►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
And
that's
site
plan
21008
we're
holding
a
hybrid
meeting
public
meeting
tonight,
which
enables
remote
electronic
participation
as
legally
authorized
by
the
code
of
Virginia
for
the
planning
commission's
electronic
meeting
policy,
which
was
adopted
on
July
7th
of
2022.
A
of
members
of
the
sbrc
subgroup
for
the
4600
Fairfax
Drive
are
participating
both
here
and
in
person
and
and
virtually
through
electronic
needs.
We
have
a
number
of
subgroup
members
participating.
Virtually
commissioner
Splat
is
on
for
remotely
I
see
that
we
also
have.
C
A
That's
another
remote
and
we
may
have
others
who
will
be
coming
on
in
the
next
few
minutes
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
orient
everyone
to
this
hybrid
environment
and
cover
a
few
specifics
about
how
tonight's
meeting
will
be
run.
Members
of
the
public
May
attend
the
meeting
here
in
person
or
electronically
by
using
the
Microsoft
teams
link,
which
is
provided
on
the
sprc's
web
page,
the
project
webpage
and
the
County's
events
calendar
as
well
as
email
notifications
sent
to
sprc
email
subscribers.
A
Please
turn
off
your
video
feed
and
I
will
address
a
little
later
when
it's
appropriate
to
turn
it
on
the
Microsoft
teams.
Meeting
chat
is
now
live
and
is
will
serve
two
purposes
for
the
sprc
subgroup
members
who
need
technical
assistance
and
for
members
of
the
public
to
add
their
names
to
the
list
for
public
comment
which
will
be
taken
at
the
end
of
this
meeting.
The
team's
chat
should
not,
as
they
should
not
be
used
for
discussion.
A
Those
who
were
planning
to
provide
public
comments
will
still
need
to
do
so
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
as
the
chat
will
not
serve
as
that
opportunity.
All
public
comments
must
be
shared
verbally
for
the
record.
During
the
assigned
public
comment
period,
we
are
recording
right
now
too.
If
subgroup
members
participate
virtually.
We
should
be
recognized
to
speak
on
any
item
during
the
course
of
the
meeting.
A
Please
turn
on
your
video
feed
and
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
teams
we're
monitoring
the
video
feeds
that
are
odds
so
I'll
know
who
is
wishes
to
speak
or
if
there
are
any
subgroup
members
participating
by
phone.
A
A
Okay,
no
one
for
members
of
the
public
who'd
like
to
provide
feedback
and
comment.
You'll
be
called
on
to
speak
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
you'll
be
allotted
two
to
three
minutes
to
speak
on
the
agenda
item,
depending
on
how
many
people
sign
up
to
speak.
A
If
you
wish
to
speak,
please
add
your
name
in
the
meeting
chat
for
the
virtual
attendees
I'll,
provide
your
provide
your
name
to
staff.
If
you
hear
a
person
also
Frontier
and
you'll
be
added
to
the
speakers
list.
Finally,
this
is
a
public
forum.
Tonight's
meeting
is
being
recorded
and
will
be
posted
to
the
County's
website.
All
information
associated
with
today's
meeting
with
a
written
or
spoken
is
subject
to
the
Freedom
of
Information
Act
requirements.
A
E
E
I
J
C
J
I'm
here,
Michael
Easter,
with
no
property.
F
I'm
sorry
I'm
Shepard,
Beeman
cphd
playing.
A
Division:
okay,
great
now,
online
raise
your
hand
for
those
who
are
online,
who
are
at
the
virtual
table.
Commissioner
slacker
first.
A
Thank
you
very,
very
well
and
Miss
Riggio.
A
Very
good,
thank
you,
I
think
we
now
have
that
all
done
and
we
can
now
move
into
the
meeting
our
agenda
tonight,
we'll
be
our
discussion.
Topics
tonight
are
ground
level,
uses
and
orientation,
site,
circulation,
building,
massing
and
architecture.
Those
are
things
now
for
that.
We
will
have
another
sbrc
that'll,
be
the
third
one.
Let
me
tell
you
right
now
what
those
topics
will
be,
so
you
can
save
those
comments
or
those
questions
for
that
next.
C
A
Before
we
start
this
anybody,
when
we
start
with
having
clarifying
questions,
we
have
the
applicant's
applicant
here
and
staff.
So
anybody
at
the
table
has
questions
about.
A
You
know
what
remember:
we've
already
had
one
sbrc
questions
carried
over
questions
about
any
changes,
questions
involving
any
of
these
three
topics
for
tonight
and
Now's.
C
C
A
Okay,
I'll:
kick
it
off
saying
that
have
there
been
changes
in
the
way
the
ground
level
uses
have
been
oriented
from
the
last
meeting,
and
now.
A
Fairfax
Drive,
we
also
have
loading
docks.
We
have
garage
entrances,
has
anything
changed
from
the
last
meeting.
C
D
D
The
lobby
is,
we
did
focus
on
kind
of
architecture
of
that
ground
floor
along
Fairfax
Drive,
especially
as
it
relates
to
recessing
that
parking
and
emphasizing
the
corner
as
it
faces
East
toward.
D
Drug,
so
if
you
blow
it
up,
there
are
some
amenities
and
in
particular
we
focus.
D
C
D
Bike,
storage,
as
it
relates
to
that
shared
use
path,
we
thought
those
were.
There
was
good
Synergy
between
those
two
uses
because
they
all
have
direct
access
out
for
that
app
so
that
they
can
be
used
by
the
residents
of
the
building
and
then
just
a
little
more
kind
of
detail
as
to
the
main
uses.
You'll
see
there
in
that
area,
Okay.
A
D
Of
glass
emphasizing
that
corner
by
recessing
the
portion
of
the
building
where
the
parking
entrance
is
and
really
highlighting
the
lobby
in
that
facade,
then
Adam
I.
C
K
D
D
D
D
A
I
Can
I
add
to
that
the
staffs
sort
of
three
concerns
which
were
the
location
of
the
garage
entry,
the.
I
To
Metro
and
the
loading
dock
on
the
there's
more
residential
side,
you
know
which
I
think
have
ground
four
uses
as
we're
talking
about
so
I
know
that
on
the
presentations
we
had,
the
garage
entry
staff
pointed
out
that
it
sort
of
on
the
way
as
you're
going
to
Metro,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
hear
is.
Are
you
the
architect.
C
D
Are
we
have
the
architect
virtually.
I
But
I
was
just
wondering
if
we
could
sort
of
cover
a
little
bit.
Some
of
the
you
know
preferred
approach
to
the
entrance
sure
on
the
side
versus
the
other
side,
where
the
pros
and
cons
right
so
and
then
just
walk
us
through
that.
A
little
bit
sure.
D
So
we've
looked
at
the
parking
garage
entrance
and
we
looked
at
you
know
the
idea
that
staff
asked
about.
Can
you
move
it?
You
know
Central
to
where
that
intersection
is,
and
we
can
certainly
get
into
more
detail
with
staff.
D
We
haven't
had
a
chance
to
kind
of
show
them
the
details,
but
we
believe
it
does
harm
not
only
to
that
ground
floor
Frontage
because
it
effectively
breaks
off
the
Western
2700
square
feet
of
amenity
space
from
the
remainder
of
that
ground
floor
use
because
you
would
have
kind
of
where
that
oval
is
in
the
middle
of
the
building.
You
would
have
a
parking
garage
going
down.
D
We
would
lose
parking
on
the
first
floor
of
the
garage,
a
significant
amount
of
parking
if
we
were
to
have
to
move
the
loading
along
that
Frontage
and
below
grade
as
well,
and
we've
done
some
research,
we're
kind
of
questioning
why
staff
is
recommending
that
we
put
the
loading
below
grade.
We've
looked
at
12
site
plan
projects
since
January
of
2021,
and
the
only
project
that
is
done
below
grade
parking
and
loading
for
low
grade
loading
is
pin
place,
which
is
three
million
square
feet
of
a
bunch
of
different
uses.
D
Every
other
project
is
I
believe
that
I
looked
at
and
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
look
at.
My
list
is
typically
mixed
use
with
some
retail
engaged
and
all
of
those
projects
have
accurate
loading
and,
of
course,
we
see
that
a
lot
and
we
usually
treat
it
by
making
sure
that
we're
paying
attention
to
that
loading
dock
door
and
making
sure
we
treat
it
architecturally.
D
It
has
to
go
somewhere,
but
we
believe
that
the
loading
cannot
go
below
grade
because
of
the
damage
it
will
do
to
the
rest
of
the
building
and
our
ability
to
provide
the
required
parking.
As
of
that
parking
entrance,
as
I
mentioned,
it
would
kind
of
cut
right
through
the
middle
of
that
first
floor
and
there
are
some
impacts
that
would
also
have
on
the
first
floor
of
the
parking.
D
Even
if
you
didn't
put
the
loading
there,
we
actually
believe
that
having
the
parking
to
the
East
and
recessing
it
right,
we
felt
it
was
important
from
an
architectural
standpoint
to
pull
that
corner
back
to
de-emphasize
the
parking
entrance.
But
regardless
of
whether
we
knew
that
parking
entrance
or
not,
we
still
need
the
lay-by
for
fire
access.
So
staff
had
also
recommended
in
our
prior
meeting
that
if
we
can't
move
the
parking
entrance
could.
E
D
Look
at
a
couple
of
things:
could
we
look
at
narrowing
the
curb
cut
to
the
east
coming
out
of
that
parking
garage
which
we
have
done
they
said,
could
you
look
at
making
that
right
out
only
so
you
only
have
one
way
of
traffic
movement
which
we
have
also
done
now.
We
in
our
plans,
we
showed
markings
that
showed
right
right
out
only
if
it
was
desirable,
we
can
look
at
signage.
We
can
look
at
channeling,
sorry.
I
I
D
Corner
yeah,
because
we
number
one
we
were
asked
to
do
that,
but
number
one
two.
We
think
that
that
would
be
a
worse
condition
to
have
that
parking
entrance
where
we
have
our
amenity
space
running
on
that
shared
use
path
and
going
back
to
the
idea
that
we
have
to
have
the
lay-by
in
front
of
the
building
for
fire
access
that
lay-by,
as
we've
designed
it
now
has
been
designed
in
consultation
with
the
fire
chief
or
the
fire
marshal
as
to
what
they
need
for
access
to
the
building,
all
right.
I
D
D
I'd
have
to
ask
we'd
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
that
as
it
relates
to
kind
of
grading
and
the
architecture
the
grading
of
the
site,
but
also
we
did
not
think
it
was
a
good
idea
to
put
a
parking
garage
entrance
next
to
that
shared
use,
path,
thought
it
was
better
to
put
amenities
in
ground
floor
units
adjacent
to
that
path.
If
I
moved
my
parking
entrance
there,
it's
just
going
to
have
a
ripple
effect
in
terms
of
like
what
I
need
to
do
to
get
down
below.
D
I
I
That
we
would
sacrifice
some
of
the
walk-up
units
to
put
the
ramp
on
there
because
on
the
planet,
looks
like
there's
like
one
bedrooms
and
I.
Think
those
open
onto
an
internal,
hallway,
right
and
I
think
the
proximity
to
the
site
is
really
tight
on
the
on
the
sort
of
right
of
the
of
the
right.
I
So
I
think
that's,
we
couldn't
repeat:
walk
up
or
walk
in
sidewalk
on
that
edge
right
exactly
and
that's
just
because
we've
moved
the
building
that
way
to
allow
more
space
with
the
shared
use
path
and
the
other
unit.
D
Okay
and
and
so
but
but
to
your
point,
you
know
we,
we
understand
that
staff
has
concerns
about
pedestrians
as
they're,
leaving
the
site
and
heading
towards
met,
and
so
we
did
talk
about
differentiated
treatment
for
the
lay-by
area,
drop-off
pickup
whatever,
and
we
think
that
we
probably
could
do
a
better
job
of
Designing
that
space
to
prioritize
pedestrians,
just
in
order
of
magnitude
in
terms
of
kind
of
the
a
the
peak
hour
trips
that
are
coming
to
that
main
building
in
the
AM
we
have
13
in
and
66
out
in
the
PM
we
have
45
in
and
20
out
and
of
those
outbound
trips.
C
C
D
66
are
going
to
be
headed
east
and,
in
the
evening
15
out
of
20
are
going
to
be
headed
east.
So
that's
why
we
thought
it
made
sense
to
make
that
Eastern.
D
Curb
cut
right
out
only
do
improvements
that
we
can
look
at
through
that
shared
use,
drive
to
really
prioritize
pedestrians
and
make
sure
that
our
vehicles
are
slowing
down
and
we
actually
think
having
the
vehicles
kind
of
come
out
of
the
garage
and
to
the
signalized
intersection,
actually
slows
those
cars
down
whether
they're
coming
in
or
going
out,
they're
just
not
shooting
into
the
garage
straight
across
that
space.
There.
Okay.
A
C
D
A
L
Thanks
yeah
I
have
a
couple
things
to
throw
in
I
think
on
the
discussion
that
just
happened,
and
then
my
original
question
was
a
different
ground
floor
use
question,
but
yeah
I
find
I,
find
the
applicants
kind
of
thinking
about
a
lot
of
this
compelling
I.
Think
I
certainly
would
not
ask
for
loading
to
be
moved
underground
in
a
site.
This
size
and
I
I
I
think
there
are
some
some
reasonable
reasons
to
have
the
garage
entrance
on
the
east
side.
L
For
me,
the
biggest
issue
is
that
it
just
feels
like
super
weird
and
indirect,
as
a
pedestrian
to
try
and
get
to
that
front
door
from
the
from
the
sidewalk
on
Fairfax
Drive.
So
I
would
really
love
to
see.
You
know
maybe
like
a
raised
Crossing
across
the
lay-by
with
you
know.
Some
differentiated
pavement
just
make
like
kind
of
a
really
clear
approach
to
that.
L
To
that
front
door
and
and
and
kind
of
emphasize
that
front
door,
a
little
more,
maybe
architecturally
I
think
would
go
like
a
long
way
to
kind
of
improving
that.
How
does
that
pedestrian
circulation
work
coming
in
from
Fairfax
Drive?
My
my
ground
floor
use.
This
question
is
actually
about
the
Bike.
Room
am
I,
seeing
correctly
that
the
Bike
Room
is
in
fact
two
stories
tall
and
what
is
is
that
stairs
or
a
ramp
between
the
two
levels
of
the
Bike
Room.
L
J
Yeah
for
encoder
for
next
time,
could
you
bring
some
more
detailed
drawings
of
that
I
appreciate
it
and
and
one
follow-up,
did
you
happen
to
parking
access
once
again?
Did
you
take
a
look
at
working
with
the
region
office
building,
okay,
tying
into
their
existing
service
Drive
rather
than
having
another
sort
of
Crossing,
because
there's
another
Crossing
with
their
service
drive
just
20
feet,
East
I,
don't
know
if
you
reached
out.
K
J
E
Yeah
I
just
want
to
know
that
in
terms
of
the
lobby
or
lay
by
Design.
E
A
D
D
J
To
be
Universal
on
the
outside,
if
they
right,
if
you
see.
C
F
It's
going
to
follow
up
to
that
question.
It
it
I
kind
of
looked
at
the
elevations
myself
and
we'll
play
some
of
it
is
elevated
a
little
bit,
but
a
lot
of
maybe
a
lot.
F
Are
you
worried
about
the
500
year?
Floodplain,
the
whole
property
is
in
a
505
I
just
would
have
assumed.
You
would
have
tried
to
elevate
the
whole
thing
a
bit.
If
you
don't
it's
great
for
the
downstream
residents,
because
the
water
all
just
run
into
the
building,
it'll
slow
it
down.
D
I
guess
I
don't
have
a
I
know
that
we
have
our
engineer
looking
at
storm
water
and
storm
water
management.
I
know
that's
a
topic
for
next
time,
so
I'll
take.
D
D
F
D
A
A
Okay,
move
on
to
site
circulation.
F
A
C
A
C
A
A
L
Chris,
thank
you.
I
just
have
a
question
about.
Oh
now,
I
lost
where
I
had
my
yes
North
Wakefield
Street
this
new
sidewalk
on
the
East
End
of
the
new
residential.
L
Can
you
tell
me,
does
that
side?
What
like,
if
I'm,
coming
out
of
my
new
units
there
onto
that
sidewalk
that
runs
along
the
south
end
of
the
property
line?
Does
That
Sidewalk
connect
me
like
to
Wakefield
like
can
I
easily
like
cross
Wakefield?
There.
C
L
That's
like
a
north,
south
crosswalk
right,
the
one
you're
talking
about
right,
yeah,
so
I'm
talking
about.
If
you
know,
I've
got
a
neighbor
who
lives
over
there
on
the
east
side
of
Wakefield.
L
I
feel
like
I
do,
or
at
least
you
know,
it's
a
good.
It's
going
to
be
a
real
quiet
street
like
I'm,
not
convinced
a
crosswalk
is
required,
but
I
would
at
least
like
you
know,
a
curb
cut
to,
and
you
know
not
have
to
tromp
across
some
grass
in
order
to
get
over
there.
A
L
D
L
K
L
E
Yeah,
yes,
yeah:
are
you
proposing
to
widen
the
road
at
all
behind
on
the
western
side,
building
three
yeah.
C
E
C
E
Well,
let
me
let
me
just
go
ahead
and
follow
up.
I
have
some
concerns
that
you're
not
preserving
a
lot
of
trees
in
the
Conservation
Area
I.
N
A
E
F
A
I
Yeah
last
time
we
spoke
about
the
I'm,
not
totally
clear,
maybe
Adam
you
can
help
me.
It's
the
bike,
connection
and
I.
Think
it's
that
was
there
a
concern
there
or
something
if
I
recall
correctly.
I
think
one
thing
we
want
to
explore
further
with
the
applicant
is
how
it
has
this
multi-use
path
terminates
sort
of
into
Woodrow,
or
this
intersection
here
and
I.
Think
our
traffic
operations
engineering
spokes
want
to
sit
down.
I
I
I
G
D
D
It
designed
is
as
a
four-way
stop,
which
we
thought
was
the
best
way
to
ensure
safety,
but
of
course,
I
mean
we're
happy
to
discuss
that
with
staff
to
figure
out,
if
there's
some
better
ways
to
do
things
just
for
context
on
that
intersection.
We're
looking
at
five
peak
hour,
vehicle
trips,
so
we're
talking
one
vehicle,
every
12
minutes
coming
or
going
and
less
throughout
the
day,
but
we're
certainly
I
mean
figuring
out
what
the
best
way
to
do.
It
is
and
signage.
C
I
A
A
Okay,
so
we
are
adding
a
connection
you
know
which
is
usually
good
for
circulation,
but
we
have
to
be
aware
of.
That
is
what
the
implications
are
to
make
sure
that
it
doesn't
read
as
let's
Zoom
through
here.
So
if
you
were
having
treatments
for
that
intersection,
that
would
you
feel
you
know
slow
down.
This
is
what's
going
on
here:
I'm,
not
sure
this
goes
through.
That
would
be
good,
I
think,
because
we're
not
trying
to
encourage
through
traffic.
A
L
Thanks
just
wanted
to
throw
in
my
two
cents
on
this
that
where
the
trail
comes
out
here
and
say,
I
think
it's
a
very
reasonable
treatment
as
it
is
four-way
stop.
You
know
is
going
to
be,
especially
with
that
low
volume
of
cars
is
going
to
be
I.
Think
totally
fine.
L
You
know,
I
wish
it
weren't
right
where
the
road
does
this
weird
kind
of
jog.
You
know
if
there
were
anything
that
could
be
done
to
to
have
it
not
happening
at
this
weird
jog.
That
would
be
great,
but
that
may
be
too.
You
know
a
little
too
much
to
ask,
given
everything
else.
L
That's
been
going
on
and
just
reiterate,
as
as
you
are
thinking
about,
you
know,
potential
changes
to
to
how
this
meets
here
that
I
I
will
strongly
again
suggest
that
the
majority
of
through
bikes
are
not
going
to
be
going
down.
Woodrow
they're
going
to
be
going
over
to
Wakefield,
because
that's
what
has
the
traffic
signal
at
Wilson
Boulevard,
so
just
something
to
keep
in
mind.
Thank
you
very
much.
F
Thank
you,
yeah
the
bike
path.
It's
a
great
community.
F
Two
questions
about
that
one:
how
is
it
going
to
be
policed?
Does
the
county
somehow
take
responsibility?
You
know,
in
other
words,
can
they
say
you
know
like
right
now
you
can't
ride
a
motorized
vehicle
on
Trails,
but
could
you
ride
a
motorized
vehicle
through
this
Trail,
for
example,
public
property?
That's.
F
D
C
D
D
Can
we've
widened
that
it's
a
straight
path?
It's
12
feet
wide,
but
we
still
have
the
condition
where
trees
on
the
outside
edge,
but
we
do
have
some
space
between
the
curb
and
that
path
and
then
I
think
we
also
talked
about
signage.
Potentially,
that
would
kind
of
be
at
the
Terminus
as
you
hit
Fairfax
Drive
you're
gonna
have
a
bench.
A
I
want
to
point
out
here,
so
people
can
people
can
talk
about
site
circulation
right
now,
if
you,
you
know
shake
that,
so
we
can
see
more
of
it.
Yeah
buildings
two
and
three
have
their
that
driveway
to
the
to
the
west
of
them
to
the
left
of
them.
That's
the
driveway
to
the
garage.
The
garage
is
for
each
of
those
buildings
understand
that
going
up
toward
the
Fairfax
Drive.
There
is.
C
A
C
A
C
A
That
for
the
site
circulation
here,
but
people
can
walk
through
it,
bikes
could
go
through
it,
presumably,
but
it's
not
for
the
average
car.
A
Very
good
well,
anyway,
just
want
to
make
people
understood.
That's
what
that
means
of
that
corner.
There
is
there
a
reason
why
the
garage
entrance
doesn't
have
a
job,
so
it
takes
advantage
of
the
signalized
intersection.
A
K
A
D
E
A
A
A
A
Okay,
any
any
questions
on
the
massing.
The
architecture
I
noticed
on
the
triplexes.
A
C
A
F
And
then
sure
I
got
two
questions
we
can
alternate
whatever
makes
sense.
This
was
a
question
that
we
raised
last
time
and
because
we're
going
to
look
into
it,
I.
F
A
F
A
question
on
the
treatment
of
the
common
boundary,
a
southern
Edge,
because
you're
you're
there's
a
common
taking
one
of
the
proper
one
of
the
one
of
the
homes
is
there's
a
brick
wall
or
defense,
along
with
our
average.
And
the
question
was
whether
or
what
was
going
to
happen
with
that.
Was
that
going
to
be
retained
or
approved
or.
F
J
D
D
F
D
M
A
Triplexes
I
think
actually
look
quite
nice
haven't
seen
anything,
that's
quite
like
that
in
Arlington,
so
very
interested
to
see
how
they
look
when
they're
for
real.
You
know
right
now,
I
think
that
they
they're
good
I,
like
that.
The.
A
A
A
A
A
J
K
J
Asked
for
Britain
at
least
forever
in
the
year
at
a
minimum
to
have
accent
pieces
in
the
past.
We
feed
that
or
some
sort
of
sort
of
something
of
substance,
an
amazing
and-
and
this
is
probably
right
and
on
the
condos
for
the
triplex-
is
whatever
we're
calling
them.
Those
are
almost
entirely.
J
J
You
know
this.
Just
I,
don't
know
appeals
to
me
like
it
would
be
something
great
in
like
a
Colorado
mountain
town
or
something
it
just.
It
just
seems
different.
Maybe
maybe
it's
just
me
maybe
I'm
sort
of
stuck
in
the
past,
but
just
it's
a
it's.
Definitely
a
departure
from
what
we
typically
see
for
townhouses
and.
I
I
On
some
of
that,
I
think
agree
that
I
think
that
the
materiality
could
be
sort
of
Revisited
I.
Understand
that
sometimes
you
can't
for
Timeless
materials
everywhere,
but
I
think.
Let
me
start
with
the
Positive.
So,
first
of
all,
I
think
the
diversity
of
the
unit
typology
is
really
exciting
and
I
really
commend
the
developer
working
with
the
triplexes,
the
the
layouts
the
unit
over
another
unit.
I
encourage
the
architect
and
perhaps
a
developer,
to
look
at
like
a
lot
of
the
Dutch
housing,
or
you
know
that
whole
area
of
Europe
has.
I
Housing
that
is
really
low
scale,
but
you
know
really
allows
for
a
lot
of
exciting
Street
entrance.
You
know
Lobby
entrance
and
just
different.
So
thanks
for
doing
that,
I
know
it's
a
little
bit
risky
I
think
in
this
Mark,
so
I
encourage
you
to
do
that.
I
will
Echo
the
materiality
thing.
I
think
I
already
mentioned
the
the.
I
I
I
Right,
but
you
know
it's
just
I,
think
I
agree
with
the
design,
but
it's
just
it.
It
runs
me
a
little
bit
the
wrong
way
just
because
so
it's
not
so
much
a
criticism
as
it
is
just
like
a
note.
K
I
C
I
Commissioner
and
tell
me
sort
of
feeling
about
the
building,
although
I
think
it's
significantly
improved
and
I
commend
you
and
the
team
for
sort
of
listening
to
what
we
said
and
has
brought
the
building
to
a
much
better
place,
it
can
continue
to
improve
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
that
we're
trying
to
encourage
is
this
bird
friendliness
aspect
and
I
think
by
minimizing.
Well,
there's
two
two
advantages
to
cutting
back
on
the
percentage
of
Glass
on
the
building.
If
you
can
do
it,
one
of
them
is,
of
course,
the
environmental
energy
requirement.
I
E
I
Two
sort
of
requests,
or-
or
you
know
things
to
look
at-
perhaps
reducing
the
number
of
window
units
emphasizing
opaque
faces
and
then
I
think
yeah
thanks
thanks
for
the
the
units,
I
think
the
the
diversity
of
the
units
is
really
exciting
and
something
that
our.
B
They're
kind
of
following
up
on
that
in
a
little
bit
more
detail
in
terms
of
understanding
better
how
you're,
using
building
orientation
as
well
as
material
selection,
as
you
mentioned,
the
the
size
of
the
window,
types
of
Windows
in
order
to
maximize
Energy
Efficiency
for
building
as
you
get
started,
where
you
have
to
start
dealing
with.
You
know
the
heat,
the
water
out
water
systems.
E
Your
cycle
just
to
piggyback
on
what
this
is
a
building
is
an
improvement,
but
it
very
definitely
is
sort
of
a
square
building
that
bases
out
of
Fairfax
Drive
and
because
this
is
a
main
entrance
to
Fairfax
Drive,
which
is
becoming
a
major
Army
from
the
street.
E
I
would
ask
that
you
just
take
a
look
at
whether
you
can
do
something
to
orient
toward
that
entrance
from
you
know.
People
are
coming
in
from
the
West
along
Fairfax
Drive.
This
is
where
they're
they're
coming
up
and
you
you
also
have
the
conjunction
with
the
best
sidewalk
too,
so
you
you've
got
kind
of
a
dynamic
intersection
here,
but
because
the
building
is
so
square
and
so
definitely
faces
out
of
here,
there
are
no
architectural
details.
E
A
A
Nothing:
okay,
that
really
covers
what
we
need,
what
we
need
to.
K
C
A
Around
and
ask
everybody
for
final
comments:
why
don't
we
start
clockwise
your
first
up,
yeah.
A
Live
near
this
site,
and
it
strikes
me
that
if,
if
I
were
to
live
in
one
of
those
units,
I
wouldn't
be
inclined
to
use
the
access
to
Woodrow
I
will
be
surprised
if
you
don't
find
a
more
pedestrian
bike.
Access
through
your
neighborhood
to.
C
A
Was
for
one
reason
but
strikes.
B
H
Across
the
street,
from
Boston
Wetlands
I've
seen
cloths
in
there
and
it's
you
know
it's
the
deer
in
there
so
and
also
when
you
come
back
with
the
discussion
the
next
time,
if
you
could
have
some
idea
of
what
Native
things
or
what
trees
or
whatever
and
and
to
Mr
stockwell's
thing,
also
preserving
why
we
cannot
work
to
look
at
preserving,
especially
for
bigger
trees,.
I
I
Mentioned
that
this
is
a
mining
town,
I
can't
see
that,
and
now
it's
like
yeah
you're
right,
it
doesn't
look
like
a
mining
town
house.
I
The
one
question
that
I
had-
and
this
is
another
a
comment
for
the
perhaps
the
architect
I-
noticed
that
the
windows
are
double
hung
and
those
are
less
efficient
than
the
basement
windows
because
of
their
they
tend
to
leak
more
so
you
know
again
it's
one
of
those
things
that
perhaps
it's
not
a
big
deal
and
if
you
switch
to
casements
or
different
type
of
more
operable
window,
it
probably
would
be
better
for
the
ceiling
and
environmental
impact,
but
other
than
that
thanks
again,
I'm
super
excited
about
this
as
much
as
I
can
be
with
this
typology,
which
I
agree
with
commission
tell
me,
but
you
know
it's
good
to
see
Improvement.
J
J
J
E
E
B
If
they're,
commission,
McIntyre
yeah.
A
B
Of
actually
building
on
that,
we
would
actually
like
a
fairly
detailed
discussion
on
sustainability
and
balance
and
actually
going
Beyond.
Just
what's
in
of
the
Green
Building
incentive
policy
to
focus
on.
You
know,
maximizing
energy
efficiency
throughout
the
building
and
also
using
electric
systems,
as
opposed
to
Fossil
gas
systems
that
they
start
out.
In
order
to
get
to
the
real
carbon
neutral,
we
find
it
very
helpful
for
developers
actually
to
do
a
zero
carbon
assessment
so
that
that
gives
them
a
lot
of
sense
of
what
the
pathway
is.
C
B
Know
we
can't
do
wall
Electric,
which
is
really
the
way
to
start,
is
have
the
electrical
credits
that,
because
you
know
we
have
stuff
or
any
fossil
skills.
So
that's
that's
going
to
be
kind
of
what
hear
a
lot
more
about
getting
to
you
know,
above
and
beyond.
What's
in
the
minimum,
Green
Building
standards
and
build
something,
that's.
C
A
With
the
comments
of
Mr,
Roof
is
a
terrible
thing
to
waste
to
be
doing
with
that.
Another
thing
which
I
notice
missing,
but
we
do
need
to
raise,
is
what
will
you
be
doing
for
affordable
housing
on
this?
How
much?
What
sizes
that
sort
of
thing
and
I
know
often
that
doesn't
get
decided
until
very,
very
late,
but
least.
C
F
C
A
A
L
Thank
you
so
much
I
do
want
to
say,
I
really
appreciate
again
the
applicants
effort
reworking
this
plan
I
just
wanted
to
say,
I'm,
a
big
fan
of
the
of
the
trail
design
and
the
eyes
on
the
trail.
I
love
having
the
units
with
direct
entrances
on
the
trail
having
the
active
amenity
spaces
that
are
adjacent,
I,
think
that's
awesome.
L
I
really
would
love
to
see
some
more
work
on
making
like
a
really
great
pedestrian
experience
for
those
walking
up
to
the
main
entrance
to
the
big
building
from
the
Fairfax
Drive
sidewalk,
making
it
not
feel
like
they
have
to
walk
around
the
lay-by
or
cross.
You
know
what
seem
feels
right
now:
I
think,
like
a
car
space
crossing
the
lay-by
I
look
forward
to
talking
the
next
meeting
more
about
that
Fairfax
Drive
sidewalk,
which
really
functions,
is
an
extension
of
the
Bluemont
Junction
trail
and
I.
L
Look
forward
to
talking
about
a
bit
more
about
the
east
west
alley,
which
I
really
think
should
actually
be
a
piece
of
public
Street
should
be
a
piece
of
9th
Street
I.
Think
it's
going
to
serve
some
Transportation
purposes
and
not
just
be
kind
of
this.
You
know
private
back
alley,
I,
don't
know
if
I
lived
on
Woodrow
and
I
wanted
to
make
a
left
onto
Wilson
Boulevard.
After
this
thing,
I
would
probably
go
around
down
Wakefield
so
that
I
could
turn
left
with
a
light.
L
M
Yes,
I
agree
with
everyone.
I
really
think
the
do-over
was
a
great
step
in
the
right
direction
and
also
a
big
fan
of
the
bike
room
leading
up
to
the
street
as
well
area.
M
N
We're
gonna
get
it
okay,
so
I
want
to.
Thank
you
all
for
sharing
the
updated
plans.
I
am
a
resident
on
North,
Wakefield,
Street
and
I
love
the
addition
of
all
the
the
new
grass
and
Greenery.
This
is
somewhat
of
a
basic
question,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it
gets
covered
there.
N
We
have
a
lot
of
pets
in
this
area
and
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there
are
people
will
be
trash,
receptacles
and
doggy
bags
you
know
placed
throughout
so
that
you
know
people
actually
pick
up
their
dog
a
pickup
after
their
dog,
because
that
happens.
If
there's
no
trash
or
doggy
bags
placed
around.
A
Still
there
okay
30
burn
yes,
Mr
Bird
go
ahead.
You're
you're
on
okay.
A
K
The
conceptual
land
of
the
plant
sheets,
so
such
a
landscape
plant
sheets
in
the
in
the
submission,
do
not
contain
any
information
about
the
species
and
locations
of
any
shrubs
ground
covers
or
perennials
that
the
site
may
contain.
You
need
to
submit
this
information
before
the
sprc
considers
the
landscape
plan
at
the
next
meeting
in
general,
the
site
will
have
too
little
green
space
at
a
very
poor
Transportation
plan.
You
need
to
correct
these
deficiencies
in
2016.
K
The
county
issue
responded
it's
Monarch
pledge
which
encourages
planted
a
native
species,
including
milkweed,
on
which
monarch
butterflies
feed
to
prevent
the
invasive
introduction
invasive
species.
All
plants
should
be
native
to
the
native
to
Northern
Virginia
plant
common
milkweed
has
left
this
syriaca
in
all
Open
Spaces,
including
the
trees,
sweet
shapes,
treats
ranches
Ledges,
the
roof
of
the
north
of
the
building
and
the
area
near
the
shared
use
path.
K
Common
milk
was
the
only
species
that
grows
well
in
Arlington's
natural
areas,
reproducing
monarchs
prefer
to
lay
eggs
on
the
common
milkweed
plant,
few
ornamental
grass
and
sedges
these
support
for
only
a
few
pollinators
as
they
are
wind
pollinated,
they
can
displace
milk.
We
did
other
important
plants
that
support
pollinators
now
we're
getting
to
the
big
Point,
reduce
the
width
of
the
so-called
generous
shared
use
path
for
12
feet
to
eight
feet.
K
The
proposed
path
will
actually
receive
little
use
now
or
in
the
future,
as
it
will
not
directly
connect
to
Major
streets
or
heavily
used
trails
at
both
ends
further.
It
is
far
better
to
separate
pedestrians
from
cyclists
than
to
have
a
shared
use.
Trail
that's
specified
in
the
in
the
transportation
plan
and
everything
most
cyclists
will
use
a
straight
and
wide
access
road
at
the
West
End
of
the
site
to
reach
Woodrow
and
Wakefield
streets.
K
Therefore,
if
they
sign
a
direct
freaking
cyclist
to
the
road
and
and
those
streets
at
key
locations,
plant
cycling
Lanes
on
the
access
road,
if
desired,
use
the
additional
four
feet
for
plantings
of
milkweed
and
other
plants
that
support
pollinators
that
are
next
next
to
the
shorts
is
Chad
use.
Trail!
That's
what
you
do.
You
move
the
cyclists
for
these
to
the
to
the
west
side
of
the
side
on
that
on
that
access
road,
it's
a
straight
shot.
That's
what
cyclists
like
to
do.
C
K
If
you're
taking
the
12
olive
oil,
three
cycles
of
speed
under
stand,
his
path,
While,
others,
traveling
side
by
sides,
the
path
will
be
unpleasant.
Hazardous
was
feeding
cake
to
cyclists,
count
as
a
pedestrians,
traveling
side
by
side,
the
west
side
of
the
site
and
other
areas
will
take
vegetative
areas.
All
these
needs
to
contain
plantings
of
common
milk.
We
eat
other
shrubs
and
flat
perennials.
That's
what
pollinators,
but
basically
use
that
shared
Street
as
a
as
a
West
End.
A
A
If
we
have
any
other
public
comments.
Okay,
that's
it
based
on
that.