►
From YouTube: Historic Resources Commission
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Good
afternoon
everyone
I
am
HRC
chair,
Emily,
kite
and
I
would
like
to
welcome
you
to
the
November
9
2022
historic,
Resources
Commission
meeting
the
HRC
is
a
quasi-judicial
body
that
is
governed
by
North
Carolina,
General
statutes,
the
city
of
Asheville's,
unified
development,
ordinance
and
Buncombe
County
ordinance.
We
are
authorized
to
hear
requests
for
certificates
of
appropriateness
for
alterations,
demolitions,
new
construction
and
other
work
within
historic
districts
or
for
the
alteration
and
demolition
of
historic
landmarks
and
other
duties,
including
preliminary
review
of
subdivisions
as
specified
in
the
ordinances
for
the
HRC.
B
E
D
A
B
B
H
Process,
that's
good
Alex,
I'm
out
school
I'm,
the
HRC
staff
liaison.
B
B
Second,
all
in
favor
say
aye
aye
aye.
Any
opposed
that
motion
carries
we're
gonna
begin
the
evidentiary
hearings
for
the
items
listed
on
our
agenda
as
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
The
HRC
is
not
setting
policy,
nor
are
we
soliciting
public
opinion
for
the
desirability
of
an
application.
The
HRC
hears
and
considers
evidence
presented
and
applies
the
standard
set
forth
in
the
guidelines
and
standards
of
a
specific
historic
district.
For
that
application,
the
HRC
must
make
its
decision
upon
competent
material
and
substantial
evidence
to
determine
the
facts
of
the
hearing.
B
The
HRC
will
use
judgment
and
discretion
to
apply
the
standards
contained
in
the
relevant
guidelines
to
the
facts.
The
Commissioners
and
voting
for
an
item
will
not
have
had
have
a
fixed
opinion
that
is
not
susceptible
to
change,
will
not
have
a
conflict
of
interest
and
will
not
have
engaged
in
ex
parte
communication.
Regarding
this
application
rules.
For
speaking,
the
meeting
is
open
to
the
public,
but
participation
is
limited
to
interested
parties
who
which
to
provide
comment
and
testimony
regarding
the
proposal.
B
If
you
will
be
speaking
as
a
witness,
please
focus
on
the
facts
and
how
they
relate
to
the
relevant
historic
district
standards
and
guidelines,
not
personal
preference
or
opinion.
Witnesses
must
swear
or
affirm
their
testimony
at
this
time,
I'm
going
to
administer
the
oath
for
all
individuals
who
intend
to
provide
witness
testimony.
So
if
you
are
going
to
be
speaking
on
behalf
of
a
an
application,
if
you
would
please
come
forward
and
we
can
catch
everybody
together,.
J
Thank
you,
chair
kite
members
of
the
commission,
I
sorry
in
advance.
If
I'm
looking
back
and
forth,
I
wasn't
able
to
actually
print
my
hard
copies
of
my
staff
reports.
I've
got
staff
reports
in
one
place
and
presentation
on
the
other,
so
this
will
be
the
third
time
that
this
application
has
been
reviewed
by
the
commission.
I
want
to
give
some
a
little
bit
of
in-depth
contact
context
for
for
a
newer,
Commissioners
I
know.
J
Commissioner
Del
Stacey
was
here
last
last
time
around,
but
I
know
this
is
commissioner
moxley's
first
time
with
this
one.
So
this
is
a
obviously
a
new
construction
project
in
Montford
on
Cumberland
Avenue,
it's
for
new
two-story
primary
structure
with
a
one
and
a
half
story
accessory
structure,
and
so
the
primary
things
that
we've
been
working
through
the
last
two
meetings,
as
you
all
probably
remember,
were
really
related
to
the
design
of
the
accessory
structure.
J
Being
that
accessory
structures
in
Mofford
are
limited
to
a
story
and
a
half,
and
how
do
you
necessarily
work
with
having
an
upstairs
living
space
for
a
structure
like
that
and
the
kind
of
design
language
between
the
two
structures
was
not
necessarily
working
in
the
previous
iteration,
because
the
primary
structure
has
a
pretty
low
pitched
roof
and
the
the
accessory
structure
Alaska
around
was
not
really
consistent
with
that
with
the
reform
of
the
primary
structure.
So,
since
the
last
meeting
I'll
go,
let
me
go
back
to
this
first
slide.
There
were
some
some
sight.
J
The
other
day,
I
had
still
some
outstanding
concerns
that
I
changed
a
little
bit
based
on
some
revisions
that
the
architect
sent
me
in
the
last
few
days,
or
so
so,
one
being
today,
I
received
new
site
plan
that
showed
the
as
you
all
might
recall.
We
talked
to
some
about
the
retaining
walls
that
are
come
off
the
street
that
are
curbed
where
the
driveway
apron
is,
and
so
they
are
proposing
to
retain
and
repair
the
wall
and
stairway
on
the
north
side
of
the
driveway
and
then
the
south
side
of
the
driveway.
J
They
do
want
to
bump
that
further
south
to
allow
for
a
wider
driveway
entrance,
but
it
will
still
be
it
will
be
rebuilt
in
the
same
curved
configuration
reusing
as
much
existing
material
as
possible.
So
I
think
the
driveway
width
is
10
and
a
half
feet
as
proposed,
and
so
then
we
just
need
to
add
a
condition
on
the
approval
that
the
trees
that
are
proposed
for
removal
that
are
within
the
city's
right-of-way
are
confirmed
as
being
okay
to
remove
with
our
City
Arborist.
So
that
will
just
be
one
condition
they
did
add.
J
Land
escaping
basically
identify
the
planting,
the
proposed
planting
materials
in
the
revised
site
plan,
and
there
was,
in
addition
to
the
accessory
structure,
design
being
modified.
They
also
made
some
revisions
to
the
rear
elevation
of
the
primary
structure
that
I'm
not
going
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
on,
because
I,
don't
think
they're
I,
don't
think
they're
super
substantial
in
terms
of
what
we're
looking
at
in
the
previous
iterations.
J
This
is
the
revised
perspective,
rendering
showing
the
the
newly
designed
or
redesigned
accessory
structure
it
did.
It
is
very
much
the
same
in
the
same
square,
footage
an
overall
square
footage
building
footprint,
but
they
were
able
to
redesign
it
so
that
the
root
form
is
more
similar
to
the
to
the
primary
structure,
and
it
is
not
quite
as
tall
I
think
it's
23
and
a
half
feet,
which
is
which
is
more
in
line
with
accessory
structures
that
the
commission
has
approved
in
the
past
than
the
previous
proposal.
J
So,
and
these
are
the
elevation
drawings,
the
deck
is
also
relocated
to
the
rear
elevation,
which
I
think
helps
the
overall
design
of
the
structure.
To
me,
this
really
does
clearly
read
as
more
of
an
accessory
to
the
primary
structure
than
either
of
the
two
proposals.
So
the
only
concern
I've
noted
and
I
didn't
pull
it
up.
In
my
plans,
let
me
see,
let
me
grab
the
the
elevation
drawing
to
show
you
the
primary
structure.
J
The
only
thing
I
wanted
to
know
that
that
I-
maybe
we
didn't
talk
about
before,
because
we
were
kind
of
hyper
focused
on
the
overall
design,
where
the
proposed
doors
on
the
primary
structure
on
the
back.
They
are
proposed
to
be
clad,
sliding
glass
doors
and
I
I.
Don't
necessarily
have
any
strong
objection
to
that
on
the
rear,
elevation
or
concern
about
that,
but
that's
not
something
that
the
commission
has
approved
in
the
past
It's,
usually
the
commission's
required.
You
know
French
stores,
like
fixed
stores.
J
There
was
one
application
years
ago
where
someone
did
Nano
glass,
but
it
was
kind
of
this
weird
situation
where
it
was
within
a
deck
that
they
had
to
accommodate
a
doorway.
So
it
was
a
little
bit
unusual
but
other
than
that.
The
commission's
always
required
fixed
doors.
So
just
a
note
on
that,
but
I'll,
let
you
guys
weigh
in
as
as
you
want
on
whether
or
not
you
think
that's
appropriate.
Of
course,
let's
see.
J
And
the
only
other
outstanding
item
that
we
really
need
from
the
applicant,
and
we
can
just
get
this-
this
can
be
a
condition
as
we
need
the
exact
specification
for
the
garage
doors.
There
was
a
garage
door,
spec
included
and
some
information
that
we
got,
but
it
didn't
identify
the
exact
the
exact
door
design.
J
Okay,
so
you
can
see
on
the
first
and
second
story
of
the
rear
elevation
of
the
primary
structure,
where
the
doors
that
I'm
talking
about
are
in
terms
of
the
sliding
glass
so
and
I.
Think
that
was
everything.
I
wanted
to
note
to
you
all.
If
there's
anything,
I
can
go
back
over
for
those
who
haven't
been
here
for
all
three
meetings.
I
can
certainly
go
back
into
any
details
that
might
be
helpful
or
answer
any
questions
that
you
all
might
have.
C
That,
if
you
can
scroll
up
an
image.
C
J
It's
not
dissimilar
from
an
accessory
structure
that
was
approved
on
Cumberland
alley,
probably
five
or
so
years
ago.
It
was
a
smaller
structure,
so,
like
the
second
they
weren't
trying
to
accommodate.
You
know
750
square
feet
on
both
floors.
It
was
ended
up
being
more
like
a
500
square
foot
Second
Story
living
space
because
of
the
the
ceiling
Heights,
where
the,
where
the
Dormers
were
kind
of
cut
out,
yeah
I
think
we're
always
going
to
be
hovering
between
what's
really
defined
as
a
two-story
structure.
I.
C
Just
don't
know
from
a
non-architect
what
how
how
to
define
that
exactly
and
the
other
thing
I
looked
at
the
driveway
and
it's
about
nine
feet,
and
so
are
the
other
ones.
South
of
there
are
the
same
width.
J
The
architect
did
go
out
and
do
some
measuring
of
nearby
driveway
wits
so
I'll.
Let
him.
C
C
It's
just
the
South
Side
right,
that's
being
rebuilt
to
form
a
current
shape
and
because
it
sort
of
has
the
jog.
C
J
Rebuilt
to
be
the
same
like
curved
design
as
the
existing,
so
I
think
from
the
streetscape.
It
won't
be
a
giant
change
to
have
an
extra
foot
and
a
half
there
in
my
mind,
but
and
I
understand
like
it
that
is
kind
of
a
tricky
street
from
being
able
to
see
when
you're
turning
out
into
the
street.
J
Yeah
I
think
it
was
sort
of
piecemeal
patched
over
the
years
and
then
there's
so
much
vegetation
on
it.
It's
one
of
those
it's
one
of
those
situations
where
they're
gonna
have
to
get
into
the
construction
before
they
know.
If
there's
probably
any
usable
material
there-
and
maybe
that's
that's-
probably
a
condition
that
we
should
put
on
the
ca
is
that
they'll
submit
a
material
sample
for
it
for
new
material
to
match
the
wall.
Since
we
can't
really
see
the
wall
right
now,
thanks
sure.
J
And
I
understand
what
you're
saying
commissioner
hornaday
I
think
this
is
the
closest
we're
going
to
get
with
the
structure
of
the
size
to
be
yeah
meeting
the
the
design
criteria,
if
you
will
for
accessory
structures,
it's
so
far
back.
G
I
Thank
you,
Alex
I'm,
Aaron
Wilson,
with
Wilson,
Architects
and
I.
Did
one
I
did
do
a
little
bit
of
I
went
out
and
measured
all
the
driveways
on
that
section
of
Cumberland.
There
were
11
driveways
out
there.
They
were
all
nine
feet
or
more
and
they're
somewhere
down
further
south
we're
about
13,
but.
I
F
I
Hand
side
it
is
it's
Stone
still
and
even
the
left
side
is
in
not
great
shape,
but
we
need
to
get
in
there
and
kind
of
pull
everything
off
of
it
and
see
how
to
see
what's
there.
If,
if
the
commission
wanted
to
make
it
a
if,
if
you
could
put
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
you
do
this,
but
if
you
put
in
there
that
the
Builder
had
to
meet
with
staff
or
something
to
look
at
it
at
some
point,
we'd
be
happy
to
do
that.
I
I
Whatever
and
then
the
sliding
doors
I
think
we're
probably
open
to
your
suggestions
on
the
sliding
doors
I
didn't
I
didn't
feel,
like
the
sliding
doors
had
a
very
different
appearance
than
the
French
doors.
But
if,
if
that
needs
to
change,
I
think
we'd
be
open
to
that.
The
garage
door,
I
I,
did
have
a
spec
in
there
on
a
on
a
metal
garage
door
and
wanted
to
ask
the
question.
I
But
I
can
I
can
provide
a
better
spec
on
that.
But
I
did
want
to
ask
if,
if
a
metal
door
was
okay.
D
Does
the
in
the
rendering
does
that
represent
the
wood
grain
Metal
finish
yeah.
H
Approved
for
every
once
in
a
while,
people
will
do
like
the
color
play
or
the
nut
club
play,
but
the
like
Carriage
House
tours
that.
F
D
C
So
I
think
the
standards
talk
about
using
is
this
applied
to
it
that
materials
compatible
with
the
main
building
and
other
historic
structures
in
the
district.
I
C
C
Wood
is
the
preference
for
the
windows
and
then
new
yeah.
B
H
I
B
Knows
no,
the
metal
tends
to
oil
can
and
you
get
it
gets
wavy.
If
you
don't
okay
cure
that
by
giving
it
some
kind
of
texture.
J
C
I
D
Think
if
you
painted
it
yeah
and
if,
if
you're,
going
for
like
a
nod
to
the
historic,
if
a
door
was
wood
and
it
would
be
painted,
it
wouldn't
look
much
different
than
a
painted
metal
garage
door.
F
B
Thank
you.
We're
gonna
open
the
floor
for
public
comment.
B
This
application,
I
think,
will
I
struggle
a
little
bit
with
the
same
question
that
you
had
about
the
sort
of
one
and
a
half
Story
versus
two-story.
The
problem
is
we
wanted
the
roof
to
flatten
out
when
we
do
that,
we
make
it
harder
to
be
a
story
and
a
half
and
my
preference
I
think
the
trade-off
is
worth
it
in
this
particular
case,
because
the
language
between
the
two
gets
much
closer
looks.
F
J
J
H
I
B
I
wish
the
Second
Story
had
him
behind
the
screen.
Yeah
I
think
I
I
feel
better
about
the
ones
that
are
in
the
screened
porch.
On
the
first
floor
that
I
do
the
second
floor.
Sliding
Windows
sliding
doors,
yeah,
I,
think
somehow
they
I
think
they'll
obviously
are
going
to
read
differently
with
the
screen
there,
but.
A
D
A
motion,
I
guess
I
would
like
to
ask
one
more
question
for
Aaron
the
the
roof
pitch
on
the
accessory
structure.
Did
you
match
the
pitch
the
the
main
structure
it
matches?
Yeah.
B
H
A
I
D
Thank
you.
I
was
just
thinking
a
little
bit
more
about
what
commissioner
hornaday
was
saying
about
it.
Reading
as
a
one
and
a
half
I
think
it
does,
but
it
might
help
even
more
to
just
bring
those
I
guess
you
would
call
it
the
primary
roof,
the
ones
that
are
on
the
corners
down
just
a
little
bit
lower,
like
maybe
just
increasing
the
pitch
on
that
a
tiny
bit
so
that
it's
like
middle
of
the
window
height
that
might
help
it
more
read
like.
A
I
To
be
a
real
challenge
to
frame,
but
we'll
we'll
figure
that
out,
but
the
yeah
see
to
make
any
usable
space
in
that
area.
I
think
we
have
to
have
some
amount
of
clearance
well,.
B
E
D
They're,
just
a
little
squirrely
all
right,
Madam
chair,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
to
this
commission,
including
exhibit
a
application
and
plans.
13
Pages,
exhibit
B
new
construction
worksheet
four
pages
Exhibit
C
near
primary
nearby
primary
accessory
structure
data
exhibit
D
manufacturer
specifications.
10
pages
exhibit
e
additional
window
specifications.
Four
pages
exhibit
F
window
details.
Three
pages
exhibit
G
revised
site
plan
received
September
5th
2022,
exhibit
H
accessory
structure.
New
construction
worksheet
four
pages
received
September
5th
2022,
exhibit
I
photos
of
subject
property.
Two
pages
taken
by
staff.
D
September
7th
2022
exhibit
J
response
to
staff
comments.
11
pages
received
September
14
2022
exhibit
K
revised
site
plan
received
September
14
2022
exhibit
L
revised
drawings
and
plans.
23
Pages
received
September
22nd
2022
exhibit
M
revised
site
plan
received
October
12
20
2022.,
exhibit
n
retaining
wall
inspection
report
received
October
12
2022
exhibit
o
a
revised
prospective
and
elevation
drawings.
Two
pages
received,
October
19th
2022
exhibit
p
revised
prospective
and
elevation
drawings
to
Pages
received
October
19
2022
exhibit
P
revised
prospective
rendering
received
November,
2nd
2022
exhibit
Q
accessory
structure.
D
New
two-story
3292
square
foot,
primary
structure
with
smooth
stucco
Foundation
six
inch,
smooth,
LP,
smart
lap,
siding
and
Iko
asphalt,
shingle
roof
and
weather
wood
color
front
entry
will
be
set
within
a
covered
porch
with
wood
deck
flooring,
wood
railing
with
two
inch
by
two
inch
pickets
space,
3.5
inches
on
Center
and
wood
tongue
and
groove
ceiling.
Porch
Piers
will
be
stucco
with
square
painted.
Lattice
screening
windows
will
be
Sierra,
Pacific
aluminum,
clad
sdl
two
over
one
double
hung
and
two
light.
D
H
D
Garage
doors,
eight
foot
by
six
inch,
wood
deck
with
wood
railing
and
two
inch
by
two
inch,
pickets
based
three
and
a
half
inches
on
Center
will
be
constructed
on
East
Elevation,
see,
site
work,
including
removal
of
33,
mature
trees
due
to
poor
health
and
are
to
accommodate
construction
removal
of
existing
driveway
and
construction
of
new
12
foot
wide,
concrete,
driveway.
Ten
and
a
half
foot
wide
concrete
driveway
at
the
same
location.
H
D
And
a
single
11
foot
wide
parking
space
adjacent
to
the
rear
elevation
of
primary
structure,
existing
retaining
wall
and
stairway
on
North
side
of
driveway
will
be
retained
and
repaired
as
needed.
Existing
retaining
wall
on
South,
Side
driveway
will
be
relocated
and
reconstructed
slightly
farther
to
the
South
to
allow
for
10
foot
six
inch
wide
driveway,
any
new
stone
material
necessary
to
rebuild
the
wall
will
match
existing
as
closely
as
possible.
Flagstone
walkways
will
extend
from
Mirror
elevation
to
parking
area
and
from
front
entry.
Stair
to
Street
three
foot
wide
by
four
foot.
D
Tall
painted
wood
fence
will
be
constructed,
adjacent
to
North
Foundation
of
primary
structure
to
screen
trash
receptacle
area.
Foundation
plantings
will
be
installed.
Ground
cover
must
be
established
for
15
days
of
completion
of
construction,
and
the
remainder
of
the
Landscaping
must
be
installed
within
three
years.
If
archaeological
resources
are
discovered
during
the
site,
work
work
will
cease
until
City
staff
have
been
notified
and
have
inspected
the
site
D,
all
work
will
be
in
accordance
with
attached
drawings
and
plans.
All
permits,
variances
or
approvals,
as
required
by
law,
must
be
obtained
before
work,
making
commence.
D
D
This
application
does
meet
the
design
standards
for
the
following
reasons.
A
new
primary
structure
is
cited
so
that
it
is
similar
to
the
historic
pattern
in
terms
of
orientation
setback,
retention
of
green
space
and
spacing
between
structures.
B
new
primary
structure
is
designed
so
that
the
overall
character
of
the
adjacent,
streetscape
and
building
site
is
maintained.
D
C,
new
primary
structure
is
compatible
in
height,
roof
form,
scale,
massing
footprint,
material,
detail,
fenestration
and
proportion
with
surrounding
historic
buildings
and
other
historic
buildings
in
the
district
d,
location
and
size
of
Window
and
Door.
Openings
are
compatible
in
placement
orientation.
Spacing
proportion,
size
and
scale
with
surrounding
historic
buildings.
E
materials
and
finishes
are
typical
of
those
found
in
the
district.
F
proportion
of
accessory
structure
is
compatible
with
the
primary
structure
in
terms
of
height
footprint
and
massing.
D
Accessory
accessory
structure
is
not
more
than
30
percent
of
the
scale
of
the
primary
structure
and
is
not
taller
than
one
and
a
half
stories.
G
accessory
structure
has
a
traditional
roof
form
materials
and
details
compatible
with
the
primary
structure
and
other
accessory
structures
in
the
district
h,
new
walkways
and
retaining
walls
will
be
compatible
with
the
site
and
District
in
terms
of
Dimension
configuration,
material,
color
and
texture.
I
existing
concrete
retaining
walls
will
be
preserved
and
repaired.
New
section
of
driveway
and
parking
will
be
concrete
and
located
in
the
rear
yard.
D
B
Is
there
a
second
second,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye.
B
B
Is
there
a
second
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed
both
motions
carry
very
good
thanks.
Aaron
thank.
J
Okay,
so
this
application
is
pretty
minimal,
so
I'm
going
to
move
pretty
quickly
through
this
one.
This
is
just
some
context
photos,
so
the
photo
on
the
left
is
the
front
elevation
and
the
photo
on
the
right
is
the
rear
elevation.
This
project
includes
two
different
aspects:
one
is
removing
some
trees.
J
These
Cedar
cypress
trees
or
whatever
they
are
in
the
front,
have
like
substantially
swallowed
the
front
elevation
of
the
house,
so
those
are
proposed
for
removal
and
then
there's
two
trees
adjacent
to
the
rear
elevation
where
they're
proposing
this
two-story
deck
need
to
be
removed.
So
they
are
no.
They
have
noted
replacement
trees
on
their
revised
plans
that
they
submitted
so
no
concerns
there.
The
elevations
on
the
left
are
existing
and
proposed
elevations.
J
The
existing
windows
that
are
on
the
Second
Story,
the
pair
they're,
going
to
be
moved
down
to
an
existing
opening
on
the
first
floor
and
then
there'll
be
new
French
doors
on
both
of
those
levels.
You
note
on
the
elevation
that
the
doors
on
the
bottom,
the
proposed
doors
on
the
bottom,
are
wider
than
the
doors
on
the
top,
because
they're
trying
to
fit
them
within
that
existing
opening
I
think
it
looks
a
little
weird
to
be
honest,
I
think
better
for
them
to
match
than
be
slightly
off
from
each
other.
J
But
it's
sort
of
a
minor
detail,
especially
since
it's
on
the
back
in
the
past,
when
we've
had
requests
come
up
for
two-story
decks,
we
have
said
to
be
more
appropriate
to
have
a
covered
porch
versus
a
deck.
If
you
look
at
the
standards
for
decks,
they
say
the
deck
should
be
aligned
with
the
first
floor
or
lower
so
having
this
kind
of
Double
Decker
on
the
back
of
a
house
with
the
deck
looks
kind
of
out
of
character
from
Watford.
It
would
be
more
typical
to
have
a
two-story
porch.
J
J
So
that's
really
the
the
bulk
of
it
that
the
the
support
pose
for
the
the
deck
reports,
whichever
ends
up
being,
will
be
square
painted
lattice.
So
it's
it's
a
pretty
simple,
pretty
simple
request.
So
that's
it
for
me
but
happy
to
answer
questions.
If
you
have
any.
C
C
So
if
you
looked
in
tight
on
the
second
picture
in
the
upper
left
corner,
there's
a
window
trim
that
rounds
the
corner
and
comes
around
where
that
there's
a
bank
of
Windows
around
the
corner.
That
was
probably
an
open
screen
porch
or
something
is
this
Change
Gonna
negate
any
ability
to,
or
what's
your
feeling
on,
losing
that
historic
element?
That's
been
swallowed
up
over
the
years,
but
is
there's
a
ghost
there?
There's.
J
Didn't
get
into
the
Weeds
on
Shingle
color
yeah!
This
that's
a
good
question.
We
can
ask
that
I.
Imagine
well,
I,
don't
know
I'll
let
Andrew
from
Falcon
Builders
is
here
so
I'll.
Let
him
speak
to
the
plan
for
for
that
in
terms
of
color
scheme,
but
I
think
like
to
go
back
to
your
question
about
the
sleeping,
porch
I.
C
J
I
think
it's
a
living
space
right
now
they
just
want
to
have
access
to
a
deck
on
the
back,
and
then
the
downstairs
is
just
being
converted
into
a
living
space.
It's
a
new
living
space.
J
K
Hi
I'm
Andrew
with
Falcon
construction
here
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
C
J
K
K
Got
it
the
brown
color,
let's
see.
K
D
C
K
B
So
under
the
two
windows
on
the
Upper
Floor
used
to
be
an
opening.
A
K
B
F
C
F
C
F
B
J
H
K
C
K
C
A
F
K
E
E
B
K
K
E
D
K
Wasn't
planning
on
it
since
we're
doing
work
mainly
on
the
back
and
bottom
of
the
structure,
but
we
can
include
that
in
the
scope
to
paint
it
more
adjust
it
if
needed.
B
B
E
Other
questions,
yeah
I,
do
have
it
to
go
back
to
the
doors.
It
wasn't
clear
like
on
the
spec
that
you
provided
like
how,
with
the
dimension
on
the
Styles
and
rails
of
the
door,
and
when
you
look
at
the
at
the
picture
and
the
spec,
they
look
kind
of
leafy.
J
Because
I
was
just
gonna
add
that
we
did
put
the
the
door
specifications
as
being
a
like
revised
door
specifications.
J
B
B
K
K
K
D
K
D
D
Madam
chair,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
to
this
commission,
including
exhibit
oh
I,
did
that:
okay,
including
exhibit
a
application
and
projects
description.
Three
pages,
exhibit
the
photos
of
the
subject:
property,
Nine,
Pages,
Exhibit,
C
drawings
and
plans.
Seven
pages
exhibit
D
manufacturer
specifications,
13
Pages
exhibit
e-revised
plans.
Four
pages
received,
October
26,
2022,
Elizabeth
F
alternate
rear
elevation,
drawing
received
October
26
2022,
exhibit
G
railing
detail
and
revised
site
plan.
D
Two
pages
received,
October
26
2022
exhibit
H
revised
manufacturer
specifications,
23
Pages
received
October
26
2022,
and
the
commission's
actual
inspection
and
review
associate
property
by
all
members,
except
I
knew
that
this
commission
approved
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
based
on
the
following
one
that
the
application
is
to
construct.
Two-Story
11
foot
8
inch
by
nine
foot
ten
and
a
quarter
inch
two-story
covered
wood
porch
with
painted
wood,
wood,
shingle,
Gable
end
roof
on
rear
elevation
structure
will
have
wood
decking
six
inch
by
six
inch.
D
Wood
support
posts
screened
by
square
painted
wood,
lattice
and
wood
railing,
with
two
inch
by
two
inch:
pickets
spaced
four
inches
on
Center,
relocate
to
existing
windows
on
rear
elevation
to
new
openings
on
rear
elevation,
install
new
wood,
multi-light
French
doors
and
existing
openings
on
rear
elevation,
replaced
a
damaged,
siding
on
basement
level
will
be
wood,
lap,
siding
with
five
inch
reveal
All
trim
and
new
siding
will
match
existing
in
Dimensions
detail
and
material.
Remove
four
existing
mature
trees
that
have
outgrown
their
original
space.
D
We
remove
trees
will
be
replaced
with
four
new
trees
of
similar
of
same
or
similar
species
from
the
Montford
recommend
recommended
species
list.
All
work
will
be
in
accordance
with
the
attached
drawings
and
plans.
All
permits,
variances
or
approvals,
as
required
by
law,
must
be
obtained
before
work.
May
commit
two,
but
the
standards
for
windows
and
doors
found
on
pages
84
to
85
decks
on
pages
38
to
39,
porches
entrances
and
balconies
on
pages
72-73
and
Landscaping
and
trees.
D
D
A
new
porch
will
be
located
on
the
rear
elevation
and
is
compatible
with
the
existing
structure
in
terms
of
roof
form
scale,
details,
materials
and
color.
B
new
modified
Window
and
Door
openings
are
on
the
rear
elevation,
see
new
doors
will
be
wood.
Existing
wood
windows
are
being
retained
and
reused
four,
but
the
action
improvements
proposed
in
the
application
before
us
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
our
congruous
with
a
special
historic
character
of
the
Montfort
historic
district.