►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
our
first
in-person
Slash
hybrid
meeting
in
several
years,
I've
basically
won
order
of
business,
which
is
to
turn
your
microphone
on.
There
is
a
button
on
the
bottom
that
says
push
and
if
the
light
is
red,
then
your
microphone
is
on.
Please
use
your
microphone
to
make
sure
everybody
can
be
heard
and
other
than
that,
it's
great
to
see
you
all
in
person
and
we
can
get
started
on
the
agenda.
B
Thank
you.
Sorry,
so
I
actually
welcomed
the
Commissioners
back
and
turned
the
meeting
over
to
Chairman
slat.
We
don't
have
any
comments
on
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda
and
we
are
now
introducing
the
first
item,
which
is
the
Arlington
resident
study
in
the
state
of
the
commute.
C
C
D
Hi,
so
thanks
Eric
for
the
introduction
so
good
evening,
everyone,
my
name-
is
Tasha
areza
and
I'm.
The
research
director
of
Mobility
lab
so
as
Eric
said
I'm
here
today
to
talk
about
some
highlights
from
our
newest
research
study,
which
is
the
2021
Arlington
resident
travel
survey
and
special
analysis.
Technical
report
do
I,
show
the
slides.
D
Oh
okay,
so
all
right
so
I'll
start
by
talking
a
little
bit
about
Mobility
lab
and
the
work
that
we
do
so
Mobility
lab
is
a
research
center
and
communication
source
for
transportation,
Behavior
policy
and
transportation
demand
management
or
TDM
for
short,
so
Mobility
lab
is
a
division
of
accs,
which
is
the
TDM
agency
in
Arlington
County,
we're
funded
by
multiple
sources,
one
of
which
is
the
Virginia
drpt,
so
Mobility
lab
designs
that
conducts
DDM
research
for
Arlington
County,
and
we
have
worked
with
other
teams
within
such
as
the
transit
to
Europe.
D
So
we
also
partner
with
established
research
contractors.
One
example
is
LDA
Consulting
kubi
athlete
partnered
with
for
this
2000
to
2021
Arlington
resident
study.
We
also
interact
with
major
regional
TDM
stakeholders
such
as
Cog
and
go
meter
connections,
and
we
also
communicate
results
and
race
awareness
and
DDM
in
Arlington
through
our
website
and
newsletters.
D
So
the
2021
Arlington
resident
travel
survey
report
is
a
report
about
commuting
patterns,
non-word
travel
and
the
opinions
and
attitudes
around
travel
of
Arlington
residents.
Given
the
timing
of
the
study,
there's
a
unique
Spotlight
on
Trends
and
conditions
Prior
to
enjoying
the
covid-19
pandemic,
so
data
was
gathered
using
an
online
survey
among
adult
residents
of
Arlington
County.
This
was
the
data
collection
was
conducted
between
the
months
of
May
and
July
in
2021,
so
postcards
were
sent
to
Arlington
households
that
invited
them
to
answer
an
online
survey.
D
There
was
also
a
telephone
number
that
we
provided
for
those
who
opted
to
answer
the
survey
over
the
phone.
So
this
whole
survey
effort
resulted
in
a
random
sample
of
4213
Arlington
residents,
the
threat
the
sample
covers
both
employed
and
unemployed
residents,
and
residents
residing
in
several
Geographic
sub-areas
in
Arlington,
such
as
Ross
in
Ballston
Corridor,
Route,
1
Columbia
against
hurling.
Then
we
also
looked
at
the
data
in
terms
of
population
subgroups,
so
this
is
based
on
certain
demographic
characteristics
or
travel
characteristics.
D
So
a
new
topic
for
the
report
is
the
travel
Behavior
changes
prompted
by
the
covid-19
pandemic.
So
in
the
survey
we
asked
about
information
regarding
telework,
as
well
as
information
on
their
current
commute
pre-pandemic
commit
and
what
they
anticipate
their
post-pandemic
commute
to
be
like
just
to
clarify
when
we
say
pre-pandemic
commute.
This
is
this
is
related
to
the
most
frequency
of
use
in
February
2020.
D
So
next
up
is
discussing
some
key
highlights
based
on
the
results
and
findings
of
the
report,
so
the
first
is
about
demographics,
So,
based
on
the
sample.
We
got.
We
see
that
75
percent
of
respondents
reported
annual
household
incomes
of
100,
000
or
higher,
and
then
there's
also
a
mix
of
new
and
long-time
residents
in
the
county.
38
moved
to
the
county
within
the
past
five
years.
Well,
46
percent
of
respondents
lived
in
Arlington
for
10
years
or
longer
in
terms
of
car
ownership.
Overall,
12
percent
of
households
are
carless.
D
D
So
as
for
work
travel
based
on
that
data,
we
see
some
changes
into
the
travel
Behavior.
First,
there's
the
rice
and
telework,
so
70
percent
of
employed
respondents
were
working
from
home
for
at
least
three
days
per
week.
Pre-Pandemic
42
did
not
work
from
home
at
all.
This
is
the
second
Shifty
chain
shift.
We
noticed
was
that
the
pandemic
shifted
commute
travel
from
transit
to
drive
alone
for
those
that
still
travel
to
work.
The
use
of
non-single
occupancy
vehicle
molds
dropped
to
15
percent
in
2021
from
55
pre-pandemic.
D
We
also
see
this
shift
in
this
chart
on
the
right,
which
shows
the
use
of
different
commute
modes
as
a
percentage
of
weekly
commute
days.
So
we
see
that
pre-pandemic,
which
is
a
time
period
of
February
2020
before
the
pandemic
restrictions
were
put
into
place.
You
see
that
drive
alone
train
bus
for
the
top
three
modes
for
commuting,
but
in
the
midst
of
the
pandemic
in
2021
Delaware
work,
making
the
top
mode,
followed
by
Drive
alone,
taxi
right,
Health
that
grouped
category.
However,
we
dug
into
the
data
a
little
bit
further.
D
If
you
compare
to
mute
travel
data
from
2015
to
2020,
you
can
see
the
drive
alone
actually
was
decreasing,
while
Transit
use
was
increasing.
So
looking
at
2020
versus
2015
that
we
saw
that
drive
alone
fell
to
38
and
2020
compared
to
45
percent
in
2015,
while
training
is
exactly
on
their
way
up
to
49
2020
before
covid-19
restrictions
are
put
into
place
to
42
in
2015.
D
The
in
the
report
we
also
discussed
data
about
non-work
travel
of
Arlington
residents,
So,
based
on
the
survey
date
they'll
be
collected.
We
see
that
drive
alone
is
the
most
common
mode
for
non-word
travel
and
74,
followed
by
walking
at
48
and
driving
or
riding
with
others.
At
27
we
analyze
the
data
a
little
bit
further
and
to
see
some
interesting
Trends,
and
we
saw
that
compared
to
weekdays
on
Arlington
residents
are
more
likely
to
drive
alone,
to
drive
a
ride
with
others
or
use,
try
and
hail
for
their
non-work
travel.
D
So
the
study
also
provides
data
on
the
level
of
satisfaction
that
our
LinkedIn
residents
have
with
the
transportation
system.
So,
according
to
the
data,
71
percent
of
respondents
were
satisfied
with
our
linkedin's
transportation
system.
This
is
higher
than
in
2015,
when
the
last
Arlington
resident
study
was
conducted
were
only
65
percent
were
satisfied
when
we
look
closer
into
the
data.
D
This
was
followed
by
the
length
of
the
trip
cited
by
91
percent
of
respondents
and
the
third
was
safety
relating
to
crashes
or
injury,
which
was
cited
by
78
percent
of
respondents.
Again,
we
looked
at
the
data
a
little
more
closely
and
found
that
factors
actually
differed
depending
on
age.
For
example,
cost
was
a
more
important
factor
for
respondents
longer
than
35
years
old,
while
for
older
respondents,
safety,
travel
flexibility
and
familiarity
with
modberg
the
more
important
factors
that
they
considered
When,
selecting
their
mode
for
travel.
D
So
the
survey
also
conducted
included
questions
about
the
level
of
awareness
and
use
of
our
link,
use
of
Arlington
residents
for
to
travel,
information
and
assistance
as
available
to
them
in
the
county
So.
Based
on
that
data,
there
is
a
high
level
of
awareness
and
use
of
the
services
to
illustrate
95
percent
of
respondents
used
at
least
one
travel
and
triple
information
up
on
a
digital
device.
83
percent
knew
of
at
least
one
travel,
information
and
assistance
organization
in
Arlington.
D
So
for
the
final
I
highlight
I'll
talk
about
the
transportation
needs
of
Arlington
residents
based
on
the
survey
data,
so
the
survey
asked
about
Transportation
needs
in
two
ways.
First,
it
asks
what
the
most
important
in
transportation
needs
or
concerns
are
in
Arlington
County,
which
we
see
the
results
of
in
the
chart
on
the
left
and
second
because
of
the
timing
of
the
survey.
The
survey
also
asked
about
transportation
services
that
are
more
important
now
than
before
the
pandemic.
D
So
generally,
the
results
show
that
Transit
and
bike
related
items
were
some
of
the
top
Transportation
needs
in
both
cases,
so
in
general,
Transit
was
cited
by
48
of
respondents
as
the
most
important
Transportation
need,
or
concern
in
Arlington
County,
followed
by
21
to
answered
by
well
and
the
other
question
walking.
Related
services
are
now
viewed
as
more
important
than
before
the
pandemic.
D
So
this
concludes
our
short
presentation
about
some
top
level
highlights
from
Mobility
Labs
latest
study,
which
is
the
2021
Arlington
resident
travel
survey.
If
you
would
like
to
read
the
complete
report,
it
is
available
for
download
on
our
website,
which
is
mobilitylab.org
and
I.
Thank
you.
For
your
time,
thanks.
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much.
It's
very
useful
information
I,
definitely
hopped
in
and
grabbed
the
full
report.
A
A
If
you
are
a
commissioner
on
Virtual,
you
can
raise
your
virtual
hand
and,
if
you're
a
commissioner
in
person,
you
can
raise
your
actual
hand
all
right
seeing
none.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
will
put
in
my
standard
plug
to
Mobility
lab,
which
is
I
would
love
to
see
us.
Do
a
business
intercept
survey
where
people
where
we
ask
people
who
are
coming
to
local
Arlington
businesses?
How
did
you
get
here
today
to
help
our
business
Community
understand?
Excuse
me,
Mr,
chair,
that.
A
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
yes,
there
we
go
then
I
will
just
put
in
my
standard
plug,
which
is
I
would
love
to
do
an
intercept
survey,
business
intercept
where
we
ask
people
attend
coming
to
local
Arlington
businesses,
how
they
got
there
to
help
our
business
Community
understand
how
their
customers
are
arriving,
whether
transit
or
bus
or
walking
or
biking
or
whatnot
I
would
love
to
see
that
potentially
happen
in
the
future
for
Mobility
lab,
seeing
no
other
hands
I
think
we're
ready
for
our
next
agenda
item.
B
Before
I
introduce
the
next
agenda
item,
excuse
me:
I
did
not
mention
Brian
Shelton,
who
was
here
with
us
tonight.
He
is
also
working
as
a
staff
liaison
for
the
Transportation
Commission
to
help
us
through
this
transition.
So
Brian
is
here
as
an
intern
from
Virginia
Tech
with
the
Masters
in
planning.
So
we
are
very
excited
to
have
them
and,
as
I
may
have
said
before,
this
is
our
first
in-person
meeting.
So
there
are
some
transitions,
so
please
bear
with
us
through
that.
E
Good
evening
Commissioners
Mr
chair
it's
good
to
be
back
in
person
for
the
record
I'm
rich
horsman,
with
the
Department
of
Environmental
Services
Transportation
division,
I'm,
the
regional
program
coordinator
I,
do
not
have
a
slide
deck
this
evening.
So
hopefully
you
folks
have
had
a
chance
to
review
the
draft
staff
report
prior
to
the
meeting
way
back
before
covid
in
November
2019.
E
This
commission
heard
an
item
and
then
the
County
board
approved
a
resolution
of
support
for
Nova
parks's,
5.6
million
dollar
funding,
application
of
the
mvta
to
design
and
construct
improvements
to
the
Washington
Old
Dominion
Trail
between
North
Roosevelt
Street
and
North
Carolina,
Springs
Road
and
before
I,
get
too
much
further
in.
Let
me
pause
for
a
moment
and
introduce
Mike
Depew.
He
is
the
Nova
Parks
planning
administrator
and
he
is
joining
the
meeting.
Virtually
I
signed
up
on
teams
before
Mike.
Can
you
unmute
yourself
for
a
moment
and
just
introduce
yourself.
F
E
Mike,
so
the
board
approved
resolution
support
Nova
Parks
applied
to
the
nvta
for
the
some
previously
mentioned
for
design
and
construction,
both
at
the
County
Board
item
for
the
resolution
support
as
well
as
during
the
authorities
public
comment
period.
Both
bodies
heard
public
comment,
both
in
support
of
and
in
opposition
to
Nova
parks's
application,
the
resolution
support
and
the
project
as
a
whole.
E
Ultimately,
the
nvta
approved
650
000
in
design
funding
only
as
part
of
their
fiscal
20
to
25
six-year
program,
there's
additional
language
that
was
part
of
the
board's
resolution
of
support,
providing
direction
to
the
county
manager,
as
well
as
verbal
Direction
provided
by
the
chair
at
the
time
of
adoption.
E
That's
all
reflected
in
the
staff
report,
so
the
money
was
approved
and
then
typically
it's
for
the
last
two
years
of
the
six
year
program:
fiscal
24
and
25
at
Nova,
parks's
request
County
staff
on
their
behalf,
requested
at
the
MBT
NBTA
forward,
appropriate
the
design
funding
to
fiscal
2023..
E
So
once
that
step
takes
place
and
the
authority
approves
their
23
budget,
then
the
clock
begins
ticking
on
the
requirement
to
execute
a
standard
project
agreement
to
actually
formalize
the
funds
and
allow
the
sponsor
to
access
the
funds.
Now,
as
as
we
were
before
when
the
application
was
put
in,
we
are
in
a
bit
of
an
unusual
situation.
E
The
Nova
Parks
is
not
allowed
under
state
law
to
apply
directly
to
the
Authority
or
to
receive
Authority
funds,
because
they
are
not
a
statutorily
enumerated
provider
of
Transportation.
They
are
a
Parks
agency,
so
anytime
they
go
for
something,
and
this
is
what
happened
with
the
similar
project
that
was
completed
toward
the
end
of
2021
in
false
Church,
the
city
or
county
needs
to
act
on
Nova
parks's
behalf.
It
is
still
Nova
parks's
project,
but
we
need
to
act
on
their
behalf
in
front
of
the
authority.
E
So
the
county
must
execute
the
standard
project
agreement
with
nvta
to
access
the
funds.
There
will
be
a
companion
memorandum
of
agreement
between
the
county
and
Nova
parks
to
govern
basically,
oversight,
review
of
Dover
parks's
invoices
to
the
authority
and
approval
for
Nova
parks
to
pay
for
an
MBTA
to
pay
Nova
parks
for
the
work.
That's
being
done.
E
So
that's
why
we
have
two
documents
that
are
going
to
go
in
front
of
the
board
and
let
me
also
say
that
the
the
Moa
and
the
center
project
agreement
were
not
distributed
to
the
commission
because
they
are
under
review
by
the
county
attorney's
office.
So
I
can't
distribute
that
at
this
time
they
will
be
available
when
the
board
report
goes
out,
assuming
that
everything
goes
forward
smoothly.
E
So
with
that
in
mind
and
given
the
guidance
from
the
board
at
the
time
of
the
resolution
of
support,
staff
has
worked
very
carefully
with
our
colleagues
and
Des,
particularly
in
the
office
of
sustainability
and
Environmental
Management,
as
well
as
with
our
colleagues
in
the
department
of
Parks
and
Recreation.
I
brief.
The
parks
and
rec
Commission
on
Tuesday
evening
on
this
same
item
got
a
little
bit
of
feedback
from
them.
E
We're
trying
to
follow
the
guidance
from
the
board
to
be
as
explicit
as
possible
with
what
we
think
makes
sense
for
Nova
parks
to
do
both
in
terms
of
public
engagement
and
the
analytical
framework
that
they
need
to
apply
in
the
design
process.
For
this
Trail
to
balance,
the
transportation
needs
with
the
Environmental
Protection
of
the
sensitive
areas
in
and
along
the
trail,
including
County
Parkland.
E
So
I
don't
want
to
go
into
the
specifics
necessarily,
but
the
the
sort
of
guidance
that
we
provided
is
outlined
in
the
staff
report,
as
well
as
in
the
resolution
which
was
provided
with
the
report
as
attachment
c
and
we're
setting
up
a
structure
where,
assuming
the
money
goes
forward-
and
you
know
everything
is
executed,
Nova
Parks
will
begin
the
design
process.
We
expect
them
to
conduct
a
robust
public
engagement,
including
you
know,
check-ins,
with
this
commission
with
PRC.
Probably
the
forestry
of
Natural,
Resources,
Commission
I,
know
e2c2
is
express
interest
as
well.
E
A
Great
thanks
so
I
just
want
to
restate
to
make
sure
I'm
fully
understanding
this.
So
in
addition
to
this
quite
clearly
saying
to
Nova
Parks,
unless
we
endorse
your
major
Design
Elements,
we're
not
going
to
give
you
support
to
go
to
nvta
for
money,
it's
my
understanding
that
without
Arlington
County
nvt
at
Nova,
Parks
literally
can't
go
to
NBTA
for
money.
That
is
correct.
Like.
E
E
A
From
the
MBTA
right,
they
could
conceivably
build
it
with
their
own
money
or
something
like
that:
okay,
great
and
yeah.
The
board
report
seems
pretty
clear
about
the
framework
here
of
looking
at
Trail
usage
and
safety
in
who
maintains
what,
in
their
resource
protection
areas
and
all
of
that
I
think
it's
pretty
clear.
Do
any
other
Commissioners
have
questions.
Commissioner
Lynn
tell
me.
G
E
Will
answer
myself
and
then
Circle
back
to
Mike
for
for
his
view,
but
there
were
very
high
level
concept
plans
that
staff
reviewed
and
were
shown
at
the
time
the
resolution
support
was
given
back
in
November
of
2019..
To
my
knowledge,
those
plans
have
not
Advanced
any
further,
because
there
hasn't
been
any
money
for
Nova
parks
to
spend.
Would.
E
No,
the
the
the
actual
Western
project
limit
is
where
that
sort
of
stub
end
of
Roosevelt
Street
comes
in
on
the
east
side
of
Sycamore.
So
it's
for
East
of
Seymour,
okay
over
to
North
Carolina,
okay,.
G
So
it's
on
the
east
side,
so
it's
not
to
the
Falls
Church
to
the
Falls
Church
line.
No.
E
It's
just
it
does
not
go
through
Medical
Park.
It
is
just
you
know,
east
of
there,
so
okay
got
it
anecdotal
or
not
a
little
bit
editorially.
The
county
is
involved
in
a
planning
study
for
the
Washington
Old
Dominion
Trail
Gap,
where
you're
operating
on
city
streets
near
the
East
Falls
Church
Metrorail
station.
So
at
some
point,
if
there
are
improvements
coming
out
of
that,
I
expect
that
will
be
a
you
know,
a
joint
type
of
thing
between
Nova
parks
and
the
county.
G
Sort
of
editorially
this
is
fascinating
to
me
because
a
hundred
years
after
the
GW
Parkway
was
first
conceived
as
a
Scenic
recreational
drive
and
built
by
the
park
service.
And
of
course,
it's
now
a
commuter
Road.
For
all
intents
and
purposes,
we've
evolved
the
same
way
for
bicycles.
The
trail
was
originally
a
recreational
trail
under
nvta
Nova
parks,
and
now
it
is
clearly
evolving
into
a
true
Transportation
Corridor.
So
I
think
you
know
a
century
later.
G
F
Just
to
concur
that
no
further
study
has
been
done
as
we
are
awaiting
the
money
to
be
able
to
do
that.
So
the
plans
that
were
submitted
in
2019
and
by
plans
I
mean
very
high
level
conceptual
designs.
They
they
remain,
they
Remain
the
latest
and
greatest
and.
A
Is
it
my
recollection
that
those
look
fairly
similar
to
what
was
what
is
actually
on
the
ground
in
Falls
Church
City,
the
Dual
Trails.
F
I
would
say
roughly
half
of
it.
There
is
a
large
segment,
that's
immediately
adjacent
to
Route
66
pushed
right
up
against
the
sound
wall,
and
because
of
that,
we
don't
have
the
opportunity
to
to
Really
develop
true,
fully
separated
Lanes
with
a
with
a
median
in
between,
in
that
case,
it's
simply
a
a
wider
Trail
surface
for
the
other
half
of
the
trail
more
towards
the
Carlin
Springs
end
of
it.
Yes,
you
can
go
to
Falls
Church
right
now
and
get
a
get
a
little
preview.
H
Just
one
quick
question:
can
you
tell
us
a
little
bit
more
about
when
the
Gap
study
will
be
completed
and
what
the
implications
are
for
the
proposal
for
this?
The
proposal
that's
going
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
E
Unfortunately,
I
cannot
I,
don't
have
the
information
about
my
head.
I
can
consult
with
the
staff
persons
working
on
it
and
send
word
back
through
the
chair.
A
Last
I
heard
it's
it's
not
too
far
in
the
future.
It's
this
fiscal
year
or
next
fiscal
year,
I,
don't
remember
which,
but
it's
just
a
study,
then
there's
money
and
construction
and
full
design-
and
you
know
it's
it's
a
long
pipeline
I
need
somebody
else,
and
this
was
just
an
information
item
right,
you're,
not
looking
for
endorsement
or
anything
another.
E
You
for
endorsement,
if
there
are
comments
that
the
commission
wants
the
board
to
be
aware
of
as
they're
considering
this,
you
know
the
it's
the
chair's
prerogative
to
take
that
and
turn
into
a
letter
that
goes
to
the
board,
but
now
we're
not
looking
for
Action,
specifically.
A
All
right,
great,
well
I'm,
very
supportive
in
making
sure
that
we
can
reduce
conflicts
on
the
wnod
in
the
section
as
much
as
possible.
While
being
very
you
know,
cognizant
of
the
potential
environmental
impacts
and
minimizing
those
as
much
as
we
can
and
when
the
wnod
was
built,
we
didn't
treat
or
try
and
slow
storm
water
in
any
way,
shape
or
form.
So
any
rebuild
would
be
an
opportunity
to
improve
our
storm
water
performance
in
this
area.
So
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
potential
win-win.
A
B
A
Just
that
I
think
more
and
more
sprcs
are
going
to
be
rolling
in
here.
There's
a
big
list
on
the
County
website
that
hasn't
fully
gone
through
yet
I
know:
we've
got
Bingham
Center
covered,
we've
got
Silver
Diner
covered,
we've
got
Choice
Motors
covered
two
of
those
are
the
same
development
we've
got
Ballston
holiday,
uncovered
We've
Got
Crystal
Plaza
5
covered,
but
there's
like
three
more
on
the
list.
I
think
coming
coming.
G
Down
the
pike
there
are
also
lrpcs
coming
down
the
pike,
including
big
ones,
such
as
missing
middle,
which
is
in
two
Transportation
Orient,
but
it
is
parking
there's
also
going
to
be
plan,
Langston
Boulevard,
on
October
25th
for
the
preliminary
concept
plan.
That's
not
the
final
plan,
but
this
commission
will
should
be
there
and
I
believe
we'll
be
interested
in
in
that
plan.
It's
it's
already
posted.
So
if
anybody's
interested
they
can
go
ahead
and
start
looking
at
it,
but
that's
up
there.
G
G
A
The
fun
thing
about
Planning
Commission
is
they
have
a
bunch
of
committees
that
are
all
Committees
of
the
whole.
They
just
go
to
a
bunch
of
meetings
and
call
them
different
things.
It's
super
hilarious
yeah
like
they're
like
oh,
it's,
a
zoning
committee
meeting
I
was
like
who's
going
to
be
there,
the
exact
same
people
who
are
at
a
normal
Planning,
Commission
meeting
yep
same
people
Committee
of
the
whole.
It's.
G
Ridiculous,
so
we
do
now
have
to
do
rosters
for
some
of
them,
depending
on
the
sbrc
and
the
lrpc
that
we
actually
have
to
have
membership
on
them
so
because
of
the
changes
in
state
law
to
allow
hybrid
meetings
in
order
to
have
a
quorum
so
yeah
there's
now
these
odd
mixes
for
committing
there
is
actual
membership
on
some
of
them.
Yeah.
A
A
No
one
got
drywalled
into
a
wall
or
anything
on
their
way
up
all
right.
Great.
Our
next
meeting,
October.
A
I
Hey
yeah,
so
in
regards
to
these
long
range
and
short-range
planning
committees,
will
we
be
getting
an
email
for
the
specific
projects
that
you
need,
somebody
to
volunteer
for
yep.
A
All
right,
seeing
no
other
hands
I,
will
declare
us
adjourned.