►
From YouTube: Transit Advisory Committee Meeting | March 14, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
our
meeting
tonight,
first
thing
we'll
do
is
introductions,
and
so
when
you're
asking
a
question
or
whatever
turn
your
cameras
on,
but
when
you're
not
or
introducing
yourself,
we
ask
you
that
you
turn
them
off,
so
it
doesn't
get
too
confusing.
So
I'll
introduce
myself
first.
My
name
is
John
carton,
I'm,
chair
of
the
committee.
D
C
A
A
A
Any
other
committee
members
out
there,
if
not,
let's,
let's
go
to
staff.
G
And
I'll
start
I'll
just
call
on
staff
as
to
what
analyst
Pierre
Holloman
assistant,
treasure,
Chief
and,
let's
see
next,
is
Clinton
Edwards.
G
G
G
Mr,
chair
I,
believe
that's
all
the
staff.
We
do
have
several
members
who
have
joined
us
and
we
also
have
several
guests
on
their
phone
as
well
as
on
teams.
N
A
A
F
All
right,
Patrick
Thompson,
joins
member
of
tech.
F
A
Okay,
if
not,
let's
go
ahead
and
start.
The
meeting
first
item
here
is
public
comment,
and
this
is
where
members
of
the
public
can
comment
for
two
minutes,
and
this
is
opportunity
for
the
public
to
speak.
Once
we
get
into
the
meeting,
we
ask
the
discussion,
be
limited
to
the
staff
and
members
of
the
committee.
So
would
any
of
the
public
like
to
speak.
A
O
Thank
you
I
said,
and
a
member
of
the
disability,
advisory,
commission
and,
and
also
a
member
of
the
disability
community,
so
Independence
Center
in
Northern
Virginia
is
a
community
resource
center,
serving
people
with
disabilities,
people
with
all
types
of
disabilities
of
all
ages,
and
we
are
concerned
about
a
number
of
issues,
the
first
being
the
apparent
resurrection
of
of
a
proposal
for
changes
in
star
services
that
was
presented
last
year
by
staff.
O
But
we
understood
to
be
withdrawn
in
order
to
have
Civic
engagement,
to
discuss
the
kinds
of
changes
that
might
be
made
and
then
prepare
a
new
version.
So
we
want
to
express
our
concerns
about
that.
If,
if
this
comes
up
with
this
committee
and
also
here
at
the
TAC,
we
want
to
express
concern
that
the
trans,
the
taxi
industry,
is
seeking
increases
in
fares.
And
yet
the
service
provided
to
the
writing.
Public
and
I-
certainly
am
a
regular
taxi
user
in
Arlington
and
and
the
service
has
gone
downhill
since
2017.
O
A
C
A
Okay,
so
the
minutes
minutes
are
approved.
So
let's
go
on
to
the
next
item
here,
which
is
Introduction
of
the
new
transit
services
manager.
A
The
committee
and
Harvey
I'm
going
to
ask
you
here:
Harvey
I'm,
going
to
ask
you
to
turn
your
camera
off,
please
just
so.
It
isn't
distracting
okay,.
G
That's
one
of
the
site,
members
that
may
just
want
to
introduce
Lynn.
She
has
some
great
news
to
share
with
everyone.
So
when
the
four
shores.
L
All
right,
thank
you.
Pierre
committee
members,
I'm
very
excited
to
introduce
our
new
staff
member.
Our
new
team
team
member
Clinton
Edwards
has
joined
us
is
all
of
a
week
two
weeks
old
at
this
point
and
we're
excited
to
say
that
he
has
joined
us
as
the
transit
services
manager,
with
oversight
of
art
and
star
and
and
all
of
the
transit
services
that
you
see.
That's
visible
to
the
community.
L
Clinton
comes
to
us
from
drpt,
where
he
was
the
transit
program
manager
for
all
of
Northern
Virginia.
So
has
extensive
background,
but
I'll
I'll.
Let
Clinton
share
a
little
bit
more
with
you,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
we're
happy
to
have
him
here
that
we
were
really
beating
the
bushes
to
find
a
good
person
to
fill
some
shoes
and
to
join
this
team,
so
so
just
wanted
to
to
welcome
Clinton
Clinton
well,.
H
Thank
you,
Miss
Rivers,
Mr,
chair
members
of
the
committee.
As
is
Miss
stated,
my
name
is
Clinton
Edwards
and
I'm
happy
and
proud
to
be
serving
as
a
transit
services
manager
with
Arlington
County
I
had
the
pleasure
of
serving
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia
for
the
past
six
years
prior
to
this
assignment,
with
the
Virginia
Department
of
rail
and
public
transportation
and
previous
to
that
was
serving
10
years
in
the
Greater
Richmond
area,
the
River
City
Community
at
GRTC
transit
system
in
various
roles
and
I
cut
my
teeth
in
public
transportation.
H
A
Right,
it's
great
to
have
you
with
us
here.
Clinton
and
I
know
the
staff
there
Lynn
and
Pierre,
and
all
them
are
glad
to
have
the
additional
help.
They've
been
having
to
wear
a
lot
of
hats
here
recently.
A
G
So
good
evening,
again,
at
the
last
attack
meeting
on
January
17th,
a
poll
was
sent
out
to
note
the
preference
for
future
meetings.
G
G
At
this
time,
attack
can
have
a
discussion
on
what
potential
meetings
shall
be
hybrid
in
the
future,
because
we
do
need
the
coordinate
in
terms
of
rooms
available,
as
well
as
getting
staff
resources
to
help
facilitate
those
meetings
that
are
going
to
be
at
the
counties.
Bosman
Government
Center,
so
additional
poll
would
be
sent
out
to
the
tax
members
or
the
attack
could
have
a
quick
discussion
tonight
about
it.
The
future
upcoming
soccer
meetings,
as
noted,
are
May
9th
2023.
G
The
July
18th
meeting
is
in
person
and
it's
exclusively
part
of
the
annual
Transit
Capital
project
tour.
So
the
options
for
future
hybrid
meetings
include
May,
9th
2023,
September,
12,
2023
and
November
14
2023..
We
did
receive
one
member,
didn't
know
a
preference
to
have
one
meeting
and
that's
the
November
14
2023
meeting,
but
the
force
opened
to
the
attack
itself
tonight
or
knowing,
if
there's
a
preference
to
do
a
poll.
That's
fine
because
they're
pulling
out
to
get
feedback
or
you
all
can
have
discussions
this
evening.
C
I
would
I
would
agree
with
the
majority
seven
that
voted
in
favor
of
hybrid
meetings.
A
A
I,
don't
have
a
strong
preference
either
way.
I
think
I've
been
impressed
with
how
well
the
virtual
Works
and
I
think
maybe
there's
times
when
that
helps
improve
our
attendance,
but
having
hybrid,
you
know,
gives
people
both
options.
Pierre.
Are
there
any
particular
meetings?
Besides,
you
know,
certainly
our
Transit
Capital
Tour
that
you
would
recommend
we
have
as
hot
hybrid.
G
I
would
suggest
attack
made
that
decision.
As
noted,
a
member
has
noted
that
they
I
mean
November.
14Th
is
their
preference,
but
it's
good
to
hear
feedback
from
others
for
those
who
voted
in
favor
of
the
hybrid.
Any
suggestions
and
I
can
mention
I
could
say
on
a
poll
if,
if
no
one
has
any
suggestions
tonight
because
there's
another
Publishers
to
get
feedback
on
what
potential
future
meetings
that
we
want
to
set
aside
as
hybrid.
C
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
have
hybrid
meetings,
as
the
majority
had
has
voted
I'd
make
that
motion
please.
A
A
Right
I
would
I
would
join
with
that
suggestion
that
maybe
we
do
the
September
meeting
hybrid
I,
know
that
as
I
understand
at
the
Hybrid
takes
a
lot
more
work
for
the
staff.
In
terms
of
you
know,
making
sure
everything
goes
smoothly.
A
I've
also
noticed
that
in
some
hybrid
meetings
I've
been
in
where
I've
either
been
at
the
meeting,
or
you
know
been
virtual
that
sometimes
it's
hard
to
coordinate
the
discussion
so
that
everybody
can
hear
and
see
the
same
things.
So
those
are
my
comments.
C
C
All
meetings,
except
for
the
the
next
meeting,
to
give
time
to
prepare
that
so
for
all
meetings
of
the
attack,
except
for
the
next
meeting,
yeah,
would
be
hybrid.
The
next
meeting
could
be
only
virtual.
A
Okay,
so
why
don't
we
go
ahead
and
vote
on
this
if
there's
no
other
discussion,
so
the
motion
is
that
all
meetings
would
have
the
hybrid
option
which,
starting
with
the
September
meeting,
because
it
wouldn't
be
the
main
meeting
and
it
wouldn't
be
the
July
meeting.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
all
right
all
right!
So
all
in
favor
of
this
state,
aye,
aye,
aye.
D
F
Just
just
quick
before
we
do
that
I
want
to
clarify
it.
So
the
the
option
is
hybrid,
meaning,
there's
a
room
in
in
the
Arlington
County
building
that
would
be
set
up.
That
staff
would
have
to
set
up
and
then
there
would
be
some
sort
of
audio
equipment
where
folks
could
stream
in
and
they
could
choose
how
they
attend.
C
C
G
Virtually
just
okay
yeah,
it's
just
just
to
clarify
the
motion-
is
for
all
future
meetings
outside
of
May,
the
May
tack
mini
and
the
July
attack
Community
to
be
all
hybrid.
There
was
also
comment
of
having
select
meetings
throughout
the
year
as
cyber
and
not
all,
meetings.
C
A
D
C
E
A
N
A
G
Andrew,
nay,
Ronald.
N
F
A
K
A
Yeah,
okay,
okay,
all
right
good,
all
right!
Well,
let's,
let's
move
on
with
our
next
next
project,
which
is
South
Georgia,
Mason,
Drive,.
A
A
I
Great
I
can
go
ahead
and
get
started.
My
name
is
Leah
Gerber
I
am
a
transportation
planner
really
focused
on
bike
and
pedestrian
planning
within
tpcpm,
which
is
the
transportation
planning
Capital
program
management
office,
which
is
a
sister
Bureau.
You
could
say
to
the
transit
Department
all
located
within
des
and
I'm
a
project
manager
for
the
South
George
Mason
Drive,
multimodal
Corridor
study
I
want
to
preface
that
we're
going
into
phase
three.
A
A
Let
me
just
say
something
before
you
start
I'm
going
to
encourage
people
to
save
their
questions
to
the
end,
so
that
we
make
the
best
use
of
our
time
so
go.
A
I
You
that
would
be
great
and
I
made
sure
I'll
keep
the
presentation
somewhat
brief,
because
I
know
Pierre
mentioned
wanting
to
have
some
time
for
Q
a
discussion
so
definitely
willing
to
take
those
questions.
I
I
The
first
round
was
really
about
existing
conditions
on
South
towards
Mason
and
then
the
second
was
we
presented
a
few
quarter
wide
cross
sections
that
we
brought
to
community
engagement
and
then
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
next
steps,
so
the
study
goals,
really
the
purpose
of
this
study-
is
to
develop
our
preliminary
plan
to
improve
safety
along
all
of
South
George,
Mason,
Drive
and
I
want
to
emphasize
that
this
project
is
multimodal,
so
it's
really
gained
at
people
who
are
you
know,
walking
rolling,
riding,
Transit,
cycling
and
driving,
so
we're
really
trying
to
improve
safety
and
access
for
all
users
and
there's
a
few
things
that
are
really
kind
of
guiding
this
study.
I
You
know
the
first
being
County
Planning
guidance,
so
we
have
you
know
the
modal
elements
like
the
bike
element,
The
Pedestrian
element
the
transit
element
of
the
master
Transportation
plan.
We
also
have
data
analysis
and
research
that
we
did
in
coordination
with
Consultants
who
are
working
on
this
study
so
really
looking
at
traffic
speed
and
how
the
road
is
currently
being
used,
also
in
a
departmental
coordination,
so
really
working
with
partners
and
Department
of
recreation.
I
You
know
cphd,
which
is
community
planning,
to
really
think
about
how
we
can
kind
of
improve
the
corridor
really
through
multiple
lenses
and
then
also
you
know
last
but
definitely
not
least,
is
public
engagement.
So
how
does
the
community,
you
know,
see
South
George
Basin
now
and
how
would
they
like
it
to
look?
You
know
in
5,
10
15
years.
I
And
this
is
the
study
area,
so
you
can
see
really
at
the
top
of
the
screen
here,
we're
starting
at
Arlington,
Boulevard
and
then
traveling
down
through
Columbia
Pike
to
end
really
right
at
the
Fairfax
Arlington
County
border.
I
I
Let
me
try
a
different
way,
maybe
I'll
just
try
to
share
it
on.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
know,
Adam
just
kept
going.
I'm
gonna
try
to
do
it
online
and
see
if
that
helps.
A
B
A
I
I
As
I
mentioned.
That's
the
entirety
of
the
study
area,
but
we'd
really
aiming
to
submit
a
15
design
for
the
southern
portion,
mostly
really
to
basically
have
that
15
design
ready.
So
we
could
submit
it
for
Grants
when
those
do
come
up.
I
We
divided
the
corridor
into
these
segments
kind
of
based
on
the
cross
sections
of
the
existing
Road
and
also
just
neighborhoods
so
really
segment.
One
is
Arlington
Boulevard
to
Columbia
Pike
that
you
can
see
highlighted
in
yellow.
We
have
segment
two
which
is
Columbia
Pike
to
South
Four,
Mile,
Run,
Drive
highlighted
in
that
pink
color
and
then
finally,
South
Four,
Mile
Run
Drive
to
the
county
line
highlighted
in
the
teal
color.
You
can
see
some
of
the
assets
that
are
along
this
Corridor.
I
You
know,
there's
Parks,
we
have
the
W
no
D
Trail
on
the
Four
Mile
Run
Trail.
We
have
multiple
schools
and
it's
also
important
to
note
that
we
have
two
Vision
zero
hot
spots.
So
these
are
areas
where
we
have.
You
know
pretty
high
crash
rates
relative
to
the
rest
of
the
county,
and
these
are
at
the
intersections
of
Columbia
Pike
and
South
Four
Mile
Run
Drive.
I
So
before
I
kind
of
get
into
some
of
the
details,
I
just
want
to
touch
base
on
you
know
where
we
came
from
and
where
we
are
now
you
can
see
from
the
beginning
of
this
timeline.
You
know
in
fall,
winter
of
2021
really
des
and
Dot
staff
identified
the
need
to
make
improvements
on
South
George
Mason
drive,
but
we
needed
to
study
it
further.
So
this
study
really
kicked
off
in
April
2022.
We
had
a
virtual
meeting.
We
had
online
engagement
and
walking
tours
I
mean
that
really
focused
on
existing
conditions.
I
So
what
was
out
there?
What
did
people
want
improved?
All
from
you
know
a
bike,
ped
Transit
and
driving
standpoint,
and
then
we
moved
on
in
summer
or
July
2022
to
an
in-person
Community
Workshop.
I
So,
like
I
mentioned,
we
had
kind
of
a
variety
of
Engagement
opportunities,
the
community
kickoff
meeting.
We
had
some
good
walking
tours
and
we
got
quite
a
bit
of
feedback
from
the
online
questionnaire.
With
about
404
responses,
you
can
see
the
perception
of
safety
by
mode,
so
we
basically
ask
you
know
how
safe
do
you
feel,
while
traveling
on
South
towards
Mason
Drive,
using
these
different
types
of
Transportation,
you
could
see
generally
with
bikes
and
scooters
people
felt
very
unsafe
or
unsafe.
I
We
asked
people,
you
know
what
changes
would
you
like
to
see
for
all
segments
and
we
divided
those
into
three,
but
generally
the
responses
were
the
same.
So
you
can
see
that
fifty
percent
of
people
wanted
safer
intersections,
followed
by
protected
bike
lanes
and
slower
vehicular
traffic,
but
it's
important
to
note
that
additional
crosswalks
were
high
on
the
list.
I
We
also
had
this
map
that
had
about
625
pins,
and
there
were
quite
a
bit
of
you,
know,
comments
and
concerns
regarding
intersections
I've
highlighted
some
of
those
comments
here,
but
generally,
a
lot
of
those
comments
were
about
Arlington
Boulevard
and
South
Four
Mile,
Run,
Drive
and
Columbia
Pike
know
where
we
do
have
crash
hot
spots,
and
there
are,
you
know
quite
a
few
issues,
but
we
also
had
you
know,
concerns
about
long
crosswalks
short
crossing
times.
You
know
things
like
updated,
curb
ramps
at
other
parts
of
of
South
Shores
Mason
as
well.
I
So
then
we
had
phase
two
where
we
kind
of
introduced
these
quarter-wide
Concepts
through.
You
know
virtual
community
meeting
once
again
an
online
questionnaire
and
a
community
Workshop,
and
what
we
found
was
that
people
kind
of
once
again
ranked
their
priorities
based
on
each
section.
They
were
generally
the
same,
so
70
of
people
ranked
a
Bikeway
as
one
of
their
top
three
priorities
with
sidewalks
being
the
second
and
then
vehicle
travel
Lanes
as
the
third.
I
I
And
we
can
also
see
here
the
preferred
Alternatives,
which
I'll
talk
about
in
a
little
bit.
I.
Think
generally,
it's
important
to
note
that
concept.
A
was
the
concept
that
had
six
foot
sidewalks
buffer
space,
but
did
have
protected
bike
Lanes
on
the
street,
while
segment
B
kind
of
has
all
of
the
same
upgrades,
but
has
a
multi-use
trail
on
the
east
side
and
across
all
all
preferred
segments.
We
had
essentially
this
concept
B,
which
I'll
talk
about
in
a
second
once
again
comment
themes:
we
had
a
an
area
for
open-ended
comments.
I
A
lot
of
these
related
to
parking
concerns,
reiterated
support
for
the
project
and
just
concern
for
the
interaction
of
people
using
a
potential
multi-use
Trail.
I
So
this
is
what's
here
today
on
segment,
one
you
can
see
highlighted
in
the
corner:
it's
Arlington
Boulevard
to
Columbia
Pike.
This
is
what
we
have
here
today.
You
can
see.
We
have
you,
know
two
travel
Lanes
in
each
Direction,
a
pretty
narrow
buffer
space,
four
foot,
sidewalks,
three
foot
buffer
and
parking.
I
The
preferred
concept
is
right
here,
so
you
have
the
East
Side
Trail,
widening
that
buffer
space
narrowing
some
of
the
travel
Lanes
I'm,
removing
parking
on
the
east
side,
maintaining
it
and
actually
widening
it,
a
little
bit
on
the
west
side
and
widening
those
sidewalks
segment
two.
This
is
what
you
have
here
today.
I
This
is
by
Barcroft
Apartments,
so
from
Columbia
Pike
to
South,
Four,
Mile,
Run,
Drive
and
I
should
note
that
what
we're
proposing
is
all
within
the
existing
right-of-way
here
we're
really
gaining
that
space
from
reducing
the
median
and
also
reducing
some
of
the
travel
Lanes
and
then
finally,
this
cross
section
from
South
Four
Mile
Run
Drive
to
the
county
line.
This
is
what's
here
today.
I
Once
again,
we
have
those
pretty
narrow,
sidewalks,
narrow
buffer
space,
pretty
large
vehicular
lanes
and
median,
and
this
is
continuing
that
East
Side
Trail
with
the
wider
buffers
maintaining
parking
on
both
sides
narrowing
the
median
and
narrowing
those
vehicular
travel
Lanes.
I
So
next
steps
so,
like
I,
mentioned
here's
the
visual
so
really
kind
of
getting
an
idea
of
what
we
heard
from
phase
one
which
is
existing
conditions.
What
we
heard
from
phase
two,
the
quarter-wide
concepts
and
now
we're
moving
into
intersections.
I
So
we
have
a
few
upcoming
public
engagement
opportunities,
the
first
being
a
virtual
community
meeting,
starting
at
7
pm
on
Wednesday
March
22nd.
It's
important
to
note
that
you
know
we
will
be
uploading,
those
slides
in
multiple
languages
to
the
website,
and
there
will
also
be
a
Spanish
language
presentation.
On
that
same
day,
the
22nd
there
will
be
an
online
feedback
form
that
will
be
open
for
comments.
I
That's
a
really
great
way
to
just
kind
of.
Let
us
know
your
input
and
we'll
be
taking
all
those
into
account,
then
we'll
also
be
having
two
pop-ups
at
Barcroft.
Apartments
feel
free
to
stop
by
those
if
you'd
like,
and
we
may
have
some
pop-up
events
along
the
wnod
and
other
locations
based
on
weather.
I
If
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
contact
myself.
Here's
my
email,
information
or
Nate
Graham,
who
is
working
on
public
engagement
for
this
project.
I
know
that
was
quite
a
bit
of
information,
but
I
wanted
to
keep
it
brief.
So
we
had
some
time
for
a
q,
a
and
discussion.
A
Okay,
Leah
I've
got
a
question
for
you
in
a
comment.
What
what
were
the
two
Vision
zero
hot
spots
along
there.
I
So
it's
these
Vision
zero
hot
spots
highlighted
on
the
image
with
the
red
Dash
circles.
So
the
first
is
South
George,
Mason
and
Columbia
Pike,
and
the
second
is
South
George
Mason
and
South
Four
Mile
Run
Drive.
Both
major
and
minor.
A
Okay,
no
surprise:
the
the
only
comment
I
have
here
is
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
narrowing
the
travel
Lanes
on
this
road,
because
you
know
particularly
when
we're
running
you
know:
Big
Art,
buses
and
other
buses
along
there.
A
I
Yeah,
that's
a
it's.
A
great
Point
we've
worked
with
transit
to
ensure
that
the
outside
Lane
is
always
11
feet,
which
is
the
minimum
for
Transit,
and
the
hope
is
that,
if
you
know
we
have
a
trail
on
the
east
side,
that
would
really
eliminate
the
need
for
bikes
to
be
in
the
travel
lanes
and
they
would
all
just
use
the
trail.
So
it
eliminate
conflict,
hopefully
between
Transit
and
cyclists.
But
that's
something
we'll
keep
in
mind.
B
This
is
James
I
noticed
that
the
the
cycle
track
I
think
it
was
from.
B
George
mate
not
from
50
to
Columbia
Pike.
Is
that
correct
the
cycle.
I
Yeah,
okay,
it'll
be
a
multi-use
trail.
B
I
It
does
kind
of
look.
C
I
Yeah,
so
it
crosses
so
it'll
stop.
So
basically
the
thing
that
we're
trying
to
link
to
is
the
Arlington
Boulevard
Trail
study
that's
being
worked
on
now,
so
the
goal
would
to
be
connecting
this
proposed
trail
to
the
improved
Arlington
Boulevard
Trail,
but
we
do
have
pretty
broad
intersection
concepts
for
how
to
get
across
Arlington
Boulevard.
I
C
Thank
you,
I
I
would
just
share
the
concern
expressed
by
the
chairman
of
the
pack
about
the
reducing
the
width
of
the
travel
Lanes.
Okay,
thank.
I
B
G
Mr
chair,
we
do
have
a
question
in
the
chat
from
Mr
Thompson.
Do
narrow
Lanes
have
also
have
the
beneficial
slowing
traffic
down.
If,
yes,
this
could
help
reduce
accidents.
I
Yeah,
definitely
that's
a
great
question
and
comment.
Yeah
the
point
of
slowing
or
the
point
of
reducing
Lanes
is
to
slow
down
traffic
and
then
also
to
reduce
the
amount
of
space
that
pedestrians
have
to
cross
in
order
to
cross
South
towards
Mason,
but
we're
definitely
hoping
that
you
know
that
will
serve
as
a
traffic
calming
measure
and
that's
something
we're
doing
in
other
areas
as
part
of
vision,
zero.
H
Yes,
I
just
was
curious
about
the
the
speed
limit
that
how
much
would
it
be
reduced
to.
I
I
think
we
would
have
to
once
again
use
and
reference
the
multimodal
toolbox
that
was
made
as
a
part
of
vision,
zero
and
that's
something
we
touch
on
kind
of
in
this
upcoming
engagement
right
now.
There
is
a
slow
school
zone
at
Wakefield,
which
you
know
makes
it
20
miles
an
hour
at
certain
times
of
the
day
when
school
is
you
know
getting
in
and
letting
out,
I
think
the
idea
would
be
to
you
know,
maybe
try
to
get
25
on
this
road.
I
We
looked
at
at
speeds
here
and
generally
people
were
going
about
10
miles
over
I.
Think
a
lot
of
it's
due
to
topography.
You
have
some
hilly
areas
where
people
are
going
down
really
fast.
You
have
some
curves
people
are
taking
quite
quickly,
so
I
think
the
ideal
would
be
25,
but
honestly,
I
can't
speak
to
it
until
the
engineers
them
can
kind
of
run
their
analysis
on
that.
A
I
K
Hi
everybody
I'm
Lauren
I'm,
with
Arlington
Transit
operations,
team
I'm,
going
to
start
by
going
over
the
Arlington
Transit
service
data.
Dashboard.
We've
heard
your
concerns
that
I'm
not
having
visualized
data
accessible
online
and
yeah.
So
our
goal
that
we
kind
of
worked
together
was
that
this
dashboard
would
be
a
tool
to
capture
visualize
and
share
with
the
public
arts
service
performance
data
and
making
sure
it
was
an
interactive
tool
that
could
be
that
had
graphs
tables
and
summary
text.
K
Underneath
one
of
these
tabs
you'd
get
transit
performance
dashboard,
and
this
is
the
beginning
of
it
down
here-
there's
a
little
tool
that
will
open
it
to
full
screen
mode
so
that
you
can
see
it
fully.
We
have
six
performance
performance
metrics
that
we
have
at
the
top.
These
are
all
clickable
that
you
can
share
that
you
can
change
too.
You
can
also
use
this
arrow
down
here.
K
All
six
have
the
same
format.
You've
got
the
title
and
legend
in
the
top
left
corner.
The
legend
has
both
different
colors
per
year,
as
well
as
shapes
for
accessibility.
You've
got
the
label
on
the
left,
in
this
case
we're
looking
at
our
system-wide
ridership,
so
you've
got
passenger
trips
with
months
on
the
bottom.
K
Underneath
the
months
you've
got
a
summary
text
that
gives
an
idea
of
what
you're
looking
at,
including
where
the
data
is
sourced
and
a
link
to
the
PDF
versions
as
well
on
the
right
you
have
these,
we
have
the
table
with
the
same
information,
and
all
these
tabs
will
have
in
the
upper
right
hand,
corner
selection
menus.
So,
in
this
case,
we're
looking
at
art
system
or
advisorship
and
I
love
this
tool.
K
For
a
couple
of
reasons,
you
can
compare
over
time
as
one
of
the
useful
Notions
of
this
also
holding
over
each
month.
You
can
see
the
numbers,
as
is
so.
You
know,
for
example,
I've
selected,
2019
and
2022.
You
can
see
the
comparison
of
where
we
were
and
where
we
go
selling.
So
this
is
system
wide,
I've
broken
it
down
as
well
to
Route
level
again,
I
go
to
the
upper
right
hand
corner
and
you
can
search
by
Route.
K
So
if
you
want
to
look
at
41,
it'll
change
in
real
time
and
the
legend
will
also
change
so,
let's
say
we're
looking
at
years
again:
I
I,
like
doing
the
2019-2022,
you
see
41
overtime,.
K
Let's
see,
then
we
have
service.
Efficiency
is
another
metric.
This
is
again
so
electable
by
year.
On-Time
performance
is
another
indicator
currently
because
we
have
all
routes
selected
in
the
top
right
selection
pane.
We
are
looking
at
system-wide
on
Time
Performance,
but
if
you'd
like
to
look
at
a
specific
route,
you
can
select,
you
know
Route
41
and
again
it
will
change
in
real
time.
K
This
is
also
Illustrated
in
the
bottom
section,
select
all
for
system,
one
select
for
individual
routes.
So
it's
again
we
are
open
for
any
feedback
that
you
have
in
terms
of
the
usability
and
you
can
hover
over
to
see
the
different
years
and
their
percentages.
We've
got
miles
between
Road
calls
as
a
measure
and
as
well
as
star
ridership
over
at
the
end.
K
So
we
have
these
six.
We
have
a
couple
of
plans
going
forward
to
include
a
little
bit
more
metrics.
We
wanted
to
add
more
service
performance
metrics.
We
also
want
to
phase
out
some
of
the
PDFs
and
look
at
the
timeline
on
what
that's
going
to
look
like
and
create
a
channel
for
customer
feedback
as
well
as
your
feedback.
K
So
if
you
have
any
now
is
the
time
we'll
have
some
open-ended
question
time,
but
we
would
like
to
have
any
extended
any
feedback
after
this
time
right
now
to
be
emailed
to
Pierre
by
by
March
24th.
So.
D
K
Know
as
text
my
understanding
that
power
bi
is
readable
by
with
that
software.
D
I
am
glad
that
you
thought
about
that
I!
Don't
have
it
myself,
so
I
can't
test
that
theory,
but
I'm
glad
that
that
was
something
that
you
guys
considered
because
sometimes
I
see
websites
that
are
gorgeous
and
then
I
ask
about
that
and
people
are
like
what.
K
So
yes,
I'm
I'm
gonna
double
check
on
that
and
as
we
go
forward
when
we
upload
it
to
the
website,
we
want
to
ensure
that
it
like
maintains
that
ability.
But
it's
to
the
best
of
my
ability
at
this
moment
that
it
is
readable
with
the
giving
audio
to
the
visuals
yeah.
A
A
Okay,
if
not
Lauren,
thank
you
very
much.
That's
really
great
to
see
like
that
interactive
nature,
okay.
So
the
next
item
here
is
Arlington
Transit,
strategic
Plan
update
and
what's
to
come
and
Harvey
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
turn
your
camera
off
again.
M
I'm
good
evening,
Paul
munier
with
Arlington
Transit,
Bureau
I,
don't
have
a
presentation
I'm
just
going
to
real
quickly
run
down
some
of
the
key
dates
that
are
coming
up
with
the
transit
strategic
plan.
We're
working
right
now
on
finalizing
the
recommendations
that
we're
going
to
put
out
to
the
public
for
public
comment.
M
We
have
a
virtual
meeting
on
March
23rd
that
is
going
to
start
the
second
round
of
public
Outreach
for
the
transit
strategic
plan.
As
I
said,
we
are
finalizing
the
recommendations
and
taking
those
to
the
public
for
comment
to
see
if
we
have
based
on
the
research
and
previous
public
Outreach
captured
what
the
needs
of
the
community
are
so
March
23rd
that
kicks
off
there's
going
to
be
a
series
of
pop-up
meetings
around
the
county.
M
At
least
16
meetings
is
what
we're
planning
for
right
now
to
to
get
out
into
the
into
the
field
and
meet
people
on
the
street
where
they
are
I
thought
it
was
successful
in
the
first
round
and
then
once
that
closes,
we
will
be
taking
the
comments,
reviewing
our
recommendations
and
making
adjustments
to
the
plan
as
needed.
M
M
How
we're
going
to
provide
service
and
the
board
will
approve
that
in
probably
very
late
summer,
early
fall,
August,
September
time
frame.
I
would
say
that
I
would
probably
come
back
to
this
Committee
in
May.
Once
we
have
completed
the
public
Outreach.
To
give
you
a
summary
of
what
the
public
Outreach
is
and
discuss,
how
how
we
may
change
recommendations,
so
that
is
a
quick
summary
of
what's
going
on.
Are
there
any
questions.
A
M
I
know
one
of
the
a
couple
of
the
locations
that
we
went
to
previously
and
that
we're
going
to
return
to
is
Dinwiddie
and
Columbia
Pike.
That
is
a
major
hub
for
us
and
has
some
of
our
our
most
important
routes
originate.
There
Shirlington
transit
station
and
I'm,
trying
to
think
Columbia
Pike
at
Glebe
Road
we
went
to.
M
We
will
be
doing
some
in
the
north,
we're
working
on
identifying
locations
up
in
the
north
part
of
the
county
to
hold
some
meetings,
but
essentially
it
is
it's.
A
group
of
us
go
out
from
the
group
before
we
should
have
iPads
with
questions
on
it.
That
will
be
also
on
the
same
questions
that
will
be
asked
and
be
in
an
online
survey,
but
actually
getting
out
and
talking
people
and
and
asking
them.
You
know
if
they
they
want
to
provide
input.
M
G
So
there's
a
question
that
shot
about
having
Spanish
speakers.
M
Paul
yeah
for
every
pop-up
that
we
go
to,
we
do
have
someone
that
will
be
with
us
that
speaks
Spanish.
That
was
extremely
important
in
the
first
round.
Also,
all
materials
will
be
translated
into
I,
think
the
five
major
languages
that
APS
recognizes
being
spoken
to
schools.
So
there
will
be
multi-uh
multi-language
materials
available,
but
we
will
have
a
Spanish
speaker
with
us
in
the
field
at
each
one
of
these
pop-ups.
M
J
Hey
everyone:
this
is
Kirk
Dan,
the
wilmada
service
coordinator
for
Arlington
County,
just
to
start
off
with
I
I.
Want
you
guys
to
know
that
all
the
budget
material
can
be
found
at
wamada.com
slam
budget.
J
There
were
three
hearings
last
week
that
were
in
one
was
in
Maryland:
one
was
in
DC,
one
was
in
Virginia
and
then
on
Friday.
There
was
a
virtual
hearing
where
the
public
was
able
to
comment
on
the
proposed
budget
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
for
a
couple
of
slides.
J
Should
be
able
to
see
the
slide
now,
can
you
see
it
yeah?
Yes,
all
right.
So
I
was
asked
to
speak
about
the
the
subsidy
and
I
took
this
straight
from
the
budget
book.
Last
year's
was
around
80
million
dollars
this
year.
Our
base
is
83.3,
there's
2.2
in
legislative
exclusions.
Those
exclusions
are
the
Potomac
Yard
Rail
station
and
the
Improvement
of
bus
service.
One
is
the
B2
in
the
District
of
Columbia.
J
The
next
is
a12
in
Maryland
and
then
the
my
chances
paid
16
m
M
Andre
was
kind
enough
to
give
me
updated
version
of
the.
Can
you
see
the
map
yeah,
we
can
see
it.
Okay,.
J
Andre
was
kind
enough
to
give
me
the
the
the
updated
version
of
the
path
of
travel
for
the
16m
from
in
in
the
in
the
budget
book.
It
has
it
going
down
18th,
but
they're
going
to
have
it
go
down
15th
Street
to
to
start
off
with
it
is
in
the
proposed
budget
for
12
minutes
all
day.
J
We
have
applied
with
nvtc
to
have
six
minutes
in
the
Peak
period
in
the
peak
Direction.
That's
one
of
their
caveats
for
the
Community
Choice
program,
because
it's
the
intention
of
it
is
to
reduce
the
cars
being
used
for
commuting
so
that
we
we
did
apply
for
that.
They
are
in
their
technical
reviews.
Right
now
for
the
the
selections
there's
some
back
and
forth
going
on
and
if
awarded
those
monies
would
be
available
as
early
as
July
1st.
J
Now
one
thing
to
keep
in
mind
is
walmarta:
has
a
driver
shortage
or
otherwise
known
as
operator
shortage,
so
wamada
signed
a
the
the
general
manager
signed
a
letter
of
support,
with
the
caveat
that
the
budget
is
approved,
because
this
is
in
a
proposed
budget,
the
board
would
need
to
approve
the
budget
with
the
16m
in
it
and
that
would
generally
take
place.
J
The
approval
will
generally
take
place
in
April
and
then
the
second
caveat
is
that
they
would
overcome
the
driver
shortage
and
once
that
happens,
then
we
could
hope
that
at
the
next
Union
bid
that
they
would
assign
have
that
part
of
the
bid
or
part
of
the
pick
depending
on
what
you
want
to
call
it
and
that
they
would
then
have
those
increased
frequencies
available.
J
J
A
C
How
does
the
proposed
FY
24
amounts
for
the
the
85
million
and
the
24
Point?
How
do
they
compare
with
the
previous
years.
J
Since
the
previous
year
was
79.6,
you
know
basically
80.
and
then
there
were
exclusions
on
that
as
well,
so
every
every
year
what
happens
is
the
there's
some
legislation?
In
effect
that
says
that
the
Commonwealth
can't
exceed
three
percent
growth
and
then
what
happens
is
the
so
the
Commonwealth's
total
amount
is
generally
Changed
by
three
percent.
In
the
you
know,
upward
State
and
then
it's
then
divvied
by
the
amount
of
service.
J
So
there's
a
4.7
percent
increase
this
year
to
Arlington
as
a
sub
jurisdiction.
J
I,
don't
have
that
data
in
front
of
me,
but
I
can
get
it
to
you.
Thank
you
because
we
we
just
the
the
CIP
or
the
CFA.
The
agreement
was
just
went
into
effect
last
year,
so
I'd
have
to
I'd
have
to
look
back
at
what
last
year's
stuff
was.
A
Okay,
Kirk
I
got
another
question
for
you
and
that
is
how's
the
ridership
holding
up
on
the
silver
line
and
then,
secondly,
when
does
it
look
like
a
Potomac
Yard
station
will
be
opening
the.
A
J
As
and
we're
not
sure
whether
it's
going
to
coincide
on
the
exact
same
date
or
not,
it
would
be
great
if
it
did,
but
the
yellow
line
is
also
going
to
be
opening
in
May.
J
The
silver
line
ridership
is
still
going
Leaps
and
Bounds
and
I
want
to
say
that
let's
see
yeah
last
week,
I
was
at
a
board
meeting.
J
They
would
they
said
that
the
the
ridership
was
once
again
at
an
all-time
high,
so
we're
still
obviously
not
too
pre-pandemic
and
that's
not
forecasted
to
happen
until
after
2025
I
believe
this
year's
ridership
overall,
where
it's
being
budgeted
70
of
you,
know
so
30
lower
than
what
the
pre-pandemic
ridership
was
for
Revenue
purposes,
I
believe
in
2025
they're,
looking
at
75
percent
and
then
hopefully,
after
that
things
will
start
getting
back
to
normal.
J
But
there's
some
speculation
as
to
whether
the
pre-pandemic
levels
will
ever
be
seen
again
because
of
the
amount
of
telework
that's
being
done
and
especially
with
the
the
federal
workers
mm-hmm.
A
Well,
this
Silver
Line,
you
know,
has
a
unique
niche
in
that.
It's
it's.
You
know
strong
connection
to
Dulles
and
I've
people.
I
talk
with
they're,
really
excited
about.
You
know
if
they
have
a
flight
out
of
Dallas,
taking
the
Silver
Line
being
able
to
get
in
in
and
out
that
way,
rather
than
pay,
75
bucks
for
an
Uber
or
cab,
or
something
like
that.
So
right
and.
J
One
one
thing
that
I
I
do
want
to
bring
up
is
that
starting
in
June
they
have
to
replace
the
guide
rails
on
the
orange
line,
so
the
end
of
the
line
will
be
Boston,
and
then
there
will
be
shuttle
buses.
That
will
then
take
you
up
to
oh
man,
the
the
next
stop
after
the
next
stop
on
the
silver
line.
After.
J
No
he's
false
he's
false
Church,
let's
see
East
Falls
Church
is
going
to
be
shut,
West
Falls
is
shut
and
then
what's
the
one
when
the
Silver
Line
breaks.
A
J
Mclean
yeah,
sorry
so
there'll
be
a
shuttle
bus
from
from
there
to
you
know
what
he
said.
J
Okay,
that's
gonna
be
taking
place
through
July,
so
there'll
be
a
all
of
the
affected
stations
that
are
shut,
we'll
be
having
a
shuttle
service.
A
Okay,
I
got
one
more
for
you
Kirk,
and
that
is
that
original
proposal
in
DC
for
free
bus
in
the
city
is
that
what's
the
status
of
that
at
this
point,.
A
A
All
right,
Thank,
you
Kirk,
appreciate
it,
be
safe:
okay,
okay,
our
next
item
here
is
the
report
from
the
accessibility
subcommittee,
Alexa.
D
Hi
everybody
I
mostly
am
a
little
bit
concerned.
D
We
have
been
told
we
still
don't
know
when
public
engagement
exactly
is
going
to
be
for
the
star
proposals,
but
we
have
heard
at
our
last
meeting
that
apparently,
what's
going
to
be
considered
are
the
proposals
that
were
put
out
last
year
with
no
amendments
to
them
and,
on
the
one
hand,
I
understand
I
think
the
idea
is
making
sure
that
everybody
who
is
able
to
make
comments
on
the
proposals,
sort
of
gets
the
same
thing
to
look
at
so
I
can
kind
of
understand
that,
but
I
also
feel
troubled
and
I
believe
that
we
heard
the
same
thing
from
some
of
the
people
that.
D
I
think
somebody
may
need
to
mute
themselves
anyway.
My
concern
is
that
the
subcommittee
and
the
many
people
that
gave
us
public
comment
through
our
meetings
are
concerned
that,
if
no
changes
at
all
are
have
been
made
to
the
proposals,
have
we
been
heard
just
just
off
the
top
of
my
head?
One
of
the
things
that
I
can
think
of
that
folks
were
concerned
about
was
there
was
a
proposal
to
change
reasonable
accommodation.
D
The
way
reasonable
accommodations
worked
to
something
that
was
I
can't
remember
exactly
came
from
a
particular
sort
of
standard
and
one
of
the
things
that
quite
a
few
people
from
the
quite
a
few
people
giving
public
comments
said.
Were
you
know
nobody
actually
looks
at
that
other
manual,
the
odds
that
star
Riders
are
just
going
to
know
that
off
the
top
of
their
head
is
very
slim
and
I
recall
the
feedback
that
we
had
gotten
at
that
time
being
oh
yeah,
that
makes
total
sense.
We're
gonna.
D
Look
at
that
again,
so
my
question
is
is
if
the
idea
is
just
the
county
does
have
all
of
that
feedback,
but
is
planning
to
look
at
it
later
when
they
look
at
everything
else.
That's
one
thing:
if
they're
just
like
oh
we're
starting
from
zero,
again
I'm
concerned,
so
my
I
I
am
very
torn
about
this.
I
am
I
am
glad
to
see
that
we
have
the
proposal
to
comment
on,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
it
wasn't.
D
My
understanding
and
I
don't
think
it
was
other
people's
understanding
that
this
was
the
way
things
were
going
to
work
so
again,
I'm
a
little
concerned
and
Confused
I'll
just
say
it
that
way
and
I
think
we
may
have
some
folks
here
at
this
meeting.
Listening
in
who
are
concerned
about
the
same
thing,
I
believe
I
know
there
were
a
couple
of
people
that
asked
me.
D
A
A
So
what
else
did
you
cover
at
the
meeting
today.
D
And
the
other
things
that
we
covered,
we
had
a
few
presentations,
although
most
of
the
meeting
was
was
taken
up
with
people,
giving
public
comment
on
this
and
again
being
concerned
that
they
had
already
commented
and-
and
you
know
that
that
we
had
our
understanding
had
been
that
there
was
going
that
their
their
proposals
were
going
to
be
looked
at
again,
and
you
know
Lynn
made
very
clear
tonight
that
that
is
not
what
happened
again.
D
I,
don't
know
whether
you
know
I
had
that
impression
falsely,
but
it
certainly
seems
like
I'm,
not
the
only
person
who
did
so
I
am
very
concerned
that
you
know
what's
going
on
how's
it
going
on.
You
know,
I
I
do
look
forward
to
there
being
a
public
comment
process,
but
I
I'm,
really
troubled
by
this.
E
Yeah
I
I
was
not
surprised
that
they
had
the
same
proposal,
but
but
I
have
a
the
same
kind
of
negative
proposal:
negative
view
of
The
Proposal
that
I
did
six
months
ago
or
nine
months
ago
or
whenever
it
was
in
particular
I
I
felt
that
that
it
was
a
study
that
was
undertaken
to
see
if
we
could,
if
looking
at
comparable
systems
and
seeing
if
we
could
save
money
and
still
be
and
still
meet
a
Ada
standards
by
finding
some
other
jurisdictions
which
we're
doing
less
than
we
were,
but
still
considered
to
be
needing
Ada
standards
and
I.
E
Don't
think
that's.
That
is
a
very
good
way
to
to
undertake
a
study,
but
that
was
my
view
of
how
it
was
undertaken.
So
it
wasn't
in
their
other
ways
you
you
could
do
it.
You
know.
Can
we
within
the
same
budget?
E
Can
we
bring
better
service
by
doing
making
some
changes
or
other
things,
but
I
I
I
think
that
the
way
the
study
was
done
was
to
look
for
ways
to
to
cut
service
and,
as
as
I
say,
still
be
in
within
Ada
and
and
had
some
bad
aspects.
I
thought,
for
example,
people
going
to
Medical
appointments
having
to
schedule
and
Advance
their
pickup,
and
it
may
be
very
costly
to
the
system.
But
I
don't
know
anyone
who
goes
to
doctors,
who
knows
when
they're,
when
they're
done
yeah.
D
D
I
guess
trying
to
thread
a
delegate
needle
and
make
people
feel
listened
to,
but
then
it
just
ended
up.
Oh
we're
we're
we're.
You
know
back
to
back
to
square
one
with
this
and
I
again,
I
mean
part
of
it.
Part
of
it
may
just
be.
You
know
how
public
comment
needs
to
work,
but
I
think
I
think
we've
got
some
angry
people
and
I
think
they're,
probably
angrier
now
I'll
just
say
it
that
way.
E
I
had
another
procedural
concern
which
was
I
was
given
the
impression
that
this
might
be
something
that
they
wouldn't
need
to
send
to
the
County
Board,
because
it
was
just
an
operational
change
and
and
I
think
the
change
is
large
enough.
The
proposed
change
is
large
enough
that
it
should
certainly
go
before
the
County
Board.
D
I
agree
with
that
as
well:
I
I
I
do
have
the
sense
that
that
there
have
there
has
been
kind
of
a
pattern
of
of
trying
to
change
the
policies,
and
you
know
give
just
enough
information
to
people
that
people
feel
like
they
can
say
something,
but
not
really
Without
Really
any
way.
For
you
know
their
concerns
to
be
clearly
addressed.
So
I
I
have
that
concern
as
well
and.
E
A
Okay,
all
right
any
comment
from
staff
on
this.
L
Yes,
I
can
respond
and
actually
share
the
same
information
that
I
shared
during
the
previous
accessibility
subcommittee,
that
no,
we
hadn't
changed
the
proposals
because
we'd
only
shared
them
with
the
Committees
and
that
our
next
step
was
to
take
it
to
the
public
for
public
engagement
and,
as
we
all
know,
there
was
change
in
staff.
So
we
just
literally
halted
everything.
We
did
not
change
anything
about
it
and
thought
it
would
be
fair
to
share
it
with
the
public
at
large
to
get
feedback
and
again
these
are
recommendations.
L
These
are
proposals
and
that's
all
they
are
right
now
and
I.
Think
there
there's
some
concern
that
there
were
changes
underway,
that
we
would
not
listen
to
or
or
or
react
to
feedback
and
without
having
the
public
at
large,
giving
feedback
we
we
would
be
doing
a
disservice.
So
that's
literally
where
we
are
right
now
is
to
do
public
Outreach,
just
as
you
heard
with
regards
to
the
South
George
Mason
Trail
and
those
changes,
we
have
to
go
through
the
same
public
comment
period
and
and
that
hasn't
happened
yet
and
so
that's.
L
What
we
we
believe
is
is
right
is
the
next
thing
to
do.
A
Okay,
any
any
more
discussion
from
the
subcommittee.
D
I,
don't
really
either
I
mean
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
that
staff
are
in
an
enviable
position,
so
you
know
I
I
hate
to
sound
like
I'm
picking
on
them,
but
at
the
same
time
I
can
understand
why
people
are
concerned
and
I'm
a
little
frustrated
myself
as
well.
So.
A
Well,
I'm
glad
Lynn
could
share
with
us
about
where
they
are
in
the
process,
and
sometimes
the
processes
do
take
quite
a
while.
So
we'll
look
forward
to
reports
in
the
future
as
the
process
continues
on
this.
D
G
Good
evening
again
just
wanted
to
give
everyone
an
update.
Last
year
we
had
last
September.
Actually
we
had
discussions
in
regards
to
potential
changes
to
the
tax
Charter
and
it
was
supposed
to
be
a
Nexus
between
the
attack
Charter,
as
well
as
the
bicycle
advisory
committee,
as
well
as
The
Pedestrian
advisory
committee
and
those
Charters
are
in
the
final
stages
of
review
and
hopefully
fingers
crossed.
We
will
have
something
to
share
at
the
May
tax
meeting
to
link
all
the
three
charts
together,
so
staff
has
been
working.
A
Okay,
great
Pierre,
appreciate
that
so
I
guess
your
goal
would
be
to
get
it
to
us
ahead
of
ahead
of
the
meeting,
so
we
could
review
it
in
advance.
Correct,
yes,
okay,
great
okay,
I
see
Kirk's
hand
is
up.
J
Yes,
I
just
I
wanted
to
follow
up
with
the
answer
to
the
question
that
I
couldn't
answer
earlier,
so
this
year's
CIP,
the
capital
monies,
is
24.1.
The
last
years
was
22.8,
so
there's
a
1.3
million
dollar
increase.
A
Okay,
so
hearing
none,
our
next
meeting
is
going
to
be
May,
9th
and
that'll,
be
the
virtual
meeting
and
then
in
July
I
guess
at
a
date
to
be
determined
in
July,
we'll
be
having
the
capital
projects.
Tour
and
I
just
want
to
encourage
everybody
to
try
and
go
on
that
tour
if
you're
at
all
possible,
because
it
really
is
fascinating
to
get
out
there
and
see
these
projects
firsthand
and
hear
from
staff
how
you
know
how
things
are
going
and
what
the
plan
is
and
be
able
to.
A
You
know
see
them
firsthand
nothing
beats
field.
Inspection
trip
is
we
used
to
say
all
right,
so
do
do
I
hear
a
motion
to
adjourn
the
meeting.