►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
C
C
C
In
addition
to
the
field,
uh
the
top
of
the
field
provides
a
synthetic
turf.
uh
I'm
sorry,
in
addition
to
the
parking,
uh
the
uh
parking
per
the
structure
provides
a
synthetic
turf
field
above
the
parking
that
is
directly
accessible
from
the
main
level
of
the
school,
and
it
will
provide
a
covered
entrance
to
the
shriver
program,
specifically
from
quinn
and
18th
street,
and
a
and
covered
secure
bicycle
parking
along
that
walkway.
C
C
Many
of
the
details
of
the
project
are
the
same
as
what
was
uh
presented
previously,
though
there
are
uh
four
areas
specifically
that
the
county
board
action
uh
that
was
approved
uh
deferred
the
project
to
look
at
specifically.
uh
The
first
was
the
18th
street
north
whip
and
parking
lane
uh
issue
uh
the
18th
street
north
streetscape,
um
which
was
in
part
uh
wrapped
up
in
that
parking
lane
discussion.
C
C
However,
that
was
put
on
hold
and
aps
re-evaluated
it,
and
in
this
project
we
will
see
um
their
thoughts,
and
uh
hopefully
that
will
provide
some
good
insight
to
uh
the
uh
the
commission's,
as
we
commissions
in
public
as
we
work
this
forward
uh
specifically
for
the
four
issues.
The
changes
uh
that
have
been
implemented
uh
include
the
provision
of
the
parking
lane
on
18th
street.
uh
This
uh
parking
lane
uh
maintains
the
street
width
that
is
out
there
today.
C
uh
It
is
consistent
with
uh
the
wraps
plan
generally
for
the
street
cross
section
as
um
as
proposed
for
this
segment
uh
along
the
school
frontage,
uh
and
this
was
a
change
from
from
what
was
originally
proposed,
with
uh
a
extension
of
the
curb
out
to
the
travel
lane,
removing
the
parking
lane,
uh
and
so
uh
the
application
has
been
updated
with
that
parking
lane.
In
addition,
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
how
to
address
the
streetscape
along
18th
street
north.
C
C
C
Allowing
direct
access
from
the
main
level
of
the
school
and
aps
will
discuss
how
they
how
this
approach
will
equitably
uh
support
the
broadest
uh
base
of
school
users,
and
um
with
that
in
mind
uh
this,
this
is
largely
the
same
field.
Elevation
and
design,
as
uh
proposed.
Previously,
however,
aps
has
had
a
chance
to
work
on
some
additional
uh
architectural
detailing
uh
throughout
the
design
of
the
garage
facade
and
the
material
choices
for
the
walkway
that
that
leads
along
north
quinn
street.
C
uh
With
that
and
with
all
this
in
mind,
the
county
manager
recommends
uh
that
recommends
that
the
project
be
approved
uh
with
the
use
permit
amendment
for
a
below-grade
parking
structure,
with
a
lighted,
synthetic
turf,
above
with
modifications
for
reduced
parking
requirements
for
parking
reduction
and
allow
parking
space
to
be
located
off-site
subject
to
the
conditions
of
the
staff
report
and
previously
approved
conditions
with
that.
I'd
like
to
turn
this
over
to
aps
to
present
their
changes.
D
D
Is
everyone
able
to
see
the
screen
looks
great?
Okay,
great
um
a
lot
of
the
information
that
we
have
is
is
some
of
what
rob
showed,
but
there
are
actually
some
additional
details
and
in
the
presentation
that's
provided
following
this
presentation
is
the
presentation
from
a
couple
of
months
ago
for
reference
by
the
commission
members.
D
D
D
We
maintained
the
existing
street
width
and
parking
lane
adjacent
to
the
aps.
Frontage,
add
continuous
added,
continuous
elevated
planning
strip
with
trees
and
other
plantings
reduced
the
sidewalk
uh
to
a
clear
width
of
10
10
feet.
As
was
noted
in
the
wraps
program,
we
did
make
a
geometry
change
to
the
stair
from
the
18th
field,
18th
street
uh
north
to
the
field,
to
make
it
more
inviting
and
less
closed
off.
It
was
just
a
straight
stair.
E
D
It
also
achieves
the
the
goals
of
of
bringing
the
trees
away
from
where
the
buses
would
be
pulling
in
and
the
trees
are
are
notorious
for
taking
off
bus
mirrors.
uh
So
this
will
definitely
be
be
helpful
from
from
that
standpoint
and
I
believe,
achieve
the
the
goals
of
softening
uh
that
facade
in
the
bottom.
You
can
see
the
initial
design
where
we
had
the
wider
sidewalk.
D
um
So
this
is
the
renderings
from
the
initial
design.
uh
You
can
see
that
we,
the
entrance
to
the
ground
level,
uh
is
still
a
sloped
sidewalk
that
goes
into
the
building,
and
one
of
the
administrative
areas
happens
to
be
the
shriver
um
administrative
area
uh
and
keeping
it
open
uh
also
covered
bar
bike
parking
uh
for
uh
student
use.
D
One
of
the
comments
that
was
made
is
is:
how
are
we
going
to
blend
this
facility
with
the
existing
structure?
One
of
the
things
that
we
wanted
to
do
is
is
keep
the
the
concrete
facade,
especially
adjacent
to
rosalind
highland
park,
with
the
texture
and
finish
of
the
concrete
intended
to
be
similar
to
what's
in
rosalind
highland
park.
D
But
we
are
planning
on
using
a
mineral
white
mineral
coating
applied
to
the
concrete
wall
and
soffit.
If
anybody
has
been
up
to
the
re
re
refurbished
um
ed
center,
uh
you
can
see
the
type
of
finish
that
we
are
looking
at
utilizing,
uh
which
is,
uh
um
I
said,
made
the
old
ed
center
looked
quite
attractive.
I
think
with
the
new
finish
and
white
and
bright,
and
that
is
the
intent
uh
and
we
would
have
up
down
lights
um
in
that
corridor.
D
D
D
And
then
this
is
the
stairs
that
are
coming
up
from
18th
street.
These
used
to
be
more
narrow
stairway
and
it
was
also
more
closed
off.
There
was
more
wall
on
the
bench
side
of
that
that
stair,
so
we
made
it
open
again
to
make
it
safer
and
to
make
it
more
inviting-
and
this
would
be
at
non-bus
times
on
the
street.
However,
I'm
assuming
there
would
probably
be
parked
cars
in
the
parking
lot.
D
And
this
is
looking
at
the
towards
the
field
from
rosalind
highland
park
from
the
basketball
court,
and
you
can
see
the
structure
of
the
the
building
to
the
left
in
the
outline
of
the
apple
building
on
the
right,
with
the
access
to
the
field
being
by
stair
and
ramp.
um
Two
ramps
actually,
and
then
this
is
uh
looking
from
again
above
quinn
street
looking
uh
east
uh
towards
the
uh
top
of
the
field.
You
can
see
the
banners
are
also
going
to
be
visible
from
the
field.
D
We've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
on
that,
since
the
uh
the
deferral
and
um
because
of
inclusion
of
our
students
and
uh
ramping,
we
would
actually
have
to
reduce
the
size
of
the
field.
uh
We
would
also
be
providing
ramps
rather
than
than
having
a
inclusive
environment
for
the
students,
and
we
just
feel
that
that's.
That
is
not
what
we
provide
for
our
students,
which
is
the
prime
reason
for
the
field
and
the
use
of
the
field,
especially
with
the
schreiber
program
within
the
building.
B
D
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
has
happened
is
the
inclusive
environment
that
we're
working
under
at
this
point,
and
we've
learned
a
lot
of
lessons
with
multi-story
buildings
that
we
did
not
have
at
the
time
of
putting
this
together,
and
I
don't
believe
that
uh
we
had
developed.
You
know
through
the
through
the
schematic
design.
D
B
D
D
D
It
was
not
done
that
way,
so
we
thought
it
would
be
more
of
a
blending
of
students
and
community
getting
to
the
field
even
during
the
school
day,
uh
but
it's
it's
really
not
panning
out
that
way
in
some
of
our
other
fields
um
that
we
have
where
community
comes
in
in
the
middle
of
a
phys,
ed
class,
etc,
etc.
So
you
know
we
didn't
really
want
that
blending,
because
aps
is
responsible
for
the
students.
You
know
from
the
time
they
come
to
the
building
until
the
time
that
they
they
leave.
F
D
F
F
D
G
Thank
you,
chair
slad,
a
couple
of
questions.
First
of
all,
looking
at
this
picture
here
is
there
since
here
that
the
fence
we
were
just
talking
about
from
commissioner
nolan,
um
why
aren't
the
stairs
wide
across
there
rather
than
having
a
fence
there
have
wider
steps
going
up?
Is
there
some
structural
reason
why
we
couldn't
do
that?
The
wider
stairs
tend
to
make
things
more,
inviting
so
that'd
be
one
question.
G
I
would
also
have
a
question
for
um
mr
gibson:
um
we're
moving
the
street
lights
to
the
tree
pit
right
up
against
the
building,
which
seems
like
a
good
idea.
I'm
assuming
des
is
okay
with
that
and
that
they
would
continue
to
be
maintained
and
operated
owned
by
des,
or
would
they
become
aps
responsibility?
D
C
Yes,
um
yes,
they
would
be
uh
county
uh
owned
and
maintained
lighting.
uh
I
anticipate
that
they
would
be
cobra
style
to
to
provide
a
a
longer
throw
of
the
light,
as
opposed
to
the
more
traditional
carlisle
style,
but
there
will
will
continue
to
work
with
aps
to
do
a
full
photometric
study
uh
and
there
could
be
a
change
from
from
cobra
to
carlisle
or
vice
versa,
depending
on
the
lighting
study.
G
My
comments
on
this
are
as
wearing
my
transportation
commission
hat.
This
is
an
improvement.
um
I
do
still
have
some
questions
about
how
the
the
conflict,
with
the
shriver
students
having
to
walk
around
to
the
entrance
across
the
drive
down
to
the
pickup
drop
off
again
for
mostly
for
schreiber.
How
are
you
going
to
be
able
to
manage
that
conflict
because
that
of
course
has
not
been
eliminated
and
all
the
shriver
students
will
have
to
go
across
that
driveway
entrance?
G
D
The
the
essentially
during
the
pickup
and
drop-off
time
uh
there
would
be
very
limited
traffic
that
would
be
permitted.
uh
Essentially,
if
you
notice
we're
blocking
traffic,
the
only
people
that
would
be
going
in
there
at
the
time
of
pickup
and
drop-off
would
be
parents
of
schreiber
students
that
need
the
accessibility
to
drop
off
the
accessible
spaces
that
we
put
on.
Quinn
street
were
put
there
because
it's
all
we
had
or
have
at
the
building.
Currently
they
were
added
to
the
project
during
the
time
that
the
fire
station
was
there.
G
G
B
H
Hi,
um
um
I
have
a
question
about
the
61
parking
spaces
in
the
garage.
um
How
do
you,
how
did
you
arrive
at
that
number,
and
would
there
be?
Is
there
any
program
to
potentially
reevaluate
that
down
the
road
given
how
much
that
area
is
densifying?
Maybe
there
down
the
road,
there
might
not
be
a
need
for
those
uh
for
the
for
that
many
uh
spaces
and
they
could
be
converted
into
more
like
class
one
biking
spaces
that
type
that
staff
has.
D
Yeah,
I
I
think
that
one
of
the
earlier
slides
has
has
the
breakdown
of
the
spaces
that
we're
providing
it's
it's
for
our
maintenance
uh
vehicles.
There's
no
place
there
for
them
to
park
at
this
point
in
time,
and
it's
been
very
difficult,
getting
them
there
uh
and
it's
the
handicapped,
accessibility,
it's
also
uh
visitors,
etc,
that
that
can
can
utilize
some
of
those
spaces
uh
and
then
the
additional
staff
we
have.
D
H
D
D
They
they
could
be
converted
into
educational
spaces.
You
know
such
as
a
science
lab
or
something
to
that
effect
that
wouldn't
necessarily
need
natural
light,
because
I
don't
think
we
want
to
put
any
light
tubes
up
through
the
field.
I
don't
think
that
would
be
appropriate
might
be
a
tripping
hazard,
um
but
uh
we
we
do
keep
that
in
mind,
uh
because
there
is
no
expansion
really
for
this
building
in
the
future.
C
Jeff,
in
addition,
um
this
is
robert
gibson.
Once
again,
um
I
think
that
the
county
would
support
uh
conversion
of
of
space
um
to
bike
parking
if,
if
the
pretty
substantial
number
of
racks
that
are
being
provided
along
the
shriver
entrance,
don't
don't
meet
the
the
needs
of
students
or
staff
um
and
uh
they're
to
be
100.
I
think
clear.
I
think
aps
has
looked
at
this
as
maximizing
the
the
number
of
of
spaces
in
that
volume
below
the
field
uh
and
that's
how
they
got
to
the
61
space
count.
C
H
D
We
are
going
to
look
into
that.
There
are
some
issues,
um
for
instance,
at
discovery.
We
do
have
any
a
charging
station,
but
we,
the
third
party
that
runs
it
because
we
can't
charge
at
this
point
in
time
for
that
they
have
disconnected
it
they.
You
cannot
charge
there.
um
It's
it's
a
an
issue
that
a
legal
issue
that
we're
going
to
have
to
work
through.
I
know
that
the
county
is
working
through
that
on
on
properties.
D
I
think
that
long
branch
has
added
some
recharging
stations,
so
we're
going
to
look
at
that
as
part
of
this,
and
that
would
also
reduce
the
the
parking
count
as
well,
because
to
do
a
universally
accessible
uh
space.
It's
about
13
feet
wide,
if
I
recall
correctly,
so
that
would
that
would
reduce
the
number
of
spaces
as
well,
depending
on
how
many
e-charging
stations
that
we
would
put
in
there,
but
we
we
have
talked
about
it
and-
and
it
is
something
that
is
being
considered.
C
And
I
think
that
this
is
an
area.
That's
that
arlington
county
transportation
certainly
is
is
looking
into.
I
know
that
our
tdm
programs
and
bike
program
is
is
constantly
evolving
our
standards
uh
and
as
as
this
becomes
more
prevalent
and
more
universal
uh
as
far
as
what
best
practices
are,
I'm
sure
that
the
county
will
be
presenting
more
informational
amounts
of
the
commission
all
right.
Thank
you.
D
And
I
think
the
other
thing
that
that
would
happen
in
that
structure
is
is
after
hours.
You
know
weekend
and
evening
programs
uh
there
is,
it
is
parking,
it's
going
to
be
operated
the
same
again.
We
don't,
we
can't
charge
for
parking,
uh
so
it
would
be
public
parking
that
it
could
be
for
these
programs.
You
know
whether
it's
a
school
event
or
whether
it's
a
parks
event.
um
There
would
be
that
parking
available
uh
and-
and
you
know
it
could
be
even
a
community
event
on
a
flat
floor.
D
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
sort
of
echo,
I
think
chairman
slats,
uh
maybe
frustration
at
the
field,
we,
I
know,
we've
gotten
a
good,
an
explanation
from
you
all
about
why
you're
not
making
um
sort
of
some
of
the
changes
we
were
looking
for,
but
um
I
think
we
were
looking
for
something
else
so
anyway,
just
just
echoing
chairman
sort
of
questioning
around
that.
It's
not
a
question.
I
think
it's
asked
an
answer.
Just
start
a
seconding.
B
D
E
C
B
B
B
G
G
Like
I
said,
I
will
reserve
further
comments
on
this
for
planning
commission
for
transportation
purposes.
I
think
the
improvements
are
sufficient,
that
I'll
vote
in
favor,
just
because
we
need
to
get
this
done
um
and
we
do
need
to
have
the
appropriate
pick
up
and
drop
off
for
the
shriver
students.
I
do
believe
that
is
important,
but
this
really
is
not
what
we
had
envisioned
for
in
um
for
this
end
of
18th
street.
So
those
are
my
comments.
B
All
right
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
that
the
transportation
commission
recommended
the
county
board
approve
the
use.
Permit
amendment
for
a
below-grade
parking
structure
with
a
lighted,
synthetic
turf
field,
above
with
modifications
to
the
zoning
ordinance
requirements
for
a
parking
reduction
and
to
allow
parking
spaces
to
be
located
off-site
subject
to
the
conditions
of
our
draft
staff
report.
H
B
C
I
A
J
um
Good
evening,
it
is
a
pleasure
to
be
here
again.
I
will
be
your
guide,
in
fact,
for
the
next
two
agenda
items
uh
and
they
will
have
a
lot
of
overlap.
So
um
I
I
am
here
today
asking
for
official
tc
recommendation
to
the
county
board
to
endorse
the
middle
of
these
applications
for
smart
scale
and
also
the
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Smart,
safe
streets
for
all.
Excuse
me.
J
First,
let
me
apologize
for
not
sending
out
the
board
reports
in
the
package
they
are
on
the
tc.
Excuse
me
the
tc
website
right
now,
um
certainly
there's
no
intent
to
keep
them
from
you
or
anything
like
that.
We
just
have
to
apologize
for
being
behind
on
uh
answering
all
the
questions
that
needed
to
be
put
into
them
before
we
could
move
them
along
the
process.
um
I
will
offer
to
walk
you
through
them,
since
I
know
that
I'm
sure
none
of
you
have
had
a
chance
to
look
at
them.
J
Yet
I
will
offer
to
walk
you
through
them
on
a
screenshot
if
you'd
like,
but
in
the
interests
of
not
making
your
meeting
uh
take
longer
than
necessary,
I'll
refrain
from
doing
that.
Unless
you'd
sort
of
like
to
ask
me
to
do
that,
um
okay,
so
uh
let's
go
ahead
and
move
on
and
we
will
begin
talking
about
smart
scale.
So
this
is,
of
course,
virginia's
main
transportation
funding
capital
program.
uh
I'm
sure
it's
very
familiar
to
you
by
now.
J
J
We
can
apply
for
almost
anything,
um
but
we
have
to
make
a
case
for
it
using
the
state's
defined
criteria
which
favors
the
number
of
trips
that
are
affected
and
the
cost
of
the
project
um
several
other
things
also,
but
mainly
those
are
the
two
sort
of
that
that
take
up
the
bulk
of
the
of
the
scoring.
So
if
you
do
well
in
one
or
the
other
criteria,
you've
got
a
good
chance
of
getting
funding
either
if
your
project
affects
a
lot
of
trips
or
if
it
doesn't,
but
it
doesn't
cost
very
much.
J
um
So
a
couple
other
real,
quick
notes,
um
some
smart
scale
funding
is
federal,
so
smart
scale
is
the
state's
funding
to
jurisdictions
and
other
fun
and
other
programs
um
system,
but
the
money
that
feeds
into
smart
scale
comes
from
lots
of
other
places,
some
of
which
are
federal.
Therefore,
smart
scale
projects
must
be
on
the
federalization
track,
or
at
least
able
to
be
federalized,
which
means
they
cost
more
and
take
longer.
J
And
also
just
within
the
last
year-
or
so
you
have
heard
me
say
this
before
vdot
has
gotten
much
stricter
in
the
level
of
detail
that
they
insist
on
for
grant
applications
that
go
to
the
state,
so
that
includes
smart
scale,
of
course,
also
includes
other
programs
that
we
talk
about.
You
know
tap
hsip
things
like
that.
J
uh
You
know
reaching
us
now,
and
this
is
the
first
round
of
smart
scale,
that
this
affects
us.
um
Vdot,
won't
let
us
do
that
anymore.
We
have
to
have
much
more
firm
project
estimates
uh
before
we
can
apply
so
sadly
that
narrows
the
list
of
projects
that
we
can
viably
apply
for
by
quite
a
lot,
uh
at
least
until
our
planning
catches
up
to
you
know
the
new,
the
new
timeline
right
we
can
adjust
to
this
internally,
but
it's
going
to
take
a
while
to
catch
up.
J
On
that
readiness
point
for
this
for
this
round,
remembering
what
I
just
said
a
minute
ago,
unfortunately,
the
list
of
viable
projects
is
small,
uh
so
we
are
proposing
to
submit
two
um
the
same
two
that
I
briefed
you
on
in
march.
The
I'll
go
through
them
each
briefly.
Now
so
one
um
arlington
boulevard,
washington,
boulevard,
interchange,
ramp,
number
one.
This
is
the
on-ramp
to
westbound
route
50
from
washington
boulevard.
J
J
um
This
is
a
very
high
priority
for
us,
uh
so
much
so
that
spoiler
alert
I'll
also
talk
about
it
during
our
next
agenda
item.
um
Suffice
it
to
say
we
are
really
excited
to
get
this
project
done.
We
think
it's
really
really
necessary,
really
really
ripe,
for
um
you
know
moving
through
the
process
getting
funded,
getting
constructed,
um
and
we
would,
you
know
like
to
like
to
submit
it
to
smart
scale
and
hope
that
you
will
concur
with
that.
J
J
This
is
a
little
bit
awkward,
because
this
is
a
vdot
priority
that
we
would
apply
to
the
state
for
on
the
state's
behalf
um
in
the
old
days
per
pre.
Smart
scale.
Vdot
would
just
sort
of
build
this
right.
um
Ultimately,
they
still
could
just
sort
of
build.
This
um
and
smart
scale
doesn't
give
us
a
veto
over
vdot
doing
things
exactly,
but
to
access
some
of
the
pots
of
money
that
are
useful
for
projects
like
this
and
that
vdot
is
allowed
to
use.
um
This
is
how
you
do
it
now.
So
here
we
are.
J
J
um
So
this
is
uh
just
to
be
fully
clear,
distinct
from
the
signal
phasing
project
that
you
may
be
familiar
with
on
arlington
boulevard,
it's
also
a
vision,
zero
hotspot.
It
costs
about
two
and
a
half
million
dollars,
um
and,
although
you
know
it
wouldn't
impact
right
of
way,
the
project
is
completely
inside
the
existing.
You
know
vdot
route
50
right
of
way.
It
would
require
shifting
the
existing
general
purpose
lanes
over
to
the
south,
which
would
likely
eat
into
the
existing
median.
J
J
uh
In
that
in
that
location,
um
we
would
of
course,
work
with
vdot
to
you
know
to
minimize
those
impacts
to
the
extent
possible,
and
um
it
is
actually
sort
of
worth
noting
that
uh
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
strategic
advantage
in
um
putting
this
into
smart
scale
now,
as
that,
would
incentivize
keeping
an
existing
scope
and
disincentivize
any
reason
to
expand
the
scope
in
a
way
that
would
allow
the
cost
to
get
larger,
not
to
say
that
that
couldn't
be
done
just
that
it
would
be
harder
um
so
anyway.
uh
This
is.
J
um
This
is
a
very
legitimate
safety
related
project.
It's
not
necessarily
des
very
highest
priority,
um
but
we
don't
object
to
it.
uh
It
doesn't
really
compete
against
the
washington
boulevard
project
since
they're
happening
at
different
scales,
um
and
uh
you
know
there
is.
You
know,
as
I
said,
a
legitimate
safety
issue
here.
uh
So
we
are
willing
to
work
with
vdot
on
submitting
it.
We
think
that
it's
ready
enough
for
application
and
very
likely
to
be
funded.
J
J
J
uh
You
have
to
have
a
pre-application
in
order
to
have
an
application,
since
the
pre-applications
are
now
done.
Your
endorsement
of
this
in
terms
of
smart
scales
process
can
be
either
these
two
projects
or
not
these
two
projects.
We
can't
add
new
projects
to
smart
scale
at
this
point
in
the
timeline
um
with
that
again,
I'm
asking
for
your
endorsement
to
the
county
board
for
these
two
grant.
Submittals.
B
J
It
it
is
a
vision,
zero,
hot
spot,
our
vision,
zero
planning
identifies
it.
um
I
can't
tell
you
how
high
or
low
a
priority
it
would
have
been
um
if
you'd,
like
a
follow-up
to
that
question
and
answer
to
that
question,
I
would
have
to
bring
in
the
vision,
zero
team
and-
and
you
know,
I'm
sure
they
could
answer
it
for
you.
I'd
be
happy
to
follow
up
and.
G
J
J
J
Great
question
I
should
have
should
have
said
that
this
there
is
no
cost
show.
These
are
100
awards.
So
we
we
can,
you
know,
submit
you
know,
share
costs
with
other
programs.
Sometimes
we
do
that,
but
there's
no
required
match
here.
These
are
these
costs.
These
projects
have
no
direct
cost
to
the
county.
B
B
B
Here,
okay
um
and
then
just
to-
I
guess
some
comments
at
this
point-
um
one
I'm
skeptical
of
the
manchester
project,
but
I'm
inclined
to
uh
to
trust
staff
and
and
endorse
it's
moving
forward.
Since
it
sounds
like
it's
unlikely
to
compete
with
the
washington
boulevard,
arlington
boulevard,
interchange
project.
B
um
I
um
part
of
the
issue-
is
that
I've
not
seen
the
full
stars
report
for
manchester
um
and
I've.
I
have
seen
the
stars
report
for
other
projects
that
vdot
has
put
forward
and
never
been
particularly
impressed
by
their
analysis
or
felt
like
they
really
came
to
the
appropriate
conclusions,
um
but
I'm
inclined
to
allow
it
to
move
forward
um
and
then
I
would
love
mr
malef.
B
If
you
would
take
back
to
your
wonderful
colleagues
in
public
engagement
that
I'm
a
little
sad
that
washington,
boulevard,
arlington
boulevard
interchange
has
gotten
far
enough
along
in
design
that
we
can
submit
it
for
grant
funding
without
any
public
engagement.
Touch
point
that
I'm
aware
of
uh
there's
more
detail
in
this
grant
application
than
I've
ever
seen
for
how
we
think
we're
solving
this
problem,
um
and
uh
I
really
wish
that
we
hadn't
gotten.
B
Quite
this
far,
um
without
checking
in
with
the
community
on
those
potential
solutions
to
what
I
believe
we
all
recognize
is
a
place
that
needs
solutions.
um
So
I
hope
we
will
see
a
public
engagement
uh
opportunity
on
that
project
before
before
too
much
longer,
though,
how
much
we
can
change
it
once
we've
submitted
smart
scale,
I
think,
is,
uh
is
a
little
bit
of
a
not
great
answer,
since
it
will
be
scored
based
on
particular
solutions
in
the
grant
application
is
my
understanding.
Is
that
correct.
J
There
are,
there
are
design
details
that
can
of
course
change.
I
mean
the
smart
scale,
doesn't
completely
lock
you
in
um
it
locks
you
into
an
estimate
that
the
state
scores
and
funds
and
if
your
estimate
drastically
changes
because
of
us
changing
scope,
then
um
you
know
that
puts
you
at
risk
of
having
your
project
rescored,
but
but
drastic
is
kind
of
a
key
word
in
that
um
description.
J
All
projects
go
through
some
revisions
as
they
go
along.
You
know.
There's
always
uh
you
know.
The
trail
needs
to
move
two
feet
this
way
uh
uh
because
there's
a
tree,
you
know
I
mean
not.
These
are
just
examples
out
of
my
head,
so
um
you
know
yes,
you
you're
correct,
um
but
sort
of
only
up
to
a
point
if
that
makes
sense.
J
J
So
uh
not
being
completely
clear
with
what
you
heard
and
what
you
didn't,
I
will
do
a
very
fast
sum
up.
All
projects
go
through
some
revisions.
Small
scale
doesn't
lock
you
into
no
revisions
at
all,
but
it
locks
you
into
um
no
drastic
revisions
to
your
scope.
That
would
be
large
enough
to
trigger
a
rescore.
If
you
have
to
move,
you
know,
move
the
trail
two
feet
over
or
something
like
that.
That's
that's!
You
know.
It's
fine.
B
B
All
right,
then,
I
will
move
that
the
transportation
commission
recommend
that
the
county
board
authorize
arlington
county's
application
to
smart
scale,
round
five
funding
for
up
to
twelve
and
a
half
million
dollars,
uh
whereas
ten
million
would
be
requested
for
the
arlington
boulevard.
Washington,
boulevard,
interchange,
ramp,
one
and
two
and
a
half
million
dollars
would
be
requested
for
the
arlington
boulevard.
Manchester
street
left
turn
lane
extension.
G
B
F
I
B
J
All
right
very
good:
this
is
a
new
funding
program
through
the
infrastructure,
investment
and
jobs
act.
uh
I
briefed
you
on
it
briefly
uh
at
your
june
second
meeting,
but
just
a
very
quick
recap.
um
This
is
essentially
a
federal
vision.
Zero
grant
program
grants
are
due
september
15th
through
the
usdot.
J
We
don't
go
through
states
for
this
localities
are
limited
to
one
application
of
between
5
and
thirty
million
dollars.
We
think
the
sweet
spot
is
around
ten
million
dollars
for
an
implementation
award.
um
That's
a
little
bit
of
speculation
based
on
math
of
how
many
they
say
they
think
they
will
give
and
how
much
money
there
is,
but
that's
what
we
think
projects
need
to
be
clearly
identified
in
an
existing
vision,
zero
type
plan.
J
This
is
for
fy
22
money
awards
are
expected
around
the
new
year,
so
it's
coming
very
quickly.
This
is
different
from
smart
scale
in
the
sense
that
it
is
eighty
percent
funding.
You
do
need
a
twenty
percent
match.
It's
not
a
hundred
percent
uh
and
money
does
have
to
be
um
allocated
within
five
years.
You
can't
sit
on
it
forever.
You
do
have
to
eventually
spend
money.
J
As
I
mentioned,
this
is
coming
much
sooner.
We
could
be
you
know:
winners
grantees
could
have
money
in
hand
by
2023.,
so
because
this
is
a
federal
program,
projects
do
have
to
be
federalized.
Naturally
speaking,
um
it
is
also
worth
noting
that
this
is
going
to
be
an
annual
program
for
at
least
the
next
five
years.
J
We
can
apply
again
for
another
project
a
year
from
now
and
a
year
after
that
and
year
after
that
year,
that
we're
already
thinking
of
projects
that
could
meet
those
timelines,
um
we're
really
hoping
for
next
year
to
have
uh
something
some
some
george
mason
drive
projects
planned
by
that
time,
but
they're
not
ripe
for
it.
Yet
um
we're
now
having
established
that
our
existing
vision,
zero
planning
does
in
fact
make
us
eligible
for
implementation
awards,
which
is
something
I
spoke
on
on
last
month.
J
J
We
are
proposing
the
washington
boulevard,
arlington
boulevard,
ramp
number
one
project.
I
won't
take
you
through
all
of
the
details
of
it
again
unless
you'd
like
me
to
I'd,
certainly
be
happy
to,
but
suffice
it
to
say
this
is
our
highest
crash
location
year
over
year.
It
addresses
huge
safety
needs,
it's
9.6
million
dollars.
We
really
think
it's
a
slam,
dunk
project
and
a
really
really
high
need
project,
um
and
it's
already
on
the
federalization
track,
because
it's
on
the
smart
scale
track
and
we've
already
been
working
that
for
a
long
time.
J
J
um
Also
since
safe
streets
for
all
is
going
to
be
awarded
much
sooner
than
smart
scale
and
we'll
get
the
money
much
sooner
than
smart
scale.
Our
recommendation
is
to
submit
this
very
high
priority
project
to
both
programs,
um
basically
hedge,
our
bets
that
we'll
get
at
least
one
of
them-
hopefully
the
sooner
one,
even
though
it
has
a
20
match
requirement.
J
um
We
would
of
course
have
to
inform
vdot
if
we
got
that
uh
if
we
won
straight
safe
streets
for
all,
um
you
know
we're
not
gonna,
then
win
the
full
amount
from
vdot
and
end
up
with
20
million
dollars
and
like
throw
a
party
and
spend
10
on
whatever
we
want.
um
We
would
have
to
you
know:
inform
vdot,
reduce
our
safe,
uh
smart
scale,
request
to
be
whatever
was
left
unfunded
after
the
safe
streets
for
all
requests.
J
If,
as
is
possible,
the
federal
government
decides
to
partially
fund
our
safe
streets
for
all
award,
then
our
smart
scale
uh
request
would
be
reduced
to
the
amount
that
was
left
to
the
balance,
which
would
help
it
be
more
competitive
because
smaller
projects
um
do,
you
know,
uh
score
better
it
that
could
trigger
competition
against
the
other
projects,
but
um
we
think
that
would
be
a
good
problem
to
have.
It
would
be
nice
if
the
higher
priority
project
came
in
at
a
lower
cost,
so.
J
That's
that's
pretty
much
all
I
have
to
say
unless
you'd
like
to
go
through
the
project,
again,
we'd
really
like
to
build
it,
we
think
it's
ready
to
go
fits
really
well.
We
think
it's
really
really
likely
to
get
funding
through
this
project.
uh
You
know
as
much
so
as
we
can
be
with
any
federal
project
program
that
we've
never
done
before,
and
I'm
asking
for
your
endorsement
of
it
now.
I
J
Yeah
um
great
question:
thank
you
for
it.
So
the
way
that
we
um
typically
answer
that
that
sort
of
question
is
to
basically
pull
up
our
equity
emphasis
areas.
This
is
a
tool
that
we
have
that
uh
cog
develops
uh
in
coordination
with
us
and
looks
at
where
trips
are
trying
to
go
from
equity
emphasis
areas.
J
Those
are
those
are
places
with
a
high
concentration
of
populations
with
equity
needs,
and
so
you
know
we
we
essentially
match
where
those
needs
are
where
the
trips
are
coming
from,
where
they're
going
and
does,
does
the
project
serve
them?
um
And
so
you
know
I,
the
equity
analysis
for
this
project
isn't
done
yet
we
are,
you
know,
just
starting
all
of
the
work
on
submitting
the
grant,
because
the
county
board
doesn't
meet
in
august.
We
have
to
do
it
in
july
so
that
we
can
meet
the
september
15th
submission
deadline.
J
If
the
board's
meeting
on
september
17th
were
a
few
days
earlier,
we
might
not
have
that
timeline
issue.
So
um
you
know,
broadly
speaking,
you
know,
I
can
say
that
we
will
look
at
the
county's
equity
planning,
identify
how
the
trips
from
those
areas
serve
this
area,
and
um
you
know,
report
those.
We
have
done
an
initial
pass
on
that.
We
do
believe
that
this
is,
you
know,
serving
a
legitimate
equity
need
of.
J
I
Yes,
I'm
glad
you're
taking
a
look
at
it.
I
think
that
that
is
something
that
should
be
heavily
emphasized
on
whatever
the
county
submits
uh
and
then
the
other
part
of
that
was
also
the
safe
system
approach
and
how
you're
addressing
addressing
that
in
the
application
as
well.
If
you
could
just
tell
me
a
little
bit
more
I'd
appreciate
it.
J
J
Crossing
it's
an
important
part
of
our
network
that
you
know
we
we
think
matters
for
the
rest
of
the
network
to
um
you
know
to
function
safely.
We
did
look
at
doing
sort
of
a
more
systemic
approach
for
this
application.
Looking
at
more,
um
you
know,
a
larger
number
of
smaller
projects
spread
around
different
locations
and
you
know
didn't
think
that
that
would
be
as
viable.
H
All
right,
thank
you,
yeah!
I
just
want
to
go
on
the
record
and
echo
chairman
slat's
uh
earlier
point
about.
It
would
have
been
really
nice
to
have
seen
some
of
this
uh
information
a
little
bit
earlier.
I'm
sure,
uh
commissioner
terry,
would
have
been
able
to
provide
even
deeper
insights
before
you
know.
We
kind
of
uh
submit
this
further.
I
kind
of
feel
like
I'm.
H
You
know
like
at
the
chinese
communist
party
congress,
where
I'm
just
like
you
know
unanimously
deciding
on
stuff
already
being
brought
to
a
decision
in
a
way,
so
I
feel,
like
the
whole
advisory
aspect
of
the
transportation
commission,
is
not
really
being
put
to
uh
put
to
use
uh
within
this
current
format,
and
uh
I
know
we've
had
like
uh
some
great
interactions
before
and
I
hope
we'll
have
more
of
those
rather
than
this.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
commissioner
moradovic
anyone
else
all
right
seeing
no
hands.
Then
I
moved
that
the
transportation
commission
recommended
that
the
county
board
uh
adopt
the
resolution
applying
for
10
million
dollars
in
fund
up
to
10
million
dollars
in
funding
from
the
safe
streets
and
roads
for
all
program
for
the
arlington
boulevard,
washington,
boulevard,
interchange,
ramp,
1
project.
I
B
H
H
A
B
I
just
dropped
the
county's
um
engage
page
into
the
chat,
I'm
sure
most
of
you
familiar
with
it
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
there
are.
There
is
quite
a
bit
of
engagement
going
on
right
now
uh
through
the
holiday
weekend.
If
folks
want
to
take
a
look,
uh
there's
engagement,
open
on
the
arlington
boulevard
trail
study
that
mizobakoya
is
uh
so
wonderfully
uh
piloting.
Project
managing
there's
also
some
open
engagement
on
behind
the
curve.
B
What
behind
the
curb
should
look
like
on
route
1
to
grade
in
uh
crystal
city
separating
crystal
city
from
pentagon
city,
and
there
is
a
open
engagement
on
uh
repaving
for
complete
streets,
uh
five
streets
that
are
getting
repaved.
The
county
would
like
to
put
back
better
than
they
are
right
now.
um
So
this
is
the
kind
of
stuff
that
isn't
usually
quite
high
enough
level
to
come
to
the
commission
much
um
but
uh
you're.
All
you
know
super
uh
interested
in
transportation.
It's
great
to
go
ahead
and
weigh
in
in
your
personal
capacity.