►
From YouTube: Transportation Commission Meeting | March 30, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Thank
you
for
being
here
this
evening
today,
Thursday
March
30th.
This
is
our
Transportation
Commission
meeting.
This
is
a
hybrid
meeting
and
we
are
joined
in
person
and
virtually
I'm
Bridget
obicoya,
the
Transportation
Commission
staff
liaison
and,
like
I,
said
this
meeting
is
being
recorded.
So
please
turn
off
your
mics
when
you
are
not
speaking
before
we
start
with
the
agenda
items.
Are
there
any
citizen
comments
on
items
found
on
the
agenda?
C
B
E
Good
evening
my
name
is
Department
of
Environmental
Services
Transportation,
Planning
and
with
me
is
Brian
Shelton
from
our
department.
Also,
we
have
detective
to
me
from
the
Arlington
County
Police
Department,
we're
here
tonight
to
advertise
a
public
hearing
to
consider
changes
in
the
rates
of
fair.
It
follows
chapter
25.1
of
the
Arlington
County
code,
which
sets
the
rates
of
a
fare
for
the
taxi
cab
industry
on
a
biannual
basis.
County
board
approval
is
required.
Last
Fair
increase
happened,
went
into
effect
in.
A
E
F
To
support
the
proposed
rate
increase
for
taxi
cab
companies,
old
Consumer
Price
Index
data
from
the
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics.
We
did
this
to
note
the
changes
in
costs
of
doing
business
as
a
taxi
driver
from
January
2016
..
F
F
D
F
Month
of
January
across
the
board
and
in
line
with
what
we're
hearing
in
the
news.
Basically,
since
the
start
of
the
pandemic,
inflation
prices
are
on
the
rise.
You
can
all
see
that
it
is
reflected
in
the
table
here.
Our
findings
indicate
that
the
cost
for
operators
has
increased
by
38
of
the
last
rate
increase
in
2016.,
some
of
the
largest
contributors
to
the
cost
increases
were
the
increase
in
fuel
costs
at
78.
F
Here
we
have
the
percent
change
in
the
proposed
fares
for
the
5,
10
and
25
mile
trips.
They
do
not
correspond
to
the
percent
rise
in
inflation
that
we're
seeing
from
the
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics.
However,
the
new
prices
will
remain
competitive
with
the
transportation,
Network
communities
and.
F
G
F
Alexandria
being
the
most
recent
to
increase
their
drop
rate,
the
price
for
getting
into
the
cab
at
four
dollars
and
they're
discussing
increasing
the
distance.
The
distance
rate
later
this
year.
F
What
you're,
looking
at
here
in
this
bar
chart
the
first
food
column.
Those
are
the
Arlington
County
current
Bears.
You
can
see
that
they're
in
line
with
the
other
jurisdictions
as
well.
The
orange
bar
here.
This
is
the
proposed
pair
still
in
line
the
most
part
and
then,
when
it
gets
to
the
25
mile
trip.
F
Also
compared
the
prices
of
Arlington
TAXI
fares
with
other
Transportation
Network
companies,
these
would
be
Uber
and
lived.
This
is
where
we
conducted
our
simulated
service
requests,
did
them
over
three
weeks,
we'll
use
the
Uber
and
Lyft
cell
phone
applications
to
record
the
observations
building
the
service
provider,
the
scenario,
the
media
service,
two-hour
reservation,
three
hour,
reservation,
work
overnight,
reservation.
The
time
of
the
service
request,
pay
the
service
request
from
a
trip
and
the
trip
cost.
F
What
we
have
in
this
graph
here
is
to
illustrate
the
difference
in
minimum
and
maximum
prices
for
Uber
and
Lyft,
which
are
these
lighter
colors
here,
Light
Blue
for
the
minimum
minimum
fair
and
Uber
dark
blue
for
the
maximum,
fair
and
Uber
light
orange
for
the
minimum
fare,
lift
dark
orange
for
the
maximum
pair
and
lift,
and
the
black
here
represents
the
proposed
taxpayer.
E
And
with
that,
the
county
managers
is
recommending
advertising
public
hearing
to
consider
an
increase
in
the
drop
charge
from
three
dollars
to
350.
the
1
6
of
a
mile
and
the
wait
time
charge
from
36
Cents
to
40
cents,
40
40
cents
for
56
seconds
to
be
effective,
July
1st
of
2023..
B
H
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity.
My
name
is
Marguerite
Reid
goodin
and
I'm.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
my
92
year
old
father,
Hartman
Reed,
owner
of
Crown,
Cab,
Company,
Chromecast,
being
one
of
two
black
owned
cab
companies
in
Arlington
50
years
ago.
My
dad
bought
com
and
he
was
the
first
drive
for
the
founder.
He
was
a
firefighter
and
drove
the
cab
on
his
days
off.
His
legacy
was
founded
on
his
belief
in
community
service
and
providing
our
employment
opportunities
for.
H
For
the
marginalized
Crown
has
become
that
opportunity
for
folks
to
make
a
sustainable
living
while
serving
the
community.
Over
the
last
decade,
the
new
Transportation
Innovation,
such
as
Uber
and
Lyft
change
the
landscape
of
the
entire
taxi
industry.
Our
small
minority-owned
company
really
took
a
hit
2020
covet
pandemic,
nearly
wiped
us
out
for
18
months.
Our
calves
lay
dormant
once
back
on
the
road.
One
third
of
our
professionals
gave
up
the
business
those
remaining
have
had
to
navigate
increases
in
gas,
food,
rent
insurance
and
the
cost
of
vehicles.
H
Our
company
has
continued
to
provide
support
for
our
loyal
professionals.
They
continue
to
work
long
hours
and
to
make
ends
meet.
Our
family
has
continued
to
honor
our
dad's
Legacy
and
is
very
aware
of
the
struggles
our
owner
drivers
face
and
how
disheartening
it
is
to
see
their
colleagues
in
Alexandria,
Fairfax
and
DC
working
for
higher
wages.
Crown
has
spent
the
last
year
working
to
diligently
provide
our
professionals
with
more
access
to
the
community
and
the
community
more
access
to
their
excellent
service.
H
Very
soon
we
will
launch
a
state-of-the-art
digital
dispatch
Service,
as
this
will
surely
help.
It
is
not
enough.
We
need
the
County's
help
as
an
advocate
for
the
entire
taxi
industry
and
specifically
Crown
Care
Professionals,
in
the
spirit
of
your
commitment
to
equity.
I,
strongly
urge
you
to
support
the
rate
increases
proposed.
It's
time
it's
needed,
and
it
is
the
right
thing
to
do.
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity.
I
I
For
increase
other
than
just
to
reiterate
the
world
out
of
context
of
real
numbers
sounds
like
a
pretty
significant
rate
increase.
If
you
look
in
the
context
of
2016
to
date,
then
it's
much
less
so
there's
no
way
that
we
feel
is
responsible
for
these
people.
I
Begin
to
attempt
to
recoup
six
or
seven
years
worth
of
inflation,
those
of
you
go
to
the
commission
for
a
while
know
that
our
industry
tends
to
be
very
cautious,
just
wait
as
long
as
we
can.
We
often
wait
too
long
in
this
particular
case.
Since
2015
our
industry
has
been
through
to
what
I
would
recall,
certainly
existential
Pisces,
both
of
which.
I
I
I
At
any
rate,
we
come
out
on
the
other
side
we're
still
here,
but
it
is
and
continues
to
be
difficult,
but
it's
not
just
a
company,
more
importantly,
for
his
drivers,
without
whom
there
is
no
taxi
cab
service.
I
The
doors
like
a
recommendation
for
the
advertising
of
this,
because
we've
outed
it
was
going
to
our
drivers,
are
going
to
continue
struggle
through
the
table.
A
few
other
cars
and
provide
service
citizens
of
the
county
need
maybe
a
little
Transportation
dependent
of
the
county,
but
also
dependent
on
tax
related
Services,
more
sober
available
to
tsas
in
their
services,
but
as
it
as
it
is,
we
continue
to
see
people
either
leading
the
business
of
economic
necessity
or
in
the
extremely
difficult
to
change,
we're
operating
it
properly.
I
B
C
As
long
as
we've
got
a
couple
books
from
industry
here,
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
kick
off
one
question
back
to
them.
Just
out
of
curiosity
is
what
what
has
happened
with
standards
so
raise
those
in
the
face
of
inflation
or
come
from
study
or
had
to
drop
them
in
order
to
attract
drivers
or
what's
happened
there.
H
Once
the
pandemic,
especially
when
the
pendant
and
it's
but
that
guy
with
my
family,
our
company
is
small
and
my
dad
raises
right
and
our
family
has
been
able
to
sustain
the
company
because
we
have
not
been
able
to
have
the
revenue
come
in
because
he's
been
more
concerned
about
trying
to
attract
and
keep
our
drivers.
We
only
have
37
numbers
and
so
he's
done
everything
to
help
the
drivers
make
a
living,
and
so
our
standards
are
pretty
pretty
low,
and
so
we
keep
the
family,
keep
sustained
the
company
economically.
I
In
in
our
case,
over
the
period
over
the
period
of
time,
since
the
last
increase,
again,
we
had
the
influx
of
the
tncs.
We
had
to
moderate
our
race,
regular,
more
competitors,
the
reality
with
the
realities
of
the
moment
under
that
period
of
time,
when
the
pandemic,
if
we
actually
eliminated
our
fees
for
several
weeks,
while
we
tried
to
assess
but
the
hell
was,
it
happened.
Next,
cyber
operation
I
was
involved
in
the
taxi
cab
company
in
North
Carolina,
which
closes
doors
in
the
first
30
days
of
the
pandemic.
I
Drastically
understand
the
it
was
a
combination
of
fixed
feas,
Revenue
sharing,
that's
frankly,
not
particularly
so
much
challenging
in
our
industry
for
more
reasons
and
I
think
we're
going
to
get
into
tonight,
but
it
it'll
manage
to
less
than
half
of
our
race.
I
We
were
late
2021
before
we
were
able
to
give
back
to
what
I
would
call
our
new
normal
Sanders
and
they
specifically
bills
which
were
still
lower
than
they
were
in
2016.
But
you
know
there
are
more
of
what
we
need
to
operate
business
frankly,
we
should
probably
only
do
it
at
that
point,
because
the
feed
itself
to
the
drivers,
leaving.
C
J
Go
ahead,
I
was
just
curious
about
the
fair
study
itself,
I
noticed
or
the
data
showed
the
minimum
and
maximum
fair
prices
and
I
guess.
The
study
noted,
or
the
board
report
noted
that
the
like
the
the
median
or
the
the
kind
of
in-between
wasn't
able
to
be
validated
because
you
had
to
have
two
two
kind
of
the
same
fair
for
it
to
be
I,
guess
taken
into
account.
J
Was
there
a
I'm
curious
if,
like
there
was
a
scatter
graph
or
something
to
kind
of
show,
the
density
of
in
general,
what
the
median
fare
was?
Even
if
we
couldn't,
even
if
we
couldn't
get
a
like
a
true
validation
of
like
each
trip,
because
it
would
vary
by
like
one
cent.
Does
that
make
sense?
First
off.
A
E
Will
just
say
that
I
was
able
to
have
Brian's
help
which
he
for
three
weeks
three
times
a
day,
including
weekends.
He
was
able
to
gather
a
bunch
of
data
and
I'll
I'll.
Just
have
them
explaining
enough
okay.
F
I
do
not
have
a
scatter
plot
that
would
illustrate
the
distribution
of
rates.
What
I
can
present
is
just
a
table.
It's
been
summarized
a
little
bit
to
give
you
a
good
idea.
F
So
this
is,
this
is
kind
of
the
results
that
we
were
able
to
come
to.
The
conclusion
that
we
came
to
at
the
end
of
the
at
the
end
of
the
study
I
mean
you
can
see
the
minimum
rates,
the
maximum
rates
and
then
we'll
be
classified
as
typical
rates.
We
didn't
choose
average
rates
because
at
that
point
we'd
be
making
up
a
number.
It
wouldn't
represent
a
real
Fair
and
then,
on
the
left
hand,
side
the
rows.
You
have
the
Uber
and
then
the
different
scenarios.
F
F
E
Like
I
said,
those
are
again
for
the
5
10
into
a
five
mile
trip
and
to
add
commissioner
Locker.
We
felt
that
it
was
more
honest
to
show
what
was
the
minimum
we've
observed
and
what
was
the
maximum
we've
observed
and
and
then
what
was
the
typical
is
like.
Okay,
we've
got
this
more
time
sort
of
the
mode
if
you,
but
we
felt
on
the
graphs
that
Ryan
was
showing
before
showing
really
the
minimum
of
the
minimum
and
then
the
maximum
of
the
maximum.
Again,
those
are
Dynamic
prices.
E
Taxis,
don't
have
you
know
we're
regulating,
so
we're
looking
at
a
possible
minimum
price
and
a
possible
Max
grade
that
we've
observed
during
those
times
and
then
compare
the
taxis,
and
we
were
happy
to
see
that
for
short
trips
of
five
miles,
taxi
cabs,
with
the
new
proposed
Fair
increase,
they
would
still
be
very
competitive
around
and
then
or
the
one.
E
So
you
can
see,
the
proposed
rates
is
in
the
black
and
the
minimals
are
on
the
left
and
the
maximums
are
on
the
right.
So,
for
the
five
miles,
in
fact,
the
proposed
rates
will
will
be
very
competitive
again
when
you
get
to
travel
to
the
Dallas
airport
because
they
have
that
Dynamic
pricing
and
they
can
just
adjust
their
fares.
E
K
Yeah,
no
and
I
answered
some
of
the
same
questions
about
these.
These
graphs
and
I've
heard
now
that
are
actually
services
are
all
in
favor
of
this
and
that's
like.
Are
we
handicapping
ourselves,
but
it?
You
also
mentioned
that
other
jurisdictions
again
when
we
were
looking
at
comparisons
with
the
other
jurisdictions.
G
I
have
a
question:
it
doesn't
tie
directly
into
the
fair
increase,
but
it
did
jump
out
to
me
when
I
was
reviewing.
The
documents
is
something
I
wanted
to
understand.
Better
I
noted
that
the
time
rate
is
based
on
56
seconds
instead
of
a
full
minute.
I
was
wondering
what
the
reasoning
is
for.
That
seems
like
oddly
specific.
I
Action
meter
was
really,
it
was
really
part
of
a
challenge:
computer
operations
bar
and
that's
what
probably
has
a
lot
of
flexibility,
but
for
the
many
years
before
that
even
electronic
taxi
meters
and
limitations
such
as
you
have
to
have
your
your
mileage
information
exactly
exactly
the
same,
and
there
was
always
a
certain
more
article
size
to
deciding
what
the
information
needed
probably
had
to
do
with
the
rate
you
were
trying
to
get,
it
doesn't
mean
it
seem
to
make
the
most
sense,
and
then
you
had
to
back
time
into
that
when
she
figured
out
what
the
knowledge
was
because,
and
so
that's
how
you
got
to
interesting
variation.
I
I
E
I
In
in
our
industry,
people
who
live
in
Austin
tend
to
take
our
Lincoln
cab
going
and
coming
backs.
Do
the
same
you'll
occasionally
get
someone
to
understand
that
if
they're
far
outings
Fairfax
it's
easier
to
get
from
Fairfax
scale
than
four
o'clock
in
the
afternoon,
it
is
here
at
Red,
Top
or
around
one
of
the
other
companies.
I
If
there's
a
competitive
issue,
it's
going
to
be
with
the
team
house,
and
even
there
you
saw
all
of
the
various
levels
of
race
that
they
have
depending
on
whether
you
want
to
order
your
captain
or
your
car
two
hours
ahead
of
time.
Three
hours
ahead
of
time,
the
night
before
I'm
too
old,
to
figure
it
out
there
will
be
systems,
I,
wouldn't
use
them
with
my
word
detection
companies,
but
at
any
rate,
I
I
think
that
I
think
we.
C
Anybody
else
I'll
just
quickly.
L
C
I
think
that
the
taxi
companies
in
Arlington
are
providing
an
amazing
new
service.
The
consistency
of
the
pricing,
the
transparency
of
the
pricing,
the
consistency
of
the
product
and
the
quality
of
driving,
including
the
navigation,
far
surpasses
my
experience
with
mode.
C
And
if,
if
this
is
the
desire
and
the
reflection
of
both
staff
companies,
I,
don't
see
why
the
Michigan
Board
would
not
supported.
M
Exactly
exactly
what
you
said
also,
these
are
I
mean
Fair
increases
are
not
popular
under
any.
M
But
this
doesn't
seem
to
be
the
price
gouging
agreed.
So
you
know
these
are
companies
that
have
deep
roots
in
in
Arlington
decades,
but
also
in
terms
of
their
employees.
Physical
infrastructure,
they're,
not
out
of
State
Corporations,
skirting
labor
laws
for
the
record.
Don't
even
have
it
or
a
lift
on.
M
Try
to
use
a
cab
whenever,
whenever
I
need
something,
that's
not
my
upcoming
or
my
feed
or
public
transit,
and
so
the
only
concern
that.
A
M
Recent
grants,
or,
or
potentially
even
like
a
write-off
or
for
these
businesses
effects
in
terms
of
whether
to
find
the
services
going
forward,
but
that
that's,
that
is,
that
is
my
only
good
start
during
that
everything.
C
I
will
also
just
encourage
everybody
to
kind
of
really
speak
up
and
use
your
projecting
voice.
I
have
been
virtual
in
meetings
that
happened
in
this
room
and
I.
Think
the
microphones
are
there,
so
you've
really
gotta
gotta
get
up
into
the
ceiling
with
your
voice,
just
to
make
sure
that
those
who
are
who
are
virtual
can
can
fully
partake
in
the
conversation,
Tim
has
a
question
there.
We
go
professional
and
told
me.
O
Yes,
thank
you,
commissioner,
chair
slat,
for
reminding
people
to
speak
up
since
I
am
remote
and
you're
right.
Sometimes
it
can
be
hard
to
hear
but
I
think
I've
gotten.
Everything
on
this
I
am
more
than
happy
to
vote
in
favor
of
this.
It's
also
pretty
clear
that
the
rates
are
competitive
with
other
jurisdictions
and
I
expect
they're
going
to
be
raising
theirs
anyway.
O
O
C
That
is
amazing
how
much
Uber
loves
have
gone
up
since
they
stopped
just
like
constantly
all
right
cool,
seeing
no
other
hands
up
I'm
just
gonna
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion,
which
is
that
the
Transportation
Commission
recommends
The
Cutting
Board
authorized
advertisement
of
hearing
to
consider
increasing
the
drop
charge
from
three
dollars
to
3.50
the
1
6
of
a
mile
charge
from
36
Cents
40
cents
and
the
wait
time
charge
from
36
Cents
to
40
cents
per
under
chapter
25.1
of
the
year.
C
12
adjustments
in
rates
Affairs
to
be
effective,
technical
reason
and,
furthermore,
I
move
that
the
Transportation
Commission
recommends
the
becoming
more
adopt
said
rate
seconds
great.
That
second
part
is
just
so
of
staff
and
applying
folks
from
taxi
cabs.
Don't
feel
that
they
need
to
come
back
to
Transportation
Commission
again.
C
In
the
next
30
days
that
would
require
all
of
this
over
again.
Is
there
any
discussion
about
the
motion
that
is
here
and
has
been
seconded
rates
on
it?
Then
we
will
go
to
a
vote.
Commissioner
Brooks
aye,
commissioner
Coleman
aye
Mr
Hussein
aye
Rick
Nolan,
is
not
here.
Commission
land
tell
me.
N
C
Professor
Locker
hi
official
Ludlow,
hi
profession,
aye,
commissioner
yerry
aye,
commissioner
Shannon
aye,
commissioner
Terry
present
in
any
way
yeah.
C
B
P
So
the
African
is
going
to
be
presented
first,
okay,
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
the
African
team.
Okay,
awesome:
my
name
is
Malcolm
Williams
I.
L
Am
the
development
manager
for
the
Americana
site
I
represent
jbgs
tonight
with
me?
Tonight
is
Louise
and
represents
bro
Slade
and
we'll
be
sharing
a
presentation
with
me.
So
I'll
start
it
off
kick
off
and
bounce
pass
it
to
her,
and
hopefully
we
can
be
informative,
helpful
discussions,
so
I
will
share
my
screen.
L
L
This
is
our
Transportation
Commission
meeting
I
think
we've
had
a
pretty
thoughtful
sprc
process
and
the
4.1
process,
and
we
are
excited
to
be
at
this
meeting
as
we
continue
through
entitlements.
So.
A
L
Folks,
who
aren't
familiar
with
the
site
subsequent
to
that
we'll
go
through
some
circulation
diagrams
for
pedestrians
and
the
modes
of
transportation,
we'll
provide
some
additional
project
detail.
That's
really
focused
on
responding
to
the
comments
we
got
from
sprc2
and
then
subsequent
to
that
police
will
provide
our
transportation.
L
So
we'll
start
with
site
location.
We
are
on
E,
Street
and
straddling
us
on
the
other
side
to
the
East
End
of
the
Richmond
Highway,
which
I'm
sure
everyone
in
this
room
knows
is
attentively
scheduled
to
come
to
great
and
just
for
reference.
Amazon
hq2
is
also
our
neighbor
Arc,
as
we
know
it
internally
and
that
will
hopefully
be
opening
up
in
the
next
month.
It's
public.
So
we're
excited
about
that.
Just
a
brief
street
view
top
left
corner.
We
have
Eads
looking
to
the
South
to
the
right.
L
We've
got
the
southwest
corner
where
our
curb
cut
currently
exists.
If
you
kind
of
see
the
existing
structure
down
to
the
bottom
left
side
got
North
View
you'll
see
the
Embassy
Suites
Hotel
in
the
top
right
corner
and
in
the
bottom
right
side,
we've
got
looks
like
the
existing
bike
lane.
Looking
from
the
Embassy
Suite
side
South
towards
our
next,
we
have
just
some
high
level
information
site
plan
top
floor
of
our
site:
editions
of
the
ground
floor
conditions.
This
is
just
to
provide
a
brief
summary
of
our
zoning
information.
L
We're
looking
at
about
527
000
square
feet
per
square
feet.
Building
approximately
3
800
square
feet
of
retail
on
the
on
the
east
side.
That
is
intentional,
as
we
aim
to
activate
that
stream
and
create
a
little
bit
more
vibrancy.
As
that
comes
online
building
will
be
approximately
200
feet
for
about
639
units.
At
this
iteration
of
the
plan,
the.
N
L
Spaces
on
site
and
200
206
bases
off-site
at
the
Bartlett,
and
we
are
participating
in
the
Green
Building
Initiative
for
the
additional
density
on
this
project.
Next,
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
circulation.
We
think
we've
had
a
a
really
good
discourse
with
community
members
and
staff
about
how
this
site
is
oriented.
It's
a
little
bit
atypical
because
it's
really
narrow
it's
really
long.
So
we
end
up
with
kind
of
this
cruise
ship
that
we
think
we
've
adjusted
and
responded
to
some
of
the
tower
setbacks.
L
So
this
first
diagram
is
going
to
be
our
Pluto
I.
Think
that's
a
colloquial
acronym.
It's
actually
to
pick
up
a
drop-off
area
for
those
watching,
and
what
that
is
designed
to
do
is
to
have
a
space
for
folks
who
are
ordering
food
like.
L
Just
kind
of
generally
coming
in
and
out
really
really
quick
basis.
That
is
not
intended
to
be
parking.
We
intend
to
sign
that,
according
to
Arlington
standards
with
a
something
along
the
lines
of
the
top
Zone
there's
a
similar
signup.
L
A
D
L
Where
this
Black
Arrow
is
our
residential
entry,
that
is
set
back
a
little
bit,
but
that
is
intentional,
as
we
thought
a
really
cool
way
to
activate
the
streets
since
we
are
so
excited
strangers,
create
kind
of
a
recessed
entry
and
you'll
see
a
little
bit
of
that
on
the
next
few
slides
next,
we'll
have
our
package
delivery
program.
So
this
is
for
all
the
big
main
folks,
as
well
as
Little
Folks,
who
come
into
our
building.
This
is
on
the
south
side
of
the
building.
L
L
On
this
slide,
I'll
zoom
in
how
to
move
my
cursor
to
where
this
box
is,
and
that
is
the
residential
loading
zone
and
loading
dock.
We
intend
that
anyone
delivering
there
can
come
in
and
follow
this
Arrow
towards
the
package
room
and
that
should
make
a
pretty
smooth
pick
up
and
drop
off
for
folks
who
are
delivering
on
a
regular
basis.
And
that
was
intentional
and
in
response
to
some.
L
L
Next,
we
have
our
bike
circulation
pathway
as
you'll,
see
on
the
west
side
of
our
site.
There's
a
long
green
arrow
is
the
bike
lane,
which
is
part
of
our
proper
package
that
we
are
currently
finalizing
with
the
city
staff,
County
staff
apologies
and
to
the
South
you'll,
see
our
proposed
route
into
the
West
elevator
core
for
Washington
East,
elevator
court,
and
one
additional
point
I
would
like
to
add.
Is
that
also
will
also
be
able
to.
L
Opera,
you
see
to
try
to
take
you
to
an
elevator
Bay
that
will
take
you
straight
down
to
where
our
beloved
parking
is
where
I
took
my
friends,
and
that
leads
me
to
our
additional
project
detail.
We
have
some
pretty
pointed
responses
after
sprc2,
so
we
took
that
to
heart,
one
of
them
being
the
entry
doors.
You
can't
really
see
here,
we're
shown
pushed
going
push
indoors
and
we
rotate
the
bills
to
push
out
so
close.
L
L
So
next
we'll
talk
about
our
proposal
parking
plan,
and
so
we
are
taking
advantage
of
the
County's
ability
to
share
offside
parking.
So
we
have
another
asset
up.
The
street
called
Bartlett
that
we
thought
was
a
has
a
ton
of
available
parking,
and
you
know.
L
Overparked
when
it
was
built
not
saying
that
officially,
but
we
are
taking
full
advantage
of
that,
so
that
site
is
possibly
operating
at
a
70
utilization
right,
give
or
take
a
couple
percentage
points,
and
so
we're
going
to
leverage
that
proximity
and
the
excess
parking
to
Americana
residents
who
don't
fit
in
our
low
grade
spaces.
Take
advantage
and
I
just
want
to
read
this
paragraph.
L
Real,
quick,
I
think
it's
relevant,
so
our
property
management
at
the
part
of
the
prepared
to
implemented
measures
to
produce
residential
parking
demand
to
accommodate
the
spaces
allocated
the
Americana.
Those
measures
could
include,
but
are
not
limited
to
increasing
parking
pricing,
a
cessation
of
bring
concessions
which
provide
free
parking
for
tenants,
ongoing.
L
L
L
So
next
this
is
what
I
was
referencing
previously.
Is
our
bike
parking
plan?
One
of
the
most
awful
comments
we
got
back
at
sprc2
was
to
consider
different
types
of
bikes,
which
was
something
that
I
think
we
had
really
taken
a
hard
look
at
internally,
so
we
were
very
happy
to
get
that
not
only
our
portfolio
but
this
project,
and
so
this
I
won't
go
through
each
line.
It's
just
a
categorization
of
those
types
of
spaces
and
in
the
diagram
to
the
right
shows
where
those
bike
spaces
allocated.
L
Next,
we
have
a
rendering
showing
our
building
entry
and
also
the
proposed
cc23
plan
that
I
think
will
likely
move
forward.
So
you'll
see
down
to
where
my
cursor
is.
We
have
a
10
foot
sidewalk,
which
is
four
foot
deeper
than
a
six
foot
minimum
required
by
County
staff.
That's
carry
over
from
some
of
the
other
projects,
we've
worked
on
in
Arlington
and
then
talking
to
constituents,
which
is
made
more
sense
to
make
it
a
larger
sidewalk.
L
L
L
Have
a
couple
of
slides
that
show
the
existing
edition
of
round
one
in
our
building
on
the
east
side.
The
next
slide
over
will
be
the
future
condition
of
Route
One
and
we're
in
constant
conversation
with
with
VDOT
team
and
the
team
BS
to
figure
out
and
make
sure
that
we're
all
coordinated
so
that
when
Route
One
does
the
grade
that
we
don't
have
a
weird
condition
on
that
side
of
the
and
also
worth
pointing
out.
L
Another
thing
that
came
out
of
our
sci-fi
networking
process
is
kind
of
where
my
cursor
is
on
that
northeast
corner.
We
did
add
an
additional
entrance
so
that,
when
Route
One
does
come
to
grade,
folks
won't
have
to
go
all
the
way
to
the
each
Street
to
get
us
out
of
building
also
worth
noting
kind
of
in
that
midsection
along
this
Patty
under
the
pathways
of
pedestrian
connection
that
we
need,
and
that
will
connect
each
Street
to
Route
One
when
it
comes
to
grade.
K
E
Again,
I'm
a
police
person
with
girl
Slade,
and
we
wanted
to
just
take
a
minute
to
walk
through
the
multimodal
transportation
zoom
out
a
little
bit.
Not
gonna
cover
the
site
itself
very
well.
The
most
kinds
of
that.
E
E
E
The
slide
focus
is
a
bit
more
in
transit.
The
site
is
kind
of
right
in
between
Crystal
City
and
Pentagon
City
Metro
stations,
it's
less
than
a
10
minute,
walk
to
either
one
point
three
miles
depending
on
cities.
E
E
E
E
E
And
then
Malcolm
already
touched
on
this,
but
I'll
just
kind
of
reiterate
again
quickly
on
particular
parking
again.
We
are
consistent
with
the
off
street
parking
guidelines
for
multiplying
residential
projects,
guidelines
call
for
point
four
spaces
per
unit,
plus
the
additional
0.05
spaces
for
visitors
in
visitor
spaces.
E
The
site
is
proposing
0.6
spaces
per
unit
plus
visitor
parking
and
again
it
gets.
Malcolm
noted
noted.
E
A
E
E
A
E
And
then
for
the
mmta
itself,
we
did
scope
with
the
county,
but
we
did
nine
study
intersections
surrounding
the
site,
including
site
driveways
identified
three
locations
where
we
signal
timing
adjustment
mitigation
side
effects
are
mitigated
as
far
as
the
site
design
elements,
other
improvements
identified
during
the
pre-process
and
then.
M
A
P
N
P
Arlington
County,
Des
and
I'll
be
presenting
on
the
Americana
Hotel.
We
have
electric
items.
We
have
every
zoning
from
rih
3.2
to
see
a
Crystal
City.
We.
P
And
then
we
have
the
Amendments
Department
to
modify
the
parking
and
allow
off-site
parking.
The
side
location,
as
we
have
talked
about
is
across
from
that.
A
P
Again,
the
development
proposal
will
be
demolish
the
existing
Americana
Hotel
rezone,
the
Castillo
Crystal
City.
It
will
be
a
predominantly
Residential
Building
19
stories,
639
units
at
a
0.6
parking
space
per
unit.
A
P
P
A
P
Improvements
that
are
being
done
on
the
east
side
of
each
Street.
Excuse
me,
the
west
side
of
East
Street
on
the
east
side
of
each
street,
from
12
to
15th
Street,
which
is
providing
the
protected
bicycle
facility.
With
the
raised.
A
P
Basically,
replacing
the
striping
posts
that
are
there
today
and
provide
some
parking
spaces
along
that
front.
As
their
applicant
didn't
mention,
there
will
be
Parkinson
space
along
this
Frontage.
This
will
be
under
County
Patrol,
so
we
will
sign
it
as
appropriate
based
on
the
uses
when
the
applicant
comes
in,
they
can
ask
for
the
pickup
and
drop-off
spaces,
but
we
will
look
at
this
solicitly
and
make
sure
that
makes
the
most
sense.
P
Basically,
in
this
area
there
will
be
three
travel
Lanes
with
that
buffered
bicycle
facility,
with
a
six
foot:
landscape,
Furniture,
Zone,
the
10
foot,
clear
sidewalk
and
just
a
free
speech
izone.
We
have
been
coordinating
a
lot
with.
P
P
Wall
and
a
proposed
building
horizontally
an
attempt
vertical
differential
and
you'll,
see
on
the
right
where
essentially,
the
building
will
be
the
same
elevation
as
the
travel
Lanes
or
the
future
alignment.
This
is
all
good
news.
The
parking
I
think
we
talked
about
that
a
lot
to
say
there
will
be
0.6
cases
per
unit
just
as
we
feed
the
parking
guidelines
because
we
do
the
visitor
spaces.
They
are
meeting
the
off-site
parking
requirements,
Sports
other
items
just
for
everyone's
edification.
P
They
will
be
producing
the
gold
certification
and
participating
in
the
present
program.
It
will
be
a
7.5
million
dollar
contribution,
Ahab,
a
2.5
million
dollar
contribution
for
offside,
Transportation
improvements,
6.1
million
dollar
contribution
for
off-site
public
space
planning
and
improvements,
and
the
future
public
easement
for
East-West
pedestrian
pathway
connecting
Southeast
and.
P
P
D
P
Meeting
in
June
and
we
had
our
sprc
online
engagement
to
hybrid
meetings.
Currently
we
are
in
the
commission
meetings
and
then
we
are
getting
going
to
the
County
Board
in
April.
These
are
these
specific
dates
because
of
spring.
A
P
Next
week,
Planning
Commission
will
be
April
10
that
Housing
Commission
on
the
13th
and
County
board
on
the
22
.
staff
does
support
the
project
and
recommends
approval
with
detached
conditions
and
I
am
here
to
answer
any
questions.
C
Great
thank
you
very
much.
I'll
go
ahead
and
kick
things
off
because
I
was
the
site
plan
review
rep
for
TC
for
this
project.
I
will
say:
I
think
this
came
in
at
submittal
as
a
good
project
and
got
better
over
the
course
of
SPS.
L
C
As
far
as
the
additional
entrance
on
the
rep
one
side,
they
also
moved
like,
like
the
fitness
center.
Basically
down
to
that
end,
so
there
will
be.
If
you
look
at,
if
you
walk
against
this
building
on
a
route
one,
it
might
actually
be
interesting.
C
The
Pedestrian
connection
that
will
eventually
be
break
up
the
super
blocks.
You
can
actually
make
brewed
around
one
or
something
C
or
different
route,
one
to
Eads,
et
cetera,
et
cetera
the
improvements
we
have
a
lot
of
conversation
at
sprc
about
this.
Like
architectural
structure,
that's
out
there
I
think
called
the
tabletop
at
a
tabletop
I.
Think
it's
going
to
be
a
neat.
You
know,
take
a
look
at
down
there,
there's
that
nice
little
kind
of
covered
area
like
the
main
door
is
inset,
so
it
was
a
pedestrating
Uber.
C
A
C
Nitty-Gritty
conversations
about
the
Bike
Room,
which
is
great
I,
think
I
hope
to
see
spots
for
non-professional
bikes
that
you
can't
get
into
a
vertical
wreck.
Some
people
like
to
charge
in
a
bike
room.
Some
people
don't
know
they
have
options
because
they're,
that's
great
and
then
I
think
the
only
other
thing
I
have
to
say
is
I
told
you
so
and
Bartlett
approval,
Transportation,
Commission
really
recommended
a
lower
parking
ratio.
Admission
to
Buck
actually
voted
against
the
project
because
he
thought
the
parking
ratio
is
too
high,
and
here.
O
M
A
M
So
that
you
have
a
security
guard
s
in
your
way
after,
like
10
pm,
so
it's
not
a
token
public
space
I,
really
like
that.
The
affordable
housing
contributions,
the
protected
bike
lane
in
front
the
amount
of
units.
This
is
like
double
the
amount
of
units
that
are
going
to
be
theoretically
possible
with
this
in
the
middle
database.
M
Per
year,
yeah
yeah,
theoretically,
if
you
can
build,
sets
onto
them,
but
this
is
double
that
almost
at
one
site.
So
that's
that's
great,
but
I
wanted
to
know
what
your
logic
is:
ratio
when
I
know
the
minimum
is
0.4
right,
Roslyn,
Austin
or
door.
We
have
sites
going
on
three
and
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
better
neighborhood,
perhaps
in
North
America
for
Transit
Options
under
you
know,
for
options
other
than
a
car.
There's
two
metro
stops
the
bus
way.
M
L
Good
question:
we
have
an
internal
guideline
that
we
try
to
follow
and
it's
a
ratio
derived
from
the
number
of
units
and
how
many
how
many
things
are
going
to
live
in
and
that
ties
to
how
many
parking
spaces
we
need-
and
we
have
a
very
robust
asset
management
team
and
operations.
Team.
M
And
for
a
building
of
the
size,
they
just
felt
most
comfortable,
but
all
right
I
mean
circular
logic,
but
but
the
it
is
a
part
of
the
issue
that
you're
going
to
have
not
not
all
of
the
parking
it's
going
to
be
on
site.
So
you
want
to
have
some
in
the
actual
building.
M
L
Yeah
I
totally
understand
what
you're
saying,
and
it
really
came
down
to
an
internal
metric
that
we
that
we
track
honestly.
That's
really
really
I
think
Bartlett
being
an
example
of
too
much,
and
then
we
have
some
projects.
You
know
around
the
corner
and
a
close
proximity
that
are
about
the
same
ratio,
but
a
greater
unit
counts,
and
so
it's
kind
of
a
holistic
view.
It's
not
just
Americana
I
think
we
have
that
unique
perspective.
L
O
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
do
have
a
question
and
a
comment.
The
Bike
Room
is
down
in
the
garage
correct.
Yes,
okay,
I.
O
It
looks
to
me
that
it
would
be
very
easily
expandable
in
the
garage
if,
if
there
aren't,
if
there
are
unused
parking
spaces
and
there's
a
greater
demand
for
bikes
than
anticipated,
it
looks
like
it
would
be
relatively
easy
to
expand
over
one
two
three,
however
many
spaces
to
give
more
more
room
to
the
Bike
Room
I
have
a
question
for
staff.
Would
that
require
a
minor
site
plan
amendment
to
expand
the
Bike
Room
and
shrink
the
parking.
O
Back
to
Mendez
as
well,
okay,
yeah,
that's
one
thing:
I
would
hope
that
would
be
would
be
be
able
to
make
it
easier
to
shrink
parking
rather
than
having
to
go
through
a
site
plan
Amendment.
So
that's
my
comment,
but
otherwise
I
you
know
I
was
in
the
SBR
season.
O
I
think
this
is
a
very,
very
good
project
and
I
also
absolutely
agree
with
commissioner
moradovic
that
it's
interesting
that
over
you
know
this
number
of
of
units
and
yet
nobody's
complaining
about
there's
not
enough
water
and
there's
not
enough
sewer
and
there's
it's
going
to
overwhelm
the
schools.
I.
Think
that's
quite
interesting.
N
General
flow
of
a
conversation
I
I'd
also
like
to
see
if
there
have
been
conversations
internally
about
offsetting
some
of
the
parking
with
the
biking
area,
because
0.6
does
c
a
bit
excessive,
at
least
comparable
to
the
area.
Given
that
there
are
two
metro
stops:
just
suggestions:
the
property
I'd.
Imagine
that
understanding
that
there
is
a
model
that
you
are
are
following.
If
there's
something
internally
that
can
be
done.
So
it's
not
important.
Q
C
Thank
you
kind
of
have
a
vague
recollection
that
maybe
a
development
came
through
in
the
past
that
we
improved
like
the
understanding.
Was
they
were
going
to
build
a
certain
number
of
parking
spaces,
but
we
approved
it
with
a
slightly
lower
ratio
to
give
that
little
bit
of
flexibility
either
on
unit
counter
yeah
I.
Q
P
Yeah,
yes,
there
have
been
a
couple
office
projects
where
there
has
been
some.
You
know
question:
what's
the
final
GFA
gonna
end
up
being,
and
so
the
applicant
has
proposed.
You
know,
let's
say
if
you
did
the
math,
you
know
by
the
letter
of
the
law.
You
end
up
getting
like
one
to
a
thousand
that
they
have
gone
in
a
proposed
or
issue
one
to
Eleven
Hundred
or
something
just
to
provide
themselves
a
little
bit
of
that
flexibility,
because
you're
absolutely
correct.
You
know.
P
There's
still
some
of
the
other
products
in
my
mind
that
we've
done
point
three
recently
with
they
could
propose
a
0.4
and
if
they
wanted
to,
they
could
choose
to
build
additional
parking
if
they
wanted
to
do
something
as
you're
saying
so.
Let's
say
they
proposed
24,
but
they
still
provided
or
many
spaces.
384
I
think
you
know,
so
they
could.
P
And
then,
if
they
decided,
you
know
in
two
months
when
they
went
through
their
cost
analysis,
they
only
wanted
to
build
a
0.4.
Then
they
would
only
have
to
build
a
0.4
so
that
you
less
I
can't
do
math
off
top
of
my
head.
However
many
spaces
that
is
so
that
is
one
method
they
could
use.
Obviously
it's
up
to
the
applicant
to
propose
what
they
want
and
they
have
proposed
a
0.6
and
that's
what
we
repeat
great.
C
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Question
Bishop.
G
So
a
couple
questions,
but
first
could
you
explain
the
residential
delivery
setup
again?
Is
that
intended
also
for
like
Amazon
drivers
and
like
the
LaserShip
kind
of
drivers,
have
come
in
and
drop
things
off
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
not
necessarily
like
Postal
Service
or
something
that
is
correct?
So
the
the
way
we
organize
that
ground
floor
was
so
that
those
folks
have
a
really
short
distance
where
they
pull
the
truck
up
to
where
the
package
room
is,
and
that
was
intentional
because.
G
To
the
length
and
size
of
the
building,
I
was
also
thinking,
it'd,
be
a
benefit
to
for
the
drivers
to
help
keep
their
cars
from
just
like
parking
in
the
street
running
inside
with
the
living
in
Ball
State
Clarendon.
That's
something
I
see
all
the
time
of
those
presidential
delivery
drivers
just
stopping
right
there
in
the
lane
to
run
something
in
yeah
the
access
point
from
the
designated
parking
spots
or
space
for
them
to
do.
They
have
to
like
be
buzzed
in
to
access
that.
L
L
G
Back
to
the
car
and
just
one
other
question
then:
can
we
talk
a
bit
more
about
the
protected
bike?
Lane
is
that
a
community
benefit
that's
being
provided
by
the
development
I
mean
just
outside
the
salon,
or
is
that
just
the
space
is
being
provided
and
then
counties
going
to
come
along
later
to
install
that
protected
bike
lane
infrastructure
so.
P
P
That's
not
where
you
were
going,
but
essentially
our
plan
is
to
be
our
project
starting
next
year.
If
they
have
not
started,
then
we
are
going
to
do
the
work
along
the
frontage,
but
if
they
have
already
started
the
they
will
be
building
their
project
Frontage
and
it
will
be
already.
G
C
What's
the
breakdown
on
the
number
of
bedrooms,
I
I
saw
an
application,
materials
I
might
be
reading
this
790.
C
M
N
K
Is
Mr
Brooklyn
yeah
just
weighing
on
the
parking
minimum,
Sunset
so
much
fun,
but
yeah
just
to
Echo
and
just
to
say
again,
very
much
thinking
well
might
consider
going
going
low
aiming
low
based
on
all
the
things
we've.
C
All
right,
then,
I
moved
that
the
Transportation
Commission
recommended
The
Cutting
Board,
adopt
the
ordinance
to
resend
the
property
known
as
1460
version
anyway
to
CEO
Chris
Crystal
District,
to
adopt
approximately
8.64
density.
A
K
C
Separately,
so
that
we
can
vote
on
it
separately,
which
is
that
I
move
the
transportation
recommended
toward
adopt
approve
this
site
with
a
lower
parking
ratio
that
what
is
listed
solely
to
give
the
applicant
flexibility
between
now
and
construction
to
reduce
the
number
of
parking
spaces
without
having
to
come
back.
A
C
Then
our
further
recommendation
to
adopt
which,
of
course,
as
we
have
discussed
during
this
they've
thrilled
exactly
what
they
have
proposed
and
then
I
just
higher
than
that
parking
ratio
0.6.
C
C
As
we've
talked
a
year
into
it,
hey
we
need
more
space
for
bike
room
and
it
would
be
very
easy
to
turn
to
at
least
Park
parking
spaces
for
cars.
You
can
do
an
expanded
bike
room
without
having
to
you
know,
give
Kendrick
more
money
to
come
back
here.
C
I
potentially
did
not
put
a
specific
ratio
in
there.
I
will
defer
to
our
professional
staff,
who
are
much
smarter
about
this
at
the
time,
but
I
think
it's
something
that
we
should
be
considering,
as
we
have
kind
of
shifted
as
a
County
from
you
really
need
to
build
this
much
parking
and
if
you're
going
to
build
less,
you
really
got
to
like
think
really
hard
about
it
to
like
gosh.
C
We
would
have
approved
a
lower
one
if
you,
you
know,
came
in
and
wanted
it
I
think
maybe
it's
time
to
start
giving
that
flexibility
to
to
be
able
to
go
a
little
lower
too
then
what
they
had
proposed
at
the
time
as
the
perfect
ratio
of
which
we
all
know
there
is
no
perfect
ratio.
It's
a
market
if
they
charge
more.
C
Features
so
that
is
the
thinking
behind
that.
Is
there
any
discussion
of
the
motion,
as
it
was
sure,
I
was
looking
for,
commissioner
Antonio,
yes,
you
know
hand,
okay,
traditional
Miranda,
yeah,.
M
I
mean
it's
the
site
plan
Amendment
for
the
parking
ratio.
It's
there's
so
many
restrictions
on
when
this
is
even
possible.
That's.
M
Kind
of
here
and
talk
about
it
because
only
two
corridors
Boston
and
Roslyn
and
then
the
route
one
and
then
there's
you
have
to
be
within
800
feet.
This
is
like
570
or
something
so
there
is
there's
so
many
things
to
meet
that
criteria
to
come
and
have
the
additional
stuff
I
feel
like
I
mean
this
is
not
related
to
the
vote
tonight,
but
I
feel
like
that.
M
County
in
the
future
should
just
allow
people
to
do
with
their
own
property,
their
own
parking
with
Within
These,
already
established
grounds
where
I
hope
they
sleep
without
having
to
bring
it
up
for
a
for
another
book
that
plays
into
the
general
theme
of
me
easier
to
beat
Bob
for
for
applicants
to
lower.
Q
C
All
right,
then,
we
will
go
to
the
boats,
commission,
Rose.
A
S
C
B
D
Good
evening,
everyone
I
am
going
to
share
my
screen
and
I
really
hope.
This
works
sorry
for
not
joining
in
person,
but
it's
been
a
busy
afternoon.
C
D
Thanks
Chris,
so
I'm
sure
everybody
here
is
familiar
to
an
extent
with
the
MTP
and
if
not,
then
okay,
but
on.
D
Mtp
was
adopted
in
2007
and
was
based
on
work
that
was
conducted
from
2005
to
2007.
over
the
past
16
years.
Various
elements
have
been
updated,
including
the
rewrite
of
the
bike
element
in
2019,
which
I
was
on
TC,
for
some
of
the
elements
remain
untouched
from
their
original
version,
including
the
parking
and
curbside
management
lotment,
and
the
demand
and
system
management
element
best
practices
for
these
areas
and
others
have
evolved
significantly
since
the
MTP
was
adopted
and
new
pressures
and
demands
have
been
put
on
the
right-of-way
requiring
new
Guidance.
D
The
MTP
no
longer
provides
the
needed
guidance
for
staff
as
they
develop.
The
CIP
review
site
plans
and
engage
the
community
on
Corridor
and
transportation
studies.
A
refreshed
MTP
would
provide
guidance
on
priorities,
articulate
how
to
implement
recommendations
and
serve
as
a
recent
consensus
on
Transportation
priorities
for
Arlington.
D
A
refreshed
MTP
would
be
framed
around
Arlington's
core
values.
The
current
MTP
does
not
reflect
the
County's
more
recently
adopted
policy
priorities,
including
Equity,
Vision,
zero
biophilia
and
a
response
to
climate
change.
The
refreshed
MTP
would
also
incorporate
modern
day
travel
options,
including
shared
Mobility
micro
mobility
and
emerging
Transportation
Technologies.
The
MTP
would
address
most
holistically,
providing
guidance
on
trade-offs
between
modes.
How
to
prioritize
the
use
of
our
constrained
right-of-way
and
set
expectations
for
the
community
by
creating
one
planning
document
rather
than
six
siled
modes.
D
Siled
modal
elements
modes
would
be
considered
together,
ensuring
that
we
don't
have
Echo
Chambers
and
that
the
transportation
system
works
as
a
whole.
The
plan
will
articulate
clear
priorities
and
goals
for
transportation
projects,
set
new
best
practices
and
reflect
changing
travel
patterns.
Postcode
19.,
ensuring
Arlington
retains
a
community
where
people
want
to
live
and
work.
Their
current
MTP
does
not
allow
staff
to
quickly
and
effectively
make
decisions.
D
A
plan
that
is
based
on
Arlington
values,
integrates
modes
and
has
clear
modal
priorities
will
allow
for
a
cleaner
process
when
implementing
projects
and
reviewing
development
applications.
As
mentioned
the
existing
MTP
was
developed
and
adopted
prior
to
the
emergence
of
many
goals.
The
county
is
working
to
realize
or
challenges.
We're
trying
to
address
a
re-envisioned
MTP
would
build
on
the
work
done
in
the
ongoing
Transit
strategic
plan,
the
decarbonization
plan,
the
upcoming
commuter
assistance,
strategic
plan
and
the
adopted
Vision
zero
action
plan.
D
There
are
also
several
sector
plans
and
special
glove
studies
that
provided
Transportation
guidance
that
we
can
pull
from.
The
MTP
would
address
how
Transportation
will
help
the
community
the
county,
meet
our
sustainability
and
resilience
goals.
It
would
address
the
challenges
presented
by
climate
change
and
provide
guidance
on
how
the
transportation
Network
can
further
equity
in
Arlington.
D
The
public
right-of-way,
as
we
all
know,
and
especially
the
curbside,
is
feeling
unprecedented
demand.
The
curbside
is
desired
for
so
many
uses
from
traditional
docked:
Bike
Share
to
dockless
scooters
and
e-bikes
pickup
drop
off
or
ride
ride.
Hailing
companies
like
uber
and
Lyft.
It's
facing
increased
demand
from
traditional
delivery
service
like
USPS,
FedEx
and
UPS.
D
As
well
as
emerging
delivery
services
like
Postmates,
doordash
and
instacarp,
the
curbside
is
also
used
for
traditional
parking.
It's
used
for
bus
stops,
bike
lanes
and
potentially
bus
lanes.
The
MTP
does
not
provide
adequate
guidance
on
how
to
balance
or
prioritize
these
different
uses
of
the
curb
space
or
the
right-of-way
as
a
whole.
A
new
MTP
will
provide
guidance
and
Direction
on
how
to
best
allocate
and
prioritize
uses
in
our
limited
right-of-way
ensure
that
we
can
meet
the
many
pressures
that
it
faces.
D
Guidance
will
help
inform
future
corridor
studies
and
will
be
critical
for
staff
as
they
review
site
plans
without
new
guidance
staff
is
forced
to
figure
out
and
justify
decisions
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
This
process
is
time
consuming
time
and
resource
consuming.
As
mentioned,
the
MTP
does
not
address
modes
holistically
and
really
it
considers
them
on
a
vacuum.
At
times
its
Silo
structure
puts
modes
against
each
other
in
the
right-of-way
and
on
corridors.
D
So
we'll
understand
where
people
want
to
travel
and
identify
what
corridors
need
modifications
to
the
right-of-way
to
meet
future
anticipated
travel
demand.
If
Demand
on
a
quarter
is
not
adequately
met
in
the
future,
we
may
need
to
plan
for
it
and
for
enhanced
Transit
service,
new
bike
facilities
or
other
enhancements
to
the
right-of-way.
D
To
identify
modal
priorities
for
quarters,
we
will
take
a
network
approach
with
the
goal
of
making
sure
transportation
in
the
county
is
Equitable,
sustainable
and
efficient,
while
Transportation
well
specific
quarters
will
get
specific,
multiple
priority
examples
of
Transit
Freight
bike
other
modes.
The
network
as
a
whole
will
work
for
individual
modes
as
well
as
a
network
as
a
whole.
These
model
priorities
will
inform
future
Transportation
studies
for
corridors.
D
If
a
specific
roadway
is
identified
for
a
Transit
priority,
Corridor
Corridor,
the
study
will
examine
how
to
best
serve
Transit
along
the
corridor
and
recommendations
to
modify
the
right-of-way
would
focus
on
transmit
improvements
if
a
quarter
is
identified
as
a
bike
priority
Corridor.
That
would
indicate
that,
when
a
future
corridor
study
is
done,
that
the
safe
accommodation
of
cyclists
should
be
prioritized
other
other
uses
of
the
right-of-way,
for
example,
long-term
vehicle
storage.
D
We
also
plan
on
having
separate
guidance
developed
for
neighborhood
streets
that
discusses
their
importance
in
the
transportation
Network,
how
we
plan
and
prioritize
their
use.
This
guidance
will
recognize
that
neighborhood
streets
are
not
just
used
for
transportation,
but
have
Civic
and
Community
uses
as
well.
This
prioritization
will
serve
as
direction
to
County
staff
when
conducting
future
corridor
and
quarter
plans
and
cips,
and
the
clear
articulation
of
modal
priority
on
corridors
will
help
minimize
pushback
on
requests
to
examine
more
options
and
Alternatives.
D
When
we
develop
projects,
the
MTP
will
create
a
modally
integrated
policy
document
with
clear
goals
and
policies.
These
goals
and
policies
will
be
created
through
an
inclusive
community
engagement
process.
We
know
the
first
task
undertaken
when
we
hire
a
consultant
will
be
develop.
A
robust
public
engagement
plan.
This
plan
will
be
guided
by
an
inclusive
Equitable
and
intentional
engagement
process.
D
In
summary,
the
updated
plan
will
integrate
the
six
modal
elements
into
one
cohesive
planning
document,
removing
the
often
competing
policies
and
actions
that
staff
must
work
through
on
a
project
by
project
basis.
It
will
consider
modal
needs
of
the
county
and
individual
corridors
and
will
help
prioritize
near-term
decision
making
and
for
the
CIP.
Multiple
priorities
will
be
identified
based
on
the
safety
demand,
connectivity
and
accessibility
needs
of
the
network.
These
priorities
will
be
identified
using
the
physical
constraints
of
the
roadway
anticipated
Future
travel
demand.
D
Safety
needs
founded
in
Vision
zero
principles
and
consider
the
importance
of
creating
a
safe,
effective,
multimodal
Network.
Most
importantly,
the
MTP
will
create
a
universal
framework
for
transportation
decision.
Making.
This
framework
will
simplify
future
decisions
on
Transportation
projects,
help
limit
debate
by
firming
expectations
and
setting
priorities,
part
of
the
MTP
process,
which
will
save
time
staff
and
money
in
the
future,
allowing
for
a
more
streamlined
implementation
process
and
delivery
projects.
D
It's
also
important
to
recognize
what
the
MTP
is
not
going
to
do.
This
MTP
will
not
create
a
laundry
list
of
projects;
rather,
it
will
identify
prioritized
areas
where
improvements
to
the
right-of-way
are
needed
to
meet
current
mobility
and
or
future
Transportation
demand,
and
it
will
not
make
recommendations
beyond
the
ground
plane.
The
MTP
will
be
a
surface
Transportation
plan
focused
on
providing
a
safe,
sustainable,
Equitable
and
efficient
Transportation
Network.
D
We
anticipate
an
RFP
will
be
released
this
calendar
year
for
the
prop
the
process,
responses,
consultant,
selection
and
Contracting
work
will
last
through
at
least
the
end
of
this
calendar
year.
Once
the
consultant
is
selected,
the
first
task
undertaken
one
will
be
to
draft
that
public
engagement
plan
to
ensure
the
effort
has
an
inclusive,
concise,
targeted
and
intentional
Outreach
process.
Following
a
public
kickoff
for
the
MTP,
we
anticipate
the
process
to
develop
and
adopt
a
new
plan
we'll
take
about
18
months.
D
The
adoption
of
the
MTP
hopefully
will
sync
with
the
preparation
of
the
FY
23
to
35
CIP,
and
we,
our
goal
is
to
have
the
adopted
plan
create
policy
Direction
with
Community
buy-in.
It
will
be
the
tool
for
staff
to
point
to
when
and
reference
when,
making
Transportation
decisions
and
allocating
right-of-way,
rather
than
just
having
to
individually
justify
each
project
and
decision.
There
would
be
a
clear
priorities
and
goals
document
that
projects
0.2
and
have
articulated
in
the
MTP.
D
That's
the
end
of
our
presentation,
we're
happy
to
hear
your
questions
and
comments
just
because,
as
a
as
a
aside,
your
last
listening
session,
we've
gone
to
many
different
groups
within
Des
Transportation
Des
as
a
whole,
we've
gone
to
see
PhD
Economic,
Development,
perks
and
Rec,
and
a
number
of
other
groups
that
I'm
just
not
mentioning
at
the
top
of
my
at
the
tip
of
my
tongue.
C
Awesome,
thank
you.
Miss
culkins
been
looking
forward
to
this
for
quite
some
time.
So
am
I
correctly
understanding
your
your
timeline
that
we're
looking
at
that
18
months
is
mid-2024,
basically
to
the
end
of
25..
G
So
normally
I'm
not
a
fan
of
big
overhauls
of
documents,
but
I
I
got
ragged
on
a
pretty
bad
over
the
past
year
and
I
have
to
say,
I'm
sold,
I'm,
definitely
I'm.
Now
in
favor
of
just
doing
a
fundamental
rethink
of
the
MTV
and
MTV
and
seeing
what
we
can
do
to
prepare
for
the
next
20
years
of
Arlington's
growth.
G
Pretty
fundamental
way
of
looking
at
these
kind
of
documents
that
they
grow
as
communities
do
right
and
if
older
documents
aren't
serving
our
needs-
and
things
have
evolved
to
a
point
where.
K
As
went
out
in
the
presentation,
they
were
just
clear
inconsistencies.
Our
reality
is,
then
we
need
to
adapt
accordingly
and
perhaps
make
these
large
overhauls
that
we
can
have
a
four
looking
document.
K
Mr
Bros,
I'm
I
also
endorse
it.
I
do
think
it's
probably
by
necessity,
but
not
by
really
a
great
plan
to
think
about
in
20
years
ahead,
because
that's
way
too
far
and
frankly,
five
years
is
probably
as
far
as
you're
gonna
actually
be
able
to
make
a
reasonable
assessment,
but
that.
K
It's
a
lot
of
money,
probably
and
a
lot
of
time
whenever
and
you
want
to
try
to,
but
I
think
the
completing
open
possibilities
for
things
that
we
are
again
little
specks
in
our
brains.
Right
now
about
where
we'll
be
interned,
interpretation
are
worthwhile
to
consider
and
I'm
sure
people
will
bring
them
up
in
the
course
public
engagement,
but
otherwise
yeah
strategic
plans
are
here.
C
C
Know
our
current
mtps,
you
know,
move
more
people
with
less
traffic
still
Rings
true
today,
as
it
did
in
2007.
C
Whatever,
but
staff
has
been
good
at
taking
document
that
has
some
solid
bones,
but
some
weirdly
out
of
date
detail
and
just
sort
of
applying
the
spirits
of
it
or
the
you
know
that
sort
of
thing
in
a
very
useful
way,
commission
tell
me,
go
ahead.
O
Yeah
I
think
that
definitely
this
is
definitely
needed.
I
think
you're
moving
in
the
right
direction,
I
like
the
idea
of
getting
rid
of
the
silos
and
having
everything
looked
at
holistically.
O
That
is
absolutely
the
right
way
to
go,
and,
of
course
you
know
getting
the
community
input
in
is
is
is,
is
necessary
and
appropriate
I'm
putting
in
a
plug
now
to
for
the
for
the
actual
map
to
add
a
pedestrian
right-of-way
layer
which
is
barely
there
at
this
point,
it's
only
in
a
couple
of
very
specific
spots
and
it's
more
theoretical
than
real.
O
Every
one
of
our
neighborhoods
I,
pretty
much
every
one
of
our
neighborhoods
has
pedestrian
only
and
I'm,
not
not
even
bikes,
that
are
either
County
owned
or
have
public
easements
that
are
pedestrian
only
rights
of
way.
Some
of
them
are
actually
almost
a
block
long.
Some
of
them
are,
maybe
you
know,
10
20
feet
long,
but
they're
all
used
in
the
neighborhoods
they're
they're,
important
and
they're
completely
unrecognized
and
a
lot
of
them
aren't
even
maintained
or
maintained
properly.
Some
of
them
are
are
almost
desire
lines,
rather
than
anything
more
than
that.
O
O
We
also
have
pedestrian
pedestrian
rights
of
way
that
that
are
on
the
map
and
we
know
what
they
are,
because
I
also
think
that
we
have
a
number
of
public
easements
that
over
the
years,
people
forget
that
they're
public
easements
and
they
end
up
being
privatized
or
my
fear,
is
they
end
up
being
privatized?
O
You
know:
we've
seen
that
with
a
couple
of
site
plans
come
through
where
that's
happened,
so
I
would
like
to
have
those
I'm
putting
in
the
The
Urge
for
you
to
do
that
so
anyway,
that
that's
my
comment.
You
asked
for
what
we
want.
That's
what
I
want.
Thank
you.
C
Awesome
I'd
love
to
jump
a
little
bit
into
the.
How
do
you
use
the
current
MTP
question?
That's
on
the
screen
up
here,
because
I
use
it
a
lot.
I
will
say
I'm
glad
to
hear
staff
talking
about
this
sort
of
priority
Corridor
concept,
because
I
think
the
primary
bicycling
corridors
that
we
got
into
the
one
of
the
most
useful
things
that
we
put
in
the
bike
element.
C
If
I
did
a
very
useful
talking
point
during
cycle
interview
or
during
you
know,
public
engagement
project
to
remind
everyone
when
we're
talking
about
a
right-of-way,
that's
a
primary
bicycling
Corridor,
it's
a
sort
of
simple
to
understand
concept
like
of
all
the
places.
This
is
one
of
the
spots,
that's
most
important
for
biking
and
I.
Think
that
does
translate
very
well
to
a
priority,
Transit
Corridor
or
even
a
primary.
C
You
know
a
priority
pedestrian
corridor
which
I
think
like
the
Ninth
Street
of
Promenade
between
Boston
Square,
which
has
never
quite
gotten
finished
out.
Thanks
to
Salt
development,
Square
or
I.
Think
the
18th
Street
Corridor
we're
trying
to
build
in
Roslyn
down
to
the
Metro
coming
down
from
you
know
from
the
whatever
they
call
that
up
there.
The.
C
All
that
you
know
I,
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
as
well,
so
I
think
that's
that's
a
great
concept.
I
will
also.
I
C
C
C
You
know
we
have
a
policy
of
the
bike
element
that
we'll
have
vigorously
enforced
mots
and
that
we
will
make
sure
that
if
there's
a
safe
route
for
biking
before
a
construction
project,
there's
a
safe
route
for
biking,
Africa
project
and
we're
not
there
but
I-
think
it's
it's
important
that
the
policy
is
there.
So
we
know
that
that's
what
we're
towards
so
I
really
hope.
We
keep
that
kind
of
stuff,
though
I
know,
there's
probably
a
lot
of
balancing.
C
We
need
to
do
on
specificity
because
I
think
is
Calkins
and
I
have
had
a
conversation
in
the
past
about
the
MTP
having
these
sort
of
varying
levels
of
like
some
of
the
policies
are
very
Broad
and
then
there's
some
very,
very
specific,
many
very,
very
specific
things
that
are
probably
two
low
level
and
in
the
weeds
to
be
in
such
a
board
adopted
positive.
G
I'm
sure,
with
you
just
I
guess
in
this
early
stage
of
talking
about
refreshing,
the
master
Transportation
plan.
One
thing
that's
very
interesting
to
me
is
the
focus
on
further
further
focus
on
corridors.
I
have
ever
since
moving
into
Arlington
Long
treat
I
mean
I've
treated
like
the
Roslyn
balston
Corridor
sort
of
like
one
neighborhood
and
I
think
that
sort
of
sentiment
could
be
I,
guess
recognized
a
lot
more,
especially
in
our
transportation
and
then
use
that
to
sort
of
roll
into
other
aspects
that
Touch
Transportation
you
know,
land
use,
schools
etc.
G
For
example,
I
would
love
to
see
that
sort
of
corridor
concept
expanded
into
other
areas,
I
mean
not
just
Langston
Boulevard
but
say
George,
Mason,
North
and
South
Carlin
Springs,
even
like
Washington
Boulevard
sort
of
linking
Clarendon
to
Penrose,
would
be.
You
know
that
sort
of
holistic
concept,
of
how
you
consider
something
a
corridor
and
with
George
Mason
in
particular
with
our
you
know
how
our
high
schools
are
that
we
really
only
have
like
three
Comprehensive
High
Schools.
G
It
would
be
really
nice
to
have
George
Mason
treated
as
a
corridor
and
then
perhaps
our
Public
School
System
would
use
that
to
draw
boundaries
that
allowed
residents
in
the
old,
long,
Columbia,
Pike
and
George
Mason
intersection
like
Douglas
Park
and
then
make
use
of
Yorktown
high
school,
because
it's
along
this
one
Corridor
of
George
Mason
Drive.
That's
just
an
example.
G
It
is
not
a
policy
position,
of
course,
but
those
sorts
of
things
have
really
popped
out
to
me
over
the
years
as
I
have
started
to
try
to
think
in
more
of
a
corridor
concept
instead
of
just
a
little
circle
or
Lobster
on
a
map.
Think
of
it
as
like,
based
on
Transit,
going
from
east
to
west
north
to
south,
so
very
excited
about
the
corridors.
B
C
D
Myself
I
was
taking
notes,
so
we're
still
working
on
what
our
public
engagement
process
looks
like.
We
don't
have
a
scope
of
work.
We
don't
have.
You
know
a
process
been
laid
out
in
front
of
us.
It's
likely
that
we'll
come
in
and
check
with.
In
with
the
commission
like.
D
We
are
right
now
at
very
important
Milestones
within
the
process,
as
well
as
having
some
sort
of
you
know,
Community
stakeholder
or
advisory
committee
that
helps
guide
the
process
as
well,
which
I
would
assume
would
have
a
representative
or
two
from
the
Transportation
Commission
on
it
as
well,
but
a
lot
of
that's
still
kind
of
a
TBD
to
figure
out
as
we
with
our
consultant
that
we
get
and,
as
Chris
pointed
out
about
it
over
a
year,
still
flush
out
a
very
robust
public
engagement
plan
to
make
sure
that
we
have
very
intentional
targeted
engagement
processes
so
that
we're
talking
to
the
people
that
we
should
at
the
same
time,
at
the
right
times.
N
C
Yeah
I
mean
I
I
definitely
have
some
aspirations
for
what
I
would
like
to
see.
I
think
just
kind
of
four
major
areas.
One
of
them
would
be
that
the
plan
is
not
only
strategic,
but
it's
integrated.
It
doesn't
Stand
Alone.
C
If
we're
making
land
use
chain,
Transportation
suggestions,
they
have
to
be
done
in
concert
with
a
broader
county-wide
Vision
on
land
use
and
other
issues,
including
our
resiliency
of
our
system,
the
ecology,
the
equity.
All
of
these
things
have
to
be
considered.
C
That's
what
I
see
most
Transportation
plans
failed
is
when
they
aren't
fully
integrated
with
a
body
of
planning
across
across
the
county.
You
know
we
just
heard
a
presentation
recently
in
the
art
strategic
plan,
for
example.
So
it's
like
the
plans
are
always
playing
catch-up
and
sometimes
you
have
to
level
set
and
kind
of
do
a
whole
series
of
strategic
planning
all
at
once
across
a
broad
body
of
different
work,
to
be
able
to
really.
P
C
Those
together
and
realize
the
full
full
potential
I
I
hope
that
also
it
can
be
integrated
in
the
sense
that
we're
paying
close
attention
to
DC
and
Alexandria
and
Fairfax
and
Falls
Church,
because
we're
certainly
not
an
island
and
there's
a
lot
of
fabric
that
needs
to
be
integrated
in
our
region
and
will
be
more
effective.
That
way
and
we
can
even
influence
the
plans
of
neighboring
communities
and
they
can
influence
us
I.
Think.
That's
really
important.
R
C
And
stakeholder,
driven
that
we're
tracking
kpis,
that
we
can
look
back
on
what
the
MTP
accomplished,
how
it
measured
it,
maybe
where
it
fell
short
and
to
what
degree
we've
been
able
to
realize
the
previous
goals
and
that
helps
us
shape
the
ones
in
the
future.
C
The
stakeholder
engagement
will
be
really
important.
A
transparent
data
driven
so
I'm
glad
that
that's
one
of
the
first
tasks
that
you're
working
on
and
that'll
be
really
critical
for
your
consultant
to
kind
of
set
that
out
and
then
finally
I'm
hopeful
that
we
will
take
a
close
look
not
only
at
the
corridor
issues
that
the
other
Commissioners
have
mentioned,
but
broader
smart
growth
principles,
aligning
land
use
and
transportation,
looking
at
15
minute
and
five-minute,
City
Concepts
Urban
clusters
and
really
thinking
about
our
new
world
of
work
from
home
and
hybrid
work.
C
C
S
Don't
see
a
lot
of
like
leads
in
general
like
just
as
compared
to
like
other
other
places,
and
so
it
would
be
nice
to
see
the
MTP
as
like
a
component
of
a
larger
DC
Regional
plan.
I
mean
this
is
that's
kind
of
beyond
the
scope
of
just
like
I
think
the
MTP
can
act
as
a
model
from
which
a
larger
Regional
plan
talked
about
more.
S
Like
in
terms
of
like
I
feel
like
we're
not
on
our
transit
system
operates
within
a
larger
widget
right,
so
I
think
that
that
Focus
I
think
it'd
be
nice
to
see
that
include
included
in
this
yeah
and
then
I
also
had
the
idea
a
very
popular
concept
and
yeah.
But
you
know
and
it'd
be
interesting.
Like
I
there,
there
are
lots
of
ways
to
have
a
15-minute
city
where
it's
like
is
it.
You
know
a
15-minute
neighborhood.
That's
everything
is
accessible,
walking,
biking,
Transit.
S
R
S
S
N
J
C
Well,
you
know,
commissioner,
like
spoken
today.
C
R
It
is
our
intent
to
provide
high
quality
transportation
services
versus
when
you're
looking
at,
especially
with
the
word
plan
in
here.
There's
a
more
conceptual
like
concept
of
you
know,
I
think
it
would
be.
You
know
if
you're
looking
for
the
ecology
and
everything
else
and
putting
this
together
as
a
plan.
What
is
what
is
the
actual
point
that
you
want
to
get
the
county
to?
R
You
know
it
tends
to
be
a
little
bit
more
I
numerical
like
we
want
as
a
percentage
of
transit
in
this
particular
area,
where
we
want
to
reduce
pollution
or
anything
else
that
you
can
think
about
about
policy
in
a
particular
segment
by
this
amount.
So
that
way
you
can
work
to
it
to
be
achievable.
R
R
M
M
I
wanted
to
say
in
terms
of
what
I
would
like
to
see
and
what
I
would
not
like
to
see
in
the
MTP
I
like
how
everything
is
being
integrated,
but
on
the
ground,
I'd
like
to
see
more
separation
in
terms
of
separating
cars
from
Vice
from
cyclists
from
vehicles,
I,
don't
specifically
I'm
thinking
about
Crystal
City
Drive.
M
So
we
no
longer
have
scenarios
like
that
where
we're
not,
unfortunately,
we're
not
able
to
count
on
the
courtesy
of
some
of
the
drivers
to
stay
out
of
a
bike
lane
and
the
police
are
physically
unable
to
enforce
it.
I
mean
I,
don't
know
how
many
police
officers
people
need
to
have
to
do
that
and
oftentimes.
It's
the
cops
that
are
apart
in
the
pipeline
as
well,
but.
M
Think
they
should
be
in
the
business
of
doing
that.
They
should
be
in
the
business
of
other
work,
and
why
have
a
cop
do
something
that
in
that
barrier
you
know
you
know,
do
instead
and
that
way
free
them
up
to
do
to
do
other
more
impactful
work.
So
I'd
like
to
not
see,
for
example,
discredited
things
like
sharers.
M
You
know,
like
I,
think
I
think,
like
staff
is
aware
of
how
how
counterproductive
they
are,
and
so
I'm
optimistic
that
when,
when
the
rough
outlines
that
will
come
out
that
that
there
won't
be
sharers,
we're
going
to
have
some
great
new
infrastructure,
I
think
of
DC
right
now,
they
have
go
to
Psycho
numbers
to
visit
in
DC
right
now
in
terms
of
helping
them
draft
some
policies
and
best
practices
from
the
Netherlands,
and
a
lot
of
it
is
just
very,
very
simple
stuff
that
doesn't
take
up
any
more
real
estate
and
an
intersection,
but
that
you're
able
to
avoid.
D
M
Like
a
mixing
sound
at
an
intersection,
I
I
hope
we
I
hope
that'll
be
a
practice
that
will
no
longer
have
in
this
County.
So
that's
that,
thank
you.
C
I
will
and
let's
kind
of
move
a
little
I
think
formally
into
the
you
know.
What
do
you
hope?
The
new
MTP
includes
and
say
I
would
say
two
criticisms
that
I
have
of
the
existing
MTP.
That
I
haven't
already
heard
kind
of
called
out
by
staff.
C
One
is
that
it's
very
light
on
operational
policy.
It's
almost
exclusively
designed,
you
know
it
talks
about.
You
know
Street
widths
and
that
sort
of
stuff
about
you
know
how
do
we
build
the
facilities
that
we
have
and
leaves?
How
do
we
operate
them
very
much
kind
of
up
to
engineering
judgment
and
I
would
love
if
there
were
a
little
more
Community
Based
policy
of
and
how
we
operate.
C
For
instance,
I
come
up
with
the
commission
before
the
only
mention
of
traffic
signals
in
the
entire
MTP
or
from
all
the
LEDs.
It
doesn't
really
talk
about
when
we
are
optimizing,
our
signals
every
two
years.
What
are
we
optimizing
for?
What's
our
ideal
outcome,
you
know
how
much
of
it
is
safety
and
how
much
of
it
is
traffic
flow
and
how
much
of
it
is
reducing
pedestrian
delay.
And
you
know
all
of
these
are
ways
things
you
can
optimize
for,
and
the
MTP
is
currently
very
silent
on
one.
C
C
You
know,
which
you
know,
is
never
sexy
and
never
fun
to
talk
about,
but
it's
kind
of
a
critical
part
of
our
transportation
system.
Is
you
know
what
are
our
community
expectations
for?
How
we're
going
to
be
maintaining
this
infrastructure
of
long-term?
You
know:
do
we
need
to
be
sweeping
leaves
out
of
bike
Lanes,
you
know
what?
How
do
we
decide
what
trails
we're
going
to
clear
snow
from
and
what
trails
are
not
important?
C
Are
we
going
to
repave
our
Trails,
or
are
we
only
going
to
repeat
our
roads
of
all
of
these
sort
of
things,
I
think
to
serve
at
least
some
place
in
our
Master
transportation
policy
document
aren't
really
in
there.
As
far
as
speaking,
to
help
in
our
existing.
D
No
either,
if
you
didn't
see
me
I'm
nodding
my
head.
Yes,
those
are
actually
comments
that
we've
even
heard
from
some
of
those
listening
sessions
that
we've
done
with
with
staff
as
well,
that
we
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
the
new
plan
speaks
to
how
we
operate
our
system
and
what
we
prioritize
in
that
operation.
D
I
think
our
goals
hopefully
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
when
we
create
this
new
MTP,
but
maintenance
from
a
lot
of
different
perspectives
have
been
brought
up
and
the
importance
of
recognizing
that
projects
have
long-term
maintenance
needs
as
well.
In
the
FTP.
C
We
we've
had
our
team
set,
so
we
couldn't
see
you,
but
now
our
team
is
assessing
and
yeah.
So
when
you
nod
it
will
actually
fix
that
on
our
end.
Other
commissioner
thoughts,
commissioner,
at.
S
I'm,
taking
a
look
at
like
the
different
goals
from
different
cities
and
like,
for
example,
one
of
DC's
goals
has
like
like
have
a
management
and
operation
operation
and
I.
Think
that
got
me
thinking
about
like
evaluation
of
the
MP
and
MTP.
Sorry,
a
lot
of
letters
and
I'm
just
wondering
like
what
does
that
look
like?
S
Process
of
our
transport,
in
terms
of
like,
like
its
impact
or
whether
or
not
it's
like
meeting
the
needs
of
the
community
like
doing
those
evaluations,
frequently
I.
A
S
S
How
are
we
evaluating
in
nature
and
what
does
that
evaluation
process
look
like,
and
how
often
are
we
doing
that
because,
like
you
know,
if
we're
not
like
where
we
can
create
lots
of
policies,
but
if
we're
not
evaluating
the
things
that
we're
doing
I,
don't
think
I'm
going
to
learn
and
again,
like
I,
don't
know
if
that's
already
being
done
in
some
way
right
now,
it
probably
is
but
like
having
that
more
explicitly
defined,
as
one
I
think
would
be.
I
think
there's
value
in
thinking
about
it.
D
Thought
I
animated
myself
apologies,
so
we
do
plan
on
actually
one
of
the
things
that
we're
hoping
to
do
and
I
touched
on
it
very
briefly:
there's
a
lot
to
cover.
So
you
know
you
didn't
want
me
talking
for
like
two
hours,
but
one
of
the
things
we're
really
hoping
to
do
with
this.
This
new
plan
is
create
kind
of
a
line
from
our
goals
to
our
policies
to
measures.
D
I
know
your
reference
move
DC
actually
worked
on
move
DC
I
worked
at
the
District
of
Columbia
before
joining
des
and
worked
on
move
DC,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
hoping
to
do
is
create
that
much
like
more
linear,
easier
to
track
and
Report
out
on
how
we're
doing
on
what
we've
articulated
within
the
MTP.
With
this
new
plan.
C
And
Kristen
tell
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I
believe
an
important
chunk
of
that
is
picking
metrics
that
we
can
actually
easily
in
the
previous
in
our
current
MTP.
Is
we've
put
measures
in
there
that
we
actually
do
reasonable.
D
C
C
B
C
I
I
will
I
will
put
out
another
plug,
for
we
need
a
rep
OS,
formerly
known
as
the
coastal
city.
C
Crc
has
also
it's
purview,
so
this
is
a
an
interesting
little
group
like
a
commission
that
is
kind
of
charged
with
tracking
progress
on
the
Crystal
City
sector
plan
and
the
Pentagon
City
Center.
How
is
implementation
going
and
are?
We
could
really
use
a
transportation
commissioner
on
it.
C
It's
an
interesting
kind
of
opportunity
to
to
look
a
little
more
holistically
right
when
you're
cycling
to
review
you're
very
focused
on
one
building.
Ccc
RC
gives
you
this
kind
of
about
three
buildings
are
happening.
We're
still
see
you
right
now
and.
A
C
They
connected
and
they're
all
kind
of
underground,
and
are
we
getting
what's
the
underground
Crystal
City
Underground
turn
into
or
they're
all
putting
in
money
to
open
space
planning
like
okay,
like
what's
the
priority
for
the
next
Park
in
Crystal
City?
Is
it
gateway,
gateway
Park?
Is
it
this
new
Metro
Market
Square
like
focusing?
C
So
if
you
have
a
little
extra
bandwidth?
Oh
it's
just
another
monthly
meeting.
It's
not
any
crazy,
huge
time
commitment!
There's
a
lot
of
those
neighborhoods
over
there
have
some
great
great
and
really
involved
reps.
So
it
could
be
a
really
useful
conversation
so
either
hit
me
up
after
this
meeting
or
shoot
me
an
email
or
whatever.
C
C
M
Meeting
as
well,
this
past
Monday,
basically
they're
going
to
have
two
meetings.
The
transportation
stuff
will
be
discussed
on
May
15th.
The
site
is
I
kind
of
sympathize
with
the
developer.
It's
kind
of
a
really
constrained
site,
both
in
terms
of
physical
space,
but
also
in
terms
of
what
they're
allowed
to
build.
M
When
that
neighborhood,
it's
125
foot
height
limit
and
that's
forcing
and
but
underneath
they
found
what
the
developer
claims
they
found
some,
but
that
they
found
some
granite
and
that's
so
they're
constrained
in
terms
of
How
High.
M
They
can
go
but
financially
they
have
constrained
strangle
and
then
that's
the
crew
causing
them
in
order
to
make
everything
work
financially,
causing
them
to
make
some
compromises
that
I'm,
not
really
a
fan
of
one
of
them,
is
kind
of
separating
the
parking
or
the
or
the
other
Wakefield
Manor
residents,
and
that's
adding
another
curb
cut.
It's
forcing
the
cyclist
to
go
two
or
three
fours
underneath
and
I'm
thinking
about
what
might
be
the
best
way
to
reconcile
all
that.
That's
kind
of
like
the
original
percent
of
everything
there
and.
M
If
you
really
want
to
be
cynical
about
it,
it's
like
causing
them
to
be
like
well,
we
want
to
separate
these
affordable
housing,
people
from
a
market
right
people,
and
then
Elevate
are
market
rate
people
on
a
higher
literally
on
a
higher
plane.
Where
there's
going
to.
M
Up
top
that
will
be
kind
of
undermining
the
whole
concept
of
a
garden
apartment,
so
I
think
if
any
other
Commissioners
want
to
keep
following
that,
I
bought
some
advice
on
how
to
reconcile
that
I
mean
it's
not
the
only
building,
that's
encounter
Granite,
it's
pretty
common
and
Roslyn
I
believe.
M
And
tell
them
turn
that
those
30
parking
units
and
the
cycling
parking
at
grade
and
then
have
the
other,
the
original
Wakefield
banner,
yes
of
residence,
so
to
speak
park
in
the
same
garage
as
the
as
the
other
ones
kind
of
to
do
space,
but
I'm
open
to
other
recommendations.
That's
really
the
only
thing
that
jumps
out
it's
it's
a
tough
site,
though
so
that's
not
May
15th,
okay,.
O
Yes,
thank
you
I'm.
As
you
know,
I'm
also
chairing
lrpcs
and
one
was
going
to
be
scheduled
for
April
27th,
which
happens
to
be
I,
think
Transportation
Commission
night
I
said
no,
because
it's
going
to
be
looking
at
the
career
center
site
and
I
thought.
The
Transportation
Commission
would
be
very
interested
in
participating
in
that
lrpc
and
having
at
least
two
members
of
TC
not
be
able
to
be
at
either
the
Lac
or
at
the
TC
meeting
is
not
a
good
idea.
O
O
We're
still
trying
to
determine
whether
it
could
actually
be
joint
that
we
formally
participate
or
that
we
could
just
sit
in
the
way
anybody
any
member
of
the
public
would.
But
the
point
is
that
would
give
Transportation
Commission
Commissioners
the
opportunity
to
hear
what
is
being
proposed
for
the
career
center
site.
I
think
we
will
be
interested
because
part
of
it
is
a
parking
garage
and
we'd.
Also,
of
course,
since
the
AWG
is
there,
we
could
get
a
better
feel
on
some
other
communities.
O
Looking
at
this,
so
anyway,
more
information
will
be
coming
on
that
as
it
evolves,
but
I
wanted
to
put
that
on
people's
calendar.
Now
that
the
26th
would
be
when
that
Aug
meeting
will
take
place
and
career
center
is
is
will
be
the
first
thing
on
that
agenda,
so
you
don't
have
to
sit
through
the
whole
thing,
so
that's
pretty
much.
It.