►
From YouTube: Historic Resources Commission
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
A
D
Okay,
okay,
Amy
Moxley
local
architect
and
just
wanted
to
give
something
back.
F
Emily
spring
a
local
designer
and
I
thought
this
was
a
really
good
chance
to
use
my
master's
degree
Maria
de
sassy
and
I'm
an
architect
with
experience
in
historic.
A
Preservation,
Sarah
gross
I
have
a
master's
in
anthropology
in
archeology.
A
D
Let
me
just
double
check
this
so
on
page
six,
and
that
was
the
Cumberland
app
and
number
three
the
reasons
it
was
missing.
As
a
last
reason,
mechanical
units
moved
to
this.
D
D
Three,
it
says
the
chemical
units
will
be
located
on
the
side
and
rear
elevations,
but
then,
when
it
gets
repeated
in
six,
the
mechanical
units
weren't
there.
But
then
in
the
findings
of
fact
and
conclusions
of
law,
we
do
have
mechanical
units
listed
as
a
reason
being
where
they
were
located
being
as
a
a
reason
why
it
was
located.
C
B
The
fight
you
know
we
took
it
out
of
the
Sierra
Quest
our
approval
because
they
weren't
sure
which
is
sort
of
becoming
I
mean
I
mean
been
normal
for
new
construction
projects.
They
don't
know
where
they're
going
to
place
the
unit
exactly
and
they
come
through
this
process,
so
they
didn't
have
a
mechanical
community.
B
A
These
are
approved.
We
will
now
begin
the
evidentiary
hearings
for
the
items
listed
on
the
agenda
as
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
The
HRC
is
not
setting
policy,
nor
are
we
soliciting
public
opinion
on
the
desirability
of
an
application.
The
HRC
hears
and
considers
evidence
presented
and
applies
the
standards
set
forth
in
the
guidelines
and
standards
of
the
specific
historic
district.
For
that
application.
The
HRC
must
make
its
decision
upon
competent
material
and
substantial
evidence
to
determine
the
facts
of
the
hearing.
A
The
HRC
will
use
judgment
discretion
to
apply
the
standards
contained
in
the
relevant
guidelines
to
the
facts.
The
Commissioners
in
voting
for
an
item
will
not
have
a
fixed
opinion
that
is
not
susceptible
to
change,
will
not
have
a
conflict
of
interest
and
will
not
have
engaged
next
part.
A
communication
regarding
the
application
rules.
For
speaking
this
meeting
is
open
to
the
public,
but
participate
participation
is
limited
to
interested
parties
who
wish
to
provide
comment
and
testimony
regarding
the
proposal.
A
If
you
will
be
speaking
as
a
witness,
please
focus
on
the
facts
and
how
they
are.
They
relate
to
the
relevant
historic
district
standards
and
guidelines,
not
personal
preference
or
opinion.
Witnesses
must
swear
or
affirm
their
testimony.
At
this
time,
I
will
administer
the
oath
for
all
individuals
who
intend
to
provide
witness
testimony.
A
So
if
y'all
would
come
to
the
front
or
stand
where
you
are
is
fine,
I
guess
there
we
go
and
raise
your
right
hand,
do
you
solemnly
swear
or
affirm
that
the
information
you
present
during
the
hearing
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
or
preliminary
subdivision
approval
before
the
historic
Resources
Commission
shall
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
Do
you?
Yes?
Yes,
thank
you.
A
B
You
chair
kite
members
of
the
commission,
I
think
all
three
applications
today
are
pretty
simple,
so
I
did
not
put
together
a
very
complicated
presentation
for
these,
so
go
go
a
little
quickly,
so
this
application
is
for
60
Terrace
Road.
This
is
the
little
accessory
structure.
That's
right
up
on
Terrace
Road.
Hopefully,
everyone
was
able
to
at
least
go
by
and
take
a
look,
but
the
request
is
just
to
Simply
rebuild
the
retaining
wall
in
existing
pave
area
and
the
same
configuration
Dimensions
Etc
with
new
concrete
in
any
of
our
other
historic
districts.
B
This
would
fall
under
minor
work,
but
there's
a
there's
a
funky
standard
in
Albemarle
Park.
That
says:
if
it's
more
than
10
percent
of
a
wall
is
being
rebuilt
or
repaired,
then
it
has
to
come
before
you
all.
So
that's
the
reason
why
it's
on
the
agenda
today,
but
not
noting
any
concerns-
and
this
is
a
site
plan
showing
the
existing
areas
that
are
on
the
south
along
the
South
elevation
and
the
East
elevation
of
the
little
accessory
structure.
So
that's
all
I
have
to
note
on
this
project
happy
to
answer
questions
the.
E
E
G
G
My
name
is
David:
May
I've
been
a
resident
at
this
at
60
Terrace
Road
for
about
23
years.
G
G
So
that
was
we
had.
You
know
a
tree
risk
assessment.
We
had
five
different
arborists,
look
at
that
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
when
we
replaced
the
retaining
wall.
We
did
minimal
damage
to
the
roots
they
actually.
After
looking
at
the
tree
risk
assessment,
we
you
know
we
were
trying
to
Grapple
with
it.
We
should
take
the
whole
tree
down
versus
just
prune
it
and
cable
it
and
we
decided
to
prune
and
cable
it
which
they
did
two
weeks
ago.
G
They
did
crack
the
patio,
so
we
will
have
to
a
little
area
where
the
garbage
cans
are
there's
a
large
crack
where
they
had
the
crane.
So
they
have
to
replace
that
or
or
a
carrot-
and
you
know
I
think
there's
a
mixture
of
Concrete
and
brick
and
I.
Don't
know
if
the
the
committee
would
allow
me
to
have
the
option
to
replace
it
with
brick,
or
you
know,
I'm
happy
just
to
replace
it
with
the
current
materials.
G
Would
think
I
would
do
it
all
with
brick
or
I
can
do
it
all
concrete
it
doesn't?
You
know
aesthetically
I
think
it
would
be
standards.
D
B
E
B
B
G
Do
concrete
I'll,
just
yeah,
it's
fine
I'll,
just
keep
it
concrete.
Unless
you
want
it,
I
mean
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
a
I.
Don't
care
that
much
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
just
want
to
repair
the
wall.
It
looks
awful
and
I
want
to
make
sure
we
preserve
the
White
Oak
and
that's
my
main
goal.
Either
we
use
brick
or
concrete
aesthetic
thing
that
I'm,
not
if
it's
more
compliant
with
the
guidelines
that
we
use.
One
of
the
other
then
I'll
defer
to
your
judgment.
G
Okay,
then,
let's
just
stay
with
con
Let's
have
the
application
officially
say
concrete.
G
G
F
F
F
F
Three
pages
Exhibit
C
site
plan
exhibit
no
exhibit
D
and
the
commission's
actual
inspection
and
review
of
subject
property
by
all
members
except
I,
move
that
this
commission
approved
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
based
on
the
following
one
that
the
application
is
to
replace
existing,
deteriorated
concrete
wall
and
paved
area
adjacent
to
East,
elevation
of
accessory
structure,
existing
dimensions
and
configurations
will
be
retained
and
all
new
material
will
be
concrete.
Matching
existing
all
work
will
be
in
accordance
with
attached
drawings
and
plans.
All
permits,
variances
or
approvals,
as
required
by
law,
must
be
obtained
before
work.
F
May
commence
number
two,
the
standards
for
paths
and
walkways
found
on
page
31
and
walls
on
pages
34
to
35
of
the
Albemarle
Park
historic
district
landscape
standards
adopted
July
8
2015
were
used
to
evaluate
this
request.
Three,
this
application
does
meet
the
design
standards
for
the
following
reasons:
a
existing
wall
and
paved
area
are
in
a
state
of
disrepair,
rebuilt
and
repaired
wall
and
paved
area.
C
F
C
A
B
We
have
all
right,
so
this
application
is,
for
preliminary
subdivision
request:
approval
for
this
property
in
the
St
Dunston's,
historic
district,
it's
15,
St,
Dunston,
Circle
or
sorry
13
grain,
Stark,
Drive,
and
this
slide
is
just
showing
the
top
left
is
the
site
map.
Where
you
can
see
it's
a
pretty
big
parcel
grind
staff
is
sort
of
like
we're
like
right
on
the
edge
of
the
historic
district
on
that
on
this
side
of
the
street,
meaning
like
all
the
Lots
on
the
north
side
of
grind
staff.
B
Once
we
get
past
the
slot
or
with
our
outside
of
the
district.
Just
to
give
some
context,
the
image
below
is
a
photograph
of
the
existing
structure.
It's
kind
of
a
big
Meandering,
Queen
Anne
influence
her
style
house.
It's
been
real,
heavily
altered
over
the
years
and
the
image
on
the
right
is
the
proposed
plot.
So,
as
you
can
see,
they're
proposing
to
subdivide
if
you're
facing
from
the
street
the
left,
the
left,
like
third
of
the
lot
off
roughly
to
create
a
new
new
lot
to
develop.
B
I
have
looked
at
the
subdivision
multiple
times
in
probably
the
past
three
or
four
years
and
I
I
haven't
all
the
times.
I've
looked
at
it
haven't
come
up
with
anything
that
gave
me
pause
in
terms
of
recommending
in
favor
of
approval
of
this
new
lot.
Clearly,
the
development
pattern
on
that
side
of
the
street,
while
it's
outside
of
the
District
boundary,
you
kind
of
it's
still
the
historic
pattern,
so
you
could
still
very
easily
build
within
that.
B
You
know
development
pattern
from
a
setback
standpoint,
a
building
size
standpoint
and
be
consistent
with
the
structures
along
that
side
of
the
street
there.
It
would
still
be
I
think
the
discussion
around
St
John's
has
the
same
standard
as
Mofford
does
as
far
as
like
new
and
old
on
the
same
site
or
where
buildings
like
behind
another
existing
larger
structure.
B
I
think
that
would
be
kind
of
an
interesting
discussion,
because
clearly
this
structure
would
probably
it
would
be
oriented
towards
grind
staff
and
I'm,
not
sure
I
have
a
strong
feeling
at
this
point,
whether
or
not
it
would
have
to
have
a
super
strong
relationship
with
that
existing
structure.
But
that's
also
down
the
road.
Whatever
a
development
proposal
is
put
forth,
but
just
in
terms
of
the
lot
layout
in
the
subdivision
itself,
I
don't
have
any
concerns.
B
B
The
subdivision,
none
of
our
historic
district
standards,
speak
to
subdivision,
with
the
exception
of
building
placement
and
orientation
that
really
that's
within
the
Udo.
The
subdivision
standards
themselves
and
the
reason
why
we
started
doing
that
was
because
we
had
some
subdivisions
come
in
that
were
creating
then
issues
with
anyone
who
wanted
to
develop
the
lot
not
being
able
to
meet
the
design
standards.
So
we
amended
our
Udo
in
2018
I.
Think
it's
been
since
we
worked
on
that.
So
just.
B
No
I,
don't
think
so.
I
mean
you
know
that
that
their
building
has
parking
and
they
have
access
to
through
the
front
of
their
lot.
So
I
think
that's.
You
know.
That
is
another
Factor.
Where
there's
not
really
anything.
That's
within
the
lot.
That's
you
know,
character,
defining
landscape,
feature
or
anything
that
would
preclude
them
from
redeveloping
a
lot.
B
A
C
H
Name
is
JD
steinhilber
I
used
to
own
this
property,
but
sold
it
to
the
current
owner
four
years
ago
and
he
lives
in
the
New
York
City
area,
and
he
and
I
have
maintained
a
relationship
and
I've
agreed
to
help
him
with
the
development
of
the
of
the
property.
H
If
you
ever
go
by
the
property,
you'll
notice,
one
of
the
distinctive
features
of
it
or
these
enormous
oak
trees,
of
which
there
are
several
on
the
property.
So
when
we
get
to
the
point
of
developing
a
site
plan,
one
of
the
things
I'd
like
to
consider
is
the
preservation
of
those
trees,
and
hopefully
you
all
will
as
well.
We
have
an
idea
in
mind
where
the
house
site,
if
you
look
at
the
diagram
on
the
left,
would
be
sort
of
in
line
with
the
I
would
say
the
the
rear.
H
Third
to
half
of
the
existing
sprawling
multi-family
structure
and
part
of
the
reason
for
that
is
to
preserve
the
the
oak
trees.
But
we
haven't
gotten
to
that
point.
Yet
we're
trying
to
get
through
this
process
and
and
I'm
also
helping
Neil
Berger
who's.
The
current
owner
retain
an
architect
and
then
a
builder
locally,
so
we're
interviewing
several
candidates
in
that
regard.
H
D
A
Do
you
solemnly
swear
affirm
that
the
information
you
present
during
the
hearing
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
before
this
or
preliminary
subdivision
approval,
before
the
historic
Resources
Commission,
shall
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you
and
backwards.
H
Can
I
ask
one
question
and
you
know
and
I'm
I'm
not
an
experienced
developer,
I'm
more
of
a
lender
on
properties
in
town,
but
will
you
require
sort
of
full-blown
architectural
services
or
design
I?
Don't
you
know
we
haven't
even
seen
an
engagement
letter
yet
from
a
from
a
designer,
but
what
level
of
architectural
services
should
we
be
shopping
for.
C
H
This
point,
because
when
you
talk
to
builders,
they
you
know
sometimes
talk
about,
you
know
drafts,
you
know
just
doing
a
you
know,
sort
of
a
draft
development
versus
I,
don't
know
really
detailed,
formal
plans,
or
is
that
not
even
an
appropriate
question
to.
B
B
We
do
highly
recommend
that
you
work
with
a
design
professional,
that's
familiar
with
the
working
with
the
design
standards
in
our
review
process,
because
it
will
help
things
typically
helps
and
things
go
a
lot
smoother
that
it's
again
not
a
requirement,
but
we
can't
recommend
anyone,
but
we
can
certainly
provide
you
a
list
of
folks
that
have
done
work
in
our
head
past.
If
that's
helpful,
it.
B
H
E
E
B
Like
we,
basically,
when
someone
submits
an
application
for
major
work
that
not
only
gets
disseminated
to
the
Commissioners,
but
it
also
gets
posted
to
our
website
so
that
anyone
who
wants
to
look
at
it
can,
but
it's
mainly
for
the
people
who
have
standing
property
and
go
on
to
the
website
and
look
at
the
performance
project
and
then
decide
to
make
public
comment
Etc
if
they
would
like
to.
But
but
yeah.
There's
there's
some
information
on
our
website
too
about
what's
required
for
new
major
work
applications.
H
Okay
and
then
related
related
question
is
directly
across
the
street
across
grind
staff.
Two
newer
homes
were
developed
in
the
past
few
years.
You
may
be
aware
of
that
and
I
assume
they're
both
in
the
historic
district.
One
of
them
in
particular,
looks
like
it.
You
know
it
was
built
to
comply
with
historic
design
standards.
The
other
one
is
more
basic
in
design,
I
would
say,
but
is
it
possible
to
through
a
public
record,
to
find
out
who
the
architect
or
Builder.
B
Have
to
go
out
there
and
look
in
person?
Okay,
you
I,
don't
remember,
because
it's
not
today
and
I
was
just
looking
at
it,
but
like
Sean
review's
house,
I,
don't
know
Sean
his.
H
B
B
F
Three,
this
application
does
meet
the
design
standards
for
the
following
reasons.
A
subdivision
of
lot
would
allow
for
new
development
features
at
a
minimum
to
be
built
in
a
manner
that
is
congruous
with
the
special
historic
character
of
The
District,
as
it
relates
to
building
setbacks,
orientation
and
consistency
with
the
historic
development
pattern.
B
new
lot
with
existing
structure
will
retain
its
congruity
with
the
historic
pattern
in
terms
of
building
orientation
setback,
retention
of
green
space
and
spacing
between
structures.
F
C
E
B
Thank
you.
This
is
just
a
picture
of
the
front
elevation
to
provide
some
context,
but
this
application
involves
a
few
items.
The
primary
thing
is
replacement
of
seven
existing
vinyl
windows,
which
is
great.
We
love
when
people
want
to
do
that,
so
so
that
the
new
windows
will
be
wood
and
will
match
the
existing
windows
that
are
on
the
house,
the
original
windows,
and
hopefully,
if
you
got
to
visit
this
house,
the
windows
are
really
beautiful.
B
I
was
they're,
just
like
really
I,
don't
know,
I
guess,
because
this
house
is
so
close
to
the
street
that
the
windows
on
the
one
side
on
Gray
Street
were
really
cool,
all
right
and
then
so
there's
a
little
just.
Some
photos
to
these
photos
show
which
windows
are
proposing
to
replace
I'm,
not
going
to
go
through
all
of
them.
But
there's
a
handful
on
the
South
elevation
went
on
the
North
elevation,
one
on
the
front
elevation
and
one
on
the
back.
The
picture
on
the
right
is
just
showing
the
driveways.
B
You
enter
into
the
rear
yard
and
the
rear
elevation.
One
part
of
The
Proposal
is
to
replace
the
existing
landing
on
the
back
of
the
house
that
concrete
Landing
it's
pretty
deteriorated,
so
that
is
part
of
this
and
then
they're
also
it's
pretty
flat
back
there,
but
you
can
kind
of
see
how
the
gravel
has
spread
out
over
time.
I
think
the
applicant
can
speak
to
this,
but
it
sounds
like
from
the
application.
They
just
want
to
kind
of
Tidy
that
up
and
Lead
it
up.
You
know
all
the
way
up
to
the
garage
door.
B
It
kind
of
shot
stopped
short
of
that,
as
you
can
see,
and
I,
don't
think
it's
completely
flat
right
in
front
of
the
accessory
structure,
so
I
think
that's
just
where
the
area
needs
to
be
regraded,
just
a
little
bit
to
be
flatter
and
the
other
site
work.
That's
proposed
is
there's
a
removal
of
an
invasive
tree
in
the
rear
yard,
so
no
concern
there
and
then
they
are
also
proposing
to
replace
the
brick
steps
in
the
front
yard.
B
I
went
out
and
to
look
at
these
today,
just
to
I
built
like
from
the
pictures.
They're
not
original,
but
I
looked
at
them
on
site
and
it's
clear
they
were
not
constructed
very
well
and
the
whole
foundation
of
the
house
and
the
retaining
walls
are
are
concrete,
so
I'm
I'm
not
concerned
about
replacing
the
walkway
with
concrete.
It
was
probably
concrete.
B
Originally
my
only
question-
and
this
is
I'll-
let
you
all
talk
this
through
the
applicant
as
I
asked
Katie
the
property
owner
about
the
landing
at
the
top
of
the
stairs
was
not
included
in
the
proposal
to
change
from
brick
to
concrete
I.
Don't
have
a
strong
opinion
that
it
should
stay
brick
or
be
concrete,
but
I
just
asked
if
that
was
part
of
the
proposal
to
clarify.
B
If
we
were
talking
about
the
whole
walkway
getting
up
to
the
concrete
stairs
so
I'll,
let
her
I,
don't
think
she
that
she
didn't
include
that
in
the
proposal.
Maybe
her
preference
to
leave
it
as
brick,
but
I'll
leave
that
to
you
all
too,
to
discuss,
but
overall
I
think
it's
pretty
simple
request
and
I.
Don't
have
any
concerns
about
what's
being
proposed,
questions
for
Alex.
I
I'm
Katie
David,
so
I
would
now
you
know
Alex
wrote
to
me
and
asked
about
that
brick
area
above
and
I
think
it.
It
would
make
sense
to
make
it
concrete.
I
was
just
going
to
remove
it
and
let
grass
grow
there
or
something
but
so
yeah
and
then
the
front
of
the
house.
The
two
windows
so
the
left's
hand
side
on
the
upstairs
is
the
vinyl
window
and
I
just
wanted
to
like
run
by.
I
We
think
it'll
be
different,
noticeably
different
or
top
slash
the
two
windows
on
the
top
floor.
So
the
left
one
is
the
vinyl
window
yeah
and
the
right
one
is
original,
but
if
I
replace
the
vinyl
with
a
new
window,
you
know
the
glass
has
that
coating
on
it
and
is
it
going
to
be
like
still
look,
funky
I
mean
what
are
you
all
would
I
should
I
replace
both
of
them,
or
is
it
good
to
do
one?
Okay,
gotcha?
Okay,.
A
E
I
E
E
I
I
B
Yeah
I
think
that
it
we
we
more
often
are
asked
to
replace
walkways
that
are
like
intact,
original
walkways
versus
a
situation
like
this,
where
it's
clearly
a
replacement,
walkway.
So
I
think
that
gives
you
some
latitude
and
to
me
when
I
went
on
site,
it
was
clear
that
all
the
the
cheek
walls
for
the
steps
to
the
house
that
she
falls
to
the
steps
to
the
sidewalk
and
the
foundation
of
the
house.
All
our
concrete
right
right
and
brick
was
not
super
common
in
Montford.
It
was
you
know.
B
Obviously
it
still
is
an
expensive
material.
So
a
lot
of
these
smaller
streets
were
you
know
their
brick
is
just
not
it's
a
more
formalized
treatment.
I
think
that
was
not
was
not
as
common
as
it
was
to
be
found
on
houses,
but
not
not
necessarily
within
the
landscape.
B
I
E
C
B
B
E
C
A
C
B
I
I
A
The
narrow
proportion
of
those
12
is
going
to
get
a
little
bit
much
for
sure,
but
I
mean
I.
Think
that
the
what
happens
in
the
twelves
is
that
this
that
the
lights
are
pretty
Square
as
opposed
to
rectangular
so
like
in
that
casement
or
that
fixed
window.
That's
on
the
top,
you
know.
Is
it
nine?
Does
that
sort
of
give
us
the
same
proportion
of
that
sort
of
square
light
that
the
rest
of
the
windows
kind
of
have
that's.
A
A
So
I
think
the
proportion
of
those
lights
is
more
important
to
me
than
the
number
of
lights
that
are
in
there.
I'd,
rather
see
it
more
square,
like
the
12
lights
end
up
being
than
vertical,
like
some
of
the
vinyl
windows
that
were
played
that
we're
replacing,
which
are
more,
the
six
of
the
six
over
ones
end
up
with
a
little
kind
of
a
longer
skinnier
light.
Pro
squares.
E
E
A
I
B
A
I
think
certainly
the
stairs
being
treated
differently
already
because
of
the
window
configuration
the
fact
that
we're
setting
it
off
the
mid
Landing,
and
so
it
always
puts
it
in
an
interesting
kind
of
solitary
spot
on
the
elevation,
because
the
floor
level
is
at
a
different
place.
So
come
in
presume
that
land
and
you
come
up
and
you
hit
the
landing
and
there's
the
window.
And
then
you
turn
and
go
back
the
other
way.
Yeah.
A
C
A
E
I
The
I
did
send
yeah
because
of
the
insides
and
their
next
outsides.
E
B
I
C
A
B
Do
Janice,
do
you
think
we're
okay
with
her
like?
Does
she
need
to
say
specifically
request
to
amend
the
application
to
include
those
two
windows
I
mean
I
asked
her
like.
D
C
H
E
E
I
C
B
I
B
B
C
I
B
I
I
Some
someday
it's
hard
to
open
yeah.
Okay,
thanks
sure.
A
A
F
My
question
to
Alex
would
be
is:
have
you
already
changed.
B
F
All
righty
all
right,
Madam,
chair,
based
on
the
evidence
presented
to
this
commission,
including
exhibit
a
application
and
project
description.
Four
pages
exhibit
B
photographs
and
plans.
Seven
pages
Exhibit,
C
window
drawings
and
specifications
set
in
Pages
exhibit
D
Google,
Street
View
image
taken
December
14
2022
and
the
commission's
actual
inspection
and
review
of
subject
property
by
all
members
except
I,
move
that
this
commission.
F
The
certificate
of
appropriateness
based
on
the
following
five
one
one,
but
the
application
is
to
replace
seven
nine
is
it
nine
okay
is
to
replace
nine
vinyl
windows
with
new
Pella
Reserve
traditional
wood,
sdl
double
hung.
Windows
matching
existing
original
windows
on
the
house,
replace
slash,
rebuild
existing
concrete
steps
at
rear
elevation
with
new,
concrete
stair
and
Landing,
replace
existing
brick
steps
in
front
yard,
with
new
concrete
steps,
extend
gravel,
driveway
to
front
elevation
of
accessory
structure
with
any
new
gravel
being
dark
in
color
and
matching
existing
remove
one
invasive.
F
Eight
foot,
eight
to
ten
inch
multi-stem
tree
of
Heaven
ale,
Atlantis
altissima
from
rear
yard.
All
work
will
be
in
accordance
with
attached
drawings
and
plans.
All
permits,
variances
or
approvals,
as
required
by
law,
must
be
obtained
before
work.
Make
months,
two
that
the
standards
for
windows
and
doors
found
on
pages
84
to
85,
porches
entrances
and
balconies
on
pages
72-73
walkways
driveways
and
off-street
parking
on
pages
50
to
51
and
Landscaping
and
trees.
F
On
pages
40
to
41
of
the
Montford
historic
district
design,
review
standards
adopted
April,
14,
2010
and
amended
December
9
2019
were
used
to
evaluate
this
request.
Three,
this
application
does
meet
the
design
standards
for
the
following
reasons.
A
historically
inappropriate
vinyl
windows
are
being
replaced
with
new
wood
windows.
New
wood
window
units
matching
existing
historic
windows
on
the
house,
B
replacement,
stairway
adjacent
to
rear
elevation
will
match
the
existing
and
location
configuration
and
material
C.
F
F
Four
that
the
action
and
improvements
proposed
in
the
application
before
us
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
are
congruous,
with
the
special
historic
character
of
the
Montfort
historic
district.
Second,
all.
A
F
Okay,
so
I'll
make
a
condition
based
on
the
foregoing
findings
and
the
reasons
set
forth
they're
in
I
move
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
be
issued
with
the
following
condition
that
manufacturer
specifications
for
the
windows
be
submitted
to
staff
for
approval.
B
B
A
E
E
D
B
C
D
B
The
other,
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to,
let
you
guys
know
is
that
I've
been
messaging
with
Nate
Pennington,
the
County
planning
director
and
he's
going
to
be
coming
to
you
all.
An
update
on
the
comprehensive
Plan
update
for
the
county.
The
city
staff
did
meet
with
them
recently,
maybe
a
month
or
so
ago,
and
I
was
happy
to
see
that
they
had
Incorporated.
Some
of
the
like
things
from
the
preservation
plan
into
their
conference
plan.
B
B
Movement
in
the
future
on
potentially
more
funding
for
our
program
because
right
I,
don't
we
have
shared
this
with,
but
our
our
program
is
obviously
housed
within
the
city
and
they
they've
fund
very
little
of
our
programmatic
budget.
So
it
really
limits
us
in
our
capacity
to
do
work
outside
of
the
city
and
Nate
and
I've
talked
about.
What
does
that
look
like?
How
do
we
know
how
much
money
we
your.
B
G
B
Or
I
don't
know:
I,
don't
I,
don't
I
mean
I.
It
would
be
better
if
it
happened
in
the
city,
because
then
our
all
of
our
activities
would
be
happening
together.
I
would
prefer
to
have
some
mechanism
of
control
over
it
versus
letting
them
have
it
because
they
haven't
really
showed
much
interest
up
anyway.
So
I
think
it
makes
more
sense
for
all
of
our
admin
functions
to
be
in
one
place,
but
anyways.
A
B
We're
making
some
progress,
hopefully
on
there
because
it'll
be
in
their
comprehensive
plan
and
that's
a
way
we
can
go
to
the
county
sort
of
justify,
having
additional
funding
progress,
so
they'll,
be
here
in
February
or
March.
To
do
also
just
be
thinking
on
that.
And
if
you
have
questions
that
you
know.
B
B
So
it
felt
very
generic
and
there's,
since
our
program
is
so
involved,
and
they
don't
really
know
that
much
about
it.
It
felt
very
like
well.
You
guys
need
to
learn
about
our
program,
probably
to
get
the
right
answers.
You
need
to
help
inform
your
your
comprehensive
plan
so
and
Nate
news
I
had
a
long
conversation.
A
B
C
B
I
might
have
mentioned
that
in
our
last
meeting
it
was
a
we
don't
usually
take
our
architectural
survey
update
project
updates
to
the
Planning
and
Zoning
commission.
So
that's
why
they
were
skipped,
but
then
they
actually
the
chair,
asked
for
me
to
come
and
present.
So
that
was
nice
that
they
showed
interest
project
so
yeah.
D
C
D
What
they
do
and,
as
you
start
to
or
Alex,
starts
to
present
to
other
boards
and
commissions,
it's
easier
for
people
to
see
how
these
things
fit
in,
like
the
walking
Street
pool,
which
was
something
that
had
to
be
approved
by
planning
and
zoning,
and
then
Alex
got
to
make
that
presentation
both
to
planning
and
zoning
and
also
to
the
city
council.
So
again,
it's
just
sort
of
it's
good
to
know
what
these
updates.
You
know
where
they're
I
guess
it's
educational
to
other
bodies
of
the
city
that
sometimes
they're
like
oh
yeah.
A
B
Need
this,
it's
taken
a
lot
of
work
internally
to
get
to
the
place
where
we
are
so
it's
all
been
positive.
But
on
that
same
note
I
would
say
you
know
the
opportunity
to
have
a
new
Council
liaison
is
a
good
thing.
You.
C
B
That
person
is
a
conduit
for
all
of
you
and
us,
you
know
really
like
if
you
have
preservation
issues
that
you'd
want
to
highlight
to
that
council
member,
you
can
contact
that
person
and
say:
hey
I.
You
know
HRC
chair
and
we've
been
talking
about
this
one
Charlotte
Street
development.
Where
we're
you
know
pretty
concerned
about
demolition
of
all
these
historic
structures
and
here's.
Why
and
they
get
to
hear
from.
C
A
B
B
D
But
she
she
was
talking
about
being
on
a
committee
that
is
now
it's.
The
Public
Safety
Committee
got
combined
with
him
an
environmental
committee
city
council
committee,
which
we've
never
had
an
environmental
city
council
committee,
and
her
comment
was
that
she's
very
excited
because
you've
known
Public
Safety
is,
you
know,
they're
both
very
important.
She
said
when
she
was
in
sustainability
and
often
sustainability
is
like
oh
yeah,
that's
the
environmental
stuff
does
if
it
doesn't
get
integrated.
So
maybe
she
would
understand
that
same
kind
of
you
know.
D
Historic
resources
is
a
part
of
this
larger
whole
I,
think
I'm
thinking
so
and
I
think
she
might
be
on
the
PED
planning
Economic
Development,
which
is
a
city
council.
C
D
And
maybe
if
she
is-
and
she
knows
part
of
planning
historic
resources
lives
in
the
planning
department
and
says.