►
From YouTube: Planning and Regulatory Services Committee on Wednesday the 2nd of February 2022 at 3.00pm
Description
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council Planning and Regulatory Services Committee on Wednesday the 2nd of February 2022 at 3.00pm in the Council Chamber at Craigavon Civic and Conference Centre
A
D
E
E
I
have
none
here
with
me:
okay,
don't
see
any
lights
on
so
I'm
moving
to
item
three
decorations
of
interest
any
decorations
inside,
so
we
just
take
them
as
we
go,
not
seeing
any
lights
on
our
hands
up.
Okay,
member
front
agenda
item
three
report
from
the
head
of
planning.
So
we'll
go
on
to
three
point.
One
decision
item
relating
to
some
guidance
note:
temporary
structures
and
changes
of
use,
I'm
going
to
hand
over
to
is
it
the
demon
to
present
this?
E
Oh
sorry,
russian,
sorry,
russian
john
is
bowsing
blue
head
version.
C
The
guidance
note
sets
out
the
council's
approach
to
the
provision
of
temporary
structures
and
temporary
changes
of
use
and
proposed
that
these
should
be
permitted
without
the
need
for
planning
permission
for
up
to
six
months.
Initially.
In
certain
circumstances,
in
january,
21
members
agreed
to
extend
the
deadline
set
out
in
the
guidance
and
in
may
21
agreed
to
extend
again
until
march
2022.
C
However,
it's
accepted
the
challenges
presented
to
businesses
and
organizations
are
still
ongoing.
With
that
in
mind,
officers
now
proposed
to
extend
this
time
frame
for
further
six
months.
This
would
mean
that
the
provision
of
temporary
structures
and
temporary
changes
of
use
would
be
permitted
without
any
need
for
planning
permission
up
to
the
30th
of
september
2022.
In
certain
circumstances,
it
is
recommended
that
members
approve
an
extension
of
time
until
the
30th
of
september
and
the
provisional
temporary
structures
and
changes
of
peace
as
set
out
in
the
guidance
note.
Thank
you
happy
to
take
any
questions.
F
F
Perfectly
reasonable
to
given
the
realities
of
the
the
current
era
that
we
do
so
I'm
happy
to
propose.
G
Yes,
thank
you,
sir.
I'm
happy
to
second
thought:
you're,
we're
still
in
on
certain
times
out
there
on
that.
I
think
that
it's
only
a
bit
right
that
we
extend
this
for
for
another
period
and
I'm
happy
to
second.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
aldermen
anderson,
any
other
questions
of
grease
members.
I'm
not
saying
I
nailed
our
lights
on
hands
up
to
a
proposal
from
alderman
wilson
sacked
my
older
announcement
they're
approved
of
the
recommendation.
They
were
all
agreed
carol
agreed
in
that
one.
So
item
3.2
against
another
decision.
Item
relating
to
the
department
of
infrastructure
issues
paper,
I'm
going
to
be
handing
over
to
helen
stoops
who
take
us
through
this
one
talent's
joining
us
on
zoom.
So
whenever
you're
ready
helen.
H
Thank
you,
chair
and
good
afternoon
members
members
may
recall
minister
marlon's
announcement
in
april
21
to
review
strategic
planning
policy
on
renewable
and
low
carbon
energy
to
inform
this
process.
The
department
of
infrastructure
is
undertaking
stakeholder
engagement
and
advised
council
on
the
15th
of
december
of
the
publication
of
an
issues
paper
entitled
review
of
strategic
planning
policy
on
renewable
and
low
carbon
energy.
H
Welcome
this
review
an
opportunity
to
identify
the
key
areas
that
need
to
be
addressed
to
enable
the
planning
system
to
assist
with
the
meeting
of
renewable
energy
targets,
which
includes
matters
relating
to
the
lack
of
guidance
on
emerging
technologies,
the
need
for
certain
issues
to
be
clarified
within
strategic
planning
policy,
along
with
the
need
for
technical
documents
to
be
updated,
a
copy
of
the
draft
response
can
be
assigned
at
appendix
3..
It
is
recommended
that
members
approve
the
draft
response
to
dfi,
as
outlined
at
appendix
3.
I
Yeah
thanks
charm,
thanks
helen,
it's
not
really
a
question,
but
I
suppose
you
know,
I
think,
we're
all
aware.
Chair
of
obviously,
the
climate
emerges
that
that
exists
at
the
moment,
and-
and
this
is
a
welcome
sort
of
you
know
obviously
paper
from
from
dfi
and
and
I've
read
the
response
and-
and
I
do
share
the
concerns
that
you
know
there's
talk
about.
I
You
know,
sort
of
non-agriculture
land
now
northern
ireland's
small
place
sure
and
and
as
I
said,
you
know
and
we're
going
through
a
a
sort
of
a
situation
now
where
obviously,
there's
been
intensive
farming
and
every
land
every
bit
of
land
is
is
is
key
so,
like
whatever
is
done
within
this,
I'm
not
against
it
like.
I
I
had
actually
a
very
good
and
interesting
a
zoom
meeting
with
with
a
group
of
farmers
down
in
county
cork
in
the
brave
project
chair
which
basically,
there
put
together
a
pilot
of
how
to
farm
with
nature,
and
there
was
different
things
that
the
farmers
can
do
on
their
farms
to
improve
the
you
know,
the
the
the
the
carbon
emissions
etc
within
within
their
lands
and
and
it
was
they're
aiming
to
get
between
ten
and
fifteen
percent.
I
You
know
improvement
are
sorry
for
for
for
for
nature
farming,
so
I
think
we
just
you
know.
I
suppose
I
just
want
to
sort
of
say
that
you
know
in
relation
to
things
like
you
know:
wind
farms
and
and
and
the
solar
farms,
and
things
like
that.
They
do
refer
to
this
kind
of
known
agriculture,
land
and,
as
rightly
so,
in
this
report
that
can
be
a
very
important
land
from
a
biodiversity
point
of
view,
etc.
So
we
just
need
to
watch
this
space.
You
know
see
what
way
this
this
develops
through
the
department.
I
I
appreciate
it's
it's
it's
an
initial
sort
of
reply
to
the
the
consultation
that's
out,
but
I
do
think
that
you
know
in
every
area
is
different
sure.
You
know
in
relation
to
our
our
our
geology
and
on
geography,
and
I
think
that
you
know
we
as
a
planning
committee.
You
know
within
our
area
plan
and
things
like
out
there.
I
think
we
should
be.
You
know
really.
You
know
taking
these
types
of
things
on
on
board,
so
chair,
I'm
happy
to
propose
this.
I
F
This
report
is
focusing
on
dfi
on
you
know
renewable
and
low
carbon
energy,
as
I
keep
saying,
building
control
of
a
fairly
big
remit
in
terms
of
not
so
much
what
what
the
future
holds,
but
what
the
situation
is
at
present
in
terms
of
building
regulations,
particularly
for
you
know
where
I
see
it
going
or
where
it
needs
to
go
in
terms
of
residential,
because
that's
where
the
vast
majority
are
you
know,
a
huge
amount
of
energy
is
used
residentially
in
people's
homes,
and
that's
rising,
of
course,
at
this
moment
in
time,
and
could
rise
further
and
put
even
more
pressure
on
everyone
and
by
ratio
then
further
pressure
on
the
most
vulnerable.
F
F
By
far
as
you
know,
in
terms
of
having
homes,
you
know
requirements
at
homes
to
be
such
that
less
a
lot
less
energy
is
used,
and
therefore
people
are
spending
a
lot
less
on
energy
and
that's
having
an
immediate
impact
on.
You
know:
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
all
the
rest
of
it,
because
it's
taken
less
energy
to
to
live
in
a
house
or
wherever.
I'm
just
wondering.
I
know
tom's
here.
You
know
what
to
do.
B
Thank
you,
sir.
Yes,
all
of
us
make
a
very
good
point
the,
and
they
can
say
that
the
members
will
remember
that
there
was
a
consultation
just
in
october
time
and
the
central
or
department
of
the
bsp
building
standards.
Branch
within
the
dof
are
now
taking
on
board
all
the
responses,
and
I
can
tell
you
that
there
is
cross-departmental
discussions
as
to
how
to
deliver.
I
should
recall
the
conservation,
fuel
and
power
issue
the
targets,
the
proposal.
B
The
recommended
proposal
was
to
improve
the
targets
by
40
percent,
which
would
bring
northern
ireland
in
line
with
indian
wales,
and
that
was
to
say
that's
one
that
the
members
had
agreed
to
as
the
the
recommended
way.
F
B
And
I
think
that
was
one
that
most
councils
have
agreed
the
best
way
forward,
and
that
is
coming
forward
to
say
the
target
that
those
are
coming
out
later
this
year,
those
proposals,
but
they
are,
I
believe,
with
the
minister
at
the
minute.
But
I
am
aware
that
the
those
departments
are
discussing
with
all
the
various
departments
as
to
how
you
tie
all
these
issues
together
and
so
the
we
will
know
further,
probably
the
end
of
march
as
to
where
we
are
with
that
consulting
response.
With
the
view
I
believe
to
implement.
J
Thanks
chair,
I'm
just
hopping
off
with
the
with
the
draft
response,
just
a
question
and
the
deadline
is:
is
february
11th
and
5
5
pm,
I'm
just
mindful
of
full
sold
as
later
on
in
the
month.
This
is
just
that
opportunity
to
make
amendments,
or
is
your
scope
to
make
amendments
to
the
draft
consultation
thanks.
K
H
I
I
It's
it's
leaning
on
the
back
of
what
obviously
tom
would
have
played
to
alderman
wilson.
There
was
common
knowledge
tom,
we're
behind
republic
of
ireland
and
england
scott
in
the
wheels
in
relation
to
your
construction
methods
for
thermal
and
things.
So,
in
your
opinion,
I
I
think
you
said
march
was
obviously
is
this
enzyme
you're
you're
referring
to
or
is
nz
now
gone,
and
is
there
any
discussions
about
sort
of?
I
I
know
for
a
fact
that
you
know
the
new
bills
that's
being
built
now
are
are
are
not
the
problem,
it's
it's!
The
old
stock.
Is
there
any
plan
to
sort
of
introduce
anything
in
discussions
with
the
department
that
you
know
assist
people
in
upgrading
their
existing?
You
know
thermal
elements,
be
it
roof,
be
it
walls.
I
know
there
was
things
about
windows
and
things
and
stuff
and
boilers,
but
it
needs
to
be
more
than
that.
I'm
sure
you
agree
and
there's
new
methods
out
there.
I
You
can
externally
insulate
and
you
can
do
different
things
and
you
know
had
a
conversation
earlier
on
about
loft
insulation
and
things
like
that.
So
look
there's
things
you
can
do
to
to
the
old
stock,
but
I
suppose
in
relational
there's
any
discussions
with
the
department
of
any
incentive,
because,
obviously
I
I
sure
you
know
counselor
wilson's,
you
know.
Obviously
you
know
buildings
do
have
a
responsibility
in
relation
to
this.
I
Hey
the
amount
of
energy
you
put
in
a
it
has
to
stay
in
and
and
that's
where
insulation
comes
into
it,
but
in
in
in
in
the
context
of
an
old
building,
an
autonomous,
listed
building.
That's
a
different
category.
It's
just
like
you
know,
60s
70s,
which
we
have
plenty
of.
Is
there
any
discussions
in
relation
to
that
type
of
structure?
Getting
some
sort
of
retrofit?
If
you
like
thanks
tom.
B
Thank
you,
sir
well
building
regulations
themselves
as
well
as
cancer,
aware
that
are
primarily
for
new
buildings
or
new
extensions
or,
if
there's
a
major
alteration
to
a
building.
There
are
various
ground
schemes
being
discussed,
I
believe
subjective
finals,
but
when
they
come
forward,
I'm
just
not
quite
sure
this
is
the
phase
one
of
fifa's
approach
that
the
department
are
doing,
but
it's
essentially
target
at
this
point
in
time.
Any
new
construction
works.
B
B
If
you
have
an
existing
wall
and
you're
up,
you
want
to
upgrade
there's
a
minimum
target
at
the
moment
and
the
proposal
is
to
improve
upon
that
again,
but
in
this
first
phase
it's
essentially
for
new
build
new
extensions
and
our
change
of
use,
but
not
the
as
kind
of
quite
maintenance
point.
There
is
quite
a
lot
of
existing
stock
out
there
that
this
will
not
necessarily
address.
E
Thank
you
tom.
You
can
thank
country,
nixon,
okay,
country,
mcclellan,.
L
Yes,
chair
thanks
for
letting
me
in
on
apologies
for
being
a
few
minutes
later
and
yet
anya
was
broadly
supportive
of
the
of
the
responses
we
have
in
front
of
us,
and
I
suppose
it
was
just
to
maybe
highlight
question
six
in
terms
of
the
solar
farms
and
agricultural
land
and
as
as
someone
who
farms
beside
I
recently
installed
at
the
solar
farm,
I
think
it
was
just
to
it
was
just
to
complement
whoever
has
written
the
two
paragraph
response
to
the
to
this
question,
because
I
think
the
they
have
got
the
tone
about
right
in
terms
of
recognizing
the
major
issues,
because
I
know
certainly
you
know
the
the
form
that
I
have
in
my
mind,
or
that
is
my
neighbor
from-
is
some
of
the
best
agricultural
land
that
we
have
with
in
the
borough.
L
E
Thank
you,
councillor,
mclelland
helen
you're,
getting
plenty
of
players
here
tonight
in
your
team.
Okay
members
know
all
our
lights
on,
so
the
recommended
recommendation
was
proposed
by
councillor
nicholson
seconded
by
alderman
wilson,
we're
all
content
members.
E
M
Thank
you,
sir
good
afternoon,
members
members
you'll
see
from
this
report:
information
relating
to
live
case
loads
and
decisions
issued
and
so
on,
and
so
the
headlines
you'll
see
from
the
report.
The
number
of
decisions
issued
during
the
month
of
january
was
87.
M
Number
of
applications
received
in
january
was
89.
I
should
mention
members
that
this
was
a
very
short
reporting
period
because
we
had
our
january
committee
on
the
12th
of
january,
so
it's
actually
a
three
week.
This
is
a
three
week
period
that
we're
reporting
on,
so
the
numbers
are
relatively
low
compared
to
to
normal,
and
so
it
was
87
issued.
89
received
the
current
live
case.
M
E
Thank
you,
damian
country
nicholson,.
I
Yeah
thanks
char
thanks
steven
for
the
report
and
and
look
a
it's
kind
of
as
you
were,
like
you're
sort
of
you've,
steadied
the
ship
and-
and
I
suppose
we're
obviously
aim-
is
to
get
that
1506
down
to
the
manageable
target
that
you're
aiming
for,
and
I
suppose
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
to
you
and
first
is
in
relation
to
staffing.
You
know
a
a:
are
you
fully
staffed?
Is
there
more
that
you
know
you're
you're
still
looking
for
staff?
I
Is
there
definitely
getting
stuff
because
we've
been
about
detailing
that
on
the
other
ones?
It's
completely
all
fail.
Is
it
the
plan
on
portal
has
been
down
this
last
week
or
so,
and
it's
been
a
major
issue.
I've
been
contacted
by
a
number
of
people
about
it
so
and
give
me
an
update
of
where
that
is.
I
know
it's
not
it's
dfi's
and
sort
of
in
charge
of
that
so
I'll.
Just
we
will
update
where
we
are
with
that
one.
So
thank
you.
Thanks
john.
M
Yeah,
thank
you.
Chair
thanks
concert,
nicholson.
I'll
now
start
with
the
second
question
around
the
planning
portal
yeah.
There
have
been
difficulties
with
the
planning
portal
for
about
the
last
three
weeks
and,
if
even
longer,
perhaps
which
are
affecting
not
just
this
council
but
affecting
all
councils
and
all
users
and-
and
I
I
recently
wrote
the
dfi
to
bring
this
to
their
attention
to
find
out
what
exactly
they
could
do
to
address
the
issue.
M
It's
effective
performance
of
the
council
and
every
other
council
and
it's
affecting
anyone
who
uses
it
and
their
response
was
that
they
were
looking
into
it
and
there's
a
meeting.
I
understand
taking
place
today
and
I'm
told
that
that
meeting
will
hopefully
resolve
that.
I
think
the
meeting
is
between
dxe
who
and
maintain
the
current
system
and
on
other
parties,
but
we're
hoping
that
there
will
be.
The
matter
will
be
resolved
today.
M
If
it
isn't,
I
will
be
running
again
to
dfi
to
ask
them
to
urgently
address
it,
because
it's
impact
on
on
ourselves
on
all
users,
so
appreciate
that
the
point
you're
really
and
listen
to
staffing.
Yes,
we
are
having
difficulty
filling
and
some
of
the
posts
that
we
have
at
the
moment,
because
members
will
recall
we
had
a
funding
brought
to
us
last
year
around
april
or
may
last
year
for
five
additional
planners.
We've
only
been
successful
in
filling
two
of
those
five
posts.
M
The
difficulties
we're
having
and
getting
staff
who
are
right
for
the
post
is
incredible.
This
is
being
faced
by
we're
competing
with
every
other
council
to
try
and
get
the
right
staff.
So
it's
proven
very
difficult.
So
we've
only
filled
two
of
the
five
we're
continuing
to
work
with
human
resources
to
find
ways
of
filling
those
posts.
So
we'll
continue
to
work
on
that
and
we
have
two
currently
vacant
posts
within
our
permanent
staff.
M
We're
working
to
replace
those
two
people,
one
is
due
to
start
in
march,
the
other
post,
which
is
a
planning
post,
we're
going
to
advertise
that
as
soon
as
possible,
understand
from
human
resources
that'll
be
in
a
few
weeks
time.
We
then
have
a
number
of
ongoing
vacant
posts
because
of
maternity
and
sickness
absence.
So,
overall
we
have
seven
vacant
posts.
It's
a
14
vacancy
level
at
the
moment
and
at
one
point
you'll
recall
members.
It
was
20
and
we
had
a
20
vacancy
level
for
quite
some
time.
F
Yeah
thanks
thanks
steven
for
the
report.
I
suppose
it's
just
on
the
waiter
point.
I
know
you're
probably
well
aware,
as
many
of
us
are
with
the
audit
office
report
into
planner,
I
suppose
it's
just
it
wouldn't
be,
or
it
would
be
remiss
if
we
didn't.
F
If
we
didn't
pick
up
on
that,
I
suppose
going
back
where
the
start
of
something
I
continually
said
at
the
time
was
the
fact
that
you
are
still
on
your
in
your
response
there
in
terms
of
staffing
and
that's
the
fact
that
we
are
in
competition
with
10
other
councils
and
that's
pretty
stark
in
terms
of
economic
terms,
because
we
do
want
to
be
in
the
borough
that
processes
applications
the
quickest
and
that's
saying
that,
with
with
due
regard
to
all
the
issues
you've
spoken
about
in
terms
of
attracting
staff
and
maintaining
staff,
and
that
so
I
understand
that.
F
But
I'm
just
curious
as
to
what
consultation
with
the
audit
office
have
you
had
prior
to
this
report
and
just
to
get
your
view
on
it
and
going
forward
how
we
seek
to
address
what
is
a
pretty
negative
headline
and
when
the
belfast
telegraph,
where
it
says
nice
planning
system
could
cause
economic
damage.
And
you
know
it
isn't
a
great
headliner,
we're
all
part
of
this
committee
and
we
all
want
to
see
a
situation
where,
where
you
know
applications
are
coming
in
they're
coming
in.
F
But
we
need
to
be
able
to
responsive
to
that
on
the
fees
and
now
that
we're
charging
our
you
know,
reflective
of
that,
and
it
allows
us
to
be
resourced
correctly
and
I
think
that's
maybe
where
we
are
getting
it
right
in
terms
of
our
resource,
a
lot
of
pressure
on
planners
in
terms
of
what's
expected
of
them.
F
I
can
only
imagine
I
know
you
know
if
you're
sitting
with
so
many
case
laws
and
you
don't
get
the-
I
don't
know
many
staff
can
enlighten
me
on
this,
but
you
might
be
struggling
to
see
you
know
a
a
tangible
outcome
of
all
that
other
than
you
know
with
the
applications
process.
But
another
one
has
took
its
place.
So
I'm
going
to
need
to
recognize
that
as
well
in
terms
of
history
and
maybe
in
our
existing
planners.
F
If
we
don't
have
enough
resource
in
place
that
the
load
is
equally
spread
or
spread,
you
know
effectively
to
allow
you
know
a
greater
level
of
work
to
be
done
and
we
don't
burn
our
planners
out
for
a
while
about
our
work
because
which
idea
occurred
to
them
as
well.
And
so
it's
just
reflective
of
those
points,
if
possible,.
E
M
Yeah
thanks
chart
thanks
alderman
wilson
yeah,
you
guys
are
very
good
points
and
you're
getting
released
to
the
audit
report
and
I
was
going
to
mention
earlier.
The
chair
was
going
to
refer
to
it
under
aob
that
the
report
was
published
yesterday
and
very
interesting
read,
I
have
to
say,
and
a
report
on
that
will
come
to
march
committee
and
because
it's
quite
a
lengthy
document,
there's
quite
a
lot
to
it,
and
but
it
does
touch
quite
a
number.
M
It
touches
on
everything
across
the
planning
system,
including
financing
and
resourcing,
and
I
think
it
acknowledges
that,
possibly
from
day
one
that
financing
and
resourcing
wasn't
quite
there.
But
I
don't
I'm
reluctant
to
say
too
much
and
not
until
obviously,
we've
had
a
chance
to
properly
review
it
and
we'll
bring
forward
the
details
next
month,
but
certainly
financing
resourcing
consistency
in
terms
of
approach
to
you
know
planning
particularly
around
processing
applications
and
enforcement
cases
and
touches
on
that.
M
But
it
doesn't
even
restrict
itself
just
to
councils,
but
also
idea
by
as
the
the
regional
planning
authority
in
northern
around
how
they're
performing
as
well.
So
some
very
the
content
is
very
interesting
indeed
and
in
relation
to
ourselves
you
know
absolutely
right.
We
are
competing
with
other
councils
for
staff,
but
it
isn't
even
just
restricted
to
other
councils.
You
know
we're
competing
with,
for
example,
the
planning
and
police
commission
and
others
out
there
and
private
sector
included
for
staff,
and
that
is
proving
extremely
difficult
to
find
the
right
staff.
M
You
know
if
we
wanted
to,
we
could
bring
bodies
in,
but
that's
not
going
to
make
a
difference.
Just
bringing
anyone
in
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get
the
right
people
who
will
hit
the
ground
running
and
we'll
make
a
difference
and
make
a
positive
difference,
and
it's
a
challenge
and
and
we're
exploring
with
human
resources
at
the
moment
with
having
discussions
about
how
we
might
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
differently
to
try
and
fill
the
three
posts
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
M
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
damian.
You
content
eleven
wilson
and
then
we
will
have
that
further
report
next
month
at
council,
wilson.
N
Thank
you
sure.
Thank
you,
damian,
it's
just
a
general
question.
Around
time
frames
I
just
I
was
brought
to
my
attention.
Local
football
club
had
a
an
application
submitted
and
it
was
up
to
this
three
months
before
a
case
officer
was
appointed
to
it.
Is
that
the
general
time
frame,
or
should
somebody
be
appointed
sooner
on
this
earlier
stage.
M
Thank
you
advice
and
know
what
what
what
it
can
tell
you
is
that
all
applications
that
are
submitted
will
be
referred
to
a
planning
officer,
but
it
may
be
a
senior
officer
very
senior
officer
who
takes
it
initially,
who
will
then
transfer
it
to
another
officer
and
after
a
period
of
time,
but
please
be
sure
the
applications
are
not
being
submitted
and
not
going
anywhere.
They
will
be
validated.
We
will
have
consultations
done.
M
We
will
carry
out
our
neighbor
notification
process,
which
is
making
obviously
neighboring
properties
aware
and
the
process
will
start,
but
there
may
be
a
transfer
of
the
application
from
one
officer
to
another
at
some
point
in
time,
and
I
fully
acknowledge
the
concerns
around
time
skills
at
the
moment.
I
touched
upon
this
I
think
last
month
and
where
you
know
the
15-week
target
has
not
been
hit
at
the
moment.
The
you
know
the
difficulties
we
have
around
that
go
back
to
the
challenges
we
had.
M
We've
had
over
the
last
12
or
18
months
and
from
when
coveted-
and
you
know
when
we
look
at
our
statistics
on
our
performance
against
targets
pre-covered,
we
were
performing
extremely
well
and
that
in
the
year
before
covet,
we
we
met
two
of
the
three
statutory
targets.
M
The
one
we
missed
was
our
majors,
but
even
though
we
missed
it,
we
were
significantly
better
than
the
northern
ireland
average,
significantly
better
the
year
before
that
we
met
all
three
of
our
statutory
targets
and
the
year
before
that
you
know
we
were
coming
in
third
out
of
11
councils
and
against
most
of
the
targets
we
were
being
assessed
against,
so
the
covet
has
said
as
badly
the
combination
of
factors
that
have
contributed
to
that
and
but
like,
as
you've,
mentioned
already
we're
trying
to
fight
our
way
out
of
it
and
we're
using
overtime.
M
So
we
are
we're
we're
fighting
back
to
trying
to
come
out
of
it,
confident
that
we
will,
when
we've
all
our
posts
filled
and
that
we
will
start
to
bring
the
caseloads
back
down,
and
that
will
enable
us
to
hear
our
targets
again,
understanding
all
that
we've
still
managed
and
to
hit
one
of
the
three
targets
this
year,
and
we
will
be
very
close
to
meeting
by
the
end
of
this
business
year,
we'll
be
very
close
to
meeting
three
of
the
three
and
that's
taken
on
board.
L
Damian
in
terms
of
you
know,
saying
that
the
finance
and
I'm
resourcing,
perhaps
from
day
one
wasn't
there,
and
also
I'm
certainly
hearing
you
that
you're
not
wanting
to
say
too
much
until
you
have
a
chance
to
maybe
digest
the
report
yesterday.
But
the
one
thing
that
I
would
maybe
you
know
ask
you
on,
or
maybe
even
for
stronger
pressure
on.
Are
you
getting
the
sense
that
there
is
much
of
a
mood
to
go
to
full
cost
recovery
or
something
like
that
that
the
system
would
be
on
a
firmer
footing?
M
Yeah
thanks
sure,
and
thanks
councilman
mcclelland.
Yes,
look,
I
suppose,
when
planning
to
to
local
government
and
the
cost
was
supposed
to
be
cost
neutral.
M
In
other
words,
it
wasn't
going
to
cost
local
government
any
any
additional
finance
or
money,
and
that
hasn't
quite
worked
out,
and
there
are
many
reasons
for
that,
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that's
coming
out
of
the
audit
report
is
whether
or
not,
for
example,
the
planning
fees
that
are
being
charged
at
the
moment
are
are
sufficient
to
help
fully
resource
the
planning
services
across
northern
on
the
various
councils
and
even
dfi
itself.
M
There
is
absolutely
no
doubt
that
whenever
planning
was
transferred
from
central
local
government
that
it
wasn't
properly
resourced
and
there
were
skills
gaps,
for
example-
and
you
know
they
didn't
transfer
staff
who
who
would
have
been
known
as
working
in
special
studies,
retail,
for
example,
minerals
and
the
likes
they
all
of
those
skills
were
not
properly
transferred
to
each
council.
M
Also,
I
I
suppose
what
you
you
could
argue
is
that
the
the
targets
that
were
introduced
for
councils
to
try
and
adhere
to
were
much
more
stringent
than
they
ever
would
have
been
when
the
department
of
the
environment
were
the
planning
authority
here,
and
so
those
more
stringent
targets
were
introduced
without
you
know,
arguably,
without
having
a
fully
resourced
complement
of
staff
in
each
and
every
council,
and
there
is
also
an
inconsistency
in
terms
of
how
you
know
the
staff
were
distributed
across
the
11
councils
and
because,
when
you
look
at
the
case,
slows
across
the
11
councils,
they're
they're
not
the
same.
M
There
are,
you
know
significant
differences
between
what,
for
example,
we
would
have,
and
what
some
of
the
other
concepts
would
have.
We
typically
receive
the
fourth
highest
number
of
planning
applications
across
the
11
councils,
but
when
you
look
at
how
we're
resourced
against
some
of
the
councils
that
have
much
fewer
applications
than
us,
you
know
there
may
not
be
an
awful
lot
of
difference.
So
you
so
arguably
there's
not
a
level
it's
not
a
level
playing
field
on
which
performance
is
being
assessed
at
the
moment.
M
I
said
earlier
we're
reluctant
to
say
too
much
at
this
moment
in
time
until
we've
had
the
detail
of
the
report
properly
reviewed,
but
look
at
hopefully
I'll.
Try
to
answer
your
question
as
honestly
as
I
can,
and
without
having
all
the
details
of
the
report
in
front
of
me,
but
if
there's
anything
further
around
that,
I'm
happy
to
take
it
thanks.
Sir.
G
Thank
you,
chair
on
it's
just
back
to
councillor
wilson's
issued
that
he
raised
in
the
processing
of
the
applications.
G
I
know
the
various
issues
that
are
involved
and
has
been
for
some
time
with
covet
on
such
like
in
the
number
of
staff
has
been
raised
here.
Many
times
and
damien
can
ask
to
the
charity.
You
demon.
Is
there
any
blocking
of
the
system
with
council?
Tease
that's
being
asked,
or
is
it
all
because
of
this
council
that
we
just
can't
go
with
their
even
with
their
own?
G
I
know
it
was
raised
here
remember
last
month,
environmental
health
and
such
like,
but
are
we
in
any
way
being
held
back
and
processing
these?
Are
they
the
same
difficulties?
All
the
console
tees?
It's
just
a
general
question
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
try
and
meet
our
targets
and
make
those
time
frames
like.
I
think,
council,
wilson,
knights
and
three
modes
to
get
the
particular
application
on
board,
and
I
would
like
to
see
that
going
quickly
through
the
system
on.
G
If
there
are
these
applications
can
be
processed
quickly,
that
we
clear
the
tax
and
get
them
out
the
door
yeah.
I
appreciate
those
others,
maybe
are
more
difficult,
not
straightforward,
but
just
a
genuine
opinion
and
damien.
Can
you
see
an
end
game
this
anyway
soon
to
try
and
get
these
applications
to
move
quicker?
Thank
you.
E
M
Yeah
thanks
chair
and
thanks
holden
anderson
yeah,
look.
The
performance
consultaes
is
critical
in
the
in
the
planning
process
and
you
know
I
would
say
that
there's
two
big
issues
and-
and
you
know,
affecting
the
time,
skills
and
processing
and
application.
One
is
the
quality
of
the
application
and
another
is
the
performance
of
the
consultants.
So
they
have
a
big
part
to
play
a
number
of
the
government
departments
at
the
moment
and
are
struggling
with
resourcing
difficulties.
M
Rivers
agency,
for
example-
and
that
does
impact
on
time,
skills
for
responding
to
planning
applications,
and
now
there
is
work
ongoing
across
government
work
at
the
moment
between
councils
and
dfans,
who
want
to
try
and
find
a
way
of
improving
the
consultation
process
working
better
as
council
teams
in
terms
of
what
information
they
receive
when
they
receive
it,
not
over
consulting,
for
example
as
well,
and
that
work
is
ongoing
and
a
new
protocol
was
ruled
out
very
recently
for
all
councils
to
follow
to
transmit
the
process
up.
M
But
if
you've
got
resourcing
challenges
within
some
of
the
government
departments,
it's
you
know
it
is
going
on.
There's
going
to
be
a
delay.
There's
no
there's
no
getting
around
that.
There
are
other
issues
at
the
moment,
for
example,
and
I
water
and
are
raising
issues
in
relation
to
many
applications
at
the
moment
because
of
capacity
issues
within
their
network.
There
was
one
application
which
was
on
the
schedule
for
today's
meeting.
We've
had
to
take
it
off
because
of
an
anti-water
issue
there.
M
Everything
else
was
ready
to
go,
but
because
of
that
anti-water
issue,
it's
had
to
come
off,
which
is
you
know
that
that
would
have
been
within
a
30-week
target
for
a
major
application,
we're
not
going
to
miss
the
target,
so
it's
extremely
frustrating
for
officers
and
for
members.
So
yes,
that
there
there's
that
there
are
many
issues
around
the
the
performance
of
consultants.
I
think
you
touched
upon
the
environmental
health
department
that
look
we.
M
The
issue
was
raised
at
the
last
meeting
and
there
has
been
a
meeting
with
environmental
health
department
and
as
to
what
we
can
do
to
try
and
speed
up
the
response
times
from
them
again.
They
have
had
some
issues
with
losing
staff
and
finding
difficulties
and
replacing
those
staff,
those
members
of
staff-
and
that
has
impacted
on
their
response
times
and
but
we're
working
that
through
with
them
as
to
what
each
side
can
do
to
try
and
make
the
process
work
more
slightly
and
I'm
happy
to
keep
members
updated
on
that.
G
Just
quickly
sharon,
thank
you
for
that
full
response.
So
it's
not
really,
but
when
applications
go
in,
we
as
members
on
others
are
looked
upon
as
the
council
or
the
planning
committee
or
who's
who's
holding
these
applications
up.
But
by
that
response,
damien
there's
many
factors
here
and
constantly.
G
So
it
may
not
all
be
down
to
this
council
on
the
planning
committee,
so
I
think
that
needs
to
be
highlighted
that
the
difficulties
are
going
further
on
the
planning
on
the
planning
committee
here
that
we
have
those
issues
to
plan
and
that
they
catch
up
again
and
to
help
us
and
assist
us
to
get
them
off
and
get
them
cleared.
Thank
you.
M
Yeah
thanks
sure
yeah
thanks
solomon
anderson
and
look
next
month's
time,
I'm
hoping
to
be
in
a
position
to
bring
a
report
to
members
on
the
performance
of
consultation,
because
we
have
some
information.
We've
been
reviewing
that
and
analyzing
that
and
hope
to
be
an
obsession
to
bring
it
to
members
next
month,
which
will
give
you
a
picture
of
how
those
console
different
consultants
are
are
performing
at
the
moment,
and
so
that
may
help
address
some
of
the
issues
you've
raised
thanks
chair.
B
Thank
you,
chair
and
good
afternoon
members,
members
of
the
award
the
council,
received
an
application
in
july
2019
for
a
dual
language
street
sign
in
respect
of
a
specified
street
in
our
council
area.
The
council's
adopted
street
name
in
norman
policy
comprise
two
stages,
as
I'd
learned
in
the
report.
B
As
noted
in
our
report,
this
committee
in
september
last,
following
verification
council
officers,
confirmed
that
the
stage
one
requisite
and
threshold
on
the
policy
had
been
met
and
therefore
the
application
could
progress
to
stage
two
in
line
with
stage
two
on
the
26th
of
november
2021
officers
issued
by
post
a
survey
which
is
an
appendix
one
to
all
occupiers
and
premises
in
the
relevant
street
and
for
the
purpose
of
clarification.
B
B
B
E
Thank
you
tom
for
taking
us
through
that.
Remember,
that's
an
information
on
the
many
questions
you
created
this
stage
once
any
other
hands
up
our
lights
on.
Okay,
I'm
just
happy
to
note.
E
Okay,
having
a
note
around
the
4.3,
then
updating,
building,
control
and
properties
certificate
applications
staying
with
home
and
avery.
B
Thank
you
chair.
This
should
force
keep
members
informed
of
the
workload
under
taken
by
the
building
department
from
the
period
first
of
april
2021
to
31st
of
june
22.,
notably
in
appendix
2.
In
this
first
10
months
period,
this
financial
year
we
received
2751
applications
which
is
actually
342
more
than
equivalent
period.
Last
year.
B
B
In
this
first
10
month
period
we
have
received
administered
3521,
new
applications
and
the
patient
certificates
to
solicitors
and
agents.
Reading
the
property
sales
on
each
of
these.
This
is
actually
878
more
than
the
equivalent
period
last
year,
so
all
of
which
hopefully
issue
signs
of
positive
positivity.
Continued
within
our
borough,
so
this
is
for
members
information.
Have
you
take
any
questions?
Members
may
have.
E
Thank
you
tom
any
questions
or
queries
on
this
one
or
happy
new
members.
Okay,
members
happy
to
note
that
one.
Okay.
Next
item
item
number
five
is
confidential
report,
so
I
need
a
proposer
and
a
second
order
to
move
into
committee,
opposed
by
accounts
for
mccloud
seconded
by
alderman
anderson,
okay.
I
just
have
to
read
out
the
following
statement:
members
and
online
viewers.
In
accordance
with
the
schedule,
6
of
the
local
government,
act
exam
information.
We
will
now
be
moving
into
a
confidential
session
of
the
council.
E
H
E
E
I
K
K
B
K
B
B
B
B
E
E
K
E
E
Back,
I
just
need
to
read
out
the
following
statement:
members
of
the
public
are
advised
that
the
planning
and
regulatory
services
committee
is
being
held
in
council
chamber
and
craig
allen.
Civic
center.
However,
due
to
covert
restrictions,
the
number
of
persons
who
can
be
physically
physically
facilitated
and
the
chamber
is
severely
limited.
As
a
result,
members
of
the
public
are
only
able
to
view
the
meeting
on
youtube
and
anyone
wishing
to
address
the
committee
has
been
invited
in
the
first
instance
as
an
attendee
value.
E
E
Okay
members,
so
first
item
is
appendix
one:
application:
number
law,
eight
slash.
Twenty
twenty
share.
Four:
five:
three
slash
f
members:
this
is
one
that
we
dealt
with
at
the
last
committee,
so
we're
just
conditions
only
today,
but
I'm
gonna
hand
over
to
russian
hammond
and
he'll.
Take
us
through
the
application
over
here.
C
Thank
you,
chair
members
will
recall
at
a
meeting
of
the
planning
and
regulatory
services
committee
on
the
12th
of
january.
It
was
agreed
that
application
number
lawed,
2020
0453
bar
f
for
a
change
of
use
from
a
dwelling
to
a
house
in
multiple
occupancy
at
one
five
six
thomas
reported
and
be
approved,
subject
to
an
additional
condition
requiring
the
submission
of
details
of
a
management
plan.
C
It
was
agreed.
The
wording
of
the
condition
would
be
presented
back
to
the
next
committee
for
members.
Approval
officers
now
propose
the
following
condition
prior
to
the
commencement
of
the
use
of
the
development
here
by
approved
a
management
plan
for
the
proposal,
which
shall
include
details
of
how
the
refuse
from
the
premises
shall
be
stored
and
disposed
of,
shall
be
submitted
to
an
agreed
and
written
by
the
council
and
thereafter
implemented,
and
the
reason
is
to
protect
residential
immunity.
E
Thank
you,
russian,
okay
members,
any
questions
or
queries
on
this
one.
No,
we
had
a
good
debate
last
month.
Otherwise,
councillor
macklin,
happy.
E
Thank
you
country,
come
on
okay
members
of
the
proposal
and
to
accept
the
recommendation
from
councilman
mclennan
second
by
councillor
coleman,
all
the
great
members.
Okay,
all
the
great
and
thank
you,
russian
okay
members
appendix
was
removed
from
the
schedule
it
requires,
as
it
requires
further
consultation
with
environmental
health.
E
Appendix
three
application
number
load:
slash:
twenty
twenty
slash,
one:
zero;
six,
one:
zero,
six:
zero;
okay,
our
hand
over
again
to
rushing
hammer
clinton's,
both
final
officer,
senator
reporting,
powerpoint
presentation
over
to
yourself
racing.
C
C
Firstly,
I'd
like
to
correct
an
error
in
the
report
in
the
section
of
the
report
dealing
with
the
assessment
of
the
proposal
against
plan
and
policy
statement.
Four,
it
states
that
the
existing
dog
kennel
business
is
a
class
b
one
use.
However,
it
should
state
that
is
the
sui
general
issues.
This
does
not
impact
on
the
assessment
of
proposal
against
the
policy
set
out
in
pps4
as
the
preamble
of
pps4
states
that
the
policy
approach
and
associated
guidance
contained
within
the
document
may
be
useful
in
assessing
proposals
for
other
serious
employment
uses.
C
The
application
site
is
located
in
the
rural
area
in
the
southwest
to
the
southwest
settlement
of
larry,
as
defined
in
the
queer
gavin
area
plan.
The
application
site
lies
between
number
15
and
number
19
valley,
durgan
road
and
there's
an
existing
dog
kennel
business
to
the
rear
of
the
site
behind
the
coast
and
wire
fence.
C
The
proposal
has
been
assessed
against
policy
cty
and
pps21
officers
consider
there
to
be
more
than
three
buildings
along
this
section
of
the
road
number
15
at
underside,
building
number
19
and
number
21
all
at
the
frontage
of
the
valley,
durgan
road
and
officers
are
satisfied.
This
constitutes
a
substantial
and
continuously
built
up
frontage
for
the
purposes
of
policy
in
considering
the
size
of
the
gap
in
the
context
of
the
existing
pattern
of
development
officers.
C
Consider
that
the
site
is
a
small
gap
within
a
buildup
frontage
and
two
dwellings
could
be
accommodated
on
the
application
site
whilst
respecting
the
existing
pattern
of
development
along
the
frontage.
Therefore,
the
proposal
is
considered
to
be
acceptable
when
assessed
against
cty1
and
c2a
and
pps21
number
15
valley.
Dugan
road
is
a
b1
listed
building
of
architectural
and
historic
interest.
Historic
environment
division
have
been
consulted
and
read
no
objections,
subject
to
conditions
on
the
siding,
height
and
materials
of
the
building
regards
with
regards
to
the
impact
and
residential
immunity.
C
It
is
considered
that
sufficient
separation
distance
could
be
maintained
to
ensure
those
dwellings
are
of
smallest
scale
and
height
and
would
not
impin
impinge
on
the
immediate
outlook
from
the
marine
dwellings.
However,
a
dog
handling
operation
was
meant
to
planning
permission
by
the
former
doa
in
2012
within
the
cartilage
of
a
residential
property
at
number.
19
valley,
dugan
road,
while
the
canals
currently
in
sight
are
now
larger
than
originally
approved.
The
historical
ortho
photographs
show
these
canons
in
place
since
2014..
C
On
this
basis,
the
buildings
are
immune
from
enforcement
action
and
our
material
to
this
planning
consideration.
The
original
permission
granted
in
2012
did
not
restrict
the
number
of
dogs
that
could
be
kept
at
the
site
and
the
business
was
licensed
for
up
to
40
dogs
at
any
one
time.
Officers
are
concerned
about
the
potential
impact
and
amenity,
given
the
separation
distances,
as
the
candles
are
located
immediately
adjacent
to
the
western
boundary
of
the
application
site.
C
The
dog
kennel
business
has
the
potential
to
give
rise
to
nuisance
from
noise
odor
and
light
over
spill,
as
the
candles
also
have
outside
security
lighting
within
the
premises
and
officers.
Consider
the
scale
of
the
activity
within
30
to
50
meters
of
proposed
dwellings
would
have
a
detrimental
impact
in
the
residential
community
of
the
prospective
occupants
of
the
dwellings.
C
This
view
is
supported
by
the
comments
received
from
the
council's
environmental
health
department
that
have
advised
their
insurmountable
difficulties
associated
with
the
proposal
by
virtue
of
noise
voter
and
vote
light
overspell.
Therefore,
officers
do
not
consider
the
applicant's
application
site
to
be
suitable
for
residential
use
and
that
this
proposal
fails.
Paragraph
5.72
of
the
spps
policy
paid
either
planning
policy
statement.
4
states
that
any
proposal
for
development
in
the
vicinity
of
an
existing
or
approved
economic
development
use
that
would
be
incompatible
with
issues
or
that
will
prejudice
this
future
operation
will
be
refused.
C
It
goes
on
to
advise
that
new
developments
such
as
housing
prejudice,
the
continued
existence
of
a
particular
economic
development
use
officers
in
consultation
with
environmental
health,
accept
that
this
existing
business
is
incompatible
with
the
proposed
dwellings
and
is
likely
to
generate
future
amenity
complaints.
On
this
basis,
the
proposal
fails
to
comply
with
period
of
pps4.
C
C
This
application
be
refused
as
country
to
paragraph
5.72
of
the
sdps,
as
the
proposal
would
fail
to
provide
an
accepting
living,
acceptable
living
environment
for
prospective
residents
for
reason,
noise,
light
over
spill
and
order
from
the
established
drug,
kennel
business
and
the
proposals
country
to
the
isbps
and
pediatric
planning
policy
statement
4,
and
that
the
proposal
is
incompatible
with
the
existing
economic
development.
Use
and
prejudice
is
future
operation
and
I'm
happy
to
take
you
through
the
powerpoint
presentation.
C
Next
slide
and
all
the
red
arrow
will
show
you
the
location
site
just
within
the
general
area
on
the
valley,
dergan
road
next
slide,
please
this
is
our
site
location
plan
and
you
can
see
the
application
site
front
and
onto
the
valley
dugan
road,
as
outlined
in
red
next
slide.
Please.
C
This
is
an
aerial
view
of
the
proposed
site.
Again,
you'll
see
the
area
of
land
from
not
the
valley
during
road,
that's
our
application
site
and
you
can
see
the
dog
panels
just
on
the
western
boundary
of
the
site.
Next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
a
historical
ortho
view
of
the
site
back
in
2014,
showing
the
candles
in
place
at
that
time.
C
This
is
a
photograph
taken
from
the
valley,
durgan
road
that
is
looking
just
our
application
site
on
the
right
hand,
side
there,
you
can
see
the
kennels
just
over
the
crest
of
the
hill
and
that's
number
19
and
number
21
valley,
durgan
road
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
another
photograph
taken
in
the
other
direction.
You
can
look
down
towards
holly
mount
which,
as
you
can
see,
is
enclosed
in
vegetation.
That's
number
15.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you
roshin
and
members.
Also,
one
of
the
tenants
first
team
is
nell
curry
from
environmental
health.
Who'll
be
able
to
take
any
questions.
Also
any
questions.
Members
councillor
savage.
O
Thank
you
very
much,
sir,
and
rushing
thank
you
for
your
report.
If
I
could
sure,
if
I
could
just
ask
rushing
a
question
and
then
one
for
now,
possibly
rushing
if
we
were
minded
to
approve
this
application
on
these
homes
were
built,
could
there
theoretically
be
in
a
few
years
time
an
enforcement
case
against
the
existing
business
by
the
residents
them
homes,
for
a
loss
of
amenity
and
just
for
now,
if
it's
terrifical
now
now
they've
mentioned
insurmountable
concerns
of
a
fair
idea
of
what
they
are.
E
Thank
you,
councilor
savage.
Am
I
bringing
russian
first
on
that
one.
C
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
as
I've
already
outlined
these,
the
kennels
were
originally
granted
ripple
back
in
2012
by
the
landing
wheel.
At
that
time,
there
was
no
restriction
on
the
number
of
dogs
that
we
kept
could
be
kept
at
the
kennels.
Now
the
candles
this
they
were
constructed
and
by
2014
they
were
constructed,
but
obviously
bigger
was
granted
planning
approval,
so
the
buildings
themselves
are
immune.
C
Where
you
know
the
building
has
been
licensed
to
take
up
to
40
dogs
and
has
been
for
a
considerable
number
of
years,
so
it's
unlikely
that
we
would
be
able
to
take
any
enforcement
action
at
this
stage.
However,
that
doesn't
mean
that
a
complaint
couldn't
be
made
by
prospective
residents
and
ie
nuisance
complaint
that
would
be
investigated,
possibly
by
the
environmental
health
team.
P
Yeah
yeah,
the
the
dog
channel
operation,
can
take
up
to
40
dogs
on
the
site,
so
there's
the
likelihood
that
there
will
be
emissions
of
dog
barking
both
day
and
night.
In
fact,
I've
had
two
visitors
out
to
the
site
and
the
witness
dog
barking.
It's
understanding
that
side
operations
include
like
a
two-hour
cleaning
and
feeding
period
morning
and
evenings
and
dogs
get
excited
around
this
time,
there's
an
increased
level
of
working
and,
furthermore,
the
structure
is
of
a
block
work
on
10,
so
it's
got
relatively
low.
P
E
Okay,
alderman
wilson
here
next.
F
P
I'm
not
aware
of
any
other
complaints.
The
other
nearest
residents
are
further
away
than
the
applicant's
site.
I
Yep
thanks
sure
thanks
russian
now
for
your
presentation,
and
I
suppose
this
is
a
new
one
sure
and
we've
we've
actually
got
a
an
info
site,
but
it
would
it's
been
refused
because
of
another
outside
influence,
be
it
the
the
dog
candles
and
obviously
these
kennels
obviously
have
been
built
bigger
than
they
were
approved
and
because
they
were
built
some
time
ago,
the
the
the
enforcement
can't
be
can
be
acted
on
and
and
as
I
say,
it's
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
fair.
To
me.
I
To
be
honest
with
you,
I
know
it's
not
a
plan
on
policy
being
fire,
but
the
doors
seem
to
be
better
in
fairness
in
in
in
that
that
this
this
this
obviously
suitable
site
is
now
being
obviously
hampered
because
of
this.
So
my
question
really
was
is
for
now
really
maybe
rushing
as
well,
but
you
mentioned
30
to
50
meters
rushing
and
not
in
in
your
your
presentation.
I
What's
the
basis
of
that
in
relation
to
the
distance
away
from
the
dog
kennels,
and
I
have
to
say
now,
dogs,
bark
and
I'm
shocked,
you
know
what
I
mean.
I
I
think
anybody
knows
he's
got
a
dog,
a
dog
will
bark
and-
and
I
suppose,
there's
an
element
in
my
head
here
like.
I
I
I
don't
know
it's
just
in
my
head,
just
as
I
say
we
go
through
this
so
many
times
this
committee
within
phil
sites
and
and
and
they're
not
suitable,
but
we've
got
one
that
actually
is
really
really
suitable
and
unfortunately,
and
these
people
are
being
sort
of,
as
I
say,
hindered
by
by
an
existing
dog
business,
but
look
there's
a
couple
of
questions
in
there
sure
and
I'm
happy
to
this
note
now
and
and
russia
has
to
say
thank
you.
C
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
the
measurements
that
are
in
the
report,
obviously
with
a
concept
drone
was
submitted
with
the
application
by
the
by
the
age
and
showing
high
tide
rounds
could
be
accommodated,
and
we,
when
we
measure
that
out
it
is
showing
the
dwells
between
25
and
30
meters
to
the
dog
kennels.
P
Yes,
in
relation
to
noise
complaints,
any
future
residents
can
make
a
noise
complaint.
That
would
the
consequence
of
that
would
mean
that
the
commercial,
I
think,
would
then
be
investigated
and
possible
action
taken
under
the
clean
neighbors
environment
act.
I
Yeah
and
look
thanks
rushing
now
if
your
answers,
and
but
I
see
what
you're
saying
russian,
that
the
building,
but
is
there
a
regulation
how
far
the
building
has
to
be
away
from
the
commercial
internet?
I
I
know
in
in
in
sort
of
countryside
policy
you're
talking
75
meters,
but
that's
for
a
farm
building.
It
is,
is
that
different
within
you
know
this
type
of
economic
sort
of
business,
which
obviously
is
dog
kennels
or
is
it?
E
Thank
you
country,
nicholson.
Rushing
can
I
come
in
on
that
one.
C
Yes,
thank
you
chair.
I'm
not
aware
of
there
being
any
set
distance
that
has
to
be
away
from
commercial
presidents
or
properties,
but
obviously
there's
a
judgment
to
be
made
and
it's
based
on.
You
know
the
business.
That's
there
the
level
of
business.
You
know
how
intense
it
is,
the
amount
of
noise
that
that
could
be
generated
from
the
business,
so
the
75
meters
does
refer
to
distance
from
agricultural
buildings,
but
I'm
not
aware
of
any
any
set
distance
from
commercial
business.
D
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
as
counselor
nicholson
alluded
to
you
know,
this
is
a
new
one
for
this
committee
and
I
suppose
it's
it's
a
very
good
application
to
call
in
and
just
to
have
this
debate
on
this
application.
But
I
suppose
what
I
wanted
to
ask
russian
was
a
genuine
conversations
with
the
applicant
or
indeed
the
agent,
and
did
these
at
all
discuss
any
mitigation
measures
like
you
know,
acoustic
reports
where
you
can
maybe
mitigate
mitigate
against
some
of
the
noise.
D
I
know
we've
done
that
for
around
businesses
and
different
things
in
the
past.
So
and
you
know
I'm
scratching
my
head
here-
it
is
it's
not
often
that
we
get
something
that
fits
the
planet
criteria
and
is
knocked
back
by
you
know
and
I'd
say
it
influences
us
transferring
a
good
similarity.
So
maybe
if
russian
will
dance
out,
please.
E
Thank
you
country,
mcnally.
Russian.
Do
you
want
to
comment
on
that?
Any
potential
mitigation
that
measures
been
discussed.
D
Yeah
and
just
them
briefly
to
follow
on
then,
if
the
applicant
was
to
maybe
submit
an
acoustic
report,
you
know,
and
there
were
certain
specifications
that
come
out
of
that
that
would
allow
you
know
for
that
noise
to
be
minimized.
You
know,
would
that
be
something
that
planners
would
look
at.
C
Certainly,
yes,
sir,
if
there
was
a
report
submitted
with
mitigation
measures
proposed,
we
would
obviously
have
to
look
at
that
and
would
have
to
to
consider.
You
know
what
the
noise
levels
were:
the
ambient
noise
levels,
what
the
noise
levels,
the
result,
noise
levels
that
would
be
in
the
dwellings
and
what
I
would
say
is
in
our
discussions
with
environmental
health.
We
didn't
really
feel
that
you
know
that
wouldn't
necessarily
be
successful,
given
the
proximity
given
the
level
of
dogs,
but
certainly
if
that
were
submitted,
we
would
also
have
to
consider
it.
E
P
In
relation
to
the
mitigation
measures
in
this
particular
situation,
the
problem
here
for
the
applicant
is
that
it
doesn't
have
control
over
the
actual
channels,
so
the
main
mitigation
you'll
be
looking
for.
There
will
be
increased
sound
insulation
of
the
channels
and
then
further
to
that,
an
increased
separation,
distance
and
the
site
as
a
whole
is
very
close
to
the
to
the
to
the
channels.
E
Thanks
thanks
now,
thank
you
that
one
country
mcclelland.
L
L
Mcnally
has
covered
most
of
what
I
was
going
to
raise,
but
I'll
just
mention
a
couple
of
other
things.
Number
one
is
the
topography
of
the
site
would
be
interested
to
hear.
Is
there
any
potential
that
that
could
reduce
the
smell
and
the
other
thing
would
be
the
prevailing
wind?
So
I
would
be
interested
in
hearing
maybe
from
both
russian
and
nile
on
those
two
points.
Thanks
chair.
C
Yes,
thank
you
chair.
The
site
does
rise
up
away
from
the
road
and
their
levels
are
disposed
towards
the
dog
kennels
a
wee
bit
and
I'm
not
sure
that
the
topography
of
the
topography
of
the
site
would
naturally
lend
itself
to
providing
any
additional
mitigation.
C
What
I
also
would
say
is
that
you
know
it's
not
just
concerns
about.
You
know
the
inside
of
the
properties,
the
proposed
properties,
because,
obviously
they
could
propose
additional
mitigation.
By
way
of
you
know,
keeping
windows
closed,
et
cetera,
but
private
immunity.
Space
of
both
properties
would
back
right
up
to
the
kennels.
You
know,
so
it
would
spoil
the
enjoyment
of
their
private
immunity
space
as
well
in
terms
of
noise,
odor
potentially
laid
over
spill
as
well.
So
it's
not
just
about
inside
the
properties
themselves.
P
Just
thought
the
the
predominant
wind
direction
for
this
area
is
southwest
direct
southwesterly
direction,
and
so,
therefore,
if
there
is
any
order
from
the
site,
you
know
the
the
direction
will
be
over
towards
the
proposed
residential
areas.
F
Yeah
thanks
chair,
it's
just
leaning
on
from
that.
I
know
so
I
supposed
to
get
what
roshin
said
there
could
be
mitigations
in
the
construction
of
the
house.
I
suppose
like
a
new,
triple
glaze
and
that's
quite
useful
for
sound
and
deadman
on
that
type
of
purpose.
But
the
issue
is
obviously
in
the
outdoor
I
mean
today,
I'm
just
wondering
in
light
of
that,
given
the
topography
of
the
site
with
the
would
there
not
be
a
requirement
it's
hard
just
to
gauge.
F
You
know,
looking
at
the
look
at
the
slides,
but
there'd
be
an
element
of
having
to
level
off
a
push
in
that
field
or
dig
in,
and
there
could
be
a
case
then
I
know
there's
a
planted
bank
mentioned,
but
would
there
be
any
requirements
for
retaining
type
structures
for
the
embankment
and
with
that
being
the
case,
would
that
not
deflect
or
you
know,
give
the
possibility
of
someone
the
same
being
deflected
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
it's
not
I'm
not
an
expert
by
any
means,
but
it's
just
to
raise
the
quest.
E
C
Thank
you
chair.
Obviously,
this
is
an
outline
application,
so
we
don't
have
full
details
of
what
they're
proposing
in
terms
of
level
say
scale
and
I'm
not
convinced
that
a
retaining
wall
would
be
necessary
here,
and
I
think
you
know
yes,
there
may
be
a
certain
amount
of
cutting
and
cutting
in,
but
it
could
be
graded.
But
again
you
know.
I
don't
think
that
that
would
necessarily
overcome
our
concerns
with
regard
to
the
impact
of
noise,
odor
and
light
overspell
as
well.
G
Thank
you
chair
just
to
rushing
just
for
clarification
approaching.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
correct
in
saying
this,
but
do
we
have
a
a
history
of
something
maybe
similar
brought
the
force
in
relation
to
an
agricultural
building
that
was
in
city
before
we
got
the
application?
I
think
it
may
have
been
around
that
particular
area,
but
I'm
trying
to
establish
it.
G
C
Yes,
you're
you're,
quite
right,
council
or
alderman
anderson.
There
was
an
application
that
was
taken
to
committee
and
probably
maybe
a
year
and
a
half
ago
it
was
for
the
erection
of
an
off-site
replacement.
Dwelling
in
close
proximity
to
an
agricultural
shed
was
which
was
to
house
pigs
and
the
same
you
know.
Very
similar
issues
were
raised
with
regard
to
odor
and
noise
and
where
the
dwelling
was
proposed
was
you
know
it
was
up
close
to
the
shed
and
private
immunity.
C
G
Yes,
I'm
thankful
for
that
clarification.
It
was
something
that
I
I
thought
was
the
back
of
my
mind
somewhere,
so
we
had
that
history,
as
as
a
planning
committee
and
yesterday
we're
working
on
something
similar
here.
I
think
that
that
was
the
case
that
we
find
ourselves
in
a
situation
where
we
have
to
be
consistent
and
ensure
that
and
we
consistent
decisions.
I
E
O
So,
thank
you,
chair,
hey
I'll.
Just
I
think
a
few
cancers
are
later
today.
It's
not
often
you
get
an
infill
state
that
takes
all
the
boxes
in
terms
of
planning
policy
and
the
unfalse
void
of
something
else.
Look
I
think
our
main
consideration
here
has
to
be
the
amenity
you're
talking
40
dogs,
at
that
literally
at
your
back
door.
You
know-
and
I
think
in
previous
plank
uses
some
it's
been
imagined
a
bear.
O
Beware
that
you
take
your
risk
around
it,
but
we
can't
really
consider
that
we
just
have
to
look
at
the
issues
here
and,
as
now
has
alluded
to
you
and
also
in
report
there's
insurmountable
difficulties
from
environmental
health.
So
to
me
that
means
there's
no
mitigations
that
can
be
put
in
place
that
directively
this
you
can't
dogs,
you
can't
regulate
the
noise
of
dogs.
You
know
you
can't
say
I
stopped
barking
at
ten
o'clock
and
started
here
at
six.
You
know
it
doesn't
work
like
that.
O
So
you
know
chair,
I'm
invariant
towards
accepting
that
the
recommendation
is
outlander.
Regrettably,
but
you
know
further
on
down
the
line.
If
these
houses
are
built,
you
know
there
could
be
a
noise
complaint
and
against
the
dog
channel,
and
you
know
had
issues
like
that
before
the
committee,
so
you
know
what
we're
going
to
be
opening
a
can
of
worms
down
at
the
road
for
something
that
we
have
done
ourselves.
So
you
know
that's
where
I'm
sort
of
out
of
the
miniature
thanks.
I
No
look,
obviously,
we've
discussed
this
and
and
then
we've
got
a
an
existing
business,
although
it's
three
times
bigger
than
what
was
approved,
but
unfortunately
it's
going
to
go
through
the
net
and
there's
there's
issues
with
potentially
of
noise
order
and
light.
My
big
issue
is
that
there's
no
legislation
to
say,
because
there
is
dwells
around
us
and
you
know,
there's
no
legislation
to
say
you
have
to
be
x
number
of
meters
away
from
this
facility.
I
So
it's
not
as
if
there's
it's
out
in
the
middle
of
nowhere.
It
is
surrounded
by
dwellings.
So
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
all
over
my
head
sure
at
the
moment.
So
as
I
say,
I
do
feel
as
thin
as
I
guess.
When
you
see
this
coming
the
committee,
you
know
you
ask
yourself
the
question:
would
we
approve
a
to
42-6
meter
dog
piano
up
in
in
a
rural
location
in
in
around
houses?
Probably
not
given
our
our
past
history
but
say
we
are.
I
We
are,
and,
as
I
say,
the
only
thing
that
in
in
my
head
is
that
you
know
if
the
houses
around
aren't
complaining
and
they're
they're
they're
near
as
close
as
as
potentially
these
houses
could
be.
You
know,
that's
that's
the
sort
of
vietnamese.
Thank
you.
F
F
How
long
I
see
him
table
lanes
was
kind
like
I
said
one
thing
I
would
ask,
and
that
is
with
it
being
a
dog
with
me:
there's
no
guarantee
in
any
walk
of
life
or
in
any
you
know,
business
scenario.
Should
that
business
cease.
Does
that
unlock
the
door
so
to
speak,
given
that
the
application
meets
all
the
requirements
for
an
infill?
Is
there
an
opportunity
in
that
scenario
to
revisit
it,
or
you
know,
is
the
very
fact
that
it
is.
F
You
know
it
exists
as
that
type
of
shared
structure
and
what
investigative
sort
of
purpose
or
process
would
planners
go
through
in
the
event
of
somebody
saying,
oh,
that
business
is
no
longer
operating.
Can
I
pursue
an
infill
application
again?
You
know
whose
word
would
be
taken.
Would
there
be
a
check
on
that
and
if
something
else
started
up,
would
that
require
a
change
of
use?
You
know
I
would
be
interested
in
a
wee
bit
of
detail
and
to
be
up
in
terms
around
that
scenario.
E
C
C
Yeah
then,
yes,
if
an
application
came
in,
we
we
would
revisit
it
on
the
basis
of
what
was
on
the
ground
at
that
at
that
moment
in
time,
and
if
it
was
to
be
used
for
something
else.
In
all
likelihood
it
would
require
planning
permission,
and
so
we
would
have
to
go
through
a
process
of
assessing
what
the
change
of
yeast
application
was
and
the
impact
that
it
would
have
on
adjacent
residential
properties,
and
if
we
could
just
go
back
to
one
issue
that
was
raised,
obviously
by
counselor
nicholson.
Yes,
I
accept
there
are.
C
There
are
other
houses
in
close
proximity
to
this
site.
Number
15
is
63
meters
away
from
the
dog
kennels
and
there's
intervening
vegetation
and
out
buildings
and
number
21
is
over
50
meters
away
with
intervening
buildings
and
vegetation,
and
possibly
they
provide
some
level
of
mitigation.
They
certainly
wouldn't
be
as
close
as
these
proposed
properties
and
their
private
immunity.
Space
wouldn't
have
to
roll
up
to
the
boundary
of
the
existing
business.
That's
there.
E
D
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
suppose
I
am
conflicted
on
this
on
this
particular
application
and,
as
opposed
to
the
point
that
I
wanted
to
make,
was
that
it's
just
a
pity
that
the
applicant
or
the
agent
wasn't
here,
because
I
would
have
felt
a
lot
more
comfortable
send
them.
You
know,
go
away
and
try
and
work
on
mitigation
measures,
something
that
would
you
know,
bring
that
level
of
noise
down
to
acceptable
something
up
to
something:
that's
acceptable
to
environmental
health.
D
G
Yes
sure,
thank
you.
Yes,
it
is,
it
is
one
like
it
does
meet
everything
else,
but
looks
like
with
as
infill,
which
is
what
we
haven't
faced
before
with
the
han
and
van
name.
It
is
other
reasons,
but
I
I'm
still
coming
back
at
what
this
committee
has
done
before
on
what
can
be
where
we
would
set
if
we
had
turned
down
an
application
before
with
the
agricultural
dwelling,
which
I
believe
was
similar
to
this
routine,
tells
us
it's
with
the
planning
appeals.
G
Maybe
there's
other
avenues
for
this,
but
someone,
but
we
we
have
been.
We
have
made
a
decision
at
some
summer
there's
another.
My
view
will
have
to
be
very
careful
here,
but
we
can't
they
would
permit
one
and
not
permit
another,
and
that's
where
I'd
have
the
difficulty.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Alderman
anderson.
That
is
a
good
point.
Okay
members
know
all
our
lights
on
our
hands
up,
we're
in
a
debate
stage
any
views
before
we
go
into
the
decision
phase.
E
E
Okay,
I'll
I'll,
second,
that
the
proposal
counter
salvage,
so
a
proposal
on
the
floor
from
cancer
savage
second
by
himself
to
accept
the
recommendation.
Well,
the
great
members.
E
Okay,
thank
you
russian,
for
taking
straight
out,
and
thank
you
now
for
for
come
with
us
committee.
Wish
you
about
all
the
best
for
the
rest
of
the
raven.
Thank
you.
Okay,
members
are
under
appendix
for
application.
Number
lao8
2021
slash
one
three,
seven
one,
slash
f,
I'm
hannah:
where
does
she
need
mcavoy
senior
plan
officer
to
present
the
report
on
powerpoint
presentations.
Q
Thank
you
chair
the
applications
section
54
obligation
to
change
conditions
attached
to
a
previously
approved
retail
development.
The
reason
this
application
is
before
the
plan
and
regulatory
service
committee
is
because
it's
a
major
application
officers
have
taken
that
members
have
read
the
report
and
followed,
so
this
will
be
a
synopsis.
Only
a
section
54
application
is
an
application
for
the
same
development,
but
requesting
different
conditions
to
be
attached.
Q
Q
In
summary,
the
overall
growth
size,
the
retail
unit,
will
remain
as
approved.
However,
as
one
single
unit
rather
than
two,
the
975
square
meters,
convenience
goods
will
remain
as
approved.
However,
the
790
square
meters
of
bulky
retail
goods
approved
will
change
to
comparison
goods.
This
will
also
necessitate
some
internal
changes.
Q
The
overall
impact
on
any
town
center
due
to
this
alterations
will
not
be
significantly
adverse.
The
overall
impact
in
the
lurgantown
center
will
be
four
point:
three
percent
and
two
point:
one
percent
from
crogaven
and
not
0.8
percent
from
porter
down
the
access
and
parking
provision
is
as
approved.
Q
The
overall
proposal
is
investment
of
5
million
in
the
logan
area,
which
has
clear
positive
economic
impacts
for
the
time,
having
regarded
above
and
after
undertaking
a
policy
assessment
and
plan
and
balancing
the
exercise
officer
of
pending
the
double
keys
and
complies
with
the
area
plan,
the
spps
and
all
other
relevant
planning
policies.
On
that
basis,
recommend
the
variance
of
these
conditions
are
approved.
Q
Q
And
that's
the
approved
floor
plan
up
close,
and
this
proposed
floor
plan
so
is
removing
that
internal
wall
between
one
retail
unit
and
that's
a
view
of
the
building
so
as
well
under
construction.
The
present
time,
the
safe
and
safe
inspection,
and
that
is
as
approved
the
same
size,
gross
floor
area
as
approved,
will
remain,
as
is
only
with
one
retail
unit
and
with
a
comparison
gauge
rather
than
bulky
goods.
E
I
Yeah
sure
I
remember
this
application.
It
was
some
time
ago.
I
think
she
needed
to
refer
to
it,
but
just
just
for
clarification
like
from
looking
at
what
we've
got
here
in
front
of
us
realistically,
there's
no
difference
in
the
size
of
the
building.
The
only
changes,
there's
a
wall
that
divided
into
two
units
is
gone
and
on
the
front
elevation.
There's
one
entrance
rather
than
two
I'm
just
looking
at
the
what's
been
built
on
site
and
is
that
in
in
essence,
the
only
difference
is
really
in
relation
to
the
what
we
approved
previously.
E
E
How
many
moving
in
the
session
phase?
Okay
members
will
move
into
the
decision
phase
any
proposals
on
this
one
country.
I
Yeah
sure
I
do
remember
this
one,
and-
and
there
was
a
long
debate
about
this
one
that
night
I
think
there
was
in
relation
to
economic
impact
and
stuff
in
in
in
the
town
center
of
logan
and
and
and
and
it
was
demonstrated
clearly
that
night
that
there
was
minimal
impact
on
it.
It's
it's.
As
I
say
it's
it's
pretty
much,
as
was
approved
previously
borrow
a
few
little
alterations,
so
I'm
happy
to
accept
the
recommendation
proposal.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
country,
nicholson's
proposal,
they're
on
on
the
second
that
proposal
or
alderman
bar
on
zoom.
If
you
want
to
come
in
hold
on
bar.
E
Okay,
thank
you
autumn
embarrassed
the
proposal
on
the
floor
from
country
nicholson's
second
by
alderman
bart,
our
appraisal
recommendation
and
the
other
proposals,
members,
okay,
now
to
innovate
or
I'll
agree
with
that.
Our
proposal,
members
I'll
agreed.
Okay,
thank
you,
shinee
and
thank
you
eamon.
You
had
an
easy
time
tonight:
okay,
members
around
the
appendix
5,
which
has
been
removed
from
the
schedule
as
it
requires
further
consultation
within
the
anti-water
on
the
appendix
six
application
number
la
or
wheat,
slash,
2021,
slash
one
zero
three
one
and
we
need
to
bring
in
cancer
nicholson.
M
M
The
application
site
is
located
in
the
open
countryside
approximately
two
miles
from
warren's
time
as,
therefore,
the
relevant
policy
context
is
provided
by
the
spps
and
pps21,
particularly
cdy
10.,
in
terms
of
the
principle
of
development
officers,
confirmed
that
the
farm
business
is
currently
active
and
has
been
established
in
accordance
with
criteria.
A
of
cty
10
officers
are
also
satisfied
that
no
dwellings
or
development
opportunity
sites
have
been
sold
off
from
from
the
holding
within
the
last
10
years.
There
are
foreign
compliance
with
criteria
b,
cty
10.
in
respect
of
criteria.
M
C
officers,
for
the
reasons
set
out
in
the
detail
of
the
body
of
the
report
are
satisfied
that
new
building
is
visually
linked
with
the
established
group
of
buildings
on
the
farm
officers
are
satisfied.
The
proposal
therefore
complies
with
policy
cty
10
and
therefore
the
principal
development
is
acceptable
in
terms
of
integration
officers.
M
Section
of
the
site
is
within
a
potential
flood
pondage
area,
but
there's
enough
space
beyond
this
area
to
locate
a
dwelling
and
any
ancillary
works.
There
have
been
no
third
party
objections
and
all
concerties
are
favorable,
so
approval
is
recommended,
subject
to
conditions
to
set
out
in
the
report.
M
This
is
an
approach
from
the
east,
so
you
can
see
the
existing
foreign
buildings
and
the
arrow
annotates
the
indicative
position
of
the
dwelling
with
the
farm
buildings
to
the
rear.
Next
slide.
Please
again,
that's
just
another
road
front
is
so
you
can
see
the
position
of
the
site
with
the
red,
the
blue,
arrow
and
the
mature
boundary.
On
the
left
hand,
side
next
slide,
please
again
just
another
view
of
that.
Further,
along
from
the
road
frontage
and
again,
you
can
see
the
farm
buildings
immediately
to
the
rear.
M
E
Say:
lights
on:
okay,
I'll
move
into
the
decision,
phase,
members
and
proposals
on
this
one
answer:
savage.
E
The
counselor
salvage
proposal
on
a
segment
of
wilson.
E
Thank
you,
alderman
wilson's,
a
proposal
from
councillor
savage
second
by
alderman
wilson,
to
appraise
the
recommendation
and
the
other
proposals.
Members.
All
the
proposals
were
all
agreed
in
the
proposal.
Members
agreed.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
liam.
We
need
to
get
the
councilor
nicholson
back
in.
C
Yes,
sir,
thank
you.
Apologies
for
that.
This
application
sticks
fully
planning
permission
for
the
erection
of
two
buildings:
240
meters,
southeast
of
unit
5,
bridgewater
retail
park
bomb
bridge.
The
reason
the
application
is
being
presented
to
committee
tonight
is
because
it's
a
major
application.
C
The
building
will
provide
office,
the
first
building,
one
will
provide
offices
and
building
two
will
provide
storage
and
warehousing
along
with
the
new
access
car
parking
and
associated
site
works.
A
car
park
will
be
provided
to
the
front
of
unit
one
creating
36
parking
spaces,
including
three
disabled
spaces
across
the
frontage,
with
the
provision
of
four
cycle
stands
to
the
front
of
the
building.
C
C
This
facility
is
for
glasgow
and
contracts
who
are
seeking
to
relocate
their
offices
from
glasgow
and
county
down
to
this
location.
The
applicant
estimates
that
the
proposed
development
will
create
over
30
full-time
employees
and
will
represent
a
1.2.5
million
investment
in
the
bandbridge
area.
This
represents
material
consideration
in
the
assessment
of
the
application
and
therefore,
officers
are
giving
way
to
the
matter,
but
not
determining
weight.
C
The
brown
bridge
new
moon
area
plans,
zoning
the
e36
states
that
mixed-use
zonings
are
those
zonings
which
can
accommodate
a
variety
of
uses
which
may
include
light
industrial
class,
b2,
general
industrial
class,
b3
business
class,
b1
storage,
distribution,
class,
b4
dwelling
houses,
class
c1,
community
and
cultural
uses,
class,
d1
and
leisure
class
d2,
where
certain
users
are
inappropriate.
These
are
set
up
in
the
keysight
requirements,
but
therefore
follows
that,
subject
to
any
material
considerations
that
outweigh
the
presumption,
the
principle
to
develop
the
area
of
the
site
for
class
b1
and
class
b4
is
considered
acceptable.
C
The
buildings
are
within
the
complaints
beside
within
the
existing
business
park,
with
proposed
policy
of
mesh
events
and
boundary
treatment
around
the
periphery
of
the
site.
Furthermore,
the
applicant
proposes
soft
landscaping
by
way
of
semi-mature
trees
to
the
front
and
sides
of
the
office
building,
as
well
as
the
addition
of
trees
to
the
front
which
helps
soften
the
hard
standing
areas.
C
Obviously,
therefore,
of
the
opinion
that
proposed
buildings
and
associated
yard
areas
will
not
have
an
unacceptable
vision
impact
and
will
visually
integrate
into
the
immediate
area
the
sites
located
within
the
conference
of
the
atlas
business
park,
the
proposed
b1
and
b4
users
are
compatible
with
the
existing
industrial
employment
uses,
which
consist
of
eos
it
solutions
to
the
west
and
retail
development
site
southwest
set
against
the
poor
going
lounge
use
context.
Officers
are
content.
The
proposal
is
compatible
with
the
context
of
the
surrounding
area.
C
This
is
considered
acceptable
officers
in
consultation
with
dfi
roads
are
content
with
a
proposal
from
a
road
safety
aspect.
Following
consultation
with
the
rivers
agency,
officers
are
satisfied
that
the
proposed
development
will
not
raise
any
detrimental
adverse
impacts
upon
drainage
or
flood
risk
matters.
C
An
assessment
of
the
suitability
of
habitats
and
features
within
the
entire
site
and
wider
area
for
potential
by
a
range
of
protected
species,
including
bats
breeding,
birds,
badger
and
smooth,
were
all
undertaken,
no
evidence
of
other
activity
or
batter
activity
that
activity
was
identified
within
the
survey
no
areas
of
stanton
water
or
suitable
new
habitat
were
identified
within
the
survey
site.
The
event
will
not
involve
the
removal
of
any
hedgerow
vegetation
or
semi-mature
trees.
Therefore,
the
potential
impact
on
foraging
and
commuting
bouts
was
assessed
as
low.
C
The
scrub
vegetation
within
the
site
would
offer
nesting
opportunities
for
a
variety
of
species
of
birds.
Therefore,
in
order
to
avoid
potential
offences,
free
killing
or
injury
of
nesting
birds
under
their
young,
any
necessary
clearance
of
vegetation
shall
be
undertaken
outside
the
bird
nesting
season,
which
runs
from
first
march
to
the
31st
inclusive
officers.
Following
consultation
with
ned
are
content,
the
proposal
is
not
likely
to
harm
a
european
species
or
national
protected
species
in
accordance
with
the
spps
and
the
policies
in
pps2.
C
There
have
been
no
third
party
objections
to
this
proposal
and,
in
regard
to
the
above
and
after
undertaking
a
policy
assessment,
planning,
balance
and
exercise
opposites
are
of
the
opinion
that
the
proposed
development
complies
with
the
area
plan.
The
spps
and
all
other
relevant
planning
policies
on
this
basis
and
subject
to
the
conditions
attached
is
recommended.
The
plan
of
permission
be
granted
and
I'll
just
take
you
through
the
slides.
C
C
C
This
is
the
proposed
elevations
and
floor
plans
of
the
office
building
and
the
proposed
elevations
and
floor
plans
of
the
storage
storage
warehouse
building,
and
this
is
a
view
of
the
site.
This
is
approaching
from
the
northwest
along
the
casca
avenue.
You
can
see
the
radar
just
allocates
where
the
site
is.
C
This
is
at
the
entrance
of
the
site,
so
this
land
has
all
been
recreated
and
has
grassed
over
and
the
species
of
grasses
is
considered
to
be
quite
poor,
and
this
is
from
the
other
side
facing
southwest
looking
back
towards
the
boulevard
retail
park,
and
that
concludes
the
presentation.
Thank
you,
sir.
E
Thank
you
rushing
for
that
for
that
recording
presentation,
okay,
members,
any
questions
or
queries
on
this
one.
E
Seen
any
lights
on
our
hands
up
any
questions
or
we'll
move
into
the
debate
stage.
Okay,
members
will
move
into
the
debate
stage
any
views
on
this
one.
E
I
suppose
myself
will
say
it
is
a
positive
application.
Now
the
business
is
moving
from
the
current
location
to
bomb
bridge,
because
the
additional
additional
advantages
of
that
and
shows
definitely
that
bomb
bridge
is
open
for
business,
so
be
inclined
to
approve
the
recommendation
any
obvious
on
this
one.
E
Thank
you,
aldon
wilson,
any
more
ways
before
I
move
into
the
proposal
stage
or
okay,
am
I
able
to
just
move
into
that
decision
phase
any
proposals
on
the
floor
members
counselor
wilson.
N
Thank
you,
charlie.
I'm
happy
to
propose
accordingly,
with
recommendation
that
I
have
to
account.
Your
sentiment
is
good
that
we're
getting
that
sort
of
investment
into
the
bomb
bridge
and
the
board
generally.
So
it's
most
welcome,
so
I'm
happy
to
propose
accordingly.
O
Thank
you,
sir.
Look.
I'm
happy
that
propose
a
counselor
wilson's,
our
second
cancer
wilson's,
a
proposed
literature,
and
what
can
cover
the
comments
he's
both
made.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
country,
savage
for
a
proposal
from
cancer.
Wilson's
second
by
council,
established
to
approve
the
recommendation.
Other
proposals-
that's
the
name,
that's
on
our
hands
up,
so
we're
all
agreed
with
that.
One
members:
okay!
Well
great!
Thank
you
russian
for
taking
us
through
that
one.
Okay.
Members
are
friends
with
them
here
at
appendix
number.
It
application
number
everywhere.
E
Q
Q
This
traded
plan
policy
statement
along
with
pps
17
control
of
outdoor
advertisements,
provides
the
relevant
policy
contacts
for
assessing
such
proposal
policy.
Ad1
of
pps17
states
that
consent
for
the
display
of
an
advertisement
will
be
granted
providing
the
scheme
respects
immunity
when
assessing
the
context
of
the
general
characteristics
of
the
county
and
does
not
prejudice
public
safety
officers
in
consultation
with
the
environmental
health
department
and
dfa
roads
are
content.
The
city
is
fully
comply
with
policy
in
this
regard.
On
that
basis,
officers
recommend
the
obligation
to
be
granted
consent.
Q
Let's
take
it
through
the
slices
to
show
you
what
the
content
of
that
the
advertisings
are
and
just
refresh
your
memory
where
it
is
next
slide.
Please.
Q
So
it's
not
far
from
the
one
rushing
has
took
you
through
there,
the
last
one
is
actually
just
to
the
northwest
of
it.
So
that's
location,
safe
in
the
general
area
again
within
a
outdoor
boulevard
retail
park
next
slide.
Please
so
that's
a
view,
aerial
view
of
the
proposed
site-
and
you
can
recall
russian
twist
in
the
southeast.
So
it's
within
the
context
of
the
the
retail
development
that's
approved,
so
the
site
location
plan.
It
just
shows
where
the
site
is
in
relation
to
the
building
and
that
the
trolley
bears
is
approved.
Q
So
that's
opposed
a
block
panel
location
of
the
sage
within
that
block
plan,
so
that
just
shows
the
whole
senate.
So
it's
a
familiar
trade,
a
northern
ireland
source
boxes,
spencer,
food
to
advertise
outside
the
brand
that
they're
putting
in
that
particular
retail
unit
and
that's
just
where
the
post
senate
is
and
that
those
are
improved
daily,
trolley
base
that
we
approved
as
part
of
that
application
as
well.
Q
So
that's
a
few
of
the
front
page
and
the
car
parking,
as
you
can
see
as
well
under
construction
the
present
time,
and
so
the
advertisement
will
be
to
the
front
the
windows
longer
and
then
one
projecting
one
in
the
front
facade,
as
well
as
the
trolley
base
that
you're
under
construction.
The
present
time.
E
F
E
F
Suppose
it's
a
it's
another
good
sign
in
terms
of
investment
in
bond
bridge,
in
particular
the
retail
parks,
and
so
that's
encouraging
from
that
aspect
and
economically
so,
given
what
has
been
done
before
us,
I
would
be
moving
with
contentment
towards
a
recommendation
of
approval.
I
Yeah
sure
I
think
again,
I
think
I
remember
this
original
application
coming
through
the
committee
and
I
suppose
it's
like
all
these
types
of
businesses
that
need
signage
and
that's
what
this
application
is.
It's
a
signage
of
a
previous
approval.
So
I
think
it
would
be
churlish
if
we
didn't,
then
it
didn't.
You
know
support
this
this
this
application.
So
that's
that's
pretty
much
a
slam,
dunk
sure
there
you
go
thanks.
E
Yeah
all
signs
are
pointing
towards
an
approval
on
this
one,
any
other
views,
members,
okay,
we'll
move
into
the
decision
phase.
Any
proposals
on
the
four
members
country
nixon.
E
Yeah
proposed
by
clinton
nicholson
seconded
by
alderman
wilson.
Well,
the
grade
members
are
any
other
proposals,
all
the
proposals,
because
they're
all
agreed
in
that
one.
Thank
you,
nade,
okay,
members
on
the
appendix
nine
application,
number
eight
slash,
2021,
slash
one
three:
three:
three
and
hannah:
we're
liam
mcram
senior
planning,
officer
report
and
powerpoint
presentation.
Where
do
you
learn.
M
Thank
you,
sir.
This
application
seeks
full
planning
permission
for
the
refurbishment
and
upgrade
of
the
existing
player
park
in
scarborough
scarborough
park
consists
of
a
number
of
components
in
the
car
park.
Pavilion
football
pets
play
areas
pond
and
weather
parkland
and
public
walkways.
This
application
say
comprises
only
of
the
existing
play
areas
within
sky
arbor
park.
M
M
The
application
is
submitted
involves
the
installation
of
27
pieces
of
play
equipment.
It
is
also
proposed
to
install
leather
bins,
satan
and
picnic
tables,
existing
fencing
to
be
removed
and
replaced
by
grass
embankments,
as
proposed
development,
is
located
in
the
countryside
on
those
specific
policies
and
local
area
plan.
M
Relevant
policy
context
is
provided
by
cty1
lpps21
and
that
refers
to
pps8
for
acceptable
uses
under
policy.
Os3
officers
are
set
out
in
the
body
of
the
report
are
content
that
all
the
criteria
listed
in
policy
os3
have
been
fulfilled,
also
os1
and
ppsc.
It
also
states
that
development
will
not
be
permitted
but
result
in
the
loss
of
open
space.
In
this
instance,
the
existing
site
is
presently
a
children's
play
area,
so
the
use
will
remain
the
same.
M
So
in
this
instance,
the
principle
of
development
is
found
to
be
acceptable
and
that
the
proposal
is
compliant
with
the
spps
policy
cty1
and
pps21,
and
all
the
policies
relevant
in
pbs8
in
terms
of
design,
layout
and
impact
and
timescape
officers
consider
that
the
modernization
of
the
park
through
the
provision
of
new
equipment
will
result
in
the
enhancement
of
the
play
park
facility
and
scarborough
park.
In
overall
terms,
the
proposal
will
not
adversely
impact
on
visual
immunity,
nor
detract
from
the
character
of
the
area
as
the
proposed
development
is
more
visually.
M
Pleasing
than
the
existing
player
part
in
terms
of
access
and
parking
officers
in
consultation
with
dfi
roads
are
of
the
opinion
that
a
considerable
number
of
users
will
be
local
residents
who
will
access
the
parking
foot
notwithstanding
this
officers
consider
the
existing
provision
of
car
parking
available.
The
president
who
serves
the
existing
player
park
is
sufficient
to
accommodate
the
proposed
refurbishment
works
proposed
in
this
application
in
terms
of
impact
on
residential
immunity.
The
closest
residential
dwelling
is
approximately
110
metres
away
in
moody
park.
M
Officers
in
consultation
with
the
environmental
health
department
of
the
council
are
of
the
opinion
that
the
proposal
will
not
have
an
unacceptable
impact
on
the
immunities
of
people
living
adjacent,
particularly
as
the
area
is
already
utilized
as
a
children's
play
area.
In
terms
of
flood
risk,
a
small
portion
of
the
site
is
located
within
an
area
of
potential
flood
plundage
officers
in
consultation
with
rivers
agency
are
of
the
opinion
that
a
drainage
assessment
is
not
required
to
be
submitted.
M
Patient
interests
over
designated
safe
officers
have
considered
the
biodiversity
checklist
that
was
submitted
with
the
application
on
the
ecological
statement
in
the
context
of
planar
policy
statement
2
and
are
content.
The
proposals
are
not
likely
to
result
in
any
unacceptable
adverse
impact
or
damage
to
any
known
priority
habitats
or
species
by
law.
M
There's
an
ariel
view
of
the
site:
you
see
the
football
pitch
to
the
left
hand,
side,
the
core
part
pavilion
just
below
it,
and
our
site
is
just
the
small
sort
of
rail
pass.
You
can
see
on
the
aerial
photograph
there's.
Maybe
a
next
slide.
Please
yeah,
there's
a
sort
of
blown
up
version
over
there,
so
the
existing
clear
part
is
the
sort
of
red
patch,
as
you
can
see,
with
the
sort
of
red
arrays
of
soft
underlay
next
layout.
Please
so
that's
our
site
location
plan.
M
M
I
Yeah
thanks
char
thanks
liam
for
your
presentation
and
I
suppose
it's
a
question
we
do
ask
just
to
make
sure,
and
most
of
these
that
come
forward
is.
Is
there
obviously
equipment
within
that
and
you
did
sort
of
outline
it
for
all
about
at
least
and
it's
just
what
sort
of
you
know
what
what
is
there
in?
I
know
it's
part
of
our
play
strategy,
but
just
I
think
it's
worth
sort
of
you
know.
I
claim
what
there
is
for
all
abilities.
So,
thank
you
sure.
M
Yeah,
thank
you,
sir
yeah.
I
mean
there's
the
27
pieces
of
equipment
are
actually
listed
in
the
report,
so
under
number
two
there
you
will
have
a
wheelchair,
accessible
pod
swing,
an
inclusive
wheelchair
roundabout.
You
will
have
accessible
spring
rocker,
two
number
wheelchair
accessible
trampolines.
So
there's
there's
quite
a
variety
there.
E
A
Thank
you
chair
and
thanks
liam
for
the
report,
liam
just
a
question
on
the
parking
facilities
for
the
vehicles,
people
with
disabilities.
Is
there
adequate
spaces
for
vehicles
or
people
with
disabilities?
I
know
I'm
just
in
referring
to
oxford
islander.
It's
open
very
soon
on
the
spaces
within
immediate
vicinity
of
the
play
park
is
allocated
for
people
with
disability.
M
No,
and
in
this
one
there
is
actually
a
pedestrian
walkway,
which
was
sort
of
shown
in
one
of
the
powerpoints
there,
so
the
actual
car
park
is
situated
approximately
70
meters
from
the
existing
player
park.
This
is
just
a
refurbishment
of
the
player
park,
but
there
are
identified
disabled
parking
spaces
in
in
the
existing
car
park
that
serves
the
facility.
R
E
Thank
you,
aldmanbar,
and
certainly
looking
at
some
of
the
photos.
Some
of
the
current
equipment
looks
a
bit
tired
and
certainly
good
to
see
that
getting
a
full
only
replacement
in
there
any
other
views
on
this
one
members
before
we
move
into
the
decision
phase,
that's
only
like
so
on
our
hands
up,
so
maybe
endless
decision
face
numbers.
Any
proposals
on
this
one,
all
the
lights
going
on
can't
turn
wilson.
You
think
you're
in
first.
N
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
am
happy
to
propose
recommendations.
As
you
quite
rightly
said,
you
see
some
of
the
pictures
of
the
equipment
and
that
they're
saying
they're
tired
is
putting
them.
Mainly.
This
park
has
been
crying
out
for
an
upgrade
for
a
number
of
years.
It's
a
very
busy
player
park
that
is
used
by
the
scarborough
residents,
and
this
investment
is
most
welcome.
Thank
you.
E
I
Thanks
john,
I
can't
help
but
smile
a
little
bit
alderman
bar,
but
there
you
go.
No
look
how
about
a
second,
it's
great
to
see.
You
know
when
we
became
the
abc
council.
It
was
one
of
the
first
strategies
we
put
into
place
and-
and
you
know
it's
great
to
see
all
areas
getting-
you
know
improved
player
parks
and
I
hope
everybody
enjoys
them
all.
So
I'm
happy
to
second
this
river
distance.
Thank
you.
E
Oh
okay,
a
membership
proposal
by
contra
wilson,
second
by
counselor,
nicholson,
to
approve
the
recommendation
and
the
other
proposals.
Members.
You
know
all
the
great
members
proposed
to
brave,
okay,
we're
all
agreed
in
that
one.
Thank
you
liam!
Can
members
run
that
pandex
night
or
appendix
10
application
number
earlier?
E
2021-1572
is
a
discharge
of
condition
I'll
hand
over
to
nia
to
talk
to
study
the
report.
G
I
thank
each
other
just
to
record
a
non-security
interest
in
the
next
three
applications:
10
11
and
12
all
really
up
to
the
game
of
thrones
and
then,
as
I
was
part
of
a
a
comedy
some
time
ago,
we
received
a
presentation
on
the
game
its
own,
so
I'd
be
having
an
open
mind
in
this
and
say
I'm
happy
not
to
sit
in
the
meeting.
Thank
you.
E
I
O
There's
plenty
of
people
around
the
room.
I
don't
know
it's,
it's
a
discharge
of
conditions,
so
you
know
I'm
happy
to
sit
down
with
an
open-minded.
Previous
members
have
stayed
as
well.
E
We'll
record
that
for
your
countryside,
you're
the
same
character,
macklin
and
you're,
the
same
kind
of
wilson,
okay,
we'll
just
note
all
those
but
everyone's
keeping
an
open
mind.
I
I
wasn't
on
the
tour
I
wasn't
working
so
unfortunately,
I
missed
out
but
we're
hand
over
to
schneider
who
talks
about
it.
Q
Q
A
number
of
measures
are
outlined
as
detailed
in
the
report,
including
how
to
encourage
walking
cycling,
use
of
public
transport
and
car
sharing
and
how
to
coordinator
and
how
the
coordinator
will
seek
to
deliver
these,
as
this
condition
also
requires
annual
monitoring
of
proposed
partially
discharging
the
condition
at
this
time.
Only
as
the
first
part
of
the
obligate
condition,
aids
mission
of
the
travel
plan
has
been
submitted
in
light
of
the
above
and
in
consultation
with
the
efi
roads
officers
would
be
content
who
partially
can
discharge
this
condition.
E
Okay,
members
again,
there's
no
powerpoint
presentation
any
questions
or
queries
appreciated
in
this
and
there's
a
discharge
of
a
condition:
nothing
any
lights
on.
Okay,
so
moving
to
the
debate
stage,
any
views
on
this
one
members:
okay,
nothing,
ivs;
okay,
we're
moving
the
legislation.
If
there's
any
proposals
on
this
one
members,
alderman
wilson,.
E
Thanks,
thank
you.
Aldman
wilson
country,
mcdonald,.
L
Yes,
indeed,
sure
are
we
a
bit
like
my
colleague
alderman
wilson,
in
terms
of
never
having
seen
it
on
and
unfortunately
wasn't
on
the
tour
either
we're
very
happy
to
second
the
recommendations.
Thank
you
sure.
E
Q
The
proposal
is
straight,
a
target
could
have
sustainable
benefits
to
the
locality,
and
the
strategy
strategy
estimate
sets
out
how
it
can
create
the
material
good
relations
with
the
local
regional
college,
which
has
a
distinctly
digital
and
creative
arts
focus
within
their
new
campus,
and
it
is
in
close
proximity
to
the
site,
src
and
then
a
military
studios
have
set
out
how
they
intend
to
work
together
and
provide
students
with
experience.
This
industry
can
provide.
E
Okay,
I'm
remembering
again
there's
no
no
powerpoint
presentation
on
this
one
and
again
there's
a
discharge
of
condition.
Any
questions.
Your
queries
first
need
any
lights
on
our
hands
up,
so
we're
moving
to
the
base
stage.
Any
views
on
this
one
members,
nothing
any
hands
on
hands
up
our
lights
on,
so
we'll
move
into
the
station
phase.
Any
proposals
on
this
one
members
can
answer
next.
I
Thanks
chair
and
I
think
that
anybody
who's
on
the
train,
you
can
see
the
benefits
that
this
is
going
to
be
to
the
college
and
especially
those
those
those
those
subjects
that
they're
studying
in
relation
to
filmmaking.
I
E
Councilor
thomann
so
proposed
by
cancer
nixon
second
by
cancer.
Commons
are
appraised
in
our
proposals:
attending
lights
on
so
all
the
great
members.
E
Okay,
so
we're
staying
with
sinead
again
in
our
discharge
condition:
panic
12,
which
is
application
number
area
where
it
slash
2021-1574.
Q
A
uniform
staff
will
be
employed
to
manage
the
car
park
to
ensure
all
visitors
arrive
and
leave
the
car
park
within
their
allocated
time
slot.
Only
as
this
condition
also
requires
that
these
measures
are
monitored
annually,
officers
can
only
partially
discharge
the
condition
at
this
time,
based
on
the
information
submitted
on
a
consultation
with
the
efi
roads
officers,
content
that
this
can
be
partially
discharged.
E
S
E
Country
mclellan
so
proposed
by
councilman,
mclennan,
second
by
councilman
mcclelland
and
the
other
proposals
members.
No,
some
members
all
agreed
in
that
proposal.
E
Okay,
so
that's
that's!
That's
a
great
and
thank
you
shane
for
taking
us
through
those
last
three:
okay
members:
it's
not
even
six
o'clock
and
we're
finished
already
so
an
early
night
for
us.
It's
up
to
myself
to
thank
strategic
director,
olga
head
department,
damien
and
tom
legal
advisor
on
all
of
our
planning
officers
are
attending
the
chamber
and
zoom
our
democratic
services
team,
our
iat
team,
as
well
as
yourselves
members
supposed
to
move
around
this
meeting.
So
I
don't
know
why.
Okay.