►
Description
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council Planning and Regulatory Services Committee on Wednesday the 7th of July 2021 at 3.00pm in the Council Chamber at Craigavon Civic and Conference Centre.
A
B
B
C
Yeah,
thank
you
chair
good
afternoon,
members
hope
you're
well
members.
As
you'll
see
from
this
report,
the
department
for
infrastructure
has
published
a
statistical
bulletin
for
20
2020
2021
and
in
it
provide
details
of
planning
activity
across
northern
ireland,
including
information
progress
against
our
three
statutory
targets.
C
C
You
will
note
also
members
that
the
number
of
planning
applications
received
across
all
councils
was
five
percent
up
on
the
previous
business
year.
While
decisions
issued
were
10
down
of
the
11
councils,
our
council
received
the
fourth
highest
number
of
applications
and
also
issued
the
first-hand
fourth
highest
number
of
decisions
on
major
applications.
We
issued
the
second
highest
number
of
decisions
of
all
11
councils
and
we
concluded
the
third
highest
number
of
enforcement
cases
recording
performance.
C
C
C
Only
three
councils
met
the
target
for
local
applications
and
the
three
councils,
which
met
that
target,
received
significantly
lower
applications
than
we
did,
and
indeed
one
of
those
councils
received
600
applications
less
than
what
we
did.
So
it's
really
just
to
put
that
figure
in
context
members
why
we
didn't
meet
the
target.
Only
three
councils
did,
but
they
received
significantly
lower
numbers
than
what
we
did
across
the
business
year.
C
On
top
of
that,
we
were
operating
from
much
of
the
business
here
without
20
of
our
staff,
while
at
the
same
time
the
number
of
planning
applications
received
reached
record
levels.
Notwithstanding.
All
of
that,
you
will
have
noted
how
well
the
department
performed
issuing
the
fourth
highest
number
of
decisions
across
the
11
councils,
the
second
highest
number
of
decisions
on
major
applications
and
concluding
the
third
highest
number
of
enforcement
cases
in
terms
of
major
applications.
C
So
hopefully,
members
while
targets
and
have
not,
unfortunately
all
been
met
at
this
time,
and
you
will
appreciate
that
in
terms
of
the
quality
of
the
decision-making,
that's
taking
place
and
the
quantity
of
investment
in
the
borough
as
a
result
of
our
decision
making,
particularly
around
major
planning
applications
and
has
been
significant,
and
it
was
really
just
to
set
the
context
for
you
around
that.
But
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions
or
queries
at
all
sure.
Thank
you.
B
D
D
We're
still
running
well
behind.
I
know
we're
in
our
recruitment
stage.
I
don't
know
what
the
latest
update
is
or
not,
but
when
are
we
likely
to
see
some
inroads
into
the
local
development
applications
to
hiring
our
targets
of
15
weeks?
Is
this
going
to
be
drawn
out
the
rest
of
this
year
and
where's
global
next
year?
Maybe
you
could
give
us
a
update
now
and
just
another
quick
point.
D
You
talked
about
only
at
the
only
two
percent
of
our
applications
were
overturned
by
the
planning
committee
from
the
officer's
recommendation,
compared
to
maybe
some
like
30
in
other
council
areas.
Does
that
what
does
that
tell
us
if
30
is
being
overturned
in
other
council
areas?
Are
we
getting
it
right?
Are
they
getting
right
and
the
name
like
there's
a
big
disgrace
here,
two
percent
to
30
percent.
I
just
would
like
to
see
to
hear
your
comments
now.
Thank
you.
C
Yeah
thanks
oliver
anderson
and
you
know
some
very
good
points
and
and
sperm
was
most
beginning
with
the
issue
around
recruitment
and
we
are
trying
to
complete
the
recruitment
process
at
the
moment.
We
have
actually
recruited
three
new
members
of
staff
recently,
but
there
are
still
a
number
of
vacant
posts
to
fill
and
we
are
working
very
very
closely
with
the
human
resources
to
complete
that.
C
The
sickness
absence
post
that
we
have
at
the
moment
we
have
a
number
of
staff
who
are
off
long
term
with
long-term
sickness
and
we're
trying
to
get
through,
go
through
the
process
to
fill
those
posts
as
well,
and
once
we
have
done
that,
we
will
certainly
be
able
to
make
inroads
to
driving
our
numbers
down
and
starting
to
hit
the
the
local
target.
Again.
C
At
the
moment,
we
are
using
overtime
to
keep
our
numbers
under
control,
but
as
we
move
forward
when
we
recruit
and
also,
I
think
when
we
complete
the
some
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
with
members
through
the
service
improvement
plan
in
terms
of
refining
our
decision-making
processes,
reviewing
our
working
practices
and
so
on,
I
think
we'll
start
to
see
the
progress
being
made.
The
difficulty
at
the
moment
is
that
the
application
numbers
coming
in
are
higher
than
ever
before
and
in
in
may
and
june.
C
We
had
190
195
coming
in
record
levels
and
and
that's
a
challenge
for
us
at
a
time
on
our
vacancy
levels
or
so
high
as
well.
So
we
are
working
through
that
process.
Believe
me,
we
are
very
working
very
hard
to
complete
the
recruitment
process
and,
at
the
same
time,
working
extremely
hard.
Our
staff
are
working
extremely
hard
to
keep
the
business
moving
and
day
by
day
and
week
by
week
we
are
reviewing
everything
we
do
to
keep
the
business
moving.
C
Members
for
information
is
piloting
the
submission
of
applications
online
using
our
new
validation
checklist,
which
stops
applications
getting
into
the
system
that
don't
have
all
the
information
they
require
to
assess
them,
and
that
will
certainly
help
our
numbers
on
our
processing
times.
So
they're
just
examples
of
the
sorts
of
things
we're
working
on
at
the
moment
regarding
the
overturn
of
decisions.
C
It's
about
ensuring
that
our
decisions
are
legally
robust,
not
legally
flawed,
that
we
don't
end
up
in
court
and
I
think
our
track
record
has
been
remarkably
good
over
the
last
six
and
a
half
years
and
and
that
I
suppose
the
two
percent
was
a
figure.
We
were
very
pleased
with.
Obviously
you'd
prefer
the
number
overturned,
but
we'll
never
reach
that
point.
But
you
know
it
was
to
provide
some
context
that
maybe
another
counselor
is
those
members.
C
Maybe
don't
think
that
they're
getting
the
detail
and
maybe
the
level
of
detail
that
they
require
to
satisfy
them
to
go
with
the
officer
recommendation.
I
don't
know,
but
it
was
really
just
to
give
you
that
context
and-
and
also
we
thought
you
know
that
figure
around
the
you
know
our
performance
at
a
pool
which
is
the
planning
appeals
commission
standing
by
the
the
recommendations
we
make.
I
mean,
maybe
that's
an
independent
body,
agreeing
with
the
recommendations
we
make,
tells
you
that
we
are.
You
know
from
an
officer
point
of
view.
C
C
So
maybe
going
back
to
to
your
point
as
well
about
the
local
applications
alderman,
it's
because
I
I
think
we,
if
you
look
at
our
track
record
in
previous
years,
covet
has
certainly
impacted.
But
if
you
look
over
the
last
three
or
four
years,
we
have
met
the
local
target
without
any
difficulty,
and
you
know
we
were
well
within
the
15
weeks.
But
this
situation,
we're
in
at
the
moment,
has
proven
extremely
challenging.
So
we
will
work
a
way
out
of
it
through.
E
Thanks
chair,
yes,
damian
just
to
follow
on
from
the
question
from
alderman
anderson
on
your
answer,
just
when
the
recruitment
process
is
complete,
how
are
we
prioritizing
the
backlog,
in
particular
with
the
local
applications?
You
know
we
are
mindful.
You
know.
Applicants
are
paying
for
our
surface
in
the
end
of
the
day.
So
how
can
we
make
that
process.
C
Quicker
yep
through
the
chair
and
yeah.
What
we're
doing
at
the
moment
is
we're
we're
we're
using
overtime
at
the
moment,
and
we
have
been
since
about
the
beginning
of
june
to
basically
make
sure
that
any
new
applications
coming
in
are
moving
and
aren't
sitting
going.
Nowhere
and
our
case
officers
already
have
their
own
day-to-day
planning
applications
to
process,
but
the
overtime
has
been
used
to
make
sure
that
any
new
stuff
coming
in
is
also
moving
and
that
way
we're
keeping
the
business
flowing.
C
So
the
overtime
will
help
us
until
obviously
we
complete
the
recruitment
process,
and
but
I
think
only
when
we
see
that
process
completed
and
we
get
the
additional
bodies
and
we
can
then
start
to
drag
the
numbers
down
and
improve
against
the
targets
and
and
that
we
hope
will
be
you
know.
From
september
onwards,
we
will
start
to
see
some
improvement
there.
We
do,
as
I
said,
already
have
a
number
of
new
officers
in
and
pleased
to
say
they
have
good
experience
and
we're
very
pleased
with
that.
E
B
C
Making
we
always
will
look
at
the
complexity
of
the
applications
and
ensure
that
they
go
to
the
right
officers
and
they
will
always
go
to
the
officers
with
most
experience
and
in
fact
our
majors
team
will
occasionally
take
applications
which
don't
fall
under
the
major
category
but
which
and
maybe
have
significant
economic
or
social
implications
associated
with
them
and
maybe
there's
a
degree
of
complexity
associated
with
them.
We
will
place
those
with
the
correct
officers
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
right
level
of
experience
to
do
with
them.
C
So
it's
a
judgment
call
as
those
applications
come
in.
We
will
look
carefully
at
who
they
go
to
and
at
the
same
time,
we're
making
sure
that
you
know
we
try
to
move
applications
through
the
system,
not
how
I'm
selling
going
nowhere
and
that's
what
the
overtime
is
about.
It's
about
keeping
applications
moving,
they're
not
going
I'll,
be
completely
open
with
you,
they're
not
going
as
quickly
as
we
would
like.
C
But
that
is
the
challenge
we
face
at
the
moment.
We're
we're
doing
everything
we
can
to
stop
things
and
to
keep
things
moving
and
preventing
any
part
of
the
process
from
stalling,
and
that
is
you
know
we're
day
by
day,
we're
constantly
reviewing
how
we're
doing
things
and
we're
tweaking
and
as
we
go
just
in
the
interest
of
keeping
the
business
moving.
F
Yes,
chair
thanks
for
letting
me
in
and
thank
you
damian
for
the
report,
and
certainly
I
would
I
would
echo
the
comments
of
alderman
anderson
in
terms
of
the
surpositives
out
of
this.
I
suppose
my
questions
centers
around
how
how
we
as
a
department
are
say
yourselves,
benchmarked
against
the
other
10
departments
throughout
the
province,
and
you
you
you
have
made
rep.
You
have
made
you've
been
mentioned
to
a
few
measures
and
so
on,
but
I
suppose
for
context.
I'm
interested
in
your
comments
around
two
particular
measures.
F
How
many
of
the
other
10
have
had
the
recruitment
issues
that
we
have
had
with
an
abc
and
the
other
one
is
in
terms
of
the
record
applications
that
we
speak
about
and
that
we
see
every
day
you
know
ice.
I
suppose
how
far
I'd
have
killed
her
or
maybe
are
we
not
out
of
kilter
in
terms
of
having
the
the
record
numbers
because,
certainly
there
there
is
a
lot
of
positives,
but
I
think
it
would
provide
a
little
bit
of
context
a
if
we
had
some
of
your
thoughts
on
those
two
things.
F
C
Thanks
chair
thanks
question
kevin
yeah
and
in
terms
of
what
the
position
is
in
other
councils,
I
mean
I,
I
can't
be
certain
what
their
level
of
vacancy
is
and
no
doubt
they
are
carrying,
and
I
think
most
organizations
should
have
you
know
around
four
percent
consistently
vacancy
level
network
sitting
at
20..
I'd
be
very
surprised
if
any
other
organization
was
was
anywhere
close
to
that
and
in
terms
of
applications
received,
I
mean
the
number
of
applications
across
northern
ireland
last
year
was
up
about
five
percent
general.
C
C
You
know
the
application
number's
up
or
across
the
board,
but
certainly
we
had
1660
applications
last
year,
which
was
the
highest
on
record.
So
I
I
I
would
say
there
could
be
one
or
two
other
councils
that
had
similar
numbers,
for
example,
belfast
and
nuri,
and
possibly
also
mid
ulster,
but
other
than
that
I
mean
there.
There
were.
C
There
was
one
I
think
there
were
three
councils
and
which
had
anywhere
between
400
and
600
applications
fewer
than
us
last
year,
and
you
know
it's
difficult
for
us
to
keep
peace
with
those
councils
when
we're
fuzzing
the
situation
that
we're
in
having
said
that,
in
normal
circumstances,
if
you
go
back
to
pre-covert,
our
track
record
over
the
years
was
extremely
extremely
good.
You
know
we
were
finishing
the
top
three
or
four
of
the
11
councils
in
relation
to
you
know
the
targets
you
know
from
year.
One
was
quite
difficult
for
similar
reasons.
C
F
Yes,
sir,
just
very
very
briefly,
thank
you
damian.
You
know.
I
think
it
certainly
provides
useful
context
in
terms
of
the
overall
conversation
and
it's
and
it's
good
that
we
that
the
recruitment
is
progressing
well
and
the
sooner
that
we're
down
to
the
four
percent
or
less
the
better.
So
thanks
chad,
thanks
tim.
B
C
Yeah,
thank
you
sure.
Yes
can
indeed
remember
it's
just
some
figures
for
you
in
relation
to,
I
suppose,
the
the
business
year
to
date.
So
between
april
and
july
we
decided
438
applications
and
now
that's
225
more
than
for
the
same
period
last
year,
and
indeed
only
62
less
from
this,
the
same
period
from
the
year
before,
which
was
pre-covered
when
we
had
a
full
staffing,
complement
and
lowercase
loads,
so
sort
of
puts
that
figure
into
context
members.
C
During
that
same
period
april
to
july,
we
received
600
applications
and
that
is
164
more
for
the
same
period
last
year,
73
more
than
for
the
same
period
the
year
before.
So
it's
a
very
strong
indicator
of
high
application.
Numbers
have
risen
and
the
current
live
case
load
is
at
1553,
which
is
down
22
on
last
month
and
but
still
a
lot
higher
than
what
we
would
obviously
want
to
see
in
terms
of
call-ins
members.
C
We
had
one
call-in
during
the
month
of
july,
which
takes
it
to
ian
collins
for
the
year
to
do
it
and
then,
in
relation
to
enforcement,
you'll,
see
the
quarterly
enforcement
report,
our
core.
Our
enforcement
number
stand
at
411,
live
cases
and
be
closed
in
82
and
during
quarter
one
and
received
102,
and
then
we
have
a
number
of
appeals
and
court
cases
ongoing
as
well.
Never
so,
and
we
have
a
busy
workload
around
enforcement
as
well,
but
happy
to
take
any
questions.
I'm
not
sure.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
damian.
The
members
have
any
questions
on
that
issue.
We're
on
that
item
3.2,
not
seeing
any
lights
thanks.
You
damian
for
taking
those
two
through
those
three
items
of
information:
okay,
we're
on
the
jdm
agenda
item
four,
which
report
from
the
head
of
building
control
so
we'll
be
heading
over
to
tom
larry
to
take
a
started,
update
on
building
control
and
property
certificate,
application
workload.
A
G
The
very
positive
pre-covered
era,
during
this
four-month
period
we
undertook
811
plan
assessments
and
they
should
just
add
you
standard
decision
notices
on
these.
The
department
also
completed
4
873
site
inspections
in
the
last
four
months,
currently
within
flux
of
applications
and
a
number
of
staff
vacancies.
Our
turnaround
times
are
not
quite
as
fast
as
we'd
like
them
to
be
on
in
contrary
business
plan,
but
we
have
comments
with
recruitment
for
current
breaking
posts
to
address
this
and
hopefully
get
back
on
target
as
quickly
as
possible.
G
B
B
Okay,
so
that
takes
us
on
to
next
day
in
the
item
which
is
confidential
business.
So
I
need
to
take
a
proposal
and
a
sector
to
move
into
committee
proposed
from
alderman
anderson
second
by
councilman,
mccloud,
okay,
I
just
have
to
read
out
the
following
statement:
members
and
online
viewers
in
accordance
with
schedule,
sex
of
a
local
government
exempt
information
will
be
moving
into
a
confidential
session
of
the
council.
This
means
that
we'll
be
turning
off
the
public
fade
of
the
meeting.
This
will
be
returned
when
the
meeting
is
restarted.
B
C
Thank
you
sure,
and
members
yeah,
it's
just
a
a
letter.
We've
received
some
saved
on
23rd
of
july
from
this
burn
at
castle
right
council
just
to
notify
us
of
the
fact
that
they
have
now
sought
a
date
for
independent
examination
of
their
global
development
plan,
and
so
it's
just
to
notify
the
council
of
that
in
accordance
with
the
regulations.
B
Thank
you
damon,
any
members
of
any
queries
on
that
item.
Okay,
having
a
note
agenda
item,
it's
any
other
relevant
business.
I
haven't
received
any
other
relevant
business.
So
that's
us
members
until
they
we
begin
the
item
items
for
our
plan,
application
at
four
o'clock
so
classic
it
t2
turn
off
the
live,
feed
and
see
all
the
viewers
online
and
store.
B
Okay,
thank
you
good
afternoon,
members
you're
all
very
welcome
to
the
plan.
Application
section
of
the
august
column
meeting
just
have
to
read
out
the
following
statement.
Members
of
the
public
are
advised
that
the
planning
and
regulatory
services
committee
is
being
held
in
the
council
chamber
gavin
civic
center.
However,
due
to
covert
restrictions,
the
number
of
persons
who
can
physically
be
facilitated
in
the
chamber
are
severely
limited.
B
As
a
result,
members
of
the
public
are
only
able
to
view
the
meeting
on
youtube
and
anyone
wishing
to
address
the
committee
has
been
invited
in
the
first
instance,
as
meant
as
an
attendee
voucher.
Audio
reporting
is
being
used
to
assist
in
preparing
the
formal
minutes.
Therefore,
anyone
participating
in
the
meeting
consents
to
it
being
recorded
and
being
live
streamed
on
youtube.
B
Appendage
3
has
also
been
removed
from
the
schedule
following
the
sheet
of
late
submission,
which
requires
an
investigation,
so
the
first
appendix
we
will
actually
being
considered
will
be
lao8,
2020
0003
slash,
oh
just
make
sure
that
democratic
services
invited
everyone
into
the
zoom.
With
our
zoom
meeting.
B
I
Sure
the
application
is
for
a
site
for
residential
development,
up
to
85
number
of
dwellings
and
associated
infrastructure,
public
open
space
landscaping
with
access
from
woodfield
glenn
with
the
gate
and
windfall
elements
in
logan.
The
reason
this
application
is
before
the
plan
and
regularly
service
committee
is
because
it's
a
major
application
officers
have
taken
that
members
have
read
the
report
in
full,
including
the
addendum
and,
as
such,
this
will
be
a
synopsis.
I
Officers
would
note
that
the
application
seeks
outline
planning
permission
only
for
residential
development,
with
details
relating
to
citing
design
and
external
appearances,
access
and
landscaping
being
considered
a
preserved
matter
stage,
subject
to
outlane
plan
and
permission
being
granted.
The
applicant
has,
however,
submitted
a
design
concept
statement,
including
an
addictive
concept
layered.
In
support
of
this
outline
proposal,
an
inductive
concept
layout
demonstrates,
in
the
officer's
opinion,
that
the
proposed
development
respects
the
surrounding
context
is
appropriate
to
the
topography
of
the
site
and
consistent
with
the
layout
of
the
adjacent
developments.
I
Given
the
site's
location
relevant
to
the
wastewater
treatment
works,
the
suite
of
reports
have
examined
the
potential
impacts
of
the
wastewater
treatment
works
on
the
proposed
development.
Consultation
with
the
council's
environmental
health
department
agrees
no
concerns
with
regard
to
likely
sources
of
potential
conflict
impacts
on
the
resolution,
immunity
and
respect
of
existing
or
perspective
occupiers,
subject
to
the
conditions
on
these
or
attached.
Within
your
addendum
report,
traffic
surveys
were
undertaken
at
peak
times
the
lock
road
access
locations
and
for
robustness.
I
The
traffic
impact
assessment
also
considered
committed
housing
development
within
the
facility
of
the
development
on
the
ansbar
road.
The
development
will
not
increase
the
traffic
over
the
five
percent
threshold
following
consultation
with
the
efi
rules.
The
company
authority
in
these
matters
the
proposed
access
arrangements.
Surface
development
are
therefore
considered
acceptable
by
officers.
Other
material
considerations,
including
assessment
of
third-party
representations,
have
been
undertaken
and
noted
within
your
reports
overall
officer
of
the
opinion.
I
That
shows
your
a
location
within
the
general
area,
so
it's
to
the
north
of
florigon
off
the
lock
off
the
lock
road
next
slide.
Please,
and
that
is
an
aerial
view
of
the
proposed
site
you'll
see
to
the
north.
The
existing
wish
water
treatment.
It
works
into
the
south
existing
residential
development
with
potentially
three
access
locations
which
are
adopted
roads
in
which
this
particular
development
is
proposing
to
be
accessed
off
next
slide.
Please
others.
I
The
red
line
of
the
site
location
plan
relevant
to
the
wastewater
treatment
works
indeed
the
existing
residential
development
in
the
south
next
slide.
Please
that's
proposed
concept
plan
the
notice
for
information
only
as
such,
we
won't
be
granting
such
a
plan.
However,
it
illustrates
to
officers
how
the
developer
is
all
going
to
potentially
undertake
this
site
in
relation
to
open
space.
You'll
note
there's
an
area
in
the
middle
and
that's
the
local
landscape
policy
area.
I
No
development
has
been
proposed
in
that,
apart
from
a
small
pedestrian
route,
a
footpath
to
give
access
between
the
two
developments
to
encourage
people
as
opposed
to
walk
rather
than
usa,
or
rely
on
the
public
car
or
the
public
transport.
Next
slide,
please
that
just
shows
the
site
in
relation
to
the
area
plan
and
it's
a
red
line
there
in
the
white
area
to
the
northeast
and
it's
a
bit
difficult
to
see,
but
through
the
center
of
that.
Yes,
thanks.
I
The
center
of
that
is
green
area
and
that's
the
local,
a
landscape
policy
area
in
which
the
developer
is
shown
that
there
will
be
no
development
and
we
have
attached
that
condition
to
ensure
that
that
will
be
the
key
to
shut
a
future
reserve
matter.
Application
come
in
if
this
application
does
be
granted
next
slide,
please
I
just
showed
a
photo
in
relation
to
windfall
glenn
access
to
the
northwest
portion
of
the
site.
So
it's
currently
our
agricultural
land
you'll
see
to
the
north
boundary
there.
I
There
is
a
substantial,
mature
screening
which
is
to
be
retained
and
that
segregates
the
site
from
the
wastewater
treatment
works
to
the
north
next
slide,
please,
that
is
a
site,
a
look
and
towards
the
start
area
in
which
all
the
landscaping
is
is
actually
the
local
landscape
policy
area.
So
you
can
see
why
it
was
destined
for
that
purposes,
so
we
have
undertaken-
and
there
has
been
a
tree
serving
that
smell
it.
All.
Those
trees
have
been
to
be
protected
and
no
developments
to
be
undertaken
within
that
area.
I
Only
pedestrian
access
next
slide
and
that
a
view
from
woodfield
ellen's
access,
location
in
existing
access
stopped
off
and
then
access
potentially
in
there
and
to
your
to
the
west.
You
will
see
the
other
side
of
the
local
landscape
policy
area,
which
is
to
be
protected
next
slide.
Please
that
shows
footage
for
four
is
the
other
access.
B
Thank
you
sinead
for
that
presentation.
It
was
noted
there
has
been
an
addendum
report
circulated
to
members,
okay
with
a
number
of
people
wishing
to
make
representation
in
this
application.
First
up
with
mr
stephen
smith
to
make
a
representation
and
objection
to
this
application.
Mr
smith,
you're
very
welcome
to
the
planning
committee.
H
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
speak,
so
I've
got
three
specific
things
that
I
would
like
to
object
on.
One
is
on
the
the
pps
eight
on
open
space
sport
and
recruit
their
recreation.
So
if
you
look
at
the
very
bottom
of
page
11
of
the
report
that
was
sent
out
to
us,
it
says
that
the
the
e
e
I
a
determination
is
that
the
land
in
question
is
for
agriculture
is
currently
in
use
as
agricultural
and
that's
factually
not
true,
and
it
hasn't
been
used
for
agricultural
purposes
in
the
15
years.
H
H
H
H
It
turns
into
a
very
sharp
right-hand
turn
at
the
end
of
it
as
you
go
further
into
the
development
and
we
have
children
cycling
down
that
longer
stretch
of
road
onto
this
smaller
stretch,
there's
been
a
few
near
misses
there
in
the
past
and
another
29
houses
worth
of
cars
is
just
going
to
make
that
even
worse
and
then.
Finally,
it's
the
disruption
to
the
existing
residents
so
and
this
this
development,
my
house,
is
15
years
old.
I
moved
into
it
in
2012.
H
He
starts
building
it,
and
that
has
resulted
in
15
years
of
continuous
building,
15
years
of
continuous
noise,
15
years
of
sort
of
heavy
construction
traffic
racing
up
and
down
the
roads,
with
children
playing
on
them
and
that's
from
all
hours
in
the
morning.
So
that's
from
seven
o'clock
onwards.
We
can
get
that
traffic.
B
B
Right,
that's
part
of
the
application.
Thank
you.
Okay,
next
up
making
a
representation,
we
have
matthew
carlos
from
tetra
tech
who's,
the
agent
to
make
a
representation
in
support
of
the
application.
Mr
crawlers
you're
very
welcome
to
the
committee
and
again
you
have
three
minutes
and
it
will
begin
to
count
down
whenever
you
begin
to
speak
over
to
yourself.
B
J
J
B
J
H
J
B
B
G
B
B
B
J
Okay,
thank
you,
chair
members
of
the
plant
committee.
Thank
you
for
affording
us
the
opportunity
to
address
you.
My
name
is
matthew
krullers,
I'm
a
charter,
town
planner
with
tetra
tech,
and
we
represent
the
applicants
for
this
application
and
we're
pleased
that
council's
plan
department
has
recommended
approval.
I
would
like
to
thank
council's
plan
officers
for
their
efforts
in
progressing
that
to
a
positive
recommendation.
J
The
proposal
seeks
outline
planning
permission
for
residential
development
of
the
85
dwellings
associated
infrastructure,
public,
open
space
and
landscaping
with
pedestrian
and
vehicular
access
from
woodville
glenn,
woodville
gate
and
woodville
elms.
In
summary,
the
proposed
development
fully
accords
with
the
kergavan
area
plan
and
provides
an
appropriate
land
use
at
this
location
within
the
settlement
development
limit
of
lurgan.
The
indicative
layout
provides
a
scheme
with
a
mix
of
semi-detached
attached
dwellings
and
keeping
with
those
found
in
the
immediate
surrounding
area
and
local
context.
J
The
internal
air
allows
connectivity
and
use
between
all
parts
of
the
development,
with
easy
accessibility
for
all
residents
to
develop
areas
of
proposed
public
open
space.
Small
part
of
the
site
is
within
lands
designated
as
a
local
landscape
policy
area.
This
area
will
be
retained
with
the
only
development
and
it
being
a
pedestrian
path
to
facilitate
a
link
between
the
eastern
and
western
sections
of
the
development
areas
of
public
open
space
are
provided
throughout
the
indicative
layout,
thereby
ensuring
that
all
residents
have
readily
accessible
areas
within
a
short
walking
distance
of
their
homes.
J
All
dwellings
and
their
individual
accesses
will
front
onto
the
internal
access
roads.
Providing
informal
surveillance
and
security
throughout
indicative
layout
has
been
designed
to
ensure
that
all
roads
with
past
and
areas
of
public
open
space
are
visibly
open,
thereby
ensuring
a
safe
and
pleasant
living
environment.
Care
has
also
been
taken
in
so
far
as
possible.
Outline
planning
up
the
case
stage
to
ensure
that
the
indicative
layout
has
addressed
the
potential
for
any
overlooking,
and
it
does
not
result
in
loss
of
light
overshadowing
noise
or
general
disturbance.
J
Details
of
height
scale
and
lasting
and
finishes
will
be
confirmed
at
reserve
matter
stage.
Dwellings
will
be
in
keeping
with
and
reflective
of
the
surrounding
residential
area
to
ensure
the
development
of
complements
and
suitably
integrates
with
the
existing
residential
context
of
this
part
of
lurkin
without
any
impact
upon
the
visual
immunity
of
the
surrounding
area
or
adverse
impacts
upon
residential
immunity
of
existing
adjacent
properties.
Planting
and
landscaping
throughout
the
site
will
respect
the
context
in
which
the
site
is
set.
J
To
summarize
proposed
development
complies
with
the
crater
governance
plan,
as
well
as
all
relevant
plant
policy,
guidance
and
advice.
It
is
acceptable
in
land
use
terms
and
will
provide
a
quality
residential
development.
All
matters
used
by
third
parties
helping
status
hardly
considered
an
address
during
the
processing
of
the
application
and
all
statutory
council.
T's
are
content.
Offering
no
objection.
Indicative
load
has
been
very
carefully
considered.
The
elements
of
which
will
be
carried
through
to
the
detailed
design
of
reserve
mileage
stage
will
create
an
attractive
and
sustainable
place
to
live.
J
They
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
the
planning
committee
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
and
trust
that
the
elected
members
agree
that
I'd
employing
permission
not
to
be
granted
both
the
project
architect,
mr
paul
mcgreener,
mcqueen
company,
art,
architects
and
myself
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
mr
crawlers,
and
we
were
able
to
hear
you
clearly
as
an
allocation
and,
as
mr
kruller
pointed
out,
paul
mccraener
from
a
creator
and
co-architects
is
on
the
zoom
as
well.
If
members
have
any
questions,
and
mr
mcgregor
you're
very
welcome
to
the
committee,
okay
members
next
stage
is
member
questions.
So
does
any
members
have
questions
for
the
planning
officer
or
objector
or
agent
counselor
savage.
K
Yeah
thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
to
the
gentleman
for
their
presentation.
Sir.
It's
just
in
relation
to
the
objector
and
the
the
issue
of
open
space.
He
stated
that
the
the
field
wasn't
induced
as
agriculture.
It
could
have
just
asked
it's
pretty
or
not.
Sorry,
sinead
sorry
does
it
does
that
field
have
to
be
in
regular
use
to
the
class?
Does
that
or
is
it
zoned
as
agriculture,
and
therefore
it
is
agriculture,
it
doesn't
need
to
be
a
working
field
or
anything
like
that.
I
There
were
a
number
of
things
I
suppose
we
took
into
consideration
relation
to
what
the
existing
use
of
the
site
is.
First
of
all,
we
obviously
asked
the
applicant:
what's
the
current
use,
that's
this
destiny
of
the
p1
as
agriculture
lands
more.
So
this
application
was
supported
by
a
primary
risk
assessment
and
the
risk
assessment
has
to
go
back
and
look
at
all
the
historical
uses
of
the
site
just
to
ensure
there's
only
contamination,
otherwise
on
any
site,
especially
a
major
application
and
detailing
this.
I
Preliminary
risk
assessment
was
just
done
by
an
independent
body
and
sailor
view
of
the
available
historical
mapping
shows
the
status
being
agricultural
land
throughout
the
recorded
history.
No
structures
were
reported
mopping
from
1833
right
through
to
the
present
time
definition
of
an
agriculture
land
under
the
legislation
for
agricultural
aim.
I
Legislation
would
be
includes
horticulture,
fruit,
growing
land,
creating
metal
land
land
left,
so
it
doesn't
have
to
actually
be
a
livestock
or
are
used
to
grow
crop
to
be
defined
as
agricultural
land
under
the
legislation
in
which
stored
weren't
really
up
to
so
putting
all
that
out
to
him
and-
and
we
would
say
this-
agricultural
land,
while
it
doesn't
have
livestock
or
otherwise,
and
indeed
the
objective
itself
did
a
refer
to
the
land
being
played.
So
you
know
that
wasn't
undertaken
so
all
in
all
collectively.
B
K
H
H
It
is
an
open
space,
no
matter
what
way
you
look
at
it.
If
nothing
has
been
planted
on
there
for
at
least
the
last
15
years,
can
you
really
designate
it
as
agricultural
land
and
use
it
to
destroy
a
habitat
that
is
used?
You
can
see
buzzards
flying
there
today,
you
can
see
bats
there.
Last
night,
my
wife
has
a
video
of
foxes
using
this
habitat,
and
it
is
definitely
not
agricultural
currently,
and
I
don't
know
what
the
legal
sort
of
definition
of
agricultural
land
is.
B
D
I
Yeah
well
the
the
concept
provided.
Obviously
we
will
not
be
approving,
but
the
land
a
through
the
center
of
the
land
is
a
mature
vegetation
which
is
zoned
as
a
local
landscape
policy
area
and
as
opposed
to
provide
a
link
between
the
two
housing
schemes,
the
developer's
proposing
a
pedestrian
link
through
that
in
through
those
mature
trees
to
provide.
So
if
you
were
living
in
one
part,
rather
than
walking
and
driving
right
round
onto
the
lock
road,
you
there
be
a
pedestrian
link
between
the
two.
I
So
our
policy
would
be
encouraging
and
people
to
make
a
means
available
for
people
to
walk
it
throughout
the
development
rather
than
use
the
car,
so
that
they're,
trying
to
as
opposed
to
under
the
concept
produce
this
scheme.
That
will
encourage
people
to
walk
between
the
developments.
If
you
lived
at
one
end
of
the
development
you're
on
the
other
relevant
round,
but
the
current
on
the
lock
road,
you
can
use
a
pedestrian
link.
So
is
that
centerpiece?
I
Sorry,
I'm
pretty
under
the
spot.
Yeah
that's,
but
we
see
the
center
sort
of
area
there
dark.
It
is
a
local
landscape
polisher,
because
they're
actually
right
down
beyond
this
development
right
down
in
the
intel
to
windville
house
there
to
the
southeast,
but
their
concept,
even
though
it
won't
be
ever
it's
not
part
of
this
approval.
It's
only
an
outline
scheme
only
shows
a
pedestrian
link
between
those
two
developments,
or
rather
than
getting
the
car
and
driving
in
right
round.
D
If
I'm
right
here,
that
was
the
case
who
would
look
after
this
and
who
would
provide
this
whole?
What
do
you
call
upkeep
of
a
pathway
or
whatever
going
through,
that
is
the
management
company
or
what's
the
leg
they
had
going
forward?
If
we're
going
to
connect
these
two
pieces
of
development
to
this
particular
particular
space
of
land,
it's
just
getting
my
head
around
further
down
the
line.
D
What
we
could
see
here,
I
do
get
the
point
that
it
would
be
good
to
connect
the
two
bits
of
development,
but
and
keep
traffic
or
track
about
what
is
going
around
the
outside,
but
is
it
likely
there
will
be
a
a
walkway
or
such
or
something
through
that
potato,
but
take
their
peace
land?
We're
not
really
sure
how
we
thank
you.
I
Yeah,
basically,
the
only
thing
we
would
allow
if
this
development
succeeded
was
a
footpath.
He
wouldn't
like
any
other
development.
But
yes,
the
the
the
agent
has
provided.
Lots
of
will
be
a
landscape
management
plan
which
would
cover
all,
including
even
that
bet
in
the
middle,
which
is
the
landscape
policy.
That'll
have
to
be
all
covered
on
the
landscape
management
plan
and
you
know,
probably
from
condition
seven.
I
B
L
B
J
Yeah,
if
I
can
jump
in
there,
I
think
maybe
paul's
dropping
yeah.
I
think
the
whole
sort
of
design
concept
between
the
scheme
and
what
paul
was
trying
to
explain
there
was
that
there's
permeability
between
all
of
the
areas
and
part
of
that
permeability.
That
includes
providing
a
potential
walkway
between
the
two
areas.
So
people
can't
go
between
the
two
that
walkway
and
within
that
area.
That
would
be
dealt
with
by
way
of
a
landscape
management
plan
and
a
management
plan.
J
I
think
that's
been
picked
up
within
the
case
officers
report
as
part
of
the
conditions.
The
wall
will
be
required
to
come
forward
as
part
of
any
reserve
matters,
so
that
would
detail,
as
was
how
that
space
will
be
managed
and
how
it
will
be
looked
after
going
forward
in
the
future
and
any
sort
of
landscaping
and
planting
associated
with
the
scheme.
B
E
Yes,
thanks
church.
Yes,
this
application,
it's
on
whitelands,
so
therefore
the
islam
doesn't
have
a
specific
allocation
or
land
development.
So
just
ask
you
just
to
go
into
more
detail.
I
know
we
have
one
in
the
detail
within
the
report,
but
just
for
the
members
in
the
audience
as
well.
If
you
can
more
detail
how
officers
have
came
to
this
decision
on
high
policy,
you
know
are
how
this
policy
and
fits
with
this
application.
I
Yeah
there
are
a
number
of
areas
say
it's
right:
there
gavin
urban
area,
indeed
the
programmer
plan,
which
is
whiteland,
but
that
basically
means
it's
not
something
for
any
particular
development,
so
it'd
be
open
for
a
number
of
uses,
so
we'd
have
to
look
at
the
use
coming
forward
and
see.
Is
it
acceptable?
I
In
that
case
we
would
look
at
the
surrounding
uses
and
see.
Would
this
particular
use
fit
with
the
surrounding
use?
Some
can
some
cannot?
There
could
be
conflict
between
uses.
The
the
adjacent
uses
around
this
site
is
residential,
so
residential
going
forward
would
be
acceptable
and
the
plan
policy
set
one
says:
favorable.
Consideration
should
be
given
to
development
in
these
particular
areas,
so
it
encourages,
but
it
doesn't
restrict
you
to
any
particular
type
of
development.
So
it's
not
sown
for
housing,
it's
not
so
for
any
purpose.
I
It
leaves
a
choice,
then,
for
developers
coming
forward
that
that
land
may
be
open
to
a
number
of
uses,
but
it
does
say
that
we,
the
development
and
I
think
that
it's
very
strongly
worth
should
be
permitted.
So
it
does
give
us
strong
consumption.
Fear
of
development
in
these
particular
urban
areas,
as
opposed
to
take
the
pressure
off
our
rural
areas
to
show
how
more
housing
these
these
urban
areas.
D
I
Yeah
absolutely
and
such
a
use
could
potentially
have
offensive
conditions
result
in
an
impact
upon
residential
immunity
on
future
occupants.
So
when
later
that,
the
applicant
was
required
to
submit
an
odor
impact
assessment
and
noise
impact
assessment,
a
door
impact
assessment
demonstrated
that
there
would
be
no
potential
for
significant
odor
impact
and
proximity
to
this
a
particular
wastewater
treatment
works.
I
The
noise
report
came
back,
and
that
said,
it
will
be
audible
on
occasions
and
subject
to
that,
then
this
developer
will
have
to
put
in
certain
gleason
it'll
be
more
triple
is
rather
than
your
double
glass
glazing.
In
addition
to
that,
there
is
an
acoustic
barrier
to
be
to
be
erected
as
well
before
the
occupation.
So
there's
a
couple
of
additional
mitigation
measures
in
relation
to
that.
I
In
addition
to
this
is
an
outlying
application
only
so
the
exact
setting
of
where
these
dwellings
are
going
in
relation
to
the
proximity
of
the
wastewater
treatment
works
still
has
to
be
looked
at
and
approved,
and
further
consultation
will
obviously
be
undertaken
with
environmental
health
at
that
their
time.
But
they
have
demonstrated
loss
that
there
is
a
scope
for
residential
dwellings
in
this
particular
aspect
of
the
see.
B
K
Thank
you
chair
for
letting
me
back
in
there.
It's
just
one
further
question.
The
objective
alluded
to
disruptions
in
sage
stated
that
the
recent
development
had
been
15
years
in
the
american.
I
could
have
just
asked
the
apple
account.
I
know
where
we're
at
outland
plan
permission
stage,
but
what
would
their
intention
be?
Would
it
be
to
develop
these
houses
pacemail,
or
would
they
to
build
them
at
in
one
go
or
what's
their
anticipated
time
scale
for
for
the
development
sure,
thanks.
B
J
Sorry,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
on,
I
don't
get
it'll
always
say,
will
depend
on
reserve
matters,
applications
being
submitted
and
those
will
have
to
be
determined
and
approved
and
then
once
those
are
granted,
then
that
would
dictate
sort
of
coming
forward
when
the
development
will
commence.
At
this
stage,
I'm
not
aware
of
anticipated
start
dates.
Unless
mr
mccrainer
would
have
any
comments
or
not,
he
can
maybe
jump
in.
L
B
L
B
F
I
I
I
We
are
asking
for
an
up
to
the
upside
drainage
plan,
a
final
drainage
plan
and
a
network
capacity
check.
So
I
suppose
it's
a
robust
measure
to
ensure
that
if
things
in
the
interim
changed
housing,
developments
can
come
along
before
this
one
and
that
supposed
as
a
protection
against
to
ensure
that
things
have
to
do
exist
because
they'll
exist
in
maybe
potentially
three
years
time
if
things
change
and
just
around
to
smith
and
reserve
matters
at
that
time.
So
it's
an
extra
caveat
supposed
to
protect
us
and
indeed
the
landowners
around
there.
B
H
So
it's
pps8
there's
a
policy
presumption
against
the
loss
of
existing
open
space,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
the
definition
of
the
land
is
agricultural
is
the
primary
support
for
that
pps
to
be
sort
of
over
ruled
yeah
so,
and
I've
just
wanted
to
very
clearly
make
the
case
that
this
is
not
agricultural
land.
This
is
this
is
wild
habitat
life.
This
is
open
space
and
to
use
the
agricultural
land
argument
to
override
the
pps8
policy.
I
You
will
note
from
the
report
that
we
do
go
in
to
see
what
the
functions
of
open
space
are
and
what
they
you
know
in
regards
to
public
value
and
has
there's
any
public
value,
and
indeed
the
objector
has
referred
to
a
potential
species.
There
are
bats
not
on
this
site,
and
we
we
acknowledge
that.
Indeed,
that's
why
a
lot
of
the
trees
have
had
to
be
retained
and
the
robust
conditions
is
that
a
thorough
ecology
report
was
done
on
this
site.
I
So
it's
not
as
if,
because
it's
used
as
agriculture
land
and
not
been
physically
been
been
used
by
livestock
does
not
mean
that
the
applicant
has
neglected
in
their
duties
or
indeed
the
officers
in
assessing
the
ecology
impact
of
this
particular
site.
So
there
has
been
a
thorough
ecology
report
done
on
this.
It's
quite
a
thick
document
and
and
and
advanced
to
the
the
normal
conditions
we
will
attach.
I
You
will
see
there's
a
detailed
condition
16
there,
which
is
a
protective
species
margin
plan,
because
we
would
see,
even
if
there's
nothing
as
regards
to
protective
species
or
bodies
on
the
site.
Now,
in
three
years,
things
could
change
and
to
protect
that
there
are
there's
not
number
16,
there's
a
very
thorough
details,
a
point
of
competent
ecology
and
target
works
has
to
be
undertaken
with
this
reserve
matters
to
ensure
that
there's
no
impact
in
eye
protective
space.
F
I
The
reds,
a
red
location
plan,
a
the
outline,
the
relocation
plan
is,
is
safe,
so
we're
saying
the
site
is
agricultural,
but
there
is
an
area
through
the
center
of
that,
but
assumed
and
that's
a
landscape
policy
area.
So
it's
soon
and
the
reason
it's
owned
is
really
for
for
woodville
house,
but
it
extends.
There
comes
a
mature
belt
of
trees
to
ensure
that
no
development
is
not
protected,
particularly
but
overall,
the
land,
as
I'm
going
to
the
historical
data
is,
is
agricultural.
F
Yes,
indeed,
I'm
kind
of
functioning
for
that.
For
that-
and
maybe
just
the
other
comment
that
would
happen,
it's
perfectly
possible
to
focus
on
to
have
bots
and
to
answer
of
all
such
things
that
that
has
been
mentioned
and
and
still
be
in
a
field
that
is
producing.
So
that's
just
a
comment,
but
I
know
I'm
I'm
strained
from
questions
and
apologies.
Sure.
B
No,
no
qualities
needed
counselor
mcfarland.
Okay
members
have
not
seen
any
more
lights
check,
so
we're
all
content,
maybe
to
move
into
the
maybe
the
debate
section
of
the
meeting
okay.
So
any
members
want
to
give
any
more
views
on
what,
where
they're
leaning
before
we
go
into
any
potential
decision
on
this
councilor.
K
Salvage,
thank
you
sure.
I
I
think
we've
had
to
have
a
good
discussion
there
and
particularly
around
the
agricultural
aspect,
and
if
it
has
been
used
for
agriculture
not
on
to
think
shania's
answer
is
fairly
comprehensive.
Who
did
go
back
in
the
records
and
looked
at
things,
and
she
did
explain
that
you
know
a
field
doesn't
have
to
be
in
constant
use
to
be
classed
as
agriculture.
K
So
I
think
it
may
mean
that
that
point
has
been
clarified
and
I
don't
think
that
that
objection
can
can
really
stand
them
based
on
what
sinead
has
provided
us
with.
So
you
know,
I'm
sort
of
thinking
that
you
know
this
is
an
outline
plan
of
permission,
we're
not
making
any
decisions
as
if
yet
out
of
the
reserve
matter
stage.
So
that's
sort
of
our
my
thoughts
at
the
minute
that
that
it
is
agriculture
around
and
that's
that's
been
clarified
for
us.
B
Thank
you,
thank
you,
country,
savage
and
they
do
crack
now.
This
outline
matters,
so
that's
probably
the
principle
of
developing
it
and
then
and
the
specifics
will
come
back
at
a
later
stage.
Any
other
members
want
to
give
a
sort
of
view,
or
I
think
we
might
be
heading
to
the
decision
on
the
application.
E
Thanks
chair,
yes,
I'm
happy
enough
with
the
officer's
recommendation,
considering
that
it
is
only
outline
approval.
You
know
I
can't
sympathize
with
mr
smith.
You
know
some
of
the
reasons
he's
outlined
and
can
be
and
should
be
addressed
and
reserve
my
honors
stages
as
a
counselor
for
your
area.
Yes,
I
will
have
questions
as
well
in
relation
to
residence
immunity
but
as
this
is
outlined,
and
I'm
happy
with
the
wrap
officer's
recommendation.
K
B
M
Consequently,
the
scope
of
officers
is
in
principle,
more
limited
when
dealing
with
a
section
54
application.
Although
officers
are
entitled
to
consider
the
circumstances
that
led
to
the
previous
conditional
grant
of
planning
commercial,
the
plan
in
history
in
this
application
is
the
permission
was
refused
to
retain
the
unauthorized
extension
built
on
site.
This
refusal
was
appealed
and
the
appeal
was
dismissed.
M
The
applicant
later
sought
to
amend
the
extension
to
reduce
the
height,
and
this
was
approved
with
the
condition
requiring
the
remedial
works
to
be
carried
out
within
three
months.
The
decision
notice,
the
works
were
not
completed
and
a
further
application
for
the
same
works
were
submitted.
This
permission
was
granted
and
required
that
the
works
be
completed
on
or
before
the
30th
of
april
this
year.
M
The
current
application
is
accompanied
by
submission
setting
up
personal
reasons
for
requesting
the
extension
time
frame
on
the
basis
of
the
information
provided.
Officers
are
of
the
opinion
that
this
variation
is
acceptable
and
the
grounds
of
the
proposed
extension
is
still
required
to
be
completed
within
a
relatively
short
time
frame.
M
M
M
M
M
So
this
has
taken
slightly
further
along
and
this
is
you
see
the
steps
that
lead
up
into
the
back
garden
of
numbers
number
three
rules
might
and
the
wall
to
the
left.
There
sorry
right
is
number
one
rosemount's
back
wall
next
slide,
please
so
that's
taken
slightly
further
along
and
shows
that
the
back
of
our
number
one
rules
might
next
slide
please.
M
M
Please
now
this
one's
taken
from
folly
lane
which
is
behind-
and
this
is
looking
over
the
fence
of
number
one-
and
you
can
see
the
extension
at
number
three-
there
is
the
block
work
just
in
the
center
of
the
photograph
and
that
I
think,
oh
sorry,
proposed
plans,
and
that
shows
what
the
proposal
would
look
like
if
it
was
implemented
this
time
and
that's
us.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
D
M
Thank
you
chair.
The
applicant
himself
has
asked
for
to
be
extended
to
completion
before
or
before
the
30th
of
september
this
year
and
the
previous
permissions
that
we
had
granted
all
had
a
period
of
then
and
around
three
to
four
months,
and
he
himself
has
asked
for
an
extension
to
honor
before
the
30th
of
september.
B
B
B
Just
I
have
to
declare
an
interest
in
this
application
because
I'm
a
member
of
sewer.
I
can
confirm
that
I
go
under
this
application
with
an
open
mind,
so
I'm
I'm
content
to
stay
and
don't
know
if
there's
any
other
store
members
country,
mcnally,
country,
magalyn,
councillor
duffy,
all
the
same
able
to
go
in
with
an
open
mind.
Okay,
it's
really
do
you
want
to
take
us
through
the
powerpoint
presentation.
B
M
These
applications
relate
to
the
environmental
improvement
works
at
the
mall
along
church
street
in
town
degree,
and
it's
before
you
this
evening,
because
the
council
is
the
applicant.
The
works
include
new
safety,
railings
handrails
timber,
seating
and
litter
bins,
upgraded
surfacing
and
upgrades
to
the
existing
stone
wall.
The
existing
stone
wall
is
listed
and
therefore
the
works
to
this
wall
also
require
the
list
of
building
consent.
M
M
The
new
surface
is
to
be
resin
bonded
aggregate
and
to
be
golden
quartz
in
colour
they're,
also
going
to
add
corduroy,
paving
to
the
top
and
bottom
of
the
steps
it
is
proposed
to
replace
the
existing
seating
with
traditional
style
benches.
More
in
keeping
with
village
officers
are
content
that
the
proposals
comply
with
the
area
plan,
the
svps
and
all
other
relevant
policies.
It
can
advise
the
consultation
responses
were
favorable
and
that
no
objections
were
received
in
relation
to
either
application.
M
M
M
So
that's
taken
from
church
street
looking
straight
across
so
you'll
see,
there's
the
existing
book
path
and
then
there's
this
raised.
Walkway
next
slide,
please
and
that's,
taken
looking
from
the
same
point,
looking
north
next
slide,
please
so
that's
taken
on
church
straight
looking
towards
the
area.
So
these
these
are
the
steps,
then
that
will
have
the
corduroy
pavonada
to
them
and
the
railings
and
the
next
slide
please
nuts
up
on
top
of
the
walkway
with
the
existing
bench
to
the
left
there.
M
So,
as
you
can
see,
there's
quite
a
wee
drop
there
and
that's
why
the
railings
are
going
along.
It's
predominantly
for
safety
reasons.
Next
slide,
please!
So
this
is
our
layout,
so
we've
got
a
new
surface
along
the
length
of
it.
The
bench
is
replaced
and,
as
I
say,
that
the
railings,
the
addition
to
the
wall
and
the
corridor
ipv
at
the
steps
next
slide,
please
so
that's
what
the
proposed
railings
will
look
like
so
they're,
fairly
traditional
in
character.
M
Next
slide.
Please
that's
our
wall
details
and
the
next
slide
shows
our
street
furniture,
railings
and
paths.
So
the
idea
is
that
everything
will
be
more
traditional
than
what's
already
there
and
she'd
be
more
in
keeping
with
the
the
character
of
the
list
of
buildings
behind
on
the
the
character
of
the
village,
and
that
should
be
us.
Thank
you.
B
B
Maybe
I'll
start
the
ballroom.
Certainly,
I
think
would
be
good
to
have
a
reeling
along
that
walkway.
It
seemed
to
be
quite
a
quite
of
a
drop
there
and
there's
as
well
as
other
handrails,
to
get
up
on
the
on
top
of
it.
So
it
seems
to
be
a
very,
very
reasonable
one
to
approve,
and
maybe,
if
any
members
have
any
views
on
that
not
seeing
any
lights,
so
alderman
anderson.
D
Thank
you
chair,
certainly
I
I
would
welcome
this
proposal
and,
as
you've
said
it's
for
the
safety
reasons
as
well.
It's
been
like
that
for
many
many
years
and
to
to
do
that
and
to
bring
it
up
with
traditional
type
materials
and
such
I
think,
I'd
well,
I
thought
I'd
sort
of
development
and
should
odd
to
the
look
of
choices
in
a
long
condor
either,
and
I
would
certainly
propose
acceptance
of
this
this
evening.
Thank
you
this
afternoon.
B
F
B
Is
there
any
other
proposals
on
the
floor
and
see
honestly
all
the
great
and
the
fold
proposal,
all
the
grading
we're
all
about
agreed
on
the
list
of
building
consent,
all
the
great
okay?
So
that's
appendix
six
and
seven
all
I'll
talk
about
the
potato
factories
make
them
hungry,
but
we'll
play
on
appendix
it's
application
number
law
at
2020,
0193-0,
I'm
going
to
hand
over
to
nicola
craney
senior
planning
officer
to
present
the
report
and
powerpoint
presentation.
N
N
This
is
a
renewal
of
planning
permission
which
has
been
considered
against
current
planning
policy,
and
there
are
no
objections
from
any
of
the
main
consultaes.
The
main
determinant
issues
are
said
out
in
the
planning
report
and
in
terms
of
the
principle
of
development.
The
site
is
in
the
rural
area
and
close
to
puerto
dyne,
and
the
main
planning
policy
is
pps21.
N
One
of
the
policies
is
cty
10
to
permit
the
development
of
a
dwelling
at
farm.
The
applicant
has
a
horticultural
business
has
not
sold
off
any
opportunities
and
the
site
is
located
to
cluster
with
buildings.
On
the
farm
to
comply
with
the
policy
requirements
and
the
proposal
will
integrate
to
the
site
and
would
not
an
officer's
opinion
impact
rural
character
in
terms
of
access
and
traffic
dfi
roads
and
their
response
state
that
they
have
no
objection
and
a
suitable
access
can
be
provided
in
terms
of
impact
on
residential
amenity.
N
There
is
adequate
separation,
however,
this
is
an
application
for
outline
planning
permission
and
all
matters
relating
to
design
and
layout
are
without
prejudice
reserved
for
future
consideration
in
terms
of
the
impact
on
built
and
natural
environment.
A
biodiversity
checklist
has
been
submitted
and
there
are
no
issues
of
concern
and
without
prejudice,
siege,
disposable,
under
cty
16
could
be
conditioned
and
again,
officer's
recommendation
is
to
approve
and
I'll
just
go
through
the
powerpoint.
N
N
Okay
next
slide,
please
thanks
ruth,
as
you
can
see,
the
site's
just
on
the
edge
ported
down
to
the
west
next
slide
place,
that's
the
site,
then,
in
terms
of
its
location,
on
an
aerial
view,
you
can
see
number
14
and
number
19
opposite
here.
Okay,
next
slide,
please
this
site
location
plans
just
turn
the
other
direction,
but
the
same
seems
like
next
slide.
Please
and
this
photograph
of
the
site
next
slide
place.
N
This
is
a
photograph
then,
from
of
the
view
from
the
roadside
next
slide
place,
and
you
can
see,
then
the
roadside
and
there's
already
the
hedge
is
already
set
back
from
the
road
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
the
view
then
further
along
looking
a
few
from
this
from
the
roadside
to
the
north
end,
and
you
can
see
the
site
is
in
on
the
right
hand,
side
next
slide.
Please,
and
this
is
number
14's,
that
the
farm
dwelling
and
the
site
will
be
in
to
the
rear
over
to
the
right
hand.
B
B
Let's
turn
any
lights
on
mine
seems
like
you
know,
it's
obviously
here
because
it's
a
you
know
a
planned
officer,
but
it
seems
that'll,
be
you
know,
it's
met
all
the
criteria
in
terms
of
being
acceptable,
so
I
think
that
the
proposals
are
prepared.
Our
recommendation
approves
correctness
instance.
Maybe
anyway,
cameras
maybe
move
into
the
decision
phase.
Does
any
members
have
any
proposals
on
this
application?
Counseling.
F
B
Are
there
any
other
proposals
on
the
floor
members?
I'm
not
saying
any
of
that
so
happy
to
accept
I'll
agreed
with
the
recommendation
and
proposal
there.
Okay,
great!
Thank
you
nicola
move
on
to
appendix
9's
application
application
number
lao
with
slash
2021,
slash,
0269,
slash,
f
hand
over
to
schneider
mcavoy
senior
plan,
present
senior
plan
officer
to
present
the
report.
I
Thank
you
sure.
The
reason
this
application
is
before
the
planner
regulatory
service
committee
is
because
it
relates
to
previous
plan
approval,
which
was
a
major
application
condition
number
15
required
that
the
groundwater
monitoring
plan
did
its
26th
of
august.
2020
shall
be
implemented
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
planned
authority
monitoring
record.
Shall
we
maintain
and
submit
to
the
platinum
authority
upon
request
this
application
seeks
to
vary
the
groundwater
monitoring
plan
and
relation
to
the
frequency
and
scope
of
sampling
based
upon
the
data
collected
over
the
quarterly
and
monarch
and
monthly
monitoring
period.
I
There
is
no
indication
of
any
significant
impact
upon
surface
water
of
groundwater
quality
from
the
dewatering
operation,
now
you're
underway
at
this
quarry
based
upon
these
results
that
it's
now
proposed
to
revise
the
target
monitoring
schedule
from
that
previously
approved
under
the
groundwater
monitoring
plan
date
of
the
26th
of
august
2020
consultation
has
been
carried
with
dira
land
and
groundwater
team
regulation
unit,
and
they
have
concluded
that,
on
the
basis
of
the
information
about
it,
they
are
content
that
this
proposal
to
vary
the
condition
is
acceptable.
On
that
basis,
we
would
be
of
the
opinion.
I
K
Thank
you
chair.
She
had
a
sense
of
what
what
what
would
been
told
is
that,
but
the
records
that
did
show
that
there's
no
issue
on
it's
just
the
case
that
they
want
to
to
vary
the
testing
so
that
a
ranking
is
okay.
So
far,
so
there's
no
way
she's
been
highlighted,
and
it's
just
a
case
that
you
know
that
the
test
is
going
to
be
on
a
less
regular
basis.
Then.
I
There's
just
a
couple
of
things
that
they
don't
need
to
really
look
at
and
sample
due
to
what
was
found
in
it.
There
still
will
be
sample
and
there's
still
a
requirement.
It's
a
cod
which
is
chemical
action,
oxygen
demand
and
body
which
is
biological
oxygen
to
bond.
So
those
particular
things
that
it
was
had
to
be
included
in
every
sort
of
dewatering
monitoring
report.
I
But
after
the
results
have
found,
they
don't
need
to
monitor
these
because
it's
not
found
within
the
surface
water
and
so
the
metals
out
there,
and
so
in
light
of
that
that
what
they
have
to
do
any
revision
to
the
monitoring
plan
under
niel.
Lessons
didn't
have
to
come
through
us
because
we
specifically
conditioned
that
they
have
to
adhere
to
the
previous
ones.
There's
no
point
doing
monitoring
first
for
something
that
doesn't
exist
and
those
particular
two
aspects
don't
exist
in
this
water.
F
Thanks
for
letting
me
in,
and
thank
you
to
cheney
for
the
presentation
and
yeah
it's
just
to
follow
on
from
from
the
question
from
councillor
savage-
and
that
is
I
mean
I
take
it-
that
all
the
statutory
agencies
are
are
are
happy
and
content
with
the
robustness
of
the
baseline
data
that
they
have
available
in
this
case.
Thank
you,
chairman.
I
Yes,
absolutely
it
would
be
dear.
The
groundwater
monarch
team
would
be
a
compliment
in
this
in
relation
to
what
the
report
says.
If
it
would
be
officers,
they've
got
an
extra
company
there
that
we
wouldn't
have,
and
it
went
through
them
and
then
they're
content
with
this
revision
to
this
monitoring
plan.
So
it
will
be
if
agreed
approved,
but
all
the
previous
conditions
will
be
attached
again
and
indeed
there
will
still
be
a
ground
water
monitoring
plan
and
we
will
still
have
it
on
request.
B
B
B
M
Thank
you
chair.
This
application
involves
the
provision
of
fiber
broadband
cable
to
a
list
of
building,
namely
39
abbey
street,
which
is
the
old
hospital
building
in
our
map.
An
application
is
before
you
this
evening,
as
it's
been
made
on
behalf
of
the
council
in
order
to
provide
the
broadband
at
the
building.
Electric
of
25
meters
in
length
and
400
millimeters
in
depth
is
required
to
be
excavated
from
the
existing
cable
box.
M
The
core
will
then
be
sealed
and
the
track
back
filled
and
reinstated
with
bitmap
to
match
the
existing
situation
in
the
car
park.
As
the
core
section
and
the
ducting
terminate
approximately
200
millimeters
below
the
external
ground
level,
these
works
will
not
be
visible
and
will
not
alter
the
physical
appearance
of
the
listed
structure.
M
M
M
M
So
we
are
right
in
the
heart
of
our
massacre
at
this
one
next
slide
face,
so
that's
our
application
site
next
slide.
Please
and
that's
our
aerial
photograph
next
slide
please.
So
this
is
the
hospital
building
taken
from
abbey
street
status,
main
front
elevation,
and
you
can
just
see
the
cable
box
to
the
right
of
the
building
in
the
middle
of
the
footpath
next
slide,
please.
M
So
this
is
taken
from
the
northern
elevation,
so
this
is
the
elevation
that
will
be
affected
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
the
point
at
which
the
the
work
will
meet
the
building,
as
it
were
next
slide.
Please
so
taken
from
this
angle
that
the
trench
will
be
dug
along
this
section
and
then
meet
the
building
along
the
section
without
any
boxes
at
present
next
slide,
please.
So
this
is
in
a
bit
more
detail.
M
As
I
say
in
the
report,
the
works
are
actually
underground,
so
the
actual
fabric
of
the
listed
button
that
you
can
see
there
won't
alter
and,
as
you
can
also
see
that
the
bitmap
has
been
patched
up
quite
a
bit
there.
So
I
don't
think
this
will
have
any
any
burn
on
that
next
slide.
Please.
So
that's
our
elevation,
showing
where
the
work
is
to
take
place
on
the
next
slide.
Please
that's
our
floor
plan
showing
where
it's
to
go
in
next
slide.
Please
that's
us!
Thank
you
very
much.