That's
the
third
item
on
the
agenda.
You.
A
D
D
This
is
the
recurring
and
perennial
issue
of
community
benefits,
which
are
almost
always
The
Usual
Suspects
Transportation,
which
benefits
the
county
that
doesn't
necessarily
benefit
Community,
affordable
housing,
which
is
absolutely
necessary,
but
I
would
refer,
staff
and
applicants
to
livability
document
Which
documents,
a
lot
of
things
which
the.
D
Thinks
would
be
Community
benefits.
One
of
the
frustrations
for
all
of
us
is
that
by
the
time
we
always
hear
that
they're
in
negotiation
and
by
the
time
they
make
it
to
the
staff
report
for
Planning
Commission,
there's
absolutely
no
opportunity
for
the
community
to
participate
so
I
think
that's
a
structural
problem
with
with
all
site
plans,
but
I
just
wanted
to
you
know,
speak.
D
A
A
C
D
A
Hands
left,
okay,
Joan
and
then
Ben.
G
Yeah
a
couple
of
questions:
first,
you
mentioned
a
20
Energy
Efficiency
gains
from
ashrae
Baseline
I
thought.
The
earlier
material
I
had
looked
at
said
24
with
85
and
85
score
for
the
energy
star
performance
for
the
building.
It
won
a
clarification
of
of
what
the
target
is.
N
That
we
were
satisfying
the
0.25,
far
prerequisite
at
the
20
above.
G
G
From
what
we've
gotten,
it
sounds
like
the
that
you're
going
with
fossil
gas
for
the
HVAC
systems
for
the
hot
water,
both
hot
water
and
Heating,
and
the
energy
model
indicates
that
there
was
a
pathway
to
an
all-electric
building
that
would
allow
it
to
be
carbon
neutral
once
the
energy
grid
would
would
be
powered
by
renewable
energy,
so
that
you
know,
is
kind
of
a
bit
more
information
as
to
why
you're
not
going
down
that
path.
G
N
Rfi
from
e2c2
earlier
this
afternoon,
that
included
some
additional
items,
but
the
current
system
is
a
water
source
heat
pump
with
a
centralized
gas-fired
boiler.
So.
C
N
Is
overall,
electrical
capacity
and
the
limitations
on
given
existing
utilities
inside
also
the
concerns
around
the
space
constraints
around
the
rooftop
or
the
additional
equipment?
We
do
understand
that
thinking
about
into
the
future.
You
know
what
would
a
pathway
towards
all
electric
potentially
be
if
the
technology
was
was
to
get
there,
so
we
are
going
to
be
working
with
the
design
team
to
think
about
items
such
as
you
know,
reinforcing
the
structural
slab
of
the
roof
to
accommodate
additional
equipment
in.
G
Are
you
by
chance
Consulting
with
people
in
the
building,
decarbonization,
Network
or
those
that
are
do
some
of
the
car,
the
the
zero
building
zero
carbon
building
certification
to
better
identify?
What
might
be
some
possible
guideline
or
possible
Pathways
to
getting
there,
preferably
with
with
actually
early
con
with
the
initial
construction,
rather
than
locking
on
fossil
gas
for
for
a
decade
or
so,
and
would
you
be
considering
maybe
geothermal
as
well.
G
Well,
actually,
there's
a
number
of
geothermal
installations
in
Manhattan
and
New
York
City,
St
Patrick's,
but
there's
others
so
they're
being
done
in
highly
Urban
environments.
So
I
think
it's
probably
worth
checking
out.
Okay,.
N
We
can
certainly
have
to
assign
a
team
check,
you
know,
do
another
analysis
on
potential
geothermal
and
then,
to
the
extent
the
sustainability
consultant
is.
C
N
Reached
out
to
some
of
those
zero
carbon
certification
agencies,
we
can
have
that
done
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
L
I'll
say
on
sustainability:
I
really
agree
with
the
earlier
comment
that
you
should
have
more
capacity
for
electric
car
spaces
on
community
benefits.
I
really
agree
with
everything.
Judy
said
it
really
does
a
disservice
to
everyone
that
we
continue
to
not
know
what
the
community
benefits
are
during
SP
I
think
that's
wrong.
L
I
will
say
on
the
affordable
housing,
though
that
I
think
it
continues
to
be
a
priority
that
affordable
housing
be
on
site.
So
hopefully
we
see
that
as
part
of
this
package,
when
we
eventually
get
it
is
revealed
to
us
what
the
community
benefits
are.
A
Thank
you,
Michael
Dowell,.
K
Oh
yes,
thank
you.
Yeah
I
agree
with
Ben
and
Judy's
perspective
on
the
community
benefits
yeah.
If
we
could
understand
those
earlier,
it
would
be
helpful.
I
did
have
a
question
for
the
applicant
regarding
like
parking.
It
feels
that
you
know
you
have
to
go
with
an
estimate
for
now.
K
You
have
your
own
best
estimates
of
how
they
can
be
used,
but
inevitably
you're
going
to
have
empty
parking
spaces
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
a
way
to
convert
that
to
open
space
as
things
you
know,
as
you
settle
into
your
real
numbers,
just
a
question,
but
I
just
wondered:
if
you
thought
about
that,
because
it
seems
like
we're
all
kind
of
making
a
forecast
we're
going
to
be
sitting
there.
Inevitably
looking
at
empty
parking
spaces.
N
C
N
Said
a
guiding
principle
when
we
set
out
was
to
ensure
that
we
were
maintaining
parking
to
satisfy
existing
demand,
because
it
felt
strange
as
a
building
owner
to
go
and
talk
to
Residents
is
we've
done
multiple
times
and.
N
N
Spot
but
we
will
be
able
to
accommodate
your
needs
and
we
we
felt
that
we
heard
that
there
that
they're,
a
preference
and
support
for
that
kind
of
in
the
future
to
the
extent
parking
utilization
changes
or
evolves.
N
We
will
be
evaluating
whether
or
not
there
are
alternate
or
more
productive
uses
for
that
surface
parking
just
having
fields
of
empty
asphalt.
Does
nobody
any
good?
It
certainly
doesn't
do
our
property
any
good.
It
doesn't
enhance
the
resident
experience,
so
we
are
committed
to
maintaining
parking
for
the
existing
demand
today,
but
we
will
be
continually
monitoring
it
and
if
the
Dynamics
change
to
where
we
have
a
tremendous
excess
of
surface
parking,
that
is
not
utilized.
E
D
Of
surface
parking
is
going,
so
not
very
many
spaces
are
being
built
in
the
new
building.
It's
mostly
that
you're
capturing
from
somewhere
else,
so
I
could
see
Mike
that
down
the
road
that
might
be
an
option
but
I
think
right
now,
in
the
near
turn,
you
have
you're
not
only
having
to
preserve
parking
for
the
900
plus
units
that
are
there,
but
for
all
the
another
200.
D
You
know
that
and
you're
you're
going
up
to
1100
space
units
and
you're,
not
adding
much
of
the
way
of
parking
you're
taking
away
more
than
you're
Banning,
so
I
think
for
now,
in
the
near
term,
you
can
make
the
numbers
work,
probably
with
a
certain
parking
ratio,
but
I,
don't
think
you
could
convert
the
pavement
any.
A
J
Yeah
following
up
on
those
comments-
and
this
came
up
a
Transportation
Commission-
so
commissioner
slad
may
want
to
expand
on
this,
but
when,
when
the
site
plan
is
approved
at
a
certain
parking
ratio,
I
would
Advocate
that
that
be
the
maximum
that
if
the
applicant
wants
to
reduce
parking
in
the
future,
they
do
not
have
to
come
back
for
a
minor
or
a
major
site
plan
Amendment.
They
can
just
go
ahead
and
do
it
if
they
want
to
convert
space
from
parking.
J
Let's
say
to
an
additional
Bike,
Room
space
or
or
or
Transformers
for
additional
capacity
for
recharging
vehicles
that
sort
of
thing
that
they
can
just
do
it.
They
don't
have
to
come
back
for
an
amended
site
plan
and
I.
Think
that
really
follows
on
we're
able
to
with
Mr
Dell
was
saying.
R
H
Approval
at
exactly
that
ratio,
because
years
ago
we
were
really
parking,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
they
couldn't
build
any
less
than
they
said
they
were
going
to
now.
They
are
thinking,
it's
shifted
and
often
you
wouldn't
be
got
opposed
to
seeing
the
lower
parking
ratio.
H
We
think
it
makes
sense
to
change
the
County's
approach
and
you
know,
prove
a
ratio
that
is
at
least
somewhat
lower
than
they
are
proposing
if
we
would
have
approved
if
they
had
proposed
it
a
lower
number,
as
he
was
saying
so
if
they
need
additional
underground
Transformers
to
support
more
EV
parking
and
obvious
place
to
do
that.
Is
it
an
existing
parking
space
in
the
parking
garage?
They
don't
have
to
come
back
for
a
reapproval,
because
now
they're
perfectly
Shield
or
they
fill
the
bike.
H
There's
no
more
space
for
bikes
in
a
parking
garage,
a
parking
space.
They
don't
have
to
come
back
forward.
So
this
was
the
thinking
Transportation
Commission
and
it's
certainly
applicable
to
most
of
the
developments
that
we
are
seeing.
M
Obviously,
as
Chris
mentioned
at
Jim
and
other
folks
have
mentioned
so
the
you
know,
the
the
construct
of
UL
to
say
plans
is
the
developer,
poses
a
ratio
and
then
staff
reviews
that
developer
proposed
a
lower
ratio
than
Stafford
review
or
lower
ratio.
If
the
developer.
P
M
To
build
more
parking,
then
that
would
be
their
up
to
them
if
they
wanted
to
do
that.
So,
if
someone
says
to
me,
is
this
parking
ratio
appropriate
I'm
going
to
review
what
is
proposed?
So
typically,
the
developers
usually
don't
propose
a
lower
ratio
than
what
has
been
built
just
for
everyone's
informations
I
mentioned
a
Transportation
Commission.
There
have
recently
been
a
couple
projects
where
they
have
proposed
a
lower
ratio.
It's
maybe
a
little
like
two
or
three
percent
lower.
M
P
M
We
had
a
lot
of
discussions
with
them
about,
let's
come
up
with
a
ratio
that
makes
sense
that
we
believe
kind
of
builds
in
that
ability
to
not
have
to
do
a
site
plan
Amendment
because
all
of
a
sudden
they're
short,
you
know
like
five
spaces,
because
the
staff-
that's
not
something
I
want
to
do,
and
so
that's
where
it
becomes
it
comes
up
to
you
know.
M
M
M
D
I
have
a
different
question
for
you:
Joanne.
What
about
parking
parking
pilot
project
are.
C
M
P
M
That
his
Project's
not
going
to
be
filled
yeah
we're
the
Pilot's
probably
going
to
be
over
before
the
project
is
constructed
and
occupied.
So
we
could
see
the
utilization
today.
M
P
M
A
A
A
Science
at
night,
yeah,
so
I,
don't
know
I'll,
just
kick
it
off
with
those.
D
D
D
C
I
D
I
assume
it's
there
for
some
safety,
sidewalk
prison
or
something,
but
when
I
look
at
new
construction,
where
there
are
these
ginormous
lights
on
every
single
floor,
we
have
to
do
something
about
screening.
The
other
thing
is
that
keeping
with
the
common
the
community
benefits,
can
it's
cometh
minute.
We
never
basically
see
any
cycling
conditions
on
hours
of
days
of
operation,
and
here.
C
D
D
D
N
Yeah
I
mean
I
would
say
that
just
being
able
to
come,
yell
at
me
is
actually
going
to
be
a
tremendous.
H
E
N
C
B
C
N
Different
conversation,
it's
a
different
set
of
issu
and
we
plan
to
continue
doing
that.
All
that
when
you
think
about
dweck,
we
are
a
family-owned
company,
much
much
smaller
relative
to
most
of
the
other
property
owners
that
we
can't.
We
can't
risk
losing
the
value
of
prison,
Towers
or
the
value
of
the
new
development.
There
has
to
be
a
balance,
and
so
I
certainly
appreciate
the
comment.
I
don't
know
that
I
have
any
solutions.
N
It
will
be
disruptive.
My
hope
is
that,
because
there
will
be
common
ownership,
because
there
will
become
an
oversight
because
I'm
going
to
be
responsible
for
the
impacts
on
Towers,
just
as
much
as
the
progress
of
development
to
be
exactly
move
forward.
That
will
be
a
tremendous
benefit
to
the
residents
relative.
C
N
B
C
M
And
I
don't
know
what
Courtney's
saying
she's
exactly
correct.
A
lot
of
developers
previously
have
come
in
to
ask
us
for
extending
their
hours,
and
it
is
something
we
are
very
Robert
may
have
asked
this
a
couple
times
before.
C
P
M
A
very
specific
and
specialized
operation
that.
M
C
M
Lot
so
there's
not
even
you
like
the
entire
street,
with
that
you're
looking
at
is
a
buffer,
so
it
is
something
we
as
staff
are
very
cognizant
of,
and
we
do
not
support
increases
to
those
hours
very
often
or
very
lightly.
The.
C
M
C
B
N
M
We're
building
safety
more
of
a
an
ISD
issue.
So
if
those
are
concerns,
that's
something
that
needs
to
be
taken
a
building,
official
and
Robert
versus
something
where
it's
temporary
lighting.
That
is
something
we
do
require
in
the
left
to
provide.
C
M
D
K
Actually,
I
think
I'm,
good
I
think
that
last
two
minutes
clarified
my
question.
So
thank
you.
A
A
About
these
things,
the
layering
and
for
our
sustainability
and
Community
benefits,
look
at
adding
more
solar
on
the
roof,
if
possible.
Consider
if
you
can
get
geothermal
in
there,
I
didn't
know
that
we
could
do
this.
A
C
E
A
O
A
C
Q
H
Yeah
well,
second,
that
I
went
back
and
consulted.
The
staff
slide,
switch
really
tough,
okay,
or
at
least
they
were
there
and
then
I
had
a
thing.
I
wanted
to
refer
back.
H
So
one
of
those
questions
that
maybe
wasn't
worth
having
everybody
go.
H
That
slide
I'm
hugely
excited
about
the
updated
protected
by
clients,
project
I
I
wish.
We
had
just
had
like
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
the
updated
pedestrian
connection.
I
still
have
words
about
how
that
all
is
going
to
feel
looking
down
upon
the
dining
thing
in
the
in
the
newly
widened
40-foot
alley,
but
all
in
all
I
think
it's
great
I'm
comfortable
with
the
parking
ratio.
H
Space
glad
that
the
median's
going
back
in
on
18th,
Street
and
I
do
hope
that
Stephanie
I
don't
know.
A
I'm
good
thanks
and
then
our
virtual
participants,
if
you
have
any
final
comments,
that
you
did
not
get
a
chance
to
make
Mike
Dowell.
K
Oh
yes,
hi,
yeah,
I,
think
I
would
I
I
like
the
I,
like
the
design,
I'm
glad
you're,
preserving
the
structure.
I
you
know,
I
would
just
ask
if
you
can
look
at
that
mid
block
Crossing
again,
that's
kind
of
more
for
the
county.
K
If
we
can
make
sure
that
the
public
The
Pedestrian
access
through
the
site
is
really
written
into
the
site,
cleaning
conditions
that
would
be
great
and
if
you
have
the
opportunity
to
kind
of
look
at
biophilia
and
the
Landscaping
across
the
entire
site,
you
know
since,
while
while
you
have
the
construction
Crews,
there
I
think
that
that
might
be
a
great
opportunity,
but
I
I
think
it's
a
nice
little
project
and
look
forward
to
how
it
turns
out.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
final
comments.
Anything
you
haven't
had
a
chance
to
reiterate.
Joe
McIntyre
then
tell
me.
G
Foreign
yeah,
just
you,
know
again
encourage
the
the
duck
to
actually.
You
know,
look
in
more
detail
about
full
electrification
at
the
outset
of
the
building
to
be
consistent
with
the
county
school
for
carbon
neutrality
and
I.
Think
that's
and
again,
Echoes
everybody
else's
comments
about
more
bio,
more
trees,
especially
canopy
trees
and
and
thinking
more
broadly,
on
on
how
the
site
could
be
perhaps
utilized
better
in
the
future,
especially
with
shifting,
hopefully
shifting
demand
away
from
car
ownership.
J
Yeah
yeah
I've
already
made
my
earlier
comments.
I
stand
by
those
I
pretty
much
agree
with
the
all
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
tonight
and
thoughtful
comments
from
my
pillow
Commissioners
on
it.
I
think
I
agree
with
those
I
very
much
I.
Think
it's
a
solid
project
overall
I'm
happy
to
see
this
moving
forward.
I
particularly
am
very
happy
with
the
applicant
for
finding
a
solution
to
what
would
have
been
the
dead
end
between
the
flats
and
the
new
building.
J
L
I'll,
just
re-emphasize
I
think
we'll
all
say
from
the
Stars.
This
is
I
think
overall,
this
will
be
a
good
thing,
hopefully
for
eids
and
does
move
us
away
from
that
Tower
in
the
parking
lot.
You
know
Mega
Bloks,
that
we
have,
but
I
do
think
that
that
made
block
Crossing
at
Eads
is
so
essential
and
I
really
do
hope.
We
can
find
more
ways
to
counteract
the
Lost
trees,
particularly
by
reducing
existing
surface
parking
on
the
lot.
R
Hello,
I'm
Jeff,
Williams
I'm,
a
neighbor
in
22202
I
have
a
couple
of
comments.
One
is
directed
at
staff
and,
of
course
they
I
think
they've
already
heard
this
and
I
appreciate
that
staff
has
safety
concerns
about
the
mid-block
crossing,
but
I
think
that
underground
connection
under
one
is
going
to
become
really
important,
particularly
when
the
route
run,
construction
comes
underway
and
so
I
hope
they
consider
to
look
very
carefully
at
how
they
can
support
a
mid-block
Crossing.
R
Maybe
it's
not
urgent
now,
but
I
think
it's
going
to
become
very
important.
The
second
one
goes
to
the
applicant.
I
was
actually
delighted
to
see
the
solar
installed
on
the
roof
of
the
crystal
towers
and
I.
Just
I
had
not
seen
that
before
I
was
really
excited
about
that
and
then
I
realized
there's
a
lot
more
space
up
there
for
more
solar
I'm
thinking.
R
E
E
Hello,
the
applicator
said:
there's
a
conceptual
landscape
plan
that
lists
the
species
of
all
trees,
shrubs
and
plants
and
ground
cloves
I
commend
the
applicant
for
this
as
applicants
for
most
sci-fi
committees.
Projects
do
not
contain
its
information.
However.
The
plant
list
has
a
number
of
major
deficiencies.
I've
asked
the
applicant
and
the
landscape
architect
to
submit
a
revised
plant.
That's
in
traffic
consideration
this
meeting.
However,
the
applicant
does
not
in
this
landscape.
Affairs
not
done
this.
The
public
needs
this
information
to
get
big
comments
before
the
planning.
At
the
time.
E
The
planning
Christian
County
board
meetings
about
three
quarters
of
the
plants
are
not
satisfactory.
Some
are
not
native
or
even
the
United
States.
These
can
become
invasive
subtle
hybrids
or
cultivars.
Their
flowers
are
often
sterile,
produce
no
nectar
and
feed
no
pollinators,
if
not
sterile,
they
can
become
invasive.
The
plant
list
consistently
contains
a
number
of
grassland
sedges.
These
are
wind
pollinated.
They
don't
have
flowers
that
feed
colonies.
There
are
a
few
of
these.
E
E
The
the
plant
list
does
not
contain
any
milkweeds
to
help
implement
the
county
boards
to
to
Bonnet
pledge
to
support,
increase
the
County's
Monarch
populations,
your
prison
plant,
common
milkweed
on
all
green
roofs,
Tree,
Trunks
and
Open
Spaces
see
sunlight
for
much
of
the
time.
This
is
the
only
milkweed
that
that
plant
that
would
want
to
prefer
to
lay
eggs
or
explosives
and
all
because,
naturally,
is
you
need
this
I
hope
Laura
schlab
is.
He
was
hearing
this
and
this
understands
what
that
what
this
happened.
The
project
is
missing.
E
Over
140
speaks
insects
in
a
450
insects,
no
speed,
ounce
common
milkweed,
it's
nectar,
attract
funds
attracts
many
many
penalties.
It's
happening
as
flowers
provide
food,
it
is
the
most
important
food
plant
for
monocataphil
is
in
the
northeastern
and
Midwest
plant.
Hope
we,
milk
within
shady
areas.
E
Okay,
so
basically
we
need
this
information
by
the
Planning
Commission
media.
If
possible,
you're
going
to
do
more
harm
than
this.
This
whole
project
will
do
more
haunt.